Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeeting Packet Planner 7/13/2023Completeness Check Meeting Development and Public Works Department Conference Room 616 & Zoom COMPLETENESS CHECK MEETING DATE: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. DPW Conference Room 616 and Zoom Completeness Check Mtg (Site Plan Review) #811 -23 -000154 -PRE 811-23-000156-PROJ Mike Schellenberg Assessor's Map: 17-02-34-42 TL: 4100 Address: 6364 Main Street Existing Use: residential Applicant has submitted proposal for parking lot expansion from the north lot. Planner: Andy Limbird Meeting: Tuesday, July 25, 2023 11:00 — 12:00 via Zoom and Conference Rm 616 SITE VICINITY MAP 811 -23 -000154 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-02-34-42 TL4100 6364 Main Street Mike Schellenberg N V � ♦M i Y /�..i r 1 'PAW CTOWR79IL SITE VICINITY MAP 811 -23 -000154 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-02-34-42 TL4100 6364 Main Street Mike Schellenberg N V City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW — TYPE 2 SPRINGFIELD W ok Application Type o Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal ❑ Final Site Plan Submittal Required Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Mike Schellenberg Complete this Section) Phone:541-726-5556 Company: Thurston Community Baptist Church Email: pastor. mike.s@outlook.com Address: 6364 Main Street, Springfield OR 97478 Applicant's Rep: Michael Cox P.E. Phone: 541-485-8383 Company: SSW Engineers Inc. Email: michaelc@sswengineers.com Address: 2350 Oakmont Way #105, Eugene OR 97401 Property Owner: Thurston Community Baptist Church Phone: Company: Email: Address: 6364 Main Street, Springfield OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-34-42 TAX LOT NO(S): 04100 Property Address (if applicable): 6364 Main Street, Springfield OR 97478 Size of Property: 1.32 (Tax acct: 0.75) a Acres Sq. Ft. Units Per Acre:0 Proposed Project Name: Parking Lot expansion Proposal: Parking lot expansion from the north lot. Expansion will consist of (3) rows of 8 spaces with new site lighting, landscaping and stormwater treatment facilities. Existing Use: Vacant grassy field w/ grassy Swale New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): 12,000 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: Associated Applications: Complete This Section) Placard: Case No: Date: Reviewed By: Application Fee: $ Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ PROJECT NO: Owner Signature(s) I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature Print Owner: Date: Signature Print Type 2 - Site Plan Review Application Process A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)). B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. AType 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below, unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3 decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.600. (SDC 5.1.415(B)). C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC 5.1.215(B)(2)). 1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting • The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing by the City. A complete application is required for the review process. • The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220 and 5.17.115 are met. • A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications. • Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of application submittal. • The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided in this form below. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting • The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist specifying items required to make the application complete. • The applicant has 160 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city; a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 160 days. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application • The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below. • An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405. • A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable. Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative. • When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. ❑ An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages). ❑ Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. O Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225, Acceptance of Application. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. ❑ General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A). ❑ Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or other qualified professional as determined by the Director; ❑ Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to the approval standards; ❑ Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision; ❑ Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County assessor's tax map and lot number; ❑ Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most recently recorded deed; ❑ Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and ❑ Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet. ❑ Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(8)). The application must include an existing site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries: ❑ The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent; ❑ The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways, rights-of-way, and easements; ❑ Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State as having a potential for geologic hazards; ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; ❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams, surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource regulatory agencies as requiring protection; ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their riparian areas; ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department; ❑ Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage ways, canals and ditches; ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper (diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources ❑ Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)). ❑ The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any, which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed development; ❑ The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities, pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a distance of 150 feet; ❑ Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings; ❑ Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and ❑ Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture, and similar improvements ❑ Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a utility and improvement plant that shows: ❑ The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status; ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities; ❑ The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails; ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet, and television cable, etc.; ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications ❑ Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)). ❑ Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines; ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls, decks, patios, shelters, and play areas; ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping; ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110; ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater treatment facilities; ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in SDC 4.4.100; ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140; ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used; ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and proposed plant materials (at time of planting); ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is first; and ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4. 100 ❑ Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)). ❑ The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping; ❑ The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas; ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be closed; ❑ On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached. ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light source; ❑ The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces; ❑ The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use; ❑ The location of off-street loading areas; ❑ Existing and proposed transit facilities; ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). ❑ Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)). ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area; ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115. Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments, and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC 5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development. ❑ Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC 5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards. ❑ Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. ❑ Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following items: Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved; A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such systems exist on the properties affected by the development. IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210: The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards. ❑ Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 4.7.360, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable). ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW. ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer. ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives. ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100. ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield Municipal Code 6.416. 10 ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided. ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. 11 TYPE 2 LAND USE REVIEW SUBMITTAL PACKAGE CHANGE OF USE 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 THURSTON COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH PARKING LOT EXPANSION %WEN61NEERS., CIVIL STRUCTURAL BUILDING DESIGN SURVEYING LAND USE PLANNING 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541)485-8383 Job #22-7932 July 2023 QSSWENGINEERS. `r CML 9RUCTURAL BUILDING N61NN susMINs LAND ME "nins TABLE OF CONTENTS Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Page 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION Page 3 PROPOSAL Page 4 REVELANT APPROVAL CRITERIA MUNICIPAL CODE ANALYSIS Page 5 SDC 5.17.110 Applicability Page 6 SDC 5.17.125 Approval Standards Page 11 SDC 3.2.200 Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, R-3) Page 13 SDC 3.3.100 Overlay Districts SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS Copy of Property deed, provided by site owner. Plans by SSW Engineers, (4) copies each: C1.0 Existing Conditions Site Plan, 8%"x11"and 24"x36" C2.0 Site Development Plan, 8%"x11"and 24"x36" 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383 Page 1 of 13 QSSWENGINEERS. `r CML 9RUCTURAL BUILDINGN6INN suxVVIxs LAND WE PLAnxixs PROJECT DESCRIPTION PROJECT LOCATION: ADDRESS USED AT THIS LOCATION: ASSESSOR'S MAP AND TAX LOT: ZONING: REQUESTED PROCEDURE: STATE PERMITS: FEDERAL PERMITS: TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS: CONTACT INFORMATION: OWNER / APPLICANT: APPLICATION PREPARED BY: Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Undeveloped North end of property 6364 Main Street, Springfield OR 97478 17-02-34-42, lot 04100 R-1 — Low Density Residential Zone Type 2 Land Use — Director Review None required nor proposed. None required nor proposed. None required, proposed site use will not change. Thurston Community Baptist Church 6364 Main Street Springfield, OR 97478 Contact: Mike Schellenberg (541) 603-9411 paster.mike.s@outlook.com SSW Engineers Inc. 2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene, OR 97401 Contact: Heather Mayfield (541) 485-8383 heatherm@sswengineers.com 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383 Page 2 of 13 MENGINEERS. L . CML STAHT RAL BUILDING DESIGN SGA21NG lAN0L5LPLANNING PROPOSAL Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON The applicant seeks a Type 2 Land Use - Director Reviewfor a property located in a R-1 — Low Density Residential Zone. Approval of this application will allowthe applicant to seek a permit for expansion of an existing parking lot at the North end of the site of an existing place of worship. The property is a developed lot of approximately 0.75 acres which sits in the R-1 Low Density Residential District Commercial Districts zone, The properties to the east and west of the site are in the R-2 Medium Density Residential Use District; while properties to the north and south are also in the R-1 district. Currently the site has two (2) parking areas. The main parking area is to the south of the "Place of Worship" building and can be accessed by entering from Main Street. The driveway for this parking area continues north to the second parking lot, added in 2004 with the addition of a Multi - Purpose Building. Vehicles can also access this lot from "A" Street via a gravel driveway in the northeast corner of the site. As attendance has grown, the need for overflow parking has increased. Often times, it is found that people tend to start parking in the existing field at the north end of the site, including parking in an existing stormwater grassy Swale, put in place as part of the 2004 addition. The applicant seeks to replace the existing gravel driveway with an asphalt one as well as construct a parking lot extension over the northern grassy field and swale. This parking lot extension would include parking area landscape planters, some of which will act as stormwater treatment filtration raingardens, an underground stormwater detention system, and site lighting. The existing berm & landscaping buffer along "A" Street, as well as fencing & landscaping along the east & west property lines, would remain. If approved site development will include: • An underground stormwater detention system, • Paving for (24) new parking spaces, sloped to direct surface water to landscape islands, • New landscape islands with notched curbs to serve as stormwater filtration raingardens, • Canopy trees & shrubs surrounding new paved parking areas, • New site lighting within parking area. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 3 of 13 (541) 485-8383 SSWENGINEERS. `r CML SURVEYING RALLAN BUILDINWE PLANNING susysriss uassas rennins Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON REVELANT APPROVAL CRITERIA - Springfield Development Code (SDC) • Applicability SDC 5.17.110 • Approval Standards SDC 5.17.125 (A) 1. Permitted Uses SDC Table 3.2.210 2. Discretionary Uses SDC 5.9.100 3. Subject Property Land Use Standards: Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, R-3) SDC 3.2.200 SDC 3.2.205 Purpose, Applicability, and Location SDC 3.2.210 Permitted Land Uses SDC 3.2.215 Lot Area and Dimensions SDC 3.2.220 Setbacks SDC 3.2.225 Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface Standards SDC 3.2.235 Density Overlay Districts SDC 3.3.100 4. Applicable Master, Facilities, or Refinement Plans, and/or Special Planned Districts 5. Infrastructure Standards - Transportation SDC 4.2.100 SDC 4.2.120 Site Access and Driveway Standards. SDC 4.2.130 Vision Clearance Area. SDC 4.2.140 Street Trees. 6. Infrastructure Standards - Utilities SDC 4.3.100 SDC 4.3.110 Stormwater Management. SDC 4.3.120 Utility Provider Coordination. SDC 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities. 7. Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards SDC 4.4.100 SDC 4.4.105 Landscaping. 8. On -Site Lighting Standards SDC 4.5.100 SDC 4.5.110 Lighting Standards. 9. Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards SDC 4.6.100 SDC 4.6.115 Motor Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Design SDC 4.6.120 Motor Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Improvements SDC 4.6.155 Bicycle Parking - Number of Spaces Required. 10. Specific Development Standards SDC 4.7.100 / 300 None Applicable 11. Temporary Use Standards SDC 4.8.100 None Applicable 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 4 of 13 (541) 485-8383 SSWENGINEERS. L CML SINNN UN B WE suxvsrixs uxxvas runxixs MUNICIPAL CODE ANALYSIS Chapter 5.17.110 — Applicability SDC 5.17.110 (A) The Site Plan Review process is used for. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (1) The following categories of multiple unit housing, commercial, public and semi-public, and industrial development or uses, including construction of impervious surfaces for parking lots and storage areas: b) Additions or expansions that exceed either 50 percent of the existing building gross floor area or 5, 000 square feet or more of new building gross floor area and/or impervious surface area, except where a proposed development qualifies for a Minimum Development Standards review according to SDC 5.15, c) Additions, expansions, and changes of use, regardless of size or intervening use, that. iv) Are located within 50 feet of property in a residential land use district or residentially designated land (as measured from the property line of the subject property). The Type 2 Site Review process is applicable for our proposed site improvements under section SDC 5.17.110 (A) (1) (b), where the proposed includes a parking lot expansion with new impervious area exceeding 5,000 square feet. Additionally, the process is applicable under section SDC 5.17.110 (A) (1) (c) (iv), where the proposed site improvements of a parking lot is on a site whose property line is within 50 feet of property in a residential land use district. SDC 5.17.110 (C) Existing lawfully developed sites that do not conform to the current standards of this code are only required to meet current standards on the portions of the site affected by the proposed alteration or expansion. Any alterations to the site must meet current code standards. The proposed parking lot expansion affects the existing gravel access from the existing north parking area to "A" Street, the existing stormwater grassy swale to the north of said existing parking area, and replacement of some asphalt in the existing parking area, which were developed to the codes of their time. All affected areas of development will meet current code standards. Any portions of the site not affected by this proposal shall not be held to current standards. 23W Oakmont Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 5 of 13 (541) 485-8383 MENGINEERS. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: CIVIL 911MURu BUILDING DESIGN 6364 MAIN STREET SURVEYING LAND WE PLANNING SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Chapter 5.17.125 -Approval Standards SDC 5.17.125 (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use or is allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. The proposed site improvements of a parking lot is an expansion of an existing use listed as allowed as both: "D " = Discretionary Use Permit Required, and "S*" = Site Plan Required, Permitted in conformance with cited code standards per Table 3.2.210. (2) If a use is allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below, a Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in SDC 5.9.100. A Discretionary Use Application shall be submitted for Type 3 Site Review if the Jurisdiction so requires. Please verify applicability as an additional Type 3 reviewwas not discussed in our initial contact with the City. The Type 2 Site Review process is applicable for our proposed site improvements as the improvements are an expansion of existing conditions suitable for expansion considering it meets the requirements of 5.9.120 (B). (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property. The proposed parking lot expansion complies with the standards of its assigned land use district. See analysis of SDC 3.2.200 - Residential Districts, page 11. (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, master facilities plan, refinement plan, and/or special planned district. The proposed site improvements are within the Low -Density Residential zoning district zone. A purpose of the zone, as described in SDC 3.2.205 (A) (2), is to implement the policies of the Springfield Comprehensive Plan and Metro Plan. The approved 2019 Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan & the adopted Diagram (2004) both designate the site as Low -Density Residential. As there are no zoning changes anticipated, the proposal complies with intent of this section. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugem OR 97401 (541) 485-8383 Page 6 of 13 O SSWENGINEERS. `r CML SURVEYING RALLAN BUILDINWE PLANNING susysriss uassas rennins Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.2, Infrastructure Standards -Transportation. The proposed site improvements are subject to the following standards of this section: SDC 4.2.120 Site Access and Driveway Standards. Existing gravel driveway to be replaced with asphalt. Existing driveway concrete apron at "A" Street will to remain and serve to accommodate the expanded parking lot per section SDC 4.2.120(C)(3). Driveway apron changes are not anticipated. SDC 4.2.130 Vision Clearance Area. Vision Clearance triangles are shown on the Site Plan to show compliance. SDC 4.2.140 Street Trees. Existing street trees line the site. No changes to existing planting strip or street trees are anticipated. (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, Infrastructure Standards -Utilities. The proposed site improvements are subject to the following standards of this section: SDC 4.3. 110 Stormwater Management The proposed 13,607 sq.ft. development area includes 11,664 sq ft new asphalt, 363 sq ft curbing, and 1,580 sq ft new landscape beds. A portion of these beds will meet stormwater filtration raingarden standards. Installation of underground detention facilities will slowthe rate of surface water runoff and will connect to existing city infrastructure after filtration. The described stormwater management system will be engineered to be compliant with the standards of this section and Sections 4.03.1, 4.03.2, and 4.03.4 of the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 7 of 13 (541) 485-8383 Q SSWENGINEERS. `r CML SURVEYING RALLAN BUILDINWE PLANNING susysriss uassas rennins SDC 4.3.120 Utility Provider Coordination. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON The proposed work will require the general contractor to coordinate with the City and applicable utility providers for tapping of existing stormwater lines & feeding of new electrical lines. SDC 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities. The proposed utilities will be placed underground as applicable. (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards Existing setback areas and lot perimeter include established and mature planting areas. No changes to existing perimeter landscaping are anticipated. Existing lot interior consists of grass. This grass will be replaced with new parking lot plantings and landscaping to meet the standards of this section. The proposed site improvements are subject to the following standards of this section: SDC 4.4.105 Landscaping The proposed site improvements are to conform to the following subsections: SDC 4.4.105 (C) Required planting and irrigation materials and installation costs are not to exceed 10 percent of the cost of parking facilities. SDC 4.4.105 (D) (2) Landscaping is required for parking lot areas. SDC 4.4.105 (E) Required planting areas to have at least 65 percent coverage within 5 years of installation. Living plant materials to be distributed throughout. Plantings per 1,000 square feet required planting area shall consist of those types listed in subsections (1) — (3). 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383 Page 8 of 13 QSSWENGINEERS. `r CML STRUCTURALBUILDING DESIGN SURVEYING riss LANuaNusL eurnins SDC 4.4.105 (F) Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Parking lot planting areas to include canopy trees & shrubs as designated for plantings per 100 square feet. SDC 4.4.105 (G) Permanent irrigation system shall be installed for all new required planting areas, unless planted with noninvasive drought tolerant species. SDC 4.4.105 (1) — Planting Installation Standards SDC 4.4. 110 Screening Screening is not required nor proposed. SDC 4.4.115 Fences Fencing is not required nor proposed. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On -Site Lighting Standards: The proposed site improvements consist of new site lighting within the parking lot and are subject to the following standards as applicable under section SDC 4.5.105 (13)(3). Installation of new outdoor lighting fixtures are subject to the standards of SDC 4.5.110. SDC 4.5. 110 Lighting Standards The proposed site improvements are to conform to the following subsections: SDC 4.5. 110 (A) (1) Outdoor lighting to be full cut-off fixtures or have a shielding method to direct light onto site and away from adjacent properties. SDC 4.5. 110 (A) (6) Parking lot lighting to turn off at the end of the working day, except where necessary for personal and building safety. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 9 of 13 (541) 485-8383 Q SSWENGINEERS. `r CML STRUCTSURVEYIRALNG BUILDINGDESIGN susysriss uaNu�L vurninc SDC 4.5. 110 (B) Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Parking lot lighting to meet illumination recommended practices as given by the Illuminating Engineering Society (IES), formerly the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA). SDC 4.5. 110 (C) (3) Free-standing parking lot lighting fixtures shall not exceed 12 feet. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. The site is located within 1/4 mile of a frequent transit route (Route 11 corridor) and is therefore exempt from minimum parking requirements under the Climate -Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rule. Proposed parking shall conform to the design standards of this section. SDC 4.6.115 Motor Vehicle Parking—Parking Lot Design. Parking areas shall comply with the given dimensional standards. SDC 4.6.120 Motor Vehicle Parking—Parking Lot Improvements. Parking areas shall comply with the following improvement standards: SDC 4.6.120 (A) Parking lot to have a durable, dust free surfacing. Parking lot surfacing must not encroach upon the public right-of-way. SDC 4.6.120 (B) Parking lot improvements to include an on-site stormwater management system to eliminate sheet flow from site. SDC 4.6.120 (C) Parking spaces to include a 6 inch by 6 foot wheel stop set back 2 feet from the front of the stall. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383 Page 10 of 13 QSSWENGINEERS. `r CML 9RUCTURAL BUILDING N61NN susWINs LAND ME "NiNs SDC 4.6.120 (E) Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON Parking spaces will be permanently and clearly marked. SDC 4.6.120 (G) The number, dimensions, and locations of parking spaces for people with disabilities must be as specified in Chapter 11 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. SDC 4.6.155 Bicycle Parking—Number of Spaces Required. Bicycle Parking is not required nor proposed. The proposed site development project does not add to the existing occupancy, seating, or floor area. (10) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Specific Development Standards. The proposed site improvements are not of a use listed under SDC 4.7. 100 - Specific Development Standards, nor SDC 4.7.300 - Standards and regulations for certain residential uses and certain uses in residential districts, therefore this section is non -applicable. (11) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.8, Temporary Use Standards. The proposed site improvements are not of a use listed under this section therefore this section is non -applicable. Chapter 3.2.200 - Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, R-3) SDC 3.2.205 Purpose, Applicability, and Location SDC 3.2.205 (A) Purpose The proposed project qualifies in purpose and applicability in that approval of expanding the existing parking lot would increase convenient access to an existing "activity center" [ SDC 3.2.205(A)(5) ] in an existing low/ medium density neighborhood. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 11 or 13 (541) 485-8383 MENGINEERS. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: CML STBOCTMNl BUILDING DEIGN 6364 MAIN STREET SURNBNING LNIIB ME"NINO SPRINGFIELD, OREGON SDC 3.2.205 (B) Applicability The Zoning Map designates the site of our proposed project as Low -Density Residential Districts (R-1), as well as the sites north and south of the project. Sites to the east and west are designated as Medium -Density Residential Districts. SDC 3.2.205 (C) Conflicts No known conflict exists between applicability of this section and SDC 4.7.370: Place of Worship and Property Owned by Religious Nonprofits. SDC 3.2.210 Permitted Land Uses The project site was developed for use as a church in 1978. The proposed development of a parking lot is included as a primary use of "Place of Worship" (and associated parking lots), as listed in the Public and Institutional Use category of Table 3.2.210. Listed under the R-1 District column of said table, 'Place of Worship" use is listed as allowed as both: "D " = Discretionary Use Permit Required, and "S*" = Site Plan Required, Permitted in conformance with cited code standards. Section SDC 3.2.210 (C), Exceptions, referring to use of non -conforming uses being allowed to continue subject to SDC 5.8.100, Non -Conforming Uses, does not apply. SDC 3.2.215 Lot Area and Dimensions The proposed parking lot expansion is not subject to the Lot Area and Dimensions provisions of this section as the existing use, a "Place of Worship", is not a listed Residential Use. It is a 'Public and Institutional' use per Table 3.2.210. SDC 3.2.220 Setbacks The proposed parking lot expansion will not include any new structures subject to the setbacks of this section. Vision Clearance Areas in compliance with SDC 4.2.130 will be shown on the site plan. SDC 3.2.225 Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface Standards Existing lot coverage is non -conforming to the standards in this section. The applicant requests approval for additional impervious surface despite already exceeding 45% impervious lot coverage. The proposed site improvements mimic and formalize existing site use conditions. The improvements will maintain existing site landscaping buffering along "A" Street. Other 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 12 of 13 (541) 485-8383 QSSWENGINEERS. `r CML 9RUCTURAL BUILDING N61NN SURVEYING LAND WE PLANNING Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For: 6364 MAIN STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON benefits of approving lot coverage expansion include improved safety and environmental impacts. If an extension is not approved, vehicles will continue to park on the existing grassy portion of the lot when no formal parking spaces are available. This continuation of use negatively impacts the neighborhood. Impacts include: 1) vehicles with low lying exhaust potentially catching long dry grass on fire; 2) vehicles that leak fluids or oils and park on the grass contaminate area soils; and 3) despite having a gravel driveway, cleanliness along "A" Street is compromised with dust, mud, or other such debris from vehicles leaving the site. Approval of this parking lot extension would eliminate or reverse those negative impacts listed above. Other positive impacts include: 1) new asphalt will be sloped to stormwater treatment landscaping areas; 2) below grade stormwater detention reduces the impact of heavy rains to the existing stormwater system; 3) perimeter parking landscaping islands with canopy trees provide shade and breakup the impact of continuous impervious areas; and 4) new site lighting in the parking area improves safety while traveling across the site after dark. SDC 3.2.235 Density As established in section SDC 3.2.210, the existing permittable use is listed under the category of "Public and Institutional uses". Section SDC 3.2.325(8)(4) lists "Public and Institutional uses" as one use where net density requirements do not apply. Chapter 3.3.100 - Overlay Districts The Zoning Map does not list this project site as having an overlay district. It was advised to include that the project site is in the "Zone of Concentration" (99 -yr TOT) per May 2019 Standard Wellhead Protection Map, as it relates to SDC 3.3.220 Time of Travel Zones. 23W Oakmort Way, Sude 105 Eugene OR 97401 Page 13 of 13 (541) 485-8383 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www. spring*eld-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Arenbelow this dnefilledoutbyApplarvt) -- — (Please return to Clayton A&Rurhern @ City ofSpringliield Development cud Pubhc Works, Far #736-1021, Phare #736-1036), email:cnaeurhern@sprbgjieldor.gov Project Name: Thurston community Baptist church Applicant: Michael cox, P.E. Assessors Parcel #: 1 7-0 2-3 4-42-0 41 0 0 Date: July 11, 2823 Land Use(s): Project Size (Acres): Approx. Impervious Area: 0.34 Phone #: Fax #: 12,009 So. FT. Email: 541 485-8383 michadciiss ngineers.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Parking lot expansion with new site lighting, landscaping and stormwater treatment facilities. Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Stormwater quality rain gardens will collect and treat stormwater runoff prior to discharge to the public system. The stormwater destination will be a new connection to existing public curb inlet 46306 on North "A" St. at 64th St. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: Maintain current BMPs. (Area below dds line tilled ord by the City rmdReduned m the Applicant) (At a mtitimmn4 all boxes checked by the City on the froat and backofdds sheet shall be subndtted or an applicadon to be con lete or submittal, although other requirements reury be recess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study- (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study —(use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@spdrgfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Bmedupon tie tnformntion provided on tie front ofthis sheet, the follmving represents a Pimiento of rvhrd is neededfor an applicedion to be complete for subndttal with respect to droinoge; however, this list sh ouldnat be usedin lieu ofthe Springfield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering DesignAlnrmal. ConWharrce with these requirements does not constitute site approval, Adrbtionned site specific tnfornsntion nary be required. Note: Upon striping sheet submitted, ensure completedforne hos been signed in the space provirkd below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered cawhbasin w/oil filtration media) for stomuwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. Where required, vegetative stomuwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specked by the Eugene Stomuwater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). If a stonnwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomuwater Management Manual. Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. 7 All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be Provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. rLJ F7 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. I^ L^I A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. F7M ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event E] [—] The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 JF7 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). rI E] Elevations of the HOE and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ ❑ Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ Maiming's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All atoms pipes shall be designed to Other/MisceOaneous F7 I ^Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ C Private stomuwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. JF7 Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: httP://www. deg.state.or.us/wg/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. JDetention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year stoma events. *7k&form shall be bwhukd m m attwhmen4 &dde the fronteover, ofthe stormwrder shady. * I.NPORTANf. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAND SICN.� As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above regi d e plete and included with the submitted stomuwater study and plan set. Signature Date 07-11-2023 Fmn Version 5: June 2015 SITE REVIEW PLAN FOR: PARKING LOT EXPANSION MOOHURSTON COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH Mp IN08N WNOITIC %AN ® �2� VICINITY MFP ®�1 N NL SSW ENGINEERS. oZ) zm ¢S xV w'- rN OF 8 0arM�+ z<M- rc> on a—z9 pjacp '21 -1 g0 aO 3z w0 W~ ww 'D NF p04C GSC AIDC �M p�LQGr] C OQ13 = pLaG3MOM D04 Tran] ,(mr ] g)mtit umjvw o,%p4p4 gCz]Mngm ENOIN EMS. LJ s ~ T, 0 ° rc I i i I I` _ I J� g reIm -11r I I k a og (E) ACP6-Z91p mE� = 3 rmmm PARKING pZQwR nwwsmcui i�' gra o m •� 9 0 3z a% z >7srn/tm m � ��� V ,lo�dE ©SITE tr ° uu'ow oa[mw' DEVELOPMENT t; %j� BOE OEVELOPMENIPVJI goo