The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMeeting Packet Planner 7/11/2023Completeness Check Meeting Development and Public Works Department Conference Room 616 & Zoom COMPLETENESS CHECK MEETING DATE: Friday, July 21, 2023 11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. DPW Conference Room 616 and Zoom Completeness Check Mtg (Annexation) #811 -23 -000152 -PRE 811-23-000115-PROJ Tom O'Keefe Assessor's Map: 17-03-33-14 TL: 908 Address: 610 Rayner Ave. Existing Use: residential Applicant has submitted proposal to annex to connect to City services Planner: Tom Sievers Meeting: Friday, July 21, 2023 11:00 — 12:00 via Zoom and Conference Rm 616 Paz" VICINITY MAP 811 -23 -000152 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-03-33-14 TL 908 610 Rayner Avenue Thomas O'Keefe City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Annexation Application Type 4 3 SPNINGFIE Annexation Application Completeness Check: Annexation ADDlication Submittal: ❑ ReQuired Proposal Information (Appilli Complete This Section) Proprty Owner: Thomas A. O'Keefe and Karen E. O'Keefe phone; 541-953-1603 Address: 610 Rayner AveRue, Springfield, O 97477 E-mail: Owner Signature: Owner Signature: J, K -- ' \ Agent Name: 'n/a Phone: Company: n/a Fax: -- Address: n/a E-mail '- Agent Signature: n/a If the applicant is other than the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his or her behalf, except where signatures of the owner of record are required; only the owner may sign the petition. ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 70333 TAX LOT NO S 17-03-33-14-00908 Property Address: 610 Rayner Avenue, Springfield, OR 97477 Area of Request: Acres:0.22 S uare Feet: 9583.2 Existing use: residential single family home (septic) Proposed use= residential single family home (sewer) Reviewed Case No.: Date: By: initials Project No.: Placard: Application Fee: Postage Fee: Total Fee: Revised 04/17/2023 sim Page 8 of 16 d a w w « .1 U! rn d 2 N O N � v m D 0 v m N m m ry N k n � IS u a v a Q N N N i j o r i x3 O O 3 W W vw W ax oz 0 0 n o co 0 CO o 3 0 o Q aD W o � 0 n x x >>t S m � n O i W m FORM 2 OWNERSHIP WORKSHEET (This form is NOT the petition) (Please include the name and address of ALL owners regardless of whether they signed an annexation petition or not. OWNERS Property Designation Ma lot number Name of Owner Acres Assessed Value Imp. Y / N Signed Yes Signed No 17-03-33-14-00908 m1. -1.0x --end Karen e. oxeere 0,22 $217,894 Y? Y n/a VALUE CONSENTED FOR 510 Rayner Aaenue, Springfield OR We77 PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR n/a TOTALS: 1 0.22 TOTAL NUMBER OF OWNERS IN THE PROPOSAL 2 NUMBER OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED 2 PERCENTAGE OF OWNERS WHO SIGNED 100% TOTAL ACREAGE IN PROPOSAL 0.22 ACREAGE SIGNED FOR 0.22 PERCENTAGE OF ACREAGE SIGNED FOR 100% TOTAL VALUE IN THE PROPOSAL n/a VALUE CONSENTED FOR n/a PERCENTAGE OF VALUE CONSENTED FOR n/a Revised 04/17/2023 slm 13 of 16 FORM 3 SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FORM (Complete all the following questions and provide all the requested information. Attach any responses that require additional space, restating the question or request for information on additional sheets.) Contact Person: Thomas O'Keefe / Karen O'Keefe E-mail: tom.okeefel3@gmaii.com / kirishl1@comcast.net Supply the following information regarding the annexation area. • Estimated Population (at present): 2 • Number of Existing Residential Units: 1 • Other Uses: n/a Land Area: 0.22 total acres • Existing Plan Designation(s): private residential • Existing Zoning(s): residential • Existing Land Use(s): residential • Applicable Comprehensive Plan(s): • Applicable Refinement Plan(s): n/a n/a • Provide evidence that the annexation is consistent with the applicable comprehensive plan(s) and any associated refinement plans. n/a Are there developmentplansassociated with this proposed annexation? Yes No L_Z If yes, describe. • Is the proposed use or development allowed on the property under the current plan designation and zoning? Yes I� No I • Please describe where the proposed annexation is contiguous to the city limits (non-contiguous annexations cannot be approved under 5.7-140, Criteria). South -end of property borders/is adjacent to City of Springfield city limits. Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 14 of 16 n/ Does this application include all contiguous property under the same ownership? Yes ! Y..... No Fi If no, state the reasons why all property is not included: Check the special districts and others that provide service to the annexation area ❑ Glenwood Water District 71 Rainbow Water and Fire District ❑ Eugene School District ❑ Pleasant Hill School District ❑ Springfield School District ❑ McKenzie Fire & Rescue ❑ Pleasant Hill RFPD ❑ Willakenzie RFPD ❑ EPUD ❑ SUB ❑ Willamalane Parks and Rec District ❑ Other Names of persons to whom staff notes and notices should be sent, in addition to applicant(s), such as an agent or legal representative. a n/a (Name) (Name) n/a n/a (Address) (Address) n/a n/a (City) (zip) n/a (Name) n/a (Address) na/ (City) (zip) (City) (Zip) n/a (Name) n/a (Address) n/a (City) (zip) Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 15 of 16 FORM 4 WAIVER OF ONE YEAR TIME LIMIT FOR ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO ORS 222.173 This waiver of the time limit is for the following described property: 17-03-33-14-00908 610 Revner Avenue, Springfield, OR 97477 Map and Tax Lot Number Street Address of Property (if address has been assigned) ONE WAIVER OF TIME LIMIT FOR EACH PARCEL, PLEASE We, the owner(s) of the property described above understand the annexation process can take more than one year but desire to annex to have City services. Therefore, we agree to waive the one-year time limitation on this petition to annex established by Oregon Revised Statutes 222.173, and further agree that this contract shall be effective [V/] indefinitely or [ ] until Date Siqnatures of Leqal Owners n i/ Please print or type name Si n Date Signed Thomas A. O'Keefe 07/07/2023 Karen E. O'Keefe 7/07/2023 11- 1112oae.1111UN11n11111II1.-.1,- 11 11 11 ee L111 S- Mly � 2023 Revised 04/17/2023 slm Page 16 of 16 / 3474'/ 17 NES -79'44"w j N82°t32'2{ 900 907 GAP ISSUE UNRESCLVEU 9URpi1 k Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:41:43 AM - Window M cap�5� I-2 f - % 0 c)OC �t I I � k aN 1VOi 13 1 2��rp k �anUa r k fn�1�0 rvi t :ull rs.as' N25'0920'E tS5 I rr.e2° - N2i}'b9'33"E t I zl 3453' el ok 1 N20"46'33'w / 3474'/ 17 NES -79'44"w j N82°t32'2{ 900 907 GAP ISSUE UNRESCLVEU 9URpi1 k Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:41:43 AM - Window M cap�5� I-2 f - % 0 c)OC __ " i V' -2 13 �0 0��-0_ � N89'05'w2404• C 905 rs.as' N25'0920'E rr.e2° - N2i}'b9'33"E 44 $9' 3453' N24'3t'30'E N20"46'33'w °� .E 10623' 1YI'S38°95'5G"W 9-03j 909 j 3834 Ni9°39'21T / 3474'/ 17 NES -79'44"w j N82°t32'2{ 900 907 GAP ISSUE UNRESCLVEU 9URpi1 k Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:41:43 AM - Window M cap�5� I-2 f - % 0 c)OC Z _Z J ! 1 Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:40:08 AM - Window 91 x s ' 29 \ 913 {] �`� � �, 1 Amax 22 �/{ 903 99. 912 i \ urzx 21 911 � ��} 2 1 e M.e, 0 9044 _ ,.. 19-03 .e 966 ,a n wzvwr� Is 908 a 907 J ! 1 Wednesday, June 28, 2023 10:40:08 AM - Window Tom and Karen O'Keefe 610 Rayner Avcnuc Springfield, Oregon 97477 (541) 953-1603/(541)726-0726 Annexation Application Type 4 - Completeness Check Checklist, Pg 11 of 16, Answers Written Narrative addressing approval criteria as specified below. All annexation requests must be accompanied with a narrative providing an explanation and justification of response with the criteria stated in the application (also stated below). [SDC 5.7.125(8)(13) and (14)] A. The affected territory proposed to be annexed Is within the City's portions of the urban growth boundary and is contiguous to the city limits or separated from the City limits only by a public right-of-way or a stream lake or other body of water; We believe that our property to be annexed with the City of Springfield is within the city limits; that is, the south -end (backside) of our property located at 610 Rayner Avenue borders and/or is adjacent to Springfield's city limits. B. The proposed annexation is consistent with applicable policies in the Metro Plan and in any applicable refinement plan or Plan Districts; In having recent discussions with Springfield's Development & Public Works officials, we believe our proposed annexation is consistent with the applicable policies within the city district. C. The proposed annexation will result in a boundary in which the minimum level of key urban facilities and services as defined in the Metro Plan can be provided in an orderly efficient and timely manner; and It is our anticipation that since key facilities and services are directly available for Rayner Avenue, this annexation can be accomplished in an orderly efficient and timely manner. D. Where applicable fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through a signed Annexation Agreement or other mechanism approved by the City Council. We would like further information of the "fiscal impacts" to the City via mitigation in an Annexation Agreement with the City and will work with planning and public works staff to understand and come to an agreement on this issue.