HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 6/22/2023SEE
1703
100
0.28 AC
FORAONN.W.1/4 S.E.1/4 SEC. 36 T.17S. R.3W. W.M. 17033642
TAXATIONXATION ONLY LY
Lane County SPRINGFIELD
1" = 100'
arm 1, 1500
0.23 AC
280 �j7i
202 ''' Y
0.14AC PCL2
201._,. '
0.13 A( .�O y
PCL1�
W
Lu
is
1400
0.28 AC
1Y
•q I/ C, B
I C ) L/
301wm
w
R a'
81 I
I I
1300
0.2AC a
300
0.36AC
e
0.14AC
e
18 zr
17
m2 '
404
401
i
20
1200
0.18 AC 8
0.14.c
e,
B
0.28 AC
_t 403_______•f____p..
$'. 0.18Ac 3 402 v ;`
$0.14 AC $
m°e'aPUE ,mar
400
600 $; fi 801
z y+° 0.14AC
700 1 80(
1600 e
0 0.33AC
1
1
1. 1700
mn ffi 0.28 AC
1800
2 8 0.52�C�� I�S
18
,9
0
11002 gl 2000
026 AC(_;, 0.33AC
1000 11001
0.18 AC8 2100
0.38 AC
f�
2500
p ____ is
23900 901 .>a. ,m's 24 o.4a ac 1�� 2200 2300 �23,
0
I ��i
sag � ���
C
1
SEE MAP
17033613
i
pp4 VACATED ST
Y
I 1.84 AC
1.84AC
•q I/ C, B
I C ) L/
IQ'tllI
C I
81 I
I I
2900
0.48AC
•t•
0
LCATJXG - 2018411-2z 13:20
CANCELLED
200
500
1900
2600
2800
4400
4600
6100-7300
r_ 111/L/1/!1L/1L!/!Il/Ll1//lU/1C1°JLll/LL/J/bli E-WZ+EsE�oR, EaER. ole,. 17033641
4131
r zff�'frf>f�a�> f� f�f>fdf��f�>f fafflff If��f �fffdffrff rffffff�tfffs fftf ff - - - -I I ski -
i, , I , 1 I ' ' ��� , �f>'dr'���fz(�''i �Yd�'��'��''i 7''i'a'��'�d>''7'��'��'��'�'�Y�S''f'��if�'>'�'-----------
7
4800' C I I ' 1 ' 41 8 2, fz 1 Y, fz 1 Y Y 1 ' 1
1 1 91 81 14 tO tO� = '
8 5 4 6 s I s Fv
SEE MAP i g 1 ' ' ' ]' 6i 4600 ' 1 ; 4300 ; 4$'00 9 8 7'e d 51 44' a 3. 211 1 i � I z.� � r 1 � e r 1 00
I ' 1 900380 1 I s 817 s s al
I a 1 4�0 1 , 1 „ W , , , , r� 370 380 350b ' 340b 1 ' 1 3300 1
17033631 1 ' , ' 1 ' , ' a ` I I 1 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 319p ' 310 W
91 1 W 1 W , 0.za ac 1' 1 1y AC 1 0
1 I I 1 ' I ' , , 1 1 'O V ' 1 ' ' W' ' 1' ' 6 Q '025.}.0 '
1 1 4700 1 ; 1 ; 1 ; �/ 1 , 1 1{10 b Q W ; , 1 ' I i , 1; 1 Qm1 O, T.
, g 0.15 C 11 1 1 ,
zz' ' I I I 11 1 , 1 1 oQ 1 ' 'W' I II '0 1 ���•
4 1
U)
24
4900 B' 51 (10 52001 i i e; i ' ' °; 1 �/J ' 1 1
30'09AC 1 0b2 AC1 I 1 ; ; 5310 ; 1540 ; i ' ' 5500 ' ; z< 14, 15j16 I I 1 n ; , , , 1 VJ __]__--
___Imn''__ g 1 t 1 1 ' , 1 024 AC 1 '0.55 �C 1 ' ' ' , ' 1 L , ; 15900 8 0
I , 1 0.3ar1C 1560U 8 ,(]/'�
1 ' ' ; ' , ' ; 10.13AC 1 QI a.aB AC 1 1 , D.SjAC
5000, , 1 I 1 ' ' 1 ' 1 1 ' , I 1- 1 I 1 1 1 1 ' , ,
° -
ASAG
4 I I I 1 ' , 1 1 , ; ; 1 1 , ; V✓I i ; 1 570p 5$08 \�� ; ; '
101 it 12' 13' 14' 15 i 18' 17' 18 10' it i i2 2 13 i 14' ' i r ' ' ' ' 'f) i i i ' '
(VAC PER ,� ) 16' 161 1] 18 N 10, 11' 12,13 14 ; 16 116 17 10� 12 13; 141 16' 18' 1]' 18 '
R125Mg32w 8) SOUTH A -- ------L-
------ r CSC
21 1� ' ' �� STREET 790Q 9n1 8 ]i 81 514 4' 31 21 1 9�AOC 8 ]' 6 r __________
' 0.18TP0 7700 ; ; 1L/600; i = ,0.31 AC , 1 0.33AG 1 75b 7400 ' ' , ' 1 1 ' , ' 8000 31 H 1 111 1 1 0.180A AC 1V! I I I , O
1 1 /��
81 �1 N
0.3Z'I 1q 1 1 ' 1
m
I
az. ' dz.
! ' ' ' ' ' ,
I - , 1--_-_-L--'-_!_--L---------L-----�--J
SEE MAP ;0
17033600 ;0
._____________________________________________________'O , I
�0 , REVISIONS
,p , 1 11Q 10-L lV-C NVERTWPTOGIS
Ip 1
10 , 1
Ip 1 1
, I
I O ,
Ip 1
Ip 1
101 1
SPRINGFIELD
17033642
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW - TYPE 2
SPRINGFIELD
W ok
Application Type
❑ Site Plan Review Completeness Check
❑ Site Plan Review Submittal
F Final Site Plan Submittal
Required Project Information (Applicant:
Applicant Name: S. R. Yett
Complete this Section)
Phone: (541) 344-6781
Company: Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
Email: permits@sryett.com
Address: P.O. Box 26125, Eugene, OR 97402
Applicant's Rep: Carl Sherwood, AA
Phone: (541) 342-8077
Company: Robertson Sherwood Architects pc
Email: csnenmodOmberlsonsnemood.mm
Address: 132 East Broadway, Suite 540 Eugene, OR 97401
Property Owner: S. R. Yett
Phone: (541) 344-6781
Company:Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
Email: permits@sryett.com
Address: P.O. Box 26125, Eugene, OR 97402
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-36-42
TAX LOT NO(S):2500
Property Address (if applicable): 130 21 st Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Size of Property: 0.89
0 Sq. R.
Units Per Acre:
Proposed Project Name: Silly Billies Child Care
Proposal: Adjustment of use for 1,665 sf of the building from Mercantile to Educational
Existing Use: Mercantile
New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): no change
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff:
Associated Applications:
Complete This Section)
Placard:
Case No:
Date:
Reviewed By:
Application Fee: $
Tech Fee: $
Notice Fee: $
TOTAL FEE: $
PROJECT NO:
Owner
• I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm the information
Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the
Information will not be provided If not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may
begin processing the application with the Information as submitted. This statement serves as
written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application.
Owner: Date: Je•e 2t, 2023
Signa ure
S. R. Yeti
Print
Owner:
Signature
Print
Date:
Type 2 - Site Plan Review Application Process
A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when
evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are
uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the
imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval
standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)).
B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing,
unless appealed. AType 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below,
unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3
decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.600. (SDC
5.1.415(B)).
C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an
identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC
5.1.215(B)(2)).
1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting
• The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed
development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing
by the City. A complete application is required for the review process.
• The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220
and 5.17.115 are met.
• A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications.
• Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of
application submittal.
• The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist
provided in this form below.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the
Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
• The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist
specifying items required to make the application complete.
• The applicant has 160 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city;
a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 160 days.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application
• The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220,
the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code
(SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below.
• An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405.
• A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed,
is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the
applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments
are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or
development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable.
Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific
application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative.
• When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an
applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of
the submitted materials.
O Site Plan Review Application Form
❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula.
O An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at
the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages).
O Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document
N/A ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application
N/A ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an
application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a
copy of the application upon request.
N/A ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet
One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal:
F Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements
in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the
necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225,
Acceptance of Application.
Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City
to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are
not necessarily required to be detailed construction level
documents
The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land
use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City
Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan.
Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any
requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon
Administrative Regulation.
O General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A).
F Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required
by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or
other qualified professional as determined by the Director;
R] Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized
appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to
the approval standards;
R1 Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision;
R] Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County
assessor's tax map and lot number;
R1 Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most
recently recorded deed;
R1 Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that
assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and
Z Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet.
O Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(8)). The application must include an existing
site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a
distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries:
R1 The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area;
R1 Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten
percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent;
R] The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways,
rights-of-way, and easements;
R1 Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State
as having a potential for geologic hazards;
R] Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey
of Lane County;
❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams,
surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource
regulatory agencies as requiring protection;
N/A ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all
watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and
their riparian areas;
N/A ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the
latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision;
R] The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the
Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department;
R1 Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage
ways, canals and ditches;
N/A ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper
(diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and
N/A ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources
O Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)).
o The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area;
R] Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any,
which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed
development;
Z The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities,
pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a
distance of 150 feet;
R1 Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings;
o Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and
o Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture,
and similar improvements
O Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a
utility and improvement plant that shows:
R1 The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within
or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and
paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status;
Z Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights,
power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities;
R] The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails;
F The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site
including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains,
power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet,
and television cable, etc.;
N/A ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and
R1 The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications
0 Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)).
R] Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines;
N/A ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls,
decks, patios, shelters, and play areas;
N/A ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping;
7
N/A ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110;
N/A ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater
treatment facilities;
N/A ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in
SDC 4.4.100;
N/A ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140;
N/A ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used;
N/A ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and
proposed plant materials (at time of planting);
N/A ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is
first; and
N/A ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4. 100
O Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)).
R] The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking
spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and
striping;
R] The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas;
R1 Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be
closed;
Z On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all
proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached.
N/A ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of
illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light
source;
Z The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces;
R1 The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the
proposed use;
N/A ❑ The location of off-street loading areas;
R1 Existing and proposed transit facilities;
N/A ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and
N/A ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when
required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4).
O Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)).
N/A ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area;
8
N/A ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
N/A ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns;
N/A ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds;
stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and
N/A ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours
N/A ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if
phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development,
including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115.
Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the
various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not
limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval
Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments,
and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC
5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development.
O Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting
how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC
5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards.
O Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed
restrictions or covenants.
O Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional
information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's
expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may
be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with
approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following
items:
N/A ❑ Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved;
N/A ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site
Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane
County.
N/A ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance
with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of
Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in
compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such
systems exist on the properties affected by the development.
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210:
The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the
applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards.
o Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the
past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances.
N/A ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact
Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and
needed mitigation measures.
N/A ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC
4.7.360, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable).
N/A ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties
located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited
Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries
of WQLW.
N/A ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area
has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer.
N/A ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district,
address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives.
N/A ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development,
including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less
intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor
plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable
standards.
N/A ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed,
a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100.
N/A ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department
of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the
property.
N/A ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application
has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of
the application upon request.
N/A ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or
excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration
permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield
Municipal Code 6.416.
10
N/A ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or
Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided.
N/A ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of
application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside
of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by
sanitary sewer.
11
SPRINGFIELD
225 FIFTH STREET
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
N/A - requirement waived FAX: 541.726.1021
Q www.spdngrnm-or.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
----------- — (Area helm this b'neJUIed outbyApplica n) -- —
(Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprre giiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov
Project Name: sill, Biirea child cera Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #: 17-03-aea2 Lor2590 Date:
Land Use(s): Mercantile(Eduoitiomi
Project Size (Acres): e.e9
Approx. Impervious Area: 35.982 a,
Phone #:
Fax #:
Email:
Rcbenaon She dArchitects Pc
Baro
(541)342-8
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Existing building = 13,489 SF, of which a planned conversion of 1,665 SF Mercantile space to Child
Care Center (Educational). No changes to building envelope or existing impervious surfaces.
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
No changes to existing impervious surfaces.
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
New sidewalk drains into existing landscape area.
(Area below this line rdkd and by the City and Aetmned to the Aaaheand
(At a nunimuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back oftks sheet shall be subnutted
or on application to be coaWletefor subauttal, although other requirements nay, be ne essor .
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH maybe substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone:
❑ Wedand/Riparian:
❑ Soil Type:
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Other Jurisdictions
Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@sprirgfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
r Bmedupon the h for nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndudnnot of uvh w it merkdfor on
application to be complete for subndttol with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprinoeld
Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Ergtreering DesignA3mma1. Connphance with these requirements does not constitute site
appromol, Additional site specific Information may be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been
signed in the spare provickd below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stommater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
Where required, vegetative storscater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Storscater Management Manual.
❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stommater Management Manual (Sec2A.1).
If a storscater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomorater Management Manual.
❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
F7 7 All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment orweather resistant enclosure.
r^
J
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
I
^
LI
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
F7M
❑
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event.
Private stomrwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommatm flows from one property to
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review ofDownstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03A.0
r—
F-1
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
-I
E]
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
E ❑ Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 90,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscethmeous
F7
n
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑
C
Private stomrwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommatm flows from one property to
another.
r—
F-1
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
thewebsite: htto:/Avww. deo.state.or.us/wo/uic/uic.htm for more information.
JF7
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*Thisform shN1 be inchukd m nn Ntnchmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormwnkr sbuty.
* IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN'
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommwater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
Robertson I Sherwood I ArchlteCtS ac
132 East Broadway. Suite 540 p1541)342:8077 w a..r.bertaonaherw*u,.conn
Eugene, Oregon 97401 r (540345-4302
Site Plan Review Narrative for:
Silly Billies Child Care
130 21st Street
Springfield, Oregon
January 26, 2023
Final Plan revised — June 21, 2023
Property Owner / Applicant
Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
P.O. Box 26125
Eugene Oregon 97401
Contact: S. R. Yett
Phone: (541) 344-6781
Email: steven@sryett.com
Architect (Plan Preparation)
Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc
132 E. Broadway, Suite 540
Eugene OR 97401
Attn: Carl Sherwood, AIA or John Webster, AIA
Phone: (541) 342-8077
Email: jwebster@robertsonshenwood.com
Project Location:
Tax Map No. 17-03-36-42 Tax Lot 02500.
Project address: 130 21st Street, Springfield Oregon 97477.
Project Description:
This application is for a Site Plan Review approval to change the Use of a portion of the building. A
portion of the existing building is planned to change use from Mercantile (M) to Educational (E).
Approvals Requested:
Site Plan Review approval is requested:
This application is a modification of a previous Site Plan Review -Minor Modification application (Case No.
TYP115-00040). That original reviewwas approved, but the changes of use require reviewto meet
Springfield Development Code standards.
Attached Information:
Site Plan Review Application
Narrative (this document)
8 ^/a x 11 copy of Site Plan (pdf)
Precertification Documentation (Child Care Center)
Full Size Plan (pdf)
Tax Map of site
Deed/fitle Report (with Recorded Shared Access Easement Agreement)
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 1 of 3
Site Ownership:
The proposed work occurs on one tax lot: Lot 2500
The property is owned by:
Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
P.O. Box 26125
Eugene, Oregon 97401.
Zoning:
The site is within the City of Springfield's Urban Growth boundary, Zoned as Community Commercial
(CC).
Per SDC 4.7-125 Child Care Facilities:
The proposed use (Child Care) is permitted for this zone and will meet the Children's Services Division
(CDS) regulations.
No outdoor play areas planned.
Site Access:
Vehicular access to the site is via an existing driveway from 21 st Street (East side of property) with
sidewalks and curb/gutter per City of Springfield standards shall remain.
REV 1 — Replacement of existing asphaltwalkway with concrete sidewalk to provide continuous
accessible pedestrian path.
Off -Street Parking Facilities:
(Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-2)
Mercantile (M) Occupancy (Retail):
Parking Ratio for Employees:
Standard Parking:
1 parking space per 300 SF of gross area
11,932 SF / 300 = 40 spaces
Educational (E) Occupancy (Child Care Center):
Parking Ratio for Employees: 1 parking space per 350 SF of gross area
Parking Ratio for "Drop Off' parking: 1 parking space per 700 SF of gross area
Standard Parking: 1,665 SF / 350 = 5 spaces
Drop Off Parkins: 1.665 SF / 700 = 3 spaces
Total Required 48 spaces
Provided Parkina Analvsis
Standard Parking (on-site): 20 spaces (2 accessible)
Compact Parking (on-site): 4 spaces
Drop Off Parking (on site): 3 spaces
Adjacent lot spaces: 21 spaces
(Per shared parkins aareement - Rec. No. 2006-006256: 10 spaces minimum)
Total Provided 48 spaces
Lot Bicycle Parking:
(Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-155)
Retail (1 per 3,000 SF —4 spaces minimum)
11,829 SF 13000 = 4 spaces required (25% long term / 75% short term)
Bicycle parking provided: 1 long term / 3 short term
Assisted Care and Day Cares (1 per 5 employees— 4 spaces minimum)
5 employees = 4 spaces required (75% long term / 25% short term)
Bicycle parking provided: along term / 1 short term
An existing floor -mounted bicycle rack provides space for 6 short-term bicycle parking on the East parking
area with walkways to both entrances.
Three (3) newwall-mounted bicycle racks will be located within the educational tenant space (Northwest
corner of tenant space).
One (1) existing long-term bicycle parking is provided within a storage room on the West side of the
building for the retail space.
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 2 of 3
Site lighting:
Existing wall -mounted lighting provides illumination for the immediate area around the building
Utility Infrastructure:
The project site is served by adequate public utilities.
No changes proposed.
Stormwater Management:
No Stonnwater management requirements per Clayton McEachern (Springfield Public Works)
No changes in impervious paving to site.
Floodplain:
The property is not in a flood plain area.
Wetlands:
The property is not identified within areas of the Springfield Local and National Wetland Inventory Map
Drinking Water Protection (DWP):
The property is located within the 20 -year Time Of Travel Zone (TOTZ) of the 16' & O Street wellhead
according to the Springfield Wellhead Protection Area Map.
No hazardous material storage is planned for the property beyond standard cleaning supplies.
Irrigation:
An existing irrigation system is present for landscaping on the site.
Fire Protection:
The existing building does not require automatic fire sprinkler systems per Code. Emergency vehicle
access is available along the perimeter of the building, with access to all sides of the building within
dimensional limits.
The site is served by an existing fire hydrant, located on 'A' Street.
Building Height:
The restriction on building height in the CC zone is 35 feet. The existing height of the building is less than
20'-0". No changes proposed.
END OF NARRATIVE
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 3 of 3
Pre -Certification Consultation -Certified Center
Pagel of 2
Date of Visit
10/24/22
Facility Name
Telephone Number
Silly Billies Springfield
541-606-2919
Facility Address
Facility Email Address
130 21st St. Springfield, OR
sillybillieschildcare@gmail.com
Contact Name
Telephone Number (if different from above)
Mandy Johnson
x
Rules Discussed:
x
0010(12)
Building codes and zoning requirements
x
0010(8)
Floor plan submission
x
0070(6)
Enrollment in the central background registry
x
0080
Director qualifications
x
0090
Teacher qualifications
x
0013
Inspections including fire and sanitation
x
0205
Lead
x
0190
Location and quantity of toilets and handwashing sinks
x
0150
Space and equipment requirements for outdoor activity area
x
0130
Caregiver -to -child ratios and group size
x
0010
Application: required documents and fee
Specific
to Infant and Toddlers:
x
0140
Determining capacity
x
0190(5)
Location of changing tables and handwashing sinks
Capacity for center care is defined as: the total number of children allowed in the center at any one time, based on the available indoor
and outdoor square footage, the number of toilets in the center and the number of qualified staff.
Calculation of Activity Area and Capacity
Sq. Ft.
Planned Use
Abe
Range
Available at
All Times
Potential
Capacity
yes
No
Room 1
1582.33
to be divided into 2 classroom and indoor gym space
x
18
Room 2
Room 3
Room 4
Room 5
Room 6
Number of toilets 1
(1:15 children 36 mo. or older):
Number of hand washing sinks
(1:2toilets): 1
Outdoor Activity Area Qsq. ft per child):
Sq. ft. = children
/�rxpaai, SrA.ai6(ai
SigiiS[ur� Licensings list
2022
Date
CUAW a 5/221N..2
Comments
Left CC packet#2
Discussed:
Planning and Zoning in process
Application process, call with questions ie: packet documents
Health and Fire inspections to be complete prior to initial OCC inspection
GS will contact to schedule initial visit
Space used outside of center business hours not needed to operate under cc rule
Diaper changing table placement for supervision
Gates in front of garage door to meet safety requirements, more info
Kitchen space not required at this time, refrigerator for bottles only
Potential in the future for older age/group size if need changes
Follow up information concerning mixing of age group/family similar to Relief Nursery exception
Entry space, indoor large motor space
Exception for outdoor play space
M-tm a s/2ZIN..z
CASCADE ESCROW
ATTN: MELISSA MITCHELL
811 WILLAMETTE STREET
FUG -,NF, OR 99401
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
2ND SUPPLEMENTAL
July 8, 2015
RsporL No: 0288999
You- No: EU15-0601
Sells-: CN THE NAY, INC.
Buyer: GCBRECHT Ec--AR
PRELIMINARY REPORT kOR:
Owner's Standard Policy
Commercial Extended Loan Policy (SID".U�)
*0288999*
$490,000.00
$e33,5CC.00
PRFMIUMS:
Owner's SLandard Premium $1,330.00
Commercial Extended Loan Premium (SIMUT) $709.00
OTIRO Endorsement $100.00
Gov. Lien/Inspect Fee $35.00
We are prepared to issue 2006 (6/17/06( ALTA t'-t_e insurance pclicy(ies) of CHICAGO TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, in the usual form insuring the title to the land described as follows:
Vest00:
( A T T A C H E D)
ON THE WAY, INC.
an Oregon corporation
Estate: FEE SIMPLE
DATED AS OF: JUNE 24, 2015 at 8:00 A.M.
Schedule B of the policy(ies) to be 'issued will con-ain the `following general and special
exceptions unless removed prior to issuance:
GENERAL EXCEPTJONS (Standard Coverage Policy Exceptions(:
_. Taxes or assessments which are not show, as existing liens by the records of any Laxir,g
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records;
proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Puol. is
Records.
2. ' k'acLs, tigh'.s, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but w;,ich
could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in
possession thereof.
No liability is assumed hereunder ¢mtil poliev has been issued and full policy premium has been paid
MAIN OFFICE FLORENCE OFFICE
811 WILLAMETTE ST. • EUGENE, OREGON 97401 715 HWY .01 - FLORENCE, OREGON 97439
PH: 1.11) 687-2233 + FAR: (591)485-0307 PH: 1°11) 997 -"4'7 + FAX: (°41)997-8216
E-MAIL: INFO@CASCADET=TLE.COM E-MAIL: FLORENCE@GgSE; fJkr'FYw�,E�ll ru.
OCT 14 2015
Grininai Submittal_ W
I
Order No. 0288999
Page 2
_. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the Public Records; reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts autaorizing the issuance thereof; wales rights, claims
or title to water.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance
affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accura Le and complete land survey
of the Land.
5. Any 1 i en, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material., equipment rental or workers
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the
Public Records.
SPECIAL EXCEP^_:ONS:
E. Taxes for the fiscal year 2015-2016, a lien not yet payable.
7. Taxes, Account No. 0333060, Assessor's Map No. 17 03 36 4 2, _2500, Code 19-99,
2014-2015, in the amount of a3,54D./9, DUE PLUS INTEREST.
8. Power line Easement, including tae terms and provisions thereof, granted to Mountain
States Power Company, a Delaware corporation, by instrument recorded January 25, 1947,
in Book 340, Page 280, Lare County Oregon Deed Records.
9. Reservation of any existing utility easements to the City of Springfield, in street
vacations recorded April 27, 1961, Reception No. 3031_0, and re-recorded July 7, 1966,
Reception No. 53197, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
10. Slope easement to tae State of Oregon and storm sewer easement to the Ci Ly of Springfield
in instrument recorded August 17, 1966, Reception No. 579C9, Lane county Oregon Deed
Records.
11. Easement, including the Lerms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield,
a municipal corporation, in Lane County, Oregon, by instrument recorded June 02, 1966,
Reception No. 49409, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
12. Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded October 24, 1984,
Rereption No. 8441492, Lane County Official Records.
13. Deed ct Trust, including the terms and prov_s!nns thereof, executed by On The Way,
Inc., an Oregon corporation., to Cascade Escrow, TrusLee, Loc the benefit of SELCO
Community Credit Union, Beneficiary, dated August 24, 2005, recorded August 25, 2005,
Reception No. 2005-066600, Lane County Deeds and Records, to secure payment of a note
for $250,000.00.
14. Assignment of rents due cr to become cue and arrruing from said property, including
the terms and provisions thereof, from On The way, ne., an Oregon corporation, to
SELCO Community Credit Union, dated August 24, 2005, recorded August 25, 2005,
Reception No. 2005-066601, Lane County Deeds and Records.
15. Financing Statement recorded Augus= 25, 2005, Reception No. 2005-066602, Lane County
Deeds and Records, lists On The Way, Inc., as Debtor, and SELCO Community Credit Union,
as Creditor, with security -,nfonna Lion obtainable from creditor.
16. Shared Parking Agreement, including the terms and provisions therect, between On The
way Inc., and Springfield Fraternal Order of Eagles, recorded January 27, 2006,
Reception No. 2CC6-006256, Lane County Deeds and Records.
Daie 'Recaive(w.:
OCT 11 2015
Originai Submittal )Lk _,__
Order No. 0288999
Page 3
17. Ordinance No. 6210 approving the Springfield Jowr.towi Urban Renewal 21an and Report,
_ncliding the terms and provisions thereof, recorded December 7, 2007, Recept, No.
2007-081042, Lane County Deeds and Records.
18. A certi'_ied copy of the Hoare of Directors' Resolution authorizing and directing the
sale or mortgage of the subject property, should be provided prior to closing. (On
The Way, Tnc.)
19. A copy of the Articles of Orga-T at on and/or Operatinc Agreement of Gobrecht Doiiar
LLC, should be furnished to Cascade Title Company for the purpose of ascertaining
members author zed to execute on behal` b` the Limited liability Company,
20. In lieu of the signatures of all the members and/or managers, we will require a Consent
Resoluti nn by all of the members and managers of Gab-echt Doiler LLC, consentinq to
Lae forthcoming sale or encumbrance and disclo=sing the party(ics( authorized to sign
for said limited liability .company to be provided p -ion to closing.
21. Prior to writing an ALTA MORTGAGEE'S no]. icy, Cascade Ti -le Company should he furnished
with a statement as to parties in possession and as Lo any construction, alterations
or repairs to the premises within the last 75 days. We also request that we he notified
in the evert that any funds are to be used for construct -on, alterations or repairs.
Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown therchy.
22. An accurate survey of these premises showing boundary lines, and location of
improvements and ea_emerts, should be furnished for ocr file prior to our writing an
AT,TA Mortgagee's Policy. Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown thereby.
NOTE: The ornoerty address as shown on the Assessor's Roll. is:
2019 s 2020 Main Street
Spring=ield, OR 9790
120 21st Street
Springfield, OR. 97977
NOTE: A judgment search has been made on the above caned Vesee (s), and we find NONE except
as set forth above.
NOTE: As of the date hereof, there are no matters against GORRECHT D077AR TALC, which wo'cld
appear as exceptions in the policy to issue, except as shown herein.
NO'T'E: 'file proposed_nsured is North Cascades Bank.
NOTE: This report is being supplemented to update the policy and premium amounts, escrow
officer, and show exception no. 6.
NOTE: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of
insurance is less than the amoant, if any, set forth in the arbitration olause, all
arbitrah-.e matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or -he -neared
as the exclusive remedy of the parties.
D21e Roceived:
OCT 14 2015
Originai SUbmittal_�
Order No. 0288999
Paye 4
This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become
null and void u,less a pol-cy is issued and the full premium paid.
Cascade Title Co.
mL: Title Officer: KURT BEA'TY
Cc: WALKER FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC.
6 REAL ESTATE SERVICES
ATTN: COREY WALKER
EMAIL: WALKERFAMILYRE@YAIIOO.COM
Cc: BARNHA.RT ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE
ATTN: DAVID HOLLAND
EMAIL: DAVIDH@BARNHARTASSOCIATES.COM
Cc: NORTH CASCADES BANK
EMUAIL: TASON.UNDERWOOD@NORTF.CASCADESBANK.COM
EMAIL: AUDR6Y.?'OX@NORTHCASCADESBANK.COM
DaW Received:
OCT 14 2015
Criginai Submittal_
Order He. 0208999
Page_ 5
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lot 1, Block A, NICHOLAS GARDENS, as platted and recorded in Book 11, Page 1, Lane County
Oregon P-st Records, in Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO: Beginning at the Southwest confer of Lot C in Block A in said NICHOLAS GARDENS, said
Southwest corner of Lot C also being the Southwest corner of the original plat of NICHOLAS
GARDENS; run thence North 0' OE' Fest along the West line of Lot C, 122.0 feet to the Southwest
corner of said Lot 1, Block A; thence South 89c 53' East along the Sou_h -_ne of said Lot
86.5 Feet; thence Northeasterly along said Lot 1, 70.0 feet to a point 40.0 feet South
0' 06' East of the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block A; thence South 89' S3' East 33.5
feet; thence South 210 57' East along the West line of Coc-ty Pond as desc-ibed in Book
258, Page 21E, Lane County Cragcn Deed Records, in Lane County, Cregon, 98.1 feet; thence
South 0' 06' East 84.0 feet to the South line of said Lot C; thence North 89' 53' West along
the said South line of Lot C, 201.0 feet to the point of beginning, in Sp-ingfield, Lane
County, Oregon.
TOGETHER with that portion of vacated 21st Street inuring to said lot by Ordinance No. 2137,
recorded July 07, 1966, Reception No. 53197, Lane Coun-y Oregon Deed Records: Beginning
at tte angle point 1r tte East line of Lot 1, Block A, of the NICHOLAS GARDENS PLAT; thence
Nortl: 0' 06' West, along Che Last line of The said Lot 1, 40.0 feet to the -Northeast corner
thereof; thence South 34' 14' 30" East 48.54 feet to a point on the North line of Lot C;
and thence North 89° 53' West, parallel to Lhe North line of Main SLzeet, 27.5 feet Co the
port of bea_-nire, -r Lane County, Oregon.
Dai- nafr''cu:
OCT 1 4 2015
ivi iCHiliai :aU ut77ktita'_-`
T .
0
CASCADE TITLE CO.
MAP NO.
17-03-36-42
1001
a 2100 (�
8 l / ®•sxw
2500 Af•^ �'^
§I •e ��' a VACA
901_____ a.I w:s \�d�• i --- 27D
o.xg \
2200 2300 lli ,2400 24 --- � 1 "• m m
,u.38 AC s �(Ji 7` '
m , ms '
S
i g°iR
p I
OV hM1
4 g a _ala `.''�f
I 'aq
axes. 24 .xs. Ince 4�, xn a� y3'�ap
EI�1-ZIP
I I
' 4' 2' a WW �g1 81 7i 6 a4 I a y261 4�0o a�o40900 801 -
g�ogo48I W
I
I I !V I 1 $ m
f^ u• i� L
00 ; 5300540 55(5
;
0.24 Ac 1
II \J I qq , I I
31 14' 151 16i 17' 18 �r�t 10' 11' 12 5 j 4i 15i 17 18 N A. 10
;
' N ,
Fl
�..
` THIS MAP IS TO ASSIST LOCATING PROPERTY.
QtLo
CASCADE TITLE CO. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES 4 2015
n i ,nwrminrvl Llml ur:• mrlr,. I W.. .11rn r IIrer.n I I v nnrnP^ 11 us
Il nIr vI .A r iil -v-., ai lA npm:
tlemn'1e .I n -1 �. I i r nurn yuil ]Onnl n91me Iia
p.1111 X11 co:.:.r.wrw anA nnvir:n.. elnll i tm,I r,vpnmrlI, In I, .ry :Lnnn..r ninrh rnnY 1, nnrrr:..
nmJ, 1 Lten. e. 14. I 1 T,'"" nlnrv.'I.rrr.lnnl.
W IT V➢vG I nd.. 4.— ui a
1 l 11 L I 1 lee !:N.I7�1f.oll
.. -�.. _. �Y �.:L!ti?-✓t.y !r(..:'CMXa.1Nen11
I:nvm I 2
OCT 1 5 2015
Gr;g;nal Submitial W
J2
-
9p
a
P156616NT FOR RIGHT -O .WAY
Pmand in ol, L1orannn "Itho num nr Dn. Dolim (V,:Lpill. ^col V: v'l(nrcnE i. LerebY nclmmd
In lH1
'n1pol n riy6aoEnrnr in hnmby c..mmd�tn ntn./ohd.r 9bnre P:w .."o, c". +nr. nre..orpo.N
lino, ite flnnrreflons nnJ ne Lin. r. n will vLu WILL. to mea rmJ mninlnin nu oletitrie pnva I'mv.
LIuPL..n�. ,.r n,.finl wM1ln lion, etm.,r tFu ablloninq i
n W I r. i s nr, l... I I 'n In' I �.I'na:n rI 1 1111 re.ny
into, ❑11. n 'ler 11Alin :d. 11- I'. po. ... Iloplhnn r..
nnl
Lh I fln 1, 1 1 p I"
__.Nlcla��a.=� Nco-Jph.
11111 NII IM n f urtlr � [.N. i,_..... n. 1• • �o s..
nml rl..., t I ndxr...:.. •,' oy_. /$• M. Iln.%S' �'% /`fie. JE• �¢...._
n i ,nwrminrvl Llml ur:• mrlr,. I W.. .11rn r IIrer.n I I v nnrnP^ 11 us
Il nIr vI .A r iil -v-., ai lA npm:
tlemn'1e .I n -1 �. I i r nurn yuil ]Onnl n91me Iia
p.1111 X11 co:.:.r.wrw anA nnvir:n.. elnll i tm,I r,vpnmrlI, In I, .ry :Lnnn..r ninrh rnnY 1, nnrrr:..
nmJ, 1 Lten. e. 14. I 1 T,'"" nlnrv.'I.rrr.lnnl.
W IT V➢vG I nd.. 4.— ui a
1 l 11 L I 1 lee !:N.I7�1f.oll
.. -�.. _. �Y �.:L!ti?-✓t.y !r(..:'CMXa.1Nen11
I:nvm I 2
OCT 1 5 2015
Gr;g;nal Submitial W
w
STATE OC OREGON
cm,.,oP
t .
31E IT 111513P.M]ipREO Th M M1ip d 9 f 9t
A. D.19....4 h Nr-mr, vhc oaauN� N t lyY FII Mtl7o !hb F�f
poemw11, .,."d'the idthin rmm
J .-i, � __ Immm w t l tl a Identl I I d l '..?:: ._..n•Ln
mnnm,t-1 nod nanmamn�n•d to ma n,da.L ,,xuecntid toa'nmmt (rely noa
IN 1% TNRl WHEISEOE, 1 h"m, 1, "L nnxmy hood und'Nmmial 3.
I;N. nM1ovr
ME
OCT 14 2015
GrigVr�aV Submittal '13`�
jOtd ttttan to Cd" 0�1Ra1'j!- `
ttOtSOn--r
'. the amt cowman of Crit CLRy t! aftm
ua' __, 4ttt ea ar aey oe aR . ` iu a
Com..... tf _.
uvr aftL fM fe�ilnj st"a lu am i
'�eaa, eebsttl
OCT 1 4 2015
Gr;g;aa; Suirjm;,eal w—i�-
Da'Le Received:
OCT 1 4 7015
Grig opal Submittsl____rrt_.._
Da'e Received:
OCT 14 2015
Onginai Submittal '�
... -THIS INDENTURE =E and
mttn£ciQa1 corporation, in Lite county,-OraEre herein.{teTt�-£e
asGrantee.
W I T N E S
That .the Grantors,'for and in consideictimi.-of one dollar to the
herd paid, do hereby grentr bargainySell -and =convey-into.t#ieY
e Perpetual e.sewent . Ip feet'in width, together with.Clie
to go. aeon said taeevent area berelneFter d .... Shad for the°.puip
conatppacting,. reconstructing maintaining and using--a-sanicarys
whichlmay hereafter be installed on, the following descr1bednpxop
to -wit
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1. Block R in the Plat of.. N14o]baJfel
as recorded -;n Vol, 11, page 1, Lane co.nty, Oregon .Piet Records; them S.10
14.0 feet along the etas line of -said Lot I to a point, Thence S. 59°. 53' B
feet. parallel to the nor th'line of said Lot 1MG the cells line o/ said -LotT
Nest Right of Vay tire of 21st street, thence N. 0° 06'. W. 14 feeF 01 oug_ailtl
of Nay line to the Northeast corner o Lot IB thence N. 89° 53' N, 130.0 feet
the n rlh,line of Lot 1, to the Point of Beginning, all 56'the City of, Spring
Lane C ... ty, Oregon.
n: TO HAVE AND To HOLD the above easementfto' the "sait3-Gronte, it.r
and assigns forever.IW :....
:_.T' WdTP1228 r Th`eTcrantors do h reby,&Me and gr&UY'pnifa'
City of Spo-rngfield, A construction . easement of- ,/,r- feet itt cell
along and abutting the .iG rtti aide and for the dD
Et, of .the afo.emeaeloned and 'described peYpeCoal easement or.c-
Paco... of giving a work Nice. during the constroeiion of a sanic
.ewer within the perpetual. easement,
-TO HAVE AND. TD HOLD said conat.ctim eaaement unto the said cit:
Springfield and to its successors and assigns during the cogst ,
of the sanitary sewer. Upon the coastrection of the `$anicaryu e,
its acceptance for use, the construction easement i{�roAs nsmad:,.l
become void. - - k �Mi,zi. 1 ::
INWITNESSW[gSEEOF, the Ltan Cora above named ft '3n cel
hands andseals.thin 2day of CI
— -97ATE OF OREGON
County of �-RHG
as
BE IT REMEMBERED, that
be£.re.me,_the. undersl
OCT 1 4 2015
original Submittal_ V'_' _.
OCT 1 4 2015
—WHEREAS. the Bprleg[lola City Couoeil pceytouol d
-to an Property 4 me City!ef48Pr ag$Id uois} {hPI
Yees�, tveh vbrstlw Is ie he but 3ntaeeet o! me cat �e,on 1
Wt 14,PIme. Sed_p4geame...fw..'s=�--al-0evelopmeo!-eL{h'e+E341
pMeBe. 1ev47 no[1u of me Propoeadhiatnad"�S
YeBegdB-r LIIe apring[leld City Couocll mat in the, (!Dwell C(�mbq�e ,pk d
Clry Yell ea YaMey, iwe 13, .1966, at 7;90 y.m to hut' hey Ub
mu _
to -e propued property vneetiou sed m peioomor'Zwered�. rb �obleh
'YW.,'1FEW0HH, the Springfield City Council aoee'maeies
Beeelw: is 'me Camail fivde that legal naMca of tqH . ly�$¢.<
lawlolly'yabliebed Sed postedt that o0 obJmt{w ape tree 4 e y.
veuttw or ma hearing holds mat w aapafy„d�$LLieor do fever .9 thY"Iof'_
Springfield or lane Cowry er4t5 met the].phorea; Ytll Se..
lnpeired by me ptaperty Vacation end [bili PraPhrty vepatioq '
to me but inteeeec of the V tiie evd taekaeee me beufit of me pi arty;
Involved.
Section 2: She following dueribed public property in ma City of
Springfield U declared'to be veutod: _
} Pnttten of 21st Street w But side ltnm Me
frw—
a9'T
' ""'^'S1i�ismld('4=3r'Poiu�Sn tba Seim lica,'ef Ynt'4 H1oet-L• nim
Ytehelu h4eu, u Platted Sed reeetdsf 4 Pei lid pegs I
Lve Cowry Oeagu P]bt Raeorde >e lade' Cgm{p, pfd
yotee be g 231.4 feee8oum 89e i9� t. C
wma of m. wa lac uj cw meo<q,�� fit' �1P�'g
__ ms wF dine o! tIIe Cowry Bwd er daearibdd e! [$ o!� �
- .. vei$l6 bE_m3'_(eA�Y9ii0tY, lA
-'Otagen 60.3feob to !be trW PHibt o! Yoe n _ a �y;
duoribed vatatlRIIS 6bente eootlnui Yy � t i t•
Wanes Ynfm' loo 02s YnC 69 0 t 4 . ��"Ji��eeF
... Ynttp D9tr S6.9� 9ee�i 0�wepme6 4 t c �-
' e`fh'menim n`"ta it �% ea9q �,,
adtb '6ey°t .9 y0 rriin
-: 40 n"•o-,Ty 26E'laitlY�tha emi4>'�j
. o yoel/eu aF-2Lr'gciut I,�ay,6tb
OCT 14 2015
Gr{girai Submittal...
I137
" '�.Eaftltm'ol 2LF Btda:N.a
Begiwlxjg ae tba .,I. p
-Ebd mlrAelw demdw i1a
J
_
yY
i ..
A public Utility wemwt shall b tetafned'b Cho Cf
P 1u6fleld ..
- y ty-`oP e Y
Door th'e fa11aoin dwribed ate,:
c
Begdening at �ad tovthwt seemed of ,at 1 Black A of 14e bole¢
Gardens flat as iword'ad in Vol. 116 page l� lava Convtyt W gwoe ae
Lana Canty. Crosse; thence youth 0 06t Gime elotlg eke eeaC �liuF''a!,
said lot 14.0 feet, tbense South 390 610 Lar, 9.65feefp ,,ever
l,. Ji
'Borth 34 34 30" West. 16.99 fret; w the, pelut of b9gtmdt:g`t#a13`,'is .
Springfiald, Ina Canty. Oregon. 1
In edditiou thereto, acoeettupcien w $
meat of 16 feet SAIV h hlamg fti,
Sed sbuttleg the South ai6e of the above dettribed perp6tww e. - 4
lig
l -
shell be retained by the City of Springfield' for the purpeee.pe
f fvtaG'
'
rock area during the ewsteuetfan of a aanitary sod a atotm wlYe[ �,'
'`!�;
Wlthiu Ne petyetval w®enti ee;d. awtruorian wemeut-Ca be veidad�- -
upon eoapiation red -eccePtaoee of the asid,e[adm and. aseltary pout*
Sactied 3: It L a'forther condition of '.Chia vwtion thattnething
tentetead An thin ordiddece ebell ewe of degaite the remval-or
ebe
- sbandenment of SW sinter, water nalot Sae min. -conduit oi,do"i
wed F'
or leteoded for on, public oesvlee except by mutual agresmott _p -Webb the '.0 y
- ugenoy boldfng ouch tight etd-the pseperty rents !m wham the=aitlaeto tlW,
vacated property shall vest. - -
Y�' 1'
ewYt : fbe City Bacosdet fe ditwtad to in- I
,.
af.able ,i:}t4 tim b mo County Clark, Leue-aiia Aedeaca W od ,-..
"""-..
...
tam Carob-8enger.
Section 9: Ire Council daclerw that it is macees.7 fay 011e ppptie
welfare red interest that this drdihemoe take affect t®edfa"tNg ip�alj its x�"�a •
peemga and that w aw&ency is declared to exist Gad tLac chfanodia$!%f t -
..
ahell ..fan 1 . ae
by �t1e mpoe. .:
r
-
Y,esed by she Cavwll wed Y"roved by the Lyar of ebe Cffy of 8jfihd'v
field this. Istb day of Jona, 1966.
'
-
a /e/Job-B neCutley- s4�et
..
AVfgBil - Council Weeidbat
/•/ William S. Wenee11
City add order n
..-
02'e Rcce;ved:
OCT 14 2015
Grigiref Suum;ttalU_'h__
Ca e Rocelvec:
OCT 1 4 2015
Crigirai Submittal ---r _
xtcNxAv Sb}iSfa0CP2aH PBPHJi � r fres':
P
p, l9[F SCroet-J IrC 5[ set Section
HCKenzle.YtRl+way. - �:_y
I'n'ca"73erecCon.�i�T.-"-EA@^MnRvi`8g?TPtce'te'treaerlved�bwamli'ie�uoee'rbi�e�'e
and the State of 0 g , by and through Its Crason State Highy Cemt efun and theCt
of Springfield, ycipat corporation, it l hQ eby -agreed that LM1 OregonStab -fg
Conmisslm, Its agep Ls, eIDplayaer, and Ca Lfa t r y.ln[ep the real " t, pY
Reelm 'ate/g
e by the undeiaigned as dese"I ed InE2L=6 Los Cadet, I.ed g rtlrzy
n diatence not to eaceed nap, (5). feet parallei [o the a 1a[ing right of y f�
M=Ranele Highway, to finish alopes�ndf here quof � Zed ern ii ddiiim°aitina°aa°Dy'9•� E ,at .`
provides nrm drainage facilities along the sold highway, end fartM1kr, it is, -hereby: eg
the' the Cill of Springfield, 1 s agents, employees and ... c -1.1s, may ,ent r open
real property after construction to maintain said e(yrn drainage f cilitiez p Sdf as
A
1. The sloso will be fin f in ad in km`lnl Ike ist. a, add will not exceedv
steepness two !21 fee[ horf vane Fto-d�'.e (11 f t tfke K.--
2. BssHng road ep pr.rch.. will be rans drue ted where disturbed. To declb:
with _atteenea sketch map and letterfroh City of Springfield..
]. any net ery —lntenenre of any .,or. drainage facilities Snclatlingaat[
beside installed m grentnr's property for the purpose of-removal.ul.an'
water may be done by the City of Spriepield. The State Highway Colas
w111 not be retion o melntenance. - - __14
4. Sh.uhs or of M1er improaamants within the slope area will be paid for at.'F
5. other
r
n of the work, and any peyaen[s to be made hereunder, the`g
fully release the State Highway Conw(eeaon from any furth
.way lmpro c—ir cowered herein.
Dated:
.Sigo edVA1,L 11L.i��, .
SSA" OP OFMyl0J1Pse
aa�
Cowry J....�9G< ...}J, yam/ }p On
M e, me sed MnF..L.
duir Main. did ear Ifi_ _ M, flw
teenssat.
_Pre�Od
IA wllla'shad Cmpaeellory std aAelllw auf Jfirtl to Walimh,mima l fee b.: alaFbd
son,wewe yawMm ,py vGma and awed 1w6eifpl eefdC aanra 6:d+fi4it
ar ou.aedgr......... ..
_._
aWmn /Md'fnw act and deed d add CarptwaN
'i,x irc TWTMQirr IPRBRPOP ra... Imaunta rat rn.aa.,
� "^`+o ofna f sed a4 f ma�m4 M
—
ame
a T— r r
—U1 1 4 2015
Originai Submittal
Grlyinal Submiftal__(6qll.' __.
store: 6F..Michigan, l'"herelnaftei'Yef ired"t
CITY OE''SPRINGEIELD,:n mu nacipal''corporat
hereinafter xaferfe3 to a9 cityl`
INCONSIDERATION for the "face 1pt oPS
the Issuance''of an occupancypermit £or'th
on the property more particularly describe
Exhibit "A," attached hereto and'-incbrpoia
Owner agrees as follows:
1. At the time that that portion of
to the south of the real property or. a.
not Porth in Exhibit "A" is improved, Owm
landscaping more particularly describedia
"B," attached hereto and incorporated here
i. At the time that that portion of
to the east of the real property more,?pati
set forth in Exhibit "A" is improved;:Ovni
landscaping more particularly descilb 4:
"B," attached hereto and incorperatedlhen
3. It is the intention of thep5ifit
ments and covenants herein contained by <,tl
the land h..r^in described, and sh ll.be;b.
gay OLF: aP'+In pe, dim±.ni,9 tcdt0 d'se�
hereto, and shall he canstrued4to be a;tie
OCT 1 4 2015
Gny nai Submittal—Se`
%ae ��:ec2rvea':
OCT 14 2015
Gdy;naV Suu�nlial
Da'Le Reoo;ved:
OCT 1 4 2015
CrIgirmf Subcrii;to L.
GCT 14 2055
Gr6irci Gubn;,ai�
uC i 14 2015
D2'tO Received:
OCT I a 2015
Griginai SubmiBal w
Du'to Rccvlvec:
OCT 14 2U15
Gr;g;r,alSubmiiwl_ �p
After Recording Return To:
Planning Department
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Send All Tax Statements To:
Springfield Eagles Lodge
PO Box 656
Springfield, OR 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk NORM
oOe /106�[E
Lane County Deeds and Reoorde gN J�
III IIIIIIIII III 111111111111111 $46.00
007766702001100062980030037
0112712006 01:10:36 PM
RPR-RGRE Cnt=1 Stn=1 CRSHIER 04
829.00 $10.00 811.00
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT
PARTIES:
On The Way Inc. Owner of the real property more particularly
An Oregon not for profit corporation described and set forth in Exhibit A.
hereinafter"On The Way". -
Springfield Fraternal Order of Eagles
An Oregon Fraternal Organization
hereinafter "Eagles Lodge".
RECITALS:
Owner of the real property more particularly
described and set forth in Exhibit B.
A. On The Way Inc., as Applicant, has applied for change of use approval to allow for a
former antique store to be used as a church under City of Springfield Journal No.
ORC2005-00079.
B. Eagles Lodge has a developed property with parking lot immediately to the west of the
site owned by On The Way.
C. The City of Springfield has issued a Tentative Site Plan Approval, with conditions in
response to On The Way's site plan submission. Condition #1 of the City of Springfield's
Tentative Site Plan Approval for On The Way requires the Applicant to provide additional
parking in accordance with Section 1 B.070(8) of the Springfield Development Code.
Where parking cannot be accommodated on the site, the City may allow parking
provided via shared parking agreements.
D. The following described shared parking agreement appertains to and serves the Eagles
Lodge site and building and the On The Way site and building.
THIS SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT IS MADE UNDER THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
General:
On The Way and Eagles Lodge create this shared parking agreement. This agreement
and obligations created hereunder shall run with the land and burden and benefit all
existing and subsequent owners of the properties described in Exhibits A and B, their
at'e received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -1- OCT 14 2015
Original swrilival '
representatives, heirs, successors, assigns in perpetuity. Future owners shall be bound
by all terms of these agreements. However, this agreement may be amended from time
to time upon unanimous agreement of the property owners and the City of Springfield
and recording such amendment in Lane County Oregon Deed Records; or, terminated
by the City of Springfield if the City, in its discretion, determines such shared parking is
no longer needed and in such event the City shall record Notice of its termination in
Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
2. Shared Parking:
The Eagles Lodge and On The Way sites are designated as Community Commercial
uses. Non-exclusive use of and access to the common parking lots is hereby granted to
all users, owners, permittees, employees and invitees of Eagles Lodge and On The Way
subject to the following conditions:
a. Eagles Lodge will provide a minimum of 10 parking spaces that will be made
available to On The Way subject to the terms of this agreement;
b. On The Way will provide a minimum of 10 parking spaces that will be made
available to Eagles Lodge subject to the terms of this agreement;
c. On The Way may use the parking on the Eagles Lodge property to the extent
that such parking is available, and does not, or will not result in inadequate
parking available to Eagles Lodge;
d. Eagles Lodge may use the parking on the On The Way property to the extent
that such parking is available, and does not, or will not result in inadequate
parking available to On The Way;
e. Eagles Lodge and On The Way shall work together to coordinate events in order
to effect the terms of this shared parking. In the event the coordination of a
particular date cannot be obtained, Eagles Lodge and On The Way shall utilize
other measures to provide adequate parking. Such measures may include but
not be limited to public transportation, ride sharing, and exploration of other
parking options such as shared parking with Paramount Center.
4. Indemnification and Liability Insurance:
Each properly owner agrees to indemnify and hold the other parcel owner harmless from
any and all liability arising out of any act or omission with regard to the maintenance and
use of the shared parking lot and appurtenances thereto caused by said property owner
or owner employees, tenants, invitees, patrons, or permittees. Each parcel owner shall
procure at its own expense a policy of liability insurance protecting parcel owners from
any claims or liabilities arising out of maintenance and use of the common parking and
their appurtenant structures. Such policies shall provide coverage in a commercially
reasonable amount as agreed upon by the parcel owners from time to time. In no event
may the coverage be less than 1 million dollars, single limit.
5. Disputes
This agreement may be enforced by any of the property owners or by the City of
Springfield by any remedy available at law and equity. The property owner shall be
entitled to recover monetary damage they sustain as a result of violation of the
agreement in addition to the equitable relief for such violation.
Dene Received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -2-
OCT 14 2015
Onginai Submittal Yfft
Any dispute among the property owners concerning or related to this agreement or
obligation created hereunder. shall be settled In arbitration before a single arbitrator
using the rules of Commercial Arbitration of The American Arbitration Association or in
accordance with ORS 36.300 et. seq. (1997) or any similar successor statute, whichever
process is selected by the party initiating the arbitration. Arbitration shall occur in Lane
County Oregon. A party substantially prevailing in the arbitration shall also be entitled to
recover such amounts for its costs and attorney fees incurred in connection with the
arbitration, which shall be deterrnined by the arbitrator. The arbitrator's award may be
entered into any court having jurisdiction. Nothing herein has or shall prevent a parcel
owner from a resort to a court of competent jurisdiction in those instances where
injunctive relief may be appropriate.
Springfield Eagles Lodge
By:
STATE OF OREGON)
) ss.
County of Lane )
Personally appeared , who slated that he/she is the
of Spri field Eagles Lodge and ackn wledged the foregoing
mij
is/ r voluntary act and deed this 2'3 day of ZQK-
L gEgLANT4W eC -OREGONl"Eoseux�rZ Notary Public for Oregon:
& ooe My Commission Expires:
On The Way, Inc.--��
�y
STATE OF OREGON)
)as.
County of Lane ) //
IPersonaLlIly appeared Lahe4/.NO_ M. 41115 who stated that he/she is the
FPSiTeof On The Way, In and acknowledged the foregoing
instrument to be his/her voluntary act and deed this day of L44- , 200).61
Eq
Notary Public for Oregon:�
sus y Commission Expires: O
OFFICIAL SEAL
LIARIA L SANTIAGO -
NOTARY POaLIC- OREGON
COMM19310N NO.358313
MVCWSIY '5LP18'
Daie received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -3- OCT 1 4 2015
Cr ginai Submittal_j'W
EXHIBIT A
� I
t000 ,00i; noxi N
£r 10 On The Way Inc.
;�, e(s�'��j: B Iw1�l �l
I; l;
—McKENZIE _ I S""=I
oao'—,
uw I xl tF�jV i` F,r e�' i_��„1e111II,1 I
Property Description
Lot 1, Block A, NICHOLAS GARDENS, as platted and recorded in Volume 11, Page 1, Lane.
County Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO beginning at the Southwest
corner of Lot C in Block A in said NICHOLAS GARDENS, said Southwest corner of Lot C also
being the Southwest comer of the original plat of Nicholas Gardens, run thence North 00 06'
West along the West line of Lot C, 122.0 feet to the Southwest comer of said Lot 1, Block A,
thence South 890 53' East along the South line of said Lot 1. 86.5 feet, thence Northeasterly
along said Lot 1, 70.0 feet to a point 40.0 feet South On 06' East of the Northeast corner of said
Lot 1, Block A, thence South B90 53' East 33.5 feet; thence South 210 57' East along the West
line of County Road as described in Volume 258, Page 216, Lane County Oregon Deed
Records, in Lane County, Oregon, 98.1 feet: thence South 0° 06' East 84.0 feet to the South
line of said Lot C, thence North 89° 53' West along the said South line of Lot C, 201.0 feet to the
point of beginning, in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
TOGETHER with that portion of vacated 21° Street inuring to said lot by Ordinance #2137,
recorded July 7, 1966, Reception No. 53197, Oficial Records of Lane County, Oregon;
Beginning at the angle point in the East line of Lot 1, Block A, of the Nicholas Gardens Plat;
thence North 0° 06' West, along the East line of the said Lot 1, 40.0 feet to the Northeast comer
thereof; thence South 34° 14' 30" East 48.54 feet to a point on the North line of Lot C; and
thence North 89' 53' West, parallel to the North line of Main Street, 27.5 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
Date Received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -4-
OCT 14 2015
Crig;raf Guam"rtai_. 5'1r'�
EXHIBIT B
1 ,zooms
m
aaoo
t=
ID]t
I�f'f 1f C0
N
_
,
em
awvi
_i\j�
zeoo t..
tt7 ✓;�� �,�'� to
a °I Earw
E g 199
c'rsm-r,
......-.!_McKENZIE
'
- - •
----a
I
bpo vl ' W
1 1 1 9i ar
'' ar�'
�'
I
- W ori l Y, ., - a
e v W a 6 1 v r
Iv 1' �'
W
¢
I
I r
Property Description
Easterly portion of the East one-half (%z) of the West one-half ('h) of Lot 24 of the H.L. & T.B.
Stewart's Plat Number 2 of Acreage Lots as platted and recorded in Volume 3, Page 36, Lane
County Oregon Plat Records, being a part of the James Ebbert Jr. Donation Land Claim
Number 74, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian and being described
as follows: Beginning at a point on the North right-of-way line of Main Street, said point being
41.52 feet South 89° 43'3r East of the West line of said East %z of the West % of Lot 24, as it
intersects with the North right-of-way line of Main Street; Running thence North Oo 18' 46" East
164.12 feet, said line running along the West face of the West wall of the Raintree Tavern;
thence South 891 43' 37" East 9.775 feet; thence South 0' 00'20" West 164.16 feet to the North
right-of-way line of Main Street; thence along said right-of-way line North 890 43' 37" West
10.655 feet to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
Date RCcaived:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -5- OCT 1 y 2015
Gric�il'lal SubmifYal__D>r! - _
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND
ADOPTING A SEVERABILTIY CLAUSE
ACCOMPANIED BY THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk 107-081012Lane County Deeds and Records
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 $426.00
12107/2007 01:49:16111
RPR-ORON C.L=1 Stnvl CASHIER 05
$415.00 $11.00
Dai'e ReceiveG:
OCT 14 2015
Originai Suhmittal�_�
li k�r1
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND
ADOPTING A SEVERABILTIY CLAUSE
ACCOMPANIED BY THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk
Lane County Deeds and Records 37402
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1ll11ll11l11l $426.00
00961788200700810420830830 1210712007 01;49:16 PM
RPR-0RON Cnt=1 Stn_1 CASHIER 05
$415.00 811.00
DaiC Received:
OCT 1 4 2015
Original Submittal_pyy-�
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD DOWNTOWN URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
WHEREAS, the Common Council has determined that there is need for a Downtown
Urban Renewal Plan for the following reasons: 1) The existence of inadequate streets, -
rights of way, open spaces, recreation facilities, and utilities (including, for example,
storm water systems and sanitary sewer trunk lines and laterals); 2) the existence of
buildings and structures for industrial, commercial, and residential use with problematic
exterior spacing, design, and physical construction (including obsolescence, deterioration
and mixed character of uses); 3) Properties and lots in irregular form, shape and
dimensions limiting usefulness and development; 4) Lack of proper utilization of areas -
resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of lands potentially useful and
valuable for contributing to the public health, safety, and welfare; and 5) Economic
deterioration and disuse of property.
WHEREAS, given the preceding information, the area within the Downtown Urban Renewal
Plan boundary is blighted;
' WHEREAS, the rehabilitation and redevelopment outlined in the Downtown Urban
Renewal Plan, incorporated herein by reference, is necessary to protect the public health,
safety or welfare of the municipality;
WHEREAS, the 2001 Springfield Charter, Section 49, requires voter approval before the
City Council can approve an Urban Renewal District Plan that includes allocating
property taxes;
WHEREAS, Ballot Measure 20-131 presented to the voters of the City of Springfield on -
November 6, 2007 for their approval of the question of the allocation of such taxes before
the City Council approval of any Urban Renewal Plan;
WHEREAS, the results of that election approved Ballot Measure 20-131 so that the City Council
may comply with the provisions of Section 49 of the 2001 Springfield Charter and state law,
WHEREAS, Oregon law also requires that adoption of an Urban Renewal Plan be
approved by the City Council in the jurisdiction included in the Urban Renewal District;
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield is a municipal corporation organized
and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the State of Oregon and the 2001
Springfield Charter;
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2004, the City transferred its authority to exercise the powers of the
urban renewal agency to the Springfield Economic Development Agency in accordance with
OAR 457.055 and all duties and obligations of the urban renewal agency within thejurisdiction
of the City were thereafter assumed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency.
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council, the governing body of the municipality, Daie 'McCONeri.
received the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report from the Springfield
OCT 1 4 2015
Crigtnal suomdtai IM
Economic Development Agency, the City's urban renewal agency;
WHEREAS, the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report was forwarded to the
governing body of each affected taxing district and the Springfield Economic Development
Agency has consulted and conferred with those taxing bodies;
WHEREAS, Notice was sent out to the electors registered in Springfield and within
the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan area on or about November 9, 2007, that the
Springfield City Council would conduct a Public Hearing on November 19, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Springfield City Council Chambers of Springfield City Hall, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield,
OR 97477;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on November 19 and testimony received on an
ordinance adopting the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, the boundaries of which are shown on
the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan map;
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report meets
the content requirements for urban renewal plans as described in ORS 457.085;
. WHEREAS, the maximum indebtedness that can be incurred under the proposed
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is $43,010,000;
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council determines and finds that the urban renewal
plan conforms to the Eugene -Springfield. Metropolitan Area General Plan which is the
comprehensive plan for the City of Springfield and which provides policy direction for
economic and land me development within the city;
WHEREAS, Section 1200 of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan specifies that SEDA will
provide relocation assistance and housing for displaced persons within their financial means in
accordance with ORS 35.500 to 35.530 and, except in the relocation of elderly or disabled
individuals, without displacing persons already on priority waiting lists for existing federally
subsidized housing;
WHEREAS, if acquisition of real property is necessary, it will be provided for through
later amendments to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan as specified in Section 900(C)(1),
which requires approval of property acquisitions for the purposes specified in Section 700(A) of
the Plan by resolution of the Springfield Economic Development Agency and the Common
Council;
WHEREAS, adoption and carrying out of the urban renewal plan is economically sound
and feasible based on the information included in the Report incorporated in the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield, as the governing municipality of the Plan, assumes
and shall complete any activities prescribed it by the urban renewal plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS THE
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ORDAINS AS OCT 1 1{ 2015
FOLLOWS:
Cdg�rai Submitial �__ _
ORDINANCE NO. 6210
SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN ALLOCATING TAXES FROM DOWNTOWN PROPERTIES
TO THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN. The Common Council of the
City hereby approves the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report set forth in Exhibit A,
allocating taxes from downtown area properties to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan.
SECTION 2: ADOPTION OF THE STAFF REPORT. The Staff Report attached
hereto as Exhibit B, and the findings and determinations contained therein, are incorporated herein
by reference and are hereby adopted.
SECTION 3. NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE. Within 4 days of
the adoption of this Ordinance approving the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, notice of this action
shall be published in the Register Guard, the newspaper having the greatest circulation within the
City of Springfield and published nearest to the City of Springfield.
SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. The City Manager, the City
Recorder, the City Finance Director, and the City Attorney, and each of them acting individually,
are hereby authorized, empowered and directed, for and on behalf on the City, to carry out the
purposes and intent of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect
after its second reading and upon its adoption at a regular meeting of the Common Council of the
City and approval by the Mayor.
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court
of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent
provision and that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5 for and
1 against, this 26ttday of November , 2007.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield, this 26th daytpf November
2007.
ATTEST:
4Mayorp
City Record4j
MIRED i "' HVtED
DATE:
OFFICE OF CIIV 1:I 1 O11NEY OCT 14 2015
ORDINANCE NO. 6210
Downtown Urban
Renewal Plan
Part One:
RENEWAL PLAN
Part Two:
REPORT ON THE PLAN
Springfield Oregon
November 26, 2007
Date RcceivMu:
OCT 1 � 2015
!
110
!
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This urban renewal plan and report was prepared with funding assistance from the City of
Springfield. Springfield citizens participated in 2 townhalls leading to the preparation of
the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report.
Staff Assistance
Gino Grimaldi, City Manager
Jeff Towery, Assistant City Manager
William Grile, Development Services Director
John Tamulonis, Community Development Manager
Mark Metzger, Planning Supervisor
Courtney Gdesel, Planner
Urban Renewal Consultant
Charles Kupper, Spencer & Kupper
Date Received:
Dowraown Urban Renewal Plan OCT 111 2015
Nwe.be 26, 1007 Z
GiIGAUi
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan
Table of Contents
100. The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan 4
200. Citizen Participation 5
300. Relationship to Local Objectives 7
400.
Proposed Land Uses
12
500.
Outline of Development
14
600.
Description of Potential Projects to be Undertaken
16
700.
Property Acquisition Procedures
22
800,
Property Disposition and Redevelopers' Obligations
23
900.
Amendments to the Urban Renewal Plan
24
1000. Maximum Indebtedness 25
1100. Financing Methods 26
1200. Relocation 26
1300. Definitions 27
Exhibit 1 -Boundary Map and Legal Description 29
Exhibit 2 -Zoning Map and Plan Diagram 36
Appendix 1 38
Appendix 2 42
Dade deceived.
Do WM . flrhan Renewal Plan
Nowmber26.1007 3 OCT 1 4 2015
ofim ouo �, —
Robertson I Sherwood I ArchlteCtS ac
132 East Broadway. Suite 540 p1541)342:8077 w a..r.bertaonaherw*u,.conn
Eugene, Oregon 97401 r (540345-4302
Site Plan Review Narrative for:
Silly Billies Child Care
130 21st Street
Springfield, Oregon
January 26, 2023
Final Plan revised — June 21, 2023
Property Owner / Applicant
Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
P.O. Box 26125
Eugene Oregon 97401
Contact: S. R. Yett
Phone: (541) 344-6781
Email: steven@sryett.com
Architect (Plan Preparation)
Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc
132 E. Broadway, Suite 540
Eugene OR 97401
Attn: Carl Sherwood, AIA or John Webster, AIA
Phone: (541) 342-8077
Email: jwebster@robertsonshenwood.com
Project Location:
Tax Map No. 17-03-36-42 Tax Lot 02500.
Project address: 130 21st Street, Springfield Oregon 97477.
Project Description:
This application is for a Site Plan Review approval to change the Use of a portion of the building. A
portion of the existing building is planned to change use from Mercantile (M) to Educational (E).
Approvals Requested:
Site Plan Review approval is requested:
This application is a modification of a previous Site Plan Review -Minor Modification application (Case No.
TYP115-00040). That original reviewwas approved, but the changes of use require reviewto meet
Springfield Development Code standards.
Attached Information:
Site Plan Review Application
Narrative (this document)
8 ^/a x 11 copy of Site Plan (pdf)
Precertification Documentation (Child Care Center)
Full Size Plan (pdf)
Tax Map of site
Deed/fitle Report (with Recorded Shared Access Easement Agreement)
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 1 of 3
Site Ownership:
The proposed work occurs on one tax lot: Lot 2500
The property is owned by:
Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
P.O. Box 26125
Eugene, Oregon 97401.
Zoning:
The site is within the City of Springfield's Urban Growth boundary, Zoned as Community Commercial
(CC).
Per SDC 4.7-125 Child Care Facilities:
The proposed use (Child Care) is permitted for this zone and will meet the Children's Services Division
(CDS) regulations.
No outdoor play areas planned.
Site Access:
Vehicular access to the site is via an existing driveway from 21 st Street (East side of property) with
sidewalks and curb/gutter per City of Springfield standards shall remain.
REV 1 — Replacement of existing asphaltwalkway with concrete sidewalk to provide continuous
accessible pedestrian path.
Off -Street Parking Facilities:
(Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-2)
Mercantile (M) Occupancy (Retail):
Parking Ratio for Employees:
Standard Parking:
1 parking space per 300 SF of gross area
11,932 SF / 300 = 40 spaces
Educational (E) Occupancy (Child Care Center):
Parking Ratio for Employees: 1 parking space per 350 SF of gross area
Parking Ratio for "Drop Off' parking: 1 parking space per 700 SF of gross area
Standard Parking: 1,665 SF / 350 = 5 spaces
Drop Off Parkins: 1.665 SF / 700 = 3 spaces
Total Required 48 spaces
Provided Parkina Analvsis
Standard Parking (on-site): 20 spaces (2 accessible)
Compact Parking (on-site): 4 spaces
Drop Off Parking (on site): 3 spaces
Adjacent lot spaces: 21 spaces
(Per shared parkins aareement - Rec. No. 2006-006256: 10 spaces minimum)
Total Provided 48 spaces
Lot Bicycle Parking:
(Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-155)
Retail (1 per 3,000 SF —4 spaces minimum)
11,829 SF 13000 = 4 spaces required (25% long term / 75% short term)
Bicycle parking provided: 1 long term / 3 short term
Assisted Care and Day Cares (1 per 5 employees— 4 spaces minimum)
5 employees = 4 spaces required (75% long term / 25% short term)
Bicycle parking provided: along term / 1 short term
An existing floor -mounted bicycle rack provides space for 6 short-term bicycle parking on the East parking
area with walkways to both entrances.
Three (3) newwall-mounted bicycle racks will be located within the educational tenant space (Northwest
corner of tenant space).
One (1) existing long-term bicycle parking is provided within a storage room on the West side of the
building for the retail space.
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 2 of 3
Site lighting:
Existing wall -mounted lighting provides illumination for the immediate area around the building
Utility Infrastructure:
The project site is served by adequate public utilities.
No changes proposed.
Stormwater Management:
No Stonnwater management requirements per Clayton McEachern (Springfield Public Works)
No changes in impervious paving to site.
Floodplain:
The property is not in a flood plain area.
Wetlands:
The property is not identified within areas of the Springfield Local and National Wetland Inventory Map
Drinking Water Protection (DWP):
The property is located within the 20 -year Time Of Travel Zone (TOTZ) of the 16' & O Street wellhead
according to the Springfield Wellhead Protection Area Map.
No hazardous material storage is planned for the property beyond standard cleaning supplies.
Irrigation:
An existing irrigation system is present for landscaping on the site.
Fire Protection:
The existing building does not require automatic fire sprinkler systems per Code. Emergency vehicle
access is available along the perimeter of the building, with access to all sides of the building within
dimensional limits.
The site is served by an existing fire hydrant, located on 'A' Street.
Building Height:
The restriction on building height in the CC zone is 35 feet. The existing height of the building is less than
20'-0". No changes proposed.
END OF NARRATIVE
Silly Billies Child Care
Site Plan Application Narrative Page 3 of 3
r
B
6
SILLY BILLIES CHILD CARE
130 21st STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
DESIGN TEAM DESCRIPTION OF WORK
PROPERTY OWNER:
GOBRECHT DOLLAR, LLC
P.O. BOX 26125
EUGENE, OR 97402
541-3446781
CONTACT: STEVEN YETT
EMAIL: STEVEN@SRYETTGOM
ARCHITECT:
ROBERTSONISHERWOODIARCHITECTS PC
132 E. BROADWAY, SUITE 540
EUGENE, OR 97401
541-342-6077
CONTACT: CARL SHERWOOD, AIA
EMAIL: CSHERWOOD@ROBERTSONSHERWOOD.COM
CONTACT: JOHN WEBSTER, AIA
EMAIL: JWEBSTER@ROBERTSONSHERWOOD.COM
CONTRACTOR:
ILO CONSTRUCTION, LLC
1792 CENTENNIAL BLVD
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
541-521-0114
CONTACT: RICHARD AIELLO
EMAI L: I LO2@COMCAST. NET
PROJECT LOCATION:
13021st STREET q SI
_ o N
Main St
_ LL
SA Sa SASt
m
3
7
TAX MAP: 17-03-36-42
LOT 2500
PROPOSED CHANGE OF USE FOR 1,665 SF OF
EXISTING BUILDING FROM MERCHANTILE (M)
OCCUPANCY TO EDUCATIONAL (E) OCCUPANCY
FOR A CHILD CARE CENTER.
SHEET INDEX
A100 PROJECT INFO, VICINITY MAP, SITE PLAN
A St
SPRINGFIELD
OREGON
1 VICINITIY MAP
ADD NTS
LAND USE CODE ANALYSIS
NORTH
a
LAND USE CODE ANALYSIS BASED ON CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
VEHICLEPARKING REQUIRED FOR THIS TENANT SPACE
DEVELOPMENT CODE.
(SDC TABLE 4.62):
FIRE RATING OF EXT WALLS
MECANTILE (RETAIL):
LOCATION: 13021ST STREET,
STANDARD PARKING: 11,932 SF 1300 SF PER SPACE =40 SPACES
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
IA, OTHERS (HOUR
EDUCATIONAL (E)
CHILD CARE (CHILD CARE FACILITIES):
MAP/TAX LOT: 17-03.3642 LOT 02500
STANDARD PARKING: 1,665F 1350 SF PER SPACE = 5 SPACES
(E)EXTERIOR
DROP-OFF PARKING: 1,6651700 SF PER SPACE = 3 SPACES
ZONING:
WALLASSEMBLY:
COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL
TOTAL REQUIRED PARKING SPACES: 48 SPACES REQUIRED
USE AS CHILD CARE CENTER APPROVED (TABLE 3.2.320).
(2 HC PARKING STALLS)
PROPERTY LOCATEDWITHIN 20YEAR TIME OFTRAVELZONE FOR
VEHICLE PARKING PROVIDED:
THE 16TH & Q STREET WELLHEAD AS DEFINED IN THE CITY OF
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT WITH ADJACENT LOT RECORDED
SPRINGFIELD DRINKING WATER PROTECTION (DWP) OVERLAY.
JAN 27, 2006 (REC NO. 2006006256) = 10 SPACES MINIMUM
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS:
(25 SPACES AVAILABLE AT EAGLES LODGE)
NOT WITHIN FLOOD PLAIN OR WETLAND ZONES.
(TABLE 503.4) 2 HOUR SEPARATION REQUIRED.
WALLOPENINGS:
ADJACENT LOT: 21 SPACES USED
SITEAREAS:
ON-SITE PARKING: 27 SPACES
OVERALLSITE AREA: 0.89ACRES
(INCLUDES 2 HC SPACES and THREE (3) *DROP OFF" PARKING
ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 35,962 sf
STALLS ALONG 21 st STIR EET.)
(NO CHANGE TO IMPERVIOUS AREA PROPOSED)
TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED: 48 SPACES PROVIDED
BUILDING AREA:
BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED (SDC TABLE 4.6-3):
TENANT IMPROVEMENT SPACE (CHILD CARE): 1,665 SF
MERCANTILE (RETAIL): 1 PER 3000 SF
MERCANTILE(RETAIQ) 11.932 SF
11,932 SF 13000 SF= 4 SPACES REQUIRED
TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 13,597 SF
25%LONG TERM /75%SHORT TERM
VEHICLE PARKING:
CHILD CARE (ASSISTED CARE AND DAY CARES): 1 PER 5 EMPLOYEES
ALL VEHICULAR AND BICYCLE PARKING HAVE BEEN APPROVED BY
5 EMPLOYEES= 1 SPACES REQUIRED
PREVIOUS PERMIT WHICH INCLUDED AREA OF TENANT
75%LONG TERM /25%SHORT TERM
IMPROVEMENT (Sl 62085).
113 -
USE HAS CHANGED, WHICH REQUIRES DROP OFF PARKING STALLS.
4 SPACES REQUIRED PER USE, MINIMUM PER SDC.
200 FT MAX (UNSPRINKLERED)
BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED:
(TABLE 1017.2)
4 LONG TERM AND 6 SHORT TERM SPACES PROVIDED.
BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS
CODE ANALYSIS BASED ON THE 2019 OREGON STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY CODE (O.S.S.C.)
\ (3) DROP OFF/
r�PICK UP STALLS
CONSTRUCTION TYPE: V -B, NON-SPRINKLERED
ENCLOSURE
(IN FEET)
(TABLE 601)
FIRE RATING OF EXT WALLS
8'
PER SEPARATION DISTANCE :> 5 FT TO < 10 FT:
OCCUPANCYTYPE: MERCANTILE (M) and
(TABLE 602)
IA, OTHERS (HOUR
EDUCATIONAL (E)
� oG
O
PER 308.5.1: MORE THAN 5, LESS THAN 100 CHILDREN 2E YEARS OR LESS
(E)EXTERIOR
ACCESSEASEMENT
OFAGE, ROOMS WHERE CHILDREN ARE CARED FOR ARE LOCATED ON
WALLASSEMBLY:
T-1-11 SHEATHING
LEVEL OF EXIT DISCHARGE AND EACH CHILD CARE ROOM HAS AN EXIT
2x6 WOOD STUDS W/ R-21 INSULATION
DOOR DIRECTLYTO THE EXTERIOR (CLASSIFICATION AS GROUP E).
5/8" GYPSUM BOARD
W
SEPERATION WALL:
8" CMU
OCCUPANCY SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS:
(TABLE 503.4) 2 HOUR SEPARATION REQUIRED.
WALLOPENINGS:
30 AND GREATER, NS- UNPROTECTED: NO LIMIT.
(2 HOUR CMU WALL EXISTING)
(TABLE 705.8)
ALLOWABLE BUILDING AREA:
OCCUPANCY:
DAYCARE: 1359 SF/35 NET =39 OCCUPANTS
(TABLE 506.2)
(TABLE 1004.5
BREAKAREA: 250SF/100=30CCUPANTS
EDUCATIONAL: 9,500 SF PER FLOOR
TOTAL= 42 OCCUPANTS
ACTUAL- 1,665 SF (NO CHANGE)
U)
EXITS REQUIRED:
1 EXIT REQUIRED
ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: 40 FT (1 STORY)
(TABLE 1006.2.1)
2 EXITS PROVIDED
(TABLE 504.3, 504.4) ACTUAL-APPROX. 141,1 STORY
O
CT21
113 -
(NO CHANGE)
TRAVEL DISTANCE:
200 FT MAX (UNSPRINKLERED)
(TABLE 1017.2)
FIRE RATING REQMT'S: STRUCTURAL FRAME: 0 HOURS
(TABLE 601) INTERIOR BEARING: OHOURS
PER 903.2.6(2): EXCEPTION TO REQUIREMENT OFAUTOMATIC SPRINKLER
INTERIOR NON-BEARING: 0 HOURS
SYSTEM - EVERY ROOM WHERE CHILD CARE IS PROVIDED HAS NOT
FLOOR CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOURS
FEWER THAN ONE EXTERIOR EXIT DOOR.
ROOF CONSTRUCTION: 0 HOURS
STAIRWAY: NO STAIRS,
NO RATED
(E) CMU WALL
5
m
H—
W
W
(7D
L
O
CN
EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION
1/8" = 1'-O"
I
I
+
+ /II oC c o
LOT 6100
(RESIDENTIAL)
777_0__7
TTANDAR�SPACES SPACES
ADDITIONAL PARKING AVAILABLE
ON ADJACENT LOT PER SHARED
l� PARKING AGREEMENT
(E) POW
EXISTING BUILDING
SWITCHGEAR AND Q
ELECTRICAL METERS
+ ACCESS
THRU GATES)
0°
O LOT 2500
0.91 ACRES
(i) LONG TERM BIKE
PARKING STALLS J// o
CD INSIDE TENANT SPACE
(EXISTING)
O y
L+ yy
a �
a ¢
O 0 ¢ o
y N LOTIS WITHIN THE 2D•YEAR
OE56-7"
TIME OF TRAVEL ZONE(TOTZ)
FOR THE 1STH & Q WELLHEAD
PER SPRINGFIELD WELLHEAD
DPROTECTION AREA MAP.O (E) GASMETER ..
IU OJ
wl
O I
N
O
O
O
Z O (E) HC
O J� PARKING
06 ant SPACES
CD
I O G�
CD
(E) LANDSCAPING I OO A
ao
o
(E) LTD BUS
STOP #00051
SITE PLAN
1„ = E.-0..
(3) LONG TERM BIKE
PARKING STALLS
INSIDE TENANT SPACE
BEYOND
E) POWER POLE
(E) CMU WALL
ENCLOSURE
NORTH WALL FACING RESIDENTIAL ZONE
DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINE: 48' -8"+/ -
WALL AREA :895SF
FENESTRATION AREA 130 SF
FENESTRATION PERCENTAGE 14%
SCALE: 1/8' V -O' (IN FEET)
0 4' B' 16'
K?'
(E) FIRE
y HYDRANT
IAI STREET
s
5e
(E)LANDSCAPING \
3
M01
.6
LED LIGHTPOLE
I
� I
13021st ST.
1665 SQ. Fr.
'EOCCUPANCY
(E) 2 -HOUR
CMU WALL
2020 MAIN ST. SUITE #100
11,932 SQ. Fr.
'M OCCUPANCY
\
\ (3) DROP OFF/
r�PICK UP STALLS
1/16"=1'-0"
(IN FEET)
a D
0
8'
16'
�O
ti
� oG
O
G
ACCESSEASEMENT
FOLLOWS INTERIOR LINE
OF (E) SIDEWALKIPATH
'Z
V
(6)SHORT-TER
BIKE PARKING
SPACES
(EXISTING)
(E) LANDSCAPING
EW GONG. CUr WEEP HOLE
ACCESSIBLE THRU(E)CURB
SIDEWALK / , y SCI EAN OUr (E) WEEP
I I 36M�' H I I �
"
0
NEWCO C.
+ 201 + O + O O SIDEWALK 0
CONNECT TO (E)
1
a (E)LANDSCAPING Al Q
LED LIGHT POLE
a MAIN STREET SUSP ANDTRAFFIC LIGHT
S 0
RObertSonISherw00dlArch ltects
132 East Broadway, Suite 540
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541-342-8077
www.robertsonsherwood.com
T CAR 0j
EUGEf ,tON ,�-
OF 010
SCALE:
1/16"=1'-0"
(IN FEET)
a D
0
8'
16'
32'
RObertSonISherw00dlArch ltects
132 East Broadway, Suite 540
Eugene, Oregon 97401
541-342-8077
www.robertsonsherwood.com
T CAR 0j
EUGEf ,tON ,�-
OF 010
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
Z\ 6/20/2023 SITE REVIEW
ISSUE DATE: 1/26/2023
ISSUE: CD
PROJECT NO: 2236
DRAWN BY: JRW
CHECKED BY: CRS
cORax ISI W WIueHa PC=w MLsxfftsa;u '
PROJECTINFO
VICINITY MAP
SITE PLAN
A001
ti
ti
O
'Z
V
LU
W
W
W
LU
LU
N
W
aLL
U)
Z
LU
N
O
CT21
113 -
Fn
fn
MARK DATE DESCRIPTION
Z\ 6/20/2023 SITE REVIEW
ISSUE DATE: 1/26/2023
ISSUE: CD
PROJECT NO: 2236
DRAWN BY: JRW
CHECKED BY: CRS
cORax ISI W WIueHa PC=w MLsxfftsa;u '
PROJECTINFO
VICINITY MAP
SITE PLAN
A001
670�° �
m
U
8
3
m
ti
y
1 PARTIAL SITE L N 5
0
e
SIDEWALK WITH T MN. 3/4"ACOMPA
'ESSIBLE CURB CUTS
CRUSHED
NORTH
PAI
1/9'�V-O" (IN FEET)
a�
DRAIN CUT THRU CURB
Raba�tsai6MrxaoEArtNi[etlsR
ENg;OHECON ,�
OF 0V
2236
r_
JRW
CHECKED BY:
CRS
NOTES:
�
a
m
U
Z
1. NO ABOVE GROUND FACILITIES (FIRE HYDRANTS, POWER POLES,
D
REPLACE (E)
(07
w
�
CATCH BASING, VALVES, JBOXES, ETC.) SHALLBE PERMITTED IN FEW
w
DAMAGED CURB
w
�
SIDEWALK AREA
W
lL
(FIELD VERIFY)
J
fn
�
r
Z
�
N
W
fn
2- ALL SURFACES SHALL HAVE BROOM FINISH.
(E)LANDSCAPING
3. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE 3000 PSI FIELD STRENGTH (3450 PSI LAB
STRENGTH) 6.0 SACK MIX CONCRETE
CUT DRAIN GAP
(E)LANDSCAPING
4. CURBS AND COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAYS SHALL BE 3500 PSI FIELD
THRU (E) CURB AT
STRENGTH (4025 PSI LAB STRENGTH)6.3 SACK MIX CONCRETE.
EXPANSION JOINT
10-P ERIFI�
TOP OF NEW WALK
TO (E) SIDEWALK
(E) LANDSCAPING CURB
3
C MIN. CONCRETE
Al
CL N OUT (E) WEEP
SIDEWALK
�i
HO THRUCURB
50:1 MAX (E)CURB/GUTTER
NEW CONC. E?
- <q
CROSS SLOPE
N w
ASPHALT
�— ASPHALT
(E)
SIDEWALK Z
STREET
CONNECT TO (E)
4
EXPANSION JOINT
AT RAAP BASE
III
I I
I
CONTRACTION
2" MIN. 31C MINUS
JOINTS AT 9-0"
I
COAPAGTE DI—
OGMIN.
CRUSHED ROCK
m'?>•
_III
III
III
I I
I
(E)LANDSCAPING
SIDEWALK
SECTION
2
.Z
r
Al
V P -D..
Po
2
Al
I
CUT 8" WIDE DRAIN GAP IN CURB
EXPANSION JOINT
NEW CONC.
TO LEVEL OF NEW SIDEWALK
I AT TOP OF RAAP
ACCESSIBLE
VERIFY I}" MIN DROP TO GUTTER
EXPAND WIDTH TO
SIDEWALK
EET (E) WALK
CONNECT TO (E)
(E) LANDSCAPING
C MIN. CONCRETE (E) CURB/GUTTER
SIDEWALK HALT
EXPANSION f
(E) LANDSCAPING
O
O
p
TO (E) SIDEWALK
1Ir �STREET
a _ _
670�° �
m
U
8
3
m
ti
y
1 PARTIAL SITE L N 5
0
e
SIDEWALK WITH T MN. 3/4"ACOMPA
'ESSIBLE CURB CUTS
CRUSHED
NORTH
PAI
1/9'�V-O" (IN FEET)
a�
DRAIN CUT THRU CURB
Raba�tsai6MrxaoEArtNi[etlsR
ENg;OHECON ,�
OF 0V
ISSUE DATE: 2OM23
ISSUE: SITE PLAN RENEW
PROJECT NC
2236
r_
JRW
CHECKED BY:
CRS
ffluw Nm: 11-07
�
a
m
U
Z
D
(07
w
�
U
w
O
w
�
N
W
lL
Z
Q
J
fn
�
r
Z
�
N
W
fn
ISSUE DATE: 2OM23
ISSUE: SITE PLAN RENEW
PROJECT NC
2236
DRAWN BY:
JRW
CHECKED BY:
CRS
ffluw Nm: 11-07
ENLARGED
SIDEWALK PLAN
AND DETAILS
Al
CASCADE ESCROW
ATTN: MELISSA MITCHELL
811 WILLAMETTE STREET
FUG -,NF, OR 99401
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
2ND SUPPLEMENTAL
July 8, 2015
RsporL No: 0288999
You- No: EU15-0601
Sells-: CN THE NAY, INC.
Buyer: GCBRECHT Ec--AR
PRELIMINARY REPORT kOR:
Owner's Standard Policy
Commercial Extended Loan Policy (SID".U�)
*0288999*
$490,000.00
$e33,5CC.00
PRFMIUMS:
Owner's SLandard Premium $1,330.00
Commercial Extended Loan Premium (SIMUT) $709.00
OTIRO Endorsement $100.00
Gov. Lien/Inspect Fee $35.00
We are prepared to issue 2006 (6/17/06( ALTA t'-t_e insurance pclicy(ies) of CHICAGO TITLE
INSURANCE COMPANY, in the usual form insuring the title to the land described as follows:
Vest00:
( A T T A C H E D)
ON THE WAY, INC.
an Oregon corporation
Estate: FEE SIMPLE
DATED AS OF: JUNE 24, 2015 at 8:00 A.M.
Schedule B of the policy(ies) to be 'issued will con-ain the `following general and special
exceptions unless removed prior to issuance:
GENERAL EXCEPTJONS (Standard Coverage Policy Exceptions(:
_. Taxes or assessments which are not show, as existing liens by the records of any Laxir,g
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records;
proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Puol. is
Records.
2. ' k'acLs, tigh'.s, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but w;,ich
could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in
possession thereof.
No liability is assumed hereunder ¢mtil poliev has been issued and full policy premium has been paid
MAIN OFFICE FLORENCE OFFICE
811 WILLAMETTE ST. • EUGENE, OREGON 97401 715 HWY .01 - FLORENCE, OREGON 97439
PH: 1.11) 687-2233 + FAR: (591)485-0307 PH: 1°11) 997 -"4'7 + FAX: (°41)997-8216
E-MAIL: INFO@CASCADET=TLE.COM E-MAIL: FLORENCE@GgSE; fJkr'FYw�,E�ll ru.
OCT 14 2015
Grininai Submittal_ W
I
Order No. 0288999
Page 2
_. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the Public Records; reservations or
exceptions in patents or in Acts autaorizing the issuance thereof; wales rights, claims
or title to water.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance
affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accura Le and complete land survey
of the Land.
5. Any 1 i en, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material., equipment rental or workers
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the
Public Records.
SPECIAL EXCEP^_:ONS:
E. Taxes for the fiscal year 2015-2016, a lien not yet payable.
7. Taxes, Account No. 0333060, Assessor's Map No. 17 03 36 4 2, _2500, Code 19-99,
2014-2015, in the amount of a3,54D./9, DUE PLUS INTEREST.
8. Power line Easement, including tae terms and provisions thereof, granted to Mountain
States Power Company, a Delaware corporation, by instrument recorded January 25, 1947,
in Book 340, Page 280, Lare County Oregon Deed Records.
9. Reservation of any existing utility easements to the City of Springfield, in street
vacations recorded April 27, 1961, Reception No. 3031_0, and re-recorded July 7, 1966,
Reception No. 53197, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
10. Slope easement to tae State of Oregon and storm sewer easement to the Ci Ly of Springfield
in instrument recorded August 17, 1966, Reception No. 579C9, Lane county Oregon Deed
Records.
11. Easement, including the Lerms and provisions thereof, granted the City of Springfield,
a municipal corporation, in Lane County, Oregon, by instrument recorded June 02, 1966,
Reception No. 49409, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
12. Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof, recorded October 24, 1984,
Rereption No. 8441492, Lane County Official Records.
13. Deed ct Trust, including the terms and prov_s!nns thereof, executed by On The Way,
Inc., an Oregon corporation., to Cascade Escrow, TrusLee, Loc the benefit of SELCO
Community Credit Union, Beneficiary, dated August 24, 2005, recorded August 25, 2005,
Reception No. 2005-066600, Lane County Deeds and Records, to secure payment of a note
for $250,000.00.
14. Assignment of rents due cr to become cue and arrruing from said property, including
the terms and provisions thereof, from On The way, ne., an Oregon corporation, to
SELCO Community Credit Union, dated August 24, 2005, recorded August 25, 2005,
Reception No. 2005-066601, Lane County Deeds and Records.
15. Financing Statement recorded Augus= 25, 2005, Reception No. 2005-066602, Lane County
Deeds and Records, lists On The Way, Inc., as Debtor, and SELCO Community Credit Union,
as Creditor, with security -,nfonna Lion obtainable from creditor.
16. Shared Parking Agreement, including the terms and provisions therect, between On The
way Inc., and Springfield Fraternal Order of Eagles, recorded January 27, 2006,
Reception No. 2CC6-006256, Lane County Deeds and Records.
Daie 'Recaive(w.:
OCT 11 2015
Originai Submittal )Lk _,__
Order No. 0288999
Page 3
17. Ordinance No. 6210 approving the Springfield Jowr.towi Urban Renewal 21an and Report,
_ncliding the terms and provisions thereof, recorded December 7, 2007, Recept, No.
2007-081042, Lane County Deeds and Records.
18. A certi'_ied copy of the Hoare of Directors' Resolution authorizing and directing the
sale or mortgage of the subject property, should be provided prior to closing. (On
The Way, Tnc.)
19. A copy of the Articles of Orga-T at on and/or Operatinc Agreement of Gobrecht Doiiar
LLC, should be furnished to Cascade Title Company for the purpose of ascertaining
members author zed to execute on behal` b` the Limited liability Company,
20. In lieu of the signatures of all the members and/or managers, we will require a Consent
Resoluti nn by all of the members and managers of Gab-echt Doiler LLC, consentinq to
Lae forthcoming sale or encumbrance and disclo=sing the party(ics( authorized to sign
for said limited liability .company to be provided p -ion to closing.
21. Prior to writing an ALTA MORTGAGEE'S no]. icy, Cascade Ti -le Company should he furnished
with a statement as to parties in possession and as Lo any construction, alterations
or repairs to the premises within the last 75 days. We also request that we he notified
in the evert that any funds are to be used for construct -on, alterations or repairs.
Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown therchy.
22. An accurate survey of these premises showing boundary lines, and location of
improvements and ea_emerts, should be furnished for ocr file prior to our writing an
AT,TA Mortgagee's Policy. Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown thereby.
NOTE: The ornoerty address as shown on the Assessor's Roll. is:
2019 s 2020 Main Street
Spring=ield, OR 9790
120 21st Street
Springfield, OR. 97977
NOTE: A judgment search has been made on the above caned Vesee (s), and we find NONE except
as set forth above.
NOTE: As of the date hereof, there are no matters against GORRECHT D077AR TALC, which wo'cld
appear as exceptions in the policy to issue, except as shown herein.
NO'T'E: 'file proposed_nsured is North Cascades Bank.
NOTE: This report is being supplemented to update the policy and premium amounts, escrow
officer, and show exception no. 6.
NOTE: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of
insurance is less than the amoant, if any, set forth in the arbitration olause, all
arbitrah-.e matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or -he -neared
as the exclusive remedy of the parties.
D21e Roceived:
OCT 14 2015
Originai SUbmittal_�
Order No. 0288999
Paye 4
This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become
null and void u,less a pol-cy is issued and the full premium paid.
Cascade Title Co.
mL: Title Officer: KURT BEA'TY
Cc: WALKER FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC.
6 REAL ESTATE SERVICES
ATTN: COREY WALKER
EMAIL: WALKERFAMILYRE@YAIIOO.COM
Cc: BARNHA.RT ASSOCIATES REAL ESTATE
ATTN: DAVID HOLLAND
EMAIL: DAVIDH@BARNHARTASSOCIATES.COM
Cc: NORTH CASCADES BANK
EMUAIL: TASON.UNDERWOOD@NORTF.CASCADESBANK.COM
EMAIL: AUDR6Y.?'OX@NORTHCASCADESBANK.COM
DaW Received:
OCT 14 2015
Criginai Submittal_
Order He. 0208999
Page_ 5
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
Lot 1, Block A, NICHOLAS GARDENS, as platted and recorded in Book 11, Page 1, Lane County
Oregon P-st Records, in Lane County, Oregon.
ALSO: Beginning at the Southwest confer of Lot C in Block A in said NICHOLAS GARDENS, said
Southwest corner of Lot C also being the Southwest corner of the original plat of NICHOLAS
GARDENS; run thence North 0' OE' Fest along the West line of Lot C, 122.0 feet to the Southwest
corner of said Lot 1, Block A; thence South 89c 53' East along the Sou_h -_ne of said Lot
86.5 Feet; thence Northeasterly along said Lot 1, 70.0 feet to a point 40.0 feet South
0' 06' East of the Northeast corner of said Lot 1, Block A; thence South 89' S3' East 33.5
feet; thence South 210 57' East along the West line of Coc-ty Pond as desc-ibed in Book
258, Page 21E, Lane County Cragcn Deed Records, in Lane County, Cregon, 98.1 feet; thence
South 0' 06' East 84.0 feet to the South line of said Lot C; thence North 89' 53' West along
the said South line of Lot C, 201.0 feet to the point of beginning, in Sp-ingfield, Lane
County, Oregon.
TOGETHER with that portion of vacated 21st Street inuring to said lot by Ordinance No. 2137,
recorded July 07, 1966, Reception No. 53197, Lane Coun-y Oregon Deed Records: Beginning
at tte angle point 1r tte East line of Lot 1, Block A, of the NICHOLAS GARDENS PLAT; thence
Nortl: 0' 06' West, along Che Last line of The said Lot 1, 40.0 feet to the -Northeast corner
thereof; thence South 34' 14' 30" East 48.54 feet to a point on the North line of Lot C;
and thence North 89° 53' West, parallel to Lhe North line of Main SLzeet, 27.5 feet Co the
port of bea_-nire, -r Lane County, Oregon.
Dai- nafr''cu:
OCT 1 4 2015
ivi iCHiliai :aU ut77ktita'_-`
T .
0
CASCADE TITLE CO.
MAP NO.
17-03-36-42
1001
a 2100 (�
8 l / ®•sxw
2500 Af•^ �'^
§I •e ��' a VACA
901_____ a.I w:s \�d�• i --- 27D
o.xg \
2200 2300 lli ,2400 24 --- � 1 "• m m
,u.38 AC s �(Ji 7` '
m , ms '
S
i g°iR
p I
OV hM1
4 g a _ala `.''�f
I 'aq
axes. 24 .xs. Ince 4�, xn a� y3'�ap
EI�1-ZIP
I I
' 4' 2' a WW �g1 81 7i 6 a4 I a y261 4�0o a�o40900 801 -
g�ogo48I W
I
I I !V I 1 $ m
f^ u• i� L
00 ; 5300540 55(5
;
0.24 Ac 1
II \J I qq , I I
31 14' 151 16i 17' 18 �r�t 10' 11' 12 5 j 4i 15i 17 18 N A. 10
;
' N ,
Fl
�..
` THIS MAP IS TO ASSIST LOCATING PROPERTY.
QtLo
CASCADE TITLE CO. ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES 4 2015
n i ,nwrminrvl Llml ur:• mrlr,. I W.. .11rn r IIrer.n I I v nnrnP^ 11 us
Il nIr vI .A r iil -v-., ai lA npm:
tlemn'1e .I n -1 �. I i r nurn yuil ]Onnl n91me Iia
p.1111 X11 co:.:.r.wrw anA nnvir:n.. elnll i tm,I r,vpnmrlI, In I, .ry :Lnnn..r ninrh rnnY 1, nnrrr:..
nmJ, 1 Lten. e. 14. I 1 T,'"" nlnrv.'I.rrr.lnnl.
W IT V➢vG I nd.. 4.— ui a
1 l 11 L I 1 lee !:N.I7�1f.oll
.. -�.. _. �Y �.:L!ti?-✓t.y !r(..:'CMXa.1Nen11
I:nvm I 2
OCT 1 5 2015
Gr;g;nal Submitial W
J2
-
9p
a
P156616NT FOR RIGHT -O .WAY
Pmand in ol, L1orannn "Itho num nr Dn. Dolim (V,:Lpill. ^col V: v'l(nrcnE i. LerebY nclmmd
In lH1
'n1pol n riy6aoEnrnr in hnmby c..mmd�tn ntn./ohd.r 9bnre P:w .."o, c". +nr. nre..orpo.N
lino, ite flnnrreflons nnJ ne Lin. r. n will vLu WILL. to mea rmJ mninlnin nu oletitrie pnva I'mv.
LIuPL..n�. ,.r n,.finl wM1ln lion, etm.,r tFu ablloninq i
n W I r. i s nr, l... I I 'n In' I �.I'na:n rI 1 1111 re.ny
into, ❑11. n 'ler 11Alin :d. 11- I'. po. ... Iloplhnn r..
nnl
Lh I fln 1, 1 1 p I"
__.Nlcla��a.=� Nco-Jph.
11111 NII IM n f urtlr � [.N. i,_..... n. 1• • �o s..
nml rl..., t I ndxr...:.. •,' oy_. /$• M. Iln.%S' �'% /`fie. JE• �¢...._
n i ,nwrminrvl Llml ur:• mrlr,. I W.. .11rn r IIrer.n I I v nnrnP^ 11 us
Il nIr vI .A r iil -v-., ai lA npm:
tlemn'1e .I n -1 �. I i r nurn yuil ]Onnl n91me Iia
p.1111 X11 co:.:.r.wrw anA nnvir:n.. elnll i tm,I r,vpnmrlI, In I, .ry :Lnnn..r ninrh rnnY 1, nnrrr:..
nmJ, 1 Lten. e. 14. I 1 T,'"" nlnrv.'I.rrr.lnnl.
W IT V➢vG I nd.. 4.— ui a
1 l 11 L I 1 lee !:N.I7�1f.oll
.. -�.. _. �Y �.:L!ti?-✓t.y !r(..:'CMXa.1Nen11
I:nvm I 2
OCT 1 5 2015
Gr;g;nal Submitial W
w
STATE OC OREGON
cm,.,oP
t .
31E IT 111513P.M]ipREO Th M M1ip d 9 f 9t
A. D.19....4 h Nr-mr, vhc oaauN� N t lyY FII Mtl7o !hb F�f
poemw11, .,."d'the idthin rmm
J .-i, � __ Immm w t l tl a Identl I I d l '..?:: ._..n•Ln
mnnm,t-1 nod nanmamn�n•d to ma n,da.L ,,xuecntid toa'nmmt (rely noa
IN 1% TNRl WHEISEOE, 1 h"m, 1, "L nnxmy hood und'Nmmial 3.
I;N. nM1ovr
ME
OCT 14 2015
GrigVr�aV Submittal '13`�
jOtd ttttan to Cd" 0�1Ra1'j!- `
ttOtSOn--r
'. the amt cowman of Crit CLRy t! aftm
ua' __, 4ttt ea ar aey oe aR . ` iu a
Com..... tf _.
uvr aftL fM fe�ilnj st"a lu am i
'�eaa, eebsttl
OCT 1 4 2015
Gr;g;aa; Suirjm;,eal w—i�-
Da'Le Received:
OCT 1 4 7015
Grig opal Submittsl____rrt_.._
Da'e Received:
OCT 14 2015
Onginai Submittal '�
... -THIS INDENTURE =E and
mttn£ciQa1 corporation, in Lite county,-OraEre herein.{teTt�-£e
asGrantee.
W I T N E S
That .the Grantors,'for and in consideictimi.-of one dollar to the
herd paid, do hereby grentr bargainySell -and =convey-into.t#ieY
e Perpetual e.sewent . Ip feet'in width, together with.Clie
to go. aeon said taeement area berelneFter d .... Shad for the°.puip
conatppacting,. reconstructing maintaining and using--a-sanicarys
whichlmay hereafter be installed on, the following descr1bednpxop
to -wit
Beginning at the Northwest corner of Lot 1. Block R in the Plat of.. N14o]baJfel
as recorded -;n Vol, 11, page 1, Lane co.nty, Oregon .Piet Records; them S.10
14.0 feet along the etas line of -said Lot I to a point, Thence S. 59°. 53' B
feet. parallel to the nor th'line of said Lot 1MG the cells line o/ said -LotT
Nest Right of Vay tire of 21st street, thence N. 0° 06'. W. 14 feeF 01 oug_ailtl
of Nay line to the Northeast corner o Lot IB thence N. 89° 53' N, 130.0 feet
the n rlh,line of Lot 1, to the Point of Beginning, all 56'the City of, Spring
Lane C ... ty, Oregon.
n: TO HAVE AND To HOLD the above easementfto' the "sait3-Gronte, it.r
and assigns forever.IW :....
:_.T' WdTP1228 r Th`eTcrantors do h reby,&Me and gr&UY'pnifa'
City of Spo-rngfield, A construction . easement of- ,/,r- feet itt cell
along and abutting the .iG rtti aide and for the dD
Et, of .the afo.emeaeloned and 'described peYpeCoal easement or.c-
Paco... of giving a work Nice. during the constroeiion of a sanic
.ewer within the perpetual. easement,
-TO HAVE AND. TD HOLD said conat.ctim eaaement unto the said cit:
Springfield and to its successors and assigns during the cogst ,
of the sanitary sewer. Upon the coastrection of the `$anicaryu e,
its acceptance for use, the construction easement i{�roAs nsmad:,.l
become void. - - k �Mi,zi. 1 ::
INWITNESSW[gSEEOF, the Ltan Cora above named ft '3n cel
hands andseals.thin 2day of CI
— -97ATE OF OREGON
County of �-RHG
as
BE IT REMEMBERED, that
be£.re.me,_the. undersl
OCT 1 4 2015
original Submittal_ V'_' _.
OCT 1 4 2015
—WHEREAS. the Bprleg[lola City Couoeil pceytouol d
-to an Property 4 me City!ef48Pr ag$Id uois} {hPI
Yees�, tveh vbrstlw Is ie he but 3ntaeeet o! me cat �e,on 1
Wt 14,PIme. Sed_p4geame...fw..'s=�--al-0evelopmeo!-eL{h'e+E341
pMeBe. 1ev47 no[1u of me Propoeadhiatnad"�S
YeBegdB-r LIIe apring[leld City Couocll mat in the, (!Dwell C(�mbq�e ,pk d
Clry Yell ea YaMey, iwe 13, .1966, at 7;90 y.m to hut' hey Ub
mu _
to -e propued property vneetiou sed m peioomor'Zwered�. rb �obleh
'YW.,'1FEW0HH, the Springfield City Council aoee'maeies
Beeelw: is 'me Camail fivde that legal naMca of tqH . ly�$¢.<
lawlolly'yabliebed Sed postedt that o0 obJmt{w ape tree 4 e y.
veuttw or ma hearing holds mat w aapafy„d�$LLieor do fever .9 thY"Iof'_
Springfield or lane Cowry er4t5 met the].phorea; Ytll Se..
lnpeired by me ptaperty Vacation end [bili PraPhrty vepatioq '
to me but inteeeec of the V tiie evd taekaeee me beufit of me pi arty;
Involved.
Section 2: She following dueribed public property in ma City of
Springfield U declared'to be veutod: _
} Pnttten of 21st Street w But side ltnm Me
frw—
a9'T
' ""'^'S1i�ismld('4=3r'Poiu�Sn tba Seim lica,'ef Ynt'4 H1oet-L• nim
Ytehelu h4eu, u Platted Sed reeetdsf 4 Pei lid pegs I
Lve Cowry Oeagu P]bt Raeorde >e lade' Cgm{p, pfd
yotee be g 231.4 feee8oum 89e i9� t. C
wma of m. wa lac uj cw meo<q,�� fit' �1P�'g
__ ms wF dine o! tIIe Cowry Bwd er daearibdd e! [$ o!� �
- .. vei$l6 bE_m3'_(eA�Y9ii0tY, lA
-'Otagen 60.3feob to !be trW PHibt o! Yoe n _ a �y;
duoribed vatatlRIIS 6bente eootlnui Yy � t i t•
Wanes Ynfm' loo 02s YnC 69 0 t 4 . ��"Ji��eeF
... Ynttp D9tr S6.9� 9ee�i 0�wepme6 4 t c �-
' e`fh'menim n`"ta it �% ea9q �,,
adtb '6ey°t .9 y0 rriin
-: 40 n"•o-,Ty 26E'laitlY�tha emi4>'�j
. o yoel/eu aF-2Lr'gciut I,�ay,6tb
OCT 14 2015
Gr{girai Submittal...
I137
" '�.Eaftltm'ol 2LF Btda:N.a
Begiwlxjg ae tba .,I. p
-Ebd mlrAelw demdw i1a
J
_
yY
i ..
A public Utility wemwt shall b tetafned'b Cho Cf
P 1u6fleld ..
- y ty-`oP e Y
Door th'e fa11aoin dwribed ate,:
c
Begdening at �ad tovthwt seemed of ,at 1 Black A of 14e bole¢
Gardens flat as iword'ad in Vol. 116 page l� lava Convtyt W gwoe ae
Lana Canty. Crosse; thence youth 0 06t Gime elotlg eke eeaC �liuF''a!,
said lot 14.0 feet, tbense South 390 610 Lar, 9.65feefp ,,ever
l,. Ji
'Borth 34 34 30" West. 16.99 fret; w the, pelut of b9gtmdt:g`t#a13`,'is .
Springfiald, Ina Canty. Oregon. 1
In edditiou thereto, acoeettupcien w $
meat of 16 feet SAIV h hlamg fti,
Sed sbuttleg the South ai6e of the above dettribed perp6tww e. - 4
lig
l -
shell be retained by the City of Springfield' for the purpeee.pe
f fvtaG'
'
rock area during the ewsteuetfan of a aanitary sod a atotm wlYe[ �,'
'`!�;
Wlthiu Ne petyetval w®enti ee;d. awtruorian wemeut-Ca be veidad�- -
upon eoapiation red -eccePtaoee of the asid,e[adm and. aseltary pout*
Sactied 3: It L a'forther condition of '.Chia vwtion thattnething
tentetead An thin ordiddece ebell ewe of degaite the remval-or
ebe
- sbandenment of SW sinter, water nalot Sae min. -conduit oi,do"i
wed F'
or leteoded for on, public oesvlee except by mutual agresmott _p -Webb the '.0 y
- ugenoy boldfng ouch tight etd-the pseperty rents !m wham the=aitlaeto tlW,
vacated property shall vest. - -
Y�' 1'
ewYt : fbe City Bacosdet fe ditwtad to in- I
,.
af.able ,i:}t4 tim b mo County Clark, Leue-aiia Aedeaca W od ,-..
"""-..
...
tam Carob-8enger.
Section 9: Ire Council daclerw that it is macees.7 fay 011e ppptie
welfare red interest that this drdihemoe take affect t®edfa"tNg ip�alj its x�"�a •
peemga and that w aw&ency is declared to exist Gad tLac chfanodia$!%f t -
..
ahell ..fan 1 . ae
by �t1e mpoe. .:
r
-
Y,esed by she Cavwll wed Y"roved by the Lyar of ebe Cffy of 8jfihd'v
field this. Istb day of Jona, 1966.
'
-
a /e/Job-B neCutley- s4�et
..
AVfgBil - Council Weeidbat
/•/ William S. Wenee11
City add order n
..-
02'e Rcce;ved:
OCT 14 2015
Grigiref Suum;ttalU_'h__
Ca e Rocelvec:
OCT 1 4 2015
Crigirai Submittal ---r _
xtcNxAv Sb}iSfa0CP2aH PBPHJi � r fres':
P
p, l9[F SCroet-J IrC 5[ set Section
HCKenzle.YtRl+way. - �:_y
I'n'ca"73erecCon.�i�T.-"-EA@^MnRvi`8g?TPtce'te'treaerlved�bwamli'ie�uoee'rbi�e�'e
and the State of 0 g , by and through Its Crason State Highy Cemt efun and theCt
of Springfield, ycipat corporation, it l hQ eby -agreed that LM1 OregonStab -fg
Conmisslm, Its agep Ls, eIDplayaer, and Ca Lfa t r y.ln[ep the real " t, pY
Reelm 'ate/g
e by the undeiaigned as dese"I ed InE2L=6 Los Cadet, I.ed g rtlrzy
n diatence not to eaceed nap, (5). feet parallei [o the a 1a[ing right of y f�
M=Ranele Highway, to finish alopes�ndf here quof � Zed ern ii ddiiim°aitina°aa°Dy'9•� E ,at .`
provides nrm drainage facilities along the sold highway, end fartM1kr, it is, -hereby: eg
the' the Cill of Springfield, 1 s agents, employees and ... c -1.1s, may ,ent r open
real property after construction to maintain said e(yrn drainage f cilitiez p Sdf as
A
1. The sloso will be fin f in ad in km`lnl Ike ist. a, add will not exceedv
steepness two !21 fee[ horf vane Fto-d�'.e (11 f t tfke K.--
2. BssHng road ep pr.rch.. will be rans drue ted where disturbed. To declb:
with _atteenea sketch map and letterfroh City of Springfield..
]. any net ery —lntenenre of any .,or. drainage facilities Snclatlingaat[
beside installed m grentnr's property for the purpose of-removal.ul.an'
water may be done by the City of Spriepield. The State Highway Colas
w111 not be retion o melntenance. - - __14
4. Sh.uhs or of M1er improaamants within the slope area will be paid for at.'F
5. other
r
n of the work, and any peyaen[s to be made hereunder, the`g
fully release the State Highway Conw(eeaon from any furth
.way lmpro c—ir cowered herein.
Dated:
.Sigo edVA1,L 11L.i��, .
SSA" OP OFMyl0J1Pse
aa�
Cowry J....�9G< ...}J, yam/ }p On
M e, me sed MnF..L.
duir Main. did ear Ifi_ _ M, flw
teenssat.
_Pre�Od
IA wllla'shad Cmpaeellory std aAelllw auf Jfirtl to Walimh,mima l fee b.: alaFbd
son,wewe yawMm ,py vGma and awed 1w6eifpl eefdC aanra 6:d+fi4it
ar ou.aedgr......... ..
_._
aWmn /Md'fnw act and deed d add CarptwaN
'i,x irc TWTMQirr IPRBRPOP ra... Imaunta rat rn.aa.,
� "^`+o ofna f sed a4 f ma�m4 M
—
ame
a T— r r
—U1 1 4 2015
Originai Submittal
Grlyinal Submiftal__(6qll.' __.
store: 6F..Michigan, l'"herelnaftei'Yef ired"t
CITY OE''SPRINGEIELD,:n mu nacipal''corporat
hereinafter xaferfe3 to a9 cityl`
INCONSIDERATION for the "face 1pt oPS
the Issuance''of an occupancypermit £or'th
on the property more particularly describe
Exhibit "A," attached hereto and'-incbrpoia
Owner agrees as follows:
1. At the time that that portion of
to the south of the real property or. a.
not Porth in Exhibit "A" is improved, Owm
landscaping more particularly describedia
"B," attached hereto and incorporated here
i. At the time that that portion of
to the east of the real property more,?pati
set forth in Exhibit "A" is improved;:Ovni
landscaping more particularly descilb 4:
"B," attached hereto and incorperatedlhen
3. It is the intention of thep5ifit
ments and covenants herein contained by <,tl
the land h..r^in described, and sh ll.be;b.
gay OLF: aP'+In pe, dim±.ni,9 tcdt0 d'se�
hereto, and shall he canstrued4to be a;tie
OCT 1 4 2015
Gny nai Submittal—Se`
%ae ��:ec2rvea':
OCT 14 2015
Gdy;naV Suu�nlial
Da'Le Reoo;ved:
OCT 1 4 2015
CrIgirmf Subcrii;to L.
GCT 14 2055
Gr6irci Gubn;,ai�
uC i 14 2015
D2'tO Received:
OCT I a 2015
Griginai SubmiBal w
Du'to Rccvlvec:
OCT 14 2U15
Gr;g;r,alSubmiiwl_ �p
After Recording Return To:
Planning Department
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Send All Tax Statements To:
Springfield Eagles Lodge
PO Box 656
Springfield, OR 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk NORM
oOe /106�[E
Lane County Deeds and Reoorde gN J�
III IIIIIIIII III 111111111111111 $46.00
007766702001100062980030037
0112712006 01:10:36 PM
RPR-RGRE Cnt=1 Stn=1 CRSHIER 04
829.00 $10.00 811.00
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT
PARTIES:
On The Way Inc. Owner of the real property more particularly
An Oregon not for profit corporation described and set forth in Exhibit A.
hereinafter"On The Way". -
Springfield Fraternal Order of Eagles
An Oregon Fraternal Organization
hereinafter "Eagles Lodge".
RECITALS:
Owner of the real property more particularly
described and set forth in Exhibit B.
A. On The Way Inc., as Applicant, has applied for change of use approval to allow for a
former antique store to be used as a church under City of Springfield Journal No.
ORC2005-00079.
B. Eagles Lodge has a developed property with parking lot immediately to the west of the
site owned by On The Way.
C. The City of Springfield has issued a Tentative Site Plan Approval, with conditions in
response to On The Way's site plan submission. Condition #1 of the City of Springfield's
Tentative Site Plan Approval for On The Way requires the Applicant to provide additional
parking in accordance with Section 1 B.070(8) of the Springfield Development Code.
Where parking cannot be accommodated on the site, the City may allow parking
provided via shared parking agreements.
D. The following described shared parking agreement appertains to and serves the Eagles
Lodge site and building and the On The Way site and building.
THIS SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT IS MADE UNDER THE FOLLOWING TERMS:
General:
On The Way and Eagles Lodge create this shared parking agreement. This agreement
and obligations created hereunder shall run with the land and burden and benefit all
existing and subsequent owners of the properties described in Exhibits A and B, their
at'e received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -1- OCT 14 2015
Original swrilival '
representatives, heirs, successors, assigns in perpetuity. Future owners shall be bound
by all terms of these agreements. However, this agreement may be amended from time
to time upon unanimous agreement of the property owners and the City of Springfield
and recording such amendment in Lane County Oregon Deed Records; or, terminated
by the City of Springfield if the City, in its discretion, determines such shared parking is
no longer needed and in such event the City shall record Notice of its termination in
Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
2. Shared Parking:
The Eagles Lodge and On The Way sites are designated as Community Commercial
uses. Non-exclusive use of and access to the common parking lots is hereby granted to
all users, owners, permittees, employees and invitees of Eagles Lodge and On The Way
subject to the following conditions:
a. Eagles Lodge will provide a minimum of 10 parking spaces that will be made
available to On The Way subject to the terms of this agreement;
b. On The Way will provide a minimum of 10 parking spaces that will be made
available to Eagles Lodge subject to the terms of this agreement;
c. On The Way may use the parking on the Eagles Lodge property to the extent
that such parking is available, and does not, or will not result in inadequate
parking available to Eagles Lodge;
d. Eagles Lodge may use the parking on the On The Way property to the extent
that such parking is available, and does not, or will not result in inadequate
parking available to On The Way;
e. Eagles Lodge and On The Way shall work together to coordinate events in order
to effect the terms of this shared parking. In the event the coordination of a
particular date cannot be obtained, Eagles Lodge and On The Way shall utilize
other measures to provide adequate parking. Such measures may include but
not be limited to public transportation, ride sharing, and exploration of other
parking options such as shared parking with Paramount Center.
4. Indemnification and Liability Insurance:
Each properly owner agrees to indemnify and hold the other parcel owner harmless from
any and all liability arising out of any act or omission with regard to the maintenance and
use of the shared parking lot and appurtenances thereto caused by said property owner
or owner employees, tenants, invitees, patrons, or permittees. Each parcel owner shall
procure at its own expense a policy of liability insurance protecting parcel owners from
any claims or liabilities arising out of maintenance and use of the common parking and
their appurtenant structures. Such policies shall provide coverage in a commercially
reasonable amount as agreed upon by the parcel owners from time to time. In no event
may the coverage be less than 1 million dollars, single limit.
5. Disputes
This agreement may be enforced by any of the property owners or by the City of
Springfield by any remedy available at law and equity. The property owner shall be
entitled to recover monetary damage they sustain as a result of violation of the
agreement in addition to the equitable relief for such violation.
Dene Received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -2-
OCT 14 2015
Onginai Submittal Yfft
Any dispute among the property owners concerning or related to this agreement or
obligation created hereunder. shall be settled In arbitration before a single arbitrator
using the rules of Commercial Arbitration of The American Arbitration Association or in
accordance with ORS 36.300 et. seq. (1997) or any similar successor statute, whichever
process is selected by the party initiating the arbitration. Arbitration shall occur in Lane
County Oregon. A party substantially prevailing in the arbitration shall also be entitled to
recover such amounts for its costs and attorney fees incurred in connection with the
arbitration, which shall be deterrnined by the arbitrator. The arbitrator's award may be
entered into any court having jurisdiction. Nothing herein has or shall prevent a parcel
owner from a resort to a court of competent jurisdiction in those instances where
injunctive relief may be appropriate.
Springfield Eagles Lodge
By:
STATE OF OREGON)
) ss.
County of Lane )
Personally appeared , who slated that he/she is the
of Spri field Eagles Lodge and ackn wledged the foregoing
mij
is/ r voluntary act and deed this 2'3 day of ZQK-
L gEgLANT4W eC -OREGONl"Eoseux�rZ Notary Public for Oregon:
& ooe My Commission Expires:
On The Way, Inc.--��
�y
STATE OF OREGON)
)as.
County of Lane ) //
IPersonaLlIly appeared Lahe4/.NO_ M. 41115 who stated that he/she is the
FPSiTeof On The Way, In and acknowledged the foregoing
instrument to be his/her voluntary act and deed this day of L44- , 200).61
Eq
Notary Public for Oregon:�
sus y Commission Expires: O
OFFICIAL SEAL
LIARIA L SANTIAGO -
NOTARY POaLIC- OREGON
COMM19310N NO.358313
MVCWSIY '5LP18'
Daie received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -3- OCT 1 4 2015
Cr ginai Submittal_j'W
EXHIBIT A
� I
t000 ,00i; noxi N
£r 10 On The Way Inc.
;�, e(s�'��j: B Iw1�l �l
I; l;
—McKENZIE _ I S""=I
oao'—,
uw I xl tF�jV i` F,r e�' i_��„1e111II,1 I
Property Description
Lot 1, Block A, NICHOLAS GARDENS, as platted and recorded in Volume 11, Page 1, Lane.
County Oregon Plat Records, in Lane County, Oregon; ALSO beginning at the Southwest
corner of Lot C in Block A in said NICHOLAS GARDENS, said Southwest corner of Lot C also
being the Southwest comer of the original plat of Nicholas Gardens, run thence North 00 06'
West along the West line of Lot C, 122.0 feet to the Southwest comer of said Lot 1, Block A,
thence South 890 53' East along the South line of said Lot 1. 86.5 feet, thence Northeasterly
along said Lot 1, 70.0 feet to a point 40.0 feet South On 06' East of the Northeast corner of said
Lot 1, Block A, thence South B90 53' East 33.5 feet; thence South 210 57' East along the West
line of County Road as described in Volume 258, Page 216, Lane County Oregon Deed
Records, in Lane County, Oregon, 98.1 feet: thence South 0° 06' East 84.0 feet to the South
line of said Lot C, thence North 89° 53' West along the said South line of Lot C, 201.0 feet to the
point of beginning, in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
TOGETHER with that portion of vacated 21° Street inuring to said lot by Ordinance #2137,
recorded July 7, 1966, Reception No. 53197, Oficial Records of Lane County, Oregon;
Beginning at the angle point in the East line of Lot 1, Block A, of the Nicholas Gardens Plat;
thence North 0° 06' West, along the East line of the said Lot 1, 40.0 feet to the Northeast comer
thereof; thence South 34° 14' 30" East 48.54 feet to a point on the North line of Lot C; and
thence North 89' 53' West, parallel to the North line of Main Street, 27.5 feet to the Point of
Beginning.
Date Received:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -4-
OCT 14 2015
Crig;raf Guam"rtai_. 5'1r'�
EXHIBIT B
1 ,zooms
m
aaoo
t=
ID]t
I�f'f 1f C0
N
_
,
em
awvi
_i\j�
zeoo t..
tt7 ✓;�� �,�'� to
a °I Earw
E g 199
c'rsm-r,
......-.!_McKENZIE
'
- - •
----a
I
bpo vl ' W
1 1 1 9i ar
'' ar�'
�'
I
- W ori l Y, ., - a
e v W a 6 1 v r
Iv 1' �'
W
¢
I
I r
Property Description
Easterly portion of the East one-half (%z) of the West one-half ('h) of Lot 24 of the H.L. & T.B.
Stewart's Plat Number 2 of Acreage Lots as platted and recorded in Volume 3, Page 36, Lane
County Oregon Plat Records, being a part of the James Ebbert Jr. Donation Land Claim
Number 74, Township 17 South, Range 3 West of the Willamette Meridian and being described
as follows: Beginning at a point on the North right-of-way line of Main Street, said point being
41.52 feet South 89° 43'3r East of the West line of said East %z of the West % of Lot 24, as it
intersects with the North right-of-way line of Main Street; Running thence North Oo 18' 46" East
164.12 feet, said line running along the West face of the West wall of the Raintree Tavern;
thence South 891 43' 37" East 9.775 feet; thence South 0' 00'20" West 164.16 feet to the North
right-of-way line of Main Street; thence along said right-of-way line North 890 43' 37" West
10.655 feet to the point of beginning, in Lane County, Oregon.
Date RCcaived:
SHARED PARKING AGREEMENT Page -5- OCT 1 y 2015
Gric�il'lal SubmifYal__D>r! - _
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND
ADOPTING A SEVERABILTIY CLAUSE
ACCOMPANIED BY THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk 107-081012Lane County Deeds and Records
111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 $426.00
12107/2007 01:49:16111
RPR-ORON C.L=1 Stnvl CASHIER 05
$415.00 $11.00
Dai'e ReceiveG:
OCT 14 2015
Originai Suhmittal�_�
li k�r1
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND
ADOPTING A SEVERABILTIY CLAUSE
ACCOMPANIED BY THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
AFTER RECORDING PLEASE RETURN TO:
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
Division of Chief Deputy Clerk
Lane County Deeds and Records 37402
IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1ll11ll11l11l $426.00
00961788200700810420830830 1210712007 01;49:16 PM
RPR-0RON Cnt=1 Stn_1 CASHIER 05
$415.00 811.00
DaiC Received:
OCT 1 4 2015
Original Submittal_pyy-�
Ordinance No. 6210 (General)
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE SPRINGFIELD DOWNTOWN URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN AND REPORT; AND ADOPTING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE
WHEREAS, the Common Council has determined that there is need for a Downtown
Urban Renewal Plan for the following reasons: 1) The existence of inadequate streets, -
rights of way, open spaces, recreation facilities, and utilities (including, for example,
storm water systems and sanitary sewer trunk lines and laterals); 2) the existence of
buildings and structures for industrial, commercial, and residential use with problematic
exterior spacing, design, and physical construction (including obsolescence, deterioration
and mixed character of uses); 3) Properties and lots in irregular form, shape and
dimensions limiting usefulness and development; 4) Lack of proper utilization of areas -
resulting in a stagnant and unproductive condition of lands potentially useful and
valuable for contributing to the public health, safety, and welfare; and 5) Economic
deterioration and disuse of property.
WHEREAS, given the preceding information, the area within the Downtown Urban Renewal
Plan boundary is blighted;
' WHEREAS, the rehabilitation and redevelopment outlined in the Downtown Urban
Renewal Plan, incorporated herein by reference, is necessary to protect the public health,
safety or welfare of the municipality;
WHEREAS, the 2001 Springfield Charter, Section 49, requires voter approval before the
City Council can approve an Urban Renewal District Plan that includes allocating
property taxes;
WHEREAS, Ballot Measure 20-131 presented to the voters of the City of Springfield on -
November 6, 2007 for their approval of the question of the allocation of such taxes before
the City Council approval of any Urban Renewal Plan;
WHEREAS, the results of that election approved Ballot Measure 20-131 so that the City Council
may comply with the provisions of Section 49 of the 2001 Springfield Charter and state law,
WHEREAS, Oregon law also requires that adoption of an Urban Renewal Plan be
approved by the City Council in the jurisdiction included in the Urban Renewal District;
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield is a municipal corporation organized
and existing under and pursuant to the laws of the State of Oregon and the 2001
Springfield Charter;
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2004, the City transferred its authority to exercise the powers of the
urban renewal agency to the Springfield Economic Development Agency in accordance with
OAR 457.055 and all duties and obligations of the urban renewal agency within thejurisdiction
of the City were thereafter assumed by the Springfield Economic Development Agency.
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council, the governing body of the municipality, Daie 'McCONeri.
received the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report from the Springfield
OCT 1 4 2015
Crigtnal suomdtai IM
Economic Development Agency, the City's urban renewal agency;
WHEREAS, the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report was forwarded to the
governing body of each affected taxing district and the Springfield Economic Development
Agency has consulted and conferred with those taxing bodies;
WHEREAS, Notice was sent out to the electors registered in Springfield and within
the proposed Downtown Urban Renewal Plan area on or about November 9, 2007, that the
Springfield City Council would conduct a Public Hearing on November 19, 2007, at 7:00 p.m. in
the Springfield City Council Chambers of Springfield City Hall, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield,
OR 97477;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was conducted on November 19 and testimony received on an
ordinance adopting the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, the boundaries of which are shown on
the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan map;
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report meets
the content requirements for urban renewal plans as described in ORS 457.085;
. WHEREAS, the maximum indebtedness that can be incurred under the proposed
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is $43,010,000;
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council determines and finds that the urban renewal
plan conforms to the Eugene -Springfield. Metropolitan Area General Plan which is the
comprehensive plan for the City of Springfield and which provides policy direction for
economic and land me development within the city;
WHEREAS, Section 1200 of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan specifies that SEDA will
provide relocation assistance and housing for displaced persons within their financial means in
accordance with ORS 35.500 to 35.530 and, except in the relocation of elderly or disabled
individuals, without displacing persons already on priority waiting lists for existing federally
subsidized housing;
WHEREAS, if acquisition of real property is necessary, it will be provided for through
later amendments to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan as specified in Section 900(C)(1),
which requires approval of property acquisitions for the purposes specified in Section 700(A) of
the Plan by resolution of the Springfield Economic Development Agency and the Common
Council;
WHEREAS, adoption and carrying out of the urban renewal plan is economically sound
and feasible based on the information included in the Report incorporated in the Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield, as the governing municipality of the Plan, assumes
and shall complete any activities prescribed it by the urban renewal plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BASED ON THE FOREGOING RECITALS THE
COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, ORDAINS AS OCT 1 1{ 2015
FOLLOWS:
Cdg�rai Submitial �__ _
ORDINANCE NO. 6210
SECTION 1. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING AN URBAN
RENEWAL PLAN ALLOCATING TAXES FROM DOWNTOWN PROPERTIES
TO THE DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN. The Common Council of the
City hereby approves the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report set forth in Exhibit A,
allocating taxes from downtown area properties to the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan.
SECTION 2: ADOPTION OF THE STAFF REPORT. The Staff Report attached
hereto as Exhibit B, and the findings and determinations contained therein, are incorporated herein
by reference and are hereby adopted.
SECTION 3. NOTICE OF ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE. Within 4 days of
the adoption of this Ordinance approving the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan, notice of this action
shall be published in the Register Guard, the newspaper having the greatest circulation within the
City of Springfield and published nearest to the City of Springfield.
SECTION 4. ADDITIONAL AUTHORIZATIONS. The City Manager, the City
Recorder, the City Finance Director, and the City Attorney, and each of them acting individually,
are hereby authorized, empowered and directed, for and on behalf on the City, to carry out the
purposes and intent of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan.
SECTION 5. EFFECTIVE DATE OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall take effect
after its second reading and upon its adoption at a regular meeting of the Common Council of the
City and approval by the Mayor.
SECTION 6. SEVERABILITY CLAUSE. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court
of competent jurisdiction, that portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent
provision and that holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion of this Ordinance.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield by a vote of 5 for and
1 against, this 26ttday of November , 2007.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield, this 26th daytpf November
2007.
ATTEST:
4Mayorp
City Record4j
MIRED i "' HVtED
DATE:
OFFICE OF CIIV 1:I 1 O11NEY OCT 14 2015
ORDINANCE NO. 6210
Downtown Urban
Renewal Plan
Part One:
RENEWAL PLAN
Part Two:
REPORT ON THE PLAN
Springfield Oregon
November 26, 2007
Date RcceivMu:
OCT 1 � 2015
!
110
!
DOWNTOWN URBAN RENEWAL PLAN
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This urban renewal plan and report was prepared with funding assistance from the City of
Springfield. Springfield citizens participated in 2 townhalls leading to the preparation of
the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan and Report.
Staff Assistance
Gino Grimaldi, City Manager
Jeff Towery, Assistant City Manager
William Grile, Development Services Director
John Tamulonis, Community Development Manager
Mark Metzger, Planning Supervisor
Courtney Gdesel, Planner
Urban Renewal Consultant
Charles Kupper, Spencer & Kupper
Date Received:
Dowraown Urban Renewal Plan OCT 111 2015
Nwe.be 26, 1007 Z
GiIGAUi
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan
Table of Contents
100. The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan 4
200. Citizen Participation 5
300. Relationship to Local Objectives 7
400.
Proposed Land Uses
12
500.
Outline of Development
14
600.
Description of Potential Projects to be Undertaken
16
700.
Property Acquisition Procedures
22
800,
Property Disposition and Redevelopers' Obligations
23
900.
Amendments to the Urban Renewal Plan
24
1000. Maximum Indebtedness 25
1100. Financing Methods 26
1200. Relocation 26
1300. Definitions 27
Exhibit 1 -Boundary Map and Legal Description 29
Exhibit 2 -Zoning Map and Plan Diagram 36
Appendix 1 38
Appendix 2 42
Dade deceived.
Do WM . flrhan Renewal Plan
Nowmber26.1007 3 OCT 1 4 2015
ofim ouo �, —
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW — TYPE 2
SPRINGFIELD
W ok
Application Type
❑ Site Plan Review Completeness Check
❑ Site Plan Review Submittal
F Final Site Plan Submittal
Required Project Information (Applicant:
Applicant Name: S. R. Yett
Complete this Section)
Phone: (541) 344-6781
Company: Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
Email: permits@sryett.com
Address: P.O. Box 26125, Eugene, OR 97402
Applicant's Rep: Carl Sherwood, AIA
Phone: (541) 342-8077
Company: Robertson Sherwood Architects pc
Email: cshemoodOmbertwnshemood.com
Address: 132 East Broadway, Suite 540 Eugene, OR 97401
Property Owner: S. R. Yett
Phone: (541) 344-6781
company:Gobrecht Dollar, LLC
Email: permits@sryett.com
Address: P.O. Box 26125, Eugene, OR 97402
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-36-42
TAX LOT NO(S):2500
Property Address (if applicable): 130 21 st Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Size of Property:0.89
n Sq.eFt.
Units Per Acre:
Proposed Project Name: Silly Billies Child Care
Proposal: Adjustment of use for 1,665 sf of the building from Mercantile to Educational
Existing use: Mercantile
New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): no change
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff:
Associated Applications:
Complete This Section)
Placard:
Case No:
Date:
Reviewed By:
Application Fee: $
Tech Fee: $
Notice Fee: $
TOTAL FEE: $
PROJECT NO:
Owner
• I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm the information
Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the
Information will not be provided If not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may
begin processing the application with the Information as submitted. This statement serves as
written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application.
Owner: Date: Je•e 2t, 2023
Signa ure
S. R. Yeti
Print
Owner:
Signature
Print
Date:
Type 2 - Site Plan Review Application Process
A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when
evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are
uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the
imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval
standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)).
B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing,
unless appealed. AType 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below,
unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3
decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.600. (SDC
5.1.415(B)).
C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an
identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC
5.1.215(B)(2)).
1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting
• The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed
development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing
by the City. A complete application is required for the review process.
• The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220
and 5.17.115 are met.
• A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications.
• Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of
application submittal.
• The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist
provided in this form below.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the
Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
• The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist
specifying items required to make the application complete.
• The applicant has 160 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city;
a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 160 days.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application
• The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220,
the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code
(SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below.
• An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405.
• A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed,
is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the
applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments
are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or
development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable.
Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
Please Note: • All the following items MUST be submitted.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific
application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative.
• When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an
applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of
the submitted materials.
O Site Plan Review Application Form
❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula.
O An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at
the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 pages).
O Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document
N/A ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application
N/A ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an
application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a
copy of the application upon request.
N/A ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet
One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal:
F Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements
in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the
necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225,
Acceptance of Application.
Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City
to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are
not necessarily required to be detailed construction level
documents
The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land
use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City
Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan.
Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any
requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon
Administrative Regulation.
O General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A).
F Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required
by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or
other qualified professional as determined by the Director;
R] Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized
appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to
the approval standards;
R1 Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision;
R] Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County
assessor's tax map and lot number;
R1 Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most
recently recorded deed;
R1 Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that
assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and
Z Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet.
O Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(8)). The application must include an existing
site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a
distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries:
R1 The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area;
R1 Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten
percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent;
R] The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways,
rights-of-way, and easements;
R1 Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State
as having a potential for geologic hazards;
R] Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey
of Lane County;
❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams,
surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource
regulatory agencies as requiring protection;
N/A ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all
watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and
their riparian areas;
N/A ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the
latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision;
R] The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the
Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department;
R1 Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage
ways, canals and ditches;
N/A ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper
(diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and
N/A ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources
O Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)).
o The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area;
R] Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any,
which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed
development;
Z The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities,
pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a
distance of 150 feet;
R1 Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings;
o Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and
o Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture,
and similar improvements
O Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a
utility and improvement plant that shows:
R1 The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within
or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and
paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status;
Z Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights,
power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities;
R] The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails;
F The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site
including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains,
power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet,
and television cable, etc.;
N/A ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and
R1 The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications
0 Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)).
R] Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines;
N/A ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls,
decks, patios, shelters, and play areas;
N/A ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping;
7
N/A ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110;
N/A ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater
treatment facilities;
N/A ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in
SDC 4.4.100;
N/A ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140;
N/A ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used;
N/A ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and
proposed plant materials (at time of planting);
N/A ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is
first; and
N/A ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4. 100
O Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)).
R] The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking
spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and
striping;
R] The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and
bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas;
R1 Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be
closed;
Z On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all
proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached.
N/A ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of
illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light
source;
Z The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces;
R1 The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the
proposed use;
N/A ❑ The location of off-street loading areas;
R1 Existing and proposed transit facilities;
N/A ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has
frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and
N/A ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when
required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4).
O Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)).
N/A ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area;
8
N/A ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
N/A ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns;
N/A ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds;
stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and
N/A ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours
N/A ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if
phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development,
including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115.
Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the
various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not
limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval
Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments,
and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC
5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development.
O Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting
how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC
5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards.
O Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed
restrictions or covenants.
O Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional
information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's
expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may
be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with
approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following
items:
N/A ❑ Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved;
N/A ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site
Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane
County.
N/A ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance
with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of
Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in
compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such
systems exist on the properties affected by the development.
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE-DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210:
The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the
applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards.
o Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the
past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances.
N/A ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact
Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and
needed mitigation measures.
N/A ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC
4.7.360, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable).
N/A ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties
located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited
Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries
of WQLW.
N/A ❑ Geotechnical Report. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area
has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer.
N/A ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district,
address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives.
N/A ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development,
including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less
intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor
plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable
standards.
N/A ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed,
a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100.
N/A ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department
of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the
property.
N/A ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application
has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of
the application upon request.
N/A ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or
excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration
permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield
Municipal Code 6.416.
10
N/A ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or
Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided.
N/A ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of
application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside
of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by
sanitary sewer.
11
SPRINGFIELD
225 FIFTH STREET
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
N/A - requirement waived FAX: 541.726.1021
Q www.spdngrnm-or.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
----------- — (Area helm this b'neJUIed outbyApplica n) -- —
(Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprrngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov
Project Name: Silly Billies Child Care Applicant: Robertson Sherwood Architects lx:
Assessors Parcel #: 17-03-36-42 LOT 2500 Date: 6/21/23
Land Use(s): Mercantile/Educational Phone #: (541) 342-6077
Project Size (Acres): 0.69 Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area:
35,962 sf Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Existing building = 13,489 SF, of which a planned conversion of 1,665 SF Mercantile space to Child
Care Center (Educational). No changes to building envelope or existing impervious surfaces.
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
No changes to existing impervious surfaces.
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
New sidewalk drains into existing landscape area.
(Area below this line rdkd and by the City and Aetmned to the Aaaheand
(At a nunimmte5 all boxes checked by the City on the front and back oftks sheet shall be subnutted
or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, although other requirements nay, be ne essor .
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone:
❑ Wedand/Riparian:
❑ Soil Type:
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Other Jurisdictions
Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
r Bmedupon the h for nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndudnnot of uvh w it merkdfor on
application to be complete for subndttol with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprinoeld
Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Ergtreering DesignA3mma1. Connphance with these requirements does not constitute site
appromol, Additional site specific Information may be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been
signed in the spare provickd below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
P
L F_ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stommater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
GWhere required, vegetative storscater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Storscater Management Manual.
r7 J For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
^ by the Eugene Stommater Management Manual (Sec2A.1).
F7 If a storscater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stommater Management Manual.
JF7 Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
F^
IJ All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment orweather resistant enclosure.
r^
J
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
I
^
LI
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
F7M
❑
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event.
Private stommater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommatm flows from one property to
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review ofDownstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03A.0
r—
F-1
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
-I
E]
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
E ❑ Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 90,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscellaneous
F7
n
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑
C
Private stommater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommatm flows from one property to
another.
r—
F-1
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
thewebsite: hum/Avww. deo.state.or.us/wo/uic/uic.htm for more information.
JF7
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*Thisform shN1 be inchukd m nn Ntnchmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormwnkr sbuty.
* IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN'
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommwater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
Pre -Certification Consultation -Certified Center
Pagel of 2
Date of Visit
10/24/22
Facility Name
Telephone Number
Silly Billies Springfield
541-606-2919
Facility Address
Facility Email Address
130 21st St. Springfield, OR
sillybillieschildcare@gmail.com
Contact Name
Telephone Number (if different from above)
Mandy Johnson
x
Rules Discussed:
x
0010(12)
Building codes and zoning requirements
x
0010(8)
Floor plan submission
x
0070(6)
Enrollment in the central background registry
x
0080
Director qualifications
x
0090
Teacher qualifications
x
0013
Inspections including fire and sanitation
x
0205
Lead
x
0190
Location and quantity of toilets and handwashing sinks
x
0150
Space and equipment requirements for outdoor activity area
x
0130
Caregiver -to -child ratios and group size
x
0010
Application: required documents and fee
Specific
to Infant and Toddlers:
x
0140
Determining capacity
x
0190(5)
Location of changing tables and handwashing sinks
Capacity for center care is defined as: the total number of children allowed in the center at any one time, based on the available indoor
and outdoor square footage, the number of toilets in the center and the number of qualified staff.
Calculation of Activity Area and Capacity
Sq. Ft.
Planned Use
Abe
Range
Available at
All Times
Potential
Capacity
yes
No
Room 1
1582.33
to be divided into 2 classroom and indoor gym space
x
18
Room 2
Room 3
Room 4
Room 5
Room 6
Number of toilets 1
(1:15 children 36 mo. or older):
Number of hand washing sinks
(1:2toilets): 1
Outdoor Activity Area Qsq. ft per child):
Sq. ft. = children
/�rxpaai, SrA.ai6(ai
SigiiS[ur� Licensings list
2022
Date
CUAW a 5/221N..2
Comments
Left CC packet#2
Discussed:
Planning and Zoning in process
Application process, call with questions ie: packet documents
Health and Fire inspections to be complete prior to initial OCC inspection
GS will contact to schedule initial visit
Space used outside of center business hours not needed to operate under cc rule
Diaper changing table placement for supervision
Gates in front of garage door to meet safety requirements, more info
Kitchen space not required at this time, refrigerator for bottles only
Potential in the future for older age/group size if need changes
Follow up information concerning mixing of age group/family similar to Relief Nursery exception
Entry space, indoor large motor space
Exception for outdoor play space
M-tm a s/2ZIN..z