Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 6/22/2023City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW - TYPE 2 ❑ Site Plan Review Completeness Check ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal SPRINGFIELD shh" Li r ME J•LC rlall .7UU1111LLa1 Required Project Information Applicant Name: JA jk-Z (Applicant: t�Ca Complete this Section) Phone: Company: Email: b Address: � a lin t 4 d R, (l7 M Applicant's Rep: Phone: Company: 5,� z Email: S k M Address: Property Owner: Phone: — Company: -- Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: TAX LOT NO(S): Property Address (if applicable): Size of Property: L7 Acres n Sq. Ft. Units Per Acre: Proposed Project Name: Proposal: _ c�1� a a K, e– ao ✓L Existing Use: f-7fc��r lei- -S("' C'.1. �Lw New Impervious Area (Sq. Ft.): Required Associated Applications: Placard: Case No: Date: Reviewed By: Application Fee: $ Tech Fee: $ Notice Fee: $ TOTAL FEE: $ PROJECT NO: 1 Owner Signature(s) • I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. t Owner: &jg r Date: Sig atur Print Owner: Signature Print Date: Type 2 — Site Plan Review Application Process A. A Type 2 application involves the Director's interpretation and exercise of discretion when evaluating approval standards. Uses or development evaluated through this process are uses that are conditionally permitted or allowed after Director review that may require the imposition of conditions of approval to ensure compliance with development and approval standards. (SDC 5.1.415(A)). B. A Type 2 decision is made by the Director after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed. A Type 2 application is reviewed according to the procedures below, unless the Director determines that the application should be reviewed as a Type 3 decision. A Type 2 decision may be appealed according to SDC 5.1.800. (SDC 5.1.415(8)). C. When application materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. (SDC 5.1.215(B)(2)). 1. Site Plan Review Completeness Check Meeting • The purpose of the completeness check meeting is to determine whether the proposed development application is complete prior to acceptance of the application for processing by the City. A complete application is required for the review process. • The completeness check meeting will examine if the submittal standards of SDC 5.1.220 and 5.17.115 are met. • A completeness check meeting is required for all Type 2 and 3 land use applications. • Completeness Check Meetings are typically held within five to seven working days of application submittal. • The application must conform with Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the SDC 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided in this form below. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Completeness Check Meeting • The applicant, owner, and associated design team are strongly encouraged to attend the Completeness Check meeting, however it is not required. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Case Planner provides the applicant with a Completeness Check Meeting Checklist specifying items required to make the application complete. • The applicant has 180 days to submit a complete Site Plan Review application to the city; a second Completeness Check meeting is required after the 180 days. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application 3 • The application must conform with the Application Submittal Standards in SDC 5.1.220, the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.17.155, and the Checklist provided below. • An application will be reviewed for completeness in accordance with SDC 5.1.405. • A Type 2 decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 12 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official, as applicable. 4 Type 2 - Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist Please Note: . All the following items MUST be submitted. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why in the attached narrative. • When application or appeal materials are over 20 pages in length, an applicant must provide an identical electronic version and hard copy of the submitted materials. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Application Fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. ❑ An electronic copy of all application materials (USB drive or other) submitted at the time of application (if total submittal package is over 20 -pages). ❑ Proof of ownership, e.g., deed or other recorded document ❑ Concurrent applications where a proposal involves more than one (1) application ❑ State or Federal Permit Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Stormwater Scoping Sheet One (1) Hard Copy of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ Application materials must be submitted as required below in addition to the requirements in SDC 5.1.220, Application Submittal Standards. Applications that do not include all the necessary information may be deemed incomplete in accordance with SDC 5.1.225, Acceptance of Application. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or in part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. ❑ General Requirements. See SDC 5.17.115(A). 5 ❑ Be prepared by a design professional, licensed in the state of Oregon, when required by state law, such as an engineer, architect, landscape architect, land surveyor, or other qualified professional as determined by the Director; ❑ Be drawn to scale with the scale indicated on the plans, and the scale sized appropriately for the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan related to the approval standards; ❑ Include a north arrow and date of preparation and/or revision; ❑ Provide the physical address of the subject property, if applicable, and the County assessor's tax map and lot number; ❑ Provide the names and addresses of all persons listed as owners on the most recently recorded deed; ❑ Provide the name, address, email address, and telephone number of any person that assisted in preparing the application materials or plans; and ❑ Show the size of the property and development area in acres or square feet. ❑ Existing Conditions Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(6)). The application must include an existing site conditions plan that shows, for the entire property and the surrounding property to a distance of 150 feet from the subject property boundaries: ❑ The property boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Topographic contour lines at one -foot intervals for slopes equal to or less than ten percent and at two -foot intervals for slopes greater than ten percent; ❑ The location and width of all public and private streets, drives, sidewalks, pathways, rights-of-way, and easements; ❑ Potential natural hazard areas, including areas mapped by the City, County, or State as having a potential for geologic hazards; ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; ❑ Resource areas, including wetlands on the City's Local Wetlands Inventory, streams, surface mines, and wildlife habitat identified by the City or any natural resource regulatory agencies as requiring protection; ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow, and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their riparian areas; ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department; I? ❑ Features, including existing structures, pavement, large rock outcroppings, drainage ways, canals and ditches; ❑ The location, size and species of trees and other vegetation having a caliper (diameter) of six inches or greater at four feet above grade; and ❑ Locally or federally designated historic and cultural resources ❑ Proposed Site Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(C)). ❑ The proposed development site, including boundaries, dimensions, and gross area; ❑ Existing site features, including trees, identified on the site analysis map, if any, which are proposed to be retained, removed, or modified by the proposed development; ❑ The location and dimensions of all existing and proposed structures, utilities, pavement, and other improvements on the site and adjacent to the site for a distance of 150 feet; ❑ Setback dimensions for all existing and proposed buildings; ❑ Loading and service areas for waste disposal, loading, and delivery; and ❑ Outdoor recreation spaces, common areas, plazas, outdoor seating, street furniture, and similar improvements ❑ Utility and Improvement Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(D)). The application must include a utility and improvement plant that shows: ❑ The name and location of all existing and proposed public and private streets within or on the boundary of the proposed development site including the right-of-way and paving dimensions, and the ownership and maintenance status; ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, streetlights, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities; ❑ The location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails; ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and communications connections including cable, internet, and television cable, etc.; ❑ The proposed connection points of the proposed utilities; and ❑ The location and size of existing and proposed easement and public dedications ❑ Landscape Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(E)). ❑ Existing and proposed building and pavement outlines; ❑ The location and dimensions of existing and proposed terraces, retaining walls, decks, patios, shelters, and play areas; ❑ Existing and proposed abutting street right-of-way landscaping; 7 ❑ Screening as specified in SDC 4.4.110; ❑ Plantings, either existing or proposed, used in erosion control and stormwater treatment facilities; ❑ Details of a permanent irrigation system, unless specifically exempted as specified in SDC 4.4.100; ❑ Street trees as specified in SDC 4.2.140; ❑ A specifications list for all landscaping materials to be used; ❑ A planting schedule containing the location, size, and species of the existing and proposed plant materials (at time of planting); ❑ The anticipated size of all proposed plants at two years, or at maturity, whichever is first; and ❑ A description of planting methods as specified in SDC 4.4.100 ❑ Access, Circulation, Parking, and Lighting Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(F)). ❑ The location, dimensions and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, landscaped areas, wheel bumpers, directional signs and striping; ❑ The location and dimensions of all site circulation for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles including entrances and exits to the site, and loading and service areas; ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served; including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways and driveways proposed to be closed; ❑ On-site lighting including the location, orientation, and maximum height of all proposed exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached. ❑ For lighting, the type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and the type of illumination, the wattage, luminous area, and a photometric test report for each light source; ❑ The location, type, number, and dimensions of all bicycle parking spaces; ❑ The amount of gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use; ❑ The location of off-street loading areas; ❑ Existing and proposed transit facilities; ❑ A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application, where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility; and ❑ A Traffic Impact Study prepared by an Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer when required by and as specified in SDC 4.2.105(A)(4). ❑ Grading, Paving, and Stormwater Management Plan. (SDC 5.17.115(G)). ❑ Stormwater management system for the entire development area; 0 ❑ The roof drainage patterns and discharge locations; ❑ The pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage ways to be retained; and ❑ The existing and proposed elevations, site grades, and contours ❑ Phased Development Plan. The application must include a Phased Development Plan if phasing is proposed. The plan must indicate any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase as specified in SDC 5.17.115. Phasing must progress in a sequence that promotes street connectivity between the various phases and accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The Approval Authority may require the applicant to enter into an agreement for phased developments, and may require bonding or other assurances for improvements, in accordance with SDC 5.15.135, Bonding and Assurances for Development. ❑ Narrative. The application must include a written letter, narrative, or report documenting how the proposal is in compliance with the applicable approval criteria contained in SDC 5.17.125, Site Plan Review Approval Standards. ❑ Deed Restrictions. The application must submit copies of all existing and proposed restrictions or covenants. ❑ Additional Information. The Director may require an applicant to submit additional information at the time of Site Plan Review application submittal. At the applicant's expense, additional studies, reports, or exhibits prepared by qualified professionals may be required to address specific site features or concerns to demonstrate compliance with approval standards. Additional information may include, but is not limited to the following items: ❑ Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved; ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Oregon -licensed engineer, if the required Site Assessment specified in SDC 5.17.120 indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. ❑ Septic Systems. If the properties are not served by the City sewer system in accordance with SDC 4.3.105, the application must include documentation from the Department of Environmental Quality or its agent that indicates that the proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable requirements for sanitary septic systems when such systems exist on the properties affected by the development. 0; IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1.210: The following information may be submitted or may be required to be submitted for the applicant to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards. ❑ Preliminary Title Report. A Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 90 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Traffic Impact Study. A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ❑ Multiple Unit Housing Standards. Materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 4.7.380, Multiple Unit Housing Standards (if applicable). ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report. Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW. ❑ Geotechnical Re ort. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high-water table, or if required by the City Engineer. ❑ Overlay District. Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives. ❑ Additional Information. Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ Tree Felling Permit. If five or more qualifying trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19.100. ❑ Wetland Delineation. A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Department of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property. ❑ Federal or State Permits. The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development in accordance with Springfield Municipal Code 8.418. 10 ❑ Discretionary Use or Variance. Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 must be provided. ❑ Annexation. An Annexation application must be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7.100, where a development is proposed outside of the City limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer. 11 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.springfield-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK --------------------------------------------- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) -------------------------------------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), email.-cmceachern@springfield-or.gov Project Name: Assessors Parcel #: Land Use(s): Project Size (Acres): Approx. Impervious Area: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Applicant: Date: Phone #: Fax #: Email: Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: --- -- ---------------- ---____ (Area below this line tilled out b►• the Citi, and Returned to the Applicant) (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted for an application to be complete_16r submittal, although other requirements may be necessary.) Drainage Study Type EDSPM Section 4.03.2: Note UH may be substituted for Rational Method ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations. ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS For Official Use Only: * Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site specific in formation may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed, form has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality EDSPM Chapter 3) Req'd N/A All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1). If a stormwater treatment swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. F-1 r_� Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall _ be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements EDSPM Section 4.03 1:1 L] Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. L.._]L7Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. !.J E] The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review of Downstream System(EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). F] Ej Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). E]7.Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. Fj Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. Other/Miscellaneous E] Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. I ElPrivate stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to l i another. Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: htth://www.dea.state.or.us/wq/uic/Uic.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the storm water study. * IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLE 4SF, ttEAD BELOW AND SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 April 28, 2023 Client: Project Address: Subject: ROBERT CORYELL Q E S I G N S The Bow Rack, Springfield Case Number: 811 -23 -000045 -PRE 392 Q Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Permit#: , Plan Review Response The following letter is in response to the plan review comments as noted below: To: Plans Coordinator City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Planning Notes: i RINGFIELD r 3460 Sue.Ann Court Springfield, OR 97477 (541) S20-39SS 1. Please provide a narrative for the proposal. See code summery sheet, 001 2. Please note the time of travel zones on the site plan (site is split with 5 & 10 year time of travel zones). See Site plan for location of Travel Zone, The 5 year line appears to divide The Bow Rack. 3. An archery museum is listed on the application but is not called out on the plans. Please show how/where this will be achieved. Update elevations to depict accordingly as needed. The Archery Museum/ Display is located at front of structure and shown throughout. 4. This section does not apply as the development has not been proposed for phasing. None. 5. Please provide location and size of the existing utilities. See Revised Site Plan for utilities. 6. No new landscaping is required, therefore, a separate landscaping plan is not required. Show any existing landscaping (might be 1 street tree at the site frontage) on the site plan. See Site Plan for tree location and landscaped areas. 7. Show the locations and types of existing and proposed light fixtures. A separate lighting plan and photometric report is not required. See Site Plan for existing utilities and over head lighting, all other will be differed. If you have any additional questions or concerns, feel free to let us know. Thank you for the opportunity to be of service. Sincerely, Robert Coryell 3460 Sue Ann Court, Springfield, OR 97477 (541) 520-3955 a Zm 0 THE BOW RACK T 4�� 4I 4POINT Zm -A Fny THE BOW RACK T 4�� 4I 4POINT m n °z REMODEL a ELECTRIC = 392 Q STREET ?�00 9 p g ` p SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 �.^ m ,§ € J L m o City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: The Bow Rack Project Proposal: Addition to existing commercial business Case Number: 811 -23 -000045 -PRE Project Address: 392 Q Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 170326242100 Zoning: Community Commercial Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Applicable Refinement Plan: Q Street Refinement Plan Refinement Plan Designation: Community Commercial Metro Plan Designation: Commercial Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: 3/10/23 Application Submittal Deadline: 9/6/23 Associated Applications: i RINGFIELD POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Project Planner Land Use Planning Tom Sievers 726-2333 Trans ortation Planning Transportation Michael Liebler 736-1034 Public Works Utilities: Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton Mceachern 736-1036 Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 682-5261 Building Official Building Code Chris Carpenter 744-4153 Applicant Wayne Endicott The Bow Rack 392 Q St Springfield, OR 97477 ed 10/25/07 Applicant's Representative Same as applicant TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee (confirm prior to submittal): Impervious Area: approximately 500 sf (new impervious cover) Tentative Site Plan Review Fee: $1899.80 APPLICAMN NAME FJ S SPECIAL INSI7Y IMONS ar t7ca3=&M Fee I 71 R+e I Notice ft SITE PLAN REVIEW: JSoc617.100� Application Completeness Check Meeting City: $449 NIA NIA Required prior to submittal of She Plan UGO: $676 WA NIA Review and Site Plan Review Modification - Major applications. Site Plan Review Type 2 City d UGS: Type 2 500 sq. ft. or less impervious surface $1,616 $80.80 $203 >500 and <10,000 Sq. ft. impervious surface $5,409 $274.46 $203 10,000 Sq. ft. or greater impervious surface $5,409 + $6611000 sq. ft. 5% $203 Final Site Plan Equivalent City & UG8: $1,891 $244.55 NIA Type I Final Site Plan ReviewMevelopment See Special Instructions >>>>> > > > > Type 1- Final site pian and development Agreement agreement fee Is 10% of the paid she plan fee (exclusive of postage) A 6% Technology Fee will applied when Imposed or collected. o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81/2"x 11" Complete Incomplete NENEWN See Planning Note(s) 8 1/2" x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 1 o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ Revised 10/25/07 Brief Narrative Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor Vicinity Map The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑ 2 The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 41/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings o Proposed Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor 3 Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown [i Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ® ❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way shall be designated including at grade connections Revised 10/25/07 o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ ❑ 4 Phased Development Plan o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor Location and width of all existing easements ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage ❑ Location and type of existing street lighting Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, Revised 10/25/07 Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces ® ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district ® ❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ❑] Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed 10 ❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ ❑ 4 Phased Development Plan o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor Location and width of all existing easements ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage ❑ Location and type of existing street lighting Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, Revised 10/25/07 neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities ® ❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ❑ 5 Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project ❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns o Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) El Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted ❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development Location and width of all proposed easements ❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities ❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 6 Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director El Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Revised 10/25/07 o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting ® ❑ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height o On -Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ ® 7 Conceptual floor plans Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area ❑ Photometric test report for each light source Planning Notes: + 1. Please provide a narrative for the proposal. +2. Please note the time of travel zones on the site plan (site is split with 5 & 10 year time of travel zones). v13. An archery museum is listed on the application but is not called out on the plans. Please show how/where this will be achieved. Update elevations to depict accordingly as needed. ✓4. This section does not apply as the development has not been proposed for phasing. +5. Please provide location and size of the existing utilities. v,16. No new landscaping is required, therefore, a separate landscaping plan is not required. Show any existing landscaping (might be 1 street tree at the site frontage) on the site plan. 7. Show the locations and types of existing and proposed light fixtures. A separate lighting plan and photometric report is not required. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Please provide proof of a shared access and parking agreement for the site. Revised 10/25/07 6 o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting ® ❑ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height o On -Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ ® 7 Conceptual floor plans Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area ❑ Photometric test report for each light source Planning Notes: + 1. Please provide a narrative for the proposal. +2. Please note the time of travel zones on the site plan (site is split with 5 & 10 year time of travel zones). v13. An archery museum is listed on the application but is not called out on the plans. Please show how/where this will be achieved. Update elevations to depict accordingly as needed. ✓4. This section does not apply as the development has not been proposed for phasing. +5. Please provide location and size of the existing utilities. v,16. No new landscaping is required, therefore, a separate landscaping plan is not required. Show any existing landscaping (might be 1 street tree at the site frontage) on the site plan. 7. Show the locations and types of existing and proposed light fixtures. A separate lighting plan and photometric report is not required. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: Please provide proof of a shared access and parking agreement for the site. Revised 10/25/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE - APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable ® Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ED If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property +❑' ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ ® Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer Revised 10/25/07 THIS APPLICATION IS: ❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ® INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE T4W, 5:,Vf44 3/10/23 City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 - day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -day timeline. Owner/Applicant's Signature Revised 10/25/07 Date