The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication Applicant 6/15/2023 (2)DocbSign Envelope ID: 064189D4-9EB74EAC-BF71-2CFD78EF0150 City of Springfield av� Development & Public Works Fifth 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision .- Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: X Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: •❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentativene Submittal: ❑ completeRequired Project Information (Applicant., qq A licant Name: BEDORTHAHOLDINGS LLC Phon� 1 2� -` Company; tli (c-} vv11��I Address: 32115 COBURG BOTTOM LOOP RD, EUGENTE, OR 97408 ID�tR�c.l 6q. •Co/7-,\ Applicant's Pep.: Phone: Company: Q Address: Property Owner: BEDORTHA HOLDINGS, LLC Phone: Company: Fax: Address: 32115 COBURG BOTTOM LOOP RD, EUGENE, OR 97408 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-34-32 TAX LOT NOS : 202 Property Address: 5842 MAIN ST, SPRINGFIELD OR 97478 Size of Property: 1.2 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Subdivision: Description of If you are flli ng in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro oral: 2 parcel partition Existing Use: Vacant # Of Lots/Parcels: 2 Total acreage of parcels/ Parcel 1: 0.85ac, allowable density: Parce12:0.33ac. proposed # Dwell Units Si natures: Please si n and rint our name and date in thea F. Associated Applications: ro riate box on the next a e. Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.:6I I -23 -I n ate: ' Reviewed b Case No.:Date: Reviewed by: A 11 ti Fee: Technical Fee: $ ;y lPostage Fee: �l TOTAL FEES: I"I I$ PROJECT NUMBER: vr' Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 DocbSign Envelope ID: 066189D49E87-0E C-BRI-20FD18EF0150 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: 6/15/2023 S�gr�a u Levi Bedortha I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the city. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the Information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]6 pertaining to a complete application. Date: Signature Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 DoduSign Envelope ID: 064189D49E874E C-BF]1-2CFD]8EF0150 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 DoduSign Envelope ID:08418904-9E874EAC-BF71-2CFD78EF0150 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑x Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. x❑ Land Division Tentative Application Form x❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. Copy of the Deed ❑x Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. x❑ Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/z"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑x Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. n/a ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. n/a ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ❑x Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: ❑x All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. x❑ All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kI 4 of 10 M.Sign Envelope ID: 064189C)4 9F814E C-BF71-2CFD78EF0150 x❑ Vicinity Map ❑x The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. n/a❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of Flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department n/aE] The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved. Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑x Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings ❑x Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan Fx Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor n/a❑ City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division x❑ Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ❑x Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination ❑x Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. x❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities ❑x Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways x❑ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Fx Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails ❑x Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10 DotuSign Envelope ID: W4189D4-9E87-4EAC-BF71-2CFD78EF0150 x❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points n/a ❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated n/a ❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater. Management Plan n/a E] Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer n/a ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system n/a❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations n/a ❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns n/a ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained n/a ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) WEE] Amount of proposed cut and fill n/a ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement ❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 DoWSign Envelope ID: 064189D4-9E874E C-BF71-2CFD78EF0150 ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer ❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 ranch ENGINEERING= June 13, 2023 WRITTEN STATEMENT TM 17-02-34-32, TL 202 Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 23-096 This application is for a two -parcel partition. The site lies east of 5V Street between A Street and Main Street. It is primarily vacant, but a sanitary sewer main crosses through the northerly portion and some drive aisles, parking spaces and stormwater infrastructure are also present. The proposed parcel boundary is the centerline of a drive aisle. SDC 5.12.125(B) requires the zoning to be consistent with the Metro Plan diagram. The site zoning is Neighborhood Commercial and the Metro Plan designation is Medium Density Residential. Neighborhood Commercial zoning is consistent with the Medium Density Residential designation since light commercial is permitted in R-2 (the zone implementation of Medium Density Residential designation). Several previous applications are relevant to the site. the most recent is SUB2008- 00007 which approved a three parcel partition on the site. Two Plat Pre -Submittal Meetings were held for the plat associated with SUB2008-00007, but the plat never recorded and the approval expired. The SUB2008-00007 Conditions of Approval are acknowledged in this application as follows: 1. A permit was obtained (COM2008-01053) for installation of the sanitary sewer laterals shown on the tentative plan approved previously. City records indicate the permit expired without piping being installed and the owner records are inconclusive. therefore, it is assumed at this time that no laterals were installed. No laterals are proposed in this application. The sanitary sewer main crosses both of the proposed parcels, giving each of them ready access without disruption to other properties or public infrastructure. 2. A permit was obtained (COM2008-01053) for installation of the stormwater laterals shown on the tentative plan approved previously. City records indicate the permit expired without piping being installed and the owner records are inconclusive. therefore, it is assumed at this time that no laterals were installed. No laterals are proposed in this application. Each parcel has ready access to a stormwater connection without disruption to other properties or public infrastructure - Parcel 1 has a lateral available for connection to the existing swale in the southern portion of the parcel and Parcel 2 has a lateral available for connection to the existing public pipe system in A Street. EOG ENE -SPRIG FIELD PHILOMATH 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p- 541.746.0637 1 w .branchengineenng.mm Written Statement June 13, 2023 3. This easement is proposed in this application and will be included on the plat which follows this approval. 4. During the previous Plat Pre -Submittal Meetings the city agreed that the 2-3" and 3-2" power conduits from a 3-phase power line in 5V Street were satisfactory for establishing compliance with this condition. SUB Electric mapping indicates wires have now been pulled through the conduits. 5. During the previous Plat Pre -Submittal Meetings the city agreed that the 1-4" phone conduit, 1-2" cable conduit and 1-4" gas conduit from 5V Street were satisfactory for establishing compliance with this condition. 6. During the previous Plat Pre -Submittal Meetings the city agreed that the 8" water main within a PUE on the south side of A Street was satisfactory for establishing compliance with this condition since each lot can make connection without disturbance to private or other public facilities. 7. A copy of ODOT's Approach Permit is included in this submittal. 8. No vision clearance obstructions exist or are proposed. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 2 42 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN Staff Report & Decision Project Name: Amigos III Partition Project Proposal: Partition one parcel (1.19 acres) to c three parcels Case Number: SUB2008-00007 Project Location: South of A Street & North of Main St 17-02-34-32, TL 202 Zoning: General Office (GO) Overlay District(s): N/A - -- - - - Applicable Refinement Plan: N/A Refinement Plan Designation: N/A Metro Plan Designation: Medium Density Residential Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: August 31, 2007 Application Submittal Date: February 4, 2008 DRC Meeting Date: March 4, 2008 Decision Issued Date: March 18, 2008 Recommendation: Approval with Conditions - Appeal Deadline Date: April 2, 2008 Associated Applications: PRE2007-00057, SUB 2006-00026 (Partition of Parent Lot), SUB2005-00042 (PLA), DRC2006-00028 (SPR for Internal Driveways) SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE - Applicant's Representative POSITION REVIEW OF I NAME PHONE Planner II Land Use Planning Molly Markarian 726-4611 Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation Gary McKenne 726-4585 Public Works Engineer in Training Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Sewer Jesse Jones 736-1036 Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Gilbert Gordon 726-2293 Engineering Technician SUB Electric Utilities Tony Talbot 726-2395 Civil Engineer SUB Water Utilities - Rebecca Tem lin 726-2396 Owner/Applicant Applicant's Representative Ron Thienes James Branch, P.E., P.L.S. Amigos III, LLC Branch Engineering, Inc. P.O. Box 25 310 Fifth Street Case No. SUB2008-00007 1 of 11 DECISION This staff report and decision grants approval with conditions to the subject application, as of the date of this decision. The standards of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) applicable to each criterion of approval are listed herein and are satisfied by the submitted plans and notes (see Appendix A) unless specifically noted in this decision with findings and conditions necessary for compliance. The plat, as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herein. This is a limited land use decision made according to city code and state statutes. Unless appealed, the decision is final. Please read this document in its entirety. REVIEW PROCESS _ This application has been reviewed under the procedures listed in SDC 5.1-130, Type II Applications, and SDC 5.12-100, Land Divisions — Partitions and Subdivisions. This application was accepted as complete on February 4, 2008, and this decision is issued on the 43`d day of the 120 days permitted per ORS 227.178. COMMENTS RECEIVED Applications for Type II limited land use decisions require notification of property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property and any applicable neighborhood association, allowing for a 14 - day comment period on the application per SDC 5.1-130 The property owner, applicant,. if different,.. _.. and parties submitting written comments during the comment period have appeal rights and are mailed a copy of this decision for consideration. In accordance with SDC 5.1-130, notice was mailed to the property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the subject property on January 7, 2008. No written comments were received during the comment period. SITE INFORMATION The subject property is a 1.19 acre, irregular-shaped lot on the south side of A Street between 58' Street and 60' Place and is located inside the City limits. The property is relatively flat, and soils are mapped as Salem -Urban Land Complex -119. Currently, the property is vacant. While property in the vicinity of the site is zoned Public Land and Open Space, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential, the property is zoned General Office and designated Medium Density Residential. Land immediately surrounding the property to the west is zoned Community Commercial while land to the north and east of the site is zoned General Office. LAND DIVISIONS—PARTITIONS AND SUBDIVISIONS—TENTATIVE PLAN CRITERIA SDC 5.12-125 states that an application shall be approved or approved with conditions upon determination that the criteria listed in SDC 5.12-125 A. through J. have been satisfied and that if conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the application shall be denied. Criterion 1 SDC 5.12-125 A.) The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Finding: SDC 3.2-315 states that for lots/parcels in all commercial zoning districts, the minimum area shall be 6,000 sq. ft., and the minimum street frontage shall be 50 ft. Finding: The applicant proposes to create three parcels as follows: Parcel Parcel Type Area Street Frontage Street Name Street Type 1 Standard 1 9,869 sq. ft. 197 ft. A Street East-West 2 Standard 14,423 s . ff. 151 ft. A Street East-West 3 Standard 27,344 sq. ft. 50 ft. Main Street East-West Finding: This application meets the requirements of SDC 3.2-315. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 1 (SDC 5.12-125 A.). Case No. SUB2008-00007 2 of 11 Criterion 2 (SDC 5.12-125 B.) The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Finding: The subject property is zoned General Office and is designated Medium Density Residential by the Metro Plan diagram, and there is no applicable refinement plan. The General Office district is a commercial district allowed within a residential designation and was "established to encourage appropriate office development as a transition zone, providing a buffer between residential and more intensive commercial development at the boundaries of a Community Commercial designation." The subject property was rezoned to from Low Density Residential to General Office via Case No. 92-12- 223 to achieve consistency with the Metro Plan designation of Medium Density Residential. Therefore, the zoning of the subject property is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram. There are no applicable Plan District maps or Conceptual Development Plans for this property, and no change to the zoning designation or boundaries is proposed. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 2 (SDC 5.12-125 B.). Criterion 3 (SDC 5.12-125 C.) - Capacity requirements of publicandprivate facilities, including but not limited towaterand electricity,' sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities, and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Finding: The Development Review Committee (DRC), including representatives from the City's Development Services Department, Public Works Department, and Fire and Life Safety Department, as well as the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) reviewed the application, and their comments have been incorporated into the findings and conditions below. Finding: Criterion 3 contains two categories of development standards with sub -sections. The application as submitted complies with any applicable sub -sections of the development standards unless otherwise noted with specific findings and conditions. The development standards relating to Criterion 3 include but are not limited to the infrastructure standards discussed in SDC 4.1-100, 4.2- 100, and 4.3-100: 4.2-100 Infrastructure Standards— 4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Transportation Utilities 4.2-105 Public Streets 4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers 4.2-110 Private Streets 4.3-110 Stormwater Management 4.2-115 Block Length 4.3-115 Water Quality Protection 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination 4.2-125 Intersections 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities 4.2-130 Vision Clearance 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection 4.2-135 Sidewalks 4.3-135 Major Electrical Power Transmission Lines 4.2-140 Street Trees 4.3-140 Public Easements 4.2-145 Street Lighting 4.3-145 Wireless Telecommunications Systems Facilities 4.2-150 Bikeways 4.2-155 Pedestrian Trails 4.2-160 Accessways Case No. SUB2008-00007 3 of 71 Public Streets Finding: Abutting the subject property to the north is A Street, a 37 -foot asphalt -paved two-way local street within a 50 -foot right-of-way. The street is fully improved to urban standards with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting. Finding: Abutting the subject property to the south is Main Street, a variable width asphalt -paved five - lane major arterial street. The street is fully improved to urban standards with curb, gutter, sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting. Finding: The proposed partition of vacant land will have no additional transportation system impacts. Impacts from site development on the newly created parcels will be addressed during the Site Plan Review process. Finding: This application meets the requirements of SDC 4.2-105. Sanitary Sewers Finding: SDC 4.3-105 A. states that sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development within the city limits and to connect developments to existing mains. Finding: The applications indicates that Parcels 1, 2; -and -3 will be provided with sanitary sewer service via six-inch laterals from the existing 15 -inch sanitary sewer main that runs through the north end of the subject property. Condition 1: Prior to plat approval, Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be serviced with private sanitary sewer laterals from the 15 -inch sanitary sewer main in the north end of the subject property as depicted on the tentative plan in accordance with SDC 4.3-105 A. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install these private sanitary sewer laterals. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-105 A Stormwater Manaaement Finding: SDC 4.3-110 B. states that development approval shall only be granted where the Public Works Director has determined that adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions, consistent with the EDSPM, have been made. Finding: SDC 4.3-110 D. states that run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Finding: SDC 4.3-110 E. states that new developments are required to employ drainage management practices that minimize the amount and, rate of surface run-off into receiving streams and that promote water quality. Finding: The application indicates that Parcel 2 can connect directly to the six-inch stormwater lateral that runs through the north end of the subject property. The applicant has proposed connecting Parcel 1 to this existing lateral via a new six-inch stormwater lateral. The application indicates that Parcel 3 can conned directly to an existing six-inch stormwater lateral near the southeast corner of Parcel 3 that discharges into a private stormwater treatment swale. Condition 2: Prior to plat approval, Parcel 1 shall be serviced with a private stormwater lateral from the existing stormwater lateral that extends through the north end of the subject property as depicted on the tentative plan in accordance with SDC 4.3-110 B. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install this private stormwater lateral. Case No. SUB2008-00DD7 4 of 11 Finding: Given that Parcels 1 and 2 will be served by the existing six-inch stormwater lateral that extends through the north end of the subject property, a private stormwater easement is required. Condition 3: Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall document on the plat and record a private stormwater easement over the existing six-inch stormwater lateral that runs through the north end of the subject property and is intended to serve both Parcels 1 and 2. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-110. Utility Provider Coordination Finding: SDC 4.3-120 states that all utility providersshallbe responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee or by separate written correspondence and that the developer shall be responsible for the design, installation, and cost of utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider. Finding: The applicant's narrative states that utilities such as gas and power are available through A Street and that laterals were provided for with the construction of A Street. However, no gas or power lines are shown in A street on the plan set submitted with this application, nor are any laterals shown. Finding. SUB has stated that only street crossings/conduits were installed at the time of the A Street construction. SUB added that electric facilities have not been installed, and additional streettasphalt cuts or bores may be necessary to serve the newly created parcels. Condition 4: Prior to plat approval, theapplicantshall verify the location of existing power lines in A Street, as well as the location of electric facilities that have been extended to all parcels. In addition, if it does not already exist, electric service shall be provided to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 via the existing private joint utility easement running north/south in the center of the subject property in accordance with SDC 4.3-120. Placement of such facilities shall be underground as conditioned in the Underground Placement of Utilities section below. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-120. Underground Placement of Utilities Finding: SDC 4.3-125 states that wherever possible, all utility lines shall be placed underground. Condition 5: Prior to plat approval, all required utility lines to serve Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be installed underground. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-125. Water Service and Fire Protection Finding: SDC 4.3-130 states that each development area shall be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply to the development and that fire hydrants and mains shall be installed by the developer as required by the Fire Marshall and the utility provider. Finding: The applicant's narrative states that water is available through A Street and that laterals were provided for with the construction of the street. However, no water line is shown in A street on the plan set submitted with this application, nor are any water laterals shown. SUB has stated that an eight -inch water line exists along the subject property's frontage along A Street. Condition 6: Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall verify the location of the existing water main in A Street, as well as the location of water facilities that have been extended to all parcels. In addition, if it does not already exist, water service shall be provided to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 via the existing private Case No. SUB2008-00007 5 of t t joint utility easement running north/south in the center of the subject property in accordance with SDC 4.3-130. All water service facilities shall be installed per SUB Water standards. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install private water laterals. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.3-110. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 3 (SDC 5.12-125 C.) as conditioned herein. Criterion 4 fSDC 5.12-125 D.) The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Finding: Criterion 4 contains four categories of development standards and requirements. As such, the application must comply with the development standards of SDC Chapter 4 not addressed by Criterion 3, as well as the development standards for the applicable zoning district not addressed by Criterion 1. In addition, the application must comply with the requirements of any applicable overlay district and/or refinement plan. The application as submitted complies with the applicable development standards and requirements unless otherwise noted with specific findings and conditions. The development standards and requirements relating to Criterion 4 include but are not limited to the following Chapter 4 — Development Standards 3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts 4.4-100 Landscaping, Screening, & Fence 3.2-310 Schedule of Use Categories Standards 3.2-315 Base Zone Development Standards 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards 4.6-100 Vehicle Parking, Loading, & Bicycle Parking Standards 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards for Certain Uses 4.8-100 Temporary Uses Applicable Overlay District Applicable Refinement Plan No overlay districts apply to the subject property No refinement plans apply to the subject property Finding: All applicable private and public design standards, as well as the schedule of use categories and base zone development standards, will be reviewed via the Site Plan Review process when this vacant site is developed. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 4 (SDC 5.12-125 D.), Criterion 5 fSDC 5.12-125 E.) Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands, rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740- 760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Finding: The Metro Plan and any applicable refinement plans, Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map, State Designated Wetlands Map, Hydric Soils Map, Natural Resources Map, Wellhead Protection Zone Map, FEMA Maps, Willamalane Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan, and the list of Historic Landmark sites have been consulted, and there are no features needing to be protected or preserved on the subject property. Case No SUB2008-00007 6 of 11 Finding: If any historic or archaeological artifacts are discovered during construction, ORS 97.740- 760, 358.905-955, and ORS 390.235-240 may apply. If any human remains are discovered during construction, it is a Class C felony to proceed under ORS 97.745. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 5 (SDC 5.12-125 E.). Criterion 6 (SDC 5.12-125 F.) Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas, minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Finding: The DRC, including representatives from the City's Public Works Department, reviewed the application, and their comments have been incorporated into the findings and conditions below. Finding: Installation of driveways on a street increases the number of traffic conflict points. The greater number of conflict points increases the probability of traffic crashes. Therefore, SDC 4.2-120 A.1. states that all developed parcels shall have an approved access to a public street or alley along the frontage of the property, a private street that connects to the. public street system, or a public street by an irrevocable joint use/access easement serving the subject property. Finding: SDC 4.2-120 C. states that driveways shall be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5, the City's EDSPM, and the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. Finding: The application indicates that existing access to the subject property is via a 24 -foot wide asphalt -paved driveway onto A Street near the north property line, and the applicant has proposed keeping this access for Parcels 1, 2, and 3. The application also indicates that there is access to the subject property via a variable -width asphalt paved driveway onto Main Street near the south property line, and the applicant has proposed keeping this access for Parcels 1, 2, and 3, as well. Finding: The proposed parcels have adequate public street access available via the shared on-site driveway network that connects to the adjoining public street system at multiple points. Previous land use decisions, SU62004-00042, SUB2004-00066, and SUB2006-00026, limit the subject property's A Street access to the existing driveway locations. Finding: Existing facilities are sufficient to meet the requirements of SDC 4.2-120 A.1. and SDC 4.2- 120 C. Finding: SDC 4.2-120 A.2. states that driveway access to designated State highways is subject to the requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Highway Division. Finding: Use of the existing private driveway onto Main Street located on proposed Parcel 3 by the abutting tax lots 300 and 400 is allowed by ODOT approach permit #52338. The applicant has applied for an ODOT access permit to allow the proposed three parcels to use this driveway for site access, as well, but has not received approval yet. Condition 7., Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall provide a copy of a new approved ODOT access permit for the Main Street access. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.2-120 A.2. Finding: SDC 4.2-130 A. states that all parcels shall maintain a clear area at each access to a public street and on each corner of property at the intersection of two streets in order to provide adequate sight distance for approaching traffic. Case No. SU9200M0007 7 of 11 Finding: SDC 4.2-130 B. states that no screen or other physical obstruction is permitted between two and a half feet and eight feet above the established height of the curb in the triangular area. SDC 4.2- 130 C. states that the triangular area for driveways is ten feet along each property line. - Condition 8: Vision clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a public street as per SDC 4.2-130. Finding: As conditioned above, this application meets the requirements of SDC 4.2-130. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 6 (SDC 5.12-125 F.) as conditioned herein. Criterion 7 ISDC 5.12-125 G.) Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Finding: Approval of this partition is in the context of multiple land use proposals for adjacent land owned by the applicant. This decision does not prevent development of the remainder of the applicant's property in accordance with the provisions of the SDC. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 7 (SDC 5.12-125 G.). Criterion 8 (SDC 5.12-125 H.1 Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Finding: Adjacent land is currently developed with commercial buildings or is vacant and has access to public streets by way of direct frontage or access easements. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 8 (SDC 5.12-125 H.). Criterion 9 (SDC 5.12-125 1.) Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified in SDC 5.12-1251. 1. and 2. shall also apply. Finding: The subject property is located inside the city limits. Therefore, Criterion 9 is not applicable. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 9 (SDC 5.12-125 I.). Criterion 10 (SDC 5.12-125 J.) Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the approval criteria in SDC 5.12-125 J. 1. through 7. apply. Finding: The application does not propose the subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park. Therefore, Criterion 10 is not applicable. Conclusion: This application satisfies Criterion 10 (SDC 5.12-125 J.). SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (VOTE: This summary of the conditions of approval is provided as a courtesy to the applicant. The applicant should, however, carefully read the decision in its entirety to understand the basis for each condition. In addition, as stated earlier, the applicant must comply with the entire decision, and the plat, as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herein. Case No. SUB2008-00007 8 of I I 1. Prior to plat approval, Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be serviced with private sanitary sewer laterals from the 15 -inch sanitary sewer main in the north of the subject property as depicted on the tentative plan in accordance with SDC 4.3-105 A. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install these private sanitary sewer laterals. 2. Prior to plat approval, Parcel 1 shall be serviced with a private stormwater lateral from the existing stormwater lateral that extends through the subject property as depicted on the tentative plan in accordance with SDC 4.3-110 B. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install this private stormwater lateral. 3. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall document on the plat and record a private stormwater easement over the existing six-inch stormwater lateral that runs through the north of the subject property and is intended to serve both Parcels 1 and 2. 4. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall verify the location of existing power lines in A Street, as well as the location of electric facilities that have been extended to all parcels. In addition, if it does not already exist, electric service shall be provided to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 via the existing private joint utility easement running north/south in the center of the subject property in accordance with SDC 4.3-120. Placement of such facilities shall be underground as conditioned in the Underground Placement of Utilities section below. 5. Prior to plat approval, all required utility lines to serve Parcels 1, 2, and 3 shall be installed underground. 6. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall verify the location of the existing water main in A Street, as well as the location of water facilities that have been extended to all parcels. In addition, if it does not already exist, water service shall be provided to Parcels 1, 2, and 3 via the existing private joint utility easement running north/south in the center of the subject property in accordance with SDC 4.3-130. All water service facilities shall be installed per SUB Water standards. NOTE: Plumbing permits are required to install private water laterals. 7. Prior to plat approval, the applicant shall provide a copy of a new approved ODOT access permit for the Main Street access. S. Vision clearance areas shall be maintained at each access to a public street as per SDC 4.2- 130. CONCLUSION The application, as submitted and conditioned herein, complies with the ten criteria listed in SDC 5.12- 125 A. through J. The tentative plan approved as submitted and conditioned herein may not be substantively changed during the platting process without an approved modification application in accordance with SDC 5.12-145. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE? SDC 5.12-140 A. states that for partitions, a plat pre -submittal meeting shall be held within one year of the tentative plan approval. Therefore, the applicant has up to one year from the date of this decision to meet SDC standards and the conditions of approval contained herein and to submit a plat application for pre -submittal. SDC 5.12-140 A. also states that the applicant shall submit the mylars and application fee within 180 days of the pre -submittal meeting. If, however, the applicant has not submitted the plat application within these timeframes, the tentative plan approval shall become mull and void and re -submittal is required. Please refer to the plat application packet available at the Development Services Department, as well as 5.12-135 through 5.12-150, for more detailed information on the platting process. Please note that the plat, as well as the installation of public and private improvements, must conform to the approved tentative plan or as conditioned herein. In addition, please note that no individual Case No. SUB2008-00007 9 of 11 parcels may be transferred and no building permits will be issued until the plat has been recorded at Lane County and the applicant has submitted five (5) recorded, rolled paper copies of the plat and three (3) copies of required documents to the Development Services Department. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The application, all documents, and supporting evidence are available for free inspection (copies are available for a fee) at the Development Services Department. APPEAL This decision is considered a Director's Type II decision and as such, may be appealed to the Planning Commission. SDC 5.3-115 states that only the property owner, applicant, if different, and those persons who submitted written comments within the 14 -day comment period have standing to appeal this decision. SDC 5.3-115 also states that an appeal application in accordance with 5.3-100 shall be filed with the Development Services Department within 15 calendar days of the Director's decision (the date of this decision). In accordance with this policy and the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 10(c), the appeal period for this decision expires at 5:00pm on April 2, 2008. QUESTIONS Please call Molly Markarian in the Development Services Department Planning Division at 726-4611 or email her at mmarkarian@ci.springfield.or.us if you have any questions. PREPARED BY Molly Markarian Planner II Urban Planning Section Case No, SUB200M0007 10 of 11 APPENDIX A M � I I 1 Ise � ,. � I �� . Ra9 I � �i • I i ZvI CI ri z o ebb y I m a ea FF o a e a 8 t ..aRr nM 3 nom' �' BreucA Lo iueerm lue AMIGOS III LLC PARTITION IE € SPRINGFIECO, OREGON �' P :` � g uu,awu.A ,No•+.•rw PROPOSED • t g TENTATIVE PARTITION PL4N 0 Case No. SOBMOM0007 11 et 11 PERMIT NO: 54963 PERMIT TO OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND USE A STATE HIGHWAY APPROACH Appl No.:7596 Turn Movement: Left OUt[7 Right Out K1 Left In❑Right ln® Permittee Information Nesee: Roger Laneiiers co Arai Ami os 111 LLC, MUIrgAdaes&: 23021 Brushline Court Bend, OR 97701-0119 PMne: (541)728-0054 ( ) - e.lxil: rwl@ricgroup.com Prooertv Information Adeteaa: 17 5850 Main street Units of Measure: Scrinerflaid OR 9'1478 23200.00 Sq. Ft count': oabat Lane 06 NIWweY H, RxM1v McKenzie 016 ORE126 MlaPam: Eve,eng Statlan: '.aa c: Fut': Puaiw,ma:x 6.50 282+65 L Private Pr '- tt Qn: 3341 Right.m Right -out approach serving commercial developemeln 02 pmmitm op=te, mabtainand use an appraacb shall he b effect for m i¢dcfivim period oftimc mks&: (a) revoked by ..al ..at (b) Far failure m abide by dee corms and ee. iumr; (c) A chaogc ofuse Deem& as set Imth in DAR 73 4 0514045; (d)Safety ae opr-ti Problems exiss.s at forth b734-051; Faame ache app5ca¢im comply ¢ithany oftbe icy& and conditions of the pamitahail be sn0icimtcaae krcam ]hm¢ ofthe permit and may result is removal ofihe IMRlry by rbc Lheges Deparseacnt afTmnaparhtian. 1 Pemit is maa,d&.bje.. the avisions of Orega¢Admb:s¢adve Rata 734051 Land Use 17 Land Use Description: Units of Measure: Cries 23200.00 Sq. Ft Retail 4142.00 Sq. Ft. Espresso Stand 2.00 wind. - Met - 3341 Tax Lot T.e.1do Rance Section Tax Lot 17 02 3432 202 17 02 3341 23DO 17 02 3341 2502 17 02 3341 2600 17 02 3341 2601 17 02 3341 2602 17 02 3432 300 0 Reasonfor Request: Changeofuse Site ADT: 685 Plan View See custom Drawing Specification 141h ere.(A): 35.00ft s0 Re]ue1(RIs Rad e3iR2): A0ft .00ft pease Ist:(P1): Paving len11P2): AOR .COR Wlsoa' =1(00): RPM(W: .00ft .00ft .00ft C..t qam: Ln: None Sib eaaeasa. TNagcsa. 12.00in nae ax: TNewxaa. 4.00In .1 one: Thiesex4: vreatcru: Trimleax: Concrete B.ODin This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Oregon Department of Transportation. lirant Ignature Date �� 1020 Il A wed OOOT ym %per Dale CHAMPS-d_qptyermit_aprxkwas-w b Page 1 oft PMMA 1M1320110&24:30AM gtur is- '6 PERMIT TO OPERATE, MAINTAIN AND USE A °�De PBpaarwhe pw ebo PERMIT NO: 52338 STATE HIGHWAY APPROACH Application ld: 4404 Highway Number. 015 Milepum: 6.50 Reamntor Request: Improvement Aoolicant Information w Mikael Shields Compaw. Bl akhiser & hubbard naaaaa'. 100 West 13th Avenue P.O. Box 10347 Eugene OR 97440 P [S (55 4116863478 [Sill 345-5303 ¢Mail: Prooertv Information A. - representative of the Oregon Department of Transportation. 6M Main Street Date SKiruifield OR 97478 f Lane M SL McKenzie ORE126 nc sae ornwy nau wrmrr. 6.SO2+6asmnorc 8.50 2852+65 L N LeM�naM: 395' East of 58th Street Plan view Specification w x Pon Themes Ce w Amigos 111, LLC Pass BOX 25 Wat Wallerviile OR 97489 lane Pnme'. F/.% (541)726$795 ( ) - e il: Tax Lot Information Towvskp Hoag¢ Seamon T.Ut 77 92 3432_300 S This permit is not valid until signed by a duly authorized representative of the Oregon Department of Transportation. AU rizaa COOT Signature Date 'y 'C0,4- f CHAMPS- rLmlt,umft apprch use Pu,eloft FM d:09/15 5012798PM PERMIT FOR ENCROACHMENT, CONSTRUCTION PERMIT NO: 52338 ON OR USE OF STATE HIGHWAY Applicationld:4406 Highway Number: 015 MilePoint 6.50 PROVISIONS Reason for Request: Improvement Applicant: Mikael Shields Company: SalzNser& hubbard 140.301 Construction Plans are approved in general only. The District Manager or representative may require field changes. When revisions are made in the field, as -constructed drawings must be submitted to the District. 150.101 The permit and all specifications, details, typical drawings and standard drawings attached to the permit shall take precedence over all plans, drawings and specifications produced by the Architect or Engineer representing the Applicant or Contractor. 150.201 Within 48 hours before beginning permit work and again after completing permit work, the Applicant (or agent) shall notify the District permitting representative. 150.411 Applicant (or agent) shall have on the job site, at all times, a copy of the permit and all attachments. The permit shall be readily available for inspection. 150.501 The permitted work is located within the Oregon Utility Notification Center (OUNC) area. The OUNC is a utilities notification system to notify owners of utilities about excavation work performed in the vicinity of their facilities. The utilftles notification system telephone number is 1-800-332-2344. 150.701 Maintain all existing highway signs. If any signs are damaged due to Contractor's operations, replace those signs before the and of that work shift - Avoid operations whose methods, conditions, ortiming may injure people or damage properties. Damage includes staining surfaces with such things as mud and asphalt. When damage occurs, the District Manager will determine if it is to be corrected by repair, replacement, or compensatory payment. If compensatory payment is required, the District Manager will determine the amount 150.702 Do not park on state right-of-way unless permitted by the District Manager. Comply with ORS 810.230, 610.160. 150.703 Remove all dirt and debris from the highway at the end of each work shift or more frequently if a hazard to the traveling public exists or as directed by the District Manager. 160.801 All areas of excavation shall be returned to "pre -construction" condition or better. Repair natural drainage so no water stands or collects in excavated areas, when practical. Slopes shall be trimmed to blend with the adjacent terrain. Replace the vegetative cover to blend with the adjacent natural growth, 200.021 The work area during construction or maintenance performed underthe permit provisions shall be protected in accordance with the current Manuel on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways, US Department of Transportation, and the Oregon Department of Transportation supplements thereto. Flaggers must have certification and must carry proof indicating their completion of an approved workzone traffic control course. All traffic control devices shall be maintained according to the ATTSSA Quality Standards for Work Zone Traffic Control Devices handbook. 225.051 Submit the following in writing five days before the permitted activity. - Proposed Traffic Control Plan (TCP) showing all Traffic Control Measures (TCM). Include the proposed order and duration of all TCM. Do not start work on any stage of construction until all TCM are in place and the TCP is operating satisfactorily. 1.000 SPECIAL PROVISIONS 2.000 Applicant shall remove all existing approaches to Tax Lots 300 & 400 and replace with one single approach to serve both. CHAMPS -dr tymv vmasb Page t of 1 Printed 0911MOS 0121:11 PM