Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 03- City of Eugene IGA- Public Safety SystemAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: Meeting Type: Staff Contact/Dept.: Staff Phone No: Estimated Time: 6/20/2023 Regular Meeting Chief Andrew Shearer 541-726-3722 Consent Calendar SPRINGFIELD Council Goals: Strengthen Public Safety CITY COUNCIL by Leveraging Partnerships and Resources ITEM TITLE: EUGENE AND SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SAFETY SOFTWARE IGA ACTION Approve an amendment to the intergovernmental agreement with the City of REQUESTED: Eugene and authorize the City Manager to sign the amendment for software maintenance and hosting costs associated with the shared public safety software. ISSUE The City of Springfield has an intergovernmental agreement with City of Eugene STATEMENT: for vendor maintenance, hosting support and hardware costs for the Central Square shared public safety software suite. The proposed contract will continue the partnership between the City of Springfield and City of Eugene. ATTACHMENTS: 1. C877 amendment 4 public safety software IGA 2. C877 IGA restatement amendments 1 - 3 DISCUSSION/ The City of Springfield has an existing partnership with the City of Eugene via an FINANCIAL intergovernmental agreement for software maintenance, hosting, and hardware IMPACT: costs associated with the Central Square public safety software (formerly SunGard and Superion). The Central Square software is currently utilized by the Springfield Police Department, Eugene -Springfield Fire Department, and Eugene Police Department and is hosted by City of Eugene ISD. The proposed intergovernmental agreement amendment (attachment 1) extends the term through June 30, 2026. The agreement's existing cost share model would remain the same. Fiscal year 2024 costs under the intergovernmental agreement are estimated at $174,337 and were included in the Springfield Police Department proposed budget. Future fiscal year costs may increase in accordance with vendor rates and CPI, but at a rate not to exceed 5%. The City of Springfield, City Attorney Office reviewed and approved the proposed amendment. Springfield Police requests Council approve and give the City Manager the approval to sign the a intergovernmental agreement amendment between City of Springfield and City of Eugene for continued public safety software services. AMENDMENT NO. FOUR (4) and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Central Square, formerly known as Superion and SunGard Hosting Operations and Maintenance IGA portion of City of Eugene Contract #2018-03006 This Amendment is made to the IGA PORTION ONLY of the Software Licenses and Services Agreement dated November 5, 2012, between the City of Eugene and Central Square (formerly known as Superion and SunGard) and the IGA partner member the City of Springfield. City and IGA partner member mutually agree to amend the IGA referenced above as follows: 1. Term: The Agreement is hereby extended through June 30, 2026, unless earlier terminated as provided in Agreement Line 22, Termination Process. Effective date of this Amendment is July 1, 2023. All other terms and conditions of the IGA (as provided in the First Amendment and Restatement dated March 29, 2018, and the Second Amendment dated July 1, 2020, and the Third Amendment dated July 26, 2021) remain in full force and effect. Acknowledging Review of this document for the Hosting party, the City of Eugene: Robin Mayall, IT Director Mia Cariaga, Central Services Executive Director Date Date Acknowledging Review of this document for the Participating Party, the City of Springfield: Kristina Kraaz, Assistant City Attorney CITY OF EUGENE Sarah Medary City Manager CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Nancy Newton City Manager Date: and apPro�aid For review dobe Sign an be seed o nai signature rout Date Signed: Effective Date of this IGA is July 1, 2023 Date: Effective Date of this IGA is July 1, 2023 Attachment 1, Page 1 of 1 AMENDMENT NO. THREE (3) to Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Central Square, formerly known as Superion and SunGard Hosting Operations and Maintenance IGA portion of City of Eugene Contract #2018-03006 This Amendment is made to the IGA PORTION ONLY of the Software Licenses and Services Agreement dated November 5, 2012 between the City of Eugene and Central Square (formerly known as Superion and SunGard) and the IGA partner: • City of Springfield City and IGA member mutually agree to amend the IGA referenced above as follows: 1. Participating Parties: Agreement and all exhibits are hereby updated to reflect that the Hosting party remains the City of Eugene and the sole participating party is the City of Springfield. All access to the system by the University of Oregon granted by the original Access Agreement has been revoked. The University of Oregon withdrew from this agreement and signed a termination letter on June 4, 2021, effective June 23, 2021, having previously provided six (6) months' notice as required by the Agreement. This Amendment removes all reference to the University as a Participating Party to this IGA as of July 1, 2021, which terminates all of the University's rights and obligations under the IGA. 2. Contingency and budgeting for products and services: Update Exhibit F, 3.A with the following table to revert to the original IGA shared costs allocation: Cost Category Description Cost Shared: Includes Software, Shared Value of cost item equally benefits and approved Hardware, Ongoing Eugene (COE) and the City of Springfield 67% COE 33% COS Maintenance, and (by COS) of Shared Services Value of cost item directly and exclusively benefits EPD Only or approved by the City of Eugene Police 100% COE Depart ent Value of cost item directly and exclusively benefits SPD Only or approved by the City of Springfield Police 100% COS Depart ent CLCC only Value of cost item directly and exclusively benefits 100% CLCC or approved by the Command Central (911) Page 1 of 3 Attachment 2, Page 1 of 29 ESF only Value of cost item directly and exclusively benefits 100% ESF or approved by the Euaene SDrinafield Fire (ESF) 3. Hosting & Maintenance Costs & Charges: Update Exhibit E, 1.2 to clarify annual cost increases and revert to the original contract formula between City of Eugene and City of Springfield with Springfield assuming 100% of the hosting costs (updates to the original contract language are noted via underline): 1.2 SunGard Hosting Annual hosting services to (Eugene for THEIR staff reimburse Eugene staff costs, costs for hosting) Eugene bills Springfield. In FYI Calculated using Eugene Network Analyst hourly rate ($81.57) x 12 months of Springfield estimated hours to $64,928 perform own hosting (61.33 hours/month) + 12 months of Springfield 24x7 /T support costs ($408/month) for a total of $64,928N The FYI amount has subsequently been inflated year -over -year by the Western Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI -U) for West region, size class 8/C (2.5 million or less). The City of Eugene will continue this $70,968.37 practice for estimating hostinq costs unless and until a different method is determined and incorporated via amendment to this contract. The FY20 hosting charges were billed at $70,968.37. Page 2 of 3 Attachment 2, Page 2 of 29 All other terms and conditions of the IGA (as provided in the First Amendment and Restatement dated March 29, 2018 and the Second Amendment dated July 1, 2020) remain in full force and effect. Acknowledging Review of this document for the Hosting Party, the City of Eugene: Patricia Scarci, AIC IT Director:aazz 07/16/2021 Mia Cariaga, Central Services Executive Director: ,,, 1b 07/25/2021 Acknowledging Review of this document for the Participating Party, the City of Springfield: Kristina Kraaz, Assistant City Attorney: kk CITY OF EUGENE 'VI Sarah Medary City Manager CITY OF SPRINGFIELD udff�4LuNV�Vyt Nancy Newton (Jul 16.202110 23 Por) Nancy Newton City Manager 07/15/2021 Date Signed: 07/26/2021 Effective date of this IGA is July 1, 2021 Date Signed: 07/16/2021 Effective date of this IGA is July 1, 2021 Page 3 of 3 Attachment 2, Page 3 of 29 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE C877 AMENDMENT NO. TWO (2) and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) Central Square, formerly known as Superion and SunGard Hosting Operations and Maintenance IGA portion of City of Eugene Contract #2018-03006 This Amendment is made to the IGA PORTION ONLY of the Software Licenses and Services Agreement dated November 5, 2012 between the City of Eugene and Central Square (formerly known as Superion and SunGard) and the IGA partners: • City of Springfield • University of Oregon Police Department City and IGA members mutually agree to amend the IGA referenced above as follows: 1. Agreement Administration: Agreement is hereby updated for the City of Eugene, the representative for purposes of administering this agreement is: Patricia Scarci Information Services Assistant Director 100 West 10th Avenue, Suite 450 Eugene OR 97401 2. Term: The Agreement is hereby extended through June 30, 2023, unless earlier terminated as provided in Agreement Line 22, Termination Process. 3. Exhibit F Participating Agencies and Departments: The agreement is hereby updated to reflect the new name of the former Eugene Fire and Life Safety to the current Eugene -Springfield Fire (ESF) All other terms and conditions of the IGA remain in full force and effect. Attachment 2, Page 4 of 29 a Acknowledging Review of this document for the Hosting party, the City of Eugene: Lori Kievith, AIC IT Director: Mia Cariaga, Central Services Executive Director: CITY OF EUGENE Sarah Medary City Manager Pro Tern Date signed: Effective date of this lGA is July 1, 2020 UNIVERSITY OF RECON kvvvw Laura Harris, Strategic Procurement Manager Purchasing and Contracting Services Date signed: June 17, 2020 Effective date of this lGA is July 1, 2020 CITY OF SPRINGFIELD Nancy Kewton City Manager Date signed: ( Izoo Effective date of this iGA is July 1, 2020 REVTF:WED & APPROVED AS TO FORM DATE: 6/22/2020 SPRINGPIELD CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE Attachment 2, Page 5 of 29 Rcoev+ed i,y city Contract Officer r Uatr 6f�S12020 _.m� Ejectronic Signatur6 Contract # W First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement — Superion, formerly known as SunGard Hosting Operations and Maintenance BETWEEN: University of Oregon ("University') AND: The City of Springfield (Springfield), a municipal corporation of the state of Oregon (hereinafter "Springfield") AND: The City of Eugene (Eugene), a municipal corporation of the state of Oregon (hereinafter "Eugene") RECITALS A. ORS 199.610, and ORS 352.138(2), provide that units of local government and public Universities may enter into agreements for the performance of any and all functions and activities that any party to the agreement, its officers, or agents have the authority to perform. B, On June 22, 2016, Eugene and Springfield entered into an Intergovernmental Agreement for SunGard now known as Superion, Hosting Operations and Maintenance ("Original Agreement"). C. At this time, the Parties desire to amend the terms of the Original Agreement as set forth in this First Amendment to Intergovernmental Agreement for Superion Hosting Operations and Maintenance ("First Amendment") to add University as a Party to the Original Agreement and modify the Original Agreement accordingly. D. The Original Agreement and this First Amendment will be collectively referred to as the "Agreement". E. Eugene, Springfield, and University are each a "Party" and collectively "Parties". F. On November 5, 2012, Eugene entered into a Software License and Services Agreement with Superion Public Sector Inc. ("Superion") for public safety software to replace the multi- jurisdictional AIRS system ("the Superion Contract"). A copy of the Superion Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit A. Eugene entered into the Superion Contract with the intent of having the Superion operating system be a hosted system with Eugene as the host and Springfield as the hostee. G. On November 5, 2012, Springfield entered into an agreement with Superion whereby Springfield acknowledged the terms and conditions of the Agency Access Agreement Supplement. The "Agency Access Agreement Supplement" explicitly grants Eugene permission to allow Springfield access to all Superion applications that are licensed to Eugene. The Agency Access Agreement Supplement states Springfield's access will terminate if the Superion Contract terminates and that Eugene is, and shall remain, solely responsible for the obligations contained in the Superion Contract A copy of the November 5 agreement is included in Exhibit A at page 78. First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement - Superion Hosting operations and Maintenance Page i of 10 Attachment 2, Page 6 of 29 ,.x_ H. On , University and Superion have entered in to a "University Access Agreement Supplement' granting Eugene permission to allow University access to all Superion applications licensed under the Superion Contract. The University Access Agreement Supplement is attached as Exhibit G and incorporated herein. I. Also on November 5, 2012, Eugene entered into a Software Maintenance Agreement with Superion for Superion`s provision of maintenance of and enhancement to the system provided pursuant to the Superion Contract ("the Superion Maintenance Contract"). A copy of the Superion Maintenance Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit B. Eugene entered into the Superion Maintenance Contract with the intent of having the shared Superion system maintained for the mutual benefit of both Eugene and Springfield and to allow either city to purchase single- city, non -shared enhancementstmodules to the shared Superion system. J. Eugene also entered into the Superion Contract with the intent of serving as the host agency for the shared Superion system and having Springfield serve as a hostee with access to the system as defined Herein, Eugene, Springfield, and University recognize that as the host agency, Eugene will perform certain ongoing hosting and operations services ("Ongoing Hosting and Operations"), some of which will benefit Eugene, Springfield, and University and some of which will benefit only one of the individual parties. The parties will share the costs, in the manner provided for in this Agreement. K. Eugene has entered into other contracts with the express purpose of enabling and implemeniung the software, hardware and services purchased pursuant to the Superion Contract and Superion Maintenance Contract. For example, on November 5, 2012, Eugene entered into a Master Services Agreement with Stratus Technologies ("the Stratus Contract"). A copy of the Stratus Contract is attached hereto as Exhibit C. Like the Superion Contract, Eugene entered into the Stratus Contract to obtain support services necessary for the proper function of the system shared by Eugene, Springfield, and University. L. The Superion system contains criminal justice information, individually identifiable health information, and other sensitive information, and as such, is subject to certain security controls and requirements, including but not limited to, The Criminal Justice Information Services ("WIS") Security Policy, the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act C"HIPAA"j and other agency policies. Springfield, Eugene, and University recognize that because they will have access to the Superion system and the information contained therein, all parties will be subject to certain security controls and requirements that will affect how the Ongoing Maintenance and Operations services will be provided and conducted. M. Springfield, Eugene, and University recognize that additional costs will be incurred for purchasing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing infrastructure required for the hosting of the public safety servers, including but not limited to firewalls, switches, and network pathways ("Ongoing Maintenance"). The parties intend to share those costs in the manner provided for in this Agreement. N. Springfield! and Eugene worked together to implement the Superion Project. During the implementation and installation period of the Superion system staff administered the contracts with Superion, Stratus and other contracting parties; designed and determined First ArnerAment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement— Superion Hosting operations and Maintenance Page 2 of to Attachment 2, Page 7 of 29 %V- system configuration; performed testing of system components; ensured proper installation and functionality of the Superion system, designed and built supporting applications and interfaces and reporting databases; engineered system connectivity for Springfield by providing secure encrypted connections to the Superion system. Some of these implementation phase services benefited solely one city and some benefited both. The parties agree to share the costs of the installation and implementation services described in this recital pursuant to Exhibit D as attached to this Agreement. O. Springfield, Eugene and University desire to enter into this Intergovernmental Agreement {"Agreement') to set forth each Parties' financial, staff support and other responsibilities related to the ongoing purchasing requirements, and servicing of the shared Superion system. P. Springfield, Eugene, and University recognize that this is not a traditional hosting relationship and have developed administrative document(s) that set forth in more detail the costing and operating procedures for the Superion, formerly known as, SunGard system. Project and personnel costs for items including, but not €invited to, implementation costs and services, Superion software, hosting operations, hardware reserves and contingency funding have been agreed to by the Parties and are attached and incorporated in this Agreement as Exhibits D, E and F. The Parties have also developed a Service Level Agreement and Operating Agreement, which is attached and incorporated into this Agreement as Exhibit F. The purpose of the Service Level Agreement and Operating Agreement includes, but is not limited to, a shared decision- making process, regulatory compliance and ongoing service prioritization. Q. The Parties agree that should additional agencies join the Superion system and their inclusion creates a revenue stream then the Parties will share in the revenue and the shared costs will be adjusted accordingly. =29 2A;R " In consideration of the above Recitals which are incorporated in this Agreement and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Definitions 1.7. Non -Shared Hardware: Hardware devices and all associated maintenance, services, licensing and warrantees that are intended for exclusive use by either Eugene, Springfield, or university including but not limited to Trimble Placer Gold GPS Bundles, Dataiogic Magellan 11001 and MagTek MinWedge Swipe Reader or any city -specific devices hosted in PSJ.net (shared public safety network hosted by Eugene). 1.2. Non -Shared Services: Services performed by Superion or another contracting party intended for exclusive use by either Eugene, Springfield, or University, including but not limited to training and project management for RMS modules used exclusively by one party such as Internal Affairs (Springfield), Property and Evidence (Springfield and University) and Crime Analysis Plus (Eugene). First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement — 5upedon Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page 3 of 10 Attachment 2, Page 8 of 29 ie 1.3. Non -Shared Software: Software and associated annual support that is intended for exclusive use by Eugene, Springfield, or University, including but not limited to the annual maintenance cost for RMS modules used exclusively by one party as well as custom interfaces. 1.4. Ongoing Hosting and Operations: Services that Eugene provides and/or performs, that include, but are not limited to, hosting, monitoring, maintaining, operating, repairing and updating the Superion System; overseeing installation and testing of new programs and system interfaces; services required for the hosting of the servers including, installation and maintenance of shared infrastructure, 24(71365 help desk services for urgent and critical system issues impacting the network or core services (software and services): management and tracking of support cases and issues. 1.5. Ongoing Maintenance: Costs that will be incurred for purchasing, maintaining, repairing, and replacing infrastructure required for the hosting of the public safety servers at Central Lane Communications Center, including but not limited to Firewalls, switches, and network pathways. 1.5. Shared Hardware: Hardware devices and all associated maintenance, licensing services and warrantees that are intended for use by Eugene, Springfield, and University including but not limited to existing production server(s), dedicated servers for reporting and licensing/services described in the Pay Agency section of the Superion Software License and Services Agreement or purchased by Eugene for the Superion Implementation Project. 1.7. Shared Services: Services provided by Superion or another party with whom Eugene has contracted with for the public safety information environment, including but not limited to hourly rates and travel expenses for Superion project management services relating to shared software modules and Superion CAD and RMS System Administration trainings, services described in the Pay Agency section of the Superion Software License and Services Agreement and installation of a second SAN disk array by Stratus Technologies technicians. 1.8. Shared Software: Software purchased for use by both Eugene, Springfield, and University and the associated annual maintenance cost, including but not limited to Superion's base RMS and CAD modules. 2. Eugene agrees to: 2.1. Manage the Contracts. For the terms of the contracts, manage the Superion Contract, Superion Maintenance Contract, Stratus Contract and associated contracts entered into by Eugene for the Superion Project. 2.2. Invoice Springfield 2.2.9. Twenty-eight percent (28%) of the Shared Software, Shared Hardware, Ongoing Maintenance and Shared Services costs Eugene incurs under the Superion Maintenance Contract as stated in Exhibit E and F of this Agreement. 2.2,2. The costs for Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services that are First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovemmenial Agreement - Superion Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page 4 of 10 Attachment 2, Page 9 of 29 J- provided or performed that benefit Springfield as determined by multiplying the Eugene Network Analyst Rate by University's estimated hours to perform its own hosting as stated in Exhibit E and F of this Agreement. 2.2.3. Invoice Springfield for 1009 of costs Eugene incurs for Ongoing Maintenance, Non -Shared Hardware, Non -Shared Software and Non - Shared Services that are intended for the exclusive use of Springfield. 2.2.4. For any cost above and beyond Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services, Eugene will Provide Springfield with invoices that clearly identify the costs (date of service, number of hours billed in half hour segments at the hourly rate identified in Exhibit D and E) and full description services provided (whether performed by Eugene staff (including name and We of Eugene staff) or third party contractors), and the items requiring payment from Springfield Invoices will be sent to AP@Springfield-or.gov and shall be, whenever possible, the invoices from Eugene's contractors and subcontractors with annotations by Eugene that clearly identify those items requiring payment from Springfield. 2.3. Invoice University 2.3.9. Twelve percent (12%) of the Shared Software, Shared Hardware, Ongoing Maintenance and Shared Services costs Eugene incurs under the Superion Maintenance Contract as stated in Exhibit E and f this Agreement. r 0 0. v &-S, f o 2.3.2. The costs for Ongoing Hostingi and Operations Services that are provided or performed that benefd404m_*efd-as determined by multiplying the Eugene Network Analyst Rate by Springfield's estimated hours to perform its own hosting as stated in Exhibit E and F of this Agreement. 2.3.3. Invoice University for 100% of costs Eugene incurs for Ongoing Maintenance, Non -Shared Hardware, Non -Shared Software and Non - Shared Services that are intended for the exclusive use of University. 2.3.4. For any cost above and beyond Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services, Eugene will provide University with invoices that clearly identify the costs (date of service, number of hours billed in half hour segments at the hourly rate identified in Exhibit D and E) and full description of the services provided (whether performed by Eugene staff (including name and title of Eugene staff) or third party contractors), and the items requiring payment from University Invoices will be sent to AP@uoregon.edu and shall be, whenever possible, the invoices from Eugene's contractors and subcontractors with annotations by Eugene that clearly identify those items requiring payment from University. 2.4. Pay 2.4.1. Sixty Percent (60%) of the costs for the lifecycle replacement of all Shared Hardware as stated in Exhibit F of this Agreement. 2,4.2. Sixty Percent (60°k) of the Shared Software, Shared Hardware, Share Services costs Eugene incurs under the Superion Maintenance Contract as stated in Exhibits E and F of this Agreement. 2.4.3. One Hundred Percent (100%) of the costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services, Non -Shared Hardware, Non -Shared Software and Non -Shared Services that are provided or performed that benefit only Eugene according to Exhibit E and First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement — Superion Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page 5 of to Attachment 2, Page 10 of 29 F of this Agreement. 3. Springfield Agrees to: 3.1. Pay 3.1.1. The implementation costs up to June 30, 2015 as stated in Exhibit D of this Agreement. 3.1.2. 28% of the Shared Software, Shared Hardware, Ongoing Maintenance and Shared Services costs Eugene incurs under the Superion Maintenance Contract as stated in Exhibits E and F of this Agreement. 3.1.3. Springfield agrees to 50% of costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services for Shared Software modules used by only University and Springfield. 3.1 A. Springfield agrees to 33% of costs for Ongoing Maintenance for Shared Software modules used only by Eugene and Springfield. 3.1.6. The costs for Ongoing Hosting and operations Services that are provided or performed as stated in Paragraph 2.2.2 and Exhibits E and F of this Agreement. 3.1.6. 100% of the costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services, Non -Shared Hardware, Non -Shared Software and Non -Shared Services that are provided or performed that benefit only Springfield according to Exhibit E and F of this Agreement. 3.1.7. Springfield shall make payment to Eugene within 15 days of receiving Eugene's invoice. 4. University Agrees to: 4.1. Pay 4.1.1. 100° of the implementation and initial licensing costs charged by Superion, formerly known as Superion, resulting from University Access Agreement Supplement attached as Exhibit G. 4.1.2. 12% of the Shared Software, Shared Hardware, Ongoing Maintenance and Shared Services costs Eugene incurs under the Superion Maintenance Contract as stated in Exhibits E and F of this Agreement. 4.1.3. University agrees to 50% of costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services for Shared Software modules used by only University and Springfield. University agrees to 17% of costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services for Shared Software modules used by only University and Eugene. 4.1.4. 100% of the costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting and Operations Services, Non -Shared Hardware, Non -Shared Software and Non -Shared Services that are provided or performed that benefit only University according to Exhibit E and F of this Agreement. 4.1.5. 12% of the FYI hardware costs as computed in Eugene invoice p ISD -00264. Eugene will give a credit in the amount of $7,908.47 to �r..� Springfield on the next invoice cycle. 4.1.6. University shall make payment to Eugene within 15 days of receiving Eugene's invoice. First Amendment and Restatement or Intergoverrunentai Agreement -- Superion Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page B of 10 Attachment 2, Page 11 of 29 All Parties Agree: S. Joint Governance and Decision Making. The parties agree to make decisions regarding the Ongoing Hosting and Operations services for the Superion system consistent with the Superion Contract, Superion Maintenance Contract, Stratus Contract and Exhibit's D, E and F of this Agreement. 6, Total Shared Costs for Superion Software Maintenance. The annual Superion Maintenance Contract costs started in November of 2013 and will continue each contract year thereafter. The total shared costs limils set forth in this paragraph does not apply to the shared costs for Ongoing Maintenance or for Ongoing Hosting and Operations services. 6.1. Eugene's share of the Superion implementation and Maintenance costs from inception to June 30, 2015 are maintained by Information Services Division [ISD], 6.2. Springfield's share of the Superion Implementation and Maintenance costs from inception to June 30, 2015 are as stated on Exhibit D. 6.3. For July 1, 2015 -June 30, 2016 Springfield's total shared costs for Superion Software Maintenance will not exceed $63,291. See Exhibit E. 6.4. From July 1, 2016 and going forward Springfield's total shared costs for Superion Software Maintenance will not increase by more than 5°% per year in accordance With Exhibit A Superion Contract unless host agency indicates the increase is not needed. The actual amount billed to Springfield will be based upon the actual amount billed to Eugene and shared cost distribution updated on an annual basis, not to exceed the 5% annual increase cap. See Exhibit E. 7. Total Annual Shared Costs for Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting, and Operations. 7.1. Eugene's share of the Ongoing Maintenance, Ongoing Hosting, and Operations costs to support the Superion System from inception to June 30, 2015 are maintained by Information Services DMsion (ISD). 7.2. Springfield's share of the Superion Implementation costs from inception to June 30, 2015 are as stated in Exhibit ❑. 7.3. For July 1, 2015 - June 30, 2016 Springfield's total shared costs for Ongoing Maintenance and Ongoing Hosting and Operations services will not exceed $64,938 in accordance with Exhibit E. 7.4. Beginning July 1, 2018 onward, Springfield's total shared costs for Ongoing Maintenance and Ongoing Hosting and Operations services shall be 50°% of the Exhibit E 1.2 FY 18 costs plus the current Consumer Price Index for the Pacific area and shall not exceed each year by more than the Consumer Price Index for the Pacific area unless mutually consented to by the Parties 7.5. Beginning July 1, 2018 onward, University total shared costs for Ongoing Maintenance and Ongoing Hosting and Operations services shall be 50°% of the Exhibit E 1.2 FY18 costs charged to Springfield plus the current Consumer Price Index for the Pacific area and shall not exceed each year by more than the Consumer Price Index for the Pacific area unless mutually consented to by the Parties First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovemmental Agreement - Superion Hosting operations and Maintenance Page 7 of 10 Attachment 2, Page 12 of 29 +' 8. Fire/EMS Dispatch Services Contract. The Parties agree that the neither Springfield nor University will be charged For the Superion services that are included in the annual Dispatch Contract. 9. Agreement Administration. Each party designates the following as its representative for purposes of administering this contract. Either party may change its designated representative by giving written notice to the other as provided in paragraph 15 of this Agreement. Springfield: Brandt Melick Information Technology Director 225 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 bmelick@springfield-or.gov Eugene: Kris Dalmolin Information Services Division Director 100 West 14th Ave., Suite 450 Eugene, OR 97401 University: Kevin McGlinchey Finance and Administration Shared Services Associate Director for Information Technology 1276 University Of Oregon Eugene OR 97443-1276 10. Recordslinspection. Each Party shall maintain records of its costs and expenses under this Agreement for a period of not less than three full fiscal years following any Party's termination of this Agreement. Upon reasonable advance notice, each party or its authorized representatives may from time to time inspect, audit, and make copies of another Party's records. 11. Records Disclosure. Subject to the Oregon public records laws, no Party will disclose anther Party's records to a third party without express written permission of the Patty that originated that record. Furthermore, University will not disclose records originated by Eugene or Springfield to University staff outside of University's police department without express written permission of the Party that originated that record. 12. Indemnification. To the extent allowed by the Oregon Constitution and the Oregon First Amendment and Restatement of lnlergovemmental Agreement - Supedc)n Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page S of 10 Attachment 2, Page 13 of 29 Revised Statutes, and subject to the limitations of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, each of the parties hereto agrees to defend, indemnify, and save the other harmless from any claims, liability or damages including attorney fees arising out of any error, omission or act of negligence on the part of the indemnifying party, its officers, agents, or employees in the performance of this Agreement. 13. Status. In providing the services specified in this Agreement (and any associated services) each Party is a public body and maintains that public body status as specified in ORS 30.260. Each Party understands and acknowledges that each retains all immunities and privileges granted them by the Oregon Tort Claims Act (ORS 30.260 through 30.295) and any and all other statutory rights granted as a result of their status as local public bodies or instrumentalities or the State of Oregon. 14.Workers Compensation Insurance. Each party is a subject employer that will comply with ORS656.017. 15. Assignment. No Party shalt assign this contract in whole or in part, or any right or obligation hereunder, without the other Parties' written approval. 16. Compliance With laws. Each party shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations at all times. 17. Notices. Any notices permitted or required by this contract shall be deemed given when personally delivered or upon deposit in the United State mail, postage fully prepaid, certified, return receipt requested, addressed to the representative designated in paragraph 9. Each party may change its address by notice given to the other Parties in accordance with this paragraph, 18. Integration. This Agreement embodies the entire agreement of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions or obligations other than these contained herein. This contact shall supersede all prior communications, representations or agreements, either oral or written, between the parties. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing, signed by both parties. 19. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the state of Oregon. 20. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by mutual agreement of the parties. All amendments shall be in writing and signed by the City Managers from both Eugene and Springfield, and a duty authorized representative of University. 21 -Term. This Agreement shall be effective upon the signature of all Parties and shall continue in effect for a minimum of one full fiscal year, and continue thereafter until June 30, 2020 unless earlier terminated by mutual agreement or in accordance with paragraph 20 of this Agreement. 22.Termination. Any party may terminate its inclusion in this Agreement for any reason by giving the other Parties notice of termination six months prior to the termination date. In the event of termination, the terminating party will be entitled to a proportional refund only First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovemmental Agreement — Superion Hosting Operations and Maintenance Page 9 of 10 Attachment 2, Page 14 of 29 %J/ if a refund is directly provided by a contractor or subcontractor pursuant to the Superion Contract, Superion Maintenance Contract, Stratus Contract or other contract executed for purposes of the Superion Implementation Project or Ongoing Maintenance. 23.Access to Data. Upon termination, cancellation or non -renewal of this Agreement, the terminating Party will deliver to the non -terminating Parties and/or continue to make available all applications, the non -terminating Parties' property and data for the non - terminating Parties' download and/or retrieval for a minimum of six months after the termination or expiration of this Agreement in order to assist the non -terminating Parties in transitioning data either to itself or third party. Data transfer methodology will be at the non -terminating Parties' sole discretion. Eugene [SIGNATURES FOLLOW ON NEXT PAGE] Springfield A //f) I By., By: S Name: z Title: C , V-� Date 312 ,zi i ( university � l /� By: i� 'od it`d r 11ptrn� � 4• Name: P. Shatiram, Assoaale I1irclor4�� - Pumhasm an ng Semces Title: Date _ REVIEWED & APPROVED AS TO FORM DATE'. ?, 2 OFFICE OF Crab A ORNEy Name: Title: L+L-A l .�y Date 3i 23l 18 First Amendment and Restatement of Intergovernmental Agreement - Superion Hosting Operations and Malntenanc- Page 10 of 10 Attachment 2, Page 15 of 29 .z r txmort u - I Past Costs Lost rrom inception to June 3u, ruitr 1.1 Past 3rd Party Vendor Materials and Services for Implementation through June 30,2015 SunGard Implementation. The following totals include Phase 1 and 2 costs categorized by Application. Consulting (training, development, travel costs, etc.), and Hardware/Equipment, LCOG Map Interface contract, and Software Maintenance costs through June 30, 2015 1.1.1 SunGard Contractual Services Phase 1 & 2 $ 561,523 Application: $39,293 Consulting: $389,585 Hardware/Equipment: $116,744 Good faith difference $I5,90I 1.1.2 LCOG Map Interface (poll to LCOG City Contract #1125) $ 20,098 1.1.3 SunGard Software Maint up to FY15 $ 100,989 111/14-6/30114 $35,545 711/14-12/31/14 $32,996 1/11I5-6130115 $31,520 9/1114-6130/15 (Mist.) $928 1.1.4 Subtotal -3rd Party Vendor M&S thru Phase II $ 682,610 1.1.5 Total Past 3rd Party Springfield SunGard (minus LL2 LCOG) $ 662,S121 2.1 FY15 Past Eugene Staff Hosting Cast SunGard Implementation and on-going up to June 30, 2015 - Eugene (staff) Implementation and Hosting 2.1.1 Eugene Implementation (staff time - no cost for Springfield) $ - 2.1.2 Eugene Hosting For FY14-FYIS (staff time -18 months: Jan 20144une $ 97,407 2014 & FY 15) Calculated using Eugene Network Analyst hourly rate ($81.57) x 18 months of Springfield estimated hours to perform own hosting 161.33 hours/rnonth)t 38 months of Springfield 207 IT support cost ($4o81mo) 2.1.3 Subtotal for Eugene Implementation and on-going FY15 $ 97,407 2.3 FY15 Past Cost Subtotal rninus LCOG {1-1.5 plus 21.3) $ 759,919 Page 1 of i Attachment 2, Page 16 of 29 wtnuHc t- apnngnera runire vests -fury s, cuss rorwara 1 Future Anticipated casts 1.1 SunGard Software (annual Annual support and maintenance cost to be paid by Springfield to $ 63,291 support and maintenance) Eugene based upon the actual SunGard lrwakce to Eugene. Contract capped at 5% per year Increase. Eugene pays SunGard and then bills Springfield the actual cost not to exceed the estimated cost. FYI& Springfield an►y=$3,438, Eugene only -$31,572 $3,438 (Springfield only] + $59,853(3396 of shared ); $63,291 1.2 SunGard Hosting IEugene for Annual hosting services to rel mhursernent Eugene staff casts. $ 64,928 THEIR staff costs for hmtingj Eugene bRls Springfield. Calculated using Eugene Network Analyst hourly rate ($81.57) x 12 months of Springfield esffmated hours to perform awn hosting (61,33 hours/month)+ 12 months of Spriwfield 24x7 IT support costs (5408/ara 1.3 FY16 Annual Future Springfield Commitment to Eugene $ 128,219 1.4 LCQG Map interface See Springfield Contract # 1125. LCDG bilis Springfield. $ 20,038 15 Hardware Reserves Annual hardware reserve for Springfield, assurnes S year $ 12,WO replacement cycle with replacement equipment costs at $I50100 (initial cost + IM). (5pringf old budgets in reser+res.l 1.6 Contingency Funding fstimofed annual contingency funds for Springfield to cover high $ 28,000 risk/unanticipofed sterns. (Springfield budge is in Contractual Services accounts.) 1.7 FY16 Annual Future cost Committed to Springfield Budget $ 60 ,098 1.8 FY 16 Total Annual Future cost Committed to Budget $ 188,317 1.9 FY 17 and Forward See IGA 5.4, 6.4 and Exhibit F Page 1 of 1 Attachment 2, Page 17 of 29 Exhibit F Superion Ongoing Hosting Operations and Maintenance Service Level Agreement and Operating Agreement Purpose: The Purpose of this Agreement is to lay out the parties, regulatory compliance responsibilities, decision making processes and costing methods for the ongoing hosting and maintenance of the Superion system. Z. Systems: (also referred to as SunGard System) refers to Public Safety and Justice (PSJ) network and Superion OSSI software detailed in the PSJ and OSSI Network Component and Software Detail Sheet. Hosting party shall keep a current inventory of shared hardware and software and will make the inventory available to Hostee's upon request. 2. Parties: refers to the City of Springfield (Springfield), City of Eugene (Eugene) and the University of Oregon (University) only. All Parties adhere to current published CJIS security standards, maintain a current list of employees in CJ IS security roles, and make list available to all Parties. 3. Party Voting: All Parties have voting rights with financial and functional decision making authority and obligation as defined herein. Any obligation of Springfield or University financial resource or personnel resource beyond that currently approved by the attached IGA requires voting. All Parties have one vote. 4. Party Type: refers to the types of program responsibilities of all Parties and clarifies which Parties bear which responsibilities: a. Hosting Party (also referred to as host): Eugene is the Hosting Party. The Hosting Party owns and hosts the largest share of system hardware and software; provides the largest share of system support staff; maintains master purchase agreements with vendors and service providers; maintains a balanced budget, provides service delivery and provides business continulty, b. Hosting Party Responsibilities include: i. Budget administration — provide accurate and timely budget information for shared hardware and software, project requests and any action that will eventually increase Hostees' resource obligation beyond rate and cost schedules identified here in or require use of contingency funds. Voting — conduct votes before financially obligating other Parties; proceed to obligate only if approved by consensus vote. ii. Contract administration — provide coordinated, accurate, timely and concise agreements. iii. Shared project coordination — assure that roles, responsibilities and resources have been identified and assigned to complete projects within schedules. iv. Inter -agency communication, coordination and collaboration — assure that Agencies and Parties participate, understand, agree and commit to priorities, agreements. and budgets. v. Business continuity — targets hosted systems continues to operate 24 hours a day 7 days a week. vi. System modifications — implement and maintain modifications when Parties agree that such modification fall under exclusive purview of Hosting Party. vii. Requesting changes — initiate user modification, application configuration, and support requests; maintain a list of Authorized Requestors. viii. System Administration - Mernhers(s) issued System Administration rights to a system application and abides by system modification protocol; maintain a list of Application Administrators. Page 1 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 18 of 29 ix. Public Safety and Justice (PSJ) Network administration — Maintain network infrastructure, monitoring, .hardware maintenance, upgrades, and patching. x. Superion Server administration — Serves as the Superion System Administrator, administers global application setting modifications, maintains connections to the State of Oregon, federal and third party databases, performs data backups, restorations and GIS map updates, and security patching. xi. Database administration -- Monitors and maintains shared reporting server, develops and maintains reporting views and data warehouses, and manages database replication services. c. Hostee Parties (also referred to as Hostee: Springfield and University are the Hostee Parties. The Hostee Parties own and host a smaller share of system hardware and software; receive system support staff from Hosting Party and review with Hosting Party master purchase agreements with vendors and service providers. d. Hostee party Responsibilities include: i. System modifications — implement and maintain Hostee-specific configuration settings and participate in decision affecting global system modifications. R. Voting — participate in voting at PSJ Steering Committee. W. Participation — participate in interagency decision making involving the prioritization of work; participate in inter -party decision making involving the allocation of resources, etc.; participate with and user training, trouble shooting. iv. System modifications — implement and maintain when Parties agree that such modifications do not fall under exclusive purview of Hosting Party, v. Requesting changes — initiate user modification, application configuration, and support requests; maintain a list of Authorized Requestors. vi. System administration — Members(s) issued System Administration rights to a system application and abides by system modification protocol; maintain a list of Application Administrators. 5. Agencies: refers to all public agencies and departments thereof participating in the shared use of the systems defined therein that are in any way connected to systems supporting Springfield and University. All Agencies will adhere to current published CJ IS security standards, will maintain a current list of employees in CJtS security roles, and will make list available to all Parties and Agencies. 6. participating Agencies and Departments: refers to the following: a. Hosting Party, City of Eugene i. Eugene Information Services Department (ISD) ii. Eugene Police department (EPD) (no budget authority) iii. Eugene Fre and Life Safety (no budget authority) iv. Central Lane Communication Center (CLCCO911) (no budget authority) b. Client Party, City of Springfield i. Springfield Informatioh Technology Department (IT) ii. Springfield Police Department (SPD) (no budget authority) iii. Springfield Fire and Life Safety (no budget authority) c. Client Party, lJniversity of Oregon i. Finance and Administration Shared Services information Technology Department (FASSIT) Page 2 of 22 Attachment 2, Page 19 of 29 ii. University of Oregon Police Department (UOPD) (no budget authority) 7. Regulatory compliance: Parties and Agencies agree to sustain compliance with regulatory obligations to follow the law, protect sensitive information, minimize risk and assure access to key resources. Compliance includes but is not limited to 9) following published regulations, guidelines and best practice, 2) following recommendations by designated authorities (Oregon State Police, FBI, etc.) included herein by reference, and 3) completing tasks required assuring compliance. Specifically, agencies agree to comply with the following: a. CJIS — compliance with regulations of the Criminal Justice Information Services (CJIS) Division of the IBI. b. HIPAA —compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). c. HITECH — compliance with Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2GG9 (ARRA). d. Agency policies — compliance with local, regional, and state policies that govern access to sensitive information. e. System audits — Host will perform systems audits, perform audits upon request by Hostees', support all requested audits required by proper authorities to sustain compliance and remain in good standing with auditing authorities, and upon request shares audit results with all participating Parties. Any breech requiring reporting to a regulatory agency will be shared with all parties. 8. Principle of Least privilege (POLP) and privilege bracketing: Parties and Agencies agree to assign the fewest privileges (permissions) consistent with assigned duties and functions of people, processes and devices. When permissions levels must be raised temporarily, the higher level is in effect for the briefest possible time to maximize security. To support POLP, participating agencies agree to the following: a. Maintain (current and complete) and share a list of permission assignments for administrative staff and contractors, that captures: I. Name 11. Agency iii. Department iv. Division v. Role vi. Permissions by system vii. Expiration date of permissions b. Notify partner agencies when changes to administrative rights with systemwide permissions occur. See Superion Change Board below. 9. Operational Efficiency and Continuity of Service: Parties agree to efficiently address issues as they arise to assure continuity of service and minimization of down time. In addition to priorities identified here In, a. Categories of Issue Awareness --Parties agreeto use the following categories of issue awareness as factors when reporting and documenting support issues (e.g., trouble shooting, patching and repairing minor and major upgrading, enhancing system, integrating with other systems, change orders, etc.) for operational efficiency and continuity of service: Page 3 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 20 of 29 Awareness Description Response Goal Unanticipated An issue shall be Agencies will report Issue, considered identify source, scope solution, Level 1 Unanticipated when identify cost and determine it is unplanned, ability to pay before accruing unbudgeted and billable hours or materials. truly unanticipated. Servicing an Unanticipated i.e., there was no issue will, if approved, reasonable negatively impact the budget indication that it would occur. Anticipated An issue shall be Agencies will report Issue, considered scope solution, identify costs Level 2 Anticipated when it and track costs as they proceed Is budgeted but not with solution. Servicing an agreed upon Anticipated issue will not schedule exists, i.e., negatively impact the budget. there was reasonable indication that it would occur, it was Identified as a risk, assigned a contingency Planned An issue shall be Agencies will review SOW, considered Planned schedule and budget, execute Level 3 when it is budgeted plan and track costs as they and an agreed upon proceed with solution. Servicing schedule exists, i.e., a Planned issue will not there was negatively impact the budget. reasonable indication that it would occur, it was identified as a planned activity, and resources were assigned. b. Categories of Criticality - Parties agree to the following categories of criticality, agree to response goals and agree to maintain a list of individual representatives assigned to each goal for operational efficiency continuity of service: Priority UesGription Response Goal Page 4 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 21 of 29 Critical 1 Non -Critical: Essential Services 2 Non -Critical: Production Services 3 Nen-Critical: Non -Production Se rvices A support issue shall be considered Critical when it produces a Work Stoppage; meaning access to Superion is not accessible and has causer{ a complete work stoppage. City of Eugene will respond within 60 minutes of the issue being reported and have a resolution plan within 8 hours A support issue shall be consideredI City of Eugene will respond during Non -Critical, Essential Service when a normal business hours, within four service issue occurs that supports day- to-day operations and are integrated with critical services; meaning access to Superion fails to perform one or more function, but the system is still usable for its intended purpose or there is a workaround. A support issue will be considered Non -Critical, Production Service when the issue affects services that improve business operation and productivity, causes minimal business or financial impact and does not affect a large number of users. This may include cosmetic issues, general questions, and how to use certain features of the system. A support issue will be considered Non -Critical, Non -Production Service when the issue is related to an optional system and does not enhance the productivity of an Agency or Department. This may include test systems, archived or historical data retrieval and non-essential complementary products. Page 5 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 22 of 29 hours of the issue being reported and have a resolution plan within 24 hours City of Eugene will respond during normal business hours, within 24 hours of the issue being reported and have a resolution plan or just response within 24 hours City of Eugene will respond during normal business hours, within 24 hours of the issue being reported and have a resolution plan or just response within 48 hours - 10. Issue togging: Parties agree to capture and share issue reporting information and follow the Shared Decision Process described herein. a. Report issue information tracking: Parties and agencies agree to track and share the following information when reporting an issue: i. Contact (who is reporting the issue): agency, department, division, name, role, phone number, etc. ii. impacted end user(s), who is suffering from issue: agency, department, division name, type, phone number, etc. iii i. Nature of issue; specific issue reported by end user, user type impacted (dispatch, field officer, etc.), impacted systems, number of people impacted, as well as Criticality and Awareness as defined herein. iv. If Criticality is priority one and issue is Unanticipated, then pre -solution scoping, costing and budgeting may occur after the issue has been resolved. 11. On -Going Service Level and Operations — Parties agree to account for full cost of ownership and share on-going cost accordingly. Amounts identified in the section, either by inclusion or reference, are fixed and shall not change during a given physical year without explicit consent by all voting parties. a. Parties agree to include contingency cost no less than: i. 7% (of overall program) reserve added to each annual budget for high priority (Critical) Unanticipated issues. ii. 15% contingency budget added to each project for agreed upon issues. b. Parties agree to include and maintain their own system reserves for replacement cost: i. A replacement reserve shall be created for each component (equipment and software) costing more than $5,DOO. This is to be calculated based on original purchase price, plus 10%. ii. Each reserve shall be based on total replacement in 5 years. iii. Each agency shall maintain their own reserves. c. Parties agree to share software annual maintenance and support licensing costs according to IGA 6. Total Shared Costs for Superion Software Maintenance. d. Hosting party agrees to provide hosting services identified herein for a lump sum annual amount identified in the (Exhibit D implementation Costs 2.1 and Exhibit E Future Costs 1.2). 12. Contingency and budgeting for products and service that are not included in Exhibit E Future Costs — Parties agree to account for full cost of ownership and share on-going cost according to the following formulas. Amounts identified in the section, either by inclusion or reference, are subject to explicit consent by both voting parties. a. Parties agree to shared contingency personnel cost, based on the following talent type and formula: i. City of Eugene share .60 ii. City of Springfield .26 iii. University of Oregon .12 b. Parties agree to track and report all contingency expenditures. 3. Cost Category — Allocation Sheet Parties agree to the following cost categories for inter -agency resource reporting and billing purposes: a. Cost Category j Description .� Cost Page 6 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 23 of 29 b. Agencies to follow the cost categories for inter -party service tracking and billing purposes, both for accounting for ongoing work defined under the attached IGA and when developing proposals for contingency and special -projects not included in this agreement. 14. PS.! and OSSI Network Component and Software detail Sheet: All Parties agree to maintain a current network component and OSSI software inventory assignment sheet in a mutually accessible location. Modification of the network component and software inventory assignment sheets requires approval by both the Hosting and Client Parties. The network and software assignment sheets will be used for inter -agency service tracking and billing purposes. 15. Contingency and Special Project Costing Formula -- when additional resources are required beyond On -Going Service Level and Operations Costing Formula and agreed upon as described herein, Parties agree to the following: a. Pre -solution Scope and Cost information tracking: Parties agree to track and share the following information before dedicating resources to an Unanticipated issue: i. Proposed solution: description, estimated cost, estimated effort, estimated Page 7 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 24 of 29 Allocation Shared Value of cost item equally benefits and 60% COE approved by the City of Eugene (COE) , 28% Cos City of Springfield (COS) and the 12% UO University of Oregon (UO). EPD Only Value of cost Item directly and 100% COE exclusively benefits or approved by the City of Eugene Police Department (EPD) SPD Only Value of cost item directly and 100% Cos exclusively benefits or approved by the City of Springfield Police Department (SPD). UO Only Value of cost item directly and 100% UO exclusively benefits or approved by the University of Oregon (UO). EUG/SPD Shared Value of cost item equally benefits and 67% COE approved by the City of Eugene (COE) , 33% COS City of Springfield (COS). EUG/UO Shared Value of cost item equally benefits and 83% COE approved by the City of Eugene (CAE) 17% UO and the University of Oregon (UO). SPD/UO Shared Value of cost item equally benefits and 50% Cos approved by the City of Springfield 50% UO (COS) and the University of Oregon (UO). CLCC Value of cost item directly and 100% FLS exclusively benefits or approved by to the Command Central Lane (911). FLS Only Value of cost item directly and 100% FLS exclusively benefits or approved by the Fire and Life Safety (FLS). b. Agencies to follow the cost categories for inter -party service tracking and billing purposes, both for accounting for ongoing work defined under the attached IGA and when developing proposals for contingency and special -projects not included in this agreement. 14. PS.! and OSSI Network Component and Software detail Sheet: All Parties agree to maintain a current network component and OSSI software inventory assignment sheet in a mutually accessible location. Modification of the network component and software inventory assignment sheets requires approval by both the Hosting and Client Parties. The network and software assignment sheets will be used for inter -agency service tracking and billing purposes. 15. Contingency and Special Project Costing Formula -- when additional resources are required beyond On -Going Service Level and Operations Costing Formula and agreed upon as described herein, Parties agree to the following: a. Pre -solution Scope and Cost information tracking: Parties agree to track and share the following information before dedicating resources to an Unanticipated issue: i. Proposed solution: description, estimated cost, estimated effort, estimated Page 7 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 24 of 29 duration, estimated talent needed For solution (Tech, DBA, etc.) ii. Proposed funding: proposed funding category, proposed awareness category, proposed allocation by agency b. Determine ability to pay information evaluation: agencies agree to track, share, evaluate and determine ability to pay before dedicating resources to an Unanticipated issue: i. Evaluate Report Issue Information it. Evaluate Proposed Solution iii. Evaluate Proposed Funding iv. Complete Shared Decislon Process c. Post -solution Scope and Cost Information tracking: agencies agree to track and share the following information when this information becomes available: L Actual solution: description, actual cost, actual effort, actual duration, actual talent dedicated to solution (Tech, DBA, etc.) ii. Actual funding: actual funding category, actual awareness category, actual allocation by Party 16. Total Cost Accounting: For any cost that exceeds rate and cost schedules identified herein or requires use of contingency funds, parties agree to identify, track and make available for budgeting purposes full cost of ownership including but not limited to hardware, software and labor cost fisted below. a. Costs for hardware and software: i. Software Purchase Cost ii. Software LicensefMaintenance Cost ill. Software Service Agreement Cost iv, Hardware Purchase Cost v. Hardware Warrantee Cost A. Hardware Service Agreement cost Al. Each agency will maintain Capital Reserves for hardware and software replacement in respective agency budgets. b. Costs for labor. €. Project Management and Administration ii. Application and Database Administration iii. Network Administration and Security iv. System Analysis v. Technician Hosing and Client Parties agree not to bill one another for meetings, budget administration, contract administration and training. 17. Rate Sheet: Parties agree to the following rate sheet for estimating inter -agency resource for Contingency and Special Project Costing. All costs shall be agreed upon by both before billable activity occurs. a. Resource Description (roles included in this Allowable category include) Billable Rates Under this contract Page a of 12 Attachment 2, Page 25 of 29 Application Data Architect, Data Management Director, $100 per hour and Database Database Analyst, Database Report Writer, to be updated Administration Data Warehouse Manager, Applications annually. ■ Engineer, Applications System Architect, , ■ Software Architect, Software Engineer, Application and . Software Quality Assurance Analyst Database Network Enterprise Infrastructure Architect, Message $100 per hour Administration Engineer, Network Administrator, Network to be updated and Security Control Technician, Network Engineer, annually. ■ Systems Administrator, Data Security Analyst, ff Data Security Manager, Data Security Network Administration ■ Supervisor, IS Security Manager, and Security ■ Systems/Application Security Analyst System System Analyst, Business Data Analyst, $60 per hour to Analysis Business System Analyst, Project Manager, be updated Information Technology Auditor, Quality annually. . Control Analyst, etc. Technician Computer Operator, Customer Service $60 per hour to ■ Representative, Help Desk be updated ■ Manager/Supervisor, Installation & annually. Maintenance Technician, Web Editor, Technical Trainer, Technical Writer b. Contingency Activities —Services Sheet for estimating inter -agency resource for Contingency and Special Project Gosling. All costs shall be agreed upon by both parties before billable activity mcurs. Resource Billable Service (agencies agree that billing can occur for the following services) Project Management . Work Plan development and Administration ■ Project Coordination ■ Dispute Resolution Application and . Database/Application Design Database ■ Database/Application Configuration Administration . DatabaselApplication Integration and ETL • Database/Application Backup ■ Database/Application Administration ff Data and Warehouse Analysis Network Administration ■ Network Design and Security ■ Network Setup and Configuration ■ Network Administration ■ Security Audit, Administration and Remediation System Analysis . Needs/Requirements Analysis • Report Writing ■ Troubleshooting Technician ■ End Users Device Support Page 9 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 26 of 29 1 S. Governance (Shared Decision Process) — Parties agree to commit to, developing a joint decision making structure in which both parties participate equally with respect to operating and maintaining the systems, related contracts, and related costs. The joint decision-making structure will include, but not be limited to an Executive Steering Committee, PSJ Steering Committee and a Superion Change Advisory board as outlined herein. a. PSJ Policy Team i. Membership consists of the Host and Hostees' executives, which includes but is not limited to: a. Eugene Central Services Department Director b. Eugene Police Chief c. Springfield Police Chief d. Springfield IT Director e. Eugene/Springfield Fre Chief f. University of Oregon Police Chief ii. Purview includes Superion system and other shared systems. iii, Policy Team will a. Meet as necessary to address topics escalated from the PSJ Steering Committee. b. Provide higher level regional policy, direction, strategy. c. Approve higher level regional work programs. iv. Highest level decisions with greatest fiscal implications. V. Voting a. Regarding Superion System decision that cannot be resolved by the Superlon Change Advisory Board or the PSJ Steering Committee, the PSJ Policy team will vote accordingly 1. The Host and Hostee's will each have one (1) mote. ii. Host and Hostee's will identify one executive that will communicate their vote. iii. Voting options include yes, no, or abstain. A"yes" vote, change will move forward with the costs shared as noted in Exhibit E, "Abstain' vote, change can move forward with the cost to be bome by the party who proposed. The Abstaining party bears no cost on the change. A `no' vote by either party, change will not occur. 6. PSJ Steering Committee L Membership consists of the Most and Hostees' program manager, which includes but is not limited to: a. Eugene ISD Page 10 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 27 of 29 • End Users Application Support ■ End Users Procedural Support Hon Billable 5ervicas (agencies agree not to bill for the following services) (Any Resource) . Meetings • Program Budgeting • Timecard Tracking • Training 1 S. Governance (Shared Decision Process) — Parties agree to commit to, developing a joint decision making structure in which both parties participate equally with respect to operating and maintaining the systems, related contracts, and related costs. The joint decision-making structure will include, but not be limited to an Executive Steering Committee, PSJ Steering Committee and a Superion Change Advisory board as outlined herein. a. PSJ Policy Team i. Membership consists of the Host and Hostees' executives, which includes but is not limited to: a. Eugene Central Services Department Director b. Eugene Police Chief c. Springfield Police Chief d. Springfield IT Director e. Eugene/Springfield Fre Chief f. University of Oregon Police Chief ii. Purview includes Superion system and other shared systems. iii, Policy Team will a. Meet as necessary to address topics escalated from the PSJ Steering Committee. b. Provide higher level regional policy, direction, strategy. c. Approve higher level regional work programs. iv. Highest level decisions with greatest fiscal implications. V. Voting a. Regarding Superion System decision that cannot be resolved by the Superlon Change Advisory Board or the PSJ Steering Committee, the PSJ Policy team will vote accordingly 1. The Host and Hostee's will each have one (1) mote. ii. Host and Hostee's will identify one executive that will communicate their vote. iii. Voting options include yes, no, or abstain. A"yes" vote, change will move forward with the costs shared as noted in Exhibit E, "Abstain' vote, change can move forward with the cost to be bome by the party who proposed. The Abstaining party bears no cost on the change. A `no' vote by either party, change will not occur. 6. PSJ Steering Committee L Membership consists of the Most and Hostees' program manager, which includes but is not limited to: a. Eugene ISD Page 10 of 12 Attachment 2, Page 27 of 29 Exhibits A. BAP & C are located in the original contract. Attachment 2, Page 28 of 29 Attachment 2, Page 29 of 29