HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 01- Planning Fee StudyAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
SPRINGFIELD
CITY COUNCIL
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Staff Contact/Dept.:
Staff Phone No:
Estimated Time:
Council Goals:
6/20/2023
Work Session
Mark Rust/DPW
541.726.3654
30 Minutes
Provide Financially
Responsible and
Innovative Government
Services
ITEM TITLE: PLANNING FEE STUDY — DRAFT PLANNING FEE REPORT
ACTION
Receive a draft of the Planning Fee Study and provide input prior to finalizing
REQUESTED:
report.
ISSUE
The City recognizes there is a need to conduct an analysis of the Planning fees
STATEMENT:
following the adoption of a major update to the Springfield Development Code in
an effort to right size the fees for service in processing planning applications.
Through this fee study there are three primary objectives. First to determine the
average cost of service for reviewing planning applications. Second, based on the
average cost of service, asses the cost recovery for reviewing planning applications.
And finally compare Springfield's fees to those of comparable cities.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Council Briefing Memo
2. Fee Study Recommendations Memo
3. Cost of Service Analysis
4. Fee Comparison Table
DISCUSSION/
The City last conducted a comprehensive planning and development fee analysis in
FINANCIAL
2010. With the adoption of significant updates to the Springfield Development
IMPACT:
Code (SDC) in June of 2022, as well as process changes that have taken place in
response to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is an important time to re -assess the
planning fees.
Staff has been working with the PSU project staff since March 2023. The draft
report and recommendations is now ready for project staff to present to the Council
at this work session.
Reducing the planning application fees will have impacts to the General Fund. In
FY 22 the current planning program took in roughly $779,000 in revenues from
planning application fees, and the program expenditures were roughly $904,000.
So, the General Fund supported the Current Planning program with $125,000. If the
revenues through fees are reduced the impact to the General Fund will increase.
MEMORANDUM City of Springfield
Date: June 20, 2023
To: Nancy Newton, City Manager COUNCIL
From: Mark Rust, Planning Manager, Current Planning BRIEFING
Jeff Paschall, Community Development Director
Subject: Planning Fee Study — Draft Planning Fee Report MEMORANDUM
ISSUE: The City recognizes there is a need to conduct an analysis of the Planning fees following
the adoption of a major update to the Springfield Development Code in an effort to right size the
fees for service in processing planning applications.
Through this fee study there are three primary objectives. First to determine the average cost of
service for reviewing planning applications. Second, based on the average cost of service, asses the
cost recovery for reviewing planning applications. And finally compare Springfield's fees to those
of comparable cities.
COUNCIL GOALS/MANDATE:
Provide Financially Responsible and Innovative Government Services
BACKGROUND:
Staff was last before Council on this topic on May 8, 2023, to introduce the process for updating the
planning fees. At that meeting Council discussed comparable cities and other concerns with the fee
study. An additional city, Corvallis, was added to the comparable cities in the study based on
Council input.
It was also discussed that State law allows collection of fees for processing permits in two different
ways, either the actual or average cost of providing the service. The model the City of Springfield
(and most other jurisdictions in the state) use is the average cost of service. (ORS 227.175). The fee
study analyzes the average cost of providing the service to processing planning applications and in
some cases recommends transitioning to and actual cost of service.
DISCUSSION
This fee study includes comparison of four cities in Oregon: Eugene, Albany, Corvallis, and
Medford. Eugene was chosen due to the proximity and being in the same development market as
Springfield. Albany, Corvallis, and Medford were selected as being close in size to Springfield. The
results of this study will assist city staff and City Council in future cost recovery goals and setting
future fees.
This fee study does not include comparison or analysis of Building Permit fees, Land and Drainage
Alteration (LDAP) Permit fees, or System Development Charges (SDC's). It only looks at planning
application fees.
Cost Recovery
The Draft Planning Fee Study (Attachment 4, Planning Fee Comparison) shows multiple scenarios
where fees could be set to attain different levels of cost recovery. Based on the overall significant
reduction in fees proposed, staff recommends generally moving forward with the 100% cost
recovery fee amounts, with some specific exceptions. However, there may be other specific fees that
Council could consider having a lower cost recovery amount.
QUESTION FOR COUNCIL: Does Council have any specific guidance or input at what level
cost recovery should be used?
Changes in fees
Most of the planning fees are proposed to have significant reductions based on the study. However,
there are a few fees that are proposed to increase. The primary information used for assessing staff
time associated with processing different types of planning applications was a survey of the current
planning staff to estimate the amount of time on average that staff spend on processing different
types of applications. This method of estimating the amount of time and therefore what the fee
should be, although customary, is imprecise. This is especially true for many of the application types
that are not received very often.
In some cases, such as Refinement Plan Amendments, Solar Access Protection, Type 3 Variances,
etc., these types of applications are potentially received once every 10 years or less. It is very
difficult to come up with an "average cost of service" for these types of applications based on so few
applications. In addition to the above-mentioned application types, others such as Discretionary Use
applications, Metro Plan Amendments, Master Plan Approvals, etc., can vary widely in the amount
of complexity and time involved with processing them based on varying levels of public input, and
other variables associated with the diverse range of policy implications that can be involved. It is
very difficult to determine an equitable "average cost of service" for processing the wide spectrum
of these applications.
It is recommended that a certain list of application types be transitioned to an "actual cost of service"
model rather the existing "average cost of service" model used now. This would create a hybrid fee
structure where many of the typical application types are charged an average cost of service, and for
other application types, the actual cost of service would be charged. This would require the
establishment of an accurate time tracking program as well as establishing deposit amounts for the
actual cost of service applications. Any excess amount of the deposit that wasn't used for processing
the application would then be refunded at the completion of the planning review.
Proposed fees only account for current planning staff time
One of the primary reasons for the large reduction in the majority of the planning applications fees is
due to not capturing the time associated with other staff time in reviewing planning applications. It
is appears from reviewing materials from 2010 and 2014 when previous planning fee study work
was completed, that it is likely that the existing planning fees take into account the amount of time
spent by other staff to process a planning application. The new proposed fees are only contemplating
current planning staff time.
Examples of other staff time that is associated with processing planning applications includes:
1. Engineering staff -review of stormwater, sanitary sewer, etc.
2. Transportation Engineering staff — review of transportation elements
3. Fire Marshal's office staff — review of fire life safety elements
4. Survey staff — review for compliance with state survey statutes
One of the recommendations by the consultant is to contemplate if fees should be charged by other
work groups for the staff time associated with their review. A good example is in the Fee
Comparison document (Attachment 4), the City of Eugene lists a "Traffic Impact Analysis Review"
fee. A significant amount of time is typically spent by the City of Springfield Transportation
Engineering staff on reviewing planning applications. With the new fees, the time of this staff is not
captured. A separate transportation analysis fee could be charged to cover this time when applicable.
Similarly, for land division applications (subdivisions and partitions, etc.) the City of Springfield
Surveyors office staff spend significant time in reviewing the final plats for these applications.
Currently there is no separate fee to account for this time spent by the survey staff. A separate fee
could be charged by the Surveyor's office to cover this time on certain applications.
Assessing fees to compensate other staff reviews required with processing planning applications
could bolster other city funds. As an example, a portion of the engineering staffs time is being paid
for out of the street fund. Revenue from an engineering or survey review fee could be used to offset
reliance on other street fund revenues allowing those funds to be utilized to support and potentially
increase maintenance, operations, and preservation of the City's street assets.
Conversely, justification can be made that using the engineering staffs time for reviewing planning
applications is ensuring minimizing impacts to the existing street infrastructure, therefore this time is
directly attributable to the activities intended to be paid for by the street fund. This could hold true
for similar activities related to stormwater infrastructure, sanitary sewer infrastructure, etc.
One of the efficiencies in the City of Springfield planning review process is that planning staff is
concurrently reviewing an application with Engineering, Transportation Engineering, Fire, etc.,
identifying all potential issues and requirements up front. The alternative would be for planning to
review for only planning compliance upon receipt of an application. Other required reviews (e.g.,
engineering, fire and life safety) would follow on a separate track potentially lengthening the path to
final approval and potentially necessitating a revised planning approval to address any issues
identified through other required reviews.
QUESTION FOR COUNCIL: Should staff pursue establishing separate fees for other city
services required for review and approval of planning applications?
Customer Service
Oregon law (OAR 660-015) requires public involvement as a part of land use planning in Oregon.
This requirement is one of the things that make Oregon's land use planning program unique. The
requirement for public participation is written in the first goal of nineteen in the statewide land use
planning system.
Goal 1 calls for "the opportunity for citizens to be involved in all phases of the planning process." It
requires each city and county to have a citizen involvement program that addresses:
1. Opportunities for widespread public involvement
2. Effective two-way communication with the public
3. The ability for the public to be involved in all phases of the planning process
4. Making technical information easy to understand
5. Feedback mechanisms for policymakers to respond to public input, and
6. Adequate financial support for public involvement efforts
Part of the way that the City of Springfield and other cities throughout Oregon meet this requirement
is to have public assistance readily available through a "Planner on Duty" (POD). The City of
Springfield Development Center provides public assistance in many areas including Building,
Engineering, and Planning. The POD is available to meet with members of the public on a walk-in
basis, via telephone, and via email to provide information on development activities, zoning
requirements, answer general questions, and the intake of planning applications. These activities
usually are not directly associated with an active planning application.
The current planning work group consists of roughly 6 full time FTE. This includes four planners,
one administrative support position, and one manager position. One full FTE of this work group is
attributed to working as the POD, being available for walk-in members of the public to answer
question, responding to phone calls and emails. This work is rotated between the planning staff
members. However, this time is not accounted for in the planning fees as it is not directly associated
with a specific planning application. This one FTE of staff time for covering the POD duties is costs
approximately $125,000 per year.
In FY 22 the current planning program took in roughly $779,000 in revenues from planning
application fees, and the program expenditures were roughly $904,000. So, the General Fund
supported the Current Planning program with $125,000. In contemplating reducing the fees for
planning applications the amount of General Fund support for the Current Planning program will
increase.
Staff time associate with the POD duties could be averaged into the "average cost of services" for
each planning application. The City received 161 to 274 planning applications per year over the last
10 years, and considering a full time equivalent staff position this would be about $455 — 775 per
planning application on average to account for the POD time for the entire program per year.
QUESTION FOR COUNCIL: Should development application fees include an amount for
covering the general customer service aspects of the current planning program?
Tech Fee
The City currently has a technology fee to address the costs of digital plan review, City Hall's kiosk,
permitting software, etc. The technology fee is assessed at 5% of the total application cost.
Considering the information above discussing if the customer service time should be accounted for
through the current planning application fees, the technology fee could also be contemplated to
transition to a more general Administrative Fee to capture both customer service and technology
needs. As a comparison, the City of Eugene assesses a 9% Admin Fee on their planning
applications.
QUESTION FOR COUNCIL: Should the Tech fee be transitioned to a more general
Administrative Fee?
UGB Fees
The fees for properties that are not annexed to the city limits, but that are within the Springfield
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) pay higher fees for planning applications. The Fee Study
recommendations include using a factor of 1.5 for fees for UGB properties compared to the cost of
service for applications for properties inside the city limits.
Properties outside of the city limits do not pay property tax to the City of Springfield that would go
into the General Fund which helps support the planning functions of the city. Processing planning
applications for properties outside the city limits, inside the UGB often require intergovernmental
coordination with Lane County. This additional coordination often involves the County Sanitarian to
resolve issues around properties that are on septic systems rather than being connected to the cities
sanitary sewer system, and driveway access issues dealing with the Lane County public works for
road access etc.
QUESTION FOR COUNCIL: Should the 1.5 factor be included for properties outside of the city
limits, inside the Urban Growth Boundary?
NEXT STEPS:
Staff is seeking input from Council at this work session on the Draft Planning Fee Study.
Specifically, staff is asking if Council is comfortable with the Draft Planning Fee Study and if
Council has specific guidance for what level cost recovery should be used.
Staff is planning to return in the fall of 2023 with proposed fee changes to reflect the direction
provided by the Council.
RECOMMENDED ACTION: Give staff direction on the following questions:
1. Does Council have any specific guidance or input at what level cost recovery
should be used?
2. Should staff pursue establishing separate fees for other city services required for
review and approval of planning applications?
3. Should development application fees include an amount for covering the general
customer service aspects of the current planning program?
4. Should the Tech fee be transitioned to a more general Administrative Fee?
5. Should the 1.5 factor be included for properties outside of the city limits, inside the
Urban Growth Boundary?
SPRINGFIELD
4Portland State
UN I V E R S I T Y
OREGON
DATE: June 8, 2023
TO: Springfield City Council
CC: Mark Rust, AICP
Planning Manager, City of Springfield
FROM: N.J. Johnson, MPA Candidate & Reva Feldman, Project Director
Portland State University
SUBJECT: Planning Department Fee Study Recommendations
Introduction
In January 2023, staff began discussions with Portland State University's (PSU) Center for Public
Service (CPS) and finalized a contract in early March 2023 to assess the City's planning and
development fees. The Fee Study being conducted by PSU CPS will provide the City with data
and information to determine if the Springfield Planning Department is capturing costs
associated with the land use process. Pursuant to direction from the City Council, the project
team gathered comparative fee data from four cities including the cities of Eugene, Medford,
Corvallis, and Albany. The project team developed a survey for Planning Department staff to
complete to determine the amount of time each Planning staff member spends on tasks
associated with each planning task and then gathered compensation data including personnel
overhead and general City overhead rates from the Finance Department. This information
provided the project team with information to develop the typical cost burden of the staff time
required to process each land use application.
Methodology
1. The project team compiled the planning/development fees that agencies comparable to
Springfield charge for each application type (see results in Appendix C). This provided
the project team and the City Council with a baseline of development fees in the region.
In addition to the numerical fee amounts, observations on the structure and simplicity
of each fee schedule were also documented and compared.
2. The project team distributed a survey to the Current Planning Manager, the four Current
Planners, and the Administrative Specialist II requesting information on the hours spent
preparing for pre -application meetings, reviewing an application for completeness,
writing the staff report, and attending Planning Commission meetings. Not all of these
steps are required for certain application types, therefore, the fee structures are based
only on actual time spent by City Planning staff.
3. The number of hours spent on writing the staff report, attending Planning Commission
meetings, performing administrative tasks, and providing customer service were
SPRINGFIELD
OREGON
Portland State
U N I V E R S I T Y
accumulated and then averaged by position classification (Current Planning Manager,
Senior Planner, Planner 1, and Administrative Specialist II).
4. The computations from Step 3 are multiplied by the total (salary and benefits) hourly
compensation rate of each position classification at mid -step as provided by the
Springfield Finance Department.
5. The computations from Step 4 are added together to reflect the total cost burden of
everyone involved in processing a typical application. For example, an application for a
Type 1 Accessory Dwelling Unit would include the cost burden of the Planner 1,
Administrative Specialist II, and Current Planning Manager. The cumulative cost burden
for each application type is considered the rate of 100% cost recovery.
Comparable Cities
Distance FY 22/23
from General Number of
City Population Springfield County Fund Employees Notes
Springfield 62,352 N/A Lane $53 million 451 Subject agency
Eugene 175,626 4 miles Lane $267 million
Albany 56,828 44 miles Linn $50 million
Corvallis 59,864 47 miles Benton $65 million
Medford 87,353 165 miles Jackson $140 million
Selected for its proximity
and structural congruity to
1,500 Springfield
Selected for its closeness in
population, region, and
structural congruity with
487 Springfield
Selected for its closeness in
population and structural
420 congruity with Springfield
Selected for its closeness in
population and structural
463 congruity with Springfield
Assumptions
1. Generally speaking, a Planner 1 processes Type 1 applications and a Senior Planner
processes Type 2, 3, and 4 applications. Multiple staff may work on an application
simultaneously.
SPRINGFIELD
OREGON
Portland State
U N I V E R S I T Y
2. The Administrative Specialist II spends 1 hour of intake per application submittal in
addition to other administrative time spent on applications at the end of each project.
3. Due to the high volume of intergovernmental coordination required for land use
proposals inside the urban growth boundary (UGB) and outside city limits, the cost of
service for processing applications in the UGB will be 1.5 times the cost of service for
applications inside city limits.
RPcultc
Please refer to Appendices A and B for the Cost of Service Recovery Rates Tables.
Recommendations
1. Due to the rare and varied nature of the following application types, the project team
recommends that the City establish an actual cost of service system for application
types listed below. To calculate actual cost of service, the staff that interact with an
application would judiciously track the time they spend on the application and the
applicant is billed by the total hours spent multiplied by the employee's current total
hourly compensation rate. This would be done for all Planning Department staff
involved in processing the application, which is likely to include the project planner on
the application, the Current Planning Manager, and the Administrative Specialist II.
a. Conceptual Development Plan (Type 3)
b. Declaratory Ruling (Type 3)
c. Discretionary Use (Type 3)
d. Establishment of Historic Landmark (Type 3)
e. Historic (Type 3)
f. Master Plan Approval Preliminary (Type 2)
g. Master Plan Approval Preliminary (Type 3)
h. Master Plan Modification (Type 1, 2, and 3)
i. Metro Plan Amendment (Type 1 and 2)
j. Public Easement (Type 2)
k. Refinement Plan Amendment (Type 4)
I. Solar Access Protection (Type 2)
m. Street Name Change
n. Variance (Type 3)
o. Zoning Map Amendment (Type 3)
2. The City currently distinguishes a Subdivision R-1 Tentative Plan from a Subdivision Non -
R -1 Tentative Plan based on what zoning district the subject site is in. The same
distinction exists for Subdivision Plats. This Fee Study found that there is minimal
SPRINGFIELD
OREGON
Portland State
U N I V E R S I T Y
difference between the time spent processing the respective Subdivision Plat
applications and there is no difference in the time required to process Subdivision
Tentative Plans. In order to simplify the structure of the fee schedule where it will not
negatively impact revenues, it is recommended that the City reduce the application
types to Subdivision Tentative Plan and Subdivision Plat, respectively rather than
differentiating by zone.
3. Similarly to the recommendation above, in consulting with Planning Department staff,
there is not a significant difference in processing an application with a large amount of
lots compared to fewer lots. The Council may consider standardizing any references to
"per lot" or "per acre" in the fee resolution.
4. The City has two types of Temporary Use Permits, one for a manufactured dwelling after
a disaster and one for emergency medical hardship. Given the tragic circumstances
under which these would be approved, it is recommended that the City waive the
Temporary Use permit fees for a manufactured dwelling after a disaster.
5. The Planning Department designates an application's type number (e.g. Type 1, Type 2,
etc.) based on the type of review and noticing that is required and who the approval
authority is. Still, the type numbers of certain applications have a wide range of
complexity and staff time required, which could also influence if a Planner 1/2 or Senior
Planner processes the application. Because of this variation, it is recommended that the
following application types be split into Major and Minor designations, based on the size
of the proposal, if they are standalone proposals, or if they are submitted concurrently
with a larger land use application:
a. Floodplain Development
b. Minimum Development Standards
c. Tree Felling Permit
6. In order to incentivize prospective developers to meet with the Planning Department
early in the process, the Council may consider allowing their payment for a
Development Initiation Meeting to act as a deposit for their Completeness Check
Meeting.
7. The City currently has a technology fee to address the costs of digital plan review, City
Hall's kiosk, permitting software, etc. The technology fee is assessed at 5% of the total
application cost. Future fee studies may consider including an administrative overhead
fee that, in conjunction with other applications, supports all administrative overhead for
the planning department.
8. The primary means of providing upfront customer service in the Planning Department is
through a Planner on Duty (POD) (rotation of current planners). This service accounts for
SPRINGFIELD
OREGON
Portland State
U N I V E R S I T Y
a full FTE annually. Capturing the time and cost associated with the POD customer
service duties should be considered as part of the overall fee structure.
9. Because the cost of service calculations are using the mid -step compensation schedule
for Fiscal Year 22-23, the adopted fees are recommended to be indexed at the rate of
the City's cost of living adjustment for each fiscal year.
Items for Future Consideration
1. This fee study does not account for the cost burden of employees from other City
departments such as Building, Engineering, Public Works, and the City Attorney's Office.
Future studies may consider incorporating external cost burden into Planning fees.
2. This fee study does not account for the cost burden of materials and other purchases
such as paper and travel. Future studies may consider incorporating materials cost
burden into Planning fees.
3. This fee study assesses the cost of service for processing specific applications. Future fee
studies should consider the entire scope of administrative fees the Planning Department
assesses.
Appendices
A) Cost of Service Recovery Rates (City Limits)
B) Cost of Service Recovery Rates (UGB)
C) Fee Comparison Table
Springfield Planning Department Cost of Service
Recovery Rates (City
Limits)
Application Type
Current Fee
% new fee
Cost of Service
90% Cost
80% Cost
70% Cost
60% Cost
50% Cost
vs. old fee
100%
Recovery
Recovery
RecoverV
Recovery
Recover
Accessory Dwelling Unit
City: $945
$445.68
$401.11
$356.54
$311.98
$267.41
$222.84
Type 1
UGB: $1,040
City: $945
Accessory Dwelling Unit
62%
$489.61
$440.64
$391.68
$342.72
$293.76
$244.80
Type 2
UGB: $1,040
City: $9,629
Amendment of Development Code Text
31
$2,972.39
$2,675.15
$2,377.91
$2,080.67
$1,783.43
$1,486.19
Type 4
UGB: $14,527
Single detached on R-1 property less than 10,000 sf: $1,275
< 1 acre: $2,787
Annexation
1-5 acres: $3,563
Type 4
5-10 acres: $4,754
113%
$1,446.45
$1,301.80
$1,157.16
$1,012.51
$867.87
$723.22
10-25 acres: $6,000
25-50 acres: $8,572
100+ acres: $11,815
Annexation
Comprehensive Planning fee: $2,444/acre
$1,446.45
$1,301.80
$1,157.16
$1,012.51
$867.87
$723.22
UGB Only
Special District boundary adjustments: 10% of annexation fee
Conceptual Development Plan
City: $17,782
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $26,823
Declaratory Ruling
City: $945
°
86/°
$814.86
$733.37
$651.88
$570.40
$488.91
$407.43
Type 1
UGB: $1,040
Declaratory Ruling
City: $2,302
42%
$976.77
$879.09
$781.42
$683.74
$586.06
$488.39
Type 2
UGB: $2,990
Declaratory Ruling
City: $6,166
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $9,302
Determination of Non -Conforming Use Status
City: $139
UGB: $209
657%
$913.40
$822.06
$730.72
$639.38
$548.04
$456.70
Discretionary Use
City: $4,978
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $7,509
City: $1,437
Minor Floodplain Development
UGB: $2,169
$470.32
$423.28
$376.25
$329.22
$282.19
$235.16
Plus
Major Floodplain Development
Subdivision: $259 per lot
66%
$953.46
$858.11
$762.76
$667.42
$572.07
$476.73
Partitions and site plans: $520 per acre
Historic
Type 1
City: $77
UGB: $203
1238%
$953.46
$858.11
$762.76
$667.42
$572.07
$476.73
Historic
Type 2
City: $229
UGB: $608
751%
$1,720.36
$1,548.32
$1,376.29
$1,204.25
$1,032.22
$860.18
Historic
City: $4,515
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $46,812
Establishment of Historic Landmark
City or UGB: $2,498
Actual cost of service recommended
Land Use Compatibility Statement/Zoning Verification
City: $365
100%
$363.73
$327.35
$290.98
$254.61
$218.24
$181.86
Letter
UGB: $395
Manufactured Dwelling Park
City: $12,831
11%
$1,418.53
$1,276.67
$1,134.82
$992.97
$851.12
$709.26
Type 2
UGB: $19,354
Master Plan Approval Preliminary
City: $17,782 + $823 per acre
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 2
UGB: $26,823 + $823 per acre
Master Plan Approval Preliminary
City: $24,465 + $823 per acre
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $36,830 + $823 per acre
Master Plan Approval Final
10% of the paid master plan approval fee
$804.04 $723.63 1 $643.23 1 $562.82 1 $482.42 $402.02
Master Plan Modification
City: $3,421
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 1
UGB: $5,129
Master Plan Modification
City: $6,888
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 2
UGB: $10,392
Master Plan Modification
City: $12,578
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $18,389
Metro Plan Amendment
City: $28,288 + $823 per acre
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 1
UGB: $42,672 + $823 per acre
Metro Plan Amendment
City: $13,719 + $823 per acre
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 2
UGB: $17,595 + $823 per acre
Minor Minimum Development Standards
39%
$505.64
$455.08
$404.51
$353.95
$303.38
$252.82
Type 1
City only: $1,299
Major Minimum Development Standards
°
88/°
$1,136.72
$1,023.05
$909.38
$795.70
$682.03
$568.36
Type 1
Modification of Approval
City: $1,613
49%
$790.22
$711.20
$632.18
$553.15
$474.13
$395.11
Type 1
UGB: $2,435
Modification of Approval
Cit or UGB: $3,421
Y
29%
$1,002.73
$902.45
$802.18
$701.91
$601.64
$501.36
Type 2, non-significant impacts
Modification of Approval
City or UGB: $5,298
22%
$1,141.33
$1,027.19
$913.06
$798.93
$684.80
$570.66
Type 2, significant impacts
Non -Conforming Use Expansion/Modification
City: $4,978
28%
$1,417.21
$1,275.48
$1,133.76
$992.04
$850.32
$708.60
Type 2
UGB: $7,509
Partition Tentative Plan
City: $6,335
21%
$1,312.45
$1,181.21
$1,049.96
$918.72
$787.47
$656.23
Type 2
UGB: $11,592
Partition Plat
Cit or UGB: $3,481
Y
17%
$600.23
$540.20
$480.18
$420.16
$360.14
$300.11
Type 1
Property Line Adjustment
City: $811
47%
$380.38
$342.34
$304.30
$266.26
$228.23
$190.19
Type 1
UGB: $1,221
Property Line Adjustment - Serial
City: $1,618
63 /°
$1,027.36
$924.62
$821.89
$719.15
$616.42
$513.68
Type 2
UGB: $2,441
Public Easement
City: $1,613
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 2 (Public Easement)
UGB: $2,435
Public Easement
City: $6,166
, plat, or other Public
Type 4ROWsubdivision � p
9,3025%
UGB: $9,302
$1,514.43
$1,362.98
$1,211.54
$1,060.10
$908.66
$757.21
Property)
Minor Replat Tentative Plan
City: $4,055
Y
32%
$1,289.14
$1,160.22
$1,031.31
$902.39
$773.48
$644.57
Type 2
Minor Replat Plat
City: $2,384
14%
$345.05
$310.55
$276.04
$241.54
$207.03
$172.53
Type 1
Major Replat Tentative Plan
City: $6,588
19%
$1,264.50
$1,138.05
$1,011.60
$885.15
$758.70
$632.25
Type 2
Major Replat Plat
Cit : $2,384
Y
15%
$354.39
$318.95
$283.51
$248.07
$212.63
$177.20
Type 1
Refinement Plan Amendment
City: $13,719 + $823 per acre
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 4
UGB: $21,107 + $823 per acre
500 or less sq. ft. of new, removed, or net change of impervious
surface: and no Traffic Impact Study required: and no change of
driveways, access, or circulation
City only: $1,616
Site Plan Review
97%
$1,570.94
$1,413.85
$1,256.75
$1,099.66
$942.56
$785.47
Type 2
500-10,000 square feet of new impervious surface
City or UGB: $5,489
10,000+ square feet of new impervious surface
City or UGB: $5,489 + $65 per 1,000 square feet
Final Site Plan Equivalent
City or UGB: $4,891
21%
$1,018.15
$916.34
$814.52
$712.71
$610.89
$509.08
Type 1
Final Site Plan Review/Development Agreement
10% of the paid site plan fee
$360.32
$324.28
$288.25
$252.22
$216.19
$180.16
Type 1
Solar Access Protection
City: $1,015
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 2
UGB: $1,232
Street Name Change
City: $6,166
Actual cost of service recommended
R-1
< 2 acres: $7,176 + $309 per lot
2-5 acres: $10,156 + $508 per lot
Subdivision Tentative Plan
5-10 acres: $13,434 + $776 per lot
Type 2
10-20 acres: $14,173 + $807 per lot
18%
$1,289.14
$1,160.22
$1,031.31
$902.39
$773.48
$644.57
20+ acres: $14,911 + $895 per lot
Non -R-1
$12,668 + $760 per acre
R-1
Subdivision Plat
$992 + $618 per lot
Type 1
50%
$497.60
$447.84
$398.08
$348.32
$298.56
$248.80
Non -R-1
$5,078 + $825 per acre
Temporary Use
City or UGB: $483
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Type 1, Manufactured Dwelling After Disaster
See memo
See memo
See memo
See memo
See memo
See memo
Temporary Use
City or UGB: $360
285%
$1,027.36
$924.62
$821.89
$719.15
$616.42
$513.68
Type 1, Emergency Medical Hardship
City or .
Minor Tree Felling Permit
Base fee: $1,281
44%
$563.51
$507.16
$450.81
$394.46
$338.11
$281.76
Type 2
< 5 trees: $0
Major Tree Felling Permit
Type 2
6-10 trees: $65 per tree
10+ trees: $650 per acre
79 /°
$1,007.33
$906.60
$805.86
$705.13
$604.40
$503.67
Filbert Orchards: Base fee only
Vacation
City: $1,613
61%
$987.30
$888.57
$789.84
$691.11
$592.38
$493.65
Type 2
UGB: $2,435
Vacation
City: $6,166
25%
$1,514.43
$1,362.98
$1,211.54
$1,060.10
$908.66
$757.21
Type 4
UGB: $9,302
Variance
City or UGB: $3,164
39%
$1,237.37
$1,113.63
$989.90
$866.16
$742.42
$618.69
Type 2
Variance
City: $8,256
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $12,455
Zoning Map Amendment
City: $6,832
Actual cost of service recommended
Type 3
UGB: $13,205
1,627.73
2441.60
Plannina/Development Fee Comparison
Fee Type
Springfield 100% Cost Recovery Fees
Springfield Current Fees
Eugene Current Fees
Medford Current Fees
Corvallis Current Fees
Albany Current Fees
Accessory Dwelling Unit
Type 1
Type 1 & 2
referred to as "Residential Accessory
City: $445.68
City: $945
Buildings"
UGB: $668.52
UGB: $1,040
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type I -L & CU II
Type 2
$520
City: $489.61
UGB: $734.42
Amendment of Development Code
Type 4
Type 4
$2,500
Initiation Reauest
Text Amendment
Text
City: $2,972.39
City: $9,629
$250
$4,824
UGB: $4,458.59
UGB: $14,527
No fee of this category
Application
$7,160
Annexation
Type 4
Type 4
City or UGB: $4,730
$4,890
Maior
Varies
$1,446.45
Single detached on R-1 property less than
$11,535 + survey fee + $171 per acre
10,000 sf: $1,275
UGB Only
< 1 acre: $2,787
Minor
$1,446.45
1-5 acres: $3,563
$3,362 + survey fee
5-10 acres: $4,754
10-25 acres: $6,000
25-50 acres: $8,572
100+ acres: $11,815
UGB Only
Comprehensive Planning fee: $2,444/acre
Special District boundary adjustments: 10
of annexation fee
Adjustment Review
Minor
$1,039 + $694 for each after 1 st
City or UGB: $548
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Maior
City or UGB: $591
Appeal
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type 2 (Directors Decision)
Hearings official decision or appeal of
Appeal of General Development Decision
study
$250
partition or subdivision
$250
City or UGB: 50% of original fee
Type 3 (Expedited Land Divisionl
Appeal of Special Development Decision
$408
Hearings official decision if filed by
10% of base fee
affected neiahborhood association
Type 4: Appeal to Type 3 Decision to
City or UGB: 25% of original fee
Appeal of Special Development Decision
City Council
by a Recognized Neiahborhood
City: $3,017
Planning Director decision of partition or
Association
UGB: $4,554
subdivision if filed by affected
5% of base fee
neiahborhood association
City or UGB: 25% of original fee
No fee of this category
Appeal of Expedited or Middle Housing
No fee of this category
Land Division
Plannina Director decision other than
no fee
partition or subdivision
$250
Planning Director decision other
partition or subdivision if filed by
affected neiahborhood association
No charge
Completeness Check Meeting
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type 1
study
City: $449
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $676
Conceptual Development Plan
Actual cost of service
Type 3
$9,150 + $109 per lot
City: $17,782
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $26,823
Conceptual Development Plan
Actual cost of service
Type 3
Amendment
City: $6,888
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $10,392
Conceptual and Detailed
Residential: $10,370 + $67 per dwelling
Development Plan
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Non-residential: $10,370 + $14 per 100
No fee of this category
square feet of building
Correction to Water Resource
Type I
Overlay or Zone Error
City: $437
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type II
City: $1,557
Correction to Water Quality
City: $1,557 (refunded if approved)
Waterways Map and/or Removal of
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
WQ Overlay Zone
Declaratory Ruling
Type 1
Type 1
City: $814.86
City: $945
UGB: $1,222.29
UGB: $1,040
Type 2
Type 2
City: $976.77
City: $2,302
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,465.16
UGB: $2,990
Tpe 3
Tae3
Actual cost of service
City: $6,166
UGB: $9,302
Design Review
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City: $2,800
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Determination of Non -Conforming
Type 1
Type 1
Use Status
City: $913.40
City: $139
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,370.10
UGB: $209
_
Development Initiation Meeting
No recommendation as part of this fee
Tvoe 1
Referred to as "Pre -Application Meeting"
study
City or UGB: $678
No fee of this category
$400 (credited to application fee if submitted
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
_
within 6 months
Discretionary Use
Tvoe 3
Tvoe 3
Referred to as "Conditional Use Permit"
Referred to as "Conditional Use Permit'
Referred to as "Conditional Development
Actual cost of service
City: $4,978
Permit'
UGB: $7,509
General
L1161-1
City: $6,136
$3,300
$8,675 + $55 per dwelling unit (residential)
UGB: $16,410
or $11 per 100 square feet of building (non-
Not generalizable into one application type
Type 11
residential)
Day Care/Group Care. Owner -Occupied
$1,650
in LDR
City or UGB: $1,408
Drinking Water Protection Overlay
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type i
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
District
study
City or UGB: $1,325
_
Existing Building
Type II (Expand or Modify)
$1,274
Type III (Expand or Modify)
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$2,251
Additional fees (apply to both)
If design standards apply: $379
If Traffic Report required: $865
Existing Parking Lot
Type II & III (Expand or Modify)
$1,274
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Additional fees
If design standards apply: $379
If Traffic Report required: $865
Expedited Land Division
No recommendation as part of this fee
Twice the fee for regular land division
$4,900
Middle Housing Land Division (Partition)
study
$5,776
No fee of this categoryNo
Middle Housing Land Division
fee of this category
(Subdivision)
$10,376
Appeal of Expedited Land Division
No recommendation as part of this fee
Deposit required by ORS 197.375. If
study
appellant prevails, they will be refunded. If
the City prevails, Hearings Official may
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
order appellant to pay costs of appeal in
excess of original deposit.
Final Site Plan Inspection
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type t
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
study
City or UGB: $365
Floodplain Development
Minr
Type 1 Base Fees
Commercial Development
Referred to as "Floodplain Development
Tvoe I
City: $470.32
City: $1,437
$800
Permit Variance"
New Construction: 5% of building permit
UGB: $705.48
UGB: $2,169
fee
Residential Development
$5,043
Placing an RV over 180 days: $95
Maior
Plus
$700
Fencing & Freestanding Walls: $95
City: $953.46
Subdivision: $259 per lot
Site Plan Improvement: $95
UGB: $1,430.19
Partitions and site plans: $520 per acre
Residential Sinale Parcel
$200
Ivoe l -L
Development in floodway: $189 + pass
through cost for third party review
Grading, Excavation, Fill, Paving, Mining,
and Drilling: $286 + pass through cost for
third party review
No fee of this category
Continuous Storage Operation: $189 +
pass through cost for third party review
Land Divisions of 19 lots or less: $286 +
pass through cost for third party review
Type 11
Alterations of a watercourse: $947 + pass
through cost for third party review
Type 111
Land Divisions of 20 or more lots, Cluster
Developments, Planned Developments,
and Manufactured Home Parks: $947 +
pass through cost for third party review
Hillside Overlay District
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type 2
Referred to as additional fee for hillside
study
City or UGB: $1,190 per acre
development
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
III
Jype
$1,212
Hazardous Materials Review
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City or UGB: $473
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Plannina/Development Fee Comparison
1,627.73
2441.60
Fee Type
Springfield 100% Cost Recovery Fees
Springfield Current Fees
Eugene Current Fees
Medford Current Fees
Corvallis Current Fees
Albany Current Fees
Historic
Tvoe 1
Tvoe 1 (Historic Commission Review)
Landmark or removal of local
Maior
Referred to as "Historic Preservation
Tvoe I & I -L
City: $953.46
City: $77
designation
$3,300
Permit"
Exterior Alteration; Designation of
UGB: $1,430.19
UGB: $203
City: $73
Landmark: $52
UGB: $2,278
Minor
HRC -level
New Construction; Substitute Materials:
Tvoe 2
Tvoe 2 (Historic Commission Review)
$50
no fee
$52
City: $1,720.36
City: $229
Demolition
UGB: $2,580.54
UGB: $608
City or UGB: $359
Standard
Tvoe III
$500
Demolition/Moving: $865
Tvi)e 3
Tvr)e 3
Actual Cost of Service
Demolition of Historic Landmark
City: $4,515
Establishment of Historic Landmark
UGB: $46,812
Invento
Actual cost of service
Establishment of Historic Landmark
Inventory
City or UGB: $2,498
Home Business
Requiring Conditional Use Approval
$644
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Additional fees
If design standards apply: $379
_
If Traffic Report required: $865
Interpretation of Development Code
City or UGB: $450
$2,522
Type 11 (Quasi-iudiciall
$865
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type IV (Legislative)
Land Use Compatibility
Type 1
Type 1
$75
$1,731
Referred to as "Land Use Status Letter"
Referred to as "Zoning Verification"
Statement/Zoning Verification Letter
City: $363.73
City: $365
No fee of this category
UGB: $545.60
UGB: $395
City or UGB: $54.88
1Y22
$74
Legal Lot Verification
City or UGB: $35
Referred to as "Validation of a Unit of
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Land"
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$1,200
LOMA, LOMR, CLOMR
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Review and5sion form
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
LUBA Remand
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$600
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Manufactured Dwelling Park
Tvi)e 2
Type 2
Tvi)e I -L
City: $1,418.53
City: $12,831
$3,121 + $20 per space
UGB: $2,127.80
UGB: $19,354
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
TypeIII (in Floodplain)
Type I -L fee -$1,214
Additional Fees
If Traffic Report Required: $865
Manufactured Home Hardship Permit
Temporary
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City: $772 + $90 per renewal
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,791 + $90 per renewal
Master Plan Approval Preliminary
Type 2
Type 2
Referred to as "Planned Development"
Referred to as "Planned Development"
Referred to as "Planned Development"
Actual cost of service
City: $17,782 + $823 per acre
UGB: $26,823 + $823 per acre
Tentative
$4,200
Type I (Final)
Type 3
City: $15,765
$865
Actual cost of service
Type 3
De Minimis Revision
No fee of this category
City: $24,465 + $823 per acre
Final
$750
Type III (Preliminary)
UGB: $36,830 + $823 per acre
City: $3,845
$4,853
Additional Fees fapplies to both)
If Traffic Report required: $865
Master Plan Approval Final
$804.04
10% of the paid master plan approval fee
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Master Plan Modification
Type 1
Tvr)e 1
Actual cost of service
City: $3,421
UGB: $5,129
Type 2
Actual cost of service
Type 2
City: $6,888
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Tvr)e 3
UGB: $10,392
Actual cost of service
Type 3
City: $12,578
UGB: $18,389
Metro Plan Amendment
Type 1
Type 1
Tyoe I
Referred to as "Comprehensive Plan
Referred to as "Comprehensive Plan
Referred to as "Comprehensive Plan
Actual cost of service
City: $28,288 + $823 per acre
City or UGB: $8,053
Amendment"
Amendment"
Amendment"
UGB: $42,672 + $823 per acre
Type 2
Type 11
$4,500
$14,289 + survey fee
Type IV
Actual cost of service
Type 2
City or UGB: $5,816
Map Amendment - Without Concurrent
City: $13,719 + $823 per acre
Zoning Map Amendment: $4,332
UGB: $17,595 + $823 per acre
Map Amendment - Concurrent Zoning Map
Amendment: $6,067
Text Amendment: $4,853
Minimum Development Standards
Maior
Type 1
City only: $505.64
City only: $1,299
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Maior
City only: 1,136.72
Modification of Approval
Type 1
Tvoe 1
Residential: $9,150 + $59 per dwelling
Unless determined otherwise by the
City: $790.22
City: $1,613
Non-residential: $9,150 + $12 per 100
Community Development Director, the fee
UGB: $1,185.33
UGB: $2,435
square feet of building
to modify or revise an approved project
Planned Development (minor): $4,623
shall be the same
Type 2 on -significant impactsl
Type 2 (non-sianificant impacts)
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
as a new application.
City or UGB: $1,002.73
City or UGB: $3,421
Type 2 (sianificant impacts)
Tvoe 2 (sianificant impacts)
City or UGB: $1,141.33
City or UGB: $5,298
Natural Resource Impact Review
Concurrent with other application: $189
Residential development not concurrent
with other application: $95
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Other development not concurrent with
other application: $189
Natural Resource Boundary Corrections &
Refinements: $95
New Construction
Type 11
$2,251 + 0.15% of construction value in
excess of $150,000
Type III
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$3,468 + 0.15% of construction value in
excess of $150,000
Additional fees (apply to both)
If design standards apply: $379
If Traffic Report required: $865
Non -Conforming Use
Type 2
Type 2
Referred to as "Nonconforming
Expansion/Modification
City: $1,417.21
City: $4,978
Situations"
UGB: $2,125.82
UGB: $7,509
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
New construction: $1,039 + 0.15% of
construction value in excess of $150,000
No new construction: $520
Nullification
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
DDP or Non-residential CDP
No fee of this category
$6,724
Pad Lot
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$3,100
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Parklet
Application
$275
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Deposit for Removal
$500
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Development Review
$2,900
Partition Tentative Plan
Tvoe 2
Tvoe 2
City: $2,431
Charged for all stages
Charged for all stages
City: $1,312.45
City: $6,335
UGB: $6,219
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,968.68
UGB: $11,592
$3,100
$3,362
Partition Plat
Type 1
Type 1
City or UGB: $1,593
Type I -L
City or UGB: $600.23
City or UGB: $3,481
Tentative Plat: $2,784
Final Plat: $700
Type III
Tentative Plat: $3,986
Planning Review of Building Permit
No recommendation as part of this fee
Iype 1 Minor
Referred to as "Single Family Building
15% of the building plan review fee
Plans
study
City: $150
Permit Surcharge"
UGB: $364
Tvoe 1 Maior
No fee of this category
$200
No fee of this category
City: $268
UGB: $364
_
Property Line Adjustment
Type 1
Type 1
City: $823
$1,200
$841
Type I
City: $380.83
City: $811
UGB: $1,149
$346
UGB: $570.57
UGB: $1,221
Property Line Adjustment - Serial
Type 2
Type 2
City: $1,027.36
City: $1,618
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,541.04
UGB: $2,441
Portable Storage Containers
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$500
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Public Easement
Type 2 (Public Easement)
Type 2 (Public Easement)
Referred to as "Public Utility Easement
Actual cost of service
City: $1,613
Removal"
UGB: $2,435
$1,200
Tvoe 4 (ROW. Subdivision Plat, or other
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
public property)
Type 4 (ROW. Subdivision Plat, or other
City: $1,514.43
public property)
UGB: $2,271.65
City: $6,166
UGB: $9,302
Plan Compatibility Review
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$1,921
No fee of this category
Reconsideration
No recommendation as part of this fee
Type 1
Referred to as "Planning Commission
Referred to as "Revised Decision"
study
$250
amendment to previously approved
action"
Type I. 11. or I -L (Staff level decision)
Type 2
$520
$250
No fee of this category
Varies by type of application
No fee of this category
Type III or IV (Planning Commission or
Type 3
City Council decision)
$2,500
$1,214
Plannina/Development Fee Comparison
1,627.73
2441.60
Actual cost of service
City: $1,015
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,232
No fee of this category
Fee Type
Springfield too-/. Cost Recovery Fees
Springfield Current Fees
Eugene Current Fees
Medford Current Fees
Corvallis Current Fees
Albany Current Fees
Minor Replat Tentative Plan
Tvoe 2
Tvoe 2
5-10 acres: $13,434 + $776 per lot
$497.60
10-20 acres: $14,173 + $807 per lot
Charged regardless of scale
20+ acres: $14,911 + $895 per lot
City: $1,289.14
City: $4,055
UGB: $14,817
$992 + $618 per lot
Non -R-1 Type 2
$12,668 + $760 per acre
Non -R-1 Tvoe 1
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Tvoe I -L (moving or removing existing
Disaster)
City or UGB: $0
City or UGB: $483
Type 2 (Emergency Medical Hardship)
Type 2 (Emergency Medical Hardship)
City or UGB: $1,027.36
subdivision or partition property lines)
No recommendation as part of this fee
Tvoe 1
study
City: $418
UGB: $1,358
$346
Minor Replat Plat
Type 1
City: $345.05
Type if
City: $2,384
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Major Replat Tentative Plan
Type 2
City: $1,264.50
Type 2
City: $6,588
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Major Replat Plat
Type l
Type 1
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Refinement Plan Amendment
Request for Public Hearing
Sewer or Water Extension
Sign
Sign Variance
Site Plan Review
Final Site Plan Equivalent
Final Site Plan Review/Development
Agreement
Solar Access Protection
Standards Review
Street Name Change
Subdivision R-1 Tentative Plan
Subdivision R-1 Plat
Subdivision Non -R-1 Tentative Plan
Subdivision Non -R-1 Plat
Temporary Use
Time Extension for Certain
Improvements
Traffic Impact Analysis Review
Transportation Facility
Tree Felling Permit
Urban Growth Boundary Amendment
Urbanization without Annexation
Vacation
Variance
Willamette Greenway
Wireless Communication Facilities in
Right-of-way
Zoning Map Amendment
City. $2,384
Type 4
Actual cost of service
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type
City: $,570.94
UGB: $2,356.41
Type 1
City or UGB: $1,018.15
Type t
$360.32
City. $2,384
Type 4
City: $13,719 + $823 per acre
UGB: $21,107 + $823 per acre
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type 2
500 or less sq. ft. of new, removed, or net
change of impervious
surface; and no Traffic Impact Study
required; and no change of
driveways, access, or circulation
City only: $1,616
500-10,000 square feet of new impervious
surface
City or UGB: $5,489
10,000+ square feet of new impervious
surface
City or UGB: $5,489 + $65 per 1,000
square feet
Type 1
City or UGB: $4,891
Type 1
10% of the paid site plan fee
Type 2
Type 2
Actual cost of service
City: $1,015
No fee of this category
UGB: $1,232
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City: Actual cost of service
City: $6,166
Tentative Plan
R-1 Type 2
City or UGB: $1,289.14
< 2 acres: $7,176 + $309 per lot
No fee of this category
2-5 acres: $10,156 + $508 per lot
pial
5-10 acres: $13,434 + $776 per lot
$497.60
10-20 acres: $14,173 + $807 per lot
20+ acres: $14,911 + $895 per lot
City: $5,224
R-1 Tvoe 1
UGB: $14,817
$992 + $618 per lot
Non -R-1 Type 2
$12,668 + $760 per acre
Non -R-1 Tvoe 1
$5,078 + $825 per acre
Tvoe 1 (Manufactured Dwelling After a
Tyne 1 (Manufactured Dwelling After a
Disaster)
Disaster)
City or UGB: $0
City or UGB: $483
Type 2 (Emergency Medical Hardship)
Type 2 (Emergency Medical Hardship)
City or UGB: $1,027.36
City or UGB: $360
No recommendation as part of this fee
Tvoe 1
study
City: $418
UGB: $1,358
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Minr
Tvoe 2
City or UGB: $563.51
City or UGB:
Base fee: $1,281
Major
< 5 trees: $0
City or UGB: $1,007.33
6-10 trees: $65 per tree
10+ trees: $650 per acre
Filbert Orchards: Base fee only
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Tvoe 2 (Public Easement)
Tvoe 2 (Public Easement)
Actual cost of service
City: $1,613
UGB: $2,435
Type 4 (ROW. Subdivision Plat, or other
public property)
Tvoe 4 (ROW. Subdivision Plat. or other
City: $1,514.43
public property)
UGB: $2,271.65
City: $6,166
UGB: $9,302
Tvoe 2 (Minor Variance or up to 30%1
City or UGB: $1,237.37
Tvoe 3 (Major Variance)
City or UGB: Actual cost of service
No recommendation as part of this fee
study
No fee of this category
Type 3
Actual cost of service
Type 2 (Minor Variance or up to 30%1
City or UGB: $3,164
Tvoe 3 (Maier Variance)
City: $8,256
UGB: $12,455
Type 3
Greenway setback line establishment
without development:
City or UGB: $3,766
Greenway setback line already established:
City: $3,766
UGB: $7,951
Greenway setback line not already
established:
City: $7,506 + $760 per acre
UGB: $10,736 + $760 per acre
No fee of this category
Type 3
City: $6,832
UGB: $13,205
City or UGB: $4,019
No fee of this category
City or UGB: $354
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
UGB: $4,730
Assessed regardless of zone, based on
No fee of this category
City: $6,215 + $25 per lot
Standard
$50
No fee of this category
TemporarySian
$255
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Referred to as "Site Review"
Referred to as "Site Plan and
Architectural Review"
City: $5,224
UGB: $14,817
Tvoe II or III
$3,100
Amendment to previously approved
action
$1,550
No fee of this category No fee of this category
No fee of this category No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City or UGB: $354
No fee of this category
City: $849
$900
Assessed regardless of zone
Assessed regardless of zone, based on
whole process
City: $6,215 + $25 per lot
$4,700
Assessed regardless of zone
City: $4,892 + $30 per lot
Assessed regardless of zone
City: $6,215 + $25 per lot
Assessed regardless of zone
City: $4,892 + $30 per lot
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
City: $2,128
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Unimproved Public Easement
City: $1,172
UGB: $1,645
Platted Plot Line
City: $1,172
UGB: $1,645
Improved Public Easement
City: $1,172
UGB: $1,645
Undeveloped Plat
City: $1,172
UGB: $1,645
& Rededication of Unimoroved Riaht-of-
wav
City: $3,682
UGB: $5,816
Unimproved Riaht-of-way
City: $3,682
UGB: $5,816
Improved Public Riaht-of-way
City: $4,447
UGB: $6,364
Riaht-of-wav with public funds
City: $4,447
UGB: $6,364
Check with Land Use Management Staff
(541-682-8336)
City: $5,888
UGB: $12,487
No fee of this category
City: $3,655
UGB: $5,425
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$1,500
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
$5,500
Richt-of-way
$5,490
Subdivision Plat
$1,990
Referred to as an "Exception"
Tsai
$3,500
Tvoe 11
$1,750
No fee of this category
$550
$2,800
$9,760
No fee of this category
Referred to as "Extension of Services
$11,767
$184
$5,043
Referred to as "Detailed Development
Plan"
Residential: $9,760 + $63 per dwelling
Non-residential: $9,760 + $14 per 100
square feet of building
No fee of this category
Referred to as "Development Agreement /
Annexation Agreement Review'
$150 minimum + $45 for each additional
hour
$1,681
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Assessed regardless of zone, based on
whole process
$7,565
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Public riaht-of-way/plat
$5,043 + survey fee
Referred to as "Lot Development Option"
Maier
$5,043
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Referred to as "Zone Change"
Administrative
$841 +survey fee
Legislative
$6,724 +survey fee
No fee of this category
For Tvoe II Applications
$321
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Type I -L
New Construction: $3,295 + 0.15% of
construction value in excess of $150,000
Modify existing development or
development with minimal impact: $2,251
Change of Use and/or Minor Development:
$172
New Parking areas or existing parking
areas expansion: $1,274
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Assessed regardless of zone
Type I -L
Tentative Plat: $3,121 + $50 per lot
Final Plat: $873
Type 111
Tentative Plat: $4,331 + $50 per lot
Additional Fees (aoolies to both)
If Traffic Report required: $865
TvDe I
$172
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
No fee of this category
Tvoe I -L (5 or more)
Concurrent with other application: $520
Residential development not concurrent
with other application: $1,385
$8,142
No fee of this category
Type IV
Public Street or Alley: $2,772
Public Easements: $2,426
Tvoe I -L (Minorl
$86
Tvoe II (Major)
$1,039 + 694 for each after 1 st
Tvoe 11
$1,559
No fee of this category
Tvoe IV
$4,332