HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication Applicant 5/24/2023 (3)City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
SPRINGFIELD
w 0#/
PApplication Type (Applicant: check ne
artition Tentative Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: I❑
Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name:Oxwood Properties A Street LLC Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address: 88695 Gentry St, Eugene, OR 97402
Applicant's Rep.: K. Keidel Associate Planner
Phone: 541/302-9830
Company: Metro Planning, Inc.
Fax:
Address: 846 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Property Owner:Oxwood Properties A Street LLC
Phone:1,4171`3171 . 919
Company:
Fax:
Add ress: 88695 G entry St, Eugene, OR 97402
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-35-42
TAX LOT NOS : 200,202,300
Property Address: Vacant - Main St & 74th
Size of Property: 2.12 Acres ® Square Feet ❑
Proposed Name of Subdivision: Oxwood Subdivision
Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: replatting of 3 three tax lots into 9 nine lot subdivision
Existing Use: vacant
# of Lots/Parcels: 9
Total acreage of parcel/
allowable dens' 2.12/6-14/nomax
proposed #
Dwell Units 9SFD-MFOURPLE
Si natures: Please sign and print your name and date in the appropriate
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.,
Associated Applications:
box on the next pace.
complete this section)
Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date:
Signature
1 represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the Information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application Is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serve written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete a/ppli/cati/�n.
Date: 5
Signate
�
K, \n/ -
Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10
Land Division Tentative Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal
• The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
• A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
• Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre -
submittal meeting.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
• A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal
Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet.
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10
Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
• ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre -submittal and submittal stages.
❑ Land Division Tentative Application Form
❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density
and the density proposed.
❑ Copy of the Deed
❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
❑ Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of
the required neighboring property notification packet.
❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage
on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
❑ Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed
Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures
Manual.
❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR
Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets:
❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved
and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
❑ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer
Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10
❑ Vicinity Map
❑ The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings,
curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and
what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use
and required setbacks from proposed property lines.
❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian
areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings
❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted
concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable
soils and/or a high water table
b. Land Division Tentative Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor
❑ City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district
boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division
❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the
proposed land division
❑ Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land
division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale
❑ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and
area of illumination
❑ Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division.
Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and
relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan,
Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map.
❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities
❑ Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways
❑ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities
❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian
access ways and bike trails
❑ Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip
Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10
❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including
sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas,
telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points
❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,
condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated
❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified
in SDC 5.12-120 E.
c. Stormwater Management Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are
proposed as part of the stormwater management system
❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but
not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater
quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained
❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for
land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals)
❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill
❑ Additional Materials That May be Required
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
❑ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement
❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal
as specified in SDC 3.2-230
❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present
❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the
additional standards of the overlay district
❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence
the permit application has been submitted for review
❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10
❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is
proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can
be served by sanitary sewer
❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate
time of installation and method of financing
Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10
225 FIFTH STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX. 541.736.1021
www.spnngfield-orgov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton
McEachem.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield-
or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov
Phone: (541) 736 —1036
Fax: (541) 736-1021
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD
225 FIFTH STREET
OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX: 541.726.1021
www.spdrygfialdor.gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
----------- — (Area below this b'sefdled out by Applicant) __—
(Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprtngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov
Project Name:
Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #:
Date:
Land Use(s):
Phone #:
Project Size (Acres):
Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area:
Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
(Area below this line /'died outby the City andReturned m the Aaabeand
(At a nurumuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlus sheet shall be subnutted
or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone:
❑ Wedand/Riparian:
❑ Soil Type:
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Other Jurisdictions
Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS
r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on
application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield
Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site
appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been
signed in the spare provickel below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual.
❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1).
❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual.
❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscethmeous
❑
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
❑
A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
drains.
❑
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event
Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0
❑
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
❑
❑
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set
❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to
Other/Miscethmeous
❑
Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑
Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to
another.
❑
Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation.
❑
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady.
* IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN'
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION APPLICATION FOR OXWOOD PROPERTIES A STREET LLC
Submittal No.
Document Date:
846 ASTREET
Applicant's Request:
SPRINGFIELD. OREGON 97AT
1541)302-9830
WW W.METROPLANNING.COM
Property Owner/ Applicant:
Applicant's Representative/
Planner/Project Coordinator:
Surveyor:
Civil Engineer:
Subject property:
Site Address/ Location:
Total Property Size:
Base Land Use District/
Metro Plan Designation:
Number of Lots Proposed:
May 23, 2023
Approval of Type 11 Tentative Subdivision
Plan to create g -Lot Subdivision
Oxwood PropertiesA Street LLC
88695 Gentry St
Eugene, OR 97402
Metro Planning, Inc.
Katie Keidel, Associate Planner
846 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
(543)302-9830
EGR & Associates
2535 Prairie Rd
Eugene, OR 97402
(541) 688-8322
A & O Engineering
380 O Street, Suite zoo
Springfield, OR 97477
(543)302-9790
Assesssa's Map Number 37-02-35-42
Tax Lots zoo, 202, and 300
Vacant — Main Street & 74" Street
2.21+/ -acres
R-3/ Low Density Residential
Nine (9)
Background
This application requests approval of a Tentative Subdivision plan for the replat of three (3) lots into nine (g) new lots on
Assessor's Map Number 17-02-35-42 Tax Lots zoo, 202, and 300, located in Springfield near Main Street and 74`^ Street
("subject property"). The subject property is approximately 2.2i acres and is zoned Springfield R -i and designated Low
Density Residential on the Metro Plan.
This written statement intends to demonstrate for City staff how the proposed Tentative Subdivision will conform to all
standards, regulations, and conditions of Land Divisions under SDC 5.12-=5 Tentative Plan —General; SDC 5.12-=20
Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC 5.=2-=25 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Springfield Development Code
(SDC) sections are indicated by bold and/or italic typeface; applicant's responses are indicated by plain typeface.
5.12.115 Tentative Plan —General.
Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards:
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this code. When lots/parcels are more than
double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Directorshall require that these lots/parcels be
arranged:
s. To allowrediviWon; and
2. To allowfor the extension of streets to servefuture lots/parcels.
3. Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the
Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lot/parcel is not impaired. In
order to make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in
SDC s.aa.aaa(E).
Response: The subject property is zoned R-= which maintains a minimum lot size requirement of 3, 000, 5,000, or 7,000
square feet, determined by the type of dwellings proposed for development. Exact dwelling types for this tentative
subdivision are yet unconfirmed, however the applicant acknowledges that eight of the nine proposed lots exceed
double the area minimums irrespective of dwelling type. As such, to ensure compliance with density requirements of
the zone, a Condition of Approval requiring development of at least (=3) thirteen dwellings on the subject property is
suggested. Additionally, a Future Development Plan has been designed and included to illustrate one possible proposal
for subsequent subdividing should that be necessary.
B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from
collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: SDC currently maintains no R-= minimum frontage requirements for subdivision lots/parcels.
C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall complywith the standards specified in SDC 4.2.21,; and s z.szo(A). In the case of
multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels
shall occur prior to recording the Plat.
Response: There are no panhandle lots proposed with this tentative subdivision plan.
D. Public street standards as specified in SDC 4.2.10q
Response: No new public streets are proposed.
5.12.12o Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements.
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this code
are being fulfilled.
EXCEPTION. In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director,
during the Application Completeness Check Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed
as part of a future development application.
A. General Requirements.
i. The Tentative Plan, including my required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18 inches x 24 inches. The services of an Oregon
Licensed Professional Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially
stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality
issues.
Response: Brent Coming, PLS of EGR & Associates, an Oregon licensed land surveyor, has prepared the Tentative
Subdivision and Future Development plans included with this submittal on standard sheets of zq"x 36".
Kyle Morris, PE of A&O Engineering, an Oregon registered professional Engineer has designed the stormwater
management plan, and all other utility planning issues with this submittal on standard sheets of zq"x 36".
]. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail
and data, normallys inch = So feet, s inch = loofeet, or s inch = 200feet.
Response: A scale of I":20'or "':30' is used for the Tentative Subdivision Plan Set as appropriate.
3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared.
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the Tentative Subdivision Plan set included with this application.
y. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who
prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response: Owner/Applicant is Oxwood Properties A Street LLC. Surveyor and engineer who prepared the Tentative
Subdivision Plans are, respectively, Brent Corning, PLS of EGR & Associates, and Kyle Morris of A&O Engineering.
S. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner orsubdivider of which the
proposed land division is a part.
Response: On the Tentative Subdivision Plans, a thicker black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show
the boundaries of the subject property.
6. Ch yboundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and myspecial service district boundaries or railroad
right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: There are no special service district boundaries, city boundaries, or railroad rights-of-way that cross or abut
the proposed subdivision.
7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties
within loo feet of the boundaryof the subject property.
Response: The subject property is zoned City of Springfield R -i and designated Low Density Residential in the Metro
Plan. All adjacent properties to the north, east and west are also zoned R -i.
8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in squarefeet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building she, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale.
Response: Dimensions and sizes for each proposed lot are indicated in feet and square feet, respectively, on the
attached Tentative Subdivision Plan.
g. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after
platting and their required setbacksfrom the proposed new property lines.
Response: There are no existing structures on the subject property.
so. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and
adjacent to the she, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems,
water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points.
Response: Existing public and private utilities are shown. Proposed private utilities are shown on A&O Engineering
Sheets C — i. o and C — z. o. All utilities are proposed to be underground. Utility dropdown to come from existing
overhead electric and utilities in A Street. Existing overhead electric utilities on Main Street to remain overhead.
Franchise utilities (natural gas, phone, and electric) proposed to be trenched within Joint Utility Trench.
Final utility design to be completed during building permitting process by franchise utility providers. Current utility
routings shown are preliminary.
See A&O Engineering Plan Sheets C—i.o, C—z.o, C -4 i.
ss. The locations, widths and purpose of all existing orproposed easements on and abutting the proposed
land division; the location of anyexisting or proposed reserve strips.
Response: All existing and proposed public and private easements are indicated on Tentative Subdivision Plans,
including location, width, and purpose.
zz. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition"
limitations of the reservations clearlyindicated.
Response: A io' Right -of -Way Dedication (A Street) to the City of Springfield is clearly indicated on the Tentative
Subdivision Plans.
(B) A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall he prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drown to scale with existing contours at s foot intervals and
percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to
physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a
finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality,
either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties maybe generalized to
show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response: The attached Tentative Subdivision Plans include all the General Requirements, Site Assessment items, and
Stormwater items. The plan was prepared and signed by Brent Corning, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor of EGR
& Associates, and Kyle Morris, an Oregon registered Engineer of A&O Engineering.
s. The name, location, dimensions, direction offlow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the
Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WOLW) Map on fil a in the Development and Public Works Department;
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property.
z. The zoa year floodplain andfloodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment orLetter of Map Revision;
Response: According to FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Number 41o3gC=62F, the subject site is located in Zone X, an
area determined to be outside of the Soo -year floodplain.
3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3.2oo and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas
Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department;
Response: According to the Springfield Wellhead Protection Map, the majority of the subject property falls outside of
the Time of Travel Zone for wellhead protection; northwestern portion of Lot i is located in the zo-gg Combined ToTz.
y. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on
the WOLW Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings;
Response: There are no significant clusters of trees or shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock
outcroppings located within the boundaries of the subject property.
S. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and
Response: Soils types on the subject property are io8C Phi lomath Cobbly Silty Clay, 77B Marcola Cobbly Silty Clay
Loam, and io6A Pengra-Urban Land Complex; soils are indicated on the attached Grading & Drainage Sheet C —i. o,
Note #q, and detailed in the attached Earth Engineer's Infiltration Test Report.
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in SDC 4..zz .
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property.
(C) AStormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 -foot intervals and percent of slope
that preciselymaps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is zo percent
or more, contours maybe shown at S foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for
the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Director, the Cityshall require that an Oregon Licensed Civil
Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon
Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components:
s. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
z. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns;
3. The size and location ofstormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain
lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater qualitymeasures; and natural
drainageways to be retained.
y. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours; and
S. A stormwater study and management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as
required in SDC 4.3.110 shall he submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and
documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to allow
staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes.
Response: A stormwater study including a report and management plan was designed by A & O Engineering.
Infiltration testing was performed in May 2022 and the maximum measured infiltration rate was found to be o.5 inches
per hour. Given the low measured rate, infiltration will not be utilized onsite.
It is proposed to route all stormwater runoff from new impervious pavement onsite and future impervious area on new
lots into proposed 2,287 sq ft Filtration Rain Garden on the northern portion of the Lot i. Proposed Filtration Rain Garden
will be planted to meet City of Springfield requirements and will include three varieties of plants — plant list and rain
garden details included on Civil Details Sheet C —4.1. Planting plan to be finalized during building permit process.
Due to the imported mediums within the rain garden, a design infiltration rate of z inches per hour will be utilized within
the rain garden, meeting the 2014 Eugene Stormwater Management Manual requirements. Existing stormwater runoff
from the northern portion of Main Street will be directed to a 2,388 sq ft grass lined Conveyance Ditch for drainage located
at the southern boundary of the subject property in order to protect building foundations. For Conveyance Ditch details
see Grading & Drainage Plan Sheet C— i.o and Civil Details Sheet C —4.1.
Drainage from private roadways to be routed to catch basins via concrete gutters and directed to Filtration Rain Garden.
Lots 1-9 roof runoff to be collected via roof drains and routed directly to Filtration Rain Garden through proposed
underground stormwater piping system. Proposed storm manholes to be constructed per City of Springfield standards.
Private storm piping shall meet requirements outlined in Oregon State Plumbing Code 2021. Approximately Soo square
feet of driveway atA Street entrance is exempt from treatment per City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
See attached A&O Engineering Stormwater Report, Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet C —1.0, and Civil Details Sheet C-
4.1 for Filtration Rain Garden cross-section and Drainage Ditch cross-section. Stormwater catch basins shown on Sheet C
—1.o enlarged for plan review purposes.
D. A response to transportation issues complying with the provisions of this code.
s. The locations, condition, e.g., fullyimproved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, orgravel, widths and
names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights-of-waywithin or adjacent to the proposed land division;
Response: All existing streets and existing improvements adjacent to the subject property are indicated in detail on the
Tentative Subdivision Plans. See Paving Plan Sheet C -3.o and Civil Details Sheet 4.0.
2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate
radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to anyprojected streets as shown on the
Metro Plan or Springfield Comprehensive Plan, including the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including
the Conceptual Street Map) and, any approved Conceptual Development Plan;
Response: No streets are proposed. Internal easements for access are shown and dimensioned on the Tentative
Subdivision Plans. See Paving Plan Sheet C -3.o and Civil Details Sheet 4. 0.
3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, multi -use paths, and accessways, including
the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in anyrequired planter strip;
Response: All existing and proposed sidewalks, multi -use paths, or accessways are shown on the Tentative Subdivision
Plans. Any of these items that might be required within the ODOT ROW will be addressed as instructed by ODOT and
can be made Conditions of Approval. See Paving Plan Sheet C -3.o and Civil Details Sheet 4.0.
y. The location of existing and proposed troffic control devices, firehydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable;
Response: Location of all existing and proposed fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units,
and similar public facilities are shown on the attached Tentative Subdivision Plans. See Utility Plan Sheet C-2.0,
Paving Plan Sheet C -3.o, and Civil Details Sheet C-4. o.
S. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways demonstrating conformance with lot or
parcel dimensions and frontage requirementsfor single family and duplex lots7parcels established in
SDC32.21s" anddriveway width and separation specifications established in SDCc2.120 whereapplicable;
Response: Internal driveway apron locations are unknown at this time and will be finalized at the time of Building
Permit process. Driveways to be constructed per City of Springfield Standard Drawing 3-22. See Paving Plan Sheet C -
3.o and Civil Details Sheet C-4. o.
6. The location of existing and proposed street trees, associated utilities along street frontage(s), and street
lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination;
Response: Existing streetlights along A Street are Cobra style High -Pressure Sodium lamps on fiberglass poles with a
25' mounting height. Proposed streetlights to be CSX -i LED fixtures mounted on fiberglass poles with a mounting
height of 20 feet. Street tree locations to be finalized during Building Permit process but will be located n o closer than
20' from streetlights and no closer than 5'from driveway approaches and utility features. All existing and proposed
street trees and lights are indicated on the Tentative Subdivision Plans. See Paving Plan Sheet C -3.o and Civil Details
Sheet C-4. o.
7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities;
Response: The nearest existing transit facility is the Thurston Station, located on the southeast corner of Main Street
and 581h Street.
8. A copy of a Right -of -Way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOT)facility; and
Response: The subject property has approximately 400 feet of frontage on Main Street but is not accessible via Main
Street; access is taken from the north via 74`h Street/ A Street. Main Street frontage improvements will include
sidewalk, curb, gutter, shoulder paving, and street trees as indicated by ODOT staff.
g. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Oregon Licensed Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in
SDC y 2.10 (A)(4).
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, ii`h Edition, the proposed
Tentative Subdivision will generate well under the i,000 trips per day threshold requiring a Traffic Impact Study (TIS).
E. AFuture Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel
size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that:
s. Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot/parcel dimensions and sequencing of each
proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan showing buildingfootprintsfor
compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in SDC 3 2.205;
z. Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based upon
compliance with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, or this code;
3. Accommodates other required public improvements, including, but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water and electricity;
y. Addresses physical features, including, but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas,
wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features and
S. Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing.
Response: No phasing is proposed. A Future Development Plan is included to illustrate feasibility of compliance with lot
size and density requirements.
F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall
include thefollowing items, where applicable:
s. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property;
Response: The subject property is currently vacant. The property owner is requesting, with this application, to
consolidate three tax lots and replat creating nine new residential lots, according to Springfield Development Code
guidelines and requirements. This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposal.
z. If the applicantis not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required;
Response: The applicant, Oxwood Properties A Street LLC, is the property owner and has signed the attached
application form.
3. A Vicinity Map drown to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants,
and other tronsportation1fire access issues within 200feet of the proposed land division and all existing
Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division;
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the attached Tentative Subdivision Plans.
y. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district;
Response: No oveday districts apply to the subject property.
S. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable
Response: The entirety of the subject property is zoned R -i, designated Low Density Residential. The proposed
Tentative Subdivision residential development plan within the R -i zone is a permitted use according to SDC 3.2 -21o. No
Discretionary Use Permit is required.
6.A Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC S.io.ioo;
Response: A Tree Felling Permitwill be obtained in the case of the removal of morethan five trees that are 5 inches in
diameter or larger over any iz-month period.
7. A Geotechnical Reportfor slopes of 15 percent orgreater and as specified in SDC z.z_____moand/or if the
required Site Assessment in SDC q.12.12 (B) indicates the proposed development area has unstable sails and/or
high water table as specified in the Sails Survey of Lane County;
Response: There are no slopes greater than 15% on this site.
8. An Annexation application as specified in SDC S. 7.ioo where a development is proposed outside of the city
limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can he serviced by sanitary sewer;
Response: The subject property is within the City of Springfield boundary.
g. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where
there is a wetland on the property;
Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject property.
so. Evidence that anyrequired Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted
concurrently;
Response: No Federal or State permits are required with this Tentative Subdivision application.
ss. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and
method of financing;
Response: The applicant proposes to initiate construction of this subdivision as soon as possible upon final approval of
subdivision plat, with private financing resources.
32. Proposed deed restrictions and a dmft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate;
Response: Any required deed restrictions can be provided on the final subdivision plat and made a condition of final
approval. No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed at thisjuncture.
13. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home parkis proposed, the Director may
waive certain submittal requirements specified in subsections (A) through (M). However, the Tentative Plan
shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specfed in
SDC c.12.12s.
Response: This application is not proposing the subdivision of a manufactured dwelling or mobile home park.
5.12-��5 Tentative Plan Criteria.
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all
applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot he attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director
shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director
may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future
development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions of this code pertaining to Iot/pa rel size and dimensions.
Response: The Applicant's request to subdivide the subject property's approximately 2.21 acres into a nine (g) lot
subdivision conforms with all provisions and mandatory mini mum development standards for City of Springfield, R -i
zone, as specified in SDC 3.2-215. Minimum development size in the R -i zone is 3,000 square feet for single-family
dwellings and dupl exes, 5, coo square feet for triplexes, and 7, coo square feet for fourplexes. Due to the proposal's lot
sizes, a Condition of Approval requiring at least (13) thirteen dwelling units can be implemented for final plat approval
to ensure compliance with code provisions pertaining to lot size and dimensions.
A Future Development Plan has been designed and included with this submittal to illustrate one possible proposal for
conformity with code provisions pertaining to lot size and dimensions with additional subdividing.
B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District
map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Response: The subject property is zoned City of Springfield R -i, which is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and
designation of Low Density Residential.
C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity;
sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be
exceeded and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless
otherwise provided for by this code and other applicable regulations. The Director or a utilityprovidershall
determine capacr'tyissues.
Response: Preliminary engineering plans designed by A&O Engineering are included with this Tentative Subdivision
Application, and address the extension of public and private facilities, and related capacity. Public Improvement Plan
(PIP) drawings will be submitted to the City after Tentative Subdivision Plan approval.
D. The proposed land division shall complywith all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this code and other applicable regulations.
Response: This proposed g -Lot Subdivision shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this code and other applicable regulations.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to. steep slopes with unstable soil orgeologic conditions; areas with
susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their
associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in SDC 4.3.117; rock outcroppings; open
spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as maybe specified in SDC z.z 000 or ORS
97-740-76o, 358_9o5_955 and390.235.240, shall be protected as specified in this code or in State or Federal law.
Response: The subject property is relatively flat with no unstable soil and some sloping at the southern property
boundary. This development site is located outside of the ioo-year floodplain. There are no significant clusters of trees,
watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings, or other historically/ archaeological significant features
within the boundaries of the proposed partition. See attached Cover Sheet —Existing Conditions.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian
safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivitywithin the development area and to adjacent residential areas,
transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on
arterial and collector streets as specified in this code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT
access management standardsfor State highways.
Response: Parking areas to be finalized prior to final plat and shall comply with all criteria in this subsection. Internal
driveways shall be proposed along Joint Access Utility Maintenance Easement complying with minimization of
driveways on arterial and collector streets. See Paving Sheet C-3. o.
G. Development ofanyremainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this
code.
Response: The subject property is owned by Omood Properties A Street LLC, a nd a II development of the su bject
property is proposed in this Tentative Subdivision Plan.
H. Adjacent land can be developed oris provided access that will allowits development as specified in this code.
Response: Adjacent land is already developed.
L Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no
concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply.
z. The minimum area for the partitioning of land in the UF -10 Overlay District shall be so acres.
z. EXCEPTIONS:
a. Any proposed new parcel between 5 and zo acres shall require a Future Development Plan as specified in
SDC s. zz.zzo(E) for ultimate development with urban densities as required in this code.
b. In addition to the standards of subsection (1)(2)(a), above, any proposed new parcel that is less than s
acres shall meet z of the following standards.
L The property to be partitioned shall be owned or operated by a governmental agency or public
utility; or
H. A majorityof parcels located within loo feet of the property to be partitioned shall be smaller than
s acres.
W. No more than 3 parcels shall be created from s tract of land while the propertyremains within the
UF -10 Overlay District.
EXCEPTION. Land within the UF -10 Overlay District may be partitioned more than once as long as no proposed
parcel is less than s acres in size.
Response: The subject property is located within the City of Springfield city limits.
J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following
approval criteria apply.
s. The park was approved before Julyz, zaoz and isin compliance with the standards in SDC 3 2.23 or other
land use regulations in effect at the time the site was approved as a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home
10
park; or the park is an approved non -conforming use. In the latter case, a park is in compliance if the Cityhas
not issued a notice of noncompliance on or before July2, 2001.
3. The number of lots proposed shall be the same or less than the number of mobile home spaces previously
approved or legally existing in the park.
3. The external boundary or setbacks of the park shall not be changed.
4. The use of lots, as shown on the Tentative Plan, shall be limited to the
installation of manufactured dwellings; i.e., "stick-built"houses are prohibited.
S. Any other area in the Subdivision other than the proposed lots shall he used as common property, unless park
streets have previously been dedicated to the City or there are public utilities in the park. All common property
shall he addressed in a Homeowners'Association Agreement.
a. Areas that are used for vehicle circulation (streets), driveways that serve more than 2 lots/parcels or
common parking areas, shall he shown in a Tract or easement on the Tentative Plan.
b. All other services and utilities that serve more than s lot shall be in a Tract or easement. Where a
service or utility serves only lot, but crosses another, that service or utility shall also be in an easement
shown on the Tentative Plan.
c. Existing buildings in the park used for recreational, meetings or other purposesfor the park
residents shall be in a Tract shown on the Tentative Plan.
6. Any public utilities shall be within a public utility easement.
7. If public utilities or services are required to serve the Subdivision, the park owner shall sign and execute a
waiver of the right to remonstrate against the formation of a local improvement district to provide the public
utilities orservices. (6443)
Response: This application is for a Tentative Subdivision but is not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling
park/mobile home park. This criterion is not applicable.
11