HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022 03 01 AIS for Zoning Map AmendmentAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 3/1/2022
Meeting Type: Regular Meeting
Staff Contact/Dept.: Andy Limbird, DPW
Staff Phone No: 541-726-3784
Estimated Time: 10 Minutes
S P R I N G F I E L D
PLANNING COMMISSION
Council Goals: Encourage Economic Development and
Revitalization through Community
Partnerships
ITEM TITLE: REQUEST FOR ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR 0.99 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1025 G STREET, CASE 811-21-000294-TYP3
ACTION
REQUESTED:
Conduct deliberations and adopt/not adopt a Final Order to amend the adopted Springfield Zoning
Map.
ISSUE
STATEMENT:
The applicant has submitted a Zoning Map amendment request for approximately 0.99 acres of
property at the southeast corner of 10th and G Streets near downtown Springfield. The applicant is
requesting to change the property zoning from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
Commercial. In accordance with provisions of the Metro Plan and the City’s Development Code,
the proposed rezoning does not require an accompanying comprehensive plan amendment.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application for Zoning Map Amendment
2. Site maps for Zoning Map Amendment
3. Applicant’s Traffic Study
4. Letter of Support from First Baptist Church of Springfield
5. Letter of Support from Springfield Public Schools
6. PC Final Order – Zoning Map Amendment Application 811-21-000294-TYP3
Exhibit A – Site Map and Legal Description
Exhibit B – Staff Report and Findings
DISCUSSION:
The subject property is addressed as 1025 G Street and it contains a 15,200 ft2 two-story building
operated by Catholic Community Services of Lane County. The subject parcel is approximately
0.99 acres and it is identified as Assessor’s Map 17-03-35-11, Tax Lot 3500. The applicant is
requesting the zone change to accommodate the existing charitable services use on the property and
to facilitate future expansions or modifications to the site.
The property is currently zoned and designated Low Density Residential in accordance with the
adopted Metro Plan diagram and the Springfield Zoning Map. Within the Low Density Residential
district, offices for charitable services are not a listed use. However, charitable services are a listed
use in the Neighborhood Commercial zoning district. The applicant contends the site meets the
criteria for rezoning from residential to commercial as outlined in the attached staff report.
The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposal to amend the Springfield
Zoning Map at the regular meeting on February 1, 2022. At the meeting, several people provided
written and verbal testimony opposing the request. One person rescinded their written testimony
opposing the request and, instead, expressed support for the proposal after having discussed their
concerns with the applicant. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the Planning Commission
requested an amended staff report that clarifies the history of the current charitable services use
operating on the site and provides additional background information on staff direction provided to
the applicant to legitimize the use on the property.
The Planning Commission is requested to use this opportunity to review all materials and
testimony previously submitted into the record, to conduct deliberations, and to vote on adopting
the Final Order based on the totality of the information.
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Zoning Map Amendment, Type III
SPgIXOFlwreamiq
Required Project
Applicant Name:
Company:
Address:
Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Chris Pickering, Operations Director Phone 541-345-3628
Catholic CommunityServices Lane Co LLC ext 312
1025 G Street, Springfie OR 97477
Applicant Signature:
Property Owner:
Company:
Address: 1 Catholic Community Services Lane Co LLC Phone
Fax: Susan Paiement, Executive Director
1025 G Street, Springfield OR 97477
Owner Signature:
GLcc
If the applicant is other than the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicent to act in his or her behalf
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-35-11 TAX LOT NO(S): 3500
Property Address: 1025 G Street, Springfield OR 97477
Area of Request Square Feet: 43,124 Acres: 0.99
Existing Use(s) Catholic Community Services is an essential provider of safety -net
of Property: services in Lane County, offering immediate assistance with food, clothing,
and energy & housing assistance.
Description of
The Proposal: The proposed zone change from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
Commercial will allow Catholic Community Services to continue to provide
charitable services and to expand operations.
Required Property Information (City Intake Staff. mplete this section)
I I 0002 I — I (P' f l ["I •Received by: 'vl(I I 'cCaseNo.: ate I (initials)
Ip Aye Postage 1 j- Total
Application Fee: ;.Jl/f + VV Fee: '"1 1(i Fee:
Edited 7/192007 bjones
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 36
Zoning Map Amendment Submittal Requirements Checklist
1. The application fee - Refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the
appropriate application and postage fee. A copy of the Fee Schedule is available at
the Development & Public Works Department.
2. Deed - A copy of the deed to show ownership,
3. Vicinity Map - A map of the property and the surrounding vicinity which includes
the existing zoning and plan designations. One copy must be reduced to 8 h" by11" which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification
packet.
4. findings - Before the Planning Commission can approve a Zone/Overlay District
Change Request, there must be information submitted by the applicant which
adequately supports the request. The Criteria the Planning Commission will
consider in making their decision is listed below. If insufficient or unclear data Is
submitted by the applicant, there is a good chance that the request will be denied
or delayed. It is recommended that you hire a professional planner or land use
attorney to prepare your findings.
Criteria of Approval (Ouasi-iudicial)
SDC 12.030 requires that In reaching a decision on these actions, the Planning
Commission or Hearings Official map approve, approve with conditions or deny a quasi-
judicial Zoning Map amendment based upon approval criteria (a) -(c), below.
a)Consistency with the Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan Diagram;
b)Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan District maps, Conceptual
Development Plans and functional plans; and
c) The property Is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and
transportation networks to support the use, or these facilities, services and
transportation networks are planned to be provided concurrently with thedevelopmentoftheproperty.
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 36
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
OF LANE COUNTY
ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION
Submitted to:
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Prepared for.,
Catholic Community Services
of Lane County
1025 G Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Submitted by:
M cBIISHOW
Submittal Date:
November 9, 2021
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 36
ZONE CHANGE -APPLICATION CONTENTS
PARTI- SUMMARY
PART II -APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
PART III - APPROVAL CRITERIA & SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
EXHIBITS
Exhibit,'A••.......................................................................................... Vicinity Map
Exhibit"B.. ..................................................................... Metro Plan Designations
Exhibit"C.. .................................................................................... Existing Zoning
Exhibit"D.. ................................................................................. Proposed Zoning
Exhibit"E.. .................................................................................Site Context Map
Exhibit"F.. ...................................................................................Assessor's Map
Exhibit ,.G"................................................................................... Warranty Deed
Exhibit "H .. ....................................................................... Preliminary Title Report
Exhibit "I.. ...................CCSLC Springfield CDBG Proposal 2021-2022 (Excerpt)
Exhibit "J.. .................................. Letter Announcing City Award of CDBG Funds
SUBMITTED SEPARATELY
Zone Change Application Form
Application Fee
Traffic Impact Analysis, Sandow Engineering
CCSLC Zone Change Page 2 of 10 P`n BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 119 CONS U LTI N G
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 36
PARTI- SUMMARY
Project Name: CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES OF LANE COUNTY
ZONE CHANGE
Project Proposal: Zone Change Application from Low Density Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial
Application: Zoning Map Amendment, Type III
Project Location: 1025 G Street, Springfield OR 97477
Assessor's Map: 17-03-35-11 Tax Lot: 3500
Project Size: 43,124 sq. ft. or 0.99 Acres
Plan Designation: Low Density Residential
Existing Zoning: Low Density Residential
Proposed Zoning: Neighborhood Commercial
Existing Use: Charitable Services
Proposed Use: Charitable Services including the OASIS Program
Project Team:
Applicant Land Use Planner
Chris Pickering, Operations Director Teresa Bishow, AICP
Catholic Community Services of Lane County Bishow Consulting LLC
1025 G Street P.O. Box 50721
Springfield, OR 97477 Eugene, OR 97405
coickerinc(W.ccslc.orc teresa(a)bishowconsuiltinc.com
Architect Traffic Engineer
Andrew L. Scheidt, AIA Kelly Sandow, PE
Andrew L. Scheidt, Architect, AIA Sandow Engineering
57 North Polk Street 160 Madison St, Ste A
Eugene, OR 97402 Eugene, OR 97402
andrewlscheidt(a)..amail.com kellvsandow(o)sandowenaineerinc.com
General Contractor
McKenzie Commercial Contractors, Inc
Toby Demasters
T Dem a sters(dmccma il. b iz
CCSLC Zone Change Page 3 of 10 Qq BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 6%d CON 5 U LT I NG
Attachment 1, Page 5 of 36
Site Characteristics
The subject property is a 0.99 -acre parcel at the southeast corner of North 10" Street
and G Street in Springfield. (Refer to Exhibit "A" —Vicinity Mao.) The parcel has about
120 feet of frontage on North 10th Street and about 360 feet of frontage on G Street and
abuts a 14 foot wide alley. The abutting property to the east is owned and occupied by
the First Baptist Church. To the west and south of the property are detached single-
family homes. To the north across G Street is The Brattain House and Two Rivers —
Dos Rios elementary school. The Brattain House is home to a number of Springfield
Public Schools programs and provides a variety of resources to families including
information and referrals to low-cost resources and services. ( Refer to Exhibit "E" — Site
Context Mao.
The subject property is developed with an existing building, interior landscaped
courtyards, and a parking lot. The partial two-story building contains about 15,200
square feet and is occupied by the Community Catholic Services of Lane County
CCSLC).
Reason for Zone Change Request:
In 1965, the subject property was developed for a church. In 1998, the subject property
was sold to a non -church entity and the church use was discontinued.
In 2004, CCSLC purchased the subject property to provide safety -net services for low-
income individuals and families offering immediate assistance with food, clothing, and
energy & housing assistance.
In March 2021, CCSLC submitted a proposal to the City of Springfield for Community
Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) for 2021-2022. The proposal was to construct
a 1,600 square foot addition to their Community Service Center at 1025 G Street in
order to permanently house their OASIS program, which assists low-income and
homeless families with a range of essential services. The OASIS program is currently
operated by CCSLC staff at First Baptist Church across the parking lot. The use of the
room at First Baptist Church is not fully under the control of CCSLC staff and is not ADA
accessible. Please refer to Exhibit "I" - CCSLC Springfield CDBG Proposal 2021-2022
Excerpt).
The City of Springfield awarded CCSLC a federal CDBG grant to expand the existing
building for the OASIS program. Please refer to Exhibit "J" - Letter Announcing Citv
Award of CDBG Funds.
Historically, cities often permitted churches outright in low-density residential zones to
help serve the surrounding neighborhoods. In general, as churches grew in size their
impacts, such as traffic, increased substantially. The existing Springfield Development
Code only allows churches to operate with an approved Discretionary Use (DU) Permit
in the Low Density Residential zone. There is no explicit allowance in LDR for
Charitable Services" or "Community and Senior Centers'. The Neighborhood
CCSLC Zone Change Page 4 of 10 V101SHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 B9 CONSULTING
Attachment 1, Page 6 of 36
Commercial (NC) zone permits outright the following uses: "Charitable services",
Community and senior centers" and "Churches, temples and weekly religious schools".
Approval of the zone change request will amend the zoning to NC and thus allow
CCSLC to operate as an outright permitted use. The minor building addition for the
OASIS program could occur without the need for a DU Permit.
PART II - APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS
Part II lists the application submittal requirements per the Springfield Development
Code (SDC) in bold italics following by the applicant's response.
SDC 5.4-105 Basic Application Submittal Requirements and Completeness Time
Lines
A. All applications required by this Code shall be submitted to the
Development Services Department on a City application form.
The applicant submitted the City Zoning Map Amendment, Type III application form
signed by the applicant and property owner.
B. An application shall consist of items required by this Code and the
following:
An explanation of the proposal and any additional information
that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken,
including findings demonstrating compliance with applicable
approval criteria;
This written narrative explains the basis for the proposed zone change and contains
findings demonstrating the application complies with applicable approval criteria.
2. Evidence that the property affected by the application is in
exclusive ownership or control of the applicant, or that the
applicant has the consent of all owners of the affected
property to act on their behalf,•
The property is owned by the Catholic Community Services of Lane County, LLC.
Please refer to Exhibit "G" - Warranty Deed and Exhibit "H" - Preliminary Title Report.
Sue Paiement, CCSLC Executive Director, signed the application form on behalf of the
property owner.
3. The legal description and assessor map and tax lot number of
the property affected by the application;
CCSLC Zone Change Page 5 of 10 Qq BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 ESg CON 5 U LT I N G
Attachment 1, Page 7 of 36
The legal description is submitted as part of the Preliminary Title Report. The assessor
map and tax lot number is provided on the application form and in this written narrative
in Part I — Summary. Please also refer to Exhibit "F' Assessor Mao, and Exhibit "G" -
Warranty Deed.
4. Additional information including maps, siteplans, sketches
and calculations as required by applicable Sections of this
Code or in information packets provided by the Development
Services Department;
The City Zoning Map Amendment application form specifies a requirement for a vicinity
map and information concerning the comprehensive plan designation and zoning in the
area. Please refer to Exhibit "A" — Vicinity Mao. Exhibit "B" - Metro Plan Designations,
Exhibit "C" - Existing Zoning and Exhibit "D" - Procosed Zoning.
5. The required number of copies of the applicant; and
This application was submitted electronically according to current City administrative
procedures.
6. Payment of the applicable application fee at the time of
application submittal.
Required fees were paid concurrent with this application.
PART III - APPROVAL CRITERIA & SUPPORTING EVIDENCE
Part III provides the applicable approval criteria and findings for the requested Zoning
Map Amendment. Springfield Development Code sections are shown in bold italics
followed by findings demonstrating compliance.
SDC 5.22-115 Criteria
A. Quasi-judicial Zoning Map Amendments. The Planning Commission
or Hearings Official may approve, approve with conditions or deny a
quasi-judicial Zoning Map amendment based upon approval criteria
C.1. through 3., below. The Planning Commission or Hearings
Official shall make the final local decision on all quasi-judicial Zoning
Map amendments that do not include a Metro Plan diagram
amendment.
This is a request for a quasi-judicial zoning map amendment that does not include or
necessitate a Metro Plan Diagram amendment.
C. Zoning Map amendment criteria of approval.,
CCSLC Zone Change Page 6 of 10 Qq BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 110 CONSULTING
Attachment 1, Page 8 of 36
Consistency with applicable Metro Plan policies and the Metro
Plan diagram;
The Metro Plan diagram designates the subject property "Low Density Residential".
Refer to Exhibit "B" — Metro Plan Designations)
As stated in the Metro Plan text (page II -G-4), the Metro Plan diagram does not depict
neighborhood commercial zoning.' The Metro Plan text describes the purpose of
neighborhood commercial facilities not shown on the Metro Plan Diagram and
establishes minimum location standards and site criteria? The Metro Plan standards
and site criteria are listed below in italics following by findings demonstrating
compliance.
Within convenient walking or bicycling distance of an adequate support
population. For a full-service neighborhood commercial center at the high
end of the size criteria, an adequate support population would be about
4, 000 persons (existing or anticipated) within an area conveniently
accessible to the site. For smaller sites or more limited services, a smaller
support population or service area may be sufficient.
The Metro Plan does not define "adequate support population" for smaller sites or "an
area conveniently accessable to the site".
The subject property is conveniently located at the edge of a residential area and close
to public schools and major employment areas such as the McKenzie Willamette
Medical Center. The subject property is only about one acre is size and is considered a
smaller site. Based on the general density of people living, working, and going to
school in the area, the site has a sufficient support population.
2. Adequate area to accommodate off-street parking and loading needs and
landscaping, particularly between the center and adjacent residential
property, as well as along street frontages next door to outdoor parking
areas.
The subject property is a 0.99 -acre parcel on a corner rectangular shaped lot. The size
and configuration of the lot are suitable for uses permitted in the Neighborhood
Commercial zone. Due to the 14 -foot wide alley to the south of the subject property, the
site is not adjacent to any property in residential use.
The Metro Plan, page I -G-2 describes why certain zones are not depicted on the Metro Plan diagram as
follows:
Certain land uses are not individually of metropolitan -wide significance in terms of size or
location because of their special nature or limited extent. Therefore, it is not advisable to account for mot
of them on the Metro Plan Diagram. The Diagram's depiction of land use designations is not intended to
invalidate local zoning or land uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enough to be included on
the Metro Plan Diagram"
2 Metro Plan, page II -G-5
CCSLC Zone Change Page 7 of 10 Ti BISHOWWritten Narrative November 9, 2021 M CON 5 U LT I NG
Attachment 1, Page 9 of 36
3. Sufficient frontage to ensure safe and efficient automobile, pedestrian and
bicycle access without conflict with moving traffic at intersections and
along adjacent streets.
The subject property is on a corner rectangular shaped lot with an alley along the south
side. The lot provides sufficient frontage for safe and efficient automobile pedestrian
and bicycle access without creating conflicts with traffic at the intersection or along
adjacent streets.
4. The site shall be no more than five acres, including existing commercial
development. The exact size shall depend on the number of
establishments associated with the center and the population to be
served.
The proposed Neighborhood Commercial site is 0.99 acres. The First Baptist Church
adjacent to the subject property is located on 1.45 acres. If the church was considered
existing commercial development", it would bring the total neighborhood commercial
site up to 2.44 acres, less than the maximum size allowed in the Metro Plan.
The Metro Plan text also provides3:
In certain circumstances, convenience grocery stores or similar retail operations
play an important role in providing services to existing neighborhoods. These
types of operations which currently exist can be recognized and allowed to
continue through such actions as rezoning."
Since 2004, CCSLC has provided vital safety -net services to the neighborhood.
Services include immediate assistance with food, clothing, and energy & housing
assistance. Approval of the zone change will allow these charitable services to continue
to be offered on the site. The NC zoning will also allow a 1,600 square foot building
addition to house the OASIS Program on-site.
2. Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan District
maps, Conceptual Development Plans and functional plans;
The subject property is not located in an area with an adopted Refinement Plan, Plan
District map or Conceptual Development Plan.
The Zoning Map Amendment is consistent with the applicable functional plans as
described below.
Sprinafield 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP)
The Springfield 2035 TSP provides a framework for how the City should maintain and
improve the transportation network to meet growth within Springfield's Urban Growth
Metro Plan, page II -G-6
CCSLC Zone Change Page 8 of 10 VET BISHOWWrittenNarrativeNovember9, 2021 6d CONSULT I N G
Attachment 1, Page 10 of 36
Boundary (UGB). The 2035 TSP includes a recommended set of transportation
improvements for the 20 -year planning horizon.
The subject property has frontage on G Street and North 101h Street. The 2035 TSP
functional classification for both streets is "Major Collector". As set forth in the Metro
Plan, the location of Neighborhood Commercial sites greater than 1.5 acres must abut a
Collector or Arterial. In this case, the Neighborhood Commercial site is only about an
acre and abuts two streets with a Collector classification. The subject property is also
located on a transit line with a bus stop abutting the property.
The 2035 TSP contains one project relevant to the subject property - PB -54 G Street 51h
St to 28"' St.4 The project is described as "G Street will be restriped with bike lanes,
signed and marked for bike route." The project improvements are for signing, striping,
and pavement marking at an estimated cost of $75,000.
PB -54 is categorized as an "opportunity project". Opportunity projects are described as:
Lower-cost and scale roadway, urban standards and pedestrian/bicycle projects that
generally would not require additional right-of-way and the City could implement as
opportunities arise (Table 4, Figure 5).5
The proposed zone change will not adversely impact the City's ability in the future to
provide bike lanes and sign G Street as a bike route.
The proposed zone change is consistent with the 2035 TSP.
Findings demonstrating compliance with the Oregon Transportation Planning Rule are
found in the Sandow, Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis provided under separate
cover.
Willamalane Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is within a block of Willamalane Park. This 14 -acre park features
basketball courts, tennis courts, softball/baseball fields, a playground, a skate park, and
the Veterans Plaza. The park also contains the Willamalane Park Swim Center.
The Willamalane Comprehensive Plan does not identify the subject property as a site
planned for future park use. The proposed zone change is not in conflict with the
Willamalane Comprehensive Plan.
4 Springfield 2035 TSP, Table 4.
5 Sorincfield 2035 TSP, page 49.
CCSLC Zone Change Page 9 of 10 Qq BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 LS Eg CONSULTING
Attachment 1, Page 11 of 36
3. The property is presently provided with adequate public
facilities, services and transportation networks to support the
use, or these facilities, services and transportation networks
are planned to be provided concurrently with the development
of the property.
The subject property is within the Springfield city limits and is provided with adequate
public facilities, services, and transportation networks to support the existing and
planned development of the property. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning district
standards will limit the intensity of future uses and development of the site.
4. Legislative Zoning Map amendments that involve a Metro Plan
diagram amendments shall:
a. Meet the approval criteria specified in Section 5.14-100; and
b. Comply with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-
0060, where applicable.
This application is not a Legislative Zoning Map amendment and does not involve a
Metro Plan diagram amendment. Although this approval criterion is not applicable,
based on a request from City staff, the applicant retained Sandow Engineering to
evaluate the proposed zone change for compliance with OAR 660-012-0060. Please
refer to the Sandow Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis under separate cover.
In closing, the proposed Zoning Map Amendment complies with applicable approval
criteria. The written narrative, exhibits, plans, and reports provide substantial evidence
to support approval of the application.
If there are questions, please contact Teresa Bishow at 541-514-1029 or via e-mail at
to resa (aD,b ishowconsu I ti ng. co m.
Sincerely,
9'eresa 93ishow
Teresa Bishow, AICP
END OF WRITTEN STATEMENT
CCSLC Zone Change Page 10 of 10 Qq BISHOW
Written Narrative November 9, 2021 MA CONSULTING
Attachment 1, Page 12 of 36
Attachment 1, Page 13 of 36
nli
n -
In
I ! q LJ t-
HcJ
E
Government and Education
I
I ! 1 rl17r-
RiTn r
L
ITTIJ,!Ti1 CI 7
IsmM
7II_]
M-edium Density, , TResidential
ttlect —. f f
L.
Est
Illlliil
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES METRO PLANscale1"= 4 0' ZONE CHANGE DESIGNATIONS
a '®
Map 17-03-35-11 Tax Lot 3500 EXHIBIT B
uisizl
Attachment 1, Page 14 of 36
JST
x
m
5T
ST
ST
High Density Residential S
hIFALI IiY vv f4
Public Land &
Open Space
S
c
Subject
Property
Neighborhood
Commercial
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES EXISTING ZONINGscale1"=300' ZONE CHANGE
u`
M EXHIBIT C
Map 17- 03- 35-11 Tax Lot 3500
11/5/20
11— Low Density Residential
Zoning
Mem Rmip Rngemni LlprrMe]lum imm pw
N(POemlry XeaiM1n®i _Xea.]'IipWgy
Mivee Ur ReeeantiY -$c1MHuryInGMMai
HeflMvm UslG emiarp FmpMm.nLMAI.(GlenNpp]I
Neg Mnatltonmertyl -9aYnJ(eAYMne¢lM
fnnnump C—. Genamicox
MeaNcdil LaiM1nlei®i -011waMlN0 Use1GkM.mn atJ MIUE Liu Rmiuiui -MehMSe Mma
GmmerotiMVlGlemwn) ®WeMflMlvOpen[m. TuY
IS MImIIIM LMIBLC WM¢yigeOpen Spv f
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES EXISTING ZONINGscale1"=300' ZONE CHANGE
u`
M EXHIBIT C
Map 17- 03- 35-11 Tax Lot 3500
11/5/20
Attachment 1, Page 15 of 36
JST
H_ALIHvwY
ta
ST
ST
ST
Zoning
LawLm¢y He¢Mem®I cmpn lNwNa
MNlum sry Fe¢genl®I YgN-MCElum lnfu9lY
rfHiBp CeMIVMasICenYel Hnry TJusOY
MMtlU¢e Re¢itlena Spew)Heery 1.ie
n. rtnsee Ur g;lemmptll Employ tMLL(GMmmoe1
mei Boi0r1¢ely MveO Ux
CommuNh4emmwa G-1 p m
Map omm a qAn M'uN Uu Glmrvaw
MdM VUCmmm
wll
M¢alul5eni¢ea
fn ner®IMLL(GMmwmp x" B Mlae Opereliom
Mv eLM186 PU MIZMBfIpen Sp¢ce
High Density Residential
htvr
Public Land &
1— Open Space
In
2
0C> r
Subject
Property
Neighborhood
Commercial
Low Density Residential
w
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICESNallY"=1 PROPOSED ZONING
wn ZONE CHANGE EXHIBIT D
Map 17-03- 35-11 Tax Lot 3500
11/5/20
Attachment 1, Page 16 of 36
V
4, Subj
r I
i
rr ):{ ':.: CI['j.l ' y i}Y` iti1C2:lIIpiTy":Y'Erpr_'11 i.[+l IG
Attachment 1, Page 17 of 36
scale 1-=10a
o
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
ZONECHANGE
Map 17-03-35-11 Tax Lo[ 3500
ASSESSOR'S MAP
EXHIBIT F
w5/21
Attachment 1, Page 18 of 36
RgUIN TO CASCADE TITLE CO.
EXHIBIT "G”
OW I.ION of Ck1.f D..utT Clark 2W4.049488La^e County D.". ..d R cor4. TITLE NO. 240/ 991
EEMM NO. BID, -, 279 31.00TTAXACCT. NO. 1403927D I lull lll 111 111 lu lu lull a 11
eee$E300200400e040E0020024 0612912004 11: 10: 44 AM
RPR4990 C.L.l Stn.$ =HIER 07
10. 00 811.00 $10. 00
WARRANTY DEED -- STATUTORY FORM
SPRINGFIELD CONEURITY DRVRLOPNENT CORP., an Oregon Coxporation,
Di r. ,
Ccdveye and wa frant. to
CATSOLIC CONNUNITT SERVICES OF LANE COUNTI, INC., Grantee,
the following described real property free of encumbrances except as
specifically set fnrth herein:
SEE E%HIBIT A WHICH IS MAO£ A PART HEREOF BY THIS REFERENCE
MIS INSTRUNDEN WILL NOT SLIM USE OF TNR PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN TRIS INSTRUEOiNT
IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LABII USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR
ACCEPTING MIS 1N8TAllA NT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING PEE TITLE TO THE PROPBRTY SHOULD
m WITS TAB' APPROPRIATE CITY CR COBETT PLANNING DEPARIENT TO M.IPY APPROPHD
USES AND TO SETERENER ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST RAISING OR FOREST PRACTICES
AS DEEMED IN ORS 30.930.
Except the following encumbrances:
Cnvenant9, Cnndr[ioh9, Reetriltiona, Easements and Rights of Nay of record, if any.
The true Conliderati.h for this comeyanee 19 $274,984.52.
Dated this 'L day of , 2,W1.
BY;
eSPRINGFIELD
z=
ENT CORP. -
PRESIDENT
STATE 'OF ORWON, County of 1, /1 )9e.
This ...tr9ment w acknowledged before m l ttik 2g, 20 ,
by JIN PLtiMMER, as PRESIDENT, of SPRINGFIELD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP., on
bekalf of the grant r
p OYYyy
MHMY IIWMM
Nocary iss is for Oregres: pON
My commission expire a--I'l_03 / bmN6 NtlDOR8A9N,11.AN
GRANTOR'S NAME AND ADDRESS
CATHOLIC COPE4'JNITY SERVICES
945 WEST ILi AVENUE
EUGENE, OR 97402
GRANTEE'S NAME AND ADDRESS
CORP. Until a Change 1B requested
all tax statements shall be
sent to the following address:
SAFE AS GRANTEE ...
After recording return to:
CASCADE TITLE CO.
911WILLAMETTE
EUGENE, OR 97401
Attachment 1, Page 19 of 36
17-09.3541
EXHIBIT -
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of 10th Street with
the South line of G Street in Springfield, Lace County, Oregon, which said
point is also 962. 48 feet North of the Northwest Corner Of Block 4 of
BRATTAIN'6 ...ilON to Springfield, 1n Lane County, Oregon, as platted and
orded in Book 9, Page 6; Lane County Oregon Plat Record.; thence Beat along
the South line of G Street 240 feet; thence South parallel t0 the East line Of
10th Street 118 feet; thence West parallel to the South line of G Street 240
feet to the East line of 10th Street; and thence North 118 feet to the point
of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon.
Beginning at a point on the South line of G Street 240 feet Easterly from the
intersection of the South line of G Street with the East line of 10th street-;
thence Easterly along The South line of c Street 120 feet; thence South 120
feet, more r leas, to the North line of the East-West alley between F Street
and G street; thence westerly along the North line of said alley a distance
of 110 feet; thence North parallel to the East line of 10th Street 120 feet,
the place of begimi;y, in the City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon.
Attachment 1, Page 20 of 36
EXHIBIT "H"
Buyer: TO COME
PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR:
Owner's Standard Policy $800, 500.00
Commercial Extended Loan Policy (SIMUL) $600, 500.00
PREMIUMS:
Owner's Standard Premium $1,800.00
Commercial Extended Loa- Premium (SIMUL) $475.00
OTIRO Endorsement $TBD
Gov. Lien/Inspect Fee $35. 00
We are prepared to issae 2006 (6/17/ 06) ALTA title insurance policy(ies) of OLD REPUBLIC
NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, in the usual form insuring the title to the land described
as follows:
Vestee:
A T T A C H E D)
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 LANE COUNTY, INC.
Estate: FEE SIMPLE
DATED AS OF: MAY 13, 2021 at 8:00 A.M.
Schedule E of the policy(ies) to be issued will contain the following general and special
exceptions unless removed prior to issuance:
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS (Standard Coverage Policy Exceptions):
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records;
proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public
Records.
2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which
could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in
possession thereof.
No liability is assumed hereunder until policy has been issued and full policypremium has been paid.
MAIN OFFICE FLORENCE. OFFICE VILLAGE PLAZA OFFICE
811 WILLAMETTE ST. 715 HWY 101' FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 4750 VMAGE PLAZA LOOP SURE 100
EUGENE, OREGON 97401 MAILING: PO BOX 508" FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 EUGENE, OREGON 97401
PH: (541)687-2233"FAX: (541) 485-0307 PH: (541)997-8417IFAX: (541)997;3246 PH: (541)6538622*FAX: (541)8411626
luuIIIII VIiIlIIIVIIIVIIT
ea. PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
CASCADE ESCROW May 20, 2021
ATTN: CARYN ROSHTO Report No: 0327565
4750 VILLAGE PLAZA LOOP, SUITE 100 Your No: V221-0829
EUGENE, OR 97401 Seller: CATPOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES LANE CO.,
Buyer: TO COME
PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR:
Owner's Standard Policy $800, 500.00
Commercial Extended Loan Policy (SIMUL) $600, 500.00
PREMIUMS:
Owner's Standard Premium $1,800.00
Commercial Extended Loa- Premium (SIMUL) $475.00
OTIRO Endorsement $TBD
Gov. Lien/Inspect Fee $35. 00
We are prepared to issae 2006 (6/17/ 06) ALTA title insurance policy(ies) of OLD REPUBLIC
NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, in the usual form insuring the title to the land described
as follows:
Vestee:
A T T A C H E D)
CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES 0 LANE COUNTY, INC.
Estate: FEE SIMPLE
DATED AS OF: MAY 13, 2021 at 8:00 A.M.
Schedule E of the policy(ies) to be issued will contain the following general and special
exceptions unless removed prior to issuance:
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS (Standard Coverage Policy Exceptions):
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing
authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records;
proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices
of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public
Records.
2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which
could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in
possession thereof.
No liability is assumed hereunder until policy has been issued and full policypremium has been paid.
MAIN OFFICE FLORENCE. OFFICE VILLAGE PLAZA OFFICE
811 WILLAMETTE ST. 715 HWY 101' FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 4750 VMAGE PLAZA LOOP SURE 100
EUGENE, OREGON 97401 MAILING: PO BOX 508" FLORENCE, OREGON 97439 EUGENE, OREGON 97401
PH: (541)687-2233"FAX: (541) 485-0307 PH: (541)997-8417IFAX: (541)997;3246 PH: (541)6538622*FAX: (541)8411626
Attachment 1, Page 21 of 36
Order No. 0327565
Page 2
3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the Public Records; reservations or
excepti one in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims
or title to water.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance
affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey
of the Land.
5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers
compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the
Public Records.
SPECIAL EXCEPTIONS:
6. Taxes, including the current fiscal year, not assessed due to Charitable Property
Exemption. If the exempt status is terminated under the statute prior to the date on
which the assessment roll becomes the tax roll in the year which said taxes were
assessed, additional taxes may be levied.
7. Easement, including tee terms and provisions thereof, granted to the Pacific Telep:^.one
c Telegraph Company, by instrument recorded November 24, 1998, Reception No. B386 P195,
and recorded December 7, 1948, Reception No. 8386 P687, Lane County Oregon Deed Records.
8. Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Catholic
Community Services of Lane County, Inc., an Oregon corporation, to Cascade Title
Company, Trustee, for the benefit of Summit Bank, Beneficiary, dated December 23, 2010,
recorded January 26, 2011, Reception No. 2011-004158, Lane County Deeds and Records,
to secure payment of a note for $250,000.00.
9. Assignment of rents due or to become due and accruing from said property, including
the terms and provisions the-eof, between Catholic Community Services of Lane County,
Inc., an Oregon corporation, and Summit Bank, dated December 23, 2010, recorded January
26, 2011, Reception No. 2011-004159, Lane County Deeds and Records.
10. Deed of Trust, including the terms and provisions thereof, executed by Catholic
Community Services of Lane County, Inc., an Oregon corporation, Grantor, to Cascade
Title Company, Trustee, for the benefit of Summit Bank, Beneficiary, dated October
24, 2011, recorded November 1, 2011, Reception No. 2011-949363, Lane County Deeds and
Records, to secure payment of a note in the amount of $521,500.00.
11. A certified copy of the Catholic Community Services of Lane County, Inc. Board of
Directors' Resolution authorizing and directing the sale or mortgage of the subject
property, should be provided prior to closing.
12. Prior to writing an ALTA MORTGAGEE'S policy, Cascade Title Company should be furnished
with a statement as to parties in possession and as to any construction, alterations
or repairs to the premises within the last 75 days. We also request that we be notified
in the event that any funds are to be used for construction, alterations or repairs.
Exception may be taken to such matters as may be shown thereby.
NOTE: The property address as shown on the Assessor's Roll is:
1023 And 1025 G Street
Springfield, OR 97477
NOTE: Taxes, Account No. 1401627, Assessor's Map No. 17 03 35 1 1, 83500, Code 19-00,
2020-2021, in tie amount
of $
0.00, EXEMPT.
Attachment 1, Page 22 of 36
Order No. 032"]565
Page 3
NOTE: A judgment search has been made on the above named Vestee(s), and we find NONE except
as set forth above.
NOTE: According to the public record, the following deed (s) affecting the property herein
described have been recorded within 24 months of the effective date of this report: NONE
This report is preliminary to the issuance of a policy of title insurance and shall become
null and void unless a policy is issued and the full premium paid.
Cascade Title Co.
at/rh: T:tle Officer: KURT BEATY
Attachment 1, Page 23 of 36
Order No. 0327565
Page 4
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1:
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of 10th Street with the South line
of G Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon, which said point in also 962.48 feet North
of the Northwest corner of Block 4 of BRATTAIN'S ADDITION TO SPRINGFIELD, in Lane County,
Oregon, as platted and recorded in Book 9, Page 6, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence
East along the So'eth line of G Street 240 feet; thence South parallel to the East line of
10th Street 118 feet; thence West parallel to the South line of G Street 240 feet to the
East line of loth Street; and thence North 110 feet to the point of beginning, all in Lane
County, Oregon.
PARCEL 2:
Beginning at a point on the Soath line of G Street 240 feet Easterly from the ;rtersect'on
of the South line of G Street with the East line of 10th Street; thence Easterly along the
South line of G Street 120 feet; thence South 120 feet, more or less, to the North line
of the East-West alley between F Street and G Street; thence Westerly along the North line
of said alley a distance of 120 feet; thence North parallel to the East line of loth Street
120 feet, the place of beginning, in the City of Springfield, Lane Cou--ty, Oregon.
Attachment 1, Page 24 of 36
Catholic
Community
Services
OF LANE COUNTY
March 15, 2021
Erin Fifield
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street, Suite 101
Springfield, OR 97477
Dear Erin,
EXHIBIT I
SPRINGFIELD: 1025 G Street I Springfield, OR 97477
EUGENE: 1464 West 6n Avenue I Eugene, OR 97402
541-345-3528 1 www.ccslc.org
We appreciate the opportunity to apply for Community Development Block Grant funds for
program year 2021-2022 and I have attached our project proposal in response to the City of
Springfield's Request for Proposals.
Our project proposal is to request financial support that will enable us to increase the size and
program capacity at the Catholic Community Services of Lane County's Springfield Community
Service Center, located at 1025 G Street. The proposed 1,600 square foot addition will allow
CCSLC to house our OASIS program, currently located across our parking lot at First Baptist
Church, at our Springfield Community Service Center.
Thank you for your consideration of our request —we look forward to discussing this with the
Committee Development Advisory Committee on March 31, 2021.
Sincerely,
mec_
Executive Director
A Catholic Charities Agency
Attachment 1, Page 25 of 36
Catholic SPRINGFIELD: 1025 G Street I Springfield, OR 97477
Community EUGENE: 1464 West 6" Avenue I Eugene, OR 97402
Services 541- 345-3628 1 v . ccslc.org
OF LANE COUNTY
Request for Proposal
for
City of Springfield
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
Program Year 2021-2022
A Catholic Charities Agency
Attachment 1, Page 26 of 36
LCI. PROJECT SUMMARY FORM
See Attachment —Form A (page 7)
2. PROJECTDESCRIPTION
This project proposal is to request financial support from the City of Springfield Community Development Block
Grant Funds to increase the size and program capacity at Catholic Community Services of Lane County's (CCSLC)
location at 1025 G St. The 1,600 square foot addition will allow CCSLC to house CCSLC's OASIS program, currently
located across our parking lot at First Baptist Church, at the CCSLC Springfield Community Service Center (SCSC).
The Board of Directors has approved the application for CDBG funds
The need or problem your project will address
CCSLC purchased the building at 10'h and G in 2004. Building operations include the Springfield Community Service
Center Resource lobby, Food Pantry, Energy Assistance, Social Services Programs and Administration offices and
are at full capacity. Due to spare limitations, the OASIS Program has been housed off-site at the First Baptist
Church since its inception in 2016. The current location is not Ideal and a very large obstacle is that it is not ADA -
compliant due to two sets ofstairs. This has been a hardship for clients who are handicapped, as well as for
families with young children who cannot bring strollers upstairs. The CCSLC OASIS Manager often meets with
clients outside due to this hindrance.
During ourtenure at the First Baptist Church, many problems have arisen including a leaking roof and
plumbing issues. These situations directly impacted OASIS and forced the program to relocate to the
Springfield Community Service Center building for several weeks at a time. Other problems at the current
location include the poor WI -Fl connection and dropped phone calls. The Case Manager needs to access the CCSLC
server/database remotely and spotty WI=Fi is not ideal. Unfortunately, the First Baptist staff are not always
availableto reset the Wi-Fi in a timely manner and, at times, the Case Manager is without internet access for days.
Safety is yet another concern for CCSLC staff W the Case Manager is often alone with clients as staff at the First
Baptist Church are located in another section of the building or not at work while OASIS is open. -
OASIS clients regularly access services located atthe SCSC including food boxes, laundry services, free clothing and
hygiene items, diapers and other basic needs assistance. At this time, an OASIS staff or volunteer must accompany
andstay with the client to.open.and closethe building and laundry facilities. This is often Inconvenient for other
clients as OASIS staff need to lockup the space at the First Baptist Church in order to assist at the main building.
Describe how your project will address the identified need or problem, Including project background, project
objectives, services to be provided by the project, the populations or areas to be served, and how the CDBG
funds will be used;
Project Background: G St. OASIS was formed in 2016 by Springfield Community Partners, many located on G St., to
assist homeless families with a range of day time services including food preparation, laundry and case -managed
support and referrals. OASIS is the only program available in the immediate Springfield area to provide this. CCSLC
recently renamed the program to just OASIS (acronym for the mission: Opportunity Access Stability Initiative
Success) as many of the initial partner agencies have relocated, and with an expansion of program services with
newer partner agencies, OASIS is not only on G St. In addition, clients are no long able to access all oftheir needs
within a short walking distance on G Street and the name has become confusing to the community.
Addressing the need and problem: With the addition of a stand-alone building at the Springfield Community
Service Center, OASIS will be able to provide clients with easy access to the agency's services. Case Managers and
volunteers will be directly connected to existing CCSLC WI-Fi and the agency's server, eliminating technology
Attachment 1, Page 27 of 36
problems. OASIS staff will be directly Integrated with all of the Social Services staff and will receive more readily
available supervision and assistance if needed. Entrances and exits from the OASIS program will be ADA -compliant
thus enhancing service delivery to clients.
The CDBG funds will be used to design and build this 1,600 square foot bullding at the Springfield Community Service
Center. Upon project completion, OASIS will be located Ina permanent location and have easy access to the wide amay
of programs and services CCSLC provides to all who come for help. It will enable OASIS to serve all clients in the same
manner, not limited by the current lack of ADA access. The project will help homeless families with children living 1n
Springfield and assist them In finding affordable housing through case -managed support and referrals.
Describe how your project will address the identified need or problem In a way or to a degree not already being
achieved in the community. Please identify any other similar programs or projects and how your project will add
to or improv: upon existing services;
CCSLC offers a wide variety of programs to assist low-income & homeless Individuals and families and has a history
of responding and developing new partnerships or creating new programs. Originating In 2016, OAS 15 was created
to address the lack of a day center for homeless families with children In Springfield and to provide case -managed
support to this population. OASIS community partners include CCSLC, Center for Community Counseling, City of
Springfield, First Baptist Church of Springfield, FOOD for Lane County, Goodwill Industries, Head Start of Lane
County, Springfield Public Schools/McKinney Vento Program, Springfield Shelter Rights Alliance, and Willamalane
Park and Recreation District.
The OASIS program Is the only one of Its kind in Springfield focusing on helping homeless families with children,
providing a day center and an array of support (free food & a place to cook meals during the day, laundry, case -
managed resources & referrals focused on finding housing, free hygiene & clothing items, etc,). The OASIS parking
program. provides up to 6 homeless families with temporary housing in one of four Conestoga huts or two tiny
houses who receive case -managed services during their stay.
Having the OASIS program housed atCCSLC will greatly improve existing services because it will be ADAcompliant
and easily accessible for all OASIS clients; all CCSLC services will be located in one location and other CCSLC staff
will be available when the OASIS manager is Involved with another client. It will provide a more welcoming space
for clients to prepare meals and interact with other families, as well as an easier way to do their laundry, access the
CCSLC free Clothing Closet, etc.
Describe the ways in which your project will have a long-term impact on the need or problem being addressed;
The need for the OASIS program has continued to grow and improvements are continually being implemented. CCSLCis
striving to respond tothis in a proactive and forward -thinking manner.
The goal and the hope is that OASIS can truly be a vibrant and welcoming place for homeless families in Springfield to
access the case -managed support and services needed to help them move out of homelessness and secure affordable
housing with the help of CCSLC staff who can work with them every step of the way. Improved space would enable more
clients to be served in a respectful way that ensures privacy and confidentiality when needed; as well as making it easier
to access the basic needs assistance that is available at the Springfield Community Service Center.
Please attach a map showing the project's location. If the project will serve a specific area, the boundaries of the
area served should be shown. If the project Involves a specific site or a physical structure, include details about
the site or structure, such as the size of the site, the floor area, the number and size of the residential units, the
project amenities, the condition of any existing structures, and any proposed alterations to the site or
structures.
19
Attachment 1, Page 28 of 36
See attachment (page 8)
3. POPULATION SERVED .
The target papulation for programs and services offered at the CCSLC Springfield Community Service Center
Includes homeless families and Individuals, unemployed and underemployed persons, and the working poor that
meet the CDBG National Objective of at least 51% of beneficiaries must have low -moderate incomes. The needs
that CCSLC addresses through all of its programs is poverty, and the destructive impact on children and families.
According to data for 2019-2020, 84% of CCSLC clients served were below the Federal Poverty Level and 52%
earned less than half of the Federal Poverty level.
The OASIS program Is a day center providing one-on-one support for homeless families with children in Springfield
with one fulltime case manager. During the most recent fiscal year (July 1, 2019 —June 30, 2020), 59 households
and 189 individuals were served.
4. PROJECT READINESS
A detailed work program and timeline, including anticipated start date and completion date for the project, and
a list of tasks with estimated start and completion dates for each task;
See Attachment (pages 9-10)
A description of the agency's readiness to proceed with the project, Including when potential sources of funding
and/or additional staff will be secured.
CCSLC received approval from Its Board of Directors to proceed with this project at the February 25, 2021 meeting.
The Board Program Assessment & Improvement Committee will assist in the implementation of this project if
funding is approved. At this time, CCSLC will rely on existing staff to assist this committee and the construction
firm that is hired. Should additional funding be required, the CCSLC Development Committee and Executive
Director will evaluate donor Interest in supporting this project financially through a fundraising campaign.
Designated donations for'where most needed' received this past year may also be accessed and $38,500 will be
designated for matching CDBG funds.
S. FINANCING
A completed Budget Form Attachment
See Attachment Form B (pages 11- 12))
A description whether you are requesting funds as a loan vs a grant.
CCS is requesting CDBG funding as a grant.
If requesting funds as a loan, outline your repayment terms. n/ a
If requesting funds as a grant, explain why you are not able to take on a loan.
CCS has limited funds available to take on this project without assistance from the City of Springfield.
3
Attachment 1, Page 29 of 36
A description of the assumptions used to determine the total project cost and the operating budget, including
the sources consulted and how costs were determined
To evaluate the options for moving OASIS to our Springfield Community Service Center, CCSLC contracted with
McKenzie Commercial for $6,000 and they evaluated the property and determined the best location for the
addition, provided a construction budget for this project by contacting subcontractors and hired an architect to
assess land use and zoning restrictions. It has been determined that the current zoning is residential so CCSLC is
moving ahead to submit a "Non -Conforming Use —Expansion/Modification Application" to the City of Springfield
Development & Public Works Department.
It has been determined that a 1,600 square foot stand-alone building will meet client and staff needs and provide a
general area/meeting space, a kitchen/breakroom, handicap accessible restroom and office space, with a door
leading to the existing laundry room located Inside the SCSC.
A brief description of your agency's plan for funding the project after the first year, if applicable. N/A
A statement regarding your agency's ability to proceed with the project without your requested CDBG funds, or
with a CDBG award less than your requested amount
If awarded CDBG funds are less than requested, CCSLC Board of Directors and Management Team are committed
to this project and will continue to pursue other funding opportunities. During the past year dealing with the COVID
pandemic, CCLSC has benefitted from a larger -than -normal number of donations from new donors and increased
support from existing donors. Due to the large amount of Federal and State COVID CARES rental & energy
assistance funds received through Lane County, CCSLC has not had the financial need to supplement these
programs with general donations unless the donor specifically requested these programs.
6. PROJECT TEAM
The agency's background, mission and semk:e history:
CCSLC's'mission is to provide immediate help by providing food and other assistance to anyone in need and to instill
hope by helping Lane County families take positive steps to move out of poverty. Founded in 1952, CCSLC has provided
services for low income households In Lane County for 69 years. We have owned, operated and continue to develop
two multi-purpose community service centers in Eugene and Springfield and recently paid offthe mortgage for the
Springfield buildings.
CCSLC provides basic needs assistance by providing food, clothing, personal rare Items, and direct assistance to
homeless and low-income individuals and families. In addition, CCSLC provides energy assistance, emergency family
shelter through Its cold weather motel shelter program, homeless prevention, short-term financial assistance and
housing counseling services.
CCSLC's Supportive Services program helps with strengthening, preserving and reunifying families through rental
housing assistance for at -risk families, case -managed support for families whose children are at risk of placement in
foster care and financial assistance to help homeless individuals and families make the transition to affordable rental
housing.
CCSLC operated one of the first emergency food pantries in Lane County and in recent years, CCSLC has distributed more
of the food collected by FOOD for Lane County than any other organization in Lane County. In fiscal year 2019-2020, the
Attachment 1, Page 30 of 36
two CCSLC community service centers distributed almost 56,000 emergency food boxes to 17,347 individuals, containing
over 1. 3 million pounds of food valued at$1.56 million.
A brief description of the agency's financial stability as it pertains to the agency's capacity to successfully complete
the project, including a brief financial history and primary funding sources.
Since the late 1980's, CCSLC has received continued funding support from Lane County, the cities of Eugene and
Springfield, Catholic Charities of Portland and the State of Oregon in support of its mission to provide services to the
low -come and disenfranchised families and individuals throughout Lane County. More recently, CCSLC's government
funding sources include the Emergency Food and Shelter Program, HUD Continuum Housing Programs, the United States
Conference of Catholic Bishops (Immigration services) and Catholic Charities USA (HUD Housing Counseling Programs).
CCSLC also draws on a broad base of private support to provide services for low income households. Private and
foundation funders Include the Oregon Community Foundation, Meyer Memorial Trust, the Collins Foundation, Cow
Creek Indian Foundation, the Oregon Food Bank, several other grant -making foundations and more than 1,400
individual donors. Private support also includesin-kind donations from individuals, churches, schools, service groups
and businesses and 300 CCSLC volunteers who provided more than 14,300 hours of volunteer service in 2019-2020.
A list of key personnel that will be assigned to this project and their job titles and qualifications. Include the FTE
hours each person will dedicate to the project.
Sue Palement, Executive Director—estimated FTE.02
Suzanne Turner, Finance & Contracts Manager—estimated FTE.02
Chris Pickering, Operations Director—estimated FTE.05
Stefan! Roybal, Development Director—estimated FTE.02
Dennis Peterson, Facilities Manager—estimated FTE.OS
Amy Wilson, OASIS Case Manager—estimated FTE .02
Proof of the agency's status as a private non-profit.
See Attached IRS Letter (pages 13-14)
Most recent program financial audit or review pursuant to 2 CFR Part 200 Subpart F
See Attached 2019-2020 Audit (pages 15-43)
A description of the agency s administrative capacity to complete the project, including its experience in
implementing and managing activities similar to the proposed project. If capacity Is achieved through partnerships
With or utilization of other organizations or agencies, describe the nature and status of these partnerships.
CCSLC has been the recipient of many CDBG funds over the years; most recently from the City of Springfield for the
improvement and repaving of our SCSC parking lot and the creation and ongoing support of the G Street OASIS program.
In 2019, the City of Eugene awarded CCSLC a $222,600 CDBG grant to remodel the Eugene Community Service Center
Resource lobby (floor, ceiling, windows, doors and lighting, and created a new meeting roam). This was coordinated by
the CCSLC Facilities Manager who is still on staff.
a
Attachment 1, Page 31 of 36
Adescription of neighborhood and/or community support for the project. Attach letters of support or other evidence
of neighborhood/communitysupport—
See Attached letterfrom Peacerlealth (page 44)
A description of the agency's familiarity with meeting the federal requirements listed in Section 411 and/or the
agency's plan for ensuring that these requirements are satisfied.
CCSLC is subject to Single Audits due to the amount of federal funding It receives including FEMA, Continuum of Care
and Housing Counseling Funds. CCSLC is very aware of the rules and regulations for the use of federal funds. CCSLC has
received COBG funds from Springfield and Eugene for over 25 years and has always complied with the terms of these
funds.
7. OTHER INFORMATION
E
Attachment 1, Page 32 of 36
SPRINGFIELD
City of Soringfield, Oregonaaeeon
Project Name: OASIS Addition at Springfield Community Service Center
Project Location: 1025 G Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477
Project Description: Remodel to add on a 1,600 square foot building at the
CCSLC Springfield Community Service Center to enable
us to house the OASIS Program and Day Center for
Springfield homeless families with children on site.
CD6G Funds
322,492.00Requested: ,ant: $
Loan: $
Applicant: Catholic Community Services of Lane County
Address: - - 1025 G Street
City, State & Zip: Springfield, Oregon 97477
Wabsite: www.ccslc.org
DUNS number: 036468619 -
Contact Person
nameltitle):. Sue Paiement, Executive Director
Phone Number. 541-345-3628, ext. 318
Email Address: spaiement@ccslc.org
City of Wngfield
2021 lDBGRFP
7
Attachment 1, Page 33 of 36
W
YCLQYQsLLLNQ) CYO
D
Lo4NO - 0NmOCL0
a`
e
Attachment 1, Page 34 of 36
PeaceHealth
Sacred Heart Medical Center
March 9, 2021
Regarding: Catholic Community Services for a Community Development Block Grant
To Whom it May Concern,
This letter is written in support of Catholic Community Services' pursuit of a
Community Development Block Grant.
PeaceHealth Oregon Network and Catholic Community Services of Lane
County have partnered on multiple projects to the betterment of the
Springfield neighborhood they currently serve. Our two organizations have
been engaged in discussion for more than a year on a potential development
of a more robust Catholic Community Services Community Center. This
gathering place would include updated facilities, community outreach and
programs that will help homeless and low-income residents and families live
healthier lives.
The resources provided by the award of a Community Block Development Grant to
Catholic Community Services will be foundational In the development of a vibrant
Springfield Community Center, where residents can be physically, mentally, emotionally,
and spiritually healthy. Having the CCS OASIS program located onsite will greatly benefit
those clients. PeaceHealth is honored to have the opportunity to be an involved and
supportive partner of this project and encourages the City of Springfield to approve the
application submitted by Catholic Community Services for a Community Development Block
Grant.
Sincerely,
Todd Salnas
Chief Executive
Oregon Network
3333 RiverBend Ddvq Springfield, OR 9747 541-2=-730kl
peacehealtb.org/sacred-heart-nverbend
Attachment 1, Page 35 of 36
EXHIBIT 7
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREETSPRINGFIELD
SPRINGFIELD, 541 O2"7M541) ]283]53
4 F"(541) 728-3689
OReGON www'spring8eldocgov
October 27, 2021
Sue Paiement, Executive Director
Catholic Community Services of Lane County
1025 G Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Dear Sue,
Congratulationsl Catholic Community Services of Lane County's request for Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding through the City's 2021 CDBG Request for Proposals
was approved. You have been awarded $322,492 in CDBG funds for the proposed addition to
the Catholic Community Services of Lane County's Springfield community service center to
house the OASIS program.
These funds are contingent on a completed Environmental Review and a signed agreement
between the City and Catholic Community Services of Lane County. As requested, this award
includes all costs of development, including soft costs and development costs.
Staff are working on completing the Environmental Review and drafting the CDBG agreement
to be signed. All soft costs incurred after August 20, 2021 will be eligible for reimbursement.
Construction can only begin after the CDBG agreement is signed. No changes to the site — even
activities not paid for with CDBG funds—can occur until the Environmental Review has been
completed.
Thank you for your commitment to helping low-income Springfield residents. We look forward
to helping see this project become a reality.
If you have anyquestions, please reach out.
Best,
Erin 4M`-"-"`
Fifield aim
Erin FIFIELD, Community Development Analyst
City of Springfield
Attachment 1, Page 36 of 36
LOCATION OF PROPERTY SUBJECT TO PROPOSED ZONE CHANGE
SITE
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 4
811-21-000294-TYP3 – PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
1025 G STREET (MAP 17-03-35-11, TAX LOT 3500)
SITE CONTEXT MAP
SITE
Dos Rios
Elementary School 9th Street G Street 10th Street F Street Attachment 2, Page 2 of 4
811-21-000294-TYP3 – PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
1025 G STREET (MAP 17-03-35-11, TAX LOT 3500)
CURRENT ZONING
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Public Land and Open Space (PLO)
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
SITE
Dos Rios
Elementary School 9th Street G Street 10th Street F Street Attachment 2, Page 3 of 4
811-21-000294-TYP3 – PROPOSED ZONING MAP AMENDMENT FOR CATHOLIC COMMUNITY SERVICES
1025 G STREET (MAP 17-03-35-11, TAX LOT 3500)
PROPOSED ZONING
Low Density Residential (LDR)
Public Land and Open Space (PLO)
Neighborhood Commercial (NC)
SITE
Dos Rios
Elementary School 9th Street G Street 10th Street F Street Attachment 2, Page 4 of 4
SANDOWENGINEERING
160 MADISON STREET, SUITE A EUGENE, OREGON 97402 541.513.3376
TECH MEMO
DATE: December 21, 2021
TO: City of Springfield
Michael Liebler, PE
FROM: Kelly Sandow, PE
Sandow Engineering
RE: TPR Analysis for 1025 G St, Springfield
1.0 PROJECT SITE
The applicant, Catholic Community Services, is proposing to rezone the property located at 1025 G
Street in Springfield, Oregon. The property is identified as Tax Lot 3500 of Assessor’s Map 17-03-
35-1. Figure 1 shows the site location. The site is approximately 0.989 acres and is currently in use
for Catholic Community Services.
Current access to the site is provided via G Street. The access on G Street is assumed to remain
through the 20-year planning horizon.
2.0 PROPOSAL
The site is currently zoned Low-Density Residential. The applicant is proposing a zone change to
Neighborhood Commercial.
3.0 WORK SCOPE
As per OAR 660-012-060, Transportation Planning Rule, an analysis of zone changes is required to
determine if the zone change will have a significant effect on the surrounding transportation
system. The evaluation is to consider trips added to the system by the reasonable “worst-case
development scenario” allowed under the proposed zoning. The worst-case development scenario
is the highest trip generator based on the use and size of buildings that are typically found in the
area.
The City of Springfield provided a work scope for this project that includes the following evaluation
requirements:
Attachment 3, Page 1 of 31
Technical Memorandum
Kelly Sandow PE
TPRA 1025 G St
12.21.21
1
x Worst case development impacts using Convenience Market as the use
x Intersection evaluation to include:
o G Street @ 10th Street
o 10th Street @ Centennial
x Evaluation of intersection LOS for the year 2035 during PM peak hour with and without the
zone change
The scoping letter from the City is provided in Appendix A.
4.0 STUDY AREA INTERSECTIONS
The study is to evaluate impacts to the adjacent intersections of 10th St at G St and 10th St at
Centennial Blvd. The intersections and roadways are described in the following, and Figure 2
provides an illustration depicting the intersection control and geometry.
x Centennial Blvd at 10th St: This intersection is signalized. The eastbound and
westbound approaches have shared through-right turn lanes and separated left turn
lanes with permissive phasing. The northbound and southbound approaches are single
shared left-through-right lanes. There are bike lanes striped on Centennial Blvd, and
10th St is shared bike-vehicle travel Lanes. There are pedestrian crossings on all four
approaches.
x 10th St at G St: This intersection is an all-way stop control with one lane approaches on
all legs. There are no striped bike lanes. There are striped crosswalks on all four
approaches.
5.0 DEVELOPMENT TRIPS
5.1 TRIP GENERATION
Several lane use options were considered for this site when determining the reasonable worst-
case development potential. The options considered uses allowed in the code, the typical size
of each type of use, and what can fit on the 0.989-acre site given building square footage,
parking, landscaping requirements, etc. For reference, the comparison is:
x Gas Station with Convenience Market (8 fueling locations)- 81
x Drive through Coffee Shop (2.5 KSF)- 49
Attachment 3, Page 2 of 31
Technical Memorandum
Kelly Sandow PE
TPRA 1025 G St
12.21.21
2
x High Turn Over Restaurant (6 KSF)-54
x Drive Through Restaurant (3.5 KSF)- 58
x Convenience Store (3.5 KSF)- 84
As demonstrated above, the reasonable worst-case development proposal for the 0.989-acre
site has been determined to be a 3,500-sf convenience store.
The ITE Trip Generation Manual 11 ed. is used to estimate the PM peak hour trips generated
by a 3,500-sf convenience store. The ITE Land Use that corresponds to this use is 851-
Convenience Market. The trip rate is based on trips per thousand square feet of building area.
This type of land use will generate a portion of the trips that are trips already on the street
system that will stop by to use the convenience market between the original origin-
destination. These are pass-by trips. As per the ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3rd Edition, the
pass-by trip rate is 51% for this land use
TABLE 1: TRIP GENERATION
Land Use Size Rate Trips In Out
851- Convenience
Market
3.5 ksf 49.11 172 (51%)
88
(49%)
84
Pass-By 51% -88 45 43
Total New Trips on System 84 43 41
5.2 TRIP DISTRIBUTION
The development trips are assigned to the street network using reasonable
origins/destinations, shortest path travel routes, and existing travel patterns. The trips are
estimated on the system as:
x 10% west on G
x 25% east on G
x 20% south on 10th
x 45% north on 10th
Figure 3 provides the trip generation for this site.
Attachment 3, Page 3 of 31
3
Technical Memorandum
Kelly Sandow PE
TPRA 1025 G St
12.21.21
6.0 TRAFFIC VOLUMES
6.1 TURNING MOVEMENT COUNTS
PM peak hour turning movement counts were collected December 8 and 9, 2021 for the time
period of 4:00-6:00 PM for the study intersections. The counts illustrate that the peak hour
occurs from 4:00-5:00 pm for the study area.
6.2 COUNT ADJUSTMENTS
The turning movement counts are adjusted to reflect peak season traffic volumes. The City
requested the use of ODOT Seasonal Adjustment Methodology to determine peak season
volumes. As per the ODOT Methodology, the season trend table is to be used. The study area
is predominantly commuter traffic. Therefore, the data for the commuter trend is the most
appropriate. The peak season for commuter traffic occurs in the latter half of June. Therefore,
the December counts are adjusted to reflect the June counts. The seasonal adjustment factor
for the December counts is 1.19.
Figure 4 provides the year 2021 seasonally adjusted traffic volumes.
6.3 FUTURE BASE VOLUMES
The 2021 seasonally adjusted volumes are “grown” to represent 2035 traffic volumes. The
growth rate is calculated using the growth rate found within the Springfield TSP for the area.
The growth rate for the area is 2.5%.
The development trips are added to the year 2035 background to represent the year 2035
with the zone change.
Figure 5 provides the year 2035 background traffic volumes, and Figure 6 illustrates the year
2035 traffic volumes with zone change.
Appendix B contains the traffic counts.
7.0 INTERSECTION ANALYSIS
7.1 PERFORMANCE MEASURES
The measure of performance for the site access and intersections is Level of Service (LOS).
LOS is a measure of performance for intersections in this analysis is based on the Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM). LOS is a concept developed to quantify the degree of comfort
(including such
Attachment 3, Page 4 of 31
Technical Memorandum
Kelly Sandow PE
TPRA 1025 G St
12.21.21
4
elements as travel time, number of stops, total amount of stopped delay, and impediments
caused by other vehicles) afforded to drivers as they travel through an intersection or along a
roadway segment. It was developed to quantify the quality of service of transportation
facilities.
LOS is based on average delay, defined as the average total elapsed time from when a vehicle
stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. The average delay is
measured in seconds per vehicle per hour and then translated into a grade or “level of service”
for each intersection. LOS ranges from A to F, with A indicating the most desirable condition
and F indicating the most unsatisfactory condition.
The City of Springfield uses a LOS D as a standard.
The LOS criteria, as defined by the Highway Capacity Manual for signalized intersections, are
provided in Table 2.
TABLE 2: HCM LEVEL OF SERVICE FOR INTERSECTIONS
Stopped Delay Per Vehicle
(Seconds per Vehicle)
hŶƐŝŐŶĂůŝnjĞĚ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ ^ŝŐŶĂůŝnjĞĚ/ŶƚĞƌƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ
A d 10.0 d 10
B > 10.0 and d 15.0 > 10 and d 20
C > 15.0 and d 25.0 > 20 and d 35
D > 25.0 and d 35.0 > 35 and d 55
E > 35.0 and d 50.0 > 55 and d 80
F > 50.0 > 80
7.2 INTERSECTION EVALUATION
A performance analysis was conducted for the studied intersections for the Year 2035 existing
conditions and conditions with the zone change for the PM peak hour. The intersection
evaluation was performed using Synchro 10 following HCM 6 critical movement methodology
outlined in ODOT’s analysis procedures manual. The results are shown in Table 3. The
SYNCHRO outputs are provided in Appendix C.
Attachment 3, Page 5 of 31
Technical Memorandum
Kelly Sandow PE
TPRA 1025 G St
12.21.21
5
TABLE 2: INTERSECTION EVALUATION RESULTS
Intersection
Standard
LOS
2035
Background
2035 w/Zone
Change
G @ 10th D A A
10th @ Centennial D A A
G St at Access D N/A B
As demonstrated in Table 2, the intersection standard is met for the study area intersections
and the site access connection.
8.0 CONCLUSIONS
As demonstrated in this evaluation, the LOS standards are met. Therefore, the criteria of OAR-
060-012-0060 are demonstrated to be met. There is not a significant effect on the
transportation system from the proposed zone change.
Attachment 3, Page 6 of 31
ENGINEERING Fiugre 1: Site Location and Vicinity MapG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPion eer
P
k
w
y G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St
Hwy126Main StMohawkBlvdSouth AF StE StD StC StB StA StAttachment 3, Page 7 of 31
ENGINEERING Figure 2: Lane configuration and Trafic ControlG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPi o ne er
P
k wy G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St Main StMohawkBlvdF StA St121. 10th @Centennial2. 10th @GSTOPSTOPSTOPSTOP STOP
Attachment 3, Page 8 of 31
ENGINEERING Figure 3: Trip DistributionG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPi o ne er
P
k wy G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St Main StMohawkBlvdF StA St1231. 10th @Centennial2. 10th @G3. Access @G668866-1131304184-1119-1123-11656321Negative numbersdenote pass-by tripsAttachment 3, Page 9 of 31
ENGINEERING Figure 4:Year 2021 No Build Peak Hour Traffic VolumesG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPi o ne er
P
k wy G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St Main StMohawkBlvdF StA St121. 10th @Centennial2. 10th @G114918252922122012501003464523544265464230Attachment 3, Page 10 of 31
ENGINEERING Figure 5:Year 2035 Background Peak Hour Traffic VolumesG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPi o ne er
P
k wy G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St Main StMohawkBlvdF StA St121. 10th @Centennial2. 10th @G156624343930162713681404586104755757386341Attachment 3, Page 11 of 31
ENGINEERING Figure 6: Year 2035 Peak Hour Traffic Volumes With Zone ChangeG St TPRA Springfield, ORSANDOW160 Madison Street Suite A Eugene, Oregon 97402 - 541.513.3376 - sandowengineering.com WillametteRiverPi o ne er
P
k wy G StCentennial Blvd
5th St
10th St Main StMohawkBlvdF StA St1231. 10th @Centennial2. 10th @G3. Access @G0105861053557581949.471555556443481631135733922354656321Attachment 3, Page 12 of 31
SANDOW ENGINEERING APPENDIX $:SCOPE OF WORKTPRA
1025 G Street
Attachment 3, Page 13 of 31
TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SCOPE OF WORK
Date: December 6, 2021
Consultant: Kelly Sandow, P.E.
Sandow Engineering LLC
160 Madison St. Suite A,
Eugene, OR 97402
Project Assumptions:
Project Name: Catholic Community Services Zone Change TPR analysis
Location: 1025 G Street
Land Uses: Low Density Residential = ITE Code 210 – Single-Family Detached Housing
Neighborhood Commercial Worst Case = ITE Code 851 - Convenience Market
Size: 0.989 Acres
Access: Via G Street.
Analysis Year: TSP Horizon Year 2035
General: - This scope is intended to support the zone change application and address
Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) findings of significant affect. Analysis provided shall
ensure that the zone change will not change the functional classification or degrade facilities
below adopted thresholds as identified within the City of Springfield’s Transportation System
Plan (TSP) in line with TPR requirements.
Trip Distribution and Assignment: Applicants submitted trip distribution and assignment was
used in scoping extents of TIA for analysis locations according to SDC 4.2-195 B (4).
Study Locations:
G Street and 10th Street
10th Street and Centennial
Analysis:
LOS Analysis Methods
Use 2016 Highway Capacity Manual methodology.
Use ODOT Seasonal Trend Tables for Count Adjustment
Use LCOG Transportation Model for Growth Rate
Period(s) – Analysis Year Scenarios
PM Peak Hour – 2035 No-Build, Build 2035
Signalized LOS Analysis Assumptions
Ideal Saturation Flow Rate = 1,900 vphpl
Peak Hour Factor = 0.95 for all movements
Area Type = Other (Not CBD)
Attachment 3, Page 14 of 31
Include this Scope of Work in the appendix of the Traffic Impact Study
Attachment 3, Page 15 of 31
SANDOW ENGINEERING APPENDIX B:TRAFFIC VOLUMESTPRA
1025 G Street
Attachment 3, Page 16 of 31
1 City:
Date:Total of All Vehicles
Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total SB WB NB EB
16:00 16:15 3 17 5 25 7 5 3 15 2 13 0 15 0 7 2 9 64 0 3 0 0
16:15 16:30 2 6 2 10 5 10 8 23 0 9 0 9 0 4 3 7 49 0 0 0 016:30 16:45 2 8 4 14 3 6 5 14 6 11 1 18 1 5 3 9 55 1 1 0 0
16:45 17:00 3 13 5 21 7 5 4 16 1 12 1 14 0 2 3 5 56 224 1 1 1 017:00 17:15 5 13 10 28 6 4 2 12 0 16 0 16 0 10 5 15 71 231 1 0 0 017:15 17:30 3 9 5 17 5 6 3 14 1 8 0 9 0 5 3 8 48 230 0 0 1 117:30 17:45 3 9 9 21 4 9 4 17 0 9 1 10 1 2 0 3 51 226 0 0 0 017:45 18:00 1 13 8 22 1 3 2 6 0 7 0 7 0 3 1 4 39 209 0 0 0 018:00 18:15 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 018:15 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:30 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
18:45 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 022894839483110853238204353521
Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach SB WB NB EB104416702226206894525611811302240000
0.83 0.65 0.80 0.70 0.79 0.65 0.63 0.74 0.38 0.87 0.50 0.78 0.25 0.64 0.92 0.83 0.880000100000100%0%0%0%4%0%0%0%0%0%6%0%
Count Period Total
% TrucksTrucks
PM Peak Hour Count SummarySouthbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians
Peak Volumes
PHF
Hourly
Volume
Pedestrians15 Minute
Volume
Intersection: 1: 10th @ G St Springfield, OR
Counter: Sandow Engineering Wednesday, December 8, 2021
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Attachment 3, Page 17 of 31
14.10%62.82%23.08%%R T L PED11149180%Ped 0 25 R 32.89%36.36%L 12 29 T 38.16%60.61%T 20 22 L 28.95%3.03%R 1 0 Ped %0 2 50 10PedLTR
Adjustment Factor %3.2%80.6%16.1%
1.120
249134
Northbound
72 62
124
33 48
76
165
78 87
Seasonally Adjusted Peak Hour Southbound
42 Eastbound1: 10th @ G St Westbound75
Attachment 3, Page 18 of 31
1: 10th @ G St
Pedestrians and Cars
Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left
4:00 PM 3 17 5 7 4 3 2 13 7 2 63
4:15 PM 2 6 2 5 10 8 9 4 3 49
4:30 PM 2 8 4 3 6 5 6 11 1 1 5 3 55
4:45 PM 3 13 5 7 5 4 1 12 1 2 3 56 2235:00 PM 5 13 10 6 4 2 16 9 5 70 230
5:15 PM 3 9 5 5 5 3 1 8 5 3 47 2285:30 PM 3 9 9 4 9 4 9 1 1 2 0 51 2245:45 PM 1 13 8 1 3 2 7 3 1 39 2076:00 PM 1 1 0 0 2 1396:15 PM 0 926:30 PM 0 416:45 PM 0 2Total02289480394631010853023720Peak Hour 0 13 43 24 0 0 21 20 14 0 0 8 47 2 0 0 1 21 14 0 228 681
Trucks
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left4:00 PM 1 14:15 PM 0 04:30 PM 0 04:45 PM 0 0 15:00 PM 0 1 1 1
5:15 PM 1 1 2
5:30 PM 0 2
5:45 PM 0 26:00 PM 0 16:15 PM 0 06:30 PM 0 06:45 PM 0 0Total000020000010Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 4
Bikes
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left4:00 PM 1 1 1 0 3 0 04:15 PM 0 0 0 04:30 PM 1 1 1 1 0 04:45 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 05:00 PM 1 1 0 0 05:15 PM 1 1 0 0 1 15:30 PM 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 06:30 PM 0 0 0 06:45 PM 0 0 0 0Total021131020010Peak Hour 0 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1 0 3 2 2 1
Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total4:00 PM 0 1 1 0 1 3 4 1 0 3 14:15 PM 1 1 1 1 0 2 2 0 2 2 04:30 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 04:45 PM 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:15 PM 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 15:30 PM 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 15:45 PM 1 1 0 2 2 0 2 0 1 06:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total3142242132574383Peak Hour 2 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 1
EB
Hourly Volume
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound SB WB NB
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 15 Minute Volume
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 15 Minute Volume Hourly Volume
Pedestrians
Time Period NE NW SW SE SB WB NB EB
Attachment 3, Page 19 of 31
City:
Date:Total of All Vehicles
Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total Right Thru Left Approach Total SB WB NB EB
16:00 16:15 0 1 0 1 2 127 6 135 11 1 17 29 10 104 1 115 280 0 0 0 016:15 16:30 0 0 0 0 1 111 7 119 6 0 11 17 13 113 0 126 262 0 1 0 016:30 16:45 0 0 1 1 2 112 11 125 3 0 15 18 6 102 3 111 255 0 0 0 016:45 17:00 0 2 3 5 1 102 11 114 10 1 21 32 25 107 0 132 283 1080 1 0 0 117:00 17:15 0 0 0 0 1 93 4 98 7 0 20 27 4 97 0 101 226 1026 0 0 0 117:15 17:30 0 1 0 1 0 96 5 101 6 0 8 14 11 124 3 138 254 1018 0 0 0 117:30 17:45 1 0 2 3 0 94 9 103 7 0 14 21 15 119 1 135 262 1025 0 0 0 017:45 18:00 0 0 0 0 2 63 8 73 5 0 4 9 18 104 1 123 205 947 0 0 0 018:00 18:15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:15 18:30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:30 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 018:45 19:00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0146979861552110102870920271103
Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach Right Thru Left Approach SB WB NB EB03476452354933026496544264484108000000.00 0.38 0.33 0.35 0.75 0.89 0.80 0.91 0.68 0.50 0.76 0.75 0.54 0.94 0.33 0.92 0.950000100000500%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%0%1%0%
Count Period Total
% TrucksTrucks
PM Peak Hour Count SummarySouthbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Pedestrians
Peak Volumes
PHF
Hourly Volume
Pedestrians15 Minute
Volume
Intersection: 2: 10th @ Centennial Springfield, OR
Counter: Sandow Engineering Thursday, December 9, 2021
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound
Attachment 3, Page 20 of 31
1%1%
0.00%42.86%57.14%%R T L PED2034048%%Ped 0 6 R 1.22%46%0.83%L 4 452 T 91.68%88.02%T 426 35 L 7.10%45%11.16%R 54 0 Ped %43%0 64 2 30PedLTR
Adjustment Factor %66.7%2.1%31.3%
1.120 1080
9%9%188
Northbound
92 96
953
484 460
493
19
7 12
Seasonally Adjusted Peak Hour Southbound
516 Eastbound2: 10th @ Centennial Westbound1000
Attachment 3, Page 21 of 31
2: 10th @ Centennial
Pedestrians and Cars
Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left
4:00 PM 1 2 127 6 11 1 17 10 104 1 280
4:15 PM 0 1 110 7 6 11 12 113 260
4:30 PM 0 1 2 111 11 3 15 6 102 3 254
4:45 PM 1 3 1 102 11 10 1 21 25 105 280 10745:00 PM 0 1 93 4 7 20 4 95 224 1018
5:15 PM 1 96 5 6 8 11 123 3 253 10115:30 PM 1 2 94 9 7 14 15 119 1 262 10195:45 PM 2 63 8 5 4 18 103 1 204 9436:00 PM 0 7196:15 PM 0 4666:30 PM 0 2046:45 PM 0 0
Total 0 1 3 6 0 9 796 61 0 55 2 110 0 101 864 9Peak Hour 0 0 2 4 0 0 4 402 31 0 0 26 1 64 0 0 46 425 6 0 1011 3103
Trucks
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left4:00 PM 04:15 PM 1 0 14:30 PM 1 14:45 PM 0 2 2 45:00 PM 2 2 65:15 PM 1 1 65:30 PM 0 0 55:45 PM 1 1 46:00 PM 0 26:15 PM 0 16:30 PM 0 16:45 PM 0 0Total000010000160Peak Hour 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 0 6 16
Bikes
Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left4:00 PM 0 0 0 04:15 PM 1 0 0 1 0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 04:45 PM 1 1 1 0 0 15:00 PM 1 0 0 0 15:15 PM 1 0 0 0 15:30 PM 0 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 06:30 PM 0 0 0 06:45 PM 0 0 0 0Total010010000030Peak Hour 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3
Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total Left Right Total4:00 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 14:15 PM 1 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1
4:30 PM 1 1 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 2 0
4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 15:00 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 1 05:15 PM 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1
5:30 PM 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 0 2 1 0 15:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 16:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Total1343361452354646Peak Hour 0 1 1 0 2 2 4 0 0 1 1 0 1 3 4 2 3 3 2
EB
EB
Pedestrians
Time Period NE NW SW SE SB WB NB
Hourly
Volume
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound SB WB NB
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 15 Minute
Volume
Time Period Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound 15 Minute
Volume
Hourly
Volume
Attachment 3, Page 22 of 31
78 87 7 122021RTLPED2021RTL PED2114918010340Ped025R76Ped0 6 R 49342L1229T516L4452TT2022L48T42635L46033R10Ped484R540Ped025010064230PedLTRPedLTR72622499296
EDIT Highlighted 2035 PM Volumes BackgroundBase Year 2021Target Year 2035Years of Growth 14Growth Rate Per Year 0.025Growth Factor 1.35
105 117 9 16RTLPEDRTL PED1156624010450Ped034R103Ped0 8 R 66657L1639T697L5610TT2730L65T57547L62145R10Ped653R730Ped036814086341PedLTRPedLTR9784124130
1: 10th @ G St 2: 10th @ Centennial
2: 10th @ Centennial1: 10th @ G St
Attachment 3, Page 23 of 31
TREND 1-Jan 15-Jan 1-Feb 15-Feb 1-Mar 15-Mar 1-Apr 15-Apr 1-May 15-May 1-Jun 15-Jun 1-Jul 15-Jul 1-Aug 15-Aug 1-Sep 15-Sep 1-Oct 15-Oct 1-Nov 15-Nov 1-Dec 15-Dec
INTERSTATE URBANIZED 1.0672 1.0684 1.0922 1.1160 1.0605 1.0050 0.9923 0.9796 0.9781 0.9767 0.9615 0.9463 0.9517 0.9571 0.9551 0.9531 0.9674 0.9816 0.9850 0.9884 1.0045 1.0206 1.0322 1.0438 0.9463
INTERSTATE NONURBANIZED 1.2426 1.2883 1.3750 1.4616 1.2645 1.0673 1.0382 1.0092 0.9798 0.9504 0.9005 0.8506 0.8322 0.8139 0.8221 0.8302 0.8719 0.9135 0.9441 0.9747 1.0178 1.0608 1.1123 1.1638 0.8139
COMMUTER 1.0850 1.0875 1.1183 1.1492 1.0880 1.0268 1.0014 0.9759 0.9705 0.9650 0.9503 0.9355 0.9470 0.9585 0.9509 0.9433 0.9528 0.9623 0.9614 0.9604 0.9938 1.0272 1.0474 1.0676 0.9355COASTAL DESTINATION 1.1885 1.1712 1.2001 1.2289 1.1242 1.0194 1.0316 1.0437 1.0080 0.9723 0.9347 0.8972 0.8612 0.8252 0.8205 0.8159 0.8686 0.9214 0.9689 1.0164 1.0660 1.1156 1.1580 1.2005 0.8159COASTAL DESTINATION ROUTE 1.3445 1.3248 1.4108 1.4968 1.2858 1.0747 1.0911 1.1076 1.0274 0.9473 0.8941 0.8409 0.7820 0.7231 0.7218 0.7205 0.8016 0.8827 0.9669 1.0511 1.1133 1.1754 1.2480 1.3206 0.7205AGRICULTURE1.4583 1.4827 1.5763 1.6700 1.4596 1.2492 1.1487 1.0482 0.9747 0.9011 0.8579 0.8146 0.8058 0.7970 0.7922 0.7873 0.7772 0.7670 0.8288 0.8905 0.9947 1.0989 1.2462 1.3934 0.7670RECREATIONAL SUMMER 1.5848 1.6474 1.7861 1.9247 1.6595 1.3942 1.2973 1.2004 1.0517 0.9029 0.8256 0.7484 0.7018 0.6552 0.6708 0.6864 0.7393 0.7922 0.8898 0.9874 1.1242 1.2610 1.3965 1.5320 0.6552RECREATIONAL SUMMER WINTER 0.8736 0.8525 0.9330 1.0135 1.0146 1.0158 1.1492 1.2825 1.1763 1.0700 0.9760 0.8821 0.8005 0.7190 0.7305 0.7420 0.8897 1.0374 1.2010 1.3645 1.5212 1.6778 1.3812 1.0847 0.7190
RECREATIONAL WINTER 0.6997 0.6389 0.6561 0.6733 0.7219 0.7704 1.0580 1.3455 1.3746 1.4038 1.2832 1.1625 0.9985 0.8344 0.8600 0.8857 1.0560 1.2262 1.4100 1.5937 1.8758 2.1580 1.5328 0.9076 0.6389
SUMMER 1.2151 1.2357 1.3129 1.3901 1.2520 1.1139 1.0620 1.0100 0.9718 0.9336 0.8976 0.8615 0.8457 0.8299 0.8354 0.8410 0.8743 0.9077 0.9357 0.9638 1.0273 1.0908 1.1322 1.1737 0.8299
SUMMER < 2500 1.3035 1.3186 1.3817 1.4448 1.2869 1.1289 1.0598 0.9906 0.9480 0.9053 0.8720 0.8387 0.8237 0.8086 0.8229 0.8373 0.8616 0.8859 0.9233 0.9607 1.0428 1.1249 1.2016 1.2783 0.8086
* Seasonal Trend Table factors are based on previous year ATR data. The table is updated yearly.* Grey shading indicates months were seasonal factor is greater than or less than 30%* February 2019 snow event causing lower seasonal factors
1Seasonal Trend Table: The 2020 table is based on 2019 values due to the irregularity caused by the Covid epidemic shutdown during the 2020 count year.
Summer Commuter December 1.0474Peak 0.9355 1.119644
Seasonal Trend Peak
SEASONAL TREND TABLE (Updated: 7/20/2021 )1
Attachment 3, Page 24 of 31
SANDOW ENGINEERING APPENDIX C:SYNCHRO OUTPUTSTPRA
1025 G Street
Attachment 3, Page 25 of 31
HCM 6th AWSC
3: G St & 10th St 12/21/2021
TPRA 12/21/2021 2035 Background Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.9
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 27 1 30 39 34 3 68 14 24 66 15
Future Vol, veh/h 16 27 1 30 39 34 3 68 14 24 66 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, %0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 17 28 1 32 41 36 3 72 15 25 69 16
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.9 7.8 8
HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %4% 36% 29% 23%
Vol Thru, %80% 61% 38% 63%
Vol Right, %16% 2% 33% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 85 44 103 105
LT Vol 3 16 30 24
Through Vol 68 27 39 66
RT Vol 14 1 34 15
Lane Flow Rate 89 46 108 111
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.106 0.058 0.128 0.132
Departure Headway (Hd)4.276 4.523 4.258 4.304
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 841 794 845 836
Service Time 2.289 2.538 2.271 2.317
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.106 0.058 0.128 0.133
HCM Control Delay 7.8 7.8 7.9 8
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.5
Attachment 3, Page 26 of 31
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: 10th St & Centennial 12/21/2021
TPRA 12/21/2021 2035 Background Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 575 73 47 610 8 86 3 41 5 4 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 5 575 73 47 610 8 86 3 41 5 4 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 605 77 49 642 8 91 3 43 5 4 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 396 840 107 357 983 12 373 37 122 329 227 0
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 794 1587 202 771 1858 23 898 147 478 763 893 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 0 682 49 0 650 137 0 0 9 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 794 0 1790 771 0 1881 1523 0 0 1656 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 12.1 2.1 0.0 10.3 1.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 10.5 0.0 12.1 14.2 0.0 10.3 2.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.11 1.00 0.01 0.66 0.31 0.56 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 396 0 947 357 0 995 532 0 0 556 0 0
V/C Ratio(X)0.01 0.00 0.72 0.14 0.00 0.65 0.26 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 500 0 1183 459 0 1243 995 0 0 1044 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I)1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh 10.8 0.0 7.5 12.9 0.0 7.1 12.6 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.3 0.0 2.5 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 10.9 0.0 9.1 13.0 0.0 7.9 12.8 0.0 0.0 11.6 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 687 699 137 9
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.1 8.3 12.8 11.6
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.1 26.5 15.1 26.5
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.5 23.5 27.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 4.9 14.1 2.1 16.2
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.6 6.4 0.0 5.8
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.1
HCM 6th LOS A
Attachment 3, Page 27 of 31
HCM 6th AWSC
3: G St & 10th St 12/21/2021
TPRA 12/21/2021 2035 With Zone Change Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 8.2
Intersection LOS A
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 31 1 48 43 64 3 57 33 55 55 15
Future Vol, veh/h 16 31 1 48 43 64 3 57 33 55 55 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Heavy Vehicles, %0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 17 33 1 51 45 67 3 60 35 58 58 16
Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB SB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 8 8.4 7.9 8.4
HCM LOS A A A A
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %3% 33% 31% 44%
Vol Thru, %61% 65% 28% 44%
Vol Right, %35% 2% 41% 12%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 93 48 155 125
LT Vol 3 16 48 55
Through Vol 57 31 43 55
RT Vol 33 1 64 15
Lane Flow Rate 98 51 163 132
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.118 0.065 0.195 0.165
Departure Headway (Hd)4.329 4.659 4.297 4.508
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 829 769 835 796
Service Time 2.351 2.686 2.318 2.53
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.118 0.066 0.195 0.166
HCM Control Delay 7.9 8 8.4 8.4
HCM Lane LOS A A A A
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.4 0.2 0.7 0.6
Attachment 3, Page 28 of 31
HCM 6th Signalized Intersection Summary
6: 10th St & Centennial 12/21/2021
TPRA 12/21/2021 2035 With Zone Change Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Volume (veh/h) 5 575 81 53 610 8 94 9 47 5 10 0
Future Volume (veh/h) 5 575 81 53 610 8 94 9 47 5 10 0
Initial Q (Qb), veh 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ped-Bike Adj(A_pbT) 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Parking Bus, Adj 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Work Zone On Approach No No No No
Adj Sat Flow, veh/h/ln 1900 1826 1900 1900 1885 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900
Adj Flow Rate, veh/h 5 605 85 56 642 8 99 9 49 5 11 0
Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95
Percent Heavy Veh, % 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cap, veh/h 389 828 116 344 982 12 359 54 126 201 372 0
Arrive On Green 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.53 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.26 0.00
Sat Flow, veh/h 794 1566 220 765 1858 23 849 204 478 349 1415 0
Grp Volume(v), veh/h 5 0 690 56 0 650 157 0 0 16 0 0
Grp Sat Flow(s),veh/h/ln 794 0 1786 765 0 1881 1531 0 0 1764 0 0
Q Serve(g_s), s 0.2 0.0 12.8 2.6 0.0 10.8 2.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Cycle Q Clear(g_c), s 11.0 0.0 12.8 15.4 0.0 10.8 3.5 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0
Prop In Lane 1.00 0.12 1.00 0.01 0.63 0.31 0.31 0.00
Lane Grp Cap(c), veh/h 389 0 944 344 0 994 539 0 0 574 0 0
V/C Ratio(X) 0.01 0.00 0.73 0.16 0.00 0.65 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00
Avail Cap(c_a), veh/h 474 0 1137 427 0 1198 961 0 0 1049 0 0
HCM Platoon Ratio 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
Upstream Filter(I) 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00
Uniform Delay (d), s/veh11.3 0.0 7.8 13.8 0.0 7.3 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0
Incr Delay (d2), s/veh 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.2 0.0 1.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Initial Q Delay(d3),s/veh 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
%ile BackOfQ(50%),veh/ln0.0 0.0 3.4 0.4 0.0 2.8 1.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0
Unsig. Movement Delay, s/veh
LnGrp Delay(d),s/veh 11.3 0.0 9.8 14.0 0.0 8.3 13.2 0.0 0.0 11.8 0.0 0.0
LnGrp LOS B A A B A A B A A B A A
Approach Vol, veh/h 695 706 157 16
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.8 8.8 13.2 11.8
Approach LOS A A B B
Timer - Assigned Phs 2 4 6 8
Phs Duration (G+Y+Rc), s 15.9 27.3 15.9 27.3
Change Period (Y+Rc), s 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5
Max Green Setting (Gmax), s 23.5 27.5 23.5 27.5
Max Q Clear Time (g_c+I1), s 5.5 14.8 2.3 17.4
Green Ext Time (p_c), s 0.7 6.2 0.0 5.4
Intersection Summary
HCM 6th Ctrl Delay 9.7
HCM 6th LOS A
Attachment 3, Page 29 of 31
HCM 6th TWSC
9: Site Access 12/21/2021
TPRA 12/21/2021 2035 With Zone Change Synchro 10 Report
Page 3
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.2
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 54 65 23 92 63 21
Future Vol, veh/h 54 65 23 92 63 21
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - - - - 0 -
Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 -
Grade, %0 - - 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, % 0 1 0 1 0 0
Mvmt Flow 57 68 24 97 66 22
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 125 0 236 91
Stage 1 - - - - 91 -
Stage 2 - - - - 145 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.1 - 6.4 6.2
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - 5.4 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - 5.4 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.2 - 3.5 3.3
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1474 - 757 972
Stage 1 - - - - 938 -
Stage 2 - - - - 887 -
Platoon blocked, % - --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1474 - 744 972
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - - - - 744 -
Stage 1 - - - - 938 -
Stage 2 - - - - 872 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.5 10.1
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)790 - - 1474 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.112 - - 0.016 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 10.1 - - 7.5 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0.1 -
Attachment 3, Page 30 of 31
SANDOW
ENGINEERING
160 Madison Street, Suite A
Eugene, Oregon 97402
541.513.3376
sandowengineering.com
Attachment 3, Page 31 of 31
nnn
First Baptist Church of Springfield
1175 G Street, Springfield, Oregon 97477-4109
541-746-6031 Fax: 541-746-5096
fbcspringfield@gmail.com www.fbcspringfieldor.com
Rev. Sam Brink, Interim Pastor
January 4, 2022
To whom it may concern:
My name is Sam Brink and I am the interim pastor of the First Baptist Church in Springfield. I am writing
on behalf of the congregation, to encourage your support of the efforts of OASIS to bring together in one
location their outreach to the community through building a new service space.
In 2015, we, as a congregation, made the choice to open up part of our campus for office and service
space for OASIS. We had sensed a need to help unhoused families, first in our neighborhood and then in
the wider Springfield community. This is a ministry need that we could not handle on our own and so
we were eager to join with Catholic Community Services in helping them reaching out into the
community. Through this partnership, we have provided not only office space and service space, but we
have helped them through the use of our parking lot for temporary housing for individuals and small
families. We have been glad to provide space for the community shower trailer when it is available and
working with them in other ways as the need arises. It has been a great and effective partnership.
As you know, life during COVID has not been easy for any of us. But I have watched as the OASIS staff
has continued to figure out how to meet the needs presented to them and yet keep the staff and the
people they are serving, safe. I believe that the proposed new service space will provide an easier way
to meet people’s needs as well as continue to keep people safe. Social ministry is difficult enough on its
own, but when you have a staff spread out over different locations and the people who need service
have to move between locations just to receive help it increases the level of difficult and decreases the
effectiveness. We think it makes perfect sense to try to consolidate the service onto one campus setting.
A new building will enable OASIS to easily share staffing needs when they arise. It will allow them to
create a space that can be shaped to make their service easier as well as more efficient. While they have
made our space work as best it can, there is always shortcomings to having to live in space not created
for your need.
Again, I, along with the members and friends of First Baptist, encourage you to approve the building of
the new service center. You will be helping not only the people they serve, but the community you serve
and together, we will make the Springfield community better.
Sincerely,
Sam Brink, Interim Pastor
First Baptist Church, Springfield
Attachment 4, Page 1 of 1
Attachment 5, Page 1 of 1
BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
FINAL ORDER FOR:
AMENDMENT TO THE SPRINGFIELD ZONING MAP TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.99 ACRES ] 811-21-000294-TYP3
OF LAND IDENTIFIED AS 1025 G STREET (ASSESSOR’S MAP 17-03-35-11, TAX LOT 3500) FROM ]
LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LDR) TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) ]
NATURE OF THE PROPOSAL
Proposed amendment to the Springfield Zoning Map:
▪ Rezone approximately 0.99 acres of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of 10th and G
Streets and addressed as 1025 G Street (Map 17-03-35-11, Tax Lot 3500) from Low Density Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial. The subject property is generally depicted and more particularly described in Exhibit A
to this Order.
Timely and sufficient notice of the public hearing has been provided, pursuant to SDC 5.2-115.
On February 1, 2022, the Springfield Planning Commission held a public hearing, and on March 1, 2022 the Planning
Commission conducted deliberations on the proposed Zoning Map amendment. The staff report, written comments,
and testimony of those who spoke at the public hearing via online meeting platform were entered into the record.
CONCLUSION
On the basis of this record, the proposed Zoning Map amendment is consistent with the criteria of SDC 5.22-115. This
general finding is supported by the specific findings of fact and conclusions as stated in the staff report and findings
attached hereto as Exhibit B to this Order.
ORDER/RECOMMENDATION
It is ORDERED by the Springfield Planning Commission that Case Number 811-21-000294-TYP3, Zoning Map Amendment,
be approved. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on March 1, 2022.
____________________________ ____________________
Planning Commission Chairperson Date
ATTEST
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Attachment 6, Page 1 of 14
EXHIBIT A
PROPERTY REZONED FROM LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TO NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1
Beginning at the point of intersection of the East line of 10th Street with the South line of G Street in
Springfield, Lane County, Oregon, which said point is also 962.48 feet North of the Northwest corner
of Block 4 of BRATTAIN'S ADDITION TO SPRINGFIELD, in Lane County, Oregon, as platted and
recorded in Book 9, Page 6, Lane County Oregon Plat Records; thence East along the South line of
G Street 240 feet; thence South parallel to the East line of 10th Street 118 feet; thence West parallel
to the South line of G Street 240 feet to the East line of 10th Street; and thence North 118 feet to the
point of beginning, all in Lane County, Oregon.
PARCEL 2
Beginning at a point on the South line of G Street 240 feet Easterly from the intersection of the South
line of G Street with the East line of 10th Street; thence Easterly along the South line of G Street 120
feet; thence South 120 feet, more or less, to the North line of the East-West alley between F Street
and G Street; thence westerly along the North line of said alley a distance of 120 feet; thence North
parallel to the East line of 10th Street 120 feet, the place of beginning, in the City of Springfield, Lane
County, Oregon.
Brattain House
Two Rivers/Dos Rios
Elementary School
First Baptist
Church of
Springfield
SITE
Exhibit A, Page 1 of 1
Attachment 6, Page 2 of 14
Staff Report and Findings
Springfield Planning Commission
Zone Change Request
Public Hearing Date: February 1, 2022
Report Date: March 1, 2022
Case Number: 811-21-000294-TYP3
Applicant: Chris Pickering, Catholic Community Services
Applicant’s Representative: Teresa Bishow, Bishow Consulting
Property Owner: Catholic Community Services of Lane County Inc.
Site: Southeast corner of the intersection of 10th & G Streets; addressed as 1025 G Street (Assessor’s Map
17-03-35-11, Tax Lot 3500).
Request
Rezone approximately 0.99 acres of Low Density Residential (LDR) to Neighborhood Commercial (NC).
Site Information
The property that is subject of the Zone Change request is comprised of a rectangular, 0.99-acre parcel
located at the southeast corner of the intersection of 10th and G Streets. The property is across the street to
the south from the Brattain House and Two Rivers-Dos Ríos Elementary School. The subject property
contains a 15,200 ft2 two-story building that houses the Catholic Community Services of Lane County
administrative offices. Charitable services and community centers are not listed uses in the LDR District
and therefore the facility is considered an existing non-conforming use.
The subject site has corner frontage on 10th Street along the western boundary and G Street along the
northern boundary. The properties across the street to the north and northwest are developed with public
school facilities and are zoned Public Land and Open Space (PLO). On the south side of G Street, properties
to the west, south and east are zoned Low Density Residential.
Background
In March 2021, representatives of the applicant Catholic Community Services (CCS) approached the City
about a planned building expansion on the site. In response to initial guidance from City planning staff,
CCS submitted an expansion of non-conforming use application in September 2021. Subsequently, City
staff conducted a more in-depth review of the history and type of uses on the site. City staff and CCS were
unable to find any documented planning approval for the existing charitable services use operating on the
site. The building ceased to be used as a church in 1998 and subsequent occupants had not re-established
its use as a church. Churches are a listed use in the Low Density Residential district subject to a Type III
Discretionary Use permit process. However, although the property is owned and operated by a religious
organization, it is not functioning as a center of religious worship, nor is this use planned in the future.
Therefore, establishing a church use on the property through a Discretionary Use permit still does not
accommodate the existing use nor does it facilitate the proposed building expansion.
Without any documentation that the charitable services use on the site was originally established through a
planning approval, expansion of a non-conforming use is not a viable process. As a result, CCS withdrew
Exhibit B, Page 1 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 3 of 14
their September 2021 application on the basis of City planning staff’s recommendation that it would not be
approvable. Staff provided input to CCS regarding alternative options that CCS might pursue to establish
the charitable services use on the site, including rezoning from Low Density Residential to another land use
district. CCS elected to pursue rezoning of the site because it provides a clear path forward to establish the
use currently operating on the site and subsequently allow for expansion of that use.
Application
The Zoning Map amendment application was initiated on November 9, 2021 and was considered complete
upon receipt of the supporting Traffic Analysis on December 23, 2021. The initial Planning Commission
public hearing on the matter of the Zone Change request was held February 1, 2022.
The applicant is proposing the zone change from LDR to Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to bring the
facility into conformity with the provisions of the commercial (NC) zoning district and to facilitate future
expansion of the charitable services stationed on the site. In accordance with provisions of the Metro Plan,
the Springfield Comprehensive Plan and Section 3.2-305 of the City’s Development Code, Neighborhood
Commercial sites can be established on residentially-designated sites. The intent of the NC zoning is to
provide small-scale sites offering commercial services to neighborhoods and localized areas, and to
accommodate commercial uses that enhance neighborhood character.
Notification and Written Comments
Notification of the February 1, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing was sent to all property owners and
residents within 300 feet of the site on January 18, 2022. Newspaper notice of the public hearing meeting
was published in the legal notices section of the Register Guard on January 24, 2022. Staff received two
letters in support of the proposal from the First Baptist Church of Springfield (1175 G Street) and Springfield
Public Schools on behalf of the McKinney-Vento Liaisons for the OASIS program. The letters of support are
included in the Planning Commission AIS packet for this application.
A letter opposing the proposed Zoning Map amendment was received on January 27, 2022 (after the report
packet for the Planning Commission meeting was prepared) and provided to the Planning Commissioners in
advance of the meeting.
On April 16, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order 20-16, which requires governing bodies to hold
public meetings and hearings by telephone, video, or through other electronic or virtual means whenever
possible. On June 30, 2020, Oregon Legislature enacted House Bill 4212 (HB 4212) which waives
requirements under the Oregon Public Meetings Law and other statutes to facilitate public meetings online or
by phone. Under HB 4212, the governing body must make available a method by which the public can listen
to or virtually attend the public meeting or hearing at the time it occurs. House Bill 4212 allows governing
bodies to accept public testimony by telephone or video conferencing technology, or to provide a means to
submit written testimony (including email or other electronic methods) that the governing body can consider
in a timely manner. House Bill 4212 overrides conflicting requirements for quasi-judicial public hearings in
state law or in the Springfield Development Code or Metro Plan.
Since issuance of the Executive Order and adoption of HB 4212, the City of Springfield has conducted regular
and public hearing meetings of the Planning Commission and City Council using online virtual meeting
platforms. The February 1, 2022 Planning Commission public hearing will be conducted as an online meeting
via Zoom which allows members of the public to observe and listen to the meeting online. Members of the
public are able to provide testimony to the Planning Commission prior to the meeting by emailing comments
to staff, using the http://springfieldoregonspeaks.org web portal, or by joining the online meeting remotely.
The public is also able to provide testimony to the Planning Commission by phone. Details regarding how to
join the online meeting were provided in the notification letter mailed to adjacent residents and property
Exhibit B, Page 2 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 4 of 14
owners, in the posted public hearing notices, in the Planning Commission meeting agenda, and posted on the
City’s website.
Summary of Testimony Provided at the Public Hearing
Verbal testimony was provided at the public hearing by respondents favoring, opposing, and neutral to the
proposal. A respondent who had submitted written comments opposing the zone change requested to rescind
the letter after he had spoken with a representative of Catholic Community Services and had questions and
concerns satisfactorily addressed. The respondent instead spoke in favor of the proposal at the public hearing
meeting.
At the public hearing meeting, three respondents expressed concerns about trash, loitering, vandalism, drug
activity, and other occurrences within the alley behind 1025 G Street and on nearby streets. The respondents
expressed concerns about negative activities conflicting with the family-friendly nature of the neighborhood
and posing a risk to children at the elementary school across the street. One respondent also commented that
rezoning the property to a commercial district could invite new and more intensive development on the
property should the charitable services use be discontinued.
The applicant answered questions of the respondents and Planning Commission and committed to addressing
the issues identified in the public hearing testimony. The applicant also clarified that Catholic Community
Services had owned the property for more than 17 years and were intending to invest time and capital into a
building expansion to accommodate an existing program that is stationed on the site (the OASIS program).
Staff Response to Testimony
Much of the testimony provided at the public hearing consisted of concerns with past and currently ongoing
activities on or adjacent to the site. The testimony regarding trash, drug activity, loitering and other negative
activities is not relevant to the criteria of approval for a zone change. However, testimony regarding site
redevelopment and the potential for more intensive uses to locate on the site in the future – once it is rezoned
to a commercial use – are valid comments that relate to criterion C.3 (below).
Criteria of Approval
Section 5.22-100 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) contains the criteria of approval for the
decision maker to utilize during review of Zoning Map amendment requests. The Criteria of Zoning Map
amendment approval criteria are:
SDC 5.22-115 CRITERIA
C. Zoning Map amendment criteria of approval:
1. Consistency with applicable Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan diagram;
2. Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan District maps, Conceptual Development
Plans and functional plans; and
3. The property is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and transportation
networks to support the use, or these facilities, services and transportation networks are planned
to be provided concurrently with the development of the property.
4. Legislative Zoning Map amendments that involve a Metro Plan Diagram amendment shall:
a. Meet the approval criteria specified in Section 5.14-100; and
Exhibit B, Page 3 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 5 of 14
b. Comply with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060, where applicable.
Proposed Findings In Support of Zone Change Approval
Criterion: Zoning Map amendment criteria of approval:
1. Consistency with applicable Metro Plan policies and the Metro Plan diagram;
Applicant’s Narrative: “The Metro Plan diagram designates the subject property ‘Low Density
Residential’. (Refer to Exhibit ‘B’ — Metro Plan Designations). As stated in the Metro Plan text (page II
-G-4), the Metro Plan diagram does not depict neighborhood commercial zoning.1 The Metro Plan text
describes the purpose of neighborhood commercial facilities not shown on the Metro Plan Diagram and
establishes minimum location standards and site criteria.2 The Metro Plan standards and site criteria are
listed below in italics following by findings demonstrating compliance.
1. Within convenient walking or bicycling distance of an adequate support population. For a full-service
neighborhood commercial center at the high end of the size criteria, an adequate support population
would be about 4,000 persons (existing or anticipated) within an area conveniently accessible to the
site. For smaller sites or more limited services, a smaller support population or service area may be
sufficient.
The Metro Plan does not define ‘adequate support population’ for smaller sites or ‘an area conveniently
accessable [sic] to the site’. The subject property is conveniently located at the edge of a residential
area and close to public schools and major employment areas such as the McKenzie Willamette Medical
Center. The subject property is only about one acre is size and is considered a smaller site. Based on
the general density of people living, working, and going to school in the area, the site has a sufficient
support population.
2. Adequate area to accommodate off-street parking and loading needs and landscaping, particularly
between the center and adjacent residential property, as well as along street frontages next door to
outdoor parking areas.
The subject property is a 0.99-acre parcel on a corner rectangular shaped lot. The size and
configuration of the lot are suitable for uses permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial zone. Due to
the 14-foot wide alley to the south of the subject property, the site is not adjacent to any property in
residential use.
3. Sufficient frontage to ensure safe and efficient automobile, pedestrian and bicycle access without
conflict with moving traffic at intersections and along adjacent streets.
1 The Metro Plan, page II-G-2, describes why certain zones are not depicted on the Metro Plan diagram as follows: ‘Certain land uses are not
individually of metropolitan-wide significance in terms of size or location because of their special nature or limited extent. Therefore, it is not
advisable to account for [most] of them on the Metro Plan Diagram. The Diagram’s depiction of land use designations is not intended to invalidate
local zoning or land uses which are not sufficiently intensive or large enough to be included on the Metro Plan Diagram.’
2 Metro Plan, page II-G-5
Exhibit B, Page 4 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 6 of 14
The subject property is on a corner rectangular shaped lot with an alley along the south side. The lot
provides sufficient frontage for safe and efficient automobile pedestrian and bicycle access without
creating conflicts with traffic at the intersection or along adjacent streets.
4. The site shall be no more than five acres, including existing commercial development. The exact size
shall depend on the number of establishments associated with the center and the population to be served.
The proposed Neighborhood Commercial site is 0.99 acres. The First Baptist Church adjacent to the
subject property is located on 1.45 acres. If the church was considered ‘existing commercial
development’, it would bring the total neighborhood commercial site up to 2.44 acres, less than the
maximum size allowed in the Metro Plan. The Metro Plan text also provides3:
‘In certain circumstances, convenience grocery stores or similar retail operations play an important
role in providing services to existing neighborhoods. These types of operations which currently
exist can be recognized and allowed to continue through such actions as rezoning.’
Since 2004, [Catholic Community Services of Lane County] has provided vital safety-net services to the
neighborhood. Services include immediate assistance with food, clothing, and energy & housing
assistance. Approval of the zone change will allow these charitable services to continue to be offered
on the site. The NC zoning will also allow a 1,600 square foot building addition to house the OASIS
Program on-site.”
Finding 1: Staff concurs with the applicant’s findings in the italicized narrative above and in the
subsections to follow. The subject property meets the criteria for size, location and use as described
in the project narrative and qualifies as a site zoned for Neighborhood Commercial use.
Finding 2: Metro Plan Chapter II, Pages II-G-5 & 6 states in part: “The determination of the
appropriateness of specific sites and uses or additional standards is left to the local
jurisdiction…[neighborhood commercial] operations which currently exist can be recognized and
allowed to continue through such actions as rezoning.” While the focus of these Metro Plan
provisions is on local retail and convenience grocery stores, the same process is applicable to the
subject property. The applicant is requesting the rezoning action in order to allow the site to be
recognized and allowed to continue. Catholic Community Services of Lane County acquired the
subject property and began operating in 2004. According to the Lane Council of Governments, the
Metro Plan was last updated and published in June 2019. Therefore, the commercial use can be
considered “currently existing” for the purpose of this review. Because the Metro Plan specifically
identifies Neighborhood Commercial sites as small-scale entities that are not shown on the overall
Metro Plan diagram, this criterion has been met.
Finding 3: The proposed zone change is consistent with provisions of the Metro Plan whereby zoning
can be monitored and adjusted as necessary to meet current urban land use demands. The requested
change from LDR to NC would bring the site into conformity with provisions of the Metro Plan and
the City’s Development Code. The rezoning action would also facilitate the future review and
approval of modifications to the site.
Finding 4: In accordance with Policy A.4 of the Metro Plan, the City shall use annexation, provision
of adequate public facilities and services, rezoning, redevelopment, and infill to meet the 20-year
projected housing demand. Currently, the property is zoned Low Density Residential and the
3 Metro Plan, page II-G-6
Exhibit B, Page 5 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 7 of 14
applicant is not proposing to change the comprehensive plan designation of the site. The proposed
rezoning does not affect the ability of the City to address projected housing demand and the need for
adequate public facilities and services to serve new development areas elsewhere within Springfield.
Finding 5: The subject property is in the central core of the City and the site is classified as
“developed” and is not tabulated as land with development potential in the City’s acknowledged
Residential Lands and Housing Needs Analysis (ref. Table 3-3). The applicant’s stated intent for the
proposed rezoning of approximately 0.99 acres is to accommodate the existing charitable services
offices and to facilitate future modifications to the site. Therefore, the proposed rezoning will
recognize and accommodate an existing “commercial” use within the neighborhood and will not
remove approximately one acre from the developable residential lands inventory.
Finding 6: The policies of the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Residential Land Use and
Housing Element and Economic Element also apply to the subject site. The Residential Land Use and
Housing Element of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan updates and refines, but does not replace,
the Residential Land Use and Housing Element of the Metro Plan.
Finding 7: There are no specific policies of the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Residential
Land Use and Housing Element that apply to this site. Because the site is retaining its residential
designation but changing zoning there is no net effect on the amount of buildable residential land or
number of dwelling units in the city.
Finding 8: The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to accommodate the existing commercial
use of charitable services, and to facilitate future expansion of the building and associated services on
the site. A future expansion of the building on the site would qualify as an infill development near
the downtown core of Springfield. The proposal is consistent with Policy E.1.
Finding 9: In accordance with the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Economic Element, Policy
E.6, the City must:
“Facilitate short term and long term redevelopment activity and increased efficiency of land use
through the urban renewal program, updates to refinement plans and the development review
process.”
Finding 10: The subject rezoning request does not require a comprehensive plan amendment and is
therefore subject to the development review process. Additionally, future expansion of the building
or services offered on the site would be subject to a separate land use approval process. Based on
these findings staff concludes that the proposal is consistent with Policy E.6.
Finding 11: In accordance with the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Economic Element,
Policy E.7, “Where possible, concentrate development on sites with existing infrastructure or on sites
where infrastructure can be provided relatively easily and at a comparatively low cost.”
Finding 12: To address the above policy, staff finds that the subject site is within a mature
neighborhood on the edge of the downtown core with all available utilities and services along the
property frontages. It is not expected that future modifications or expansions to the building would
require additional or upgraded public infrastructure. Therefore, based on the above findings, staff
concludes that the proposal is consistent with Policy E.7.
Exhibit B, Page 6 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 8 of 14
Finding 13: In accordance with Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Economic Element, Policy
E.23, the City must “identify and target commercial activities that will generate living-wage
employment opportunities and/or meet daily needs of local residents.”
Finding 14: The existing commercial use on the site provides charitable services to residents of
Springfield and the rest of Lane County. Many of the services are specifically for low-income and
disadvantaged individuals or in response to local emergencies and natural disasters. Based on the
applicant’s project narrative, these services are offered both on-site and at other locations within the
community. The subject site provides a centralized and accessible location for the provision of
charitable services in the community. The proposal is consistent with Policy E.23.
Finding 15: In accordance with Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Economic Element, Policy
E.25, the City must “update plans and zoning to create more opportunities for mixing compatible
commercial uses within employment zones in ways that preserve the industrial land supply, minimize
vehicular trips and traffic congestion, and promote convenience and walkability for employees.”
Finding 16: The subject site is located immediately adjacent to a large cluster of public agency and
school facilities along 10th and G Streets that include Two Rivers-Dos Ríos Elementary School,
Springfield High School, the Brattain House, and Willamalane Park Swim Center. These facilities
are long-standing education and employment centers and focal points of community activity.
Additionally, some of the target groups for charitable services offered by Catholic Community
Services include school-aged children, youth, and families. For these reasons the subject property is
strategically located within the community and rezoning to a commercial use recognizes the current
and future activities occurring on the property. The proposal is consistent with Policy E.25.
Conclusion: Rezoning the subject property from LDR to NC is consistent with provisions of the
adopted Metro Plan, the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Residential Land Use and Housing
Element, and the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan – Economic Element.
2. Consistency with applicable Refinement Plans, Plan District maps, Conceptual Development
Plans and functional plans;
Applicant’s Narrative: “The subject property is not located in an area with an adopted Refinement
Plan, Plan District map or Conceptual Development Plan. The Zoning Map Amendment is consistent
with the applicable functional plans as described below.
Springfield 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP)
The Springfield 2035 TSP provides a framework for how the City should maintain and improve the
transportation network to meet growth within Springfield' s Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The
2035 TSP includes a recommended set of transportation improvements for the 20-year planning
horizon. The subject property has frontage on G Street and North 10th Street. The 2035 TSP functional
classification for both streets is ‘Major Collector’. As set forth in the Metro Plan, the location of
Neighborhood Commercial sites greater than 1.5 acres must abut a Collector or Arterial. In this
case, the Neighborhood Commercial site is only about an acre and abuts two streets with a Collector
classification. The subject property is also located on a transit line with a bus stop abutting the
property. The 2035 TSP contains one project relevant to the subject property - PB-54 G Street 5th St
to 28th St.4 The project is described as ‘G Street will be restriped with bike lanes, signed and marked
4 Springfield 2035 TSP, Table 4.
Exhibit B, Page 7 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 9 of 14
for bike route.’ The project improvements are for signing, striping, and pavement marking at an
estimated cost of $75,000. PB-54 is categorized as an ‘opportunity project’. Opportunity projects
are described as: Lower-cost and scale roadway, urban standards and pedestrian/bicycle projects
that generally would not require additional right-of-way and the City could implement as
opportunities arise (Table 4, Figure 5).5 The proposed zone change will not adversely impact the
City's ability in the future to provide bike lanes and sign G Street as a bike route. The proposed zone
change is consistent with the 2035 TSP. Findings demonstrating compliance with the Oregon
Transportation Planning Rule are found in the Sandow Engineering Traffic Impact Analysis provided
under separate cover.
Willamalane Comprehensive Plan
The subject property is within a block of Willamalane Park. This 14-acre park features basketball
courts, tennis courts, softball/baseball fields, a playground, a skate park, and the Veterans Plaza. The
park also contains the Willamalane Park Swim Center. The Willamalane Comprehensive Plan does
not identify the subject property as a site planned for future park use. The proposed zone change is
not in conflict with the Willamalane Comprehensive Plan.”
Finding 17: Staff concurs with the applicant’s findings stated in the italicized project narrative above.
The property is not within an adopted neighborhood Refinement Plan or Plan District so these sub-
elements are not applicable to the proposed rezoning action. However, the proposed rezoning is
consistent with the applicable functional plans as stated in the applicant’s narrative and described
herein.
Conclusion: Rezoning the subject property from LDR to NC is consistent with the provisions of the
City’s adopted functional plans.
3. The property is presently provided with adequate public facilities, services and transportation
networks to support the use, or these facilities, services and transportation networks are planned
to be provided concurrently with the development of the property.
Applicant’s Narrative: “The subject property is within the Springfield city limits and is provided with
adequate public facilities, services, and transportation networks to support the existing and planned
development of the property. The Neighborhood Commercial zoning district standards will limit the
intensity of future uses and development of the site.”
Finding 18: The property requested for Zone Change has frontage on G Street along the northern
boundary and 10th Street along the western boundary. Both public streets are classified as collector
streets. The intersection of 10th and G Streets is 4-way stop controlled. As noted in the previous
criterion, there is a future TSP project for bicycle facilities on G Street. No other near-term or long-
term improvements for either 10th or G Streets are identified for the year 2035 horizon.
Finding 19: Access to the site is via multiple driveways onto G Street beginning approximately 260
feet east of the intersection with 10th Street. The driveways access a shared parking lot and driving
aisles for Catholic Community Services and the First Baptist Church of Springfield located at the
corner of G and 12th Streets. The applicant is not currently proposing to modify the site access or
parking configuration.
5 Springfield 2035 TSP, page 49.
Exhibit B, Page 8 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 10 of 14
Finding 20: At the public hearing meeting on February 1, 2022, a respondent asked about potential
redevelopment or a change of occupancy occurring on the site after it is zoned for commercial use.
Redevelopment or a change of use on the property under the proposed Neighborhood Commercial
zoning could result in at least four possible scenarios, depending upon the nature of the proposed
changes:
In the first scenario, an applicant proposes to re-use the existing building in accordance with the
NC zoning provisions. No land use approvals would be required if another tenant moves onto
the site and continues the charitable services activities already occurring within the building, or
the use changes to another allowable use within the NC district (for example, the building is
converted to a community center, church, or public offices). The proposed change of building
tenancy would not require notification to the neighborhood or a public hearing.
In the second scenario, an applicant proposes to modify the existing building and/or site to
accommodate a use that is listed in the NC district. The proposed changes to the building and/or
site would require land use approval, including notification to the adjacent property owners and
residents, but it would not require a public hearing.
In the third scenario, an applicant proposes to demolish the existing building and redevelop the
site. Site Plan Review approval would be required for the proposed development and the
applicant would need to demonstrate that the site meets all applicable criteria of the City’s
Development Code. Public notification of the proposed development would be provided to
adjacent property owners and residents, but it would not require a public hearing.
In the fourth scenario, an applicant proposes a use that is listed as a Discretionary Use in the NC
District. The proposal could include either partially or fully re-using the existing building, or
completely redeveloping the site. Public notification of the proposed development would be
provided to adjacent property owners and residents, and the development plans would be
reviewed and approved through a public hearing process.
Under any of the development scenarios listed above, the ultimate use of the site is predicated on the
availability of utilities and infrastructure to serve the property. The applicant has demonstrated
through their project narrative and traffic analysis that rezoning the property to a commercial district
does not adversely impact the local street network – even if the site were to redevelop under the
“reasonable worst-case scenario” (in this case a convenience store). Utilities necessary to serve the
property are also available along the street frontages or in the rear alley behind the site. Depending
on the nature and magnitude of changes proposed for the site, the adjacent neighborhood may or may
not be notified and provided an opportunity to comment once the site is rezoned to commercial use.
With the adoption of new Development Code provisions anticipated later in 2022, public notification
may not be provided for site redevelopment if the proposal adheres to clear and objective standards
and employs the Minimum Development Standards (MDS) process. If the property is zoned for
commercial use, it is eligible for using the MDS process for future modifications to the building and
site.
Finding 21: The surrounding neighborhood is fully developed with public streets and utilities that are
available to serve future modifications on the site. A full suite of public utilities and services with
sufficient capacity to support the requested rezoning from Low Density Residential to Neighborhood
Commercial are available within or on the perimeter of the subject property including the following:
Exhibit B, Page 9 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 11 of 14
• Sanitary Sewer: There is an existing 8-inch sanitary sewer line that runs east-west along the
mid-block alley behind the subject site. Multiple service laterals branch from this public sewer
line to serve the existing buildings on the site. The public sewer line has adequate capacity
for future modifications to the site that would incrementally increase the amount of sewer
flows originating from the property.
• Storm Sewer: There are existing public storm sewer lines and curb inlets along the west side
of the property in 10th Street. Concurrent with any future modifications to the site, under the
proposed Neighborhood Commercial zoning the property owner or applicant would be
responsible for installing adequate facilities to manage and treat stormwater runoff before it
reaches the public system in 10th Street.
• Water: Springfield Utility Board (SUB) Water service is located along the public street
frontages of the property. There is an existing 8-inch water line running east-west along G
Street in front of the subject property and another 8-inch water line running north-south along
the 10th Street frontage of the site. Additionally, there is an existing fire hydrant at the
northwest corner of the property at the intersection of 10th and G Streets. The existing water
lines and fire hydrant provide sufficient coverage for the subject property as it is currently
configured. The applicant or developer would be responsible for ensuring that water system
capacity is sufficient for any future modifications to the site under the proposed Neighborhood
Commercial zoning.
• Electricity: SUB Electric has overhead electrical facilities along the west side of 10th Street
and within the mid-block alley that runs behind the subject site. The existing electrical
facilities are adequate for the current use. However, the applicant or developer would be
responsible for ensuring that electric system capacity is sufficient for any future modifications
to the site under the proposed Neighborhood Commercial zoning.
• Telecommunications: Comcast and CenturyLink have telecommunication facilities along the
10th and G Street frontages of the property. The existing facilities are suitable for the current
use and future modifications to the site under the proposed Neighborhood Commercial zoning.
Finding 22: Any future modifications or redevelopment of the subject site with commercial uses
would be subject to the land use approval process outlined in SDC 5.17-100 (Site Plan Review). The
Site Plan Review procedures will detail the design and configuration of the commercial site and
associated building(s), the location of utility connections, and conformance with the criteria of
approval for Site Plan Review.
Conclusion: Based on the above findings and the existing transportation and utility network serving
the site, the proposed zoning change to Neighborhood Commercial can be accommodated without
required upgrades or extensions to public infrastructure.
4. Legislative Zoning Map amendments that involve a Metro Plan Diagram amendment shall:
1. Meet the approval criteria specified in Section 5.14-100; and
2. Comply with Oregon Administrative Rule (OAR) 660-012-0060, where applicable.
Applicant’s Narrative: “This application is not a Legislative Zoning Map amendment and does not
involve a Metro Plan diagram amendment. Although this approval criterion is not applicable, based
on a request from City staff, the applicant retained Sandow Engineering to evaluate the proposed
zone change for compliance with OAR 660-012-0060. Please refer to the Sandow Engineering Traffic
Impact Analysis under separate cover.”
Exhibit B, Page 10 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 12 of 14
Finding 23: The applicant is not proposing to change the comprehensive plan designation of Low
Density Residential for the property. Therefore, a Metro Plan diagram amendment has not been
initiated and the approval criteria of SDC 5.14-100 are not applicable.
Finding 24: The Transportation Planning Rule (TPR), Oregon Administrative Rule OAR 660-12-0060,
requires local governments to put in place mitigation measures as provided in the TPR whenever an
amendment to a functional plan, an acknowledged comprehensive plan, or land use regulation (including
a zone change) would “significantly affect” an existing or planned transportation facility.
Finding 25: Under the TPR, a plan amendment or zone change may result in a “significant affect” under
OAR 660-012-0060(2)(a) and (b) by changing the functional classification of an existing or planned
transportation facility or by changing the standards implementing a functional classification system.
The subject application proposes to change the property from Low Density Residential (LDR) to
Neighborhood Commercial (NC) zoning. The proposed zoning map amendment does not alter the
functional classification of any facility or change any standards for implementing the functional
classification system and therefore does not result in a “significant effect” under OAR 660-012-
0060(2)(a) or (b).
Finding 26: Under the TPR, a plan amendment or zone change may also result in a “significant affect”
if it would result in any of the effects listed under OAR 660-012-0060(2)(c) “based on projected
conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified in the adopted TSP.”
Finding 27: Under the TPR, a “significant affect” occurs if the proposed amendment(s) would result
in types or levels of travel or access that are inconsistent with the identified function classification of
the existing or planned transportation facilities, that degrade the performance of an existing or planned
transportation facility such that it would not meet performance standards identified in the TSP, or that
degrade the performance of an existing or planned transportation facility that is otherwise not projected
to meet the performance standards identified in the TSP.
Finding 28: When determining whether a proposed functional plan or land use amendment has a
significant effect, OAR 660-012-0060(4)(a) states that local governments must rely on existing
transportation facilities and services and on the planned transportation facilities and services set forth
under subsections (4)(b) and (4)(c) of the rule.
Finding 29: OAR 660-012-0060(4)(b)(E) states that improvements to regional and local roads, street,
or other facilities that are included in a regional or local transportation system plan are considered
planned facilities, improvements or services when the responsible local government provides a written
statement that the facilities, improvements, or services are “reasonably likely to be provided by the end
of the planning period.”
Finding 30: As required by SDC 5.22-110, the applicant has submitted a Traffic Impact Study (TIS)
addressing traffic impacts associated with the proposed zone change from Low Density Residential to
Neighborhood Commercial to show compliance with the TPR at OAR 660-012-0060.
Finding 31: The scope of the applicant’s TIS complies with the requirements in SDC 4.2-105.B.4 and
the City of Springfield Standard Operational Procedures and Policies. The intersections and driveways
scoped in the applicant’s TIS are reasonable, appropriate, and relevant to the potential impacts of the
proposed zone change.
Exhibit B, Page 11 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 13 of 14
Finding 32: The City’s Transportation Planning Engineer concurs with the applicant’s trip generation
methodology and findings. The applicant’s TIS provides Trip Generation scenarios for the proposed
plan designation and zoning. The trips generated by a convenience market under ITE land use 851
represent the “reasonable worst case scenario” under the proposed Neighborhood Commercial zoning
and complies with the TPR.
Finding 33: The applicant’s TIS analyzes traffic impacts in year 2035. Under the TPR, a plan
amendment or zone change results in a “significant affect” if its results listed under OAR 660-012-
0060(2)(c) are “based on projected conditions measured at the end of the planning period identified
in the adopted TSP.” The end of the planning period in the Springfield TSP is the year 2035.
Finding 34: The applicant’s TIS demonstrates that the proposed zoning of Neighborhood Commercial
will not result in any study intersections failing to meet City of Springfield mobility standards in the
projected 2035 analysis period. Thus, the applicant’s TIS demonstrates that, through the end of the
planning period in 2035, the proposed zoning map amendment will not degrade the performance of an
existing or planned facility such that is does not meet the performance standards in the Springfield TSP.
Thus, the proposed zoning map amendment does not result in a “significant affect” under OAR 660-
012-0060(2)(c).
Conclusion: Based on the above findings, the subject application proposal to change the zoning to
Neighborhood Commercial will not significantly affect an existing or planned transportation facility.
Therefore, the proposed zoning map amendment is consistent with OAR 660-012-0060 and SDC 5.22-
115C.4.b, and no additional mitigation is required under the TPR.
Conclusion: Based on the above-listed criteria, the criteria for rezoning have been met.
Conditions of Approval
SDC Section 5.22-120 allows for the Approval Authority to attach conditions of approval to a zone change
request to ensure the application fully meets the criteria of approval. The specific language from the Code
section is cited below:
5.22-120 CONDITIONS
The Approval Authority may attach conditions as may be reasonably necessary in order to allow the
Zoning Map amendment to be granted.
No Recommended Conditions of Approval.
Staff advises that the zone change request was initiated in accordance with provisions of the City’s
Development Code. The Planning Commission is requested to review and deliberate on the totality of the
submitted information and to vote on the Final Order attached hereto. The Planning Commission’s decision
is the final decision on this requested Zoning Map Amendment.
Exhibit B, Page 12 of 12
Attachment 6, Page 14 of 14