Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021 07 20 AIS Willamalane Pierce Park AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 7/20/2021 Meeting Type:Regular Meeting Staff Contact/Dept.:Melissa Cariño, DPW Staff Phone No:541.744.4068 Estimated Time: 20 minutes S P R I N G F I E L D PLANNING COMMISSION Council Goals: Promote and Enhance our Hometown Feel while Focusing on Livability and Environmental Quality ITEM TITLE: SITE PLAN REVIEW AND DISCRETIONARY USE APPLICATIONS FOR PIERCE PARK LOCATED NORTH OF THE EWEB PATHWAY AND IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR’S MAP 17-02-19-33, TAX LOT 1500. ACTION REQUESTED: Conduct a public hearing and deliberations, and approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for both a Type II Site Plan Review and a Type III discretionary use approval of a proposed neighborhood park using the Site Plan Review criteria listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.7-125 and Discretionary Use criteria listed in SDC 5.9-120. ISSUE STATEMENT: The applicant has requested a review of the Site Plan (SDC 5.7-125) and Discretionary Use criteria (SDC 5.9-120) for Pierce Park, a new Willamalane neighborhood park with a bicycle playground for kids. The applicant seeks approval of this discretionary use, a neighborhood park, in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning district. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: PC Order –811-21-000142-TYP2 and 811-21-000143-TYP3 Exhibit A: Vicinity Map for Subject Site Exhibit B: Staff Report and Findings Exhibit C: Willamalane Online Survey Response Data Exhibit D: Willamalane’s Pierce Park PowerPoint Presentation Attachment 2: Pierce Park Site Plan Set Exhibit A: Site Plan Review Application 811-21-000142-TYP2 Exhibit B: Discretionary Use Application 811-21-000143-TYP3 DISCUSSION/ FINANCIAL IMPACT: Pierce Park is proposed as a new Willamalane neighborhood park with a bicycle playground for kids. Neighborhood parks are listed as a discretionary use in the Medium Density Residential (MDR) zoning district (SDC 3.2-210). In accordance with SDC 5.9-105, the Planning Commission may approve certain uses which, due to the nature or their impact on nearby uses and public facilities, require a case-by- case review and analysis of these impacts. The Type III Discretionary Use review process is running concurrently with their Site Plan Review application for the proposed park. The Planning Commission may:  Approve the applications with conditions as presented;  Modify the findings and/or conditions of approval; or  Deny one or both of the applications based on the Commissions’ findings in response to criteria found in SDC 5.7-125 (Site Plan Review) and SDC 5.9-120 (Discretionary Use). The Planning Commission’s decision is final unless appealed to the Springfield City Council as provided in SDC 5.3-120. BEFORE THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON  FINAL ORDER FOR:    SITE PLAN REVIEW AND DISCRETIONARY USE APPLICATIONS FOR  WILLAMALANE’S NEW PIERCE PARK LOCATED NORTH OF THE EWEB  PATHWAY IDENTIFIED AS ASSESSOR’S MAP 17‐03‐24‐44, TAX LOT 2300  AND ASSESSOR’S MAP 17‐02‐19‐33, TAX LOT 1500.   ]   ]   811‐21‐000142‐TYP2 ]   811‐21‐000143‐TYP3 ]  ]      NATURE OF THE APPLICATION   Tentative Site Plan Review and Discretionary Use Approval for a new Willamalane neighborhood park  with a bicycle playground for kids on two adjacent parcels that are approximately 2.85‐acres each. The  subject site is located west of 31st Street, east of Otto Street, and just north of the EWEB pathway (Map  17‐02‐24‐44, Tax Lot 2300 and Map 17‐02‐19‐33, Tax Lot 1500).  The subject property is shown in the  Vicinity Map for the subject site, which is Exhibit A to this Order.    Timely and sufficient notice of the public hearing has been provided, pursuant to SDC 5.2‐115.    On July 20, 2021, the Springfield Planning Commission held a public hearing and conducted deliberations  on the proposed Site Plan and Discretionary Use applications. The staff report, written comments, and  any testimony of those who spoke at the public hearing were entered into the record.    CONCLUSION  On the basis of this record, the proposed Site Plan and Discretionary Use is consistent with both the Site  Plan Review criteria of SDC 5.17‐125 and the Discretionary Use criteria of SDC 5.9‐120 with specific  conditions of approval.  This general finding is supported by the specific findings of fact and conclusion  in the Staff Report and Findings, attached hereto as Exhibit B.    ORDER/RECOMMENDATION  It is ORDERED by the Springfield Planning Commission that Case Numbers 811‐21‐000142‐TYP2 Site Plan  Review application, and 811‐21‐000143‐TYP3, Discretionary Use Application, be approved as  conditioned in Exhibit B. This ORDER was presented to and approved by the Planning Commission on  July 20, 2021.      ____________________________     ____________________  Planning Commission Chairperson     Date    ATTEST  AYES:  NOES:  ABSENT:  ABSTAIN:  Attachment 1, Page 1 of 73 EXHIBIT A, Page 1 of 1 Attachment 1, Page 2 of 73 Staff Report and Findings Planning Commission Site Plan Review & Discretionary Use Applications for Pierce Park, a Neighborhood Park and Kids’ Bicycle Playground Hearing Date: July 20, 2021 Case Numbers: 811-21-000142-TYP2 (Site Plan Review) 811-21-000143-TYP3 (Discretionary Use) Applicant: Willamalane Parks & Recreation District (Willamalane) Property Owner: Willamalane Parks & Recreation District Site: Two adjacent properties (both approximately 2.85-acres each) located west of 31st Street, east of Otto Street, and just north of the Eugene Water and Electric Board (EWEB) pathway (Assessor’s Map 17-03-24-44, Tax Lot 2300 and Assessor’s Map 17-02-19- 33, Tax Lot 1500). _________________________________________________________________________________________________ REQUEST The Planning Commission is asked to conduct a public hearing and deliberations, and approve, approve with conditions, or deny a request for Discretionary Use Approval for Pierce Park, a new neighborhood park with a bicycle playground for kids. A tentative Site Plan application of Pierce Park was submitted concurrently with the Discretionary Use application. SITE INFORMATION/BACKGROUND The applicant proposes the development of a new neighborhood park and bicycle playground on two vacant parcels that total 5.7 acres, with each parcel being approximately 2.85 acres. The properties subject to this proposal are located west of 31st Street, east of Otto Street, and just north of the EWEB path. The applicant submitted their Site Plan and Discretionary Use applications on June 11, 2021. The Planning case numbers for these applications are 811-21-000142-TYP2 (Site Plan Review) and 811-21-000143-TYP3 (Discretionary Use). The proposed development site is comprised of two separate tax lots located adjacent to each other, but the zoning is not the same for both parcels. The western parcel (Assessor’s Map 17-03-24-44, Tax Lot 2300), where most of the neighborhood park amenities are located, is zoned Public Lands and Open Space (PLO). Neighborhood parks are a permitted use in the PLO zoning district, but Site Plan Review is required (SDC Section 5.17-100). The eastern parcel (Assessor’s Map 17-02-19-33, Tax Lot 1500), where the kids’ bicycle playground is located, is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) where neighborhood parks are listed as a discretionary use While the overall proposed Pierce Park (on both the eastern and western parcels) is subject to the Type II Site Plan Review process, the eastern portion (Tax Lot 1500) must also go through the Type III Discretionary Use review process because the proposed use – neighborhood park – is a discretionary use in the MDR zoning district. Therefore, the eastern parcel of the neighborhood park (where the kids’ bicycle playground is located) must meet the Type III Discretionary Use criteria in accordance with SDC 5.9-100 and obtain approval from the Planning Commission in order for the applicant to develop the entire Pierce Park as proposed. Notification and Written Comments Notification of the July 20, 2021 Planning Commission public hearing was sent to all property owners and residents within 300 feet of the outer boundary of the subject site on June 25, 2021. Notification was also published in the July 6, 2021 edition of The Register Guard. Staff also posted notices on the subject site, the City’s website, and the Digital Displays located in City Hall. EXHIBIT B, Page 1 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 3 of 73 Comments: On July 1st, City staff received an email from Sandra Holland of 3106 “W” Street who asked who was paying for the proposed park project. She is concerned whether tax dollars were being used for developing the park. Staff Response: City staff replied to Ms. Holland via email and stated that the applicant, Willamalane Parks & Recreation District, is the responsible party for funding the project. Staff offered to provide applicant contact information if she wants to find more details regarding the funding used for this park project. The applicant also responded to both Ms. Holland and City staff that funding comes from Willamalane’s System Development Charges (SDCs) rather than from property taxes. Comments from SpringfieldOregonSpeaks: On July 1st, Scott Miller of 3390 Parker Lane left a comment sharing that the proposed park plans look great but suggests the applicant consider using pavement for the bike skills park [bicycle playground] instead of gravel as he believes gravel will require more maintenance. “I know that pavement is more expensive, but gravel will require more ongoing maintenance. Also with a large number of riders going over the same spots, it will be subject to rutting and damage, especially if people ride it during wet weather. For comparison, mountain biking trails are often shut down during the rainy season to prevent damage, and even when they are opened up riders are strongly encouraged to avoid puddles. In order to keep it open year-round and in good condition, pavement would be much better.” Staff Response: Mr. Miller’s comment and suggestion relates to Criterion B.1 for Discretionary Use applications, which covers the location, size, design and operating characteristics of the use. While the applicant appreciates the suggestion, the company that designs the bicycle skills course prefers to use dirt paths so Willamalane’s proposal to use gravel is an upgrade. Because the bicycle playground is aimed at youth, turns and jumps on pavement is more extreme than what is needed for this age group. The applicant understands that weather and use may still have a negative impact on the gravel trails, and they will strive to maintain the course to remain in good condition. Lastly, the use of pavement for these trails would make the overall Pierce Park project cost prohibitive. * * * On April 16, 2020, the Governor issued Executive Order 20-16, which requires governing bodies to hold public meetings and hearings by telephone, video, or through other electronic or virtual means whenever possible. The governing body must make available a method by which the public can listen to or virtually attend the public meeting or hearing at the time it occurs. Executive Order 20-16 allows governing bodies to accept public testimony by telephone, video, or other virtual or electronic means, or to provide a means to submit written testimony (including email or other electronic methods) that the governing body can consider in a timely manner. Executive Order 20-16 overrides conflicting requirements for quasi-judicial public hearings in state law or in the Springfield Development Code or Metro Plan. The July 20th public hearing is being conducted via online meeting platform that allows members of the public to listen to the meeting online or by calling a toll-free number. Members of the public may provide testimony to the Planning Commission by joining the online meeting remotely. Details regarding how to join the online meeting were provided in the Planning Commission meeting agenda and posted on the SpringfieldOregonSpeaks online platform1. Criteria of Approval A Discretionary Use may be approved only if the Planning Commission finds that the proposal conforms with the Site Plan Review criteria of approval in SDC 5.17-125 and the applicable Discretionary Use criteria in SDC 5.9-120. CRITERIA OF DISCRETIONARY USE APPROVAL SDC 5.9-120 contains the Discretionary Use criteria that are applicable to this application. The applicable discretionary criteria from this section are as follows: 1 SpringfieldOregonSpeaks can be accessed at https://springfieldoregonspeaks.org EXHIBIT B, Page 2 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 4 of 73 A. The proposed use conforms with applicable: 1. Provisions of the Metro Plan; 2. Refinement plans; 3. Plan District standards; 4. Conceptual Development Plans or 5. Specific Development Standards in this Code. Finding 1: The applicable documents that this proposed use must conform to include the Metro Plan, the Willamalane 2012 Comprehensive Plan, and the Specific Development Standards for Public Land and Open Space (PLO) section of the Springfield Development Code (SDC 4.7-203). There are no Plan District Standards or Conceptual Development Plans that apply to this proposed subject site. Finding 2: The subject site is in a neighborhood located in the northern part of Springfield that has no City-adopted Refinement Plan; therefore, Refinement Plans do not apply for this subject site. Finding 3: The applicable policies from the Parks and Recreation Facilities Element of the Metro Plan include: (H.2) Local parks and recreation plans and analyses shall be prepared by each jurisdiction and coordinated on a metropolitan level. The park standards adopted by the applicable city and incorporated into the city’s development code shall be used in local development processes; and (H.5) Develop mechanisms and processes by which residents of an area to be served by a neighborhood park, neighborhood center, or play lot can participate in the design, development, and maintenance of the facility. Finding 4: The 2012 Willamalane Comprehensive Plan meets Policy H.2 because it is a refinement of the Eugene- Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan. The plan lists various projects that require ongoing coordination and collaboration with public agencies, non-profit organizations, and the private sector. The Springfield Development Code (SDC) has incorporated park standards to be used in the local development processes listed in Section 4.7-200 for both public and private parks. Pierce Park proposal is designated as a neighborhood park in the adopted 2012 Willamalane Comprehensive Plan. SDC 4.7-200.B.3 requires that a community park be designated on a Park Facilities Plan adopted by the City, and be approved in accordance with Type III review procedure (Discretionary Use). The Willamalane’s Comprehensive Plan was co-adopted by the City and serves as the Park Facilities Plan. As required, Pierce Park as and is being considered for Discretionary Use approval, a Type III review procedure. Finding 5: The applicant conducted community outreach in the Fall of 2020 by engaging nearby community members through a virtual meeting, social media, and an online survey (See Attachment 1, Exhibits C & D) where respondents could provide the applicant with feedback and suggestions to the proposed conceptual Pierce Park to conform to Policy H.5. The applicant received no negative comments about the proposed bicycle playground, and only 12% of respondents said they would drive to the park. Moreover, the applicant – as part of the City’s review process – provided public written notice, welcomed online comments on the City’s SpringfieldOregonSpeaks2 platform, and is inviting participation in a public hearing at a regular Planning Commission meeting. Finding 6: In accordance with the Metro Plan’s Parks and Recreation Facilities Element, the proposed Pierce Park development is proposed as a neighborhood park, and the applicant’s proposal conforms to Policies H.2and H.5. Finding 7: The proposed Pierce Park is listed in the Willamalane 2012 Comprehensive Plan as Project #1.1 Pierce Park Development and Project #1.2 Pierce Park Expansion (Chapter 4, Table 1: Neighborhood Parks Actions). Actions include working with Springfield Public Schools for coordinated development of outdoor recreation areas 2 https://springfieldoregonspeaks.org EXHIBIT B, Page 3 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 5 of 73 with the schools located north of the subject site as well as the City of Springfield for coordinated park planning with the adjacent Marcola Meadows development. Finding 8: The following Special Development Standards listed in SDC 4.7-203, “Public Land and Open Space,” apply to this proposed development project because a portion of the park is within the Public Land and Open Space zoning district:  (A) Primary access shall be on arterial or collector streets except as provided or exempted elsewhere in SDC Section 3.2-700;  (B) Stadiums, swimming pools, and other major noise generators shall be located at least 30 feet from residential property lines and shall be screened by a noise attenuating barrier; and  (D) For all special uses, a traffic impact study shall be prepared as specified in SDC Section 4.2-105B. Finding 9: Anticipated access to the proposed neighborhood park will mostly come from Otto Street from the west, the Eugene Water & Electric Board (EWEB) pathway from the south, and 31st Street from the east. While 31st Street is classified as a collector street, the proposed neighborhood park is not accessible directly from 31st Street and must be accessed via the EWEB pathway that connects to 31st Street. To meet SDC 4.7-203.A, the applicant must provide signage that instructs visitors on how to access Pierce Park from 31st Street and the EWEB pathway as the primary entrance to the park prior to Final Site Plan approval. Finding 10: The proposed neighborhood park includes various amenities such as a basketball court, walking paths, a picnic shelter, and a bicycle playground for kids. The neighborhood park is not considered to be a major noise generator to nearby residential properties located to the north and south of the parcel as described in SDC 4.7-203.B by the applicant because the anticipated noise would not be greater than existing City playgrounds. Despite this, the applicant shows on their proposed site plans that a buffer area between the bicycle playground tracks to residential properties to the north of at least 30 feet, with landscaping and a gravel walking path located in between. Because of the EWEB pathway and open space planned between the pathway and the Marcola Meadows residential subdivision to the south, the applicant provides more than a 30-foot buffer. Finding 11: In accordance with SDC 4.2-105.B.4 and SDC 4.7-200.B.4, a traffic impact and/or parking study must be prepared by a Traffic Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. A traffic impact assessment (TIA) is required if more than 1,000 average daily trips or 100 peak hour trips are anticipated with the proposed use. The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 10th Generation handbook lists the rate for Average Daily Trips (ADT) would be 0.78 per acre under a public park, and the weekday PM peak generator average rate is 0.11 per acre. Finding 12: As a public park, the ITE handbook takes into consideration that most people will not drive to public neighborhood parks. The total trip generation expected for the site is approximately 5 average trips per day and less than one peak hour trip. Therefore, a TIA or parking study was not warranted in accordance with SDC 4.2-105.B. . Condition of Approval: 1. To meet SDC 4.7-203.A, the applicant must provide signage that instructs visitors on how to access Pierce Park from 31st Street and the EWEB pathway as the primary entrance to the park prior to Final Site Plan approval. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, this proposal meets Criterion A for Discretionary Use review. EXHIBIT B, Page 4 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 6 of 73 B. The site under consideration is suitable for the proposed use, considering: 1. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the use (operating characteristics include but are not limited to parking, traffic, noise, vibration, emissions, light, glare, odor, dust, visibility, safety, and aesthetic considerations, where applicable); 2. Adequate and safe circulation exists for vehicular access to and from the proposed site, and on-site circulation and emergency response as well as pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation; 3. The natural and physical features of the site, including but not limited to, riparian areas, regulated wetlands, natural stormwater management/drainage areas and wooded areas must be adequately considered in the project design; and 4. Adequate public facilities and services are available, including but not limited to, utilities, streets, storm drainage facilities, sanitary sewer and other public infrastructure. Finding 13: The proposed development site consists of two vacant 2.85-acre parcels adjacent to each other for a total of 5.7 acres for Pierce Park. The applicant provides the following park amenities with their proposal: play areas, picnic shelter with tables, central gathering space, bicycle playground and skills course for kids, basketball court, playground, walking trails, and stormwater management facilities. The development site is suitable for the neighborhood park use through its location to nearby residences, public schools, and the existing EWEB pathway. The size of the proposed development site is large enough to accommodate all the proposed park design. Finding 14: The proposed neighborhood park on the subject site impacts other operating characteristics including parking, light/glare, visibility/safety, and aesthetic considerations. The applicant is not providing additional off- street parking for Pierce Park so there may be an impact of more cars parked on public streets to access the park. The applicant addresses light/glare and visibility/safety with their lighting plan and proposed light fixture specifications and locations in order to limit the level of glare to adjacent residential properties surrounding the park as well as provide visibility and safety of certain park areas (e.g. central meeting spot, picnic shelter, etc.) during hours of darkness. The applicant also provides a detailed Landscaping Plan, which provides for aesthetic considerations for the park. Finding 15: The proposed development site can be accessed by vehicles from either Otto Street to the west or 31st Street to the east. There are no proposed buildings for this site that require fire protection or access because the picnic shelter will be an open metal structure with metal tables. As can be seen on the Site Plan (Sheets C2.00 and C2.01), the applicant provides on-site circulation with multiple pedestrian and bicycle paths throughout the proposed park. Finding 16: While the proposed development site does not contain any protected riparian areas or significant wetlands, the applicant proposes to retain many existing trees on-site as well as the existing stormwater management facility (swale at the western end) in the park design. Finding 17: On Sheet C4.00, the applicant provides a drainage and utility plan, which shows connections to water for the proposed irrigation system and drinking fountain for the western parcel. The applicant does not provide any connections to the public sanitary sewer as there are no bathrooms proposed in the entire park. On Sheet C5.00, the applicant provides an Electrical/Lighting Plan for the western parcel. The applicant is already in discussion with SUB Water and Electric to coordinate connections. EXHIBIT B, Page 5 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 7 of 73 Finding 18: The proposed development site is accessible from public streets (Otto Street and 31st Street) and the EWEB pathway, which is used by bicyclists and pedestrians and provides connections from the path to Pierce Park. In addition, the subject site is also accessible by public transportation with Lane Transit District’s #17 and #18 bus lines running about a 20-minute walk away near the 19th Street and Hayden Bridge Road intersection to the west. Finding 19: In addition to the existing stormwater mitigation and drainage facilities (swale along western end), the applicant also proposes that the majority of on-site stormwater be directed to run off into adjacent landscape areas with grass or shrubs. On Sheet C4.00, the applicant states that runoff from larger impervious surfaces (e.g. picnic shelter, basketball court) will be directed into grassy swales consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). Conclusion: As proposed, this application meets Criterion B for Discretionary Use review because the proposed development site has access to adequate and available public facilities and services, including utilities, streets, storm drainage facilities, and other public infrastructure Finding 20: The applicant has begun work with the SUB Electric Division to determine best locations for transformers and connections. The applicant proposes a 2” conduit for electrical service to the subject site, which will be used for on-site light poles, electrical, and communication services. SUB Electric confirmed that its existing transformer located at the end of Otto Street already has the capacity to handle the proposed neighborhood park’s electrical needs and will work with the applicant on the installation of an electrical enclosure for the connection from Otto Street. Finding 21: Both SUB Water and Electric Divisions will coordinate with the City to avoid any anticipated utility conflicts with other public facilities. Finding 22: Based on the applicant’s submittal, the existing water and electrical facilities are adequate for the proposed development. Finding 23: In accordance with SDC 4.3-125, wherever possible, all utility lines must be placed underground. Additionally, vaults and transformers for utility connections along the street frontage should be screened from view or placed out of sight at the side or rear of buildings. The applicant shows all utility connections and lines to serve Pierce Park as being placed underground on both the Utility Plan and Electrical/Lighting Plan. The applicant also depicts vegetative screening on the Landscaping Plans from the Otto Street frontage on the western end of the proposed neighborhood park in accordance with SDC 4.4-110.B. Conditions of Approval: 2. In accordance with SDC 3.3-200, contractors/developers/owners must be responsible for the safe handling and storage of chemicals, petroleum products, fertilizers, and the prevention of groundwater and stormwater runoff contamination. Special requirements may be necessary for groundwater protection at this development. Development Advisory: Any water-related items affecting the development will need to be coordinated through SUB Water Division independently from any items or submittal that may be required by the City. The applicant must continue to work with the SUB Water Division at 541-726-2396 for detailed information regarding any water service(s) to the proposed development site. Conclusion: The existing SUB Water and Electric facilities are adequate to serve the site. As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. EXHIBIT B, Page 6 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 8 of 73 Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater Management Facilities Sanitary Sewer Finding 24: Section 4.3-105.A of the SDC requires that sanitary sewers must be installed to serve each new development and to connect developments to existing mains. Additionally, installation of sanitary sewers must provide sufficient access for maintenance activities. Finding 25: No sanitary sewer connection is proposed or required for this proposed park development. The park has no restrooms or trash enclosures as proposed. Therefore, SDC 4.3-105 does not apply to this application. Conclusion: As proposed, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Stormwater Management (Quantity) Finding 26: SDC 4.3-110.B requires that the Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Development & Public Works Director, consistent with the EDSPM. Finding 27: SDC 4.3-110.C states that a stormwater management system must accommodate potential run-off from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the development. Finding 28: SDC 4.3-110.D requires that runoff from a development must be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Finding 29: SDC 4.3-110.E requires new developments to employ drainage management practices that minimize the amount and rate of surface water runoff into receiving streams, and that promote water quality. Finding 30: To comply with Sections 4.3-110.D & E, stormwater runoff from the limited impervious surface areas on-site will be directed into an existing grassy swale at the western edge of the development site where it will infiltrate. The existing City-owned swale at the western edge of the development site will be retained in its current configuration and does not have the capacity for any increased stormwater runoff. Most of the development site’s new stormwater runoff from proposed impervious surface areas will be directed to either grassy or landscaped areas. Isolated walkways will not generate any significant runoff. Conclusion: As proposed, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Stormwater Management (Quality) Finding 31: Under Federal regulation of the Clean Water Act (CWA), Endangered Species Act (ESA), and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), the City of Springfield has obtained a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit. A provision of this permit requires the City to demonstrate efforts to reduce the pollution in urban stormwater to the Maximum Extent Practicable (MEP). Finding 32: Federal and Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) rules require the City’s MS4 plan to address six “Minimum Control Measures”. Minimum Control Measure 5, “Post-Construction Stormwater Management for New Development and Redevelopment”, applies to the proposed development. Finding 33: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to develop, implement and enforce a program to ensure the reduction of pollutants in stormwater runoff to the MEP. The City also must develop and implement strategies that include a combination of structural or non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) appropriate for the community. EXHIBIT B, Page 7 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 9 of 73 Finding 34: Minimum Control Measure 5 requires the City of Springfield to use an ordinance or other regulatory mechanism to address post-construction runoff from new and re-development projects to the extent allowable under State law. Regulatory mechanisms used by the City include the SDC, the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM) and the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SFMP). Finding 35: As required in SDC 4.3-110.E, “a development shall be required to employ drainage management practices approved by the Public Works Director and consistent with the Metro Plan policies and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual.” Finding 36: Section 3.01 of the City’s EDSPM states the Development & Public Works Department will accept, as interim design standards for stormwater quality, water quality facilities designed pursuant to the policies and procedures of the City’s EDSPM and the City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. Finding 37: Sections 3.02 of the City’s EDSPM states all public and private development and redevelopment projects must employ a system of one or more post-developed BMPs that in combination are designed to achieve at least a 70 percent reduction in the total suspended solids in the runoff generated by the development. Section 3.03.4.E of the manual requires a minimum of 50 percent of the non-building rooftop impervious area on a site must be treated for stormwater quality improvement using vegetative methods. Finding 38: To meet the requirements of the City’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the City’s EDSPM, the applicant proposes grassy infiltration swales for the picnic shelter and basketball court. No other significant impervious areas are proposed for the neighborhood park. Finding 39: To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the EDSPM, the proposed stormwater management area must be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final Site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant must provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until the vegetation becomes fully established. Condition of Approval: 3. To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the EDSPM, the proposed stormwater management area must be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final Site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant must provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until the vegetation becomes fully established. Development Advisory: In accordance with SDC 4.3-110.B, the property owner or their designee must be responsible for ongoing and perpetual maintenance of the private stormwater facilities on the site to ensure they function as designed and intended, and to ensure protection of groundwater resources. Annual maintenance records must be kept by the property owner or their designee and provided to the City for review upon reasonable request – normally within five business days. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Streets and Traffic Safety Controls Finding 40: SDC 4.2-105.G.2 requires that whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on the City street system and that development has unimproved street frontage abutting a fully improved street, that street frontage must be fully improved to City specifications. EXHIBIT B, Page 8 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 10 of 73 Finding 41: The construction access is proposed at the end of Otto Street where there is an existing driveway ramp along the western parcel’s street frontage. This driveway will not serve as a future public vehicle access point, but it will be retained for construction and maintenance. Finding 42: Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show some method for controlling public entry to the park using the existing driveway ramp and limiting motor vehicle access. In accordance with SDC 4.2-160.C, the applicant must bear the cost of accessway improvements. City staff recommend placing bollards or installing a gate at that location to control and limit motor vehicle access. Finding 43: The proposed transportation facilities (public sidewalks, pathways/accessways, bike paths, bicycle parking) are adequate to accommodate the anticipated pedestrian and bicycle traffic patterns generated by the development in a safe and efficient manner. Finding 44: The length of Otto Street along the subject property’s frontage is already fully improved with curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street trees. Conditions of Approval: 4. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show some method for controlling public entry to the park using the existing driveway ramp and limiting motor vehicle access. In accordance with SDC 4.2-160.C, the applicant must bear the cost of accessway improvements. City staff recommend placing bollards or installing a gate at that location to control and limit motor vehicle access. Development Advisory: In accordance with the Springfield Municipal Code (SMC) Section 3.208, the applicant and contractor must obtain an encroachment permit for the access location at the end of Otto Street for any traffic control into the site or for any needed restoration/repair of the sidewalk or driveway at the conclusion of utility installation and construction of the neighborhood park. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. C. The proposed development must comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Finding 45: Criterion C contains three different elements with sub-elements and applicable code standards. The Site Plan application, as submitted, complies with the code standards listed under each sub-element unless otherwise noted with specific findings and conclusions. The applicable elements, sub-elements, and code standards of Criterion C include but are not limited to: 1. Infrastructure and Development Standards in accordance SDC 4.1-100, 4.2-100, 4.4-100, 4.3-100, 4.4-100, 4.5-100, and 4.6-100  Water Service and Fire Protection (4.3-130)  Public Easements (4.3-140)  Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards (4.4-105, 4.4-110, 4.4-115)  On-Site Lighting Standards (4.5-100)  Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards (4.6-100) 2. Conformance with standards of SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, SDC 3.2-700 Public Land and Open Space (PLO) Zoning District, SDC 3.2-200 Medium Density Residential (MDR) Zoning District, and SDC 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards  Establishment of Public Land and Open Space (PLO) Zoning District (3.2-705)  PLO Zoning District – Use Categories (3.2-710)  PLO Development Standards (3.2-715) EXHIBIT B, Page 9 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 11 of 73  Establishment of Residential Zoning Districts (3.2-205)  Residential Zoning District – Primary and Secondary Uses (3.2-210)  Medium Density Residential (MDR) Development Standards (3.2-215) 3. Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements  Drinking Water Protection Overlay District (3.3-200) C.1 Public and Private Improvements in accordance with SDC 4.1-100, 4.2-100, 4.4-100, 4.3-100, 4.4-100, 4.5-100, and 4.6-100 Water Service and Fire Protection (4.3-130) Water Supply Finding 46: The Springfield Fire Code requirement for fire hydrant locations states that hydrant(s) need to be within 400 feet of any proposed non-sprinklered building as measured to the furthest point on the building along an approved route. This requirement applies only to non-sprinklered building being constructed on-site. The only building proposed on this site is a non-sprinklered metal picnic shelter (2014 Springfield Fire Code 507.5.1). Because the metal picnic shelter is more than 400 feet from the closet fire hydrant, the applicant must obtain approval for a Fire Code Modification for the metal picnic shelter. Access Finding 47: All fire apparatus access routes are to be paved all-weather surfaces able to support an 80,000-lb. imposed load in accordance with the 2014 Springfield Fire Code (SFC) 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1. Additionally, all water hydrants must meet the 1500 gallons per minute (gpm) as required by the Fire Code. Finding 48: In accordance with SFC 912.3, immediate access to fire department connections must always be maintained and without obstruction by fences, trees, shrubs, walls or any other objects. Finding 49: At least three (3) feet of clear space must be maintained around the circumference of all fire hydrants in accordance with SFC 507.5.5. Working space around fire department connections must be maintained 3 feet in width on both sides of the connection point; 3 feet in depth in front of the connection; and 78 inches in height above the connection in accordance with SFC 912.3.2. Finding 50: Because the proposed metal picnic shelter is located more than the required 400 feet from the closest fire hydrant, the Eugene-Springfield Fire Marshal’s Office has determined that the applicant must provide a Fire Code Modification application to modify the fire apparatus access and water supply requirements for Pierce Park’s picnic shelter. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must obtain Fire Code Modification approval and provide evidence to the City in accordance with the Springfield Fire Code. Condition of Approval: 5. Because the proposed metal picnic shelter is located more than the required 400 feet from the closest fire hydrant, the Eugene-Springfield Fire Marshal’s Office has determined that the applicant must provide a Fire Code Modification application to modify the fire apparatus access and water supply requirements for Pierce Park’s picnic shelter. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must obtain Fire Code Modification approval and provide evidence to the City in accordance with the Springfield Fire Code. Conclusion: As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. EXHIBIT B, Page 10 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 12 of 73 Public and Private Easements (4.3-120 – 4.3-140) Finding 51: SDC 4.3-130.A requires each development area to be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish adequate supply to the development and provide sufficient access for maintenance. SUB Water and Electric divisions coordinate the design of the water system and location of easements within Springfield city limits through their design process with the applicant. Finding 52: SDC 4.3-140.A requires applicants proposing developments to make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area. The minimum width for public utility easements (PUEs) adjacent to street rights-of-way (ROW) and internal to private properties must be 7-feet, unless the Development & Public Works (DPW) Director requires a larger easement to allow for adequate maintenance access. Finding 53: The applicant proposes utility connections at the end of Otto Street where the subject site has street frontage. These utility connections include electricity and water to serve the neighborhood park. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show a 7-foot wide PUE along the property line adjacent to the Otto Street ROW, which allows adequate maintenance access and therefore meets this requirement. Condition of Approval 6. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show a 7-foot wide PUE along the property line adjacent to the Otto Street ROW, which allows adequate maintenance access of electrical and water utilities in accordance with SDC 4.3-140.A. Conclusion: Safe and efficient provision of public access and utilities requires the provision of corresponding access and utility easements. As conditioned herein, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Landscaping, Screening, and Fence Standards (4.4-105, 4.4-110, 4.4-115) Finding 54: The applicant provides two required types of landscaping in their proposal along the Otto Street frontage: (1) adding a street tree; and (2) improving the curbside landscape strip. Because the proposal is for a neighborhood park, the applicant proposes that over 96% of the park be landscaped and provides a detailed landscaping plan and irrigation system in the proposal (Sheets L1.00 , L1.01, L1.50, L2.00, and L2.50) thereby meeting the applicable landscaping standards of SDC 4.4-205. Finding 55: In accordance with SDC 4.4-110.A, screening is not required for this proposed development. However, the applicant still provides screening along its northern boundary with existing trees, landscaping, and a 6-foot chain link fence. Finding 56: In accordance with SDC 4.4-115, the applicant proposes a compliant 6-foot high chain link fence to replace the existing fence along the property line separating the Pierce Park and Briggs Middle School to the north. The new fence will have a controlled access by the school. On-Site Lighting Standards (4.5-100) Finding 57: In accordance with the standards listed in SDC 4.5-100, the applicant provides an Electrical & Lighting Plan (Sheet C5.00). The plan intends to create a safe and secure environment during hours of darkness as well as reduce and prevent light pollution by minimizing glare to nearby residential properties. The applicant also includes compliant lighting specifications as an attachment to the written narrative. Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards (4.6-100) Finding 58: The Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Manual does not include information for neighborhood parks and motor vehicle parking. However, the Springfield Transportation Plan requires recreational EXHIBIT B, Page 11 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 13 of 73 facilities to have 1 vehicular parking space for each 100 sq. ft. of floor area for primary assembly and 1 parking space for the rest of the floor area in accordance with the Springfield Development Code (SDC) Table 4.6-2. Finding 59: While the proposed Pierce Park can be considered a recreational facility, there are no enclosed indoor spaces on which to calculate floor area and the respective required motor vehicle parking. Furthermore, because the applicant is emphasizing that Pierce Park is a neighborhood park, where most visitors will access as pedestrians or on bicycle, and is not proposing any restrooms to serve the park, there is no motor vehicle parking proposed with this application. The applicant does not provide a parking study with their application because the proposed park does not trigger any parking requirements. Finding 60: Because there are no enclosed indoor spaces and no restrooms as part of this application, the applicant does not include any loading areas that trigger the requirements of SDC 4.6-130 and 4.6-135. Finding 61: Bicycle parking requirements still apply to the Pierce Park application in accordance with SDC 4.6-140 – 4.6-155 and require at least 8 bicycle parking spaces. The applicant proposes 16 short-term bicycle parking spaces exceeding the requirement listed in Table 4.6-3 for parks and playgrounds. While the application is for one neighborhood park, they consider the two parcels and different uses on the parcels to serve as two separate parks for the purpose of the bicycle parking requirements, thereby providing twice the required bicycle parking. Finding 62: Bike parking is depicted on Sheet 2.00 with one set of parking spaces located south of the central gathering space and another set located on the eastern edge of the western parcel where the neighborhood park transitions from the park facilities to the bicycle playground for kids. Finding 63: The applicant plans to utilize and install inverted U-shape racks that are powder coated and attached to concrete pads. The bicycle parking areas are located adjacent to internal park sidewalks to avoid conflict with pedestrians. The applicant must ensure that the bicycle parking facilities meet the design standards listed in SDC 4.6- 145 so that the parking spaces function as planned and accommodate all 16 bicycle parking spaces. The bicycle parking facilities will also be checked during the Final Site Inspection. Conclusion: As proposed, the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. C.2 Conformance with Standards of SDC 5.17-100, Site Plan Review, SDC 3.2-700, Public Land & Open Space (PLO) Zoning District, and SDC 3.2-200, Residential Zoning Districts Establishment of Public Land and Open Space (PLO) Zoning District (3.2-705) Finding 64: In accordance with SDC 3.2-705, PLO districts are established to include the following categories: (1) Government uses, including public offices and facilities; (2) Educational uses, including high schools and colleges; and (3) Parks and open space uses including publicly owned metropolitan and regional scale parks as well as publicly or privately owned golf courses and cemeteries. The PLO district must also be permitted on properties designated other than Public and Semi-Public as specified in the Metro Plan, a refinement plan, or plan district. Finding 65: The western 2.85-acre parcel fronting Otto Street is designated and zoned PLO in accordance with the Metro Plan and the Zoning Map Diagram (Assessor’s Map 17-03-24-44, Tax Lot 2300). Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. PLO Zoning District – Use Categories (3.2-710) Finding 66: In accordance with SDC 3.2-710, neighborhood parks are a permitted use in the PLO district. The applicant’s proposal for Pierce Park complies with the permitted use categories for the western parcel. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. EXHIBIT B, Page 12 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 14 of 73 PLO Development Standards (3.2-715) Finding 67: In accordance with SDC 3.2-715, the applicant’s proposal meets the minimum parcel size, landscape requirements and coverage, street setbacks, residential property line setbacks, and building heights for uses in the PLO district. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Establishment of Residential Zoning Districts (3.2-205) Finding 68: In accordance with SDC 3.2-205.C.1, the Medium Density Residential (MDR) District establishes sites for multi-family dwellings with a density range of 14 to 28 dwelling units per net acre. Conclusion: This application is not for residential use; therefore, this sub-element of the criterion does not apply. Residential Zoning District – Primary and Secondary Uses (3.2-210) Finding 69: While the western parcel is zoned PLO, the eastern parcel (Assessor’s Map 17-02-19- 33, Tax Lot 1500) is zoned Medium Density Residential (MDR) where neighborhood parks are listed as a Discretionary Use with Special Development Standards in SDC 3.2-210. There is no secondary use proposed in this application. Conclusion: As proposed, the application satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. Medium Density Residential (MDR) Development Standards (3.2-215) Finding 70: In accordance with SDC 3.2-215, the minimum size for an MDR parcel on an east-west street is 4,500 ft2 with 60 feet of street frontage. The subject property proposed for development and zoned MDR exceeds the requirement for parcel area with an area of 2.85 acres. Finding 71: In accordance with Footnote #15 of SDC 3.2-215, lot areas and dimensions may be reduced through the subdivision application process if density and open space standards can be met. For the proposed neighborhood park use, there are no density requirements for the MDR zoned property. Open space requirements are met with this proposal because the majority of the subject site serving as open space exceeds the 55% minimum parcel coverage in accordance with SDC 3.2-215 for the MDR zoned property. Conclusion: The proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. C.3 Overlay Districts and Applicable Refinement Plan Requirements Drinking Water Protection Overlay District (3.3-200) Finding 72: The subject site is located within the mapped 1-year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) for the Pierce drinking water wellhead. Because the project is a public neighborhood park, the project has already been granted a Drinking Water Exemption from the SUB Drinking Water Source Protection Department. However, as a “Best Practices” recommendation for this site, the applicant is encourage to take care during site construction and operation to prevent contamination from chemicals that may spill or leak onto the ground surface, including fuel and automotive fluids (such as lubricants and antifreeze, etc.). Fluid-containing equipment, including vehicles parked on the site, should be monitored for leaks and spills. Any chemical spills or leaks must be cleaned up immediately and cleanup materials disposed off-site in accordance with Lane County and State DEQ requirements. Finding 73: The applicant submitted a DWP Exemption application in early July and was granted approval. As a condition of the DWP Exemption approval, Drinking Wellhead Protection construction notes must be included in the construction documents prior to Final Site Plan approval. A minimum number of two “You are in Springfield’s EXHIBIT B, Page 13 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 15 of 73 Drinking Water Protection Area” signs must be posted permanently at the park at locations to be determined in consultation with SUB. WELLHEAD PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION NOTES: ꞏ DNAPL Prohibition: The contractor and all subcontractors are required to provide the owner’s engineer with copies of SDSs for all chemicals proposed for use on-site prior to use or delivery to the property. Based on these SDSs, the engineer will determine if the chemical is approved for use on this site (i.e., whether or not the product contains DNAPLs). The engineer may contact the SUB Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator (541-744-3745) with any questions about evaluating products for DNAPLs. ꞏ Any chemical spills or leaks must be cleaned up immediately and clean-up materials disposed off-site and in accordance with Lane County and DEQ requirements. In every case, care shall be taken to prevent groundwater contamination. ꞏ Chemical handling, storage, and use: Contractors/developers shall be responsible for the safe handling and storage of chemicals, petroleum products, and fertilizers and the prevention of groundwater and storm water runoff contamination. Chemicals used during construction, including paint and cleaning materials/wastes, must not enter the soil or be washed into the storm water system. All chemicals should be stored in adequate secondary containment. ꞏ Equipment maintenance and fueling: Precautions must be taken to prevent fluid-containing equipment located outside from leaking, including providing a dedicated area for fueling and maintenance of equipment. This area should be prepared and maintained in a way that prevents spills or leaks from migrating to the soil or storm water drainage system. ꞏ No fill materials containing hazardous materials shall be used on this site. Condition of Approval: 7. As part of the DWP Exemption approval, Drinking Wellhead Protection construction notes must be included in the construction documents prior to Final Site Plan approval. A minimum number of two “You are in Springfield’s Drinking Water Protection Area” signs must be posted permanently at the park at locations to be determined in consultation with SUB. Development Advisory: As a “Best Practices” recommendation for this site, care must be taken during site construction and operation to prevent contamination from chemicals that may spill or leak onto the ground surface, including fuel and automotive fluids (such as lubricants and antifreeze, etc.). Fluid-containing equipment, including vehicles parked on the site, must be monitored for leaks and spills. Any chemical spills or leaks must be cleaned up immediately and cleanup materials disposed off-site in accordance with Lane County and State department of Environmental Quality requirements. Conclusion: As conditioned herein the proposal satisfies this sub-element of the criterion. D. Parking areas and ingress-egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize curb cuts on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Finding 74: Installation of driveways on a street increases the number of traffic conflict points. The greater number of conflict points increases the probability of traffic crashes. Effective ways to reduce the probability of traffic crashes include the following: reducing the number of driveways, increasing distances between intersections and driveways, EXHIBIT B, Page 14 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 16 of 73 and establishing adequate vision clearance areas where driveways intersect streets. Each of these techniques permits a longer, less cluttered sight distance for the motorist, reduces the number and difficulty of decisions that drivers must make, and contributes to increased traffic safety. Finding 75: In accordance with SDC 4.2-120.C, site driveways must be designed to allow for safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5, the City’s EDSPM, and the City’s Standard Construction Specifications. Ingress-egress points must be planned to facilitate traffic and pedestrian safety, avoid congestion, and minimize curb cuts on public streets. Finding 76: The applicant does not propose any site access driveways for the neighborhood park since there is no public motor vehicular access into the park nor any parking spaces provided. Access to/from the site will come from the sidewalk at the end of Otto Street, the EWEB pathway that runs along the southern boundary of the proposed park, and through nearby residential areas including the new Marcola Meadows residential development to the south. Finding 77: The proposed site plan provides for pedestrian connectivity between Otto Street, all proposed park amenities, the bicycle playground, and the EWEB path through the use of public sidewalks, multi-use path, internal park sidewalks and paths, and other pedestrian/bicycle accessways. Conclusion: As proposed, the application satisfies this criterion. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas; wetlands; rock outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, must be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Finding 78: The Natural Resources Study, the Springfield Local Wetland and Riparian Inventory, Floodplain Areas, and the list of Historic Landmark Sites have been consulted, and there are no natural features or resources on the property that warrant additional protection that have already been outlined in this staff report. Finding 79: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on or near the subject site. The subject site does not have any unstable conditions or rock outcroppings. As for clusters of trees, the applicant shows retention of some existing trees along the northern property boundary as depicted in the Landscaping Plan (Sheets L1.00 , L1.01, L1.50, L2.00, and L2.50). While the subject site is mostly vacant, the nature of the proposed use – a neighborhood park – the site plan provides more than the minimum amount of open space required. Conclusion: As proposed, the proposed development provides storm and ground water quality protection in accordance with SDC 3.3-200 and receiving streams have been protected in accordance with SDC 4.3-110 and 4.3- 115. CONCLUSION: Based on the above-listed criteria, City staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide a conditional approval of the proposal because it meets the Site Plan Review criteria as listed in SDC 5.17-125 as well as the Discretionary Use (SDC 5.9-120). CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL SDC Sections 5.7-130 and 5.9-125 allows for the Approval Authority to attach conditions of approval to a Site Plan Review and Discretionary Use review request to ensure the application fully meets the applicable criteria of approval: EXHIBIT B, Page 15 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 17 of 73 SUMMARY OF CONDITIONS: 1. To meet SDC 4.7-203.A, the applicant must provide signage that instructs visitors on how to access Pierce Park from 31st Street and the EWEB pathway as the primary entrance to the park prior to Final Site Plan approval. 2. In accordance with SDC 3.3-200, contractors/developers/owners must be responsible for the safe handling and storage of chemicals, petroleum products, fertilizers, and the prevention of groundwater and stormwater runoff contamination. Special requirements may be necessary for groundwater protection at this development. 3. To ensure a fully functioning water quality system and meet objectives of Springfield’s MS4 permit, the Springfield Development Code, and the EDSPM, the proposed stormwater management area must be fully vegetated with all vegetation species established prior to approval of Final Site inspection. Alternatively, if this condition cannot be met, the applicant must provide and maintain additional interim erosion control/water quality measures acceptable to the Public Works Department that will suffice until the vegetation becomes fully established. 4. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show some method for controlling public entry to the park using the existing driveway ramp and limiting motor vehicle access. In accordance with SDC 4.2-160.C, the applicant must bear the cost of accessway improvements. City staff recommend placing bollards or installing a gate at that location to control and limit motor vehicle access. 5. Because the proposed metal picnic shelter is located more than the required 400 feet from the closest fire hydrant, the Eugene-Springfield Fire Marshal’s Office has determined that the applicant must provide a Fire Code Modification application to modify the fire apparatus access and water supply requirements for Pierce Park’s picnic shelter. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must obtain Fire Code Modification approval and provide evidence to the City in accordance with the Springfield Fire Code. 6. Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the applicant must show a 7-foot wide PUE along the property line adjacent to the Otto Street ROW, which allows adequate maintenance access of electrical and water utilities in accordance with SDC 4.3-140.A. 7. As part of the DWP Exemption approval, Drinking Wellhead Protection construction notes must be included in the construction documents prior to Final Site Plan approval. A minimum number of two “You are in Springfield’s Drinking Water Protection Area” signs must be posted permanently at the park at locations to be determined in consultation with SUB. DEVELOPMENT ADVISORY NOTES:  Any water-related items affecting the development will need to be coordinated through SUB Water Division independently from any items or submittal that may be required by the City. The applicant must continue to work with the SUB Water Division at 541-726-2396 for detailed information regarding any water service(s) to the proposed development site.  In accordance with SDC 4.3-110.B, the property owner or their designee must be responsible for ongoing and perpetual maintenance of the private stormwater facilities on the site to ensure they function as designed and intended, and to ensure protection of groundwater resources. Annual maintenance records must be kept by the property owner or their designee and provided to the City for review upon reasonable request – normally within five business days. EXHIBIT B, Page 16 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 18 of 73  In accordance with the Springfield Municipal Code (SMC) Section 3.208, the applicant and contractor must obtain an encroachment permit for the access location at the end of Otto Street for any traffic control into the site or for any needed restoration/repair of the sidewalk or driveway at the conclusion of utility installation and construction of the neighborhood park.  As a “Best Practices” recommendation for this site, care must be taken during site construction and operation to prevent contamination from chemicals that may spill or leak onto the ground surface, including fuel and automotive fluids (such as lubricants and antifreeze, etc.). Fluid- containing equipment, including vehicles parked on the site, must be monitored for leaks and spills. Any chemical spills or leaks must be cleaned up immediately and cleanup materials disposed off-site in accordance with Lane County and State department of Environmental Quality requirements. WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE BY THE APPLICANT TO OBTAIN FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL? Five copies of a Final Site Plan, the Final Site Plan application form and fees, and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be submitted to the Planning Division within 90 days of the date of this decision (i.e. by October 22, 2021). The application form and fee information is available on the City’s website here: http://www.springfield-or.gov/dpw/Permits.htm. In accordance with SDC 5.17-135 – 5.17-140, the Final Site Plan must comply with the requirements of the SDC and the conditions imposed by this decision. The Final Site Plan otherwise must be in substantial conformity with the tentative plan reviewed. Portions of the proposal approved as submitted during tentative review cannot be substantively changed during final site plan approval. Approved Final Site Plans (including Landscape Plans) must not be substantively changed during Building Permit Review without an approved Site Plan Decision Modification. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: In order to complete the review process, a Development Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of site plan review are binding upon both the applicant and the City. This agreement will be prepared by Staff upon approval of the Final Site Plan and must be signed by the property owner prior to the issuance of a building permit. EXHIBIT B, Page 17 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 19 of 73 Please be advised that the following is provided for information only and is not a component of the Site Plan Review decision. FEES AND PERMITS SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE: Pay applicable Systems Development Charges when building permits are issued for developments within the City limits or within the Springfield Urban Growth Boundary. (The cost relates to the amount of increase in impervious surface area, transportation trip rates, and plumbing fixture units. Some exceptions apply to Springfield Urban Growth areas.) [Springfield Code Chapter II, Article 11] Systems Development Charges (SDCs) will apply to the construction of buildings and site improvements within the subject site. The Charges will be based upon the rates in effect at the time of permit submittal for buildings or site improvements on each portion or phase of the development. Staff can prepare an SDC estimate for the proposed project on request. The final charge will be calculated at the time of Building Plans submittal using documents submitted for the Building Permits. OTHER CITY PERMITS: An Encroachment Permit is required for this development for the connections at Otto St. This permit will be noted on the final site plans and must be obtained with the building permits. Land & Drainage Alteration Permits (LDAP) for stripping and/or grading activities. [Contact the Springfield Development & Public Works Department @ 541-726-5849 for appropriate applications/requirements] ADDITIONAL PERMITS/APPROVALS MAY BE NECESSARY:  Building Permit(s) for plumbing, electrical and structural work on the site  Tree Felling Permit if applicant is planning to take down more than 5 trees from the development site  Commercial Paving Permit, if applicable EXHIBIT B, Page 18 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 20 of 73 APPENDIX Proposed Pierce Park EXHIBIT B, Page 19 of 19 Attachment 1, Page 21 of 73 Pierce Park Development 1 / 35 Q1 What types of amenities would you most like to see at Pierce Park? Answered: 89 Skipped: 1 Play structure for younger... Play structure for older ki... Climbing structure Swings Individual play pieces... Small play house for yo... Picnic tables Musical play pieces Basketball court Picnic shelter Bicycle Park/Playground Bicycle pump track Concrete walking paths Gravel walking paths Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% EXHIBIT C, Page 1 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 22 of 73 Pierce Park Development 2 / 35 47.19%42 76.40%68 61.80%55 59.55%53 33.71%30 11.24%10 73.03%65 13.48%12 47.19%42 49.44%44 51.69%46 40.45%36 48.31%43 24.72%22 39.33%35 Total Respondents: 89 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Play structure for younger kids (ages 2-5) Play structure for older kids (ages 6-12) Climbing structure Swings Individual play pieces (spinners, see-saw, etc.) Small play house for young children Picnic tables Musical play pieces Basketball court Picnic shelter Bicycle Park/Playground Bicycle pump track Concrete walking paths Gravel walking paths Other (please specify) EXHIBIT C, Page 2 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 23 of 73 Pierce Park Development 3 / 35 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 bathrooms 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 2 Dog park 10/19/2020 9:55 AM 3 maintained porta-potties instead of bathroom structure 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 4 Pickle ball?10/12/2020 7:50 AM 5 Keep some of the grass area open for soccer/frisbee etc like in option 3 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 6 dog park 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 7 Water feature! And no sand or bathrooms for sanitary reasons.10/10/2020 1:21 PM 8 walking gravel labyrinth 10/8/2020 6:41 PM 9 Dog park area 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 10 Dog park 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 11 sandbox/sand pit 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 12 Instead of play structures, using earth friendly structures 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 13 Dog park 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 14 Splash Pad 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 15 Bathrooms; BBQ grill, and game tables for people to play games 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 16 Splash pad, we don't have anything like this in the area 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 17 I think that a short workout circuit for adults would be great too 10/7/2020 8:50 AM 18 restrooms 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 19 It’s functioned as is for years. Please don’t change ambiance with multiple enhancements. Keeping it mowed along with upgrading already in place paths would be wonderful. 10/7/2020 2:45 AM 20 Outdoor workout equipment 10/6/2020 10:09 PM 21 Restroom Building 10/6/2020 3:51 PM 22 Splash fountains/water feature 10/6/2020 2:23 PM 23 Skate park, spray park 10/6/2020 1:59 PM 24 Parking 10/6/2020 1:49 PM 25 small community food garden 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 26 Sand Volleyball court, Dog Park 10/6/2020 9:40 AM 27 Sand Volleyball Court 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 28 I’ve seen swings for both parents and babies/toddlers where they can face each other and swing together! I would love to see that included in the new park. 10/6/2020 9:23 AM 29 Bathroom facilities 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 30 NO SANDBOXES 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 31 Dog comfort station - water, waste disposal bags, etc.10/4/2020 12:04 AM 32 Dog park 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 33 Pickleball courts 10/3/2020 3:19 PM 34 restrooms 10/3/2020 10:51 AM 35 Fitness course 10/3/2020 9:34 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 3 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 24 of 73 Pierce Park Development 4 / 35 Q2 Of the three park designs displayed in the presentation, please rank them below. Answered: 87 Skipped: 3 21.43% 18 25.00% 21 53.57% 45 84 1.68 50.00% 43 24.42% 21 25.58% 22 86 2.24 27.91% 24 51.16% 44 20.93% 18 86 2.07 Concept #1 Concept #2 Concept #3 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 2 3 TOTAL SCORE Concept #1 Concept #2 Concept #3 EXHIBIT C, Page 4 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 25 of 73 Pierce Park Development 5 / 35 46.67%42 37.78%34 15.56%14 Q3 How close do you live to Pierce Park? Answered: 90 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 90 Within a short walk Less than ½ mile I don’t live in the... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Within a short walk Less than ½ mile I don’t live in the neighborhood EXHIBIT C, Page 5 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 26 of 73 Pierce Park Development 6 / 35 76.67%69 16.67%15 3.33%3 3.33%3 Q4 How often do you think you would visit Pierce Park if your preferred design was constructed? Answered: 90 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 90 At least once per week At least once per month A few times a year Rarely or not at all 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES At least once per week At least once per month A few times a year Rarely or not at all EXHIBIT C, Page 6 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 27 of 73 Pierce Park Development 7 / 35 Q5 What activities do you enjoy participating in at other parks? Answered: 86 Skipped: 4 EXHIBIT C, Page 7 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 28 of 73 Pierce Park Development 8 / 35 #RESPONSES DATE 1 pump track, basketball, climbing structures 10/30/2020 8:58 AM 2 Playing basketball, climbing and other things.10/29/2020 2:31 PM 3 running, biking, native plants, birding, volunteering, meetings/visits now due to COVID 10/24/2020 10:21 AM 4 Playing with my kids on swings, slides, basketball court 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 5 The bike paths, play structures, enjoy the variety in Springfield as we visit all parks frequently. 10/22/2020 6:38 PM 6 Dog walking 10/22/2020 2:06 PM 7 Swings and playgrounds with my young children, picnic areas, nature walks, bike riding, as they grow older we'll enjoy basketball courts, and we don't necessarily enjoy but we appreciate using bathrooms at parks. 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 8 Lots of places to sit with good visibility of play structures to make watching kids comfortable. 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 9 walking 10/19/2020 4:24 PM 10 Biking/schooler or skateboarding 10/19/2020 9:55 AM 11 Dog training 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 12 Basketball, playground equipment, benches, picnic tables 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 13 biking, walking and kids play age 8.10/15/2020 10:50 AM 14 Swings, picnic, jungle gym. My kids would love anything bicycle related. That would be a very unique feature. 10/12/2020 4:19 PM 15 Picnics, playing on play structures, balancing, climbing, swings,10/12/2020 7:50 AM 16 Play structures, walking paths, swings, water features, open space to run 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 17 I have 3 young kids and we are very often at the local parks! We love play structures, but also using open fields for running around & sports. 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 18 dog walking, picnicking, watching children enjoy, looking at nature 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 19 My kids love climbing walls, water features, and paved paths to ride their bikes/scooters. 10/10/2020 1:21 PM 20 Basketball and kids play structures 10/10/2020 9:47 AM 21 Bike and playground 10/10/2020 9:46 AM 22 Playground, climbing structures 10/10/2020 6:19 AM 23 Picnics, frisbee, walks, football, basketball, catch 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 24 Running, rollerblading, biking, swingset, frisbee, soccer, basketball,10/8/2020 7:42 PM 25 Open spaces, playing on the playground, basketball court, meeting other families, picnic tables 10/8/2020 6:41 PM 26 basketball, soccer, tire swing, climbing/rock wall, monkey bars 10/8/2020 5:48 PM 27 Bike paths, climbing structures, swings 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 28 walking 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 29 Walking paths and biking 10/8/2020 8:42 AM 30 L 10/8/2020 4:50 AM 31 Playground. Please no sand.10/8/2020 1:38 AM 32 Climbing on play stuctures (my two toddlers), and especially playing in water fountains/puddles and a sandbox, having picnics under trees, exploring winding trails. 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 33 My 15 yr old is loving bike tracks/jumps/ramps, my 17/20 yr olds go w/friends to talk and swing or maybe get on some equipment; my older kids are now taking their toddlers, so we go for the littles equipment. 10/7/2020 7:25 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 8 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 29 of 73 Pierce Park Development 9 / 35 34 Meeting Place 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 35 Varies on the park.10/7/2020 6:59 PM 36 Spinning things, stuff to climb on like a small rock wall 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 37 Riding bikes and scooters on flat paths, walking, playing on playgrounds when COVID-19 isn't rampant, frisbee, etc. 10/7/2020 6:50 PM 38 Open spots to walk dogs. Need benches and picnic tables most parks don’t have enough 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 39 Playground for kids, splash pad, swings 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 40 relaxing, frisbee, etc.10/7/2020 6:06 PM 41 Walks and relaxing.10/7/2020 6:02 PM 42 Playgrounds, picnic areas, open fields to play soccer, frisbee, wiffle ball, basketball courts, walking paths. 10/7/2020 4:29 PM 43 My kids love splash pads, swings and climbing structures 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 44 Walking, basketball, rollerblading, bike riding 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 45 Biking around. Walking, relaxing.10/7/2020 8:50 AM 46 Basketball courts, playgrounds (kids are 6 and 9), picnics, open field to run/soccer, playing in trees, walking paths 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 47 Water park, dog walking trails, freezbee park, rock climbing, bridge walks. Sand play, water play a must. Plus a native totem 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 48 Play structure and walks 10/7/2020 4:44 AM 49 Walking biking 10/7/2020 2:45 AM 50 Walking paths 10/6/2020 10:09 PM 51 Swings, play structures, climbing, biking 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 52 Swings and slides. My kids are so excited about the possibility of a pump track!!! The bigger the better! :) 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 53 Climbing equipment, swings, tunnel slides, ages 6+ play structures 10/6/2020 7:37 PM 54 Bicycle riding BMX or MTB, frisbee, playing catch 10/6/2020 6:56 PM 55 Swings. Fields to run in.10/6/2020 5:14 PM 56 Swinging, play structures and basketball 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 57 A smooth place to roller blade, skateboard, ride bikes with my kids. And a little time for playground equipment. 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 58 Toys, basketball, bike pump track would be fun 10/6/2020 4:04 PM 59 My kids love play structures, but a bike play area would be AMAZING!!! A walking path would be nice, but more play for the kids is most important to me!! Thank you for asking for neighborhood input!!! 10/6/2020 3:55 PM 60 Swings, looking forward to riding bikes on the track, slides, and just running around.10/6/2020 3:51 PM 61 Bicycling, fitness, slides 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 62 Playgrounds, walking, dog park (PLEASE)10/6/2020 2:49 PM 63 Walking path while the kiddos play 10/6/2020 2:23 PM 64 Swings, riding bikes (we LOVE and use bike path very frequently), hiking, hanging out near river, kayaking 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 65 Enjoying the clean family atmosphere 10/6/2020 2:14 PM 66 Spray parks, basketball, scooter, bike riding, walking, play structures.10/6/2020 1:59 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 9 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 30 of 73 Pierce Park Development 10 / 35 67 Walks, picnics 10/6/2020 1:49 PM 68 kids like play structures and basketball courts and paths to ride bikes.10/6/2020 1:47 PM 69 Swings, Walking Patchs/Biking Paths 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 70 Picnics, walking paths 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 71 playground, picnic 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 72 walking, birding, picnic, reading 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 73 Walking, letting my dog play at dog parks.10/6/2020 9:40 AM 74 Sand Volleyball - my daughter is hoping to play in college so we visit further parks away more often. Would be nice to have one in walking distance 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 75 My son loves to swing and go down slides. We also love to just sit and play in the grass. A sand and water area would also be awesome for sensory play! 10/6/2020 9:23 AM 76 Running, kids playing, picnics 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 77 playground 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 78 Walks 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 79 Walking dogs, walking for exercise, sitting and drawing/writing/reading, picnics 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 80 Playground/dog park 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 81 Playgrounds, walking and exploring in more wooded areas, and riding bikes.10/3/2020 4:30 PM 82 Picnic, open fields for games, basketball, spending time with friends and family, playgrounds, walking & exploring 10/3/2020 4:27 PM 83 Pickleball, social gatherings 10/3/2020 3:19 PM 84 I like walking the river path, and Thurston hills trails 10/3/2020 10:51 AM 85 Walking thru fitness course 10/3/2020 9:34 AM 86 Walking with other mom friends while watching our kids safely play. Parties for my kids at picnic tables when the weather is nice. Plenty of space to play and run without disrupting others. 10/2/2020 3:47 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 10 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 31 of 73 Pierce Park Development 11 / 35 57.30%51 25.84%23 12.36%11 4.49%4 Q6 How would you normally get to the park? Answered: 89 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 89 #OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 walk or bike 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 2 We would use all 3 modes to get there depending on how much time we had available at a given time. We normally walk to that area. 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 3 bike, walk or car, depending on mood 10/7/2020 6:50 PM 4 car,scooter,bike 10/7/2020 7:31 AM Walk Bike Car Other (please specify) 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Walk Bike Car Other (please specify) EXHIBIT C, Page 11 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 32 of 73 Pierce Park Development 12 / 35 Q7 What else would you like our Parks and Planning team to know? Answered: 67 Skipped: 23 EXHIBIT C, Page 12 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 33 of 73 Pierce Park Development 13 / 35 #RESPONSES DATE 1 Restroom and a cover during rain season.10/29/2020 2:31 PM 2 We need a dog park in the Hayden Bridge area. Look forward to opportunities to volunteer at the park. 10/24/2020 10:21 AM 3 Unknown 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 4 The bike park would be great and meets the need of adolescent children whom need some physical outlets and there isn’t one near by that were aware of. 10/22/2020 6:38 PM 5 Thank you very much for doing this. I live in Ambleside Neighborhood and we have concerns about what is going on with our duck pond? Someone keeps coming and draining it? 10/22/2020 2:06 PM 6 We are so excited to finally have a park in our neighborhood! We've wanted a park that was walking or biking distance for years! Thank you! Seriously, thank you! 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 7 Please include restrooms.10/19/2020 7:49 PM 8 We are loosing dog running areas so dog park would be needed 10/19/2020 9:55 AM 9 Keep open space 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 10 No covered picnic areas please. I like the covered port-a-potty structure for all concepts. Having those on site will reduce the chance of people using the bushes as a bathroom. The large bike track is a good idea, but i do have a couple concerns: One is that it is going to get dominated by much older kids/young adults (fast, aggressive riders) so younger kids wont be able to safely use it. Second, it may increase the likelihood of graffiti (see under Wash/Jeff bridge in Eugene). My son does BMX at Emerald Valley. If you create a race track be prepared for lots of racers on it since Emerald Valley isn't always open for casual riding/practice. No skateboard ramps please. 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 11 N/A 10/15/2020 10:50 AM 12 That is a very sunny area so natural or artificial shading would be a great feature.10/12/2020 4:19 PM 13 I prefer the idea of a portapoty unless it can be assured the bathrooms will be maintained regularly. A water bottle fill station would be great.Lights for basketball? We’ve seen outdoor stationary exercise equipment in other parks, might be good for adults to use. Also pull-up bars. CC cameras? 10/12/2020 7:50 AM 14 Bathrooms are needed 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 15 It would be nice if the walking path continued around the playground part of the park and visibility was maintained between the two so one kid could be riding scooter etc and I can still see all my kids. It hard when trees etc are planted on the inside of paths blocking views. 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 16 We need a dog park in Springfield!10/11/2020 7:33 AM 17 We frequent parks very regularly so I have strong opinions about what works and what doesn’t. I strong recommend astroturf as opposed to any other surface. This allows kids to play even when it’s wet. I’d also recommend skipping any sand pits. They are really messy and I literally found a hypodermic needle in the sand at Oakmont Park a few weeks ago. I’d also strongly recommend skipping a formal bathroom. Although it’s inconvenient for Park goers, it will prevent people from lingering, especially homeless. Maybe a port o potty? Lots of shady trees would be nice. 10/10/2020 1:21 PM 18 Our property borders the North property line of the proposed park. In the past there has been a problem with transient camps in the brush/blackberries between the proposed park and the properties to the North. We are opposed to installing public restrooms. This would only serve as a draw to the transient population that has left the area due to things being cleaned up. We recently installed a new fence at the property line we share with the proposed park and cleaned up all the debris, blackberries and brush. We would like to see landscaping developed along the property line that would aid in security, privacy and noise reduction. Thank you for allowing our input. 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 19 New dto provide parking space. Neighborhood lacks parking 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 20 Please consider our labyrinth idea! Eugene/Springfield currently doesn't have one and they are 10/8/2020 6:41 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 13 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 34 of 73 Pierce Park Development 14 / 35 wonderful, contemplative spaces! Also, bathrooms are essential! 21 Basketball court is top priority 10/8/2020 5:48 PM 22 Dog park area please and thanks 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 23 Where would parking be ?10/8/2020 12:38 AM 24 Thanks, guys! I'm sure whatever you decide will be great and an exciting asset to our neighborhood. We were so excited to get the postcard this week! We can't wait to watch you guys build it. 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 25 Our property adjoins the park on the North side. In the past we have had homeless people camp in the trees/brush that used to be at the back of our property. We would be concerned that a restroom facility in the park might encourage homeless to come to the area after dark. We would ask you to consider not putting restrooms in the park. Also, we have cleaned up and removed the brush, dead trees and blackberries from the back, park edge, of our property and are hoping that Willamalane would be willing to plant trees and/or tall shrubs along our new fence line to help buffer and secure our property from the increased, close proximity to people very near our property. Thank you. 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 26 I think an eye and awareness of preserving as much of that natural habitat as possible. The idea of using that depression to create a stormwater garden is a good consideration. The natural surroundings don't go out of style or become outdated. If enough is preserved that some of the wildlife remains, it becomes a natural educational opportunity especially for PreK- early gradeschool kids that do most of their learning while playing and exploring. Also, the pump track idea is really exciting. Hard to please everyone, I know. :) 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 27 The trees in between the park and Briggs track would at the very least need to be thinned. Lot's of ugly stuff found there, not a safe place. 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 28 My property borders the park. I am HIGHLY concerned about the removal of the blackberries on the northern border. It provides security and privacy. If you consider removing the blackberries, you will remove our security. Will you be replacing the blackberries with a secure wall if you consider removing them? 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 29 The pump track is a really good idea my 15 year old son loves biking and he would love it 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 30 We need more off leash dog areas 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 31 Dirt bike track is not recommended. As a mountain biker, I can tell you that dirt trails require a lot of maintenance, and will turn muddy in the winter. If people ride through it when it is muddy, it will cause damage that is challenging to repair. Even if it is not muddy and tracked, it will require ongoing maintenance 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 32 Splash Pad!!!!!!!!!!!10/7/2020 6:06 PM 33 I would like to see some stationary tables for people to be able to play a card game, chess or checker game, etc. etc. 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 34 Love the diversity of play interests in the 3 concepts you presented! Something for everyone, for sure! 10/7/2020 4:29 PM 35 Pease don't use wood chips. I've seen rubberized beauty bark used at other parks, it was amazing! And please consider a splash pad for our kids 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 36 We don't have any other parks near this neighborhood, so an all-ages park would be exceptional (not only geared to smaller children) 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 37 While parking won't matter for me, I can see it being a challenge if others are coming into the area. Where would the main parking area be? 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 38 make it family friendly lots of lights great bathrooms. Pinic tables. Walking park. Sand and water. Pinic shelter. Maybe even a covered play area so when it rains as it is Oregon 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 39 The curvy slides hurt. We love the long straight slides.10/6/2020 8:27 PM 40 Excited to see a park in this area. We don't have anything in walking distance besides Yolanda Elementary and the majority of their equipment is very old. 10/6/2020 7:37 PM 41 1-2 water fountains for public use would be awesome!10/6/2020 6:56 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 14 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 35 of 73 Pierce Park Development 15 / 35 42 Bike racks available for those who opt to bike there 10/6/2020 5:14 PM 43 A bike track made of dirt is my first choice but any bike track would be amazing. We have more than enough walking paths in this area already. 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 44 Asphalt will help with other sports like roller blades and skating unlike a dirt path. It's hard to find good/safe places to take kids do enjoy their hobbies. 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 45 Sounds good 10/6/2020 4:04 PM 46 We appreciate you thinking of our kids!!10/6/2020 3:55 PM 47 Pet play area We are looking forward to having a park in our area.10/6/2020 3:51 PM 48 Once I heard of the possibility of a pump track I was excited. I would use the park more frequently. 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 49 Please add a dog park! There’s only ONE in Springfield in Thurston 10/6/2020 2:49 PM 50 Love the bike trail ideas! Not sure a walking path makes sense with so many miles of bike path right there and both Yolanda & Briggs have gravel tracks we can use. Whatever you decide please make sure there is something for all ages. We adore our neighborhood and want a community space to reflect our close knit family neighborhood. SUPER EXCITED about this project!!! Would love to help more. 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 51 It’s important to me that the area be kept clean. Free from vandalism and criminal activity. 10/6/2020 2:14 PM 52 We live on the acsess street. Traffic is an issue, but where are they going to park?10/6/2020 1:49 PM 53 As a parent of 4 kids ( ages 4-12) I love the parks that have the rubber mats instead of the wood chips. Sand areas are always gross and there are always cigarettes and animal waste in them. I would appreciate NOT having sand at this park. My house is nest to this proposal sight. I do worry about the increase in cars as the col-de-sac is already small and there is o other close parking. 10/6/2020 1:47 PM 54 N/a 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 55 We have so many kids wanting a bicycle track that this would be such a wonderful addition to Springfield! 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 56 enclosed playhouse would invite bad behavior from older kids/adults, cameras to discourage graffiti, add interpretive/area history signs. (I hope the subdivision has affordable housing!) 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 57 N/A 10/6/2020 9:40 AM 58 Please consider a sand volleyball court it's a growing sport in the community with adults and kids 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 59 nothing 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 60 There should not be an access area in the culdesac on Otto Street other than the gravel path already leading to the bike path 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 61 While we prefer design #3, we would MUCH rather have a full restroom building than a port-a- potty. 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 62 Please include bathrooms 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 63 I appreciate when parks have dense areas of trees and bushes, areas of flowers, and some open fields of grass. 10/3/2020 4:30 PM 64 Restrooms are important.10/3/2020 3:19 PM 65 Enjoy your parks 10/3/2020 10:51 AM 66 The walking path currently has many retired and older persons who use the path daily. WP&R needs to take a look at their usage also. The play structures at Yolanda fill the neighborhood need of playground structures. Definitely would not support a BMX or Skate park structure, especially so close to the middle school. There’s already a gravel track at Briggs - no need for another at Pierce. A dog park would also be a welcome addition, as many people walk their dogs along the path daily. 10/3/2020 9:34 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 15 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 36 of 73 Pierce Park Development 16 / 35 67 We are excited for this new park! We hope it turns out great! Thank you!10/2/2020 3:47 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 16 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 37 of 73 Pierce Park Development 17 / 35 57.14%48 79.76%67 45.24%38 Q8 How many children, by age, currently live in your household? Answered: 84 Skipped: 6 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 0-5 years 6-12 years 13-17 years EXHIBIT C, Page 17 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 38 of 73 Pierce Park Development 18 / 35 #0-5 YEARS DATE 1 1 10/30/2020 8:58 AM 2 1 10/29/2020 2:31 PM 3 0 10/24/2020 10:21 AM 4 4 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 5 1 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 6 1 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 7 0 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 8 2 10/12/2020 4:19 PM 9 1 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 10 0 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 11 2 10/10/2020 1:21 PM 12 0 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 13 0 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 14 0 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 15 1 10/8/2020 4:50 AM 16 1 10/8/2020 12:38 AM 17 2 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 18 0 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 19 0 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 20 0 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 21 0 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 22 0 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 23 1 10/7/2020 6:50 PM 24 0 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 25 2 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 26 0 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 27 2 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 28 0 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 29 1 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 30 1 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 31 1 10/6/2020 6:56 PM 32 1 10/6/2020 5:14 PM 33 1 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 34 0 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 35 0 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 36 1 10/6/2020 1:47 PM 37 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 18 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 39 of 73 Pierce Park Development 19 / 35 38 0 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 39 1 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 40 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 41 0 10/6/2020 9:40 AM 42 1 10/6/2020 9:23 AM 43 1 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 44 0 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 45 1 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 46 0 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 47 0 10/3/2020 9:34 AM 48 1 10/2/2020 3:33 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 19 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 40 of 73 Pierce Park Development 20 / 35 #6-12 YEARS DATE 1 1 10/30/2020 8:58 AM 2 1 10/29/2020 2:31 PM 3 6 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 4 1 10/22/2020 6:38 PM 5 1 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 6 1 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 7 0 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 8 2 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 9 1 10/15/2020 10:50 AM 10 2 10/12/2020 7:50 AM 11 1 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 12 2 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 13 0 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 14 2 10/10/2020 9:47 AM 15 2 10/10/2020 9:46 AM 16 2 10/10/2020 6:19 AM 17 0 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 18 1 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 19 0 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 20 2 10/8/2020 6:41 PM 21 2 10/8/2020 5:48 PM 22 3 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 23 0 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 24 3 10/8/2020 8:42 AM 25 1 10/8/2020 1:38 AM 26 1 10/8/2020 12:38 AM 27 0 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 28 0 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 29 0 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 30 0 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 31 0 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 32 1 10/7/2020 6:50 PM 33 0 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 34 0 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 35 2 10/7/2020 4:29 PM 36 0 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 37 1 10/7/2020 8:50 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 20 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 41 of 73 Pierce Park Development 21 / 35 38 2 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 39 1 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 40 1 10/7/2020 4:44 AM 41 1 10/6/2020 10:09 PM 42 1 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 43 1 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 44 1 10/6/2020 7:37 PM 45 1 10/6/2020 5:14 PM 46 1 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 47 3 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 48 2 10/6/2020 4:04 PM 49 2 10/6/2020 3:55 PM 50 2 10/6/2020 3:51 PM 51 3 10/6/2020 2:49 PM 52 2 10/6/2020 2:23 PM 53 1 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 54 2 10/6/2020 2:14 PM 55 2 10/6/2020 1:59 PM 56 3 10/6/2020 1:47 PM 57 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 58 0 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 59 1 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 60 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 61 0 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 62 1 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 63 0 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 64 2 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 65 0 10/3/2020 9:34 AM 66 3 10/2/2020 3:47 PM 67 1 10/2/2020 3:33 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 21 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 42 of 73 Pierce Park Development 22 / 35 #13-17 YEARS DATE 1 1 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 2 3 10/22/2020 2:06 PM 3 0 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 4 1 10/15/2020 10:50 AM 5 1 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 6 0 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 7 0 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 8 1 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 9 0 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 10 2 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 11 0 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 12 1 10/8/2020 8:42 AM 13 0 10/8/2020 12:38 AM 14 0 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 15 2 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 16 0 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 17 0 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 18 2 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 19 0 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 20 0 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 21 0 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 22 1 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 23 2 10/7/2020 4:44 AM 24 1 10/6/2020 4:04 PM 25 2 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 26 2 10/6/2020 2:23 PM 27 1 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 28 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 29 0 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 30 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 31 1 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 32 0 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 33 0 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 34 0 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 35 3 10/3/2020 4:30 PM 36 2 10/3/2020 4:27 PM 37 2 10/3/2020 3:19 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 22 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 43 of 73 Pierce Park Development 23 / 35 38 0 10/3/2020 9:34 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 23 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 44 of 73 Pierce Park Development 24 / 35 41.11%37 65.56%59 23.33%21 20.00%18 Q9 How many adults, by age, currently live in your household? Answered: 90 Skipped: 0 ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES 18-35 years 36-50 years 51-64 years 65+ EXHIBIT C, Page 24 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 45 of 73 Pierce Park Development 25 / 35 #18-35 YEARS DATE 1 4 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 2 1 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 3 2 10/10/2020 9:47 AM 4 2 10/10/2020 9:46 AM 5 2 10/10/2020 6:19 AM 6 1 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 7 2 10/8/2020 4:50 AM 8 2 10/8/2020 12:38 AM 9 2 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 10 1 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 11 1 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 12 1 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 13 2 10/7/2020 6:50 PM 14 2 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 15 1 10/7/2020 6:06 PM 16 1 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 17 1 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 18 1 10/7/2020 4:44 AM 19 2 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 20 1 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 21 3 10/6/2020 6:56 PM 22 2 10/6/2020 5:14 PM 23 2 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 24 1 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 25 1 10/6/2020 2:49 PM 26 0 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 27 3 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 28 2 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 29 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 30 2 10/6/2020 9:40 AM 31 2 10/6/2020 9:23 AM 32 2 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 33 1 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 34 2 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 35 2 10/3/2020 4:30 PM 36 2 10/3/2020 4:27 PM 37 2 10/2/2020 3:33 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 25 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 46 of 73 Pierce Park Development 26 / 35 #36-50 YEARS DATE 1 2 10/30/2020 8:58 AM 2 2 10/29/2020 2:31 PM 3 2 10/24/2020 10:21 AM 4 2 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 5 2 10/22/2020 6:38 PM 6 2 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 7 2 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 8 1 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 9 2 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 10 2 10/15/2020 10:50 AM 11 2 10/12/2020 4:19 PM 12 2 10/12/2020 7:50 AM 13 2 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 14 2 10/10/2020 1:21 PM 15 2 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 16 1 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 17 2 10/8/2020 6:41 PM 18 2 10/8/2020 5:48 PM 19 2 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 20 2 10/8/2020 8:42 AM 21 2 10/8/2020 1:38 AM 22 0 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 23 0 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 24 2 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 25 1 10/7/2020 6:06 PM 26 1 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 27 2 10/7/2020 4:29 PM 28 1 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 29 1 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 30 1 10/7/2020 8:50 AM 31 2 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 32 1 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 33 2 10/6/2020 10:09 PM 34 1 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 35 2 10/6/2020 7:37 PM 36 1 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 37 2 10/6/2020 4:04 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 26 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 47 of 73 Pierce Park Development 27 / 35 38 2 10/6/2020 3:55 PM 39 2 10/6/2020 3:51 PM 40 1 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 41 2 10/6/2020 2:49 PM 42 2 10/6/2020 2:23 PM 43 2 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 44 2 10/6/2020 2:14 PM 45 2 10/6/2020 1:59 PM 46 2 10/6/2020 1:47 PM 47 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 48 2 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 49 2 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 50 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 51 2 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 52 0 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 53 0 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 54 1 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 55 1 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 56 2 10/3/2020 4:30 PM 57 2 10/3/2020 4:27 PM 58 2 10/3/2020 3:19 PM 59 2 10/2/2020 3:47 PM EXHIBIT C, Page 27 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 48 of 73 Pierce Park Development 28 / 35 #51-64 YEARS DATE 1 1 10/22/2020 2:06 PM 2 1 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 3 2 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 4 1 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 5 2 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 6 1 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 7 2 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 8 2 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 9 1 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 10 0 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 11 1 10/7/2020 8:50 AM 12 1 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 13 1 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 14 0 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 15 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 16 1 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 17 0 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 18 2 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 19 1 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 20 2 10/3/2020 10:51 AM 21 2 10/3/2020 9:34 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 28 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 49 of 73 Pierce Park Development 29 / 35 #65+DATE 1 3 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 2 2 10/19/2020 4:24 PM 3 2 10/19/2020 9:55 AM 4 1 10/11/2020 7:33 AM 5 1 10/8/2020 2:13 PM 6 0 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 7 0 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 8 2 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 9 1 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 10 0 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 11 1 10/7/2020 2:45 AM 12 0 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 13 2 10/6/2020 1:49 PM 14 0 10/6/2020 1:31 PM 15 0 10/6/2020 10:08 AM 16 0 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 17 0 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 18 1 10/4/2020 12:04 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 29 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 50 of 73 Pierce Park Development 30 / 35 1.12%1 0.00%0 0.00%0 1.12%1 1.12%1 69.66%62 16.85%15 10.11%9 Q10 Which race/ethnicity best describes you? (Please choose only one.) Answered: 89 Skipped: 1 TOTAL 89 American Indian or... Asian Pacific Islander Black or African... Latinx White / Caucasian I choose not to answer Multiple ethnicity /... 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES American Indian or Alaskan Native Asian Pacific Islander Black or African American Latinx White / Caucasian I choose not to answer Multiple ethnicity / Other (please specify) EXHIBIT C, Page 30 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 51 of 73 Pierce Park Development 31 / 35 #MULTIPLE ETHNICITY / OTHER (PLEASE SPECIFY)DATE 1 Springfield 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 2 Springfield 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 3 Springfield 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 4 Springfield 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 5 white /Asian 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 6 White/ pacific islander 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 7 Why does this even matter?10/6/2020 4:04 PM 8 Springfield 10/6/2020 3:51 PM 9 Springfield 10/3/2020 10:51 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 31 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 52 of 73 Pierce Park Development 32 / 35 78.89%71 21.11%19 Q11 Would you like to be kept up to date on progress with the design and construction of Pierce Park? Answered: 90 Skipped: 0 TOTAL 90 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes No EXHIBIT C, Page 32 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 53 of 73 Pierce Park Development 33 / 35 Q12 At what email address would you like to be contacted? Answered: 72 Skipped: 18 EXHIBIT C, Page 33 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 54 of 73 Pierce Park Development 34 / 35 #RESPONSES DATE 1 jjordan11@gmail.com 10/30/2020 8:58 AM 2 coachchism@yahoo.com 10/29/2020 2:31 PM 3 brandiferg@gmail.com 10/24/2020 10:21 AM 4 missy_jones@comcast.net 10/22/2020 7:56 PM 5 smatti@hsolc.org 10/22/2020 6:38 PM 6 debraanderson263@aol.com 10/22/2020 2:06 PM 7 kk.cure@gmail.com 10/19/2020 7:50 PM 8 andrew.f.emmott@gmail.com 10/19/2020 7:49 PM 9 ddnowak@comcast.net 10/19/2020 4:24 PM 10 bascha911@outlook.com 10/19/2020 8:06 AM 11 beaveremmett@gmail.com 10/15/2020 11:54 AM 12 ben.j.nayl@gmail.com 10/12/2020 4:19 PM 13 Leah.emmett@gmail.com 10/12/2020 7:50 AM 14 Rice_Tara04@hotmail.com 10/11/2020 9:19 AM 15 Racheldrainey@gmail.com 10/11/2020 8:53 AM 16 Kirstencamerer@gmail.com 10/10/2020 1:21 PM 17 tboehm@springfield-or.gov 10/9/2020 7:54 PM 18 andrejcvitanich@gmail.com 10/8/2020 9:07 PM 19 spence.trisha@gmail.com 10/8/2020 7:42 PM 20 colin.w.lyons@gmail.com 10/8/2020 6:41 PM 21 zackdbarnett@gmail.com 10/8/2020 5:48 PM 22 Leapyear1976@gmail.com 10/8/2020 4:14 PM 23 Clairebarnum1@gmail.com 10/8/2020 8:42 AM 24 Ruwithme22@aol.com 10/8/2020 1:38 AM 25 ann.c.leavitt@gmail.com 10/7/2020 8:47 PM 26 terrybarbboehm@gmail.com 10/7/2020 7:31 PM 27 teambrenda@juno.com 10/7/2020 7:25 PM 28 mselland1@comcast.net 10/7/2020 7:16 PM 29 ral299@gmail.com 10/7/2020 6:59 PM 30 milkmanfort@gmail.com 10/7/2020 6:57 PM 31 lisa.mccown@gmail.com 10/7/2020 6:12 PM 32 squigley@gmail.com 10/7/2020 6:07 PM 33 parker510@comcast.net 10/7/2020 6:02 PM 34 kate21g@hotmail.com 10/7/2020 4:29 PM 35 amhicken@gmail.com 10/7/2020 12:18 PM 36 jack.mantel@willamalane.org 10/7/2020 11:20 AM 37 alboszta@gmail.com 10/7/2020 8:50 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 34 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 55 of 73 Pierce Park Development 35 / 35 38 jamiehb@gmail.com 10/7/2020 8:25 AM 39 tracijohnstonruiz07@gmail.com 10/7/2020 7:31 AM 40 Jessiclattion22@gmail.com 10/7/2020 4:44 AM 41 maggieally@gmail.com 10/7/2020 2:45 AM 42 dawnrogers77@yahoo.com 10/6/2020 10:09 PM 43 Sarah_dg@ymail.com 10/6/2020 8:39 PM 44 kumm.cassandra@gmail.com 10/6/2020 8:27 PM 45 e_lander@hotmail.com 10/6/2020 7:37 PM 46 Alyssabarth7@gmail.com 10/6/2020 5:14 PM 47 emass07@gmail.com 10/6/2020 4:44 PM 48 tashamjohnson3@gmail.com 10/6/2020 4:40 PM 49 bellcorrine17@gmail.com 10/6/2020 4:04 PM 50 Jaynehulse@icloud.com 10/6/2020 3:55 PM 51 t.lohner.4@gmail.com 10/6/2020 3:51 PM 52 Bmxngirl@aol.com 10/6/2020 3:45 PM 53 jeramy.card@gmail.com 10/6/2020 2:49 PM 54 tracey_edmundson@msn.com 10/6/2020 2:18 PM 55 Oregonaz22@yahoo.com 10/6/2020 2:14 PM 56 Gifullerton@msn.com 10/6/2020 1:59 PM 57 Janijeam@aol.com 10/6/2020 1:49 PM 58 andreakhanson@gmail.com 10/6/2020 1:47 PM 59 tlhilkey@gmail.com 10/6/2020 12:38 PM 60 loracycle@hotmail.com 10/6/2020 11:14 AM 61 Kim_walker1193@comcast.net 10/6/2020 9:40 AM 62 vgruver@hotmail.com 10/6/2020 9:32 AM 63 Kaykaycam@gmail.com 10/6/2020 6:27 AM 64 bntsmeltz@comcast.net 10/6/2020 5:58 AM 65 abailey007@gmail.com 10/4/2020 3:49 PM 66 amy.unfred@gmail.com 10/4/2020 12:04 AM 67 teresabrowning@hotmail.com 10/3/2020 7:39 PM 68 colleen.lovdokken@gmail.com 10/3/2020 4:30 PM 69 slovdokken@gmail.com 10/3/2020 4:27 PM 70 demian@aol.com 10/3/2020 3:19 PM 71 RPLiles@outlook.com 10/3/2020 10:51 AM 72 Kjmealy@gmail.com 10/3/2020 9:34 AM EXHIBIT C, Page 35 of 35 Attachment 1, Page 56 of 73 Pierce Park Development Welcome to a presentation on the development of Pierce Park, a new neighborhood park for Springfield. This slide show will present the background behind the park’s development, the project scope, and describe some ideas of what the park could look like. We would appreciate your input on these ideas. After watching the slide show, please complete the questionnaire to give us an idea of what you think is important for the design of this neighborhood park.EXHIBIT D, Page 1 of 17Attachment 1, Page 57 of 73 Table of contents Today we will present ideas for a new neighborhood park at the Pierce property. Receive feedback on those ideas, and welcome other suggestions of how to develop the park to best serve the neighborhood. 1.Project background 2.Project scope 3.Project schedule 4.Existing conditions 5.Marcola Meadows development 6.Present images of what may be included in the park 7.Discuss three concepts for park designEXHIBIT D, Page 2 of 17Attachment 1, Page 58 of 73 Project Background •Existing park property is approximately 5.75 acre open space with no improvements •The park is directly adjacent to the EWEB bike/pedestrian path allowing access from many parts of Springfield •Marcola Meadows to the south of the EWEB path is due for development in the early 2020’s with residential housing, increasing the need for a neighborhood park •The developer of Marcola Meadows will be due to pay System Development Charges (SDC’s) which will help fund the construction of a new park Developing a park that meets the needs of the neighborhood.EXHIBIT D, Page 3 of 17Attachment 1, Page 59 of 73 Project Scope •Design a new playground with a varied play experience •Provide sitting and picnic areas •Possible basketball play area •New pathway around the park linking to neighborhoods and the EWEB path •Potential bike playground or bike pump track included in the design of the new park •Coordinate with Briggs Middle School to provide access to/from the new parkEXHIBIT D, Page 4 of 17Attachment 1, Page 60 of 73 Project Schedule Note: This is the fastest possible schedule and is dependent on the adjacent development of Marcola Meadows and timeline for review of design drawings by the City of Springfield October, 2020 ……………... Public Meeting Fall, 2020 ……………………… Refine concepts based on public input Fall, 2020 ……………….…….. Site Plan Review by City of Springfield Winter 2020/21 …………… Park construction drawings Spring, 2021 ………………….. Project out to bid Summer/Fall 2021 ………... Project constructionEXHIBIT D, Page 5 of 17Attachment 1, Page 61 of 73 N. 31st Street Marcola Meadows Subdivision –to be developed EWEB path Pierce Park property line Yolanda Ave. Briggs Middle School Existing Conditions EXHIBIT D, Page 6 of 17Attachment 1, Page 62 of 73 Existing Conditions Western portion of the park EWEB Path looking east User defined trails around path Trail to Briggs Middle School •The property is around 5.75 acres in size •It is generally flat •The EWEB pedestrian and bike path runs along the south boundary •Informal use of the property includes dog walking and blackberry picking •Students cross the property to get to Briggs Middle SchoolEXHIBIT D, Page 7 of 17Attachment 1, Page 63 of 73 Existing Conditions Construction at Marcola Meadows Eastern end of park •Construction on the Marcola Meadows subdivision has recently started •There will be pedestrian connections from the new development to the EWEB path •The EWEB path is constructed within EWEB/City of Eugene property for power and waterlines. No other construction is permitted on this property.EXHIBIT D, Page 8 of 17Attachment 1, Page 64 of 73 Marcola Meadows Development Pierce Park Marcola Meadows Subdivision •The area shown in red indicates the extent of the Marcola Meadows subdivision, currently under construction •Phases 1 and 2 will be directly south of the EWEBpath and Pierce Park •The new park should be designed to accommodate the occupants of several hundred new residences •System Developments Charges (SDC’s) will be due on the development, which will help fund the park construction EXHIBIT D, Page 9 of 17Attachment 1, Page 65 of 73 Concepts for the new park.EXHIBIT D, Page 10 of 17Attachment 1, Page 66 of 73 Playground 2 to 5 age group 5 to 12 age group These images from other Willamalane parks show ideas for what could be constructed at Pierce Park EXHIBIT D, Page 11 of 17Attachment 1, Page 67 of 73 Park Features Site furnishings such as bike racks, trash cans and benches will be included in the park. Picnic shelter, restroom, basketball court, etc will be dependent on public input response and budget. Playground safety surfacing to be selected from: Rubber tile Artificial turf Engineered Wood Fiber (wood chips) EXHIBIT D, Page 12 of 17Attachment 1, Page 68 of 73 Bicycle Play Options Pump track……. …..or bike playground Willamalane does not have any kind of bicycle play facility for kids at any of its parks. The presence of the EWEB path would allow easy access from multiple neighborhoods. Proposed use would be recreational only –no competitions.EXHIBIT D, Page 13 of 17Attachment 1, Page 69 of 73 Concept 1EXHIBIT D, Page 14 of 17Attachment 1, Page 70 of 73 Concept 2EXHIBIT D, Page 15 of 17Attachment 1, Page 71 of 73 Concept 3EXHIBIT D, Page 16 of 17Attachment 1, Page 72 of 73 Here’s our contact information again: simond@willamalane.org 541-735-0515 Thank you for watching our presentation! Please complete the questionnaire on the table. If you have any questions, please call or email us.EXHIBIT D, Page 17 of 17Attachment 1, Page 73 of 73 Attachment 2 Full Size Plan Sets Attachment 2, Page 1 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 2 of 159 ',*,7$//<6,*1('Attachment 2, Page 3 of 159 ',*,7$//<6,*1('Attachment 2, Page 4 of 159 ',*,7$//<6,*1('3523(57<'(6&5,37,212:1(5$33/,&$17'(6,*17($06,7('$7$352-(&7/2&$7,216,7(7$%8/$7,216*5$',1*675((7$1'87,/,7<(526,21&21752/&216758&7,21127(66+((7,1'(;&,9,/(1*,1((56859(<25,163(&7,217$%/(352326('&216758&7,21$&7,9,7<(526,21$1'6(',0(17&21752/1$55$7,9((;&$9$7,21$1'),//0$,17(1$1&(2)(526,21&21752/0($685(6(;,67,1*&21',7,216,163(&7,215(48,5(0(176:5,77(15(&25'6&216758&7,216&+('8/(&87),//48$17,7,(662,/7<3(6(526,21$1'6(',0(17&21752/%03,03/(0(17$7,217(0325$5<$1'3(50$1(179(*(7$7,2163(&,),&$7,216:,//$0$/$1(3,(5&(3$5.6,7(,03529(0(176/$1'$1''5$,1$*($/7(5$7,21352*5$0 /'$3 127(6635,1*),(/'/$1(&2817<25(*21'(4*(1(5$/127(6Attachment 2, Page 5 of 159 & ',*,7$//<6,*1('Attachment 2, Page 6 of 159 ',*,7$//<6,*1('Attachment 2, Page 7 of 159 3+$6(&76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 8 of 159 462463467 467466 462463464465466464462TSIGEERED RL A N DS CAPEARCHITECTAttachment 2, Page 9 of 159 466462TSIGEERED RL A N DS CAPEARCHITECTAttachment 2, Page 10 of 159  76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 11 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 12 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 13 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 14 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 15 of 159  76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7xxAttachment 2, Page 16 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7xxAttachment 2, Page 17 of 159  ',*,7$//<6,*1('*5$66<6:$/(6(&7,217<3,&$/75(1&+6(&7,21Attachment 2, Page 18 of 159 462463467467466462463464465466464C5.00Electrical/Lighting Plan Pierce Park Otto Street, Springfield, OR 97477 REVISIONSSite ImprovementsElectrical/Lighting PlanKeynotes:LegendService Panel DetailOne Line DiagramAttachment 2, Page 19 of 159 462463467 467466 462463464465466464462TSIGEERED RL A N DS CAPEARCHITECTAttachment 2, Page 20 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 21 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7Attachment 2, Page 22 of 159 32&&6HH1RWH3URYLGH  %DFNIORZ3UHYHQWHUV2QHIRULUULJDWLRQDQGRQHIRUGULQNLQJIRXQWDLQ/RFDWH  TXLFNFRXSOHUVLQDGMDFHQWSODQWEHG/$1'6&$3(3/$17,1*,UULJDWHG/$:1,UULJDWHG/$:11RW,UULJDWHG&Valve NumberValve SizeValve FlowVALVE CALLOUT6,=,1*&+$57&/$663,3(6,=,1*&+$57&/$663,3(180%(5'(6&5,37,216,=(7<3(36,*30 /DZQ   /DZQ  6KUXE6SUD\   /DZQ  6KUXE6SUD\   3ODQW%HG  6K /DZQ /DZQ/DZQ/DZQ/DZQ/DZQ 7UHH %XEEOHU  76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&7´Attachment 2, Page 23 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6 &$3($5&+,7(&70LQLPXP0D[LPXP0LQ0D[Attachment 2, Page 24 of 159 PIERCE PARK SITE IMPROVEMENTS Land Use Applications for a New Neighborhood Park Submitted by: Willamalane Park and Recreation District 250 South 32nd Street Springfield, OR 97478 June 8, 2021 EXHIBIT A, Page 1 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 25 of 159 Pierce Park Site Improvements Narrative 1.0 Introduction Willamalane Park and Recreation District has owned the two parcels that make up the Pierce property since the early 1990’s. Since that time, the land has remained undeveloped, with casual use for recreation by residents in the adjacent neighborhood. With the development of the Marcola Meadows subdivision immediately to the south of the Pierce property, comes an opportunity and a need to improve the space and create an attractive and active space in the form of a new neighborhood park. 1.1 Applicant’s request As advised by City planning staff during the Development Issues Meeting, Willamalane requests approval of the project through Site Plan Review, Discretionary Use, and Drinking Water Protection Overlay District Development applications. These are included with this document. 1.2 Existing Use The park currently has no improvements. It is rough grass, with trees and shrubs on the north property boundary. The site is predominantly flat with a storm water swale at the far south west corner of the site. The park borders the EWEB pathway which runs along the south boundary of the property. Willamalane currently has a maintenance agreement with EWEB for the pathway. South of the EWEB path is the new Marcola Meadows development, currently under construction. Access to the park will be via new connections from this development, from Otto Street to the west, from the EWEB path, and outside of school hours, from Briggs Middle School property. Residential properties exist to the west of the park in Otto Street, and to the north of the eastern parcel with properties that are accessed from Yolanda Avenue. 1.3 Land Use Requirements and Environmental Constraints The western parcel (tax lot 2300) is zoned and designated as Public Land and Open Space (PLO), to which the proposed used complies with city zoning requirements. The eastern parcel (tax lot 1500) is zoned as Medium Density Residential (MDR), which generates the application to the city for Discretionary Use. The site is within the 1-year TOTZ for the Pierce Wellhead, and a Drinking Water Protection Overlay District Development Application is submitted. The site is entirely outside of the 500 year floodplain EXHIBIT A, Page 2 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 26 of 159 according to the FEMA floodplain map. No wetlands are located on site according to Springfield’s Local Wetland Inventory, or Water Quality Limited Watercourses. According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service website mapping services, the existing soil types are predominantly Salem gravelly silt loam (NRCS soil #118) with a small area of Malabon-urban land complex (NRCS soil #76), which are generally well draining soils. Coupled with site observations by Branch Engineering, good infiltration of storm water is expected. Overflow storm water from Marcola Meadows development will be directed towards the existing swale in the western part of Pierce Park. No changes to this swale are proposed with the exception of some very limited fill on the eastern side of the swale to allow pedestrian pathways between the development and the new park to align. 1.4 Proposed Development The western parcel will be the focus of most site improvements. A concrete loop path will allow access to/from the park and the new playground. The playground will include play equipment for age groups 2 to 5 and 5 to 12, in separate spaces. Play elements will include spinners, climbing structures, slides and swings, and equipment will be selected from a manufacturer certified by the International Play Equipment Manufacturers Association (IPEMA) and installed by a certified playground installer. New sidewalks and sitting areas will surround the playground, with benches, picnic tables, and other site furnishings provided. A concrete basketball play area will be provided also. The safety surface at the playground will be artificial turf over foam matting, which provides a permeable surface. The approximate area of the playground including adjacent paving and picnic shelter is 12,000 square feet. All paved areas, play and site features will be installed to Americans with Disabilities Act standards. A small number of existing trees may need to be removed to accommodate the proposals. Additionally, the understory vegetation, which is largely invasive blackberry and other shrubs, and possibly some small trees will be removed to allow installation of a new fence along the property line between Pierce Park and the school district property, and to allay security concerns related to illegal camping in this area. The current fence is currently four feet north of the property line. Vegetation on the property line between Pierce Park and the residences on the eastern parcel will be retained as is. Grading is limited to excavation needed for installation of the playground and paving; excess soil will be used to create small berms adjacent to the play area. Landscaping and irrigation are included in the improvement proposal, with a new underground irrigation system installed, and shrub beds bordering sitting areas. A new connection for potable water to the site is planned, for use with the drinking fountain and irrigation. Trees will be primarily deciduous shade and flowering trees, with some conifers. Willamalane is also proposing to include a bicycle playground at the property. Conceptual design images are included with this application from consultant designer American Ramp Company. The majority of this playground will be located on the eastern parcel, with bike skills elements that are intended to appeal to varying age groups, up to early teens. There will also be some bike play elements located closer to the traditional playground, which are intended to appeal to younger age groups, and where adult supervision will be easier. EXHIBIT A, Page 3 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 27 of 159 The bicycle playground has been designed to be a local, neighborhood facility rather than an element to which a wider population may be attracted. Willamalane staff are aware that no parking lot is available for this park due to its location, and do not wish to encourage excessive on-street parking on existing or new streets, by making the park more attractive than it needs to be. Typically, neighborhood parks do not include parking lots as this type of park is intended to serve residents within a half mile radius, which is deemed walkable or accessible by bike. The EWEB path, particularly, provides excellent access to the park by foot, and a safe, easy route to the park for young people to ride to the bike playground without needing assistance from adults in cars. The bike playground may be constructed as a second phase of the park development, depending on available funds. Willamalane will not be renting out the proposed picnic shelter for events, or allowing anything resembling competitive events at the bike playground. This is with the intention of not promoting potential vehicle transportation to the park. This is typical of most of our neighborhood parks, where the majority of park visitors walk or bike, but it is understood a limited number may drive, but not be a nuisance with regard to parking on neighborhood streets. 1.5 Utilities Willamalane is in the process of securing design services and cost quotes from Springfield Utility Board to provide service for water and power to the site. Approximately one-third of the new park site will be irrigated and a drinking fountain will be provided. Electrical needs are limited to provision for two light poles at the park. Both of these connections will be established on Willamalane property in Otto Street. No storm water connections are proposed. Impervious areas of sidewalk will be directed to drain to adjacent landscaped areas, with grassy swales constructed as needed to accommodate run-off from larger areas of paving at the picnic shelter and basketball court. No restrooms or other enclosed buildings will be constructed at the park, and no connection to sanitary sewer is proposed. A porta-potty may be placed on site during summer months if the park is selected for Willamalane’s summer playground program. 1.6 Project Objective The project objective is to implement Action 1.1 of Willamalane’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan, which is to “work with SPS to develop and implement a school/park master plan for the Pierce property and adjacent Briggs and Yolanda school grounds that provides for coordinated development and optimizes outdoor recreation opportunities”. Also, to implement Action 1.2 which states ”work with the city and future developer to coordinate park planning with the adjacent Marcola Meadows development and see opportunities to expand Pierce Park. The proposed park can provide new recreational experiences, and a chance for the park to become a central community gathering place where children can be more active, and learn through the play experience. Physical connections to Briggs Middle School are proposed, and once the park is established, Willamalane and SPS can look at additional opportunities to use the park for learning opportunities. Willamalane is currently working with the Marcola Meadows developer, coordinating construction EXHIBIT A, Page 4 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 28 of 159 opportunities, siting the main part of the new playground adjacent to the open space in the north of the development, and connecting to pedestrian links proposed for the development. 1.7 Springfield Development Code (SDC) Review Criteria To approve the proposed application, it must be found that the request complies with the applicable criteria as outlined in the SDC. Approval of the land use applications is contingent upon an applicant demonstrating that the subject proposal is consistent with the SDC chapter 4 development standards, chapter 4 discretionary use criteria, and chapter 3 drinking water protection requirements. To facilitate a review of Willamalane’s proposal for Pierce Park, this narrative addresses those sections of the SDC that are deemed relevant to the application. Only the criteria to which a response is deemed necessary has been included in the following paragraphs for the three different land use applications. EXHIBIT A, Page 5 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 29 of 159 1.8 Site Plan Review application Willamalane’s response to the SDC sections deemed applicable is as follows: 3.2-215 Base Zone Development Standards The eastern parcel of the park meets/exceeds the minimum lot size of 4500 s.f. The parcel does not have means of accessing street frontage. No buildings are present with regard to setbacks. 3.2-715 Base Zone Development Standards At less than 1%, the western parcel of the park meets the requirements for maximum 65% of the development area to be parking, driveways and structures. Over 85% of the park will be landscaped. The picnic shelter is the only element on site that could be regarded as a building, and is outside of all required setbacks, and at 11’-3” height it meets any requirements in that regard. 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways A. Site Access and Driveways—General. 1. All developed lots/parcels are entitled to one approved driveway access provided by either direct access to a: a. Public street or alley along the frontage of the property The Pierce park property has an existing gravel driveway from Otto Street. No changes to this access or any additional vehicular access is proposed from this location. 4.2-135 Sidewalks C. Concrete sidewalks must be provided according to Section 4.2-105.C, Table 4.2-1, and the following criteria: 1. Sidewalks must conform to the existing or planned street grades. 2. Sidewalks must conform to current ADA standards. 3. Sidewalks must be separated from the curb by the planting strip, except when necessary for connectivity, safety, or to comply with street design requirements, and subject to approval by the Director. EXHIBIT A, Page 6 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 30 of 159 4. New sidewalk width and type must be consistent with existing sidewalk design in the same block, but must physically transition to comply with current sidewalk standards as determined by the Director. When replacing damaged sidewalk, new sidewalk must be located in the same position as the existing sidewalk. 5. Facilities including, but not limited to, mail boxes, water meters, valves, junction boxes, manholes, utility poles, trees, benches, fire hydrants, signs, and bus stops must not be located within the sidewalk, and must be removed or relocated prior to the construction or reconstruction of the sidewalk, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If facilities remain, there must be at least 5 feet of unobstructed width on arterial class streets and 4 feet on all other streets. The Pierce park property abuts existing sidewalk for approximately 80 linear feet. This sidewalk will be repaired as required to ensure it is compliant with ADA standards. New connections to public utilities for water and power will be established at the property at the end of Otto Street. Junction boxes and vaults will be installed in the planter strip or on Willamalane property in coordination with Springfield Utility Board. 4.2-140 Street Trees A. New Street Trees. New street trees shall be at least 2 inches in caliper. New street trees shall be selected from the City Street Tree List and installed as specified in the City’s Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The Director shall determine which species are permitted or prohibited street trees. One new street tree will be planted in the planter strip in Otto Street. See landscape Plan L1.00. 4.2-145 Lighting Standards Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and access ways must conform to the following design standards and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications: C. Design Standards. 1. Lighting must comply with Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting – RP-8-14 and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. No lighting for public streets, paths or access ways are proposed. However, two light poles will be installed in the park to comply with the above codes and practices. 4.2-150 Multi-use Paths EXHIBIT A, Page 7 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 31 of 159 A. Development abutting an existing or proposed multi-use path identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), City-adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan, or the adopted Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan must include provisions for the extension of the multi-use path through the development area by the dedication of public easements or rights-of-way. The developer bears the cost of multi-use path improvements. The park is adjacent to the existing EWEB path which is used by pedestrians and cyclists. No changes to the path are proposed and the path does not enter the park. Paved connections from the park to the EWEB path are proposed, which will also connect to the Marcola Meadows development to the south. See Site Plan C2.00. 4.3-110 Stormwater Management C. A stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run-off from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the development. The Public Works Director shall determine the necessary size of the facility, based on adopted Public Facility Plans and Stormwater Facility Master Plans. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to adopted City Council policy. The existing swale at the western end of the site accommodates potential overflow Stormwater from the Marcola Meadows development via a pipe under the EWEB path, before draining into the City stormwater system. With the exception of some minor grading to accommodate new sidewalks, this swale will be left intact. No run off from the Pierce Park site will be directed to this swale. D. Run-off from a development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Where the Public Works Director determines that the additional run-off resulting from the development will overload an existing stormwater management system, the Approval Authority shall withhold Development Approval until provisions, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, have been made to correct or mitigate this condition. The majority of Stormwater in Pierce Park will be directed to run off into adjacent landscape areas of grass or shrubs. The larger impervious surfaces such as at the picnic shelter and basketball court will be directed into grassy swales consistent with the City Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. See sheet C4.00 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination A. All utility providers shall be responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee or by separate written correspondence. EXHIBIT A, Page 8 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 32 of 159 B. The developer shall be responsible for the design, installation and cost of utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider. Willamalane is coordinating with SUB with regard to provision of service for water and power to the park site. All utilities will be placed underground. 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection A. Each development area shall be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply to the development with sufficient access for maintenance. Water service will be established to the site by SUB to provide water for landscape irrigation and for a public drinking fountain. No fire hydrants are being provided as part of the site improvements. No buildings requiring fire protection or access are proposed. The picnic shelter will be an open all metal structure with metal tables. 4.4-105 Landscaping A. These regulations ensure that new development complies with the landscaping provisions of this Code and any applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, and Conceptual Development Plans; is adequately screened from less intensive development; considers the effects of vegetation on public facilities; retains significant clusters of natural trees and shrubs wherever possible; minimizes run-off; facilitates energy conservation and crime prevention; and improves the appearance of the City to create a desirable place to live and work. As a proposed new park for the city of Springfield, Willamalane’s intention is for the site to be an attractive, welcoming place for the neighborhood to gather and recreate. Many shade, flowering and coniferous trees will be planted. Some new lawn will be planted and irrigated but some areas of existing vegetation will be left and managed for natural resource promotion, and to minimize the need for irrigation and mowing. Areas of ornamental shrubs will be planted to provide color and interest to the playground area. The park landscape design is intended to be simple but to provide a traditional park feel, once vegetation has matured. B. Three types of landscaping may be required: 1. Landscaping standards for private property as specified in this Section and other Sections of this Code. 2. Street trees in the public right-of-way as specified in Section 4.2-140. EXHIBIT A, Page 9 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 33 of 159 3. Curbside planter strips in the public right-of-way as specified in Section 4.2-135. An additional street tree will be planted in the landscape strip in Otto Street, and the currently unimproved landscape strip will be seeded and irrigated. D. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, the following areas of a lot/parcel shall be landscaped: 1. All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as specified in the appropriate zoning district. E. At least 65 percent of each required planting area shall be covered with living plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant materials shall be distributed throughout the required planting area. The planting acceptable per 1,000 square feet of required planting area is as follows: 1. As a minimum, 2 trees not less than 6 feet in height that are at least 2 inches in caliper (at the time of planting, not including root ball); and 2. Ten shrubs, 5 gallons or larger. 3. Lawn and/or groundcover may be substituted for trees or shrubbery, unless required for screening when there are adequate provisions for ongoing maintenance Over 85% of the park will be landscaped with either existing trees, grass or other vegetation, as well as proposed new shrub beds, approximately 54,000 square feet of newly seeded lawn, and (59) new trees. Deciduous and flowering trees will be specified as 2” caliper, and evergreen trees as 6’ to 7’ height. G. All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system unless where planted with native species or plant communities, or as may be exempted by the Director. A permanent underground irrigation system will be provided for all areas of new lawn, shrub planting beds and new trees. Areas of existing rough grass and natural vegetation will not be irrigated. I. Planting Installation Standards. 1. The applicant shall provide methods for the protection of existing plant material, which will remain through the construction process. The plants to be saved and the method of protection shall be noted on the Planting Plan. EXHIBIT A, Page 10 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 34 of 159 2. Existing trees to be retained on private property shall not have construction occur within the drip line, unless a landscape architect certifies that affected trees will have at least a 90 percent chance of survival over a 5-year period. Trees to be saved shall be kept free from trunk abrasion. Most existing trees in the park will be retained and protected with construction fencing at the drip line. Several trees and the understory vegetation along the property line between Pierce Park and the school district property, which is largely invasive blackberry and other shrubs, will be removed to allow installation of a new fence, as the existing fence is four feet north of the property line. Removal of the understory will help to minimize illegal camping in this area also. See Demolition Plan C1.00 and Landscape Plan L1.00. Vegetation on the property line between Pierce Park and the residences on the eastern parcel will be retained as is. 3. The Planting Plan may be required to include specifications for topsoil, including depth and organic matter requirements, to ensure the health and vitality of required planting. Where planting areas have been excavated, the Planting Plan shall provide for the replacement of topsoil. All waste material shall be removed from required planting areas prior to the application of topsoil. 18 inches of topsoil shall be provided at all shrub planters. The preference is for existing topsoil free of imported weed sources to be re-used, ameliorated with locally available compost. 4.4-115 Fences A. General. 1. In any zoning, overlay or plan district not specifically listed in Table 4.4-1, fence standards shall be determined based upon the use, for example a commercial use in the Mixed Use Commercial District shall comply with fence standards for the commercial districts in Table 4.4-1. A 6’ height chain link fence is proposed to replace the existing post and wire fence on the property line between Pierce Park and Briggs Middle School. The fence will include a gate that will have controlled access by the school on a timer. 4.5-110 Illumination and Height A. On-site lighting shall be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application including parking areas and vehicle sales areas. All exterior light fixtures shall be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property, and directed downward and away from abutting properties; public rights-of-way; and riparian, wetlands and other protected areas identified in this Code on the same property. EXHIBIT A, Page 11 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 35 of 159 B. Height. 1. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the principal permitted structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface and the bottom of the light fixture. 2. EXCEPTIONS: b. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture within 50 feet of any residential district and riparian, wetlands and other similarly protected areas shall not exceed 12 feet. Two light poles are proposed for the park, located near one of the park entrances from the EWEB path, and at the picnic shelter. These are not intended for people to be able to use the park at night, but to dissuade illicit use of the park, and to allow law enforcement to view the main area of the park during hours of darkness. The lights will be on a control device that will allow dimming or turning off lights at certain hours. The lights are not within 50 feet of a residential district. Refer to the lighting cut sheets attached to this document. 4.6-110 Motor Vehicle Parking—General M. Right Size Parking Alternative—Minimum. The Approval Authority may authorize an alternative parking standard that is less than the minimum off-street parking standard in Section 4.6-125, including reductions in excess of the cumulative maximum reduction specified in Section 4.6-110.K. above. The alternative parking standard must be one of the following: 1. The average peak period parking demand identified for the use in the current version of the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Manual, for the day(s) of the week with the highest parking demand; or 2. The peak parking demand identified by the applicant and supported by information that a reasonable person would rely upon as determined by the Approval Authority. This information may include, but is not limited to, transportation demand management or a parking study for a similar development. The ITE Parking Manual does not include information for neighborhood parks. Performing a parking study for a neighborhood park would be difficult as without parking lots associated with these kinds of parks being present, it would be almost impossible to ascertain how park visitors arrived, and if they did arrive by car, in which part of the neighborhood they may have parked. Additionally, neighborhood parks are typically provided for those living within half a mile of the park, and would normally be expected to travel by non-motorized means. Public consultation took place with respect to the Pierce Park project in Fall of 2020. This took the form of an online public meeting, outreach through social media, and a survey on Willamalane’s website soliciting comments on the park concepts that had been prepared. The park EXHIBIT A, Page 12 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 36 of 159 proposals were well received with no negative comments regarding a bike play facility. Only 12% of the 90 respondents indicated they would drive to the park. It is understood that the city may have concerns over the bike playground element that is included in the proposal for Pierce Park. However, Willamalane staff feel that the presence of the EWEB path directly next to the park, provides an excellent way for children to travel to the park independently and safely, without the generation of additional vehicle traffic that might otherwise be required for a parent or caregiver to facilitate access to the park. All new developments in Willamalane’s parks usually generate higher visitor use when they first open, so some parking in neighborhood streets such as Otto Street or W Street in Marcola Meadows could be expected in the beginning. However, visitor use usually diminishes from the numbers first witnessed fairly soon after a new park is opened. Additionally, the bike play elements have been designed to appeal to younger riders, so the possibility of older, car driving visitors using the bike playground is negated, and the likelihood of the bike playground being accessed by children who would ride independently along the EWEB path is increased. American Ramp Company have advised that provision of these kinds of bike facilities without associated parking is not uncommon. Examples of such bike parks they have designed include: • Blue River Bike Park, Breckenridge, CO. Parking on neighborhood streets, with access along a paved multi-use trails along the Blue River. EXHIBIT A, Page 13 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 37 of 159 • Northern Pacific Skills Trail, Yelm, WA. Access along a paved multi-use trail. Project to be constructed. • Lower Stillwell Bike Park, CA. Access via a multi-use pathway. Project to be constructed. EXHIBIT A, Page 14 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 38 of 159 Additionally, Stone Creek Park in Bend, OR is a 6 acre bicycle skills park that does not have a designated parking lot. It relies on parking on neighborhood streets and a nearby public school for those that choose to drive to the site. 4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking—Parking Space Requirements F. Public Land and Open Space District. Motor vehicle parking standards shall be determined based upon standards for similar uses in Table 4.6-2. Uses not listed shall require a Parking Study. Table 4.6-2 does not include minimum standards for parks. Refer to the response to 4.6-110 above for further information regarding a parking study. No restroom or other buildings are proposed for the park which would trigger parking requirements. 4.6-145 Bicycle Parking—Facility Design A. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be a powder coated staple or inverted-U rack as shown in Figure 4.6-B. EXHIBIT A, Page 15 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 39 of 159 Bike racks locations are shown on Site Plan sheet C2.00. These will be standard inverted-U shape racks, powder coated and attached to concrete paving. Racks will be installed to conform to minimum standards of Figures 4.6-B and 4.6-C. 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking—Facility Improvements A. Bicycle Parking Location and Security. 1. Bicycle parking racks, shelters, or lockers must be securely anchored to the ground or to a structure. Bike racks will be surface mounted to concrete paving. 7. Bicycle parking and bicycle racks must be located to avoid conflict with pedestrian movement and access. Direct access from bicycle parking spaces to the public right-of-way must be provided by at-grade or ramp access. Pedestrian access must be provided from the bicycle parking area to the building entrance. Bicycle parking may be located in the public sidewalk or right-of-way where there is a minimum 5 feet between the parked bicycle and the storefront and does not conflict with pedestrian accessibility. Bike racks will be located on concrete pads adjacent to sidewalks so as to avoid conflict with pedestrian movement. 4.6-155 Bicycle Parking—Number of Spaces Required B. The following parking standards have been established according to use and apply to that use in any zoning district. Table 4.6-3 Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces (extract) Parks and Playgrounds 8 per park or playground 100% short-term Eight bike racks are shown on Site Plan sheet C2.00 to accommodate sixteen bikes. 4.7-200 Public and Private Parks Public parks shall be designated in the Metro Plan including the Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan or be approved in accordance with a Discretionary Use application as specified in Section 5.9-100. EXHIBIT A, Page 16 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 40 of 159 B. Standards for Public and Private Parks in the PLO District. 1. Primary access shall be on arterial or collector streets unless specified or exempted elsewhere in this Section. Pierce Park is isolated from public streets with the exception of Otto Street at the western end of the property. This is the only public street that provides direct access to the property. The park is included in Willamalane’s Comprehensive Plan, so should have already been reviewed with regard to compatibility with surrounding uses. PLO allows parks within that designation; MDR zoning may allow access from a local street through the Discretionary Use review. Additionally, creation of a park within the MDR zone would generate less vehicle trips than residential uses. Most of Willamalane’s existing neighborhood parks are accessible along local streets rather than arterial or collector streets. 2. Stadiums, swimming pools and other major noise generators within parks shall be located at least 30 feet from residential property lines and screened by a noise attenuating barrier. No major noise generators are included in the park proposals. 3. Community and regional parks shall be designated on a Park Facilities Plan adopted by the City, or be approved in accordance with Type III review procedure (Discretionary Use). Pierce Park is not classified as a community or regional park. 4. A traffic impact and parking study shall be prepared by a Traffic Engineer and approved by the City Engineer. Refer to the response to 4.6-110 above for further information regarding a parking study. 4.7-203 Public Land and Open Space A. Primary access shall be on arterial or collector streets except as provided or exempted elsewhere in Section 3.2-700. B. Stadiums, swimming pools and other major noise generators shall be located at least 30 feet from residential property lines and shall be screened by a noise attenuating barrier. Refer to the response to 4.7-200 above for responses to these criteria. EXHIBIT A, Page 17 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 41 of 159 1.9 Pierce Park Discretionary Use Application Willamalane’s response to the SDC sections deemed applicable is as follows: 5.9-115 Review A. New Discretionary Uses are reviewed under Type III procedure. Typically, a Discretionary Use application is reviewed concurrently with a Site Plan application. However, upon request from the applicant, the Director may allow the Discretionary Use application to be processed first. 5.9-120 Criteria A Discretionary Use may be approved only if the Planning Commission or Hearings Official finds that the proposal conforms to the Site Plan Review approval criteria specified in Section 5.17-125, where applicable, and the following approval criteria: A. The proposed use conforms with applicable: 1. Provisions of the Metro Plan; The proposed use conforms to the Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan General Plan (updated June 2019) in several ways. Approximately 32 percent of areas zoned residential are available for auxiliary uses, such as streets, elementary and junior high schools, neighborhood parks, other public facilities, neighborhood commercial services, and churches not actually shown on the Metro Plan Diagram. Such auxiliary uses shall be allowed within residential designations if compatible with refinement plans, zoning ordinances, and other local controls for allowed uses in residential neighborhoods. Other statements in the Metro Plan that support the proposed use include: • Combining educational facilities with local park and recreation facilities provides financial benefits to the schools while enhancing benefits to the community. Pierce Park will have a close association with Briggs Middle School and a potential new school at the Marcola Meadows site. • Provide a variety of parks and recreation facilities to serve the diverse needs of the community’s citizens. Pierce Park aims to provide recreational activities that appeal to a broad age group, with different interests. • It is becoming increasingly difficult for local park agencies to meet the demands and needs of the community for parks and recreation facilities. The major problems include areas developing without parks and recreation facilities available for the residents. Pierce Park will provide a much needed park for the new Marcola Meadows development which does include a park, as well as the existing neighborhood. • Close the gap between the current supply of park and recreation facilities and the projected demand. Pierce Park is a good sized neighborhood park, and will help to meet the increased demand on such facilities from the Marcola Meadows development. EXHIBIT A, Page 18 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 42 of 159 • Parks and Recreation Facilities Element Policy H.2 states that local parks and recreation plans and analyses shall be prepared by each jurisdiction and coordinated on a metropolitan level. The park standards adopted by the applicable city and incorporated into the city’s development code shall be used in local development processes. Pierce Park is identified in Willamalane’s 2012 Comprehensive Plan as an area for development as a park in conjunction with the Marcola Meadows development, and in association with the school district to optimize outdoor recreation opportunities. 2. Refinement plans; The proposed use conforms to the Springfield 2030 Refinement Plan – Residential and Housing Element in the following ways: • Policy H.14 states: to continue to update existing neighborhood refinement plan policies and to prepare new plans that emphasize the enhancement of residential neighborhood identity, improved walkability and safety, and improved convenient access to neighborhood services, parks, schools and employment opportunities. Pierce Park will add to the areas identity, and become a hub between new and old neighborhoods. It will enhance the walkability of the area, including adding an attractive element and destination along the EWEB path. • The results of the Springfield Residential Land and Housing Needs Analysis (RLHNA) indicate that Springfield has an overall surplus of residential land, but has deficits in the High Density Residential and Parks and Open Space categories. There is sufficient buildable land in Springfield’s UGB designated for low and medium density residential uses to meet the future housing needs of the projected population. Pierce Park will reduce the deficit for parks and open space, and will impact medium density residential land which has a surplus of 76 gross acres according to the RLNHA. • The Parks and Open Space designation has a deficit of 300 acres. This need does not require the City to expand the UGB for parks and open space. The City has a surplus of buildable lands in the low and medium density residential plan designations that can provide land for future parks within those designations, consistent with the objectives of the adopted Park and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. A portion of the parks and open space need can also be met on residentially designated land that has constraints and therefore is not counted as buildable acres. Pierce Park can help reduce the deficit of park acreage while reducing the surplus for MDR land. Additionally, it may be regarded that the eastern parcel in Pierce Park has access constraints that limit the opportunities for residential development, as it has no property line that is adjacent to a public street. 3. Plan District standards; Refer to Site Plan Review responses for sections 3.2-215 and 3.2-715 5. Specific Development Standards in this Code; Refer to Site Plan Review responses for sections 4.7-200.b, 4.7-203. EXHIBIT A, Page 19 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 43 of 159 B. The site under consideration is suitable for the proposed use, considering: 1. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the use (operating characteristics include but are not limited to parking, traffic, noise, vibration, emissions, light, glare, odor, dust, visibility, safety, and aesthetic considerations, where applicable); Refer to Site Plan Review responses for sections 4.1-120.A.1.a; 4.4-105.B, D, E, G; 4.4-115.A; 4.5-110; 4.6-110.M; 4.6-145.A; 4.6-150.A.1, 7; 4.6-155.B 2. Adequate and safe circulation exists for vehicular access to and from the proposed site, and on-site circulation and emergency response as well as pedestrian, bicycle and transit circulation; The park borders Otto Street, which is the only direct access to the park from a public street. Emergency access is available from this location and along the EWEB pathway. Pedestrian and bicycle circulation within the park will be via the proposed concrete and gravel pathways. 3. The natural and physical features of the site, including but not limited to, riparian areas, regulated wetlands, natural stormwater management/drainage areas and wooded areas shall be adequately considered in the project design; and The site is generally flat and suitable for development as a neighborhood park, with few existing site features. There are no riparian areas or regulated wetlands present. An existing stormwater swale exists in the western parcel of the park, which will remain undeveloped with the exception of some minor grading that is required to align sidewalks from the Marcola Meadows subdivision with those in the park. What may be described as wooded areas exist on the northern boundary of the property. Willamalane proposes to leave this area largely intact, although understory vegetation will need to be removed to replace the fence at the boundary with Briggs Middle School. The vegetation on the boundary that borders private residences at the eastern parcel will remain in its current condition. The site is within the 1-year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) for the potential Pierce wellhead. A separate application is included with this document in relation to the TOTZ. 4. Adequate public facilities and services are available, including but not limited to, utilities, streets, storm drainage facilities, sanitary sewer and other public infrastructure. No connections to existing utilities for stormwater or sanitary sewer are proposed. Refer to Site Plan Review responses for sections 4.3-120, 4.3-130 regarding water and electrical utilities. EXHIBIT A, Page 20 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 44 of 159 1.10 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District Development Application The park is within the 1-year time of travel zone for the Pierce wellhead. This is a potential wellhead as shown on the Wellhead Protection Areas map by City of Springfield and SUB. The following sections of the Springfield Development Code apply to the development of the site as a park. 3.3-235 Standards for Hazardous Materials within Time of Travel Zones Applications shall comply with the following standards. Where the following standards are more restrictive than the standards of the Springfield Fire Code, the following standards apply: A. Zero to One Year TOTZ Standards. 1. Within the zero to one year TOTZ, hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater may be stored in aggregate quantities of no more than 500 gallons if in original containers not exceeding 5 gallons* in size. Within that aggregated 500- gallon inventory, no more than 150 gallons of hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater may be on the premises in opened containers for handling, treatment, use production, or dispensing on site. Hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater are allowed only upon compliance with containment and safety standards specified by the most recent Fire Code adopted by the City. * A waiver of the 5-gallon maximum size may be given by the Director if the applicant can demonstrate that a larger size container would pose less risk to the aquifer. No hazardous materials that pose a risk to groundwater will be stored on site as part of the park development proposals. 3. All new uses of Dense Non-Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs) are prohibited. No DNAPLs will be used or stored on site as part of the park development proposals. 5. The following certain types of new facilities or changes in use and/or storage of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater are prohibited: e. Fill materials containing hazardous materials; The only fill material that may be brought on to site will be topsoil to meet ASTM D 5268, and therefore, not contain hazardous materials. 8. Application of fertilizers containing nitrates are restricted to no more than the amount recommended by the Lane County, Oregon State University Extension Service for turf grass and are prohibited within 100 feet of a wellhead. In no event shall a single application exceed one half pound per 1,000 square feet of area per single EXHIBIT A, Page 21 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 45 of 159 application or a total yearly application of 5 pounds nitrogen fertilizer per 1,000 square feet. Willamalane will abide by the restrictions on fertilizers containing nitrates with regard to any applications made at Pierce Park. 1.11 Attachments The following attachments are provided in support of the Site Plan Review, Discretionary Use, and Drinking Water Protection Overlay District Development applications. A. Copy of the Deeds B. Copy of Site Plans at 8.5”x 11” C. Stormwater management Plan and Drainage Study (includes completed Scoping Sheet) D. Plan Sets at 24”x36” C0.00 Cover Sheet including vicinity plan C1.00 Existing Conditions C1.01 Existing Conditions EC1 Erosion Control Notes EC2 Erosion Control Plan EC3 Erosion Control Details C1.50 Demolition Plan C2.00 Site Plan West C2.01 Site Plan East C2.02 Site Layout West C2.03 Site Layout East C2.50 Site Details C2.51 Site Details C2.52 Site Details C3.00 Site Grading Plan West C3.01 Site Grading Plan East C4.00 Site Drainage and Utility Plan C5.00 Electrical/Lighting Plan L1.00 Landscape Plan West L1.01 Landscape Plan East L1.50 Landscape Details L2.00 Irrigation Plan L2.50 Irrigation Details E. Bike Playground Plans F. Lighting Specifications G. Title Reports H. Transit Facilities EXHIBIT A, Page 22 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 46 of 159 Attachment A: Copy of Deeds EXHIBIT A, Page 23 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 47 of 159 Real Property Tax Lot Record Lane County Assessment and Taxation Print Date: Oct 22, 2020 In preparation of these records, every effort has been made to offer the most current, correct, and clearly expressed information possible. Nevertheless, inadvertent errors in information may occur. In particular but without limiting anything here, Lane County disclaims any responsibility for typographical errors and accuracy of this information. The information and data included on Lane County servers have been compiled by Lane County staff from a variety of sources, and are subject to change without notice to the User. Lane County makes no warranties or representations whatsoever regarding the quality, content, completeness, suitability, adequacy, sequence, accuracy, or timeliness of such information and data. The legal descriptions contained herein are for tax lot purposes only. Included in this report: A listing of documents affecting ownership and/or property boundary changes.1. The scanned tax lot record image and any legal description changes made since .2. Map & Tax Lot 1702193301500 Status Active Current Parcel/Account Current TCA 0113769 01900 Document #Type Date Effective Year Tax Lot Acres Description Card 2.85 Comments: EXHIBIT A, Page 24 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 48 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 25 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 49 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 26 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 50 of 159 Real Property Tax Lot Record Lane County Assessment and Taxation Print Date: Oct 22, 2020 In preparation of these records, every effort has been made to offer the most current, correct, and clearly expressed information possible. Nevertheless, inadvertent errors in information may occur. In particular but without limiting anything here, Lane County disclaims any responsibility for typographical errors and accuracy of this information. The information and data included on Lane County servers have been compiled by Lane County staff from a variety of sources, and are subject to change without notice to the User. Lane County makes no warranties or representations whatsoever regarding the quality, content, completeness, suitability, adequacy, sequence, accuracy, or timeliness of such information and data. The legal descriptions contained herein are for tax lot purposes only. Included in this report: A listing of documents affecting ownership and/or property boundary changes.1. The scanned tax lot record image and any legal description changes made since .2. Map & Tax Lot 1703244402300 Status Active Current Parcel/Account Current TCA 1495447 01900 Document #Type Date Effective Year Tax Lot Acres Description Card 2.86 Comments: EXHIBIT A, Page 27 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 51 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 28 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 52 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 29 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 53 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 30 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 54 of 159 Attachment B: Site Plans at 8.5” x 11” EXHIBIT A, Page 31 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 55 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 32 of 111Attachment 2, Page 56 of 159 2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTEXHIBIT A, Page 33 of 111Attachment 2, Page 57 of 159 2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTEXHIBIT A, Page 34 of 111Attachment 2, Page 58 of 159 2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTPROPERTY DESCRIPTIONOWNER/APPLICANTDESIGN TEAMSITE DATAPROJECT LOCATIONSITE TABULATIONSGRADING, STREET AND UTILITY EROSION CONTROL CONSTRUCTION NOTESSHEET INDEXCIVIL ENGINEER/SURVEYORINSPECTION TABLEPROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NARRATIVEEXCAVATION AND FILLMAINTENANCE OF EROSION CONTROL MEASURESEXISTING CONDITIONSINSPECTION REQUIREMENTSWRITTEN RECORDSCONSTRUCTION SCHEDULECUT/FILL QUANTITIESSOIL TYPESEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP IMPLEMENTATION:TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT VEGETATION SPECIFICATIONS:WILLAMALANE PIERCE PARKSITE IMPROVEMENTSLAND AND DRAINAGE ALTERATION PROGRAM (LDAP) NOTESSPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY, OREGONDEQ GENERAL NOTESEXHIBIT A, Page 35 of 111Attachment 2, Page 59 of 159 & '7)'0'9#6'4#0&'.'%64+%#.$1#4&2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTEXHIBIT A, Page 36 of 111Attachment 2, Page 60 of 159 2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTEXHIBIT A, Page 37 of 111Attachment 2, Page 61 of 159 3+$6(&76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 38 of 111Attachment 2, Page 62 of 159 462 463 467 467466 462 463 464465466464 462TSIGEEREDR LAN DSC APEARCHITECTEXHIBIT A, Page 39 of 111Attachment 2, Page 63 of 159 466462TSIGEEREDR LAN DSCA PEARCHITECTEXHIBIT A, Page 40 of 111Attachment 2, Page 64 of 159    76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 41 of 111Attachment 2, Page 65 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 42 of 111Attachment 2, Page 66 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 43 of 111Attachment 2, Page 67 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 44 of 111Attachment 2, Page 68 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7 EXHIBIT A, Page 45 of 111Attachment 2, Page 69 of 159   76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7xxEXHIBIT A, Page 46 of 111Attachment 2, Page 70 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7xxEXHIBIT A, Page 47 of 111Attachment 2, Page 71 of 159    2KGTEG2CTM1VVQ5V5RTKPIHKGNF144'8+5+1055KVG+ORTQXGOGPVUDIGITALLY SIGNED14')10*%0#4$'0#.'#14255'(01+.#4&'4)+56''4#74$';(*%+/.'ZRKTGU&GEGODGTGRASSY SWALE SECTIONTYPICAL TRENCH SECTIONEXHIBIT A, Page 48 of 111Attachment 2, Page 72 of 159 462 463 467 467466 462 463 464465466464 EXHIBIT A, Page 49 of 111Attachment 2, Page 73 of 159 462 463 467 467466 462 463 464465466464 462TSIGEEREDR LAN DSC APEARCHITECTEXHIBIT A, Page 50 of 111Attachment 2, Page 74 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 51 of 111Attachment 2, Page 75 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7EXHIBIT A, Page 52 of 111Attachment 2, Page 76 of 159 32&&6HH1RWH3URYLGH  %DFNIORZ3UHYHQWHUV2QHIRULUULJDWLRQDQGRQHIRUGULQNLQJIRXQWDLQ/RFDWH  TXLFNFRXSOHUVLQDGMDFHQWSODQWEHG/$1'6&$3(3/$17,1*,UULJDWHG/$:1,UULJDWHG/$:11RW,UULJDWHG&Valve NumberValve SizeValve FlowVALVE CALLOUT6,=,1*&+$57&/$663,3(6,=,1*&+$57&/$663,3(180%(5'(6&5,37,216,=(7<3(36,*30 /DZQ   /DZQ  6KUXE6SUD\   /DZQ 6KUXE6SUD\   3ODQW%HG 6K/DZQ /DZQ/DZQ/DZQ/DZQ/DZQ 7UHH %XEEOHU  76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&7´EXHIBIT A, Page 53 of 111Attachment 2, Page 77 of 159 76,*((5('5/$1 '6&$3($5&+,7(&70LQLPXP0D[LPXP0LQ0D[EXHIBIT A, Page 54 of 111Attachment 2, Page 78 of 159 Attachment C: Scoping Sheet EXHIBIT A, Page 55 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 79 of 159 Stormwater Management Plan and Drainage Study Pierce Park Site Improvements Branch Engineering Project #20-444 For Willamalane Parks and Recreation Dept. 250 S 32nd Ave Springfield, OR 97478 March 5, 2021 DIGITALLY SIGNED EXHIBIT A, Page 56 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 80 of 159 Contents Page No. 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 2.0 Existing conditions ................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Topography & Existing Drainage 1 2.2 Soils 1 3.0 Proposed Development ......................................................................................... 1 4.0 Stormwater Management ..................................................................................... 2 4.1 Stormwater Summary 2 5.0 Conclusion .................................................................................................................. 2 Appendices Description Appendix A Drainage And Utility Plan SIM Form – Picnic Shelter SIM Form – Basketball Court Appendix B NRCS Soils Data Appendix C Stormwater Scoping Sheet EXHIBIT A, Page 57 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 81 of 159 Pierce Park Site Improvements March 5, 2021 Branch Engineering, Inc. 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) has been prepared for the Pierce Park Improvements located between Otto and 31st Street, just south of Briggs Middle School. The new park will include walking paths, picnic shelter, basketball court and playground equipment and other park amenities. This report will display conformance to the City of Springfield requirements for stormwater quality as well as infiltration of the runoff from all new impervious surfaces. 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS 2.1 TOPOGRAPHY & EXISTING DRAINAGE The 5.7-acre site is currently an undeveloped grassy field with a few trees. It generally slight slopes to the north with elevations ranging between 465 & 467. The main existing site feature is a wide natural swale located on the southwest corner of the site. An 18” diameter pipe outlets at the south end of the swale, and there is an inlet pipe at the north end that continues to Otto Street. The proposed site improvements retain this stormwater feature, with no additional drainage proposed to be directed to it. 2.2 SOILS According to the Natural Conservation Service Website mapping services, the existing soil at the site is Salem-Urban land complex (NRCS Soil #119), which is in Hydrologic Group B having good capacity to transmit and infiltrate water, and depth to groundwater of greater than 6 feet. 3.0 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT This report is for the storm treatment and management resulting from the development of the site to a public park. The primary impervious surfaces will be walking paths, a basketball court, and a picnic shelter. The future grades and drainage patterns are expected to be similar to existing in order to minimize earthwork operations. The improvements are also dispersed around the site, which limits any significant concentrated runoff. EXHIBIT A, Page 58 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 82 of 159 Pierce Park Site Improvements March 5, 2021 Branch Engineering, Inc. 2 4.0 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 4.1 STORMWATER SUMMARY The well-draining Salem soils at the site are expected to be able to effectively infiltrate runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces. The sidewalk/path surfaces will sheet flow to the adjacent landscaping, where it will be absorbed quickly without significant overland flow. The two larger impervious surfaces proposed are the picnic shelter and the basketball court. Runoff from these areas is proposed to be directed to an adjacent grassy swale/raingarden, where it will be retained. Sizing for the grassy swales/raingarden has been established by using the Simplified Approach from Eugene’s Stormwater Manual. The area required for the grassy swale/raingarden serving the basketball court area is 780sf. Runoff from the picnic shelter requires a 208sf swale/raingarden. The raingardens will be relatively shallow depressions with 18” of growing medium over a drain rock trench. Facility ID Base Elevation Top Elevation Top Width (feet) Bottom Width (feet) Area (sf) Picnic Shelter 465 466 12 2 480 Basketball Court 465 466 12 2 960 The proposed stormwater facilities are illustrated on the attached Drainage and Utility Plan. 5.0 CONCLUSION The stormwater system for the Pierce Park Improvements has been designed in accordance with the City of Springfield requirements for water quality and quantity by directing runoff from the main impervious areas to grassy swales/raingardens. The well-drained soils on site will absorb runoff from the proposed path areas without significant overland flow. EXHIBIT A, Page 59 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 83 of 159 APPENDIX A Drainage And Utility Plan SIM Form – Picnic Shelter SIM Form – Basketball Court EXHIBIT A, Page 60 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 84 of 159 462463467467466462463464465466464Pierce ParkOtto St, Springfield, OR 97477REVISIONSSite Improvements civil transportationstructural geotechnical SURVEYINGDIGITALLY SIGNEDOREGONHCNARBENALEA#52996ORPSSEFNOILARDERGISTEE0002,8RAURBEYFHCIMLExpires: December 31, 2021GRASSY SWALE SECTIONTYPICAL TRENCH SECTIONEXHIBIT A, Page 61 of 111Attachment 2, Page 85 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 62 of 111Attachment 2, Page 86 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 63 of 111Attachment 2, Page 87 of 159 APPENDIX B NRCS Soils Data EXHIBIT A, Page 64 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 88 of 159 Soil Map—Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 1 of 3487940048795004879600487970048798004879900487940048795004879600487970048798004879900500700500800500900501000501100501200501300501400501500501600 500700 500800 500900 501000 501100 501200 501300 501400 501500 501600 44° 4' 22'' N 122° 59' 31'' W44° 4' 22'' N122° 58' 47'' W44° 4' 1'' N 122° 59' 31'' W44° 4' 1'' N 122° 58' 47'' WN Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 10N WGS84 0 200 400 800 1200Feet 0 50 100 200 300Meters Map Scale: 1:4,470 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. EXHIBIT A, Page 65 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 89 of 159 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:20,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 11, 2020 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 12, 2019—Jun 19, 2019 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Soil Map—Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 2 of 3 EXHIBIT A, Page 66 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 90 of 159 Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 32 Coburg-Urban land complex 0.8 0.8% 75 Malabon silty clay loam 0.0 0.0% 76 Malabon-Urban land complex 31.9 32.1% 100 Oxley gravelly silt loam 1.5 1.5% 118 Salem gravelly silt loam 65.3 65.6% Totals for Area of Interest 99.6 100.0% Soil Map—Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 3 of 3 EXHIBIT A, Page 67 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 91 of 159 Lane County Area, Oregon 76—Malabon-Urban land complex Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 238t Elevation: 300 to 650 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Malabon and similar soils:50 percent Urban land:45 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Malabon Setting Landform:Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Silty and clayey alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 12 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 12 to 42 inches: silty clay H3 - 42 to 60 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high (0.20 to 0.57 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Available water capacity:High (about 11.4 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 1 Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 1 Hydrologic Soil Group: C Forage suitability group: Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Other vegetative classification: Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Hydric soil rating: No Map Unit Description: Malabon-Urban land complex---Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 68 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 92 of 159 Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 8 Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 11, 2020 Map Unit Description: Malabon-Urban land complex---Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 69 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 93 of 159 Lane County Area, Oregon 118—Salem gravelly silt loam Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2340 Elevation: 300 to 800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 40 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 52 to 54 degrees F Frost-free period: 165 to 210 days Farmland classification: All areas are prime farmland Map Unit Composition Salem and similar soils:85 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Salem Setting Landform:Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional):Tread Down-slope shape:Linear Across-slope shape:Linear Parent material:Gravelly mixed alluvium Typical profile H1 - 0 to 7 inches: gravelly silt loam H2 - 7 to 26 inches: gravelly clay loam H3 - 26 to 60 inches: very gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope:0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature:More than 80 inches Drainage class:Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat):Moderately high to high (0.57 to 1.98 in/hr) Depth to water table:More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding:None Frequency of ponding:None Available water capacity:Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 2s Hydrologic Soil Group: B Forage suitability group: Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Other vegetative classification: Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Map Unit Description: Salem gravelly silt loam---Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 70 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 94 of 159 Hydric soil rating: No Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 17, Jun 11, 2020 Map Unit Description: Salem gravelly silt loam---Lane County Area, Oregon Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 3/3/2021 Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT A, Page 71 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 95 of 159 APPENDIX C Stormwater Scoping Sheet EXHIBIT A, Page 72 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 96 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 73 of 111Attachment 2, Page 97 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 74 of 111Attachment 2, Page 98 of 159 Attachment E: Bike Playground Plans EXHIBIT A, Page 75 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 99 of 159 This page is the creative property of Progressive Bike Ramps. It cannot be copied or redistributed. EXHIBIT A, Page 76 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 100 of 159 This page is the creative property of Progressive Bike Ramps. It cannot be copied or redistributed. EXHIBIT A, Page 77 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 101 of 159 This page is the creative property of Progressive Bike Ramps. It cannot be copied or redistributed. EXHIBIT A, Page 78 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 102 of 159 This page is the creative property of Progressive Bike Ramps. It cannot be copied or redistributed. EXHIBIT A, Page 79 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 103 of 159 Attachment E: Lighting Specifications EXHIBIT A, Page 80 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 104 of 159 | 1 | JOB NOTES TYPE APPROVALS WP9S-LED WARP9® Small PicoEmitter® LED kl_wp9seled_spec.pdf Kim Lighting reserves the right to change specifications without notice. © 2021 KIM LIGHTING | 17760 Rowland Street | City of Industry | CA 91748 P 626.968.5666 | F 626.369.2695 | www.kimlighting.com | Rev. Jan. 07, 2021 SPECIFICATIONS ORDERING CODE FEATURES Certifications ■ Full Cutoff PicoEmitter technology ■ Patented low profile luminaire1 ■ Available in 580nm, 3000K, 4000K and 5000K standard CCT ■ Type 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, R, L distributions ■ 0-10V dimming drivers standard ■ Sealed optical chamber, IP66 certified Max. Weight = 30 lbs. EPA .52 for 1SA. See Configuration for Additional EPAs. Side Front BottomTop 4B"(105 mm)1K"(38 mm)5N"(141 mm) 26I"(684 mm) 8I"(227 mm)15"(381 mm) 4G"(113 mm) 1"(25 mm) 3000K and warmer CCTs only Distribution 1 Type I 2 Type II 3 Type III 4 Type IV 5 Type V R Type R, Right L Type L, Left Housing WP9S Small, 60 LEDs Drive Current E35 350mA PicoEmitter Fixture Fixture Finish BL Black DB Dark Bronze GT Graphite LG Light Gray PS Platinum Silver TT Titanium WH White CC**Custom Color **Consult representative Electrical Module Source 60L 60 LEDs, 66W Color Temperature2 2K3580nm 3K3000K 4K4000K 5K5000K Voltages 120 120V 208 208V 240 240V 277 277V 3474 347V 4804 480V Photocell Options A25-7†7-pin Photocell Receptacle A30 120V Button Photocell A31 208V Button Photocell A32 240V Button Photocell A33 277V Button Photocell A34 480V Button Photocell A35 347V Button Photocell †Not compatable with SiteSync Lens Options LS5 Polycarbonate Lens NFO Option NFO#Neighbor Friendly Optic Other Options TL Tamper Resistant Latch Fuse Options SF 120, 277, 347 Line Volts DF 208, 240, 480 Line Volts 1 2 3 4 5 6 US Patent No. D568,521 S. Other patents pending.For custom optics and color temperature configurations, contact factory. Turtle friendly. Maximum 500mA drive current for 2K amber option.347V & 480V currents may be supplied with step-down transformer. Use only when vandalism is anticipated to be high. Required only for vandal protection in locations where fixtures can be reached by unauthorized persons.SiteSync is not compatable with products using 480V option. 7 8 9 10 Specify group and zone. See SiteSync product page www.hubbelllighting.com/controls/sitesync for more details. Specify time delay; dimming level and mounting height.Not available with other sensor or wireless control options. Specify group and zone at time of order. See www.hubbelllighting.com/sitesync for more details. Order at least one SiteSync interface accessory SWUSB or SWTAB. Each option contains SiteSync License, GUI, and Bridge Node. For Pole Spec Select: http://www.kimlighting.com/products/arms_and_poles/ For Control Spec Select: http://trpssl.com/index.html Motion SCH-R Round Pole Mounted Occupancy Sensor up to 30' SCH-S Square Pole Mounted Occupancy Sensor up to 30' Control Optionss #Photometry available for Type III/IV. All others, consult factory. Mounting Options Side Arm Mount 3 3" O.D. Pole 3.5 3.5" O.D. Pole 4 4" O.D. Pole 5 5" O.D. Pole 6 6" O.D. Pole SQ Square Pole VSF Vertical Slipfitter Mount for 2" pipe tenon, (2-3/8" O.D.) SVSF Vertical Slipfitter Mount square for 2" pipe tenon, (2-3/8" O.D.) Wireless WIR-RMI-IO 120-480V, 1000’ range, wiS- CAPE RF control system with on/off/dim, alerts, monitoring and metering capabilities SWP6,7 SiteSync Wireless Pre-Commission SWPM6,7,8 SiteSync Wireless Pre-Commission w/ Occupancy Sensor SW7PR9,10 Site Sync with 7 pin PCR SWUSB†SiteSync Software on USB SWTAB†SiteSync Windows® Tablet SWBRG†SiteSync Wireless Bridge Node WIR-RME-L wiSCAPE 7-pin Module NXOFM-1R1D-UNV NX 7-pin Module Control Accessories SiteSync Lighting Control is available from our most popular brands in a broad range of award-winning product families. ‡ When ordering with SiteSync, one of the following interface options must be chosen and ordered separately. Each option contains the SiteSync License, GUI and Bridge Node. Configuration EPA 1A Single Arm Mount .95 1W Wall Mount n/a HSF Horizontal Slipfitter n/a * Available round poles only. EPA is for Fixture only EXHIBIT A, Page 81 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 105 of 159 | 2 | WP9S-LED WARP9® Small PicoEmitter® LED kl_wp9seled_spec.pdf Kim Lighting reserves the right to change specifications without notice. © 2021 KIM LIGHTING | 17760 Rowland Street | City of Industry | CA 91748 P 626.968.5666 | F 626.369.2695 | www.kimlighting.com | Rev. Jan. 07, 2021 LUMINAIRE PERFORMANCE Absolute Lumens for 350mA Temperature Type I Type II Type III Type III NFO Type IV Type IV NFO Type V Type L/R 3000K N/A 6868 6773 N/A 6925 5462 7000 N/A 4000K N/A 7044 6946 N/A 7103 5602 7179 N/A 5000K N/A 7125 7026 N/A 7184 5666 7261 N/A B.U.G. Rating for 350mA (TM15) in Lumens where B = Backlight, U = Uplight, G = Glare Temperature Type I Type II Type III Type III NFO Type IV Type IV NFO Type V Type L/R 3000K N/A B2 U0 G2 B2 U0 G1 N/A B1 U0 G2 B1 U0 G2 B3 U0 G1 N/A 4000K N/A B2 U0 G2 B2 U0 G1 N/A B1 U0 G2 B1 U0 G2 B3 U0 G1 N/A 5000K N/A B2 U0 G2 B2 U0 G2 N/A B1 U0 G2 B1 U0 G2 B3 U0 G1 N/A Electrical Drive Current @ 350mA Volts - AC Amps - AC System Watts 120 0.55 66 208 0.32 66 240 0.28 66 277 0.24 66 347 0.19 66 480 0.14 66 Spectroradiometric 3000K Average 4000K Average 5000K Average Color Rendering Index (CRI)≤80 ≤80 ≤70 Power Factor >.90 >.90 >.90 LED performance and lumen output continues to improve at a rapid pace. Log onto www.kimlighting.com to download the most current photometric files from Kim Lighting’s IES File Library. For custom optics and color temperature configurations, contact factory. Projected Lumen Maintenance mA 100,000 hrs Calculated L70 350 mA 94.26%719,000 Hrs. EXHIBIT A, Page 82 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 106 of 159 | 3 | WP9S-LED WARP9® Small PicoEmitter® LED kl_wp9seled_spec.pdf Kim Lighting reserves the right to change specifications without notice. © 2021 KIM LIGHTING | 17760 Rowland Street | City of Industry | CA 91748 P 626.968.5666 | F 626.369.2695 | www.kimlighting.com | Rev. Jan. 07, 2021 Housing: ■ 0ne-piece die-cast, low copper (<0.6% Cu) aluminumalloy with integral cooling ribs over the optical chamber and electricalcompartment. ■ Solid barrier wall separates optical and electrical compartments. ■ Double-thick wall with gussets on the support-arm mounting end. ■ Housing forms a half cylinder with 55° front face plane providing a recess to allow a flush single-latch detail. ■ All hardware is stainless steel or electro-zinc plated steel. Lens: ■ Clear 3/16" thick tempered glass lens is secured by stainless steal hinge and spring latch. Extruded and vulanized silicon gasket seals the perimeter. Optical Module: ■ Precision, replaceable PicoEmitters are positioned to achieve directional control toward desired task. ■ The entire EmitterDeck fastens to the housing as a one-piece module. ■ Type I, II, III, IV, V, L (left), and R (right) standard distributions. Custom available. ■ 3000K, 4000K, 5000K standard CCT. Amber and custom available. ■ IP66 certified ■ Die-cast, low copper aluminum heat sink modules provide thermal transfer at PCB level. ■ Anodized aluminum carrier plate and heat sink modules. Electrical Characteristics: ■ 120V through 480V @ 50/60Hz. ■Class 1, 350mA. ■Power Factor = >.90 ■ National Electrical Code, ANSI/NFPA 70. ■ 10kV surge suppression. ■Thermalshield thermal control. ■-40c starting driver. ■ 0-10V dimming interface. ■All electronic components are IP66 rated. ■ Electronic components are UL and/or CSA recognized. Dimming: ■ 10% to 100% dimming by the use of standard 0-10V interface driver. ■ To activate the dimming system, a wiring harness is supplied and attached to the DIM Port (DIM IN) on the thermal shield protection system. This port allows the 0-10V Interface to bypass the thermal shield and control the driver. ■ The thermal shield works in conjunction with the control system to assure that overheating will not harm the LEDs. ■ The wiring harness is connected with the use of the Purple lead as the positive (+) and the Grey lead as the negative (-) to an available control signal (by others). Support Arm: ■ One-piece extruded aluminum with internal bolt guides and fully radiussed top and bottom. ■ Luminaire-to-pole attachment is by internal draw bolts, and includes a pole reinforcing plate with wire strain relief. ■Arm is circular cut for specified round pole. ■ Optional cast, low copper aluminum horizontal slip-fitter with adaptor plate to secure the luminaire to 2” IPS pipe size arms. ■ Optional cast aluminum wall mount plate assembly. Attaches to the wall over the junction box. Luminaire attaches to the wall plate. Finish: ■ Fade and abrasion resistant, electrostatically applied, thermally cured, triglycidal isocyanurate (TGIC) polyester powdercoat. ■ Standard colors include (BL) Black, (DB) Dark Bronze, (GT) Graphite, (WH) White, (PS) Platinum Silver, (LG) Light Gray, (TT) Titanium, and (CC) Custom Color (Include RAL#). Fusing: SF for 120, 277 and 347 Line Volts DF for 208, 240 and 480 Line Volts. ■ High temperature fuse holders factory installed inside the fixture housing. Fuse is included. Certifications and Listings: ■ UL 1598 Standard for wet locations for Luminaires. ■ UL 8750 Standard for Safety for Light Emitting Diode (LED) Equipment for use in Lighting Products. ■IP66 certified. ■ CSA C22.2#250.0 Luminaires. ■ ANSI C136.31-2010 3G Vibration tested and compliant. ■ RoHS compliant. ■ Meets Buy American provisions within ARRA. ■IDA approved, 3000K and warmer CCTs only. ■ This product qualifies as a “designated country construction material” per FAR 52.225-11 Buy American-Construction Materials under Trade Agreements effective 6/06/2020. See Buy American Solutions. CAUTION: ■ Fixtures must be grounded in accordance with national, state and/or local electrical codes, Failure to do so may result in serious personal injury. WARRANTY: ■ For full warranty see http://www. hubbelllighting.com/resources/warranty SPECIFICATIONS FixtureHousing 30 mA Max Gray Dimming Lead (-) Standard Input Black (+)White (-)Green (GND) Purple Dimming Lead (+) EXHIBIT A, Page 83 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 107 of 159 | 4 | WP9S-LED WARP9® Small PicoEmitter® LED kl_wp9seled_spec.pdf Kim Lighting reserves the right to change specifications without notice. © 2021 KIM LIGHTING | 17760 Rowland Street | City of Industry | CA 91748 P 626.968.5666 | F 626.369.2695 | www.kimlighting.com | Rev. Jan. 07, 2021 CONTROLS Gray Wire0-10V Dimming Purple Wire0-10V Dimming Orange Wire10V CustomerDefinedRed WireLine Voltage Brown Wire10V CustomerDefined Black WireLine Voltage White WireNeutral Photocell Receptacle A25-7 Fully gasketed and wired 7-pin receptacle option. Easy access location above the electrical compartment. 7-pin construction allows for a user-defined interface and provides a controlled definition of operational performance. ANSI twist-lock control module by-others. Standard customer operation modes: 1. Traditional on/off photoelectric control. 2. 5-pin wireless photoelectric control for added dimming feature. 3. 7-pin wireless photoelectric control for dimming and additional I/O connections for customer use. Button Photocell A30 for 120V, A31 for 208V, A32 for 240V, A33 for 277V, A35 for 347V, A34 for 480V, Photocell is factory installed inside the housing with a fully gasketed sensor on the side wall. For multiple fixture mountings, one fixture is supplied with a photocell to operate the others. Wireless Controls wiSCAPE™ Hubbell Control Solution’s wiSCAPE™ wireless control modules allow an individual fixture to managed, monitored and measured. The modules communicate securely over a robust certified meshed radio signal. The wiSCAPE modules provide on/off/dim control, external device input, alerts and metering. WIR-RMI-IO wiSCAPE Internal Module, 120-480V, 1000ft range (LOS), 3 Digital Inputs/1 Analog Input, 2 Outputs. WIR-RME-L wiSCAPE External Module,120-480V, 1000ft range (LOS), Internal Photocell, 1 Digital Input, Compatible with the A-25-7H option SiteSync™1 SiteSync™ wireless control system for reduction in energy and maintenance cost while optimizing light quality 24/7. See ordering information or visit www.hubbelllighting.com/products/sitesync for more details. Pole Mounted Round Pole-Mounted Occupancy Sensor up to 30’ SCH-R Round Pole-Mounted Occupancy Sensor: up to 30’ - an outdoor occupancy sensor with 0-10V interface dimming control that mounts directly to the pole. Wide 360° pattern. Module colors are available in Black, Gray, and White. Module is cut for round pole mounting. Pole diameter is needed upon order. Poles to be drilled in the field will be provided with installation instructions. Ordering Example: SCH-R44/2772/BL3 Square Pole-Mounted Occupancy Sensor up to 30’ SCH-S Square Pole-Mounted Occupancy Sensor: up to 30’ - an outdoor occupancy sensor with 0-10V interface dimming control that mounts directly to the pole. Wide 360° pattern. Module colors are available in Black, Gray, and White. Module is cut for round pole mounting. Pole diameter is needed upon order. Poles to be drilled in the field will be provided with installation instructions. Ordering Example: SCH-S/2772/BL3 SCP The SCP is a photo-control with motion sensing accessory thats mounts to the side of any new or existing 3”-5” round or square straight pole. The SCP enables any pole mounted luminaire in excess of 75 watts, to meet California Title 24 requirements with integral 20KV/10KA surge protection for added reliability and serviceability. For more detail: http://www.aal.net/products/sensor_control_ programmable 2Voltage, 3Color, 4Pole Diameter 1 PRECOMMISSIONED SITESYNC ORDERING INFORMATION: When ordering a fixture with the SiteSync lighting control option, additional information will be required to complete the order. The SiteSync Commissioning Form or alternate schedule information must be completed. This form includes Project location, Group information, and Operating schedules. For more detailed information please visit www.HubbellLighting.com/products/sitesync or contact Hubbell Lighting tech support at (800) 345-4928. SiteSync fixtures with occupancy sensor (SWPM) require the mounting height of the fixture for selection of the lens. Examples: SiteSync only : ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/SWP SiteSync with Motion Control: ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/SWPM-20F MOB ORDERING INFORMATION: When ordering a fixture with a dimming occupancy sensor option (MOB), please specify the appropriate information. These settings are specified in the ordering as shown in the example below. ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/MOB - 1 to 30 min - 33%or 50% - ?? / DBT High to Dim Delay Low Level Mounting Height (ft.) 2Voltage, 3Color, 4Pole Diameter 1 PRECOMMISSIONED SITESYNC ORDERING INFORMATION: When ordering a fixture with the SiteSync lighting control option, additional information will be required to complete the order. The SiteSync Commissioning Form or alternate schedule information must be completed. This form includes Project location, Group information, and Operating schedules. For more detailed information please visit www.HubbellLighting.com/products/sitesync or contact Hubbell Lighting tech support at (800) 345-4928. SiteSync fixtures with occupancy sensor (SWPM) require the mounting height of the fixture for selection of the lens. Examples: SiteSync only : ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/SWP SiteSync with Motion Control: ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/SWPM-20F MOB ORDERING INFORMATION: When ordering a fixture with a dimming occupancy sensor option (MOB), please specify the appropriate information. These settings are specified in the ordering as shown in the example below. ALT3/P70/60L/3KUV/PS/US/MOB - 1 to 30 min - 33%or 50% - ?? / DBT High to Dim Delay Low Level Mounting Height (ft.) EXHIBIT A, Page 84 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 108 of 159 Attachment E: Title Reports EXHIBIT A, Page 85 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 109 of 159 0RKDZN%RXOHYDUG‡ 6SULQJILHOG25 32%R[‡6SULQJILHOG25 3KRQH )D[ &RXQWU\&OXE5G6WH‡ (XJHQH25 32%R[‡ (XJHQH25 3KRQH )D[ 7,7/(,1685$1&(6(59,&(6‡(6&52:&/26,1*6 -XQH 2UGHU1R 6833/(0(17$/ 7,7/(5(3257 :LOODPDODQH3DUN 5HFUHDWLRQ'LVWULFW  WK6WUHHW 6SULQJILHOG25 $WWQ6LPRQ'DZV HPDLOVLPRQG#ZLOODPDODQHRUJ 'HDU6LPRQ'DZV 3DUWLDO%LOOLQJ $GGLWLRQDO&KDLQ 727$/   :HDUHSUHSDUHGWRLVVXHRQUHTXHVWDQGRQUHFRUGLQJRIWKHDSSURSULDWHGRFXPHQWVDSROLF\RUSROLFLHV DVDSSOLHGIRUZLWKFRYHUDJH VDVLQGLFDWHGEDVHGRQWKLVSUHOLPLQDU\UHSRUW /(*$/'(6&5,37,21 6(((;+,%,7$$77$&+('+(5(72 6KRZLQJIHHVLPSOHWLWOH DVRI-XQHDWDPYHVWHGLQ :,//$0$/$1(3$5.$1'5(&5($7,21',675,&7 6XEMHFWRQO\WRWKHH[FHSWLRQVVKRZQKHUHLQDQGWRWKHWHUPVFRQGLWLRQVDQGH[FHSWLRQVFRQWDLQHGLQWKH SROLF\IRUP1ROLDELOLW\LVDVVXPHGXQWLODIXOOSUHPLXPKDVEHHQSDLG 2UGHU1R 3DJHRI EXHIBIT A, Page 86 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 110 of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age 87 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 111 of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age 88 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 112 of 159 (;+,%,7$ /(*$/'(6&5,37,21 %HJLQQLQJDWDSRLQWEHLQJ6RXWKƒ¶(DVWIHHWDQG(DVWIHHWIURPWKH1RUWKZHVWFRUQHURI WKH)HOL[6FRWW'RQDWLRQ/DQG&ODLP1RLQ7RZQVKLS6RXWK5DQJH:HVWRIWKH:LOODPHWWH 0HULGLDQLQ/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQWKHQFH6RXWKƒ¶(DVWIHHWPRUHRUOHVVWRWKH1RUWKHUO\OLQH RIWKDWSDUFHOFRQYH\HGWRWKH&LW\RI(XJHQHE\LQVWUXPHQWUHFRUGHGLQ%RRN3DJH/DQH &RXQW\2UHJRQ5HFRUGVWKHQFH6RXWKƒ¶:HVWIHHWPRUHRUOHVVDORQJVDLG1RUWKHUO\OLQH WR DSRLQWRQWKH:HVWOLQHRIWKDWWUDFWFRQYH\HGWR5DOSK+3LHUFHHWX[DVGHVFULEHGDQGUHFRUGHG 1RYHPEHULQ9ROXPH3DJH/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ5HFRUGVVDLGSRLQWEHLQJIHHW 6RXWKRIWKHSRLQWRIEHJLQQLQJWKHQFH1RUWKIHHWWRWKHSRLQWRIEHJLQQLQJDOOLQ/DQH&RXQW\ 2UHJRQ 2UGHU1R 3DJHRI EXHIBIT A, Page 89 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 113 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 90 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 114 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 91 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 115 of 159 0RKDZN%RXOHYDUG‡ 6SULQJILHOG25 32%R[‡6SULQJILHOG25 3KRQH )D[ &RXQWU\&OXE5G6WH‡ (XJHQH25 32%R[‡ (XJHQH25 3KRQH )D[ 7,7/(,1685$1&(6(59,&(6‡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age 92 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 116 of 159 6&+('8/(% *(1(5$/(;&(37,216      7D[HVRUDVVHVVPHQWVZKLFKDUHQRWVKRZQDVH[LVWLQJOLHQVE\WKHUHFRUGVRIDQ\WD[LQJDXWKRULW\ WKDWOHYLHV WD[HVRUDVVHVVPHQWVRQUHDOSURSHUW\ RUE\WKHSXEOLF UHFRUGV SURFHHGLQJVE\D SXEOLFDJHQF\ZKLFKPD\UHVXOWLQWD[HVRUDVVHVVPHQWVRUQRWLFHVRIVXFKSURFHHGLQJVZKHWKHU RUQRWVKRZQE\WKHUHFRUGVRIVXFKDJHQF\RUE\WKHSXEOLFUHFRUGV )DFWVULJKWVLQWHUHVWVRUFODLPVZKLFKDUHQRWVKRZQE\WKHSXEOLFUHFRUGVEXWZKLFKFRXOGEH DVFHUWDLQHGE\DQLQVSHFWLRQRIWKHODQGRUE\PDNLQJLQTXLU\RISHUVRQVLQSRVVHVVLRQWKHUHRI (DVHPHQWVRUFODLPVRIHDVHPHQWQRWVKRZQE\WKHSXEOLFUHFRUGVUHVHUYDWLRQVRUH[FHSWLRQVLQ SDWHQWVRULQ$FWVDXWKRUL]LQJWKHLVVXDQFHWKHUHRIZDWHUULJKWVFODLPVRUWLWOHWRZDWHU 'LVFUHSDQFLHVFRQIOLFWVLQERXQGDU\OLQHVVKRUWDJHLQDUHDHQFURDFKPHQWVRURWKHUIDFWVZKLFKD FRUUHFWVXUYH\ZRXOGGLVFORVH $Q\OLHQRUULJKWWRDOLHQIRUVHUYLFHVODERUPDWHULDOHTXLSPHQWUHQWDORUZRUNHUVFRPSHQVDWLRQ KHUHWRIRUHRUKHUHDIWHUIXUQLVKHGLPSRVHGE\ODZDQGQRWVKRZQE\WKHSXEOLFUHFRUGV &855(17(;&(37,216   7KHUHDOSURSHUW\WD[HV IRUWKHILVFDO\HDU DUHH[HPSWHGE\YLUWXHRIPXQLFLSDO RZQHUVKLS7KHFRPSDQ\DVVXPHVQROLDELOLW\VKRXOGWKHH[HPSWVWDWXVEHOLIWHGDQGWD[HVOHYLHG 0DS 1R&RGH$FFRXQW1R 7KH$VVHVVPHQW5ROODQGWKH7D[5ROOGLVFORVHWKDWWKHSUHPLVHVKHUHLQGHVFULEHGKDYHEHHQ VSHFLDOO\DVVHVVHGDV)DUP8VH/DQG,IWKHODQGEHFRPHVGLVTXDOLILHGIRUWKHVSHFLDO DVVHVVPHQWXQGHUWKHVWDWXWHDQDGGLWLRQDOWD[PD\EHOHYLHGDQGLQDGGLWLRQWKHUHWRDSHQDOW\ PD\EHOHYLHGLIQRWLFHRUGLVTXDOLILFDWLRQLVQRWWLPHO\JLYHQ 7KLVUHSRUW SROLF\ GRHVQRWLQFOXGHDQ\VHDUFKIRUILQDQFLQJVWDWHPHQWVRUDJULFXOWXUDO VHUYLFHVOLHQVZKLFKDUHILOHGZLWKWKH6HFUHWDU\RI6WDWHDQGDQ\PDWWHUVZKLFKZRXOGEH GLVFORVHGWKHUHE\DUHH[SUHVVO\RPLWWHGIURPFRYHUDJHKHUHLQ 127(3RVWSRQHGLQIRUDWRWDOSRWHQWLDOWD[RI 127(7KHDGGUHVVRIWKHSURSHUW\WREHLQVXUHGKHUHLQLV1<$2WWR6WUHHW6SULQJILHOG25  127($-XGJPHQW/LHQ%DQNUXSWF\6HDUFKZDVGRQHIRUWKHQDPH V :,//$0$/$1(3$5.  5(&5($7,21',675,&7DQGDVRI-XQHQRQHZHUHIRXQG 127($VRI-XQHWKHUHDUHQROLHQVIRUWKH&LW\RI6SULQJILHOG ,1)250$7,21$/127(7KHFXUUHQWYHVWLQJGHHGDQGDOOFKDQJHVEDFNWRWKHGHHGZKLFK YHVWVRZQHUVKLSPRQWKVDJRDUHDVIROORZV &255(&7,21'(('5(&25'(')(%58$5<)520$//$1+3,(5&($1' -$0(6/+(56+1(575867((681'(57+(:,//2)5$/3++3,(5&('(&($6('$6 72$181',9,'('21(+$/),17(5(67$1'$//$1+3,(5&($1'-$0(6/ +(56+1(575867((681'(57+(:,//2)(/,=$%(7+&3,(5&('(&(($6('$672 $181',9,'('21(+$/),17(5(6772:,//$0$/$1(3$5. 5(&5($7,21',675,&7 5(&(37,2112 2UGHU1R 3DJHRI EXHIBIT A, Page 93 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 117 of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age 94 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 118 of 159 (;+,%,7$ /(*$/'(6&5,37,21 %HJLQQLQJDWWKH1RUWKHDVWFRUQHURI/2&+/2021'7(55$&(),567$'',7,21DVSODWWHGDQG UHFRUGHGLQ%RRN3DJH/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ3ODW5HFRUGVLQ/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQWKHQFHDORQJ WKH1RUWKHUO\SURMHFWLRQRIWKH(DVWOLQHRIVDLG/2&+/2021'7(55$&(),567$'',7,211RUWKƒ  :HVWIHHWWRWKHPRVW1RUWKHUO\1RUWKZHVWFRUQHURIWKDWFHUWDLQWUDFWRIODQGGHVFULEHGLQ %RRN3DJH/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ'HHG5HFRUGVWKHQFHDORQJWKH1RUWKOLQHRIVDLGWUDFW1RUWK ƒ (DVWIHHWWRWKH7UXH3RLQWRI%HJLQQLQJWKHQFHOHDYLQJVDLG1RUWKOLQHDQGUXQQLQJ 6RXWKƒ :HVWIHHWWKHQFHDORQJWKHDUFRIDIRRWUDGLXVFXUYHULJKW WKHFKRUGRI ZKLFKEHDUV6RXWKƒ (DVWIHHW DGLVWDQFHRIIHHWWKHQFH6RXWKƒ (DVW IHHWWRDSRLQWRQWKH1RUWKOLQHRIWKDWFHUWDLQWUDFWGHVFULEHGLQ%RRN3DJH/DQH &RXQW\2UHJRQ'HHG5HFRUGVWKHQFHDORQJWKH1RUWKOLQHRIVDLGWUDFW1RUWKƒ (DVW IHHWPRUHRUOHVVWRWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRIVDLG1RUWKOLQHDQGWKDWFHUWDLQOLQHGHVFULEHGLQDERXQGDU\OLQH DJUHHPHQWUHFRUGHGLQ%RRN3DJH/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ'HHG5HFRUGVWKHQFHDORQJWKHOLQH GHILQLQJVDLGERXQGDU\OLQHDJUHHPHQW1RUWKƒ :HVWIHHWPRUHRUOHVVWRDQLURQSLSH PDUNLQJWKH:HVWHUQWHUPLQXVRIVDLGERXQGDU\OLQHDJUHHPHQWWKHQFH6RXWKƒ (DVWIHHW WRWKH1RUWKHDVWFRUQHURIWKDWFHUWDLQWUDFWGHVFULEHGLQ%RRN3DJH/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ'HHG 5HFRUGVWKHQFHDORQJVDLG1RUWKOLQH6RXWKƒ :HVWIHHWWRWKH7UXH3RLQWRI%HJLQQLQJ DOOLQ/DQH&RXQW\2UHJRQ (;&(37WKDWSRUWLRQFRQWDLQHGLQ7D[/RWRQ0DS1R 2UGHU1R 3DJHRI EXHIBIT A, Page 95 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 119 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 96 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 120 of 159 EXHIBIT A, Page 97 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 121 of 159 Attachment H:Transit Facilities Bus Service #17 Bus Service #18 Bus Service #91 Bus Stop Location B Project Location B B B B B B B B B B EXHIBIT A, Page 98 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 122 of 159  City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name:Pierce Park by Willamalane Project Proposal:New neighborhood park and bike park for the Marcola Meadows area Case Number:811-21-000081-PRE Project Address:Two parcels located east of the end of Otto Street Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): Map ϭϳͲϬϯͲϮϰͲϰϰ͕dĂdž>ŽƚϮϯϬϬĂŶĚ DĂƉϭϳͲϬϮͲϭϵͲϯϯ͕dĂdž>ŽƚϭϱϬϬ Zoning:TL 2300: Public Land & Open Space (PLO) & TL 1500: Medium Density Residential (MDR) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Overlay - subject site is located in the 1-year TOTZ for the Pierce wellhead Applicable Refinement Plan: Q Street Neighborhood Refinement Area Refinement Plan Designation: TL 2300: PLO & TL 1500: Low Density Residential (LDR) Metro Plan Designation: TL 2300: Parks & Open Space & TL 1500: MDR Pre-Submittal Meeting Date: April 30, 2021 Application Submittal Deadline: November 1, 2021 Associated Applications: 811-20-000234-PRE (Development Initiation Meeting) SPRINGFIELD’S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM: APPLICANT’S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Applicant/Property Owner: Simon Daws Willamalane Parks & Recreations District 250 S. 32nd Street Springfield, OR 97478 541.736.4544 Applicant's Representative: Simon Daws Willamalane Parks & Recreations District 682 36th Street Springfield, OR 97478 541.735.0515 POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Project Planner Land Use Planning Melissa Cariño 541.744.4068 Transportation Planning Engineer Transportation Michael Liebler 541.736.1034 Public Works Civil Engineer Utilities, Sanitary & Storm Clayton McEachern 541.736.1036 Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Eric Phillips-Meadow 541.682.5741 Building Official Building Chris Carpenter 541.744.4153 EXHIBIT A, Page 99 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 123 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING oApplication fee - discuss the applicable fees What is total impervious surface area proposed? 20,525 sq ft. Fees = $5,146 (app) + $610 (add’l impervious area) + $287.80 (tech) + $190 (postage) =$6,233.80 site plan review Final site plan review fees = 10% of total site plan review amount = $623.30 + (tech fees?) Discretionary Use Application = $5,358.30 oCopy of the Site Plan reduced to 8½”x 11” Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 8 ½” x 11” Copy of Site Plan oCopy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report oBrief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Brief Narrative EXHIBIT A, Page 100 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 124 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 oSite Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s)   Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer N/AProposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs N/ALocation, dimensions, and number of typical, compact, and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces  Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation  Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces N/A Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses 2Location of existing and proposed transit facilities  oPhased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) N/A Phased Development Plan EXHIBIT A, Page 101 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 125 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 oLandscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Drawn by a Landscape Architect Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system Location and type of street trees List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting oArchitectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height N/A Conceptual floor plans oOn-Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 3 Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached 3 Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area 3 Photometric test report for each light source  EXHIBIT A, Page 102 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 126 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes: 1. Stormwater scoping sheet/study not required, Calculations sheet for the onsite impervious area treatment, infiltration facility is Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: xSome landscaping and street trees will be required for the frontage on otto. xHow will material and equipment be brought on the site for construction? xAn EWEB permit will be needed for the sidewalk connections into their ROW  EXHIBIT A, Page 103 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 127 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 Planning Notes: 1.Please provide preliminary title reports with the Site Plan application submission, ensuring that it’s dated within 30 days of submission. 2.Add nearby public transit facilities on Existing Conditions – Vicinity Map. 3.Provide lighting plan as per Development Code and Transportation comments. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: xAll utilities must be placed underground. xSUB Water: Contact SUB Water Division for detailed info regarding any proposed modification of the existing water services or additional water service to the proposed development. xSubmit ASAP: Fire Code Modification application included re: park structures  EXHIBIT A, Page 104 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 128 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer:Clayton McEachern Case#: 21-81-PRE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING oSite Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s)   Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer  Vicinity Map  The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings n/aThe name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department n/aThe 100-year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision  The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3- 200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department  Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5” in diameter or greater when measured 4 ½ feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings  Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table EXHIBIT A, Page 105 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 129 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 oImprovement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s)   Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer  Location and width of all existing and proposed easements n/aLocation of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities  Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points oGrading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s)   Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer  Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system  Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations  Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns  The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained  Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) n/aAmount of proposed cut and fill oStormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 1 Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study EXHIBIT A, Page 106 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 130 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes: 1. Stormwater scoping sheet/study not required, Calculations sheet for the onsite impervious area treatment, infiltration facility is Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: xSome landscaping and street trees will be required for the frontage on otto. xHow will material and equipment be brought on the site for construction? xAn EWEB permit will be needed for the sidewalk connections into their ROW  EXHIBIT A, Page 107 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 131 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE-SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#:21-000081 Applicant:Willamalane – Pierce Park TRANSPORTATION oRight-of-Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NA Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application oTraffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City’s transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) NA Traffic Impact Study oSite Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s)  Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed oImprovement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) (1) Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting  Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails Location, widths (of paving and right-of- way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, EXHIBIT A, Page 108 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 132 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable Location of existing and required traffic control devices Transportation Notes: 1.Please show the existing streetlight in the cul-de-sac and the proposed lighting for path connections to the new subdivision to the south. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: x  EXHIBIT A, Page 109 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 133 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT’S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE- APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable Where a multi-family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City’s urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer   EXHIBIT A, Page 110 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 134 of 159 Revised 10/25/07 THIS APPLICATION IS: COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE 4/30/2021 City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120-day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre-Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120- day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120-day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120-day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120-day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180-day timeline. 4/30/2021 Owner/Applicant’s Signature Date Please note the following with regard to items marked as incomplete above: Site Plan: Transit facility information is now included under attachment H Landscape Plan: some items are checked as incomplete but these were included on the original plans. On –Site Lighting Plan: information as supplied by the manufacturer was originally supplied under attachment F. Improvement and public utilities plan: The existing street light on Otto Street was shown on the existing conditions plan previously submitted. EXHIBIT A, Page 111 of 111 Attachment 2, Page 135 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 1 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 136 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 2 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 137 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 3 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 138 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 4 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 139 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 5 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 140 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 6 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 141 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 7 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 142 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 8 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 143 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 9 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 144 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 10 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 145 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 11 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 146 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 12 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 147 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 13 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 148 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 14 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 149 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 15 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 150 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 16 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 151 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 17 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 152 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 18 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 153 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 19 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 154 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 20 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 155 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 21 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 156 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 22 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 157 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 23 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 158 of 159 EXHIBIT B, Page 24 of 24 Attachment 2, Page 159 of 159