HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/25/2023City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
srwtxowe
�7
Application Type (Applicant. check one)
Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: Cxf Ma -or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑
Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma"or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑
Required Project Information (Applicant.,
Applicant Name: Patrick Elliott
complete this section)
Phone: 541-344-0681
Company: Bi -Mart Corporation
Email: PatnckElliott@bimart.com
Address: 220S Seneca Road, Eugene ene Ore on 97402
Applicant's Rep.: Heather Mayfield
Phone: 541-485-8383
Company, SSW En ineers Inc
lErnaikheatherm@sswengineers.com
Address: 2350 Oakmont Wa # 105, Eugene Oregon 97401
Property Owner: Greg Aldridge
Phone: 541-297-2238
Company: McKenzie Plaza LLC
Email: greg@gnrsloutions.net
Address: PO Box 10066 Eugene, OR 97440
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-42
TAX LOT NOS : 03300
Property Address: 5415 Main Street, Springfield Oregon 97476
Size of Property: +/-6.11 Acres x❑ Square Feet ❑
Proposed No. of
u � era • o
Proposed Name of Project: Cascade Farm and Outdoor
Description of it you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Retail tenant infill +1- 37.250 s _ ft_ out of 51 727 it plus re -purposing of 8,200 sqft of parking lot to be outdoor sales_
Existin Use: Former grocery store, now vacant
New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): o sf
Si natures: Please ion n Lint our name and date in the a roriate box on the next Qaacj
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Reviewed by:
Case No.:
Date: Reviewed b :
I 1 p
Application Fee: -T'�l •Di7
Technical Fee:
Posta a Fee:
TOTAL FEES: $ 9 •CSO
I PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. if the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that f/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
.L.c,. 11c +..z.>.� t�u.la-r.a LL -C
I represent this app icabon to be complete ler submRtal to the Ciry. Consistent with the completeness chKk
performed on tln, arbitration at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I afflnn lite m ormabun identified by the Cly as
Msesse,y or processing the application K provided herein or the Information will not be provided if not omemisp.
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the appllcadon with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notes pursuant to the rainomments of OHS 227.178 pertaining to a
.ormote application, f{..., LL`
A/.4 �Eaa�CiE rLwZh
Date- 4
Signa Uri -
Revised 1/7/I4 KL 2 of 11
Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal
• The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
• Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre -
submittal meeting.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
• The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
• A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
• ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
x❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre -submittal and submittal stages.
x❑ Site Plan Review Application Form
x❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property
(acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed.
X❑ Copy of the Deed
0 Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8'/2^x 11-, which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an
application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy
of the application upon request.
x❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet
❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal:
x❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
0 All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
Please Note:
• These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to
determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not
necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents.
• The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use
criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine
the feasibility of a proposed plan.
• Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in
contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Vicinity Map
❑ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be
shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock
outcroppings
b. Site Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon
licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown.
❑ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public
rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections
❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces
❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
❑ Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile)
Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11
❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence
addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the
logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to,
sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must
clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan
application and which are deferred to future review procedures.
c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Location and width of all existing easements
❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development,
including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof
drainage.
❑ Location and type of existing street lighting
❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar
public facilities
❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary
sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone,
and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate
to the complexity of the proposed project.
❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage
patterns.
d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below
❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components
❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development
❑ Location and width of all proposed easements
❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting
❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed
surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10
percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines
Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11
e. Landscape Plan
❑ Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional
approved by the Director
❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
❑ Location of existing and proposed street trees
f. Architectural Plans
❑ Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed
structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be
shown
g. On -Site Lighting Plan
❑ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until
Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal:
❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing
❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting
plan shall be provided.
❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above
ground utilities.
❑ Photometric test report for each light source.
❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address
Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts
Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director:
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify
potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation
measures.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11
❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or
a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer
❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives
❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to
scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses,
the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information
necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards.
❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any
required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request
❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified
In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but
within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 Of 11
SPRINGFIELD
tyl\YS1a.7J:w ]i;1q*l[9L'LXK@7►���
225 FIFTH STREET
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE. 541.726.3753
FAX 541.736.1021
www spnngfwidor.gov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stonnwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Atm: Clayton
McEachern.
4.) Receive completed scoping street (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwatcr study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httpJ/www.s rin Weld-
or Qov/DPW/EneineerineandConstmetionReso ces htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: emeeachern@springfield-or.gov
Phone: (541) 736-1036
Fax: (541) 736 —1021
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726 3753
FAX 541.726.1021
www.Springfield-or go v
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
(Area belotr this line filled nor by Applicant)
(Please relura to C7avtott McEach ern @ City afSpringfield Development and Public Works; Fee #736-1027, Phone 4 736-1036),
email: eniceachern@sprmgfield-or.gov
Project Name:
Tenant Infill: Cascade Farm & Outdoor Applicant:
Michael Cox P.E.
Assessors Parcel If
17-02-33-42-03300
Date:
Aodl 27. 2023
Land Use(s):
Community Commercial
Phone #:
541485-8383
Project Size (Acres):
+f- 6.11 (developed)
Fax #:
Approx. Impervious
Area: unchanged
Email:
michaeleosswengineers.com
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Tenant infill of approximately 37,250 square feet for retail use with a change of use for 8,200 square feet of
existing parking lot to become a fenced Outdoor Sales area.
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
No changes to current drainage including existing pipe system.
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
Maintain current BMPs.
-------- --- (Area belom this line filled out br rhp Cif: and Returned to the.A licanl----------------_
(At a n+hdmamt, all boxes checked by the City on die front and back of this sheet shall be submined
or as application to be com p lere for submittal, althoaeh other requirements may be necessary.)
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.032)7 (Note UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study— (use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email., emceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS or ouo;et o e o m
*Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed for on
application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage,' however, this list should not be used in Ilan ofthe Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval, Additional. site specific infonnahou may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed,/oral has been
signed in the space provided below.
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
❑ F-1 All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be healed by
vegetated methods.
❑ Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stonnwater Management Manual.
For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stonnwater Management Manual (Sec2.4. 1).
If a stonnwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, slid seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stonnwater Management Manual.
Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid Containing equipment located outside of thebrdlding, shall
—;— --A............e..:.....e.. —4--enrin—
❑ F� Drainage smdy prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
❑ ❑ A complete dmimge study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
❑ ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event.
n n The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
❑ F� Ras Ong and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drums.
Private stortwater casements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stomtwater flows from one property to
another.
❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
the website: http'// den.stite.or.us/waiuic/Uic.him for more information.
❑ ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rales for the 2 through 25 -year stor , events.
*This farm shall be included as an alrachmeny inside the front cover, of the.stormwater studv.
* IMPORTANT.- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAAD SIGNI
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted slornwater sandy
and plan set Signature Date
Form Version 5: lime 2015
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03 A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
❑
❑
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
❑
❑
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑
Flaw lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
❑
E]
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 mcbes for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient m support an 80,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑
❑
Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a mininmm vChwity of three f31 feet oer second at 0.5 vice frill based on Table 4-1 as well.
❑ F� Ras Ong and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drums.
Private stortwater casements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stomtwater flows from one property to
another.
❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to
the website: http'// den.stite.or.us/waiuic/Uic.him for more information.
❑ ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rales for the 2 through 25 -year stor , events.
*This farm shall be included as an alrachmeny inside the front cover, of the.stormwater studv.
* IMPORTANT.- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAAD SIGNI
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted slornwater sandy
and plan set Signature Date
Form Version 5: lime 2015
TYPE 2 LAND USE REVIEW
SUBMITTAL PACKAGE
CHANGE OF USE
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478
TENANT:
CASCADE FARM AND OUTDOOR
A DIVISION OF BI -MART CORPORATION
220 SOUTH SENECA ROAD
EUGENE, OR 97402
,%WENGINEERS.,
�1 CIVIL STRUCTURAL BUILDING DESIGN
SURVEYING LAND USE PLANNING
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Eugene OR 97401
(541)485-8383
Job #21-7897
April 2023
- SSWENGINEERS.
CIVIL 5 IMRAL MILDINDIMAq
mmHg Nown"1418o
SITE PLAN REVIEW - CHANGE OF USE
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For,
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
Page 13 Supplemental Documents
Copy of Property deed, provided by site owner
C1.0 Existing Conditions Site Plan, 8/." x 11"
C1.1 Site Development Plan, 8 W x 11"
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 1 of 13
(541) 485-8363
Proiect Scope
Page 1
Table of Contents
Page 3
Project Description
Page 5
Proposal & Relevant
Approval Criteria
Municipal Code Analysis
Page 7
SDC 3.2.300
Commercial Districts
Page 8
SDC 3.3.100
Overlay Districts
SDC 5.17.110
Applicability
SDC 5.17.125
Approval Standards
Page 13 Supplemental Documents
Copy of Property deed, provided by site owner
C1.0 Existing Conditions Site Plan, 8/." x 11"
C1.1 Site Development Plan, 8 W x 11"
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 1 of 13
(541) 485-8363
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 2 of 13
iv,
�':SMENGINEERS.
iCIO MMM VVNVINSDSIN
SVAw"a UJIDVSEWHINV
SITE PLAN REVIEW - CHANGE OF USE
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
PROJECT LOCATION:
ADDRESS USED AT THIS LOCATION:
ASSESSOR'S MAP AND TAX LOT:
ZONING:
REQUESTED PROCEDURE:
STATE PERMITS REQUIRED:
FEDERAL PERMITS REQUIRED:
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
Village Square shopping center,
vacant anchor tenant space & parking lot
5415 Main Street, Springfield OR 97478
17-02-33-42, lot 03300
CC — Community Commercial Zone
Type 2 Land Use — Director Review
None required
None required
Ivlcrenzle rlaza LLc
contact:
Greg Aldridge
PO Box 10066
Phone:
(541) 297-2238
Eugene, OR 97440
Email:
greg@gnrsloutions.net
APPLICANT:
Bi -Mart Corporation
Contact:
Patrick Elliott
220 South Seneca Rd
Phone:
(541)521-9406
Eugene, OR 97402
Email:
Patrick. Elliott@bimart.com
APPLICATION PREPARED BY:
SSW Engineers Inc.
Contact:
Heather Mayfield
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105
Phone:
(541) 485-8383
Eugene, OR 97401
Email:
heatherm@sswengineers.com
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 3 of 13
(541) 485-8383
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 4 of 13
SS==K NNEERS.
CML R SIXNCIULMOM MMIN INN
SNRNYINC IAYXVSEgANNINC
SITE PLAN REVIEW - CHANGE OF USE
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review
PROPOSAL
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
The applicant seeks a Type 2 Land Use - Director Review for a property located in a CC —
Community Commercial Zone. Approval of this application will allow the applicant to seek a permit
for tenant infill development of a vacant anchor store space in an existing retail strip mall. The
proposed anchor tenant, Cascade Farm and Outdoor, is a newer division of Bi -Mart Corporation
with a goal "to offer the hard working farmers, ranchers and homeowners of our area a helping
hand along with a great selection of quality merchandise". Cascade Farm and Outdoor intend to
employ 25 people with roughly 16 employees on shift each day.
Additionally, the applicant would like to request approval of a 15% parking reduction from the
calculated minimum spaces required, as allowed per Springfield Development Code (SDC)
Section 4.6.110(1). If approved site development will include:
• A Change of Use for (28) existing parking spaces and (1) drive aisle at the west side of the
building to become approximately 8,200 square feet of Outdoor Sales area, surrounded by
a chain-link fence.
• Additional loss of parking spaces at the north side of the building is possible with
installation of cart corrals at existing parking spaces in front of the store.
• A relocation of one (1) handicap parking space, and loss of one (1) existing parking space
(converted to an access aisle), will bring users closer to existing building access.
• New stripping in the south-east corner of the property, behind the east portion of the retail
strip mall, will make up the spaces lost from the development of the west side of the
property.
• Other site development features include installation of site screening, landscaping, repair or
replacement of existing worn hardscapes, and/or upgraded on-site lighting as required by
current Development Standards.
The property is a developed lot of 5.88 tax account acreage, (6.11 mapped taxlot acreage) which
sits in the Commercial Districts zone, CC — Community Commercial District. The property to the
east is a vacant lot in the PLO, Public Land and Open Space District zone, property to the south
and a majority of the property west, across 54'" Street, is developed R1 (Low Density) Residential
(LDR), while property to the north, across Main Street, is R2 (Medium Density) Residential (MDR)
Zoning.
REVELANT APPROVAL CRITERIA - Springfield Development Code
• Chapter 3.2.300, Commercial Districts
• Chapter 5.17.110, Applicability
• Chapter 5.17.125 (A), Approval Standards
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 5 of 13
(541) 485-8383
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 6 of 13
ENGINEERS.
NA—V CIVIL MLTM BUILBINGBUIGN
SUBIBNINC IAMB BSE PUNNING
SITE PLAN REVIEW - CHANGE OF USE
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review
CODE ANALYSIS
SDC 3.2.300 - Commercial Districts
SDC 3.2.305 (B) Applicability
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
The Zoning Map designates the site of our proposed project as Community Commercial (CC).
The table in SDC 3.2.305 (B) description of the location and characteristics of a CC district
matches up with our project for retail sales in an existing strip commercial area.
SDC 3.2.310 Use Category Determination
The proposed use falls into the category Commercial. No additional use categories, as listed in
Table 3.2.320: Lodging, Industrial, Residential, Transportation Facilities, Other, or Public and
Institutional, are anticipated.
SDC 3.2.315 Commercial Use Category
The Commercial Use Category applicable for this project is: Retail Sales & Service (3): Non -
Automobile Dependent or Oriented Use.
SDC 3.2.320 Permitted Uses
There are two listed uses in Table 32.320 Permitted Uses, under the category of Commercial,
that closely match the proposed use. Both these uses are considered Permitted Use in the CC
Commercial District column. Uses, along with their listed Applicable Code Standards, are:
• Retail Sales & Service (non -automobile dependentloriented): SDC 4.7.230 & 4.7.235.
• Garden Supply or Feed Store: SDC 4.7.150.
"Applicable Code Sections" listed are not applicable to this project.
SDC 3.2.325 Development Standards
The site is fully developed. Proposed site improvements subject to these standards include
installation of a chain-link fence. The proposed fence will be sited on existing parking spaces
already compliant with the setbacks listed in 3.2.325(B)(3)(b)(ii).
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 7 of 13
(541) 485-8383
SDC 3.3.100 - Overlay Districts
The Zoning Map does not list this project site as having an overlay district. It was advised to
include that the project site is in the "Zone of Concentration" (99 -yr TOT) per May 2019
Standard Wellhead Protection Map, as it relates to SDC 3.3.220 Time of Travel Zones.
SDC 5.17.110—Applicability
SDC 5.17.110 (A) The Site Plan Review process is used for.
(1) The following categories of multiple unit housing, commercial, public and semi-
public, and industrial development or uses, including construction of impervious surfaces for
parking lots and storage areas:
(c) Additions, expansions, and changes of use, regardless of size or intervening
use, that:
(iv) Are located within 50 feet of property in a residential land use district or
residentially designated land (as measured from the property line of the subject
property).
The proposed site improvements include a proposal for a commercial parking lot having a
change of use to allow for storage of Outdoor Sales merchandise on a site whose property line
is within 50 feet of property in a residential land use district.
SDC 5.17.110 (C) Existing lawfully developed sites that do not conform to the current standards
of this code are only required to meet current standards on the portions of the site affected by the
proposed alteration or expansion. Any alterations to the site must meet current code standards.
Other than parking area stripping, proposed site improvements will occur in the southwest
portion of the site. Any portions of the site not affected by this proposed alteration shall not be
held to existing standards.
SDC 5.17.125 - Approval Standards
SDC 5.17.125 (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site
Plan Review application based on the following standards:
The proposed site improvements meet all approval standards as currently developed. The
following standards are applicable to the proposed site.
(1) The proposed land use is a permitted use or is allowed as a discretionary use in the land use
district.
The proposed use is Permitted as determined in SDC 3.2.300 code analysis, above.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 6 of 13
SSWENGINEERS.
smt swusrunu wlmins sssiss
54WVE17M61m0YRPUNMIXB
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
5415 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
(2) If a use is allowed as a discretionary use, in addition to meeting the standards below, a
Discretionary Use application must be approved in conformance with the standards in
SDC 5.9.100.
The proposed use is permitted outright.
(3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property.
The subject property shall meet the Development Standards as listed in SDC 32.325.
(4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, master facilities plan,
refinement plan, and/or special planned district.
The current zoning district for this site is Community Commercial with no anticipated zoning
changes. The 2019 Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan & adopted
Diagram (2004) designates the site as Commercial. Community Commercial centers are
described to include existing strip commercial. Further, development of this category is
described as usually around a small department or grocery store, on at least 5 acres. The
currently vacant anchor tenant space is a former grocery store within an existing strip
center.
Additionally, the 2015 Main Street Corridor Vision Plan has designated the area around this
site as the 54th Street Activity Node encouraging destination businesses. The proposed
anchor tenant, Cascade Farm and Outdoor, is a newer division of Bi -Mart Corporation. With
only 4 other Cascade Farm and Outdoor locations, they comply with the Approved Master
Plan as a small department store and comply with the Main Street Vision Plan as a
destination business.
(5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.2, Infrastructure Standards -
Transportation.
The proposed site improvements do not anticipate any changes to existing streets, public
or private; site access and driveways; intersections; sidewalks; nor street lighting
conditions. Applicable transportation standards that would apply include verification of
Vision Clearance, and possibly Street Trees.
4.2.130 Vision Clearance Area
The Site Plan shows the proposed fenced -in Outdoor Sales area located in the existing
parking area between both existing driveways along South 541h street. Vision Clearance
triangles have been applied to the Site Plan to show compliance.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 9 of 13
4.2.140 Street Trees
Existing street trees line the site. No changes to existing street trees are anticipated.
No new street trees are currently planned.
(6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, Infrastructure Standards -
Utilities.
The proposed site improvements are not anticipated to affect or change any existing site
utilities.
SDC 4.3. 110 Stormwater Management
The proposed 8,200 sq.ft. Outdoor Sales area, though a new use, will be created by the
installation of chain-link fencing on the existing asphalt thus not triggering Stormwater
Management Improvements under SDC 4.3.110 (A), nor do they trigger a Stormwater
Study as described in SDC 4.3.110 (B).
(7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening, and
Fence Standards.
Proposed site improvements that may trigger standards in this section include the addition
of the proposed Outdoor Sales area in the southwest corner of the site.
4.4.105 Landscaping
Existing setback areas and parking lot include established and mature planting areas. No
changes to existing landscaping are anticipated.
Subsections that may be applicable include:
4.4.105 (C) — Materials and installation costs of required planting and irrigation ... must
not exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development, including the cost of
parking facilities.
4.4.105 (E) — At least 65 percent of each required planting area must be covered with
living plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant materials
must be distributed throughout the required planting area.
4.4.105 (F) — Parking lot planting areas must include 1 canopy tree at least 2 inches
(dbh) in caliper that meets City street tree standards as may be permitted by
the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and at least 4 shrubs, 5
gallon or larger, for each 100 square feet of planting area.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 10 or 13
al.7rY EN6INEERS. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
CIYII WING w BUILDING DESIGN
5415 MAIN STREET
— mamiNo IAtlou55eutlNlAs SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
4.4.110 Screening
Screening is triggered around development as the development is in a commercial district
abutting a residential district and no approved screening exists. The proposed screening
will consist of sight -obscuring slats installed on the south facing side of the new chain-link
fence surrounding the proposed Outdoor Sales area.
4.4. 110 (B) (1) — Vegetative Screening. Evergreen shrubs must be planted to form a
continuous hedge. When immediate screening is necessary, a sight -obscuring fence
must be installed in place of, or in conjunction with the shrubs.
4.4.115 Fences
Fencing proposed is a 6 -foot high chain-link fence as permitted under the requirements of
this section.
4.4.115 (A) (2) — Fences must be permitted as specified in the screening standards in
SDC 4.4.110. Where permitted in the commercial, industrial, mixed use employment
and the PLO Districts, outdoor storage of materials must be screened by a 100 percent
sight obscuring fence when abutting residential districts along common property lines.
Partial screening along rights-of-way and non-residential districts may be permitted
when necessary for security reasons.
4.4- 115 (C) (8) — Barbed wire, razor wire, or electrified fencing is permitted atop a 6 -foot
chain link fence. The total height of the fence and barbed wire must not exceed 8 feet.
These materials must not extend into the vertical plane of adjoining public sidewalks.
Barbed wire or razor wire only fences are prohibited. Electrified fencing must be posted
with warning signs every 24 feet.
(8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On -Site Lighting Standards:
The site is fully developed. Site improvements may include repair or replacement of
existing on-site lighting fixtures to meet the standards of this section.
Subsections that may be applicable include:
4.5.105 (C) — The following light fixtures or uses are exempt from complying with the
outdoor lighting standards of this section.
(1) — All outdoor light fixtures lawfully installed and operating prior to the July 1, 2022
ordinance codified in this section, and not prohibited by this section. This exemption
does not apply if an existing light fixture is replaced. The addition of supplementary
shielding and/or re -aiming of existing fixtures that shine direct illumination or visible
glare beyond the property line where the fixture is installed are encouraged to help
improve safety and quality of life.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401
Page 11 of 13
(541) 485-8383
(3) — Commercial and industrial low wattage lighting used to highlight driveways and
landscaping or installed to a building provided they are properly aimed and shielded
to not shine visible glare onto the public right-of-way or onto adjacent or nearby
properties.
Installation of new outdoor lighting fixtures are subject to the standards of SDC 4.5.110.
(9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking,
Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards.
The site improvements proposed as part of the Tenant Infill project include reducing the
number of existing parking spaces to provide the proposed Outdoor Sales area as well as
flexibility to install some cart corrals in the main parking lot at the front of the building. For
this reduction in spaces to meet code, we request a full 15% reduction as allowed under
Section 4.6.110 (1). This reduction would bring the required total down to 249 spaces as
calculated below.
The site has an existing count of 278 off-street parking spaces, including 8 ADA parking
spaces. With the proposed change of use to the west parking lot, we would lose 28 spaces
bringing the existing parking count to 250 spaces. Possible installation of cart corrals would
further reduce the amount of parking. These spaces are proposed to be replaced one-for-
one by adding stripping to the existing paved area behind the --east portion of building. New
parking stripping will comply with the dimensional standards of SDC 4.6:115.` :.
MINIMUM PARKING REQUIRED BASED ON SDC TABLE 4. 6.2
JUNE 2022
USE TYPE AREA RATE I PARKING SPACES REVD
EXISTING RETAIL: NON-AUTOMOTNE 69,360 300
231.2
PROPOSED RETAIL :NON-AUTOMOTNE(OUTDOOR SALES) 8,200 1 300
2733
EXISTING EATING AND DRINKING ESTABLISHMENTS 1 3,285 1 100
32.85
SUBTOTAL MINIMUM SPACES REQUIRED
282
IFREQUESTED_MAXIMUM OF 15% REDUCTION ALLOWED PER SDC 4.6A 10(i)
43
TOTAL MINIMUM SPACES REQUIRED
248
Existing bicycle parking racks are installed in front of the building at the approximate center
of the full building width. No changes in bicycle parking are proposed.
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-6383
Page 12 of 13
MINGINEERS. Type 2 Land Use - Director Review For:
cwr-M mm BBBBBmB IGN 5415 MAIN STREET
B RMA Wm BB pumm6 SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
SITE PLAN REVIEW - CHANGE OF USE
Type 2 Land Use - Director Review
SUPPLEMENTAL DOCUMENTS
Copy of Property deed, provided by site owner
Plans by SSW Engineers, (4) copies each:
C1.0 Existing Conditions Site Plan,
8 Yz' x 11"and 24" x 36"
CIA Site Development Plan,
8%'x11"and 24"x36"
2350 Oakmont Way, Suite 105 Eugene OR 97401 (541) 485-8383
Page 13 of 13
5- 1 9- 99
2550
99045274
iOREGON STATUTORY WARRANTY DELU
^0,
0' Elmo 1. Aldridge and Jewel V. Aldridge, Trustees of the Aldridge Family Trust dated
October 30, 1991, Grantors, convey and Warrant to McKenzie Plan, LLC, Chance, tin real
property more particularly described in Exhibit A, free of encumbrances except as specifically
set forth herein:
Subject In and excepting Ounn nus, encumbrances, leases, Right m EUcnd Omand
Leese, Right of First Refusal, reservations and resmctions ofmrord.
The true consideration for this conveyance is other than money.
Until a change is requested, all lex statements are to be sent to the following add mssc
McKenzie Plaza, LLC
1750 Tabu, Street
Lugene, OR 97401
"rax Account \umber. 0136828
THIS INSTRUMENTWILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPEOTY OESCHIUM IN THIS
INSIRUMEN'1' IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, BEFORE
SIGNING OR ACCEPTING 1'i11S INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TALE TO TIIL
PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPNATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMhN 1'
TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND 10 DETERMINE ANY LIA1I IS ON LAWSU[IS AGAINSr FARMING
OR FOREST PRACTICES AS. DERIDED IN on 30.930.
Dated (]its 121h day of May, 1999.
mol. Al�rid�2e ...
ewe Aldri g TNs1e aaeynyY.39'99NU/REC IS,EC
.MY.t9'99I107FGUFO uLco
STATE UP OREOON J nMKRY.17 99HODIST FUIIL ?O.Op
County oClane )
The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 12th it., of Muy, 1999, by
Elmo 1. Aldridge, Trustee ofthe Aldridge Family T st dated October 30, 1991.
6J/ Me _ _
WTD wo o[S. PfWH y tic or rpire, ( 3
IRMO M .he fo expire, t ! I
in
.10=11MMAH61
AFTER RECORDING RL I'UIUV TO: Stephen O. Lane
Gkaves Swearingen Larsen Potter Sano $ Smith LI.IP
974 Oek SL, Suite 800
Eugene, OR 97401
5. 19- 99
95045274
STATE OF O&,GON
2550
Cowry of Lane )
The foregoing insvumem was amknowledgcd before me this 12th day of Nky, 1999, by
Jewel V. Aldridge, Tmstee ofthe Aldridge Farnily T stdaced October 70, 1991.
Notary lie fo Oregon y/9/C1
Le076"ll Myo issia Expirrs:
mm NSIIE�aMON
CWMISSION110.2MM
IMSW[45SYWt)PR5MX4A, A9
5 19- 99 2550
99045274
EXHIBIT 'A'
A tract of real propperty situatedin the Southeast quarter of Section 33.
TownshipP 17 South, Hange 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, being. more
particularly described as follows:
State of Oneeon
.coo ly a Lane — :s.
L fneCrynq CIe:N, in ene!v,ne va,J
ea„ v.mw:•W a..nxy wuno w,ln,o
o,uumam wa, :.e..r<d !m rc�o:e a
'93HAMa8 3:33
255OR
moo: ca -..ay a'nnncn�ora..
tai,e a„ Ix eh::
Comly mn,N -
9 e`1e
5�m F
zQ
SITE REVIEW PLANS FOR:
CASCADE FARM & OUTDOOR
5415 MAIN STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OR 9]4]8 p[.3;
P u,y
Rx
.11CT: 1]M331]I03. J5
�de9
EXECUTIVE OFFICES. 220 SOMISENEG9 ROAD EVGENE, OREGON, 9)002
^E