The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 4/6/202304/07/2023 City of Springfield Development and Public Works Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Subject: Applicant Response to Incomplete Letter 811 -22 -000220 -PRE #04987 Chick-fil-A Site Plan Review Dear Development and Public Works Staff, Thank you for your thoughtful comments and noted incomplete items. We have provided additional application materials and revised our narrative to address your comments. Please see below for responses to your comments and a summary of the changes made to the application package. Planning 1. General a. Copy of the deed and preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Response: A copy of the preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days is included with this revised application submittal package in Appendix 2. 2. Site Plan a. Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment storage, trash receptacles, and signs. Please provide elevation details for the trash enclosure. Response: Elevations of the trash enclosure are included with this revised application submittal as Sheet A-103 of Appendix 5. The trash enclosure will be approximately 8'-8" feet tall and 18'-8'/." feet wide by 22'-3/, feet long. b. On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation. No interior pedestrian circulation or connections to Gateway Street sidewalk system shown. Response: A new five -foot -wide pedestrian walkway has been added to the site plan, included with this revised application submittal as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. There will be two pedestrian circulation walkways that can be accessed along Gateway Street. the first is towards the south and the second is located east of the CFA building. The south access will connect to the existing sidewalk along Gateway and lead pedestrians to Pad A. The second access also connects to the existing sidewalk along Gateway, crosses the concrete CFA drive-thru, goes along the frontage of the CFA building, turns towards the north along the west side of the proposed CFA 541-683-6090 • 920 Country Club Road, Suite 100B • Eugene, Oregon 97401 • wwai.daud.cam Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 2 of 8 building, and turns to the west as it crosses the asphalt -paved parking lot to Pad B See SITE PLAN, sheet C2.0. c. Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces. Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses No bicycle parking facilities depicted on site plan. Development Code requires 9 spaces on the site, of which 7 can be uncovered, short -tern spaces. Response: Nine (9) bicycle parking spaces are the required minimum per code and ten (10) spaces have been provided to the revised site plan included with this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. The ten bicycle parking spaces are located along the southern extent of the restaurant, within 50 -feet of the restaurant entrance. Six of the ten bicycle parking spaces will be uncovered and have signage indicating they are reserved for short term use. Four (4) bicycle parking spaces are covered by the canopy attached to the building just east of the main entry. See SITE PLAN, sheet C2.0. d. Location of existing and proposed transit facilities. Show or describe location of nearest transit stop (approximately 250 feet south of site on Gateway Street). Response: The applicant is aware of two transit stops that are reasonably accessible from the project site and located along Lane Transit District (LTD)'s Route 12 and further identified as the W/S of Gateway S of Beltline stop. According to LTD's online system map, this transit stop is considered a minor stop. The second stop located 250 feet south of the site on Gateway Street is identified as the Kruse Way Station which provides covered benches. Both transit facilities are located on the west side of Gateway Street. The location of both transit stops has been added to the EXISTING TRANSIT FACILITIES EXHIBIT included with this revised application submittal in Appendix 4 (last sheet). 3. Landscape Plan a. Drawn by a Landscape Architect b. Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage c. Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110. d. Written description, including specifications, of thepermanent irrigation system e. Location and type of street trees L List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting. Response: A planting plan, details, and landscape notes are included with this revised submittal as sheet 11.0, 11.1, and 11.2 of Appendix 4. Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 3 of 8 4. Additional Comments a. Street trees will be required along site frontages on Gateway Street and Beltline Road. Response: The planting plan included with this revised submittal provides nine (9) trees along Gateway Street and five (5) trees along Beltline Road. These trees are set behind the walkway along Beltline Road and adjacent to the drive-thru lane abutting Gateway St. Refer to Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. In total 14 trees and 128 shrubs will be provided along site frontages, consistent with this comment. b. Site is within the Gateway Refinement Plan area which requires at least 7.5% interior parking lot landscaping, and all landscaped areas must have 75% coverage within 3 years. Response: A table summarizing the number of trees and shrubs and the area of interior parking lot landscaping is included on the planting plan, included with this revised application submittal as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. In total 5,196 square feet of the 28,898 square foot parking area (18°x) will be dedicated to interior parking lot landscaping. In total, 28 trees and 425 shrubs will be placed in planters, sized approximately 5 feet wide by 36 feet long on average. c. Vegetative screening of parking lots and drive through lanes visible from Gateway Street and Beltline Road is required in accordance with the Refinement Plan policies. Response: The landscape plan indicates the perimeter parking area will be screened by a three -foot -tall evergreen shrub hedge between the interior parking lot and Beltline Road and Gateway Street. The location of the parking lot is interior to the project site and as such, no conflict between vegetation height and vision clearance areas is anticipated. The landscape plan is included with this revised application submittal as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. d. Provide manufacturers cut sheets for the proposed lighting fixtures to be used on the site. Parking lot light fixtures can be placed a maximum of 20 feet above grade, which is the height of the restaurant building. Response: The manufacturers cut sheet for lighting fixtures has been added along with the photometric plan in Appendix 6. e. Please provide a title report dated within 30 days of application submittal. Response: A copy of the preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days is included with this revised application submittal package in Appendix 2. Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 4 of 8 Public Works Engineering 1. Site Assessment and Existing Conditions a. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department. 1 do not we a time of travel zone (I-OTZ) to drinking water wellhead statement or line on the existing conditions sheet. The project narrative does talk about the restrictions, so the developer is aware of it. Response: A general note has been added to the EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN, sheet C1.0 in Appendix 4 stating: 'THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA MAP ON FILE IN THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. A 5 -YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL ZONE (TOTZ) TO DRINKING WATER WELLHEAD HAS BEEN DETERMINED FOR THIS SITE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT WILL REPLACE THE EXISTING RESTAURANT (FORMERLY ELMERS). DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IS ANTICIPATED TO BE SIMILAR TO THOSE PRACTICES CURRENTLY USED FOR ELMERS. CHICK-FIL-A USES CLEANING, SANITIZING, AND DISINFECTING CHEMICALS THAT ARE EPA -REGISTERED PRODUCTS. CLEANING SOLVENTS, DEGREASERS, AND OTHER CLEANING CHEMICALS ARE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S LABEL, SAFETY DATA SHEETS, AND LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THROUGH DAILY USE, CLEANING CHEMICALS ARE DISPOSED OF IN THE SANITARY SEWER IN DILUTED FORMS. SHOULD BULK CONTAINERS NEED TO BE DISPOSED OF, THE CONTAINERS WILL BE TAKEN TO A PERMITTED LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING FACILITY.". 2. Improvements and Public Utilities Plan a. Location and width of all existing and proposed easements. Documents for the internal driveways and aisles to the south and west are required. Response: The applicant anticipates reciprocal access agreements will be recorded and submitted to the City following the submittal of this completeness response but before the applicant can apply for building permits. Therefore, the applicant requests that the city make obtaining reciprocal access agreements to the south and west a condition of approval. b. Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities. Existing streetlights along Gateway will be required to have the heads changed out to current city LED standards for arterials. Onsite mailboxes not shown, not sure if that is still done for new commercial development. Response: The location of existing power poles, transformers, and public facilities present in the development area that were present during the time of survey were shown in the EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN, Sheet C1.0 of Appendix 4. A general note has been added to state, 'PROPOSED MAILBOX LOCATION Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 5 of 8 FOR NEW DEVELOPMENT WILL BE DETERMINED BY USPS AND TENANT AT A LATER TIME" and keynote #23 has been included to state, "PROPOSED LED LIGHTS FOR EXISTING STREET LIGHT HEADS ALONG GATEWAY PER CURRENT CITY OF SPRINGFIELD LED STANDARDS FOR ARTERIALS" on Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. Please note, there are two existing street lights along Gateway within the off-site limits of the site. Neither of these existing street lights will need to be removed, relocated, nor replaced. The only proposed work to be done is updating to current LED standards of the City of Springfield. 3. Grading and Paving Plan a. Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system. Detailed planting plan for all stormwater facilities required per the Eugene stormwater manual, including a cross section for all planters/swales/rain garden. Response: A drainage report is included with this revised submittal as Appendix 10. Section 5.2 of Appendix 10 reports that the stormwater planters have been designed per Section 2.3.11 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014), utilizing the Presumptive Approach. The facilities will have 24 inches of growing medium and will not implement an underground injection control (UIC) component, per advisement by the City during the pre -application conference dated June 9, 2022. For additional information regarding water quality and water quantity, please refer to the drainage report (Appendix 10). b. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns. Downspout discharge for roof not shown, assuming it will be discharged to parking lot. It is preferred NOT to discharge across sidewalks. Response: Surface water runoff from the restaurant's roof will be conveyed through a Grinch PVC D3034 storm line and will not discharge across sidewalks. See callout and keynote #4 on the STORMWATER PLAN, sheet C4.0 included with this revised submittal of Appendix 4 and supplemented by findings presented in the drainage report (Appendix 10). c. The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained. No sizing information/drainage report provided for the stormwater system. The system is not required to provide flow mitigation but must be adequately sized to provide water quality treatment. The Eugene Manual prescriptive sizing worksheet may be used for this requirement. Response: A drainage report addressing the size and location of stormwater management components is included with this revised submittal as Appendix 10. d. Amount of proposed cut and fill Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 6 of 8 Total cumulative amount of cut/fill not listed on grading sheet, required for Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP). Likely to be a substantial number for the amount of basement and swimming pool fill needed. Response: The total cumulative cut/fill quantities have been added to the grading plan included with this revised submittal as Sheet C3.0 of Appendix 4. Approximate values are provided for the following volumes: 1,040 cubic yards for cut, 6,150 cubic yards for fill, and a net volume of 5,110 cubic yards. A table with this information has been added to the GRADING PLAN, sheet C3.0. 4. Stormwater Management System Plan a. Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study No sizing information/drainage report provided for the stormwater system. The system is not required to provide flow mitigation but must be adequately sized to provide water quality treatment. The Eugene Manual prescriptive sizing worksheet may be used for this requirement. Response: A copy of the stormwater drainage report is included with this revised submittal as Appendix 10. 5. Additional Comments a. Last conversation 1 had with city staff and developer was a PIP project would be required for median alterations needed on Gateway. The line work from the current project underway should be shown. City capital projects staff can provide this layer. Response: The civil plan set (Appendix 4)'s linework has been revised incorporate the new median alterations on Gateway Street. The linework for the median alterations on Gateway is shown as the existing condition and a general note on the EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN, sheet C1.0, has been added to state, "THE MEDIAN LINE WORK ALONG GATEWAY (PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD IN AN EMAIL SENT TO DOWL ON OCTOBER 11, 2022) IS SHOWN AS EXISTING CONDITIONS PER THIS SHEET ALTHOUGH THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT BEGIN UNTIL A LATER TIME". b. It is likely that the stormwater parking lot islands that are split by the phase lines will need to be fully completed -it is almost impossible to build 'half of a stormwater facility that will function right and if done to the smaller size a full rebuild will be likely upon further development. Response: The applicant anticipates all stormwater parking lot island planters will be constructed as part of this development. A general note #2 has been added to the STORMWATER PLAN (sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4) stating "2. STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL AREA, WHICH INCLUDES THE CFA BUILDING AND TWO OTHER PADS TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING A LATER PHASE, WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN FULL AND WILL NOT BE PARTIALLY BUILT". Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 7 of 8 c. Street trees will be needed along Gateway and for most of the interior islands and probably along Beltline as well. Response: Street trees are provided along Gateway Street and Beltline Road. A table summarizing the number of street trees and shrubs and the area of perimeter landscaping is included on the planting plan, included with this revised application submittal as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. Transportation 1. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan a. Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting. Applicant must show existing and proposed street lighting. New roadway lighting will be needed to replace the existing streetlight to be removed with the driveway relocation. b. Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way) and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, access easements, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed development including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. Response: New roadway lighting will not be needed because there are no existing street lights that are being removed or relocated. c. Location of existing and required traffic control devices. Applicant must show the striping and planned median improvements along Gateway Street in relation to the proposed driveway relocation and overall site circulation. Adjustments to the proposed median will be required along with the relocation of the driveway entering the site. Response: The civil plan set (Appendix 4)'s linework has been revised incorporate the new median alterations on Gateway Street. General note #2 has been added to the EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DEMOLITION PLAN, sheet C1.0 that states, "THE MEDIAN LINE WORK ALONG GATEWAY (PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD IN AN EMAIL SENT TO DOWL ON OCTOBER 11, 2022) IS SHOWN AS EXISTING CONDITIONS PER THIS SHEET ALTHOUGH THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT BEGIN UNTIL A LATER TIME." The median Iinework is found on all other civil plan sheets and is shown as the off -site's existing condition. Fire 1. Additional Comments a. Proposed waterline running from Gateway Street to the west shall be increased from 6 inch to minimum 8 inch in diameter. Response: The proposed fire water line running from Gateway Street to the west has been called out with a diamond keynote #14 as "PROPOSED 8" FIRE WATER LINE" in the UTILITY PLAN (sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4). Mr. Andy Limbird City of Springfield Development and Public Works 04/07/2023 Page 8 of 8 General Checklist Items a. Geotechnical Report b. Address Overlay Districts c. Tree Felling Permit (SDC 5.19-100) d. Land and Drainage Alteration Permit Response: a. A geotechnical report has been added to the revised application as Appendix 11. b. A note has been added to the existing conditions (Sheet C1.0 of Appendix 4) indicating the project's location within the 5 -year Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. c. A Tree Felling Permit will be provided during the building permit or during the preparation of construction documents. J. A Land and Drainage Alteration Permit will be provided during the building permit or during the preparation of construction documents. Appendices: Appendix 1: Site Plan Review Application Appendix 2: Lot -of -Record Information Appendix 3: Service Provider Comments (Springfield Utility Board) Appendix 4: Plan Set Sheet C0.0: Cover Sheet Sheet C1.0: Existing Conditions & Demo Plan Sheet C2.0: Site Plan Sheet C3.0: Grading Plan Sheet C4.0: Stormwater Plan Sheet C5.0: Utility Plan Sheet C5.1: Fire Access Plan Sheet L1.0: Planting Plan Sheet L1.1: Landscape Details Sheet L1.2: Landscape Specifications Existing Transit Facilities Exhibit Appendix 5: Architectural Plans Appendix 6: Photometric Plan Appendix 7: Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson & Associates) Appendix 8: Parking Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson and Associates) Appendix 9: Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Appendix 10: Drainage Report Appendix 11: Geotechnical Report Appendix 12: Existing Transit Facilities Exhibit Appendix 13: Original Submittal Package Narrative "Pre -Submittal" cc: Steve Schwartz, Mike Towle, Jenn Glueck, Mariah Mitchell APPENDIX 1 City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD � Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal • ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: iMajor Site Plan Modification Submittal: A licant Name: Steve Schwartz Phone. 303.519.7206 Company: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Email: steve. Schwartz@ Address: 105 Progress, Ste 100, Irvine, CA 92618 efacorp. coI Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.8362 Com an : 4G Development & Consulting, Inc. Email: ahunt@4gdev.com Address: PO Box 270yy571, San Diego, CA 92198 Pro ert Owner_ �lfdl: /�,� /J,•: ZS Phone: S/y/ 13` CEfj Com an%1) f y- .. o- C:4 rte.: �,ez./ 2�Email Ypo' i75;S Address: 5-Z 4_,/1//-ZJ . 5 r? t!' ASSESSOR'S MAP NO; ��-03-,<',.�-.2fJ TAX LOT NO S < /r Property Address: ] }�% r- '��✓�.. �J r:z-i.',Il IletG Size of Propert /I 73 Acres S ware Feet ❑ ropose(�- Pro osed Name of Pro'ect: Description of If you are filing in this form by hantl, please attach your proposal description to this applkation. Pro osal: Proposed Chick-fil-A fast food restaurant with dual drive-thru la , Existin Use: Hotel/Motel and Elmer's Restaurant. New Im envious Surface Covera a Includin Bld . Gross Floor Area): sf Si natures: Please si nand riot our name and date in the appropriate box on the next iDaae.. Associated A lications: Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed b : Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 as. OocuSign Envelope 10: 47BF0571-BOE7-4E4 -MI M8040418EM Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. s Date: 10/4/2022 Signature Nan Evans I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to Me requirements of QRS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. A' i rs Po517%yf SIDate• g/n�ature /y,—iia✓d ��, �J0�1eS Print Revised 1/7/14 KL 2 of 11 APPENDIX 2 RANDY PAPE BELTLINE 1%9 1700 r i 1400 1300 ZVt ~ BELT 00 1201 1100 1 00 1300 1400 1600 904 KRUSE 1900 w 901 i a` 905 0 Taxlot Lot of Record F —I PLSS Section 0 Deed 98-13132 I�n Chick-Fil-A Gateway & Beltline 0 Puerta Plat (Lot 2, Block 2) U rw Dale: Ju 28,2022 o s7. Ts Iso *DOW L Fgure 1 JM—Ing aPa JIW,= 1 18 PM Uw'ssoding Fmou of Land Monag—K,Shh ofQgon, Shh of Ogon WT, Shh of 0mgon GEO, rsn Canada, r ,HERE, Garan, ZMnolgm, M., LEGS, EPA USDA ®pALTA Commitment for Title Insurance )G— First American ISSUED BY Commitment First American Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE IMPORTANT -READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENTTO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I -Requirements; Schedule B, Part II -Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have not been met within 90 days after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY �: gyral Kenneth D. DeGiarg ia, President BY: LiCameh If this jacket was created electronically, it constitutes an original document This page is only a part ofa 2016 At TAp Commi�t for Title lmumn issued by HatAmerimn Tide lmuam Coat ny. This Commitnmtis not valid ewthout the Notion; the Cbnmi nt N &sue Policy; the Commi nt Conditiom; Schedule A; Schedule 8, part I -Req lrar ana,; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbons Copyright 2066-2016 American Land title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or" Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Rem rds. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule Aand affixed improvements that bylaw constitute real property. The tam "Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extant that a right of access wand from the Landis to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Commitment. (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule Aas the Proposed Policy Amountofeach Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established understate statutes at the Commitment Data for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Title": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terrnnates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Comrnbnent is not valid without (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and (f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Comrnbnent at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Date, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Comrnbnent S. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Comrnbrent and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title orcreate the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Comrntrrent Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the matterand did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Commibment was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (d) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(axi) through 5(axiii) or the Proposed Policy Amount (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Comrnbrent unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Conn v&m,,t for Tire Insurance issued by HatAmerian Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commihrmtis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Commibrent to Issue ibk y; the Conmi nt Conditiom; Schedule a Schedule 3,, Part I-Requirerren6; Schedule 3,, Part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted b ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Asodaton. S. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commitment. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terns and provisions of this Commitment (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commitment. (d) The deletion or modification of any Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terns and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the lirnted purpose of issuing title insurance comrntments and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. S. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the time that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. This page is only a partofs 2016 AL TAO Conn v&m,,t for Title Insurance issued by HatAmerian Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commihrmtis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Commibrent to &sue ybk y; the Commibrent Conditiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimr n6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted b ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Asociabon. �,s.t ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance j irstAmezican ISSUED BY Schedule A First American Title Insurance Company Transaction Identification Data for reference only., Issuing Agent: First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services Issuing Office's ALTA& Registry ID: Commitment No.: NCS -1090350 -SD Property Address: Randy Pape Beltline and Gateway, Street, Springfield, OR Revision No.: 6 Issuing Office: 4380 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 110, San Diego, CA 92122 Loan ID No.: Issuing Office File No.: NCS -1090350 -SD SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: March 28, 2023 at 8:00 a.m. 2. Policy to be issued: (a) ® ALTA& 2006 Owners Standard Coverage Policy Proposed Insured: Chick-fil-A, Inc., a Georgia corporation Proposed Policy Amount: $8,000,000.00 $12,600.00 (b) ® ALTA& 2006 Loan Policy Proposed Insured:To Be Determined Proposed Policy Amount: $TBD $TBD (c) ❑ ALTA@ Policy Proposed Insured: Proposed Policy Amount: $ (d) Govt Service Charge $10.00 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: Sycan B Corp., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided 80.0% interest and Olympic Street, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to an undivided 20.0% interest, as undivided Tenants in Common, as to Parcel I and SYCAN B CORP., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided eighty percent (80%) interest, and OLYMPIC STREET, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided twenty percent (20%) interest, as Tenants in Common, as to Parcel II S. The Land is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof This page is only a part ofe 2016 At TAO Commitnent for Title Imumnre issued by Hat Am rimn Tide lmua m Conpany. This Comnxan tis not valid Wthout the Notion; the Cbnmi ant to &sue Policy; the Cbmmi nt Cond1vom; Schedule A� Schedule 8, part I -Req lrar ana,; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. FIRST AMERICAN TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY By: Authorized Signatory If there are any questions concerning this Commitment, please contact: Melissa Smith at MelSmith@firstam.com First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 4380 La 3olla Village Drive, Suite 110 San Diego, CA 92122 (858)410-3900 phone This page is only a p3 ofa 2016 AL TAO Conwxme t for Title Insurance issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Issuance Coat ny. This Comm mt tis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Cbmwx mnt to Issue ibk y; the Commibrent Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen&; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All right; reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Revnnted under license from the American land Title Aesodation. ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance First American ISSUED BY Schedule BI & BI First American Title Insurance Company i . u r�I7 .ri .rrfa0rM0W1'i4YIfx3.Y4II.9y SCHEDULE B, PART Requirements Al of the following Requirements must be met: 1. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. This page is only a part ofa 2016 At TAO Commitment for Title lmumn issued by HatAmenan Tide lmua m Conpzny. This Comnxh tis not valid Wthout the Notion; the Conmr nt to &sue Policy; the Conor nt Conditiom; Schedule o4� Schedule 8, part I-Requirerren6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Forth (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. j f ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance FII SL{ ,4.wcrICtlw ISSUED BY Schedule BI & BII (Cont. First American Title Insurance Company i . u r�I7 .ri .rrfa0rM0W1'iuYIfx3.Y4II.9y SCHEDULE B, PARTII Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the Public Records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the Land), encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 5. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. The exceptions to coverage 1-5 inclusive as set forth above will remain on any subsequently issued Standard Coverage Title Insurance Policy. In order to remove these exceptions to coverage in the issuance of an Extended Coverage Policy the following items are required to be furnished to the Company; additional exceptions to coverage may be added upon review of such information: A. Survey or alternative acceptable to the Company B. Affidavit regarding possession C. Proof that there is no new construction or remodeling of any improvement located on the Land. In the event of new construction or remodeling the following is required: This page is only a partofa 2016 At TAO Commitnent for Title lmumn issued by RrstAmenan Tide lmua m Conpzny. This Comnxh tis not valid Wthout the Notion; the Cbnmi nt to &sue Policy; the Cbmmi nt Conditiom; Schedule A� Schedule 8, part I -Req Imre n6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Forth (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. i. Satisfactory evidence that no construction liens will be fled; or ii. Adequate security to protect against actual or potential construction liens; iii. Payment of additional premiums as required by the Industry Rate Filing approved by the Insurance Division of the State of Oregon 6. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements are met. 7. Water rights, claims to water or title to water, whether or not such rights are a matter of public record. 8. Intentionally Deleted. 9. Intentionally Deleted. 10. Taxes for the year 2022-2023 Tax Amount $ 83,368.69 Unpaid Balance: $ 84,109.75, plus interest and penalties, if any. Code No.: 01900 Map B. Tax Lot No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID No.: 1104866 11. Taxes for the year 2022-2023 Tax Amount $ 3,321.98 Unpaid Balance: $ 3,351.51, plus interest and penalties, if any. Code No.: 01900 Map B. Tax Lot No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID No.: 5275159 (Affects personal property; schedule to be terminated in upcoming tax year) 12. Intentionally Deleted. 13. City liens, if any, of the City of Springfield. Note: A SEARCH WILL BE DONE UPON REQUEST 14. Unrecorded leases or periodic tenancies, if any. 15. Any conveyance or encumbrance by Sycan B Corp, should be executed pursuant to a proper resolution of the shareholders voted on at a duly called meeting of the shareholders in accordance with the By -Laws or other authority of the corporation. Certified copies of the resolution authorizing the conveyance and encumbrances and of the minutes of the meeting of the shareholders and copies of the By -Laws or other authority for such conveyance or encumbrance should be furnished for examination. The resolution should specify the officers authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation. This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commimn t for Title lmumn issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commmn tis not valid Wthout the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Poky; the Commitment Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmena,; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. NI rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are crohibited. Reonnted under license from the American land Title Aesociation. 16. Any conveyance or encumbrance by Olympic Street LLC should be executed pursuant to their Operating Agreement, a copy of which should be submitted to this office for inspection. IGIa;[#]I[e1TlILrem Val gJINI0f.' IAA9eltl;;l;1q M7.11 'JIM 0A 17. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 18. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission recorded November 25, 1966, Reception No. 67649 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 19. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 21, 1972, Reception No. 9831 In Favor of: City of Springfield, a municipal corporation 20. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 06, 1972, Reception No. 27017 In Favor of: Pacific Power 8. Light Company, a corporation For: right of way 21. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: March 07, 1973, Reception No. 73-9791 In Favor of: Pacific Power 8. Light Company, a corporation For: right of way 22. A lease, including the terms and provisions, dated December 11, 1971, executed by Charles F. Larson, Jr. as lessor and Jim E. Hemstreet as lessee, recorded April 02, 1976 as Reception No. 76- 15350 of Official Records. By mesne instruments of record, the Lessee's interest in said lease has been assigned and/or conveyed to Alis Hospitality, an Oregon limited liability Company by instrument recorded December 07, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-062954, and instrument recorded December 11, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-063355. By mesne instruments of record, the Lessee's interest in said lease has been assigned and/or conveyed to BOEV, LLC, by instrument recorded October 22, 2014 as Instrument No. 2014-041794. Assignment of Lease by instrument: Recording Information: October 29, 2020 as Instrument No. 2 02 0-0626 10 23. Limited access provisions contained in Deed from Sunset Investment LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, successor in interest to Sunset Investments Limited Partnership, an Oregon limited partnership to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation recorded October 06, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009-056577 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 24. Limited access provisions contained in Deed from Shilo Inn, Springfield, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation recorded This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commimn t for Title Insurznce issued by Hat Amerimn Tide lmua m Conpzny. This Comment tis not valid Wthout the Notice; the Commitment to Issue Pokey the Commitment Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. NI rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reonnted under license from the American land Title Aseociation. October 06, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009-056578 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 25. Permanent easement for wall maintenance, including terns and provisions thereof. Recorded: October 06, 2009 as Instrument Nos. 2009-056577 and 2009- 056578 26. Lease and the terns and conditions thereof Lessor: Shilo Management Corporation, dba Shilo Inn Lessee: Elmers Restaurants, Inc. As disclosed by: Warranty Deed Recorded: November 10, 2011 Recording No.: Instrument No. 2011-051261 Lessors interest is now held of record by Sterling Savings Bank, a Washington state chartered bank: By Instrument: Assignment of Lease Recorded: November 10, 2011 Recording No.: Instrument No. 2011-051263 27. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Boev, L.L.C., an Oregon Limited Liability Company Grantee/Beneficiary: Summit Bank Trustee: Cascade Title Company Amount: $2,000,000.00 Recorded: October 22, 2014 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2014-041795 28. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terns and conditions thereof: Assignor: Boev, L.L.C., an Oregon limited liability company Assignee: Summit Bank Recorded: October 22, 2014 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2014-041796 THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS ARE AFFECTS PARCEL II: 29. Subject property is under CITIES AND TOWNS EXEMPTION and is tax exempt. Any change in ownership before delivery of assessment roll may result in tax liability. Account No. 0188217. 30. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 31. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission recorded November 25, 1966, Reception No. 67649 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 32. Easement as shown on the recorded plat/partition For: Public utilities Affects: See plat for exact location This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commimn t for Title Insurznce issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commmn tis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Commitment to &sue Poky; the Commitment Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All ti0hts reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is mstrictad to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other usx are crohihited. Reonnted under license from the American land Title Association. 33. Relinquishment Deed, including terns and provisions thereof. Recorded: January 21, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020-003155 34. The forced removal or remediation of any existing structure, or any part of it, because any portion of it was built without obtaining a building permit from the proper government office or agency. 35. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the City of Springfield, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, recorded January 20, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-004085 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 36. Covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in Deed. Executed by: The State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation Recorded: January 20, 2021 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2021-004085 37. Property Line Adjustment Deed, including terns and provisions thereof. Recorded: September 24, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-061809 THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS AFFECTS ALL PARCELS: 38. Pendency of action in Lane County Circuit Court/Superior Court. Plaintiff: Olympic Street, LLC and Sycan B Corp. Defendant: Alis Hospitality LLC Case No.: 22CV40831 Recorded/Filed: December 01, 2022 Action For: Ejectment; Breach of Contract Attorney for Plaintiff: John R. Roberts 39. Order Appointing Receiver, including terms and provisions thereof. Recorded: March 06, 2023 as Instrument No. 2023-005653 40. Any facts, rights, interests orclaims that may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by an ALTA/NSPS survey made by SB.F Land Services on November 12, 2021 last revised November 29, 2021, designated 2021-014-78: (A) Traffic signal junction box extends over the easterly boundary by an undisclosed distance onto the subject property; (B) Signs in the southeasterly corner extend over the easterly boundary by undisclosed distances, ownership unknown; (C) Signs extend over the southerly boundary by undisclosed distances, ownership unknown; (D) Concrete extends over the southerly boundary by an undisclosed distance, ownership unknown; (E) Power vault on the east side of the subject property does not fall within easement; (F) Electric transformers on the east and south portions of the subject property do not fall within an easement. 7g11tIe]ii:(MiJ�N11 f.'L This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commimn t for Title Insurznce issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commmn tis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Commitment to &sue Pokey the Commitment Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. NI rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reonnted under license from the American land Title Aesociation. INFORMATIONAL NOTES NOTE: This report has been updated to date down; added exceptions 37 and 38 NOTE: We find no matters of public record against Chick -fl -A, Inc. that will take priority over any trust deed, mortgage or other security instrument given to purchase the subject real property as established by ORS 18.165. NOTE: This Preliminary Title Report does not include a search for Financing Statements fled in the Office of the Secretary of State, or in a county other than the county wherein the premises are situated, and no liability is assumed if a Financing Statement is fled in the Office of the County Clerk covering Fixtures on the premises wherein the lands are described other than by metes and bounds or under the rectangular survey system or by recorded lot and block. NOTE: According to the public record, the following deed(s) affecting the property herein described have been recorded within 24 months of the effective date of this report: Statutory Warranty Deed recorded October 29, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020-062629, BOEV, LLC to Sycan B Corp and Olympic Street, LLC. Warranty Deed recorded September 30, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-063161 to Sycan B Corp., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided 80% interest, and Olympic Street, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 20% interest, as tenants in common NOTE: Taxes for the year 2022-2023 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $9,112.34 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01300 Property ID: 0188217 Tax Code No.: 01900 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2022-2023 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $23,589.59 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 1041506 Tax Code No.: 01900 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2022-2023 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $1,651.80 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 5329923 Tax Code No.: 01900 (Affects personal property) Situs Address as disclosed on Lane County Tax Roll: 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commimn t for Title lmumn issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Issuance Conpzny. This Commmn tis not valid Wthout the Notice; the Comxl nt to &sue Poky; the Commit nt Condifiom; Schedule a Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen6; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are aohibited. Reonnted under license from the American land Title Aesociation. ISSUED BY RnstAmmican First American Title Insurance Company Exhibit A File No: NCS -1090350 -SD File No.: NCS -1090350 -SD The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, and is described as follows PARCEL I: BEGINNING AT A2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND MARKING THE INITIAL POINT OF PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGE 2, LANE COUNTY OREGON PLAT RECORDS, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON, SAID INITIAL POINT DESCRIBED AS BEING SOUTH 613.80 FEET AND EAST 646.49 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE WILLIAM STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, IN SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION, 150.0 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 INCH IRON ROD MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 00 04'25" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GATEWAY STREET 300.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST ALONG THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION 80.0 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, IN SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MOST SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST 150.0 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00 04'25" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION 277.15 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF EAST BELT LINE ROAD AS SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN MONUMENTED BY THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT; THENCE SOUTH 830 39' 16" WEST ALONG SAID MONUMENTED RIGHT OF WAY LINE 236.36 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 INCH IRON ROD MARKED SHRW 358+00; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 890 57' 14" WEST 28.44 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CERTAIN SPIRAL CURVE RIGHT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 370 30' 33" WEST 4.87 FEET) ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HIGHWAY I-5 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID WILLIAM STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46; THENCE SOUTH 00 05'49" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 498.31 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD BEARING SOUTH 00 04' 25" EAST 250.78 FEET AND SOUTH 890 55' 35" WEST 416.15 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 890 55' 35" EAST 416.15 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF GATEWAY STREET; THENCE NORTH 00 04'25" WEST 250.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL BEING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND PREVIOUSLY TRANSFERRED TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE WILLIAM M. STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, LANE COUNTY, OREGON AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE QUITCLAIM DEED TO SUNSET INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1998, RECEPTION NO. 9813132, LANE COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS, THE SAID PARCEL BEING THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY INCLUDED IN A STRIP OF LAND 98.50 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE RELOCATED BELT LINE HIGHWAY, WHICH CENTER LINE IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ENGINEER'S CENTER LINE STATION 'BL' 354+00.00, SAID STATION BEING 2,420.96 FEET SOUTH AND 1,275.21 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ASHLEY C. STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 45, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 870 58,13" EAST 1,000.00 FEET TO ENGINEER'S CENTER LINE STATION 'BL' 364+00.00, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON. PARCEL II This pose is only a port ofa 2016 At TAO Commitnent for Title Im vanre issued by Hat Amerimn Tile lmua m Grrs a y. This Commitnentis not valid Wthout the Notion; the Cbnmi ant to Issue Policy; the Cbmmi nt Cond1vom; Schedule A� Schedule 8, part I -Req lrar anti; Schedule 8, part II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license firm the American Land Title Assodation. THAT PORTION OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHWEST ONE-QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, LANE COUNTY, OREGON, AND BEING THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF OREGON, BY THAT CERTAIN DEED RECORDED JANUARY 20, 2021 RECORDER'S RECEPTION NUMBER 2021-004085, LANE COUNTY OREGON DEED RECORDS, LYING SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK 2, PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGE 2, LANE COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, LANE COUNTY, OREGON; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, NORTH 02000'49" EAST, 10.00 FEET; THENCE PARALLEL WITH AND 10.00 FEET NORTHERLY FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 1, SOUTH 88000'31" EAST, 150.00 FEET TO THE EAST BOUNDARY OF SAID LOT 1, BLOCK 2 AND THERE ENDING. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LAND DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 05, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2020-005894. This page is only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Hat Amerimn Tide Imus m Conpzny. This Commmsamtis not valid ewthout the Notice; the Comnkbrent to Issue Poky; the Commibrent Conditions; Schedule o4� Schedule 8, part I-Requimmen6; Schedule 8, part II{xreplion' Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is mstrictad to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Asodation. P U E R T A 5 U B D I V 15 1 ON SEC. 22 T17 R 3 W W.M. LANE COUNTY, OREGON DEDICATION SURVEYORS AFF/DAVIT H Y ,f,:-!/nP•••• M„lees ve11 �L.. �z. 081, w .(n. rN R�rvts - F� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT q osEcaN � ', k +rn rc ov s s w b0 Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. pv ig 0� •� a see y.es ,..�mo< a ;k d SURVEYORS AFF/DAVIT H Y ,f,:-!/nP•••• M„lees ve11 �L.. �z. APPRO(/AL5 .(n. rN R�rvts - r su w b0 Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. pv 0� •� a see y.es ,..�mo< a ;k d W DE5CR/P7/0N F� h n a-.rvr-cNeszrw�� V:..lf n. airs a<+n 0 C Ill19266 1 wH APPRO(/AL5 .(n. rN R�rvts - r su Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. 1690 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Richard L. Larson JOHNSON, CLIFTON, LARSON At CORSON, P.C. 975 Oak Street, Suite 1050 Eugene, Oregon 97401 9sr-oz-aysy UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED MAIL ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Sunset Investments Limited Partnership P 0 Box 10667 Eugene, Oregon 97440 "mat RECORDING RETURN TO: (�81'�1'�2 Faep E ft.m.iNNr or ou DmIsm Noe = 8.26'95g0PAEC 15.00 .0...oeeraaa 's0MR.26' 98Ap2PFON0 10.00 NC FEE.26'95g02AdT FOND 20.00 QUITCLAIM DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That SUNSET INVESTMENT CO., hereinafter "Grantor," for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby remise, release, and quitclaim unto SUNSET INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oregon limited partnership, hereinafter "Grantee", and unto Grantee's heirs, suc Lessors, and assigns all of Grantor's rights, title, and interest in that certain real property with the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, described as follows: Legal description on attached Exhibit "A", consisting of 1 page. To have and to hold the same unto the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration for conveyance is: contribution to limited partnership. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WHICH, IN FARM OR FOREST ZONES, MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OF A RESIDENCE AND WHICH LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES. QUITCLAIM DEED - Page 1 9tl1313G -In construing this deed„ where the context at requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made 6o that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument this 25th day of February, 1998. SUNSET INVVESTMENT CC, BY,. Charaoo P. Laraon, Managing Partner GRANTOR STATE OF OREGON ) 66 County of Lane ) y On this 25th day of February, 1998, before me, 466EIA LFtLF157wo the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Charles F. Largon, personally known to me / proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that he executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. assau.sASAUCEPotary Publac for Ore on ., tlRll ]Ao M Commission Expires: ]a�✓/Id No]IA", 9mn, Y f4AW55gN,p 09BdR Rramwrnuw¢sa]..iex QUITCLAIM DEED - Page 2 I ' 9813132 EXHIBIT "A" The tadmfased To'bsdd,Polity is desebed as fenews: Beginning at a 2 inch Roo pipe found marking the hddal point of PUERTA SyrBDI VISION, as planed and recorded inBook 53, Page 2I.= County OregonPlat Record; in Laos County, Oregon, said iallial point described as being South 613.80 fat and But 646.49 her gem the Norihwastcoeaofthe Wiliiam Stevens Donation Land Calm No. 46, Towesbip 17Scutb, Range 3 Westafthe Wthmelm MosMie; theme -South 85°55'35"Wartaloogthe iorthadyline oflot 1,Black1, in said PUERTA SUBDIVISION, 150.0 feet to afoued5/8 inch rte rod mer)�zigthe Norlhww mmwoflaid Lot 1; thence South 0o 04' 25"East a[odg the Westerly line ofsaid Lot 1 od the Eestalyright ofway tine of Gateway Street 300.0 tet m the Semhaly Southeancamaafsafd PUERTA SUBDIVISION; thence South 89' 55'35" Wastud0ngt1temast Southerly I'me afsild PUERTA SUBDIVISION 80.0 fat we 5/8 inch von rad and the Southeast tamer ofLot 2, Black 2, in said PUERTASUBDIVISION, end the True point ofbeg®ng affix, tracthencin describ4- tuna eominuiog along said mon Southerly Has Smth890 55' 35" West 150.0 het m a5/8 Toch frmred aM the Scuthwbn emerafsaid PUERTA SUBDIVISION; them North 0.04' 25"Wen along the Westerly line ofed PUERTA SUBDIVISION 277.15 feet ao a 5/8 inch iron rod set an the Southerly right ofway Ona efEast Belt Lt.. Road as said right ofway line was food to have been contaminated by the Oregon State Siigieway Deparseent thence South 83° 39.16"Wese alms said emumeatedright ofway line 236.36 fee to a found 3/8 inch iron and marked SERW 358:01; thee- contlnuins along said right ofway line North 89" 57' 14" Wess 28.44 fat to a 5/8 inch Ron it; thee. Southerly along the ue of a certain spial curve right (the fang chard ofwhich beam South 37' 30' 33" Went 4.87 feet) on the Easterly right of way line ofPEghway I-5 to apdint m the Westerly line ofsaid Willies Stmmn Demotion Lend Claim No. 46; theme South 0° 05'49" East along said line 498.31 feet to a 5/x, inch iron and hearing SouthT 04' 25"East 250,78 feet ed South 89° 55' 35" West 416.15 fee from the true point ofbegimivg; thence North 89" 55'35" East 416.15 feet to a point m said Westerly tiro of Gateway Street; thence Nath P 04' 25"West 250.78 feetm the true pointofbighaft.11 being in the Northwest quarter of Seedan22, Township 17 South, Range 3 West ofthe Wih mmeMa die,, in Sane Comty, Oregon. Stare of Oregon County of Lane — ere, 'n tya'i. in and fw Na ,u hueby insw,nent waa,we I orr m at Fin p p'98FEE26ax 9:13 aaai 238.717 Exhibit A tape Conry...... aecoms Page 1 of 1 tare Cou/ty�cien �annaan --- 4 APPENDIX 3 -- _ LEGEND GENNOTES GRACCEEGAL—B �..�p ERAL "RABUB'DOGNrvsxe r. rxo.�v�orvex Uux®sl uFAL_IAR,�Iva _ _ rr xxoror CAN.. �xFINE r Ns EIxERENTFOR ruECPOWER }[ Lr I �� .. NIFFIFIEDIORACCUTUROATERT e / I ,FSI 1� e N+ rNeros©eRE�"" ITNE ENE WATER CONSTRUCTION NOIES� E ;T ^J,i� r' 'I E rvcros®mwEalEWEOTRc)WxE I. rRorosmooxESTowe _ ORor—NEREDDITURECTNONNET„oN RVIA a. rNO OmESTOEtc cn Oxs ��NO DART rooms®aoxn-ox RYO..Bing.. INNI 4. rRCPo9FDSDC AII]Wa OGIB FUTURE -i PaaPos�9 �g.�E R PROPOSEWRO�TERLINEROET.P LEWxE ae-saws PAD �— III ®� � 1 w x CLEANOUT T w cELINE TA1— ExcmmNE i , PRP R R .>N r RIxD �- OWED REE WATER COUNBECTION I "'IN' �� O W L .. N N 1. sw AF.,,rl.B IBI rAso ,n�: rR nxereN GUI 1 FUTURE PHASE — ` 3xm U111 wms WORK �� F' I D NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN ' — PROPOSED s ` Wx o R++�w RESTAURANT 6r 4� �SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES III CURRENT PERMIT "`,) _ I, nEmu EREEPTOR. II ✓ k 1� �I r�raN®ENENELINE YYY 3 FROM BUILLING l "��1� + �� I N xN rRT PCFAw _ -R �r�m NT.R.EE _ — PROERsEENRENNO m FM- BE i „- DEADEm NTRR., �EORE W � � TPMENCE � I I FRANCHISE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTE Tr — - ,III (I INDPONERPo,��sERVkETo ��New��. Q FERE109.R RREDoo I WGUED�.NUNENwONgR. IBOU sub 1� �� 0. - - INxr�r�I�ti�.A�,` xsENa1 z i mRrUTx�r��orN� T a needs-- _ _ rRaP�GANNER. ETOB WRNR --- -- J -- -� Loop our 5 l I EAC LL �� ae —.—. I l U� aloh k �'Q )-w jj 7 �- (l } 14 k-I_...Vl �, i s �I �,� Q Qo I�- E FUTURE PHASE WORK �� \./ Ww NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN 111. ,,,.( CURRENT PERMIT USe �'LJ 17b,. e a �p 4,o save none " T iFITN FUTURE ' — TF,L'T TL �h FSR# 04887 PADA T III IIIb„ T �- rN»rtr, .O, OREGON UTILITY A m '�-------._ NOTIFICATION CENTER A^^^^• i 1-300332-2344 9 BE%ORE �� 7 -.Fl PUN a 3 , AI IN FEET A, --."A. C5.0 APPENDIX 4 R c B 4 m VA CHICKiiiiiiiiiiiiiiFlLiiiiiiiiiiiA GATEWAY &RANDY PAPE G48 PROJECT d AREA tr _ rHe Cm due OStco WhcleSaIE aceHeaIth sacred art Medical enteral 1 ` R�Rd Safeway I 111 m _ VICINITY MAP SCALE: NTS N PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS OF BEARING THIS PHASE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE -STORY COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH A FOOTPRINT OF 4,897 SF, A CONCRETE -PAVED DRIVE-THRU, AN ASPHALT -PAVED PARKING LOT, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSISTING OF WATER QUALITY LIDAS. THIS PHASE WILL ALSO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTING THREE ACCESS POINTS AND ASSOCIATED DRIVEWAYS LOCATED ON THE EAST (ALONG GATEWAY), SOUTH (ALONG THE FREIGHT ACCESS), AND WEST (ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY). FUTURE PHASES TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SITE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. SITE LOCATION THIS PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SE CORNER OF RANDY PAPE BELTLINE AND GATEWAY ST IN SPRINGFIELD OREGON. THE SITE HOLDS THE ADDRESS OF 3358 GATEWAY STREET N SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477.THE PROJECT SUE IS LOCATED ON TAX MAP 1703222 AND INCLUDES TAX LOT NUMBERS 001600 AND W1300 EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OREGON REVISED STATUTES 209.140-209.155 Al PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER OREGON SOUTH STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83 (2011) BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES, INTERNATIONAL FEET, SCALED ABOUT A CENTRAL CONTROL POINT DATUM NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE OPUS STATIC OBSERVATIONS. CHICK-FIL-A ATTN: STEVE SCHWARTZ 15635 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 350 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PHONE: (404) 305-4407 STEVE.SCHWARTZ@CFACORP.COM 4 ARCHITECT WARE MALCOMB ATTN: NONY RIVERA 3015 112TH AVE NE #205 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 PHONE: (425) 582-5517 NRI VERA@WAREMALCOMB.COM 3358 GATEWAY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 LAND USE DOCUMENTS CIVIL ENGINEER DOWL ATTN: MIKE TOWLE, PE 720 SW WASHINGTON AVE, SUITE 750 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PHONE: (971) 280-8645 MTOWLE@DOWL.COM 3 SITE MAP SCALE: NTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TERRACON CONSULTANTS ATTN: KRISTOPHERT. HAUCK, PE 700 NE 55TH AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 PHONE: (503) 742-7181 KRISTOPHER. HAUCK@TERRACON.COM L SURVEY 1 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CO.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 STORMWATER PLAN C5.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.1 FIRE SERVICE PLAN L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L1.2 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS 1 OF 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN S&F LAND SERVICES ATTN: CHRIS SHERBY, PLS 4858 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD, STEW PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 PHONE: (503) 345-0328 JERED.MCGRATH@SFLANDS.COM OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REOU I RES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00O a-&-OIA Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 R 40'6DOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION M144NIIMA140 CO.O J CIVICS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A 11/10/2021 DRAWN BY JLG Q)Inbimaim cWarc mNin d""Nsi,n 81 F__tligaba files pratl f above nmei prgW Z m Y ny b ereprolxi in my mazer mtM G exprcsz vnllmarveAalcmttnikan G auYaizel praptl rcprcsaYa4ves. LU SHEET U COVERSHEET O M144NIIMA140 CO.O J ----mss}= IE 6" CPP=431.91' I Y N A N a-} In ok 4 a I, 53755-17V I 22A0' I I / ELEC LINE CIVIL'S PROJECT p A 1987 SURVEY PER 27852 LAND USE DOCUMENTS ELEC A11110021 TRANSFORMER / I ON PL I I i J Ima�aloaewaaed a�ws na•,d�pam In 8l files Proiuxd la aLavenmed PrgW 1 / G express vnlMna vaEal co n.-nihom G au1Mx¢ed pygal rcpresenrn_ LU \\\\Irl D (E 1RC 430.96' PLAN \ > W U) SHEET NUMBER O III/ C1.0 IE r6/ PVC a -430.95' �i�ii I III il`y 1 � I It II I ml f1 �F r IJ//1 i 1 N//�PoI F C=431.60 =433.15' A. C Y N A N a-} In ok 4 a I, 53755-17V I 22A0' I I / ELEC LINE CIVIL'S PROJECT p ABANDONED PER 1987 SURVEY PER 27852 LAND USE DOCUMENTS ELEC A11110021 TRANSFORMER ON PL / AG J RANDY PAPE BELTLINE ACCESS RESTRICTION 14 IN FAVOR OF COOT KI PARCEL 1 DEED TO COOT, AND LIMITED 19 20 21 ACCESS TO HIGHWAY —ne MIT Os — cs O.D.O.T RW STA I eBLe361+20.00 98.501'T RIGHT RIGHT i � \ `` -----J 440 • I I IE 4" CMP A3\0' I ( \434' EASEM;CT TO ODOT I I/( \e\' 437 8 \`--_ FOR ALL 19 .SMI L{?ENANCE a �.: 20/ \\y I 21p --r439---- Aa 32 e Ir 'T'8 \ I \\ I I ,A 14' 14' EASEMENT FGf I\ PUERTA SUBDIVISION � \ --- / \ _ 129.51' I I --11e6'oo'29w---= '__-- �h =� /----- — i ----------- _ ADJUSTED PROPERTY ' LINE PER EXCEPTION 1 2021-061809 / r I I / e= —� — ( I �I i I `1 If r I L_ _ TAX LOT 1300 SUBJFICT TO DEC EASEMENT AND/ 30 II EQUITABLE SERVITUDESI I p DOCUMENT FROM ODOTI PER n' EXCEPTION 2020-065354 I I fi H 1 e li I Iha� I I I \ \ I ( \ 1 \ I 139.62'1 1 SEWERETOECCIITYI FOR SANITARY OF SPRINGFIED I -'I i I--� I �---1 436•l I I \\\mss Q I J --------1 437-- \ ~( J I I I I I I I I I I / I f I 16 4'X15" EASEMENT FOR PACIFIC •� m L / POWER G \ G G G —�435— — — — 436_-------------- --G ' G -a — t G G __G\ G — _ — S6B w'57'E _ G—T ' G \G G —437 cl 10'X200' EASEMENT TO 1'y PACIFIC POWER I n I \� ---------------------------------------------------- 4 ---------------------------- -- -- -- -- -- 4 3 0 Ell r Ih 2 LEGEND: } I - SO ss G FO D � I J I POINT 0 BEGINNING PARCEL -I WESTEJ Y LINE OF O RELINQ ISHMENT 29 (DEED P OPERTY FROM OSSOT TO CITY PER EX EPTION 2020-0 3155 �I 110 3 I I I I 3 I miff I II I 1a i I� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I +00 I I I I I I i I I I } I 7 -SS I 11— I RUSE WAY �qq— — E me _a or 4P 08 #o 0 ASCO OT I] sp ON 0 0 30 siiiiiiiiiiz SCALE IN FEET BUILDING BUILDING OVERHANG PARKINGSTRIPES FLOWLNECURB EXTRUDED CURB STANDARDCURB EDGE OF PAVEMENT EDGE OF CONCRETE WALL -TOP WALL -TOE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATER GAS FIBER OPTIC FENCE-CHANLNK BUILDING HATCH CONCRETEHATCH MAJOR CONTOUR MINOR CONTOUR HANDICAP PARKING SIGN FLAG POLE MONITORING WELL BOLLARD TREE- DECIDUOUS TREE -CONIFER POWER METER POWER TRANSFORMER POWER VAULT LIGHT -LAMP POST SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM AREA DRAIN STORM MANHOLE STORM CLEANOUT WATER SPIGOT - SHUTOFF FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER WATER VALVE TRAFFIC SIGNAL JUNCTION BOX TELEPHONE RISER COMMUNICATION VAULT IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE CATV RISER UNKNOWN VAULT SURVEY CONTROL POINT LY 1 GENERAL NOTES 1. THIS SITE IS LOCATED WITHIN THE WELLHEAD PROTECTION AREA MAP ON FILE IN THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. A 5 -YEAR TIME OF TRAVEL ZONE (TOTZ) TO DRINKING WATER WELLHEAD HAS BEEN DETERMINED FOR THIS SITE. IT SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE CHICK-FIL-A RESTAURANT WILL REPLACE THE EXISTING RESTAURANT (FORMERLY ELMERS). DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS IS ANTICIPATED TO BE SIMILAR TO THOSE PRACTICES CURRENTLY USED FOR ELMERS. CHICK-FIL-A USES CLEANING, SANITIZING, AND DISINFECTING CHEMICALS THAT ARE EPA -REGISTERED PRODUCTS. CLEANING SOLVENTS, DEGREASERS, AND OTHER CLEANING CHEMICALS ARE DISPOSED OF IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S LABEL, SAFETY DATA SHEETS, AND LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS. THROUGH DAILY USE, CLEANING CHEMICALS ARE DISPOSED OF IN THE SANITARY SEWER IN DILUTED FORMS. SHOULD BULK CONTAINERS NEED TO BE DISPOSED OF, THE CONTAINERS WILL BE TAKEN TO A PERMITTED LOCAL HAZARDOUS WASTE RECYCLING FACILITY. 2. THE MEDIAN LINE WORK ALONG GATEWAY(PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD IN AN EMAIL SENT TO DOWL ON OCTOBER 11, 2022) IS SHOWN AS EXISTING CONDITIONS PER THIS SHEET ALTHOUGH THE IMPROVEMENTS WILL NOT BEGIN UNTIL OCTOBER 31, 2022 AND END ON DECEMBER 31, 2022 (DATES ARE APPROXIMATE). 3. ALL DEMOLITION WORK TO BE PERFORMED UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. 1 ■ W® IE09o00� 0 all- oo o <J Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 'OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 Uj C Q J � off z LL 0 0 ' LU Q'o a LL ' J ^^ V B Qz N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL'S PROJECT p 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A11110021 DRAWN BY AG CO Ima�aloaewaaed a�ws na•,d�pam In 8l files Proiuxd la aLavenmed PrgW Z vma be rcprc en In any manner wrneur my G express vnlMna vaEal co n.-nihom G au1Mx¢ed pygal rcpresenrn_ LU SHEET C) EXISTING CONDITIONS OO PLAN W U) SHEET NUMBER C1.0 —Q WE C ■-1 In 4 RANDY PAPE SELTLINE [41 4 1 3 1 K E LEGEND -- BOUNDARY LINE MINIMUM PARKING: BUILDING --------- EASEMENT ADA STALLS CATCHING CURB & GUTTER ---------------- ---- SPILLING CURB & GUTTER a SIGN C SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT e STORM SEWER CLEANOUT 5STORM CATCH BASIN � PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT Z PROPOSED CONCRETE G exprcsz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITIES W SHEET GENERALNOTES ...-'----......---'----...._... _............... ..--- --'---- DETERMINED BY USPS AND TENANT AT A LATER TIME. 2. SEE STORM PLAN, SHEET C4.0, FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT STORMWATER FACILITIES. X1SITE PLAN NOTES 1. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2. PROPOSED CFA STANDARD CATCHING/SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 3. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PAINTED PARKING STRIPE 4. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE 5. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DETAILS 6. PROPOSED STANDARD A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 7. PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 8. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE 9. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE 10. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CANOPY 11. PROPOSED A.D.A. RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES 12. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ELEVATION 13. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CONCRETE 14. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS 15. PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO W/ OUTDOOR TABLES & SEATING 16. PADS A AND B AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND DRIVING AREAS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED AT A LATER TIME. 17. PROPOSED BUILDING 18. PROPOSED 6"CURBAND GUTTER 19. PROPOSED LID STORMWATER FACILITY (RAIN GARDEN OR INFILTRATION PLANTER), SEE STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION 20. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 21. 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION WALKWAY 22. PROPOSED LED LIGHTS FOR EXISTING STREET LIGHT HEADS ALONG GATEWAY PER CURRENT CITY OF SPRINGFIELD LED STANDARDS FOR ARTERIALS. 23. PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 1 SITE STATISTICS SITE PARKING: CIVIVS PROJECT M MINIMUM PARKING: 50 STALLS MAXIMUM PER CODE: 63 STALLS ADA STALLS 2 STANDARD STALLS PROVIDED 63 TOTAL PROVIDED 65 STALLS ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET E o00� 0 po� Qo0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 40'6OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIVS PROJECT M 10841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG (p mamaia�cwairea aims araa�q aramai � dal8 files praticci fm abwenmeaprgW Z mY^y be rcproLxainanY mvrrl WlFaY G exprcsz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G auCnizea pmRtl rcprcsWa4ves. W SHEET U SITE PLAN O W CO SHEET NUMBER a C2.0 _ ni 000 0 0 ° 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 'OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 U N UU Q J � Off z LL W 0 UU FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECTp 14801.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY AG CO IMamaoncaaarc mfivs&waq lnal F-- dPlafilesprWuxdlas—aniedprgW Z may rel be rcPr eci In am manner rMMvd G express vnlMna vaGalwmerY bm G aYMx¢ed pygal rcprcsaYaEws. LU SHEET U GRADING PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER Q C3.0 11 C ■-1 M1 4 I 3 I RANnv pno� ocii TIw4r o 4 1 3 1 SE Y K E GENERAL NOTES: 1. CLEAN OUTS ARE REOU I RED AT A MAXIMUM OF 90 FEET ALONG A STORM LINE. 2. STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL AREA, WHICH INCLUDES THE CFA BUILDING AND TWO OTHER PADS TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING A LATER PHASE, WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN FULL AND WILL NOT BE PARTIALLY BUILT. X) STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PROPOSED STORMWATER FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 2. PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION PLANTER FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 3. PROPOSED 1.5' WIDE CURB CUT 4. PROPOSED 6" DUCTILE IRON STORM LINE FOR ROOF DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING OR DRIVE-THRU CANOPY. 5. PROPOSED 6" PERFORATED (AT TOP OF PIPE ONLY WITHIN STORMWATER FACILITY) PVC D3034 STORM UNDERDRAIN 6. PROPOSED 10" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 7. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 8. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE TO BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO 6" PERFORATED PIPE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMWATER FACILITY 9. PROPOSED 15" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 10. CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC MANHOLE 11. REPLACE EXISTING 12" PUBLIC DRAINAGE LINE WITH 15" PVC D3034. 12. PROPOSED OVERFLOW WITH BEEHIVE GRATE LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER SPILLING CURB & GUTTER SIGN SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STORM SEWER CLEANOUT STORM CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITY 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 1 OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 0 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 40'6OOWL 309 SW STH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 W Q C. Q a J � 06 z LL W Q'o Uj LUJ LL 0 B rQn2 IL V N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIVS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG CO Inform be on demand, on the d ravnng and In all algmal floor produceal for above named broody Z may not be reproduced in any manner wfbow G express whiten orverbalconseni ham G auPonretl proRtl representatives. LD SHEET U STORMWATER PLAN O W CO SHEET NUMBER C4.0 _a oo�D 0 pl 0 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 40'6OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 Q a J � Off z LL W Q'o LLJ LUJ ILL F— 0 rQnIL 2 UV N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT M 10841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY JLG (p mamaia��wai,ea a�msarcare a,am ai � dpla files pmticci fm abwenmea prgW Z maY ^a Ge rcProlxaln anY mutts �MMa ezPrcss �.auem or..ma �m�i rm � b,ma�rca PrcKa rcPrc:aaa4ves. LU SHEET U UTILITY PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER Q C5.0 oo�D 0 pl 0 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 40'6OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 Q a J � Off z LL W Q'o LLJ LUJ ILL F— 0 rQnIL 2 UV N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT M 10841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY JLG CO Inform be onconferee on in. a roving ane In tll algnal files proauoetl for above nametl projet Z may not be reproaocetl in any manner without G ex press whiten oralconseni ham G au PonreaproRtl represent atives. LU SHEET U FIRE SERVICE PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER C5.1 EI O / B C I A I Fc 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 G 0 RANDY PAPE BELTLINE (MINOR ARTERIAL) 5'WIDE PARKING VEGETATIVE EXISTING PROPERTY SCREENING, T-6- HT (TYP) LINE (TYP) �N:IYP STORMIAATER lgil I 1 li u fiGARDEN (T d' a t . IN01 A"111F, Jill a �°:°� i°�� 0.Il e.ee.r `e0 eO °eesOv/30 dO{e•ooee%�p�` _ eats Q \ OOcii�.a re eye a C¢040QQ6 "ae ap,py��pQ' 090eo00-a..�000t 0000006 9000=p� �T yppp00 �No 9 a 1 - - yn �It i- - _��u • • 1"t al Fe .� �ee• D I LEASE LINE (TVP) G -� 2" CAL. / B&B 2 G PAPERBARK MAPLE AS SHOWN ABELIA X'EDWARD GOUCHER' EXFOLIATED BARK ACER RUBRUM'BOWHALL' 4 1 CHICK-FIL-A PHASE 1 " STORMWATER PLANTER (TYP) D_CO•i•4SIe epee OOOO.ee�1ie e0000 GARDEN (TYP) INSTALLE IN GROUN ww®jd%t f, W W —LEASE LINE (TVP) W FO FO ss 1 G G ^\ G \G G DEcl l I � i 'I I L------------- 4 1 3 p I LANDSCAPE PLANT & MATERIALS LEGEND LINE (TYP) 1 3 I III I I � I 3 I I I I r=i I I 5' WIDE PARKING VEGETATIVE I `SCREENING, -T-6" HT (TYP) I IIjIII I EXISTING PIROPERTY I LINE (TYP) I 1 � I I y4 1 I \ 1 I Y WIDE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT (TYP) I I 1 I ss ' I I I I I I I I p I ► I Ss ' ' 1 I , I 1 ) i i I KRUSE WAY I le 00 I s I 1 III y N 30 0 30 U 60 I I I I I^ SCALE IN FEET I� 2 TREES ITEM SIZE CITY. MATURE SIZE (H X W) / COMMENTS ACER GRISEUM 2" CAL. / B&B 2 20'H X 12'W/ UPRIGHT PAPERBARK MAPLE AS SHOWN ABELIA X'EDWARD GOUCHER' EXFOLIATED BARK ACER RUBRUM'BOWHALL' 2" CAL. / B&B 12 40'H X 15'W/ COLUMNAR BOWHALL RED MAPLE AS SHOWN 2,182 48"H IZONE A/EVERGREEN 0 ACER RUBRUMTRANKSRED' 2" CAL. / B&B 6 45'H X 35'W/ UPRIGHT BRANCHING RED SUNSET MAPLE AS SHOWN 3-6" O.C. /7 ALNUS RUBRA 2" CAL. / B&B 12 50'H X 30'W/ UPRIGHT BRANCH ING RED ALDER AS SHOWN MAGENTA ROCK ROSE CARPINUS BETULUS TRANS FONTAINE' 2" CAL. / B&B 14 30'H X 20'W/ COLUMNAR FRANS FONTAINE EUROPEAN HORNBEAM AS SHOWN 174 SH X 4'W / EVERGREEN PINUS PONDEROSA' WILLAMETTE VALLEY' 6' HT / B&B 6 50'+ H X 25'W / EVERGREEN WILLAMETTE VALLEY PONDEROSA PINE AS SHOWN MISCANTHUS SINENSIS'LITTLE KITTEN' 2 GAL. 68 STEWARTIA PSEUDOCAMELLIA 2" CAL. / B&B 2 30'H X 20'W/ OVAL SHAPE JAPANESE STEWARTIA AS SHOWN © PENNISETUM A. 'HAMELN' EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN AS NOTED 30" H X 2'W CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT IN PLACE GROUNDCOVERS SHRUBS & ACCENTS ITEM SIZE CITY. MATURE SIZE (H X W) / COMMENTS ©+ ABELIA X'EDWARD GOUCHER' 5 GAL 107 SH X &W / EVERGREEN CITY. PINK ABELIA 4'-0" O.C. 50%CAREX OBNU PTA 1GAL CONT /24"HT 2,182 48"H IZONE A/EVERGREEN 0 CHAMAECYPARIS OBTUSA 'GRACILIS' 4' - 5' HT. / 7 GAL 19 10'H X S W / COLUMNAR EVERGREEN 8,919 SF SLENDER HINOKI FASLSE CYPRESS 3-6" O.C. /7 TOTAL GROUNDCOVER (100 1100 SF) = 6,282 PLANTS O CISTUSX PULVERULENTUS 'SUNSET 2 GAL. 144 2'H X 4'W / EVERGREEN MAGENTA ROCK ROSE 3-0" O.C. 55 PLANTS 18" H X 18" W 0 MAHONIA AQUIFOLIUM 5 GAL 14'-0" OC 174 SH X 4'W / EVERGREEN YELLOW FLOWER OREGON GRAPE HOLLY LANDSCAPE COVERAGE WI 3 YRS = 75% NARCISSUS'DUTCH MASTER' BULBS O' MISCANTHUS SINENSIS'LITTLE KITTEN' 2 GAL. 68 3H X TIN DUTCH MASTER TRUMPET DAFFODIL LITTLE KITTEN MAIDEN GRASS T-0" OC YELLOW FLOWERS- SPRING 000 © PENNISETUM A. 'HAMELN' 2 GAL CONT 44 30" H X 2'W HAMELN FOUNTAIN GRASS 2'-0" OC BULBS FULL SUN / DROUGHT TOLERANT Q ROSA'RADRAZZ' 5 GAL 13 CANES 86 3H X TIN KNOCK OUT ROSE 3-0" O.C. 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE VIOLA X WITTROCKIANA'CROK4V GOLDEN' 4" POT 54 PLANTS ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS 'ARP' 5 GAL 102 3H X TIN / EVERGREEN 9" O.C. ARP ROSEMARY T-0" O.C. pmDECORATIVE 0• RUDBECKIA FULGIDA'EARLY BIRD GOLD' 1 GAL 52 2'H X 2'W / PERENNIAL EARLY BIRD GOLD BLACK EYED SUSAN AS SHOWN VALLEY LANDSCAPE CENTER YELLOW FLOWERS SPRING TO FALL GROUNDCOVERS GROUNDCOVERS CITY. POTENTIAL HEIGHT / PLANTING ZONE ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 1 GAL. CONT. 1,919 SF 6" H X 12" W /ZONE B / EVERGREEN ITEM SIZE CITY. MATURE SIZE (H X W) 2,181 36" H / ZONE A / EVERGREEN 50%CAREX OBNU PTA 1GAL CONT /24"HT 2,182 48"H IZONE A/EVERGREEN 6,282 TOTAL STORMWATER FACILITIES (CITY OF EUGENE STORMWATER ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI'MASS.' 1 GAL. 8,919 SF 9" H X T W / EVERGREEN TOTAL AREA = 6,282 SF /7 TOTAL GROUNDCOVER (100 1100 SF) = 6,282 PLANTS (6,282 PLANTS REO) KINNIKINICK 2'-0" O.C. 2,586 PLANTS LEASE AREA: TAX LOT 1703222001300 = 79,555 SF (1.83 AC) AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR HEMEROCALLIS'HAPPY RETURNS' 1 GAL 55 PLANTS 18" H X 18" W MATERIALS WITHIN 3 YEARS OF THE DATE OF 30% HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY 18" O.C. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH A YELLOW FLOWER FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND SYSTEM CAPABLE OF LANDSCAPE COVERAGE WI 3 YRS = 75% NARCISSUS'DUTCH MASTER' BULBS 218 BULBS 20" H X 6" W / BULB BULB MIX 30% DUTCH MASTER TRUMPET DAFFODIL 9" O.C. YELLOW FLOWERS- SPRING 000 INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPE = 5,390 SF OR 21% INTERIOR PARKING TREES- 1/100 SF = 23 TREES Q 2" CAL (19 TREES REO) INTERIOR PARKING SHRUBS - 4/100 SF = 127 SHRUBS Q 5 GAL (75 SHRUBS REO) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED = 16,803 SF COLCHICUM GIGANTEUM'THE GIANT BULBS 180 BULBS 8" H X 6" W / BULB 356 SF 25% GIANT AUTUMN CROCUS 9" O.C. PURPLE FLOWERS - FALL NOTIFICATION CENTER 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE VIOLA X WITTROCKIANA'CROK4V GOLDEN' 4" POT 54 PLANTS 8" X 10" / WINTER ANNUAL NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 15% CROWN GOLDEN PANSY 9" O.C. CLEAR GOLDEN FLOWERS pmDECORATIVE ROCKBAND @ BUILDING T-6" X 6" 60 SF WASHED RIVER ROCK, SIZE 2"- 3" VALLEY LANDSCAPE CENTER 1.25 CY INSTALL OVER MIRAFI 140N NON -WOVEN SURE -LOC STEEL EDGING 1/4" X 5" X 16' 48 LF GEO-TEXTILE, TUALATIN, 503-692-0606 15" STEEL STAKES, COLOR BLACK STORMWATER FACILITY PLANT MATERIALS: GROUNDCOVERS ITEM SIZE CITY. POTENTIAL HEIGHT / PLANTING ZONE ARCTOSTAPHYLOS UVA-URSI 1 GAL. CONT. 1,919 SF 6" H X 12" W /ZONE B / EVERGREEN KINNIKINICK 100/100SF 1,919PLANTS NATIVE RUSH/SEDGE MIX 100 / 100 SF 4,363 SF NATIVE 50%JUNCUS PATENS 1 GAL CONT 124" HT 2,181 36" H / ZONE A / EVERGREEN 50%CAREX OBNU PTA 1GAL CONT /24"HT 2,182 48"H IZONE A/EVERGREEN 6,282 TOTAL STORMWATER FACILITIES (CITY OF EUGENE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MANUAL): GROWING MEDIUM =SEE CIVIL SHEETS STORMWATER FACILITIES = RAIN GARDENS & PLANTERS TOTAL AREA = 6,282 SF TOTAL GROUNDCOVER (100 1100 SF) = 6,282 PLANTS (6,282 PLANTS REO) LANDSCAPE CODE SUMMARY LEASE AREA: TAX LOT 1703222001300 = 79,555 SF (1.83 AC) AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS FOR DEVELOPMENT, ALL LANDSCAPED AREAS SHALL BE AT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD LEAST 75 PERCENT COVERED WITH LIVING PLANT ZONING BASE: COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) CH 3.2.200 MATERIALS WITHIN 3 YEARS OF THE DATE OF PARKING SETBACK - CC ZONING =SMIN INSTALLATION. ZONING OVERLAY: GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH A COMMERCIAL ELEMENT FULLY AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND SYSTEM CAPABLE OF LANDSCAPE COVERAGE WI 3 YRS = 75% DELIVERING 100% COVERAGE OF ALL EXISTING AND INTERIOR PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE = 7.5% MIN PROPOSED PLANT MATERIAL. PARKING VEGETATIVE SCREENING=3-6"HT SHRUBS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: PARKING LOT AREA = 24,711 SF INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPE REQ = 1,853 SF OR 7.5% INTERIOR PARKING LANDSCAPE = 5,390 SF OR 21% INTERIOR PARKING TREES- 1/100 SF = 23 TREES Q 2" CAL (19 TREES REO) INTERIOR PARKING SHRUBS - 4/100 SF = 127 SHRUBS Q 5 GAL (75 SHRUBS REO) TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED = 16,803 SF TOTAL TREES - 2/1,000 SF = 54 TREES Q 2" CAL (34 TREES REO) _ TOTAL SHRUBS - 10/1,000 SF = 488 SHRUBS Q 5 GAL (168 SHRUBS REO) ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES OREGON UTILITY ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR NOTIFICATION CENTER 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE 1-800-332-2344 CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 ■ W® E o00� aft oo Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 rm 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 4R�ISTEh,� OB?�,^/-/ j� rWel A ICM/I .{Cv� y OREGON ccj 06/11/07 ` PE ARG EXPIRES 05/31/2023 LU C Q J � _ 06z LL 0 / LU Uj LU LL J 0 B �Q'^) z V FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION Cll PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A11/1012021 DRAWN By PEG Co Ma imcWarc mNad�inal --- apla files approticei fm abwenmedprgW z YrvYbercprW inanY—wtF G upresz vnllmarvabalcmvnlim G autlxnzed��tlrc�aYadves. LU SHEET U LANDSCAPE 0❑ PLAN W CO SHEET NUMBER Q _J L1.0 4 3 2 1 TREE INSTALLATION STEPS: IL 1. WHILE TREE IS OUT OF THE HOLE: GROUNDCOVER PLANT: REMOVE WIRE BASKET COMPLETELY. REFER TO LEGEND FOR SPECIES • LOOSEN TWINE FROM ROOTBALLAND REMOVE COMPLETELY. O.C. FT - _f - _M� 2. PLACE TREE IN HOLE. SPACING ° HARDSCAPE ELEMENT i ' 3. UNFOLD BURLAP AND CUTAWAY E +°I e. CURB/SIDEWALK------------ AT LEAST 3/40F BURLAP. E a------- l 4. BACKFILL TREE ROOTBALL + i. ❑ ❑ ❑1 ❑ ❑� I w/APPROVED AMENDED TOPSOIL. 1/2 PACIN 11 11.. 1 JUNCUS PATENS DECIDUOUS TREE: + + ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ I � REFER TO LEGEN D FOR SPECI ES �, 11 - ' 00000 O.C. + � -4�� i '1 CAREX OBNUPTA SPACING i b ° I O O O O O - i + + GROWING MEDIUM (2) 2" WOODEN STAKE, DRIVEN A MINIMUM OF 18" INTO EXISTING u a J ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 1/2 TREE HT. UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SOIL. t� �l DECIDUOUS / EVERGREEN SHRUB : + I I ADJUSTABLE PLASTIC GUY -WIRE _ J REFER TO LEGEND FOR SPECIES I. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ SAMPLE AREA TREE ROOTBALL tel` SHRUB ROOTBALL 3" MULCH LAYER I 1 3" MULCH LAYER 3" MULCH LAYER 1" LIP L -------------------J FINISH HARDSCAPE ELEMENT FINISH TOPSOIL GRADE FINISH TOPSOIL GRADE TOPSOIL - � CURB/SIDEWALK GRADE ; ROOTBALL- TOPSOIL: AMEND TOPSOIL PER LABT'J III�� TOPSOIL: AMENDTOPSOIL PER LAB - GROUNDCOVERPLANT: NOTES: DEPTH 1J�4" h'I ANALYSIS AND TOPSOIL NOTESN ANALYSIS AND TOPSOIL NOTES A� REFER TO LEGEND FOR SPECIES ^ \ _ PRIOR TO ADDING FERTILIZER. ` 4" ° �- „� ,i' = PRIOR TO ADDING FERTILIZER. 2" MIN. TOPSOIL: ALL GROUND COVER SHALL BE PLANTED AT EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING PER AMEND TOPSOIL PER LAB SCARIFY AND RE -COMPACT TO 4" HT. �_ ON CENTER SPACING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANTING PLAN. _ SCARIFY AND RE -COMPACT TO 4" HT. IIIIII�-III- IIII-SII ANALYSIS AND TOPSOIL NOTES �-III-III III-� III-- PRIOR TO ADDING FERTILIZER.III III - EXISTING SUBGRADE IIIIII=IIIIII=III=III= �_� = �:= EXISTING SUBGRADE EXISTING SUBGRADE LOCATE GROUND COVER ONE HALF OF SPECIFIED SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANY 18" MIN. D CURB, SIDEWALK, OR OTHER HARDSCAPE SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2x ROOTBALL D ALL GROUND COVER SHALL BE PLANTED AT LOCATE GROUND COVER ONE HALF OF SPECIFIED DO NOT INSTALL MULCH IN STORMWATER FACILITIES BELOW THE TOP OF BANK - REMOVE CONTAINER FROM PLANT AND EQUAL TRIANGULAR SPACING PER ON CENTER SPACING DISTANCE FROM ANY CURB, SIDEWALK, OR I� SCORE ROOTBALLS TO LOOSEN ANY ROOT SPACING AS SPECIFIED ON PLANTING PLAN. OTHER HARDSCAPE SURFACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2 x ROOTBALL BOUND MATERIAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ,I-, GROUNDCOVER SPACING / PLANTING NOT TO SCALE C2J STORMWATER FACILITY PLANTINGS NOTTOSCALE3 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE 4 SHRUB PLANTING NOT TO SCALE TREE INSTALLATION STEPS: Off. 1. WHILE TREE IS OUT OF THE HOLE: 1. ALL CEMENT TREATED LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE EXCAVATED A MINIMUM OF 6'BELOW BOTTOM OF TREAT AREA AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE. BACKFILL WITH TOPSOIL TO ORIGINAL GRADE PRIOR TO ADDING THE SPECIFIED • ---�� REMOVE WIRE BASKET COMPLETELY. 3"MULCH O AMENDED SOIL PER THE PLANS. • LOOSEN TWINE FROM ROOTBALL AND v TOPSOIL REMOVE COMPLETELY.-j�n✓' 1. 2. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY VdTH OWNER AND UTILITY COMPANIES THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, TO DETERMINE IN THE FIELD THE ACTUAL LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, 2. PLACE TREE IN HOLE. WHETHER SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR NOT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CALL UTILITY PROTECTION SERVICE 72 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. UNFOLD BURLAP AND CUTAWAY AT LEAST 314 OF BURLAP. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXAMINE FINISH SURFACE,GRADES, TOPSOIL QUALITY AND DEPTH. DO NOT START ANY WORK UNTIL UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED. VERIFY LIMITS OF WORK BEFORE STARTING. 4. BACKFILL TREE ROOTBALL i 4. CONTRACTOR TO REPORT ALL DAMAGES TO EXISTING CONDITIONS AND INCONSISTENCIES WITH PLANS TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. w/ APPROVED AMENDED TOPSOIL. TOP OF BARK MULCH EVERGREEN TREETO BE 1"BELOW S. ALL PLANT MASSES TO BE CONTAINED WITHIN A 3" LAYER OF BARK MULCH BED, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. : BACK OF CURB. REFER TO LEGEND FOR SPECIES 6. BED EDGE TO BE NO LESS THAN 12" AND NO MORE THAN 18" FROM OUTER EDGE OF PLANT MATERIAL BRANCHING. WHERE GROUND -COVER OCCURS, PLANTTO LIMITS OF AREA AS SHOWN. NOTE "A": 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS. ^, (3) 2" WOODEN STAKE, DRIVEN A LANDSCAPE MOUNDING HEIGHT Jp ��✓ \`� MINIMUM OF 18" INTO EXISTING VARIES BASED ON PLANTER 8. CONTRACTOR TO FINE GRADE AND ROCK -HOUND ALL PLANTING AREAS PRIOR TO PLANTING, TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH AND CONTINUAL SURFACE, FREE OF IRREGULARITIES (BUMPS OR DEPRESSIONS) & EXTRANEOUS MATERIAL OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SOIL. WIDTH AS FOLLOWS: DEBRIS. C (ONE STAKE HIDDEN) ADJUSTABLE PLASTIC GUY -WIRE 1/2 TREE HT. �% CJ -�� TREE ROOTBALL 3" MULCH LAYER INSIDE PLANTER WIDTH MOUNDING HEIGHT 3'-4' 3" 5'-9' 6" 10'-20' 9" 9. QUANTITIES ARE INTENDED TO ASSIST CONTRACTOR IN EVALUATING THEIR CAN TAKEOFFS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FORBID QUANTITIES AS INDICATED N THE PLANS. IF THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE c NUMBER IN THE PLANT LEGEND AND THE QUANTITY OF GRAPHIC SYMBOLS SHOWN, THE GRAPHIC SYMBOL QUANTITY SHALL GOVERN. 10. COORDINATE PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH INSTALLATION OF UNDERGROUND SPRINKLER AND DRAINAGE SYSTEMS. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT REMOVE ANY TREES DURING CONSTRUCTION WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 12. WHERE PROPOSED TREE LOCATIONS OCCUR UNDER EXISTING OVERHEAD UTILITIES OR CROWD EXISTING TREES, NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ADJUST TREE LOCATIONS. FINISH TOPSOIL GRADE 13 LANDSCAPE TREES, SHRUBSCOMPLETIONNTENANCE PERIOD BEGINS IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE ANTIONS AND C , LAWNS AND OTHER PLANTS UNTIL NAL ACCEPTANCE OR 90 DAYS AFTER NOTIFICATION D ACCEPTANCE, STTHAT ALL PUNCH L \A IICHEVER IILONGER. WARRANTY ALL PLANTING FOIST ITEMS HAVE R COMPLETED TOPSOIL: AMEND TOPSOIL PER LAB A PERIOD OF TWO (2) YEARS FROM THE DATE OF 18" MIN. " q ANALYSIS AND TOPSOIL NOTES VARIES - SEE NOTE'WABOVE ACCEPTANCE. PRIOR TO ADDING FERTILIZER.' � N 14. REMOVE EXISTING WEEDS FROM PROJECT SITE PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF ORGANIC AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZER SCARIFYAND RE-COMPACTT04"HT. y� - _ 15. BACKFILL MATERIAL FOR TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING SHALL CONTAIN: ONE PART FINE GRADE COMPOST TO FOUR PARTS TOPSOIL BY VOLUME. INCORPORATE ANY SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZERS AND AMENDMENTS PER SOIL LAB P - -III III -III EXISTING SUBGRADE ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS. =III=III=III=III=III=III= 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FOR ALL PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 90 DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. PLANT SUBSTITUTIONS WITHOUT PRIOR WRITTEN APPROVAL THAT DO NOTCOMPLY WTH THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS MAY BE REJECTED BYTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THESE ITEMS MAV BE REQUIRED TO BE REPLACED WITH PLANT MATERIALS THAT ARE IN 2 x ROOTBALL III III -III III IIIIIIIII-III COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAWINGS. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SECURE ALL PLANT MATERIAL IN THE SIZE SPECIFIED ON PLAN PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. IN THE EVENT THE PLANT MATERIAL IS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE SIZE SPECIFIED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE OWNERS' REPRESENTATIVE, AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, A WRITTEN ESTIMATE TO INCREASE PLANT MATERIAL (AND INSTALL) THE NEXT AVAILABLE CONTAINER SIZE PLANT (I.E. 4" POT TO ONE GALLON CONTAINER, 2' CALIPER TREE TO 2.5" CALIPER). �5j EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING NOT TO SCALE6 SOIL MOUNDING: ISLANDS AND PERIMETER NOT TO SCALE 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO STABILIZE ALL SLOPES 3;1 OR GREATER AND PREVENT EROSION OR MOVEMENT OF SOIL FROM SLOPES. THIS COULD INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, EROSION CONTROL FABRIC, STAKING, NETTING, AND STRAW WATTLES. SUBMIT METHOD OF SLOPE STABILIZATION TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW AND WRITTEN APPROVAL 30 DAYS PRIOR TO IMPLEMENTATION. 19. PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING IF THEY BELIEVE ANY OF THE PLANT MATERIAL IDENTIFIED ON THE PLAN MAY NOT BE SUITABLE FOR THE SITE OR MAY DIE. B 1. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO PROVIDE A NUMBER IN THE BASE BID TO FURNISH B. AMENDED IMPORTED TOPSOIL SHALL INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY FERTILIZER AND AMENDMENTS PER SUBSTITUTION REQUESTS MAY BE GRANTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. IF NOTIFICATION IS NOT GIVEN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ALL PLANTING WHICH FAILS TO B THE SOIL ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS. TOPSOIL ANALYSIS SHALL STATE ORGANIC MATTER GROW EXCEPT FOR DEFECTS RESULTING FROM LACK OF ADEQUATE MAINTENANCE AS DETERMINED BYTHE OWNER NEGLECT OR VANDALISM SHALL BE REPLACED BYTHE CONTRACTOR AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. AND INSTALL AMENDED TOPSOIL IN ALL LANDSCAPE BEDS AND SEEDED AREAS AS SPECIFIED BELOW UNLESS , OTHERWISE NOTED. AMENDED TOPSOIL SHALL INCLUDE ALL NECESSARY FERTILIZERS, ORGANIC AND INORGANIC MATTER (SILT, CLAY AND SAND), DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, PH, MINERAL AND 20. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IN WRITING, WHEN CONDITIONS DETRIMENTAL TO PLANT GROWTH ARE ENCOUNTERED, SUCH AS RUBBLE FILL, POOR PLANTING SOIL, ADVERSE DRAINAGE CONDITIONS, OR OBSTRUCTIONS, INORGANIC AMENDMENTS, BASED ON INDUSTRY STANDARDS FOR EXCEPTIONAL PLANT DEVELOPMENT. PLANT -NUTRIENT CONTENT. IN ADDITION THE REPORT SHALL ALSO STATE RECOMMENDED QUANTITIES PRIOR TO PLANTING. • SCARIFY ALL PLANTING AREA SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 6". INSTALL & TILL IN 2" LAYER OF AMENDED (BY PERCENTAGE OF WEIGHT TE. 2 LBS OF 15-15-15 PER 1DDOSF) OF NITROGEN, PHOSPHORUS AND TOPSOIL INTO SCARIFIED SUBGRADE AND RE -COMPACT TO 90%. POTASH, NUTRIENTS AND ANY LIMESTONE, ALUMINUM SULFATE, OR OTHER SOIL AMENDMENTS TO BE 21. PLANTING RESTRICTIONS- PLANTING IS NOT PERMITTED DURING THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: • INSTALL A MINIMUM 12" DEPTH OF AMENDED TOPSOIL TO PERIMETER AND FRONTAGE AREAS. ADDED TO PRODUCE A SATISFACTORY AMENDED TOPSOIL. FURNISH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS A. COLD WEATHER: LESS THAN 32 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT • INSTALL A MINIMUM 18" DEPTH OF AMENDED TOPSOIL TO ALL PLANTER ISLANDS AND BUILDING TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEWAND WRITTEN APPROVAL 30 DAYS PRIOR TO MOBILIZATION. B. HOT WEATHER: GREATER THAN 90 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT FOUNDATION PLANTERS. INCLUDE ADDITIONAL TOPSOIL MOUNDING REQUIREMENT, SEE DETAIL THIS C. WET WEATHER: SATURATED SOIL OR STANDING WATER SHEET. 7. IN ADDITION TO THE SOILS ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD I D. WINDY WEATHER: WIND VELOCITIES GREATER THAN 20 M.P.H. PART (2 "LAYER) OF APPROVED HUMUS MATERIAL TO 2 PARTS AMENDED TOPSOIL. SUBMIT CUT SHEET 22_ ALL PLANTING AREAS EXCEPT FOR MITIGATION AREAS SHALL BE WATERED WITH AN AUTOMATIC UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. MITIGATION AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED PER CWS REQUIREMENTS. 2. UPON BEING AWARDED THE CONTRACT, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH A STATE OF HUMUS MATERIAL (CERTIFIED FINE COMPOSTED YARD DEBRIS) TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR LICENSED SOIL LABORATORY AND THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, TO DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY AND REVIEW AND WR ITTEN APPROVAL PRIOR TO MIXING. 23. DO NOT LOCATE TREES IN EASEMENTS. AVAILABILITY OF THE EXISTING SITE TOPSOIL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEND THE TOPSOIL TO A SOIL LABORATORY FOR ANALYSIS STATING THAT THE TOPSOIL BE ANALYZED FOR A LANDSCAPE CROP. AFTER 8. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF TOPSOIL SCARIFY AND LOOSEN SUBGRADE OF PLANTING BED AREA TO A 24. SEE CIVIL PLANS FOR EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ON SITE. RECEIVING RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE SOILS EXPERT FORWARD A COPY TO THE OWNERS MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6INCHES. REMOVE STONES LARGER THAN V IN ANY DIMENSION AND STICKS, REPRESENTATIVE AT WHICH TIME A DECISION WILL BE MADE BYTHE OWNER AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE ROOTS, RUBBISH AND OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS. REMOVE WEEDS FROM EXISTING SUBGRADE 25. ALL PLANTS MUSTCOMPLY TO THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. THOSE THAT DO NOTWILL BE REJECTED. CALIPER TREES MUST BRANCH AT S MIN. HT. EXISTING ON-SITE STOCKPILE WILL BE USED FOR THE PROJECT. AND TREAT WITH NECESSARY HERBICIDE TO PREVENT WEED GROWTH. SPREAD HALF OF THE 26. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS (SHEET L-1.2) PRIOR TO FINALIZING BIDS. THE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE ADHERED TO THROUGHOUTTHECONSTRUCTION AMENDED TOPSOIL MIXTURE AND WORK INTO TOP OF LOOSEN SUBGRADE TO CREATE A TRANSITION PROCESS. 3. IF THE EXISTING TOPSOIL IS TO BE USED THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADD THE RECOMMENDED AMENDMENTS LAYER. PLACE REMAINING HALF OF THE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE TO THE DEPTH REQUIRED TO MEET 27. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING EXISTING TREES FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ALL TREE PROTECTION DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE STARTOF LAND DISTURBANCE, AND MAINTAINED UNTIL AND FERTILIZERS AS STATED IN THE SOILS ANALYSIS ALONG WITH ADDITIONAL AMENDMENTS AND FERTILIZERS THICKNESS, GRADES AND ELEVATIONS SHOWN, AFTER LIGHT ROLLING AND NATURAL SETTLEMENT. FINAL LANDSCAPING. ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS TO BE PROTECTED FROM SEDIMENTATION. ALTREE PROTECTION FENCING TO BE INSPECTED DAILY, AND REPAIRED OR REPLACED AS NEEDED. NO PARKING, STORAGE OR LISTED IN NOTE #6 AND #7. OTHER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE TO OCCUR WITHIN TREE PROTECTION AREAS. 9. WITHIN TREE WELLS & PLANTER ISLANDS, REMOVE EXISTING SOIL AND OTHER DEBRIS, TOA MINIMUM 28. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE CLEANED OF CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS (IE. CONCRETE, ROCK, RUBBLE, BUILDING MATERIALS,ETC) PRIOR TO ADDING AND SPREADING OF THE TOPSOIL. 4. IN THE EVENT THE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL IS OF POOR QUALITY(AS DETERMINED BYTHE SOIL ANALYSIS) DEPTH OF 18" AND REPLACE WITH AMENDED TOPSOIL. ADD ADDITIONAL SOIL AS REQUIRED PER 29. PLANTING AREA SUBGRADE TO BE HELD DOWN THE APPROPRIATE ELEVATION TO ACCOUNT FOR TOPSOIL DEPTH AND MOUNDING. OR IS UNAVAILABLE FOR USE, THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE WILL MAKE A DECISION AS TO WHETHER OR NOT DETAILS AND NOTES. 30. PRIOR TO BEGINNING WORK, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSPECT THE SUBGRADE, GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS, VERIFY ELEVATIONS, UTILITY LOCATIONS, AND OBSERVE THE SITE CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH THE WORK IS THE NUMBER FOR IMPORTING 9" OF AMENDED IMPORTED TOPSOIL WILL BE ADDED TO THE SIGNED CONTRACT TO BE DONE. NOTIFY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY UNSATISFACTORY CONDITIONS, WORK SHALL NOT PROCEED UNTIL SUCH CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED AND ARE ACCEPTABLE TO THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, SHIPPING TICKETS FOR IMPORTED 31. ANY DEVIATIONS FROM THE APPROVED SET OF PLANS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. AGREEMENT. 32. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH ANSI Z60.1 THE'AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK' AND THE ACCEPTED STANDARDS OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. TOP SOIL AND HUMUS MATERIAL, 60 DAYS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND WRITTEN 33. EXISTING GRASS IN PROPOSED PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE KILLED AND REMOVED. HAND RAKE TO REMOVE ALL ROCKS AND DEBRIS LARGER THAN 1 INCH IN DIAMETER, PRIOR TO ADDING TOPSOIL AND PLANTING SHRUBS. SOIL TO A 5. IF AMENDED IMPORTED TOPSOIL IS TO BE USED, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR WALL BE NOTIFIED IN WRITING BY APPROVAL. BE TESTED TO DETERMINE FERTILIZER AND LIME REQUIREMENTS PRIOR TO LAYING SOD. A THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CONTRACT MODIFIED ACCORDINGLY. TOPSOIL SHALL BE OBTAINED 34. SOD TO BE DELIVERED FRESH (CUT LESS THAN 24 HOURS PRIOR TO ARRIVING ON SITE), LAID IMMEDIATELY,ROLLED, AND WATERED THOROUGHLY IMMEDIATELY AFTER PLANTING. EDGE OF SOD AT PLANTING BEDS ARE TO BE"V" FROM NATURALLY WELL -DRAINED SITES WHERE TOPSOIL OCCURS AT LEAST 4INCHES DEEP. DO NOT OBTAIN TRENCHED; SEE LANDSCAPE DETAILS. FROM BOGS OR MARSHES. IMPORTED TOPSOIL TO COMPLY WITH ASTM D 5268, WITH A PH RANGE OF 5.5 TO 7.0, 35. ANY EXISTING GRASS DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION TO BE FULLY REMOVED, REGRADED AND REPLACED. ALL TIRE MARKS AND INDENTIONS TO BE REPAIRED. FREEOFSTONESI INCHORLARGER IN ANY DIMENSION, AND ANY OTHER EXTRANEOUS MATERIALS(ROCKS, 38. WATER THOROUGHLY TWICE IN FIRST 24 HOURS AND APPLY MULCH IMMEDIATELY. STICKS,RUBBISH,SOD) HARMFUL TO PLANT GROWTH. AN ADDITIONAL SOILS ANALYSIS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR 37. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL PLANTS INSTALLED FOR ONE FULL YEAR FROM DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE OWNER. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE ALIVE AND AT A VIGOROUS RATE OF GROWTH AT THE END OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. SEE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS/EXPECTATIONS. ANY PLANT THAT IS DETERMINED DEAD, IN AN UNHEALTHY, UNSIGHTLY CONDITION, LOST ITS SHAPE DUE TO DEAD THE IMPORTED TOPSOIL. BRANCHES, OR OTHER SYMPTOMS OF POOR, NON -VIGOROUS GROWTH, SHALL BE REPLACED BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. SEE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS FOR WARRANTY REQUIREMENTS/EXPECTATIONS. 38. IRRIGATION AS -BUILT SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT WITHIN 24 HOURS OF IRRIGATION INSTALL COMPLETION. 39. STAKE ALL EVERGREEN AND DECIDUOUS TREES AS SHOWN IN THE PLANTING DETAIL AND AS PER THE LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS. REMOVE STAKES AND GUYING FROM ALL TREES AFTER ONE YEAR FROM PLANTING. ,j,_7 TOPSOIL NOTES 8 GENERAL NOTES - LANDSCAPE PLANTING PLAN 4 3 2 1 O�oO aft oo Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 4R�ISTEh,� os.{� � WA B. u � y OREGON ccj 05/11/07 4PE ARG EXPIRES 05/31/2023 W Q FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY PEG Co �aia,ewa�mhmdaw inwl � dpl8 files pmtic_NN fm abwenmeiprgW Z m•r�x,ropa,eea m•ro ^••me, wiles ezprcss wmen o� verbal emeni em •,nal:<a proKa 2prcsWa4ves. IJJ SHEET U LANDSCAPE 0❑ DETAILS W CO SHEET NUMBER Q J L1.1 4 1 3 LANDSCAPE SPECIFICATIONS 3. Landscape IslandsJMedians: Fracturelloosen existing subgrade to a minimum 24" PART 1 - GENERAL depth. Remove and replace any subgrade unsuitable for planting. Once subgrade is clean of debris and loosened, add topsoil as shown on details. PRUNING All ornamental trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be pruned when appropriate to remove dead or damaged branches, develop the natural shapes. Do not shear trees or shrubs. If previous maintenance practice has been to shear and ball, then a natural shape will be restored gradually. Pruning Guidelines: 1. Prune those that flower before the end of June immediately after flowering. Flower buds develop during the previous growing season. Fall, winter or spring pruning would reduce the spring flowering display. 2. Prune those that flower in summer or autumn in winter or spring before new growth begins, since these plants develop flowers on new growth. 3. Delay pruning plants grown for ornamental fruits, such as cotoneasters, pyracanthas and viburnums. 4. Hollies and other evergreens may be pruned during winter in order to use their branches for seasonal decoration. However, severe pruning of evergreens should be done in early spring only. 5. Broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be hand -pruned to maintain their natural appearance after the new growth hardens off. 6. Hedges or shrubs that require shearing to maintain a formal appearance shall be pruned as required. Dead wood shall be removed from sheared plants before the first shearing of the season. 7. Conifers shall be pruned, if required, according to their genus. A. Yews, junipers, hemlocks, arborvitae, and false -cypress may be pruned after new growth has hardened off in late summer. If severe pruning is necessary, it must be done in early spring. B. Firs and spruces may be lightly pruned in late summer, fall, or winter after completing growth. Leave side buds. Never cut central leader. C. Pines may be lightly pruned in early June by reducing candles. 8. Groundcover shall be edged and pruned as needed to contain it within its borders. 2 The installation of perennials, annuals, and bulbs, unless specified herein, shall be reviewed with the owner, and, if accepted, installed and billed to the owner. SEASONAL COLOR MAINTENANCE Perennialization of Bulbs: 1. After flowering, cut off spent flower heads. 2. Allow leaves of daffodils and hyacinths to remain for six weeks after flowers have faded. Cut off at base. 3. Allow leaves of other bulbs to yellow naturally and then cut off at base. 4. Apply fertilizer after flowering in spring, possibly again in fall. Apply 10-10-10 at the rate of 2 pounds per 1000 square feet, or top -dress with compost 1" deep. Fall fertilization with a bulb fertilizer or mulching with 1" of compost is optional. Flower Rotation: 1. Bulbs: Remove the entire plant and bulb after flowers have faded or at the direction of the owner, and install new plants if included in contract. 2. Summer Annuals or Fall Plants: a. Dead heading: Pinch and remove dead flowers on annuals as necessary. b. Fertilizing Summer Annuals: Fertilize using one or two methods: Apply a slow-release fertilizer in May following manufacturers recommendations. A booster such as 10-10-10 may be necessary in late summer. Or, apply liquid fertilizations of 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizers, not to exceed 2 pounds of 20-20-20 per 100 gallons of water, monthly; or mulch with compost 1" deep. c. Removal: If fall plants are to be installed, summer annuals shall be left in the ground until the first killing frost and then removed, unless otherwise directed by the owner. 1 O�oO aft o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 4�PISTEh, �O 062 n WA IA C Cv 'y OREGON 05/11/07 4PE ARG EXPIRES 05/31/2023 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE AD uwN By 11/1012021 PEG D IRamalm cWarcl mins drnti,p ad In 81 F-- dplafiies prai1cedfrabwenmedprc. Z nsyn,x wnxxxexineanamc%el G opensvnumorvecal-ttan G 0-,.I. pm Rd 2prcsWa4ves. LU SHEET U LANDSCAPE 00 SPECIFICATIONS W CO SHEET NUMBER Q L1.2 DESCRIPTION 2 1 Provide trees, shrubs, ground covers, sod, and annuals/perennials as shown and specified on the landscape Mulch: see landscape plans for type of much to be used. Hold mulch 4" from tree trunks and plan. The work includes: shrub stems. Perennials: 1. Soil preparation. ori in on anent stems. This method results in a more open )ant without stimulating 9 P P P 9 2. Trees, shrubs, ground covers, and annuals/perennials. Guying/Staking: 3. Planting mixes. 1. See Details. 4. Top Soil, Mulch and Planting accessories. 2. Remove Guying/Staking after one yearfrom planting. The Contractor shall provide as a separate bid, maintenance for a period of 1 year after final 5. Maintenance. 6. Decorative stone. PART 3 - EXECUTION E 2. The following year: Related Work: INSPECTION a. 1. Irrigation System; see irrigation specifications (sheet L-2.2) Prior to beginning work the Landscape Contractor shall inspect the subgrade, general site 9 9 P P 9 . contractor who can provide maintenance. forsythia, deutzia, spimea, etc. conditions verifyelevations utility locations irrigation, approve to soil rovided b the General ty 9 P P Y mulch perennials with compost 1"deep. QUALITY ASSURANCE Contractor and observe the site conditions under which the work is to done. Notifythe h Plant names indicated; comply with "Standardized Plant Names" as adopted by the latest edition of the t General Contractor of any unsatisfactory conditions, and work shall not proceed until such an American Joint Committee of Horticultural Nomenclature. Names of varieties not listed conform generally with conditions have been corrected and are acceptable to the Landscape Contractor. names accepted by the nursery trade. Provide stock true to botanical name and legibly tagged. STANDARDS needed. PREPARATION Mulch the perennial bed once in early spring at 1"-2" depth. If soil is bared in late Comply with sizing and grading standards of the latest edition of "American Standard for Nursery Stock". A plant Planting shall be performed only by experienced workmen familiar with planting procedures shall be dimensioned as it stands in its natural position. under the supervision of a qualified supervisor. All plants shall be nursery grown under climatic conditions similar to those in the locality of the project for a Locate plants as indicated on the plans or as approved in the field after staking by the d. minimum of 2 years. Landscape Contractor. If obstructions are encountered that are not shown on the drawings, do Maintenance Contract. A certified arborist under a separate contract shall perform this type of not proceed with planting operations until alternate plant locations have been selected and hostas and ligularias. Powdery mildew on phlox, monardas, and asters can be Nursery Stock furnished shall be at least the minimum size indicated. Larger stock is acceptable, at no approved by the Landscape Architect; spacing of plant material shall be as shown on the work. additional cost, and providing that the larger plants will not be cut back to size indicated. Provide plants indicated landscape plan. E by two measurements so that only a maximum of 25% am of the minimum size indicated and 75% are of the e. maximum size indicated. INSTALLATION SPRING CLEANUP Set plant material in the planting pit to proper grade and alignment. Set plants upright, plumb, Prune branching species to increase density. Cut only the flowering stems after 9 P Y Y 9 Before submitting a bid, the Contractor shall have investigated the sources of supply and be satisfied that they and faced to give the best appearance or relationship to each other or adjacent structure. Set Plant beds shall receive a general cleanup before fertilizing and mulching. Cleanup includes can supply the listed plants in the size, variety and quality as specified. Failure to take this precaution will not plant material 2" -3" above the finish grade. No filling will be permitted around trunks or stems. relieve the Contractor from their responsibility for furnishing and installing all plant materials in strict accordance Backfill the pit with topsoil mix and excavated material. Do not use frozen or muddy mixtures for with the Contract Documents without additional cost to the Owner. The Landscape Architect shall approve any backfilling. Form a ring of soil around the edge of each planting pit to retain water. shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified applicator. substitutes of plant material, or changes in plant material size, prior to the Landscape Contractor submitting a 3. The following fall cut back deteriorating plant parts unless instructed to retain for bid. After balled and wrapped in burlap plants are set, muddle planting soil mixture around bases of balls and fill all voids. D DELIVER, STORAGE AND HANDLING 1. Remove all burlap, ropes, and wires as shown on details. Take all precautions customary in good trade practice in preparing plants for moving. Workmanship that fails to Any work performed in addition to that which is outlined in the contract shall only be done upon meet the highest standards will be rejected. Spray deciduous plants in foliage with an approved "Anti -Desiccant" Space ground cover plants in accordance with indicated dimensions. Adjust spacing as Long-term Care: immediately after digging to prevent dehydration. Dig, pack, transport, and handle plants with care to ensure necessary to evenly fill planting bed with indicated quantity of plants. Plant to within 24" of the fertilization, and growth stage of the tree. Mature specimens benefit from fertilization every 3 to protection against injury. Inspection certificates required by law shall accompany each shipment invoice or order trunks of trees and shrubs within planting bed and to within 18" of edge of bed. to stock. Protect all plants from drying out. If plants cannot be planted immediately upon delivery,Pro properly 4 years; younger trees shall be fertilized more often during rapid growth stages. protect them with soil, wet peat moss, or in a manner acceptable to the Landscape Architect. Water heeled -in Mulching: All seasonal color selections shall be approved by the General Manager prior to ordering and plantings daily. No plant shall be bound with rope or wire in a manner that could damage or break the branches. 1. Mulch tree and shrub planting pits and shrub beds with required mulching material (see if ever, e.g. peonies, hostas, and astilbe. Cover plants transported on open vehicles with a protective covering to Prevent wind bum. landscape plan for mulch type); depth of mulch as noted above. Hold mulch back 4" The current recommendation is based on the rate of 1000 square feet of area under the tree to b. awayfrom tree trunks and shrub stems. Thoroughly water mulched areas. After 9 Y PROJECT CONDITIONS watering, rake mulch to provide a uniform finished surface. Protect existing utilities, paving, and other facilities from damage caused by landscape operations. SOIL TESTING narrow -leaf evergreens, 1 to 4 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for broadleaf Decorative Stone: (where indicated on landscape plan) and Frederick McGouty, Hp Books Publisher; Herbaceous Perennial Plants. A A complete list of plants, including a schedule of sizes, quantities, and other requirements are shown on the 1. Install weed control barrier over sub -grade prior to installing stone. Lap 6" on all sides. evergreens, 1 to 3 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet. drawings. In the event that quantity discrepancies or material omissions occur in the plant materials list, the 2. Place stone without damaging weed barrier. planting plans shall govern. 3. Arrange stones for best appearance and to cover all weed barrier fabric. The irrigation system will be installed prior to planting. Locate, protect and maintain the irrigation system during Staking & Guying: for approval, and the necessary corrections made at an additional cost to the owner. planting operations. Repair irrigation system components damaged during planting operations; at the 1. Staking: Contractor's expense. Refer to the irrigation specifications, irrigation plan and irrigation details. a. Stake and guy wire all trees immediately after lawn sodding operations and prior to with 10-6-4 analysis fertilizer at the rate of 3 pounds per 100 square feet of bed area. SUMMARY acceptance as shown on details. Do not begin landscape accessory work before completion of final grading or surfacing. 2. Remove all staking and guying after one year from planting. WARRANTY Pruning: Warrant plant material to remain alive, be healthy and in a vigorous condition for a period of 1 year after 1. Prune deciduous trees and evergreens only to remove broken or damaged branches. completion and final acceptance of entire project. Laldscape Trees arM ShrLs Turfrecommendation LAWN MAINTENANCE WORKMANSHIP C Replace, in accordance with the drawings ands specifications, all plants that are dead or, are in an unhealthy, or PP P Y. During landscapelrrigation installation operations, all areas shall be kept neat and clean. Soil analysis performed annually to determine pH. If pH does not fall within specified unsightly condition, and have lost their natural shape due to dead branches, or other causes due to the Precautions shall be taken to avoid damage to existing structures. All work shall be performed in Annually, all tree and shrub beds will be prepared and mulched, to a minimum depth of 3" with Contractor's negligence. The cost of such replacement(s) is at the Contractor's expense. Warrant all a safe manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. replacement plants for 1 year after installation. quality mulch to match existing. Bed preparation shall include removing all weeds, cleaning up 2. Maintain proper fertility and pH levels of the soil to provide an environment Upon completion of installation operations, all excess materials, equipment, debris and waste Phosphorus (2205) 15 1bs./a«e 150Hbsla«e mts/ toexc«e Warranty shall not include damage, loss of trees, plants, or ground covers caused by flees, floods, freezing rains, material shall be cleaned up and removed from the site; unless provisions have been granted conducive to turf Walit for cool season grasses lightning storms, winds over miles per hour, winter kill caused by extreme cold, severe winter conditions not by the owner to use on-site trash receptacles. Sweep parking and walks clean of dirt and debris. removed from beds where applicable. If deemed necessary, apes -emergent herbicide may be typical of planting area, and/oror acts of vandalism or negligence on a part of the Owner. Remove all plant tags and other debris from lawns and planting areas. Remove and immediately replace all plants, found to be unsatisfactory during the initial planting installation. Any damage to the landscape, the structure, or the irrigation system caused by the landscape Remove no more than the top 1/3 of leaf blade. Clippings on paved and bed areas contractor shall be repaired by the landscape contractor without charge to the owner. mmhos/cm in high organic mix mmhos/«n in high organic mix Maintain and protect plant material, lawns, and irrigation until foal acceptance is made. will be removed. MAINTENANCE Organically maintained gardens shall not receive an pre -emergent herbicides. Mulch in excess 9 Y 9 YP 9 ACCEPTANCE A Contractor shall provide maintenance until work has been accepted by the Owners Inspection of planted areas will be made by the Owner's representative. Representative. 5. 1. Planted areas will be provided accepted ided all requirements, including maintenance have been P P q 9 per pounds Manganese 50 acre g v v complied with and plant materials are alive and in a health vi orous condition. P P Y. 9 Maintenance shall include mowing, fertilizing, mulching, pruning, cultivation, weeding, watering, extend barrier. and application of appropriate insecticides and fungicides necessary to maintain plants and PP9 ry the health of the plants. Upon acceptance, the Contractor shall commence the specified plant maintenance. lawns free of insects and disease. sodium 20 wounds per acre 1. Re -set settled plants to proper grade and position. Restore planting saucer and adjacent 7. CODES, PERMITS AND FEES material and remove dead material. WORKMANSHIP Obtain any necessary Permits for this Section of Work and pay any fees required for permits. 2. Repair stakes and guy wire as required. Remove all stakes and guy wire after 1 year. Apply non-selective herbicide, to mulched bed areas and pavement and remove after deficiencies become 3. Correct defective work as soon as possible apparent and All beds shall beweeded on a continuous basis throughout the growing season to maintain a The entire installation shall fully comply with all local and state laws and ordinances, and with all established weather and season permit. codes applicable thereto; also as depicted on the landscape and irrigation construction set. 4. Water trees, plants and ground cover beds within the first 24 hours of initial planting, and not less than twice perweek until final acceptance. manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. PART 2 - PRODUCTS TREE, GROUNDCOVER, AND SHRUB BED MAINTENANCE MATERIALS Pre -emergent (soil -applied) and post -emergent (foliar -applied) herbicides shall be used where B Plants: Provide typical of their species or variety; with normal, densely developed branches and vigorous, Upon completion of maintenance operations, all debris and waste material shall be cleaned up fibrous root stems. Provide only sound health vi orous plants free from defects disfiguringiknots sun scald systems. Y Y, 9 P natural appearance. injuries, frost cracks, abrasions of the bark, plant diseases, insect eggs, borers, and all fortes of infestation. All and removed from the site, unless provisions have been granted by the owner to use on-site plants shall have a fully developed form without voids and open spaces. Plants held on storage will be rejected Mulch to be applied in February/March with a half rate in late summer to top dress. if they show signs of growth during the storage period. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL: TREES, SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER 3. 1. Balled and plants wrapped with burlap, to have firm, natural balls of earth of sufficient diameter and depth to encompass the fibrous and feeding root system necessary for full recovery of the plant. Provide ball 4. Manual weed control to maintain clean bed appearance. sizes complying with the latest edition of the "American Standard for Nursery Stock". Cracked or Any damage to the landscape, the structure, orthe irrigation system caused by the maintenance The maintenance contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the landscape site on a regular mushroomed balls, or signs of circling roots are not acceptable. Apply fungicides and insecticides as needed to control insects and disease. 2. Container- grown stock: Grown in a container for sufficient length of time for the root system to have basis. The monitoring frequency shall be monthly except for growing season, which will be 6. developed to hold its soil together, firm and whole. a. No plants shall be loose in the container. with a balanced material (January/February, April/May, and October/November) b. Container stock shall not be pot bound. TURF pathogenic diseases and potential cultural problems in the landscape. The pest or cultural 3. Plants planted in rows shall be matched in form. Edge all mulched beds. 4. Plants larger than those specified in the plant list may be used when acceptable to the Landscape problem will be identified under the supervision ofthe contractor. 8. Architect. GENERAL CLEAN UP a. If the use of larger plants is acceptable, increase the spread of roots or root ball in proportion to the GENERAL MAINTENANCE size of the plant. and followthe recommendations ofthe most current edition of the state Cooperative Service 1. 5. The height of the trees, measured from the crown of the roots to the top of the top branch, shall beds, and paved areas. not be less than the minimum size designated in the plant list. 2. Inspect grounds on a monthly basis and schedule inspection with Unit Operator. 6. No pruning wounds shall be present with a diameter of more than 1"and such wounds must MOWING Plant pathogenic disease problems identified by the contractor that can be resolved by pruning show vigorous bark on all edges. 7. Evergreen trees shall be branched to the ground or as specified in plant list. or physical removal of damaged plant parts will be performed as part of the contract. For an 8. Shrubs and small plants shall meet the requirements for spread and height indicated in the plant Cr maintained at a height of 2" to 3" in spring and fall. From June through September, mowing list. a. The measurements for height shall be taken from the ground level to the height of the top of the plant height shall be maintained at no less than 3". applications of fungicides shall be made when the owner authorizes it. and not the longest branch. A b. Single stemmed or thin plants will not be accepted. If the contractor notes an especially insect -or disease -prone plant species in the landscape, c. Side branches shall be generous, well -twigged, and the plant as awhole well -bushed to the ground. and removingdebris from walks curbs and parking areas. Caution: Weed eaters should NOT P 9 d. Plants shall be in a moist, vigorous condition, free from dead wood, bruises, or other root or branch injuries. be used around trees because of potential damage to the bark. with the intent of the landscape design. ACCESSORIES Topsoil: Shall be Fertile, friable, natural topsoil of loamy character, without admixture of subsoil material, NOTE: For identification of plant -damaging insects and mites, a reference textbook that can be obtained from a well -drained arable site, reasonably free from clay, lumps, coarse sands, stones, roots, sticks, Edging of all sidewalks, curbs and other paved areas shall be performed once every other and other foreign materials, with acidity range of between pH 6.0 and 6.8. Note: All planting areas shall be cleaned of construction debris (ie. Concrete, rubble, stones, building material, mowing. Debris from the edging operations shall be removed and the areas swept clean. Associates. For plan pathogenic diseases, two references are suggested: Scouting and etc.) prior to adding and spreading of the top soil. 1. Sod Areas. Spread a layer of top soil and rake smooth. Controlling Woody Ornamental Diseases in Landscapes and Nurseries, authorized by Gary 2. Planting bed areas: Spread layer of top soil and rake smooth. 4 3 PRUNING All ornamental trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be pruned when appropriate to remove dead or damaged branches, develop the natural shapes. Do not shear trees or shrubs. If previous maintenance practice has been to shear and ball, then a natural shape will be restored gradually. Pruning Guidelines: 1. Prune those that flower before the end of June immediately after flowering. Flower buds develop during the previous growing season. Fall, winter or spring pruning would reduce the spring flowering display. 2. Prune those that flower in summer or autumn in winter or spring before new growth begins, since these plants develop flowers on new growth. 3. Delay pruning plants grown for ornamental fruits, such as cotoneasters, pyracanthas and viburnums. 4. Hollies and other evergreens may be pruned during winter in order to use their branches for seasonal decoration. However, severe pruning of evergreens should be done in early spring only. 5. Broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be hand -pruned to maintain their natural appearance after the new growth hardens off. 6. Hedges or shrubs that require shearing to maintain a formal appearance shall be pruned as required. Dead wood shall be removed from sheared plants before the first shearing of the season. 7. Conifers shall be pruned, if required, according to their genus. A. Yews, junipers, hemlocks, arborvitae, and false -cypress may be pruned after new growth has hardened off in late summer. If severe pruning is necessary, it must be done in early spring. B. Firs and spruces may be lightly pruned in late summer, fall, or winter after completing growth. Leave side buds. Never cut central leader. C. Pines may be lightly pruned in early June by reducing candles. 8. Groundcover shall be edged and pruned as needed to contain it within its borders. 2 The installation of perennials, annuals, and bulbs, unless specified herein, shall be reviewed with the owner, and, if accepted, installed and billed to the owner. SEASONAL COLOR MAINTENANCE Perennialization of Bulbs: 1. After flowering, cut off spent flower heads. 2. Allow leaves of daffodils and hyacinths to remain for six weeks after flowers have faded. Cut off at base. 3. Allow leaves of other bulbs to yellow naturally and then cut off at base. 4. Apply fertilizer after flowering in spring, possibly again in fall. Apply 10-10-10 at the rate of 2 pounds per 1000 square feet, or top -dress with compost 1" deep. Fall fertilization with a bulb fertilizer or mulching with 1" of compost is optional. Flower Rotation: 1. Bulbs: Remove the entire plant and bulb after flowers have faded or at the direction of the owner, and install new plants if included in contract. 2. Summer Annuals or Fall Plants: a. Dead heading: Pinch and remove dead flowers on annuals as necessary. b. Fertilizing Summer Annuals: Fertilize using one or two methods: Apply a slow-release fertilizer in May following manufacturers recommendations. A booster such as 10-10-10 may be necessary in late summer. Or, apply liquid fertilizations of 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizers, not to exceed 2 pounds of 20-20-20 per 100 gallons of water, monthly; or mulch with compost 1" deep. c. Removal: If fall plants are to be installed, summer annuals shall be left in the ground until the first killing frost and then removed, unless otherwise directed by the owner. 1 O�oO aft o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 4�PISTEh, �O 062 n WA IA C Cv 'y OREGON 05/11/07 4PE ARG EXPIRES 05/31/2023 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE AD uwN By 11/1012021 PEG D IRamalm cWarcl mins drnti,p ad In 81 F-- dplafiies prai1cedfrabwenmedprc. Z nsyn,x wnxxxexineanamc%el G opensvnumorvecal-ttan G 0-,.I. pm Rd 2prcsWa4ves. LU SHEET U LANDSCAPE 00 SPECIFICATIONS W CO SHEET NUMBER Q L1.2 2 1 1 LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS 9. Thinning: Remove branches and water sprouts by cutting them back to their point of Perennials: ori in on anent stems. This method results in a more open )ant without stimulating 9 P P P 9 1. After initial installation if a time -released fertilizer has been incorporated during P 9 excessive growth. Thinning is used on crepe myrtles, lilacs, viburnums, smoke bush,etc. plant installation, no more fertilizer need be applied the first growing season. The Contractor shall provide as a separate bid, maintenance for a period of 1 year after final 10. Renewal pruning: Remove oldest branches of shrub at ground, leaving the younger, acceptance of the project landscaping. The Contractor must be able to provide continued more vigorous branches. Also remove weak stems. On overgrown plants, this method 2. The following year: maintenance if requested by the Owner or provide the name of a reputable landscape may be best done over a three-year period. Renewal pruning may be used on abelia, a. Fertilize perennials with a slow-release fertilizer or any 50% organic fertilizer, or contractor who can provide maintenance. forsythia, deutzia, spimea, etc. mulch perennials with compost 1"deep. b. Cut all deciduous perennials flush to the ground by March 1, if this was not done the Plants overhanging passageways and parking areas and damaged plants shall be pruned as previous fall, to allow new growth to develop freely. STANDARDS needed. c. Mulch the perennial bed once in early spring at 1"-2" depth. If soil is bared in late All landscape maintenance services shall be performed by trained personnel using current, fall, re -mulch lightly after ground is frozen to protect perennials. acceptable horticultural practices. Shade trees that cannot be adequately pruned from the ground shall not be included in the d. Inspect for insect or disease problems on perennials. Monitor and control slugs on Maintenance Contract. A certified arborist under a separate contract shall perform this type of hostas and ligularias. Powdery mildew on phlox, monardas, and asters can be All work shall be performed in a manner that maintains the original intent of the landscape P 9 P work. prevented with properly timed fungicides or use of disease -resistant varieties. E design. e. Weed perennial bed as specified in "WEEDING" above. SPRING CLEANUP f. Prune branching species to increase density. Cut only the flowering stems after 9 P Y Y 9 All chemical applications shall be performed in accordance with current county, state and Plant beds shall receive a general cleanup before fertilizing and mulching. Cleanup includes blooming. Do not remove the foliage. federal laws, using EPA registered materials and methods of application. These applications removing debris and trash from beds and cutting back herbaceous perennials left standing shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified applicator. through winter, e.g. ornamental grasses, Sedum Autumn Joy. 3. The following fall cut back deteriorating plant parts unless instructed to retain for winter interest, e.g. Sedum Autumn Joy and ornamental grasses. APPROVALS FERTILIZING Any work performed in addition to that which is outlined in the contract shall only be done upon For trees, the rate of fertilization depends on the tree species, tree vigor, area available for 4. Long-term Care: written approval by the Owner's Representative (General Manager ofthe restaurant). fertilization, and growth stage of the tree. Mature specimens benefit from fertilization every 3 to a. Divide plants that overcrowd the space provided. Divide according to the species. 4 years; younger trees shall be fertilized more often during rapid growth stages. Some need frequent dividing, e.g. asters and yarrow every two years; other rarely, All seasonal color selections shall be approved by the General Manager prior to ordering and if ever, e.g. peonies, hostas, and astilbe. installation. The current recommendation is based on the rate of 1000 square feet of area under the tree to b. For detailed information regarding the care of specific perennials, refer to All About be fertilized. For deciduous trees, 2 to 6 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for Perennials by Ortho; Perennials. How to Select, Gran and Enjoy by Pamela Harper SOIL TESTING narrow -leaf evergreens, 1 to 4 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet; for broadleaf and Frederick McGouty, Hp Books Publisher; Herbaceous Perennial Plants. A The maintenance contractor shall perform soil tests as needed to identity imbalances or evergreens, 1 to 3 pounds of Nitrogen per 1000 square feet. Treatise on their Identification, Cullum and Garden Attributes by Allan Armitage, deficiencies causing plant material decline. The owner shall be notified of the recommendation Stipes Pub LLC. for approval, and the necessary corrections made at an additional cost to the owner. Shrubs and groundcover shall be top -dressed with compost 1" deep, or fertilized once in March Acceptable Soil Test Results P with 10-6-4 analysis fertilizer at the rate of 3 pounds per 100 square feet of bed area. SUMMARY OF MAINTENANCE Ericaceous material shall be fertilized with an ericaceous fertilizer at the manufacturer's rate. If plants are growing poorly, a soil sample should be taken. Laldscape Trees arM ShrLs Turfrecommendation LAWN MAINTENANCE pH Range 5.0-7.0 6.0-7.0 MULCHING 1. Soil analysis performed annually to determine pH. If pH does not fall within specified Organic Matter >1.5% >2.5% Annually, all tree and shrub beds will be prepared and mulched, to a minimum depth of 3" with range, adjust according to soil test recommendations. Magnesium (Mg) 1ODtlbsJa«e 100Hbsla«e quality mulch to match existing. Bed preparation shall include removing all weeds, cleaning up 2. Maintain proper fertility and pH levels of the soil to provide an environment Phosphorus (2205) 15 1bs./a«e 150Hbsla«e mts/ toexc«e said bed, edging and cultivating decayed mulch into the soil. Debris from edging is to be conducive to turf Walit for cool season grasses SPotassium luble Not Not to exceed 750ppmN.75 mmhoskm removed from beds where applicable. If deemed necessary, apes -emergent herbicide may be 3. Mow warm and cool season on a regular basis and as season and weather dictates. Conductivity in sdl; not to exceed 1400 ppm/2.5 in scil; not to exceed 2000 ppmQ o applied to the soil to inhibit the growth of future weeds. Remove no more than the top 1/3 of leaf blade. Clippings on paved and bed areas D mmhos/cm in high organic mix mmhos/«n in high organic mix will be removed. F«unusual sol cantliims,lhefdlaxing optional tests are recommended with levds nd to etceetl: Organically maintained gardens shall not receive an pre -emergent herbicides. Mulch in excess 9 Y 9 YP 9 4. Aerate warm season turf areas to maintain high standards of turfappearance. Harm 3 pounds per acre of 4" will be removed from the bed areas. SPECIAL CARE shall be taken in the mulching 5. Apply pre -emergent to turf in two applications in early February and early April to per pounds Manganese 50 acre g v v operation not to over -mulch or cover the base of trees and shrubs. This can be detrimental to extend barrier. Pdassum(K2O)50 pounds per acre ( ) v v the health of the plants. 6. Apply post emergent as needed to control weeds. sodium 20 wounds per acre 7. Mechanically edge curbs and walks. WORKMANSHIP WEEDING 8. Apply non-selective herbicide, to mulched bed areas and pavement and remove During landscape maintenance operations, all areas shall be kept neat and clean. Precautions All beds shall beweeded on a continuous basis throughout the growing season to maintain a excess runners to maintain clean defined beds. shall be taken to avoid damage to existing structures. All work shall be performed in a safe neat appearance at all times. manner to the operators, the occupants and any pedestrians. TREE, GROUNDCOVER, AND SHRUB BED MAINTENANCE Pre -emergent (soil -applied) and post -emergent (foliar -applied) herbicides shall be used where 1. Prune shrubs, trees and groundcoverto encourage healthy growth and create a Upon completion of maintenance operations, all debris and waste material shall be cleaned up and when applicable and in accordance with the product's label. natural appearance. and removed from the site, unless provisions have been granted by the owner to use on-site 2. Mulch to be applied in February/March with a half rate in late summer to top dress. trash receptacles. INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL: TREES, SHRUBS & GROUNDCOVER 3. Apply pre -emergent herbicides in February and April. 4. Manual weed control to maintain clean bed appearance. Any damage to the landscape, the structure, orthe irrigation system caused by the maintenance The maintenance contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the landscape site on a regular 5. Apply fungicides and insecticides as needed to control insects and disease. contractor, shall be repaired by the maintenance contractorwithout charge to the owner. basis. The monitoring frequency shall be monthly except for growing season, which will be 6. Ornamental shrubs, trees and groundcovers to be fertilized three (3) times per year every otherweek. Trained personnel shall monitor for plant damaging insect activity, plant with a balanced material (January/February, April/May, and October/November) TURF pathogenic diseases and potential cultural problems in the landscape. The pest or cultural 7. Edge all mulched beds. problem will be identified under the supervision ofthe contractor. 8. Remove all litter and debris. GENERAL CLEAN UP For plant damaging insects and mites identified in the landscape, the contractor shall consult GENERAL MAINTENANCE Prior to mowing, all trash, sticks, and other unwanted debris shall be removed from lawns, plant and followthe recommendations ofthe most current edition of the state Cooperative Service 1. Remove all man-made debris, blow edges. beds, and paved areas. publication on insect control on landscape plant material. 2. Inspect grounds on a monthly basis and schedule inspection with Unit Operator. MOWING Plant pathogenic disease problems identified by the contractor that can be resolved by pruning Cool season grasses, including blue grass, tall fescue, perennial ryegrass, etc., shall be or physical removal of damaged plant parts will be performed as part of the contract. For an Cr maintained at a height of 2" to 3" in spring and fall. From June through September, mowing additional charge, plant pathogenic diseases that can be resolved through properly timed height shall be maintained at no less than 3". applications of fungicides shall be made when the owner authorizes it. The mowing operation includes trimming around all obstacles, raking excessive grass clippings If the contractor notes an especially insect -or disease -prone plant species in the landscape, and removingdebris from walks curbs and parking areas. Caution: Weed eaters should NOT P 9 he/she will suggest replacement with a more pest -resistant cultivar or species that is consistent be used around trees because of potential damage to the bark. with the intent of the landscape design. EDGING NOTE: For identification of plant -damaging insects and mites, a reference textbook that can be Edging of all sidewalks, curbs and other paved areas shall be performed once every other used is Insects that feed on Trees and Shrubs by Johnson and Lyon, Comstock Publishing mowing. Debris from the edging operations shall be removed and the areas swept clean. Associates. For plan pathogenic diseases, two references are suggested: Scouting and Caution shall be used to avoid flying debris. Y 9 Controlling Woody Ornamental Diseases in Landscapes and Nurseries, authorized by Gary Moorman, published by Penn State College of Agricultural Sciences, and Diseases of Trees LIMING & FERTILIZING and Shrubs by Sinclair and Lyon, published by Comstock Publishing Press. A soil test shall be taken to determine whether an application of limestone in late fall is necessary. If limestone is required, the landscape contractor shall specify the rate, obtain TRASH REMOVAL approval from the owner and apply it at an additional cost. A unit price for liming of turfshall The maintenance contractor shall remove trash from all shrub and groundcover beds with each accompany the bid based on a rate of 50 pounds per 1000 square feet. visit. Fertilizer shall be applied in areas based on the existing turfs ecies. PP 9 P LEAF REMOVAL All fallen leaves shall be removed from the site in November and once in December. If LAWN WEED CONTROL: HERBICIDES requested by the owner, the maintenance contractor, at an additional cost to the owner shall Selection and proper use of herbicides shall be the landscape contractor's responsibility. All perform supplemental leaf removals. chemical applications shall be performed under the supervision of a Licensed Certified Applicator. Read the label prior to applying any chemical. WINTER CLEAN-UP The project shall receive a general clean-up once during each ofthe winter months, i.e., INSECT & DISEASE CONTROL FOR TURF January, February, and March. The contractor shall be responsible for monitoring the site conditions on each visit to determine if any insect pest or disease problems exist. The contractor shall identity the insect pest or Clean-up includes: B disease, as well as the host plant, and then consult the most current edition ofthe Cooperative ❑ Cleaning curbs and parking areas Extension Service's "Commercial Insecticide Recommendation for Turf' for control. The ❑ Removing all trash and unwanted debris licensed applicator shall be familiar with the label provided for the selected product prior to ❑ Turning mulch where necessary application. ❑ Inspection of grounds Inspection and treatment to control insect pests shall be included in the contract price. SEASONAL COLOR: PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND TREES, SHRUBS,& GROUND COVER BULBS PRUNING All ornamental trees, shrubs and ground cover shall be pruned when appropriate to remove dead or damaged branches, develop the natural shapes. Do not shear trees or shrubs. If previous maintenance practice has been to shear and ball, then a natural shape will be restored gradually. Pruning Guidelines: 1. Prune those that flower before the end of June immediately after flowering. Flower buds develop during the previous growing season. Fall, winter or spring pruning would reduce the spring flowering display. 2. Prune those that flower in summer or autumn in winter or spring before new growth begins, since these plants develop flowers on new growth. 3. Delay pruning plants grown for ornamental fruits, such as cotoneasters, pyracanthas and viburnums. 4. Hollies and other evergreens may be pruned during winter in order to use their branches for seasonal decoration. However, severe pruning of evergreens should be done in early spring only. 5. Broadleaf evergreen shrubs shall be hand -pruned to maintain their natural appearance after the new growth hardens off. 6. Hedges or shrubs that require shearing to maintain a formal appearance shall be pruned as required. Dead wood shall be removed from sheared plants before the first shearing of the season. 7. Conifers shall be pruned, if required, according to their genus. A. Yews, junipers, hemlocks, arborvitae, and false -cypress may be pruned after new growth has hardened off in late summer. If severe pruning is necessary, it must be done in early spring. B. Firs and spruces may be lightly pruned in late summer, fall, or winter after completing growth. Leave side buds. Never cut central leader. C. Pines may be lightly pruned in early June by reducing candles. 8. Groundcover shall be edged and pruned as needed to contain it within its borders. 2 The installation of perennials, annuals, and bulbs, unless specified herein, shall be reviewed with the owner, and, if accepted, installed and billed to the owner. SEASONAL COLOR MAINTENANCE Perennialization of Bulbs: 1. After flowering, cut off spent flower heads. 2. Allow leaves of daffodils and hyacinths to remain for six weeks after flowers have faded. Cut off at base. 3. Allow leaves of other bulbs to yellow naturally and then cut off at base. 4. Apply fertilizer after flowering in spring, possibly again in fall. Apply 10-10-10 at the rate of 2 pounds per 1000 square feet, or top -dress with compost 1" deep. Fall fertilization with a bulb fertilizer or mulching with 1" of compost is optional. Flower Rotation: 1. Bulbs: Remove the entire plant and bulb after flowers have faded or at the direction of the owner, and install new plants if included in contract. 2. Summer Annuals or Fall Plants: a. Dead heading: Pinch and remove dead flowers on annuals as necessary. b. Fertilizing Summer Annuals: Fertilize using one or two methods: Apply a slow-release fertilizer in May following manufacturers recommendations. A booster such as 10-10-10 may be necessary in late summer. Or, apply liquid fertilizations of 20-20-20 water-soluble fertilizers, not to exceed 2 pounds of 20-20-20 per 100 gallons of water, monthly; or mulch with compost 1" deep. c. Removal: If fall plants are to be installed, summer annuals shall be left in the ground until the first killing frost and then removed, unless otherwise directed by the owner. 1 O�oO aft o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 4�PISTEh, �O 062 n WA IA C Cv 'y OREGON 05/11/07 4PE ARG EXPIRES 05/31/2023 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE AD uwN By 11/1012021 PEG D IRamalm cWarcl mins drnti,p ad In 81 F-- dplafiies prai1cedfrabwenmedprc. Z nsyn,x wnxxxexineanamc%el G opensvnumorvecal-ttan G 0-,.I. pm Rd 2prcsWa4ves. LU SHEET U LANDSCAPE 00 SPECIFICATIONS W CO SHEET NUMBER Q L1.2 APPENDIX 5 E 0 C B D -B ,0 SF 24' 4 1 3 RANDY PAPE BELTINE ❑ I ❑ I I I ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E 14 1 8 E 10 ❑ E 11' o 0 zo 0 0 zo D 0 0 0 0 0 w t ❑E ❑E 1 f 0 0 w ❑E ❑E w ❑ ❑ °E °E w ❑ ❑ 00000000000- 0000000000 0 0 ❑E °E ❑E °E 00 °E )❑E 0 0 ❑E °E ❑E °E °E E 10 24' °E D 0 °E °E °E °E 00 °E ❑E GROSS: ❑E D 0 CHICK-FIL-A ❑E °E ❑E °E 0 °E ❑E SITE PLAN In = 20'-0n 8' O" GO" Walkway Clearance °E ❑E °E ❑E °E ❑E °E 24' t f o BYPASS LANE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRI 000000000000"R PICK UP ° 7, E � po 0P13 LS LRG SERVICE EGRESS ENTRY 0 90 SEATS GROSS: 4,987 SF MAIN ENTRY EGRESS D4 I 8 -BICYCLES COVEREDOVERED o24 ®® ° ® 0000000 E � t 10 0 g0000000 9 ❑E ❑E t o 0 E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E :11:1 a9_1:1ILIIIts 9010111,:71►11 32" 4 66" Access Q J A LU w 3, O., 4' 6" Access d (TYP) Go 0 V Q 2'0" N BIKE PARKING SEATBACKS N N � o � N � U) N J 0 o 9BIKE RACK 4 III��I'Illl �22 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 °3 °3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 U ,2 ° GRADE 1 3/8" ANCHOR ROD `CONCRETE t F ' GRANULAR NATIVE SOIL t / BIKE RACK DETAIL 5 ,/2" = V-0" 3 BUS STOP (RE:CIVIL) 4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.) 2 GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES BODY SITE PLAN KEYNOTES SITE PLAN LEGEND w_lONII as»� PROPERTY LINE ------------ BUILDING LINE NEW 6" CURB NEW SIDEWALK a EXISTING CURBS AND SIDEWALKS OUTDOOR SEATING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 4" WIDE DIAGONAL STRIPPING PARKING LIGHT FIXTURE EASEMENT LINE VEHICLE (20'4" LENGTH TYP.) PROJECT DATA B E SITE AREA ° GROSS: 4.38 AC BUILDING FOOTPRINT: E ❑ CHICK-FIL-A D 4 E ❑E 0 0 E-1 0 f o BYPASS LANE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DRI 000000000000"R PICK UP ° 7, E � po 0P13 LS LRG SERVICE EGRESS ENTRY 0 90 SEATS GROSS: 4,987 SF MAIN ENTRY EGRESS D4 I 8 -BICYCLES COVEREDOVERED o24 ®® ° ® 0000000 E � t 10 0 g0000000 9 ❑E ❑E t o 0 E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E ❑E :11:1 a9_1:1ILIIIts 9010111,:71►11 32" 4 66" Access Q J A LU w 3, O., 4' 6" Access d (TYP) Go 0 V Q 2'0" N BIKE PARKING SEATBACKS N N � o � N � U) N J 0 o 9BIKE RACK 4 III��I'Illl �22 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 °3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 °3 °3 ❑3 ❑3 ❑3 U ,2 ° GRADE 1 3/8" ANCHOR ROD `CONCRETE t F ' GRANULAR NATIVE SOIL t / BIKE RACK DETAIL 5 ,/2" = V-0" 3 BUS STOP (RE:CIVIL) 4" PAINTED LINE (TYP.) 2 GENERAL NOTES: GENERAL NOTES BODY SITE PLAN KEYNOTES SITE PLAN LEGEND w_lONII as»� PROPERTY LINE ------------ BUILDING LINE NEW 6" CURB NEW SIDEWALK a EXISTING CURBS AND SIDEWALKS OUTDOOR SEATING ACCESSIBLE ROUTE 4" WIDE DIAGONAL STRIPPING PARKING LIGHT FIXTURE EASEMENT LINE VEHICLE (20'4" LENGTH TYP.) PROJECT DATA SITE AREA 190,852 SF GROSS: 4.38 AC BUILDING FOOTPRINT: CHICK-FIL-A 4,989 SF PADA 3,858 SF TOTAL FOOTPRINT: 8,858 SF COVERAGE: OSHA YELLOW FILLED GROSS: 5% PARKING CALCULATION PARKING REQUIRED: RESTAURANT (,/100SF) 50 STALLS RETAIL (1/300 SF) 13 STALLS TOTAL: 63 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED: 250 STALLS @34.55/1000 SF REQ. ACCESSIBLE: 8 STALLS PROVIDED ACCESIBLE: 9 STALLS DT CAR STACK 50 CARS OP CANOPY 9TH CAR AT INNER LANE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ZONING: CC BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT: 10 FT1 SIDE: 10 FT REAR: 10 FT LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: FRONT: 5 F SIDE: 5 FT REAR: 5 FT LANDSCAPE REQ: 5%1 OFF-STREET PARKING: 0 STANDARD: 9X18 COMPACT: 8X16 DRIVE AISLE: 24 FT OVERHANG: 2 F NOTE: 1. INTERIOR PARKING LOT AREA. n ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL NOTES: 1. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS, SEE DETAIL 2. PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE APPLIED ACCORDING TO REQUIREMENTS AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 3B OF THE CURRENT MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT ON ASPHALT &YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT ON CONCRETE, UNLESS UPON VERIFICATION BY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IT IS DETERMINED THAT LOCAL, STATE, OR ADA CODES DIFFER, IN WHICH CASE THESE CODES SHALL GOVERN. PAVEMENT MARKETING 123/4" 3/4" = V-0" r' I 2X2" SQUARE TUBING 14A-100 BOLLARD MOUNTED SIGN LETTERING STYLE TO BE HELVETICAL MEDIUM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MUTCD R 7-8 AND R 7-8P5) (CIVIL TO VERIFY SIGN PANELS AND COLORED WITH STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) $ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN I n = I. -On ACCESSIBLE SIGN SEE SITE SIGN BASE DETAIL NOTE: SIGNS SHALL BE FABRICATED USING SIF 0.08 NON -ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM WITH VINYL COPY APPLIED TO THE FIRST SURFACE. NOTE: VERIFY COLORS WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. GREEN 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE'REFLECTIVE COLOR WITH WHITE 'REFLECTIVE TEXT' NMITE'REFLECTIVE' COLOR PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REGUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW 2"X2" SQ. TUBING BUILDING FACE EDGE OF SIDEWALK FACE OF CURB O VAN 11 11 11 1— 11 9 -Q $ -Q 9 -Q 9 0 V4" TRAFFIC STRIPING TYP. TRAFFIC BLUE 4" TRAFFIC BLUE ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL STRIPING @ 45 DEGREE 2-0" O.C. AND LETTERING NOTES 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS ISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE. 2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES & ADA STANDARDS. SEE SITE PLAN FOR COMPLETE STRIPING LAYOUT. 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS. S. NO WHEEL STOPS TO BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK. 7. ADA SIGNS IN BOLLARDS AND BOLLARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO FLUSH CURB OR A RAMP. 8. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STRIPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. STRIPING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 90 DEGREE PARKING STRIPING ,� 3 1/2" = V-0" 1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Q um 1 /� a) \V a) 1 �w O Q ❑ H LU z CD \ V Lo B V� M fn FSR#04987 BUILDINGTYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/W DRAWN BY Author Fbmdw anbine mHis rt gaM In SI alglw nlc patlucetl Irabae nanetl pgct may M berglatlueetl In mymma vAtlwlewpen ft a1ebL m�ae'f Ran amalzm wa�ewgae r�aznbnvn SHEET SITE PLAN SHEETNUMBER A-100 z U) 6" DIA. SCH. 80 STEEL ILI PIPE BOLLARD PAINTED OSHA YELLOW FILLED WITH CONCRETE Q w U) U) o 3: O PAINT CONCRETE BLACKI 1 AFTER CURING AT O ASPHALT LOCATIONS 0 F 0 m 4000 PSI 0 CONCRETE o n LJ d d a d d a d ; d - I—III—III< < e I—II—III .I I—I—I a dd f d II—IIIIII N d d, d fO —III a a 14A-100 BOLLARD MOUNTED SIGN LETTERING STYLE TO BE HELVETICAL MEDIUM ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (MUTCD R 7-8 AND R 7-8P5) (CIVIL TO VERIFY SIGN PANELS AND COLORED WITH STATE/LOCAL REQUIREMENTS) $ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN I n = I. -On ACCESSIBLE SIGN SEE SITE SIGN BASE DETAIL NOTE: SIGNS SHALL BE FABRICATED USING SIF 0.08 NON -ILLUMINATED ALUMINUM WITH VINYL COPY APPLIED TO THE FIRST SURFACE. NOTE: VERIFY COLORS WITH LOCAL MUNICIPALITY. GREEN 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR WHITE 'REFLECTIVE' COLOR BLUE'REFLECTIVE COLOR WITH WHITE 'REFLECTIVE TEXT' NMITE'REFLECTIVE' COLOR PENALTY SIGN WITH WORDING AS REGUIRED BY STATE OR LOCAL LAW 2"X2" SQ. TUBING BUILDING FACE EDGE OF SIDEWALK FACE OF CURB O VAN 11 11 11 1— 11 9 -Q $ -Q 9 -Q 9 0 V4" TRAFFIC STRIPING TYP. TRAFFIC BLUE 4" TRAFFIC BLUE ACCESSIBLE SYMBOL STRIPING @ 45 DEGREE 2-0" O.C. AND LETTERING NOTES 1. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE AISLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 2% IN SLOPE IN ANY DIRECTION. IF ONLY ONE ACCESS ISLE IS INSTALLED, IT IS TO BE A VAN SIZE. 2. PARKING STALL DIMENSIONING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE GOVERNING AUTHORITIES & ADA STANDARDS. SEE SITE PLAN FOR COMPLETE STRIPING LAYOUT. 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO PARKING LOT STRIPING SPECIFICATIONS. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE WHITE REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON ASPHALT PARKING LOTS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL USE 4" WIDE YELLOW REFLECTIVE PAINT FOR STRIPING ON CONCRETE PARKING LOTS. S. NO WHEEL STOPS TO BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO SIDEWALK. 7. ADA SIGNS IN BOLLARDS AND BOLLARDS SHALL BE INSTALLED WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT TO FLUSH CURB OR A RAMP. 8. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO CENTERLINE OF STRIPE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 9. STRIPING IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR 90 DEGREE PARKING STRIPING ,� 3 1/2" = V-0" 1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Q um 1 /� a) \V a) 1 �w O Q ❑ H LU z CD \ V Lo B V� M fn FSR#04987 BUILDINGTYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/W DRAWN BY Author Fbmdw anbine mHis rt gaM In SI alglw nlc patlucetl Irabae nanetl pgct may M berglatlueetl In mymma vAtlwlewpen ft a1ebL m�ae'f Ran amalzm wa�ewgae r�aznbnvn SHEET SITE PLAN SHEETNUMBER A-100 E D C W_ 4 EXTERIOR FINISHES A17ACHED BR -A EC -1 BRICKVENEER PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: DARK BROWN COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE SIZE: MODULAR Integral Lighting BR -B -11 BRICKVENEER EXTERIOR PAINT - COLOR: LIGHT BROWN COLOR: DARK BRONZE SIZE: MODULAR FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS Bell 9 6'-4" 1'-0" 0" No STUCCO SYSTEM STOREFRONT COLOR: WRITE COLOR: DARK BRONZE FINISH: SAND MEDIUM 4'-0" 2'4" STUCCO SYSTEM COLOR: BROWN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM Gran° total 13 PERSPECTIVE VIEW B 0 W N[If -o W O O A Z U) LU g 0 0_ O M M � N W O) N V N C? O U) N J M x w iC 4 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW REF. ENCLOSURE FINISHES EC -1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE BR -A BRICKVENEER COLOR: DARK BROWN SIZE: MODULAR OP CANOPY FINISHES CP -1 PREFINISHED METAL COLOR: DARKBRONZE CP -2 METAL DECKING COLOR: WHITE PERSPECTIVE VIEW EXTERIOR ELEVATION T/ FRAMING 20'-412". EXTERIOR ELEVATION R, 2 1 1_ PROJECT DATA Prototype Edition: LS-_ _. Playground NO. PLAY Ls Exterior Finish Type: TOWER STUCCO Landscaping Type STANDARD CK, RD, LEED Rating NOT CERTIFIED 'Accept_ Wall FMETAL STUD NOT C-, - raminT Ing ype. GOLD, PLATINUM , � -- zl) STUD D-valuesPR: w000 METAL OOLD, PNriNUM ✓JO°O STUD- PREFAB, METAL RAM '_I I I - PREFAB, MODULAR FRAME, Drive TIIN Stack COs # • ,^-�•—..+'C MOWIAR ml tlic.dcr- iAiis� Kitchen Type: CENTERLINE Drive Thru Bypass Lane: YES E.. Water Filtration Type: TYPE A Drive Thru Number of Fulfillment Lanes:. # p D enc ETC Drive Thru Number of Pickup Lanes # OL Drive-Thru: YES 0 B O O 0 o p Drive Thru Number of Order Point Pylons: # O Industrialized Construction YES Drive Thru Number of Pickup Windows # Chick-til-A Number of Parking Spaces:# Drive Thru Door YES 5200 Buffington R o adp NumberAccessible Parking Spaces: Cross Parking: YES Square 4996 Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Seat Count - Interior: 84 Menu Board - Interior: YES Seat Count - Exterior: 16 Menu Board - Interior- Count: 5 ala _ Canopy Type - Order Point: DOUBLE Menu Board - Interior - Type DIGITAL °a' .HER Canopy Type - Meal Delivery: DOUBLE Menu Board - Walk-up: NO SITE 5 Menu Board -Walk-up -Count 0 Number of Registers: ADAPT Menu Board - Walk-up - Type N/A LOGO :HER AND Menu Board -Ober Point YES � � � �.. Mer Point - Count 4 __.SUP SO DO PD ADDRESS Menu Board - O e a NOT APPROVED- REVISE AND RESU&r9T... Menu Boats - Ober Point - Type: DIGITAL ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED - REJISE AND RESJBMR D FER ❑ APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT Planned Classification: BASE INITIAL DATE: raUED HIGH M STOM LOW :USTOM-LOW :USTOM-HIGH FRAMING 20'1 JOINT 13'-0" B/ CANOPY Y-8" WATER TABLE T-0" i T/ SLAB 0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION 'Recwa ar, I I I •l I .,... li 0 T/ FRAMING 20'-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Ilii Q Q� 1 a U 06 O Q LU LU rUL CD Lo V (� B a M in FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION A CONSULTANT PROJECT # DATE MWDDNY DRAWN BY Author Ftmdan on MZ J gats in LI all fllc paWce! for bae.I lej. lbay M be rmMu MIn arymaErq ulevPeawXNe�a�efblea�se'f han wlMlttc!tl Vde2 rprcnmvez SHEET DESIGN OVERVIEW SHEET NUMBER X-900 A17ACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Wdth Overall TleBack Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) Integral Lighting CI -A Exterior Canopy 1 V-812" 1'-0" 0" No CI -C Exterior Canopy 9 6'-4" 1'-0" 0" No C3 -B Exterior Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'-0" 2'4" No CSC Exterior Canopy 1 15'4" 4'-0" 2'4" Yes C4 -G Exterior Canopy 1 T-0" 4'-0" 2'4" Yes Gran° total 13 PERSPECTIVE VIEW B 0 W N[If -o W O O A Z U) LU g 0 0_ O M M � N W O) N V N C? O U) N J M x w iC 4 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW REF. ENCLOSURE FINISHES EC -1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE BR -A BRICKVENEER COLOR: DARK BROWN SIZE: MODULAR OP CANOPY FINISHES CP -1 PREFINISHED METAL COLOR: DARKBRONZE CP -2 METAL DECKING COLOR: WHITE PERSPECTIVE VIEW EXTERIOR ELEVATION T/ FRAMING 20'-412". EXTERIOR ELEVATION R, 2 1 1_ PROJECT DATA Prototype Edition: LS-_ _. Playground NO. PLAY Ls Exterior Finish Type: TOWER STUCCO Landscaping Type STANDARD CK, RD, LEED Rating NOT CERTIFIED 'Accept_ Wall FMETAL STUD NOT C-, - raminT Ing ype. GOLD, PLATINUM , � -- zl) STUD D-valuesPR: w000 METAL OOLD, PNriNUM ✓JO°O STUD- PREFAB, METAL RAM '_I I I - PREFAB, MODULAR FRAME, Drive TIIN Stack COs # • ,^-�•—..+'C MOWIAR ml tlic.dcr- iAiis� Kitchen Type: CENTERLINE Drive Thru Bypass Lane: YES E.. Water Filtration Type: TYPE A Drive Thru Number of Fulfillment Lanes:. # p D enc ETC Drive Thru Number of Pickup Lanes # OL Drive-Thru: YES 0 B O O 0 o p Drive Thru Number of Order Point Pylons: # O Industrialized Construction YES Drive Thru Number of Pickup Windows # Chick-til-A Number of Parking Spaces:# Drive Thru Door YES 5200 Buffington R o adp NumberAccessible Parking Spaces: Cross Parking: YES Square 4996 Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Seat Count - Interior: 84 Menu Board - Interior: YES Seat Count - Exterior: 16 Menu Board - Interior- Count: 5 ala _ Canopy Type - Order Point: DOUBLE Menu Board - Interior - Type DIGITAL °a' .HER Canopy Type - Meal Delivery: DOUBLE Menu Board - Walk-up: NO SITE 5 Menu Board -Walk-up -Count 0 Number of Registers: ADAPT Menu Board - Walk-up - Type N/A LOGO :HER AND Menu Board -Ober Point YES � � � �.. Mer Point - Count 4 __.SUP SO DO PD ADDRESS Menu Board - O e a NOT APPROVED- REVISE AND RESU&r9T... Menu Boats - Ober Point - Type: DIGITAL ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED - REJISE AND RESJBMR D FER ❑ APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT Planned Classification: BASE INITIAL DATE: raUED HIGH M STOM LOW :USTOM-LOW :USTOM-HIGH FRAMING 20'1 JOINT 13'-0" B/ CANOPY Y-8" WATER TABLE T-0" i T/ SLAB 0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION 'Recwa ar, I I I •l I .,... li 0 T/ FRAMING 20'-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Ilii Q Q� 1 a U 06 O Q LU LU rUL CD Lo V (� B a M in FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION A CONSULTANT PROJECT # DATE MWDDNY DRAWN BY Author Ftmdan on MZ J gats in LI all fllc paWce! for bae.I lej. lbay M be rmMu MIn arymaErq ulevPeawXNe�a�efblea�se'f han wlMlttc!tl Vde2 rprcnmvez SHEET DESIGN OVERVIEW SHEET NUMBER X-900 4 T/ EXTERIOR BOND BEAM V - 8" T/ INTERIOR BOND BEAM 7' - 4" T/ SLAB O'-0" r+A REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEVATION v i 3/8"=1'-0" WHITE ROOFING ON ROOF DECKII STRUCTURAL ON RAFTERS - R STRUCTURAL ON PLYWOOD CEILIP PAINT T/EXTERIOR BOND BEAM 08--8" T/ INTERIOR BOND BEAM T-4" WHITE ROOFING MEMBRANE AT WALL BEYONI TOP OF UNISTRL BE FLUSH WITH I OF DRIP EDGE A' FACE OF METAL INSTALL 4'-0" LEN UNISTRUT VERTI BEHIND EACH BC PAINT TO MATCF ADJACENT WALL -T[iZa37yl��:�h6 ONE COAT OF PRIMER & ONE C EPDXY PAINT TO MATCH BRICK. CONCRETE SLAE RE: STRUCTURA T/ SLAB A A REFUSE ENCLOSURE SECTION /"%-r 112"=1'-O" 4 3 SLAB -RE: STRUCTURAL 3 2 4'-0" UNISTRUTS 6" DIAMETER STEEL PIPE GATE POST PIPE BOLLARDS a0 RE: CIVIL � 1 r%n REFUSE ENCLOSURE FLOOR PLAN V L 1/4"=V-0" 1/4" 11 '-O" LOWER ROOF A4 WHITE ROOFING MEMBRANE ON ROOF DECKING - RE:STRUCTURAL B2 REFUSE ENCLOSURE ROOF PLAN 1/4" = 1'-0•, A n REFUSE ENCLOSURE ELEVATION !lL 3/8" =I '-0" 2 & 51/7, PAINTED STEEL POST CAPS (TYP) PAINT -11 2 EQUAL PANELS COLLAR HINGES (TAP & ADD GREASE FITTINGS AT EACH HINGE -GREASE HINGES AFTER PAINTING) 2-1/2"X 2-1/2" PAINTED STEEL TUBE GATE FRAME - PAINT On DIAMETER PAINTED STEEL POST - PAINT T-11 1-1/2"X 1-1/2" PAINTED STEEL ANGLES- PAINT -11 16 GA FORM DECK PANELS WELDED TO FRAME - PAINT -11 DROP RODS BEYOND B 1 REFUSE ENCLOSURE GATE REAR ELEVATION 3/8" = V-0' T/ GRADE -0'- 6" T/ EXTERIOR BON D BEAM 8' - 8" h 1 TERIOR BOND BEAM T- 4" T/ SLAB O'-0" y 510 B !S ■ Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 ARE MALC OMB ing Design for Commercial Real Estate 915 Wilshire Blvd. Suite 2150 Los Angeles, CA 90017 P 310.903.4000 N:Z011r011 Wdw14111MOM I NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION FSR#05058 BUILDING TYPE/SIZE: P14 DTO SO RELEASE: 22.08 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT # SNR22-0002-00 DATE 10/27/2021 DRANN BY Author Mem w-nbin on tbls d—ng"In Si digW flk pab N fc bye nametl pr%N mry M be mnxi..a F arymane Wi -press uriana�aLW mxe'f Ram amwiva wear raraema'— SHEET TRASH ENCLOSURE SHEET NUMBER A-103 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author Fbmtw -bane on His G g and In Si a1gbil Mc ,oL Ic bee nanM pj. may. be mnA tlIn ary mane Wbwb mpress wnudn c baba mb tm amGlua aeax rm,esMr�'��es. SHEET FLOOR PLAN Fy:IMi�aWWIMM:+ A-201 4 3 2 1 REFER TO A-105 FOR OMD CANOPY INFO 35'-9' 19'-61/2' 64'-41/2" V - 81/2" 6' - 0" 4--8" 6' - 0" 4--8" 6' - 0" V - 75/8" 3'-41/2" V-8 3/ 10'-81/4" 7'-01/2' V-93/4 8'-2" 6'-0" 20-3" 6'-0" 23'-11 1/2" MB.B A2 D1 A-401 15 A-301 P P FIRE SPRINKLER RISER SHOWN M6.E FOR REFERENCE ONLY A A C m F v M6.J N m F 1 M6.B M C 1a DRIVE THRU � o ^ m I \`��.HOOD #1��/ I \\/� I w MB.B 00 WB.BD MB.B A2 MB.EJ LL. .�9 I -•-. q -I- e HOOD #21 I �� i�\ I a STORAGE 11701 �G________ ____ y _ of WALLS AT 2 • 1T-3 • 1/4' a o m STORAGE TO HAVE 33 STUD FRAMING m 0 3 A-601 1 O A3 4'-41/2" • 38'-5" lY z y ¢ EXTEND TO DECK A 401 A-622 3 O A-701 I y y 0 z_ w c m A• 4 WB.BD WB.BE LL W _ z of u • , • 8 ¢ LL 2 O rc O p A-602 1 0 y W6.BB o , m u 0 • 7 A-601 9 Q = LL J �, 11o I ¢ U ----____CI _ U - • rc o of MAINTAIN Z'GAP 0 A4 o B1 i 0 I TYPICAL TRIM '-£I A-401 A-301 • m 27'-41/2" i 8'-51/2' I 41'-11" 5'-4" 8'-51/2" M 8'-6" m s' -z" ' IHOOD #3I I SERVICE m m M6.B m C9 ._ DINING 4 i _ 1 I PROVIDE FROM EDGE MINIMUM 9" CLEAR OF PANEL TO W6. BM rwBB N m O A-621 9 F • ADJACENT WA LL SU RFACE TO 7 D c a 4 A-622 2 _ - - - - - -_ - - _- - - -_ - - _ a MB.BF I • I AVOID CONFLICT WITH LADDER 3 1 W6.BB m - W04.BB WB.BM A-602 5 A-603 8 O a a^ ' D c m � p I 16 8 23 A-622 n'-2" 1'-7" < i SERVING 5'-6" 2'-5" 2 1T-2" I WB.AB WB.AK WB.AB WS. BB c 1 1U i •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-• - - _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - _ - - _ \ WB.BB ." ... WB.BO i i i 11'-T' 3'-4.. i Q MB I I m � - - - - - -•- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WB.BN 11 M6.B • O �� MB.D WO DD WB • 5 A-602 7 WB.BN • M6.0 E1 i N r 7'-31/2" 2'-B" 6'-41/2" 5" 23'-03/4" WB.AB WB.BE I 6 A-604 TECH CLOSET • WB.BH TEAM MEMBER I M6.0 i ROOM A-622 1I 21 1 M I • I • W4.AA ( R - -• mA 10 H-.-.-•-•-.-.-. • -.-. -.-•� WOMENS WB.AK • A-604 I • I • 12 12 B3 WB.DD WB.DL VESTIBULE 7 O4.AC A-622 5 WB.AD W4.AA I I J W6.HN •• 1 A-602 15 N I A-301 - a - MOD 6 A-621 m ^ 8 11 A-622 B2 A-623 y • I W4.AD � • WB.BH' • W6.BN I "T M6.B y r, °J WB.CD CLOSET W4.AC W4.AA WB.BN 14 0 5WB.LL ! - W4.AA WB.EK I I I OFFICE i 30 32 O 4"I W4.AD - - - - - AAAAAAA 20 of 1 A-621 1 c = RR VEST MENS .-.-. .-. .-. .-.-. MS.E .-.-. .-.-. N W4.CD e N U 31 MB.A A • 5 Al I 3 MOB(M6.N I M6.B E A-631 M MB.D MB MB.D MB.D L C 01 .- K -. .-.-.-.-.-.-. .-.-.-. .-. K .- .-.-. D3 C A-301 ----- ----- MB.D --- ----- A-611 *A1 9'-111/2" -41/2" 1'-103/4" 4'-93/4" 6'-0" 4'-8" 6'-0" 4'-73/4" 3'-41/2" 2'-81/2" 4'-63/4" 6'-0" 14'-5" 6'-0" 4'-63/4" 14'-41/4" S. 13'-4" &Y-51/4" 35'-6 1/2" 33'-8 1/4" 119'-8" FLOOR PLAN C4 1/4" = 1'-0" BRACE INTERIOR PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH REFER TO LEGEND BELOW REFER TO WALLTYPES ON THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR FOR WALL CAVITY FRAMING RIGHT FOR SHEATHING AND DRAFSTOPPING PARTITION LOCATIONS THAT EXTEND TO DECK. AND INSULATION MATERIALS ON EXPOSED SIDE(S) OF WALL (REFER TO ROOM WB ABS LABELS FOR ORIENTATION) \\ 14• • Al \\ I I A-611 I 1 A-623 I I I I PLUS SIGN INDICATES ADDITIONAL LAYER OF SHEATHING PAINTED FINISH I I - - ZI PAINTED FINISH w >O 0 > I m z GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING w• 8o • I �• • ' i MENU BOARD BULKHEAD > Or w r N Z ¢ J p1 -A ¢ PAINTED FINISH O ¢ w > W m Z m W Z w GYPSUM BOARD z w z W Z ¢ z m z x¢ SHEATHING 0 �F mz W . A-624 U �F I ? U �F w ¢ z0 w Z0 ¢ J w3 w z0 FRP FINISH WOOD STUD WALL iOz m0 - z fOw T.O. FRP iOw . z >rc �� W4 2X4 WOOD STUDS GYPSUM BOARD TO xu o • GYPSUM BOARD TO m 4 m 0 = m w aOpO ¢ o m w EXTEND BELOW • z¢ 0 z w < EXTEND 1" BELOW TO. z • I TILE STOPS -- o ¢ x o z z x U W6 2X6 WOOD STUDS T.O. WALL TILE LL ¢ on WAINSCOT CAP o w ¢ AT BULKHEAD FRP WALL z m z a W8 2X8 WOOD STUDS W F 0 y W i FINISH LL ¢ W H z LLQ STAINLESS O 0 z 13 m 0 w W ? x WAINSCOT TOP CAP m 0 w z m 0 w F STEEL FINISH w ¢ onH m z LL¢ A-611 zx 20 • ?x _J 0 zx 0 CEMENT BOARD m x� onH m w m METAL STUD WALL = ¢ of x WAINSCOTING FINISH 2 0 • WALL TILE a �_ x SHEATHING z W Z 0 z w B M4 35/8"METAL STUDS WALL TILE U- LL PLYWOOD LL FINISH J U- LL ¢ x ¢ of STAINLESS STEEL W w ¢ o B M6 6" METAL STUDS FINISH z O FRP WALL FINISH z SHEATHING w CEMENT BOARD LL STOPS AT SINK of LL (70 wx LL M8 8" METAL STUDS ¢ PLYWOOD PAINTED O ¢> z p SHEATHING 1- STAINLESS STAINLESS WOOD BOARD z SHEATHING, TYP FINISH ID WALLTILE ¢ d STEEL FINISH STEEL FINISH D2 FINISH ¢ ¢ of BATT INSULATION wGYPSUM BOARD w WAINSCOTHEIGHT FINISH PLYWOOD z SHEATHING z VARIES BETWEEN D & N w of A 623 SHEATHING 3/4" PLYWOOD NOTE 1: WALL BLOCKING SHALL BE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S a CEMENT BOARD FINISH TYPES d CEMENT BOARD I I CEMENT BOARD CEMENT BOARD I SHEATHING SHEATHING I - CEMENT BOARD CEMENTBOARD SHEATHING RESPONSIBILITY. BLOCKING SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: AREAS w CEMENT SHEATHING Lu WAINSCOT BOTTOM SHEATHING LL GYPSUM BOARD • • FRP WALL SHEATHING SHEATHING INDICATED ON INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR GRAB BARS, SHELVING BRACKETS, CEMENT BOARD BOARD TILE BASE Iii rc CAPANDTRIM SHEATHING z z FINISH TILE BASE WALK-IN MONITORS, FIXTURES, ETC, AS WELL AS BLOCKING FOR WINDOWS, CANOPIES SHEATHING SHEATHING FINISH TILE BASE W I I rc CARRY STAINLESS TILE BASE 0 FINISH d MIN. CLEARANCE, ROOF FRAMING, ROOF TOP UNITS, ETC. •17 • • TILE BASE -• • . CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING FINISH TILE BASE STEELALLTHE WAY FINISH ¢ RE: FLOOR PLAN NOTE 2: REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TILE BASE FINISH - I' ' - FINISH, TY ' '- ' < TILE BASE • ' Ca • - . • - • FINISH Qq VYNIL BASE FINISH - TO FLOOR TILE • I • • I • Ea w A3 w I • • • • - • - D3 3/4" CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION. m C4 • A-604 _ m •-• _ m A3 C1 -• m FINISH C1 A -boa m m • A 604 m C2 A-604 TILE BASE - A-604 C1 m FINISH A-623 -. A3 • A- 04 O 0 -j TILE BASE FINISH io --4 C1 NOTE 3: REFER TO FINISH PLAN FOR WALL FINISH INFO AND SPECIFICATIONS RESTROOM ITYFI ❑A I ❑g EGOIEx A-604 A-623 CLOSET D1x1xG A-624 RESTROOMrvANIm SERMGIMMIURDARGRI X-641 PIAY EITCNEx IMOFIDxXI EITCNEx moon MMHM DHHGISRAADEMI A-604 WALWEI COOLER recx 0 aoSET A-623 FOR WALL SHEATHING INFO DRNE-ixRU VESTEIILE yESiIBULE DRNETIRIJ MARI..NI VES WLE18gx M WALWEI FREMER SERM5 OFFICE NOTE 4: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND/OR VERIFY FIRE BLOCKING SERVICE UTILITYIRISER ❑TEAM MEMBER ROOM N AT 10' MAX VERTICAL SPACING AND AT CEILING HEIGHT IN ALL COMBUSTIBLE STUD WALLS, ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: WALL TYPES LEGEND CT CABIN ET r ----- I RE: ELECTRICAL L N.T.S. -----� MDP RE: ELECTRICAL STEEL WALL BY INSULATION SCHEDULE FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES OWNER RE: OWNER A.1 ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FRAMING DIMENSIONS (FACE OF STUD/JAMB) EXACT LOCATIONS LOCATION R -VALUE THICKNESSFOR ROOF R-17.4 3" RIGID pUNLESS ISE NOTED. A.2 FASTENERS, ANCHORS, CLIPS, STRAPS, ETC WHICH ARE IN CONTACT WITH ITEM BY OWNER 0 A PRESERVATIVEATIVE RAND/OR FIRE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE OF G-185 HOT DIPPEDZINC- L WALLR-5 COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. -q-01 (CONTINUOUS) I" RIGID A.3 REFER TO CIVILAND LANDSCAPE FOR LOCATIONS OF WALKS, BOLLARDS, LANDSCAPING AREAS, FLAG POLE, AND OTHER SITE ITEMS. SOFFIT OR BULKHEAD WALL R 19 6" BATT A.4 REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF CORNER GUARDS. ABOVE RE: REFLECTED (CAVITY) A.5 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE LOCATION OF POLE MOUNTED EXTERIOR CAMERA WITH CEILING PLAN STRONG SYSTEMS AND INSTALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AS REQUIRED. RE: SLAB R-10 2" RIGID ELECTRICAL. 2 -SIDED BRAND ICON AS REFER TO ACCESSIBILITY PLAN AND FURNITURE DRAWINGS FOR SEATING LAYOUT & RE: OWNER DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT: OWNER. NOTES: A.7 REFER TO ACCESSIBILITY PLAN AND OWNER DRAWINGS FOR CONDIMENT COUNTERS RECESSED PIN AND SLEEVE 1. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN AND WALL SECTION SHEETS AND TRASH RECEPTACLES. BOX. RE: A4/A620 & MEP FOR INSULATION EXTENTS AND LOCATIONS. A.B REFER TO IT WALLBOARD USER GUIDE FOR WALLBOARD INSTALLATION, IF APPLICABLE. DRAWINGS. 2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSULATION A.9 REFER TO MILLWORK PLAN FOR RAISED CONCRETE CURB LOCATIONS. ELECTRICAL PANEL RE: PRODUCT INFORMATION. A.10 FREEZER AND COOLER DOORS AND HARDWARE SUPPLIED BY FREEZER/COOLER ELECTRICAL D MANUFACTURER 4 3 2 1 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author Fbmtw -bane on His G g and In Si a1gbil Mc ,oL Ic bee nanM pj. may. be mnA tlIn ary mane Wbwb mpress wnudn c baba mb tm amGlua aeax rm,esMr�'��es. SHEET FLOOR PLAN Fy:IMi�aWWIMM:+ A-201 E 4 K 2 1 a W- E oC� o � � o O O o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 D1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = V-0.1 D B4 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS A4 T/ FRAMING 20'-41/2" v PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR • REGULATORY T` CONTROL JOINT I3'-0"� APPROVAL, c3c B2 c1 -c c1 -c C1 -A c,_c BIDDING, OR vim A-504 CONSTRUCTION ■M i■ B/ CANOPY 9'-8" A-504 WATER TABLE 3'-0'h _... _... 11111 1 111110 C - A-504 A-501 `,........ T/ SLAB 0" A-501 Cl EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1 •-0" li 1 A-504 A-504 A-504 A-504 T/ FRAMING 20-41/2"h T/ FRAMING 20'-4 1/2' h a) •1 'cl) w 06 0 • -D; llw_ ' w CONTROL JOINT 13'-0' C4G CONTROL JOINT 13'-0" LL C1 -C - � Q 71� C3 -B AB04 T 0 Z B/ CANOPY 9'-8" B/ CANOPY 9'-8"h CDLin A/ LL *■ ■■ A, A-504 A-504 63 A-504 WATER TABLE 3'4"c4 WATER TABLE 3'-0h B3 A3 C CJ 0 w Q v FS !.r A-501 A-501 _ BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG _ RELEASE: 22.05 T/ SLAB O" T/ SLAB O" PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS B3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION V 0) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION or BR-A(PRIMARY BRICK) W DESCRIPTION 0_ BR -02.... . 0 H ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX - SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 IMUTUAL MATERIALS LU JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA W BR -20....... N IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN 0 LU BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) o LU � J BR-03ACME D_ RUSTIC NMITE ARGOS, SAN TAN O A BR -19 D_ DESERTWHITE B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES (SEE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS LIST FOR CONTACT INFORMATION) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION PREFERRED REGION(S) BR-A(PRIMARY BRICK) W DESCRIPTION 0_ BR -02.... . ACME BRICK 1 PALOMA GRAY _. ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX - SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 IMUTUAL MATERIALS MIDNIGHTSKY JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -20....... GLEN-GERY IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK,PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) O N) 4-0' 24" � J BR-03ACME BRICK RUSTIC NMITE ARGOS, SAN TAN MALVERN, AR SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -19 MUTUALMATERIALS DESERTWHITE JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA WA IWEST BR -26 GLEN-GERY WHITEHALL JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA. ATLANTIC NORTHEAST MIDWEST B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN LU CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - ....MODEL.... X a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL W DESCRIPTION 0_ MODELNAME o COLOR NOTE BR -A v Q 9 MODULAR * No *SEE APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1_ CANOPY METAL FASCIA N V DURA COAT O DARK BRONZE N 1 O N) 4-0' 24" � J C4 -G M TEXTURE PVD O CANOPY METAL DECK Yes B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN CANOPY SCHEDULE CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - ....MODEL.... Overall Width... a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL MARK- DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODELNAME NUMBER COLOR NOTE BR -A BRICK VENEER (PRIMARY) 9 MODULAR * No *SEE APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1_ CANOPY METAL FASCIA .... DURA COAT DC19ST-2703 DARK BRONZE OIL RUBBED BRONZE METALLIC 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" YW C4 -G EMeHor Canopy TEXTURE PVD CP -2 CANOPY METAL DECK Yes WRITE SMOOTH V%HITE HIGH GLOSS EC -1 PARAPET WALL COPING DUROLAST/ MIDNIGHT EXCEPTIONAL METALS BRONZE PT -100 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE SW2807 ROCKWOOD REFUSE ENCLOSURE. FINISH: ACRYLIC #B66.350 SEMI -GLOSS ON DOOR FRAMES, SATIN ON WALLS PT -113 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE DARK BRONZE FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS - - ACRYLIC#B66-350 SC -1 -. STUCCO STO POWERWALL WESTHIGHLAN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM DWHITE- SC-2 STUCCO STO POWERWALL HARDWARE ST -1 STOREFRONT. YKK YES 45 DARK BRONZE (MATTE) GENERAL NOTES - LEGEND ❑ OIL EXTRACTION 1. ALL SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY OTHERS PORT ACCESS BOX 2. REF FLOOR PLAN AND WINDOW LEGEND FOR STOREFRONT INFORMATION - EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO. CO2 FILL BOX - r. DATE MM/DDNY FINISH SAND MEDIUM MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN CANOPY SCHEDULE CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - Description Count Overall Width... a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL Integral Lighting CI -A 9R"A VENDOR -RE: ELEC 1 3'-81/2" r — � No C1 -C SCUPPER- T-11 CT CABINET- T-11 9 64" SEE A2/A-503 RE. ELECTRIC No C3 -B EMeHor Canopy A CONSULTANT PROJECT # iklfklf 15-0" 4-0' 24" No r. DATE MM/DDNY FINISH SAND MEDIUM an Siaigla ni DRAWN BY DOWNSPOUT- T-11. igW ffl or n SEE A3/A-503. u,mm'i«n zmlaream mz rtaip am zz SC -2 waaz=zar«mae na.za aq«cmm «c nermmauem in O ay ma""«znmwcapea waan Quwaeaizcc rvan azo -'am , zer eznmvc od ar SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EC -1 MDP - 9 RE ELECTRICAL SHEET NUMBER Grand total 13 A-301 0 0 4 1 3 1 2 1 ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Width... Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) - Integral Lighting CI -A EMeHor Canopy 1 3'-81/2" ,'-0" 0" No C1 -C EMeHor Canopy 9 64" ,'-0" 0" No C3 -B EMeHor Canopy 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" No C3 -C EMedor Canopy 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" YW C4 -G EMeHor Canopy 1 7-0" 4-0' 24" Yes an Siaigla ni DRAWN BY DOWNSPOUT- T-11. igW ffl or n SEE A3/A-503. u,mm'i«n zmlaream mz rtaip am zz SC -2 waaz=zar«mae na.za aq«cmm «c nermmauem in O ay ma""«znmwcapea waan Quwaeaizcc rvan azo -'am , zer eznmvc od ar SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EC -1 MDP - 9 RE ELECTRICAL SHEET NUMBER Grand total 13 A-301 0 0 4 1 3 1 2 1 E 0 C B Q A, 5 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 rn4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION U 1 1/4" = V -a' Cl EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" B3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = T-0" 4 B 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES (SEE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS LIST FOR CONTACT INFORMATION) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION PREFERRED REGION(S) BR -A (PRIMARY BRICK) MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER BR-02ACME BRICK PALOMA GRAY ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 MUTUALMATERIALS MIDNIGHTSKY JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -20 GLEN-GERY IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes BR -03 ACME BRICK RUSTIC V%H ITE ARGOS, SAN TAN MALVERN, AR SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -19 IMUTUAL MATERIALS DESERTWHITE JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -26 GLEN-GERY WHITEHALL JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST 4 B 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark MODEL Overall Wdth Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODELNAME NUMBER COLOR NOTE BR -A BRICK VENEER (PRIMARY) 9 MODULAR 1'-0" 0" No *SEEAPPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1 CANOPY METAL FASCIA 15'-0" DURA COAT DC19ST-2703 DARK BRONZE OIL RUBBED BRONZE METALLIC 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes C4 -G Ededor Canopy TEXTURE PVD CP -2 CANOPY METAL DECK Yes V%HITE SMOOTH V%HITE, HIGH GLOSS EC -1 PARAPET WALL COPING DUROLAST/ MIDNIGHT EXCEPTIONAL METALS BRONZE PT -100 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE SW2807 ROCKWOOD REFUSE ENCLOSURE. FINISH: ACRYLIC #B66.350 SEMI -GLOSS ON DOOR FRAMES, SATIN ON WALLS PT -113 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE DARK BRONZE FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS ACRYLIC #B66-350 SC -1 STUCCO STO POWERWALL WESTHIGHLAN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM D NMITE SC -2 STUCCO STO POWERWALL HARDWARE FINISH: SAND MEDIUM ST -1 STOREFRONT YKK YES 45 DARK BRONZE MATTE) 41 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY OTHERS 2. REF FLOOR PLAN AND WINDOW LEGEND FOR STOREFRONT INFORMATION CANOPYNOTES: BUILDING MOUNTED CANOPIES - 8" THICK CANOPY - KYNAR FINISH OF STRUCTURE, FASCIA, & DECKING TO MATCH(T.1) COLUMN MOUNTED CANOPIES - 10" THICK CANOPY - FINISH OF STRUCTURE TO BEC R1 - FINISH OF DECKING TO BE CP -2 Grand total 2 13 LEGEND EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH MORTAR COLOR CARD READER BY ® SECURITY VENDOR -RE: ELEC SCUPPER- T-11 SEE A2/A-503 DOWNSPOUT- T-11 SEE A3/A-503 MDP_#D RE ELECTRICAL 0 0 1 ❑ OIL EXTRACTION PORT ACCESS BOX CO2 FILL BOX - RE: KITCHEN LIGHT FIXTURE - RE:ELECTRICAL r — � CT CABINET- T-11 RE: ELECTRICA L — J EC -1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION 1' FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE /SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author inmrmal'iDn nmrarea on wa d g am in Si digla mea produced fa lose naned pgct may na be maxi ead In any manna-�duwcayen v.drce� a rvba cmzcc rtan a hors:ed Drded rmreznmvaz. SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-301 ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Wdth Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) Integral Lighting CI -A Ededor Canopy 1 3'-81/2" 1'-0" 0" No CI -C Eodedor Canopy 9 64" 1'-0" 0" No C3 -B Ededor Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" No C3 -C Ededor Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes C4 -G Ededor Canopy 1 7'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes Grand total 2 13 LEGEND EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH MORTAR COLOR CARD READER BY ® SECURITY VENDOR -RE: ELEC SCUPPER- T-11 SEE A2/A-503 DOWNSPOUT- T-11 SEE A3/A-503 MDP_#D RE ELECTRICAL 0 0 1 ❑ OIL EXTRACTION PORT ACCESS BOX CO2 FILL BOX - RE: KITCHEN LIGHT FIXTURE - RE:ELECTRICAL r — � CT CABINET- T-11 RE: ELECTRICA L — J EC -1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION 1' FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE /SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author inmrmal'iDn nmrarea on wa d g am in Si digla mea produced fa lose naned pgct may na be maxi ead In any manna-�duwcayen v.drce� a rvba cmzcc rtan a hors:ed Drded rmreznmvaz. SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-301 APPENDIX 6 Plan View Scale - 1" = 25R + 'es 'ab +ab a.5 +p] 'a5 0.5 a.5 'a.5 *a.5 __ __ ___ _._ _. +05 'a.5 *08 'a.9 a.] '01 'a8 a8 'a8 'OA '0] 'O8 '8 'O8 +0A '3 +op +op +op +0a +a.a a.2 +a.a - _ _ I _ _ _ 'a5 'p8 'a. '09 '1A '1.1 '1.5 '18 13 '1A +02 'p8 'p8 'O8 '09 '1.1 ' 3 '1.2 'a.9 '0.5 j pAi I a1 'a.] '09 '1.1 '13 '1A '18 'l8 'l] '2p '1.5 '13 '13 ,-,+ '09 '1A '13 '18 '18 1A 'a.B 00 a.1 ap +al SA +u +1A +19 +2g +a2 +aa '2a 42a Sl SA +v +1. +u +1e +22 v +1.2 ae 'p8 '11 '18 'lp 'l8 '32 '5.5 '3< 'l] '21 '18 '13 '1. '11 '2.1 '29 32 '197 j a.1 *p9 *13 *19 *. A *31 8 *1 *1.5 *3p *37 *32 A< '2.1 00 a.2 *1A *13 *3p *38 *38 *38 *5 �ay,+88 '39 '38 *3A *23 18 *1.5 *1.7 *23 *32 *32 3.5 '22 W7,/5'9'J +02 'IA '11 '1A '2.1 '38 '37 'Ap '88 ']2 '43 '39 '3A '25 A '1.7 '18 '34 '33 #r '13 � I a°! 00 I I'12 15 + +� '43 '87 ']2 'Ag 1] + '27 ' 1 '19 '1 1 3 '33 3.6 +2.5 II 'a.3 II '13 +11 23 28 33 'A< '] 2 '] g 'A8 '3.5 (11 '29 < 1 '2 '2T '3 ' 'L.9 8 ± ___ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ --------- _ _ _ _ _ ________ --I I 0 'a.2 'a.2 *a.L *a.5 'a.] 'a.] 'a.] 1 'aA I 00 I I y '14 '18 +2d '28 '32 '<.5 ']p '73 '5.1 43<'3 A '2. +22 + + + + +1.2 '1.0 'a8+ + .Aus'13 '18 '22 '28 '3< 'A3 ']3 ']8 'A] '38 '35 '31 '27 '23 '2.1 +2'� *< M]3 *8.9 • 1 � 'a1 5�+*8A 'I 3e ® *p.] *fA ➢.] m *1A *15 *11 811 *a.] I '00 0] � 11 I '1A '15 5 '28 '3g 'A2 '6.5 +7.1 '<.5 39 35 '<A 38 '3p ' 3 '2.1 -SO 6 * 9 '40 ] ].5 0a *13 *18 *2A *"1. 'a. I 1 A +1A '22 +29 +38 +4A +89 +73 +A20 38 A] +43 + +2.5 +2.2 3 +'1.3 *2.p *3. +]5 +16 +0, <ai1 11 +02 +02 '03 403 +a8 +09 21 +2a +v +39 +eg +7.1 'a2 43a +38 +51 A 3. '3.a 'E. 8 \'31 '3.a `aa +20 +5 +.2 1 4- 0 ° oo0"O4 0 +0.2 +03 '03 40.5 +p8 +09 +13 +2p +2.5 +32 +37 +5.7 +6.2 +3.8 43.5 +32 +5A *m9 *A2 3.3 '12.8 ] +36 8 +2 T,i 'p5 +03 II I=13ILS ILIR� 11 ®S34S* 11 *.3 *03 *0.5 *OB *01 *09 *13 *1.B+22 *27 *33 *&0 *3.8 *2.B *28 *LB *l] *l< *2.7 * .5 8 J.8 K3.9 .� +p, 'a.3 87 SP 1 1 *aA +0a +0a +p.] *a8 *12 *15 181 *2p *22 '28 'Ap +<. +3.0 *2.2 *2 *LA'I NA 04A *3. '2A *L. _ _ _ _ _ _ b.] „�'�6 'd0 *A2 *3211 *p +a.3 - y +0.5 4.8 'aP 49 '12 '1B '18 '1P '1P '19 '22 '27 37 '19 '42 *sA *m2 *3A *2A ''33 3 319 2 a] 37 35 b_p. 3 'all + +a.ai --_- ______- _- - ____- _____ ---- 1 +01 '09 '1.1 '13 +18 +22 +2A +2.1 +19 +18 +18 +2p '19 '1. +1.1 +13 +38111 *<A i.8 *3. *2.81 *2 /2 118 '15 p*1.L 1"IA *1A *1A *1a *11 *18 18 'i *19 '2.5 ��.3 *41 Ns +35i +13 O8 %2 �4 t +23 +33 +35 +28 1 t9 +18 +11 '1.5 *12 � +� +2.7 * p .1 �0 '2 ��' '4Q 18 698 '18 '11 '11 A '2A '22 ' l �1l _ _'2.p 'I 23 *2g NA +511 '15 +0a 1!! +09 +1A +11 42.1 +29 +42 +53 +34 +2.5 +2.1 +18 +1A +1.1 +p. +0A a.] +18 '3A '3 '42 8 '2.5 '2.2 '2.3 '23,..:.1 '23 A '3A *3S 3 '2.1 / �1-a +19 +0a i1! +1A +18 +2p 427 +3A '55 +62 +38 +3p +23 +19 +13 +09 +p. 408 +8 +12 '31 '< B.2 '48 '3.1 '2.8 '2.8 '28 A '28 '3S i.8 '4g '2.9 8 '1458i 3 III +0a -I +1A +11 +23 432 +35 +g0 +65 +39 +3.5 +2g +2p +13 +09 +p. 408 +1.1 +2A '22 '2A i.2 NA 9 '5.'31 '3.2 '3.1 '32 '3.1 '35 '4.3 'g. '3 3 44 3 'g.8 -1 i+ r +0a i +1.1 +11 +2.5 433 +35 +53�+5] +3] +3g +27 +2p +13 +09 +p. 401 +11 +181 '22 72.8 '3.5 5.p %.2 '5. '3S '31 '3.5 '35 '35 '39 L.] '].a 5.6 '31 l Na 92 -'k 58' .2 *pg I a. a.b +1A +11 +22 '3.1 +3A '51 +63 +38 +34 +2.5 +19 +13 +09 +p. 401 +1A +1.]' '22 2.9 '3a '<.5 '<. '3S '3A '3A '38 '37 ND L.5 '49 '31 9 ' $ " 5 I +8 *pg I i 1 +03 +1A +18 +2p '2g +32 +55 +g.1 +3g +28 +22 +18 +1.2 +a.8 +a. '0] +1A +18 ''2.1 l 3< '48 %.p '5. 3.9 '"a.8 '3.5 3.5 i.5 '39 <a *].0 b.3 3.8 8 '4411 91 'ae 65 � +221i +p8 03 '1A +1A +11 +2.0 *2.] *L5 *L8 *3.1 +22 +18 +1.8 +1.2 *0.9 +a. +08 +1A 15 +2.1 +2i 30 04< B.9 b.2 3.8 3'3S 33 32 38 04S "T b.3 .5 .1 40 58 22111 +a.] 1 ,,.�+_ +p3 '09 +13 +1A +18 +21 +29 +31 +24 *A�-r.8 *1A *1.2 *1.a *a.B *a.8 *1.1 *1A i *1B *2.1 1X2.] 40 i 3+4. 3.1 3.9 '32 33 33 33 *4< S.8 *48 *2.8 *28 A *38 A *35 *1 ]I +al 0.8 +1A +13 +13 +15 +20 +20 +11 +1 +13 +1.1+ 9 +1A +1.1 +1A i *18 1X18 *2. � � +3 '2.9_ _ '2.8_ 03e_ _ 33 _ _ 3A 38 304S _____040 - 31 +2.5 '2. '1B 0 +1311 03 'al __ _ +a.8 '09 '1A '1.1 18 +15 +13 +13 +13 +A +1. '1.1 +12 18 �// '2.$ 'S.6 '2. + g '2A ' '3a 33 + '38 ND * A '44 ' '38 '2A ' '25 '2.2 '18 13 '2.2 1l +1Aii +03 'al \ +a8 '1A '1.1 '13 +15 8 +1A +13 +1.2 +1 +1.1 +1.1 1. +1.1 *1.2 +13 +18 f +11 +18 � ] '19 '2.1®�--''i -.a .8 '3.2 35 'aA '4.2 '43 *3.8 '3.2 ].]® *2.1 ®18 t2 'y� +1 +a.] +1.a 1. '13 418 +2A +18 +4 +1.4 +13 13 +13 +13 +1. +1.4 A +20 +22 +19 +11 '19 '19 '2.1 a i.2 *42 '41 '4p '4.1 3A *3A l '2.2 '18 +13 +09 +a.s j +1.2 +1A +18 422 +30 +30 +22 +11 +18 +1.5 +1.5 +1A +1. +18 411 +21 +29 .5 3 8 +1.3 +es +l +0511 +02 +10 11 +1.5 +11 +2.1 43p +41 +<A +28 +2.1 +19 '11 +1.5 +1.5 +1] +19 42.1 +27 +<A +48 +33 +23 +19 +11 +1A 1.1 + +p.5 p.5 +OB +0] +01 +pA +aAl *02 +1.1 +1.8+2e +27 43< +59 '51 +33 +27 +2A +1.8 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +2.1 42g +32 '55 +63 +37 +28 +2.1 +11 +13 +O8 +0A 40.5 0'' +pA +pA +O8 +01 +pA li '03 +1.1 +0 +32 43g +1 +59 +35 +3.2 +2A +2A +1.8 +1.8 +2. 43.1 +35 +A +gA +38 +34 +2A 1.9 1.4 0.8 a.8 i 12 1A 22 2.2 2.2 19 2.5 28 2. 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 lz0 +1.2 111 ♦�� yt' +18 +2.5 < )♦a +yma, 0 +3A +3< +2] +2A +1.g +1.g +2 +2.g ♦ * +51,a.ar 8. +38 +3g +28 +2.1 1.5 +1.1 +1.1 +1.3 +1.] 5 +3] +43 +3.5 +3< +3] +4< +3 +2A +2.1 +18 +1A +131 'O8 +13 T ! '18 +23 +33 +38 *83 1 *35 *33 *2< *2.a '18 '1.5 +2. *2 +32 *35 *59 *g. *4p *3.5 *28 '2. '1.5 +13 *1.2 +1A *18 A *29 +32 +3.1 *3.1 +32 +3p 28 +24 +23 *22 *2.1 *1811 1 +1 1 +1A +2p +27 +34 +58 +5A +3A +27 +2.1 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +22 +28 +33 +53 +62 +38 +3p +23 + 9 +1.5 +13 +1.1 '1A +1A +18 '21 +27 +3p '3.1 +28 +2.5 +2.1 +2p +22 '23 +25 +2A li +' l +1A +1A +1.7 +2.1 +29 +42 +48 +28 +2.1 +1. g +1A +1A +16 +19 +22 +28 +42 +5A +34 +24 +19 +1] +13 +1.1 +1.0 '1.1 '11 +12 '15 +18 +19 +19 +19 +11 +1.6 +1A +2p +23 +29 +3A1 A +02 +1.1 +1.3 *1A '2.2 3.1 +31 +22 +1A +1.5 +1A +13 +1A '1. 1. '11 +22 3. +35 +27 +1A +1.5 +13 +1.0 +0.9 408 +01 +p8 +02 +1A +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 '13 '18 +2g +31 +45'i 3.1 +p8 i O8 1A %1 '1A +19 +19 +1A +13 +13 +1.1 +1.1 +13 '1. *1.3 +1A +1A +2.1 +22 +18 +A +13 +1.1 +1A a. +.g +a5 +a5 +aA +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.] +08 +1.1 18 +27 +33 +36I '3A +pA 11 +0A +01 +O8 40.9 +12 +12 +1A +1A +1A +1A 1.1 +1.2 +13 +13 +15 +1A +13 +A 1. +09 +8 I 1A +1.7 +27 +33 +3Ak *2.5 +aA 1. +e4 +0a +0A 40A +p8 +p8 +p8 + 8 +09 +09 9 1A +1.1 +1.2 413 +13 +1A +1A +13 +A +1A +09 + 8 1.0 +1.5 +2.5 +32 +3311 +2] 03 +3 +e4 40 +05 +05 +e6 +01 +O8 +1.1 1. +13 +1. 1.7 +18 +18 +1A +1A +13 +1A 9 I��yl /////�� 09 +13 '22 +29 +38� +3A +03 II (� 11 -A +0.2 +0.3 '03 403 +03 +pA +p 5 +OB +O8 +1A +13 +1.5 +18 2. +2A +2. +2] +25 +22 +18 +1.5 +13 + .1 O8 +1.1 '11 +23 +33 A +29 li +02 +2p +0.2 402 03 +0 +0a +01 +1A +13 +18 +21 2 -3 +3A +32 +28 +23 +2p +1A +3 01 +0.9 +13 +19 +22 +a.1 11 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +02 +02 +03 +Om +0A +p.8 +13 +11 +24 '3 +33 +3A +}.p +3.1 n +2.1 +1,$ +A Og +a.] +1.1 18 151 '13 +0.1 +a.1 +a.1 +0.1 +02 +a.3 *aA +a.g +09 +1A +2.0 +2.9 +3.6 +3A •+2A +32 +3.5 +2g +11 +13 +O8 *0< * 3 +02 +01 +01 +aO +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op *p.3 *1.1 *1A f' p8 +a.1 ....... ..... ....... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ *a.1.1 +a.a +aA +aA +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 a. + . + +aA +aA + * . a.3 'a.2 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 *aA +a.0 OA +0A +a.a +0A +a.1 tel +a. +0.4+aA 'a.] +a.] 0A 5/ 3/16/2022 cele of to Scale rowing No. Lumark The Prevailc^ LED pole end fixture combination makes selection and installation of poles end fixtures simple. Ideluded is the die-cast Prevail area, site and roadway lmembers with standard mounting arm, 07 /0707 square straight steel pole, anchor bolts, base cover, tempi are and L/r L. EI hardware. Stock configurations are available in single and dual fixture combinations. The Prevail luminaire delivers a new level of versatility and value in patent pending, architectural design that delivers energy savings greater than 62% and replaces 150450W metal halide fixtures. The Prevail fixture and pole combo is ideal for general area/site lighting applications. IF I Construction Construction is comprised of a heavy-duty, single -piece die-cast aluminum lousing in dark bronze polyester powder paint. The die- cast aluminum door is tethered to provide easy access to the driver if replacement is required. The optics is mounted on a versatile, aluminum plate that dissipates heat from the LEDs resulting in longer life of the fixture. The fixture is INS and 3G vibration rated (ANSI C136.31). Optics Available in Type III and IV distributions with lumen packages ranging from 6,173 to 18,992 nominal lumens. Light engine configurations consist of 1 or 2 highegicacy LEDs mounted to metal -core circuit boards to maximize heat dissipation and promote low life (up to L92/60,000 hours at 25-C) per IESNA TM -21. For the ultimate level of spill light control, an optional house side shield accessory can be field or factory installed. DIMENSIONS Electrical Available in 120-07V 50/60Hz. 10kV/10kA surge protection standard. 0-10V dimming driver Is standard with leads external to the fixture to accommodate controls capability such as dimming and occupancy. Suitable for ambient temperatures from -0 Cto"T. Mounting The versatile, patent pending, standard mount arm accommodates multiple drill patterns ranging from 1-12" to 4-7/8". Removal of the door on the standard mounting arm enables ring of the fixture without having to access the driver compartment. A knock -out on the standard mounting arm enables round pole mounting. Pole Shaft is one-piece construction ASTM A500 grade "B" steel, slot blasted and finished in dark bronze polyester powder coat. Anchor base is fabricated from ASTM grade steel. ASTM A366 steel full base cover is provided to enclose base plate and anchor bolts. Anchor bolts are per ASTM A576 with two nuts, two flat washers, and one lock washer. Hardware and threaded portion of bolt are hot dip galvanized. 3" hook for 3/4" Wit. 4" hook for 1- bolt. Plnlsh Housing and cast parts finished in five-ataW super TGIC polyester bronze powder coat paint, 2.5 mil nominal thickness for superior Protection against fade and wear. Warranty Rve-year warranty. 23/4" pomml is za Llan5"1954mmI zstsna"Parrm1 POLE MOUNT ARM O Is in] TN. flare• Immml IVAmmI 4. ease Vlaw 1102mm � J � 916m ol4.3• ii-isda . e L O 26mml comml] E:7•N MaeeA�'m 14bh1tvN PFPRV PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO LED CERTIFICATION DATA VLand CULwei location used In56no N 36 Vibration noted So 9001 ENERGY DATA ....Lt.OXvar Oa n war Fanor QO c Local Harmonk Cloonan 1z0z77VoA aM 601z, ADVIRue, aAry/811Hz -0 minimum Tempambre Poem, a Amble. TempalabR Poem, EPA HtaaWa NOIwM1d Act car. R., O.75 n tixemrO SHIPPING DATA 4pirmomato Ns Wa1aM: z0be. 19.094aa.I It ficand f'y / TC5pN29FN T A1md1,z0183A61M page 2 PWIW PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO 0-1OV ID) This fixture is offered standard with 0-10V dimming driver(s). The dimming option provides 0-10V dimming wire leads for use with a lighting control panel or other control method. Ph rtocontrol (PER and PERT) Photocontrol receptacles (PER and PERT) provide a flexible solution to enable "dusk -to -dawn" lighting by sensing light levels. Advanced control systems compatible with NEMA 7 -pin standards can be utilized with the PERT receptacle. Dimming Occupancy Sensor (MSP/DIM-LXX, MSP/X-LXX end MSP -LXX) These sensors are factory installed in the luminaire housing. When the MSP/DIM-LXX sensor option is selected, the occupancy sensor is connected to a dimming driver and the entire luminaire dims when there is no activity detected. When activity is detected, the luminaire returns to full light output. The MSP/DIM sensor is factory preset to dim down to approximately 50 percent power with a time delay of five minutes. The MSP -LXX sensor is factory preset to turn the luminaire off after five minutes of no activity. These occupancy sensors includes an integral photocell that can be activated with the ISH H-01 accessory for "dusk -to -dawn" control or daylight harvesting -- the factory preset is OFF. The ISH H-01 is a wireless tool utilized for changi W the dimming level, time delay, sensitivity and other parameters. A variety of sensor lens are available to optimize the coverage pattern for mounting heights from 8'-30'. For .Wnnne.0. Nom r m 1r FuD) 0 e........._... 1111 ...............1111... 20 15 10 5 0 5 10 15 40 Cmerpe SklnArN FNt) Cowage Atla AM I FNp WaceLlnx Wlrelns Outdoor Lighting Control Module (WOLC-7P-10A) The 7 -pin wireless outdoor lighting control module enables Wavel-inx to control outdoor area, site and good lighting. Wavel-inx controls outdoor lighting using schedules to provide ON, OFF and dimming controls based on astronomic or time schedules based on e T day week. ORDERING INFORMATION Sample Number: PFPNV-I-A2ST345-N/AB BMBat'' Number I Nxturye Light Engine BYMOUBon pals 1pispa Mntlmum Send zags MPH) Opeona AEE as$...I AiNBWBBs OMer$eparmaly) PFPBV=PrNgll 1=1 Ai&II LEDI5,100 ]T -Type 111 15-15' BIN9=80 N/AB=NO AnCNOr Both loam when Ordered separately) X&VEBRHOUN$IEe Pole and 21 Nam lnal Lumens 14 -Type IV 20-20' 9-% XBB-House Side ShICIE ShICIE Fixture 8-3 A$ -I2 LEDI 10,20) 192% $-25' 0-10O MW/DIM-U1 lnXgratN Sensor tot Di mming >%% Cameo 4-4 Nam lnal Lumens IA) M-30' 0.28 Operation, B'- 12'Mounti nO Height 0.49 Input Curran a NW A40 -I2 LED115,100 IA) MW/DIM-M0 lnXgratN Scam, tot Di mmin0 0.21 0.33 0.35 NOM anal Lumens Lumens 4139 10,204 Operation, 12'-30Mounting Height 181830 new 11 150-I2 LEDI 18,90) PEP -NEMA age Hendrick PLORMIttol Receptsel e' BUG eatlnB Bt-UO-Gt B2 -U0.62 NOM anal Lumens &i -UO -G3 111 Lumens PEP]-NEMA]PIN Twaatlork PNoar-ratol Race garll e' 10,292 ...I lttoK calptmMld h.-1363770, 39aV El mmlag 25teNnd arcial ml nelWtlwlm laws. supplied wise malBhYuelah111..,has, umplam, ham r-.r—m.--. a Wtpvpllphle Mm All War. POWER AND LUMENS LUMEN MAINTENANCE Eight Engine A15 AM Ate me Npmind Power IWNI}/ 57W 87W 14M Larry Input Current 0120V PaNmg bLunera H'mMna. ww'aw"s sperme dvage—V,pmee. u Noun' NO.,.- (A) 0.49 018 1.23 1.34 Input Cogent 02]]V 0.22 0.35 0.54 040 (A) 193% 192% 187% 1255000 Input Current ®34N >%% 192% 191% 185% IA) 0.18 0.28 0.45 0.49 Input Curran a NW IA) 0.13 0.21 0.33 0.35 Lumens 4139 10,204 15,073 181830 new 11 BUG eatlnB Bt-UO-Gt B2 -U0.62 B3 -UO -63 &i -UO -G3 111 Lumens RAW 10,292 15,20 18,9M Type BUB eating N -UO -62 B2-U0.c3 B2 -U0 -G3 KEUO-G4 Lumens 8,173 10,281 15,157 18,9W Type1V BUB Rating N-UO BIUO-63 B2 -UO -G4 BIUO-c6 V Lumens 813% 10,.7 15,89] 19410 Type euc Rating Ba-uo-ca m-uo-ca e4-u0-G4a %-uo-c4 amr warel wwtal mania h avefis ,n M101 plasm Xree mlo,a 11ww 1.111 ogmgt aS slur el— amr.aammlorean« Ile—ma reams, a.1. TNNretitel H f". AmbW[ E:T•N Bag. ; ma�a aro im'"o .1.1 PaNmg bLunera H'mMna. ww'aw"s sperme dvage—V,pmee. u wl lasrw]N.n eau. alsomped dome 16T TNNretitel Thermal., AmbW[ 25,000 50,000 im'"o 100'000 L]0 TempereNre Noun' NO.,.- Form- 25'0 >%% 193% 192% >8]% 1280,000 ewd>%% 193% 192% 187% 1255000 EST >%% 192% 191% 185% >2501000 wl lasrw]N.n eau. alsomped dome 16T 1.01 25T 1.00 40�C 0.99 TDSKIESEN August 1, 2018308 PM paw 3 ONE FIXTURE CONFIGURAMON (90FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH B0, 80 AND 100MPH WINO ZONES USE A 8' POLE) PFPPV PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO E.'s TY14997 TY149M MOuntlng XMgM1[ �FPMI Wmnne MaAmum Vend Zeno MPH) HID NOmInel deM1EUBOn PO 90 100 EU."Hen[ � ,PIIn0e) 15' RAW Type III PFPXV-1A1SF3-15PFPRV4-A15-Tb159I PFP1111A1ST3-16-0' 16. 5,173 Type IV PFPRV-1-A15-T0.15' PFPXV-1A16-T4-15-9' PFPRV4-A15-T0.15-0' 150W 101292 Type III PFP1111125-T345' PFPRV-1-A25-T3-16-9' PFPXV-1-A26-T3-15-0' 250W 10,251 Type IV PFPR0.1-AM-15' PFPXV-1A25-T445-9' PFPRJ-lA25-T0.16-0' 250W 15,203 Type III PFP1111AM-T345' PFPRV4-A40-T3159I PFPXV-1-A4043-15-0' 4COW 15,157 Type IV PFPRV4-AW-T0.15' PFPNV-1A4-T445-9' PFPRV4-A4-T0.15-0' 40OW 18,992 Type III PFPX11-ADRID145' PFPRJ-1-A80-T3-16-9' PFPXV-1-A804345-0' 450W 18.935 TypelV PFPRV4-A50.-15' PFPXV-IAW-T445-9' PFPXV-1A50.-16-0' 450W 20' 8,192 TYp2III PFPRV4-A15-T3-20' PFPXV-1A16-T3-20-9' PFPRJ4-A15-T3-20-0' 15pW 8.173 TVpn IV PFPXV-1A16-T0.20- PFPRJ-1-A15-T0.209' PFPXV-1A16-T0.20-0' 150W 10,292 Type III PFPRV4 A25 -T3-20' PFPXV-1-A25-T3-20-9' PFPXV-lA25-T3-20-0' 25pW 10,251 Type IV PFPXV-1-A25-T4-20' PFPR0.1-A25- 40-9- PFPNV-TPI-20-0' 250W 15,203 Type 111 PFPRV4-AW-Tb20- PFPXV-1A4043-20-9' PFPRJ-I-AM-Tb20-0' 4WW 15,157 Type IV PFPRV-1APIDT4-20' PFPRV4-AW-TP-25PFPRV-1A40.T440-0' 4WW 18,992 Type 111 PFPRJ-1-A50-T3-20' PFPXV-1-A9RT3-20-9' PFPXV-1A50-Tb20.0' 450W 18,935 Type IV PFPXV-T4-T0.20I PFPRV4-A50J440-9- PFPRV-1A80-T440-0' 450W 25' 8,192 Type III PFPRV4-A15-T3-25' PFPXV-1A16-T3-25-9' PFPRVA-A15-Tb25-0' 16M 8.173 TypeIV PFPXV-1A16-T4-25' PFPRJ-1-A15-25PFPNV-I-AIST4-25-0' 15pW 10,292 Type III PFPRJ-1-A25-T3-25' PFPXV-1-A25-T3-25-9' PFPXV-1A25-T3-26-0' 25pW 10.281 TypeIV PFPXV-1A25-T4-25' PFPRJ-1-A25-T4-2S9' PFPNV-1-A26-T4-25-0' 25pW 15,203 Type III PFPRV4-A40-T3-25' PFPXV-1A4043-25-9' PFPRJ-IAM-T3-25-0' 4COW 15,157 TypelV PFPXV-1A40.T4-25' PFPRV4-PAG-TP-25PFPRV-1-A40.T4-25-0' 4COW 18,992 Type III PFPRJ-1A80-T3-25' PFPXV-1-AiYT3-25-9' PFPXV-1AORIDE6-0' 450W 18.935 Type IV PFPXV-I-AW-T4-25' PFPRJ-1-A50.45-9- PFPRV-1-A60-25-0' 450W 30' 8,192 Type III PFPXV-1-A15-T3-3J' PFPRJ-lA15-T330.9' PFPXV-1-A15-T3-30-0' 16M 5,173 Type IV PFPRV4-A15-T430' PFPXV-I-AIST4-30-9' PFPRV-1A15-T430.0' 150W 10,292 Type III PFPRJ-1-A26-T330' PFPXV-1A25-Tb30-9' PFPRV4-A25-T3-30-0' 25pW 14251 TypelV PFPXV-1A25-T4-W' PFPXV-1-A26-T4-30-9' PFPXV-1A25-T0.30.0' 25pW 15,203 Type III PFPXV-1-A4043-3J' PFPXV-IAM-T3-30.9' PFPRJ-1-A40-T3-30-0' 4COW 15.157 TypelV PFPRJ-IAM-T0.30' PFPXV-I-PA0.T430-9' PFPXV-IAM-T430.0• 4COW ype III PFPRJ-1-A80.T330' PFPXV-1AiYT3-3J-9' 1FPRJ-1-AERE _ J-0• 18,992 Type—,,:,:::: 450W 18.935 TVpn IV PFPXV-IAW-TIW PFPRJ-1-A50.T4309' PFPXV-IAW-T0.30.0' 450W NOIEB: orlhlep�eglnrtln4enelplabeonPom gleets fol 'll epplluJona PehIbinanlleNon lrowNonalMetteIINIII WlewM1lU pepe,WP519001ENb,III Inb�meJom r 3.BuppllId 4AEgw�e SoaIBM StrI5NN1A51.Aneho1POIb(AM N iempleuliMPIL M1e Nwe ne nE hen aor�. 15'eom ho sXAP FM<.ID'eomho5£1i305FM<, enE15'eomM SyA1$FM6 CEopplltlwlm EAE,ImStalBM 5wI5NN ISAI Aneho� 9olts AMI iempleUliMPI heNwen eM heae ,90' m rE W5MPNFM6 IL Eopplto11 k Equan Soalle StrI5NN1A51II—IlIPOIb1A9p iempleuliMPIL M1eNwenenE hereor�. 90'mmho S85M905FM<. £ PehIb In SKKL W 14eblMe4tleo�mNnNanaaM avellehlllty. Fabn1 E:7•N AaA hva+¢aLslm TD5W029EN Powrvig BuiPeeNbXh.M` way.XP—Aylp eMpwNlM ropee. A,.. 1, 20183A8PM Page 4 PFPFV PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO TWO FIXTURE CONFIGURATION 130FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH B0, 90, 100MPH WINO ZONES ANO 25FTOONROURAM ONS WITH IWRIPH WINO ZONE USE 0' POLES) EPA=1.50 MOuntln9 HM9H[ Feed Lumpe MON.- Win. 2.ne MPH) HID NOMIn. ..MBUBOn 90 90 100 EqulvUen[ W0'.1, 15' 81192 Type III PFPRJ-2-A1513-15' PFPBV-2A15-13-15-9' PFPBV-2-A15-13-15-0' 150W 6,173 TVPeI PFPBV-2A15-T445PFPRJ-2-A15.-1S-9' PFPBV-2A15-T44S-0' 150W 10,292 Type 111 PFPBV-2A2 T3-15' PFPBV-2A25-13-159' PFPBV-2A25-T3-16-0' 250W UL251 TVPeN PFPBV-2A25-T0.15' PFPBV-2-A2S-T4-15-9' PFPRJ-2A25-T44S-0' 250W 15,203 Type 111 PFPRJ-2-A40-T3-15' PFPBV-2AM-13-159' PFPBV-2A40-T3-16-0' 40OW 15,157 TVPeN PFPBV-2A4p-T0.15' PFPRJ-2-P40.T4-16-9' PFPB12AW-T445-0' 40OW 181992 Type 111 PFPBV-2.0-T3-15' PFPRJ-2ADJ-13159' PFPBV-2A50.T3-16-0' 450W 18,935 TVPeN PFPB12AW-T0.15- PFPBV-2A50.T4-15-9' PFPBV4-A80-T115-0' 450. 20' 8.192 TYPe 111 PFPBV-2A15-T3-20' PFPRJ-2-A15-T3209- PFPBV-2A16-13-20-0' 16M 8.173 TVPeN PFPRJ-2-A1S.10- PFPBV-2A15-T4-20-9' PFPRJ-2-A15-T0.20.0' 150W 10,292 TYPe 111 PFPBV-2A25-1320' PFPBV-2A26-T3-20-9' PFP1111.25-T3-20-0' 250"' 10.281 TVPeN PFPRJ-2-A26-T4-20' PFPBV-2A25-T4209- PFPBV-2-A25-ID "- 250W 15,203 TYPe 111 PFPBV-.40-1320' PFPRJ-2-A40-TS10-9' PFPBV-.40-T3-20-0' 40OW 15,15) TVPeN PFPRJ-2-P40.T4-20' PFPB12AW-T4-25-9' PFPBV-2-"O.-20.0' 40OW 18.992 TVPe 111 PFPBV-2A60-1320' PFPBV-2-A60T3-20-9' PFPRJ-2AW-T3-20-0' 450W 18,935 TVPeN PFPRV4-A50.T440- PFPBV-2-AW-T0.201• PFPBV-2A50.T4-20.0' 450W 25' 51192 Type 111 PFPBV-2A15-T3-25' PFPRJ-2-A15-T326-9' PFPBV-2A16-T3-25-0' 150W 6,171 TVPeN PFPRJ-2-A1S.4S' PFPBV-2A15-T4-25-9' PFPRV4-A15-T0.26-0- 150W 10,292 Type 111 PFPBV-2A25-1325' PFPBV-2A25-T3-25-9' PFPRJ-2-A25-T3-25-0a 250W 10,251 TVPeN PFPBV-2-A26-T4-25' PFPBV-2A25-T4-259' PFPBV-2-A25-T4-26-0' 250W 15,203 Type 111 PFPBV-.40-T3-25' PFPBV-2A40-T3-26-9' PFPRJ-2A40.T3-25-0a 40OW 15,157 TVPeN PFPRJ-2-P40.-25' PFPB12AW-T4-25-9' PFPBV-2-A40-T0.26-0' 400W 181992 Type 111 PFPRJ-2AW-T325' PFPBV-2-A80.T3-25-9' PFPRJ-2-A60-T3-25-0' 450W 18,935 Type PFPRV4-A50.T445• PFPRV-2-AW-T0.25-9' PFPBV-2-A50-T4-2}0' 450W 51192 Type 111 PFPBV-2-A15-T330• PFPRJ-2A16-T3309• PFPBV-2-A15-T330.0• 150W 5,173 Type PFPBV-2A16-T430' PFPBV-2-A15-Td-W-9' PFPRV4A16-T4-30-0• 150W 10.292 Type 111 PFPBV-2A25-T330a PFPRJ-2-A25-1D330.9a PFPBV-2A25-1330-0• 250"' 10,251 TVPeN PFPRJ-2-.-T430' PFPBV-2-AM-30-9' PFPRJ-2-A26-T430-0• 250W 15.203 Type 111 PFPBV-2-A40-1337• PFP1111-2A40.T3309a PFPBV-2A40-1D330-0• 40OW 15,157 TVPeN PFPRJ-2AM-T430' PFPBV-2-A40-T0.3p-9' PFPRV-2-A40-30.0• 400W18,992 TVPe111 PFPBV-2A50-T330• PFPRV AW -T330.9• PFPBV-2AW-T330-0• 450W 18,935 Type PFPRV-2-A80-T4-30' PFPBV-2-80-T4-30-9• I PFPBV-2A50.T4-309• 450W NOIEB: amlblebterpineennBanal¢Inaeanfitm poleeM Ikwneom WNhllltyfl, ll epplluJonc PeNtb InnallaNan Imtrvetlanx ISSOtt01ENaM MlewM1ln paper WPSAWIENel, aEElNanal app- Inbtmatlan tK 3.SupplltlwltM1 SASpwro SoalBM SneI SM1eNI5551.AneM1ot POIb1ASN iemplenliMPIL M1eNwenenE heveavet. l5'eam ho$$V,l SFM<.ID'eomho5o$RN,FM<. enE15'eomM SSN155FM6 CEupplltlwlthSA SpwroS tl%h SwIS h,EDSSI AneM1ot Rol% AIRF iemp1we MPq hol-eM have must.PS'M,b SEEA155FMsenE90'eomho SSW905FM6 6 Eupplltl wltM1 SM 5gvaro SoaIBM Seel SMNISSSI. AneMt Polo )ASI I, iemplebl7MPp, M1eNwero enE hen ewer. A' mmho SSSM905FMs. £ Pehtb In SKKL W IEebt Me4tleoitFW nNonaeM evellehlllty. Fabna E:7•N AaA M1va+¢aLstm TD5Wp29EN Powrvig Buimae NbXh.M` wavappnpm,4ylp tMpvNNM ropee. Au0u011, 20183A8 PM paw 5 PFP9V PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO THREE FIXTURE CONFIGURATION J30FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH 0, 00, 100MPH WINO ZONES AND 20FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH 00, 100MPH WINO ZONE USE w POLES) EPA -225 MOuntln9 xFpMI1 lymnne NOmInn1) MNMum Wine 2ann )MPH) NIU daVEutlnn p 90 100 EZ..W[ Wn'.'aF 15' RAW Type III PFPRV3-A15-T3-15' PFPNVOA15-T345-9' PFPNV-3-A1513-16-0 150W 6,173 Type IV PFPNV-bA15-T445' PFPIN3-A16-T4-16-9' PFPNV-3A15-T445-0' 150W 10.292 Type III PFPNV-3-A26-T3-15' PFPRV-3A25-T3-159' PFPNV-3A26-T3-16-0' 25pW 10.251 Type IV PFPNV-3A25-T0.15' PFPRI- A26 -T4-15-9' PFPIN3A25-T0.15-0' 25 15.20 Type III PFPRV3-.U13-15' PFPNV-3AM-T3-159' PFPNV-3A40-T3-16-0' 400W 15.157 Type IV PFPNI- AW -T0.15- PFPIN3-PA0-T4-16-w PFPRV-3A40-T445-0' 400W REM Type 111 PFPRI- A8UT3-15' PFPRV3A03-T3-159' PFPNV-3ABUT3-16-0' 450W 18,935 Type IV PFPRV-3-AW-T0.15' PFPRI- A50.T4-15-9' PFPRV-3-AW-T0.15-0' 4WW 20' 8.192 TVpn 111 PFPNV-3A15120' PFPRJ3-A15-TSl0-9' PFPNV-3A15-T3-20-0' 16M 8.173 TVpn IV PFPRJ3A16-T41w PFPNV-bA15-T4-209' PFPRI- A15.10-0- 150W 10.292 Type III PFPRJ-3A25-T3-20' PFPNV-3-A26-T3-20-9' PFPRJ3A25-T3-20-0' 260W 1 Type IV PFPRI- A26 -T0.20- PFPRJ-3A25-T0.209-T4PFPRI- A26 -T4-20.0' 250W Typ¢III PFPNV-3AW-T-20' PFPNV3-.UlDl 0-9' PFPRV3AW-T3-20-0' 400W TVpn IV PFPRJ3-PA0-T0.20- PFPNV-3A40-T0.259- PFPRI- AAO. -20.0' 400W TVpn 111 PFPRJ-SAO-Tb20- PFPRI- .0-T3-20-9' PFPRJ3AOYT320-0' 450W TVPe IV PFPRV3A50.T4-20' PFPRV-3-AW-T0.20-9' PFPRV3A50.T4-20-0' 4WW 25' t16,2WType TVpn 111 PFPNV-3A15-T3-25' PFPNV3-A15-T3-$9' PFPRJ-3A16-T3-25-0' 150W TVpn IV PFPRV-3-A15-T0.25' PFPNV-3A15-T4-259' PFPNV-bA15-T0.26-0- 150W Type III PFPRV3A25-T-25' PFPNV-3-A26-T3-25-9' PFPRJ3A25-T3-25-0' 260W 1 TVpn IV PFPNV3A26-T4-25' PFPRJ3A25-T4-.9' PFPNV-bAM5 -26-0' 250W Type III PFPNV-3AW-T-25' PFPNV-3-A40-T3-25-9' PFPRV3AW-T3-25-0' 400W TVPn IV PFPNV-3-A40.T4-25' PFPNV-3AM-T0.259' PFPNV-bPA0-T0.$0' 4COW 2 TVpn 111 PFPRJ3AW-Tb25- PFPNV3ABUT3-25-9' PFPRJ3A03-T3-25-0' 450W 18,935 Type IV PFPRV3A50.T4-25' PFPRV-3-AW-T0.25-9- PFPRV3A50.T4-25-0' 4WW 61192 Type 111 PFPNV-b,US-TbW' PFPRJ3A16-T3309• PFPNV-3-A15-T3-W-0' 150W 6,173 Type IV PFPRV-3A16-T44iw PFPNV-bA15-T0.30.9' PFPRJ3A16-T4-30.0' 150W 10.292 Type III PFPNV-3-A25-T330' PFPRJ3-A25-T33U9• PFPNV-3A25-T330-0' 260W UE251 Type IV PFPRJ3A25-T44iw PFPNV-bA25-T4-30-9' PFPRJ3-A25-T44i" 250W 15.20 Type III PFPNV-3-A40-T330' PFPRV3A40-lDFZ • PFPNV-3-AM-T33J-0• 4COW 15,157 Type IV PFPRV3A40-A.PFPNV3PA0-T4-30.9' PFPRV3A40.T430-0' 400W 181992 TVpn 111 PFPNV-bA80-T3-30' PFPRJ3-A60-T330.9' PFPNV-3-A50-TbsE-0' 450W 18,935 TVPn IV PFPNV-3-A80-T4-30' PFPRV3A50-T4-30.9' PFPNV-3-A80-T4-30.0' 450W RODE& =nal bl'e,"Xlneeen0 a 1a 1'taoG"poleaM fia-0mpatlhlllty bri ll aPpllmtl=nc PNe t'lmullat-lmtrvnl=n= IazdttORN aM Wle whin papaAPE1SW1ENDw aeeltb lwpp=n Mmmatl=n z wppllMwlm W sawrost'alaMsteals.It..I Anmot Poria aMI Dampl.uJTMPIL OM -ane ba«=wet. ts==mbo WsAWFR4. X) -bo $s $FR4, aM 19 -beB =F%< z wppu.ewlm sAswat. sttal9nt M..I snan tsss Ambot mlulAsn. T.mpI.RITMPR baMwt..m ma.M»=zs==mbo$AV la$FM4ane Poi Mmbo$$ Vs sFM4 a. wppu.ewlmsM mwMst..I9lnswlsbantsssi Anmo. mluasn T.mpl.t.ITMPn Omwateanebad=wet.� Mmbo WaMPXFM4. 9 BRaro m st«�wle.rot...ILblutr. E.ro p E:7•N AaA Jn Ova+¢aLsim TD5W029EN Powrvig Buimae NbXh.M` wavappnpmAylp usry w4iNM roeee. A,.. 1, 20183misa paw PWIN PREVAIL POLE AND FIXTURE COMBO FOUR FIXTURE CONFIGURATION J30FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH B0, 90, 100MPH WINO ZONES ANO 25FT CONFIGURATIONS WITH 100MPH WINO ZONE USE 0' POLES) EPA=}W MOuntln9 Height¢nt FalWBI1nOn) ly WPmnneanow, MNMum Wlntl 2ann )MPH) HID DERSou On p 90 1W Equ1vUM[ 15' 8,192 Type III PFPIN-0.A15-13-15' PFPHV4AI6T345-9' PFPIN-0.A15-13-15-0' 160W 5,123 TVpnI PFPHV-4A15-T445PFPINd-A15-T4,159I PFPHV4AI5T4-15-0' FRO. 101292 Type III PFPIN-0.A25-T3-15' PFPHV-0A25-T345-9' PFPHV4A25-T3-160' 250W UENR Type PFPHV-4AM-T445' PFPIN-0.A2.45-9I PFPH14-.-T445-0' 250W 15,203 Type III PFPIN-0.A40-T3-15' PFPHVPIAM-T345-9' PFPIN-0.A40-13-159' 400W 15,152 Type PFPHV-4AM-T445I PFPIN-0.PA0.45-9' PFPHV4A40.T4-15-0' 400W t0.Y92 Type III PFPIN-0.A5DT3-15' PFPHV-0-ADY1D3-1599 PFPHVPIA50-Tb150' ARM 10,935 Type PFPHV-4AW-T0.15' PFPIN-0.A50.T4-1S9' PFPHV-4-AND-T445-0' 450W 20' 51192 TYp=III PFPHV-4A16T3-20' PFPIN-0.A15-Tb20.9' PFPHV4AI5T3-20-0' 1WW 5,123 TVpeI PFPIN-0-A15-T0.20' PFPRV4-AIST4-20-9' PFPIN-0.A15-T0.20-0' 15DW 101292 Type III PFPHV4AM-T3-20' PFPIN-0.A25-T310-9I PFPHV-0.A25T3-20-0' 250V 101251 Type PFPHV-0.A2 T0.20' PFPHV4AM-T4-20-9' PFPIN-4AM-T0.20.0' 250W 15,20 Type III PFPHVPIA410-T3-20' PFPIN-0.A40-T3-209I PFPHVPIA40-T3-20-0' 400W 15,152 Type PFPHV-0.PA0.10' PFPHV4A40.T4-25-9' PFPIN-0.PA0-10.20-0' 400W t0.Y92 TYp=III PFPHV4AW-13-20' PFPIN-0.A50-T3- I PFPHV-4-AW-T3-20-0' 41 10,935 Type PFPHV-0.A80.T4-20' PFPHV4A6D-T4-20-9' PFPHV-4-A50.40-0I 450W 25' 81192 TYp=III PFPHVPIAI6-T3-25' PFPIN-0.A15-IDE2 9' PFPHV-0AI6T3-25-0' 160W 5,123 Type PFPIN-0.A15-T42M' PFPHV4AI5T4-25-9' PFPIN-0.A15-TI-M-0' 1WW 11 10,292 TYp=III PFPHV-0-A25-T3-25' PFPIN-0.A25-T3-$9' PFPHV-0-A26T3-25-0' 250W 10,251 Type N PFPIN-0.A25-10.25' PFPHV 4AM-T4-25-9' PFPHV 4AM-T4, S0 250V 15,20 TYp=III PFPHVPIA40-T3-25' PFPIN-0.A40-T3-$9' PFPHV-0-A40T3-25-0' 400W 15,152 Type PFPIN-0.PA0-T0.25' PFPHV4A40.T4-25-9' PFPIN-0.AM-T0.259' MOW 10.Y92 TYp=III PFPHVPI-AW-T3-25' PFPIN-0.A50-T3-$9' PFPIN-0-A5DT3-25-0' MOW 10,935 Type PFPHV-P-MO -25' PFPHV-4-AW-T0.25-9' PFPRV-4-A50-T0.250' 450W 30' 51192 Type III PFPIN-0.A15-13-30' PFPHV-4-A15T3-W09 PFPHV4A15-1D3300' 1WW 5,123 Type PFPRV-4A15T4-W PFPHV-0.A15-T0.30.9• PFPHV-4-A15-ID-30.0• 15DW 10,292 TYp=III PFPHVPIA25-IDEM PFPIN-0-A261D3309• PFPHV-0A25-13-30-0• 250W 10,251 Type PFPRV-0.A25T430' PFPHV4AM-T0.30.9• PFPIN-0.A2 T4-30.0• 250" 15,20 IF PFPHV-0AM-T3-3J' PFPHV-0-A4DT3-M-. PFPHV_ 0-T33D0' MOW 15,152 ±y TVpnN PFPHV-4-PA0.T430' PFPIN-PIAN-T0.3--E' PFPIN-0.PA02-30.0• MOW 10,%2 TYp=III PFPHVPIAW-T3-3J' PFPINd-A5D1D3309' PFPHV4AW-1D3-3J-0• 450W 10,935 TVpnN PFPHV-4-A80.T430' PFPHV4A6D-T0.30.9' PFPIN-0.A50.T4-30.0' MOW =«ablI P,,I nen«tl Banal¢h1.tl no I, and mWle=o m WllhllltypIII me IPall Pe6, to mete I erlon I rvtaill I IRIPINVER and pole wMU PIP., VVIR Xm EN in, Id ltlonel wpooIt eel s'4iftD N,An=Mt EOIY IAMIT Lmpleu QMPI L beNwe«end he«=onn XI=omho ImeAm FM< VmM ImemoM<, end15'mmhosslilSSFM<. s.1P P It'IPl $»elslnnlsss Anmotso t JAN) TemplemIUMP I hemwe«em w«welt. a =omho ss9easFMs.nesp' wmhp ss9epsFM4 :M x.a.. sttalmn s«I snap Isssl. Al mIu JAN h *empl.t. DMPII, b.mw.«end h.«=o«t. n' =omho sssMsosFM4 �. P.«tM�seac.Im«tae,ILhllnr. "mw E:7•N 1 A9A on dvy` .1.1 TDWW29EN ReamgB=imae NbXh.M` wava«YnamAWM N+pv+olono. A,.. 1, XR83A0PM APPENDIX 7 I< KITTELSON 851 SW 6M AVENUE, SUITE 600 RTLAND, OR &ASSOCIATES P503228.52309T204 F 503.273.8169 u uS:eR,o u Date: August 5, 2022 To: Michael Liebler, PE City of Springfield Department of Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Cc : Steve Schwartz & Beth Witt, Chick-fil-A, Inc. Andrew Hunt & Sean 011et, PE, 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. From: Chris Brehmer, PE & Julia Kuhn, PE Project: Springfield Chick-fil-A#04987 Subject: Trip Generation Assessment Memo Project Ji: 28083 Chick-fil-A is proposing to redevelop the Guesthouse Inn & Suites site located in the southwest quadrant of the Gateway Street/Beltline Road intersection; the site address is 3358 Gateway Street. The existing buildings on-site will be removed and the site would be redeveloped to include a 4,987 square foot restaurant with a drive-through as well as two retail pad buildings. This memorandum provides a summary of the existing and proposed uses and the corresponding change in site trip generation. Based on the estimated change in trip generation, redevelopment of the site results in fewer than 1,000 new daily trips and fewer than 100 new peak hour trips compared to the former uses to be removed. We request your review and guidance related to site-specific traffic impact study scoping required to address Springfield Development Code Standards and the Department of Public Works Standard Operating Policies and Procedures. Existing and Proposed Site Uses Today, the site is occupied by occupied by a 143 -room Guesthouse Inn and Suites (previously the hotel was branded as a Shilo Inns Hotel and Suites) and includes a former attached restaurant and bar totaling 16,948 square feet (including a 6,048 square feet former Elmer's restaurant, a former 3,400 square feet Trackstirs Sports Bar and Grill, and a 7,500 square feet additional finished restaurant space). The site is bordered by Beltline Road to the north, Gateway Street and commercial developments to the east and Crossroads Center to the south. Today, access to the site is provided by a full movement driveway on Gateway Street located approximately 25 feet north of Kruse Way. HLENA ME. H. 128128083-SFRING17ELD CHICK -RL AI REPOR7jFINAL128C83 TRIGA£SESSMENTMEMO.00IX Sprmgfleld flick-fd-A Project#:28M3 A,mm2022 Pope As proposed, all existing site structures will be removed and the site will be redeveloped as a 4,987 square feet Chick-fil-A with a drive-through window on the north and east sides of the building. Two future general retail pad buildings are proposed including Pad A (approximately 7,000 square feet building) to the south and Pad B (approximately 6,250 square feet building) to the west. The tenants of these two retail buildings are not known at this time. The proposed site plan is attached to this letter as Appendix 1 for reference. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left -in -right -in -right - out movements and new cross-over access will be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south'. The new connections will provide site -generated trips with the opportunity to enter and exit the site via the signalized access to Gateway Street via Crossroads Center. Existing Site Trip Generation Potential A trip generation estimate for the existing land use categories was estimated using trip rates and trip type date from the Trip Generation Manual, 11" Edition (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE in 2021) to provide a basis for comparison with the proposed redevelopment. For all uses, the peak hour of the generator is reported, rather than the peak hour of the adjacent street. Table 1. Trip Generation Potential — Existing Uses 'ITE published data only includes PM peak hour pass -by rate' this rate was applied to Daily and AM peak hour lacking other data. ' The left -turn movement restriction is planned in conjunction with other access changes along Gateway Street as part of the City of Springfield's Kruse Way caphal improvement project (P21165). This City project is funded by the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program, is intended to address safety issues associated with operations at the Gateway Street and Kruse Way intersection (ARTS Key # 20174), and is currently out for bidding for construction. Orals.& Associate, lot. POldmrd, Oregon Hotel 310 143 Rooms 1,143 76 40 36 86 SO 36 High Tumowr(SR-Down) Restaurant Less Pass -by Trps (43%p 932 16,9465F 1,811 -781 232 (100) 132 (57) 100 (Q3) 277 -119 141 -61 136 -S8 Net New Restaurant Trips 1,036 132 75 57 158 80 78 Total Drivtrway/External Trips TONT Pass -by Trips 2,960 (781) ME; (100) 172 (57) 136 (43) 363 (119) 191 (61) 172 (SB) Total Net Existing Trips 2,179 208 115 93 244 130 F 114 'ITE published data only includes PM peak hour pass -by rate' this rate was applied to Daily and AM peak hour lacking other data. ' The left -turn movement restriction is planned in conjunction with other access changes along Gateway Street as part of the City of Springfield's Kruse Way caphal improvement project (P21165). This City project is funded by the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program, is intended to address safety issues associated with operations at the Gateway Street and Kruse Way intersection (ARTS Key # 20174), and is currently out for bidding for construction. Orals.& Associate, lot. POldmrd, Oregon SWingfleld Ch ck-fd-A A,.t2022 Proposed Development Trip Generation Project #:28083 Pope 3 Table 2 presents vehicular trips associated with the proposed redevelopment per trip data in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Table 2. Proposed Development Trip Generation Estimate Weekday ��JWay PM Pro k He., ITE Daily 11111- 3,052 353 181 172 r Fart -food Restaurant with Drive- rive- Less Potential Trips far the Existing Ha[el andges[auran6 2,960 308 2,331 252 131 121 254 ]29 125 Th Through Window Resulting Difference in Driveway Trips q2 45 9 36 62 33 34 (Proposetl less Existing( Less Pau -by Trips DailyF,, 4,987 SF AM,SS%PM% (1,166) (]26) (66) (60) (]27) (65) (62/ Net New Restaurant Trips 1,165 126 65 61 127 64 63 Pad A—Strip Retail Plaza (fid 381 53 26 27 93 So 43 fin 7,000SF Less Poss-by Trips(W%)' (]30/ (]8/ (9) (9) (32) (I7) (]5) Net New Pad A Trips 251 35 17 18 61 33 28 Pad B— Strip Retail Plaza(<40k) 34048 24 24 83 45 38 tin 61250SF Less Pass -by Trips (34%l' (116) (16) (8) (8) (28) (15) (13) Net New Pad B Trips 224 32 16 16 55 30 25 Total Driveway/External Trips 3,052 353 181 172 430 224 206 Tata)Pass-by Tdps (1,412) (1 60) (83) (77) (187) (97) (90) Total Net Existing Trips 1,640 193 98 95 243 127 116 a No data provided for land Use Code 822 in Trp Generation Manoo),11"Edition. The average pass -by rate of 40% cited for ITE Land Use Code 821 seems high for site so a 34% pan -by rate from ITE Shopping Center in the hip Generation lbndbook, 3'a Edition was used as a proxy for AM, PM and daily rates. Estimated Change in Site Trip Generation Table 3 shows the anticipated change in trip generation associated with the redevelopment of the site. Table 3. Estimated Change in Trip Generation Kithelson 8 Associate; Inc. Portland, Oregon Proposed Site Redeezi proem (Table 2) 3,052 353 181 172 030 221 206 Less Potential Trips far the Existing Ha[el andges[auran6 2,960 308 172 136 363 191 172 (Toblel) Resulting Difference in Driveway Trips q2 45 9 36 62 33 34 (Proposetl less Existing( Kithelson 8 Associate; Inc. Portland, Oregon 5Poogfleld aiick-fd-A August= Project #:28093 Poge 0 Based on the 1,000 new daily trip and 100 new peak hour trip thresholds documented in Springfield Development Code Section 4.2-30S(B)2, it does not appear that a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is triggered by the proposed redevelopment. Should the future land use assumptions for Pad A or Pad B change, an additional trip comparison should be provided to assess whether an increase in site trip generation would trigger preparation of a TIS under the City's then -current traffic impact study thresholds. Traffic Management Plan Based on experiences at other Chick-fil-A restaurants, the grand opening period can experience higher trip generation rates than will occur under a "stabilized" condition. For this initial opening period, Chick- fil-A can prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) that may incorporate support by local law enforcement and can include multiple levels of on-site management that can be activated or pared back as needed. Next steps Please review the trip information provided in this letter and let us know what additional traffic -related information may be required to support a land use application for site development. We appreciate your review and guidance and look forward to working with you on the Chick-fil-A land use application. PROFRs�/ 62R36PE l n OREGON P�SX, v<Y 11 1Z �BR LYNNE EXPIRES12131123 'Source: https://Iibra".gcode.us/Iib/sprimfield or/pub/development code/item/chapter 4 -section 4 2 100- 4 2105 Kittehon 8 Associate, Inc Pcm* d, Oregon Appendix 1 Proposed Site Plan WE C ■-1 In 4 RANDY PAPE SELTLINE [41 4 1 3 1 K E LEGEND -- BOUNDARY LINE MINIMUM PARKING: BUILDING --------- EASEMENT ADA STALLS CATCHING CURB & GUTTER ---------------- ---- SPILLING CURB & GUTTER a SIGN C SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT e STORM SEWER CLEANOUT 5STORM CATCH BASIN � PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT Z PROPOSED CONCRETE G exprcsz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITIES W SHEET GENERALNOTES ...-'----......---'----...._... _............... ..--- --'---- DETERMINED BY USPS AND TENANT AT A LATER TIME. 2. SEE STORM PLAN, SHEET C4.0, FOR MORE INFORMATION ABOUT STORMWATER FACILITIES. X1SITE PLAN NOTES 1. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2. PROPOSED CFA STANDARD CATCHING/SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 3. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PAINTED PARKING STRIPE 4. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE 5. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DETAILS 6. PROPOSED STANDARD A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 7. PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 8. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE 9. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE 10. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CANOPY 11. PROPOSED A.D.A. RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES 12. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ELEVATION 13. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CONCRETE 14. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS 15. PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO W/ OUTDOOR TABLES & SEATING 16. PADS A AND B AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND DRIVING AREAS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED AT A LATER TIME. 17. PROPOSED BUILDING 18. PROPOSED 6"CURBAND GUTTER 19. PROPOSED LID STORMWATER FACILITY (RAIN GARDEN OR INFILTRATION PLANTER), SEE STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION 20. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL 21. 5' WIDE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION WALKWAY 22. PROPOSED LED LIGHTS FOR EXISTING STREET LIGHT HEADS ALONG GATEWAY PER CURRENT CITY OF SPRINGFIELD LED STANDARDS FOR ARTERIALS. 23. PROPOSED LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 1 SITE STATISTICS SITE PARKING: CIVIVS PROJECT M MINIMUM PARKING: 50 STALLS MAXIMUM PER CODE: 63 STALLS ADA STALLS 2 STANDARD STALLS PROVIDED 63 TOTAL PROVIDED 65 STALLS ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET E o00� 0 po� Qo0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 40'6OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIVS PROJECT M 10841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG (p mamaia�cwairea aims araa�q aramai � dal8 files praticci fm abwenmeaprgW Z mY^y be rcproLxainanY mvrrl WlFaY G exprcsz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G auCnizea pmRtl rcprcsWa4ves. W SHEET U SITE PLAN O W CO SHEET NUMBER a C2.0 _ APPENDIX 8 I< KITTELSON 851 SW 6M AVENUE, SUITE 600 RTI -AND, OR &ASSOCIATES P0503.28.52309T204 F 503.273.8169 MEMORANDUM Date: March 31, 2023 To: Andy Limbird & Andrew Larson City of Springfield Community Development Division 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Cc: Steve Schwartz & Beth Witt; Chick-fil-A, Inc. Andrew Hunt & Logan McGown; 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. From: Chris Brehmer, PE & Julia Kuhn, PE Project: Springfield Chick-fil-A#04987 Subject: Parking Alternative Assessment Memo Project Ji: 28083 ��REO PR'01%_ �S SND i NeF 62836PE OYREGON � 0o t� �Zvt SER LN YNNE EXPIRES 12/31/23 Chick-fil-A is proposing to redevelop the Guesthouse Inn & Suites located at 3358 Gateway Street. The existing buildings on-site will be removed and replaced with a 4,987 square foot restaurant with a drive- through and two retail pad buildings. This memorandum provides a summary of parking demand anticipated with the proposed Chick-fil-A in support of a request for an alternative parking standard to exceed the off-street parking maximum standard in Springfield Development Code (SDC) Section 4.6.125. Based on Chick-fil-A's experiences, the proposed restaurant parking supply is needed to serve the parking demand on-site. As such, this memorandum provides technical documentation in support of the proposed alternative maximum for the Chick-fil-A only per the requirements in SDC Section 4.6.110. The retail tenants are not known at this time so the parking allowable by SDC 4.6.125 is being proposed for these pad buildings. CITY PARKING SUPPLY MAXIMUM SDC Table 4.6.2 establishes minimum off-street parking standards and SDC 4.6.125.0 states the maximum off-street parking standard for any use that is not a residential use is 125 percent of the minimum off- street parking standard. Per the table, the minimum parking requirement for eating and drinking establishments is 1 space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. For the proposed Chick-fil-A, application of the 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking standard results in a maximum allowable 62 parking spaces (i.e., 1 space per 100 square feet • 1.25 •4,987 square feet). Chick-fil-A is proposing to provide 65 parking spaces, three more than the maximum allowed. FILENAME: H: 128126083 -SPRINGFIELD CHICK -RL AIPARKING128083Gs1Rh7NGA£SESSSMENTMEMOMARCH2O23.00IX 5N,wfi6d ChOfd-A Protect#:2803 March 2023 Page 2 The Applicant seeks approval of additional parking for Chick-fil-A per SDC 4.6.130.N: Right Size Parking Alternative—Maximum that states: "The Approval Authority may authorize an alternative parking standard that is more than 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking standard in SDC 4.6.125. The alternative parking standard must be the peak parking demand identified by a parking generation study conducted according to the ITE Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies and prepared by a licensed engineer." ALTERNATIVE PARKING SUPPLY DETERMINATION In support of the proposed parking adjustment, we evaluated Information contained in the Parking Generation Manual, 51^ Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This reference document includes average and 85'^ percentile parking rates based on the number of seats and the building size for Fast -Food Restaurants with Drive -Through Windows (Land Use Code 934). These rates are provided for an average weekday, a Friday, and a Saturday. For both seats and building size, the Friday and Saturday time periods reflect higher demands than a Monday— Thursday. Table 1 provides the average and 85'^ percentile required parking calculations for the proposed Chick-fil-A based on information contained in the Parking Generation Manual for Friday and Saturday Table 1. Springfield Chick-fil-A Estimated Parking Demand per ITE Parking Generation Manual, 51' Edition For retail uses, the effective capacity for parking is typically defined by the 85'^ percentile conditions. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the Parking Generation Manual, 3k Edition suggests that provision of 83 parking spaces could be considered appropriate (actual parking demand may be higher'). NEXT STEPS We trust this memorandum provides adequate documentation to support the proposed parking alternative maximum to allow 65 parking spaces on site. Please let us know if you need any additional information as part of your review. 1 Per Parking Generation Manual, St" Edition, 85th percentile demand represents "the point at which 85 percent of the values fall at or below and 15 percent are above)" and "This number is not intended to recommend a policy about the level of parking that should be supplied. It is provided solely as qualitative reference for the analyst" KkN,A n & Associate; Im. Portland, Oregon APPENDIX 9 Return to: Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Protection Coordinator Springfield Utility Board 202 South 1St" Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone: 541.744.3745 Email: AmyC@subutil.com I SPRINGFIELD 1k D Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Steve Schwartz Phone: 303.519.7206 Company: Chick-fl-A,Inc. Email: steve.schwartz@cfacorp.com Address: 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92618 Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.5362 Company: 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. Email: shunt@4gdev.com Address: PO Box 270571, San Diego, CA 92198 Property Owner: Attn: Richards Boyles !Phone: 5412840613 Company: Sycan B Corp+ Olypic Street, LLC Fax: Address: 840 Beltline Rd, Ste 202, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032220 TAX LOT NOS : 1300, 1600 Property Add reSS: 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield OR 97477 Associated Land Use or Building Permit Case No.: Planner: Andrew Limbird Existing Use: Motel and Restaurant Proposed Use: Restaurant Size of Proper : 4,49 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Property The undersigned acknowledges that the Information included with this application is correct and accurate. The undersigned also certifies that the total quantity of hazardous materials on the subject site will not exceed the Owned amount listed in this ap lication and will not contain Dense Non -Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs). s. 4'r ^1 'r g/JJnature �f y /(rLn�r le r L. Z Print Date: Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3 DWP Application Exemption Request Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ DWP Application Exemption Request Form ❑ Proposal Description — provide a very brief description of the nature of the business or operation, as well as a description of how the business or operation will use, store, or produce hazardous materials Pleasesee attached project description and narrative responsewith findings for Spuny(ield Development Code (SDC) 3.3-200. ❑ List of All Hazardous Materials to be used, stored, or produced on the site (e.g., cleaning products, paints and paint products, pesticides, maintenance supplies, petroleum products, automotive supplies, etc.). Hazardous materials are defined as those chemicals or substances which are physical or health hazards as defined and classified in the most recently adopted or amended Fire Code by the City, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition. Commonly used office supplies do not need to be listed. The list should include the following for each hazardous material: ❑ Name of the product ❑ Manufacturer ❑ Total quantity of each product Response: Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting chemicals that are EPA registered products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and other cleaning chemicals are disposed in accordance with the manufacturer's label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through daily use, cleaning chemicals are disposed into the sanitary sewer in diluted forms. Should bulk containers need to be disposed, the containers will be taken to a permitted local hazardous waste recycling facility. Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 3 of 3 APPENDIX 10 DRAINAGE REPORT Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape 2322.14841.01 Prepared for: Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, GA 30349 EW MTM GOB ONSI 81 Prepared by: 4le'D0WL 720 SW Washington St, Suite 750 Portland, OR 97205 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape development will construct a new fast food restaurant located southwest of the corner of Gateway Street& Randy Pape Beltline in Springfield, Oregon. The site will be developed with a drive through, parking areas, and landscaping. New sanitary, water and storm drain utilities will be constructed to service the development. The purpose of this report is to describe the stormwater management strategy being proposed for the CFA development. The design follows the standards and regulations developed by The City of Springfield as described in the Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). The City of Springfield defers to The City of Eugene's stormwater standards for the sizing of water quality facilities. The City of Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) describes that 1.4 inches of rainfall over 24 -hours must be mitigated by proposed stormwater facilities to meet pollution reduction requirements. Stormwater planters and raingardens have been proposed to mitigate runoff from the site for water quality. These have been sized following City of Eugene's approved methodology, referred to as 'The Presumptive Approach'. Proposed conveyance pipes have been sized for the 25 -year, 24-hour stormwater event. Runoff from the development has been designed to release into the public stormwater main in Gateway Street. DESIGNER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this Stormwater Report for Chick-Fil-A— Gateway & Randy Pape has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets minimum standards of City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012) and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of drainage facilities designed by me. AL BOWL Pagel Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape I1F_3-l4:91l0111l�kI:Wks` 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW.....................................................................................1 Table 2: 1.1 Project Overview....................................................................................................1 Table 3: 1.2 Location.................................................................................................................1 Table 4: 1.3 Regulatory Requirements.......................................................................................1 Table 5: 1.4 Purpose..................................................................................................................2 2.0 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS ......................................... 2 Table 7: 2.1 Hydrologic Method.................................................................................................2 Table 8: 2.2 Design Storm.........................................................................................................2 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS.......................................................................3 3.1 Land Cover and Topography..................................................................................3 3.2 Climate...................................................................................................................3 3.3 Site Geology and Soil Characteristics....................................................................3 3.4 Hydrology...............................................................................................................4 4.0 POST -DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS...................................................4 4.1 Curve Number........................................................................................................4 4.2 Time of Concentration............................................................................................4 4.3 Hydrology...............................................................................................................5 5.0 WATER QUALITY..............................................................................................5 5.1 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................5 5.2 Stormwater Planters...............................................................................................5 5.3 Stormwater Rain Gardens......................................................................................6 6.0 WATER QUANTITY...........................................................................................6 6.1 Detention Requirement..........................................................................................6 6.2 Facility Design........................................................................................................6 7.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS.............................................................................7 7.1 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................7 7.2 System Capacity....................................................................................................7 7.3 Downstream Analysis.............................................................................................7 8.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................7 FIGURES Figure1: Vicinity Map..................................................................................................................1 TABLES Table 1: Springfield Storm Data..................................................................................................2 Table 2: Eugene Storm Data.......................................................................................................3 Table 3: Soil Characteristics........................................................................................................3 Table 4: Existing Basin Areas.....................................................................................................4 Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas..........................................................................................4 Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas.........................................................................................5 Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary ............................................................................6 Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary ...................................................................6 AL 1OWL Page 11 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Basin Maps Appendix B: Soil Report Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations Appendix D: Civil Stormwater Plans Appendix E: Conveyance Calculations Appendix F: Excerpts from Geotechnical Report Appendix G: Correspondence AL pOWL Page 111 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 Project Overview The proposed Chick-Fil-A (CFA) Gateway & Randy Pape project will construct a fast-food service restaurant with associated drive through, parking, landscaping, and utilities. The project will include additional tenant improvements on the western and southern portions of the site that will be developed in future phases, the stormwater system has been designed for the fully built condition. 1.2 Location The project site resides on one lot and is located at 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 (See Figure 1: Vicinity Map). The lot to be used for this project is Taxlot No. 1703222001600. Figure 1: Vicinity Map peed i p _ 4 n Aee Project Location � AM1nEN wl 'K KMrM1Cn two 5 Y v S . Ke yuyaen Grupe way y L;L 2U51 EnEpp^"eis�� as 1.3 Regulatory Requirements The site is within the jurisdictional boundary of City of Springfield and must comply with the Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). The stormwater standards require water quality and quantity management for all re -developments. Additional details of the specific treatment, detention, and conveyance requirements are outlined in Section 5, 6, and 7. fkDOWL Pagel 1.4 Purpose The purpose of this report is to describe the water quality and quantity facilities being proposed as part of the project and to show that the design follows the standards and regulations developed by City of Springfield. 2.0 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the project follows'The Presumptive Approach', as described by City of Eugene. The City of Springfield has chosen to utilize portions of Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) to address water quality and LIDA system sizing requirements. 2.1 Hydrologic Method The City of Eugene prescribes two methodologies for sizing stormwater planters and raingardens, the'Simplified Approach' and the'Presumptive Approach'. The Presumptive Approach has been selected for this project. The City publishes an Excel worksheet that conforms to The Presumptive Approach. The methodology used in the worksheet is based upon the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and Technical Release No. 55 (TR -55) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. This worksheet was used to size the stormwater planters and raingardens proposed onsite. The SCS method is based on the curve number (CN) approach and uses the Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) equations for computing runoff losses and precipitation excess. The SCS method converts the incremental runoff depths into instantaneous hydrographs, which are then routed through an imaginary reservoir with a time delay equal to the basin time of concentration. Detailed descriptions of the site conditions and design assumptions used for the Pre -developed and Post -developed are outlined in Section 3 and 4. 2.2 Design Storm The design storm to be used within the City is a Type IA, 24-hour duration, based upon the rainfall depths reported on page 4-6 of the City of Springfield's Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). These values will be used for the water quantity portion of the design. Table 1: Springfield Storm Data shows the total precipitation depths that were applied using the Type IA distribution to determine the runoff rates from the contributing drainage area. Table 1: Springfield Storm Data 2 -yr 3.30 Syr 3.80 10 -yr 4.30 25 -yr 4.80 100 -yr 5.20 Due to the City of Springfield adopting the City of Eugene's standard LIDA facilities, a'pollution reduction' or water quality storm event of period will be utilized for sizing the proposed rain gardens and planters. This value comes from Table C-1 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014). Recurrence Interval 24 -Hour Rainfall Depth (yrs) (in) 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing conditions are defined as the conditions that existed prior to the current development. The following sections outline the current topography, climate in the vicinity of the project site, site geology and soil characteristics, site hydrology, as well as assumptions related to the pre - development condition. 3.1 Land Cover and Topography The current site is developed and occupied by Guest House Inn, a motel with associated parking and landscaping. The existing onsite basin is 81.6% impervious. The existing site has slopes of approximately 1-5%, draining to catch basins throughout the site. A pre -developed curve number of 74 has been selected, assuming 'grassland' in good condition with a hydrologic soil group rating of'C', per Table 2-2a of the USDA Urban Hydrology forSmall Watesheds: TR -55 manual. 3.2 Climate The site is located in Lane County, Oregon. The area experiences distinct seasonal characteristics with gradual changes between seasons. Average daily temperatures range from 40"F to 68"F. Average annual rainfall recorded in this area is 46 inches. 3.3 Site Geology and Soil Characteristics The underlying soil types are classified by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Lane County, Oregon and are identified in Table 2: Soil Characteristics. See Appendix B: Soil Report for additional information. Table 3: Soil Characteristics Coburg -Urban Land Complex C 26.3 Malabon-Urban Land Complex C 73.7 Group C soils have a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. There is a geotechnical report by Terracon dated January 7, 2022 with an Addendum dated August 5, 2022. An infiltration rate ranging from 0 to 2 inches per hour was found during investigations on the site. See Appendix F: Excerpts from Geotechnical Report. 3.4 Time of Concentration A time of concentration of 28.8 minutes has been calculated for the assumed pre -development condition. The pre -developed drainage path was taken to be 400 feet long, with an average slope of 0.50%. See Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations. 3.5 Hydrology The existing condition for the site appears to flow into catch basins throughout the site and release into an existing facility west of the site. It is undetermined whether this facility outlets into the public system in the public right of way to the north. The site is located in a greater drainage area that releases to Dodson Slough. Dodson Slough is listed as impaired for dissolved oxygen and Escherichia colitis (bacterium), but does not have any listed TMDL restrictions. Table 4: Existing Basin Areas lists the existing basin area, Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas lists the pre -developed basin areas. See Appendix A: Site Basin Maps for the location and extent of each basin. Table 4: Existing Basin Areas Site Condition At r a Area 1 Onsite Drainage Area' 1.388 0.439 1.827 1, 'Onsite Drainage Ama'consistsoa#amasth Maintoexistirgdt mwateriacitty. Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas Impervious Pervious Total Site Condition Area I Area Area Onsite Drainage Area' 0.000 1.827 1.827 1, 'Omte Drainage Ama'consists ofall areas that Main to existing stormwater boffity. 4.0 POST -DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Curve Number Runoff curve number calculations were completed using TR -55 methodology. The stormwater calculations have been completed with the assumption that all pervious areas have soils that are Hydrologic Soil Group 'C', see Appendix B: Soil Report for additional information. Using Table 2-2a of TR -55, a pervious curve number of 74 was used, assuming 'open space' in good condition. Impervious surfaces were assumed to have a curve number of 98. An overall composite curve number of 92.78 was calculated for the site. 4.2 Time of Concentration A time of concentration of 5.0 minutes has been assumed for all basins under post-devel conditions. This has been used to calculate peak runoff rates for the proposed flow cc water quality methodologies. 4.3 Hydrology The proposed on-site development area is split into six sub -basins. All of the proposed basins are delineated by the drainage path they take from points across the site to their respective stormwater mitigation facilities. The proposed stormwater facilities include a combination of rain gardens and planters. Each facility has been designed with an underdrain and emergency overflow riser to ensure water quality and quantity performance standards can be met. The facilities have been designed to filter the water quality storm event through the growing media, while allowing excess flows to overflow into the emergency overflow riser. All flows leaving the facilities will exit the site via a connection into the public stormwater system in Gateway Street. Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas has been provided to summarize the proposed basin delineation and associated land use coverages. Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas Basin 1 0.584 0.142 0.725 Basin 2 0.150 0.037 0.186 Basin 3 0.320 0.048 0.368 Basin 4 0.376 0.171 0.547 Total 1.429 0.397 1.827 5.0 WATER QUALITY 5.1 Design Guidelines The water quality facilities were designed per Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) to facilitate the treatment of all stormwater runoff from the proposed development. Per Section 1.7.2, stormwater facilities shall be designed to capture and treat runoff generated by 1.4 inches of rainfall over 24 hours for an NRCS Type 1A event. Because the facilities will route flows into the public system, they have additionally been sized to ensure that the 25 -year storm event, per Table 1: Springfield Storm Data, can pass through without causing indundation outside of each facility. 5.2 Stormwater Planters The site will utilize stormwater planters as a portion of the proposed water quality mitigation facilities. These have been designed per Section 2.3. 11 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014), utilizing The Presumptive Approach. The facilities will have 24 inches of growing medium and will not implement an underground injection control (UIC) component, per advisement by The City of Springfield during the pre -application conference dated June 9, 2022. The facilities will not have a subgrade infiltration rate of greater than 2 inches per hour and have therefore been sized as 'filtration' facilities, per Section 2.3.11. Each facility has been designed with an underdrain located below the growing medium, se the purpose of routing treated runoff out and to the public connection. The facilities have designed such that the rate at which flows filter through the growing medium and exit t the underdrain will not cause runoff to pass through the overflow during the water q stormwater event. Additional flows will pass through the overflow riser to ensure that flooding outside of each facility does not occur. A summary of the stormwater planters is shown in Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary below. Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary Planter 1 Basin 3 1 16,025 12 850 1,006 1, Minimum fodpnnt represents mqu red surfam area d covemg to meet 'Pdbtion Redu ion' an Destination'dandar s. 5.3 Stormwater Rain Gardens The site will additionally utilize stormwater rain gardens to achieve water quality mitigation for the site. These have been designed per Section 2.3.9 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014), utilizing The Presumptive Approach. The facilitieswill have 24 inches of growing medium, with an assumed drain down rate of 10 inches per hour, factored to 2.5 inches per hour. The facilities will not have a subgrade infiltration rate of greater than 2 inches per hour and have therefore been sized as 'filtration' facilities, per Section 2.3.9. A summary of the stormwater rain gardens is shown in Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary below. Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary Rain garden 1 Basin 1 31,595 1 12 2,450 2,530 Rain garden 2 Basin 2 8,121 12 650 742 Rain garden 3 Basin 4 23,823 12 1,300 2,002 1, Minimum fodpnnt mp ds required surface area dcovemge to meet 'Pdbtion ReduG 'an Destlnadon'dandar .. 6.0 WATER QUANTITY 6.1 Detention Requirement The project has been deemed as flow control exempt, per advisement by The City of Springfield during the pre -application conference dated June 9, 2022. The site has not been designed with any detention -specific facilities, and will not include restriction devices to provide flow -control. 6.2 Facility Design In accordance with the conveyance design, each facility has been designed such that tA25year, 24-hour Stormwater event can pass through without causing inundation outside o facilities. This primarily will be achieved by providing emergency overflow structures in planter and rain garden to ensure that larger stormwater events do not exceed the uptake rate of the growing media. 7.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS 7.1 Design Guidelines Per section 4.03.5 of the City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012), proposed conveyance pipes must convey the 25 -year, 24-hour design storm event. A manning's n value of 0.013 will be used for all proposed pipe. 7.2 System Capacity A conveyance analysiswill be completed and stormwater pipes sized such that the proposed conveyance systems can adequately convey the 25 -year storm event without surcharging. Per section 4.03.5, surcharging will not be allowed if it will cause flooding in portions of a habitable structure. The conveyance pipes meet this requirement. The proposed conveyance pipes onsite have been modeled in Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis (2022) to meet these requirements, see Technical Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations. 7.3 Downstream Analysis Because this project will be redeveloping an existing site that has more impervious coverage than what is being proposed, the resultant peak flows entering the public system will be smaller than existing. Due to the decrease in flow, the project will not require a downstream analysis to prove capacity. 8.0 SUMMARY The proposed stormwater system design follows the standards and regulations developed by The City of Springfield. The site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens. These have been sized for a 1.4 inch over 24-hour stormwater event. The proposed conveyance pipes have been designed to convey the 25 -year, 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found not to create capacity issues in the existing system. All facilities have been designed in accordance with the City of Sprin Standards & Procedures Manual (2012) and referenced Eugene's St Manual (2014) sections. APPENDIX A: SITE BASIN MAPS US US 45 US RANDYF BASIN 1 �y�° 31,595 SF (0.725 AC) A IN 66 50 SFF ® t,\ I2 , 530 SF RDEN: m m BASIN �2 8,121 SF \ RAIN A R g74AIN GARDEN: 742 SF W YLI ate— as TINE T P o 90 SEATS DSS: 4,987 SF 16,025 SF (0.368 AC) PLANTER: 1,006 SF ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL: 1.827 AC (79,564 SF) PROPOSED PERVIOUS: 0.397 AC (17,298 SF) 21.74% I PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 1.429 AC (62,266 SF) 78.26% BASIN 1: w PERVIOUS=6,167 SF IMPERVIOUS=25,428 SF TOTAL=31,595 SF BASIN 2: — I I PERVIOUS=1,608 SF IMPERVIOUS=6,513 SF I TOTAL=8,121 SF ;I BASIN 3: 1I• I PERVIOUS=2,075 SF BASIN 4 IMPERVIOUS=13,950 SF 23,823 SF TOTAL=16,025 SF IIS' (0.662 AC) al BASIN 4: RAIN GARDEN: I PERVIOUS=7,448 SF 2,002 SF I IMPERVIOUS=16,375 SF J. + I h TOTAL=23,823 SF I• P I o 3 + 4 I � I I o y I I I 0 W I r101 -GATEWAY CHICK-FIL-A PROPOSED BASIN MAP ® 50 0 50 SCALE IN FEET PROJECT 14891-01 DATE 04/012023 EXHIBIT 1 as as as as r I / \ C :u — as as as as I _439-❑ I k I I \ N —I L� I \ I f� I i a 1 / EXISTING BASIN — \79,564 SF it �' — (1.827 AC)� I — I / I I \ I I \ 1 1 \ Tc — 26 9 min — mm J I I \ 8E�-,438\ \ DOW I I I I I F I ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL: 1.827 AC (79,564 SF) EXISTING PERVIOUS: 0.439 AC (19,124 SF) 24.04% EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 1.388 AC (60,440 SF) 75.96% PRE -DEVELOPED PERVIOUS: 1.827 AC (79,564 SF) 100.00% PRE -DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS: 0.000 AC (0 SF) 0.00% PRE -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PATH: 100 FT SHEET FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE 160 FT SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE I � I �I I n 50 0 50 SCALE IN FEET PROJECT 14841-01 DATE 04/012023 GATEWAY CHICK-FIL-A EXISTING BASIN MAP EXHIBIT 2 APPENDIX B: SOIL REPORT Hydrologic Soil Group�ane County Area, Oregon a X £ x M 3 3 ApSale: 1:1,030RPnlealon A powb- t(&Sx IV)9rH. w a Nrva a ss 33 m m � ANw prnJ',rcn: wm hHUv Cxxnrrmo�tlrata: NG584 5kena:IIIM Zme1W YJG539 C51Jr1 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 71MM22 3i Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 4 x N Hydrologic Sod Group—Lane County Area, Oregon LSDn Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 72N2D22 eal Conservation Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page 2 of 4 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area at Were. (A09 ■ C The sal surveys that comprise your AOI ware mapped at Areaalntaest(AOII CID 1:20,090. ■ Soils ■ D blming: aSail Map may not be valid al Mile scale. Sail Rating Polygons O A G Not rated ornot available maps beyond the scale of mapping cause isunementof misunderstanding mie accuracy the detail of mapping and accuracyf soil 0 AID Water Feavtr placement,The lineplacem ent. The maps do not show the small areas Screams and Canals d contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed 0 B scale. Tmnspodaion 0 BIB .-.. Rails Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map 0 O N Interstate Highways measurements. 0 CID IIS Routes Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service 0 D Web Soil Surveil Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:9B5]) 0 Not rated ornot available Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Soil Raring Lines Background projection, which preserves direction and shape but distods A distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more +�+ AIB accurate calculations of distance dreams are required, B This product is generated from the USDA4gRCS carded data as �y BID of Ne version date(s) listed below. N C Sod Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 19, Oct 27, 2021 y CID Sail map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales ,y D 1:5[),00D or larger. .. Not rated or not available Dates) genal images were photographed: Jun 12, 2019—tun Sal Rating Palms 19, 2019 ■ A The odhophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background ■ AID imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor ■ B shifting ofmap unit boundaries may be evident. BID LSDn Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 72N2D22 eal Conservation Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Sol Group—lane County Area, Oregon Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map lsul name Acres in A01 percent of AOI 32 Coburg-UNan land C 1.2 26.3% complex ]S Malabon-Urban land C 3.5 ]3.]% complex Totals for An. of Interest 4.7 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate ofwater infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained Orwell drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement Ofwater or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate Of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition LSM Natural Resources Web Sal Survey 7/20/2022 2allit Conservation SeMce Nalonal Cooperative Soil Survey page 3 of4 Hydrologic Sol Group—Lane County Area, Oregon Componert Percent Cuto//. None Specked Tie-break Rule: Higher LSM Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/20/2022 2� Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of4 APPENDIX C: STORMWATER INPUT AND CALCULATIONS Chaptee4 Estimating Ruvof[ Technical Release 66 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2a Runoffcurve numbers for urban areas li Curve numbers for ---------Coverdescription--------- _--hydrologic soil group Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious areas A B C D Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established) Open space (lawns, Parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.) W: Poor condition (grass cover < 60%) 68 79 86 88 Fair condition (gross cover 60% to 7696) 48 68 78 84 Good condition (grass cover> 7696) ......................................... 38 61 74 80 Impervious areas: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way)............................................................. 88 98 ® 88 Streets and roads: Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right -Of -way) . 88 98 98 88 Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) 83 89 92 83 Gravel (including right-of-way) . 76 86 89 81 Dirt (including rigbtof--way). 72 82 87 88 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) -V ..................... 63 77 86 88 Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed harrier, desert shrub with 1- W 2 -inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) 86 96 96 86 Urban districts: Commercial and business 86 88 92 94 86 Industrial 72 81 88 81 83 Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less (town houses) 66 77 86 90 82 1/4 acre 38 61 76 83 87 1/3 acre 30 67 72 81 86 1/2 acre 26 64 70 80 86 1sure 20 61 68 79 84 2 acres 12 46 66 77 82 Developing urban areas Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) si 77 86 91 94 Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2c). I Average mnoffcondition, and I,-0.28. a The average percent Impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions areae follows: impervious meas me directly corrected to the drainage system, Impervious areas have aCN of 98, and pervious areas me considered equivalent W open store in good hydrologic condition. CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figsae23 or 24. s CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture Composite CN's may, be computed for other combinations of open space coverrype. Composite CN's for natwul desert landscaping should be computed using Rgues 23 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage (CN =98) and the pervious save CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert elnub in poor hydrologic condition. Composite CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and consomme should be computed using figure 28 or 2-0 based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the CN's for the newly graded pervious aeae. (210 -VI -TR -M, Second Ed., Jrre 1986) 2-6 Chapters RethnaGng Ruvof[ Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2c Runoffcurve numbers for other agricultural lands gazing and generally mowed for hay Brush—brush-weed-gates ndxWm with brush Poor 48 Curve numbers for 77 Cover description the major element. v Fair hydrologic soil group ---- 56 70 Hydrologic Good 30 a Cover type condition A B C D Pasture, grassland, or range—continuous Poor 68 79 86 89 Range for grazing. v Fair 49 69 84 Good 39 61 74 80 Meadow—continuous grass protected from — 30 58 71 78 gazing and generally mowed for hay Brush—brush-weed-gates ndxWm with brush Poor 48 67 77 83 the major element. v Fair 35 56 70 77 Good 30 a 48 65 73 Woods gores combination (orchard Poor 57 73 82 86 or tree farm). Y Fair 43 65 76 82 Good 32 58 72 79 Woods.& Poor 45 66 77 83 Fair 36 60 73 79 Good 30 v 55 70 77 Farmsteads—buddings, lanes, driveways, — 59 74 82 86 I Average mnolfcondltion, and 1.=024. 3 Poor: <5006)ground cover or heavily grazed with no match. Fair: 50 to 75%growd cover and not heavily grand. Good: >75% growl rover and tightly or only wessionally grazed. 3 Poor: <5006 growl rover. Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover. Good. >75% ground cover. 4 Actual curvenumber is less then 80; use CN= 80 for mnoff computations. e CN'sshownwere computed for areas with 50% woods and 50% goes (pastwe)cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the CN's for woods and pasture. a Poor: FoastlitWe smWitn,wdbrusliuedeAmyedbyheavygrazingortegWarbu ng. Fair: Woods are grazed but notburned, andsomeforest tittercovetuthe soil. Good.. Woods se, protected from grazing, and litter and brash adequately cover the soil. (210 -VI -TR -M, Second M., Jwe 1986) Z-7 Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 Catchmentl0: Basinl :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry9prmn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 31595 sgfi Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 6167 sgft Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 37762 sfi Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 94 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 26.9 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design= N/Ain/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Rainfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Type=l Filtration Rain Garden Facility Side Slopi Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility= Depth of Growing Medium (So EM1Y.'rWrSflk:rlS rl Facility Su Facility Surface Facility Bt Facility Bottom Ratio of FacilityArea to Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results cis Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=q2.3 Peak Facility Overflow Rate= OD00 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry =of Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeet. Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.134 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 0.144 cis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Faci Itry= 9234 cf Total Overflow Volume= 3g?of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Undercirairn 0.142 cis Drawdown Time= 1.6hours Pre-Development Runoff Dara Peak Flow Rare a 0.160 cfs Total Runoff Volume =1 4120 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= N/A cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= N/A cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility a N/A cf Total Overflow Volume= N/A cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= N/A in Drawdown Time= N/A hours N/A Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? fMeetN/A s Requirement of No Facility Flooding? N/A Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? EIiIY.'rYkSf R9rl-. JAI Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 Catchment ID: Basing :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry mn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 8121 sgfi Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 1608 sgft Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 9729 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 94 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 26.9 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr at Design Soil Infiltration Re- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Type=l Filtration Rain Garden Facility Side Slopi Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility= Depth of Growing Medium (So EM1Y.'rWrSflk:rlS rl Facility Su Facility Surface Facility Bt Facility Bottom Ratio of FacilityArea to Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=Icis Peak Facility Overflow Rate= DDDD cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry =of Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.189 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 0.032 cis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Faci Itry= 2375 cf Total Overflow Volume= ?4 of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairn D.D38 cis Drawdown Time= 1]hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare- 0.041 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 1062 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? EIiIY.'rYkSf R9rl-. JAI Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 Catchment ID: Basin :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry0prmn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 16025 sqft Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 2W5 sgft Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 18100 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 95 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 26.9 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Reduction 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Fbod Control Facility Type= Surf ace Width= Surface Length= Facility Side Slopes= Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility- Depth of Growing Medium(Soil)s Filtration Stopnwater Planter Facility Surface Area 85ft Facility Surface Perimeter- 10ft Facility Bottom Area= Oto1 Facility Bo[ tom Perimeter- 12 in Basin Volume= 24 in Ratio of FacilityArea to Impervious Area= 852 sgft sgft cf 190ft 850 190ft 850,0 0,04T 4/1/202}11:31 PM Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=q1.1 Peak Facility Overflow Rate= OD00 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Facility=cf Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.365 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 0.066 cis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= 4610 cf Total Overflow Volume= 439 of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairn OD49 cis Drawdown Time= 2.7 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare = 0.077 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 1975 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 4/1/202}11:31 PM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 CatchmentlD: Basin4 :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry0prmn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 163]5 sgfi Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 7448 sgft Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 23823 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN= 90 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 26.9 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr at Design Soil Infiltration Re- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Rainfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Type=l Filtration Rain Garden Facility Side Slopi Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility= Depth of Growing Medium (So 4/5/202}2:3] PM Facility Su Facility Surface Facility Bt Facility Bottom Ratio of FacilityArea to Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.083 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= DDDR cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= 1251 cf Total Overflow Volume= 0cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 1.4 in Drawdown Time= 02 hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.403 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 00]9 cis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= 5125cf Total Overflow Volume= 268 cf Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairn 0.075 cis Drawdown Time= 22 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare- 0.101 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 2599 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 4/5/202}2;3] PM APPENDIX D: CIVIL STORMWATER PLANS c B 4 m VA CHICKiiiiiiiiiiiiiiFlLiiiiiiiiiiiA GATEWAY &RANDY PAPE .4rmte . = - PROJECT d AREA v � rs� C� Ave Dstco Wholesale Q �, i PeaceHeaI h acred Heart Medical enter a1 Safi- eway q 9 o � e� VICINITY MAP SCALE: NTS N PROJECT DESCRIPTION BASIS OF BEARING THIS PHASE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE -STORY COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH FOOTPRINT OF 4,897 SF, A CONCRETE -PAVED DRIVE-THRU, AN ASPHALT -PAVED PARKING LOT, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND STORMWATER TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSISTING OF WATER QUALITY LIDAS. THIS PHASE WILL ALSO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTING THREE ACCESS POINTS AND ASSOCIATED DRIVEWAYS LOCATED ON THE EAST (ALONG GATEWAY), SOUTH (ALONG THE FREIGHT ACCESS), AND WEST (ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY). FUTURE PHASES TO THE WEST AND SOUTH OF THE SITE WILL BE UNDER A SEPARATE PERMIT. SITE LOCATION THIS PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SE CORNER OF RANDY PAPE BELTLINE AND GATEWAY ST IN SPRINGFIELD OREGON. THE SITE HOLDS THE ADDRESS OF 3358 GATEWAY STREET N SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477.THE PROJECT SUE IS LOCATED ON TAX MAP 1703222 AND INCLUDES TAX LOT NUMBERS 001600 AND 001300 EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OREGON REVISED STATUTES 209.140-209.155 Al PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER OREGON SOUTH STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83 (2011) BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS. DISTANCESSHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES, INTERNATIONAL FEET, SCALED ABOUT A CENTRAL CONTROL POINT DATUM NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVDW) BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE OPUS STATIC OBSERVATIONS. CHICK-FIL-A ATTN: STEVE SCHWARTZ 15635 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 350 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PHONE: (404) 305-4407 STEVE.SCHWARTZ@CFACORP.COM 4 ARCHITECT WARE MALCOMB ATTN: NONY RIVERA 3015 112TH AVE NE #205 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 PHONE: (425) 582-5517 NRI VERA@WAREMALCOMB.COM 3358 GATEWAY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 LAND USE DOCUMENTS CIVIL ENGINEER DOWL ATTN: MIKE TOWLE, PE 720 SW WASHINGTON AVE, SUITE 750 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PHONE: (971) 280-8645 MTOWLE@DOWL.COM 3 SITE MAP SCALE: NTS N GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TERRACON CONSULTANTS ATTN: KRISTOPHERT. HAUCK, PE 700 NE 55TH AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 PHONE: (503) 742-7181 KRI STOPHER. HAUCK@TERRACON. COM L SURVEY 1 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CO.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 STORMWATER PLAN C5.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.1 FIRE SERVICE PLAN L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 10 1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN S&F LAND SERVICES ATTN: CHRIS SHERBY, PLS 4858 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD, STEW PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 PHONE: (503) 345-0328 JERED.MCGRATH@SFLANDS.COM OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REOU I RES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 0 000 Doo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 R 40'6OOWL 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 c 0 Q a J � `6 'Z^^ V 1 LU Q Uj (LU `+ B \ 2 ILN FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL'S PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG (p mamaia��wai,ea aims arcare admai � dal8 files pmticci fm abwenmeaprgW Z m YrvY be rcProlxalnanY mvrrs �MMva ezPrcss �.auem or..mm �m�i rm � b,na�rca mKa rcPrc:aaa4ves. LU SHEET U COVER SHEET O LU (n SHEET NUMBER CO.O Q J 11 C ■-1 M1 4 I 3 I RANnv pno� Dm Tlwir o 4 1 3 1 SE Y K E GENERAL NOTES: 1. CLEAN OUTS ARE REOU I RED AT A MAXIMUM OF 90 FEET ALONG A STORM LINE. 2. STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR THE ENTIRE PARCEL AREA, WHICH INCLUDES THE CFA BUILDING AND TWO OTHER PADS TO BE CONSTRUCTED DURING A LATER PHASE, WILL BE CONSTRUCTED IN FULL AND WILL NOT BE PARTIALLY BUILT. X) STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PROPOSED STORMWATER FILTRATION RAIN GARDEN FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 2. PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION PLANTER FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 3. PROPOSED 1.5' WIDE CURB CUT 4. PROPOSED 6" DUCTILE IRON STORM LINE FOR ROOF DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING OR DRIVE-THRU CANOPY. 5. PROPOSED 6" PERFORATED (AT TOP OF PIPE ONLY WITHIN STORMWATER FACILITY) PVC D3034 STORM UNDERDRAIN 6. PROPOSED 10" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 7. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 8. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE TO BE INSTALLED PARALLEL TO 6" PERFORATED PIPE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE STORMWATER FACILITY 9. PROPOSED 15" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 10. CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC MANHOLE 11. REPLACE EXISTING 12" PUBLIC DRAINAGE LINE WITH 15" PVC D3034. 12. PROPOSED OVERFLOW WITH BEEHIVE GRATE LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER SPILLING CURB & GUTTER SIGN SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STORM SEWER CLEANOUT STORM CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITY 30 0 30 60 SCALE IN FEET 1 OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 40'6DOWL 309 SW STH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION C4.0 CIVIUS PROJECT # 14&11.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A1111012021 DRAwN BY JLG ISO inmmnaim cwairee m ms dawn, sne in ai � tligltal files pmticcN fm abwenmeiprgW Z mY^y bereproLxiin anY mvrrl WlFaY G exPrczz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G au Ynizelautluvixlprc�tlrc�Wa4ves. LU SHEET U STORMWATER PLAN O C4.0 APPENDIX E: CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS Conveyance calculations will be included in future submission. APPENDIX F: EXCERPTS FROM GEOTECHNICAL REPORT August 5, 2022 Chick-fil-A, Inc. 3350 Gateway Street Atlanta, Georgia 30349 Attn: Ms. Beth 1Mtt P:(404)765-7822 E: beth.witt@cfacorp.com 1 rerracon Re: Infiltration Testing Results Report Chick at Restaurant #04987 G 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, Lane County, Oregon or Terracon Project No. 82225063 Dear Ms. 1Mtt:III/ This letter presents the results of our additional subsurface expIDPEl1En and infiltration testing for the proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 restaurant to be located at 3350 Gateway Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. Our services were performed in accordance with Change Request #4 dated July 1, 2022, to our Master Services Agreement dated March 31, 2005. Terracon previously performed a geotechnical investigation at the siA, the results of which were presented in ourreport entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Report, Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987, 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, Lane County, Oregon," Terracon Project No. 82225063, dated June 16, 2022. INTRODUCTION r The design team requested we performesting at four locations at the project site and provided a marked up Conceptual Site Plan, prepared by Ware Malcomb, dated June 16, 2022, showing the proposed locati ns. Email communications indicated that the tests should be performed at 5 feet below nd surface (bgs). This addendum describes the additional subsurface explorations and p IVs results of our infiltration testing. SITE CONDITIONS AND GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION Site conditions at the time of our infiltration testing appeared unchanged from those described in the referenced Geotechnical Engineering Report. As part of our supplemental infiltration testing scope of services for the proposed development, we advanceerfve additional drilled borings (IT -1, IT -2, IT -3, IT -3a, and IT -4) to depths ranging from approximately 3.7 to 10 feet bgs. Soils encountered during the exploration generally Terracon Consultants, Inc. 766 NE 55TH Avenue Portland, Oregon 97213 P 156316593281 F [5031659 1287 terracmwnn Infiltration Testing Results 1 �err�con Chick -fl -A, Inc. a Springfield, Lane County, Oregon August 5, 2022 a Terracon Project No. 82225063 consisted of up to %-foot of asphalt over %-foot of base rock. The base rock was underlain by native lean clay with sand (CL). These materials are consistent with GeoModel Layers 1 and 2, respectively, as described in the Geotechnical Characterization section of t eferenced geotechnical report. Boring logs showing the soils encountered are presented in achments sh at the end of this report. A map showing the site and boring locations are the attached Exploration Plan. Groundwater Conditions We observed our explorations while drilling and after comple the presence I of groundwater during the current and previous site investigatio oundwater was encoun din B-1 during our previous 2022 investigation and in IT -3a during the infiltration testing, as shown on the boring logs at the end of this report. Groundwater levels previously observed in on-site explorations during our eadier investigation are provided on the boring logs in Exploration Results section of the referenced geotechnical report and are summarized in the following table: Approximate Depth to pproximate Depth to Groundwater while Drilling Groundwater after Drilling (feet) (feet) B-1 7 9 IT -3a 5% 5h 1. Below ground surface(bgs) 2. To prevent heating sands below the groundwater table, waterwas injected into the advancing augers within explorations B-3, 3-4, P-1 and P-2. Therefore, groundwater levelswere not recorded in these explorations. Groundwater Iuctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on lKoring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. STORMWATER INFILTRATION Infiltration tests were performed in general accordance with the Encased Falling Head Test method as described in Appendix G of the 2014 City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. The borings were advanced using a trailer -mounted solid -stem auger drill rig operated by our drilling subcontractor, Dan Fischer Excavating. Upon reaching the target infiltration depth, the auger was removed and a 6 -inch inner diameter PVC pipe was advanced approximately 2 to 3 inches into the soils at the infiltration test depth to create a seal with the surrounding soils. Then Responsive a Resourceful a Reliable Page 2 Infiltration Testing Results Chick -fl -A, Inc. a Springfield, Lane County, Oregon August 5, 2022 a Terracon Project No. 82225063 lrerracon a thin layer of open -graded gravel was placed in the bottom of the pipe to prevent scouring during placement of water for the testing. The test pipes were filled with 12 inches of water, and the soils were allowed to s r 2 hours. The water level was topped off as needed during the soaking period to maim water level. After the soaking period, we refilled the water level to 12 inches, and the drop in water level was recorded at 30 -minute intervals. Water levels were adjusted to provide a 12-incad following each reading. Measurements were taken with a tape measure and recorded to rest one- eighth of an inch for 90 minutes. Test results are presented at the end of this report, and are summarized in the following tW Infiltration Test Location Raw filtration Rate fo esign (does not inc ude safety or correction factors) 2 inches per hour IT -1 IT -2 2 inches per hour IT -3 0 inches paliakir IT -4 hes per GENERAL COMMENTS Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variationswill occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this letter, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation a d testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluatioi pplemental recommendations. SI,ance upon the services and ny work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for partiesAnyuse orreliance of the provided information bythird partiesisdone solelyattheirrisk.No warrantieseither expressorimpliedare intended ormade. Site safetyand cost'ng includingexcavation supportand dewateringrequirements/design are the onsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and eitherverify or modify our conclusions in writing. Responsive a Resourceful a Reliable Page 3 EXPLORATION PLAN lrerracon Chick -fl -A #04987 • Springfield, OR GeoReport August 4, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82225063 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY. AND IS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY MIC ROSOFT BING MAPS APPENDIX G: CORRESPONDENCE Arren Padaett From: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-ocgov> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 20224:05 PM To: Arlen Padgett Subject: [EXT] RE: Planter Sizing in City of Springfield SRemal Sender - use ca@ion when clicking links anrt opening attachments Yes that would be correct, as long as the project and area fall within the parameters of that design per the Eugene manual. Almost all projects in the city right now use wither the presumptive or simplified approach and we approve that regularly. From: Arren Padgett <apadgett@dowl.com> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 3:59 PM To: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-or.gov> Subject: Planter Sizing in City of Springfield Good afternoon Clayton, I am trying to get some questions clarified for a project I am working on in City of Springfield. We are planning to design stormwater planters to provide the runoff mitigation for the site, and I am trying to figure out what design methodology I need to follow. I see that in Chapter 3.0 'Stormwater Quality" of the Springfield SWMM it says that the jurisdiction uses portions of Eugene's SWMM for stormwater treatment facilities. I want to know if I need to be following Eugene's Section 2.3.11 to size the facilities, and whether I need to be using their "Presumptive Approach" that utilizes Eugene's design runoff events (see attached). Thank you, Arren Padgett Water Resources Designer DOWL (971)280-8641 1 office (971)280-8652 1 direct dowl.com Arren Padaett From: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-ocgov> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 10:52 AM To: Arlen Padgett Subject: [EXT] RE: Downstream Analysis Clarification SRemal Sender - use ca@ion when clicking links anrt opening attachments Is this for the proposed chick fit a at the corner of gateway and beltline? If so, no downstream analysis is required for that site as the site is already 100% impervious (or so close it doesn't matter) and as long as your impervious area doesn't exceed the existing impervious area there will be no increase in flow and with the requirement to meet current stormwater quality treatment requirements there will, in fact, be a decrease in peak flow due to the nature of how quality control works so those things let me find that no downstream analysis is required. From: Arren Padgett <apadgett@dowl.com> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 9:17 AM To: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-or.gov> Subject: Downstream Analysis Clarification Good morning Clayton, I first want to say I really appreciate how fast you were with the turn around on my last question, that helped considerably with pushing our design forward. I have another question I would like to get clarified if possible. I am now addressing the Downstream Analysis requirement for our project, and I would like to knowwhat type of delivery the city typically likes to see for this. Theway I sit right now, I have very limited information about the existing stormwater main in Gateway Street and the drainage basin or flow capacity it currently experiences. Does the City typically provide as-builts / drainage studies / etc. for developers? Project information: Chick-Fil-A Gateway 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 98477 Thank you, Arren Padgett Water Resources Designer Ill (971) 2868641 office (971) 2868652 direct dowl.cc,m APPENDIX 11 1 rarracon GeoReport Geotechnical Engineering Report Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 Terracon Project No. 82215117 Prepared for: Chick -fl -A, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia Prepared by: Terracon Consultants, Inc. Portland, Oregon January 7, 2022 Chick-fil-A, Inc. 5200 Bufngton Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349 Attn: Ms. Beth Wltt P:(404)765-7822 Re: Geotechnical Engineering Report Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, Lane County, Oregon Terracon Project No. 82215117 Dear Ms. 1Mtt: lrerracon Geon port We have completed the Geotechnical Engineering servicesforthe above referenced project. This study was performed in general accordance with Terracon Master Services Agreement dated September 29, 2021. This report presents the findings of the subsurface exploration and provides geotechnical recommendations concerning earthwork, pavement and the design and construction of foundations and floor slabs for the proposed project. We appreciate the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further service, please contact us. Sincerely, Terracon Consultants, Inc. Jim P. Tomkins, P.E. Kristopher T. Hauck, P.E. Senior Staff Engineer Principal I Office Manager National Account Manager: Joshua J. Shilling Terracon Consultants, Inc. 788 NE 55th Ave Portland, Oregon 97213 P (583) 659 3281 F (583) 6591287 terracon.com REPORT TOPICS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1 SITE CONDITIONS......................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION..............................................................................................2 GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION......................................................................3 GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW.......................................................................................6 SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS........................................................................................7 EARTHWORK................................................................................................................8 SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS......................................................................................... 13 FLOORSLABS............................................................................................................ 16 LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES.................................................................................18 PAVEMENTS................................................................................................................ 20 GENERAL COMMENTS...............................................................................................24 Note: This report was originally delivered in aweb-based format. For more interactive features, please view your project online at client.terracon.com. ATTACHMENTS EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES PHOTOGRAPHYLOG SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS EXPLORATION RESULTS SUPPORTING INFORMATION Note: Refer to each individual Attachment for a listing of contents. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, Lane County, Oregon Terracon Project No. 82215117 January 7, 2022 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of our subsurface exploration and geotechnical engineering services performed for the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant #04987 to be located at 3350 Gateway Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. The purpose of these services is to provide information and geotechnical engineering recommendations relative to: • Subsurface soil conditions • Groundwater conditions • Site preparation and earthwork • Demolition considerations • Excavation considerations • Foundation design and construction • Floor slab design and construction • Seismic site classification per IBC • Lateral earth pressures • Pavement design and construction The geotechnical engineering Scope of Services for this project included the advancement of six (6) test borings to depths ranging from approximately 6% to 21% feet below existing ground surface (bgs). Maps showing the site and boring locations are shown in the Site Location and Exploration Plan sections, respectively. The results of the laboratory testing performed on soil samples obtained from the site during the field exploration are included on the boring logs and as separate graphs in the Exploration Results section. SITE CONDITIONS The following description of site conditions is derived from our site visit in association with the field exploration and our review of publicly available geologic and topographic maps. IDescription The site is approximately 3 acres and located at 3350 Gateway Street in Parcel Information Springfield, Oregon. Latitude: 44.0826° N, Longitude: 123.0419° W See Site Location Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987. Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022. Terracon Project No. 82215117 lrerracon GeoReport. The site is currently occupied by an existing commercial restaurant, and hotel, which was observed during the time of exploration, along with landscaping and an asphalt concrete (AC) parking lot. Both the existing Existing restaurant and the hotel are currently in operation, and will be demolished Improvements pdorto the new construction. The site is surrounded by other existing commercial developments to the south and west, Gateway Street to the east and Beltline Road to the north. Current Ground The majority of the site is covered with existing pavement, the two buildings Cover and landscaping. Existing Topography The site was generally flat and level. From review of historical aerial photographs, it appears there used to be two small buildings in the northeast area ofthe site that were demolished Site History between 1994 and 2000. Additional site history can be found in the Hazardous Building Materials Survey Terracon completed for this site, Terracon Report No. 82217229A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Our initial understanding of the project was provided in our proposal and was discussed during project planning. A period of collaboration has transpired since the project was initiated, and our final understanding of the project conditions is as follows: Item Description Information provided included a proposed boring layout and site sketch Information Provided sent from the client sent on November 10, 2021. Construction of a new single -story restaurant structure with exterior Project Description seating, parking, and a drive-through lane. Approximately 5,000 square -foot, single -story restaurant structure, a Proposed Structures drive-thru canopy, and a trash enclosure. Building Construction Wood framed with a slab -on -grade floor. Finished Floor Elevation Not pravdied, but assumed to be within a foot of existing rade. . Columns: 50 kips a Walls: 2 kips per linear foot (klf) Maximum Loads Slabs: 100 pounds per square foot s Grading/Slopes The site will be developed near existing site grades. Below -Grade Structures I No below grade basement structures are anticipated. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Pavements Paved driveway and parking will be constructed on less than 1 acre of the parcel. Anticipated traffic is as follows: a Autos/light trucks: 300 vehicles per day a Heavy delivery and trash collection vehicles: 5 vehicles perweek a 75, 000 Ibf fire truck loading Estimated Start of I Summer 2022 Construction GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION Geology Based on our review of the Geologic map' the site is underlain by fan -delta alluvium (Quaternary) deposits that consist of abroad fan of sand and gravel deposited by the Willamette and McKenzie rivers in the head of the Willamette Valley. Fan -delta sediments range from silt to boulder gravel. however, are predominately sandy pebble -cobble gravel. A nearby well log (%-mile to the southeast) shows sand and gravel to the depth explored, about 120 feet below ground surface (bgs). Seismic Hazards Seismic hazards resulting from earthquake motions can include slope stability, liquefaction, and surface rupture due to faulting or lateral spreading. Liquefaction is the phenomenon wherein soil strength is dramatically reduced when subjected to vibration or shaking. We reviewed the Statewide Geohazards Viewer (HazVu) published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Studies (DOGAMI) and available online'. The viewer categorizes the ' Madin, 1. P. and R.B. Murray, 2006, Preliminary Geologic Map of the Eugen East and Eugene lMist Quadrangles, Lam Courig Oregon, Oregon Department of Geology arid Mineral Industries, Open -Fib Report 0-06-17. z Statewide Geohazards Viewer (HazVu) published by the Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) httos://ais.doaami.oreaon.ao /hmw/ Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. expected earthquake shaking from light, moderate, strong, very strong, severe and violent. and the landslide susceptibility from low, moderate, high, and very high. • Earthquake Liquefaction Hazard: N/A • Expected Earthquake Shaking: Strong • Landslide Susceptibility (due to earthquake): Very Low Faults The United States Geological Survey (USGS) maintains the Quaternary Fault and Fold Database containing descriptions and locations of recently active faults within the United States. The three closest faults to the project site include the the Upper WIlamette River fault zone (No.863), the Owl Creek fault (No.870), and the Corvallis fault zone (No.869). Published information pertaining to each fault or fault zone is provided in the following tables: Strike (degrees) I N52°W Sense of Movement Riaht lateral Distance from Fault 1 68 km SE Owl Creek fault (Class A) No. 870 Inform Length Description 15 km Strike (degrees) WE Sense of Movement Reverse Dip Direction 60°E Slip -rate Category Less than 0.2 mm/yr Most recent Drehistoric deformation Middle and late Quaternary (<750 ka) Strike (degrees) I NWE Sense of Movement Thrust Most recent prehistoric deformation I class B Inferred Distance from Fault 55 km N -NW Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 4 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Based on our review of the available fault information, the depth to bedrock, and the site's proximity to the nearest known faults, and the activity of mapped faults, it is our opinion that the risk of surface rupture at the site due to ground faulting is low. Subsurface Conditions We have developed a general characterization of the subsurface conditions based upon our review of the subsurface exploration, laboratory data, geologic setting and our understanding of the project. This characterization, termed GeoModel, forms the basis of our geotechnical calculations and evaluation of site preparation and foundation options. Conditions encountered at each exploration point are indicated on the individual logs. The individual logs can be found in the Exploration Results section and the GeoModel can be found in the Figures section of this report. As part of our analyses, we identified the following model layers within the subsurface profile. For a more detailed view of the model layer depths at each boring location, refer to the GeoModel. Model Laver I Laver Name 1 ASPHALT AND I Asphalt Concrete: 3 -inch thickness; Aggregate Base Course: 6- BASECOURSE inch thickness,'/." -0 crushed rock, gray 2 LEAN CLAY Lean Clay to lean clay with sand: low to medium plasticity, dark brown and gray, medium stiff to very stiff 3 GRAVEL Well graded gravel with clay and sand; Poorly -graded gravel with silt and sand: sub -rounded, gray and brown, dense to very dense 4 SAND Poorly -graded sand: fine-grained, gray and brown, medium dense Groundwater Conditions We observed our explorations while drilling and after completion for the presence and level of groundwater. The water levels observed in the explorations are provided on the boring logs in Exploration Results, and are summarized below. Approximate Depth to Groundwater while Drilling (feet) B-1 B-2 Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Approximate Depth to Groundwater after Drilling (feet) 8% 11% Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Well logs available on the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD)3 website indicate that groundwater level in the area of the site is around 8 feet bgs. Groundwater level fluctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on the boring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. GEOTECHNICAL OVERVIEW The soil borings indicate that subsurface conditions at the project site generally consist of low to medium plasticity lean clays, soft to very stiff in consistency (GeoModel Layer 2). The existing pavement (Asphalt Concrete over Aggregate Base) section was generally very thin (GeoModel Layer 1). GeoModel layers 3 and 4 consisted of medium dense to very dense sands and gravels. The near surface soils are fine-grained in nature and exhibit some risk of expansive soils being present at the site, especially if moisture fluctuations are allowed during site development. In addition to the plasticity concerns of the near surface soils, we encountered a poorly graded sand from about 14 to 17 feet bgs. Based on our analyses, this soil layer has a moderate risk of liquefaction and we estimate this could exhibit up to about 1 % inches of liquefaction settlement at the surface of the site. Based on our experience with these structures and the design team, we understand that this is within the typical building construction tolerance and no further mitigation of the liquefaction risks needs to be incorporated into the design. If this is beyond the normal tolerance of the structure, we should be consulted to evaluate alternatives for design. Foundation Recommendations: Conventional, shallow spread footings may be used for support of the new footings placed on at least 12 inches of compacted Select Fill. Specific recommendations for shallow foundations are presented in the Shallow Foundations section of this report. This is due to the low strength of the fine-grained soils as well as the potential for shrinktswell of the sensitive soils. Floor Slabs: The slab -on -grade floors should be supported on 12 inches Select Fill in addition to the aggregate base placed over native subgrade per Earthwork recommendations or compacted structural fill. The subgrades should be protected from moisture fluctuations (drying and wetting) during and after construction to reduce the heave potential of the clay soils. Wet site conditions may require replacement of the upper 1 foot or more of wet yielding subgrades with structural fill. ' Oregon Water Resources Department, 2021. Well Log Records, accessed November 2021, from OWRD web sae: htto://apps.wid.state.or.uslapps/awAvell loa/ Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. The purpose of the additional 12 inches of Select Fill underneath the floor slab is to provide a layer of separation to avoid building floor slabs bearing on the moderately expansive lean clays. This undercutting will also help mitigate the effects of soil shrinkage and expansion and prevent additional movement. Moisture Sensitive Subsurface Conditions: The near surface, fine-grained soil (GeoModel Layer 2) could become unstable with typical earthwork and construction traffic, especially after precipitation events. The effective drainage should be completed early in the construction sequence and maintained after construction to avoid potential issues. If possible, the grading should be performed during the warmer and driertimes of the year. If grading is performed during the winter months, an increased risk for possible undercutting and replacement of unstable subgrade will persist. Dry weather grading is recommended to minimize ground disturbance. Additional site preparation recommendations, including subgrade improvement and fill placement, are provided in the Earthwork section. Pavements: Conventional asphaltic concrete and Portland cement concrete pavements are suitable for this development. The Pavements section addresses the design of pavement systems, and includes a layer of sub -base to protect against heave from the clay soils. The exposed pavement subgrade should consist of medium stiff or bettersubgrade and be adequately proof -rolled. In addition, the natural moisture content of these materials varied from 23% to 33% and averaged 27% indicating moist to wet conditions within the upper 5 of the existing ground surface. This will likely result in difficulty achieving minimum compaction density during fill placement. Therefore, we recommend subgrade stabilization consisting of either removal and replacement with non -expansive granular fill or subgrade improvement using chemical stabilization. Additionally, high -modulus geotextiles can be used for subgrade improvement as described in Earthwork section of this report. The General Comments section provides an understanding of the report limitations. SEISMIC CONSIDERATIONS The seismic design requirements for structures are based on Seismic Design Category. Site Classification is required to determine the Seismic Design Category for a structure. The Site Classification is based on the upper 100 feet of the site profile defined by a weighted average value of either shear wave velocity, standard penetration resistance, or undrained shear strength in accordance with Section 20.4 of ASCE 7-16. Site Latitude I 44.082790°N Site Longitude I 123.041955°W Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. 1. Seismic site classification in general accordance with the 2019 Oregon Structural Speciaffy Code(OSSC), which refers to ASCE 7-16. 2. ASCE 7-16 requires a site soil profile extending to a depth of 100 feet be used for seismic site classification. The site properties below the boring depth to 100 feet were estimated based on our experience and knowledge of geologic conditions of the general area. Additional deeper borings or geophysical testing may be performed to confirm the conditions below the current boring depth. 3. These values were obtained using online seismic design maps and tools available on the Applied Technology Council (ATC) website referenced in Section 1613.2.1 of the 2019 OSSC. We understand, based on our experience with structures similar to the proposed development, that the fundamental period of the structure is less than 0.5 seconds. For structures with fundamental periods of vibration equal to or less than 0.5 second, section 20.3.1 of ASCE 7-16 allows site coefficients Fa and Fv to be determined from Tables 11.4-1 and 11.4-2 using the corresponding Site Class determined according to section 20.3. Provided the structure fundamental period is 0.5 second or less, the parameters corresponding to Site Class D may be used to determine the values of Fa and Fv. If the fundamental period is greater than 0.5 second, building code requires a site-specific evaluation for development of spectral response accelerations. Liquefaction Liquefaction is the phenomenon where saturated soils develop high pore -water pressures during seismic shaking and lose their strength characteristics. This phenomenon generally occurs in areas of high seismicity, where groundwater is shallow and loose granular soils or relatively low - to non -plastic fine-grained soils are present. Poorly graded sands were encountered in boring 13- 1 between 14 and 17 feet bgs. Groundwaterwas observed as shallow as 8% feet bgs. The risk for liquefaction of these sandy soils encountered between the top of the groundwater surface and about 30 feet bgs is moderate and we estimate liquefaction -induced settlements of approximately 1Y inches could be experienced at the site. It is our understanding that this is within the typical building construction tolerance, and have prepared this report with the assumption that the structure can tolerate this settlement using conventional foundations. EARTHWORK Earthwork is anticipated to include clearing and grubbing, excavations, and fill placement. The following sections provide recommendations for use in the preparation of specifications for the work. Recommendations include critical quality criteria, as necessary, to render the site in the Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. state considered in our geotechnical engineering evaluation for foundations, floor slabs, and pavements. Site Preparation Prior to placing fill, any existing vegetation and root mat from the landscape areas should be removed. Complete stripping and removal existing fill around the existing structure should be performed in the proposed building and parking/driveway areas. Site preparation will also require removing surface pavements and unsuitable soil materials in proposed developments areas, as well as demolition of the existing buildings. Prior to placing fill, all unsuitable soils should be removed within the building footprint. Where existing utility lines are encountered during construction activities, such features shall be removed within the building pad limits, utilities should be properly capped at the site perimeter, and the trenches should be backfilled in accordance with structural fill recommendations presented in the following sections of this report. The subgrade should be proofrolled with an adequately loaded vehicle such as a fully -loaded tandem -axle dump truck. The proofrolling should be performed under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Areas excessively deflecting under the proofroll should be delineated and subsequently addressed by the Geotechnical Engineer. Such areas should either be removed or modified by stabilizing with new structural fill. Excessively wet or dry material should either be removed or moisture conditioned and recompacted. Due to the plasticity and shrink/swell potential of the site soils, it is important to not allow significant moisture fluctuations of the exposed native subgrades during construction. If subgrades are allowed to dry significantly, this could increase the risk of swelling of site soils post construction. Therefore, we recommend that exposed native soils be covered as soon as feasible with the recommended Select Fill and not be allowed to become overly dry during dry season earthwork. Subgrade Stabilization As described in the Geotechnical Overview, we expect pavement subgrades to need stabilization in order to provide a suitable working surface. Therefore, some overexcavation or subgrade stabilization should be expected, especially during wet periods of the year as described in the previous section. Methods of stabilization, which are outlined below, could include removal of unstable materials and replacement with granular fill (with or without geotextiles). The most suitable method of stabilization, if required, will be dependent upon factors such as schedule, weather, size of area to be stabilized and the nature of the instability. ■ Granular Fill - The use of crushed stone or gravel could be considered to improve subgrade stability. Typical undercut depths would range from about 1 foot to 1 % feet. The use of high modulus geotextiles (i.e., woven geosynthetic fabric such as RS 3801) may be used to aid in stabilization of the subgrade. See pavement section thicknesses in the report Pavements section for an alternative using this fabric. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Chemical Stabilization - Improvement of subgrades with Portland cement could be considered for unstable and plastic soils. Chemical modification should be performed by a pre -qualified contractor having experiencewith successfully stabilizing subgrades in the project area on similar sized projects with similar soil conditions. Fill Material Types Fill required to achieve design grade should be classified as structural fill and general fill. Structural fill is material used below, or within 5 feet of structures, pavements or constructed slopes. General fill is material used to achieve grade outside of these areas. Earthen materials used for structural and general fill should meet the following material property requirements: ODOT SSC 02630.10 Dense All gradations are acceptable within the Crushed Aggregate Graded Aggregate (2"-0 to'/W-0) building pad. Use 1" 0 or''/." -0 gradation for Base Course (CABC) with the exception of less than 8 floor slab and pavement base course percent passing the No. 200 materials. sieve. 1. Controlled, compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free (free = less than 3% by weight) of organic matter and debris. Frozen material should not be used, and fill should nat be placed on a frozen subgrade. A sample of each material type should be submitted to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation. 2. The building pad is defined as the footprint of the building plus a horizontal bearing splay of 213 the depth of any overexcavation. 3. Note that the native soils do not meet these minimum requirements for re -use as structural fill. It should be noted that the onsite native materials are overly moist, exhibit low to medium plasticity, and likely do not meet the requirements of structural fill above for reuse. Selection of the fill material types identified during construction should follow the requirements above for placement of structural fill. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 10 USCS Classification Oregon DOT Standard All locations across the site, except within Specifications for Construction building pad (and 5 feet beyond) and upper Common Fill (ODOT SSC) 00330.13 Selected General Backfill with exception of 12 inches below the pavement subgradesz. LL<403and Pl<10. Dry weather conditions only. ODOT SSC 00330.14 Selected Select Fill Granular Backfill with exception All locations across the site, wet or dry of no more than 5% passing the weather conditions acceptable. No. 200 sieve by weight ODOT SSC 02630.10 Dense All gradations are acceptable within the Crushed Aggregate Graded Aggregate (2"-0 to'/W-0) building pad. Use 1" 0 or''/." -0 gradation for Base Course (CABC) with the exception of less than 8 floor slab and pavement base course percent passing the No. 200 materials. sieve. 1. Controlled, compacted fill should consist of approved materials that are free (free = less than 3% by weight) of organic matter and debris. Frozen material should not be used, and fill should nat be placed on a frozen subgrade. A sample of each material type should be submitted to the geotechnical engineer for evaluation. 2. The building pad is defined as the footprint of the building plus a horizontal bearing splay of 213 the depth of any overexcavation. 3. Note that the native soils do not meet these minimum requirements for re -use as structural fill. It should be noted that the onsite native materials are overly moist, exhibit low to medium plasticity, and likely do not meet the requirements of structural fill above for reuse. Selection of the fill material types identified during construction should follow the requirements above for placement of structural fill. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 10 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Fill Compaction Requirements Structural and general fill should meet the following compaction requirements. Structural Fill Minimum Compaction 95 percent of the material's maximum modified Proctor dry density Requirements I (ASTM D 1557). Moisture Content 2 Wthin ±2 percent of optimum moisture content as determined by the Modified Proctor test, at the time of placement and compaction. Minimum Testing One field density test per 20,000 square feet or fraction thereof per 1 - Frequency foot lift. 1. We recommend that engineered fill be tested for moisture content and compaction during placement. Should the results of the in-place density tests indicate the specified moisture or compaction limits have not been met, the area represented by the test should be reworked and retested as required until the specified moisture and compaction requirements are achieved. 2. Specifically, moisture levels should be maintained low enough to allow for satisfactory compaction to be achieved without the cohesionless fill material pumping when proafrolled. Utility Trench Backfill For low permeability subgrades, utility trenches are a common source of water infiltration and migration. Utility trenches penetrating beneath the building should be effectively sealed to restrict water intrusion and flow through the trenches, which could migrate below the building. The trench should provide an effective trench plug that extends at least 5 feet from the face of the building exterior. The plug material should consist of cementitious flowable fill or low permeability clay. The trench plug material should be placed to surround the utility line. If used, the clay trench plug material should be placed and compacted to comply with the water content and compaction recommendations for structural fill stated previously in this report. Grading and Drainage All grades must provide effective drainage away from the building during and after construction and should be maintained throughout the life of the structure. Water retained next to the building can result in soil movements greaterthan those discussed in this report. Greater movements can result in unacceptable differential floor slab and/or foundation movements, cracked slabs and walls, and roof leaks. The roof should have gutters/drains with downspouts that discharge onto splash blocks at a distance of at least 10 feet from the building. Exposed ground should be sloped and maintained at a minimum 5% away from the building for at least 10 feet beyond the perimeter of the building. Locally, flatter grades may be necessary to transition ADA access requirements forflatwork. After building construction and landscaping have Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 11 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. been completed, final grades should be verified to document effective drainage has been achieved. Grades around the structure should also be periodically inspected and adjusted, as necessary, as part of the structure's maintenance program. Where paving or flatwork abuts the structure, a maintenance program should be established to effectively seal and maintain joints and prevent surface water infiltration. Earthwork Construction Considerations Shallow excavations for the proposed structure are anticipated to be accomplished with conventional construction equipment. Upon completion offilling and grading, care should be taken to maintain the subgrade water content prior to construction of floor slabs. Construction traffic over the completed subgrades should be avoided. The site should also be graded to prevent ponding of surface water on the prepared subgrades or in excavations. Water collecting over or adjacentto construction areas should be removed. If the subgrade freezes, desiccates, saturates, or is disturbed, the affected material should be removed, or the materials should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and recompacted prior to floor slab construction. The groundwater table could affect overexcavation efforts, especially for over -excavation and replacement of lower strength soils. A temporary dewatering system consisting of sumps with pumps could be necessary to achieve the recommended depth of over -excavation. As a minimum, excavations should be performed in accordance with OSHA 29 CFR, Part 1926, Subpart P, "Excavations" and its appendices, and in accordance with any applicable local, and/or state regulations. Construction site safety is the sole responsibility of the contractor who controls the means, methods, and sequencing of construction operations. Under no circumstances shall the information provided herein be interpreted to mean Terracon is assuming responsibility for construction site safety, or the contractor's activities. such responsibility shall neither be implied nor inferred. Construction Observation and Testing The earthwork efforts should be monitored under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. Monitoring should include documentation of adequate removal of vegetation and topsoil, proofrolling, and mitigation of areas delineated by the proofroll to require mitigation. Each lift of compacted fill should be tested, evaluated, and reworked as necessary until approved by the Geotechnical Engineer prior to placement of additional lifts. Each lift of fill should be tested for density and water content at a frequency stated in Earthwork. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 12 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 is Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 is Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. In areas of foundation excavations, the bearing sub grade should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. In the event unanticipated conditions are encountered, the Geotechnical Engineer should prescribe mitigation options. In addition to the documentation of the essential parameters necessary for construction, the continuation of the Geotechnical Engineer into the construction phase of the project provides the continuity to maintain the Geotechnical Engineer's evaluation of subsurface conditions, including assessing variations and associated design changes. SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS If the site has been prepared in accordance with the requirements noted in Earthwork, the following design parameters are applicable for shallow foundations. Item Description Maximum Net Allowable Bearing 1,2 3,000foundations sf constructed on structural fill P ( ) Pressure 12 inches minimum Select Fill as described in Bearing Required Bearing Stratum Provisions above undisturbed, medium stiff or better native soils Columns: 30 inches Minimum Foundation Dimensions Continuous: 18 inches Ultimate Passive Resistance° 480 pcf (granular backfill) (equivalent fluidpressures) Ultimate Coefficient of Sliding Frictions 0.55 (granular material) Minimum Embedment below Exterior footings in unheated areas: 18 inches Exterior footings in heated areas: 18inches Finished Grade Interior footings in heated areas: 12 inches Compaction requirements 95% of the materials maximum Modified Proctor dry density for a depth of 12 inches below footin and slabs. One field density test per Onefelddensity test per Minimum Testing Frequency footing for the spread 501inear feet for footing. continuous footing. Estimated Total Settlement from Structural Loads Less than about 1 inch Estimated Differential Settlement 2,7 About hof total settlement Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 13 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 is Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 is Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. 1. The maximum netallowable bearing pressure isthe pressure in excess of the minimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. An appropriate factor of safety has been applied. Values assume that exterior grades are no steeper than 20% Within 5 feet of structure. 2. Values provided are for maximum loads noted in Project Description. 3. Unsuitable or soft soils should be overexcavated and replaced per the recommendations presented in the Earthwork. 4. Use of passive earth pressures require the sides of the excavation for the spread footing foundation to be nearly vertical and the concrete placed neat against these vertical faces or that the footing forms be removed and compacted structural fill be placed against the vertical footing face. 5. Can be used to compute sliding resistance where foundations are placed on suitable soil/materials. Should be neglected for foundations subject to net uplift conditions. 6. Embedment necessary to minimize the effects of frost and/or seasonal water content variations. For sloping ground, maintain depth below the lowest adjacent exterior grade within 5 horizontal feet of the structure. 7. Differential settlements are as measured over a span of 50 feet. Design Parameters—Canopy & Trash Enclosure Foundations Item lt Descripti Maximum Net Allowable Bearing 1,2 2,000foundations sf constructed on structural fill P ( ) Pressure a 6 inches minimum structural fill as described in Bearing Required Bearing S[ra[um Provisions above on top of native soils Columns: Winches Minimum Foundation Dimensions Continuous: 18 inches Ultimate Passive Resistance 480 pcf (granular backfill) (equivalent fluidpressures) Ultimate Coefficient of Sliding Frictions 0.55 (granular material) Minimum Embedment below Finished Grades Exterior footings in unheated areas: 18 inches Compaction requirements 95% of the materials maximum Modified Proctor dry density for a depth of 12 inches below footing and slabs. Minimum Testing Frequency One field density test per footing for the spread footing. Estimated Total Settlement from Structural Loads Less than about 1 inch Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 14 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. 1. The maximum netallowable bearing pressure is the pressure in excess ofthe minimum surrounding overburden pressure at the footing base elevation. An appropriate factor of safety has been applied. 2. Values provided are far maximum loads noted in Project Description. 3. Unsuitable or soft soils should be overexcavated and replaced per the recommendations presented in the Earthwork. 4. Use of passive earth pressures requirethe sides oftheexcavation forthe spread footing foundation to be nearly vertical and the concrete placed neat against these vertical faces or that the footing forms be removed and compacted structural fill be placed against the vertical footing face. 5. Can be used to compute sliding resistance where foundations are placed on suitable soil/materials. Should be neglected for foundations subject to net uplift conditions. 6. Embedment necessary to minimize the effects of frost and/or seasonal water content variations. For sloping ground, maintain depth belowthe lowest adjacent exterior grade within 5 horizontal feet of the structure. Footing Drains We recommend that footings drains be installed around the perimeter of the proposed buildings at the base of the foundations. Footing drains should consist of a minimum 4 -inch diameter, Schedule 40, rigid, perforated PVC pipe placed at the base of the heel of the footing with the perforations facing down. The pipe should be surrounded by a minimum of 4 inches of clean free - draining granular material, such as Oregon Standard Specifications Section 00430.11 Granular Drain Backfill 1 Y - 3W. We recommend enveloping the drain rock with a non -woven geotextile, such as Mirafi 140N, or equivalent. Footing drains should be directed toward appropriate storm water drainage facilities. Water from downspouts and surface water should be independently collected and routed to a suitable discharge location. Foundation Construction Considerations As noted in Earthwork, the footing excavations should be evaluated under the direction of the Geotechnical Engineer. The base of all foundation excavations should be free of water and loose soil, prior to placing concrete. Concrete should be placed soon after excavating to reduce bearing soil disturbance. Care should be taken to prevent wetting or drying of the bearing materials during construction. Excessively wet or dry material or any loose/disturbed material in the bottom of the footing excavations should be removed/reconditioned before foundation concrete is placed. The recommendations in the Shallow Foundations table recommend undercutting 12 inches to native, undisturbed soils and replacement with structural fill. Undercutting for structural fill placement below footings should be conducted as shown below. As previously stated, this undercutting is recommended to account for the moderate to high plasticity lean and fat clays anticipated during excavation. The over -excavation should be backfilled up to the footing base elevation, with Select Fill or CAB placed, as recommended in the Earthwork section. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 15 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. FLOOR SLABS Design parameters for floor slabs assume the requirements for Earthwork have been followed. Specific attention should be given to positive drainage awayfrom the structure and positive drainage of the aggregate base beneath the floor slab. Due to the presence of low to moderate plasticity clays exhibiting the potential to swell with increased water content, we recommend removal of the top 12 inches of subgrade and replacing it with compacted Select Fill as noted in the Fill Material Types section. The purpose of the granular fill underneath the floor slabs is to provide separation from potentially expansive soils in addition to facilitate a reduction in potential moisture fluctuation of the native soils by making them deeper below the finish ground surface. Floor Slab Design Parameters Item Floor Slab Support Minimum 6 inches of crushed aggregate (CABC) in addition to the 12 inches of Select Fill compacted to at least 95% of ASTM D 1557 x' Subgrade Minimum 12 inches of Select Fill over native or stable proof -rolled subgrade per Earthwork recommendation or compacted structural fill. Estimated Modulus of Subgrade Reaction i 175 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/n) for point loads 1. Floorslabsshould be structurally independent of building footings orwallsto reduce the possibilityoffloor slab cracking caused by differential movements between the slab and foundation. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 16 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. 2. Modulus of subgrade reaction is an estimated value based upon our experience with the subgrade condition, the requirements noted in Earthwork, and the floor slab support as noted in this table. It is provided for point loads. For large area loads the modulus of subgrade reaction would be lower. 3. Free -draining granular material should have less than 5% fines (material passing the No. 200 sieve). Other design considerations such as cold temperatures and condensation development could warrant more extensive design provisions. The use of a vapor retarder should be considered beneath concrete slabs on grade covered with wood, tile, carpet, or other moisture sensitive or impervious coverings, or when the slab will support equipment sensitive to moisture. When conditions warrant the use of a vapor retarder, the slab designer should refer to ACI 302 and/or ACI 360 for procedures and cautions regarding the use and placement of a vapor retarder. Saw -cut control joints should be placed in the slab to help control the location and extent of cracking. For additional recommendations refer to the ACI Design Manual. Joints or cracks should be sealed with a water -proof, non -extruding compressible compound specifically recommended for heavy duty concrete pavement and wet environments. Where floor slabs are tied to perimeter walls or tum -down slabs to meet structural or other construction objectives, our experience indicates differential movement between the walls and slabs will likely be observed in adjacent slab expansion joints or floor slab cracks beyond the length of the structural dowels. The Structural Engineer should account for potential differential settlement through use of sufficient control joints, appropriate reinforcing or other means. Floor Slab Construction Considerations Finished subgrade, within and for at least 10 feet beyond the floor slab, should be protected from traffic, rutting, or other disturbance and maintained in a relatively moist condition until floor slabs are constructed. If the subgrade should become damaged or desiccated prior to construction of floor slabs, the affected material should be removed and structural fill should be added to replace the resulting excavation. Final conditioning of the finished subgrade should be performed immediately prior to placement of the floor slab support course. The Geotechnical Engineer should approve the condition of the floor slab subgrades immediately prior to placement of the floor slab support course, reinforcing steel, and concrete. Attention should be paid to high traffic areas that were rutted and disturbed earlier, and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 17 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. LATERAL EARTH PRESSURES Design Parameters Structures with unbalanced backfill levels on opposite sides should be designed for earth pressures at least equal to values indicated in the following table. Earth pressures will be influenced by structural design of the walls, conditions of wall restraint, methods of construction and/or compaction and the strength of the materials being restrained. Twowall restraint conditions are shown in the diagram below. Active earth pressure is commonly used for design of free- standing cantilever retaining walls and assumes wall movement. The "at -rest' condition assumes no wall movement and is commonly used for basement walls, loading dock walls, or other walls restrained at the top. The recommended design lateral earth pressures do not include a factor of safety and do not provide for possible hydrostatic pressure on the walls (unless stated). For eoli a pressure movamen S=SurMa,ge (01x2 H to 0.0 H) S For at -rest pressure - No Movement Assumed okonW Iishetl ratle H HOriIDOUI Fi,eshetl Gratle �__q�tp,yl aerainmg wan Lateral Earth Pressure Design Parameters—Granular Backfill Only Earth Pressure Coefficient for Surcharge Effective Fluid Pressures (per) 2, u, s Condition Backfill Type .,. P, (Per) Unsaturated g (0.24)S (31)H Submerged e Active (Ka) 0.24 - At -Rest (Ko) 0.38 (0.38)S (50)H - Passive (Kip) 4.20 - (546)H - 1. For active earth pressure, wall must rotate about base, with top lateral movements 0.002 H to 0.004 H, where H is wall height. For passive earth pressure, wall must move horizontally to mobilize resistance. 2. Uniform, horizontal backfill, compacted to at least 95% of the ASTM D 1557 maximum dry density, estimated at 130 pcf (select granularfll). 3. Uniform surcharge, where S is surcharge pressure. 4. Loading from heavy compaction equipment is not included. 5. No safety factor is included in thesevalues. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 18 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. W Lateral Earth Pressure Design Parameters — Granular Backfill Only Earth Pressure Coefficient for Surcharge cEffective Fluid Pressures (psf) 2, 4, 5 Condition Backfill Type Pressure e 6 Unsaturated Submerged 6. To achieve "Unsaturated" conditions, follow guidelines in Subsurface Drainage for Below - Grade Walls below. "Submerged' conditions are recommended when drainage behind walls is not incorporated into the design. Backfill placed against structures should consist of granular soils or low plasticity cohesive soils. For the granular values to be valid, the granular backfill must extend out and up from the base of the wall at an angle of at least 45 and 60 degrees from vertical for the active and passive cases, respectively. Subsurface Drainage for Below -Grade Walls A perforated rigid plastic drain line installed behind the base of walls and extends below adjacent grade is recommended to prevent hydrostatic loading on the walls. The invert of a drain line around a below -grade building area or exterior retaining wall should be placed near foundation bearing level. The drain line should be sloped to provide positive gravity drainage to daylight or to a sump pit and pump. The pipe should be surrounded by a minimum of 4 inches of clean free - draining granular material, such as Oregon Standard Specifications Section 00430.11 Granular Drain Backfill 1'/." - 3W. The free -draining aggregate should be encapsulated in a filterfabric. The granularfill should extend towithin 2feet offinal grade, where it should be capped with compacted cohesive fill to reduce infiltration of surface water into the drain system. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 19 Slope to drain ai from building teyerof dedesvelll T — 1-7, T Fmntlaron'.vall Pill - Ba."ll side report 4 �t ,ulrements) Free draining graded �� gramsarfltmaterialar n on graded d _g material dnP [din V S Fr nap pp Pri ate flierli NatNatrae undr tied fin(port) d Ply? /�,1ry4 1 engineeredfill r Perforated drain pipe (Rigid PVC unless stated bi In report) Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 19 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. As an alternative to free -draining granuIarfiII, a pre -fabricated drainage structure maybe used. A pre -fabricated drainage structure is a plastic drainage core or mesh which is covered with filter fabric to prevent soil intrusion, and is fastened to the wall prior to placing backfill. PAVEMENTS General Pavement Comments Pavement designs are provided for the traffic conditions and pavement life conditions as noted in Project Description and in the following sections of this report. A critical aspect of pavement performance is site preparation. Pavement designs noted in this section must be applied to the site which has been prepared as recommended in the Earthwork section. Support characteristics of subgrade for pavement design do not account for shrinktswell movements of an moderate plasticity clay subgrade, such as soils encountered on this project. Thus, the pavement may be adequate from a structural standpoint, yet still experience cracking and deformation due to shrinktswell related movement of the subgrade. In order to mitigate this we are recommending either a high -modulus geotextile or chemical stabilization, as mentioned in the Earthwork section. Pavement Design Parameters Provided the existing subgrade soils are tested, evaluated and prepared in accordance with the recommendations provided in this report, these materials should provide suitable pavement support. The subgrade materials within the proposed pavement areas are generally expected to consist of lean clay having an estimated minimum California Bearing Ratio (CBR) value of 1. Based on our expectation that the car parking areawill be subjected to automobile traffic only and that the drive areas will be subjected to a maximum of five delivery trucksttrash collection trucks per week, it is our opinion that Chick -fl -A's minimum pavement sections noted below are acceptable forthis site. Pavement Section Thicknesses The following table provides recommended Asphalt Concrete Pavement (AC) and Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCC)AC thicknesses: Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 20 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Minimum Pavement Section Thickness (inches) —NO GEOSVNTHETIC FABRIC Pavement Alternative Asphalt2 Asphalt Portland Aggregate Tota Concrete Concrete Concrete Cement Base Surface urface Binder Concrete Course Course ourse Course Parking Parking AC 2 2 -- 12 16 Parking PCC -- -- 5^/: 6 11 Drive- 10 14 Through/Canopy AC 2 2 -- 14 18 Throu h/Canopy Drive- PCC -- -- 6 6 11^/: Through/Canopy 1. See Project Descriptim for more specifics regarding Light Duty and Medium Duty traffic. 2. All materials should meet the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Standard Specifications for Highway and Construction (2021). • Asphaltic Surface -ODOT Type A Asphaltic Cement Concrete: Section 00744 • Asphaltic Base - ODOT Type B Asphaltic Cement Concrete, Class I: Section 00745 • Concrete Pavement -COOT Portland Cement Concrete Type C: Section 00756 13. A minimum 1.5 -inch surface course should be used on ACC pavements. Minimum Pavement Section Thickness (inches) —WITH GEOSVNTHETIC FABRIC Pavement Alternative Asphalt2 Asphalt Aggregate Total Area' Concrete Concrete Base Course Thickness Surface Binder 3 Course Course Parking AC 2 2 8 12 Drive- AC 2 2 10 14 Through/Canopy 4. See Project Description for more specifics regarding Light Duty and Medium Duty traffic. 5. All materials should meet the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) Standard Specifications for Highway and Construction (2021). • Asphaltic Surface- ODOT Type A Asphaltic Cement Concrete: Section 00744 • Asphaltic Base - ODOT Type B Asphaltic Cement Concrete, Class I: Section 00745 • Concrete Pavement -COOT Portland Cement Concrete Type C: Section 00756 26. A minimum 1.5 -inch surface course should be used on ACC pavements. For flexible pavement, the recommended granular base course should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557 or evaluated in the field in a test strip subjected to repeated passes of a 10 -ton, or heavier, roller. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 21 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. The recommended granular base course should be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density, as determined by ASTM D 1557 or evaluated in the field in a test strip subjected to repeated passes of a 10 -ton, or heavier, roller. The listed pavement component thicknesses should be used as a guide for pavement systems at the site for the traffic classifications stated herein. These recommendations assume a 20 -year pavement design life and an average weekly truck traffic value of 1 (forthe tractor trailers). They also assume 300 automobiles a day, and 5light delivery trucks and trash collection vehicles per week. Joint locations and reinforcement should be in accordance with ACI 330R-01. If the design life or loads will be different than that specified, Terracon should be contacted and allowed to review these pavement sections. We recommend a minimum 7 -inch thick PCC pavement be utilized in entrance and exit sections, dumpster pads, loading areas, or other areaswhere extensivewheel maneuvering are expected. Portland cement concrete should be designed with proper air -entrainment and have a minimum compressive strength of 4,000 psi after 28 days of laboratory curing. Adequate reinforcement and number of longitudinal and transverse control joints should be placed in the rigid pavement in accordance with ACI requirements. The joints should be sealed as soon as possible (in accordance with sealant manufacturer's instructions) to minimize infiltration of water into the soil. Design Considerations Traffic patterns and anticipated loading conditionswere not available atthe time that this reportwas prepared. However, we anticipate that traffic loads will be produced primarily by automobile traffic and occasional delivery and trash removal trucks. The thickness of pavements subjected to heavy truck traffic should be determined using expected traffic volumes, vehicle types, and vehicle loads and should be in accordance with local, city or county ordinances. Long-term pavement performance will be dependent upon several factors, including maintaining subgrade moisture levels and providing for preventive maintenance. In addition to providing preventive maintenance, the civil engineer should consider the following recommendations in the design and layout of pavements: • Final grade adjacent to parking lots and drives should slope down from pavement edges at a minimum 2%. • The subgrade and the pavement surface should have a minimum Y4 -inch per foot slope to promote proper surface drainage. • Install pavement drainage surrounding areas anticipated for frequent wetting (e.g., wash racks). • Install joint sealant and seal cracks immediately. • Seal all landscaped areas in, or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to subgrade soils. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 22 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987. Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022. Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Place compacted, low permeability backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter. and, Place curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on low permeability subgrade soils rather than on unbound granular base course materials. Pavement Construction Considerations On most project sites, the site grading is accomplished relatively early in the construction phase. Fills are placed and compacted, and the initial surface is prepared in a relatively uniform manner. However, as construction proceeds, excavations will be made into these areas, rainfall and surface water may saturate some areas, heavy traffic from construction equipment disturbs the subgrade, and surface irregularities are often filled with loose materials. As a result, the pavement subgrades should be carefully evaluated as the time for pavement construction approaches. Within a few days of planned paving, we recommend the pavement areas be proof -rolled with a loaded tandem axle dump truck (minimum weight 20 tons). Particular attention should be given to high traffic areas that have been rutted and disturbed, and to areas where backfilled trenches are located. Any areas found to be unstable should be repaired by removing and replacing the materials with dense graded crushed stone, or by recompacting the soils to the specified density and moisture limits. Pavement Drainage Pavements should be sloped to provide rapid drainage of surface water. Water allowed to pond on or adjacent to the pavements could saturate the subgrade and contribute to premature pavement deterioration. In addition, the pavement subgrade should be graded to provide positive drainage within the granular base section. The subgrade and the pavement surface should have a minimum Y4 inch per foot slope to promote drainage. Appropriate sub -drainage or connection to a suitable daylight outlet should be provided to remove water from the base layer. Pavement Maintenance The pavement sections represent minimum recommended thicknesses and, as such, periodic maintenance should be anticipated. Therefore, preventive maintenance should be planned and provided for through an on-going pavement management program. Maintenance activities are intended to slow the rate of pavement deterioration and to preserve the pavement investment. Maintenance consists of both localized maintenance (e.g., crack and joint sealing and patching) and global maintenance (e.g., surface sealing). Preventive maintenance is usually the priority when implementing a pavement maintenance program. Additional engineering observation is recommended to determine the type and extent of a cost-effective program. Even with periodic maintenance, some movements and related cracking may still occur and repairs may be required. Pavement performance is affected by its surroundings. In addition to providing preventive maintenance, the civil engineer should consider the following recommendations in the design and layout of pavements: Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 23 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. • Final grade adjacent to paved areas should slope down from the edges at a minimum 2%. • Subgrade and pavement surfaces should have a minimum 2% slope to promote proper surface drainage. • Install below pavement drainage systems surrounding areas anticipated for frequent wetting. • Install joint sealant and seal cracks immediately. • Seal all landscaped areas in or adjacent to pavements to reduce moisture migration to subgrade soils. • Place compacted, low permeability backfill against the exterior side of curb and gutter. • Place curb, gutter and/or sidewalk directly on clay subgrade soils rather than on unbound granular base course materials. GENERAL COMMENTS Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variationswill occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this report, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation and testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluation and supplemental recommendations. Our Scope of Services does not include either specifically or by implication any environmental or biological (e.g., mold, fungi, bacteria) assessment of the site or identification or prevention of pollutants, hazardous materials or conditions. If the owner is concerned about the potential for such contamination or pollution, other studies should be undertaken. Our services and any correspondence or collaboration through this system are intended for the sole benefit and exclusive use of our client for specific application to the project discussed and are accomplished in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering practices with no third -party beneficiaries intended. Any third -party access to services or correspondence is solely for information purposes to support the services provided by Terracon to our client. Reliance upon the services and any work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for third parties. Any use or reliance of the provided information by third parties is done solely at their own risk. No warranties, either express or implied, are intended or made. Site characteristics as provided are for design purposes and not to estimate excavation cost. Any use of our report in that regard is done at the sole risk of the excavating cost estimator as there may be variations on the site that are not apparent in the data that could significantly impact excavation cost. Any parties charged with estimating excavation costs should seek their own site Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 24 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. characterization for specific purposes to obtain the specific level of detail necessary for costing. Site safety, and cost estimating including, excavation support, and dewatering requirements/design are the responsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and either verify or modify our conclusions in writing. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable 25 FIGURES Contents: GeoModel Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable r GEOMODEL lrerracon CFA_FCUM4987 Gateway and RPB Goo ■ Slai glleld, OR Teralcon Protect No. 8221519 GeoReport This is not a cross section. This is ntontlel to dsplay the Ge nasi Matld only. See ndNidual lags for more tldalel conditions. Model Later Layer Name Cenral Denwipdon AND HALT BASE do mcrete; n 1 ASPCOURSE Aggegae Vase cmrae; va'w maned rock, gray. Birch NiWness 2 LEAN CLAY Le'n cloy; Lean clay' Mtn pard; lav to malum pasddty, can, hrovm and gray, mill who, bay stiff 3 1 GRAVEL I Wm Slltard d SANDcanseN�ed sand; finegrained, gray and broom, median LEGEND ■Asphalt E0dayandeard ®Lawry ®Aggregate Base Corrse Poorly-gradedSend ®�nCkY wilh Santl ®Poorly -graded! Gral With Silt and Send SL NOTES: First Water Observaion Layering shad n on his figure has been developed by the geotechnical engineer for purposes of model ing the subsu Race conditions as required for the subsequent geotechnical engineering for this pmj ed. Gro undwater levels are tem pons l. The lees' s shown are re presentative of the date Numbers adjacent to soil column indicate depth below ground and time dour exploration. Significant changes are possible over time, surface. Water levels shown are as measured during andlor after drilling, In some bases, boring advancement methods mask the presencelabsence of groundwater. See I ndlr,dual logs for detail s. ATTACHMENTS Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES Field Exploration Number of 2 21 Y2 Building 1 11 Y2 Drive -Through Lane & Canopy Structure 2 1 6Y2 1 Parking Lot Drive Aisles Boring Layout and Elevations: Unless otherwise noted, Terracon personnel provided the boring layout. Coordinates were obtained with a handheld GPS unit (estimated horizontal accuracy of about t10 feet) and approximate elevations were obtained by interpolation from the Google Earth Pro. If elevations and a more precise boring layout are desired, we recommend borings be surveyed following completion of fieldwork. Subsurface Exploration Procedures: We advanced the borings with a track -mounted rotary drill rig using continuous flight augers (solid stem and/or hollow stem, as necessary, depending on soil conditions). Five samples were obtained in the upper 10 feet of each boring and at intervals of 5 feet thereafter, with the exception of the borings that hit refusal. In the thin-walled tube sampling procedure, a thin-walled, seamless steel tube with a sharp cutting edge was pushed hydraulically into the soil to obtain a relatively undisturbed sample. In the split -barrel sampling procedure, a standard 2 -inch outer diameter split -barrel sampling spoon was driven into the ground by a 140 -pound automatic hammer falling a distance of 30 inches. The number of blows required to advance the sampling spoon the last 12 inches of a normal 18 -inch penetration is recorded as the Standard Penetration Test (SPT) resistance value. The SPT resistance values, also referred to as N -values, are indicated on the boring logs at the test depths. A 3 -inch O.D. split -barrel sampling spoon with 2.5 -inch I.D. ring lined sampler was used for sampling. We observed and recorded groundwater levels during drilling and sampling. For safety purposes, all borings were backfilled with bentonite chips and auger cuttings after their completion. The sampling depths, penetration distances, and other sampling information was recorded on the field boring logs. The sampleswere placed in appropriate containers and taken to our soil laboratory for testing and classification by a Geotechnical Engineer. Our exploration team prepared field boring logs as part of the drilling operations. These field logs included visual classifications of the materials encountered during drilling and our interpretation of the subsurface conditions between samples. Final boring logs were prepared from the field logs. The final boring logs represent the Geotechnical Engineer's interpretation of the field logs and include modifications based on observations and tests of the samples in our laboratory. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable EXPLORATION AND TESTING PROCEDURES f of Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. Laboratory Testing The project engineer reviewed the field data and assigned laboratory tests to understand the engineering properties of the various soil strata, as necessary, for this project. Procedural standards noted below are for reference to methodology in general. In some cases, variations to methodswere applied because of local practice or professional judgment. Standards noted below include reference to other, related standards. Such references are not necessarily applicable to describe the specific test performed. • ASTM D2216 Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Determination of Water (Moisture) Content of Soil and Rock by Mass • ASTM D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils • ASTM D1557 Standard Test Methods of Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-Ibf/ft3 (2,700 KN-m/m3)) • ASTM D2166/D2166M Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil • ASTM D1883 Standard Test Method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of Laboratory - Compacted Soils • ASTM D6913 Standard Test Methods for Particle -Size Distribution (Gradation) of Soils Using Sieve Analysis The laboratory testing program often included examination of soil samples by an engineer. Based on the material's texture and plasticity, we described and classified the soil samples in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System. Responsive Resourceful Reliable EXPLORATION ANDTESTING PROCEDURES 2 of2 Geotechnical Engineering Report lrerracon Chick -fl -A Restaurant #04987 • Springfield, Lane County, Oregon January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 GeoReport. PHOTOGRAPHYLOG Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 • 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 1 �erracon Date Pictures Taken: December 8, 2021 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 Photo 1: Boring B-1 prior to backfill and asphalt patching. Photo facing north. Photo 2: Boring B-2 backfilled and patched with asphalt patch. Photo facing northeast. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 • Gateway 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OF 1 �erracon Date Pictures Taken: December 8, 2021 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 Photo 3: Boring B-3 prior to backfill and asphalt patching. Photo facing northeast. Photo 4: Boring B-4 backfilled and patched with asphalt. Photo facing northwest. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 • Gateway 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR rracon� Date Pictures Taken: December 8, 2021 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 rG Photo 5: Boring B-5 backfilled and patched with asphalt. Photo facing southeast. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable SITE LOCATION AND EXPLORATION PLANS Contents: Site Location Plan Exploration Plan Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. Responsive • Resourceful • Reliable SITE LOCATION lferracon Chick-Fil-A Restaurant #04987-3350 Gateway Street + Springfield, OR GeoRe of f January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 p 1L -1 :EM 930 \ 0 I • 0 BM 433 x 43 � ; y. SITE y i_- A_ P mi O ° �W�llvkersLe to +' eNzi ao D r.dl� 11 a i °• � � N u �a Ir e ? 21 1.46 SL P,N �e ,- -�� SR' t a 22 JOYS ¢ O _ Jr H9 �I° IL T,r,l` OWHAdf,07V I RQf BM IN - �2k aRLa 5uh �. I DAGFW IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY. ANO IS TOFOGRAPHp WP IM4GE COURTESY OF THE U S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES QUADRANGLES NCOIOE'. EUGENE FAST, OR 111/19861. EXPLORATION PLAN Chick-Fil-A Restaurant #04987-3350 Gateway Street • Springfield, OR January 7, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82215117 lferracon GeoReport LEGEND APPROXIMATE BORING LOCATION AND NUMBER 7°re' DIAGRAM IS MR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY, PND IS AERIAL VNOTOGRAMY PRMIOEO NOT INTENDED MR CONSTRUCTION Fl RMSES BY MICMSOR BNG MAPS EXPLORATION RESULTS Contents: Boring Logs (B-1 through B-5) Unconfined Compression Test Atterberg Limits CBR Proctor Grain Size Distribution Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. BORING LOG NO. B-1 Pae 1 of 1 PROJECT: Chick-ftl-A Restaurant #04987 CLIENT: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, CA SITE: 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 00 LOCATION Sx Erylorarior'lar m 2 JQ w 10 ydo. p ad LMRS ad 5 V LatlWtle:46.W28"Lagddidi-1Y1.0ral J LL ) to N F Z F K J K da FF (F,� aF a 2 6 da E p �� S. O�o 3V ��u LL-PL-PI W Surface Elev: 428 (R.) 3r� LL ji O 5 g DEPT ELEVATION R. O 1 ASPNALT 3-nM Ihiclmess AGGREGATE EASE COURSE angular, gray, 3/4"-0 crushetl mck, 6 nM Ihicldness 5-7-8 N=15 6500 (HP) 24.3 39-23-18 WTN SAk y,vel,lau to medium la brown. ndgrarace metlium plasticity, tlafk brown and gray, very sltR 6500 brown, stiff N=8 N=8 (HP) 25.0 2 5 medium stiff 0-2-3 2500 33.9 N=5 (HP) 70 421 WELL GRADED GRAVEL 1I CLAY PND SAND (GW-GCI, subrounded, gray and brown, very dense 1 11.8 11 N=76 N=78 1 30 36-40-45 6.7 11 N=85 40 414 POORLY GRADED SAND (SP), trace sit, fine grained, gray and brown, wet, medium dense 15-- 4 5-5-6 25.5 5 N=11 170 411 POORLY GRADED GRAVEL W TH SILT AND SAND 1GP-GIRT, subrounded, gray and brown, r. dense 3 a � 2 ]-16-28 9.4 7 N�4 215 4055 Soling Terrrinaeetl at 21.5 Feet SlratlflwtlmlmseareapprokmYe. ll the traral maybe gradual. Wmmer Type: AUlanatle Atbamdl rrlyMd See fora bound Htllow stem adial O R descnprion of fi eld and lab oratory procedures were special man aulal pAwloarapin bNrg sed and ad di tion al d ata (If an y) Oe. Gowan aN Pro See for explanation of symbols and abbreviations_ gaBMazncf Metl,o]: Ban; WIXfllletl viM bd2aile Wpzupan aanpl�an. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS lrerracon mdng Stated: 11-301 ming Competed: 11-3s20n �7 Atccrnpletwedcrdrill OXII eIg:CME 850 firlller. Olman 7WNE55 Ave Panders, OR R{eC No.: 82215117 BORING LOG NO. B-2 Pae 1 of 1 PROJECT: Chick-ftl-A Restaurant #04987 CLIENT: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, CA SITE: 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 00 LOCATION Ses Frylorarior ular m ad 2 JQ 10 ydo. p y>Y LMRS Z 5 V LafiWtle:" Wrl L"Hadf:-123.0l J LL ) R F Z F p w K -w FF �o (F,� aF ad 6 da E ad ad Oto 3V Y� �[ LL-PL-PI W Suhee Rev.: 427(R.) 3r� do LL 5 ji O 5 g OEP ELEVATION(11.1O 1 ASPNALT 3tinM thickness AGGREGATE EASE COURSE angular, gray, 3/4"-0 crushetl mck, 6 nM Thickness N 12 (Hp 26.3 LEANCLAYWTNSANDICLI.lowlometlum plasticity, dark brown, sfiR brown 5IM 1130 30.9 85 43-23-2078 2 3-66 4000 30.9 5 N=11 (HP) 75 4195 VkELL GRADED GRAVEL W TH CLAY AND SAND ° 17-1421 9.5 (GW-GCI, subroundeq broom and gray, dense N=35 1 1028-24 8.2 8 Nom] 3 medium dense 141612 12.0 7 N=27 190 m POORLY GRADED SAND ISPI, trace At, fine grained,bmwn, medium dense z 4 12-13-13 20.] 4 N=26 4255 Boring Termirr al at 21.5 Feet Slnfiflwtlmllrezareapprokmate. Il the deal maybe gradual. Wmmer Type: Apterre e Aduamdnert Near See fora Note. Htllow Yam aqc 6' O R descnpnion of f eld and lab oratory procedures eorearnwere lot>palY°tl Rdn aulal rAwloaraf.Yn bNrg used and ad di tion al d ata (If an y). Ge OEaN Ro See for explanation of symbols end abbreviations_ gasamen Medd: �Irg WIXfllletl viM bdiaite Wpzupan wmpl�an. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONSmdn8 lrerracon strtm: 11-30 1 as cangeted: 11-362021 �7 AtcanpletiondtlriA'rg OXII eIB:CME 850 Orlller. Olman 703NE3M Ade sanders, OR Poll Ne.: 82215117 BORING LOG NO. B-3 Pae 1 of 1 PROJECT: Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 CLIENT: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Irvine, CA SITE: 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 00 LOCATION See Erylorarior'ldu m ad W. JQ 10 yad p y>Y LMRS Z g V LatlWtle:aa.Wffi"LaglWie:-t23.W2t" J LL ) R F Z F K w ad K -w FF �o (F,� ad 6 da E ad $ Oto aF 3V Y� �[y LL-PL-PI W Suhee Rev: 628(R.) 3r� LL j 5 g DELPT EAlrlON R.I O do ASPNALT 3tinM thickness AGGREGATE EASE COURSE angular, gray, crushed Pal 6 in& thickness 2-2-3 14=5 22.9 LEAN CLAY WTN SAND ICLI. m edium pkadwity, dark brown, medium stiff brown 980 36.8 83 65 2 aw 5 0-2-9 1000 N=11 (HP) 37.5 5 4203 Vh6LLGR40E0GRAVEL WTN CLAY MD SAND 2N subrounded, gray andbmwn, aerydense 6135 77 ,'.� C:, 3 0 - medium dense 1416-12 10.18 N=27 tt(GW-GCl, 5 4165 Borhrg Terminalled at 11.5 Feet are.-rodur..approkmYe. Il the mares nmaybe gradual. Wmmer Type: Pdtorde e hduad—ent Niel See lora NNes: Hdi. Yam safe- 6'OR desunpnion of 11 eld and lab oratory purged ures Elevatwere Interpolated Rdn ae-lal rAwloaraf.Yn bNraf sed and ad di tion al d ata (If an y). Gurgle e EaI EaM Pro See for explanation of symbols end abbreviations_ gPBM; fiend [bad With �Irg WMfllletl wiM be-2aile Wpzupan wmpean. WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONSawing "Irerracon staged: 12-01-2021 awing Cwnpead: 12-011 Grgl ader nM er wrtered .11 Rd, CME 850 alller. Olman 7WNESS Fie PwtlaM, OR Prefect No.: 82215117 BORING LOG NO. B-4 Pae 1 of 1 PROJECT: Chick -M -A Restaurant #04987 CLIENT: Chick-fil-q Inc. Iry ne, CA SITE: 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 00 LOCATION See Frylorarior'lar m 2 JQ w 10 yad p ya.I LMRS ad 5 V LatlWtle:" Ol LaglWie:-1Y1.W2V J LL ) to R F Z F K J K da FFad 2 6 da E G �� $ O�o Y� �[y LL -PL -PI W Solace Dev.: 628(R.) 3r� LL j 5 g DEPT ELEVATION R. O do 1 ASPNALT 34n& Ihiclmess AGGREGATE EASE COURSE angular, gray, 3/4"-0 andshetl Pool 6 nah Ihiclmess 985 N=11 2500 (HP) LEAN CLAY ICLI. lace santl, medium plasticity, dark brown, stiff 0-1-3 3750 low to metlum plasticity, trial sot to metlum stiff N=4 (HP) 28.8 2 5 medium stiff 2-34 3750 40.4 N=7 (HP) 75 41ads WELL GRADED GRAVEL VI CLAY PND SAND 31316 13.5 (GW -GCI, subangular, gay and brown, metlium dense N=29 a o 10— very tlense 11-2213 12.5 N�5 115 4143 Boring Terrrinal at 11.5 Feet SlrafiflwtlmllrezareapprokmYe. Il the mares nmaybe gradual. Wmmer Type: AUlematle Aduamdnent rrlyMd See fora NNes: Hdi. sem aper 6'OR tlesunpnion of f eld and lab oratory pmced ures ElevatrelnlerpalYetl man aerial program" fears sed and ad di tion al d ata (If an y). e EaI EaM Pro See for explanation of symbols end abbreviations_ gash; Med Wi sIrg WMfllletl viM ber2aile Wpzupan wmpean. bath WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONSming "Irerracon Slates: 12-01-2521 ming Canpetee: 12-011 GrglnWlaler not edwou Rer6d .11 Full CME a50 shier. Olman 700NESS Ade Paul OR Prefect No.: 82215117 BORING LOG NO. B-5 Pae 1 of 1 PROJECT: Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 CLIENT: Chick-fit-A, Inc. Irvine, CA SITE: 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 00 LOCATION See Frylorarior'lar m 2 JQ w 10 ydo p ya. LIMITS ad 5 V LatlWtle:" Wrl LaglWie:-1Y1.W2>P J LL ) to R F Z F K J K Z FF ad (F,� 2 6 da E G �� $ O�o aF 3V Y� �[y LL-PL-PI W Suhee Elev.:6M(R.) 3r� LL j 5 g DEPT ELEVATION R. O ad ASPNALT 3ti g Ihiclmess A REW TE BASE COURSE angular, gay, 3/4"-0 ctushetl mck, 6 nM thiclmess 2-1 N=3 31M gyp) 32.7 f ceu CLAY ICLI. face sand, metlum plastiaty, dark brovn, soft 3-67 2000 low to metlum plasticity, bmvm, stiff 0 N=12 (Np) 34.3 5 trace gava, very stiff 2-2-14 1000 38.3 N=16 (HP) ss Blas Boring TerninaMrl at 6.5 Feet SlntlflwtlmlmemareapprokmYe. Il the mares nmaybe gradual. Wmmer Type: AUlarel Aduamdnert lrlyMd See fora NNee: Hallow area aper 6' O R tleacnpnion of f eld and lab oratory pmced ures Elevations were Interpol aboard aerial rAwloaraf.Yn bNrg sed and ad dition al d ate (If an y). GurgleeEaM Pro See for explanation of symbols end abbreviations_ Med gaaga; With galrg WMfllletl viM ber2aile Wpzupan aanpel. bad WATER LEVEL OBSERVATIONS Irerracon Said, stated: 12,01-Ml Eaing Canpetee: lam-= GrglnWlaler lla edwou Rer6d .11 RI,: CMEM alller. Olman 70DNE 3M Ade Poll OR FjaC No.: g2S,15117 irs UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 200 ,100 ,000 900-- 800-- 700- 600- 500 00800700600500 400 300 200 100 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 AXIAL STRAIN - % SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH 1 &+l Al 911 Ael 9 Yi T I -MR •--. PROJECT: Chick -fl -A Re mrmtM 4987 STE: 3350 Cr.y Sre Spmg�, OR SPECIMEN TEST DATA Muaiae Ccnlml: % Cry C My. pd Ciamela: n. Heghl: n. Heghl / Dwnda Raba Smn Rales Comlaletl salr.alim: % Comlaletl Va Rdb: Faure Sven: % 3.88 Un.ftnad%mpreas Srmglh (Paf) 1125 Untrained a. Srmglh: (Pad 583 Smn Rales Wmin Ranarka 5 PLE LOCATION: &2@ LL PL PI 43 1 23 2D 1 rerracon 700NESOhA- Ponlanq OR PROJECT NUMBER: 82215117 CLIB. ah -N-A, Inc. 1r e, CA R n w w F w w rn w w a 0 O U UNCONFINED COMPRESSION TEST ASTM D2166 ,000 900 800 rz 700-- 600-- 500-- 400- 300 00600500400300 200 100 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 AXIAL STRAIN - % SPECIMEN FAILURE PHOTOGRAPH &+A AI 91iai 9 Yi T I -ma---. PROJECT: Chick -fl -A RestaurantM 4987 9TE: 3350 Cra .y 9re Spmg�, OR SPECIMEN TEST DATA Muslae Ccnlml: % 38.8 Cry Delany. pd 83 Ciamela: n. 2.87 Heighl: n. 6.81 Height / Diameter Raba 2.38 CdcuWa Saturation: % 97.38 CdcuWa Va Rdb: 1.00 Faure grin: % 3.82 U .ftne Compress 9rength (Psf) Ni Untrained a.9rength: (Psi 490 grin Rata Wmin Ranarks F+ A,yl 91 A W9.40 U; 2P 1 rerracon 700NESOhA- Ponlanq OR PROJECT NUMBER: 82215117 CLIEI4r: ah -N-A, Inc. 1r e, CA ATTERBERG LIMITS RESULTS ASTM D4318 60 50 P O� O+ A S 40 T Gyp MM c -ML i ML OL T 30 _ V N 20 0 E 8 or OH p X ? 10 z p 5 0 0 0 20 40 s 60 80 100 LIQUID LMR o Bon epth LL PL PI Fines USC criptio s • B-1 1- 2.5 39 23 16 CL LEAN CLAY With SD m 8-2 2.5-4.5 43 23 20 78.2 CL EAN LCLAY With SD i, t0 y PROJECT: Chick -fl -A RestaurantM4W PROJECTNUMBER: 82215117 lrerraeon loo NE ssm Are 0 IM: M50 Cray Strad CU . Chi& -N -A, Inc. a aoniana, OR IrMe, CA 5 t O� Gyp MM CL -ML i ML OL k _ t k 8 z 0 s g t0 y PROJECT: Chick -fl -A RestaurantM4W PROJECTNUMBER: 82215117 lrerraeon loo NE ssm Are 0 IM: M50 Cray Strad CU . Chi& -N -A, Inc. 0 �9�. OR aoniana, OR IrMe, CA 5 M CALIFORNIA BEARING RATIO ASTM D1883-072 4.0 3.5 3.0 0 w r U W w 2.5 0 O U 2.0 m O x 1.5 N 1.0 0.5 0 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 DRV Dii (Ii Source of Material Description of Wenal Remarks Percent Fines % Aderber9 Limits LL PL PI Sasple No. 1 2 3 S pk,Con,i Soaked Compac8an M cei A5 898A Ma . Dry Density. (1 9927 98.37 9937 Opilli Mai Coni (%) MA 23.6 23.6 Dy Density betas Sosidn9. IDS 87.79 S/.19 99.08 MsieNe Conti (%) AW CeMpacban 24.3 24 24.1 Tei, 1-A4 S g 28 25S 25.1 SWn7 (lbs) 15.00 15.00 15.00 SSN, (%) 1 0.31 -0.04 -0.13 Sis irg Ratlo, (%) 1 1.8 2.4 3.6 Penetration (in) Dry Density ® 90% 89.5 pot CBR ®9D%Dms y 1.0 Dry Density ®95% 93.5 pot CBR ®95%Density 12 Dry Density ®100% 99.4 pot CBR ®100%Density 3.1 PROJECT: Chick-fPA Restaurant(104987 lrerraeon PR11 MIM1 82215117 SITE 3360 Gateway Street ]bb NE 55th Ane CLIi ChiticfiFA Inc. Springfield, OR Podland. OR Koine, CA SUPPORTING INFORMATION Contents: General Notes Unified Soil Classification System Note: All attachments are one page unless noted above. GENERAL NOTES lrerracon DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS Chick-fil-A RestaurarR#04987 M Springfield, OR GeoReport Tarracon Project No. 82215117 SAMPLING WATER LEVEL FIELD TESTS CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS N Standard Penetration Test (Mae than 50% retained m No. 200 sieve.) s Water Initially Resistance(elowslR.) Encountered! Consistmcydedemnined by laboratory shear strength testing, red vlsualvnanual Grab Shelby 'Tube Level a WaterAgor roet (HP) Hand Penormor Sample Specified! Pedod of Time Descnmive Term UncorMned Campressve Strength Standard Penetration or v Water Level Ager (T) Torvene Standard Specified Period of Time Eli Penstralion Tell Cave In (MP) Dynamic Cone PenetmnMer Very Loose Encountered Verysen less than 500 Water levels indicated on the soil booing logs are UC Unconfined Con ixeseve Loose the levels measured in the borehole at the times strength 500101,00) indicated. Groundwater level variations will Occur 2-4 Medium Dense Overtime. In low permeability soils, accurate Merlurn SER 1,o00ro2,000 determination Of groundwater levels is not (PID) PhotoJomostion Detector Dense possible with short term water level SO 2,000104,000 observations. (OVA) OManicVapor Malyrer I M DESCRIPTIVE SOIL CLASSIFICATION I Soil classification as noted on the soil boring logs is based Unified Soil Classification System. Where sufficient laboratory data exist to classify the soils consistent with ASTM D2487 "Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes" this procedure is used. ASTM D2488'Description and Identification of Soils (Visual -Manual Procedure)" is also used to classify the soils, particularly where insufficient laboratory data exist to classify the soils in accordancewith ASTM D2487. In addition to USCS classification, coarse grained soils are classified on the basis of their in-place relative density, and fine-grained soils are classified on the basis of their consistency. See "Strength Terms" table below for details. The ASTM standards noted above are for reference to methodology in general. In some cases, variations to methods are applied as a result of local practice Or professional judgment. Ir LOCATION AND ELEVATION NOTES Exploration point locations as shown on the Exploration Plan and as noted on the soil boring logs in the form of Latitude and Longitude are approximate. See Exploration and Testing Procedures in the reportfar the methods used to locate the exploration points for this project. Surface elevation data annotated with +I- indicates that no actual topographical survey was conducted t0 confirm the surface elevation. Instead, the surface elevation was approximately determined from topographic maps of the area. STRENGTH TERMS RELATIVE DENSITY OF COARSEGRAINED SOILS CONSISTENCY OF FINE-GRAINED SOILS (Mae than 50% retained m No. 200 sieve.) (50% or mare pass, the No. 200 sere.) Density determined by Standard Pmdincen Resistance Consistmcydedemnined by laboratory shear strength testing, red vlsualvnanual procedures orsiandertl penetration reseslance Descriptive Term Standard Penetration or Descnmive Term UncorMned Campressve Strength Standard Penetration or (Density) N -Value (Conestenry) Get,(pso N -Value Eli NowNFt. Very Loose 0-3 Verysen less than 500 0-1 Loose 4-9 Sol 500101,00) 2-4 Medium Dense 10-29 Merlurn SER 1,o00ro2,000 4-8 Dense W-50 SO 2,000104,000 8-15 Very Dense >50 Very Sbfl 4,00010$000 15-W Hard > 8,000 > 30 RELEVANCE OF SOIL BORING LOG The soil boring logs contained within this document are intended for application to the project as described in this document. Use of these soil boring logs for any other purpose may not be appropriate. UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM Criteria for Assigning Group Symbols and Group Names Using Laboratory Tests A Sits and Clays: Liquk limit less then 50 Fine -Grained Soils: 5D% or more passes the No. 2DD sieve Sits and Clays: Liquid! limit 50 or more ABased on the material passing the 3inM (75 -mm) sieve. G If field sample contained cobbles orboulders, orboth, atltl Seth cobbles orboulders, or both" to group name. c Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW -GM well -graded gravel with silt, GW -GC well -graded gavel AM clay, GP -GM poorly graded gavel with silt, GP -GC poody graded gavel with clay. °Sands with 5 t 12% fines require dual symbols: SW -SM well -graded sand with sill, SWSC well -graded sand AM clay, SP -SM poorly graded send with sill, SP -SC poorly graded sand AM clay. (D. )2 aCu=Dw0j0 Cc= Dra x D. F If soi captains _> 15%santl, atltl Seth send' to group name. GIf fres classiv as CL -ML. use dual svmbcl GC -GM. crSC-SM. 50 a W 40 O Z F 30 F_ W 20 a 10 7 4 0 0 10 15 20 30 40 50 w 70 80 90 100 >_4and 1<Cc<3E < 4 andlor [Cc<i or Cc>3.0] a es classify as ML a - MH es classify as CL er CH _>6 and 1<Cc 53a < 6 andlor Kcal or Cc>3.01 a es classify as ML a - MH es classify as CL er CH lrerracon GeoReport Soil Classification Group Name e GW GP Gravels: More than 50% of cfimcoarnmt Clean ravels: LesslhaGn 5%fresc ally gmVd F. G.H GC No.4 seve Gravels AM Files: Coarse -Grained Soils: SP More than 12%fnesc More than 5D% reamed ally sand G -KI SC on No. 2DD sieve CL Clean Sands: ML Sands: Less than 5%fires ° 5D% or mare of coarse Equation ol'A"-line J, fraction passes No. 4 •P Senate AMR.:sieve Horizontal at PI --4 to LL -25.5. a More than 12 me ° Sits and Clays: Liquk limit less then 50 Fine -Grained Soils: 5D% or more passes the No. 2DD sieve Sits and Clays: Liquid! limit 50 or more ABased on the material passing the 3inM (75 -mm) sieve. G If field sample contained cobbles orboulders, orboth, atltl Seth cobbles orboulders, or both" to group name. c Gravels with 5 to 12% fines require dual symbols: GW -GM well -graded gravel with silt, GW -GC well -graded gavel AM clay, GP -GM poorly graded gavel with silt, GP -GC poody graded gavel with clay. °Sands with 5 t 12% fines require dual symbols: SW -SM well -graded sand with sill, SWSC well -graded sand AM clay, SP -SM poorly graded send with sill, SP -SC poorly graded sand AM clay. (D. )2 aCu=Dw0j0 Cc= Dra x D. F If soi captains _> 15%santl, atltl Seth send' to group name. GIf fres classiv as CL -ML. use dual svmbcl GC -GM. crSC-SM. 50 a W 40 O Z F 30 F_ W 20 a 10 7 4 0 0 10 15 20 30 40 50 w 70 80 90 100 >_4and 1<Cc<3E < 4 andlor [Cc<i or Cc>3.0] a es classify as ML a - MH es classify as CL er CH _>6 and 1<Cc 53a < 6 andlor Kcal or Cc>3.01 a es classify as ML a - MH es classify as CL er CH lrerracon GeoReport Soil Classification Group Name e GW GP Well -graded gravel F Poorly graded gravelF GM ally gmVd F. G.H GC Clayey graven F. G.H SW VVel raded sand I SP Poorly graded sand I SM ally sand G -KI SC Clayey sand 4 KI CL Lean day W4m ML Silt 144m limit - over dried _ .. ... <0.75 1 OL M Liquid Liquid limit -nor drietltl <0.]5 ON Organic ell W 4 m.G n, end organic odor PT I Peal H If fres are organic, add Seth organic lines' to group name. I tract contains >_ 15%gravel, add "Ath graver to group name. u If Alterberg limits plot in shaded area, soil is a CL -ML, silty clay. HlfWil contains 15 to 29% plus No. 2DD, add'wih sand" or 'with gravel"whichever is predominant, L tract contains >_ 3D% plus No. 2DD predominantly sand, atltl "sandy" to group name, mlfsoil contains >_ 3D% plus No. 2DD, predominantly gravel, atltl "gravelly" to group name. H Pi >_ 4 and plots on or above 'A" line. ° PI < 4 or plots below'A" line. F PI plots on or above 'A" line. °PI plots below 'A" line. For classification of fine-grained soils and fine-grained traction of coarse-grained soils Equation ol'A"-line J, •P Horizontal at PI --4 to LL -25.5. a Then P1=0.73(LL-20) - line X01 Vertical at LL=" Venial LL=1610 PI=7, G 1 Then PI_0.9 (LL -8) O� ,Gyo MH or OH L' MLor OL APPENDIX 12 ni Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 309 SW 6TH AVENUE, #700 PORTLAND, OREGON 97204 971-280-8641 Q a J � 06 z �W Q'o LLJ LUJ ILL F— 0 rQnIL 2 UV N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT # 14&11.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/10/2021 DRAWN BY JLG U) inbimaim:Warcl m his drntinq ad in 8i � tli9ita files praticcN fm abwenmedprgW Z maY ny bereproLxdin mY mxml WlFaY G exPrczz vnllmarvabalcmvnlim G auYaized Praptl rcPrcsWa4ves. LU SHEET U EXISTING TRANSIT 00 FACILITIES EXHIBIT M1449M]"A140 Z a APPENDIX 12 APPENDIX 13 TYPE II SITE PLAN REVIEW (PRE -SUBMITTAL) Chick-fil-A #04987 2322.14841.01 Prepared for: Prepared by: 4G Development and Consulting Inc. P.O. Box 270571 San Diego, California 92192 O O W L 920 Country Club Road, Suite 100B Eugene, Oregon 97401 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 2 General Information......................................................................................................2 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................3 2.1 Existing Conditions.................................................................................................3 2.2 Previous Approvals................................................................................................6 2.3 Project Description.................................................................................................6 3.0 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC)............................................7 Chapter 3 Land Use Districts...........................................................................................7 3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts......................................................................7 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District.................................................9 Chapter 4 Development Standards................................................................................ 10 4.2-100 Transportation......................................................................................... 10 4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Utilities........................................................... 23 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards..................................................................... 33 4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards ............. 34 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards............................................................. 45 5.0 GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN................................................................46 CommercialElement..................................................................................................... 46 Policies and Implementation Actions.................................................................... 46 5.0 CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................47 TABLES Table 1: Surrounding Uses.........................................................................................................3 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Site Plan Review Application Appendix 2: Lot -of -Record Information Appendix 3: Service Provider Comments (Springfield Utility Board) Appendix 4: Plan Set Sheet C0.0: Cover Sheet Sheet C1.0: Existing Conditions & Demo Plan Sheet C2.0: Site Plan Sheet C3.0: Grading Plan Sheet C4.0: Stormwater Plan Sheet C5.0: Utility Plan Sheet C5.1: Fire Access Plan Sheet L1.0: Planting Plan Appendix 5: Architectural Plans Appendix 6: Photometric Plan Appendix 7: Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson & Associates) Appendix 8: Parking Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson and Associates) Appendix 9: Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Appendix 10: Drainage Report 400WL. Pagel Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 1.0 INTRODUCTION �:.111171170 sMe Applicant: 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 270571 San Diego, California 92198 Contact: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.8362 Email: ahunt(a)4Gdev.com Prepared by: DOWL 920 Country Club Road, Suite 100B Eugene, Oregon 97401 Contact: Mariah Mitchell Phone: 541.762.2096 Email: mmitchell@doW.com Project Location 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 97477 Parcel ID Numbers: T17-R3W-S22-20-TL01300 T17-R3W-S22-20-T L01600 Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Project Site Area: 4.49 acres DOWL Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 2.1 Existing Conditions The project site is approximately 4.49 -acres of Community Commercial (CC) zoned land and further identified as tax lots 17-03-22-20-01300 and 17-03-22-20-01600, herein referred to as the "Project Site". The project site is located at the southwestern intersection of Randy Pape Beltline and Gateway Street and generally consists of level terrain between 0-3 percent slopes. The project site is developed with an existing motel and restaurant building, approximately 42,906 square feet, built in the early 2000s. The project site is considered two legal lots as described in the preliminary title report and vesting deed included with this application as Appendix 2. The project site is designated as Community Commercial (CC)with no overlay districts or natural resource features. Surrounding lots to the north, south, east, and west are designated as CC and have existing commercial buildings. Surrounding land also includes fully developed roads and city utilities along street frontages. According to Springfield's Transportation System Plan (TSP) Functional Classification Map (Figure 2), Gateway Street is considered a minor arterial with no on -street parking, and the northern extent of Randy Pape Beltline is considered a major arterial with no on -street parking. Access to the site is provided from Gateway Street and no access is provided from Randy Pape Beltline. Drive aisles of varying widths provide access for internal traffic circulation to the motel and restaurant building. Additional access and utility information are provided later in this narrative. A Type II Site Plan Review subject to approval by the Director or staff is required. Therefore the applicant is requesting approval through the Type II Site Plan Review procedure for the proposed Chick-fil-A. A Site Plan Review Application form is included with this submittal as Appendix 1. Surrounding uses are identified in Table 1 below. Table 1: Surrounding Uses 4013WL. Page Zoning Use North CC Communit Commercial South CC Community Commercial East CC Community Commercial West CC Community Commercial 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Fri OOWL Pages Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2.2 Previous Approvals The project site has four previous records located online. • 811-22-000128-PROJ (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Expired • 811 -22 -000127 -PRE (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Pre -application Conference • 811 -19 -000265 -PRE (Master ProjecUMayhew Redevelopment): Pre -application Conference • 811-19-000266-PROJ — (Master Project/Mayhew Redevelopment): Expired 2.3 Project Description The applicant proposes the construction of a new 4,987 square -foot Chick -fl -A restaurant with dual 26 -foot -wide drive-through lanes and associated improvements in the northeast corner of the project site. Two future pad sites are proposed in the southeastern and northwestern areas of the project site. The applicant is seeking approval for the first phase of development only (restaurant with drive-through lanes). The anticipated timeline and specified use for future phases are unknown and will therefore be requested through a separate application in the future. Site improvements include the removal of the existing motel and restaurant facilities, repaving of the parking lot, new curbing and traffic marking, and new perimeter and interior parking lot landscape planters. A total of 83 parking spaces will be provided for Chick-fil-A customers (of which 81 will be standard stalls and two (2) will be ADA -accessible parking spaces). Traffic will enter the site via Gateway Street (minor arterial) and a private driveway to the south and west from two right-in/right-out drive aisles that connect to a series of on-site drive aisles adjacent future pad sites and the proposed restaurant with drive-through lanes. Drive-through lanes enter south of the main entry for the restaurant and parking lot, travel along the eastern property line, up to the pick-up window along the northern extent of the restaurant building before terminating within the new parking lot. Existing city utilities (water, sewer, and stormwater) are extended and available on tax lot 1600. Tax lot 1300 does not have an existing water line. As such, comments from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) are included with this application as Appendix 3, including comments and recommendations for the extension of a water line from the southeast. Therefore, the applicant requests approval to use existing facilities readily available to support the proposed restaurant. A property line adjustment application has been prepared and submitted concurrently with this site plan review application package to request the relocation of the western property line to maintain the required setbacks and prevent the restaurant from straddling any property lines. Ileo 13WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 3.0 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC) The applicable development code provisions are set forth below with responses demonstrating the project's consistency with these provisions. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts 3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts 3.2-305 (8) Community Commercial District (CC). 3.2-305 (B) Community Commercial District (CC). The CC District establishes sites to provide for a wide range of retail sales, service, and professional office use and also includes all existing strip commercial areas. 3.2-310 Schedule of Use Categories. "P" = PERMITTED USE subject to the standards of this Code. "S" - SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS subject to special localional and/or siting standards as specified in Section 4.7- 100_ "D" . DISCRETIONARY USE subject to review and analysis under Type III procedure (Section 5 9-100) at the Planning Commission or Hearings Official level. "N" = NOT PERMITTED SITE PLAN REVIEW SHALL BE REQUIRED unless exempted elsewhere in this Code. Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative. 4013WL. Page Commercial Dismore Use Caw,desNses NC CC MRC GO Ealing and Drinill EmblishmenM Cocklallxunges P P p N Delicatessens and sit down restaurants Includina es rewo shops Section 47-1,15) P P p 5 Dope up restaurants and espresso shops P P P N Tavems and brew pubs 0 P p N Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative. 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #84967 3.2-315 Base Zone Development Standards Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage, landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report. 'lleo13WL Page Commeeial Zoning District Development Standard NC CC MRC GO Minimum Area 6.000 square feet 6, 000 square feet6.000 squarefeet 6.000 square feet Minimum Street Fronlage(1) 50 feet 50 lead50 feet 50 feet AO Panhandle LotvParcels Minimum Steen Net Permanent 40 feet Net Pmmiaed Not Permitted Frontage Maximum LaVParcal Coverage Development Areas 1 A. and 2 Aaes- Labia el coverage limited onty by standards Nome, 35 percent Oavalopment Meas between Sections sidle Cade. 2 antl 3Aaes- 35 pail and no single lease space shall exceed 15 000 square feet Minimum Landscaping Perimeter and Interior landscaping area Minimum requomems defined by standards in often combined coverage shall not be less Nan SefLons of this Code. 20 percent of me total development area. Maxknum Perking, loading and vehicular 45 percent Laeparcel coverage limited onty by standards M oMer circulation area average Sections of this Code. Landscaped Se baths (2)(3)(4) and (5) Front Street Side Yard, and Through Lon Rear Yard Building Setba t 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet Paddng, driveway, and me! .... Smile 7 Feel 5 Fed 5 Feet 5 Feet setback Interior Safe, Rear Yard S deaths when Abuming Residential or Cl Distils Building Setbatlt 10 Fed 10 Feat 10 Feet 10 Feat Pelting, Driveway Omdoor Storage 7 Feet 5 Feet 5 Feet 5 Feet Setback Maximum Budding Height(6) 20 Fast No Maximum, except as specified belew When a butting an MR or MDR District to 20 Feet Defend hymn Maxanum Shade Pant Heigmrecommuche at the nosh Saddled 2-225410, sup to 50 foul "da mwNom Istel he. a pare mbnding sash wM as state N23 degrees and onglnala, man Ne lop of a 16 loin hypodermal fence coed on Ne noMem seemed lie. When abutting an UDR or MDR Direct to 20 Feet No greater Man MatpelmMed in me MR or MDR Carl ler Me east, wed, or scum a dividends of 50 feet Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage, landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report. 'lleo13WL Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District 3.3-210 Applicability As of May 15, 2000, all areas within specified wellhead TOTZ automatically are rezoned to add the DWP Overlay District to the underlying zoning district. The areas to which the DWP Overlay District is applied are shown on the Drinking Water Protection Area Maps on file in the Development Services Department and incorporated in this Section by reference. Response: The project site is located in the Five Year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) in the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking Water Protection Area. Therefore, this section is applicable and responses are provided as required. 3.3-220 Time of Travel Zones A. The DWP Overlay District includes 4 TOTZ: 0-1 year; 15 years; 5-10 years; and 10-20 years. The locations of the TOTZ for each wellhead are shown on Drinking Water Protection Area Maps on file with the City's Development Services, Public Works, and Fire and Life Safety Departments; and Springfield Utility Board (SUB) and Rainbow Water District (RWD). Response: The project site is located in the Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) five (5) year in the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking Water Protection Area. 3.3-225 Review A. A DWP Overlay District Development Application is required when the criteria of both Subsections A.1. and 2., below are met: 1. A site is affected by one of the following: a. There is a change of land use, occupancy or tenancy of a property, including, but not limited to: a change from vacant to occupied; or b. During the Building Permit process; or c. In conjunction with any development application, including, but not limited to: Site Plan review and Minimum Development Standards. Response: Existing conditions on the project site include a vacant motel and Elmers Restaurant. The applicant's anticipated plans include demolishing both structures and building a new restaurant (Chick -fl -A). An existing conditions and demolition plan is included with this application as Sheet C1.0 of Appendix 4. Future uses of Pad -A and Pad -B are unknown at this time and therefore, are not included in this site plan review application or Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request. Therefore, the applicant anticipates future Pad - A and Pad-Bwill be subjectto reviewthrough a DWP Overlay District Development Application at a later point in time. 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 The Chi ck-fil-Arestaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers) and therefore, no change of use, occupancy, or tenancy of the property is proposed with this application. Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to those practices currently used for Elmers. 2. The action in Subsection A.1., above will: a. Affect the storage, use, and/or production of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater; or b. Increase the quantity of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater that are stored, used and/or produced. Response: The Chick -fl -A restaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers). Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to those practices currently used for Elmers. Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting chemicals that are EPA -registered products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and other cleaning chemicals are disposed of in accordance with the manufacturer's label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through daily use, cleaning chemicals are disposed of in the sanitary sewer in diluted forms. Should bulk containers need to be disposed of, the containers will be taken to a permitted local hazardous waste recycling facility. B. Prior to the submittal of a DWP Overlay District Development Application, an exemption request may be submitted to the Director as specified in Section 3.3-23013.1. Response: No change of use is proposed with this application and no new hazardous materials are anticipated thatwould cause a risk of contamination to groundwater. Therefore, the applicant has included an exemption request from the DWP Overlay District Development Application, including with this application as Appendix 9. Chapter 4 Development Standards 4.2-100 Transportation 4.2-105 Public Streets (B) An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met: (1) Peak Hour Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS must be performed by a registered professional engineer. Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a Ileo 13WL. Page 10 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated, this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not generate 100 or more vehicular trips during any peak hour, and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is not required. (2) Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 1,000 or more trips per day as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS must be performed by a registered professional engineer. Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated, this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not generate 1,000 or more vehicular trips per day, and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is not required. (3) Variance and Known Issues Threshold. The Director may determine that a TIS is necessary to support a request for a Variance from the transportation provisions of this code or where traffic safety, street capacity, future planned facility, or multimodal concerns may be associated with the proposed development. Response: No variance from the transportation provisions is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. B. An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met: Response: The applicant has included a Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum prepared by Kittleson and Associates with this application as Appendix 7. The applicant concludes that traffic generated from the proposed use will not be substantially different than existing traffic levels generated from the existing use and therefore requests confirmation of the need and scope of a TIS. C. Minimum street curb -to -curb widths and minimum street right-of-way widths are as specified in Table 4.2-1 unless otherwise indicated in the Springfield Transportation System Plan, an applicable Refinement Plan, Plan District, 400WL Page 11 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Master Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, or the adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan; where necessary to achieve rightof-way and street alignment; or as needed to meet sitespecific engineering standards, including but not limited to requirements for multi -way boulevard and/or modern roundabout designs. Example street layouts meeting minimum street standards are provided in Figures 4.2-13 through 4.2-V for illustrative purposes only. These Figures are intended to demonstrate potential street configurations that meet the requirements. Table 4.2-1 Minimum Street Right -of -Way and Curb -to -Curb Standards Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght- in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria. 1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map. Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through. IE313WL Page 12 Tneal bearably FM. RIgMM-Way Cu@10 Cure 7.61 Lanes Tum Lane SMq and H. street Classllkalum (1) wade (1) Lanes Wki VAON(2) 91keudautp) Cure (1) sidexew 4vt i4blted 43&D Me, Adenal(5) 14952'/84' 7BM9' L 12' hua 6'bel 5' Teen sloes e1M ie 42 EG MucaMesd(5) 75'/68.69 521/44'M 2 12' 6 W sloes 5 ' 7'aoM SMfls req'a�er 4.2 NJ Mader Colleda 7.I64'l56' 52/10'/36 2 17 lam. 6'take sides 5• 5- note sides requ ed Minor CollWor-Nam 4.2 K- 13'efiere Residential Zoning roBY50' S9I1Y21' 2 it 8'boM Sills 5 5'boM SMes M expense DlsMds (8) MlnorCdedor- 13'e9ere 4.2 N -P Resleena6l Zoning M'159M2' 35'/392.2 4' WA 5' 5'Win sides M,xM4 DaMM(6) Lool5tree1 X15 pefceM 42Q5 5.7.719.14' M'28'70' 2 19 WA Not required 5' 5'aoM tleas Node (7) Loral Sheet x15p bt 4.2 T -V y149132' 362a'2o' 2 19 WA Not requVed 6 -curbs only 5'both sees Value (7) Sar CuFde-sacauM 83•dlemeYr 79 diarbeler WA WA NIA WA 5'arwnd bulb Noy 29 =qft�f WA WA WA Nolrequlred Nulrequlred Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght- in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria. 1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map. Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through. IE313WL Page 12 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2. Local Streets. The local street network, which includes pedestrian accessways and multiuse paths, must meet the following standards: Response: No local streets are proposed with this application. 3. Dead -End Streets. Response: No dead-end streets are proposed with the redevelopment of the project site. Therefore this provision and Subsections a — b are not applicable. 4. Block Length and Block Perimeter. a. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following maximums, except as provided or exempted elsewhere in this Code or in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District: iv. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts. Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and the block perimeterwill not exceed 1, 600 feet. b. Block length must not exceed: 600 feet for local street not in industrial zones or that do not serve industrial nonconforming or the maximum block length established in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District, whichever is less; Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district (considered other zoning between Subsections i -iii) and the block length will not exceed 600 feet. 5. Maximum Street Grades. Street grades must not exceed 8% on major and minor arterial streets, 10% on major and minor collector streets, and 12% on local streets. Response: No new roads (private, collector, or arterial) are proposed for this project site. All local drive aisles will be graded to be level, with slopes well below 12%. A grading plan is included as Sheet C3.0 of Appendix 4 reflecting proposed grading throughout the project site. Medians. 1. General. A raised median physically deters vehicles from crossing or entering a median area by way of a raised curb or concrete barrier. Raised medians help avoid crashes caused by crossover traffic, reduce headlight glare distraction, prevent traffic turning left from through lanes, provide refuge for pedestrians crossing the street, and remove turning traffic from through lanes, thereby maintaining efficient and safe traffic flow. Median design and installation must follow the standards in the Manual on Uniform 'lleo0 WL Page 13 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 Traffic Control Devices and AASHTO's "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." Response: No medians are proposed for new internal drive aisles on the project site. However, preliminary discussions with the City indicate the existing raised median on Gateway Street will need to be shifted north to accommodate the proposed driveway location entering the project site. A Project Improvement Plan (PIP) is anticipated as a condition of approval for this project. The width, size, and length of the relocated median are anticipated to remain the same as the existing median. G. Additional Right -of -Way and Street Improvements. 1. Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring Development Approval, the dedication of additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street dedication results in the right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Deeds and Records stating that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street is constructed to serve the property, and connect with the City street system. Response: Preliminary discussions with the City during a pre -application conference (811-22- 000127) indicate Gateway Street is not underdeveloped or inadequate and would not require street frontage improvements at this time. Therefore, subsections two through five are not applicable. 2. Whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on the City street system and the development site has unimproved street frontage, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications in accordance with the following criteria: Response: No land partition or development is proposed that would increase traffic, as mentioned previously. In support of this conclusion, a trip generation assessment memo drafted by Kittleson and Associations is provided with this application as Appendix 7. Table 4.2-1A Special Street Setbacks Streat Classlaoabon Sataaok Distance from Ne Cantanlna (q Major Anerlal 50' Minor Arterial 38' Major Collector 36' Mlnor Colleabr 35' Local Street, <16 percent slope 28.5' Local Street, 215 percent sbpe 25' Alley 10' 4013WL. Page 14 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 (1) Where fully improved right-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property, the setback distance is one-half of the width of the existing, fully improved right-of- way. Response: Preliminary communications with the City indicate the right-of-way abutting the eastern property line (Gateway Street) is fully improved. The Chick-fil-A building is proposed 51 feet from Gateway Street (considered a minor arterial) and exceeds half the required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A. The Chick -fl -A building is not adjacent to Beltline (major arterial) and therefore exceeds half the required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A. 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways A. Site Access and Driveways—General. 1. All developed lotstparcels are entitled to one approved driveway access provided by either direct access to a: a. Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The primary way traffic will enter the project site is from Gateway Street. The driveway access from Gateway Street will be limited to left -in -right -in -right -out movements and new cross-over access will be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. 2. Driveway access to designated State Highways is subject to the provisions of this Section in addition to requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Where City and ODOT regulations conflict, the more restrictive regulations shall apply. Response: No access to the project site is proposed from a designated State Highway. 3. As determined by the Director, sites with abutting parking areas within the same zoning district may be required to provide driveway connections or pedestrian connections internal to the sites and joint access agreements to provide efficient connectivity and preserve public street functions and capacity. Response: Driveway connections and pedestrian walkways are shown on the site plan included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. It is the client's intention to obtain a reciprocal access agreement on the southern drive aisle per this requirement. B. Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development sites abuts more than one street and streets are of differing classification as identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan. 4E30WL Page 15 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 EXCEPTION: Driveway access to or from a higher classification street may be permitted if no reasonable alternative street access exists or where heavy use of local streets is inappropriate due to traffic impacts in residential areas. Response: Driveways to the project site will take access from the lower classification street, Gateway Street. No access is proposed from Beltline. No exemptions are requested with this application. C. Driveways shall be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5 and the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. Table 4.2-2 Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot - wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2. Table 4.2-3 Driveway Design Specifications 1.way Driveway 2 -way Drivewayz Width Width Radius of Curb (2) Driveway Throat Depth Land Use MinN., MiNMas. Mes. Sioglefamily and Duplexes (3) (41 12'716' 12'-af(1)NA. NA. NA. NA Multifamily Residential 26165' 118'CommercldWubg[ Mu6lfamlly Residential 24 feel 30 feet Land(4)(5) 12916' 24135'(1)1Intlusldal 60 feet CommarciaVPublic Land (6) 12118' 26T35'n)18'(2) 35 feet Go feet Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot - wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2. Table 4.2-3 (1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or to improve traffic safety. (2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are anticipated. (3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle. 400WL. Page 16 Curb Room Dries" Design Specifications Driveway WMth(1) Radius of Curb (2) Driveway Throat Dep1h lend... (3) tend Use Min. Mac Min. Mes. Single -Family and Duplexes NA. NA. NA NA. NA. Mu6lfamlly Residential 24 feel 30 feet 10 feel 20 feel 60 feet CommarciaVPublic Land 24 feet M feet 15 feet 35 feet Go feet Industrial 24 feet 35 feet 15 feet 35 feel 60 feel (1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or to improve traffic safety. (2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are anticipated. (3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle. 400WL. Page 16 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street and multiple internal drive aisles and private roadways within the commercial development site to the south and west, which are within existing reciprocal access easements. New internal drive aisles will be 24 feet wide or greater and allow for turning radii of 20 feet measured from curb to curb. A site plan is included with this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. Table 4.2.4 Minimum Separations Between a Driveway and the Nearest Intersection Curb Return an the Same Side of the Street (1) Land Use, Street Type Atterlal Collector Local Single -Family Residential and Duplexes 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet Nulffamily Residential 209 feel IDO feet 75 feet CommerciaOPablic Land 209 feet 1DD feet 75100[ Induellial 200 feet 200 feet 150 Seel (1) Each category of street is considered separately. Distances may be reduced in the following circumstances: (a) Access is from a one-way street. (b) The driveway is marked for "right -in -right -out only." (c) The driveway is marked "exit only" and is designed to prevent left turns. Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street (minor arterial) and multiple internal drive aisles and private roadways within the commercial development site to the south and west. The right-in/right-out access driveway from Gateway Street is 147 feet from the nearest intersection curb, consistent with this provision. (d) In cases where an existing lotiparcel and/or use make compliance with these specifications unreasonable, a new driveway or an existing driveway required to be relocated by this Code shall be placed at the furthest point from the intersection curb return, considering both safety and internal circulation requirements of the development. Response: Compliancewith these specifications is feasible, as specified above. Thereforethis adjustment does not apply. 4013WL Page 17 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.2-125Intersections Intersections shall be designed and constructed as specified in the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the following requirements. A. In order to minimize traffic conflicts and provide for efficient traffic signalization, intersections involving curb return driveways and streets, whether public or private, shall be directly opposed, unless a Traffic Impact Study indicates that an offset intersection benefits public safety to a greater degree. Response: Preliminary communications with the city and Kittleson and Associates indicate that the drive aisle to the south is considered aligned with adjacent commercial drive aisles perthis requirement. B. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. The angle of intersection between 2 intersecting streets shall be at least 80 degrees. At intersections, each local street shall be straight or have a radius greater than 400 feet for a distance of 100 feet from each intersection. At intersections, each collector or arterial street shall be straight or have a radius greater than 600 feet for a distance of 100 feet from each intersection. Response: New drive aisles and southern and western intersections are provided at right angles throughout the project site per this requirement, per this requirement. 4.2-130 Vision Clearance Area A. All lots or parcels must maintain a Vision Clearance Area to provide adequate sight distance for approaching traffic. Vision clearance areas must be shown on Site Plans for applicable land use applications. Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4. B. No screens, plantings, or other physical obstructions are permitted between 2Yz and 8 feet above the established height of the curb in the Vision Clearance Area. Response: All structures and public facilities have been designed in accordance with the appropriate City codes to meet this standard. Plantings include trees that will reach mature heights between 30-50 feet. The applicant anticipates shrubs will be maintained to a height less than two and one-half feet from the curb to keep clear vision areas free of visual obstacles. A landscape plan and supplemental information sheets are included with this application as Sheets L1.0 — L1.2 of Appendix 4. 4013WL. Page 18 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 C. The Vision Clearance Area must be in the shape of a triangle. Two sides of the triangle must be property lines or a property line and edge of driveway for a distance specified in this Subsection. Where the property lines or driveway edge have rounded corners, they are measured by extending them in a straight line to a point of intersection. The third side of the triangle is a line across the corner of the lot or parcel joining the non -intersecting ends of the other 2 sides. The following measurements establish the Vision Clearance Area: Table 4.2-5 Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4. As illustrated, the areas exceed ten feet from all approaches, as measured from the rounded corners of the driveway edge in a straight line to a point of intersection. 4.2-135 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets shall be located wholly within the public street right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the Director. Response: Existing sidewalks and planter strips are provided on Gateway Street and Beltline. The applicant does not anticipate that new sidewalks and planter strips along street frontages will be required for the redevelopment of the project site. 4.2-140 Street Trees Street trees are those trees required within the public right-of-way. The primary purpose of street trees is to create a streetscape that benefits from the aesthetic and environmental qualities of an extensive tree canopy along the public street system. Street trees are attractive amenities that improve the appearance of the community, provide shade and visual interest, and enhance the pedestrian environment. Street trees also improve air quality, reduce stormwater runoff, and moderate the micro -climate impacts of heat absorbed by paved surfaces. Street trees may be located within a planter strip or within individual tree wells on a sidewalk, round -about, or median. EXCEPTION: In order to meet street tree requirements where there is no planter strip and street trees cannot be planted within the public right-of-way, trees shall be planted in the required front yard or street side yard setback of private property as specified in the applicable zoning district. 40E3 WL Page 19 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: No modifications to the existing frontages on Beltline or Gateway Street are proposed. As such, the applicant anticipates existing street treeswill be preserved consistent with this provision. 4.2-145 Lighting Standards Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and accessways must conform to the following design standards and the Development 8r Public Works Standard Construction Specifications: A. Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment. Existing lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new developments or redevelopment. The developer is responsible for lighting material and installation costs. Response: New lighting will be provided forthe Chick-fil-A building and internal parking areas, consistent with this provision. B. Upon approval by the Director, a developer may install decorative lights, as may be permitted in this section and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. Response: The applicant does not anticipate decorative lighting forthe project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. C. Design Standards. 1. Lighting must comply with Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8- 14 and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. Response: All proposed lighting is designed to comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8-14, and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. A photometric plan is included with this application as Appendix 6 to demonstrate consistency with this provision. 2. Intersections must be illuminated to a level equal to the sum of the average required illuminance of the 2 intersecting streets. Response: The applicant is proposing two new drive aisles, one each at the west and south from adjacent parcels. The location of driveway intersections and illumination levels are shown on the photometric plan, included with this application as Appendix 6. 3. Mid -block crosswalks that are approved by the City Traffic Engineer must have 2 times the illumination required for the street. 400WL. Page 20 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: No mid block crosswalks are proposed for this project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 4. Decorative poles with City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used on all streets within the Nodal Development Overlay District and where any refinement plan or plan district requires decorative lighting. Decorative poles may be used on streets, paths, and accessways in any other zone at the option of the developer as approved by the Director. Response: The project site is not located within the Nodal Development Overlay District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 5. City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used when lighting is required along multi -use paths and accessways. Response: No multi -use paths or accessways are proposed with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 6. Roadway style poles and "cobra head" fixtures with City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used along streets in all other locations. Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application. All existing exterior building and parking lot lighting will be shielded and directed inwards towards the proposed development area. The lighting shall not reflect on or cast a glare on adjacent properties and will likely use "cobra head" fixtures for all parking lot light poles. When roadway style poles are used on arterial and collector streets in any zone other than residential, they must be steel or aluminum. When roadway style poles are used on local and collector streets in residential zones, they must be fiberglass, steel, or aluminum. Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application. Therefore this provision does not apply. 8. Where lot frontages are 80 feet or less, poles must be located at property lines unless approved by the Director. Response: Lot frontages on the project site exceed 80 feet. Therefore this provision does not apply. 9. The weak point illumination must not be less than 0.1 -foot candles. Response: The weak point illumination exceeds 0.1 -footcandle, as demonstrated on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6. 4013WL. Page 21 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 10. Roadway style poles set behind sidewalks must have 8 -foot arm length. Roadway style poles set between curb and sidewalk or where no sidewalk exists must have 6 -foot arm length. Response: No new walkways or multi -use paths are proposed with this project and as such, lighting or roadway -style poles along said paths are not proposed. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 11. Pole handholes must be used instead of junction boxes where feasible. Junction boxes for street lighting must only be utilized for street crossings or where necessary to comply with electrical code standards cited above. Response: Where applicable, the applicant anticipates pole handholes will be used for all light poles in place of junction boxes, consistent with this provision. 12. Pole Height. Lights on local streets with a curb -to -curb width of less than 28 feet must have a 20 -foot fixture mounting height. Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, light poles on local streets will be designed to have a 20 -foot fixture -mounted height, per this requirement. Lighting on local streets must be installed on the same side of the street and on the side of the street first constructed, except where necessary to be consistent with the existing lighting design and placement. Response: No new local street lights are proposed with this project. Light poles must not be placed on the outside of curves with less than a 1,000 -foot radius. Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, no light poles are proposed on the outside of curves with less than a 1,000 -foot radius, per this requirement. 4.2-150 Multi -Use Paths A. Development abutting an existing or proposed multi -use path identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), City -adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan, or the adopted Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan must include provisions for the extension of the multi -use path through the development area by the dedication of public easements or rights-of-way. The developer bears the cost of multi -use path improvements. 'lleo0 WL Page 22 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The project site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed multi -use path as identified in Figure 12 ofthe City's Transportation System Plan —Conceptual Street Map. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 4.2-120 Accessways A. Accesswsys allow pedestrians and bicyclists convenient linkages to adjacent streets, residential areas, neighborhood activity centers, industrial or commercial centers, transit facilities, parks, schools, open space, or trails and paths where no public street access exists. Accesswsys may also be used as a secondary emergency access. Accessways must be dedicated as public right-of-way during the development review process. EXCEPTION: When site constraints preclude the ability to dedicate right-of- way without impacting setback requirements or other development standards, the Director may authorize dedication of a public easement or may otherwise modify the standards in this Section. Response: Existing pedestrian accessways are provided on Beltline and Gateway Street. Therefore no accessways are proposed for this project. 4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Utilities 4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers A. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development within the city limits and to connect developments to existing mains. Installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities and shall comply with the provisions of this Code, with the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications, the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997 and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regulations. Response: Existing sanitary sewer lines are present throughout the project site. The applicant anticipates that the restaurant will connect to the city sewer in the northeastern corner of the project site. A utility plan showing the location of water, sewer, and stormwater lines is included with this application as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. B. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to development approval. Response: The applicant anticipates that review and approval of the utility plan are necessary before development approval, consistent with this provision. C. Proposed sewer systems shall include design consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Metro Plan. Response: The project site is not adjacent to an expansion area or proposed expanded service pipe as shown in Figure 5.5 of the City Wastewater Master Plan. 4tJ 0 W L Page 23 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 D. Proposed developments shall provide dedication and improvements indicated in an adopted Capital Improvements Program or Public Facilities Plan. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to adopted City Council policy. Response: No wastewater projects are identified adjacent to the project site according to Table 6.1 of the City's Wastewater Master Plan. 4.3-110 Stormwater Management A. Stormwater Management Regulations. By implementing the policies set forth in the currently approved Stormwater Management Plan, provide for the effective management of stormwater and drainage from the City into the groundwater and watercourses within the City and its urbanizing area; minimize demand on the City's stormwater management system, and alleviate future costs of treating the discharge; promote water quality; preserve groundwaterand the vegetation and rivers it supports; reduce peak storm flows; minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions; and minimize stormwater discharge impacts on water quality and quantity and stream flow patterns, including peak and base flows in intermittent and perennial streams, within the McKenzie River and Willamette River watersheds. Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in the existing system. B. The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The stormwater management system shall be separated from any sanitary sewer system. Surface water drainage patterns shall be addressed on every Preliminary Site Plan, or Tentative Partition or Subdivision Plan. Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed stormwater management system complies with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual as required by this section. C. A stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run-off from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the development. The Public Works Director shall determine the necessary size of the facility, based on adopted Public Facility Plans and Stormwater 400 0 W L Page 24 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Facility Master Plans. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to adopted City Council policy. Response: The proposed stormwater system design is shown on Sheet C4.0 and described in the drainage report included with this application as Appendix 10. Because the project will be redeveloping an existing site that has more impervious coverage than what is proposed, the resultant peak flows entering the public system will be smaller than existing. D. Runoff from development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Where the Public Works Director determines that the additional run-off resulting from the development will overload an existing stormwater management system, the Approval Authority shall withhold Development Approval until provisions, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, have been made to correct or mitigate this condition. Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in the existing system. E. Any development with a stormwater threshold management requirement of 1,000 square feet of impervious surface area shall be required to employ stormwater management practices consistent with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into receiving streams. The following stormwater management practices may be required in order to relieve demand on the City's piped drainage system, alleviate future costs of treating the piped discharge, promotewater quality, preserve groundwater and the vegetation and rivers it supports, and reduce peak storm flows: 1. Temporary ponding of water; 2. Permanent storage basins; 3. Minimizing impervious surfaces; 4. Emphasizing natural water percolation and natural drainageways; 5. Preventing water flowing from the street in an uncontrolled fashion; 6. Stabilizing natural drainageways as necessary below drainage and culvert discharge points for a distance sufficient to convey the discharge without channel erosion, as perm ittedlal lowed by City, State and Federal regulations; 400WL Page 25 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 7. On-site filtration or skimming of run-off, that will enter natural drainageways to maintain water quality; 8. On-site constructed wetlands; and 9. The riparian area boundary, as specified in Subsection 4.3-115A, may be utilized to meet City on-site stormwater management requirements for flood control and water quality treatment provided the design is complementary to and supportive of the primary objective of a properly functioning riparian habitat condition. Where the riparian boundary is not of sufficient size to meet these on-site requirements, the additional area needed shall be located contiguous to the riparian boundary to form a consolidated stormwater feature for operational and maintenance efficiencies and that is designed to be compatible with and complementary to the riparian area boundary. Response: Total impervious cover exceeds 1,000 square feet and therefore, will implement several of the stormwater management practices listed above, including stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 inch over 24-hour stormwater event. It's of note that the redevelopment of the project site will decrease the area of impervious cover from 3.651 acres (159,037 square feet) to 3.648 acres (158,907 square feet). F. Identification of Water Quality Limited Watercourses. The Director shall maintain a Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map on file in the Development Services Department, which designates certain watercourses and their direct tributaries within the City and its urbanizing area. The WQLW Map shall contain watercourses recommended by the Public Works Director. Any revision to the WQLW Map shall be approved by the City Council as an amendment to this Code. Those watercourses and their direct tributaries included on the WQLW Map have been found to warrant protective measures in support of the City's response to State and federal regulations regarding surface and subsurface discharging stormwater management systems by satisfying the following criteria: 1. Water Quality Limited Watercourses(WQLW): Waters of the State that meet one or more of the following criteria: a. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing area, that are included by the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) on its most recently adopted "303(d)" List of Impaired and Threatened Waterbodies. b. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing area, with significant water quality impairment identified by water quality monitoring and sampling done in accordance 'lleo0 WL Page 26 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 with approved quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols. Response: The project site is not adjacent to a watercourse as identified in the City's Natural Resource Study Report (2011). The applicant's proposed use is the same as the existing use on the project site. Consistency with water quality assurance/quality control protocols is outlined in further detail in findings for the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. Therefore, the applicant anticipates this provision and all Subsections do not apply. 4.3-117 Natural Resource Protection Areas Response: No locally significant wetland and riparian areas, flood hazard areas, or Goal 5 resources are identified on the project site. The site is located within the Drinking Water Protection Overlay. The project's consistency with the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District is discussed earlier in this narrative. Therefore, this section does not apply. 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination A. All utility providers shall be responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee or by separate written correspondence. B. The developer shall be responsible for the design, installation and cost of utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider. Response: The applicant anticipates existing wastewater, stormwater, and franchise lines are available adjacent to the proposed restaurant. There is no existing water line to serve the future restaurant location and as such, the applicant plans to extend water from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. Plans indicate the new waterline and junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide dedicated easement for SUB. The location and specifications surrounding the new domestic waterline are outlined in the marked site plan from SUB, included with this application as Appendix 3. These comments were included in the design and shown on the utility plan included as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities Whenever possible, all utility lines shall be placed underground. However, overhead and above -ground facilities are permitted for the following: Response: All existing and proposed utility lines shown on Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4 that are contiguous to the project site, including those required for electricity, communication, water, and stormwater will be placed underground as required by this provision. to 13 W IL Page 27 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection A. Each development area shall be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply to the development with sufficient access for maintenance. Response: A new water line will extend from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. The proposed line will be sized to provide domestic water service and with adequate pressure for fire suppression purposes. The location of fire hydrants and water lines are shown on Sheet C5.0 and Sheet C5.1 in Appendix 4. B. Fire hydrants and mains shall be installed by the developer as required by the Fire Marshal and the utility provider. Response: The applicant anticipates fire hydrants and mains will be installed as required by the Fire Marshal and utility provider (SUB). As such, the applicant has provided a utility plan (Sheet C5.0) and fire access plan (Sheet C5.1) in Appendix 4 to demonstrate the project's consistency with this provision. 4.3-135 Major Electrical Transmission Lines A. When necessary to increase the capacity of major electrical power transmission lines, utility providers shall provide the increase by use of existing rights-of-way or easements. Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed restaurant use will have similar if not less electrical utility demand compared to the previous uses (formerly Elmer's restaurant and a motel). Therefore, no increase in the capacity of major electrical power transmission lines is anticipated and this provision does not apply. 4.3-140 Public Easements A. Utility Easements. The applicant shall make arrangements with the City and each utility providerforthe dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area, as necessary. The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street rights-of-way shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements shall also be 7 feet. However, the utility provider or the Public Works Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major electric power transmission lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance orto accommodate multiple utility lines. Where feasible, utility easements shall be centered on a lotiparcel line. Response: There is no existing water line to serve the future restaurant location and as such, the applicant plans to extend water from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. 40013 W L. Page 28 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 Plans indicate the new waterline and junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide dedicated easement for SUB. The location and specifications surrounding the new domestic waterline are outlined in a letter from SUB, included with this application as Appendix 3. These comments were included in the design and shown on the utility plan included as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. 4.4-100 Landscaping, Screening and Fence Standards 4.4-105 Landscaping A. These regulations ensure that new development complies with the landscaping provisions of this Code and any applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, and Conceptual Development Plans; is adequately screened from less intensive development; considers the effects of vegetation on public facilities; retains significant clusters of natural trees and shrubs wherever possible; minimizes run-off; facilitates energy conservation and crime prevention; and improves the appearance of the City to create a desirable place to live and work Response: A landscaping plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4 to illustrate landscaping improvements and consistency with the Gateway Refinement Plan. B. Three types of landscaping may be required: 1. Landscaping standards for private property as specified in this Section and other Sections of this Code. Response: Existing street trees and curbside planter strips along the public right-of-way were both noted as sufficient, with no required landscaping improvements. Therefore, the applicant anticipates private property landscaping requirements, as specified in this code, and the Gateway Refinement Plan will be required. C. Materials and installation costs of planting and irrigation other than what is required by the Minimum Development Standards (Section 5.15-100) shall not be required to exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development, including parking facilities. The Director shall determine the location, quantity and quality of required landscaping as specified in this Code. Response: The applicant anticipates that the cost of planting and irrigation will not exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development, as specified in this provision. D. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, the following areas of a lotiparcel shall be landscaped: 1. All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as specified in the appropriate zoning district. 2. Parking lot planting areas required in this Section. 'lletJ 0 W L. Page 29 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The applicant has prepared and included a landscape plan as Sheet L1.0 of Appendix 4, that identifies perimeter landscaping, interior landscaping, and parking lot planting areas, consistent with this provision. E. At least 65 percent of each required planting area shall be covered with living plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant materials shall be distributed throughout the required planting area. The planting acceptable per 1,000 square feet of the required planting area is as follows: Response: The landscape plan is designed such that each required planting will achieve at least 75 percent with living plant materials within three (3) years, consistent with the more stringent standard outlined in the Gateway Refinement Plan. The gross floor area of the proposed restaurant is 4,987 square feet. The landscape plan shows 71 trees, 1,222 shrubs, and 10,365 square feet of ground cover. A landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet L1.0 of Appendix 4. F. Parking lot planting areas shall include 1 canopy tree at least 2 inches in caliper that meets City street tree standards as may be permitted by the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and at least 4 shrubs, 5 -gallon or larger, for each 100 square feet of planting area. Shrubbery that abuts public right-of-way or that is placed in the interior of any parking lot shall generally not exceed 2-1/2 feet in height at maturity. Parking lot planting areas shall include: Parking and driveway setback areas specified in the applicable zoning district; and 5 percent of the interior of a parking lot, exclusive of any required parking setbacks, if 24 or more parking spaces are located between the street side of a building and an arterial or collector street, and are visible from any street. Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and is subject to a ten -foot building setback and five-foot parking, driveway, and outdoor storage setback. The landscape plan indicates 18 percent or 5,196 square feet of the interior parking lot is screened from Beltline and Gateway Street, consistent with this provision and the Gateway Refinement Plan. G. All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system unless where planted with native species or plant communities, or as may be exempted by the Director. Response: The applicant anticipates that all new planting areas will be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system. Irrigation system design and plans will be provided following land use approval. 40013 W L Page 30 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 H. Landscaped setbacks abutting required screening on the same property may be exempted by the Director from planting requirements if the area is not visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent property. Response: The applicant anticipates that the project site will be able to provide landscaping within the required property setbacks in the CCzoning districtwhile also complying with the screening requirements for mechanical equipment and trash enclosures. Therefore, no exemption is requested with this application. Planting Installation Standards. 1. The applicant shall provide methods for the protection of existing plant material, which will remain through the construction process. The plants to be saved and the method of protection shall be noted on the Planting Plan. Response: No existing planting material will remain through the construction process. Therefore this provision does not apply. 2. Existing trees to be retained on private property shall not have construction occur within the drip line, unless a landscape architect certifies that affected trees will have at least a 90 percent chance of survival over a 5 -year period. Trees to be saved shall be kept free from trunk abrasion. Response: No existing trees will be retained on the project site. Therefore, the applicant anticipates a Tree Felling Permit will be required and will be provided following land use approval. 3. The Planting Plan may be required to include specifications for topsoil, including depth and organic matter requirements, to ensure the health and vitality of required planting. Where planting areas have been excavated, the Planting Plan shall provide for the replacement of topsoil. All waste material shall be removed from required planting areas prior to the application of topsoil. Inspection may be made by the Director prior to planting to verify proper rough grade and installation of irrigation systems. b. Plant materials and soil preparation may be inspected prior to or in conjunction with the occupancy inspection to ensure that placement, quantity, size, and variety conform to the approved Planting Plan and the requirements of this Section. Nursery tags identifying variety and species shall remain on plant specimens until the Final Building Inspection by the Building Official or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ltJO WL Page 31 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The applicant understands that inspection and verification of soil depth and organic matter will occur before the proposed plantings. 4.4-110 Screening A. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, screening shall be required: 2. For outdoor mechanical devices and minor and major public facilities; 4. For trash receptacles; Response: The project site does not abut a residential or different zoned area, and therefore is not subject to screening between uses. Outdoor mechanical devices and minor and major facilities will be located on the roof and screened behind the building fagade. The location and screening method for mechanical equipment can be seen on the architectural plan, included with this application as Appendix 5. Trash and recycling receptacles will be located within an enclosure, designed to have matching architectural features to the proposed restaurant including a combination of dark steel and white stucco siding. B. Screening shall be vegetative, earthen and/or structural and be designed to minimize visual and audible incompatible uses from adjacent properties. Unless specified elsewhere in this Subsection, screening shall be continuous to at least 6 feet above ground level. The following standards shall apply: 1. Vegetative Screening. Evergreen shrubs shall be planted to form a continuous hedge. When immediate screening is necessary, a sight - obscuring fence shall be installed in place of, or in conjunction with the shrubs. The 6 -foot height standard specified in Subsection B., above shall occur within 4 years of planting. 3. Structural Screening. Afence or masonry wall shall be constructed to provide a uniform sightobscuring screen. EXCEPTIONS: Any refuse container or disposal area which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility, adjacent property, or any residential area, shall be screened from view as specified in Subsections 1. and 3., above. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. See also Section 3.2-240D.3.b. for multifamily design standards. This standard does not apply to single and 2 -family dwellings. Response: The refuse and recycling areas are located within an enclosed masonry wall, as shown on the architectural plan included in Appendix 5. 4013WL. Page 32 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 4.4-115 Fences Fences shall not exceed the height standards in Table 4.4-1 and shall be located as follows: A. General 1. In any zoning, overlay or plan district not specifically listed in Table 4.4-1, fence standards shall be determined based upon the use, for example a commercial use in the Mixed Use Commercial District shall comply with fence standards for the commercial districts in Table 4.4-1. Response: No fences are proposed with this application. Therefore this provision does not apply. 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards 4.5-110 Illumination and Height A. Standards for Installation and Operation of Outdoor Lighting. Except as exempt by subsection (C) of SDC 4.5.105 above, new outdoor lighting fixtures installed after July 1, 2022, are subject to the standards below. No provision of this section is intended to preempt Springfield Municipal Code 8.200 et seq., Signs, or applicable State codes. (1) All outdoor lighting fixtures subject to this section must be designed as a full cut-off fixture or have a shielding method to direct light emissions down onto the site and not shine direct illumination or glare onto adjacent properties. (2) All lighting for roadways, roadway signs, intersections, and pedestrian ways must be designed or have an opaque shielding method to direct light emissions downward and below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. (3) The use of laser source light or any similar high intensity light for outdoor advertising or entertainment is prohibited. (6) Businesses and institutions with outdoor lighting, such as parking lot lights, building lights, landscaping lights, and other similar exterior lighting features, are encouraged to extinguish such lights at the end of the working day, except for lights necessary for personal and building safety. Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on- site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas, landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be 40013 W L Page 33 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided at roadway signs and private driveway intersections will be designed to be downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. B. On-site lighting shall be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application including parking areas and vehicle sales areas. All exterior light fixtures shall be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property and directed downward and away from abutting properties; public rightsof-way; and riparian, wetlands, and other protected areas identified in this Code on the same property. Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on- site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas, landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided at roadway signs and at private driveway intersections will be designed to be downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. C. Height. 1. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the principal permitted structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface and the bottom of the light fixture. Response: All proposed light poles will not exceed the 25 -foot maximum height requirement per this provision. 4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards 4.6-110 Motor Vehicle Parking — General A. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided, consistent with requirements in Section 4.6-125, Table 4.6-2, unless excepted as allowed herein, for: 1. All new construction and expansion of multiple family residential, commercial, industrial and public and semi-public uses. If an existing development is expanded, new parking spaces shall be provided in proportion to the increase only. 2. Changes in use or the use category of an existing building or structure. Response: The applicant anticipates new parking spaces are required due to the change in use from the existing buildings (formerly Elmer's and a motel) to the new restaurant 400 13 W L Page 34 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 and future Pad Site A and future Pad Site B. Parking totals and design findings are provided for the restaurant only. Future Pad Site parking totals will be provided when developed in the future. B. If parking has been provided to serve an existing use, the number of parking spaces cannot be reduced if the result would be fewer spaces than required by this Section, except as parking reductions are allowed below and under Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2. Response: The applicant has reconfigured the parking lot from the existing use and existing parking in an effort to provide ample room for new development (utilities, drive aisles, landscape improvements, and future pad sites). Parking counts will not result in fewer parking spaces than those provided under the existing approval. C. Parking reductions under Sections 4.6-110.1-1 through L and Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2 shall not reduce the number of ADA parking spaces required in accordance with the minimum parking in Table 4.6-2 or under Section 4.6-110.M. Response: No parking reductions are requested with this application. Two ADA parking spaces are proposed, consistentwith Table 4.6-2 and Section 4.6-110.M. E. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of passenger vehicles of residents, customers, patrons, visitors, and employees only, and shall not be used for outdoor displays, storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials. Parking for company motor vehicles that remain on the premises overnight, or enclosures designed for the temporary collection of shopping carts, must be provided in addition to the number of parking spaces required by this Section. Response: All required parking totals are provided for passenger vehicles of customers, patrons, visitors, and employees. No outdoor displays, storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials is proposed with this application. E. Unless joint use of parking facilities is requested as may be permitted in Subsection E. below, the total requirement for off-street parking spaces is the sum of the requirements for all uses. If the total number of required parking spaces results in a fraction, the fraction shall be rounded up to the next whole number. Off-street parking facilities for one use shall not be considered as providing parking facilities for any other use, unless as may be permitted in Subsection F., below. Response: Parking totals proposed with this application are for the restaurant building only. Additional parking stalls to serve future pad sites A and B are shown on the site plan but not requested as a part of the application and will be designed and included in future submittals. G. When on -street parking is available directly abutting the property and there are no adopted plans to remove the on -street parking, parking spaces in a 400 0 W L Page 35 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 public right-of-way directly abutting the development area may be counted as fulfilling a part of the parking requirements for development as follows: For each 18 feet of available on -street parking, there will be 1/2 space credit toward the required amount of off-street parking spaces. The developer is responsible for marking any on -street spaces. Response: There are no on -street parking areas directly abutting the project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. H. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Additional Bicycle Parking. Additional bicycle parking beyond the minimum amount required in Table 4.6-3 that complies with the bike parking standards in Sections 4.6-145 and 4.6-150 may substitute up to 20% of off-street motor vehicle parking otherwise required in Table 4.6-2. For every 2 non -required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short -or long-term bicycle parking standards specified in Table 4.63, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by 1 space. When existing parking converted to bicycle parking under this subsection results in surplus motor vehicle parking spaces, the surplus parking may be converted to another use in conformance withthe requirements of this Code. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors—Abutting Sites. Development sites abutting an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 15% from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. J. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors—Nearby Sites. Development sites not abutting but within 1/4 -mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 10% from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. K. Reduction Credit for ADA Improvements for Frequent Transit Corridors. Development sites abutting or within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may receive a reduction of up to 10% from the minimum off-street motorvehicle parking required in Table4.6-2 in exchange for contribution to the City forADA improvements in the public right-of-way. The required contribution will be equal to the Base Curb Ramp Fee multiplied by each set of 4 parking spaces to be reduced, rounded up to the next whole number (e.g. one Base Curb Ramp Fee for 1 to 4 parking spaces reduced, double the Base Curb Ramp Fee for 5 to 8 parking spaces reduced, etc.). The 400 0 W L Page 36 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Base Curb Ramp Fee must be set by Council resolution and must be approximately the cost of constructing one ADA -compliant curb ramp. Nothing in this subsection waives or alters any requirement for a developer to construct or provide on-site or off-site ADA improvements. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. N. Right Size Parking Alternative -Maximum. The Approval Authority may authorize an alternative parking standard that is more than 125% of the minimum off-street parking standard in Section 4.6-125. The alternative parking standard must be the peak parking demand identified by a parking generation study conducted according to the ITE Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies and prepared by a licensed engineer. (6412) Response: The project site is required to provide a minimum of 50 parking stalls and is limited to a maximum of 63 parking stalls. Atotal of 83 parking stalls is requested to serve the proposed restaurant, which exceeds the maximum allowed amount. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. 4.6-115 Motor Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Design All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards: Table 4.6-1 Dimensional Feature (all dimensions in feet) Diagram Stall width, standard Parking Angle 0 45 J � 0 90 A I 9.0 9.0 I 9.0 I 9.01 Stallwidth, compact I A 1 30 801 801 8 0 Stall length. standard I1 24.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Stall length. compact I1 22.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Aisle width between stall Imes I 1 12.0 12.0 16.0 24.0 Bumper overhang(typicah IDI 0.0 1.5 1.6 2.0 Cross -aisle, I-way I1 16.0 16.0 16.0 1 16.0 Cross -aisle, 2 -way I1 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Response: Parking stall locations and dimensions are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. 41to0 WL Page 37 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.6-120 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Lot Improvements All parking areas shall conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting and screening provisions of this Code and shall be completed prior to occupancy. Required parking spaces shall be improved as follows: A. All parking lots, bays, and spaces must have a durable, dust -free surfacing of Asphaltic concrete, Portland cement concrete or other materials as approved by the City Engineer. Permeable pavement meeting standards in the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual may be allowed by the City Engineer for parking areas and driveways. Parking lot surfacing shall not encroach upon the public right-of-way. Response: The existing parking area will be resurfaced with new Asphalt concrete, as approved by the City Engineer. B. Adequate drainage improvements shall be provided to manage all onsite run-off. Provisions shall be madeforthe on-site collection of drainagewaters to eliminate sheet flow onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private property. All drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer. Response: Adequate drainage improvements are proposed to manage surface water run-off from the site, as shown on the storm plan included in Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. C. All parking spaces fronting a sidewalk, alley, street, landscaped area or structure shall be provided with a secured wheel bumper or linear curb not less than 6 inches in height to be set back from the front of the stall a minimum of 2 feet to allowfor vehicle encroachment. Wheel bumpers shall be a minimum of 6 feet in length. Curbs shall be constructed in conformance with the Standard Construction Specifications. EXCEPTION: As an option, the sidewalk or landscaped area may be widened 2 feet beyond the minimum dimension required to allow for vehicle encroachment. A curb not less than 6 inches in height shall protect the widened sidewalks and planter areas. Response: The site has been designed such that linear curb will be provided in front of parking spaces abutting the restaurant, drive-through lanes, and landscaped areas. D. Backing into the public right-of-way, other than alleys is prohibited. EXCEPTION: Parking areas of less than 4 spaces on a residentially zoned lotiparcel may back into the public right-of-way. Response: On-site traffic circulation allows for efficient navigation without backing into the public right-of-way. to 13WL. Page 38 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 E. All spaces shall be permanently and clearly marked unless the Director determines that the spaces should not be marked for safety considerations. Old striping shall not be visible after being replaced by new striping. Response: All parking stalls with be permanently and clearly marked, consistent with this provision. No existing striping will be visible after being replaced by the new asphalt paving and new striping. F. Not more than 30% of the total parking spaces in a parking lot may be designated for compact cars, unless a greater percentage is authorized by the Director based on substantial evidence that greater than 30% of the total parking spaces is appropriate for the use. These spaces shall be signed andlor the space painted with the words "Compact Car Only." Response: No compact spaces are proposed with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. G. Parking Spaces for People with Disabilities. 1. Parking spaces for people with disabilities and accessible passenger loading zones that serve a particular building shall be located as close as possible to a building entrance. Response: The project site provides two accessible parking stalls with a shared passenger loading zone. Both spaces are located adjacent to the restaurant entrance. 2. The number and dimensions of parking spaces for people with disabilities shall be as specified in Section 1106 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Response: The project site provides 83 parking stalls and therefore, is required to provide a minimum of two accessible parking stalls and one van accessible space according to Oregon Structural Specialty Code. The location of accessible parking stalls is shown on the site plan, included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. 4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Space Requirements A. Table 4.6-2 establishes minimum off-street parking standards according to use, which apply to that use in any zoning district. B. The minimum parking standard for any use not specified in Table 4.6-2 is the average peak period parking demand identified for that use in the current version of the ITE Parking Manual, forthe day(s) of the weekwith the highest parking demand. C. The maximum off-street parking standard for any use that is not a residential use is 125% of the minimum off-street parking standard. There is no maximum off-street parking standard for residential uses. Ileo0 WL Page 39 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 D. Parking standards established in Table 4.6-2 may be modified as provided in Section 4.6-110. Table 4.6-2 Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie - 125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83 parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. Special Provisions. B. Commercial Districts. 1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed buildings. Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. too WL Page 40 Minimum Panama standard Zu Nssmmual uses Single mmily (attached and Oadoned) and auplev 1 space Wr each MVelnng when paved on street Poll Is available directly ab rt ng dwellings the proper and Mere are no adopted plans to remove the On street parking. 2 spau5 for each dwelMg when no paved on street parking Is available directly abuding the properly or when the Skbting on -street parking Is planned to be removed as pan UI an NoflW also Manuel dealings, l space ror each dwelling One GIWs out, Pus . 025 space for each bedroom orlove Hing unit plus l per bull hme employee W the busiest shin Sparking and morning houses (see SOC 67-215) 05 Man additional parking space for each boardlog mom In addition to any puling fora pnmary use. Commemialllndustdal uses CMld care center l space Snatch 35d square(eetofgrossarea, plus l dropoRspacs foretell 700 squarebeet,ff, sdoorarea. MMait.00 or bed and breakfast tadlNes l spas plus i space nor each guest mom. Eann and drintrat establishments is ace for each 1 Ws uam leet or aress Mor area. Retail trade and seMces(Induding shopping centers) l space for every 300 square feet or gross floor area. Manufacture and assembly. and other primary l space ror can l No square feet or gross floor area industrial uses. Includes warehousing, warehouse commereWl saks(IncludNg bulky l space has each 6N square fleet M gross Mor area. ...handle.) Pushed ark InsrXYtlonal was Educationist htllniss 2spaceloreableastimmin plus l Wasch 100squarebeet Urine largest Public assembly area. Public chatty holly None, unlessuunryvUltlxwill be parned ovemlght Recreational MdN s, and reYglous, social and public 1 spat or each IN square beet OF door area In Me prhnary aasembry area and 1 Instaboons for Sued 200 square feet Orgross Poor area for Me remainder of ale building. TMnspoftM facHPks tspace tor each 300 square feel M gross Mor area not Including vehicle storage aRu. Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie - 125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83 parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. Special Provisions. B. Commercial Districts. 1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed buildings. Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. too WL Page 40 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2. Parking lots shall be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles. EXCEPTION: Parking spaces in excess of the number required by this Code may be used for temporary sales or display of merchandise where the activity does not create a hazard for automobile or pedestrian traffic orwhere otherwise allowed under this Code or the Springfield Municipal Code. Response: The project site's parking lot will be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles. 3. A minimum of 4 off-street parking spaces shall be required for all sites in commercial zoning districts that require parking, unless reduced under Section 4.6-110.M. Response: The parking totals provided for the proposed restaurant exceed the minimum off- street parking requirements established by this section. Adequate parking counts are provided, consistent with Table 4.6-2. 4.6-135 Loading Areas — Facility Design and Improvements A. All necessary loading areas for commercial and industrial development shall be located off-street and provided in addition to the required parking spaces. Response: As provided under Subsection C, no loading areas are provided based on the minimum size requirements for commercial loading areas. B. Vehicles in the loading area shall not protrude into a public right-of-way or sidewalk. EXCEPTION: When no other reasonable alternative exists, loading areas shall be located so that vehicles are not required to back or maneuver in the public right-of-way or internal travel aisles. Response: As provided below, no loading areas are provided based on the minimum size requirements for commercial loading areas. C. The minimum sizes required for commercial and industrial loading areas are as follows: 1. Two hundred fifty square feet for buildings of 5,000 to 20,000 square feet of gross floor area. Response: The restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor space and therefore, is below the 5,000 square foot threshold therefore the project is not required to provide a loading area. 41to0 WL Page 41 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 4.6-145 Bicycle Parking — Facility Design A. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be a powder coated staple or inverted -U rack as shown in Figure 4.6-B. Alternatively, the required bicycle parking spaces must fulfill the criteria for quality bicycle parking, which are as follows: 1. Supports the bicycle frame in a stable position without damage to wheels, frames, or components and provides two points of contact; 2. Allows locking of the frame and one or both wheels with a U -lock; 3. Is securely anchored to the ground or to a structure; 4. Resists cutting, rusting, bending, or deformation, both from natural causes and from human abuse; 5. Powder coated or durable, non -scratching surface; and 6. Works well for a variety of bicycle frame types (e.g., should work for step -through frame as well as diamond frame, children's bicycles as well as adult bicycles, recumbent as well as other styles of adaptive bicycles). Response: Bicycle parking spaces will consist of powder -coated staple style racks that are spaces to work with a variety of bicycle frame types. B. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be constructed and installed in accordance with Section 4.6-150 and Figures 4.6-13 and 4.6-C. Bicycle parking must be provided at ground level unless an elevator with clear bicycle wayfinding signage is easily accessible and directs users to an approved bicycle storage area. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without removing another bicycle. Response: Bicycle parking will be provided adjacent to the restaurant building on the ground floor with adequate spacing between bicycles to provide convenient access. C. All required long-term bicycle parking spaces must be sheltered from precipitation and include lighting. Response: The proposed Chick -fl -A restaurantwill be 4,987 square feet. Per Table 4.6.3, the project restaurant is required to provide 1 bicycle parking space per 600 square feet of floor area, or nine bicycle parking spaces, with 25 percent of spaces designated as long-term parking and 75 percent designated as short-term parking. The applicant will provide ten bicycle parking spaces (four long-term, six short- term). Bicycle parking will be located under an awning and well -lit per this provision. 4013WL. Page 42 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 D. Short-term bicycle parking must be sheltered as follows: 1. If 10 or fewer short-term bicycle parking spaces are required, no shelter is required for short-term bicycle parking. Response: Six (or 75 percent) short-term bicycle spaces are provided. Therefore, the applicant does not exceed ten short-term bicycle spaces and is not required to shelter short-term bicycle parking. E. Bicycle parking that accommodates oversized bicycles and alternative bicycle types must be provided as follows: 1. Each oversized bicycle parking space must provide minimum clear area of 4 feet by 8 feet as shown in Figure 4.6-C. 2. At least 10% of the long-term bicycle parking spaces for commercial uses and residential uses must be oversized bicycle parking spaces. Response: One oversized bicycle parking space (10 percent ofthe required long-term parking) can be provided, as necessary, on the outside of the bicycle rack. 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking — Facility Improvements A. Bicycle Parking Location and Security. 1. Bicycle parking racks, shelters, or lockers must be securely anchored to the ground or to a structure. Response: Bicycle parking racks will be securely anchored to the ground, consistent with this provision. 2. Exterior long-term bicycle parking must be located within 200 feet from the main building entrance, primary point of entry to the use, or employee entrance. Response: Exterior long-term bicycle parking racks are located within 100 feet from the restaurant building entrance, consistent with this provision. 3. Exterior short-term bicycle parking must: a. Be located no further than 50 feet from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the use, as determined by the City, but not further away than the closest onsite automobile parking space excluding designated accessible parking spaces, whichever distance is less; and b. Be clearly visible from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the use. too WL Page 43 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: Exterior short-term bicycle parking racks are located 40 feet from the restaurant building entrance and are visible from the main building entrance, consistent with this provision. 4. Bicycle parking shall be separated from motor vehicle parking by a barrier, curb, or sufficient distance to prevent damage to parked bicycles. Response: Bicycle parking will be located immediately adjacent to the restaurant building, separated by curbing to prevent damage to parked bicycles. 5. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way, signs shall be provided to direct bicyclists to the parking. Directions to sheltered facilities inside a structure may be signed or supplied by the employer, as appropriate. Short-term parking shall be made available to the general public. Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right- of-way, either from Gateway Street or the southern drive aisle. 6. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor, which has an outdoor entrance open for use, and which does not require stairs to access the space. EXCEPTION: The Director may allow bicycle parking on upper stories within multi -story residential buildings. Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right- of-way, either from Gateway or the southern drive aisle. Bicycle parking and bicycle racks must be located to avoid conflict with pedestrian movement and access. Direct access from bicycle parking spaces to the public right-of-way must be provided by at - grade or ramp access. Pedestrian access must be provided from the bicycle parking area to the building entrance. Bicycle parking may be located in the public sidewalk or right-of-way where there is a minimum 5 feet between the parked bicycle and the storefront and does not conflict with pedestrian accessibility. Response: Bicycle parking will be located adjacent to the restaurant building, separated from pedestrian walkways. The applicant does not anticipate bicycle parking will conflict with pedestrian movement and access. B. Employers with changing rooms and shower facilities or other additional amenities may be eligible fora 10% reduction of Transportation System Development Charges if the Director determines that those facilities encourage bicycling or other active modes of transportation by employees or patrons. 4t7 0 W L Page 44 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 Response: The applicant anticipates no changing rooms and shower facilities or other amenities will be provided with the development of the project site. 4.6-155 Bicycle Parking — Number of Spaces Required Table 4." Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces Long and abort -Term Bicycle Use Catwory specific uses Number of Required Spaces Parkins Percentages Commends] General retail 1 per 3.000 square feet of floor area 25% long-term 75%short-term Eating and drinking 1 per 600 square feet of floor area 25% long -ten establishments 75% short-term Service establishments 1 per 2.000 square feet of floor area 25% long-term 75%short-term Art lnsthuflOngallery 1 per 1,500 square feet of floor area 25% long -tend 75%short-term DrIve-through only 2 for employee parking(minMum of 4 does not 100%tong-term establishments apply) Lodging 1 per 10 rentable rooms 75% long-term 25X short-term Omce, Including medical 0.75 per 5.000 square feet of floor area 7:% 'o offices and clln]¢ 25%short-term Industrial and wholesale 0,25 per employee OR 1 per 4.000 square feel of 75% long-term floor area, v.Tlchever a was 25%short-term Response: The proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant will be 4,987 square feet. Therefore, nine bike spaces are provided (four long-term, six short-term). 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards 4.7-145 Eating and Drinking Establishments The cumulative total area of sit-down restaurants and delicatessens, secondary retail uses and exercise studios in the GO District shall be limited to no more than 10 percent of the gross floor area of the office building in which they are sited. Response: The project site is not in the General Office (GO) zoning district. Therefore, this provision does not apply. IE30 WL Page 45 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 5.0 GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN Commercial Element Policies and Implementation Actions 2.0 Improve the appearance of the freeway commercial area around the intersection of Gateway Street and Belt Line Road. 2.1 As part of the site plan review process for development, require all landscaped areas to be at least 75 percent covered with living plant materials within 3 years of the date of installation. Response: The landscape plan includes a note that at least 75 percent of landscape areaswill be covered with living plant materials within three years of the date of installation. In support of this statement, the landscape architect has designed an automatic irrigation system and anticipates soil depth and organic composition is compatible with the plant species selected. The landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. 2.2 Through the site plan review process requires 7.5% of the interior of parking lots visible from arterials and collectors to be landscaped. Require vegetative screening of parking lots. Allow such vegetative screens to include shrubs to 3'/]' high, except in vision clearance areas. Response: The landscape plan indicates the majority of perimeter parking (17,372 square feet) will be screened by a three foot tall evergreen shrub hedge between the interior parking lot and Beltline and Gateway Street. The location of the parking lot is interior to the project site and as such, no conflict between vegetation height and vision clearance areas is anticipated. The landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. 2.3 Require properties developing along the potential access routes to the McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site to provide planter strip and front yard landscaping designed to enhance the site's entryway. Examples could include additional street trees and landscaped areas. Response: No access to the McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site is proposed with this project. Therefore, the applicant anticipates that this policy does not apply. 2.4 The City shall explore siting and construction of a "Welcome to Springfield" sign in the vicinity of the Gateway/Beltline intersection. The sign shall be aesthetically designed and visible to travelers entering the Gateway area from Belt Line Road and 1-5. Surrounding park -like landscaping should be considered and encouraged as part of this entry design. Response: The applicant anticipates that a Welcome to Springfield sign would be placed at the Intersection of Gateway and Beltline on tax lot 1703222001201. The project site is located to the south of the speculative sign and therefore, the applicant 41ttJ 13 W L Page 46 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 anticipates no significant conflict with future siting considerations for the city welcome sign. 5.0 CONCLUSION As evidenced through this narrative and associated documents, the applicant's pre -development review application is consistent with the applicable local policies and regulations governing the allowance of these requests. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests the City of Springfield's approval of this application. 4013WL Page 47