HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/6/2023!City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SPpINOPI�
ML *
PERMIT REVIEW INTAKE FORM (City Staff completes form{ )
Permit Type
Dept of Motor Vehicles -New: ElLand Use Compatibility Statement: City: pJ
Dept of Motor Vehicles -Renewal: ❑ Zoning Verification Letter: ❑ UGB: ❑
Project Information
Applicant Name: i -A lee OrveN Phone: TOO -2616-9350
Company: -T-{MObII-e W2f'f- LLC'
cell:
Address: `sem Skinnllny hilum"lyl.5
O�
Pro ert Owner: Pefeyglei Na&ineN co
Phone:
Company:
Cell:
Address: °I� MAYla BJYd
-All Lpqkdvb C%F
i`T+;1-I
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 16030313 0
TAX LOT NOS
: 0500
Property Address: 2300 kelkdtySOH Nt
F -
&Jelele OF -
Description
Description of Proposal:
IhSfafI&NO a 50- Yhv d Iz el ewiW t7
heva r
,Record Information
Record No: rI -23 UUUpN-� - P I Date Received: 3 3 1 20 Z3
Application Fee: ;V)C? -
Technical
Fee: 25
TOTAL FEES: 2✓�3 2_(_9 Assigned Planner:
Revised 11.2. 11 k]
NETWORK
AAAI
February 28, 2023
City of Springfield
Development Center
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Subject: Land Use Compatibility Statement (LUGS)
On behalf of T -Mobile, Synergy Advantage Engineers dba Network Connex, hereby submits the attached Land Use
Compatibility Statement (LUCS) for T -Mobile's existing Telecommunications facility located at 2300 Henderson Ave.,
in Springfield. T -Mobile is planning on installing a 50 -kW diesel emergency generator to provide backup electrical
power in the event of loss of grid power. We received a planning department approval for this site (PS -0840). I have
enclosed a copy of the approval with this letter.
If there are any questions concerning this submittal, please contact me at 661-754-1282 or via email at
rsegura Cw networkconnex.com.
Sincerely,
Ruth Segura
Site Acquisition Specialist
661-754-1282
rscgu ra n networkconnex. cam
655 N. Central Ave., Suite 1520 networkconnex.com
Glendale, CA 91203
Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STATEMENT
Basic and General Air Contaminant Discharge Permits, R
Who needs to complete this form?
If you are required to apply for an LRAPA Basic Air Contaminant
Discharge Permit, be assigned to a General Air Contaminant Discharge
Permit, or are opting for registration in lieu of permitting, you need to
complete this form. This form only applies to Basic and General Air
Contaminant Discharge Permits and Registration. Applicants for
Construction, Simple, or Standard Air Contaminant Discharge Permits
must complete LRAPA's general Land Use Compatibility Statement form.
LRAPA
Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
Why is this form required?
This form is required because LRAPA must determine whether issuing the permit you are applying for or approving
your registration will be consistent with local government land use regulations. Oregon law requires that LRAPA
permits be consistent with the local government's acknowledged comprehensive plans and land use regulations.
LRAPA documents this consistency with a Land Use Compatibility Statement as required by Oregon Revised
Statutes 197.180 and LRAPA 34-036 (1) (p).
Where can I find this form?
A Land Use Compatibility Statement form is included in the Basic and General Air Contaminant Discharge
Permit and Registration application approval packets. It can also be found on LRAPA's website.
How to complete this form:
Step
Who Does It
What Happens
1
Applicant
Applicant completes Section 1 of this form and submits it to the appropriate
city or county planningoffice.
2
City or County
City or county planning office completes Section 2 of this form to indicate that
Planning
the use is compatible with the acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use
Office
regulations, attaches written findings supporting the decision of compatibility,
and returns the signed and dated form to the applicant.
3
Applicant
Applicant submits the completed form and any supporting information
provided by the city or county to LRAPA along with the LRAPA permit or
registration application. See the permit or registration application for specific
submittal instructions.
Applications are available on LRAPA's website: www.lrapa.org
Do not submit this form to LRAPA if it is incomplete or if the local planning
office informs you that your use is not consistent with its regulations. You
must work with the local planning office to ensure that your use is
compatible before submitting this orm to LRAPA
Where to get help:
Questions about this form should be directed to the staff responsible for processing your air quality permit or
registration application. LRAPA may be reached at (541) 736-1056
LRAPA Basio/G .0 ] ACDP & Rogistafion LUCS 3/30/2015 Page 1 or2
Lane Regional Air Protection Agency
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STATEMENT
(Instructions on back -side)
SECTION 1- TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT
1. Applicant Name (This must be the same name as the legal reamc you will use on your permit/registration application form):
T -Mobile West LLC
Mailing Address: 86 Shining Mountains Loop Rd.
City, state, zip:Enni5,MT59729
Telephone: 806-290-5350
z. Property Physical Addreas:2300 Henderson Ave
city, state, zip: Eugene, OR 97403
County:Lane County
Tax Let #: 603031300500
3. Describe the type of development, business, or facility and the provided services or products:
Emergency generator installation to existing cell site.
4. Check the type of LRAPA Air Contaminant Discharge Permit being applied for at this time:
❑E Basic or General Air Contaminant Discharge permit ❑ Registration
SECTION 2 - TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING OFFICIAL
Instructions: Written findings of fact for all local decisions are required; written findings from previous actions are acceptable. For
allowed pre-existing uses and uses allowed outright, LRAPA will accept written findings in the form of a citation to the applicable
land use regulation. In all other cases, LRAPA will accept a rcfcrence to the specific plan policies, criteria, or standards that were
relied upon in rendering the decision with an indication of why the decision is justified based on the plan policies, criteria, or
standards.
A. The project proposal is located: ❑ Inside City Limits ❑ Inside UGB ❑ Outside UGB
B. Name of the city or county that has land use jurisdiction (the legal entityresponsible for land use decisions for the subject
property):
C. Is the use compatible with the applicable acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use regulations?
Please complete this farm to address the use for which the applicant is seeking approval (see #3 in Section I above). 11 you cannot
answer "yes, -please discuss your findings with the applicant. LRAPA cannot proceed with permit issuance if the use is not
compatible with your acknowledged comprehensive plan. LRAPA will not accept any alterations to this farm.
❑ Yes, the activity or use is pre-existing nonconforming use allowed outright by (provide reference to local ordinance):
❑ Yes, the activity or use is allowed outright by (provide reference to local ordinance):
❑ Yes, the activity or use received preliminary approval that includes requirements to fully comply with local
requirements; findings are attached.
❑ Yes, the activity or use is otherwise compatible with the acknowledged comprehensive plan and land use regulations
findings are attached.
Additional comments (attach additional information as needed):
Planning Official Signature: Title:
Print Name: Telephone #: Date:
LRAPA Bas ecGcneaal ACnP & Registration LIR14 3/30/2015 Page 2 of 2
LAND USE COMPATIBILITY STATEMENT (LUCS)
WHAT IS A LUGS? The LUCS is the process Lane Regional Air Protection Agency (LRAPA) uses to determine that
LRAPA permits are consistent with the local government comprehensive plan.
WHY IS A LUCS REQUIRED? Oregon law requires that activities that impact land use be consistent with
local comprehensive plans. DEQ Division 18 administrative rules identify LRAPA actions that are defined as programs
affecting land use and for which LRAPA must have a process for determining local plan consistency.
WHEN IS A LUCS REQUIRED? A LUCS is required for nearly all LRAPA permits. In cases where a source needs
more than one permit or approval (e.g., DEQ water discharge permit and LRAPA air contaminant discharge permit), a
single LUCS may be used.
A permit modification requires a LUCS when there is any physical change or change of operation of an air pollutant
source that results in a net significant emission rate increase ('SER' as defined in LRAPA's rules, Section 12-001).
Apermit renewal requires a LUCS if one has not previously been submitted, or if there is any physical change or change
of operation of an air pollutant source that results in a net significant emission rate increase ('SER' as defined in LRAPA's
rules Section 12-001).
HOW TO COMPLETE A LUCS:
• The applicant fills out Section 1 of the LUCS and then submits it to the city or county planning office.
• The city or county planning office determines if the business or facility meets all local planning requirements.
• The city or county planning office must attach written findings of Fact for local reviews or other necessary
planning approvals that are required of the applicant.
• The applicant includes the completed LUCS and attachments with the permit application or modification form
submitted to LRAPA. Note: The LUCS form with the original signature of the]n among official is the one which
must be submitted to LRAPA.
WHERETO GET HELP WITH A LUCS: Questions can be directed to LRAPA staff responsible for processing
the permit application or modification at (541) 736-1056.
SECTION 1 — TO BE FILLED OUT BY APPLICANT
Name of Applicant T -Mobile West LLC
Contact Person (Name&Title) Kaylee Greer, Project Manager
Telephone Number 806-290-5350
Location Address:
2205 Henderson Ave
Eugene, OR 97403
Mailing Address:
88 Shining Mountains Loop Rd.
Ennis, MT 59729
Land Use Compatibility Statement LUCS Page 2
Tax Account # 0582104
Township 100
Latitude 44.03592222
Tax Lot# 803031300500
Range 3W Section 3
Longitude -123.03842500
2. Describe type of business or facility and the services or products provided:
Emergency generator installation to existing cell site.
3. The type of LRAPA permit applied for at this time is:
Notice of Intent to Construct 1:1 Air Indirect Source Permitl �®� Title V Air Pemdt
L'. I
Air Contaminant Discharge Permit (portable facilities excluded)
4. This application is for a: �j
New Permit R Permit Renewal Q Permit Modification jam_ Other (specify)
SECTION 2 — TO BE FILLED OUT BY CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING OFFICIAL
5. The facility (for which the applicant is applying for a LUCS) is located:
0 Inside City Limits D Inside UGB R Outside UGB
6. Name of city or county that has land use jurisdiction-:
'jurisdiction mean the legal entity that is respaasihlefn haat use dmeeions fn-the.euhdeet property ar land use.
7. The facility complies with all applicable local land use requirements: ❑ Yes 0 No
A. List all local reviews or approvals that were required of the applicant before the LUCS consistency was
determined (this does nal include past regan emence that do nat relate to the pending LRAPA permit, caest):
Land Use Compatibility Statement(LUCS)
Page 3
B. If "No," identify reasons for noncompliance or list requirement(s) that the applicant must comply with before
LUCS consistency can be determined:
C. Is city or county government currently processing remaining requirements to attain LUCS consistency:
D. Are public notice and a hearing required ? E]Yes ❑ No
If yes, Date of Hearing:
S. Planning official reviewer's telephone number:
SIGNATURE(S): Please use blue ink.
Planning Official -- Signature (Print Name)
Title
Planning Official -- Signature' (Print Name)
' Second signature, ifreguired by the city/county agreement on jurisdiction outside tidy limits but within UGB)
ATTENTION: A LUCS approval cannot be accepted by LRAPA until all local requirements have been met. Written
findings of fact for all local decisions addressed under 7A and 7B must be attached to the LUCS.
Zw
o 0 oma s f a
p=o u�`1.,w
E Fc r
6
5
%6
WO
M
1s
'sa
> d °°. c "s��3�pr, �3es t. k'�P33
MIN
O HURRAH
p�j i z Z F Z S F 2 4i
= 6
,`. >
2 = Z Y g6
1
In
3 o Fok�oww
Ws9g
•`r^�' FLU
Z rn y at' a 's'z84a z_Bib
W O w H
O U O Fy o ��
} U rc e a =e.�8�;.
Z ❑ Q d' €3=ogzgau
�i wg�q�.
O F � 9fi 6 na �Oai 3ya�NS.
ray' U co OUF
■
5w8
YY
-Me
a¢ a
Z W i'Z
O J
Z O w'�
K a
W O w 4.
o>z swo, _Ea__ I3,"
d oo°" e e 3; §I alr a
mui �a s
:2 :2 "o q 'o
z�
DQ ad „v..o 'Zi: s E
Z Z °
F F F k RLz
.., - t
(A W m > gY4= k b ` 548 =dins - HI-Ns
W W a =0 a rt
J J Ka �i > i ak z e KGs k
Go m W w a x 8
O O m s a s a�ec P
F O O 3x�e:k v canes °sa a raei
k ? a a= a s s 'czurx-.
.€ ss.gg.M giCd e,.�...� �.,s�ss,3: s„ea` �ssd� ess,sd�
0 0
�wo3
c.
go38
(
Pe=o
W
s€�=
_ _
VII
Vii'::e
■
e€ tl
'�Im`
-=�y
e„=es
Sgw�
e s:e
a3€k3
koe�o
p
V'o?se
D
'et�p
_ _
VII
Vii'::e
c `c
'�Im`
-=�y
Sgw�
e s:e
-H
/
\/ :
((§.
B �} g{ ` , . - � ■, �
r
|IA:
S_;
aq u ,
oa .y/:a z.§§ \ 7
(/
a
,
�
( � Plix
)'IN
\\ /dibi\-R
!l�2
j
�
/
\
%
�
)
!
)
gkMi/
�
meq.
ZJ
3~
>
�
a
0
if
�
a
9§Ak AAk `vx"n3YYHS"aus
xF
YAxx
E+..£ASA. va
e�f3
PHSRRS.
u.
�
iev'�e
$e$a€=
S
EP E�$i§�BY..i
Ey y�
e'
sF�yy'!
a
i
sil"+s-�e�[I=i
?�Y*£�i
f+�
::.:.::.....:::.:::::::...---:::000
----- ----
�,
EEH5A6
8'e A`e"e
Hd5`a
➢5355':'vA
&3SiS. `vA � 35
L�
4 zi
t
=i
Alm
i�:Ft,;.
kt -. • � Ps-�8'i�
Planning h1�, Ver t+Cyv
& Development
Planning
City of Eugene
99 West 10th Avenue, Suite 240
September 17, 1996 Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541)687-5481
(541)687-5572 FAX
Gary Pape'
Pape' Properties, Inc.
101 E. Broadway, "400
Eugene, OR 97401 RECD SEP 191996
APPROVAL OF SITE REVIEW FOR PAPE BROS. 1\rC. (SR 96-291
In accordance with Section 9.690 of the Eugene Code, the Eugene Planning Director reviewed
and approved your request for a site review permit to expand an existing building, provide a
roof over an existing wash area, and construct a 150 -foot high monopole antenna for cellular
telephone communications.
The following conditions, apply to the 150 -foot high monopole antenna portion of the project:
I. A building permit will not be issued for the monopole antenna until the annexation of the
subject property is effective. (FMI: Cathy Czemiak, Planning Division, 687-5481)
• 2. The monopole antenna will he co -locatable and designed to accomodate additional
providers. (FMI: Cathy Czemiak, Planning Division, 687-5481)
Several conditions apply to the building expansion and wash area roof construction portion of
the project, and shall be reflected on a revised site plan to be submitted and approved by staff
before a site review agreement is completed. The conditions applying to the building expansion
and wash area roof construction are as follows:
3. R is not possible from the drawings submitted to verify compliance with code
requirements for auto and bicycle parking spaces. Drawings which show the location and
dimensions of all auto and bicycle parking spaces shall be submitted for staff review and
verification of code compliance. (FMI: Kevin Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
4. A wheel stop or bumper shall be provided for all parking spaces abutting required
vegetative buffers, in order to protect the required vegetation from encroaching vehicles.
(FMI: Kevin Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
5. The proposed development involves the expansion of the existing parking area. An
expansion of the existing parking area requires that the entire parking area be brought up
to current code standards for parking lots, including the provision of interior puking lot
landscaping. Drawings shall be submitted which show how this development will satisfy
the parking lot landscaping requirements outlined in E.C. 9.589. (FMI: Kevin Finney,
• Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
ClibPDF - www.fastio.corn
RECD SEP 191996
• 6. An automatically -controlled irrigation system shall be provided for all plant materials.
used to meet the parking area landscaping and screening requirements. The irrigation
system shall be illustrated on a landscape plan and shall be submitted for approval with
the building permit application as required by E.C. 9.589(2)(h). (FMI: Kevin Finney,
Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
The decision of the Planning Director is final unless appealed to the Eugene Hearings Official.
An appeal of the decision must be submitted within 10 days of the date the decision is mailed.
Appeal forms are available at the Permit and Information Center, 99 West loth Avenue. If you
have any questions or need further assistance, please feel free to contact me at 687-5481.
Cordially,
l
Rodney Mink
Planner
enclosure
cc: Eric Hall, Architect
Opanyi Nasiali, Whalen and Company
•
C11bPDF - www.fastio.com
• September 16, 1996 RECD SEP 191996
FINDINGS AND DECISION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR
rmumammenizutam:;• I
Date Submitted: June 28, 1996. Revised plans for the monopole antennae and
additional information submitted on September 9, 1996.
Property: Assessor's Map 18-03-03-20, Tax Lot 600
Assessor's Map 18.03.03-13, Tax Lot 500
Location: Located south of 22nd Avenue, on the east and west sides of
Henderson Avenue.
Project Area: 10.5 Acres
Zoning: I-2/SR Light Medium Industrial District/ Site Review Subdistrict
and I-2/SR/UL Light Medium Industrial DistristlSite Review
Subdistrict/Urbanizeable Land Subdistrict.
• Request: The applicant is requesting site review approval to expand an
existing building, provide a roof over an existing wash area, and
construct a 150 -foot high monopole antenna for cellular telephone
communications.
Applicant: Pape' Brothers. Inc.
Background
The subject property is located in the Glenwood neigborhood in the area south of 22nd Avenue
and north of Interstate 5. The subject property is surrounded by property planned ultimately for
industrial uses. Several houses are located northeast of the subject property on land that is
presently zoned RA/UL Suburban Residential/Urbanizeable LandSubdistrict. RA is primarily a
single-family residential zoning designation.
Annexation of a portion of the subject property into the City of Eugene is currently underway
and is expected to be completed in mid October.
Referrals regarding this application were made to the relevant public and private agencies,
including the Glenwood Community Organization. Notice of the application was mailed to
• property owners within 100 feet of the subject property. The planning staff received no written
FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE I
CIibPDF - www.tastio.com
. response to the notice. RECD SEP 191996
Present Request
The present request includes three separate elements. The first two include building a roof over
an existing outdoor wash area and building a 5000 square foot addition to an existing
manufacturing building. The third element is the construction of a new 150 -foot tall monopole
antenna for cellular communications.
Findings
The site review criteria required for this project arc noted below, followed by applicable
findings:
A. Compatibility with the surroundings, particularly when residential in character.
Every effort shall be made to buffer surrounding residences form the visual and
noise impact of the industrial development, including creation of a ten -foot buffer
zone with minimum improvements of:
1) A six-foot wooden fence or masonry wall which shall be constructed ro
provide a uniform site -obscuring screen; or
• 2) An earth berm combined with evergreen plantings or fence which shall
form a sight and noise buffer at least six feet in height within two years of
completion; or
3) A planting screen of year-round site obscuring vegetation planted a
minimum of six feet in depth and which shall form a sight and noise buffer at least
six feet in height within two years of completion.
The wash area roof addition and the power division building addition are both located on the
portion of the Pape' Bros. site located west of Henderson Avenue. The wash area is located on
the far west of the property, a distance from any residential areas. The abutting properties
surrounding the wash area include other industrial areas that are similar in visual and noise
impact. The wash area improvement is compatible with the surroundings.
The addition to the power division building is located across Henderson Street from a single
family residence. The power division building is located on a Flat area 10 to 20 feet higher than
the adjacent residential property. The slope between Henderson Street and the flat area where
the power division building is located is landscaped with a variety of deciduous and coniferous
trees, shrubs, and groundcover. The landscaping is attractive, and provides a buffer similar to
those listed as the minimum necessary to address this criterion. The landscape buffer is similar
enough that it suffices to provide what is necessary for compatibility with the adjacent
• FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE 2
CIibPDF - www.fastio. con,
• residential. RECD SEP 191996
The cellular tower component of the site review is located on the east side of Henderson
Avenue and zoned 1-2/SR/UL. This site review criterion is specifically limited to finding that
the use is compatible with residential surroundings by making every effort to buffer existing
residences from noise and visual impacts of the use by using screening techniques. Noise will
not be a factor in the use of the site as any noise associated with the use is from electrical
equipment will be negligible given the surrounding industrial and I-5 freeway noise already
present. The visual impact is what is at issue here. The revised plans submitted for the tower
show that it's proposed location will be further set back from the residential area along 22nd
Avenue an additional 60 feet (approximate). The original site plans showed the tower
approximately 30 feet from the northern property line of the the residential area. Situated
between the tower location and the residential area to the north is a row of coniferous trees that
are approximatley 40-50 feet in height. The trees consitute a uniform site obscuring screen far
exceeding the six feet in height between existing residential and the use as noted under this
criterion. Further, the buffer distance of over 60 feet from the nearest residence provides a
considerable buffer distance in excess of the ten feet noted under this criterion. In addition, the
residential neighborhood has quite a few trees amongst the homes in the area which will assist
in partially obscuring the tower. The tower will not be completely obscured given it's 150 -foot
height. However, given the buffer distance, the existence of site obscuring trees described
above, it will not have a pronounced presence for the surrounding area. It is noted that the
• character of the surrounding area is primarily industrial and freeway oriented. Given the above
information and findings, it is found that the cellular tower at this particular location will be
compatible to the extent possible.
•
B. Signs and illumination in scale and harmony with the site and area. Illumination
shall be designed so as to reflect the light away from neighboring residential
properties.
In the applicant's statement it is noted that Pape' Brothers may,wish to install a sign at some
time in the future on the power divsision building that will be visible from the I-5 freeway. The
statement notes that existing landscaping and grade changes will prevent this sign from being
visible to adjacent residential properties. A sign permit would have to be obtained before the
sign is constructed.
C. Adequate provision for flood control and storm drainage.
The flood control and drainage elements of the site review plans were reviewed by the City
Engineering Division. The plans show that flood control and storm drainage concems can be
addressed adequately during the building permit review process. There is no need for specific
site review conditions to provide for adequate flood control or storm drainage, and the
application is, therefore, consistent with the approval criterion.
FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE 3
CIibPDF - www.fastio.coin
RECD SEP 191996
• D. Safe and efficient ingress and egress, and on-site traffic circulation, including
emergency vehicle access, with particular attention to the impact of industrial
traffic on surrounding residences, minimizing industrial traffic in front of
residential development as much as possible.
Approval of the site review will not significantly change the existing vehicular circulation
patterns on the subject property. There are, at present, two entrances to the property. The first,
used primarily for trucks provides access from 22nd Avenue. The second, used primarily to
provide access to the employee parking lot, is located on Henderson Street. The improvements
made to the site will not result in any significant increases in employee traffic. The safety and
efficiency of ingress, egress, and on-site traffic circulation and the impact of traffic on
surrounding residences will be unchanged from what it is now.
Staff of the City's Land Use Management section reviewed the plans and made the following
comments regarding parking and landscaping (FMI7 Kevin Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-
5252):
I. It is not possible from the drawings submitted to verify compliance with code
requirements for auto and bicycle parking spaces. Drawings which show the location
and dimensions of all auto and bicycle parking spaces shall be submitted for staff review
and verification of code compliance.
• 2. A wheel stop or bumper shall be provided for all parking spaces abutting required
vegetative buffers, in order to protect the required vegetation from encroaching vehicles.
3. The proposed development involves the expansion of the existing parking area. An
expansion of the existing parking area requires that the entire parking area be brought up
to current code standards for parking lots, including the provision of interior parking lot
landscaping. Drawings shall be submitted which show how this development will
satisfy the parking lot landscaping requirements outlined in E.C. 9.589.
4. An automatically -controlled irrigation system shall be provided for all plant materials
used to meet the parking area landscaping and screening requirements. The irrigation
system shall be illustrated on a landscape plan and shall be submitted for approval with
the building permit application as required by E.C. 9.589(2)(1[).
In order to make positive findings under this criterion, the site review site plans need to be
revised to address the above code requirements cited by the land use management division.
E. Heating, cooling, and other mechanical equipment, should be designed and located
to minimize noise impacts to adjacent residences.
As noted in the applicant's statement, any noise presently coming from the wash area is
• FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE 4
CIibPDF - www.fastio.com
• 0 RECD SEP 191996
• projected to the north and west by Building C. The addition of a roof over the wash will help to
buffer noise even more. Heating and cooling equipment for the 5,000 square foot small shop
addition will be housed inside. The addition of the small shop will benefit noise reduction, as
the activities that will occur in the small shop are now done outside. The cellular antenna will
not emit a great deal of noise that is audible on adjacent properties. The criterion that heating,
cooling, and other mechanical equipment be designed and located to minimize the noise
impacts on adjacent residential properties is met.
Conclusion
Based on the above information and findings, the site review request to expand an existing
building, provide a roof over an existing wash area, and construct a 150 -foot high monopole
antenna for cellular telephone communications is approved subject to conditions. The
following conditions apply to the 150 -foot high monopole antenna portion of the project:
A building permit will not be issued for the monopole antenna until the annexation of
the subject property is effective. (FMI: Cathy Czemiak, Planning Division, 687-5481)
2. The monopole antenna will be co -locatable and designed to accomodate additional
providers. (FMI: Cathy Czemiak, Planning Division, 687-5481)
Several conditions apply to the building expansion and wash area roof construction portion of
•- the project, and shall be reflected on a revised site plan to be submitted and approved by staff
before a site review agreement is completed. The conditions applying to the building expansion
and wash area roof construction we as follows:
3. It is not possible from the drawings submitted to verify compliance with code
requirements for auto and bicycle parking spaces. Drawings which show the location
and dimensions of all auto and bicycle parking spaces shall be submitted for staff review
and verification of code compliance. (FMI: Kevin Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-
5252)
4. A wheel stop or bumper shall be provided for all parking spaces abutting required
vegetative buffers, in order to protect the required vegetation from encroaching vehicles.
(FMI: Kevin Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
5. The proposed development involves the expansion of the existing parking area. An
expansion of the existing parking area requires that the entire parking area be brought up
to current code standards for parking lots, including the provision of interior parking lot
landscaping. Drawings shall be submitted which show how this development will
satisfy the parking lot landscaping requirements outlined in E.C. 9.589. (FMI: Kevin
Finney, Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
• FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE 5
CIiUPDF - www.rastio.com
RECD SEP 191996
• 6. An automatically -controlled irrigation system shall be provided for all plant materials.
used to meet the parking area landscaping and screening requirements. The irrigation
system shall be illustrated on a landscape plan and shall be submitted for approval with
the building permit application as required by E.C. 9.589(2)(h). (FMI: Kevin Finney,
Land Use Analyst, 687-5252)
In accordance with Section 9.690 of the Eugene Code, the decision of the Planning Director is
final unless appealed to the Hearings Official within ten days of the decision date. Appeal
forms and information are available at the Permit and Information Center located at 99 West
10th Avenue.
Approval Date: 6Pgen,
Approved Hy: for I W. Ids,ning Director
•
• FINDINGS AND DECISION --PAGE 6
CIibPDF-.w.Jastio.com