HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/2/2023City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Annexation Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
i
fsort
A
Required Project Information (Applicant.
Prospective
Daniel Basaraba
A licant Name:
complete this section)
541-520-1303
Phone:
Company: Planktown Holdings LLC
Fax: NA
Address: PO Box 72495, Springfield, OR 97475
E-mail• danielbasaroba@hotmail
Prospective Rick Satre
Applicant's Rep.:
541586-4540
Phone:
Company: The Satre Group
Fax: NA
Address: 375 West 4th Ave, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401
E-mail: rick@satregroup-com
Property Owner: Daniel Basaraba
Phone: 541-520-1303
Company: Planktown Holdings LLC
Fax: NA
Address: PO Box 72495, Springfield, OR 97475
E-mail: danielbasaraba@hotmail
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-0434--03
TAX LOT NOS :11300 through 11700
Property Address: 3709, 3787, and 3799 Franklin Blvd and 3713 East 14th Avenue
Size of Pro•1.56 Acres ■ Square Feet
Description of If you am filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal de.a ption to this appl otlon.
Proposal: Receivere-development
Existing use: Commercial and residential Proposed Use: Mixed -Use per Glenwood Plan
Glenwood Office
Ci Zonin :Mixed Use
Commercial
Metro Designation: Mixed Use
Population:
Prospective
Applicant: Date: _ z
ature
Print
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff: complete this section)
Case No.: Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee:
Technical Fee: 0
Postage Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES:
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 4/8/14 B] 6 of 16
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
❑✓ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
❑✓ Development Issues Meeting Application Form
❑✓ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions. Examples of relevant issues for annexation include but are not limited to the
following:
• Contiguity
• Availability and capacity of surrounding city services
• Affected special districts
• Fees
❑✓ Three (3) Copies of the Proposal - suggested information valuable for staff to review the
proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot
plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the
level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level
of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.7, Annexations.
❑✓ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
❑✓ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
❑✓ North arrow
❑d Date of preparation
❑✓ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
❑✓ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the annexation area
❑✓ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
❑✓ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
❑✓ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
future public road right-of-way
❑✓ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
❑✓ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
❑✓ Future development plan, which may include proposed and existing buildings
(location, dimensions, size) or other impervious surfaces
Revised 4/8/14 BJ 7 of 16
THE SATRE GROUP
Land Use Planners, Landscape Architects, Environmental Specialists
375 West 4' Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, Oregon 97401
(541) 686-4540 www.satrearoup.com
TRANSMITTAL
TO: City of Springfield DATE: February 28 2023
Development and Public Works PROJECT: Big B Block Annexation
225 5^ Street
Springfield OR 97477
ATTN: SG PROJ #: 2118
TRANSMITTED: Herewith X DISPOSITION: For Your Approval
Separate Cover For Your Information/Use X
Other For Reply
TRANSMITTED:
#Copies Item Dated No. Pages
(In addition to this transmittal page)
3 paper copies and one electronic copy (CD) of a:
Annexation Develooment Initiation Meetina Various Dates Several
REMARKS: This Annexation Development Initiation Meeting application packet is hereby submitted
for processing. The submittal package includes:
1. This Transmittal
2. Application Form
3. Application Fee
4. Written Statement — Project Narrative and List of Questions
5. Annexation Agreement- Outline
6. Plan Set
We look forward to your assistance with the project. Don't hesitate to contact us should you have any
questions or need any additional information. Thank you.
COPIES TO: Agency
File X Consultant Team
B X
Owner X Other
BY:
Rick Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI
February 28, 2023
:1"1111110101 11
3709 Franklin Blvd and Adjacent Property
Map 17-03-34-43, Tax Lots 11300 through 11700
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND LIST OF QUESTIONS
In support of the applicant's request for an Annexation Development Initiation Meeting this project
description and list of questions has been generated to provide an explanation of the project and asks for
city review and response to the information and questions presented herein.
I. REQUESTED ASSISTANCE
The applicant, Planktown Holdings LLC, requests a Development Initiation Meeting in order to share
information regarding a redevelopment vision for its property, receive responses to its questions and
have a two-way conversation with city staff regarding the project. Receiving the benefit of a
Development Initiation Meeting will assist Planktown Holdings in moving forward with its interest in
submitting an annexation application with a degree of certainty about successfully developing the
property.
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
A. Big Picture
The applicant's objective is to work with the City of
Springfield to establish a pathway to development
and a bridge to fulfilling the community vision for
the redevelopment of Glenwood.
This path forward comprises only two components
—a short-term plan and a long-term plan.
The long-term component can be summarized as
a plan to redevelop the entire block in
conformance with the Springfield Comprehensive
Plan, the Glenwood Refinement Plan and the
Springfield Development Code, and guided by the
CIBL and GRMU Plan District. Redevelopment is
the long-term objective and there are substantial
challenges to conducting block -wide
redevelopment at this time — most notably the
unknowns associated with the planned Franklin
Blvd (roundabout) project. The Franklin Blvd
project may require acquisition of a fair amount of
additional right-of-way along the property's
frontage with Franklin, as well as right-of-way and
roadway reconstruction along both side streets.
As the design is not yet complete and funding does not yet exist, it is impossible to
know the full impact or the timing of the planned public improvements.
conthat in mind, rather than allow the property to remain in its current fallow
condition, and with a keen interest in reinvigorating the Franklin streetscape, bring life
and vitality to this segment of the corridor, the applicant has identified a short-term
component to its redevelopment vision. This short-term component focuses on doing FW
1U
PLANNERS i LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS + ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
375 West 4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 9]401
Phone: 501.6&6.4540
www.sa-.regroip.comLipi
Big B Blo k Page 2 cf 7
Annexation Development Indiation Meeting —Project Description and List of Questions
February 28. 2023
something now—something easily implemented and easily replaced when the time comes.
B. Long-Term—Visionary and Inspirational
The Glenwood Refinement Plan —the long-term vision for the neighborhood —is both visionary
and inspirational.
Refinement Plan Goals
1. Improve public connection to the Willamette River.
2. Establish inviting public spaces, including parks, plazas, and multi -use paths.
3. Encourage aesthetically pleasing, sustainable building and sites that are context sensitive
and oriented to human activity.
4. Provide opportunities for the installation, display, and creation of art.
5. Allow for a mix of uses suitable to the unique development opportunities in Glenwood
6. Provide opportunities for the development of a variety of housing types to meet the needs
of a range of households.
7. Facilitate opportunities for businesses to provide goods and services to local, regional,
statewide, national, and international markets.
8. Restore, enhance, and protect the ecological function of natural resources and increase
public awareness of these resources.
9. Protect the public from potential natural and manmade hazards.
10. Celebrate Glenwood's contributions to the region's historic development.
11. Enhance the transportation system to improve safety, convenience, and movement for all
modes of travel, including vehicles, trains, public transit, bicycles, and pedestrians.
12. Provide a full range of urban public facilities and services for redevelopment and new
development.
13. Facilitate redevelopment while addressing the consequences of change to existing
residents and businesses.
While goals are broad statements of philosophy, describing hopes for the community and helping
to establish direction, they are indeed aspirational. They assume market -place acceptance and
action. They assume motivation and financing will appear. They are fraught with challenges.
Refinement Plan Challenges
• Being the first to develop or re -develop a property means blazing atrail, establishing a path
for others to follow. You are the guinea pig in the experiment.
• Development requires extensive, and expensive, infrastructure extensions.
• In the case of Glenwood, largely starting from nothing, providing infrastructure will require
substantial time before parcels are developable.
• Previously developed sites will often include cleanup and remediation that is both costly and
result in delays.
• Jurisdictional approval is discretionary, without guaranty and require investment of time
and expense.
• Dependence on prescriptive development requirements and standards assumes the
marketplace will be receptive.
Nonetheless, the applicant buys into the vision and is willing to undertake the investment when
the time comes. To minimize the risk, to shorten delays, to put bookends on the discretionary
nature of jurisdictional approvals, the applicant desires to enter into an Annexation Agreement
with reference to the long-term and focus on the short-term.
C. Short -Term —A Plan for Doing Something Now
The applicant's short-term plan contains three components —Annexation, Catalytic Investment
and Phased Development.
The Satre Group. 375Wea4-Avonue, Suite201, Eugene, OR 97401.(541)68&4540.yrvv.sarepmup.corn
Big B Blo k Page 3 of 7
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting —Project Description and List of Questions
February 28, 2023
1. Annexation— Begin Immediately
"Provide financial incentives to assist developers in solving critical problems and overcoming
barriers to development... mitigate identified development constraints... encourage expansion
and development of value-added business to produce jobs... provide suitable assistance to
increase employment opportunities..." (GRP, Economic Development, Policies &
Implementation Strategies, P. 121-122).
Objectives include:
• Articulate the annexation process and timeline.
• Begin planning for annexation and generate an annexation agreement with the city.
• Include city and SEDA support.
2. Catalytic Investment — 0 to 3 years (aka "Short -Term")
"...Provide sites with a variety of characteristics ... including sites that are available for
relatively fast development... promote redevelopment, infill development... support and assist
existing businesses... attract and develop new businesses... maintain flexibility in
planning... develop flexible policies..." (GRP, Housing and Economic Development, p. 108).
Highlights include:
• Rehab existing structure at 3709
Franklin. Allow interim uses.
• Install food cart pod with visibility
from Franklin.
• Install landscape improvements
in above ground planters.
• Provide safe vehicular access
with parking to side and rear of
3709 Franklin.
• Repair and use existing utilities.
• Allow continued commercial use
in existing structure at 3799
Franklin.
• Allowcontinued Residential use
in existing residential buildings at
3787 Franklin and 3713 East 148.
3. Phased Development—Upon Franklin BIW Redevelopment (aka"Long-Term")
Utilize the Master Plan process found in the Springfield Development Code (SDC 5.13.100)
to articulate and allow phased approach to development on the property in compliance with
the Glenwood Riverfront Mixed -Use Plan District (SDC 3.4.200).
Implementation Trigger:
• Upon city construction of adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd, redevelopment will be in
compliance with the Springfield Comprehensive Plan, Glenwood Refinement Plan and
Springfield Development Code.
The Satre Group. 375 West 0 Avenue, Suite 2D1, Eugene, OR 97401.(541) 686-4540• w.va.sarepmup.corn
Big B Block Page 4 or7
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting —Project Description and List of Questions
III. ANNEXATION AGREEMENT
A. Annexation is Required
Under Oregon law, property must be annexed into the boundaries of the adjacent city in order to
receive such key urban services needed to develop the property.
Key urban services can only be provided by cities.
The minimum level of key urban services to be provided includes wastewater services,
stormwater services, solid waste management, water service, fire and emergency medical
services, police protection, city-wide parks and recreation programs, electric service, land use
controls, communication facilities and public schools on a district -wide basis.
The full range of key urban services includes the minimum level plus urban public transit, natural
gas, street lighting, libraries, local parks and recreation facilities and services and health services.
Requirements and procedures for annexations in Springfield are codified in the Springfield
Development Code (SDC), specifically at SDC 5.7.100—Annexations. SDC 5.7.113 defines
Annexation Agreements as:
"Annexation Agreement A written agreement between the City and owners of
land requesting annexation that states the terms, conditions and obligations of the
parties to mitigate fiscal and service impacts to the City associated with the
annexation and future development of the property. The agreement may be used
to ensure annexation consistent with the Metro Plan."
SDC 5.7.125(B)(13) requires an Annexation Agreement to be included in the annexation
application:
"(13) A signed Annexation Agreement, if required by the Director, to resolve fiscal
impacts upon the City caused by the proposed annexation. The Annexation
Agreement shall address, at a minimum, connection to and extension of public
facilities and services. Connection to public facilities and services shall be at the
discretion of the City, unless otherwise required by ORS. Where public facilities and
services are available and can be extended, the applicant shall be required to do so."
SDC 5.7.140(D) requires an Annexation Agreement as part of an annexation application's
approval:
"(D) Where applicable, fiscal impacts to the City have been mitigated through an
Annexation Agreement w other mechanism approved by the City Council."
B. Annexation Agreement– Springfield Requirements
The City of Springfield has developed a standard format for Annexation Agreements. The
Agreement typically includes an Opening Statement, a list of RECITALS, a list of
AGREEMENTS, and a closing section of notarized signatures. A legal description of the area to
be annexed is included as an Exhibit. Once fully executed, the Agreement is recorded with Lane
County Deeds and Records and is included as an Exhibit to the adopting Annexation Ordinance
before the City Council.
RECITALS vary little from one annexation to the next. AGREEMENTS can vary greatly as they
are specific to each individual annexation request.
C. Annexation–Applicant Requests
Working with the standard Annexation Agreement format, a familiar form and format which should
ease the review of applicant requests, the applicant requests modifications to the AGREEMENT
The Satre Group. 375 West 4'^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97491.(541)a 4549.w.vu.satreacup.con
Big B Mock Page 5 of 7
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting —Project Description and List of Questions
section to accommodate specific requests regarding the Big B Block. See EXHIBIT A for an
outline of specific applicant requests.
IV. QUESTIONS
A. Annexation—Begin Immediately
1. Annexation.
a. Annexation Agreement.
• The applicant agrees and supports the fad that annexation will be required in order
to proceed with redevelopment of the property. A key component of annexation is
the development and execution of an Annexation Agreement. Key attributes in this
case include a set of short-term agreements that will allow property utilization at this
time and a set of long-term agreements that lay the groundwork for eventual
redevelopment. The trigger for implementation of the long-term agreements is
proposed to be the commencement of construction of the adjacent segment of the
Franklin Blvd project. Until that time, actual annexation is deferred, and the short-
term agreements will be in place. The applicant understands that arriving at an
agreed -to Annexation Agreement is a negotiation process.
Question: Does staff understand the reasons for the proposed structure of an Annexation
agreement? Is staff agreeable to enter into a negotiation process?
B. Catalytic Investment — 0 to 3 years (aka "Short -Term")
1. Key Urban Facilities & Services.
a. Utilities.
• Sanitary Service —As described in the accompanying Annexation Agreement —
Contents Outline: Short-term sanitary service would consist of repairing and using the
on-site septic system, supplemented with portable toilets if/as needed.
• Stormwater Management —As described in the Annexation Agreement Outline:
Short-term stormwater management would be by way of maintaining the current
stormwater situation on the site— maintaining the existing paving and drainage
conditions.
Transportation.
• Streets and Right -of -Way — Agree now to voluntarily sell to the city the land area
needed for the future Franklin Blvd redevelopment project, including the area needed
for the proposed roundabout and the two adjacent side streets. The agreement
would be commemorated now in the Annexation Agreement, the sale would occur
when the precise area is known and at the commencement of Franklin construction.
• Easements — Agree now to voluntarily dedicate any easements that may be required
in association with the Franklin Blvd project, improvements to the adjacent streets,
and/or associated public utilities.
Question: Does staff agree to these proposals regarding the short-term approach to the
provision of Key Urban facilities and Services?
Permitted Uses.
a. Permitted Uses.
• Short-term permitted uses for the west half of block — Big B Property (Tax Lot 11700)
o Allow interim uses now, including, but not limited to, brew pub/restaurant, food
truck pod, drive-through coffee, maker studio, art, retail, and any and all dog
related uses (including but not limited to indoor/outdoor dog park, dog daycare
and grooming). Vehicle parking to side and rear of Big B building.
o Uses the applicant will NOT consider include auto -related operations, storage,
sheds for sale out front.
The Satre Group • 375 West 0 Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 *(541) 666-4549 • w.va.sa repmuo.carn
Big 8 Block Page 6 cf 7
Annexation Development Iniialion Meeting —Project Description and List of Questions
• Short-term permitted uses for the east half of block (Tax Lots 11300 through 11600)
o Allow existing uses to continue (commercial shop at 3799 Franklin, residential 5-
plex at 3787 Franklin, and additional residential at 3713 East W).
Land Use Requirements / Design and Construction Standards.
• Land Use requirements associated with short-term uses on the Big B Block include
the following:
o Requirements found in the Springfield Development Code, including but not
limited to Section SDC 3.4.200—Glenwood Riverfront Mixed -Use Plan District,
Chapter 4—Development Standards and Chapter 5—The Development Review
Process and Applications are waived. Applicable requirements in the building,
plumbing and fire code still apply.
o Existing adjacent streets remain as is. Bringing them up to urban standards
would be premature in advance of the Franklin Blvd project.
o Existing paved and non -paved areas remain as is. If some of the non -paved
areas are rock surfacing and will be part of one or more of the short-term uses,
that is allowed.
o Landscape improvements can be in above grade planters.
Question: Does staff see any challenge with allowing these contemplated short-term uses?
Does staff see any challenge with the proposed approach to requirements and
standards?
3. City Support.
a. Annexation.
• The city will support the annexation request as well as support Applicant's defense in
the event of an appeal. The effective date of annexation will be delayed until
construction of adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd.
b. Alley Vacation.
• Concurrent with the annexation application, the applicant will generate and submit
application to vacate the existing north -south alley at this time. The city will support
the alley vacation request.
c. Density Transfer.
• The city will allow the transfer of density at the maximum permitted amount in
accordance with the subject property's plan designation and zoning district from the
land area sold to the city in association with the adjacent segment of the Franklin
Blvd project, to the remaining property.
d. Development Approval.
• Development approval for short-term uses will consist of building, plumbing,
demolition, erosion control and fire and life safety.
e. Applications and Fees.
• Land use application fees are waived in the short-term. SEDA will pay for SDCs.
Building, plumbing, demolition and erosion control permits, and fees would still apply.
Question: Does staff see any challenge with these components of the agreement?
C. Phased Development – Upon Franklin Blvd Redevelopment (aka "Long -Term")
Mirroring the above Short -Term components, the proposed Annexation Agreement would include
a Long -Term component of each – Key Urban Facilities & Services; Permitted Uses; City
Support. See EXHIBIT A.
The Salve Group. 375 West 0 Avenue, Suite 2D1, Eugene, OR 97491.(541) 68 G45,40.w.vu.salreomuo.con
Big B Block Page 7 cf 7
Annexation Development Indiation Meeting -Project Description and List of Questions
Question: As with the Short -Term components, what can staff share in regard to the Long -Term
components of the proposed Annexation Agreement?
D. Other Information.
Question: Is there anything else that staff would like to share with the applicant regarding this
property, the above information, or the proposed approach to generating an
Annexation Agreement?
This concludes the applicant's Annexation Development Initiation Meeting project description and
questions. In advance, the applicant wishes to express its appreciation of staff time and effort in preparing
responses to the questions and discussing the proposal.
Sincerely,
R." SatYe�
Rick M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI
Principal
The Satre Group
The Satre Gronp.375 West 4'^ Avenue, Suite 2D1, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 6 4540.w.va.sarepmup.carn
EXHIBIT A
February 28, 2023
Big B Block
3709 Franklin Blvd and Adjacent Property
Map 17-03-34-43, Tax Lots 11300 through 11700
Annexation Development Initiation Meeting
ANNEXATION AGREEMENT—CONTENTS OUTLINE
The City of Springfield has developed a standard format for Annexation Agreements. The Agreement
typically includes an Opening Statement, a list of RECITALS, a list of AGREEMENTS, and a closing
section of notarized signatures. A legal description of the area to be annexed is included as an Exhibit.
Once fully executed, the Agreement is recorded with Lane County Deeds and Records and is included as
an Exhibit to the adopting Annexation Ordinance before the City Council.
RECITALS vary little from one annexation to the next. AGREEMENTS can vary greatly as they are
specific to each individual annexation request.
Springfield Typical
RECITALS
A. A statement citing property ownership, legal
description and city limit adjacency.
B. A statement that the applicant has submitted
an Annexation Application.
C. A statement that the applicant requests
annexation of the property and seeks City
support.
D. A citation regarding the current plan
designation and zoning district.
E. A statement that the application includes
documentation that the minimum level of key
urban facilities and services can be provided;
and the City has determined that the minimum
level of key urban facilities and services are
currently available to the property.
F. A statement that the Agreement memorializes
both the Applicant's and City's commitment
and agreement regarding the allocation of
financial responsibility for public facilities and
services, including sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, transportation, and Fire and Life
Safety.
G. A statement that public sanitary sewer service
is available, along with any specifics or
limitations.
Applicant Specifics
RECITALS
Applicant does not request any adjustments to the
typical list of RECITALS.
PLANNERS + LANOSCAPEARCHITECTS + ENVIRONMENTAL SPECIALISTS
375 West 4th, Suite 201. Eugene, OR 97401
Phone: 501.086.4540
W W w s3.regrOup.com
Mg 6 Block
Annexation Development Issues Meeting -Annexation Agreement Outline
H. A statement regarding the necessity of a
stormwater management system, the
availability, or lack thereof, of a public system,
along with requirements for on-site stormwater
management.
I. A statement regarding the transportation
system, including current and future streets,
right-of-way and easements, access and
driveway requirements and limitations, access
for Fire and Life Safety.
J. A statement that the Applicant shall comply
with the requirements found in the Annexation
Agreement.
K. A citation of and statement about the status of
any prior recorded agreements.
AGREEMENT
1. Obligations of the Applicant.
a. Sanitary service - Decommissioning
existing septic, constructing and
connecting to public and triggers for when
this is to occur (xx number of years, upon
development, change in use, etc).
b. Stormwater management - Design and
construction of on-site stormwater system
as required.
c. Road network - Voluntarily sell land for
right-of-way as needed.
d. Easements- Voluntarily dedicate any
requirement easements, now or in the
future, should approval of a land use
decision require such.
e. Improvements - Provide and pay for any
urban facilities and services should
approval of a future land use decision
require such.
Page 2 of 6
AGREEMENT
Here the applicant requests modifications to the
AGREEMENT section to accommodate specific
requests regarding the Big B Block.
1. Obligations of the Applicant.
a. Sanitary service -
1) Short-term - Short-term sanitary
servicewould consist of repairing and
using the on-site septic system,
supplemented with portable toilets
if/as needed.
2) Long-term -Upon city construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd,
Applicant will decommission on-site
septic system, design and construct
new sanitary system and connect
system to adjacent public system in
the right-of-way.
b. Stormwater management -
1) Short-term - Short-term stormwater
management would be byway of
maintaining the current stormwater
situation on the site - maintaining the
existing paving and drainage
conditions.
2) Long-term -Upon city construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd,
Applicantwill design and construct
new on-site stormwater management
system.
c. StreetsandROW-
1) Short -term -Agree now to voluntarily
sell to the city the land area needed
for the future Franklin Blvd
redevelopment project, including the
area needed for the proposed
roundabout and the two adjacent side
streets. The agreement would be
The Sal. Group . 375 West 4- Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 . (541) 686-4540.w.vu.wgreomup.com
Mg It sock
Annexation Development Issues Meeting -Annexation Agreement Outline
Obligations of the City.
a. Support annexation application -
Support the annexation request as well as
support Applicant's defense in the event
of an appeal.
b. Provide due consideration of future
land use applications - Provide timely
processing of future applications (i.e., Site
Plan Review, Public Improvement Permit,
etc).
Page 3 orb
commemorated now in the
Annexation Agreement, the sale
would occur when the precise area is
known and at the commencement of
Franklin construction.
2) Long-term -Sell the required land
area in coordination with the
construction of the adjacent segment
of Franklin Blvd and adjacent streets.
Easements -
1) Short-term— Agree now to voluntarily
dedicate any easements that may be
required in association with the
Franklin Blvd project, improvements
to the adjacent streets, and/or
associated public utilities.
2) Long-term — Dedicate required
easements in coordination with the
construction of the adjacent Franklin
Blvd project, improvements to
adjacent streets and/or associated
public utilities.
Improvements —
1) Long-term — Design, construct and
pay for required improvements
associated with connections to the
minimum level of key urban facilities
and services at the time of city
construction of adjacent segment of
Franklin Blvd.
Obligations of the City.
a. Support annexation application -
1) Short-term —The city will support the
annexation request as well as support
Applicant's defense in the event of an
appeal. The effective date of
annexation will be delayed until
construction of adjacent segment of
Franklin Blvd.
2) Long-term —Annexation becomes
effective at time of construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd.
b. Support alley vacation -
1) Short-term— Concurrent with the
Annexation application, the applicant
will generate and submit application
to vacate the existing north -south
alley at this time. The city will support
the alley vacation request.
c. Density —
1) Short-term— The city will allow the
transfer of density at the maximum
permitted amount in accordance with
The Sal. Group . 375 West 4'^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(W) 60e-4540.w.vu.salreomup.com
Big It Block
Annexation Development Issues Meeting -Annexation Agreement Outline
3. Land Use.
a. All other requirements apply - All land
use requirements found in the Springfield
Municipal Code, the Springfield
Development Code or any applicable
State or Federal permits apply.
Page 4 of 8
the subject property's plan
designation and zoning district from
the land area sold to the city in
association with the adjacent segment
of the Franklin Blvd project, to the
remaining property.
2) Long-term -The density transfer
becomes effective upon the sale of
the property in association with the
adjacent segment of the Franklin Blvd
project.
d. Development Approval -
1) Short -Term- Development approval
for short-term uses will consist of
building, plumbing, demolition,
erosion control and fire and life safety.
2) Long-term -Commencing in concert
with the construction of the adjacent
segment of Franklin Blvd,
development on the subject property
will require approval of required land
use applications (i.e., Site Plan
Review, Public Improvement Permit,
etc).
e. Applications and Fees -
1) Short-term - Land use application
fees are waived. SEDA Pays for
SDCs. Building, plumbing, demolition
and erosion control permits, and fees
would still apply.
2) Long-term -At time of construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd, all
applicable land use applications and
application fees shall apply. The
Springfield Economic Development
Agency (SEDA) shall pay applicable
SDCs.
Land Use.
a. Permitted uses -
1) Short-term -
• Short-term permitted uses for the
west half of block - Big B
Property (Tax Lot 11700) -Allow
interim uses now, including, but
not limited to, brew
pub/restaurant, food truck pod,
drive-through coffee, maker
studio, art, retail, indoor/outdoor
dog park, with vehicle parking to
side and rear of Big B building.
Will not propose auto -related
uses, storage or sheds for sale
out front.
The Sal. Group . 375 West 4- Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 686-4540.w.vu.salreomup.com
Big B Block Page 5 as
Annexation Development Issues Meeting —Annexation Agreement Outline
• Short-term permitted uses for the
east half of block (Tax Lots 11300
through 11600)–Allow existing
uses to continue (commercial
shop at 3799 Franklin, residential
5-plex at 3787 Franklin, and
additional residential at 3713 East
14h).
2) Long-term –Upon city construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd,
allow uses in accordance with the
then in effect Springfield Development
Code and the property's zoning.
Land use requirements / design and
construction standards –
1) Short-term –
• Requirements found in the
Springfield Development Code,
including but not limited to
Section SDC 3.4.200—Glenwood
Riverfront Mixed -Use Plan
District, Chapter 4—Development
Standards and Chapter 5—The
Development Review Process
and Applications are waived.
Applicable requirements in the
building, plumbing and fire code
still apply.
• Existing adjacent streets remain
as is. Bringing them up to urban
standards would be premature in
advance of the Franklin Blvd
project.
• Existing paved and non -paved
areas remain as is. If some of the
non -paved areas are rock
surfacing and will be part of one
or more of the short-term uses,
that is allowed.
• Landscape improvements can be
in above grade planters.
2) Long-term – At time of construction of
adjacent segment of Franklin Blvd,
land use requirements found in the
Springfield Municipal Code, the
Springfield Development Code,
Springfield Engineering Design and
Procedures Manual or any applicable
State or Federal permits will apply.
4. Covenants Running with the Land. No changes.
a. Pre -condition - Execution and recording
of the Agreement is a pre -condition of
annexation.
The Salre Graup . 375 West 4- Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401. (591) 688-4540.w.vu.salreomup.com
Big B Block Page 6 of 6
Annexation Development Issues Meeting —Annexation Agreement Outline
February 28. 2023
b. Run with the land —The recorded
Agreement will run with the land.
5. Mutual Cooperation. No changes.
a. Cooperate - City and applicant shall
cooperate.
6. Waiver of Right of Remonstrance. No changes.
a. Consent— Applicant shall not
remonstrate against required
improvements.
7. Modification of Agreement. No changes.
a. Modify in writing— Agreement can only
be modified in writing and must be
approved by the city council.
8. Dolan. No changes.
a. Obligations do not need to be
proportional — Applicant waives right that
city demonstrate that the obligations of the
Agreement are proportional to demand
upon city services.
9. Ballot Measures 37/49 and ORS 195.3000 et No changes.
seq.
a. Obligations independent of impact on
property value — Applicant waives right to
protest impact on property value triggered
by the Agreement or any other land use
regulation.
10. Invalidity. No changes.
a. Provisions remain valid — Each
provision in the Agreement remains valid
regardless of whether any other provision
is deemed invalid.
The Sal Group . 375 West 4- Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 .(541) 686-4540.wew.sstrepreup.com