Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 1/27/2023City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ 111- Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: El Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal, ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant. complete this section) Applicant Name: Chris Looney Phone: 541.954.8409 Company: Paradigm Properties Email: chris@paradigmproperties.com Address: 1361 Pearl Street, Eugene, OR 97401 Applicant's Rep.. Carol Schirmer --Phone. 541.234.5108 Company: Schirmer Consulting, LLC Email: Address: PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 schirmer@schirmerconsulting.com Pro ertOwner: Justin Thomas Phone: 541.914.3768 Company: XT Investments, LLC Email: justin@gdchillers.com Address: 130 E 1st Ave Junction City, OR 97448 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032513 TAX LOT NOS : 800 Property Address: N/A Vacant property Size of Property: 4.73+ Acres 0 Square Feet ❑ proposed No. of • 28 Proposed Name of Project: Marcola Apartments Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Proposed multi -family development with associated parking and stormwater treatment Existing Use: Vacant New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 133,693+ sf Si natures: Please sign and Drint Mour name and date in the acicirociriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ I PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 Id_ 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre -Submittal Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Signature Justin Thomas Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.176 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: 1.27.23 S nature Carol c er Print Revised 1/7/14 Ia 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑x Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. x❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑x Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. x❑ Copy of the Deed ❑x Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. NIA ❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. x❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet ❑x Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: x❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑x All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions x❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ❑x Vicinity Map ❑x The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. N/A ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department N/A ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision See site ❑x The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Plan Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department x❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor x❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. ❑x Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ❑x Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections ❑x Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces N/A ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district x❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation x❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed x❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces ❑x Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within '/3 mile) Revised 1/7/14 Ia 5 of 11 x❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses N/A ❑ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ❑x Location and width of all existing easements ❑x Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. ❑x Location and type of existing street lighting ❑x Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities ❑x Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ❑x Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. ❑x Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below ❑x The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components ❑x Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development x❑ Location and width of all proposed easements ❑x Location and type of proposed street lighting ❑x Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 Ia 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan ❑x Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director ❑x Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage x❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 ❑x Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans ❑x Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan ❑x Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ❑x Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: ❑x List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing x❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. Will be prepared for Submittal ❑x Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. Irrigation Note ❑x Photometric test report for each light source. N/A ❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: x❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. N/A ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11 x❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 N/A ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer Will be prepared for Submittal N/A ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives N/A ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. x❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 Submitted after Submittal N/A ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property N/A ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request ❑x Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development N/A ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 N/A ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 Ia 8 of 11 PRE -SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION Paradigm Marcola Apartments A RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT Assessor's Map Tax Lot 17 03 25 13 800 January 27, 2023 Schirmer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture t Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Reme,u Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Table of Contents Part I Project Summary Part 11 Site Information Part III Approval Criteria and Supporting Evidence Attachments Attachment A FIRM Map Attachment B Deed Attachment C Lighting Specifications Items Submitted Separately Storm mater Scoping Sheet Preliminary Storm mater Report Geotechnical Engineering Report (for Submittal) Title Report SHMimer Conaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architeclure ♦ Land Use Planning Page 2 of 21 Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Statement January 27, 2023 PRE -SUBMITTAL SITE PLAN R EVI EW APPLICATION Paradigm Marcola Apartments A Multiple Unit Housing Project Applicant Paradigm Properties 1361 Pearl Street Eugene, OR 97401 Contact: Chris Looney Email: chris@paradigmpropertiesnw.com Phone: 541.968.6990 Applicant's Representative Landscape Architect + Land Use Planner Schirmer Consulting, LLC PO Box 10424 Eugene, OR 97440 Contact: Carol Schirmer Email: schirmer@schirmerconsulting.com Phone: 541.234.5108 Architect Dustrud Architecture 1622 Pearl Street Eugene, OR 97401 Contact: Paul Dustrud Email: paul@dustrudarchitecture.com Phone: 541.338.8544 Civil Engineer KPFF Consulting Engineers 800 Wllamette Street Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 Contact: Matt Keenan Email: matt.keenan@kpff.com Phone: 541.684.4902 Surveyor KPFF Consulting Engineers 800 Wllamette Street Suite 400 Eugene, OR 97401 Contact: Mike Pinske Email: mike.pinske@kpff.com Phone: 541.684.4902 SctMhmer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Page 3 of 21 Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Page 4 of 21 The following is specific proposal information from the Site Review Application Checklist. This information addresses the proposed development located on Main Street. Part I: Project Summary Project Name: Paradigm Marcola Apartments Project Proposal: Construct a 128 unit multiple unit housing project Project Location: Marcola Road and 22nd Street, Springfield, OR Map and Tax Lot: 17 03 25 13 00800 Property Size: 206,039 sf or 4.73 acres (gross) 1998,819 sF or 4.56 acres (net: subtracting 7,320 sf of easements) Existing Zoning: R-2 Existing Use: Vacant Proposed Use: Residential (multiple unit housing) Prior Land Use Decisions • The subject propertywas annexed into the city around 1969. WRITTEN STATEMENT In accordance with Site Plan Review submittal requirements, thiswritten statement describes the proposed development and demonstrates that the proposal complies with the criteria contained in SDC 5.17-100 through SDC 5.17-125. I. LAND USE REQUEST This land use request is for a Site Plan Review application to allow the development of a 128 -unit multiple unit housing project. The subject site is zoned R-2 (Medium Density Residential). The applicant is seeking Site Plan Review approval as required by the City of Springfield. Development Proposal The proposed 128 units are comprised of 6 buildings. Each building is 3 stories. Bicycle parking is in a room within each of the buildings. There is a clubhouse/office building that will serve a use similar to a community building for the residents. There will be meeting space, exercise equipment, and places for informal gathering. The majority of the parking spaces will have carports, some will have garages. There will also be a dog park on site as well as a pickleball court. II. THE SITE AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Location and Site Context The subject property is comprised of a rectangular, 4.73 -acre parcel located on the south side of Marcola Road east of Mohawk Blvd., west of 22nd Street and north of Highway 126. The subject property has frontage on Marcola Road and 22nd Street. The properties to the east of the site are developed with single unit dwellings. To the west of the site are the Village Inn Apartments, a multiple unit housing project. That property is zoned Community Commercial (CC). North across Marcola Road is a commercial development with a large chain grocery store. To the south across Highway 126 are both commercial development and a large distribution center. The subject property is currently vacant. SHMhmer Conaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Statement Page 5 of 21 Existing Conditions The subject property is relatively flat. Please see the Existing Conditions map for grades and contours. There are some fairly sizeable trees along the west property line and a handful on the interior of the property. The majority of the trees on the west are on the neighboring property. There is a sizeable berm on the south end of the property. The remainder of the site contains random varieties of grass and weeds. Environmental Floodplain: The subject property is outside the 500 year floodplain. See attached FIRM map. Well Head: The subject property is located within the MAIA Wellhead Protection area and the 1,2 and 5 year Time of Travel (TOT) and is subject to the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. There isa symbol on the map that represents Registered Hazardous Waste Generators. Extensive communication with city staff did not result in any concerns or documentation about this symbol. Goal 5: There are no Statewide Goal 5 natural features on the subject property. Transportation Cly of Springfield Transportation Plan The Springfield area's adopted transportation plan, 2035 Transportation System Plan, adopted in 2014 and revised in 2020, includes one project within the vicinity of the subject property, at 19in Street and Marcola Road. It is on the 20 year Improvement projects: Opportunity Projects list and proposes either a right tum lane on the west bound approach or a roundabout. Conceptual Street Map The City of Springfield Conceptual Street Map depicts where future streets and street connections may be required. The current map, dated January 2020, shows no planned changes near the development site. Street Classification Springfield's Functional Classification Map identifies the streets near the development site. Each street classification carries with it a standard right-of-way (ROW). The standards for these streets are as follows: Street Clsealkstbn Existing ROW Minimum ROW Min. Curb-toCurb 17M. Road Mzjar Cdlectcr Will 56 feel 36 feel Highway 126 '.. Major Arteial '.. 195 - 215 feel '.. sliest '.. 60 feel M- steel ''... Local Street ''... 60 feel ''... 57 feel ''... 36 feel Streets and Traffic Safety Controls SDC 4.2-105 (G)(2)mquims that whenever a proposed land division or development will increase tmffic on the City street system and that development has unimproved street frontage abutting a fully improved street, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications in accordance with the following criteria: (a) When fully improved street rigft-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property, street improvements must be constructed across the entire property frontage. The subject property abuts both Marcola Road and 22nd Street. The development will take access from the lesser classification street (22nd Street). Marcola Road is fully improved except for street trees. The development proposes to install street trees. There is an existing sidewalk curb side sidewalk which will be replaced with a 5 foot wide setback sidewalk. 22nd Street is fully improved except for street trees and sidewalk. The development proposes to install street trees and a 5 foot wide setback sidewalk. Public Transit The metro area's public transit system, Lane Transit District (LTD), provides service to Springfield Station via Route 17 and 18 on Marcola Road approximately 200 feet west of the development sites northwest corner. Sciri mer Cmalting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Page 6 of 21 Site Plan Reties Pre -Submittal Application: Written Statement January 27, M23 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities There are dedicated bikes lanes and sidewalks on both sides of Marcola Road. There is a sidewalk on the east side of 22nd Street and no dedicated bike lanes. Utilities Stormwater There is an existing 12" stormwater line north of the property that flows to a 24" line that connects to the 60" stormwater line in 22nd Street. From there it empties into the O Street canal. Staff indicated there are no capacity issues. Infiltration testing will be completed to determine the extent of infiltration on site. Stormwater quality for paved areaswill be treated in a collection of stormwater treatment facilities (bioswales). Biosvales and infiltration will function to limit post development run off to pre -development levels. See attached Preliminary Stormwater Report. Wastewater There is an existing 8" sanitary sewer line in 22nd streetwith no capacity issues. See Existing Conditions Plan. Water and Electric A development site is to be provided with awater system sufficiently sized to furnish adequate supply and provide access for maintenance. Springfield Utility Board (SUB) coordinates the design of the water system within Springfield city limits. There are existing fire hydrants at the southwest corner of the site and the northeast corner of the site. There are existing overhead power lines to the site extending from Mamola Road. Electric is available to the site. Wherever possible all utility lines shall be placed underground. Wellhead Protection The site is within the 1,2 and 5 year time -of -travel zone therefore it is subject to the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. Natural Resources The subject site is located within Zone X, meaning it is an area of minimal flood hazard and is determined to be outside the 500 -year flood zone. There are no wetlands or other natural resources on the site. Parks and Open Space There are no proposed park and recreation projects nearby the subject site. III. SITE PLAN REVIEW— APPROVAL CRITERIA AND FINDINGS The following are the applicable Site Plan Review approval criteria. The criteria are in plain text and responses are in italics. SDC 5.17-125 Criteria (A) The Director must approve, approve with conditions, or deny a proposed Site Plan Review application based on the following standards: (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use or is allowed as a discretionary use in the land use district. Per Table 3.2.210 Permitted Uses Multiple Unit Housing is permitted in the R-2 District. (2) If a use is allowed as a discretionary use . . Ssiri mer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-51M tantlscape Architedum ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Page 7 of 21 Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Not applicable. Multiple Unit Housing is not a discretionary use. (3) The proposal complies with the standards of the land use district of the subject property. The proposed development complies with applicable standards as discussed below. Chapter Land Use Districts Section 3.2.205 Purpose, Applicability, and Location. Section 3.2.210 Permitted Land Uses. Section 3.2.215 Lot Area and Dimensions. Section 3.2.220 Setbacks. Section 3.2.225 Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface Standards. Section 3.2.230 Height. Section 3.2.235 Density. (4) The proposal complies with any applicable approved master plan, master facilities plan, refinement plan, and/or special planned district. The subject property is not located in an area with an adopted Refinement Plan, Plan District Map or Conceptual Development Plan. The site is zoned R-2 (Medium Density Residential) consistent with the Medium Density Residential designation on the Metro Plan diagram. (5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.2, Infrastructure Standards - Transportation. See responses below. (6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, Infrastructure Standards -Utilities. See responses below. (7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening and Fence Standards. See responses below. (8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On -Site Lighting Standards. See responses below. (9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards. See responses below. (10)The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Specific Development Standards. See responses below. (11)The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.8, Temporary Use Standards. Not applicable. A temporary use is not proposed. SDC Chapter 3 Land Use Districts Section 3.2.205 Purpose, Applicability, and Location. (B) Applicability. The standards in this section apply to development in the R-1, R-2, and R-3 land use districts. These districts are identified on the City's official Zoning Map. These districts are intended to implement the following plan designations, unless otherwise specified in an applicable refinement plan or plan district. (2) The R-2 district is intended to implement the medium density plan designation. The property is in the R-2 district and is planned Medium Density Residential. Section 3.2.210 Permitted Land Uses. Table 3.2.210 Permitted Uses lists Multiple Unit Housing as a permitted use in the R-2 district. SHMimer Conaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architedure ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Slalemenl Page 8 of 21 Section 3.2.215 Lot Area and Dimensions. (A) In addition to applicable provisions contained elsewhere in this code, the development standards listed in this section apply to all development in residential districts.... Lot area and lot dimension standards for residential uses are listed in Table 3.2.215. For other residential uses listed in Table 3.2.210, the lot area and dimensions are subject to the type of residential structure being occupied. Lot development must be in conformance with SDC 3.2.235, Density. Density in R-2 for multiple unit housing is 14 units per acre minimum and 28 units per acre maximum. Development Site 4.73 gross acres 4.56 net acres Density (minimum) 4.56 x 14 units per acre = 63.85 units Density (maximum) 4.56 x 28 units per acre = 127.68 units Proposed 128 units Section 3.2.220 Setbacks Front Yard 10 feet required 10 feet proposed Garage or carport 18 feet required 18 feet proposed Side yard 5 feet required No side yards exist Rear Yard 10 feet required 10 feet proposed Section 3.2.225 Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface Standards. (A) Lot coverage and the amount of impervious surface may not exceed the standards listed in SDC 3.2.225. Stormwater treatment facilities required under SDC 4.3.110 or other developed standards may result in less impervious surface area than these maximums. (B) The following Lot Coverage and Impervious Surface standards apply to all development in Residential Districts. (3) On lots or parcels of 4,500 sf or larger in size, the lot coverage must not exceed 45 percent of the lot or parcel area. The development site is greaterthan 4,500 sf The building(carports cover 73,847 sf The site is 206,039 sf. Lot coverage is 35.8%. Section 3.2.230 Height. R-2 Required 50 foot maximum Proposed 41 feet and under Section 3.2.235 Density. Discussed in Section 3.2.215 above. SDC Chapter 4 Development Standards Section 4.2.100 — Infrastructure Standards — Transportation. Section 4.2.105 Public Streets (A) General Provisions. 1. All public streets and alleys must be improved as specified in this Code and must be dedicated through the approval of a subdivision plat or by acceptance of a deed approved by the City. The development site abuts 3 streets, Highway 126, Mamola Road and 22nd Street. See Site Plan. (C) Minimum street curb -to -curb widths and minimum street right-of-way widths are as specified in Table 4.2.1, unless otherwise indicated in the Springfield Transportation System Plan, an applicable SHMhmer Cmalling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture ♦ land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal Application: Milan Selemenl Page 9 of 21 Refinement Plan, Plan District, Master Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, or the adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan; where necessary to achieve right-of-way and street alignment; or as needed to meet site-specific engineering standards, including, but not limited to, requirements for multi -way boulevard and/or modern roundabout designs. Example street layouts meeting minimum street standards are provided in Figures 4.2.B through 4.2.11 for illustrative purposes only. These Figures are intended to demonstrate potential street configurations that meet the requirements. Highway 126 is classified as a Major Arterial. Maroola Road is classified as a Major Collector. 22"d Street is classified as a local street. Table 4.2.1 shows the following. Highway 126: Minimum ROW 84 feet Minimum curb to curb 60 feet Existing ROW 195— 215 feet Existing curb to curb 120 feet + Mamola Road. Minimum ROW 56 feet Minimum curb to curb 36 feet Existing ROW 80 feet Existing curb to curb 45 feet 22nd Street Minimum ROW 57 feet Minimum curb to curb 36 feet Existing ROW 60 feet Existing curb to curb 36 feet Minimum Street Right -of -Way and Curb -to -Curb Standards (D) Street Network Standards — General Criteria. Not applicable. No local streets are proposed. (G) Additional Right -of -Way and Street Improvements. (1) Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring Development Approval, dedication of additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street dedication results in right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Deeds and Records stating that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street is constructed to serve the property, and conned with the City street system. Schirmer Conaling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture+ Land Use Planning Planting Turn Strip Curb -to- Travel Lane and b5g. Street Bight -n0. Curb Travel I.nneg Width Bikeways Curb No. Cl.ndlika6on Way (1) Width (1) Lanes Width (2) (3) (4) Sidewalk 4.2_ Major 14 6'both 7' both B Arterial(5) 100'/92'/84' 76'/69'/60' 4 12' where sides 5 sides D required 4.2 4.2 Major 72/64'/56' 52/44'/36' 2 l2' 14 where 6'both 5 5'both Collector required sides aides 4.2 Local Street Not 5'both Q -S <15%slope 5T/49'/41' 36/26'/20' 2 10' N/A required 5, aides (7) (D) Street Network Standards — General Criteria. Not applicable. No local streets are proposed. (G) Additional Right -of -Way and Street Improvements. (1) Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring Development Approval, dedication of additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street dedication results in right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Deeds and Records stating that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street is constructed to serve the property, and conned with the City street system. Schirmer Conaling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture+ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment (H) Where a developmentwould result in the need to improve a railroad crossing .... Not applicable. (1) Traffic Control Devices. Not applicable. (J) Bus turn out lanes .... Not applicable. (K) Street names are assigned as specified in the Springfield Municipal Code. Not applicable. No new streets are proposed. (L) The Director may require a developer to install traffic calming measures ... Not applicable. (M) Special Street Setbacks. No special setbacks are required. Section 4.2. 110 Private Streets. Not applicable. No new streets are proposed. Page 10 of 21 Section 4.2.120 Site Access and Driveway Standards. (A) Site Access and Driveways — General. (1) All developed lots/parcels are entitled to 1 approved driveway access provided by either direct access to a: (a) Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or The subject property has access to a public street, 22nd Street, along the east boundary of the property. See Site Plan forthe one proposed access. (B) Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development sites abut more than 1 street and streets are of differing classifications as identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan except as allowed under this section. Mamola Road is classified as a Major Collector, Highway 126 is classed as a Major Arterial and 22"d Street is classified as a Local Street. The development is taking access off the lower classification street, 22"d Street. (C) Driveways must be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in SDC Tables 4.2.2 through 4.2.5, and the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. SDC Table 4.2.2 Driveway Design Specifications 2 -Way Driveway Width —Multiple Unit Housing Required: 24 feet minimum — 35 feet maximum Driveway throat depth: 18' minimum The driveway entrance is designed to be 24 feet wide. See Site Plan. The throat depth is a minimum of 18'. SDC Table 4.2.3 Curb Return Driveway Design Specifications Driveways do not include a curb-retum. SDC Table 4.2.4 Minimum Separations between a Driveway and the Nearest Intersection Curb Return on the Same Side of the Street (1) Multiple Unit Housing: Local Street: 30 feet SHMimer Cmalting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 2345188 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Page 11 of 21 Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Milan Statement January 27. 2023 The nearest intersection curb return is Marcola Road and that is over 350 feet away from the development site entry driveway. Section 4.2.125 Intersections. (A) In order to minimize traffic conflicts and provide for efficient traffic signalization, intersections involving curb return driveways and streets, whether public or private, must be directly opposed, unless a Traffic Impact Study indicates that an offset intersection benefits public safety to a greater degree. Driveway entrance and R Street are not directly opposed. Transportation planning indicated that this slight offset would not create issues and would be acceptable without a Traffic Impact Study. Section 4.2.130 Vision Clearance. (A) All lots or parcels must maintain a Vision Clearance Area to provide sight distance for approaching traffic. Vision clearance areas must be shown on Site Plan for applicable land use application. Table 4.2.5 Type of Intersection Measurement Along Each Property Line Any Street 20 feet Any Alley 15 feet Any Driveway 10 feet The intersection of Mamola Road and 22- Street shows a Vision Clearance Triangle of 20 feet. The intersection of 22nd Street and the entry drive to the development site show a Vision Clearance Triangle of 10 feet. See Site Plan. Section 4.2.135 Sidewalks. (A) Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets must be located wholly within the public right-of- way. Improvements proposed for Marcola Road and 22nd Street on the development side of the right of way will be located wholly within the public right-of-way. (B) Sidewalks must be designed, constructed, replaced or repaired as specified in the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications and the Springfield Municipal Code. The proposed sidewalk will be designed according to the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. (C) Concrete sidewalks must be provided according to Section 4.2-105.C, Table 4.2-1, and the following criteria: 1. Sidewalks must conform to the existing or planned street grades. 2. Sidewalks must conform to current ADA standards. 3. Sidewalks must be separated from the curb by the planting strip, except when necessary for connectivity, safety, or to comply with street design requirements, and subject to approval by the Director. 4. New sidewalk width and type must be consistent with existing sidewalk design in the same block, but must physically transition to com ply with current sidewalk standards as determined by the Director. When replacing damaged sidewalk, new sidewalk must be located in the same position as the existing sidewalk. 5. Facilities including, but not limited to, mail boxes, water meters, valves, junction boxes, manholes, utility poles, trees, benches, fire hydrants, signs, and bus stops must not be located Sotri mer Consul ng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-51M Landscape Amhiledure ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Page 12 of 21 within the sidewalk and must be removed or relocated prior to the construction or reconstruction of the sidewalk, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. If facilities remain, there must be at least 5 feet of unobstructed width on arterial class streets and 4 feet on all other streets. See Civil drawings. The existing sidewalk on Marcola Road is a curb side sidewalk. It has been designed to transition to a setback sidewalk to move pedestrian access away from the busy street and provide a plant bed between pedestrians and vehicles. 22nd Street also has curb side sidewalks, and the proposed setback sidewalk will create the same type of transition to separate pedestrians from vehicles. At the DIM both public works and transportation planning agreed this was an appropriate design. The proposed sidewalks are 5' wide on both streets. (D) Planter strips are required as part of sidewalk construction. Planter strips must be at least 4 1/2 feet wide (as measured from the back of curb to the edge of the sidewalk) and at least 4 1/2 feet long. Planter strips must have approved landscaping consisting of street trees and ground cover allowed per the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual Tree wells set in concrete or sidewalk areas must be a minimum of 4 feet by 4 feet. Concrete, asphalt or other impermeable pavement are not allowed to substitute for landscaping within planter strips. The proposed planter strip is 6 12 feet on Marcola Road and 6 feet on 22nd Street, both measurements include the curb. They are the full length of the project except where interrupted by the driveway entrance. It will be planted as indicated above. (E) Maintenance of sidewalks is the continuing obligation of the abutting property owner. (6443; 6412) Acknowledged. Section 4.2-140 Street Trees. (A) New Street Trees. New street trees must be a minimum of 2 -inch (dbh) caliper. New street trees shall be selected from the City Street Tree List contained in Appendix 6A, Approved Street Tree List in the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and installed as specified in Chapter 6 of the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Street trees will be provided in the park strip on Marcola Road and 22 d Street. They will be 2" dbh when installed. See Planting Plan. (B) Existing Street Trees. There are no existing street trees. Section 4.2.145 Street Lighting. (A) Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment. Existing lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new developments. The developer is responsible for street lighting installation costs. No new street ligfts are proposed for Marcola Road and 22' Street per discussions with transportation planning. (B) Design Standards. See Electrical Site North and Electrical Site South plans. See attached product sheets forproposed lighting. Section 4.2.150 Multi -Use Paths. Not applicable. The development does not include or abut any existing or proposed mutt -use paths. Section 4.2.160 Accessways. (A) Accessways allow pedestrians and bicyclists convenient linkages to adjacent streets, residential areas, neighborhood activity centers, industrial or commercial centers, transit facilities, parks, schools, open space, or trails and paths where no public street access exists. Accessways may also be used as a secondary emergency access. Accessways must be dedicated as public right-of-way during the development review process. No accessways are planned as part of this development. SchirmerConaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Page 13 of 21 Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Slalemenl Section 4.3.100 — Infrastructure Standards — Utilities See Utilities discussion Page 6 of this document. Section 4.3.105 Sanitary Sewer. (A) All sanitary sewer design including supporting documentation must be prepared and stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer. See attached sanitary sewer design signed and stamped by I0 -FF Consulting Engineers. (B) Sanitary sewers must be installed to serve each new developm ant within the city limits and to connect developments to existing sanitary sewer mains. See Site Plan and Utility Plan for sanitary sewer information. Section 4.3. 110 Stormwater Management. (A) Stormwater Management Improvements — General Standards. (1) All stormwater management system design including supporting documentation must be prepared and stamped by an Oregon licensed engineer. See attached stormwater system design and report signed and stamped by KPFF Consuiting Engineers. (2) A stormwater management system must be installed to serve each new development within the city limits. See Site Plan and Utility Plan for stormwater system information. See attached Preliminary Stormwater Report (B) Stormwater Study Standards. (1) A complete Stormwater Study, as outlined below, must be submitted for all developments that generate public and/or private stormwater runoff from more than 1 acre of land or generate peak flows in excess of 0.5 cfs. Applications for development that creates 5,000 square feet of new impervious surface or modifies an existing stormwater management system with a capacity of 0.5 cfs or greater must also include a complete Stormwater Study. See attached Preliminary Stormwater Report. Section 4.3.115 Water Quality Protection. Not applicable. Development site is not near a watercourse. Section 4.3.117 Natural Resource Protection Areas. Not applicable. Development site is not near a natural resource Section 4.3.125 Underground Placement of Utilities. Whenever possible, all utility structures, facilities and equipment will be placed underground Section 4.3.127 Electrical Service. Electrical utility facilities are available to serve the site at the time of development and have the capacity. Section 4.3.130 Water Service and Fire Protection. (A) Each development area must be provided with awater system having sufficient sized mains and lesser lines to furnish adequate water supply to the development with sufficient access for maintenance. See Site Plan and Utility Plan for water system design. (B) Fire hydrants and mains must be installed by the developer as required by Fire Marshall and the utility provider. Sciri mer Cmalling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 La niscape Archileclure ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Reme,u Pre -Submittal Application: Written Statement Page 14 of 21 Per the DIM there are no additional fire hydrants required. There is an existing public fire hydrant at 22nd and Mata Loop (Springfield Utility Board hydrant H-1182). There is another public fire hydrant on the southwest comer of 22nd and Marcola Road (Springfield Utility Board hydrant H-26). Section 4.3.140 Public Easements (A) Utility Easements. The applicant must make arrangements with the City and each utility provider for the dedication of utility easement necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area, as necessary. Public utility easements must be shown on plat or in a form approved by the City attorney, and must meet the following standards: (1) The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to collector and arterial streets is 10 feet. No public utilities are proposed. (2) The minimum width for sewer easements is 5 feet on either side of sewer line for sewers less than 12 inches diameter and less than 5 feet of cover, and 7 feet on either side of the sewer line for sewers greater than 12 inches diameter or with greater than 5 feet of cover. There is an existing 14 -foot utilty easement over the existing 10" saniary sewer line. See Site Plan. (3) The minimum width for all other public utility easements is 7 feet. No public utilities are proposed. (4) Notwithstanding the above standards, the utility provider or the Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major electric power transmission lines, stormwater management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance or to accommodate multiple utility lines. There is an existing 10 -foot water line easement over the existing EWEB water line. See Site Plan. (5) Where feasible, utility easements must be centered on a lot/parcel line. Acknowledged. Section 4.4.100 — Landscaping, Screening and Fence Standards Section 4.4.105 Landscaping. (B) Three types of landscaping may be required: (1) Landscaping standards for private property as specified in this section and other sections of the code. See Planting Plan. (2) Street trees in the public right-of-way as specified in SDC 4.2.140. See the response in that section. (3) Curbside planter strips in the public right-of-way as specified in SDC 4.2.135.. See the response in that section. (D) The following areas of a lot/parcel must be landscaped, unless otherwise specified in this code: (1) All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as specified in the appropriate zoning district. Required setbacks are as follows: 10 feet front yard. Highway 126: 10' x 296.98' = Z970 sf Marcola Road. 10'x 294.73' = 2, 947 sf 22nd Street: 10' x 681.36' = 6,814 sf 10 feet rear yard. west property line: 10'x 668.94'= 6,689 sf Total setback landscaping = 19,420 sf Scirimer Constri ng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-51M La niscape Architecture ♦ tantl Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Page 15 of 21 Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment 15% of the site minimum: 30, 906 sf less 19, 420 sf (setback landscaping) = 11, 486 sf See Planting Plan. (2) Parking lot planting areas required in this section. See Planting Plan. (E) At least 65 percent of each required planting area must be covered with living plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant materials must be distributed throughout the required planting area. The planting acceptable per 1,000 square feet of required planting area is as follows: (1) A minimum of 2 trees, not less than 6 feet in height, that are at least a 2 inch (dbh) caliper (at the time of planting, not including root ball); and (2) Ten shrubs, 5 gallons or larger. (3) Lawn and/or groundcover may be substituted for up to 25 percent of the living plant material requirement, unless trees or shrubbery are required for screening. This substitution is only allowed when the applicant has demonstrated that there is provisions for ongoing maintenance of the landscape areas. At least 65 percent of each required planting area is covered with living plant material and will be at 5 years time. There is a minimum per 1000 sf the following. 2 trees not less 6' in height 2" caliper dbh and 10 shrubs 5 gallons or larger. Other landscaping may be lawn or ground cover. See Planting Plan. See Planting Plan fortme locations (tentative). Shrubs will be shown for Submittal application. Trees have not been proposed on the west property line due to the existing large canopy trees that are in close proximity to the required setback area. The trees required for that area have instead been distributed throughout the site. Trees are not proposed to the south as there is an existing 6' high earth berm there. 30,906 sf of required landscaping= 31 required trees. These standards do not apply to single unit detached dwellings and middle housing in the R-1 District. (F) Parking lot planting areas must include 1 canopy tree at least 2 inches (dbh) in caliper that meets City street tree standards as may be permitted by the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and at least 4 shrubs, 5 gallon or larger, for each 100 square feet of planting area. Shrubs that abut public right-of-way or that is placed in the interior of any parking lot must not exceed 2.5 feet in height at maturity. Parking lot planting areas must include: (1) Parking and driveway setback areas specified in the applicable land use district; and Parking and driveway setbacks are per the Residential District (R-1, R-2, R-3) standards. (2) Five percent of the interior of a parking lot, exclusive of any required parking setbacks, if 24 or more parking spaces are located between the street side of a building and an arterial or collector street and are visible from any street. Not applicable. Marcola Road is classified as a Major Collector. Buildings have been placed on the street and parking is behind the buildings. (3) See also SDC 4.7.380 or 4.7.385 for multiple unit housing design standards. See that section for discussion. SHMhmer Cmalting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-51M Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Page 16 of 21 (G) All new required planting areas must be provided with a permanent irrigation system which can include a drip irrigation system. Areas planted with noninvasive drought tolerant species or plant communities are exempt from this standard. See Irrigation Note on Planting Plan. H. Landscaped setbacks abutting required screening on the same property may be exempted by the Director from planting requirements if the area is not visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent property. Acknowledged. I. Planting Installation Standards. Acknowledged. Section 4.4. 110 Screening. (A) Unless otherwise specified in the code, screening is required: (4) For garbage and recycling receptacles and areas: The garbage and recycling areas are fully screened. See Architectural Plans. (6) For multiple unit housing. See Planting Plan. (B) Screening must be vegetative, earthen, and/or structural. Unless specified elsewhere in this subsection, screening must be continuous to at least 6 feet above ground level. (1) Vegetative Screening. Evergreen shrubs must be planted to form a continuous hedge. When immediate screening is necessary, a sight -obscuring fence must be installed in place of, or in conjunction with the shrubs. The 6 -foot height standard specified in subsection (B), above must occur within 4 years of planting. For multiple unit housing, the vegetative screening standards specified in SDC 4.7.380(4) or 4.7.385(D) apply. This project is choosing SDC 4.7.380 which is Multiple Link Housing (Clear and Objective Standards). SDC 4.7.380(4) refers to screening garbage and recycling. See Architectural Plans. (2) Earthen Screening. Earthen berms may be used to screen either visual or noise impacts. A berm must be combined with evergreen plantings or a fence to form an attractive sight and noise buffer. The maximum height of a berm is 6 feet along local streets and 8 feet along collector and arterial streets or railroad rights-of-way. There is an existing 6' high berm on the south property line. This will remain except for those portions that need to be removed to construct the project. (3) Structural Screening. A fence or masonry wall must be constructed to provide a 100 percent sight - obscuring screen. Section 4.5.100 Lighting Standards. (A) Standards for Installation and Operation of Outdoor Lighting. Except as exempt by subsection (C) of SDC 4.5.105 above, new outdoor lighting fixtures installed after July 1, 2022, are subject to the standards below. No provision of this section is intended to preempt Springfield Municipal Code 8.200 at seq., Signs, or applicable State codes. (1) All outdoor lighting fixtures subject to this section must be designed as a full cut-off fixture or have a shielding method to direct light emissions down onto the site and not shine direct illumination or glare onto adjacent properties. See Electrical Site North and Electrical Site South plans. See attached product sheets for proposed lighting. SctMhmer Conaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Reme,u Pre -Submittal Application: Milan Statement Page 17 of 21 (B) On-site lighting must be the minimum illumination necessary in compliance with the Illuminating Engineering Society of North America recommended practices for a given application, including parking areas and vehicle sales areas. All exterior light fixtures must be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property and directed downward and away from abutting properties; public rights-of-way; and riparian zones, wetlands, and other protected areas identified in this code on the same property. All proposed lighting will be full cut off shield to prevent light trespass to neighboring properties or buildings. See attached product sheets forproposed lighting. (C) Height. 1. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture must not exceed 25 feet or the height of the principal permitted structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface and the bottom of the light fixture. The light fixtures will not exceed 25 feet or the height of the principal permitted structure (3) The height of a free standing exterior light fixture within 50 feet of any residential district, riparian zone, or wetland must not exceed 12 feet. The light fixtures will not exceed 12 feet wlthin 50 feet of any residential district (bordering the south east property line). Section 4.6. 100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Standards. Section 4.6.115 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Lot Design. All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards. T Pa� Dimensional Feature (all dimensions in feet) I Diagram MaiM Stall width, standard 1 901 901 9.0 1 9.0 Stall width, compact 1 801 801 8.0 1 8.0 Stall length, standard 1 2401 18 01 18 01 18.0 Stall length, compact I 2201.1601 1601 16.0 Aisle width between stall lines 1 1201.1201.1601 24.0 Bumper overhang (typical)�1f I0.0 1.5 1.8 2.0 Cross -aisle, 1 -way IE1f I16.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Cross -aisle, 2 -way IF1 2401 24 01 24 01 24.0 All full-size parking stalls are designed to be 9' wide 18' deep with 24' of back up. No compact spaces are proposed. See Site Plan. Section 4.6.120 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Lot Improvements. All parking areas must conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting, and screening provisions of this code and must be completed prior to occupancy. Required parking spaces must be improved as follows: (A) All parking lots, bays, and spaces must have a durable, dust free surfacing of Asphaltic concrete, Portland cement concrete, or other materials as approved by the City Engineer. Permeable pavement meeting standards in the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual may be allowed by the City Engineer for parking areas and driveways. Parking lot surfacing must not encroach upon the public right-of-way. All proposed parking areas will have a durable dust -free surface of asphaltic concrete. SHMimer Cmalling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Milan Statement Page 18 of 21 (B) Stormwater management system improvements must be provided to manage all on-site run-off. The stormwater management system improvements must provide for the on-site collection of stormwater to eliminate sheet flowonto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private property. All stormwater management system improvements must meet the standards in SDC 4.3.110, and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, Chapters 3 and 4. See Utility Plan. (C) All parking spaces fronting a sidewalk, alley, street, landscaped area, or structure must be provided with a secured wheel bumper or linear curb not less than 6 inches in height to be set back from the front of the stall a minimum of 2 feet to allow for vehicle encroachment. All parking spaces abut a 6" raised sidewalk. The sidewalks are 7' wide allowing for 2' of car over hang and 5' clear pedestrian access. (F) Not more than 30 percent of the total parking spaces in a parking lot may be designated for compact cars. All proposed parking spaces are full size. Section 4.6.125 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Space Requirements Table 4.6.2 in this section specifies the following. Multiple Unit Housing • Required. 1 parking space/dwelling unit • Result: 128 dwelling units = 128 parking spaces • Provided. 147 parking spaces (142 standard spaces and 5 ADA) Section 4.6.140 through 4.6.155 Bicycle Parking Table 4.6.3 in this section specifies the following. Residential. Multiple Unit Housing Required. 1 space per dwelling unit, 75% long-term/25% short term Result: 128 units = 96 long term/ 32 short term Proposed. 128 long term 100% of all bicycle parking spaces are sheltered. 10% oversized = 10 spaces. 11 are provided. All required long-term bicycle parking spaces must be sheltered from precipitation, in conformance with (D)(3) below, and include lighting in conformance with the lighting standards in SDC 4.5_100. 100% of the required long-term bike spaces are sheltered. Bike rooms inside the building have been provided. If more than 10 short term bicycle parking spaces are required, at least 50% of the short-term bicycle parking spaces in excess of 10 must be sheltered. 100% of the bikes are sheltered. At least 10% of the long-term bicycle parking spaces for commercial uses and residential uses must be oversized bicycle parking spaces. 10% of the long-term bike parking spaces are oversized. Section 4.7.380 Multiple Unit Housing (Clear and Objective Standards). (C) Development Standards for Multiple Unit Housing Developments in the R-2 and R-3 Districts. The following standards apply to multiple unit housing developments unless otherwise stated. These standards do not apply to Cottage Cluster Housing developments. (1) Common Open Space. Sommer Conaling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Segment Page 19 of 21 (d) For multiple unit housing developments that have a net density of 20 dwellings units or more per acre in the R-2 district, or 30 dwelling units or more per net acre in the R-3 district the common open space standard does not apply. This project is exempt from open space requirements. Net density is 28 units per acre. (4) Garbage and Recycling Receptacle Storage. Garbage and recycling receptacle storage must meet the following standards: (a) Receptacles must not be located within setbacks for property lines shared with R-1 district property. All garbage and recycling storage is internal to the site and not located within any setback areas. (b) Receptacles must be covered and screened on at least 3 sides. Screening must be in conformance with the standards in SDC 4.4.110. Receptacle storage is screened on 4 sides with 100% site obscuring materials. See Architectural elevations. (c) Receptacles must be located to provide access by garbage and recycling pick-up vehicles. Receptacles are located along parking area drive aisles providing access by garbage and recycling pick-up vehicles. (d) Receptacle storage areas must drain only to the sanitary sewer system, through hydraulic isolation of the receptacle storage area connected to the sanitary sewer system by a drain. Receptacle storage areas are connected to the sanitary sewer. See Utility Plan. (5) Landscaping, Fences, and Walls. Multiple unit housing developments must provide landscaping as specified in the following standards and in compliance with SDC 4.4.105. (a) A minimum of 15 percent of the site must be landscaped with a mix of vegetative ground cover, shrubbery, and trees. Trees, a minimum 2 inches (dbh —diameter at breast height) in caliper, and shrubbery, a minimum of 24 inches in height, must be planted. Bark mulch, rocks and similar non -plant material may be used to compliment the cover requirement but is not considered a sole substitute for the vegetative ground cover requirement. Required. Standard. 15% of site Result Site: 206,039 sf 15% of Site:30, 906 sf Proposed. 72,114 sf (35% of Site) See Planting Plan. (b) Street trees, a minimum 2 inches (dbh) caliper, must be placed within the planter strips between the curb and the sidewalk. Street trees must be planted a minimum of 1 per every 30 linear feet of street frontage, as specified in SDC 4.2_140. See Planting Plan. (c) Fences in front yards and along any frontage used to comply with the building orientation standard are limited to 3 feet in height. Fences in other yards must comply with the fence standards specified in SDC 4.4.115, and the vision clearance standards specified in SDC 4.2.130. Acknowledged. (d) The use of non-invasive and/or drought -tolerant landscaping is encouraged. All landscaping must be irrigated with a permanent irrigation which may include a drip irrigation system unless a licensed landscape architect submits written verification that the proposed plant materials do not require irrigation. The property owner must maintain all landscaping. See plant list and irrigation note on Planting Plan. SHMimer Cmalling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Slalemenl Page 20 of 21 (6) Pedestrian Circulation. Multiple unit housing developmentswith more than 20 units must provide pedestrian circulation as specified in the following standards. (a) Continuous internal sidewalks must be provided throughout the site. Discontinuous internal sidewalks are permitted only where stubbed to a future internal sidewalk on abutting properties, future phases on the subject property, or abutting recreation areas and pedestrian trails. See Site Plan. All sidewalks are continuous, connect all buildings and amendy areas, and all connect to the public rigid of way. (b) Internal sidewalks must be separated a minimum of 5 feet from dwellings, measured from the sidewalk edge closest to any dwelling unit. All sidewalks are a minimum of 5 feet from all buildings. (c) The internal sidewalk system must connect all abutting streets to primary building entrances. All internal sidewalks connect to both public rights of way. (d) The internal sidewalk system must connect all buildings on the site and must connect the dwelling units to the parking areas, bicycle parking, storage areas, all recreational facilities, common areas, and abutting public sidewalks and pedestrian trails. All internal sidewalks connect dwellings, parking, common areas, etc. See Site Plan. (e) Surface treatment of internal sidewalks/accessways must be concrete, asphalt, or masonry pavers. The sidewalks must be at least 5 feet wide. Multi -use accessways (e.g., for bicycles, pedestrians, and emergency vehicles) must be of the same materials ... . All internal sidewalks are a minimum of 5 feet wide and will be concrete. No multi -use accessways are proposed. (f) Where internal sidewalks cross a vehicular circulation area or parking aisle, they must be clearly marked with contrasting paving materials, elevation changes, raised pedestrian crossing, or striping. A raised pedestrian crossing is subject to review and approval by the Fire Marshal. Internal sidewalk design must comply with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. See Site Plan for proposed striping where internals sidewalks/circulation crosses vehicular circulation or a parking aisle. The pedestrian crosswalks are not proposed to be raised. (g) Where the internal sidewalks are parallel and abutting to a vehicular circulation area, the sidewalk must be raised or be separated from the vehicular circulation area by a raised curb, bollards, landscaping, or other physical barrier. If a raised sidewalk is used, the ends of the raised portions must be equipped with curb ramps. The internal sidewalks are raised to 6"to separate pedestrian circulation from vehicular circulation. (h) All on-site internal sidewalks must be lighted to a minimum of 2 foot-candles. Lighting along on-sde internal sidewalks will comply with this standard. See Electrical Site North and Electrical Site South plans. (7) Parking. Multiple unit housing developments must provide parking as specified in SDC 4.6.100 through 4.6.155. See responses in those sections above. (8) Vehicular Circulation. Multiple unit housing developments must provide vehicular circulation as specified in the following standards. (a) The on-site driveway, or private street, system must connect with public streets abutting the site. Sciri mer Conaling, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5109 Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Paradigm Marcola Apartments Site Plan Remew Pre -Submittal Application: Written Statement Page 21 of 21 The onsite driveway connects with 22nd Street. No connection is proposed to Marcola Road per discussion with city of Springfield Transportation Planning Engineer. (b) Site access and driveways must conform to SDC 4.2.120. (6443) See Site Plan. IV. CONCLUSION The Paradigm Mancola Apartments project Sde Plan Review complies with applicable approval criteria and SDC standards. The application provides substantial evidence to support approval of the application. We look forward to your review and comments. This is an appropriate use of the property considering the base zone. Locating housing near transportation and services and other housing is a natural fit. If you have any questions or need additional clarification, please do not hesitate to call. We look forward to your review and approval of this project. Sincerely, Schirmer Consulting, LLC Carol Schirmer Principal SHMimer Conaltng, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-51M Landscape Architecture ♦ Land Use Planning Attachment A ZONE XyNE G x XMQN. AME CITY OF SPRINGFIE I 1 415592 PANOE 44W3'45•• 23°00'00" Project Site FIRM Map LIMITS Marcola Road THIS PANEL IS LOCATED WITHIN WEST AND TOWNSHIP IT SOUTH, LEGEND SPECIAL FLOOD H IZU ARIAS INVNNATFD BY IQ)-YFAR 710013 XON! A w w. mna eMaliw� aw.,wa 2000 AF Lv Ard eWvn. dawmwd xaNF AH .am e.pr. a . m 1 en wo... Nu.m�Md. zomE Ao .end A^ N t y I Iwa fwl, 0.ai tlnw rc dgivq I rera0e MpM mmmd v n.Nr.W le bdry .elrcui yn Mnmre! xol4e A99 k ��n�b am. Iw-En., Fie br IpN Y C.uN Amt xaM1 m0xlry Mu0 Iw Nlw'. w Wx bad eMtm MnnmN. XCHE W [wY Nod Wi w w F..�d Iwea adaV, rirt hW MfLo7 bM�N. FLOCOWAY AREAS IN ZONE AE OTHER FLO00 ARIAS ZONE x ♦xw d sM-�s AmL am N d?Tar bN M rve� Jpf� b ti 1 Aw n �iN Aad droit l uLn I .e.w. •+ir, .nd � N.n ioo-H.. Food OTHER AREAS xaw x .. 4.rcm�nd m d m� mT.v de qp,m_ ^!'v RECORDING REQUESTED BY: re - Fidelity National'I➢tle �omw"ror�, 3007 North Delta Hwy., Ste 206 Eugene, OR 97408 GRANTOR'S NAME: MAIA, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company GRANTEE'S NAME: JKT Investments LLC, an Oregon limited liability company AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Order 60222203418 -WC JKT Investments LLC, an Oregon limited liability company 3498 West 1st, Ste 1 Eugene, OR 97402 SEND TAX STATEMENTS TO: JKT Investments LLC, an Oregon limited liability company 3498 West 1st, Ste 1 Eugene, OR 97402 APIN 0203586 Map: 17-03-25-13-00800 2125 Marcola Road, Springfield, OR 97477 Attachment B Lane County Clerk 2022-031717 Lane County Deeds & Records 07/20/2022 11:57:16 AM RPR -DEED Cnt=1 Stn=8 CASHIER 12 3pages $15 00 $11 00 $1000 $61 00 $97.00 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED MAIA, LLC, an inactive Oregon limited liability company, Grantor, conveys and warrants to JKT investments LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, Grantee, the following described real property, free and clear of encumbrances except as specifically set forth below, situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon: Commencing at the Brass Cap marking the Southwest comer of the Felix Scott Jr. D.L.C. No. 51 dated 1971, said corner also marking the centerline of Mandela Road; thence along the South line of said Felix Scott D.L.C. No. 51 South 88°1 East 584.01 feet; thence leaving the South line of the Felix Scott D.L.C. No. 51 and bearing South 01 °55'55" West 35.00 feet to a point on the South margin of Marcola Road, said point being 35.00 feet from, when measured at right angle to, the centerline of Marcola Road, said point also being the True Point of Beginning; thence leaving the South margin of Marcola Road and continuing South 01 °55'55" West 688.94 feet to a point on the North margin of Eugene -Springfield Highway 1-105; thence along the North margin of Eugene -Springfield Highway 1-105 South 85"39'30" East 296.98 feet to a point, said point being on the Southerly projection of the West margin of 22nd Street; thence leaving the North margin of Eugene -Springfield Highway 1-105 and along the West margin of 22nd Street and its Southerly projection North 0146'11" East 701.36 feet to a point on the South margin of Marcola Road, said point being 35.00 feet from, when measured at right angles to, the centerline of Marcola Road; thence along the South margin of Marcola Road North 19" West 294.73 feet to the True Point of Beginning, all in the City of Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION FOR THIS CONVEYANCE IS TWO MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND AND NO/100 DOLLARS ($2,200,000.00). (See ORS 93.030). Subject to: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS, IF ANY, UNDER ORS 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. THIS INSTRUMENT DOES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING TRANSFERRED IS A LAWFULLY ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, AS DEFINED IN ORS 92.010 OR 215.010, TO VERIFY THE APPROVED USES OF THE LOT OR PARCEL, TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT THE RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OWNERS, IF ANY, UNDER ORB 195.300, 195.301 AND 195.305 TO 195.336 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 424, OREGON LAWS 2007, SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 17, CHAPTER 855, OREGON LAWS 2009, AND SECTIONS 2 TO 7, CHAPTER 8, OREGON LAWS 2010. eeed (slat.Nrywarrany) Legal 0Ro13M.daclupdzred 04.29.19 P., 1 OR-FT-FEUG-01520.470003-60222203413 Produced using RLID (www.rlid.org) on 01/25/2023 at 11:43 AM STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED (continued) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this document on the date(s) set forth below. r J Dated: Z MAIA, LLC,7 Oregon limit d liability company ,sr //�h Dennis C. Harlow Managing Member r State of County of This Instrument was acknowledged before me on l� J% .71 by Dennis C. Harlow, as Managing Member for MAIA, LLQ, an zygon limited liability company. t Notary Public - to CrOregon My Commission Expires: W 7 9YPUNIR't f iota }� i �:dhiil 6tiP q sIC"N UC. >tsFiis i Deed (StaWl.,W.rrente Lee.] ORD1368 doa l Updated: M.26.19 Paga2 GR-FT-FEUG-0152047000MO222203418 Produced using RLID (www.rlid.org) on 01/25/2023 at 11:43 AM EXHIBIT "A" Exceptions subject to: 1. Rights of the public to any portion of the Land lying within the area commonly known as streets, roads and highways. 2. The ownership of said Land does not include rights of access to or from the street, highway, or freeway abutting said Land, such rights having been relinquished by the document, Recording Date: December 14, 1961 Recording No 53325 3, Easements) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document. Granted to: City of Springfield Purpose. sanitary sewer Recording Date: July 1, 1983 Recording No: 8322857 4. Waiver and Agreement, including the terms and provisions thereof Recording Date: July 1, 1983 Recording No.: 8322858 5. Easement(s) for the purposes) shown below and rights Incidental thereto, as granted In a document: Granted to: City of Springfield Purpose. public water utility easement Recording Date: February 8, 1984 Recording No: 8404454 6. Easements) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: Granted to. City of Springfield Purpose: utility easement Recording Date: September 16, 1999 Recording No: 99079669 need(etatutary Warranty) ragaI ORD1368 tloa ;Updated 0426.19 Page3 OR -FT FEUG 0152047000360222203418 Produced using RLID (w ..rlid.org) on 01/25/2023 at 11:43 AM L/TAFL7N/A Submittal Spec Sheet L/GHT/NG Dynamically Generated Series: CNY Contractor Select CNY LED Canopy Most popular and readily available CNY configurations for your everyday lighting needs aunoa- Product Submittal Description: CNY, LED, Package 2, 5000K, 120-277V, Dark bronze finish, Master pack of 4 aLIES FIes aLBIMModg9 aLFull Stec Sieg Product Welopage: www.ach Whrznds carn/groduclsldefir IM31724 Warranty: www.acuitvbrands.com/su000d/warmntvaetms-and-can Model O: CNY LED P2 50K MVOLT DDB M4 ✓ Attachment C com 1/5/2023 Prole¢ Cry '. 0 D The product images shove are Nril cindionpurposes only araimaynot bean esactrepresedetion close product. Series' Lamp Type' LED Conflguratbn' I Correlated Color Temperature' Vollage' FinisH Sitarist Packaging OMEN This is a dynamic specification sheet that is based on certain selections made by the user. All results generated are for informational purposes only The usershould validale the results with its agency sales represeraative to determine whether the product has been configured correctly beach, visiting Acuity Brands Lyhimg is not responsible for any loss resulting from product configuration errors. Not all versions Nine product are available with all options. SpecMications subject to change without notice. Actual performance may star as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design ortypical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C See the full specMication sheet at the product page link above for And product information and detailed ordering information. Certain airborne comaminams can diminish the imeghty of acrylic arWorpsycerbonate. Me NIpJ/www_acOybrendsllghtingcomplbmrypl/documents/spersheetVacrylkyo"&ovate-compatibilitypdfforAWIl PWycarbonate Compatibilitytablekrsultable uses All trademarks referenced me '.L?NON/d One Lithouia Way Conyers, 0 30012•Phone: 8067057378• www.acuitymmnds.can Createtl Date: 115120232: 38 PM "ayin G O2023 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Pagel oft Visual - Template Tool Mon. Eight, CoMguration Design Information lamp Lumens project Nara CesnpHon l mpsny 8 Nore 1 Mm Length Email A [ - CNV LEO P2 40K MVOLT 51.9 Tilt [ A I - CNV LED P2 40K MVOLT QAcuiiyerands. ThurM%I nueN 05, 2023 80 Manufacturer Mon. Eight, CoMguration Swee lamp Lumens ti 61010ourg non SBgla lamp Quarrtiry 168 Mount NegM1t 8 Light Log Factor 1 Mm Length 1 In Wt M—r 51.9 Tilt 0 Mex ltuminallCe MAiga�0.5h 1310 .I.r.uFtrMwwmn mAb.reb,g�'em lMormftYAelp abwr.amime.nu�wtw..n6..to.a'u.�r.. Mwnnra ewra..pan.i.6waanr.rpm+IammM wmn �.emml.ainr.wrw.wos:.nwmw..naimen.r. ,soiwwmN. viw . LITNOAIIA Submittal Spec Sheet LIGHTIMIG Dynamically Generated Series: RADPT RADPT LED Area Luminaire RADEANTM Post Top —Visually Comfortable for Pedestrian Environments Product Submittal Description: Radean post top, LED, Package 4, 5000K, Pathway, 120V, Opentop round pole -41N OD for Post top mounting, Single Fuse, 1 OFT steel pole, 41N dia., Blackfnish, super durable yp IES -Free .4, aim1voca. A.Full Snec Sheet Product Webpage: w.vw.acuitvbmnds.cambrodudsdetaiIM8W41 Warranty: w.vv witvbmds cam/moves lwamntvfierms-and-candifims Model#: RADPT LED P4 50K PATH 120 PT4SF RSSIO DBLXD ✓ Daae 1/5/2023 Project Marcola Apartments adwnyTa: we an e.otteMeent h. dr6n µrodueL '. L?NON/d One tiMmi r Way Cmyaa, GA 30012 • Phone: 80670S7378 • w acuitl4rands.can created Date :115120231:21 PM L/"VMMG OM23 Acuity Brands fighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Pagel of2 rural rti ev I£D tsD Pi Pan e1 zM zmaR PS Pa nngez lIX 3. P3 Pa ,,e3 3. 5M Po Pa ,,e< lM M]OX PS Pan e5 SIX 50Iq( .1 "am. 1. 1. XS IM[ntl]e#eM ppereprcuna YN W WPod4 MTI PoNeI 2W 2WV Pie Tarim SYM YmmM[ 2p 21W RFDPIA IaaN Term Ypmo 2n 2m K. 2can Term rl Diz airy ieo ieov M19LT 1. DininiablelUntrollable KTNR2 Wfe argn2w4eM Photocell PE PMxer, WlMye Internal RR Control Iktltt/milseamf Ial, drib Field Adjustable FRO Rd1 eluMea�1 '. L?NON/d One tiMmi r Way Cmyaa, GA 30012 • Phone: 80670S7378 • w acuitl4rands.can created Date :115120231:21 PM L/"VMMG OM23 Acuity Brands fighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Pagel of2 fL/TWAM&A Submittal Spec Sheet L/GHT/NG Dynamically Generated Series: RADPT Dates 1/5/2023 Predict Mari Apartments aawfrma: me: This is a dynamic specification sheeuhaf is based on certain selections made by the at All results generated are for mformatronalpurpoaes only The usershouM validate the results wdh ds agency sales represerdative to determine whether the product has been configuredcorrectlybefore and ing Acuity Brands Lyhtingis not responsible for any loss resulting from product configuration errors. Not all versions One product are available wdh all options. Specdications subject to change wdhi notice. Actual performance may order as a result of end-user environment and application. All values are design ortypical values, measured under laboratory condi at 25 "C. See the full specdroathon sheet at the product page link above for full product information and detailed ondenng information. Certain airborne cordeminards can diminish the irdegrdy of acrylic an Worpolycarbonale Vlslt_NIpJ/www_acultybrendsllghtingcomplbmry411documents/specsheelVacrylk9olycaZonate-compaNbllltypdfkrAcryli PolycarbonateCompaNblldytablekrsultable All trademarks referenced me '.L?NON/d One Lithonia Way Conyers, G 30012•Phone: 806705-7378• wxw.acuitybrame.con created! Date: 115120231: 21 PM UGNT/NG 02023 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights rererved. Page2of2 Visual - Template Tool "Wityerands. Design Information TM1uraa% January05,= project dame CesnpHon lompsny Nore Email A [ - MDPT P4 50K PATH 101 [ A I - RADPT P4 50K PATH 120 0.1 0.2 0.5 Men lecturer LINaMa Ll4Min4 Configuration Single lamp Wmens 9001 Mountanon Silyle 10 lamp L— Fact I Aron L ng HegM1t 10 Light Log Factor 1 Mm Lem[M1 1 NW[puaer 45. 0 Mex lLLumall inCe a ArMd�0.5h 3M1 meeelNtrewwuon mAb erebrg�'em lMormftYA¢Ip a+rw r.amM�.nu�wtw..n6..m.avvr.c �elYbAttY'x on..e.. raAn.i.wr.aanuKrpm•+ammM wmn � .emm valar.wrw.wos:.nwmw..nnmen.r. .soiwwmN.nm DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.springfiald-or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK (Area below this huefdled outbyApplica n) __— (Please return to Clayton A&Eamhern @ City ofSprb4gi2eld Development and Public Works, Fm # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enwd:cnaeurlern@sprirtglleldor.gov Project Name: Paradigm Marcola Apartments Applicant: Matt Keenan, PE KPFF Engineers Assessors Parcel #: 1703251300800 Date: 01/10/2020 LandUse(s): Residential Phone#: 541.684.4902 Project Size (Acres): 4.7 Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: 133,693 SF Email: 1703251300800 Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Project consist of construction of five new multi -family housing units, community center, drive aisle, associated parking and other amenities. Drainage Proposal (Public connedion(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Storm runoff will be collected on-site via roof drains, downspouts, area drains and trapped catch basin. There is an existing 18" stub that will serve as the site connection point. The 18" stub is located Proposed Storrewater Best Management Practices: Storm runoff will potentially be treated with vegetated facilities (rain gardens, storm water planters) or a combination of vegetated facilities and mechanical tr atment. Additionally all catch basins within vehicle pavements will be tr ped for oil/ rease se aration. Areabelawahishne dledordb the C' mrdR edtatheA lk (At a nundimn5 all boats checked by the City on the front and bekkoftlds sheet shall be submitted or on application to be con Tete r subnuttal, akin h other irenwnb nay, be recess Mechanical treatment (such as catch basin ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) Ittillers) allowed for meeting pre treatment ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use unit Hydrograph Method for calcu -tins quiremenls, not allowed to meet the 50 "king lot treatment requirement ❑ Full DIainage Development Study- (use Unit Hydrogmph Method for calcula ions) Environmental Considerations: jrWellheadZone: 1 year totz ❑ Hillside Development: n/a ❑ Wedand/Riparian: n/a ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: n� ❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions n/a Downstream Analysis: 8 N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@spdngfeAd-orgov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A 7 ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasinw/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. 7 ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. Z❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). 0 ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. Z❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. Z❑ 71 Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Z M A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. Z❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 Z❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous 71 ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. Z❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 FOR ASSESSMENT AND TAXATION ONLY vVV SEE MAP i 17032521 I' 11 c3'000000000000 � SW COR FELIX SCOTT DLC 51 1, 1 2700 I 1500 0i i 3AC 1 I' 1 1' 1 ,1 3 4 I 1 11 I 1 1 1 I' 11 'F• I' A 11 300 1' z, 1 11 I' 11 1 I' 1 Im I� 11 1 I 1 11 1 2900 z 1' 1 I� 1 a 1 S.W.1/4 N.E.1/4 SEC. 25 T.17S. R.3W. W.M. Lane County 1" = 100' 1501 3 3.9 AC 5.29998 a LOT "K 344 O NW COR �.B-POWERS---------- _-------- i DLC 81 ii 500 i - � 0.87A91' , a / —1 1 5.29008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i - - - / +602 o / • J J 1 / U S=5/ i>,1 -- /%�� 4-_ _________1______ I o0 /P 702 700 i 701 1.43AC 4.49 AC 0.6 AC i i / i i / ' pce a / i' a i i / i ; e / i / / SE COR oLc so SEE MAP 17032512 1600 1 2.38 AC 1800 1.72 AC PCL.2 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i 1700 1.89 AC PCL.1 5.29811 9 529717 A m 5.34749 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- SEE MAP 17032542 EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD HIGHWAY 1-105 1 0.1AC A7 3600 el 0.13 AC 76 3500 0.21 AC NIITIIAL s s 4142W.. 2700 1z0a5 1000 0i i 301 1300 0.34 AC 1 028 AC 1 2 3 4 I 1 3000��� I 1 1 1 0.1713 C 'F• 529008 A ? i 300 n z, 1 0.04 AC 11 1 _ 1 Im I� �ero',ee 1 I 1 3400 1 2900 z 0.18 AC- 1 1 ' 400 1 3s 0.14 AC 74 I' e9 f O NW COR �.B-POWERS---------- _-------- i DLC 81 ii 500 i - � 0.87A91' , a / —1 1 5.29008 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i - - - / +602 o / • J J 1 / U S=5/ i>,1 -- /%�� 4-_ _________1______ I o0 /P 702 700 i 701 1.43AC 4.49 AC 0.6 AC i i / i i / ' pce a / i' a i i / i ; e / i / / SE COR oLc so SEE MAP 17032512 1600 1 2.38 AC 1800 1.72 AC PCL.2 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 i 1700 1.89 AC PCL.1 5.29811 9 529717 A m 5.34749 — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- SEE MAP 17032542 EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD HIGHWAY 1-105 1 0.1AC A7 3600 el 0.13 AC 76 3500 0.21 AC NIITIIAL s s ,•etl I __________ ________ 4142W.. 2700 1z0a5 1000 1101Q�T 1200 1300 0.34 AC 1 028 AC 1 2 3 4 I 1 3000��� I 1 1 1 0.1713 C 1 1 1 1 0.11 AC 1 1 SEE MAP I 170325111 I 1 _ 1 Im I� �ero',ee 1 I 1 3400 1 2900 1 0.18 AC- 1 0.18AC I 1 1 1 74 1 e9 f I 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 i ,•etl I __________ ________ \�, S 1100_____ 1 O.snc 1400 �. \1 027AC 28 .xe "ly1 24s 2600 60 ,m0 016ACA2300xp0]s721200 at2100a-00.14AC 2000012A e 4 F �' 0.121 " 2 3 a 2500 1 a n,enc 32 3 2700 1z0a5 1000 1101Q�T 1200 1300 0.34 AC Os8 AC 028 AC 1 pPo 2 3 4 3000��� C 0.1713 C k 0.11 AC COMMON ARA \�, S 1100_____ 1 O.snc 1400 �. \1 027AC 28 .xe "ly1 24s 2600 60 ,m0 016ACA2300xp0]s721200 at2100a-00.14AC 2000012A e 4 F �' 0.121 " 2 3 a 2500 1 a n,enc 32 3 2700 1z0a5 1200 0.14 AC 72 T1 e] w117 w',ve 3300 3000��� m. 0.1713 C k 0.11 AC COMMON ARA 0 2800E A 0.19AC _ �ero',ee 3400 2900 0.18 AC- 0.18AC ^F 74 e9 f 17032513 SPRINGFIELD LCATSKP- 2021-12-3009:08 CANCELLED 100 101 104 105 106 107 108 200 201 600 601 602 900 REVISIONS OL1&ID11- LCATIB,-CONVERT WP TO GIS 11.12-LCAT115- WN'R' STREET NTO TL 11M 12/30/2021-ICAT1M-LLABET MTL1101STL11W SPRINGFIELD 17032513