Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 1/17/2023AGENDA DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT 225 FIFTH STREET Conference Room 616/ MS Teams Staff Review., Tuesday, January 31, 2023 A'00-9,•30 a.m. 1. Minor Variance 811-23-000006-TYP2 Casey Koontz Assessor's Map: 18-02-06-14 TL: 14800 Address: 948 Hazelnut Ln. Existing Use: residential Applicant submitted request for variance to setbacks for addition to existing residence. Planner: Andy Lim bird Meeting: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 9:00 — 9:30 virtual meeting via Microsoft Teams The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out from the laserfiche website: htto://www.si)ringfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.asi)x SITE VICINITY MAP 811-23-000006-TYP2 Minor Variance 18-02-06-14 TL 14800 948 Hazelnut Ln. Casey Koontz 'iCity of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Minor Variance SPRINGFIELD I& Required Project Information (Applicant., Applicant Name: complete this section) Phone: 5 1 - o. - 7- 6 Company: Y2opaz- Fax: Address:3Q�\o K1k'WQ- >,l G,.i� UNIT P� SYZirfGFlt-C,� 02L q-r47S Applicant's Rep.: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: Property Owner: xw ezT -6.GG5 Phone: 541-9iZ-63 Company: Fax: Address: `\`'ta 1kt 2'al.NJT \Ad -t oe-- "T -E78 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18o-Lo6\'-1 TAX LOT NOS : ti-tB,cbn9 Proper Address: See. owN�2- bPP9�5 �x�-E A it i nVt— LOA Size of Property: o- 16 Acres g Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Existing Use: Numeric Standard to be Adjusted (See SDC 5.21-125 A. for standards that may be adjusted): 5 . 21. 1-2-5 (A) C 1) 3+�L�ia6 S(cT tis Percentage of Standard to be Adjusted: -7'/. Si natures: Please sin and Urint your name and date in the appropriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: lications:: box on the next a e. complete this section) Si ns: Case No.811-23-0* Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $)OlDoTechnical Fee: v ee: $Z03 Zw3 I Postage Fee: TOTAL FEES: $ 3s)-5 -�-D PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 2/25/11 1 of 4 VIA Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the Information in this application is correct and accurate. Applicant: —� Date: e; awy atur If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: G@4tI� Date: Signature � t-. Bd.�C 5 Print Revised 2/25/11 2 of Minor Variance Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Land Division applications, where applicable. ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑ Minor Variance Application Form ❑ Copy of the Deed ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with the Minor Variance Criteria described in SDC 5.21-125 D. NOTE: Before the Director can approve a Minor Variance request, information submitted by the applicant must adequately support the request. All of the Minor Variance Criteria must be addressed by the applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. In certain circumstances, it is advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to prepare the required findings. ❑ Three (3) Copies of a Plot Plan including the following: ❑ If submitted concurrently with a Land Division or Site Plan Review application, eighteen copies of the Land Division Tentative Plan or Site Plan sheet may be submitted in lieu of the plot plan as long as it meets the following requirements. ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor if the minor variance involves a setback ❑ The scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100', north arrow, and date of preparation ❑ The nature and extent of the minor variance requested and relevant site features Revised 2/25/11 4 of 4 PROPER BUILT INC. BOGGS ADDITION - MINOR VARIANCE NARRATIVE 11 January 2073 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 OwcIDsaring eld-curgovv Subject:BOGGS ADDITION — MINOR VARIANCE NARRATIVE To Whom it may Concern, /.\ PROPER BUILT A4 DESIGN 4 BUILD The owner, Darlene Boggs, of the subject property, 948 Hazelnut Lane, is proposing to build a 400 square feet living space addition on the west side of the existing house. A structural permit - 811-22-001095-STR — has been issued and is currently active. Excavation and formwork for the addition footprint has been completed and all measurements were taken based upon the existing house foundation as the datum and the West side fence as the Plot's westemmost boundary line (Please see Exhibits A 8. B). A Footing and Foundation inspection was performed on November 3p,2022. Upon Inspection, a discrepancy concerning the Public Utility Easement (7'-0"), P.U.E., and the deck footing (below grade) was noted as a potential encroachment by city inspector, Duane Smith and Proper Built Representative, Brad Anderson. Concerned with the potential P.U.E encroachment, as well as the accuracy of the fence being located on the property line, Brad scheduled a property line verification with the surveying company, EGR and associates. EGR performed a property line verification and located the westemmost boundary pins which were located — 14" to the east of the existing fence, towards the existing house. As the proposed deck was on the border of the P.U.E. prior to the property line verification, this would put it ^14" within the bounds of the 7' easement. The deck, which was the initial point of concern, has been decided to be omitted from the design as the allowable space would make it an unusable accessory element. The subject of this narrative proposal is the proposed building addition footprint, and it's newly discovered encroachment into the 10' rear building setback as a result of the property line verification survey. Please reference the Site plan completed by EGR and associates, completed on January 3i° 2023, attached with this application. The proposed addition footprint currently encroaches into the 10' rear setback not more than 9". We are requesting a minor variance for this project for the following reasons: AI A significant amount of resources, in terms of time and currency, would be expended should we have to build outside of the setback as the structural forms would need to stripped reassembled, as well as the extended and costly process of re -design which includes design, structural and truss engineering. B) The requested dimensional variance - 9" or 7.5%- falls within the dimensional criteria listed for approval of a minor variance - 36" or 30% C) The owner, Darlene Boggs, would not have to sacrifice more living space than what she has already lost as a result of the inaccuracy and confusion over fence and property line location. 3990 Kathryn Ave, Unit B - Springfield OR 97478 1 CCB 237697 The proposed addition complies with the criteria of Section 5.21.125 'Minor Variances — Criteria' in the Springfield Development Code, as follows: (D) The Director must approve the Minor Variance if the applicant demonstrates compliance with all of the applicable approval criteria: (1) Lomtionol or dimensional problems have been identified that oan be resolved by a Minor Variance; Response: The requested dimensional variance (9" of 120" rear setback = 7.5%) falls within the 30% criteria allowed for a minor variance. (2) The request is the minimum necessary to alleviate the identified dimensional or locational problem; Response: The requested dimensional variance of 9" is the minimum necessary to alleviate the locational problem of the proposed building footprint. (3) Where applicable, the request shall result in the preservation of on-sife trees 5 -inch dba and above; Response: Not applicable — No tree removal is requested with this application (4) The request shall not impede adequate emergency access he the site; Response: adequate emergency access will not be impeded as a result of this variance. (5) The request shall not unreasonably adversely impact public or private easements; and Response: The Public Utility Easement will not be affected as a result of this variance. (6) This subsection is not applicable as the request does not involve nor request a parking reduction Please contact me immediately if any additional information is required to process this request. Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. Sincerely, Casey Koontz Owner / Designer Proper Built Inc. P 1541.505.9236 E I cosey@properbuilt.net 3990 Kathryn Ave, Unit B - Springfield OR 974781 CCB 237697 W o r� e , i Zxo OOM 1 :E D / /I < X M \o�O w o Moz {Om i N N / zo. x�vacas,ol w O m A Cd Up O / z m / IoSB / �g9rk 1 -dHAO %2' w A o� e / /I /I / x�vacas,ol -dHAO %2' w A SITE BOUNDARY 4 Y --------------- ]18' r 5Vd' 13'4 15'tl 1 w pw� is 4 e PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN DFTAILNO MV1 fJ� BOGGS ADDITIONHazzaelnut°995 TAX MAF: 180206'4 TAX LOT: 14800 948 H elnut Lane, Springfield, OR 97478 SCALE: 8' = 1'-0' DRAWN BY: CKK PROPER BUILT PROPER BUILT 3990 Kathryn Ave. Unit B - Springfield OR 97478 - 541.505.9236- casey®properhuitt.net CHECKED DY. DATE: REVISION: CKK 01/11/23 3 DESIGN+BUILD SITE INFORMATION TAX MAP: 18020614 - 14800 ZONE: L - Low Density Residential MAP ACRES: 0.16 acres OWNER INFORMATION Darlene Boggs 948 Hazelnut Lane, Springfield, OR 97487 Email: darlenekb1016®gmail.com EXHIBIT A w _ _ 1490 OV RVEE 153.54' _C J' \ \ \ IPO TAX ACRES =.16 ACRES = 6969.6 FT2 \ ME MAX BUILDING COVERAGE = 45% \ 45% X 6969.6 = 3136 FT2 l� CURRENT BUILDING COVERAGE = 2487 FT2 (INCLUDING COVERED PORCH + (E) SHED) 2487 FT2 / 6969.6 FT2 = 0.357 = 35.7% COVERAGE SITE PLAN 1" = 20,_0" /L PROPER BUILT DESIGN - BUILD K W � d Z� r F x Z Z Z zo SN 3w 0 a 0 0 Z x O a N C 01 h J D-' a Qo O� 01 _O 0 C O 0 [n m N ,rt N rt N C3)<V =C g 0 Lo V 0-< m 001 (nom ISSUE23 JUN 2022 DRAWN BY: GNP SCALE:As indicated SITE PLAN C101 (E) HOUSE alp of m \\ (E) DRIVEWAY \ SETBACK \ \ \ (E)CLEANOUT / \ POWER TRANSFORMER (E1 WEEPH(ILES —iii _EI (E) WATER METER /L PROPER BUILT DESIGN - BUILD K W � d Z� r F x Z Z Z zo SN 3w 0 a 0 0 Z x O a N C 01 h J D-' a Qo O� 01 _O 0 C O 0 [n m N ,rt N rt N C3)<V =C g 0 Lo V 0-< m 001 (nom ISSUE23 JUN 2022 DRAWN BY: GNP SCALE:As indicated SITE PLAN C101 EXHIBIT B Ed I' '}FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING va=r-o' A PROPER BUILT o�N. auao.. 3 � m o � o u O NOM Z a a m VN✓�M1W €6 aI .11 TEWT APP S EXISTING FLOOR PLANS A101