HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 1/17/2023AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 616/ MS Teams
Staff Review., Tuesday, January 31, 2023 A'00-9,•30 a.m.
1. Minor Variance 811-23-000006-TYP2 Casey Koontz
Assessor's Map: 18-02-06-14 TL: 14800
Address: 948 Hazelnut Ln.
Existing Use: residential
Applicant submitted request for variance to setbacks for addition to existing residence.
Planner: Andy Lim bird
Meeting: Tuesday, January 31, 2023 9:00 — 9:30 virtual meeting via Microsoft Teams
The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out
from the laserfiche website: htto://www.si)ringfield-or.gov/weblink8/browse.asi)x
SITE
VICINITY MAP
811-23-000006-TYP2 Minor Variance
18-02-06-14 TL 14800
948 Hazelnut Ln.
Casey Koontz
'iCity of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Minor Variance
SPRINGFIELD
I&
Required Project Information (Applicant.,
Applicant Name:
complete this section)
Phone: 5 1 - o. - 7- 6
Company: Y2opaz-
Fax:
Address:3Q�\o K1k'WQ- >,l G,.i� UNIT P� SYZirfGFlt-C,� 02L q-r47S
Applicant's Rep.:
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
Property Owner: xw ezT -6.GG5
Phone: 541-9iZ-63
Company:
Fax:
Address: `\`'ta 1kt 2'al.NJT \Ad -t
oe-- "T -E78
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18o-Lo6\'-1
TAX LOT NOS :
ti-tB,cbn9
Proper Address: See. owN�2- bPP9�5 �x�-E
A
it i
nVt— LOA
Size of Property: o- 16 Acres g Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal:
Existing Use:
Numeric Standard to be Adjusted (See SDC 5.21-125 A. for standards that may be adjusted):
5 . 21. 1-2-5 (A) C 1) 3+�L�ia6 S(cT tis
Percentage of Standard to be Adjusted: -7'/.
Si natures: Please sin and Urint your name and date in the appropriate
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.,
Associated Applications:
lications::
box on the next a e.
complete this section)
Si ns:
Case No.811-23-0*
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $)OlDoTechnical Fee:
v
ee: $Z03 Zw3
I Postage Fee:
TOTAL FEES: $ 3s)-5 -�-D
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 2/25/11 1 of 4
VIA
Signatures
The undersigned acknowledges that the Information in this application is correct and accurate.
Applicant:
—� Date: e; awy
atur
If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
Owner:
G@4tI� Date:
Signature
� t-. Bd.�C 5
Print
Revised 2/25/11 2 of
Minor Variance Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
❑ Submitted Concurrently with Site Plan Review or Land Division applications, where
applicable.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services
Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the
time of complete application submittal.
❑ Minor Variance Application Form
❑ Copy of the Deed
❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
❑ Narrative explaining the proposal and any additional information that may have a bearing
in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with
the Minor Variance Criteria described in SDC 5.21-125 D.
NOTE: Before the Director can approve a Minor Variance request, information submitted
by the applicant must adequately support the request. All of the Minor Variance Criteria
must be addressed by the applicant. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or
unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. In certain
circumstances, it is advisable to hire a professional planner or land use attorney to
prepare the required findings.
❑ Three (3) Copies of a Plot Plan including the following:
❑ If submitted concurrently with a Land Division or Site Plan Review application, eighteen
copies of the Land Division Tentative Plan or Site Plan sheet may be submitted in lieu
of the plot plan as long as it meets the following requirements.
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor if the minor variance involves a setback
❑ The scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100', north arrow, and date of
preparation
❑ The nature and extent of the minor variance requested and relevant site features
Revised 2/25/11 4 of 4
PROPER BUILT INC.
BOGGS ADDITION -
MINOR VARIANCE NARRATIVE
11 January 2073
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
OwcIDsaring eld-curgovv
Subject:BOGGS ADDITION — MINOR VARIANCE NARRATIVE
To Whom it may Concern,
/.\ PROPER BUILT
A4 DESIGN 4 BUILD
The owner, Darlene Boggs, of the subject property, 948 Hazelnut Lane, is proposing to build a 400 square feet living space addition
on the west side of the existing house. A structural permit - 811-22-001095-STR — has been issued and is currently active.
Excavation and formwork for the addition footprint has been completed and all measurements were taken based upon the existing
house foundation as the datum and the West side fence as the Plot's westemmost boundary line (Please see Exhibits A 8. B). A Footing
and Foundation inspection was performed on November 3p,2022. Upon Inspection, a discrepancy concerning the Public Utility
Easement (7'-0"), P.U.E., and the deck footing (below grade) was noted as a potential encroachment by city inspector, Duane Smith
and Proper Built Representative, Brad Anderson.
Concerned with the potential P.U.E encroachment, as well as the accuracy of the fence being located on the property line, Brad
scheduled a property line verification with the surveying company, EGR and associates. EGR performed a property line verification and
located the westemmost boundary pins which were located — 14" to the east of the existing fence, towards the existing house.
As the proposed deck was on the border of the P.U.E. prior to the property line verification, this would put it ^14" within the bounds of
the 7' easement. The deck, which was the initial point of concern, has been decided to be omitted from the design as the allowable
space would make it an unusable accessory element.
The subject of this narrative proposal is the proposed building addition footprint, and it's newly discovered encroachment into the 10'
rear building setback as a result of the property line verification survey. Please reference the Site plan completed by EGR and
associates, completed on January 3i° 2023, attached with this application.
The proposed addition footprint currently encroaches into the 10' rear setback not more than 9". We are requesting a minor variance
for this project for the following reasons:
AI A significant amount of resources, in terms of time and currency, would be expended should we have to build outside of
the setback as the structural forms would need to stripped reassembled, as well as the extended and costly process of
re -design which includes design, structural and truss engineering.
B) The requested dimensional variance - 9" or 7.5%- falls within the dimensional criteria listed for approval of a minor
variance - 36" or 30%
C) The owner, Darlene Boggs, would not have to sacrifice more living space than what she has already lost as a result of the
inaccuracy and confusion over fence and property line location.
3990 Kathryn Ave, Unit B - Springfield OR 97478 1 CCB 237697
The proposed addition complies with the criteria of Section 5.21.125 'Minor Variances — Criteria' in the Springfield Development Code,
as follows:
(D) The Director must approve the Minor Variance if the applicant demonstrates compliance with all of the applicable approval criteria:
(1) Lomtionol or dimensional problems have been identified that oan be resolved by a Minor Variance;
Response: The requested dimensional variance (9" of 120" rear setback = 7.5%) falls within the 30%
criteria allowed for a minor variance.
(2) The request is the minimum necessary to alleviate the identified dimensional or locational problem;
Response: The requested dimensional variance of 9" is the minimum necessary to alleviate the locational
problem of the proposed building footprint.
(3) Where applicable, the request shall result in the preservation of on-sife trees 5 -inch dba and above;
Response: Not applicable — No tree removal is requested with this application
(4) The request shall not impede adequate emergency access he the site;
Response: adequate emergency access will not be impeded as a result of this variance.
(5) The request shall not unreasonably adversely impact public or private easements; and
Response: The Public Utility Easement will not be affected as a result of this variance.
(6) This subsection is not applicable as the request does not involve nor request a parking reduction
Please contact me immediately if any additional information is required to process this request. Thank you for your time and
consideration of this matter.
Sincerely,
Casey Koontz
Owner / Designer
Proper Built Inc.
P 1541.505.9236
E I cosey@properbuilt.net
3990 Kathryn Ave, Unit B - Springfield OR 974781 CCB 237697
W
o
r�
e
, i
Zxo
OOM
1
:E
D
/
/I
<
X M
\o�O
w
o
Moz
{Om
i N
N
/
zo.
x�vacas,ol
w
O
m
A
Cd
Up
O
/
z
m / IoSB
/ �g9rk
1
-dHAO
%2'
w
A
o�
e
/
/I
/I
/
x�vacas,ol
-dHAO
%2'
w
A
SITE BOUNDARY
4 Y
---------------
]18'
r
5Vd'
13'4 15'tl 1 w
pw�
is 4
e
PROPOSED FLOOR PLAN
DFTAILNO
MV1
fJ�
BOGGS ADDITIONHazzaelnut°995
TAX MAF: 180206'4 TAX LOT: 14800
948 H elnut Lane,
Springfield, OR 97478
SCALE:
8' = 1'-0'
DRAWN BY:
CKK
PROPER BUILT
PROPER BUILT
3990 Kathryn Ave. Unit B - Springfield OR 97478 - 541.505.9236-
casey®properhuitt.net
CHECKED DY.
DATE:
REVISION:
CKK
01/11/23
3
DESIGN+BUILD
SITE INFORMATION
TAX MAP:
18020614 - 14800
ZONE:
L - Low Density Residential
MAP ACRES:
0.16 acres
OWNER INFORMATION
Darlene Boggs
948 Hazelnut Lane,
Springfield, OR 97487
Email: darlenekb1016®gmail.com
EXHIBIT A
w _ _ 1490 OV RVEE
153.54' _C
J'
\ \ \ IPO
TAX ACRES =.16 ACRES = 6969.6 FT2 \ ME
MAX BUILDING COVERAGE = 45% \
45% X 6969.6 = 3136 FT2
l�
CURRENT BUILDING COVERAGE = 2487 FT2
(INCLUDING COVERED PORCH + (E) SHED)
2487 FT2 / 6969.6 FT2 = 0.357 = 35.7% COVERAGE
SITE PLAN
1" = 20,_0"
/L
PROPER BUILT
DESIGN - BUILD
K
W
� d
Z� r
F x
Z
Z Z
zo
SN
3w
0
a
0
0
Z x
O a
N
C 01
h J D-' a
Qo O�
01 _O
0 C O 0
[n m N
,rt N
rt N C3)<V =C g
0 Lo V 0-<
m 001 (nom
ISSUE23 JUN 2022
DRAWN BY: GNP
SCALE:As indicated
SITE PLAN
C101
(E) HOUSE
alp
of
m
\\
(E) DRIVEWAY
\
SETBACK
\ \
\
(E)CLEANOUT
/ \
POWER TRANSFORMER
(E1 WEEPH(ILES —iii
_EI
(E) WATER METER
/L
PROPER BUILT
DESIGN - BUILD
K
W
� d
Z� r
F x
Z
Z Z
zo
SN
3w
0
a
0
0
Z x
O a
N
C 01
h J D-' a
Qo O�
01 _O
0 C O 0
[n m N
,rt N
rt N C3)<V =C g
0 Lo V 0-<
m 001 (nom
ISSUE23 JUN 2022
DRAWN BY: GNP
SCALE:As indicated
SITE PLAN
C101
EXHIBIT B
Ed
I' '}FLOOR PLAN - EXISTING
va=r-o'
A
PROPER BUILT
o�N. auao..
3
� m o
� o u
O NOM
Z a a
m VN✓�M1W
€6
aI
.11
TEWT APP S
EXISTING
FLOOR PLANS
A101