Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application APPLICANT 12/29/2022
City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Pian Partition, Subdivision ISPNIN(pFi� Application Type (Applicant; check one) Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: Partition Tentative Submittal:X❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant; complete this section) Applicant Name: BETTY KOEHLER lPhone: 541-968-3686 Company: Fax: Address: 4025 CAMELLIA ST, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 Applicant's Rep.: MARVIN KRUSH Phone: 541-686-9211 Company: KRUSH AND ASSOCIATES Fax: Address: 115 W 8TH AVE, SUITE 240, EUGENE, OR 97401 Propertil Owner: BETTY KOEHLER Phone: 541-968-3686 Company: Fax; Address: 4025 CAMELLIA ST, SPRINGFIELD, OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-33-11 TAX LOT NOS : 600 Property Address: 835 ANDERSON LN, SPRINGFIELD Size of Property: 19,815 Acres ❑ Square Feet 191 Proposed Name of Subdivision: N/A Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: CREATE THREE PARCEL PARTITION. RETAIN EXISTING DWELLING ON PARCEL 2 Existing Use: RURAL RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE DWELLING Total acreage of parcels # of Lots/Parcels: 3 allowable densit :19,81 6 min -14 max Proposed # Dwell units 3 Si natures: Please si nand Drint vour name and date in the Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. Associated Applications: ro riate box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: $11-zz^ooulc4%— Pre -Sub Case No.: �J Ip `'L°6`2u22 Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: '5) f -2fZ-- 0002-779 1 Date: 11)La Reviewed by: Q Application Fee: 6335• 0-0 Technical Fee: 316�i� 1 Postage Fee: 2,03M TOTAL FEES: (o Z 5"f.7S- PROJECT NUMBER:uI`'r%I-� q ' Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, 1 affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application Is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Date: 28 DECEMBER 2022 Signatu BETTY KOEHLER Print Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ® Land Division Tentative Application Form ❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. X❑ Copy of the Deed ® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑O Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2'x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. ® Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. ❑ Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. ® Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: ® All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. XJ All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions X1 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 JK] Vicinity Map ® The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. ® The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ® The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision X❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ® Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4'/3 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings Q Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan XI Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor Q City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division X❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division © Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ® Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination ® Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. © Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities ® Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways ❑ Location of existing and proposed transit facilities 0 Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails 0 Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 kl 5 of 10 ® Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points X❑ The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated ❑ Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan © Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ® Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ® Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ® Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns ® The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained © Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ® Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑ Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement ❑ Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present Q Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 117114 ki 6 of 10 ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer ❑ All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 • SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH ST REET s OEEGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 6.375353 FAX: 547.7267261.1027 www sphngbeld-orgov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK -- (Area below this fine filled oul byApplican0------------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springoeld Development and Public Works, -Far: # 736-1021, Phone # 7364036), email: emeeachern@spring ?eld-or.gov Project Name: Partition 835 Anderson Lane Applicant: Scott Goebel – Goebel Engineering Assessors Parcel #: Map 17-03-33 11 Lot 4600 Date: 1 December 2022 Land Use(s): Residential Phone #: 541-687-0542 Project Size (Acres): 19815 square feet Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: 9,654 square feet Email: scoff@goebeleng.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Development of existing tract of land with a single dwelling to a three -parcel residential partition. Existing dwelling to remain. Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: On-site runoff to stormwater treatment soakage trench system for each parcel. Existing improvements on Parcel 2 to remain. Public improvements within -right-of-way runoff to public treatment soakage trench located between sidewalk and right-of-way. Proposed StorrawaterBest Management Practices: Stormwater soakage trench ----- — (Area bet" this line filled out by the CiN and Returned theAatdicaml (At a minimum, all bares checked by the City on the front and back ofthis sheet shall be submitted or an application to be complete for submittal, although other requirements mayhe necessary Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ® Small Site Study – (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study – (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ® Wellhead Zone: 2 year time oftravel-(Sports Way) ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ® Soil Type: 425 -Chapman Urban Land Complex E] Other Jurisdictions Downstream Analysis: ® N/A [] Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmoeachern@spring(eld-o ,gov, FAX: (541) 736.1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS Fm Official Use ONy: * Based upon the information provided on the front ofolds sheet, the following represents a minimum ofwhat is needed for an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofthe Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval, Additional site specific information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submia4 ensure completedfaror has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Standards[Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A 7 E] ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stone event and overflow effects of 25 -year storm event. media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50%of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. teview of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) vegetated methods. 0 0 Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). in Chapter 2 ofthe Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. ❑ n For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified Design of Sturm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). by the Eugene Stormwatcr Management Manual (See2.4.1). ❑ lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. Ifa stormwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or bottom slope, and seed mix consisted with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall U U Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. ❑ 7 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stone event and overflow effects of 25 -year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. teview of Downstream System (EDSPM Section 4.03.4.C) ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Sturm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). QFlow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load without failure of the pipe structure. E] L] Maraing's'W' values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-I of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 pipe full based on Table 4-1 as well. )ther/Miseellaneous E] Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: huy://www.dea.state.or.m/wo/uic/uie.htm for more information. F1 ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit mnoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside thefmnt cover, of the stormwererstudy. • IMPORTANT.• ENGINEER PLEASE READ RELOWAND SIGNI As the engineer of record, 1 hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted story water study and plan set. Signature Scott Goebel, P.E.. P.L.S. Date 14 Dec 2022 Form Version 5: June 2015 0�2. a3mm a � ar �o wK w 0�2. a3mm a �o wK w HWO 3T .VNV7 N03930NV S 0�2. a3mm a