HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/23/2022;City of Springfield
Development & Public Warks
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
SPRINOFI Q
lJj
Application Type (Applicant; check one)
Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑
Site Plan Review Submittal: x❑ Major Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Brett Yancey Phone: (541)747-3331
Company: Springfield School District 19
Email• brett.yancey@springfeld.
Address: 640 A Street, Springfield OR 97477
Applicant's Rep.: Eric Favreau
Phone: (541) 556-4425
Company: Favreau Engineering
Email: favreaueng@gmail.com
Address' 2206 Country Haven Dr, Eugene OR 97408
Property Owner: Spnngfeld School District 19
Phone: (541) 747-3331
Company:
Email:
Address: 640 A Street, Springfield OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17'03-35-11
TAX LOT NOS : 3400
Property Address: 1064OSt
Size of Property: 20.04 Acres ZSquare Feet ❑
Proposed No. of
v„ p;� o; r 0
Proposed Name of Project Springfield High School Softball Facility
Description of If ycu are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Installation of team facility for Springfield High School Softball team
Existing Use: Softball fields (zoned PL)
New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 4,712 sf
Si natures: Please sitin and print your name and date in the aDDroDriate
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.,
Associated Applications:
box on the next Q.QOF.
complete this section)
Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Postage Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11
12.or.us
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date:
Signature
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the Information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a
complete application.
Date: 3 L
4S,g,u,e
Revised 1/7/14 KL 2 of 11
Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal
• The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
• Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre -
submittal meeting.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
• The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
• A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
• Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
• ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre -submittal and submittal stages.
❑ Site Plan Review Application Form
❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property
(acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed.
❑ Copy of the Deed
❑ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to S•/z"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
❑ state or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an
application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy
of the application upon request.
❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet
❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal:
❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
❑ All plan sets must be folded to 81/2° by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
Please Note:
• These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to
determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not
necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents.
• The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use
criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine
the feasibility of a proposed plan.
Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in
contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Vicinity Map
❑ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be
shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock
outcroppings
b. Site Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon
licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown.
❑ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public
rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections
❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces
❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation
❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
❑ Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile)
Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11
❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
❑ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence
addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the
logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to,
sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must
clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan
application and which are deferred to future review procedures.
c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
❑ Location and width of all existing easements
❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development,
including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof
drainage.
❑ Location and type of existing street lighting -
❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar
public facilities
❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary
sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone,
and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate
to the complexity of the proposed project.
❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage
patterns.
d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan
❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below
❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components
❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development
❑ Location and width of all proposed easements
❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting
❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed
surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10
percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines
Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11
e. Landscape Plan
❑ Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional
approved by the Director
❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage
❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
❑ Location of existing and proposed street trees
f. Architectural Plans
❑ Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed
structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be
shown
g. On -Site Lighting Plan
❑ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until
Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal:
❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing
❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting
plan shall be provided.
❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above
ground utilities.
❑ Photometric test report for each light source.
❑ An applicant may submit conceptual Floor plans in order to have staff address
Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts
Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director:
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify
potential traffic impacts from proposed development andneeded mitigation
measures.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11
❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or
a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer
❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives
❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to
scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses,
the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information
necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards.
❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100 -
❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any
required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request
❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified
In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but
within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
ReAis d 1/7/14 KL 8 of 11
REET
SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH ST
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541726.3753
FAX 541.736.1021
wwwspnngieldorgov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released atrial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
l.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton
McEachem.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Sto irwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.soringfield-
or.eov/DPW/EngineeringandConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachern, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email- cmceachem@springfield-or.gov -
Phone: (541) 736 —1036
Fax: (541) 736 — 1021
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD
b. 225 FIFTH STREET
OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 9747753
PHONE. 541.726.3753
FAX: 54172eld-or
www. springleld-or. gov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
--------- (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) --------
(Please return to Clayton McEachern @ Cut of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036),
email: emceachmm@sp'ingfield-or. gov
Project Name:
Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #:
Date:
Land Use(s):
Phone #:
Project Size (Acres):
Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area:
Email:
Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices:
-------------- (Area below this line filled out by die City and Returned to the Applicant) -------
(At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet shall be submitted
or an a lication to be com lete or submittal, although other requirements may be necessa
Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2)' (Note, UH maybe substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email; cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS o o eial use only:
* Based upon the information provided on lhefront ofthis sheet the following represents a mimmoin ofwhat is neededfor an
application to be comphaefe subniha l with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofthe Spring/ield
Development Code (SDQ at the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval: Additional site specific information may be required. Note. Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completed form has been
signed in the space provided below:
Interim Design Standards/Water Quality EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
All non -building rooflop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for Stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of50%ofthe NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
❑ F1 Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 ofthe Eugene Stormwater Management Manual.
❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.t).
Ifa smarwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual.
F Water Qual ity calculations ae, required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside ofthe building, shall
❑
❑
Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
A complete drainage study, a, required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including ahydrological study map.
Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event.
❑
❑
The time of concentration (Te) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
Review of Downstream System EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0
❑
❑
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
Elevations ofthe HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain covcrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,00016 load
without failure ofthe pipe strucbrre.
Manning's "n' values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 ofthe EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet Der second at 0.5 otoo full based on Table 4-1 as well.
F1 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
Private stormwater casements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private Stormwater flows from one property to
another.
Drywells shall not receive runoff From any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs(EDSP Section 3.03A.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEC. Refer to
the website: http://www.dog.state.or.us/wq/uiciiiic.htm for more information.
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rales for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stor»nvater study.
* IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAND SIGN.r
As the engineer ofrecord, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
SPRINGFIELD
1&0
Project Name: Springfield High School Softball Facilitiy
Project Proposal: Installation of team facility for Springfield High School Softball team
Case Number: 611 -22 -000236 -PRE
Project Address: 1064 G Street, Springfield, OR 97476
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-35-11; TL 3400
Zoning: Public Land Open Space (PLO)
Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP)
Applicable Refinement Plan:
Refinement Plan Designation:
Metro Plan Designation: Parks Open Space
Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: November 15, 2022
Application Submittal Deadline: May 14, 2023
Associated Applications: 811 -22 -000166 -PRE- DIM
POSITION
REVIEW OF
NAME
Project Planner
Land Use Planning
Haley Campbell
Transportation Planning
Transportation
Michael Liebler
Public Works
Utilities: Sanitary & Storm Sewer
Clayton Mceachern
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire and Life Safety
Gilbert Gordon
Building Official
Building Code
Chris Carpenter
Brett Yancey
Springfield School District 19
640 A Street
Revised 10/25/07
Eric Favreau
Favreau Engineering
2206 Country Haven Or
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application fee (confirm prior to submittal):
Impervious Area: 5,000 sf
Tentative Review Fee: $5,966.45
Final Site Plan Fee:
SRS PLAN RENEW: (1 rami
AppllrwllenC rnplelaneea Clad M*"
CBF: 4419
WA
WA
Requlre4 prlc'M..l ni IMBBO Plan
BGE: U79
WA
NIA
II and SIM Plan Review
MCEIRcatlon - Malar applications.
Slee Plan Roviow
Typal
cry E rGE:
Type x
S00 aq. R or leas inpsrrloua nA.
$1,616
SEEN
$204
>SOO and! '10.000Sq. B impervious $.loge
55,409
U74A5
5304
I G." Sq. R or gre inperim, surface
$5,409•%$11000 eq. R.
6%
5404
Final SBM Plan Equlvalnrq
CIM 6 rGB: K11191
"".lis
NIA
Type I
FIIMI SIM Plan RaWawlBevalopmant
Sae SII luwd..
»»
»>
Type l- Flml sin plan and devaiopment
Agreement
agroomant fna le 19%n1 the Pam elan
Plan foo (a..I. o of PosMgoi A 6%
Te rrdoBy Fee Mil applied vrI
I ad grooll.Md
o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81/2"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
❑ ® 1 6 1/2"x 11"Copy of Site Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
❑ M 2 Deed and Preliminary Title Report
o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property,
and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be
taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future
expansion plans, if known.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
❑ ® 3 Brief Narrative
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑
® ❑
Revised 10/25/07
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
Vicinity Map
❑ ® 4
The name, location and dimensions of all
existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly
indicating what is remaining and what is being
removed. For existing structures to remain, also
indicate present use, size, setbacks from
property lines, and distance between buildings
❑ ❑ n/a
The name, location, dimensions, direction of
flow and top of bank of all watercourses and
required riparian setback that are shown on the
Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file
in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ ❑ n/a
The 100 -year floodplain and floodway
boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or
FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or
Letter of Map Revision
® ❑
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC
3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development
& Public Works Department
❑ ❑ n/a
Physical features including, but not limited to
trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured
4 '/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than
five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with
mix of trees species noted), riparian areas,
wetlands and rock outcroppings
o Proposed Site Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
® ❑
Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size
(gross floor area applicable to the parking
requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks
from property lines, and distance between
buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared
by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum
setbacks are shown
❑ n/a
Location and height of existing or proposed
fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash
receptacles, and signs
❑ n/a
Location, dimensions, and number of typical,
compact and ADA parking spaces; including
aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and
striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way
shall be designated including at grade
connections
Revised 10/25/07
®
❑
See Planning
Dimensions of the development area, as well as
Note(s)
area and percentage of the site proposed for
❑
❑
buildings, structures, parking and vehicular
o Existing Improvements
and Public Utilities
Complete
areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious
See Planning
surfaces
❑
❑
n/a
Observance of solar access requirements as
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
specified in the applicable zoning district
❑
❑
n/a
On-site loading areas and vehicular and
n/a
Location and width of all existing easements
❑
pedestrian circulation
❑
❑
n/a
Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be
names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications,
served, including the location and dimensions of
or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the
existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts
proposed development, including jurisdictional
proposed to be closed
❑
❑
n/a
Location, type, and number of bicycle parking
for roof drainage
spaces
❑
❑
n/a
Note location of existing and planned Lane
n/a
Location of existing and required traffic control
Transit District facilities (within '/2 mile)
❑
❑
n/a
Area and dimensions of all property to be
conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common
open spaces, recreational areas, and other
similar public and semi-public uses
o Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and
sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the
Site Plan application being submitted.
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
N/A
Note(s)
❑
❑
Phased Development Plan
o Existing Improvements
and Public Utilities
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
®
❑
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
❑
❑
n/a
Location and width of all existing easements
❑
®
5
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and
names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications,
or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the
proposed development, including jurisdictional
status other than City. Indicate connection points
for roof drainage
❑
n/a
Location and type of existing street lighting
n/a
Location of existing and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
Revised 10/25/07
o Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer,
except where noted
❑
❑
neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow
❑
❑
preventers and similar public facilities
®
❑
Location, width, and construction material of all
❑
❑
existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and trails
®
❑
Location and size of existing utilities on and
adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail
must be proportionate to the complexity of the
proposed project
®
❑
Show existing and proposed spot elevations or
contours, and direction of drainage patterns
o Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer,
except where noted
❑
❑
n/a
❑
❑
n/a
❑
❑
n/a
❑
❑
n/a
o Landscape Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
®
❑
❑
❑ n/a
❑
❑ n/a
❑
❑ n/a
Revised 10/25/07
The approximate size and location of storm water
management systems components
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and
names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the
proposed development
Location and width of all proposed easements
Location and type of proposed street lighting
Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be
prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be
drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land
with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with
5 foot contour interval lines
Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or
other Landscape Professional approved by the
Director
Location and dimensions of landscaping and open
space areas to include calculation of landscape
coverage
Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
Location and type of street trees
o Architectural Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
o On -Site Lighting Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
❑ ❑ n/a
❑ ❑ n/a
❑ ❑ n/a
Planning Notes:
Where abutting residentially zoned properties,
exterior elevations of all proposed structures over
140 square feet for the development site,
including height, shall be shown
Location, orientation, and maximum height of
exterior light fixtures, both free standing and
attached
Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off
angles and type of illumination, wattage, and
luminous area
Photometric test report for each light source
The submittal is missing a copy of the Site Plan reduced to 8.5x11.
A deed must be submitted with the application.
Please address all of the standards in SDC 5.17.125.
For the existing structures, please indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines,
and distance between buildings.
Please provide the location, width, and names of existing streets, alleys, dedications, or
other rights-of-way within and adjacent to the proposed development.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
• Most information is present in various places. Please follow the Site Plan checklist and
provide the necessary information on the required plans. It's ok to state that some
standards are not applicable but we still need the information on the plans for efficiancy in
review and site inspections.
• Once the site plan receives tentative approval, you have 90 days to submit the final site
plan application.
Revised 10/25/07
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR
APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE -
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Revised 10/25/07
Applicable
❑
M
Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional
materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
❑
®
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses
(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct
tributaries of WQLW
❑
®
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted
concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table
present
®
❑
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address
the additional standards of the overlay district
❑
M
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100
❑
®
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
on the property
❑
®
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
M
❑
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted prior to development
❑
M
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified
in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100
❑
M
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the
City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 22 -238 -PRE
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete
See PW
Note(s)
®
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
® 0
Vicinity Map
®
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between
buildings
❑
n/a The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
❑ 0
n/a The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
®
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings
®
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
Revised 10/25/07
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following
information:
❑
Complete Incomplete See PW
❑
Note(s)
0 F1Prepared
by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
® ❑
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements
® ❑
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
® Q
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
o Grading and Paving Plan
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
®
❑
®
❑
®
❑
0 0
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
® ❑ Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
Revised 10/25/07
PW Notes:
1.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
COMPLETENESS CHECKLIST
Transportation Engineer/ Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#: 21-000236
Applicant: Springfield School District
TRANSPORTATION
o Right -of -Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ NA Copy of ROW Approach Permit
Application
o Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ NA Traffic Impact Study
o Site Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to
be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb
cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Revised 10/25/07
Note(s)
❑
®
Location and type of existing and
proposed street lighting
®
❑
Location, width, and construction material
of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways,
and trails
®
❑ NA
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-
way) and names of all existing and
Revised 10/25/07
proposed streets, alleys, dedications,
access easements or other right-of-ways
within or adjacent to the proposed
development, including ownership and
maintenance status, if applicable
❑ ® Location of existing and required traffic
control devices
Transportation Notes;
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application;
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Deputy Fire Marshal: Gilbert Gordon Case #: 22 -000238 -PRE
FIRE
o Site Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
® ❑ On-site vehicular circulation
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
® Location of existing and required fire hydrants and
similar public facilities
Fire Notes:
1.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
Need fire apparatus access road from 121h/I Streets to the proposed building site. The
access road will be required to have a minimum 20 foot clear width (2019 Springfield
Fire Code 503.2.1) with an all-weather surface capable of supporting an 60,000 Ib. load
(SFC 503.2.3 and SFC Appendix D102.1). "No Parking Fire Lane" signs shall be posted
on both sides of the fire apparatus access road (SFC 503.3 and SFC Appendix D103.6).
The building will be required to be sprinklered meeting the requirements of NFPA 13 due
to the required fire flow exceeding 3,600 gpm based on the proposed 4,712 sq. ft.
building of Type V -B construction per SFC Appendix B, Table B105.1(2) and the distance
from the furthest point on the building exceeding 400 feet along an approved route to
the new proposed fire hydrant on the corner of 121h and I Streets per SFC 507.5.1 for a
non-sprinklered commercial building.
Revised 9/24/07
THIS APPLICATION IS:
❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
® INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
City Planner Date
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4-
105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.176 require the City take final action on a limited land
use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day
processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or
when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either
signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the
date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing
information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information
will be submitted, then you have 160 days from the date the application was submitted for
Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to
submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and
processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 -
day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after
the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the
120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the
120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if
the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is
sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects
the application proposal and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the 180 -day timeline.
Owner/Applicant's Signature Date
Revised 10/25/07
FaMPeaU Engineering
Cou
Haven Dr
FURS U ZZO6Euge eOR 97408
(5411 556,4425
December 21, 2022
FINAL SITE PLAN REVIEW NARRATIVE
Applicant: Springfield Public Schools
Applicants Representative: Favreau Engineering, LLC
2206 Country Haven Or
Eugene, OR 97408
541-556-4425
favreaueng@gmaii.com
Assessor's Map: 17-03-35-11 Tax Lot: 03400
LAND USE REQUEST
The applicant is seeking approval of a new hitting and team facility located at the Springfield High School
softball field.
SITE AND SURROUNDING CHARACTERISTICS
The subject site is currently utilized as softball fields and is located on the Two Rivers Elementary School
property. The subject site is zoned Public Land and Open Space. Because the properties to the north and
south of the subject property are zoned residential, a Site Plan Review is required.
SITE PLAN APPROVAL
The applicant is seeking an approval of the construction of a new hitting and team facility plus required
utility connections. Since the proposed facility is just to be utilized by the softball teams during the
season, it will not generate any additional traffic and therefore will not trigger any additional parking
needs. The facility will be ADA compliant and will include an accessible route to the building.
The application also includes the installation of a public fire hydrant along the access road to the east of
the proposed building. There is an existing gate near the proposed hydrant that will be utilized for
emergency vehicle access. The building has been located so that the entire building is within 400' of the
proposed hydrant, measured as the Fire Department's hoses are laid. Therefore the building is not
required to have sprinklers.
The proposed development is compatible with the surrounding developments.
There will be no hazardous materials stored on site as a part of this construction.
SITE DRAINAGE
The proposed building will discharge roof runoff to splash blocks that will drain into the existing
vegetation on the north side of the building. There is approximately 360' of vegetation between the
proposed building and residential development to the north, so there is more than sufficient space for
runoff to be treated. The site does not currently experience drainage issues.
Page 1 of 2
F&R E U 2206 uge eryHaven Dr
R 47408
(5411 556,4425
APPROVAL STANDARDS (SDC 5.17.125)
(A) (1) The proposed land use is a permitted use within the Public Land and Open Space land use
district and therefore satisfies this criteria.
(2) A discretionary use is not required for this proposed land use. Therefore, this criteria does
not apply.
(3) The proposal complies with the standards of Public Land and Open Space land use district
and therefore satisfies this criteria.
(4) The proposal is not in conflict with any approved master plan, master facilities plan,
refinement plan, and/or special planned district. Therefore, this criteria is satisfied.
(5) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.2, Infrastructure Standards —
Transportation. As noted by staff, no public improvements are required as part of this
development. All private improvements are designed in accordance with applicable standards.
Therefore, this criteria is satisfied.
(6) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.3, Infrastructure Standards —
Utilities. As noted by staff, no public improvements are required as part of this development. All
private utilities are designed in accordance with applicable standards. Therefore, this criteria is
satisfied.
(7) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.4, Landscaping, Screening, and
Fence Standards. As noted by staff, no additional landscaping, screening, or fencing is required
as part of this proposal. Therefore, this criteria is satisfied.
(8) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.5, On -Site Lighting Standards. As
noted by staff, no additional on-site lighting is required as part of this proposal. Therefore, this
criteria is satisfied.
(9) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.6, Motor Vehicle Parking,
Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards. As noted by staff, no additional motor vehicle parking,
loading, or bicycle parking is required as part of this proposal. Therefore, this criteria is satisfied.
(10) The proposal complies with the applicable sections of SDC 4.7, Specific Development
Standards. Specifically, the standards of SDC 4.7.203 Public land and Open Space do not apply as
the proposal is an ancillary building to an existing softball field. It is not a traffic generator, cause
for additional access, it is not a major noise generator, community park, RV park or campground,
private/public elementary or middle school, wellness center, or public building and therefore
does not trigger any of the additional requirements listed in this criterion. As noted by staff, no
additional landscaping, screening, or additional fencing is required as part of this proposal.
Therefore, this criteria is satisfied.
(11) The criteria of SDC 4.8, Temporary Use Standards do not apply as this is a permanent
structure for an existing softball facility.
Page 2 of 2