HomeMy WebLinkAboutMiscellaneous Correspondence 1992-03-03SPRI' FIELO
DEVELOPMENTSEFY/CES
PUAUC WORKS
M ETR O POLITAN WA ST EWAT ER M A N AG E M ENT
March 3, l99Z
Mr. SchIey L_v-nch2400 c. streEtSpringfield, OR g7 4].7
Subject: plan reviewrenovation/repai r at
Dear Mr. Lynch:
hte are unable toprcposed buildingthe plans.
buildingStreet, Spfd.
of proposed
955 s. 28th
r talked to your son by telephone approxirnately two weeks aqoreoardins rhis-rnarter,-=*pi;i;i;; ;;Ii"'.i= plans sub:_uirred rl*.,the apprication aIe f or tf,e originri-rrilciing design :.n tg7 4.The plans do not inoi"it""ur.,y_proposed repai rs or ienoration tothe structure. _Another set it'nrln=-rru" i"f t at-o;l..r"ceptiondesk sometime af te. ah; .iigirui- -noiilution !,,as made, however:: i:"ili:r:."on, of rhe orisinar-;i;;;."onrainins no cornmenrs
r spoke briefly with your gngineer, who indicated that he hadprovided you with revised dr;*i;;i'rt,orling t!" prcposed repai rsto be made to the.buirding. we would appieciate ,!."iving twocopies of the revi sed orariingr-u;-;;;"":. pcssible in orcer roa1lorn'us Eo r'roceeci with the reguired pran review.
SincereJ_y,
proceed with therenovation due
Representative
.:tYi"'-9f plans for yourco rnsufficient inforiration
#ry^*
Donal d I'1oo re
Cc;':struction
L/c: ! e
Joe
D'T
Puent, Building OfficialLeahy, City AttorneyHill Engineering Co., 29333 Siesta I:-o Frra r\D, _r). ui\
91 402_9 099