The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 11/29/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 1 SPNINDFIELD Required Project Information .. Prospective Joe Karcher: joe@teamjck.com Applicant Name: Roch Belisle: rockconstruction mail.com Phone: 503-568-4043 Company; JCK Birdz LLC Fax: Address: 875 Country Club Road, Eugene, OR 97401 Prospective Cam Fultz, cam@cba-arch.com A .: Applicant's Re Office: 206-782-2911 Phone: Cam: 509-312-0134 Company: CB Anderson Architect Fax: 206-782-5624 Address: 7209 Greenwood Ave N, Seattle WA 98103 Property Owner: Joe Karcher: joe@teamjck.com Phone: 541-342-6557 Company: JCK Enterprises LLC Fax: Address: 875 Country Club Road, Eugene, OR ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032531 Springfield TAX LOT NOS : 17032531-02700.-02800,-03100 Property Address: 1570 Mohawk Blvd, 97477 Size of Property: 0.74 acres Acres x❑ Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Re -develop site into food establishment with a drive-through Existing Use: Retail, office building with a drive-through (bank) # of Lots Parcels: - Av . Lot/Parcel Size: - sr Densit : - du/acre Prospective Applicant: Signatu e // Print Required Project Information (City Intake Case No.: Date: Date: Staff., complete this section) Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 10 1 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may charge over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑ Development Issues Meeting Application Form ❑ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ❑ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" ❑ Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ❑ North arrow ❑ Date of preparation ❑ Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ❑ Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 CB ANDERSON ARCHITECT Date: Nov 22, 2022 To: Shannon Morris City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 smorris®springfield-or.gov 541744.3 387 Re: DIM QUESTIONS: Site Address: 1570 Mohawk Blvd, 97477 - TENANT IMPROVMENT A BRIEF NARRATIVE OF THE PROJECT A tenant improvement of an existing structure used as a bank and other commercial offices with a drive-through. The tenant improvement would change to a restaurant use. The square footage would be reduced to comply with existing parking quantity. The reduction is easily achieved by removing mezzanine use. The current bank teller window use would be pick up only for people who have already ordered ahead on-line. No exterior work is planned. BACKGROUND We have a final site plan approval for a redevelopment. However, a drive-through is not the primary building type that Dave's Hot Chicken (DHC) does. With the recent opening of the Eugene location and additional input from corporate regarding this growing brand. It is likely not feasible to pursue a redevelopment. 5 QUESTIONS 1. For this tenant improvement, can the existing driveway out on Mohawk at the south end remain since no changes are occurring? Are there code triggers that can cause sitework to happen even when no site work is proposed? 2. For this tenant improvement, do we have to provide vegetative stormwater treatment even if we are not changing the parking lot? If no, can we update any landscaping? Alternatively, can we voluntarily provide areas vegetative storm water treatment without triggering any other site requirements? In other words, what can we volunteer to do with the current layout (not changing non-compliant setbacks) to help the city with their critical few items without triggering a landslide of other things? 3. For this tenant improvement, do we still need to replace the existing fire hydrant at the northeast corner that is on an undersized main? 4. For this tenant improvement, do we still need to add street trees or do the public art? 208782-2911 7209 Greenwood Ave N F: 208.782-%24 8eanle WA 98103 Development Issues Meeting 1570 Mohawk Blvd Date: Nov 22 2022 5. We want to reuse this building as -is without major modifications, structural upgrades, sprinkler adds, or building envelope upgrades. Our goal is to limit development to within the space's existing envelope. 7o what extent can we relocate existing windows and doors before they need to be preplaced with new meeting current energy standards? Are there any problems with adding windows the fa4ade facing Center Street? (We know that city design standards prefer this, and it doesn't hurt to have more visibility into the dining room, but it is not necessary.) Similarly, there used to be a garage door at the north east corner of the building. Is there a code problem if this were to become a sectional, glazed storefront open to dining? Page 2 of 2