HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 10/6/2022�[City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Final Site Plan Review
SPnINGl1�
Application
Site Plan: ❑
Minor Site Plan Modification:
Required Project Information
Applicant Name: /j&.— 81; Klr
Ma'or Site Plan Modification:El
(Applicant., complete this section)
7phone:SL/1'6S3•l9YJ�
Company: ,t }wc Na<K LLC
Fax:
Address: 3&57 Idsr rnnc
fr J- 47 Y7 8
Applicant's Rep.:
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
PropertyOwrl Forty } o u
Uc-
Phone: l -6S -l948
Com any:
Fax:
Address: 364571 AlJeA 0laAel,il
r(e 10 O 7Y73
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-0]-50- oo
TAX LOT NOS : 1911
Property Address: le Z o y,2k.4
Size of Property: avre,
Acres ® S uare Feet ❑
Proposed Name of Project:
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal:
Existing Use:
Tentative Case #:
Si q natures: Please si nand rint .our name and date in thea ro riate box on the next nang.1
Required Project Information (CltY xntake staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications:
Case No.: LZ'c�D�1Z3--[ 1
Date: �O
b M-
Reviewed b :-c�
Application Fee: $ - 6 b
Technical Fee: $ , be JPostage Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES: 6 . 2
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 4
Signature
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. I affirm that the information identified by the
City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not
otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a
complete applicati
Date:
Sign ire
Print
Revised 1/1/013 Molly Markarian 2 of 4
City of Springfield 10/6/2022
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield OR 97477
Re: Minor Site Plan Modification
Case Number 811 -22 -000123 -Type 1
This letter is to satisfy the requirement that the applicant address each condition of the approval and to
detail the actions taken for the above case.
The summary of conditions of approval:
1. The applicant must revise the Minor Modification Site Plan to reflect the existing sidewalk on the
north side of building "D" and show at a minimum, 24 parking spaces approved in the Final Site Plan,
including one space between building "B" and "C" and one ADA/van accessible parking space at stall 9.
2. In accordance with SDC 4.6-120(C), the applicant must move the wheel bumpers of each parking stall
back 2 feet from any abutting sidewalk, driveway, landscaped area or structure.
3. To be in compliance with the Final Site Plan approval and retain good neighbor relations, the applicant
must remove the wheel bumpers on the eastern side of building "A" and install bollards to discourage
parking at this location.
4. In accordance with SDC 3.3-240, Springfield standard wellhead protection signs that include the
operator emergency contact number will be posed in visible locations at each building, adjacent to the
stormwater swale, and at the trash enclosure. The applicant is also advised to contact Amy Chinitz
Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator with the Springfield Utility Board at (541) 744-3475 if
there are any further questions regarding the Drinking Water Protection Permit for the site or other
related matters.
Actions taken:
1. The applicant is submitting a site plan showing the location of the sidewalk on the northside of
building "D", 24 parking spaces including the removal of one space between building "B" and "C",
creating one ADA/van accessible parking space.
The ADA/van accessible parking space has been painted and signs installed as per code
2. The applicant has relocated the wheel bumpers at each stall in accordance with code
3. The applicant has removed the wheel bumpers from the east side of building "A" and installed
bollards. Although we have met this requirement, we would note our disagreement with the comment
in the conditions stating this is part of retaining "good neighbor relations".
We are being asked to abandon parking in an area that has no impact on our neighbor's use of their
property. We acknowledge that this neighbor has an easement for ingress and egress over our
property, limited to an area of 72'x45' but the parking stalls you are requiring us to remove in no way
encumber their access. In the pictures provided by this neighbor in response to our application,
(Crowbar Properties) you can see that their own vehicle is parked in a space adjacent to our property
and that vehicle sticks out at least ten feet further than any car that may be parked at our building, and
they park their car there almost daily (we have numerous pictures to support this). Clearly these spots
are not encumbering them or their easement in anyway,
We have continually strived to be good neighbors with that neighbor, even while they have filed
numerous complaints against us with the city. Those complaints commenced as soon as we started our
construction process, and they continue to this day. Building officials, planning officials and engineering
officials have all made numerous visits to our property in response to those complaints and none of
them have been found to have any merit (a search of city records will validate this).
At the same time that they have complained, they have acted in ways that are incongruent with a "good
neighbor policy" including:
*Confronting and harassing several of our tenants
*Forcing at least two vehicles with equipment trailers, to back out onto 42"d Street because they had
entered onto their property, (the drivers did not know they would be refused access from the
neighboring property to ours). Just two weeks ago a fatality occurred on highway 126 when a
construction vehicle attempted the same thing, which points out how dangerous their actions are to the
public safety.
*Coming on to our property to take pictures of perceived violations.
*Harassing our tenants and their customers
A good neighbor policy should go both ways, and this has not been the case.
4. The applicant has installed Springfield wellhead protection signs on each building and the trash
enclosure
We have complied with all conditions of approval.
Sincere��=%%'
Aaron Stickler
Forty Two North LLC