Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Studies APPLICANT 9/28/2022 (2)
ranch ENGINEERING - May 25, 2022 Ben Bazer 836 S. 70'° LLC 1151 Being Road Eugene, Oregon 97404 RE: GEoncnmR lNvBmGAnON 836 S. 70- SntBEF- Tn Mne/LOT 18-02-02-23-04300 SPRWGFRRD, OREGON BRA ENGwBNtwG WC PROJECT No. 21-287 Pursuant to your authorization, Branch Engineering hie. (BEI) has conducted a geotechnical engineering investigation at the subject site for the proposed 8 -lot subdivision of a 1.76 -acre parcel of vacant land located adjacent to 836 S. 70'° Street in Springfield, Oregon. This report is intended to present field investigation findings and site research to assess the feasibility of the proposed site development from a geotechnical engineering perspective and provide pertinent geotechnical recommendations for design and construction. The following report has been prepared in accordance with the City of Springfield Engineering and Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Sincerely, Branch Engineering Inc. `� #16,170 Ronald �e AJ% Kr -Ally 2.05.2ned by:00:19 Ronald 07'00'J. ick .--, 4, DaIo:2022.05.2607:00:19-07'00' 6 FITS, lgq'L ti� EXPIRES: 12/31/2023 Ronald) Derrick, P.E, G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Branch Engineering, Inc. I I P a g e 836 S. 791 Sheet BEI PN 21-287 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................................3 1.1 Scope of Work 3 1.2 Site Information Resources 3 2.0 PROJECT AND SITE DESCRIPTION...........................................................................................4 2.1 Site Description 4 2.2 Proposed Development 4 2.3 Site Observations and Soils 4 2.4 Ground Water 5 3.0 GEOLOGIC SETTING......................................................................................................................5 3.1 Regional Geology 5 3.2 Site Geology 6 4.1 Summary of Site Subsurface Conditions 6 4.2 Presence of Expansive Soils and Other Special Considerations 6 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS...................................................................................................................7 6.0 REPORT LIMITATIONS................................................................................................................ 10 FIGURE 1— Sita Investigation Map FIGURE 2— Site Geology Map Appendix A Soil Logs -Well Logs -USDA Soil Survey Map & Soils Appendix B Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 12 836 S. ]a^ sheet BEI PN 21-287 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results and findings of Branch Engineering, Inc. (BEI) field observations and research for the subject site. The purpose of our investigation was to assess the geotechnical suitability of the subject site for the proposed development. Our work was authorized by Ben Bazer. 1.1 Scope of Work Our scope of work included a site visit and limited subsurface investigation on April 1, 2022. Five test pits were excavated to a maximum depth of 5 -feet below ground surface (BGS). The soil was visually classified in accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method D-2488. See the attached Figure -1, Test Pit Site Plan, for test pit locations. Our work scope also included pertinent site research activities, engineering data review, analysis, and preparation of this Report A summary of findings from the exploratory test pits on site is presented in Section 4.1 of this report, and copies of nearby well logs from the Oregon Department of Water Resources online database along with the soil survey mapping of the site are presented in Appendix A 1.2 Site Information Resources The following site investigation activities were performed and literature resources were reviewed for pertinent site information • Review of USGS Geologic Map of Oregon Walker and MacLeod 1991 and review of the 2010 Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMD Geologic Map Open File Report 0-10-03 Digital Geologic Map of the Southern Willamette Valley by Jason D. McClaughry, Thomas J. Wiley, Mark L Ferns, and Ian P. Marlin. • Review of online aerial photographs of site since 1994. • Five exploratory test pits performed on the site. • Review of the Lane County Area Web Soil Survey, United States Department of Agricultural (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), see Appendix A • Review of Oregon Department of Water Resources Well Logs, see Appendix A • Oregon Structural Specialty Code 2019 (OSSC 2019), applicable building code criteria • Geology of Oregon sixth edition by On, Orr and Baldwin, 2012. • Oregon Department of Geology and Mineral Industries (DOGAMI) website, Statewide Geohazards Viewer (HazVu), http://www.oregongeology.org/hazvu/ Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 13 836 S. ]a^ street BEI PN 21-287 • DOGAMI website, Statewide Landslide Information Layer for Oregon (SLID/) Viewer. https://gis.doganii.oregon.gov/maps/shdo/ • DOGAMI Interpretive Map 60: Landslide Hazard and Risk Study of Eugene -Springfield and Lane County, Oregon. 2018. Nancy C. Calhoun, William J. Burns, Jon J. Franczyk, and Gustavo Monteverde. • DOGAMI Interpretive Map Series 14: Relative Earthquake Hazard Map of the Eugene - Springfield Metropolitan Area Lane County, Oregon. 2000 Black, G., Wang, Z., Wiley, T., Wang, Y., and Keefer, D. 2.0 PROTECT AND SLIE DESCRIPTION The analyses, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as they presently exist and assume the exploratory test pits are representative of the subsurface conditions throughout the site. If, during construction, subsurface conditions differ from those encountered in the exploratory test pits, BEI requests that we be informed to review the site conditions and adjust our recommendations, if necessary. 2.1 Site Desmption The subject site is located at latitude 44.038622° north and 122.902851° west off South 70- Street in Springfield, Oregon. The nearest cross street is Glacier Drive, located approximately 170 -feet to the north. The site is bordered by developed single-family lots to the north and south, by forested land and Forest Ridge Drive to the west, and South 6i Street to the east. Surface elevations on the site are highest in the southwest corner at approximately —710 -feet above mean sea level (MSL), sloping to an elevation of approximately 680 -feet in the northeast corner of the site. Site topography generally slopes down to the north at <10 -degrees. The site vegetation is short grass with scattered oak and fir trees. No surface springs, or areas of water loving vegetation were found during the site investigation. 2.2 Proposed Development Based on documents provided to BEI by the client, the proposed development will be a land subdivision to create eight (8) single-family residential lots each approximately 0.17 -acre in size. A public street extension of S. 69- Place will traverse the site from west to east. 2.3 Site Observations and Soils The USDA NRCS Lane County Area web soli survey maps the majority of the site as Urban land Elazelair-Dixonville complex (127C). This silty clay soli unit is characterized by 3- to 12 -percent slopes, described as moderately well drained and originating from colluvium derived from sedimentary rock Visual classification of the near surface soils was performed M accordance with the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Method D-2488 and the Unified Soll Classification System Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 14 836 S. ]a^ street BEI PN 21-287 (USCS). The site subsurface sofl conditions generally consisted of existing vegetation and topsoil overlying medium stiff, high plasticity clay with the presence of rock fragments 3- to 4 -feet BGS. There were no observations of gross land movement and area fir trees appear relatively straight. The site and surrounding area are mapped as pre -historic (>150 years) landslide and is in a location of moderate risk of slope instability, intermediate to high earthquake hazard and low amplification hazard. 2.4 Groundwater No groundwater was encountered during the site exploration; however, some seepage was noted in TP -2 emanating from the topsoil zone. The area in generally is known for the presence of springs, seeps, and seasonally wet sofl conditions. Surface runoff and subsurface seasonal groundwater should be expected to be encountered during, and after construction of the proposed development Nearby geotechnical boring logs show no groundwater encountered to a depth of 30 - feet BGS. (See attached Oregon Department of Water Resources well logs in Appendix A). We expect that ground water levels (from the regional water table or perched lenses) will fluctuate with the seasons and should be expected to be highest during the late winter and spring months when rainstorms are more intense and frequent, and soils are near saturation The hillside topography above the site will contribute to surface water on and crossing the site. 3.0 GEOIDGIC SETTING The following sections describe the regional and local site geology. Our field findings are consistent with the geologic mapping of the site area on USGS Geologic Map of Oregon (Walker and MacLeod 1991) and the 0-10-03 Digital Geologic Map of the Southern Willamette Valley (Open -File Report DOGAMI, 2010). 3.1 Regional Geology The subject site lies within the southern portion of the Willamette Valley Geomorphic Province (WVGP), east of the Coast Range and west of the Cascade Mountains Provinces. The WVGP is regional lowland that extends from just south of Eugene, Oregon to Vancouver, Washington In Oregon, this alluvial plain is approximately 130 miles long and 20 to 40 -miles wide (Orr and Orr, 1996). The WVGP is drained by the north flowing Willamette River. Deposits of silt and clay from fluvial and lacustrine environments covered the bedrock to various depths during the presence of low energy streams and lakes in the mid -Willamette Valley. Subsequent compression forces and uplifting of the Cascade and Coast Range Mountains depressed the Willamette River Valley. The rapid uplift of the Cascade and Coast Range mountains steepened stream gradients causing increased erosion of the mountains and resulting deposition of thick gravel layers incised within the fluvial and lacustrine deposits. The area of the subject site is believed to be underlain by marine Eugene formation of residuum of sedimentary rock from the late Eocene to Oligocene epochs (approximately 20 to 40 million years ago). Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 15 836 S. ]a^ street BEI PN 21-287 3.2 Site Geology The 0-10-03 2010 DOGAMI Digital Geologic Map of the southern Willamette Valley maps the site geology near a boundary of three geologic units. Landslide and Debris Avalanche Deposits (Qld) are mapped on the site and to the north, south, and east. To the west the geology is mapped as Early Western Cascades laves (Twd) and Early Western Cascades Volcaniclastic Rocks and Tuff (Twcv). The landslide and Debris Avalanche Deposits unit is described as unconsolidated chaotically mixed and deformed rock, colluvium, and soil deposited by landslides. The Early Western Cascades laves are described as basalt and basaltic andesite, andesite, and dacite lavas that are part of the upper Eocene Fisher Formation and the upper Eocene to lower Miocene little Butte Volcanics. Also mapped in the area to the south and east is the Early Western Cascades Volcaniclastic Rocks and Tuff. Described as terrestrial volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks and ash - flow tuffs. These strata are interbedded with the Early Western Cascades lavas. Rocks in this formation are prone to landslides along high angle contacts with lavas or intrusive rocks and where bedding planes are steeply dipping. The nearby geotechnical boring logs obtained by the Oregon Department of Water Resources website for the water tower across South 67° Street from the site show silt, and silt with gravel to a depth of 20 -feet BGS. Below that the logs show slltstone to at least 30 -feet BGS. It is BEI's opinion that the slltstone is more likely to be volcaniclastic sedimentary rocks associated the Early Western Cascades Volcaniclastic Rocks mapped in the site vicinity. Surtidal geology logged in the test pits consisting of basaltic rock with clay/silt, is likely colluvium and landslide deposits. 4.0 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Summary of Site Subsurface Conditions The site soil consists of medium stiff clay with rock fragments at 3- to 4 -feet BGS. The observed soil conditions in the exploratory test pits are consistent with the USDA NRCS and site geologic mapping, as well as with area well logs, presented in Appendix A 4.2 Presence of Expansive Soils and Other Special Considerations Based upon previously conducted testing of similar geologic conditions and soil within 0.5 -miles of the site, a low to moderate shrink/swell potential is expected of the upper 2- to 3 -feet of the site soil profile. Exposed soil should be covered with compacted aggregate in a timely manner to minimize fluctuations in the moisture content of the subgrade soil. Slope Instability: The site is mapped as high risk, or existing landslide, on the DOGAMI online hazard viewer. Based on the SUDO viewer and the IMS 60 report the mapped landslide extends west and another landslide is directly east of the site. The area landslides of the area are classified as deep-seated rock slide -translational and is dated as "pre -historic', indicating a slide event greater than 150 -years old. Surffcial soils found in the site test pit excavations are interpreted by BEI as colluvium derived and are likely slide debris or runout from the slide that have weathered in place for many years. light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) imagery of the site and surrounding area indicate smoothed ground contours and no obvious scarps on the site. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 16 836 S. ]a^ street BEI PN 21-287 Nearly all the area surrounding the site is mapped within the landslide inventory and has been developed over the past several decades with no known ground movement impacts. The risks of slope instability on the site may be managed with Geotechnical Engineering oversight and incorporating the recommendations of this report into the design and construction of the project. Recommendations to reduce the risk of slope instability to the site are discussed below. 5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are for earthwork in the building foundation areas and parking areas. Earthwork shall be performed in general accordance with the standard of practice as generally described in Appendix J of the 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code and as specified in this report. All areas intended to directly or laterally support structures, roadways, or pavement areas shall be stripped of vegetation, organic soil, unsuitable fill, and/or other deleterious material such as moisture softened exposed soil. These strippings shall be removed from the site or reserved for use in landscaping or non-structural areas. In areas of existing trees, vegetation, or previously placed fill the required depth of site clearing/stripping may be increased. The subsurface conditions observed in our site investigation test nit excavations are consistent: however, the test nits only represent a very small portion of the site. Should soft or unsuitable soils extend to a depth greater than that described herein or areas of distinct Boll variation be discovered this office shall be notified to perform site observation and additional excavation may be reunited. Building Foundation Subgrade Preparation In areas of building foundations, the foundation excavation shall be advanced through any organic topsoil zones or previously placed fill material into suitable subgrade consisting of the colluvial clay. Stumps and roots greater than approximately 1.5 -inches in diameter, and root clusters should be removed from foundation subgrade areas. The depth to suitable subgrade is expected to be approximately 12- to 18 -inches unless in areas affected by tree stumps and vegetation where deeper excavation depths will be required to remove organic materials. To reduce the risk of slope instability, site grading should be kept to a minimum and existing mature vegetation left in place. Due to the hillside nature of the site topography, we expect that the building pads consisting of level terraces separated by vertical cuts may be required. Footings set above vertical cuts shall be set back a distance equivalent to the height of the cut or structurally connected to adjacent foundation elements and any remaining void spaces backfilled. Footings shall be set back horizontally so that bearing splay, calculated by a plane extending downward at a 1:1 (HV) slope from the outside edge of footings does not intersect the face of excavation, or native slopes. To facilitate drainage and mitigate the potential for differential settlement we recommend that building pads be prepared with a minimum of 8 -inches of compacted open graded rock where the averaged sized rock is at least 3 -inches in diameter. A cap consisting no less than 4 -inches of compacted %"-0 aggregate shall be placed on the open graded rock and is recommended to extend a minimum of 12 -inches beyond foundation elements. The base of the open -graded rock shall have a daylight drain at the low point with drainage to a suitable place of disposal. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 17 836 S. ]a^ sheet BEI PN 21-287 Compacted aggregate with a thickness of 12 -inches or more should be compacted to a minimum 90% relative compaction as determined by modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557) which may be confirmed with compaction testing by nuclear densometer if required by the building permit. If certification by our office of the building pad preparation is required, we request notification to confirm the excavation to suitable subgrade material prior to the placement of structural fill. Pavement Area Subgrade Preparation In pavement areas, topsoil and organics shall be removed to an anticipated depth of 12- to 18 - inches. We recommend that the subgrade be proof -rolled with a loaded 10cy haul -truck, or equipment of equivalent ground pressure, to assess the subgrade consistency and identity potential soft or wet areas. Should pavement area preparation occur during the wet season additional excavation may be required, and proof -rolling atop the base rock layer is recommended, but the client needs to be aware that areas showing pumping or other indications of subgrade failure will require removal of the base rock and further soil excavation. Prior to the placement of compacted aggregate base rock in pavement areas we recommend that the GER, or designated representative, visit the site to observe the subgrade; excavation of areas of unsuitable areas of soil may be recommended to pass subsequent proof -roll. Recommendations for aggregate base rock thickness, compaction, and asphalt concrete (AC) thickness are presented below. Engineered Fill Placement Compacted aggregate placed on the site to support foundations equal or greater than 12 -inches in thickness shall meet the following specifications as included in Section 1803.5.8 of the 2019 Oregon Structural Specialty Code (OSSC). • Unless otherwise described above the fill material shall consist of compacted aggregate. • A modified Proctor (ASTM D1557) shall be used to determine the maximum dry density of the aggregate to be used. A prior moisture -density curve may be submitted from the aggregate source. • The fill material shall be placed in lifts and compacted with loose lift thickness not exceeding 8 -inches in thickness. • Compaction testing by nuclear densometer shall be used in the field to determine the in- place dry density of the fill material. • 90% relative compaction as determined by modified Proctor testing is required for a passing test. • One passing test per structure, or lift, shall be required to confirm conformance with the above specifications. Allowable Bearing Capacity: Conventional perimeter style foundations and spread footings for column loads are suitable for the proposed building construction and we recommend that loads are distributed evenly to mitigate the potential for differential settlement. If foundation areas are prepared as described in this report, the allowable bearing capacity is 1,500 pat and may be increased by 1/3 for short-term loading such as wind or seismic events. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 18 836 S. ]a^ street BEI PN 21-287 Drainage We recommend that the foundation perimeter be backfilled and graded away from the structure as soon as concrete curing allows. Footing drains are recommended on the perimeter of the foundation to be conveyed to suitable downslope location for disposal of runoff. Permanent surface drainage shall be established to convey water to suitable locations for disposal, downslope of the foundation. Final perimeter landscape grades shall slope away from the foundation and surface water shall not be allowed to pond adjacent to the foundation. A subdrain, or outlet for water that may accumulate on the building pad is recommended The subdrain may consist of a perforated pipe with a downslope outlet, or a shallow ditch, or swale filled with open -graded rock to convey drainage to a suitable point of disposal, downslope of structures. Frosion of any exposed soli in cut slopes or fill slopes shall be mitigated by establishing vegetation or other means. Excavations For temporary cuts or utility trenches deeper than 4 -feet, slopes should be constructed according to the OSHA Technical Manual for Rccavations, using a Soll Type "A" within the clay material. There should be no equipment load or other load surcharges within 10 -feet (or the height of the cut, whichever is greater) of the crest of temporary construction slopes. Utility trenches shall be adequately braced and shored using trench -boxes designed by a structural engineer. Utility trench backfill shall meet the requirements of Appendix B. Structural Pavement Section Recommendations Our recommendations used the guidance of the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures, the 2003 revised Asphalt Pavement Design Guide, published by the Asphalt Pavement Association of Oregon, and engineered structural pavement sections developed for sites with similar soils and anticipated traffic loads. For new asphalt concrete (AC) pavement installation of the public street parking, we recommend a minimum pavement thickness of 4 -inches of AC over a minimum of 12 -inches of compacted 1.5 -inch minus crushed aggregate base material (ABM) placed atop a geotextile separation fabric. Wet season construction may likely require and increased ABM section or use of a bi-axial geogrid. Prior to placement of ABM, any soft soil, wet soil, or organic soil shall be removed from the parking subgrade. We recommend that the subgrade be moisture conditioned and compacted to at least 90% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by AASHTO T-180/ASTM D- 1557 (modified Proctor). The pavement recommendations discussed above are designed for the type of vehicle use on the site after construction completion, not for construction vehicle traffic which is generally heavier, occurs over a short time, and impacts the site before frill pavement sections are constructed. The construction traffic may cause subgrade failures and the site contractor should consider over- building designated haul routes through the site to mitigate soft areas at the time of final paving. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 19 836 S. ]a^ sheet BEI PN 21-287 Provisions for Wet Weather Construction Dry season construction is recommended; however, excavation to subgrade can proceed during periods of light to moderate rainfall provided that the subgrade remains covered with aggregate. A total aggregate thickness of at least 18 -inches may be necessary to protect the subgrade from heavy construction traffic. Construction traffic should not be allowed directly on the subgrade only atop a sufficient compacted rock thickness to mitigate subgrade "pumping'. If the subgrade becomes wet and "pumps", no construction traffic shall be allowed on the road alignment Positive site drainage away from the street shall be maintained if site paving will not occur before the on -set of the wet season. Construction traffic haul routes will require thicker rock sections to mitigate subgrade failure. The mitigation of wet or soft subgrade, if encountered during proof -rolling or by visual observation can either be removed and replaced with compacted crushed aggregate, removed and dried or dried in-place and recompacted, or an area of sufficient size (generally at least 3 - feet beyond the edge of soft material) may be covered with a bi-axial geogrid and covered with compacted crushed aggregate. Seismic Site Classification and Hazards Based on the soil properties encountered in our site pits and on-site well log information a Seismic Site Class D designation stiff soil (Table 20.3-1 ASCE 7-16) is recommended for design of site structures. 6.0 REPORT IIINPEATIONS This report has presented BEI's site observations and research, subsurface explorations, geotechnical engineering analyses, and recommendations for the proposed site development. The conclusions in this report are based on the conditions described in this report and are intended for the exclusive use of Ben Bazer and his representatives for use in design and construction of the development described herein. The analysis and recommendations may not be suitable for other structures or purposes. Services performed by the geotechnical engineer for this project have been conducted with the level of care and skill exercised by other current geotechnical professionals in this area. No warranty is herein expressed or implied. The conclusions in this report are based on the site conditions as they currently exist and it is assumed that the limited site locations that were physically investigated generally represent the subsurface conditions at the site. Should site development or site conditions change, or if a substantial amount of time goes by between our site investigation and site development, we reserve the right to review this report for its applicability. If you have any questions regarding the contents of this report, please contact our office. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 110 FIGURE 1- SITE INVESTIGATION MAP m LEGEND _ ...,. nrvrtnxiwre ttsr vn �ounoN w _ TEST PIT "p 6� d • SITE PLAN f R mmu Mq amox (e -y l ~w _ a i _ C m. �mp r u LEGEND _ ...,. nrvrtnxiwre ttsr vn �ounoN w _ TEST PIT "p 6� d • SITE PLAN f R mmu Mq amox (e -y l i Ha 1 Hoa �1a5 - _ T(;vcl Old LEGEND Landslide and Debris Av ilauehe Deposits (Quaternary) ¢ams. =1A.W,ae� atea aaoemnny msA c¢a aafmmxa mr2.emnxw¢m aryl xml sae^maA np la.amF mymity 1>8b Peme¢a nr ramgo(LndxBae aee1Dta rccuc alaag Eil e.—on mHia of the L—L 1rn W illametre l' 1) 1 moria mrkx of'i, Littre 8¢tte earoraea (map mRs'1hrLahem,ad Thal). 1Te mites hk.1y Pn doaavalmenedeposits shagthewarterns, D d— Cobavg Himllikely amplai aid Do—, ewtiil ratrdions_ fideo£ma..Imdali,. hors a(—Yosad oh-- 2008)_'hag6exi¢g mr,,lD— afaclmdalidex eaddebne..,.bin magi --b hmvv unriu. di—t—'hdrbEcasiv. devegetdia¢deet &,nd mmbimtia¢tbmed Acres d esuxtiag lM Fpde deportsxbmldbe eoaadecdat a,d oddi farth,:cslate movemcok. Napped oa the bvv afficld ebskcavtims and amlyau of I mLdv DEM.. - E—lly W—n,—Cmmdaa Ls as Mia nO— bx miadleEorm ) m Tay na,Teas, T.4T.bk.Tamb, x..b, T..be. Tabs, a..bl, Tvb.: Basile and b. Ittcandeste andi and daate laves that are pazt of the inter le— M'ob- in na..o¢ and thaIs- ..s—. t. lawece iaceae L.I. 8¢tte Whadrae. These lava. me 4ypica¢7 dirrwir has ami have mmplea sheet relnti.mhiv. With rsvalvdcaaictarticxv.6 (mai mit Twcvl. The early We.fm CasraAe lanae aropartef a mib-ePre.d mm5nental vnnznN. tmanre tM1mt aA ]mdnuvira.nsm4¢ge ah. oin t- b3a18t.(L—,1992, no]L7 Wad M.l, 200ib Th n "b"Dgbyluw.ini.to. eartedandla.sell ells generses,58.)bilherperrnarkattysoioom-etthtubrc]d "rn..andwrwiat- st -.-,eanbly (is. "d oEe> 2006)-Wbefx6 Eha lordim a',iae rcof �oeth,olmck -Earp Western Cascades Volcanlclastic%ocks and Tuff Mower Miocene to v middle E.eem)d. Teal Rnb. Teta ince T.W. TmdT da e eadn ""pe, Wrtic and ,r—ttksdial tho Baos DionEHstbn4 axcP Idnor6cm middlesada Vol—Gv®eeir R.emati.a andtee upper ,,W blower Mimme (dale Butte ol"d Thesestrat¢ are Inlnrsort wkcarp Waster¢ Ceradelavas rhea,—t m ...iss and pale.8em murue seaamen[eraxrcka (man mfs 9fua, 4mm) rhoa,—z the urd,.dge.f—mopoma.Ash Flowtartsfat xmc Hill Rd (4vkm mit. is fe sal (410 . xtrata¢mphic Wier. Wil -done.. reCimyl hill buff (1l 6,iad inH of Pox Dolbw (1L0 Ma).2uHof 9cuf WSsmeEte 6treet (m daWy Nff ofHc¢d CreeY(r3$348 HIal (26 t8Hat br P®tem 9 M.), id ffi va Bd W. drC(, tWE of Fmtae D®(262b Nu), f%of Da#ee (Z6.9 Mab and f c uvff d Lm.mb (m date)(Betallackaado4hm.200¢MuccaY ^^d A[adi*, 2000, McCauSkcy, 2000)_ These corks ere typvallYPmr ayulfen. andnear mt£betls and intrusions mnY rv¢tet¢ Qdf nate SiteQld� �1u 1 T\lvcl tandrely hghl—ar axxeme (8mtle maP dl ." 1999). Tbexe crc6 eea pm¢e t. N la¢dxlidaa ab¢g high mgle ¢¢tecta aitblewx.r mteueiw cocks and wheee beading wme. are ahxpl, apaag. Site Geology Map from DOGAMI Bunch` SITE GEOLOGY 1MAR).0 6 S 70th St FIGURE -2 NGINEE11i Tax Map/Lot 18-02-02-23-04300 Springfield, OR 5-25-2022 PROJECT NO. 21-287 APPENDIX A: Soil Survey and Well Logs Borehole ID: TP -1 GIHtanch NIININfr Sheet l of l Client Ben Baxr Project Name: 836 S. 70dn Subdivision Project Number. 21-287 Project for tion 836 S. 70th Street Springfield, Oregon Date Started: Apr012022 Completed: Apr012022 Lagged By. PID Checked B, PID Drilling Contractor. Lazitudc 44.038852 Longitude: -122.902988 Elevation: Drilling Method: Test Pit Excavation Ground Water Levels Equipment Rubber Tracked Mini -Excavator Q No Groundwater Encountered, No Caving Hammer Type: IW Notes 2 — Moisture Content: o PL and LL N Description E gMaterial V � O 6 LL 10 311 39 40 50 6] 10 &I A'1 Soft, brown CLAY (0K with moo, moist (Topsoil Zone) 1 Medium stiff, brown CLAY (CH) high plasticity, very moist (Colluvium) - Free Swell - 70% 2 3 - Stiff, reddish -brown CLAY (Cf0 with basalt rock fragments, mottled, moist 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Borehole ID: TP -2 GIHtanch NIININfr Sheet l of l Client Ben Baxr Project Name: 836 S. 70th Subdivision Project Number. 21-287 Project for tion 836 S. 70th Street Springfield, Oregon Date Started: Apr012022 Completed: Apr012022 Lagged By. PID Checked B, PID Drilling Contractor. Lazitudc 44.038852 Longitude: -122.902988 Elevation: Drilling Method: Test Pit Excavation Ground Water Levels Equipment Rubber Tracked Mini -Excavator Q Slight Seepage in Topsoil Zone Hammer Type: IW Notes 2 — Moisture Content: ie PL and LL N Description E gMaterial V � O 6 LL 10 311 39 40 50 6] 10 &I A'1 Soft, brown CLAY (OK with mots, moist, slight seepage (Topsoil Zone) 1 - Medium stiff, brown CLAY (CIO high plasticity, very moist (Colluvium) 2 3 - 4 Stiff, reddish -brown CLAY (CIO with basalt rock fragments, mottled, moist 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Borehole ID: TP -3 GIHtanch NIININfr Sheet l of l Client Ben Baxr Project Name: 836 S. 70dn Subdivision Project Number. 21-287 Project for tion 836 S. 70th Street Springfield, Oregon Date Started: Apr012022 Completed: Apr012022 Lagged By. PID Decked B, PID Drilling Contractor. Lazitudc 44.038852 Longitude: -122.902988 Elevation: Drilling Method: Test Pit Excavation Ground Water Levels Equipment Rubber Tracked Mini -Excavator Q W Groundwater Encountered Hammer Type: IW Notes 2 — Moisture Content: ie PL and LL N Description E gMaterial V � O 6 LL 10311 39 4050ro10 &I A'1 Soft, brown CLAY (OK with roots, moist, slight seepage (Topsoil Zone) 1 _ Medium stiff, brown CLAY (CH high plasticity, very moist (Colluvium) 2 3 - Stiff, reddish -brown CLAY (CK with basalt rock fragments, mottled, slightly at 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Borehole ID: TP- GIHtanch NIININfr Sheet l of l Client Ben Baxr Project Name: 836 S. 70dn Subdivision Project Number. 21-287 Project for tion 836 S. 70th Street Springfield, Oregon Date Started: Apr012022 Completed: Apr012022 Lagged By. PID Decked B, PID Drilling Contractor. Lazitudc 44.038852 Longitude: -122.902988 Elevation: Drilling Method: Test Pit Excavation Ground Water Levels Equipment Rubber Tracked Mini -Excavator Q W Groundwater Encountered Hammer Type: Notes 2 — Moisture Content: ie PL and LL N Description E gMaterial V � O 6 LL 10 311 39 40 50 6] 10 &I A'1 Soft, brown CLAY (OK with mots, moist, slight seepage (Topsoil Zone) 1 - Medium stiff, grey to brown CLAY (CK high plasticity, wet (Colluvium) 2 3 - _ Stiff,brown-grey CLAY(CK with basalt rock fragments, waxy tenwre, mottled, slightly moist 4 Free Swell 90% 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Borehole ID: TP -5 GIHtanch NIININfr Sheet l of l Client Ben Baxr Project Name: 836 S. 70dn Subdivision Project Number. 21-287 Project for tion 836 S. 70th Street Springfield, Oregon Date Started: Apr012022 Completed: Apr012022 Lagged By. PID Decked B, PID Drilling Contractor. Lazitudc 44.038852 Longitude: -122.902988 Elevation: Drilling Method: Test Pit Excavation Ground Water Levels Equipment Rubber Tracked Mini -Excavator Q W Groundwater Encountered Hammer Type: IW Notes 2 — Moisture Content: ie PL and LL N Description E gMaterial V � O 6 LL 10311 39 4050ro10 &I A'1 Soft, brown CLAY (OH) with roots, moist, slight seepage (Topsoil Zone) 1 Medium stiff, grey to brown CLAY (CH) high plasticity, wet (Colluvium) 2 3 Stiff, reddish -brown CLAY (CH) with basalt rock fragments, mottled, slightly at 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0 E 2' 10,36 I—AWE � STATE OF OREGON VJp I I u.: : ' ci DEPT. C'�{ 1/ GEOTECHNICAL HOLE REPORT SALEM, OREGON J(IIb (es requited by OAR 650-340.0)5) (1) OWNERIPROJECT: Hale Number E<-9 XNew ❑Deepening ❑ Alteration Repaidrecondifion)❑Abandonment (3 CONSTRUCTION: (fomry Air ❑Hand Auger ❑Hollow Stem Auger Rotary Mud ❑ Cable Tool ❑ Push Probe ❑Other (d) TYPE OF HOLE: Maar ❑ Unsemd Temporary XCasN Permanent ❑ Ureased Permanent E] Slope Stability ❑Other ❑ X (5)USEOFHOLE: 1, t.ci C(.rttr hETEQMWE -X TcevT At [SUALAT E< nF GRAVEL (6) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION: Special CmwowtionappmvxIXYes❑No Depth of Completed Hole Z.6,ft. HOLE SEAL Immeter From Is, Material F. To Saekstse"nls " O z.6 C ENT o Ball Placed from ft. to ft. Material Filter Pack placed from n, m ft. Stwc npack (7) CASING/SCREEN: Ismer., From To Gauge Steel Maar Welded Threaded n ❑ X ❑ Casing. El F-1 F-1 El El F-1 11 El/ El F-1 El ElScreen' El El 1-1 ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Slotsire A)O CA £/moi/A M-ROUA/D(a_A-r7R (8) WELLTEST. NG ❑ Pump ❑Bailer ❑ Air ❑ Flowing Artesian Permeability Yield GPM Temperature of water T/C Depth artesian Flow found_ h. Was warer analysis done? ❑ Yes ❑ No Depth of strum analyzed. From H. to R. THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO (9) LOCATION OF HOLE by legal deseciption: county LANE Latitudr'fY"Z46"N LoagimdrjZZoY9'g"1A/ Township /8 N or&Range 7. E m© WM. Section NW 1/4 NW 1/4 Tax Lot LotIllock Subdivision Street AmImuof Well(ormareutuderess) BEnJEW WA F 1b t R MID NE F INiFR<rdnaAf Iy9 AND 69TM 9l y $xRIr,9FL Map with Notion Ident leo must be etMchod -f;G SP�IArLFlEkp 7 F_r•aLMLLyZ:1 (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL: NA 0. below land surface. Date S/14 N Artesian pressure It. per square inch. Date (1l) SUBSURFACE LOG Ilk NOR "r fflmpm� l�e.�R1C,R!ll!il�illll}Sfl���� DateSta&d 9/1;196 Date Completed R/4/9% (12) ABANDONMENT LOG: Datestarred Daze Completed Professional Certification (to be signed by a licensed seam, supply or mooimting well constructor, or registered geologist or civil engineer). I accept responsibility for the construction, alteration, or abandonment work performed on during the construction dates reported above. All work performed during this time Is In compliance with Oregon geotechnical hole construction standards. This report is one to the best of my knowledge and belief. License or Registration Number GitY� Signed fie._ A Dan, )2 R6 Afftllation OilE DAPI �'iz )LACY AND MIN /NOUS DEPARTMENT WITHIN 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK ORIGINAL & FIRST COPY -WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SECOND COPY -CONSTRUCTOR THIRD COPY -CUSTOMER oil LANE 72772 Page 1 f STATE OF OREGON MONITORING WELL REPORT WELLI.D.LABELYL 111]13 (as required by ORS 53].]65&OAR 690,240095) 10)17)2013 START CARD # 1021238 FirstNene L.tName Caapary SPRINGFlELDUTILITYBOARD Address 250ASTREE[ City SPRBJGPIELD Sleds OR Zip 97477 (2) TYPE OF WORK ONew ❑Demwans ❑ convernm rIAllemtim(repionsconlition) r-JAbmdonmml 3 DRILL METHOD Rolery Air ORalaryMud ElCabh Hollow Stan Auger Cable Mud ❑Reveres Raley ❑ Other (4) CONSTRUCTION Piezaneler Well ❑K DgrMof Ccinpleted Well 3500 R Special SterderdE] MONUMENT/VAULT Below Ground From 0 To 1 BOREHOLE Diameter 5 Fran p To 35 CASING Dia. 1 Fran ❑ 0 To 10 Oman, Step Wld Thrd Material QSl«I ( 'sero El O LINER Dia. Frets❑ Ta Gmge Wld Thsd Material QSl«I 0"ladir El SEAL Fran 1 To g Material Bentonite Chios AramN 1 Secke Crmutweighl SCREEN Casng/Lner Casir Material PVC Diameter 1 From 10 To 20 Sid Size 0d20 FILTER From 9 To 21 Material SILICASAND Siaeofpack 10/20 (5) WELL TESTS QPaap OBailer 0Air 0Fkwng Adesim Yield d. an Drawdown Drill dem/Pum de th Duration Teniperawre °F Lab matyeis ❑Yee By MPevking Ged,dsun,neer Wder'aft,twreraR ❑Yea(desatabei.) Pran To Desai tin Amanl Unls (0) LUUA11U1N UC WDLL (legm description) Canty IANE Twp 18.00 S NIS Range 2,00 W E/ WM Ser 3 NE 1/4 dF Me NE 1/4 Tac Lal 6700 Tac Map Number Lal Lal a 44.0d027778 Long err -122.90863889 DMS a DD Str«[address afwell (, Newesladdrese 1 (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL Date SWL(p) + SWL(fi) uhng amgkkd WeO Plowing AdesnnR❑ Dry Hole?O WATERBEARINGZONES Deplhwahrwastimtfmnd Ground Elecatim (Date Started 1Wn 013 Completed loP/ o13 (unbnded) Monitor Well Constructor Cer[ificatin" 1 certify Mat the wok 1 performed on the c.manallin, deepening, alteration, a abandauaent of this well is in compliance with Oregon monitoring well condmdion standuds. Materials used and information reported above are Ove to Me bed ofmy knowledge and belief License Number 10630 Date 101172013 password: (iftiling electronically) Signed SAMEs DENNES (E -filed) (bonded) Mannar Well 1 accept responsibility n for Me cdmction, dery ing, alteration, a abmdonmml work performed on this well during Me construction dates reported above. All work performed during Mis time is in compliance with Oregn monitoring well conshvctsnstandards. Thisreportistiuetothebest ofmyknovledge andbelid License Number 10563 Date 10/17/2013 Password: (4'fiingelectionically) OWATER-WATPARE DEEARTDEPARTMPNT THIS REPORT MUST BE SUBMfIT®TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTk1ENT WITBRJ 30 DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK Pam Vereron. MONITORING WELL REPORT continuation page LANE 72772 WELLLD. LABEL#L111719 START CARD # 1021298 10/17/2013 BORE HOLEFILTER PACK the Fc. To Fee. To hfakfial a hiptenal R. To And the .. Im CASING/LINER ♦ From To Goo, C■Z,■ ■ LOX* ■ ■ Cele ■ ■ [OZ, ■ ■ LOX* ■ ■ Cele ■ ■ [eZe ■ ■ SCREENS Pesf/ Casng/Sarem 9ameae/ Slot #of Tele/ (5) WELL TESTS Yield avaron Drawdown Drill sfi / mp depth Uvalim Water Quality Cape erne Fmm To Ue.notioo Aman! Unit, (7) STATIC WATER LEVEL Water Bearing Zones Page 2 of 3 (S) WELL LOG Comments/Remarks Page 3 a 3 MOMTORMG WELL REPORT- Map with beatim identified LANE 72772 mud be attached and shall include an approximate xaleand oaM enmv 10/17/2013 STATE OF OREGON GEOTECHNICAL HOLE REPORT (ae required by OAR 690-2400035) (1) OWNER/PROJECT Hole Number PROJECT NAMENBR: Fl-M5/S LANE 72778 10117/2013 Fiml Nana L.tNama Carrpary SPRMGFBiLD UTILITY BOARU AMaa 250ASTREET City SlaMO ELD State OR zip 97477 (2) TYPE OF WORK ONaw E]ListeningOAbarrdoanmt ❑ Alteration papairtraanifinn) (3) CONSTRUCTION F]RabryAir E]Hard Auger ❑ Hollowahmanger ORohryMud Elcable nNAr Pmbe ElOdar (4) TYPE OF HOLE: QUceased Tanis., QCaaed Permanent QUricased permanent OSlape Slablity OOlher (5) USE OF HOLE GEOTECHNICAL (6) BORE HOLE CONSTRUCTION Spaial Standard DAlbrh ropy Depth of Completed Hole 3000 R BOREHOLE SEAL sake/ Dia From To Mala®1 From To Amt Iba 4 1 0 1 30 BeNaute Cb' a 0 M 4 S Page 1 aft (9) LOCATION OF HOLE (legal description) CauNy Lnna Twp 1800 S NIS Range 20O W EWWM Sea 2 SW 1/4 of tla NW 1/4 Tacla 3700 Tac Mir Number Lal Lal—"-.44.0374444T-- Lon, a 44.03]44444 Lang as -12290341667 DMS a DD afhale G Namesladdre® (10) STATIC WATER LEVEL Dela SWL(pei) + SWL(R) m[mg pmmg amplded war re PlawingAAaianR� NATERBEARB4G ZONES Depmwahrwaacmtfand Grand Elevation Material From To Date Started l"4n)13 Completed 10/8/2013 Backfill placed fmm at. R Material (12) ABANDONMENT LOG: Filer pall, flan ft to QMahrud Sim Mfmml Pmr (7) CASING/SCREEN r l_oONE■��(qx ■ ■ 9_o ONE 000010001001 r�z4 ■ A_* ONE■��� Cox* ■ i�=o ONEN��� lox* 0 0=6� N��� [Oil 0 (8) WELL TESTS O pump 0Rouler 0Air 0Fbwng AAaeian Yridaal/mW Drawdown Drill Aen✓aumodedh Dumtiadlr) Tempamure °F LabaalyaiaE1Ya By Sugerviebg GmbgiAiEngiceer watergim0tycaceema4 n MS Date Started 10/82013 Completed l ,,2013 Professional Certification (lo be signed by an Oregon licensed wAer m mmitmmgwellcmm We OregmregiAerM gmbgiAaprofessionalengineer). I accept responsibility for the emmbaafim, deepening, alteration, m abmdmmenl wmkperfmmedduingthecrosweomdahsrepa d above. Allwmkpartbarad dining this time is in compliance wilh Oragm geotechnical hole constraion Amdards. Thisrepo iswetotheb dao kcewledge andbelief Licrose/Re,kralim Number 10630 Dah 10/17/2013 FimlNana SANIES "d Name DENNta AdlrAmn WF.CTFliN STATES SOIL CONSFRVATfON. MC. 0mGINAL - WAMRRESOURCES DEPARTI THIS REPORT MUST BE SUals[[ ® TO THE WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT WITHM M DAYS OF COMPLETION OF WORK I. Vereim: �. ♦ jy, *s T ., Al _ Y a +� S i..r Std Ivy St Sp, -qf e 0 OR97478 USA 1 , w C],T. M 1 21 N M 2'15'N = Soil Map—Lane County Area, Oregon 3 (836 S. 7Uh Street) h Pr SBalo SBBtl �J.9®0 58A] Y81f] �ArR] S1J19] 3 A hops 6:1:1,610 Rprol on A 6in6ape(11"x S.S)sM1uf. p N oes a ID a m im AhtU goJ¢Nn: WAN 3a Cammwtlrala:1W584 FAgeEa: NM]me1CN WG584 �5pp Nmural Resources N Sod Survey �i Conservation Serece National Cooperative Sed Survey •A2&V •A28Y1 918):1 RLIo ft 6 9 M• I is N 9Ap 3 A a 5/23/2022 Pagel a 3 Shc Map—Lane County Area, Oregon (838 S. 70th Street) _SD, Natural Resources web Sol Survey 5232D22 all Conservation Service National Cooperative Shc Survey Page 2 of 3 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area at Were. tA09 Spot Area The sal surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest(AOI) 1:20,090. Q Stany Spat Soils Very Sony Spa Waming: Shc Map may not be vapid al Mrs scale. 0 Soil Map Unit Polygons 9 VJrf Spot p Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause ,.,. Soil Map Unic Lines misunderslantling of the tletail of mapping and accuracy of soil 4 Other line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Soil Map Unit Points contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed Special Line FeeNres Special Point Features scale. Lg Blowout water Features Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map ® Boraw Pit measurements. Trenspartatian Clay Spot Rails Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service 0 Closed Depression Web Soil SurveyLIRL: Interstate Highways Coordinate System: web Mercator(EPSG:3B5]) Gravel Pit US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravely Spa Malor Roads projection, which preserves and shape but ion that schdistorts and area, projection that preserves area, such as the ® Landfill Local Roads Abersdistance o Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more Lara Flaw accurate calculations of distance or area are req uired, Background aga Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography This productis generated from the USDAgRCS certified data as of Ne version dates) listed below. * Mine or Query Sus Survey Area: Lane County ® Miscellaneous Ydscer 27, 21 Survey Area Data: Version 19, Oc12T, 2021 Oct ® Perennial VMmer Shc map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales y, Rock Outcrop 1:50,ODD or larger. A Saline Spot Dates) aerial images were photographed: Jun 12, 20191 19, 2019 Sandy Spot The odhophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor Sinkhole shifting ofmap and boundaries may be evident. �p Slide or Slip Sodic Spot _SD, Natural Resources web Sol Survey 5232D22 all Conservation Service National Cooperative Shc Survey Page 2 of 3 Sal Map�ane County Area, Oregon Map Unit Legend 838 S. 7Qh Street LSD4 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/23/2022 iMi Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 ot3 Map Unit Symbd Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 43C DixonWle-Phllomath-Hmelair 2.8 22.3 complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes 43E Dixonsile-Philornath+.lair 2.8 22.7% cornplex, 12 to 35 percent slopes 52D Hmelmr sky day loam, 71020 2.1 18.7% percent slopes 127C UrEan Iand+azelair-Monville 4.7 37.7% canplex, 31012 percent slopes Totals far Arm of Interest 12.4 100.0% LSD4 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/23/2022 iMi Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 ot3 Map Unit Description: Urban land-Huelair-Dkonvile cornplex, 3 to 12 percent slopes --Lane 836 S. 7Mh Street County Area, Oregon Lane County Area, Oregon 127C—Urban land-Hazelair-Dixonville complex, 3 to 12 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol. 2341 Elevation. 200 to 2,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 30 to 60 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 55 degrees F Frost -free period. 160 to 235 days Farmland classification. Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Urban land. 35 percent Hazelair and similar sails: 25 percent Dixonville and similar soils: 20 percent Minorcomponents: 3 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Urban Land Interpretive groups Lard capability classification (irrigated): None specified Lard capability classification (nonirrigated): 8 Hydric sail rating. No Description of Hazelair Setting Landform: Hills Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve, nose slope, base slope Dawn -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Colluvium derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile Hl - 0 to 11 inches: silty clay loam H2 - 11 to 15 inches. silty clay H3 - 15 to 36 inches: clay H4 - 36 to 46 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock Drainage class. Moderately well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Very low to moderately low (0.00 to 0.06 in/hr) Depth to watertable: About 12 to 24 inches LSDA Natural Resources Web Sal Survey 5/23/2022 i Conservation Serves National Cooperative Soil Survey Pagel or3 Map Unit Description: Urban land-Huelair-Dkonvile cornplex, 3 to 12 percent slopes --Lane 836 S. 70th Street County Area, Oregon Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches. Low (about 4.8 inches) Interpretive groups Lard capability classification (irrigated): None specified Lard capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Sal Group: D Ecaogicalsite: R002XC010OR- Claypan Low Hill Group Forage suitability group: Moderately Well Drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY004OR) Other vegetative classification. Moderately Well Drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY004OR) Hydric sal rating. No Description of DixomAlle Setting Landform: Hills Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, shoulder, toeslope Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfiuve, nose slope, base slope Down-slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material. Colluvium and residuum derived from basalt Typical profile H1 - 0 to 14 inches. silty clay loam H2 - 14 to 26 inches: silty clay H3 - 26 to 36 inches: weathered bedrock Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 12 percent Depth to restrictive feature: 20 to 40 inches to paralithic bedrock Drainage class. Well drained Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately Iowto moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 inlhr) Depth to watertable: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches. Low (about 4.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): None specified Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Sal Group: D Ecaogicalsite: R002XC011OR-Low Hill Group Forage suitability group: Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Other vegetative classification. Well drained < 15% Slopes (G002XY002OR) Hydric sal rating. No LSDA Natural Resources l4pb Soil Survey 6/23/2022 i Conservation Serves National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 or3 Map Unit Description: Urban land-Huelair-DucnAle cornplex, 3 to 12 percent slopes --Lane 836 S, 7Mh Street County Area, Oregon Minor Components Panther Percent of map und: 3 percent Landform: Scales Hydnc sal rating. Yes Data Source Information Soil Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 19, Oct 27, 2021 LSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/23/2022 i Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of3 APPENDIX B: Recommended Earthwork Specifications GEOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS General Earthwork t. All areas where structural fills, fill slopes, structures, or roadways are to be constructed shall be stripped of organic topsoil and cleared of surface and subsurface deleterious material, including but limited to vegetation, roots, or other organic material, undocumented fill, construction debris, soft or unsuitable soils as directed by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. These materials shall be removed from the site or stockpiled in a designated location for reuse in landscape areas if suitable for that purpose. Existing utilities and structures that are not to be used as part of the project design or by neighboring facilities, shall be removed or properly abandoned, and the associated debris removed from the site. z. Upon completion of site stripping and clearing, the exposed soil and/or rock shall be observed by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record or a designated representative to assess the subgrade condition for the intended overlying use. Pits, depressions, or holes created by the removal of root wads, utilities, structures, or deleterious material shall be properly cleared of loose material, benched and backfilled with fill material approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record compacted to the project specifications. 3. In structural fill areas, the subgrade soil shall be scarified to a depth of 4 -inches, if soil fill is used, moisture conditioned to within z% of the materials optimum moisture for compaction, and blended with the first lift of fill material. The fill placement and compaction equipment shall be appropriate for fill material type, required degree of blending, and uncompacted lift thickness. Assuming proper equipment selection, the total uncompacted thickness of the scarified subgrade and first fill lift shall not exceed 8 -inches, subsequent lifts of uncompacted fill shall not exceed fl- inches unless otherwise approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. The uncompacted lift thickness shall be assessed based on the type of compaction equipment used and the results of initial compaction testing. Fine-grain soil fill is generally most effectively compacted using a kneading style compactor, such as a sheeps-foot roller; granular materials are more effectively compacted using a smooth, vibratory roller or impact style compactor. 4. All structural soil fill shall be well blended, moisture conditioned to within z% of the material's optimum moisture content for compaction and compacted to at least 9o% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D-1557, or an equivalent method. Soil fill shall not contain more than to% rock material and no solid material over 3 -inches in diameter unless approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Rocks shall be evenly distributed throughout each liftof fill that they are contained within and shall not be clumped together in such away that voids ren occur. 5. All structural granular fill shall be well blended, moisture conditioned at or up to 3% above of the material's optimum moisture content for compaction and compacted to at least go% of the material's maximum dry density as determined by ASTM Method D-1557, or an equivalent method. 95% relative compaction may be required for pavement base rock or in upper lifts of the granular structural fill where a sufficient thickness of the fill section allows for higher compaction percentages to be achieved. The granular fill shall not contain solid particles over z -inches in diameter unless special density testing methods or proof -rolling is approved by the Geotechnical Engineer of Record. Granular fill is generally considered to be a crushed aggregate with a fracture surface of at least 7o% and a maximum size not exceeding t.5 -inches in diameter, well -graded with less than to%, by weight, passing the No. zoo Sieve. 6. Structural fill shall be field tested for compliance with project specifications for every 2 -feet in vertical rise or Soo cy placed, whichever is less. In-place field density testing shall be performed by a competent individual, trained in the testing and placement of soil and aggregate fill placement, using either ASTM Method D -t556/4959/4944 (Sand Cone), D-6938 (Nuclear Densometer), or D-2937/4959/4944 (Drive Cylinder). Should the fill materials not be suitable for testing by the above methods, then observation of placement, compaction and proof-rollingwith a loaded to cy dump -truck, or equivalent ground pressure equipment, by a trained individual may be used to assess and document the compliance with structural fill specifications. Utility Excavations I. Utility ezeavations are to be ezeavated to the design depth for bedding and placement and shall not be over-ezeavated. Trench widths shall only be of sufficient width to allow placement and proper construction of the utility and backfill of the trench. z. Backfilling of a utility trench will be dependent on its location, use, depth, and utility line material type. Trenches that are required to meet structural fill specifications, such as those under or near buildings, or within pavement areas, shall have granular material strategically compacted to at least the spring -line of the utility conduit to mitigate pipeline movement and deformation. The initial lift thickness of backfill overlying the pipeline will be dependent on the pipeline material, type of backfill, and the compaction equipment, so as not to cause deflection or deformation of the pipeline. Trench backfill shall conform to the General Earthwork specifications for placement, compaction, and testing of structural fill. Geotextiles I. All geotextiles shall be resistant to ultraviolet degradation, and to biological and chemical environments normally found in soils. Geotextiles shall be stored so that they are not in direct sunlight or exposed to chemical products. The use of a geotextile shall be specified and shall meet the following specification for each use. Suberade/Aggregate Separation Woven or nonwoven fabric conforming to the following physical properties: • Minimum grab tensile strength ASTM Method D-4632 ISO lb • Minimum puncture strength (CBR) ASTM Method D-6241 37116 • Elongation ASTM Method D-4632 15% • Maxi mum apparent opening size ASTM Method D-4751 No. 40 • Minimum permittivity ASTM Method D-4491 0.05 s� Drainage Filtration Woven fabricconforming to the following physical properties: • Minimum grab tensile strength ASTM Method D-4632 11016 • Minimum puncture strength (CBR) ASTM Method D-6241 220 Ib • Elongation ASTM Method D-4632 50% • Maxi mum apparent opening size ASTM Method D-4751 No. 40 • Minimum permittivity ASTM Method D-4491 0.5 s1 Geoerid Base Reinforcement Extruded biaxially ortriaxially oriented polypropylene conformingto the following physical properties: • Peak tensile strength ASTM Method D-6637 925 lb/ft • Tensile strength at 2% strain ASTM Method D-6637 300 lb/ft • Tensile strength at 5% strain ASTM Method D-6637 600 lb/ft • Flexural Rigidity ASTM Method D-13SS 250,000 mg -cm • Effective Opening Size ASTM Method D-4751 1.5x rock size