HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 10/4/2022Completeness Check
Meeting
Development and Public Works Department
Reern 61
COMPLETENESS CHECK MEETING DATE:
Tuesday, October 11, 2022
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
Zoom + DPW Conference Room 616
Completeness Check Meeting (Site Plan Review) #811 -22 -000220 -PRE 811-22-000128-PROJ
Assessor's Map: 17-03-22-20 TL: 1300 & 1600
Address: 3350 Gateway Street
Existing Use: motel/parking
Applicant submitted proposal to construct restaurantwith dual drive thru lanes.
Planner: Andy Limbird
Meeting: Tuesday, October 11, 202211:00— 12:00 via Zoom + DPW Conference Room 616
MIRA
VICINITY MAP
811 -22 -000220 -PRE Development Issues Meeting
17-03-22-20 TL 1300 & 1600
3350 Gateway Street
Steve Schwartz
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY
2.1 Existing Conditions
The project site is approximately 4.49 -acres of Community Commercial (CC) zoned land and
further identified as tax lots 17-03-22-20-01300 and 17-03-22-20-01600, herein referred to as the
"Project Site". The project site is located at the southwestern intersection of Randy Pape Beltline
and Gateway Street and generally consists of level terrain between 0-3 percent slopes. The
project site is developed with an existing motel and restaurant building, approximately 42,906
square feet, built in the early 2000s. The project site is considered two legal lots as described in
the preliminary title report and vesting deed included with this application as Appendix 2.
The project site is designated as Community Commercial (CC)with no overlay districts or natural
resource features. Surrounding lots to the north, south, east, and west are designated as CC and
have existing commercial buildings. Surrounding land also includes fully developed roads and city
utilities along street frontages.
According to Springfield's Transportation System Plan (TSP) Functional Classification Map
(Figure 2), Gateway Street is considered a minor arterial with no on -street parking, and the
northern extent of Randy Pape Beltline is considered a major arterial with no on -street parking.
Access to the site is provided from Gateway Street and no access is provided from Randy Pape
Beltline. Drive aisles of varying widths provide access for internal traffic circulation to the motel
and restaurant building. Additional access and utility information are provided later in this
narrative.
A Type II Site Plan Review subject to approval by the Director or staff is required. Therefore the
applicant is requesting approval through the Type II Site Plan Review procedure for the proposed
Chick-fil-A. A Site Plan Review Application form is included with this submittal as Appendix 1.
Surrounding uses are identified in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Surrounding Uses
4013WL. Page
Zoning
Use
North
CC
Communit Commercial
South
CC
Community Commercial
East
CC
Community Commercial
West
CC
Community Commercial
4013WL. Page
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Fri
OOWL Pages
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
2.2 Previous Approvals
The project site has four previous records located online.
• 811-22-000128-PROJ (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Expired
• 811 -22 -000127 -PRE (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Pre -application Conference
• 811 -19 -000265 -PRE (Master ProjecUMayhew Redevelopment): Pre -application
Conference
• 811-19-000266-PROJ — (Master Project/Mayhew Redevelopment): Expired
2.3 Project Description
The applicant proposes the construction of a new 4,987 square -foot Chick -fl -A restaurant with
dual 26 -foot -wide drive-through lanes and associated improvements in the northeast corner of
the project site. Two future pad sites are proposed in the southeastern and northwestern areas of
the project site. The applicant is seeking approval for the first phase of development only
(restaurant with drive-through lanes). The anticipated timeline and specified use for future phases
are unknown and will therefore be requested through a separate application in the future.
Site improvements include the removal of the existing motel and restaurant facilities, repaving of
the parking lot, new curbing and traffic marking, and new perimeter and interior parking lot
landscape planters. A total of 83 parking spaces will be provided for Chick-fil-A customers (of
which 81 will be standard stalls and two (2) will be ADA -accessible parking spaces).
Traffic will enter the site via Gateway Street (minor arterial) and a private driveway to the south
and west from two right-in/right-out drive aisles that connect to a series of on-site drive aisles
adjacent future pad sites and the proposed restaurant with drive-through lanes. Drive-through
lanes enter south of the main entry for the restaurant and parking lot, travel along the eastern
property line, up to the pick-up window along the northern extent of the restaurant building before
terminating within the new parking lot.
Existing city utilities (water, sewer, and stormwater) are extended and available on tax lot 1600.
Tax lot 1300 does not have an existing water line. As such, comments from the Springfield Utility
Board (SUB) are included with this application as Appendix 3, including comments and
recommendations for the extension of a water line from the southeast. Therefore, the applicant
requests approval to use existing facilities readily available to support the proposed restaurant.
A property line adjustment application has been prepared and submitted concurrently with this
site plan review application package to request the relocation of the western property line to
maintain the required setbacks and prevent the restaurant from straddling any property lines.
Ileo 13WL. Page
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967
3.0 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC)
The applicable development code provisions are set forth below with responses demonstrating
the project's consistency with these provisions.
Chapter 3 Land Use Districts
3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts
3.2-305 (8) Community Commercial District (CC).
3.2-305 (B) Community Commercial District (CC). The CC District establishes sites to
provide for a wide range of retail sales, service, and professional office use
and also includes all existing strip commercial areas.
3.2-310 Schedule of Use Categories.
"P" = PERMITTED USE subject to the standards of this Code.
"S" - SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS subject to special localional and/or siting standards as specified in Section 4.7-
100_
"D" . DISCRETIONARY USE subject to review and analysis under Type III procedure (Section 5 9-100) at the Planning
Commission or Hearings Official level.
"N" = NOT PERMITTED
SITE PLAN REVIEW SHALL BE REQUIRED unless exempted elsewhere in this Code.
Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a
permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses
demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development
standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative.
4013WL. Page
Commercial Dismore
Use Caw,desNses
NC
CC MRC
GO
Ealing and Drinill EmblishmenM
Cocklallxunges
P
P p
N
Delicatessens and sit down restaurants Includina es rewo shops Section 47-1,15)
P
P p
5
Dope up restaurants and espresso shops
P
P P
N
Tavems and brew pubs
0
P p
N
Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a
permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses
demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development
standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative.
4013WL. Page
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #84967
3.2-315 Base Zone Development Standards
Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located
on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more
than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all
property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two
feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage,
landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report.
'lleo13WL Page
Commeeial Zoning District
Development Standard
NC
CC
MRC GO
Minimum Area
6.000 square feet
6, 000 square feet6.000
squarefeet 6.000 square feet
Minimum Street Fronlage(1)
50 feet
50 lead50
feet 50 feet
AO Panhandle LotvParcels Minimum Steen
Net Permanent
40 feet
Net Pmmiaed Not Permitted
Frontage
Maximum LaVParcal Coverage
Development Areas 1 A. and 2 Aaes-
Labia el coverage limited onty by standards Nome,
35 percent Oavalopment Meas between
Sections sidle Cade.
2 antl 3Aaes- 35 pail and no single
lease space shall exceed 15 000 square
feet
Minimum Landscaping
Perimeter and Interior landscaping area
Minimum requomems defined by standards in often
combined coverage shall not be less Nan
SefLons of this Code.
20 percent of me total development area.
Maxknum Perking, loading and vehicular
45 percent
Laeparcel coverage limited onty by standards M oMer
circulation area average
Sections of this Code.
Landscaped Se baths (2)(3)(4) and (5)
Front Street Side Yard, and Through Lon Rear Yard
Building Setba t
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
10 Feet
Paddng, driveway, and me! .... Smile
7 Feel
5 Fed
5 Feet
5 Feet
setback
Interior Safe, Rear Yard S deaths when Abuming Residential or Cl Distils
Building Setbatlt
10 Fed
10 Feat
10 Feet
10 Feat
Pelting, Driveway Omdoor Storage
7 Feet
5 Feet
5 Feet
5 Feet
Setback
Maximum Budding Height(6)
20 Fast
No Maximum, except as specified belew
When a butting an MR or MDR District to
20 Feet
Defend hymn Maxanum Shade Pant Heigmrecommuche at
the nosh
Saddled 2-225410, sup to 50 foul "da mwNom Istel
he. a pare mbnding sash wM as state N23 degrees and
onglnala, man Ne lop of a 16 loin hypodermal fence coed on Ne
noMem seemed lie.
When abutting an UDR or MDR Direct to
20 Feet
No greater Man MatpelmMed in me MR or MDR Carl ler
Me east, wed, or scum
a dividends of 50 feet
Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located
on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more
than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all
property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two
feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage,
landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report.
'lleo13WL Page
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967
3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District
3.3-210 Applicability
As of May 15, 2000, all areas within specified wellhead TOTZ automatically are rezoned
to add the DWP Overlay District to the underlying zoning district. The areas to which
the DWP Overlay District is applied are shown on the Drinking Water Protection Area
Maps on file in the Development Services Department and incorporated in this Section
by reference.
Response: The project site is located in the Five Year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) in the
Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking
Water Protection Area. Therefore, this section is applicable and responses are
provided as required.
3.3-220 Time of Travel Zones
A. The DWP Overlay District includes 4 TOTZ: 0-1 year; 15 years; 5-10 years;
and 10-20 years. The locations of the TOTZ for each wellhead are shown on
Drinking Water Protection Area Maps on file with the City's Development
Services, Public Works, and Fire and Life Safety Departments; and
Springfield Utility Board (SUB) and Rainbow Water District (RWD).
Response: The project site is located in the Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) five (5) year in the
Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking
Water Protection Area.
3.3-225 Review
A. A DWP Overlay District Development Application is required when the
criteria of both Subsections A.1. and 2., below are met:
1. A site is affected by one of the following:
a. There is a change of land use, occupancy or tenancy of a property,
including, but not limited to: a change from vacant to occupied; or
b. During the Building Permit process; or
c. In conjunction with any development application, including, but not
limited to: Site Plan review and Minimum Development Standards.
Response: Existing conditions on the project site include a vacant motel and Elmers
Restaurant. The applicant's anticipated plans include demolishing both structures
and building a new restaurant (Chick -fl -A). An existing conditions and demolition
plan is included with this application as Sheet C1.0 of Appendix 4.
Future uses of Pad -A and Pad -B are unknown at this time and therefore, are not
included in this site plan review application or Drinking Water Protection (DWP)
Application Exemption Request. Therefore, the applicant anticipates future Pad -
A and Pad-Bwill be subjectto reviewthrough a DWP Overlay District Development
Application at a later point in time.
4013WL. Page
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
The Chi ck-fil-Arestaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers) and
therefore, no change of use, occupancy, or tenancy of the property is proposed
with this application. Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to
those practices currently used for Elmers.
2. The action in Subsection A.1., above will:
a. Affect the storage, use, and/or production of hazardous or other
materials that pose a risk to groundwater; or
b. Increase the quantity of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk
to groundwater that are stored, used and/or produced.
Response: The Chick -fl -A restaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers).
Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to those practices
currently used for Elmers. Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting
chemicals that are EPA -registered products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and
other cleaning chemicals are disposed of in accordance with the manufacturer's
label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through daily
use, cleaning chemicals are disposed of in the sanitary sewer in diluted forms.
Should bulk containers need to be disposed of, the containers will be taken to a
permitted local hazardous waste recycling facility.
B. Prior to the submittal of a DWP Overlay District Development Application, an
exemption request may be submitted to the Director as specified in Section
3.3-23013.1.
Response: No change of use is proposed with this application and no new hazardous
materials are anticipated thatwould cause a risk of contamination to groundwater.
Therefore, the applicant has included an exemption request from the DWP Overlay
District Development Application, including with this application as Appendix 9.
Chapter 4 Development Standards
4.2-100 Transportation
4.2-105 Public Streets
(B) An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to
identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed
mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met:
(1) Peak Hour Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an
existing use generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour as
determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the
Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS
must be performed by a registered professional engineer.
Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the
existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by
Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a
Ileo 13WL. Page 10
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the
project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated,
this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer
average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of
the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application
as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not
generate 100 or more vehicular trips during any peak hour, and a Traffic Impact
Study (TIS) is not required.
(2) Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or
intensification of an existing use generates 1,000 or more trips per
day as determined by procedures contained in the most recent
edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation
Manual, a TIS must be performed by a registered professional
engineer.
Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the
existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by
Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a
marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the
project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated,
this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer
average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of
the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application
as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not
generate 1,000 or more vehicular trips per day, and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is
not required.
(3) Variance and Known Issues Threshold. The Director may determine
that a TIS is necessary to support a request for a Variance from the
transportation provisions of this code or where traffic safety, street
capacity, future planned facility, or multimodal concerns may be
associated with the proposed development.
Response: No variance from the transportation provisions is requested with this application.
Therefore, this provision does not apply.
B. An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to
identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed
mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met:
Response: The applicant has included a Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum prepared
by Kittleson and Associates with this application as Appendix 7. The applicant
concludes that traffic generated from the proposed use will not be substantially
different than existing traffic levels generated from the existing use and therefore
requests confirmation of the need and scope of a TIS.
C. Minimum street curb -to -curb widths and minimum street right-of-way widths
are as specified in Table 4.2-1 unless otherwise indicated in the Springfield
Transportation System Plan, an applicable Refinement Plan, Plan District,
400WL Page 11
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Master Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, or the adopted bicycle and
pedestrian plan; where necessary to achieve rightof-way and street
alignment; or as needed to meet sitespecific engineering standards,
including but not limited to requirements for multi -way boulevard and/or
modern roundabout designs. Example street layouts meeting minimum
street standards are provided in Figures 4.2-13 through 4.2-V for illustrative
purposes only. These Figures are intended to demonstrate potential street
configurations that meet the requirements.
Table 4.2-1
Minimum Street Right -of -Way and Curb -to -Curb Standards
Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is
anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing
full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght-
in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the
site to commercial properties to the west and south.
D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria.
1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the
location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the
Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map.
Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The
applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the
site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through.
IE313WL Page 12
Tneal
bearably
FM.
RIgMM-Way
Cu@10 Cure
7.61
Lanes
Tum Lane
SMq and
H.
street Classllkalum
(1)
wade (1)
Lanes
Wki
VAON(2)
91keudautp)
Cure (1)
sidexew
4vt
i4blted
43&D
Me, Adenal(5)
14952'/84'
7BM9'
L
12'
hua 6'bel
5'
Teen sloes
e1M
ie
42 EG
MucaMesd(5)
75'/68.69
521/44'M
2
12'
6 W sloes
5 '
7'aoM SMfls
req'a�er
4.2 NJ
Mader Colleda
7.I64'l56'
52/10'/36
2
17
lam.
6'take sides
5•
5- note sides
requ ed
Minor CollWor-Nam
4.2 K-
13'efiere
Residential Zoning
roBY50'
S9I1Y21'
2
it
8'boM Sills
5
5'boM SMes
M
expense
DlsMds (8)
MlnorCdedor-
13'e9ere
4.2 N -P
Resleena6l Zoning
M'159M2'
35'/392.2
4'
WA
5'
5'Win sides
M,xM4
DaMM(6)
Lool5tree1 X15 pefceM
42Q5
5.7.719.14'
M'28'70'
2
19
WA
Not required
5'
5'aoM tleas
Node (7)
Loral Sheet x15p bt
4.2 T -V
y149132'
362a'2o'
2
19
WA
Not requVed
6 -curbs only
5'both sees
Value (7)
Sar
CuFde-sacauM
83•dlemeYr
79 diarbeler
WA
WA
NIA
WA
5'arwnd bulb
Noy
29
=qft�f
WA
WA
WA
Nolrequlred
Nulrequlred
Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is
anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing
full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght-
in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the
site to commercial properties to the west and south.
D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria.
1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the
location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the
Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map.
Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The
applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the
site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through.
IE313WL Page 12
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
2. Local Streets. The local street network, which includes pedestrian
accessways and multiuse paths, must meet the following standards:
Response: No local streets are proposed with this application.
3. Dead -End Streets.
Response: No dead-end streets are proposed with the redevelopment of the project site.
Therefore this provision and Subsections a — b are not applicable.
4. Block Length and Block Perimeter.
a. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following
maximums, except as provided or exempted elsewhere in this Code or in an
applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District:
iv. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts.
Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and the block perimeterwill not
exceed 1, 600 feet.
b. Block length must not exceed:
600 feet for local street not in industrial zones or that do not serve
industrial nonconforming or the maximum block length established
in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District, whichever is less;
Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district (considered other zoning
between Subsections i -iii) and the block length will not exceed 600 feet.
5. Maximum Street Grades. Street grades must not exceed 8% on major and
minor arterial streets, 10% on major and minor collector streets, and 12% on
local streets.
Response: No new roads (private, collector, or arterial) are proposed for this project site. All
local drive aisles will be graded to be level, with slopes well below 12%. A grading
plan is included as Sheet C3.0 of Appendix 4 reflecting proposed grading
throughout the project site.
Medians.
1. General. A raised median physically deters vehicles from crossing or
entering a median area by way of a raised curb or concrete barrier. Raised
medians help avoid crashes caused by crossover traffic, reduce headlight
glare distraction, prevent traffic turning left from through lanes, provide
refuge for pedestrians crossing the street, and remove turning traffic from
through lanes, thereby maintaining efficient and safe traffic flow. Median
design and installation must follow the standards in the Manual on Uniform
'lleo0 WL Page 13
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967
Traffic Control Devices and AASHTO's "A Policy on Geometric Design of
Highways and Streets."
Response: No medians are proposed for new internal drive aisles on the project site. However,
preliminary discussions with the City indicate the existing raised median on
Gateway Street will need to be shifted north to accommodate the proposed
driveway location entering the project site. A Project Improvement Plan (PIP) is
anticipated as a condition of approval for this project. The width, size, and length
of the relocated median are anticipated to remain the same as the existing median.
G. Additional Right -of -Way and Street Improvements.
1. Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a
development area requiring Development Approval, the dedication of
additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street dedication results in the
right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed
restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Deeds and Records
stating that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street
is constructed to serve the property, and connect with the City street system.
Response: Preliminary discussions with the City during a pre -application conference (811-22-
000127) indicate Gateway Street is not underdeveloped or inadequate and would
not require street frontage improvements at this time. Therefore, subsections two
through five are not applicable.
2. Whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on
the City street system and the development site has unimproved street
frontage, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications in
accordance with the following criteria:
Response: No land partition or development is proposed that would increase traffic, as
mentioned previously. In support of this conclusion, a trip generation assessment
memo drafted by Kittleson and Associations is provided with this application as
Appendix 7.
Table 4.2-1A
Special Street Setbacks
Streat Classlaoabon
Sataaok Distance from Ne Cantanlna (q
Major Anerlal
50'
Minor Arterial
38'
Major Collector
36'
Mlnor Colleabr
35'
Local Street, <16 percent slope
28.5'
Local Street, 215 percent sbpe
25'
Alley
10'
4013WL. Page 14
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
(1) Where fully improved right-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property,
the setback distance is one-half of the width of the existing, fully improved right-of-
way.
Response: Preliminary communications with the City indicate the right-of-way abutting the
eastern property line (Gateway Street) is fully improved. The Chick-fil-A building is
proposed 51 feet from Gateway Street (considered a minor arterial) and exceeds
half the required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A. The Chick -fl -A
building is not adjacent to Beltline (major arterial) and therefore exceeds half the
required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A.
4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways
A. Site Access and Driveways—General.
1. All developed lotstparcels are entitled to one approved driveway access
provided by either direct access to a:
a. Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or
Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The primary way traffic will
enter the project site is from Gateway Street. The driveway access from Gateway
Street will be limited to left -in -right -in -right -out movements and new cross-over
access will be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west
and south.
2. Driveway access to designated State Highways is subject to the provisions
of this Section in addition to requirements of the Oregon Department of
Transportation (ODOT). Where City and ODOT regulations conflict, the more
restrictive regulations shall apply.
Response: No access to the project site is proposed from a designated State Highway.
3. As determined by the Director, sites with abutting parking areas within the
same zoning district may be required to provide driveway connections or
pedestrian connections internal to the sites and joint access agreements to
provide efficient connectivity and preserve public street functions and
capacity.
Response: Driveway connections and pedestrian walkways are shown on the site plan
included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. It is the client's intention to obtain a
reciprocal access agreement on the southern drive aisle per this requirement.
B. Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development
sites abuts more than one street and streets are of differing classification as
identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan.
4E30WL Page 15
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967
EXCEPTION: Driveway access to or from a higher classification street may be
permitted if no reasonable alternative street access exists or where heavy use of
local streets is inappropriate due to traffic impacts in residential areas.
Response: Driveways to the project site will take access from the lower classification street,
Gateway Street. No access is proposed from Beltline. No exemptions are
requested with this application.
C. Driveways shall be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and
egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5 and the City's Engineering Design
Standards and Procedures Manual and the Development & Public Works Standard
Construction Specifications.
Table 4.2-2
Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the
project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with
no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes
from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified
in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot -
wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths
are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional
width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2.
Table 4.2-3
Driveway Design Specifications
1.way Driveway 2 -way Drivewayz
Width Width
Radius of Curb (2)
Driveway Throat
Depth
Land Use
MinN., MiNMas.
Mes.
Sioglefamily and Duplexes (3) (41
12'716' 12'-af(1)NA.
NA. NA.
NA
Multifamily Residential
26165' 118'CommercldWubg[
Mu6lfamlly Residential
24 feel 30 feet
Land(4)(5)
12916' 24135'(1)1Intlusldal
60 feet
CommarciaVPublic Land
(6)
12118' 26T35'n)18'(2)
35 feet
Go feet
Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the
project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with
no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes
from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified
in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot -
wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths
are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional
width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2.
Table 4.2-3
(1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or
to improve traffic safety.
(2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are
anticipated.
(3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle.
400WL. Page 16
Curb Room Dries" Design Specifications
Driveway WMth(1)
Radius of Curb (2)
Driveway Throat
Dep1h lend... (3)
tend Use
Min. Mac
Min.
Mes.
Single -Family and Duplexes
NA. NA.
NA
NA.
NA.
Mu6lfamlly Residential
24 feel 30 feet
10 feel
20 feel
60 feet
CommarciaVPublic Land
24 feet M feet
15 feet
35 feet
Go feet
Industrial
24 feet 35 feet
15 feet
35 feel
60 feel
(1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or
to improve traffic safety.
(2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are
anticipated.
(3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle.
400WL. Page 16
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street and multiple
internal drive aisles and private roadways within the commercial development site
to the south and west, which are within existing reciprocal access easements. New
internal drive aisles will be 24 feet wide or greater and allow for turning radii of 20
feet measured from curb to curb. A site plan is included with this application as
Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4.
Table 4.2.4
Minimum Separations Between a Driveway and the Nearest
Intersection Curb Return an the Same Side of the Street (1)
Land Use,
Street Type
Atterlal
Collector
Local
Single -Family Residential
and Duplexes
200 feet
50 feet
30 feet
Nulffamily Residential
209 feel
IDO feet
75 feet
CommerciaOPablic Land
209 feet
1DD feet
75100[
Induellial
200 feet
200 feet
150 Seel
(1) Each category of street is considered separately. Distances may be reduced
in the following circumstances:
(a) Access is from a one-way street.
(b) The driveway is marked for "right -in -right -out only."
(c) The driveway is marked "exit only" and is designed to prevent left
turns.
Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street (minor
arterial) and multiple internal drive aisles and private roadways within the
commercial development site to the south and west. The right-in/right-out access
driveway from Gateway Street is 147 feet from the nearest intersection curb,
consistent with this provision.
(d) In cases where an existing lotiparcel and/or use make compliance with
these specifications unreasonable, a new driveway or an existing
driveway required to be relocated by this Code shall be placed at the
furthest point from the intersection curb return, considering both safety
and internal circulation requirements of the development.
Response: Compliancewith these specifications is feasible, as specified above. Thereforethis
adjustment does not apply.
4013WL Page 17
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967
4.2-125Intersections
Intersections shall be designed and constructed as specified in
the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the following
requirements.
A. In order to minimize traffic conflicts and provide for efficient traffic
signalization, intersections involving curb return driveways and streets,
whether public or private, shall be directly opposed, unless a Traffic Impact
Study indicates that an offset intersection benefits public safety to a greater
degree.
Response: Preliminary communications with the city and Kittleson and Associates indicate
that the drive aisle to the south is considered aligned with adjacent commercial
drive aisles perthis requirement.
B. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right
angles. The angle of intersection between 2 intersecting streets shall be at
least 80 degrees. At intersections, each local street shall be straight or have
a radius greater than 400 feet for a distance of 100 feet from each
intersection. At intersections, each collector or arterial street shall be
straight or have a radius greater than 600 feet for a distance of 100 feet from
each intersection.
Response: New drive aisles and southern and western intersections are provided at right
angles throughout the project site per this requirement, per this requirement.
4.2-130 Vision Clearance Area
A. All lots or parcels must maintain a Vision Clearance Area to provide
adequate sight distance for approaching traffic. Vision clearance areas must
be shown on Site Plans for applicable land use applications.
Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as
Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4.
B. No screens, plantings, or other physical obstructions are permitted between
2Yz and 8 feet above the established height of the curb in the Vision
Clearance Area.
Response: All structures and public facilities have been designed in accordance with the
appropriate City codes to meet this standard. Plantings include trees that will reach
mature heights between 30-50 feet. The applicant anticipates shrubs will be
maintained to a height less than two and one-half feet from the curb to keep clear
vision areas free of visual obstacles. A landscape plan and supplemental
information sheets are included with this application as Sheets L1.0 — L1.2 of
Appendix 4.
4013WL. Page 18
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
C. The Vision Clearance Area must be in the shape of a triangle. Two sides of
the triangle must be property lines or a property line and edge of driveway
for a distance specified in this Subsection. Where the property lines or
driveway edge have rounded corners, they are measured by extending them
in a straight line to a point of intersection. The third side of the triangle is a
line across the corner of the lot or parcel joining the non -intersecting ends
of the other 2 sides. The following measurements establish the Vision
Clearance Area:
Table 4.2-5
Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as
Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4. As illustrated, the areas exceed ten feet from all
approaches, as measured from the rounded corners of the driveway edge in a
straight line to a point of intersection.
4.2-135 Sidewalks
A. Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets shall be located wholly
within the public street right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the
Director.
Response: Existing sidewalks and planter strips are provided on Gateway Street and Beltline.
The applicant does not anticipate that new sidewalks and planter strips along street
frontages will be required for the redevelopment of the project site.
4.2-140 Street Trees
Street trees are those trees required within the public right-of-way. The primary
purpose of street trees is to create a streetscape that benefits from the aesthetic
and environmental qualities of an extensive tree canopy along the public street
system. Street trees are attractive amenities that improve the appearance of the
community, provide shade and visual interest, and enhance the pedestrian
environment. Street trees also improve air quality, reduce stormwater runoff, and
moderate the micro -climate impacts of heat absorbed by paved surfaces. Street
trees may be located within a planter strip or within individual tree wells on a
sidewalk, round -about, or median.
EXCEPTION: In order to meet street tree requirements where there is no planter
strip and street trees cannot be planted within the public right-of-way, trees shall
be planted in the required front yard or street side yard setback of private property
as specified in the applicable zoning district.
40E3 WL Page 19
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: No modifications to the existing frontages on Beltline or Gateway Street are
proposed. As such, the applicant anticipates existing street treeswill be preserved
consistent with this provision.
4.2-145 Lighting Standards
Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and accessways must conform to the
following design standards and the Development 8r Public Works Standard Construction
Specifications:
A. Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment.
Existing lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new
developments or redevelopment. The developer is responsible for lighting
material and installation costs.
Response: New lighting will be provided forthe Chick-fil-A building and internal parking areas,
consistent with this provision.
B. Upon approval by the Director, a developer may install decorative lights, as
may be permitted in this section and the Development & Public Works
Standard Construction Specifications.
Response: The applicant does not anticipate decorative lighting forthe project site. Therefore,
this provision does not apply.
C. Design Standards.
1. Lighting must comply with Illuminating Engineering Society,
American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8-
14 and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National
Electrical Code (NEC) standards.
Response: All proposed lighting is designed to comply with the Illuminating Engineering
Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8-14,
and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical
Code (NEC) standards. A photometric plan is included with this application as
Appendix 6 to demonstrate consistency with this provision.
2. Intersections must be illuminated to a level equal to the sum of the
average required illuminance of the 2 intersecting streets.
Response: The applicant is proposing two new drive aisles, one each at the west and south
from adjacent parcels. The location of driveway intersections and illumination
levels are shown on the photometric plan, included with this application as
Appendix 6.
3. Mid -block crosswalks that are approved by the City Traffic Engineer
must have 2 times the illumination required for the street.
400WL. Page 20
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: No mid block crosswalks are proposed for this project site. Therefore, this provision
does not apply.
4. Decorative poles with City -approved LED fixtures and lighting
controls must be used on all streets within the Nodal Development
Overlay District and where any refinement plan or plan district
requires decorative lighting. Decorative poles may be used on streets,
paths, and accessways in any other zone at the option of the
developer as approved by the Director.
Response: The project site is not located within the Nodal Development Overlay District.
Therefore, this provision does not apply.
5. City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used when
lighting is required along multi -use paths and accessways.
Response: No multi -use paths or accessways are proposed with this application. Therefore,
this provision does not apply.
6. Roadway style poles and "cobra head" fixtures with City -approved
LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used along streets in all
other locations.
Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application. All
existing exterior building and parking lot lighting will be shielded and directed
inwards towards the proposed development area. The lighting shall not reflect on
or cast a glare on adjacent properties and will likely use "cobra head" fixtures for
all parking lot light poles.
When roadway style poles are used on arterial and collector streets
in any zone other than residential, they must be steel or aluminum.
When roadway style poles are used on local and collector streets in
residential zones, they must be fiberglass, steel, or aluminum.
Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application.
Therefore this provision does not apply.
8. Where lot frontages are 80 feet or less, poles must be located at
property lines unless approved by the Director.
Response: Lot frontages on the project site exceed 80 feet. Therefore this provision does not
apply.
9. The weak point illumination must not be less than 0.1 -foot candles.
Response: The weak point illumination exceeds 0.1 -footcandle, as demonstrated on the
photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6.
4013WL. Page 21
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
10. Roadway style poles set behind sidewalks must have 8 -foot arm
length. Roadway style poles set between curb and sidewalk or where
no sidewalk exists must have 6 -foot arm length.
Response: No new walkways or multi -use paths are proposed with this project and as such,
lighting or roadway -style poles along said paths are not proposed. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
11. Pole handholes must be used instead of junction boxes where
feasible. Junction boxes for street lighting must only be utilized for
street crossings or where necessary to comply with electrical code
standards cited above.
Response: Where applicable, the applicant anticipates pole handholes will be used for all light
poles in place of junction boxes, consistent with this provision.
12. Pole Height.
Lights on local streets with a curb -to -curb width of less than 28
feet must have a 20 -foot fixture mounting height.
Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, light poles on
local streets will be designed to have a 20 -foot fixture -mounted height, per this
requirement.
Lighting on local streets must be installed on the same side of
the street and on the side of the street first constructed, except
where necessary to be consistent with the existing lighting
design and placement.
Response: No new local street lights are proposed with this project.
Light poles must not be placed on the outside of curves with
less than a 1,000 -foot radius.
Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, no light poles
are proposed on the outside of curves with less than a 1,000 -foot radius, per this
requirement.
4.2-150 Multi -Use Paths
A. Development abutting an existing or proposed multi -use path identified in
the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street
Map), City -adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan, or the adopted Willamalane
Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan must include provisions
for the extension of the multi -use path through the development area by the
dedication of public easements or rights-of-way. The developer bears the
cost of multi -use path improvements.
'lleo0 WL Page 22
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: The project site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed multi -use path as
identified in Figure 12 ofthe City's Transportation System Plan —Conceptual Street
Map. Therefore, this provision does not apply.
4.2-120 Accessways
A. Accesswsys allow pedestrians and bicyclists convenient linkages to
adjacent streets, residential areas, neighborhood activity centers, industrial
or commercial centers, transit facilities, parks, schools, open space, or trails
and paths where no public street access exists. Accesswsys may also be
used as a secondary emergency access. Accessways must be dedicated as
public right-of-way during the development review process.
EXCEPTION: When site constraints preclude the ability to dedicate right-of-
way without impacting setback requirements or other development
standards, the Director may authorize dedication of a public easement or
may otherwise modify the standards in this Section.
Response: Existing pedestrian accessways are provided on Beltline and Gateway Street.
Therefore no accessways are proposed for this project.
4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Utilities
4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers
A. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development within the
city limits and to connect developments to existing mains. Installation of
sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities
and shall comply with the provisions of this Code, with the Public Works
Standard Construction Specifications, the City's Engineering Design
Standards and Procedures Manual, the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997 and
Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regulations.
Response: Existing sanitary sewer lines are present throughout the project site. The applicant
anticipates that the restaurant will connect to the city sewer in the northeastern
corner of the project site. A utility plan showing the location of water, sewer, and
stormwater lines is included with this application as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4.
B. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed
systems prior to development approval.
Response: The applicant anticipates that review and approval of the utility plan are necessary
before development approval, consistent with this provision.
C. Proposed sewer systems shall include design consideration of additional
development within the area as projected by the Metro Plan.
Response: The project site is not adjacent to an expansion area or proposed expanded
service pipe as shown in Figure 5.5 of the City Wastewater Master Plan.
4tJ 0 W L Page 23
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
D. Proposed developments shall provide dedication and improvements
indicated in an adopted Capital Improvements Program or Public Facilities
Plan. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to
adopted City Council policy.
Response: No wastewater projects are identified adjacent to the project site according to
Table 6.1 of the City's Wastewater Master Plan.
4.3-110 Stormwater Management
A. Stormwater Management Regulations. By implementing the policies set
forth in the currently approved Stormwater Management Plan, provide for
the effective management of stormwater and drainage from the City into the
groundwater and watercourses within the City and its urbanizing area;
minimize demand on the City's stormwater management system, and
alleviate future costs of treating the discharge; promote water quality;
preserve groundwaterand the vegetation and rivers it supports; reduce peak
storm flows; minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions; and
minimize stormwater discharge impacts on water quality and quantity and
stream flow patterns, including peak and base flows in intermittent and
perennial streams, within the McKenzie River and Willamette River
watersheds.
Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of
Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The
drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and
quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that
are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis
has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in
the existing system.
B. The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where
adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions
have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with
the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and
the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The stormwater
management system shall be separated from any sanitary sewer system.
Surface water drainage patterns shall be addressed on every Preliminary
Site Plan, or Tentative Partition or Subdivision Plan.
Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed stormwater management system complies
with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and the Engineering
Design Standards and Procedures Manual as required by this section.
C. A stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run-off
from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the
development. The Public Works Director shall determine the necessary size
of the facility, based on adopted Public Facility Plans and Stormwater
400 0 W L Page 24
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Facility Master Plans. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the
cost according to adopted City Council policy.
Response: The proposed stormwater system design is shown on Sheet C4.0 and described
in the drainage report included with this application as Appendix 10. Because the
project will be redeveloping an existing site that has more impervious coverage
than what is proposed, the resultant peak flows entering the public system will be
smaller than existing.
D. Runoff from development shall be directed to an approved stormwater
management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Where
the Public Works Director determines that the additional run-off resulting
from the development will overload an existing stormwater management
system, the Approval Authority shall withhold Development Approval until
provisions, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual, have been made to correct or mitigate this condition.
Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of
Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The
drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and
quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that
are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis
has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in
the existing system.
E. Any development with a stormwater threshold management requirement of
1,000 square feet of impervious surface area shall be required to employ
stormwater management practices consistent with the
Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, which
minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into receiving streams.
The following stormwater management practices may be required in order
to relieve demand on the City's piped drainage system, alleviate future costs
of treating the piped discharge, promotewater quality, preserve groundwater
and the vegetation and rivers it supports, and reduce peak storm flows:
1. Temporary ponding of water;
2. Permanent storage basins;
3. Minimizing impervious surfaces;
4. Emphasizing natural water percolation and natural drainageways;
5. Preventing water flowing from the street in an uncontrolled fashion;
6. Stabilizing natural drainageways as necessary below drainage and
culvert discharge points for a distance sufficient to convey the
discharge without channel erosion, as perm ittedlal lowed by City,
State and Federal regulations;
400WL Page 25
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
7. On-site filtration or skimming of run-off, that will enter natural
drainageways to maintain water quality;
8. On-site constructed wetlands; and
9. The riparian area boundary, as specified in Subsection 4.3-115A, may
be utilized to meet City on-site stormwater management requirements
for flood control and water quality treatment provided the design is
complementary to and supportive of the primary objective of a
properly functioning riparian habitat condition. Where the riparian
boundary is not of sufficient size to meet these on-site requirements,
the additional area needed shall be located contiguous to the riparian
boundary to form a consolidated stormwater feature for operational
and maintenance efficiencies and that is designed to be compatible
with and complementary to the riparian area boundary.
Response: Total impervious cover exceeds 1,000 square feet and therefore, will implement
several of the stormwater management practices listed above, including
stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 inch over 24-hour
stormwater event.
It's of note that the redevelopment of the project site will decrease the area of
impervious cover from 3.651 acres (159,037 square feet) to 3.648 acres (158,907
square feet).
F. Identification of Water Quality Limited Watercourses. The Director shall
maintain a Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map on file in the
Development Services Department, which designates certain watercourses
and their direct tributaries within the City and its urbanizing area. The WQLW
Map shall contain watercourses recommended by the Public Works Director.
Any revision to the WQLW Map shall be approved by the City Council as an
amendment to this Code. Those watercourses and their direct tributaries
included on the WQLW Map have been found to warrant protective measures
in support of the City's response to State and federal regulations regarding
surface and subsurface discharging stormwater management systems by
satisfying the following criteria:
1. Water Quality Limited Watercourses(WQLW): Waters of the State that
meet one or more of the following criteria:
a. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing
area, that are included by the State of Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality (ODEQ) on its most recently adopted
"303(d)" List of Impaired and Threatened Waterbodies.
b. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing
area, with significant water quality impairment identified by
water quality monitoring and sampling done in accordance
'lleo0 WL Page 26
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
with approved quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC)
protocols.
Response: The project site is not adjacent to a watercourse as identified in the City's Natural
Resource Study Report (2011). The applicant's proposed use is the same as the
existing use on the project site. Consistency with water quality assurance/quality
control protocols is outlined in further detail in findings for the Drinking Water
Protection Overlay District. Therefore, the applicant anticipates this provision and
all Subsections do not apply.
4.3-117 Natural Resource Protection Areas
Response: No locally significant wetland and riparian areas, flood hazard areas, or Goal 5
resources are identified on the project site. The site is located within the Drinking
Water Protection Overlay. The project's consistency with the Drinking Water
Protection Overlay District is discussed earlier in this narrative. Therefore, this
section does not apply.
4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination
A. All utility providers shall be responsible for coordinating utility installations
with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee
or by separate written correspondence.
B. The developer shall be responsible for the design, installation and cost of
utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider.
Response: The applicant anticipates existing wastewater, stormwater, and franchise lines are
available adjacent to the proposed restaurant. There is no existing water line to
serve the future restaurant location and as such, the applicant plans to extend
water from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing
tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. Plans indicate the new waterline and
junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide dedicated easement for SUB. The
location and specifications surrounding the new domestic waterline are outlined in
the marked site plan from SUB, included with this application as Appendix 3. These
comments were included in the design and shown on the utility plan included as
Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4.
4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities
Whenever possible, all utility lines shall be placed underground. However, overhead
and above -ground facilities are permitted for the following:
Response: All existing and proposed utility lines shown on Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4 that are
contiguous to the project site, including those required for electricity,
communication, water, and stormwater will be placed underground as required by
this provision.
to 13 W IL Page 27
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967
4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection
A. Each development area shall be provided with a water system having
sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply
to the development with sufficient access for maintenance.
Response: A new water line will extend from the eastern property line up to the restaurant
building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. The proposed
line will be sized to provide domestic water service and with adequate pressure for
fire suppression purposes. The location of fire hydrants and water lines are shown
on Sheet C5.0 and Sheet C5.1 in Appendix 4.
B. Fire hydrants and mains shall be installed by the developer as required by
the Fire Marshal and the utility provider.
Response: The applicant anticipates fire hydrants and mains will be installed as required by
the Fire Marshal and utility provider (SUB). As such, the applicant has provided a
utility plan (Sheet C5.0) and fire access plan (Sheet C5.1) in Appendix 4 to
demonstrate the project's consistency with this provision.
4.3-135 Major Electrical Transmission Lines
A. When necessary to increase the capacity of major electrical power
transmission lines, utility providers shall provide the increase by use of
existing rights-of-way or easements.
Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed restaurant use will have similar if not less
electrical utility demand compared to the previous uses (formerly Elmer's
restaurant and a motel). Therefore, no increase in the capacity of major electrical
power transmission lines is anticipated and this provision does not apply.
4.3-140 Public Easements
A. Utility Easements. The applicant shall make arrangements with the City and
each utility providerforthe dedication of utility easements necessary to fully
service the development or land beyond the development area, as
necessary. The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street
rights-of-way shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility
easements shall also be 7 feet. However, the utility provider or the Public
Works Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major
electric power transmission lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater
management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance
vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance orto accommodate
multiple utility lines. Where feasible, utility easements shall be centered on
a lotiparcel line.
Response: There is no existing water line to serve the future restaurant location and as such,
the applicant plans to extend water from the eastern property line up to the
restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street.
40013 W L. Page 28
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967
Plans indicate the new waterline and junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide
dedicated easement for SUB. The location and specifications surrounding the new
domestic waterline are outlined in a letter from SUB, included with this application
as Appendix 3. These comments were included in the design and shown on the
utility plan included as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4.
4.4-100 Landscaping, Screening and Fence Standards
4.4-105 Landscaping
A. These regulations ensure that new development complies with the
landscaping provisions of this Code and any applicable Refinement Plans,
Plan Districts, Master Plans, and Conceptual Development Plans; is
adequately screened from less intensive development; considers the effects
of vegetation on public facilities; retains significant clusters of natural trees
and shrubs wherever possible; minimizes run-off; facilitates energy
conservation and crime prevention; and improves the appearance of the City
to create a desirable place to live and work
Response: A landscaping plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4 to
illustrate landscaping improvements and consistency with the Gateway
Refinement Plan.
B. Three types of landscaping may be required:
1. Landscaping standards for private property as specified in this
Section and other Sections of this Code.
Response: Existing street trees and curbside planter strips along the public right-of-way were
both noted as sufficient, with no required landscaping improvements. Therefore,
the applicant anticipates private property landscaping requirements, as specified
in this code, and the Gateway Refinement Plan will be required.
C. Materials and installation costs of planting and irrigation other than what is
required by the Minimum Development Standards (Section 5.15-100) shall
not be required to exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development,
including parking facilities. The Director shall determine the location,
quantity and quality of required landscaping as specified in this Code.
Response: The applicant anticipates that the cost of planting and irrigation will not exceed 10
percent of the value of the new development, as specified in this provision.
D. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, the following areas of a lotiparcel
shall be landscaped:
1. All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as
specified in the appropriate zoning district.
2. Parking lot planting areas required in this Section.
'lletJ 0 W L. Page 29
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: The applicant has prepared and included a landscape plan as Sheet L1.0 of
Appendix 4, that identifies perimeter landscaping, interior landscaping, and
parking lot planting areas, consistent with this provision.
E. At least 65 percent of each required planting area shall be covered with living
plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant
materials shall be distributed throughout the required planting area. The
planting acceptable per 1,000 square feet of the required planting area is as
follows:
Response: The landscape plan is designed such that each required planting will achieve at
least 75 percent with living plant materials within three (3) years, consistent with
the more stringent standard outlined in the Gateway Refinement Plan.
The gross floor area of the proposed restaurant is 4,987 square feet. The
landscape plan shows 71 trees, 1,222 shrubs, and 10,365 square feet of ground
cover. A landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet L1.0 of Appendix
4.
F. Parking lot planting areas shall include 1 canopy tree at least 2 inches in
caliper that meets City street tree standards as may be permitted by the
City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and at least 4
shrubs, 5 -gallon or larger, for each 100 square feet of planting area.
Shrubbery that abuts public right-of-way or that is placed in the interior of
any parking lot shall generally not exceed 2-1/2 feet in height at maturity.
Parking lot planting areas shall include:
Parking and driveway setback areas specified in the applicable
zoning district; and
5 percent of the interior of a parking lot, exclusive of any required
parking setbacks, if 24 or more parking spaces are located between
the street side of a building and an arterial or collector street, and are
visible from any street.
Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and is subject to a ten -foot
building setback and five-foot parking, driveway, and outdoor storage setback. The
landscape plan indicates 18 percent or 5,196 square feet of the interior parking lot
is screened from Beltline and Gateway Street, consistent with this provision and
the Gateway Refinement Plan.
G. All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent
underground irrigation system unless where planted with native species or
plant communities, or as may be exempted by the Director.
Response: The applicant anticipates that all new planting areas will be provided with a
permanent underground irrigation system. Irrigation system design and plans will
be provided following land use approval.
40013 W L Page 30
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
H. Landscaped setbacks abutting required screening on the same property may
be exempted by the Director from planting requirements if the area is not
visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent property.
Response: The applicant anticipates that the project site will be able to provide landscaping
within the required property setbacks in the CCzoning districtwhile also complying
with the screening requirements for mechanical equipment and trash enclosures.
Therefore, no exemption is requested with this application.
Planting Installation Standards.
1. The applicant shall provide methods for the protection of existing
plant material, which will remain through the construction process.
The plants to be saved and the method of protection shall be noted
on the Planting Plan.
Response: No existing planting material will remain through the construction process.
Therefore this provision does not apply.
2. Existing trees to be retained on private property shall not have
construction occur within the drip line, unless a landscape architect
certifies that affected trees will have at least a 90 percent chance of
survival over a 5 -year period. Trees to be saved shall be kept free from
trunk abrasion.
Response: No existing trees will be retained on the project site. Therefore, the applicant
anticipates a Tree Felling Permit will be required and will be provided following
land use approval.
3. The Planting Plan may be required to include specifications for
topsoil, including depth and organic matter requirements, to ensure
the health and vitality of required planting. Where planting areas have
been excavated, the Planting Plan shall provide for the replacement
of topsoil. All waste material shall be removed from required planting
areas prior to the application of topsoil.
Inspection may be made by the Director prior to planting to
verify proper rough grade and installation of irrigation
systems.
b. Plant materials and soil preparation may be inspected prior to
or in conjunction with the occupancy inspection to ensure that
placement, quantity, size, and variety conform to the approved
Planting Plan and the requirements of this Section. Nursery
tags identifying variety and species shall remain on plant
specimens until the Final Building Inspection by the Building
Official or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy.
ltJO WL Page 31
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: The applicant understands that inspection and verification of soil depth and organic
matter will occur before the proposed plantings.
4.4-110 Screening
A. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, screening shall be required:
2. For outdoor mechanical devices and minor and major public facilities;
4. For trash receptacles;
Response: The project site does not abut a residential or different zoned area, and therefore
is not subject to screening between uses. Outdoor mechanical devices and minor
and major facilities will be located on the roof and screened behind the building
fagade. The location and screening method for mechanical equipment can be seen
on the architectural plan, included with this application as Appendix 5.
Trash and recycling receptacles will be located within an enclosure, designed to
have matching architectural features to the proposed restaurant including a
combination of dark steel and white stucco siding.
B. Screening shall be vegetative, earthen and/or structural and be designed to
minimize visual and audible incompatible uses from adjacent properties.
Unless specified elsewhere in this Subsection, screening shall be
continuous to at least 6 feet above ground level. The following standards
shall apply:
1. Vegetative Screening. Evergreen shrubs shall be planted to form a
continuous hedge. When immediate screening is necessary, a sight -
obscuring fence shall be installed in place of, or in conjunction with
the shrubs. The 6 -foot height standard specified in Subsection B.,
above shall occur within 4 years of planting.
3. Structural Screening. Afence or masonry wall shall be constructed to
provide a uniform sightobscuring screen.
EXCEPTIONS:
Any refuse container or disposal area which would otherwise
be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking
area, any public facility, adjacent property, or any residential
area, shall be screened from view as specified in Subsections
1. and 3., above. All refuse materials shall be contained within
the screened area. See also Section 3.2-240D.3.b. for
multifamily design standards. This standard does not apply to
single and 2 -family dwellings.
Response: The refuse and recycling areas are located within an enclosed masonry wall, as
shown on the architectural plan included in Appendix 5.
4013WL. Page 32
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
4.4-115 Fences
Fences shall not exceed the height standards in Table 4.4-1 and shall be located as
follows:
A. General
1. In any zoning, overlay or plan district not specifically listed in Table 4.4-1,
fence standards shall be determined based upon the use, for example a
commercial use in the Mixed Use Commercial District shall comply with
fence standards for the commercial districts in Table 4.4-1.
Response: No fences are proposed with this application. Therefore this provision does not
apply.
4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards
4.5-110 Illumination and Height
A. Standards for Installation and Operation of Outdoor Lighting. Except as
exempt by subsection (C) of SDC 4.5.105 above, new outdoor lighting
fixtures installed after July 1, 2022, are subject to the standards below. No
provision of this section is intended to preempt Springfield Municipal Code
8.200 et seq., Signs, or applicable State codes.
(1) All outdoor lighting fixtures subject to this section must be designed
as a full cut-off fixture or have a shielding method to direct light
emissions down onto the site and not shine direct illumination or
glare onto adjacent properties.
(2) All lighting for roadways, roadway signs, intersections, and
pedestrian ways must be designed or have an opaque shielding
method to direct light emissions downward and below the horizontal
plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position.
(3) The use of laser source light or any similar high intensity light for
outdoor advertising or entertainment is prohibited.
(6) Businesses and institutions with outdoor lighting, such as parking lot
lights, building lights, landscaping lights, and other similar exterior
lighting features, are encouraged to extinguish such lights at the end
of the working day, except for lights necessary for personal and
building safety.
Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the
photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be
provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on-
site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas,
landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be
40013 W L Page 33
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided
at roadway signs and private driveway intersections will be designed to be
downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently
installed position.
B. On-site lighting shall be the minimum illumination necessary for a given
application including parking areas and vehicle sales areas. All exterior light
fixtures shall be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are
contained within the boundaries of the property and directed downward and
away from abutting properties; public rightsof-way; and riparian, wetlands,
and other protected areas identified in this Code on the same property.
Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the
photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be
provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on-
site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas,
landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be
downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided
at roadway signs and at private driveway intersections will be designed to be
downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently
installed position.
C. Height.
1. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture shall not exceed 25
feet or the height of the principal permitted structure, whichever is
less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between
the paved surface and the bottom of the light fixture.
Response: All proposed light poles will not exceed the 25 -foot maximum height requirement
per this provision.
4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards
4.6-110 Motor Vehicle Parking — General
A. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided, consistent with requirements in
Section 4.6-125, Table 4.6-2, unless excepted as allowed herein, for:
1. All new construction and expansion of multiple family residential,
commercial, industrial and public and semi-public uses. If an existing
development is expanded, new parking spaces shall be provided in
proportion to the increase only.
2. Changes in use or the use category of an existing building or
structure.
Response: The applicant anticipates new parking spaces are required due to the change in
use from the existing buildings (formerly Elmer's and a motel) to the new restaurant
400 13 W L Page 34
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
and future Pad Site A and future Pad Site B. Parking totals and design findings are
provided for the restaurant only. Future Pad Site parking totals will be provided
when developed in the future.
B. If parking has been provided to serve an existing use, the number of parking
spaces cannot be reduced if the result would be fewer spaces than required
by this Section, except as parking reductions are allowed below and under
Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2.
Response: The applicant has reconfigured the parking lot from the existing use and existing
parking in an effort to provide ample room for new development (utilities, drive
aisles, landscape improvements, and future pad sites). Parking counts will not
result in fewer parking spaces than those provided under the existing approval.
C. Parking reductions under Sections 4.6-110.1-1 through L and Special
Provisions to Table 4.6-2 shall not reduce the number of ADA parking spaces
required in accordance with the minimum parking in Table 4.6-2 or under
Section 4.6-110.M.
Response: No parking reductions are requested with this application. Two ADA parking
spaces are proposed, consistentwith Table 4.6-2 and Section 4.6-110.M.
E. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of passenger
vehicles of residents, customers, patrons, visitors, and employees only, and
shall not be used for outdoor displays, storage of vehicles, equipment, or
materials. Parking for company motor vehicles that remain on the premises
overnight, or enclosures designed for the temporary collection of shopping
carts, must be provided in addition to the number of parking spaces required
by this Section.
Response: All required parking totals are provided for passenger vehicles of customers,
patrons, visitors, and employees. No outdoor displays, storage of vehicles,
equipment, or materials is proposed with this application.
E. Unless joint use of parking facilities is requested as may be permitted in
Subsection E. below, the total requirement for off-street parking spaces is
the sum of the requirements for all uses. If the total number of required
parking spaces results in a fraction, the fraction shall be rounded up to the
next whole number. Off-street parking facilities for one use shall not be
considered as providing parking facilities for any other use, unless as may
be permitted in Subsection F., below.
Response: Parking totals proposed with this application are for the restaurant building only.
Additional parking stalls to serve future pad sites A and B are shown on the site
plan but not requested as a part of the application and will be designed and
included in future submittals.
G. When on -street parking is available directly abutting the property and there
are no adopted plans to remove the on -street parking, parking spaces in a
400 0 W L Page 35
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
public right-of-way directly abutting the development area may be counted
as fulfilling a part of the parking requirements for development as follows:
For each 18 feet of available on -street parking, there will be 1/2 space credit
toward the required amount of off-street parking spaces. The developer is
responsible for marking any on -street spaces.
Response: There are no on -street parking areas directly abutting the project site. Therefore,
this provision does not apply.
H. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Additional Bicycle
Parking. Additional bicycle parking beyond the minimum amount required in
Table 4.6-3 that complies with the bike parking standards in Sections 4.6-145
and 4.6-150 may substitute up to 20% of off-street motor vehicle parking
otherwise required in Table 4.6-2. For every 2 non -required bicycle parking
spaces that meet the short -or long-term bicycle parking standards specified
in Table 4.63, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by 1 space.
When existing parking converted to bicycle parking under this subsection
results in surplus motor vehicle parking spaces, the surplus parking may be
converted to another use in conformance withthe requirements of this Code.
Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit
Corridors—Abutting Sites. Development sites abutting an existing or
proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 15%
from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2.
Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
J. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit
Corridors—Nearby Sites. Development sites not abutting but within 1/4 -mile
of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a
reduction of up to 10% from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking
required in Table 4.6-2.
Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
K. Reduction Credit for ADA Improvements for Frequent Transit Corridors.
Development sites abutting or within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed
Frequent Transit Corridor may receive a reduction of up to 10% from the
minimum off-street motorvehicle parking required in Table4.6-2 in exchange
for contribution to the City forADA improvements in the public right-of-way.
The required contribution will be equal to the Base Curb Ramp Fee multiplied
by each set of 4 parking spaces to be reduced, rounded up to the next whole
number (e.g. one Base Curb Ramp Fee for 1 to 4 parking spaces reduced,
double the Base Curb Ramp Fee for 5 to 8 parking spaces reduced, etc.). The
400 0 W L Page 36
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Base Curb Ramp Fee must be set by Council resolution and must be
approximately the cost of constructing one ADA -compliant curb ramp.
Nothing in this subsection waives or alters any requirement for a developer
to construct or provide on-site or off-site ADA improvements.
Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
N. Right Size Parking Alternative -Maximum. The Approval Authority may
authorize an alternative parking standard that is more than 125% of the
minimum off-street parking standard in Section 4.6-125. The alternative
parking standard must be the peak parking demand identified by a parking
generation study conducted according to the ITE Manual of Transportation
Engineering Studies and prepared by a licensed engineer. (6412)
Response: The project site is required to provide a minimum of 50 parking stalls and is limited
to a maximum of 63 parking stalls. Atotal of 83 parking stalls is requested to serve
the proposed restaurant, which exceeds the maximum allowed amount. In support
of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates
is included with this application as Appendix 8.
4.6-115 Motor Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Design
All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards:
Table 4.6-1
Dimensional Feature (all dimensions in feet) Diagram
Stall width, standard
Parking Angle
0 45 J � 0 90
A I 9.0 9.0 I 9.0 I 9.01
Stallwidth, compact
I A
1 30
801 801
8 0
Stall length. standard
I1
24.0
18.0 18.0
18.0
Stall length. compact
I1
22.0
16.0 16.0
16.0
Aisle width between stall Imes
I 1
12.0
12.0 16.0
24.0
Bumper overhang(typicah
IDI
0.0
1.5 1.6
2.0
Cross -aisle, I-way
I1
16.0
16.0 16.0
1 16.0
Cross -aisle, 2 -way
I1
24.0
24.0
24.0
24.0
Response: Parking stall locations and dimensions are shown on the site plan included with
this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4.
41to0 WL Page 37
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967
4.6-120 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Lot Improvements
All parking areas shall conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting and
screening provisions of this Code and shall be completed prior to occupancy.
Required parking spaces shall be improved as follows:
A. All parking lots, bays, and spaces must have a durable, dust -free surfacing
of Asphaltic concrete, Portland cement concrete or other materials as
approved by the City Engineer. Permeable pavement meeting standards in
the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual may be
allowed by the City Engineer for parking areas and driveways. Parking lot
surfacing shall not encroach upon the public right-of-way.
Response: The existing parking area will be resurfaced with new Asphalt concrete, as
approved by the City Engineer.
B. Adequate drainage improvements shall be provided to manage all onsite
run-off. Provisions shall be madeforthe on-site collection of drainagewaters
to eliminate sheet flow onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting
private property. All drainage systems shall be approved by the City
Engineer.
Response: Adequate drainage improvements are proposed to manage surface water run-off
from the site, as shown on the storm plan included in Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4.
C. All parking spaces fronting a sidewalk, alley, street, landscaped area or
structure shall be provided with a secured wheel bumper or linear curb not
less than 6 inches in height to be set back from the front of the stall a
minimum of 2 feet to allowfor vehicle encroachment. Wheel bumpers shall
be a minimum of 6 feet in length. Curbs shall be constructed in conformance
with the Standard Construction Specifications.
EXCEPTION: As an option, the sidewalk or landscaped area may be widened
2 feet beyond the minimum dimension required to allow for vehicle
encroachment. A curb not less than 6 inches in height shall protect the
widened sidewalks and planter areas.
Response: The site has been designed such that linear curb will be provided in front of parking
spaces abutting the restaurant, drive-through lanes, and landscaped areas.
D. Backing into the public right-of-way, other than alleys is prohibited.
EXCEPTION: Parking areas of less than 4 spaces on a residentially zoned
lotiparcel may back into the public right-of-way.
Response: On-site traffic circulation allows for efficient navigation without backing into the
public right-of-way.
to 13WL. Page 38
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967
E. All spaces shall be permanently and clearly marked unless the Director
determines that the spaces should not be marked for safety considerations.
Old striping shall not be visible after being replaced by new striping.
Response: All parking stalls with be permanently and clearly marked, consistent with this
provision. No existing striping will be visible after being replaced by the new asphalt
paving and new striping.
F. Not more than 30% of the total parking spaces in a parking lot may be
designated for compact cars, unless a greater percentage is authorized by
the Director based on substantial evidence that greater than 30% of the total
parking spaces is appropriate for the use. These spaces shall be signed
andlor the space painted with the words "Compact Car Only."
Response: No compact spaces are proposed with this application. Therefore, this provision
does not apply.
G. Parking Spaces for People with Disabilities.
1. Parking spaces for people with disabilities and accessible passenger
loading zones that serve a particular building shall be located as
close as possible to a building entrance.
Response: The project site provides two accessible parking stalls with a shared passenger
loading zone. Both spaces are located adjacent to the restaurant entrance.
2. The number and dimensions of parking spaces for people with
disabilities shall be as specified in Section 1106 of the Oregon
Structural Specialty Code.
Response: The project site provides 83 parking stalls and therefore, is required to provide a
minimum of two accessible parking stalls and one van accessible space according
to Oregon Structural Specialty Code. The location of accessible parking stalls is
shown on the site plan, included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4.
4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Space Requirements
A. Table 4.6-2 establishes minimum off-street parking standards according to
use, which apply to that use in any zoning district.
B. The minimum parking standard for any use not specified in Table 4.6-2 is the
average peak period parking demand identified for that use in the current
version of the ITE Parking Manual, forthe day(s) of the weekwith the highest
parking demand.
C. The maximum off-street parking standard for any use that is not a residential
use is 125% of the minimum off-street parking standard. There is no
maximum off-street parking standard for residential uses.
Ileo0 WL Page 39
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967
D. Parking standards established in Table 4.6-2 may be modified as provided in
Section 4.6-110.
Table 4.6-2
Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and
requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie -
125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83
parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In
support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and
Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8.
Special Provisions.
B. Commercial Districts.
1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed
so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator
between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces
shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed
buildings.
Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District.
Therefore, this provision does not apply.
too WL Page 40
Minimum Panama standard
Zu
Nssmmual uses
Single mmily (attached and Oadoned) and auplev
1 space Wr each MVelnng when paved on street Poll Is available directly ab rt ng
dwellings
the proper and Mere are no adopted plans to remove the On street parking.
2 spau5 for each dwelMg when no paved on street parking Is available directly
abuding the properly or when the Skbting on -street parking Is planned to be
removed as pan UI an NoflW also
Manuel dealings,
l space ror each dwelling One
GIWs out, Pus .
025 space for each bedroom orlove Hing unit plus l per bull hme employee W the
busiest shin
Sparking and morning houses (see SOC 67-215)
05 Man additional parking space for each boardlog mom In addition to any puling
fora pnmary use.
Commemialllndustdal uses
CMld care center
l space Snatch 35d square(eetofgrossarea, plus l dropoRspacs foretell 700
squarebeet,ff, sdoorarea.
MMait.00 or bed and breakfast tadlNes
l spas plus i space nor each guest mom.
Eann and drintrat establishments
is ace for each 1 Ws uam leet or aress Mor area.
Retail trade and seMces(Induding shopping centers)
l space for every 300 square feet or gross floor area.
Manufacture and assembly. and other primary
l space ror can l No square feet or gross floor area
industrial uses. Includes warehousing,
warehouse commereWl saks(IncludNg bulky
l space has each 6N square fleet M gross Mor area.
...handle.)
Pushed ark InsrXYtlonal was
Educationist htllniss
2spaceloreableastimmin plus l Wasch 100squarebeet Urine largest Public
assembly area.
Public chatty holly
None, unlessuunryvUltlxwill be parned ovemlght
Recreational MdN s, and reYglous, social and public
1 spat or each IN square beet OF door area In Me prhnary aasembry area and 1
Instaboons
for Sued 200 square feet Orgross Poor area for Me remainder of ale building.
TMnspoftM facHPks
tspace tor each 300 square feel M gross Mor area not Including vehicle storage
aRu.
Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and
requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie -
125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83
parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In
support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and
Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8.
Special Provisions.
B. Commercial Districts.
1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed
so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator
between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces
shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed
buildings.
Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District.
Therefore, this provision does not apply.
too WL Page 40
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
2. Parking lots shall be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles.
EXCEPTION: Parking spaces in excess of the number required by this Code
may be used for temporary sales or display of merchandise where the
activity does not create a hazard for automobile or pedestrian traffic orwhere
otherwise allowed under this Code or the Springfield Municipal Code.
Response: The project site's parking lot will be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles.
3. A minimum of 4 off-street parking spaces shall be required for all sites in
commercial zoning districts that require parking, unless reduced under
Section 4.6-110.M.
Response: The parking totals provided for the proposed restaurant exceed the minimum off-
street parking requirements established by this section. Adequate parking counts
are provided, consistent with Table 4.6-2.
4.6-135 Loading Areas — Facility Design and Improvements
A. All necessary loading areas for commercial and industrial development shall
be located off-street and provided in addition to the required parking spaces.
Response: As provided under Subsection C, no loading areas are provided based on the
minimum size requirements for commercial loading areas.
B. Vehicles in the loading area shall not protrude into a public right-of-way or
sidewalk.
EXCEPTION: When no other reasonable alternative exists, loading areas
shall be located so that vehicles are not required to back or maneuver in the
public right-of-way or internal travel aisles.
Response: As provided below, no loading areas are provided based on the minimum size
requirements for commercial loading areas.
C. The minimum sizes required for commercial and industrial loading areas are
as follows:
1. Two hundred fifty square feet for buildings of 5,000 to 20,000 square
feet of gross floor area.
Response: The restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor space and therefore, is
below the 5,000 square foot threshold therefore the project is not required to
provide a loading area.
41to0 WL Page 41
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
4.6-145 Bicycle Parking — Facility Design
A. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be a powder coated
staple or inverted -U rack as shown in Figure 4.6-B. Alternatively, the required
bicycle parking spaces must fulfill the criteria for quality bicycle parking,
which are as follows:
1. Supports the bicycle frame in a stable position without damage to
wheels, frames, or components and provides two points of contact;
2. Allows locking of the frame and one or both wheels with a U -lock;
3. Is securely anchored to the ground or to a structure;
4. Resists cutting, rusting, bending, or deformation, both from natural
causes and from human abuse;
5. Powder coated or durable, non -scratching surface; and
6. Works well for a variety of bicycle frame types (e.g., should work for
step -through frame as well as diamond frame, children's bicycles as
well as adult bicycles, recumbent as well as other styles of adaptive
bicycles).
Response: Bicycle parking spaces will consist of powder -coated staple style racks that are
spaces to work with a variety of bicycle frame types.
B. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be constructed and
installed in accordance with Section 4.6-150 and Figures 4.6-13 and 4.6-C.
Bicycle parking must be provided at ground level unless an elevator with
clear bicycle wayfinding signage is easily accessible and directs users to an
approved bicycle storage area. Each required bicycle parking space must be
accessible without removing another bicycle.
Response: Bicycle parking will be provided adjacent to the restaurant building on the ground
floor with adequate spacing between bicycles to provide convenient access.
C. All required long-term bicycle parking spaces must be sheltered from
precipitation and include lighting.
Response: The proposed Chick -fl -A restaurantwill be 4,987 square feet. Per Table 4.6.3, the
project restaurant is required to provide 1 bicycle parking space per 600 square
feet of floor area, or nine bicycle parking spaces, with 25 percent of spaces
designated as long-term parking and 75 percent designated as short-term parking.
The applicant will provide ten bicycle parking spaces (four long-term, six short-
term). Bicycle parking will be located under an awning and well -lit per this
provision.
4013WL. Page 42
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
D. Short-term bicycle parking must be sheltered as follows:
1. If 10 or fewer short-term bicycle parking spaces are required, no
shelter is required for short-term bicycle parking.
Response: Six (or 75 percent) short-term bicycle spaces are provided. Therefore, the
applicant does not exceed ten short-term bicycle spaces and is not required to
shelter short-term bicycle parking.
E. Bicycle parking that accommodates oversized bicycles and alternative
bicycle types must be provided as follows:
1. Each oversized bicycle parking space must provide minimum clear
area of 4 feet by 8 feet as shown in Figure 4.6-C.
2. At least 10% of the long-term bicycle parking spaces for commercial
uses and residential uses must be oversized bicycle parking spaces.
Response: One oversized bicycle parking space (10 percent ofthe required long-term parking)
can be provided, as necessary, on the outside of the bicycle rack.
4.6-150 Bicycle Parking — Facility Improvements
A. Bicycle Parking Location and Security.
1. Bicycle parking racks, shelters, or lockers must be securely anchored
to the ground or to a structure.
Response: Bicycle parking racks will be securely anchored to the ground, consistent with this
provision.
2. Exterior long-term bicycle parking must be located within 200 feet
from the main building entrance, primary point of entry to the use, or
employee entrance.
Response: Exterior long-term bicycle parking racks are located within 100 feet from the
restaurant building entrance, consistent with this provision.
3. Exterior short-term bicycle parking must:
a. Be located no further than 50 feet from the main building
entrance or primary point of entry to the use, as determined by
the City, but not further away than the closest onsite
automobile parking space excluding designated accessible
parking spaces, whichever distance is less; and
b. Be clearly visible from the main building entrance or primary
point of entry to the use.
too WL Page 43
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
Response: Exterior short-term bicycle parking racks are located 40 feet from the restaurant
building entrance and are visible from the main building entrance, consistent with
this provision.
4. Bicycle parking shall be separated from motor vehicle parking by a
barrier, curb, or sufficient distance to prevent damage to parked
bicycles.
Response: Bicycle parking will be located immediately adjacent to the restaurant building,
separated by curbing to prevent damage to parked bicycles.
5. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible and obvious
from the public right-of-way, signs shall be provided to direct
bicyclists to the parking. Directions to sheltered facilities inside a
structure may be signed or supplied by the employer, as appropriate.
Short-term parking shall be made available to the general public.
Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right-
of-way, either from Gateway Street or the southern drive aisle.
6. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor, which has
an outdoor entrance open for use, and which does not require stairs
to access the space.
EXCEPTION: The Director may allow bicycle parking on upper stories
within multi -story residential buildings.
Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right-
of-way, either from Gateway or the southern drive aisle.
Bicycle parking and bicycle racks must be located to avoid conflict
with pedestrian movement and access. Direct access from bicycle
parking spaces to the public right-of-way must be provided by at -
grade or ramp access. Pedestrian access must be provided from the
bicycle parking area to the building entrance. Bicycle parking may be
located in the public sidewalk or right-of-way where there is a
minimum 5 feet between the parked bicycle and the storefront and
does not conflict with pedestrian accessibility.
Response: Bicycle parking will be located adjacent to the restaurant building, separated from
pedestrian walkways. The applicant does not anticipate bicycle parking will conflict
with pedestrian movement and access.
B. Employers with changing rooms and shower facilities or other additional
amenities may be eligible fora 10% reduction of Transportation System
Development Charges if the Director determines that those facilities
encourage bicycling or other active modes of transportation by employees
or patrons.
4t7 0 W L Page 44
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967
Response: The applicant anticipates no changing rooms and shower facilities or other
amenities will be provided with the development of the project site.
4.6-155 Bicycle Parking — Number of Spaces Required
Table 4." Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces
Long and abort -Term Bicycle
Use Catwory specific uses Number of Required Spaces Parkins Percentages
Commends]
General retail
1 per 3.000 square feet of floor area
25% long-term
75%short-term
Eating and drinking
1 per 600 square feet of floor area
25% long -ten
establishments
75% short-term
Service establishments
1 per 2.000 square feet of floor area
25% long-term
75%short-term
Art lnsthuflOngallery
1 per 1,500 square feet of floor area
25% long -tend
75%short-term
DrIve-through only
2 for employee parking(minMum of 4 does not
100%tong-term
establishments
apply)
Lodging
1 per 10 rentable rooms
75% long-term
25X short-term
Omce, Including medical
0.75 per 5.000 square feet of floor area
7:% 'o
offices and clln]¢
25%short-term
Industrial and wholesale
0,25 per employee OR 1 per 4.000 square feel of
75% long-term
floor area, v.Tlchever a was
25%short-term
Response: The proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant will be 4,987 square feet. Therefore, nine bike
spaces are provided (four long-term, six short-term).
4.7-100 Specific Development Standards
4.7-145 Eating and Drinking Establishments
The cumulative total area of sit-down restaurants and delicatessens, secondary
retail uses and exercise studios in the GO District shall be limited to no more than
10 percent of the gross floor area of the office building in which they are sited.
Response: The project site is not in the General Office (GO) zoning district. Therefore, this
provision does not apply.
IE30 WL Page 45
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
5.0 GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN
Commercial Element
Policies and Implementation Actions
2.0 Improve the appearance of the freeway commercial area around the intersection of
Gateway Street and Belt Line Road.
2.1 As part of the site plan review process for development, require all
landscaped areas to be at least 75 percent covered with living plant materials
within 3 years of the date of installation.
Response: The landscape plan includes a note that at least 75 percent of landscape areaswill
be covered with living plant materials within three years of the date of installation.
In support of this statement, the landscape architect has designed an automatic
irrigation system and anticipates soil depth and organic composition is compatible
with the plant species selected. The landscape plan is included with this application
as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4.
2.2 Through the site plan review process requires 7.5% of the interior of parking
lots visible from arterials and collectors to be landscaped. Require
vegetative screening of parking lots. Allow such vegetative screens to
include shrubs to 3'/]' high, except in vision clearance areas.
Response: The landscape plan indicates the majority of perimeter parking (17,372 square
feet) will be screened by a three foot tall evergreen shrub hedge between the
interior parking lot and Beltline and Gateway Street. The location of the parking lot
is interior to the project site and as such, no conflict between vegetation height and
vision clearance areas is anticipated. The landscape plan is included with this
application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4.
2.3 Require properties developing along the potential access routes to the
McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site to provide planter strip and
front yard landscaping designed to enhance the site's entryway. Examples
could include additional street trees and landscaped areas.
Response: No access to the McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site is proposed with
this project. Therefore, the applicant anticipates that this policy does not apply.
2.4 The City shall explore siting and construction of a "Welcome to Springfield"
sign in the vicinity of the Gateway/Beltline intersection. The sign shall be
aesthetically designed and visible to travelers entering the Gateway area
from Belt Line Road and 1-5. Surrounding park -like landscaping should be
considered and encouraged as part of this entry design.
Response: The applicant anticipates that a Welcome to Springfield sign would be placed at
the Intersection of Gateway and Beltline on tax lot 1703222001201. The project
site is located to the south of the speculative sign and therefore, the applicant
41ttJ 13 W L Page 46
Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967
anticipates no significant conflict with future siting considerations for the city
welcome sign.
5.0 CONCLUSION
As evidenced through this narrative and associated documents, the applicant's pre -development
review application is consistent with the applicable local policies and regulations governing the
allowance of these requests. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests the City of
Springfield's approval of this application.
4013WL Page 47
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
SPRINGFIELD
�
Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal • ❑
Site Plan Review Submittal: or Site Plan Modification Submittal:
A licant Name: Steve Schwartz phone. 303.519.7206
Company: Chick-fil-A, Inc.
Email: Steve. schwartz@
Address: 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92618 cfacorp.com
Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt
Phone: 760.214.8362
Company: 4G Development & Consulting, Inc.
Email: ahunt@4gdev.com
Address: PO Box 2//70571, San Diego, CA 92198
Pro ert Owner: IVI1: /�,�. /,j;,,: ZS Phone: 511 1$` GElj
Company: Glc - 1%) f .i .. o- (1 2L-_ r-.: Tree / 42� Email apo' i7s'"«er.c.0�
Address: F -Y& 4M�i�r
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO; TAX LOT NO S
< /r
Property Address: ] }�% r� � '��✓�.. �J r:z-i. _5 �; ',q � tG/, ��f� �f�`l7�
Size of Property: , V ropuse No. of _
(�-
Pro osed Name of Pr -A -
Description of If you are filing in this form by hantl, please attach your proposal description to this applkation.
Pro osal: Proposed Chick-fil-A fast food restaurant with dual drive-thru la
Existin Use: Hotel/Motel and Elmer's Restaurant.
New Im envious Surface Covera a Includin Bld . Gross Floor Area): sf
Si natures: Please si nand riot our name and date in the apprc riate box on the next a e.
Associated A lications:
Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed b :
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11
as.
Plan View
Scale - 1" = 25R
+ 'es 'ab +ab a.5
+p] 'a5 0.5 a.5 'a.5 *a.5 __ __ ___ _._ _.
+05 'a.5 *08 'a.9 a.] '01 'a8 a8 'a8 'OA '0] 'O8 '8 'O8 +0A '3
+op +op +op +0a +a.a a.2 +a.a - _ _ I
_ _ _ 'a5 'p8 'a. '09 '1A '1.1 '1.5 '18 13 '1A +02 'p8 'p8 'O8 '09 '1.1 ' 3 '1.2 'a.9 '0.5 j
pAi I
a1
'a.] '09 '1.1 '13 '1A '18 'l8 'l] '2p '1.5 '13 '13 ,-,+ '09 '1A '13 '18 '18 1A 'a.B
00
a.1
ap
+al SA +u +1A +19 +2g +a2 +aa '2a 42a Sl SA +v +1. +u +1e +22 v +1.2
ae
'p8 '11 '18 'lp 'l8 '32 '5.5 '3< 'l] '21 '18 '13 '1. '11 '2.1 '29 32 '197 j
a.1
*p9 *13 *19 *. A *31 8 *1 *1.5 *3p *37 *32 A< '2.1
00
a.2
*1A *13 *3p *38 *38 *38 *5 �ay,+88 '39 '38 *3A *23 18 *1.5 *1.7 *23 *32 *32 3.5 '22
W7,/5'9'J
+02
'IA
'11 '1A '2.1 '38 '37 'Ap '88 ']2 '43 '39 '3A '25 A '1.7 '18 '34 '33 #r '13 � I
a°!
00 I I'12 15 + +� '43 '87 ']2 'Ag 1] + '27 ' 1 '19 '1 1 3 '33 3.6 +2.5 II 'a.3 II
'13 +11 23 28 33 'A< '] 2 '] g 'A8 '3.5 (11
'29 < 1 '2 '2T '3 ' 'L.9 8 ± ___ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ --------- _ _ _ _ _ ________ --I I
0 'a.2 'a.2 *a.L *a.5 'a.] 'a.] 'a.]
1 'aA I
00 I I y
'14 '18 +2d '28 '32 '<.5 ']p '73 '5.1 43<'3 A '2. +22 + + + + +1.2 '1.0 'a8+ + .Aus'13 '18 '22 '28 '3< 'A3 ']3 ']8 'A] '38 '35 '31 '27 '23 '2.1 +2'� *< M]3 *8.9 • 1 � 'a1 5�+*8A 'I 3e ® *p.] *fA ➢.] m *1A *15 *11 811 *a.] I
'00
0]
� 11 I
'1A '15 5 '28 '3g 'A2 '6.5 +7.1 '<.5 39 35 '<A 38 '3p ' 3 '2.1 -SO 6 * 9 '40 ] ].5 0a *13 *18 *2A *"1. 'a. I
1
A +1A '22 +29 +38 +4A +89 +73 +A20 38 A] +43 + +2.5 +2.2 3 +'1.3 *2.p *3. +]5 +16
+0, <ai1 11
+02 +02 '03 403 +a8 +09 21 +2a +v +39 +eg +7.1 'a2 43a +38 +51 A 3. '3.a 'E. 8 \'31 '3.a `aa +20 +5
+.2 1 4- 0 ° oo0"O4
0
+0.2 +03 '03 40.5 +p8 +09 +13 +2p +2.5 +32 +37 +5.7 +6.2 +3.8 43.5 +32 +5A *m9 *A2 3.3 '12.8 ] +36 8 +2 T,i 'p5
+03 II
I=13ILS ILIR� 11
®S34S* 11
*.3 *03 *0.5 *OB *01 *09 *13 *1.B+22 *27 *33 *&0 *3.8 *2.B *28 *LB *l] *l< *2.7 * .5 8 J.8 K3.9 .� +p,
'a.3
87 SP 1
1 *aA +0a +0a +p.] *a8 *12 *15 181 *2p *22 '28 'Ap +<. +3.0 *2.2 *2 *LA'I NA 04A *3. '2A *L. _ _ _ _ _ _ b.] „�'�6 'd0 *A2 *3211 *p
+a.3 -
y
+0.5 4.8 'aP 49 '12 '1B '18 '1P '1P '19 '22 '27 37 '19 '42 *sA *m2 *3A *2A ''33 3 319 2 a] 37 35 b_p. 3 'all +
+a.ai --_- ______- _- - ____- _____ ----
1
+01 '09 '1.1 '13 +18 +22 +2A +2.1 +19 +18 +18 +2p '19 '1. +1.1 +13 +38111 *<A i.8 *3. *2.81 *2 /2 118 '15 p*1.L 1"IA *1A *1A *1a *11 *18 18 'i *19 '2.5 ��.3 *41 Ns +35i +13
O8 %2 �4 t +23 +33 +35 +28 1 t9 +18 +11 '1.5 *12 � +� +2.7 * p .1 �0 '2 ��' '4Q 18 698 '18 '11 '11 A '2A '22 ' l �1l _ _'2.p 'I 23 *2g NA +511 '15
+0a 1!!
+09 +1A +11 42.1 +29 +42 +53 +34 +2.5 +2.1 +18 +1A +1.1 +p. +0A a.] +18 '3A '3 '42 8 '2.5 '2.2 '2.3 '23,..:.1 '23 A '3A *3S 3 '2.1 / �1-a +19
+0a
i1!
+1A +18 +2p 427 +3A '55 +62 +38 +3p +23 +19 +13 +09 +p. 408 +8 +12 '31 '< B.2 '48 '3.1 '2.8 '2.8 '28 A '28 '3S i.8 '4g '2.9 8 '1458i 3 III
+0a -I
+1A +11 +23 432 +35 +g0 +65 +39 +3.5 +2g +2p +13 +09 +p. 408 +1.1 +2A '22 '2A i.2 NA 9 '5.'31 '3.2 '3.1 '32 '3.1 '35 '4.3 'g. '3 3 44 3 'g.8 -1 i+
r
+0a i
+1.1 +11 +2.5 433 +35 +53�+5] +3] +3g +27 +2p +13 +09 +p. 401 +11 +181 '22 72.8 '3.5 5.p %.2 '5. '3S '31 '3.5 '35 '35 '39 L.] '].a 5.6 '31 l Na 92 -'k 58' .2
*pg I
a. a.b
+1A +11 +22 '3.1 +3A '51 +63 +38 +34 +2.5 +19 +13 +09 +p. 401 +1A +1.]' '22 2.9 '3a '<.5 '<. '3S '3A '3A '38 '37 ND L.5 '49 '31 9 ' $ " 5 I +8
*pg I i
1 +03
+1A +18 +2p '2g +32 +55 +g.1 +3g +28 +22 +18 +1.2 +a.8 +a. '0] +1A +18 ''2.1 l 3< '48 %.p '5. 3.9 '"a.8 '3.5 3.5 i.5 '39 <a *].0 b.3 3.8 8 '4411 91 'ae 65 � +221i
+p8
03
'1A +1A +11 +2.0 *2.] *L5 *L8 *3.1 +22 +18 +1.8 +1.2 *0.9 +a. +08 +1A 15 +2.1 +2i 30 04< B.9 b.2 3.8 3'3S 33 32 38 04S "T b.3 .5 .1 40 58 22111
+a.]
1 ,,.�+_ +p3
'09 +13 +1A +18 +21 +29 +31 +24
*A�-r.8 *1A *1.2 *1.a *a.B *a.8 *1.1 *1A i *1B *2.1 1X2.] 40 i 3+4. 3.1 3.9 '32 33 33 33 *4< S.8 *48 *2.8 *28 A *38 A *35 *1 ]I
+al
0.8 +1A +13 +13 +15 +20 +20 +11 +1 +13 +1.1+ 9 +1A +1.1 +1A i *18 1X18 *2. � � +3 '2.9_ _ '2.8_ 03e_ _ 33 _ _ 3A 38 304S _____040 - 31 +2.5 '2. '1B 0 +1311 03
'al __ _
+a.8 '09 '1A '1.1 18 +15 +13 +13 +13 +A +1. '1.1 +12 18 �// '2.$ 'S.6 '2. + g '2A ' '3a 33 + '38 ND * A '44 ' '38 '2A ' '25 '2.2 '18 13 '2.2 1l +1Aii +03
'al \
+a8 '1A '1.1 '13 +15 8 +1A +13 +1.2 +1 +1.1 +1.1 1. +1.1 *1.2 +13 +18 f +11 +18 � ] '19 '2.1®�--''i -.a .8 '3.2 35 'aA '4.2 '43 *3.8 '3.2 ].]® *2.1 ®18 t2 'y� +1
+a.]
+1.a 1. '13 418 +2A +18 +4 +1.4 +13 13 +13 +13 +1. +1.4 A +20 +22 +19 +11 '19 '19 '2.1 a i.2 *42 '41 '4p '4.1 3A *3A l '2.2 '18 +13 +09
+a.s j
+1.2 +1A +18 422 +30 +30 +22 +11 +18 +1.5 +1.5 +1A +1. +18 411 +21 +29 .5 3 8 +1.3 +es +l +0511 +02
+10 11
+1.5 +11 +2.1 43p +41 +<A +28 +2.1 +19 '11 +1.5 +1.5 +1] +19 42.1 +27 +<A +48 +33 +23 +19 +11 +1A 1.1 + +p.5 p.5 +OB +0] +01 +pA +aAl *02
+1.1
+1.8+2e +27 43< +59 '51 +33 +27 +2A +1.8 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +2.1 42g +32 '55 +63 +37 +28 +2.1 +11 +13 +O8 +0A 40.5 0'' +pA +pA +O8 +01 +pA li '03
+1.1
+0
+32 43g +1 +59 +35 +3.2 +2A +2A +1.8 +1.8 +2. 43.1 +35 +A +gA +38 +34 +2A 1.9 1.4 0.8 a.8 i 12 1A 22 2.2 2.2 19 2.5 28 2. 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 lz0
+1.2 111 ♦�� yt'
+18 +2.5 < )♦a +yma, 0 +3A +3< +2] +2A +1.g +1.g +2 +2.g ♦ * +51,a.ar 8. +38 +3g +28 +2.1 1.5 +1.1 +1.1 +1.3 +1.] 5 +3] +43 +3.5 +3< +3] +4< +3 +2A +2.1 +18 +1A +131 'O8
+13 T !
'18 +23 +33 +38 *83 1 *35 *33 *2< *2.a '18 '1.5 +2. *2 +32 *35 *59 *g. *4p *3.5 *28 '2. '1.5 +13 *1.2 +1A *18 A *29 +32 +3.1 *3.1 +32 +3p 28 +24 +23 *22 *2.1 *1811 1
+1 1
+1A +2p +27 +34 +58 +5A +3A +27 +2.1 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +22 +28 +33 +53 +62 +38 +3p +23 + 9 +1.5 +13 +1.1 '1A +1A +18 '21 +27 +3p '3.1 +28 +2.5 +2.1 +2p +22 '23 +25 +2A li +'
l
+1A
+1A +1.7 +2.1 +29 +42 +48 +28 +2.1 +1. g +1A +1A +16 +19 +22 +28 +42 +5A +34 +24 +19 +1] +13 +1.1 +1.0 '1.1 '11 +12 '15 +18 +19 +19 +19 +11 +1.6 +1A +2p +23 +29 +3A1 A
+02
+1.1 +1.3 *1A '2.2 3.1 +31 +22 +1A +1.5 +1A +13 +1A '1. 1. '11 +22 3. +35 +27 +1A +1.5 +13 +1.0 +0.9 408 +01 +p8 +02 +1A +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 '13 '18 +2g +31 +45'i 3.1
+p8 i
O8 1A %1 '1A +19 +19 +1A +13 +13 +1.1 +1.1 +13 '1. *1.3 +1A +1A +2.1 +22 +18 +A +13 +1.1 +1A a. +.g +a5 +a5 +aA +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.] +08 +1.1 18 +27 +33 +36I '3A
+pA 11
+0A +01 +O8 40.9 +12 +12 +1A +1A +1A +1A 1.1 +1.2 +13 +13 +15 +1A +13 +A 1. +09 +8 I 1A +1.7 +27 +33 +3Ak *2.5
+aA 1.
+e4 +0a +0A 40A +p8 +p8 +p8 + 8 +09 +09 9 1A +1.1 +1.2 413 +13 +1A +1A +13 +A +1A +09 + 8 1.0 +1.5 +2.5 +32 +3311
+2]
03
+3 +e4 40 +05 +05 +e6 +01 +O8 +1.1 1. +13 +1. 1.7 +18 +18 +1A +1A +13 +1A 9 I���yl /////���������� �� 09 +13 '22 +29 +38� +3A
+03 II (� 11 -A
+0.2 +0.3 '03 403 +03 +pA +p 5 +OB +O8 +1A +13 +1.5 +18 2. +2A +2. +2] +25 +22 +18 +1.5 +13 + .1 O8 +1.1 '11 +23 +33 A +29
li
+02
+2p
+0.2 402 03 +0 +0a +01 +1A +13 +18 +21 2 -3 +3A +32 +28 +23 +2p +1A +3 01 +0.9 +13 +19 +22
+a.1 11
+a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +02 +02 +03 +Om +0A +p.8 +13 +11 +24 '3 +33 +3A +}.p +3.1 n +2.1 +1,$ +A Og +a.] +1.1 18 151 '13
+0.1 +a.1 +a.1 +0.1 +02 +a.3 *aA +a.g +09 +1A +2.0 +2.9 +3.6 +3A •+2A +32 +3.5 +2g +11 +13 +O8 *0< * 3 +02 +01 +01 +aO +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op *p.3 *1.1 *1A f' p8
+a.1 ....... ..... ....... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*a.1.1 +a.a +aA +aA +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 a. + . + +aA +aA + * . a.3 'a.2 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 *aA +a.0 OA +0A +a.a +0A +a.1 tel +a. +0.4+aA 'a.] +a.] 0A
5/
3/16/2022
cele
of to Scale
rowing No.
C
I
I
I
I
I
Imm
4
m
20
4
3 I
RANDY PAPE BELTINE
9 STALL:
@9'X18'
E4FEEE
MPU
PC. UP
17
P13 LS LRG
90 SEATS
LOSS: 4,987 SF
@9'X18'
i I I
"n"n"
!Ni Y
)STALLS
@9'X18'1
'k
24.00'
16
2
1 1
7 STALLS
14 TYP
3200,.
O
v
IN"
nSITE PLAN NOTES
1. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
2. PROPOSED CFA STANDARD CATCHING/SPILLING CURB
AND GUTTER
3. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PAINTED PARKING STRIPE
4. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE
5. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS REFER
TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DETAILS
6. PROPOSED STANDARD A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE
7. PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE
8. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE
9. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE
10. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CANOPY
11. PROPOSED A.D.A. RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES
12, PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL
PLANS FOR ELEVATION
13. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CONCRETE
14. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS
15. PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO W/ OUTDOOR TABLES &
SEATING
16. PADS A AND B AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND DRIVING
AREAS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED AT A LATER
TIME.
17. PROPOSED BUILDING
18. PROPOSED 6"CURBAND GUTTER
19. PROPOSED LID STORMWATER FACILITY, SEE
STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION
20. PROPOSED PHASE II LID STORMWATER FACILITY, SEE
STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION
I
ILEGEND
CIVIUS PROJECT #
BOUNDARY LINE
BUILDING
EASEMENT
CATCHING CURB & GUTTER
------------ -
SPILLING CURB &GUTTER
a
SIGN
e
SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT
e
STORM SEWER CLEANOUT
❑®
STORM CATCH BASIN
tli9ital files pmticcN fm abwenmeiprgW
PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT
'.°.
PROPOSED CONCRETE
I
OREGON UTILITY
NOTIFICATION CENTER
1-800-332-2344
ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY
THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH
IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES
OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER
FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.)
1
3 1 2 1 1
N
1
20 0 20 40
SCALE IN FEET
■ W®
E o00�
ma-ayo,) nq o
0
Chick-fil-A
5200 Buffington Road
Atlanta, Georgia
30349-2998
720 SW Washington Street, #750
Portland, Oregon 97205
971-280-8641
RIIIIIIIIIIIIII
LU
I.i
I.i
C
Q a
J �
_
06z
LL 0
/ W
Q
UJ LUJ
ILL
0
B �Q'^) z
ILV
FSR# 04987
REVISION SCHEDULE
NO. DATE DESCRIPTION
CIVIUS PROJECT #
14841.01
PRINTED FOR
LAND USE DOCUMENTS
DATE
A1111012021
DMBy
JLG
ISO
inmmnaicn cwaii,aa ca ms dnnw� am is aii
�
tli9ital files pmticcN fm abwenmeiprgW
Z
maY ^y bereproLxiin anY mvrrl WlFaY
G
exPrczz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim
G
auYaizel pmRtl rcprcsWa4ves.
LU
SHEET
U
SITE PLAN
O
W
CO
SHEET NUMBER
C2.0
_a
Appendix 9
Drinking Water Protection (DWP)
Application Exemption Request
Return to:
Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Protection Coordinator
Springfield Utility Board
202 South 1St" Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Phone: 541.744.3745
Email: AmyC@subutil.com I
SPRINGFIELD
1k D
Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Steve Schwartz Phone: 303.519.7206
Company: Chick-fl-A,Inc. Email: steve.schwartz@cfacorp.com
Address: 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92618
Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt
Phone: 760.214.5362
Company: 4G Development and Consulting, Inc.
Email: shunt@4gdev.com
Address: PO Box 270571, San Diego, CA 92198
Property Owner: Attn: Richards Boyles
!Phone: 5412840613
Company: Sycan B Corp+ Olypic Street, LLC
Fax:
Address: 840 Beltline Rd, Ste 202, Springfield, OR 97477
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032220
TAX LOT NOS : 1300, 1600
Property Add reSS: 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield OR 97477
Associated Land Use or
Building Permit Case No.:
Planner: Andrew Limbird
Existing Use: Motel and Restaurant Proposed Use: Restaurant
Size of Proper : 4,49 Acres ® Square Feet ❑
Property The undersigned acknowledges that the Information included with this application is correct and accurate. The
undersigned also certifies that the total quantity of hazardous materials on the subject site will not exceed the
Owned amount listed in this ap lication and will not contain Dense Non -Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs).
s. 4'r ^1 'r
g/JJnature �f y
/(rLn�r le r L. Z
Print Date:
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3
DWP Application Exemption Request Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the
explanation to this form.
❑ DWP Application Exemption Request Form
❑ Proposal Description — provide a very brief description of the nature of the business or
operation, as well as a description of how the business or operation will use, store, or
produce hazardous materials Pleasesee attached project description and narrative responsewith findings
for Spuny(ield Development Code (SDC) 3.3-200.
❑ List of All Hazardous Materials to be used, stored, or produced on the site (e.g.,
cleaning products, paints and paint products, pesticides, maintenance supplies, petroleum
products, automotive supplies, etc.).
Hazardous materials are defined as those chemicals or substances which are physical or
health hazards as defined and classified in the most recently adopted or amended Fire
Code by the City, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition. Commonly used
office supplies do not need to be listed.
The list should include the following for each hazardous material:
❑ Name of the product
❑ Manufacturer
❑ Total quantity of each product
Response: Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting chemicals that are EPA registered
products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and other cleaning chemicals are disposed in accordance
with the manufacturer's label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through
daily use, cleaning chemicals are disposed into the sanitary sewer in diluted forms. Should bulk
containers need to be disposed, the containers will be taken to a permitted local hazardous waste
recycling facility.
Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 3 of 3