Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 9/30/2022TYPE II SITE PLAN REVIEW (PRE -SUBMITTAL) Chick-fil-A #04987 2322.14841.01 Prepared for: Prepared by: 4G Development and Consulting Inc. P.O. Box 270571 San Diego, California 92192 O O W L 920 Country Club Road, Suite 100B Eugene, Oregon 97401 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 2 General Information......................................................................................................2 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY......................................................................................3 2.1 Existing Conditions.................................................................................................3 2.2 Previous Approvals................................................................................................6 2.3 Project Description.................................................................................................6 3.0 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC)............................................7 Chapter 3 Land Use Districts...........................................................................................7 3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts......................................................................7 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District.................................................9 Chapter 4 Development Standards................................................................................ 10 4.2-100 Transportation......................................................................................... 10 4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Utilities........................................................... 23 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards..................................................................... 33 4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading, and Bicycle Parking Standards ............. 34 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards............................................................. 45 5.0 GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN................................................................46 CommercialElement..................................................................................................... 46 Policies and Implementation Actions.................................................................... 46 5.0 CONCLUSION.......................................................................................................47 TABLES Table 1: Surrounding Uses.........................................................................................................3 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Site Plan Review Application Appendix 2: Lot -of -Record Information Appendix 3: Service Provider Comments (Springfield Utility Board) Appendix 4: Plan Set Sheet C0.0: Cover Sheet Sheet C1.0: Existing Conditions & Demo Plan Sheet C2.0: Site Plan Sheet C3.0: Grading Plan Sheet C4.0: Stormwater Plan Sheet C5.0: Utility Plan Sheet C5.1: Fire Access Plan Sheet L1.0: Planting Plan Appendix 5: Architectural Plans Appendix 6: Photometric Plan Appendix 7: Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson & Associates) Appendix 8: Parking Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson and Associates) Appendix 9: Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Appendix 10: Drainage Report 400WL. Pagel Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 1.0 INTRODUCTION �:.111171170 sMe Applicant: 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. P.O. Box 270571 San Diego, California 92198 Contact: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.8362 Email: ahunt(a)4Gdev.com Prepared by: DOWL 920 Country Club Road, Suite 100B Eugene, Oregon 97401 Contact: Mariah Mitchell Phone: 541.762.2096 Email: mmitchell@doW.com Project Location 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, OR 97477 Parcel ID Numbers: T17-R3W-S22-20-TL01300 T17-R3W-S22-20-T L01600 Zoning: Community Commercial (CC) Comprehensive Plan: Commercial Project Site Area: 4.49 acres DOWL Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2.0 PROJECT SUMMARY 2.1 Existing Conditions The project site is approximately 4.49 -acres of Community Commercial (CC) zoned land and further identified as tax lots 17-03-22-20-01300 and 17-03-22-20-01600, herein referred to as the "Project Site". The project site is located at the southwestern intersection of Randy Pape Beltline and Gateway Street and generally consists of level terrain between 0-3 percent slopes. The project site is developed with an existing motel and restaurant building, approximately 42,906 square feet, built in the early 2000s. The project site is considered two legal lots as described in the preliminary title report and vesting deed included with this application as Appendix 2. The project site is designated as Community Commercial (CC)with no overlay districts or natural resource features. Surrounding lots to the north, south, east, and west are designated as CC and have existing commercial buildings. Surrounding land also includes fully developed roads and city utilities along street frontages. According to Springfield's Transportation System Plan (TSP) Functional Classification Map (Figure 2), Gateway Street is considered a minor arterial with no on -street parking, and the northern extent of Randy Pape Beltline is considered a major arterial with no on -street parking. Access to the site is provided from Gateway Street and no access is provided from Randy Pape Beltline. Drive aisles of varying widths provide access for internal traffic circulation to the motel and restaurant building. Additional access and utility information are provided later in this narrative. A Type II Site Plan Review subject to approval by the Director or staff is required. Therefore the applicant is requesting approval through the Type II Site Plan Review procedure for the proposed Chick-fil-A. A Site Plan Review Application form is included with this submittal as Appendix 1. Surrounding uses are identified in Table 1 below. Table 1: Surrounding Uses 4013WL. Page Zoning Use North CC Communit Commercial South CC Community Commercial East CC Community Commercial West CC Community Commercial 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Fri OOWL Pages Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2.2 Previous Approvals The project site has four previous records located online. • 811-22-000128-PROJ (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Expired • 811 -22 -000127 -PRE (Prior Chick-fil-A Request): Pre -application Conference • 811 -19 -000265 -PRE (Master ProjecUMayhew Redevelopment): Pre -application Conference • 811-19-000266-PROJ — (Master Project/Mayhew Redevelopment): Expired 2.3 Project Description The applicant proposes the construction of a new 4,987 square -foot Chick -fl -A restaurant with dual 26 -foot -wide drive-through lanes and associated improvements in the northeast corner of the project site. Two future pad sites are proposed in the southeastern and northwestern areas of the project site. The applicant is seeking approval for the first phase of development only (restaurant with drive-through lanes). The anticipated timeline and specified use for future phases are unknown and will therefore be requested through a separate application in the future. Site improvements include the removal of the existing motel and restaurant facilities, repaving of the parking lot, new curbing and traffic marking, and new perimeter and interior parking lot landscape planters. A total of 83 parking spaces will be provided for Chick-fil-A customers (of which 81 will be standard stalls and two (2) will be ADA -accessible parking spaces). Traffic will enter the site via Gateway Street (minor arterial) and a private driveway to the south and west from two right-in/right-out drive aisles that connect to a series of on-site drive aisles adjacent future pad sites and the proposed restaurant with drive-through lanes. Drive-through lanes enter south of the main entry for the restaurant and parking lot, travel along the eastern property line, up to the pick-up window along the northern extent of the restaurant building before terminating within the new parking lot. Existing city utilities (water, sewer, and stormwater) are extended and available on tax lot 1600. Tax lot 1300 does not have an existing water line. As such, comments from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB) are included with this application as Appendix 3, including comments and recommendations for the extension of a water line from the southeast. Therefore, the applicant requests approval to use existing facilities readily available to support the proposed restaurant. A property line adjustment application has been prepared and submitted concurrently with this site plan review application package to request the relocation of the western property line to maintain the required setbacks and prevent the restaurant from straddling any property lines. Ileo 13WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 3.0 SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC) The applicable development code provisions are set forth below with responses demonstrating the project's consistency with these provisions. Chapter 3 Land Use Districts 3.2-300 Commercial Zoning Districts 3.2-305 (8) Community Commercial District (CC). 3.2-305 (B) Community Commercial District (CC). The CC District establishes sites to provide for a wide range of retail sales, service, and professional office use and also includes all existing strip commercial areas. 3.2-310 Schedule of Use Categories. "P" = PERMITTED USE subject to the standards of this Code. "S" - SPECIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS subject to special localional and/or siting standards as specified in Section 4.7- 100_ "D" . DISCRETIONARY USE subject to review and analysis under Type III procedure (Section 5 9-100) at the Planning Commission or Hearings Official level. "N" = NOT PERMITTED SITE PLAN REVIEW SHALL BE REQUIRED unless exempted elsewhere in this Code. Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative. 4013WL. Page Commercial Dismore Use Caw,desNses NC CC MRC GO Ealing and Drinill EmblishmenM Cocklallxunges P P p N Delicatessens and sit down restaurants Includina es rewo shops Section 47-1,15) P P p 5 Dope up restaurants and espresso shops P P P N Tavems and brew pubs 0 P p N Response: The project site is zoned CC. The development of a drive-through restaurant is a permitted use in the CC zone per the Schedule of Use Categories. Responses demonstrating the project's consistency with the commercial development standards are provided in subsequent sections of this narrative. 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #84967 3.2-315 Base Zone Development Standards Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage, landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report. 'lleo13WL Page Commeeial Zoning District Development Standard NC CC MRC GO Minimum Area 6.000 square feet 6, 000 square feet6.000 squarefeet 6.000 square feet Minimum Street Fronlage(1) 50 feet 50 lead50 feet 50 feet AO Panhandle LotvParcels Minimum Steen Net Permanent 40 feet Net Pmmiaed Not Permitted Frontage Maximum LaVParcal Coverage Development Areas 1 A. and 2 Aaes- Labia el coverage limited onty by standards Nome, 35 percent Oavalopment Meas between Sections sidle Cade. 2 antl 3Aaes- 35 pail and no single lease space shall exceed 15 000 square feet Minimum Landscaping Perimeter and Interior landscaping area Minimum requomems defined by standards in often combined coverage shall not be less Nan SefLons of this Code. 20 percent of me total development area. Maxknum Perking, loading and vehicular 45 percent Laeparcel coverage limited onty by standards M oMer circulation area average Sections of this Code. Landscaped Se baths (2)(3)(4) and (5) Front Street Side Yard, and Through Lon Rear Yard Building Setba t 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet 10 Feet Paddng, driveway, and me! .... Smile 7 Feel 5 Fed 5 Feet 5 Feet setback Interior Safe, Rear Yard S deaths when Abuming Residential or Cl Distils Building Setbatlt 10 Fed 10 Feat 10 Feet 10 Feat Pelting, Driveway Omdoor Storage 7 Feet 5 Feet 5 Feet 5 Feet Setback Maximum Budding Height(6) 20 Fast No Maximum, except as specified belew When a butting an MR or MDR District to 20 Feet Defend hymn Maxanum Shade Pant Heigmrecommuche at the nosh Saddled 2-225410, sup to 50 foul "da mwNom Istel he. a pare mbnding sash wM as state N23 degrees and onglnala, man Ne lop of a 16 loin hypodermal fence coed on Ne noMem seemed lie. When abutting an UDR or MDR Direct to 20 Feet No greater Man MatpelmMed in me MR or MDR Carl ler Me east, wed, or scum a dividends of 50 feet Response. The project site and abutting lots are zoned CC. The restaurant building is located on two tax lots which combined are approximately 4.49 -acres in size with more than 50 feet of street frontage. The building is proposed ten feet or more from all property lines, with no architectural features anticipated to extend more than two feet into the required setback. A review of standards related to lot coverage, landscaping, and parking are addressed later in this report. 'lleo13WL Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District 3.3-210 Applicability As of May 15, 2000, all areas within specified wellhead TOTZ automatically are rezoned to add the DWP Overlay District to the underlying zoning district. The areas to which the DWP Overlay District is applied are shown on the Drinking Water Protection Area Maps on file in the Development Services Department and incorporated in this Section by reference. Response: The project site is located in the Five Year Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) in the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking Water Protection Area. Therefore, this section is applicable and responses are provided as required. 3.3-220 Time of Travel Zones A. The DWP Overlay District includes 4 TOTZ: 0-1 year; 15 years; 5-10 years; and 10-20 years. The locations of the TOTZ for each wellhead are shown on Drinking Water Protection Area Maps on file with the City's Development Services, Public Works, and Fire and Life Safety Departments; and Springfield Utility Board (SUB) and Rainbow Water District (RWD). Response: The project site is located in the Time of Travel Zone (TOTZ) five (5) year in the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District as identified in the Map 3 of the Drinking Water Protection Area. 3.3-225 Review A. A DWP Overlay District Development Application is required when the criteria of both Subsections A.1. and 2., below are met: 1. A site is affected by one of the following: a. There is a change of land use, occupancy or tenancy of a property, including, but not limited to: a change from vacant to occupied; or b. During the Building Permit process; or c. In conjunction with any development application, including, but not limited to: Site Plan review and Minimum Development Standards. Response: Existing conditions on the project site include a vacant motel and Elmers Restaurant. The applicant's anticipated plans include demolishing both structures and building a new restaurant (Chick -fl -A). An existing conditions and demolition plan is included with this application as Sheet C1.0 of Appendix 4. Future uses of Pad -A and Pad -B are unknown at this time and therefore, are not included in this site plan review application or Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request. Therefore, the applicant anticipates future Pad - A and Pad-Bwill be subjectto reviewthrough a DWP Overlay District Development Application at a later point in time. 4013WL. Page Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 The Chi ck-fil-Arestaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers) and therefore, no change of use, occupancy, or tenancy of the property is proposed with this application. Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to those practices currently used for Elmers. 2. The action in Subsection A.1., above will: a. Affect the storage, use, and/or production of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater; or b. Increase the quantity of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater that are stored, used and/or produced. Response: The Chick -fl -A restaurant will replace the existing restaurant (formerly Elmers). Disposal of hazardous materials is anticipated to be similar to those practices currently used for Elmers. Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting chemicals that are EPA -registered products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and other cleaning chemicals are disposed of in accordance with the manufacturer's label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through daily use, cleaning chemicals are disposed of in the sanitary sewer in diluted forms. Should bulk containers need to be disposed of, the containers will be taken to a permitted local hazardous waste recycling facility. B. Prior to the submittal of a DWP Overlay District Development Application, an exemption request may be submitted to the Director as specified in Section 3.3-23013.1. Response: No change of use is proposed with this application and no new hazardous materials are anticipated thatwould cause a risk of contamination to groundwater. Therefore, the applicant has included an exemption request from the DWP Overlay District Development Application, including with this application as Appendix 9. Chapter 4 Development Standards 4.2-100 Transportation 4.2-105 Public Streets (B) An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met: (1) Peak Hour Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS must be performed by a registered professional engineer. Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a Ileo 13WL. Page 10 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated, this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not generate 100 or more vehicular trips during any peak hour, and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is not required. (2) Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 1,000 or more trips per day as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS must be performed by a registered professional engineer. Response: This site plan review requests approval for a new restaurant facility to replace the existing restaurant (Elmer's). A Trip Generation Assessment Memo provided by Kittleson and Associates for the project site (Chick -fl -A #04987) indicates a marginal increase in average daily trips and hourly peak trips at full buildout of the project site, assumed retail uses for Pads A and B. However, as previously stated, this application requests approval for the restaurant facility, which will have fewer average daily and peak hour trips than the existing uses as reflected in Table 2 of the memo. A copy of this technical memorandum is included with this application as Appendix 7. Therefore, the applicant concludes the proposed use will not generate 1,000 or more vehicular trips per day, and a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is not required. (3) Variance and Known Issues Threshold. The Director may determine that a TIS is necessary to support a request for a Variance from the transportation provisions of this code or where traffic safety, street capacity, future planned facility, or multimodal concerns may be associated with the proposed development. Response: No variance from the transportation provisions is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. B. An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. ATIS is required if any of the following criteria are met: Response: The applicant has included a Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum prepared by Kittleson and Associates with this application as Appendix 7. The applicant concludes that traffic generated from the proposed use will not be substantially different than existing traffic levels generated from the existing use and therefore requests confirmation of the need and scope of a TIS. C. Minimum street curb -to -curb widths and minimum street right-of-way widths are as specified in Table 4.2-1 unless otherwise indicated in the Springfield Transportation System Plan, an applicable Refinement Plan, Plan District, 400WL Page 11 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Master Plan, Conceptual Development Plan, or the adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan; where necessary to achieve rightof-way and street alignment; or as needed to meet sitespecific engineering standards, including but not limited to requirements for multi -way boulevard and/or modern roundabout designs. Example street layouts meeting minimum street standards are provided in Figures 4.2-13 through 4.2-V for illustrative purposes only. These Figures are intended to demonstrate potential street configurations that meet the requirements. Table 4.2-1 Minimum Street Right -of -Way and Curb -to -Curb Standards Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght- in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria. 1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map. Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through. IE313WL Page 12 Tneal bearably FM. RIgMM-Way Cu@10 Cure 7.61 Lanes Tum Lane SMq and H. street Classllkalum (1) wade (1) Lanes Wki VAON(2) 91keudautp) Cure (1) sidexew 4vt i4blted 43&D Me, Adenal(5) 14952'/84' 7BM9' L 12' hua 6'bel 5' Teen sloes e1M ie 42 EG MucaMesd(5) 75'/68.69 521/44'M 2 12' 6 W sloes 5 ' 7'aoM SMfls req'a�er 4.2 NJ Mader Colleda 7.I64'l56' 52/10'/36 2 17 lam. 6'take sides 5• 5- note sides requ ed Minor CollWor-Nam 4.2 K- 13'efiere Residential Zoning roBY50' S9I1Y21' 2 it 8'boM Sills 5 5'boM SMes M expense DlsMds (8) MlnorCdedor- 13'e9ere 4.2 N -P Resleena6l Zoning M'159M2' 35'/392.2 4' WA 5' 5'Win sides M,xM4 DaMM(6) Lool5tree1 X15 pefceM 42Q5 5.7.719.14' M'28'70' 2 19 WA Not required 5' 5'aoM tleas Node (7) Loral Sheet x15p bt 4.2 T -V y149132' 362a'2o' 2 19 WA Not requVed 6 -curbs only 5'both sees Value (7) Sar CuFde-sacauM 83•dlemeYr 79 diarbeler WA WA NIA WA 5'arwnd bulb Noy 29 =qft�f WA WA WA Nolrequlred Nulrequlred Response: No modifications to the existing right-of-way and curb -to -curb standards is anticipated to result from the applicant's proposed driveway location. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left-in-dght- in-right-out movements and new cross-over accesswill be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. D. Street Network Standards—General Criteria. 1. Collector and Arterial Streets. Subject to the standards of this code, the location of collector streets and arterial streets must comply with the Transportation System Plan, including the Conceptual Street Map. Response: No modifications to Gateway Street are proposed with this application. The applicant proposes several internal drive aisles to facilitate access throughout the site and to the proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant and drive-through. IE313WL Page 12 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2. Local Streets. The local street network, which includes pedestrian accessways and multiuse paths, must meet the following standards: Response: No local streets are proposed with this application. 3. Dead -End Streets. Response: No dead-end streets are proposed with the redevelopment of the project site. Therefore this provision and Subsections a — b are not applicable. 4. Block Length and Block Perimeter. a. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following maximums, except as provided or exempted elsewhere in this Code or in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District: iv. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts. Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and the block perimeterwill not exceed 1, 600 feet. b. Block length must not exceed: 600 feet for local street not in industrial zones or that do not serve industrial nonconforming or the maximum block length established in an applicable Refinement Plan or Plan District, whichever is less; Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district (considered other zoning between Subsections i -iii) and the block length will not exceed 600 feet. 5. Maximum Street Grades. Street grades must not exceed 8% on major and minor arterial streets, 10% on major and minor collector streets, and 12% on local streets. Response: No new roads (private, collector, or arterial) are proposed for this project site. All local drive aisles will be graded to be level, with slopes well below 12%. A grading plan is included as Sheet C3.0 of Appendix 4 reflecting proposed grading throughout the project site. Medians. 1. General. A raised median physically deters vehicles from crossing or entering a median area by way of a raised curb or concrete barrier. Raised medians help avoid crashes caused by crossover traffic, reduce headlight glare distraction, prevent traffic turning left from through lanes, provide refuge for pedestrians crossing the street, and remove turning traffic from through lanes, thereby maintaining efficient and safe traffic flow. Median design and installation must follow the standards in the Manual on Uniform 'lleo0 WL Page 13 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 Traffic Control Devices and AASHTO's "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets." Response: No medians are proposed for new internal drive aisles on the project site. However, preliminary discussions with the City indicate the existing raised median on Gateway Street will need to be shifted north to accommodate the proposed driveway location entering the project site. A Project Improvement Plan (PIP) is anticipated as a condition of approval for this project. The width, size, and length of the relocated median are anticipated to remain the same as the existing median. G. Additional Right -of -Way and Street Improvements. 1. Whenever an existing street of inadequate width is abutting or within a development area requiring Development Approval, the dedication of additional right-of-way is required. Whenever street dedication results in the right-of-way that does not connect with the City street system, a deed restriction shall be recorded with the Lane County Deeds and Records stating that the property shall not be built upon until a fully improved street is constructed to serve the property, and connect with the City street system. Response: Preliminary discussions with the City during a pre -application conference (811-22- 000127) indicate Gateway Street is not underdeveloped or inadequate and would not require street frontage improvements at this time. Therefore, subsections two through five are not applicable. 2. Whenever a proposed land division or development will increase traffic on the City street system and the development site has unimproved street frontage, that street frontage shall be fully improved to City specifications in accordance with the following criteria: Response: No land partition or development is proposed that would increase traffic, as mentioned previously. In support of this conclusion, a trip generation assessment memo drafted by Kittleson and Associations is provided with this application as Appendix 7. Table 4.2-1A Special Street Setbacks Streat Classlaoabon Sataaok Distance from Ne Cantanlna (q Major Anerlal 50' Minor Arterial 38' Major Collector 36' Mlnor Colleabr 35' Local Street, <16 percent slope 28.5' Local Street, 215 percent sbpe 25' Alley 10' 4013WL. Page 14 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 (1) Where fully improved right-of-way abuts the property line of the subject property, the setback distance is one-half of the width of the existing, fully improved right-of- way. Response: Preliminary communications with the City indicate the right-of-way abutting the eastern property line (Gateway Street) is fully improved. The Chick-fil-A building is proposed 51 feet from Gateway Street (considered a minor arterial) and exceeds half the required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A. The Chick -fl -A building is not adjacent to Beltline (major arterial) and therefore exceeds half the required right-of-way width specified in Table 4.2-1A. 4.2-120 Site Access and Driveways A. Site Access and Driveways—General. 1. All developed lotstparcels are entitled to one approved driveway access provided by either direct access to a: a. Public street or alley along the frontage of the property; or Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The primary way traffic will enter the project site is from Gateway Street. The driveway access from Gateway Street will be limited to left -in -right -in -right -out movements and new cross-over access will be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south. 2. Driveway access to designated State Highways is subject to the provisions of this Section in addition to requirements of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT). Where City and ODOT regulations conflict, the more restrictive regulations shall apply. Response: No access to the project site is proposed from a designated State Highway. 3. As determined by the Director, sites with abutting parking areas within the same zoning district may be required to provide driveway connections or pedestrian connections internal to the sites and joint access agreements to provide efficient connectivity and preserve public street functions and capacity. Response: Driveway connections and pedestrian walkways are shown on the site plan included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. It is the client's intention to obtain a reciprocal access agreement on the southern drive aisle per this requirement. B. Driveways must take access from lower classification streets when development sites abuts more than one street and streets are of differing classification as identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan. 4E30WL Page 15 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 EXCEPTION: Driveway access to or from a higher classification street may be permitted if no reasonable alternative street access exists or where heavy use of local streets is inappropriate due to traffic impacts in residential areas. Response: Driveways to the project site will take access from the lower classification street, Gateway Street. No access is proposed from Beltline. No exemptions are requested with this application. C. Driveways shall be designed to allow safe and efficient vehicular ingress and egress as specified in Tables 4.2-2 through 4.2-5 and the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. Table 4.2-2 Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot - wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2. Table 4.2-3 Driveway Design Specifications 1.way Driveway 2 -way Drivewayz Width Width Radius of Curb (2) Driveway Throat Depth Land Use MinN., MiNMas. Mes. Sioglefamily and Duplexes (3) (41 12'716' 12'-af(1)NA. NA. NA. NA Multifamily Residential 26165' 118'CommercldWubg[ Mu6lfamlly Residential 24 feel 30 feet Land(4)(5) 12916' 24135'(1)1Intlusldal 60 feet CommarciaVPublic Land (6) 12118' 26T35'n)18'(2) 35 feet Go feet Response: The project site has three access driveway locations. The driveway accessing the project site from Gateway Street is a right -in -right -out, 32 -foot -wide driveway, with no variation in throat width. The transitional width on the eastern driveway goes from 32 -feet -wide to 29 -feet -wide, consistent with the transitional width specified in Table 4.2-2. The western and southern driveways are right -in -right -out, 29 -foot - wide and 24 -foot -wide driveways, respectively. Driveway width and throat depths are the same as overall width, and therefore are consistent with the transitional width and throat width specified in Table 4.2-2. Table 4.2-3 (1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or to improve traffic safety. (2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are anticipated. (3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle. 400WL. Page 16 Curb Room Dries" Design Specifications Driveway WMth(1) Radius of Curb (2) Driveway Throat Dep1h lend... (3) tend Use Min. Mac Min. Mes. Single -Family and Duplexes NA. NA. NA NA. NA. Mu6lfamlly Residential 24 feel 30 feet 10 feel 20 feel 60 feet CommarciaVPublic Land 24 feet M feet 15 feet 35 feet Go feet Industrial 24 feet 35 feet 15 feet 35 feel 60 feel (1) Wider driveways may be permitted to accommodate traffic demands and/or to improve traffic safety. (2) Greater curb radii may be permitted where high volumes of large trucks are anticipated. (3) Measured from the face of the curb to the first stall or aisle. 400WL. Page 16 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street and multiple internal drive aisles and private roadways within the commercial development site to the south and west, which are within existing reciprocal access easements. New internal drive aisles will be 24 feet wide or greater and allow for turning radii of 20 feet measured from curb to curb. A site plan is included with this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. Table 4.2.4 Minimum Separations Between a Driveway and the Nearest Intersection Curb Return an the Same Side of the Street (1) Land Use, Street Type Atterlal Collector Local Single -Family Residential and Duplexes 200 feet 50 feet 30 feet Nulffamily Residential 209 feel IDO feet 75 feet CommerciaOPablic Land 209 feet 1DD feet 75100[ Induellial 200 feet 200 feet 150 Seel (1) Each category of street is considered separately. Distances may be reduced in the following circumstances: (a) Access is from a one-way street. (b) The driveway is marked for "right -in -right -out only." (c) The driveway is marked "exit only" and is designed to prevent left turns. Response: Vehicular access to the site will be provided from both Gateway Street (minor arterial) and multiple internal drive aisles and private roadways within the commercial development site to the south and west. The right-in/right-out access driveway from Gateway Street is 147 feet from the nearest intersection curb, consistent with this provision. (d) In cases where an existing lotiparcel and/or use make compliance with these specifications unreasonable, a new driveway or an existing driveway required to be relocated by this Code shall be placed at the furthest point from the intersection curb return, considering both safety and internal circulation requirements of the development. Response: Compliancewith these specifications is feasible, as specified above. Thereforethis adjustment does not apply. 4013WL Page 17 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.2-125Intersections Intersections shall be designed and constructed as specified in the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and the following requirements. A. In order to minimize traffic conflicts and provide for efficient traffic signalization, intersections involving curb return driveways and streets, whether public or private, shall be directly opposed, unless a Traffic Impact Study indicates that an offset intersection benefits public safety to a greater degree. Response: Preliminary communications with the city and Kittleson and Associates indicate that the drive aisle to the south is considered aligned with adjacent commercial drive aisles perthis requirement. B. Streets shall be laid out so as to intersect as nearly as possible at right angles. The angle of intersection between 2 intersecting streets shall be at least 80 degrees. At intersections, each local street shall be straight or have a radius greater than 400 feet for a distance of 100 feet from each intersection. At intersections, each collector or arterial street shall be straight or have a radius greater than 600 feet for a distance of 100 feet from each intersection. Response: New drive aisles and southern and western intersections are provided at right angles throughout the project site per this requirement, per this requirement. 4.2-130 Vision Clearance Area A. All lots or parcels must maintain a Vision Clearance Area to provide adequate sight distance for approaching traffic. Vision clearance areas must be shown on Site Plans for applicable land use applications. Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4. B. No screens, plantings, or other physical obstructions are permitted between 2Yz and 8 feet above the established height of the curb in the Vision Clearance Area. Response: All structures and public facilities have been designed in accordance with the appropriate City codes to meet this standard. Plantings include trees that will reach mature heights between 30-50 feet. The applicant anticipates shrubs will be maintained to a height less than two and one-half feet from the curb to keep clear vision areas free of visual obstacles. A landscape plan and supplemental information sheets are included with this application as Sheets L1.0 — L1.2 of Appendix 4. 4013WL. Page 18 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 C. The Vision Clearance Area must be in the shape of a triangle. Two sides of the triangle must be property lines or a property line and edge of driveway for a distance specified in this Subsection. Where the property lines or driveway edge have rounded corners, they are measured by extending them in a straight line to a point of intersection. The third side of the triangle is a line across the corner of the lot or parcel joining the non -intersecting ends of the other 2 sides. The following measurements establish the Vision Clearance Area: Table 4.2-5 Response: Vision clearance areas are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C3.0 in Appendix 4. As illustrated, the areas exceed ten feet from all approaches, as measured from the rounded corners of the driveway edge in a straight line to a point of intersection. 4.2-135 Sidewalks A. Sidewalks and planter strips abutting public streets shall be located wholly within the public street right-of-way unless otherwise approved by the Director. Response: Existing sidewalks and planter strips are provided on Gateway Street and Beltline. The applicant does not anticipate that new sidewalks and planter strips along street frontages will be required for the redevelopment of the project site. 4.2-140 Street Trees Street trees are those trees required within the public right-of-way. The primary purpose of street trees is to create a streetscape that benefits from the aesthetic and environmental qualities of an extensive tree canopy along the public street system. Street trees are attractive amenities that improve the appearance of the community, provide shade and visual interest, and enhance the pedestrian environment. Street trees also improve air quality, reduce stormwater runoff, and moderate the micro -climate impacts of heat absorbed by paved surfaces. Street trees may be located within a planter strip or within individual tree wells on a sidewalk, round -about, or median. EXCEPTION: In order to meet street tree requirements where there is no planter strip and street trees cannot be planted within the public right-of-way, trees shall be planted in the required front yard or street side yard setback of private property as specified in the applicable zoning district. 40E3 WL Page 19 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: No modifications to the existing frontages on Beltline or Gateway Street are proposed. As such, the applicant anticipates existing street treeswill be preserved consistent with this provision. 4.2-145 Lighting Standards Lighting design and placement for streets, paths, and accessways must conform to the following design standards and the Development 8r Public Works Standard Construction Specifications: A. Lighting must be included with all new developments or redevelopment. Existing lighting must be upgraded to current standards with all new developments or redevelopment. The developer is responsible for lighting material and installation costs. Response: New lighting will be provided forthe Chick-fil-A building and internal parking areas, consistent with this provision. B. Upon approval by the Director, a developer may install decorative lights, as may be permitted in this section and the Development & Public Works Standard Construction Specifications. Response: The applicant does not anticipate decorative lighting forthe project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. C. Design Standards. 1. Lighting must comply with Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8- 14 and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. Response: All proposed lighting is designed to comply with the Illuminating Engineering Society, American National Standards Practice for Roadway Lighting — RP -8-14, and applicable National Electrical Safety Code (NESC) and National Electrical Code (NEC) standards. A photometric plan is included with this application as Appendix 6 to demonstrate consistency with this provision. 2. Intersections must be illuminated to a level equal to the sum of the average required illuminance of the 2 intersecting streets. Response: The applicant is proposing two new drive aisles, one each at the west and south from adjacent parcels. The location of driveway intersections and illumination levels are shown on the photometric plan, included with this application as Appendix 6. 3. Mid -block crosswalks that are approved by the City Traffic Engineer must have 2 times the illumination required for the street. 400WL. Page 20 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: No mid block crosswalks are proposed for this project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 4. Decorative poles with City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used on all streets within the Nodal Development Overlay District and where any refinement plan or plan district requires decorative lighting. Decorative poles may be used on streets, paths, and accessways in any other zone at the option of the developer as approved by the Director. Response: The project site is not located within the Nodal Development Overlay District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 5. City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used when lighting is required along multi -use paths and accessways. Response: No multi -use paths or accessways are proposed with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 6. Roadway style poles and "cobra head" fixtures with City -approved LED fixtures and lighting controls must be used along streets in all other locations. Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application. All existing exterior building and parking lot lighting will be shielded and directed inwards towards the proposed development area. The lighting shall not reflect on or cast a glare on adjacent properties and will likely use "cobra head" fixtures for all parking lot light poles. When roadway style poles are used on arterial and collector streets in any zone other than residential, they must be steel or aluminum. When roadway style poles are used on local and collector streets in residential zones, they must be fiberglass, steel, or aluminum. Response: No modifications to street frontage lighting is proposed with this application. Therefore this provision does not apply. 8. Where lot frontages are 80 feet or less, poles must be located at property lines unless approved by the Director. Response: Lot frontages on the project site exceed 80 feet. Therefore this provision does not apply. 9. The weak point illumination must not be less than 0.1 -foot candles. Response: The weak point illumination exceeds 0.1 -footcandle, as demonstrated on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6. 4013WL. Page 21 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 10. Roadway style poles set behind sidewalks must have 8 -foot arm length. Roadway style poles set between curb and sidewalk or where no sidewalk exists must have 6 -foot arm length. Response: No new walkways or multi -use paths are proposed with this project and as such, lighting or roadway -style poles along said paths are not proposed. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 11. Pole handholes must be used instead of junction boxes where feasible. Junction boxes for street lighting must only be utilized for street crossings or where necessary to comply with electrical code standards cited above. Response: Where applicable, the applicant anticipates pole handholes will be used for all light poles in place of junction boxes, consistent with this provision. 12. Pole Height. Lights on local streets with a curb -to -curb width of less than 28 feet must have a 20 -foot fixture mounting height. Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, light poles on local streets will be designed to have a 20 -foot fixture -mounted height, per this requirement. Lighting on local streets must be installed on the same side of the street and on the side of the street first constructed, except where necessary to be consistent with the existing lighting design and placement. Response: No new local street lights are proposed with this project. Light poles must not be placed on the outside of curves with less than a 1,000 -foot radius. Response: Light pole location and height are unknown at this time. However, no light poles are proposed on the outside of curves with less than a 1,000 -foot radius, per this requirement. 4.2-150 Multi -Use Paths A. Development abutting an existing or proposed multi -use path identified in the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), City -adopted bicycle and pedestrian plan, or the adopted Willamalane Park and Recreation District Comprehensive Plan must include provisions for the extension of the multi -use path through the development area by the dedication of public easements or rights-of-way. The developer bears the cost of multi -use path improvements. 'lleo0 WL Page 22 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The project site is not adjacent to an existing or proposed multi -use path as identified in Figure 12 ofthe City's Transportation System Plan —Conceptual Street Map. Therefore, this provision does not apply. 4.2-120 Accessways A. Accesswsys allow pedestrians and bicyclists convenient linkages to adjacent streets, residential areas, neighborhood activity centers, industrial or commercial centers, transit facilities, parks, schools, open space, or trails and paths where no public street access exists. Accesswsys may also be used as a secondary emergency access. Accessways must be dedicated as public right-of-way during the development review process. EXCEPTION: When site constraints preclude the ability to dedicate right-of- way without impacting setback requirements or other development standards, the Director may authorize dedication of a public easement or may otherwise modify the standards in this Section. Response: Existing pedestrian accessways are provided on Beltline and Gateway Street. Therefore no accessways are proposed for this project. 4.3-100 Infrastructure Standards — Utilities 4.3-105 Sanitary Sewers A. Sanitary sewers shall be installed to serve each new development within the city limits and to connect developments to existing mains. Installation of sanitary sewers shall provide sufficient access for maintenance activities and shall comply with the provisions of this Code, with the Public Works Standard Construction Specifications, the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, the Springfield Municipal Code, 1997 and Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) regulations. Response: Existing sanitary sewer lines are present throughout the project site. The applicant anticipates that the restaurant will connect to the city sewer in the northeastern corner of the project site. A utility plan showing the location of water, sewer, and stormwater lines is included with this application as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. B. The City Engineer shall approve all sanitary sewer plans and proposed systems prior to development approval. Response: The applicant anticipates that review and approval of the utility plan are necessary before development approval, consistent with this provision. C. Proposed sewer systems shall include design consideration of additional development within the area as projected by the Metro Plan. Response: The project site is not adjacent to an expansion area or proposed expanded service pipe as shown in Figure 5.5 of the City Wastewater Master Plan. 4tJ 0 W L Page 23 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 D. Proposed developments shall provide dedication and improvements indicated in an adopted Capital Improvements Program or Public Facilities Plan. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to adopted City Council policy. Response: No wastewater projects are identified adjacent to the project site according to Table 6.1 of the City's Wastewater Master Plan. 4.3-110 Stormwater Management A. Stormwater Management Regulations. By implementing the policies set forth in the currently approved Stormwater Management Plan, provide for the effective management of stormwater and drainage from the City into the groundwater and watercourses within the City and its urbanizing area; minimize demand on the City's stormwater management system, and alleviate future costs of treating the discharge; promote water quality; preserve groundwaterand the vegetation and rivers it supports; reduce peak storm flows; minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions; and minimize stormwater discharge impacts on water quality and quantity and stream flow patterns, including peak and base flows in intermittent and perennial streams, within the McKenzie River and Willamette River watersheds. Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in the existing system. B. The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate public and/or private stormwater management systems provisions have been made as determined by the Public Works Director, consistent with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. The stormwater management system shall be separated from any sanitary sewer system. Surface water drainage patterns shall be addressed on every Preliminary Site Plan, or Tentative Partition or Subdivision Plan. Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed stormwater management system complies with the policies set forth in the Stormwater Management Plan and the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual as required by this section. C. A stormwater management system shall accommodate potential run-off from its entire upstream drainage area, whether inside or outside of the development. The Public Works Director shall determine the necessary size of the facility, based on adopted Public Facility Plans and Stormwater 400 0 W L Page 24 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Facility Master Plans. The developer shall pay a proportional share of the cost according to adopted City Council policy. Response: The proposed stormwater system design is shown on Sheet C4.0 and described in the drainage report included with this application as Appendix 10. Because the project will be redeveloping an existing site that has more impervious coverage than what is proposed, the resultant peak flows entering the public system will be smaller than existing. D. Runoff from development shall be directed to an approved stormwater management system with sufficient capacity to accept the discharge. Where the Public Works Director determines that the additional run-off resulting from the development will overload an existing stormwater management system, the Approval Authority shall withhold Development Approval until provisions, consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, have been made to correct or mitigate this condition. Response: A preliminary stormwater plan is included with this application as Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. A drainage report is included with this application in Appendix 10. The drainage report concludes that the project site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 -inch over 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found that development did not create capacity issues in the existing system. E. Any development with a stormwater threshold management requirement of 1,000 square feet of impervious surface area shall be required to employ stormwater management practices consistent with the Springfield Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual, which minimize the amount and rate of surface water run-off into receiving streams. The following stormwater management practices may be required in order to relieve demand on the City's piped drainage system, alleviate future costs of treating the piped discharge, promotewater quality, preserve groundwater and the vegetation and rivers it supports, and reduce peak storm flows: 1. Temporary ponding of water; 2. Permanent storage basins; 3. Minimizing impervious surfaces; 4. Emphasizing natural water percolation and natural drainageways; 5. Preventing water flowing from the street in an uncontrolled fashion; 6. Stabilizing natural drainageways as necessary below drainage and culvert discharge points for a distance sufficient to convey the discharge without channel erosion, as perm ittedlal lowed by City, State and Federal regulations; 400WL Page 25 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 7. On-site filtration or skimming of run-off, that will enter natural drainageways to maintain water quality; 8. On-site constructed wetlands; and 9. The riparian area boundary, as specified in Subsection 4.3-115A, may be utilized to meet City on-site stormwater management requirements for flood control and water quality treatment provided the design is complementary to and supportive of the primary objective of a properly functioning riparian habitat condition. Where the riparian boundary is not of sufficient size to meet these on-site requirements, the additional area needed shall be located contiguous to the riparian boundary to form a consolidated stormwater feature for operational and maintenance efficiencies and that is designed to be compatible with and complementary to the riparian area boundary. Response: Total impervious cover exceeds 1,000 square feet and therefore, will implement several of the stormwater management practices listed above, including stormwater planters and rain gardens that are sized for a 1.4 inch over 24-hour stormwater event. It's of note that the redevelopment of the project site will decrease the area of impervious cover from 3.651 acres (159,037 square feet) to 3.648 acres (158,907 square feet). F. Identification of Water Quality Limited Watercourses. The Director shall maintain a Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) Map on file in the Development Services Department, which designates certain watercourses and their direct tributaries within the City and its urbanizing area. The WQLW Map shall contain watercourses recommended by the Public Works Director. Any revision to the WQLW Map shall be approved by the City Council as an amendment to this Code. Those watercourses and their direct tributaries included on the WQLW Map have been found to warrant protective measures in support of the City's response to State and federal regulations regarding surface and subsurface discharging stormwater management systems by satisfying the following criteria: 1. Water Quality Limited Watercourses(WQLW): Waters of the State that meet one or more of the following criteria: a. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing area, that are included by the State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (ODEQ) on its most recently adopted "303(d)" List of Impaired and Threatened Waterbodies. b. Watercourse reaches, lying within the City and its urbanizing area, with significant water quality impairment identified by water quality monitoring and sampling done in accordance 'lleo0 WL Page 26 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 with approved quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) protocols. Response: The project site is not adjacent to a watercourse as identified in the City's Natural Resource Study Report (2011). The applicant's proposed use is the same as the existing use on the project site. Consistency with water quality assurance/quality control protocols is outlined in further detail in findings for the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District. Therefore, the applicant anticipates this provision and all Subsections do not apply. 4.3-117 Natural Resource Protection Areas Response: No locally significant wetland and riparian areas, flood hazard areas, or Goal 5 resources are identified on the project site. The site is located within the Drinking Water Protection Overlay. The project's consistency with the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District is discussed earlier in this narrative. Therefore, this section does not apply. 4.3-120 Utility Provider Coordination A. All utility providers shall be responsible for coordinating utility installations with the City and the developer through the Development Review Committee or by separate written correspondence. B. The developer shall be responsible for the design, installation and cost of utility lines and facilities to the satisfaction of the utility provider. Response: The applicant anticipates existing wastewater, stormwater, and franchise lines are available adjacent to the proposed restaurant. There is no existing water line to serve the future restaurant location and as such, the applicant plans to extend water from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. Plans indicate the new waterline and junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide dedicated easement for SUB. The location and specifications surrounding the new domestic waterline are outlined in the marked site plan from SUB, included with this application as Appendix 3. These comments were included in the design and shown on the utility plan included as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. 4.3-125 Underground Placement of Utilities Whenever possible, all utility lines shall be placed underground. However, overhead and above -ground facilities are permitted for the following: Response: All existing and proposed utility lines shown on Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4 that are contiguous to the project site, including those required for electricity, communication, water, and stormwater will be placed underground as required by this provision. to 13 W IL Page 27 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.3-130 Water Service and Fire Protection A. Each development area shall be provided with a water system having sufficiently sized mains and lesser lines to furnish an adequate water supply to the development with sufficient access for maintenance. Response: A new water line will extend from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. The proposed line will be sized to provide domestic water service and with adequate pressure for fire suppression purposes. The location of fire hydrants and water lines are shown on Sheet C5.0 and Sheet C5.1 in Appendix 4. B. Fire hydrants and mains shall be installed by the developer as required by the Fire Marshal and the utility provider. Response: The applicant anticipates fire hydrants and mains will be installed as required by the Fire Marshal and utility provider (SUB). As such, the applicant has provided a utility plan (Sheet C5.0) and fire access plan (Sheet C5.1) in Appendix 4 to demonstrate the project's consistency with this provision. 4.3-135 Major Electrical Transmission Lines A. When necessary to increase the capacity of major electrical power transmission lines, utility providers shall provide the increase by use of existing rights-of-way or easements. Response: The applicant anticipates the proposed restaurant use will have similar if not less electrical utility demand compared to the previous uses (formerly Elmer's restaurant and a motel). Therefore, no increase in the capacity of major electrical power transmission lines is anticipated and this provision does not apply. 4.3-140 Public Easements A. Utility Easements. The applicant shall make arrangements with the City and each utility providerforthe dedication of utility easements necessary to fully service the development or land beyond the development area, as necessary. The minimum width for public utility easements adjacent to street rights-of-way shall be 7 feet. The minimum width for all other public utility easements shall also be 7 feet. However, the utility provider or the Public Works Director may require a larger easement for major water mains, major electric power transmission lines, sanitary sewer lines, stormwater management systems or in any other situation to allow maintenance vehicles to set up and perform the required maintenance orto accommodate multiple utility lines. Where feasible, utility easements shall be centered on a lotiparcel line. Response: There is no existing water line to serve the future restaurant location and as such, the applicant plans to extend water from the eastern property line up to the restaurant building from an existing tap adjacent to Pad A and Gateway Street. 40013 W L. Page 28 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 Plans indicate the new waterline and junction box will be included in a 10 -foot -wide dedicated easement for SUB. The location and specifications surrounding the new domestic waterline are outlined in a letter from SUB, included with this application as Appendix 3. These comments were included in the design and shown on the utility plan included as Sheet C5.0 of Appendix 4. 4.4-100 Landscaping, Screening and Fence Standards 4.4-105 Landscaping A. These regulations ensure that new development complies with the landscaping provisions of this Code and any applicable Refinement Plans, Plan Districts, Master Plans, and Conceptual Development Plans; is adequately screened from less intensive development; considers the effects of vegetation on public facilities; retains significant clusters of natural trees and shrubs wherever possible; minimizes run-off; facilitates energy conservation and crime prevention; and improves the appearance of the City to create a desirable place to live and work Response: A landscaping plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4 to illustrate landscaping improvements and consistency with the Gateway Refinement Plan. B. Three types of landscaping may be required: 1. Landscaping standards for private property as specified in this Section and other Sections of this Code. Response: Existing street trees and curbside planter strips along the public right-of-way were both noted as sufficient, with no required landscaping improvements. Therefore, the applicant anticipates private property landscaping requirements, as specified in this code, and the Gateway Refinement Plan will be required. C. Materials and installation costs of planting and irrigation other than what is required by the Minimum Development Standards (Section 5.15-100) shall not be required to exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development, including parking facilities. The Director shall determine the location, quantity and quality of required landscaping as specified in this Code. Response: The applicant anticipates that the cost of planting and irrigation will not exceed 10 percent of the value of the new development, as specified in this provision. D. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, the following areas of a lotiparcel shall be landscaped: 1. All required setback areas and any additional planting areas as specified in the appropriate zoning district. 2. Parking lot planting areas required in this Section. 'lletJ 0 W L. Page 29 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The applicant has prepared and included a landscape plan as Sheet L1.0 of Appendix 4, that identifies perimeter landscaping, interior landscaping, and parking lot planting areas, consistent with this provision. E. At least 65 percent of each required planting area shall be covered with living plant materials within 5 years of the date of installation. The living plant materials shall be distributed throughout the required planting area. The planting acceptable per 1,000 square feet of the required planting area is as follows: Response: The landscape plan is designed such that each required planting will achieve at least 75 percent with living plant materials within three (3) years, consistent with the more stringent standard outlined in the Gateway Refinement Plan. The gross floor area of the proposed restaurant is 4,987 square feet. The landscape plan shows 71 trees, 1,222 shrubs, and 10,365 square feet of ground cover. A landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet L1.0 of Appendix 4. F. Parking lot planting areas shall include 1 canopy tree at least 2 inches in caliper that meets City street tree standards as may be permitted by the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual and at least 4 shrubs, 5 -gallon or larger, for each 100 square feet of planting area. Shrubbery that abuts public right-of-way or that is placed in the interior of any parking lot shall generally not exceed 2-1/2 feet in height at maturity. Parking lot planting areas shall include: Parking and driveway setback areas specified in the applicable zoning district; and 5 percent of the interior of a parking lot, exclusive of any required parking setbacks, if 24 or more parking spaces are located between the street side of a building and an arterial or collector street, and are visible from any street. Response: The project site is located in the CC zoning district and is subject to a ten -foot building setback and five-foot parking, driveway, and outdoor storage setback. The landscape plan indicates 18 percent or 5,196 square feet of the interior parking lot is screened from Beltline and Gateway Street, consistent with this provision and the Gateway Refinement Plan. G. All new required planting areas shall be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system unless where planted with native species or plant communities, or as may be exempted by the Director. Response: The applicant anticipates that all new planting areas will be provided with a permanent underground irrigation system. Irrigation system design and plans will be provided following land use approval. 40013 W L Page 30 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 H. Landscaped setbacks abutting required screening on the same property may be exempted by the Director from planting requirements if the area is not visible from any public right-of-way or adjacent property. Response: The applicant anticipates that the project site will be able to provide landscaping within the required property setbacks in the CCzoning districtwhile also complying with the screening requirements for mechanical equipment and trash enclosures. Therefore, no exemption is requested with this application. Planting Installation Standards. 1. The applicant shall provide methods for the protection of existing plant material, which will remain through the construction process. The plants to be saved and the method of protection shall be noted on the Planting Plan. Response: No existing planting material will remain through the construction process. Therefore this provision does not apply. 2. Existing trees to be retained on private property shall not have construction occur within the drip line, unless a landscape architect certifies that affected trees will have at least a 90 percent chance of survival over a 5 -year period. Trees to be saved shall be kept free from trunk abrasion. Response: No existing trees will be retained on the project site. Therefore, the applicant anticipates a Tree Felling Permit will be required and will be provided following land use approval. 3. The Planting Plan may be required to include specifications for topsoil, including depth and organic matter requirements, to ensure the health and vitality of required planting. Where planting areas have been excavated, the Planting Plan shall provide for the replacement of topsoil. All waste material shall be removed from required planting areas prior to the application of topsoil. Inspection may be made by the Director prior to planting to verify proper rough grade and installation of irrigation systems. b. Plant materials and soil preparation may be inspected prior to or in conjunction with the occupancy inspection to ensure that placement, quantity, size, and variety conform to the approved Planting Plan and the requirements of this Section. Nursery tags identifying variety and species shall remain on plant specimens until the Final Building Inspection by the Building Official or the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. ltJO WL Page 31 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: The applicant understands that inspection and verification of soil depth and organic matter will occur before the proposed plantings. 4.4-110 Screening A. Unless otherwise specified in this Code, screening shall be required: 2. For outdoor mechanical devices and minor and major public facilities; 4. For trash receptacles; Response: The project site does not abut a residential or different zoned area, and therefore is not subject to screening between uses. Outdoor mechanical devices and minor and major facilities will be located on the roof and screened behind the building fagade. The location and screening method for mechanical equipment can be seen on the architectural plan, included with this application as Appendix 5. Trash and recycling receptacles will be located within an enclosure, designed to have matching architectural features to the proposed restaurant including a combination of dark steel and white stucco siding. B. Screening shall be vegetative, earthen and/or structural and be designed to minimize visual and audible incompatible uses from adjacent properties. Unless specified elsewhere in this Subsection, screening shall be continuous to at least 6 feet above ground level. The following standards shall apply: 1. Vegetative Screening. Evergreen shrubs shall be planted to form a continuous hedge. When immediate screening is necessary, a sight - obscuring fence shall be installed in place of, or in conjunction with the shrubs. The 6 -foot height standard specified in Subsection B., above shall occur within 4 years of planting. 3. Structural Screening. Afence or masonry wall shall be constructed to provide a uniform sightobscuring screen. EXCEPTIONS: Any refuse container or disposal area which would otherwise be visible from a public street, customer or resident parking area, any public facility, adjacent property, or any residential area, shall be screened from view as specified in Subsections 1. and 3., above. All refuse materials shall be contained within the screened area. See also Section 3.2-240D.3.b. for multifamily design standards. This standard does not apply to single and 2 -family dwellings. Response: The refuse and recycling areas are located within an enclosed masonry wall, as shown on the architectural plan included in Appendix 5. 4013WL. Page 32 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 4.4-115 Fences Fences shall not exceed the height standards in Table 4.4-1 and shall be located as follows: A. General 1. In any zoning, overlay or plan district not specifically listed in Table 4.4-1, fence standards shall be determined based upon the use, for example a commercial use in the Mixed Use Commercial District shall comply with fence standards for the commercial districts in Table 4.4-1. Response: No fences are proposed with this application. Therefore this provision does not apply. 4.5-100 On -Site Lighting Standards 4.5-110 Illumination and Height A. Standards for Installation and Operation of Outdoor Lighting. Except as exempt by subsection (C) of SDC 4.5.105 above, new outdoor lighting fixtures installed after July 1, 2022, are subject to the standards below. No provision of this section is intended to preempt Springfield Municipal Code 8.200 et seq., Signs, or applicable State codes. (1) All outdoor lighting fixtures subject to this section must be designed as a full cut-off fixture or have a shielding method to direct light emissions down onto the site and not shine direct illumination or glare onto adjacent properties. (2) All lighting for roadways, roadway signs, intersections, and pedestrian ways must be designed or have an opaque shielding method to direct light emissions downward and below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. (3) The use of laser source light or any similar high intensity light for outdoor advertising or entertainment is prohibited. (6) Businesses and institutions with outdoor lighting, such as parking lot lights, building lights, landscaping lights, and other similar exterior lighting features, are encouraged to extinguish such lights at the end of the working day, except for lights necessary for personal and building safety. Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on- site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas, landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be 40013 W L Page 33 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided at roadway signs and private driveway intersections will be designed to be downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. B. On-site lighting shall be the minimum illumination necessary for a given application including parking areas and vehicle sales areas. All exterior light fixtures shall be shielded or recessed so that direct glare and reflection are contained within the boundaries of the property and directed downward and away from abutting properties; public rightsof-way; and riparian, wetlands, and other protected areas identified in this Code on the same property. Response: Lighting will be provided in accordance with these standards. As shown on the photometric plan included with this application as Appendix 6, lighting will be provided throughout the project site at lighting levels consistent with the City's on- site lighting standards. Lighting will be provided throughout parking areas, landscaped areas, and all building entrances. Any proposed lighting will be downward facing and shielded to avoid significant light trespass. Lighting provided at roadway signs and at private driveway intersections will be designed to be downward facing, below the horizontal plane of the fixture in the permanently installed position. C. Height. 1. The height of a free standing exterior light fixture shall not exceed 25 feet or the height of the principal permitted structure, whichever is less. In this case, height is measured as the vertical distance between the paved surface and the bottom of the light fixture. Response: All proposed light poles will not exceed the 25 -foot maximum height requirement per this provision. 4.6-100 Motor Vehicle Parking, Loading and Bicycle Parking Standards 4.6-110 Motor Vehicle Parking — General A. Off-street parking spaces shall be provided, consistent with requirements in Section 4.6-125, Table 4.6-2, unless excepted as allowed herein, for: 1. All new construction and expansion of multiple family residential, commercial, industrial and public and semi-public uses. If an existing development is expanded, new parking spaces shall be provided in proportion to the increase only. 2. Changes in use or the use category of an existing building or structure. Response: The applicant anticipates new parking spaces are required due to the change in use from the existing buildings (formerly Elmer's and a motel) to the new restaurant 400 13 W L Page 34 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 and future Pad Site A and future Pad Site B. Parking totals and design findings are provided for the restaurant only. Future Pad Site parking totals will be provided when developed in the future. B. If parking has been provided to serve an existing use, the number of parking spaces cannot be reduced if the result would be fewer spaces than required by this Section, except as parking reductions are allowed below and under Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2. Response: The applicant has reconfigured the parking lot from the existing use and existing parking in an effort to provide ample room for new development (utilities, drive aisles, landscape improvements, and future pad sites). Parking counts will not result in fewer parking spaces than those provided under the existing approval. C. Parking reductions under Sections 4.6-110.1-1 through L and Special Provisions to Table 4.6-2 shall not reduce the number of ADA parking spaces required in accordance with the minimum parking in Table 4.6-2 or under Section 4.6-110.M. Response: No parking reductions are requested with this application. Two ADA parking spaces are proposed, consistentwith Table 4.6-2 and Section 4.6-110.M. E. Required parking spaces shall be available for the parking of passenger vehicles of residents, customers, patrons, visitors, and employees only, and shall not be used for outdoor displays, storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials. Parking for company motor vehicles that remain on the premises overnight, or enclosures designed for the temporary collection of shopping carts, must be provided in addition to the number of parking spaces required by this Section. Response: All required parking totals are provided for passenger vehicles of customers, patrons, visitors, and employees. No outdoor displays, storage of vehicles, equipment, or materials is proposed with this application. E. Unless joint use of parking facilities is requested as may be permitted in Subsection E. below, the total requirement for off-street parking spaces is the sum of the requirements for all uses. If the total number of required parking spaces results in a fraction, the fraction shall be rounded up to the next whole number. Off-street parking facilities for one use shall not be considered as providing parking facilities for any other use, unless as may be permitted in Subsection F., below. Response: Parking totals proposed with this application are for the restaurant building only. Additional parking stalls to serve future pad sites A and B are shown on the site plan but not requested as a part of the application and will be designed and included in future submittals. G. When on -street parking is available directly abutting the property and there are no adopted plans to remove the on -street parking, parking spaces in a 400 0 W L Page 35 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 public right-of-way directly abutting the development area may be counted as fulfilling a part of the parking requirements for development as follows: For each 18 feet of available on -street parking, there will be 1/2 space credit toward the required amount of off-street parking spaces. The developer is responsible for marking any on -street spaces. Response: There are no on -street parking areas directly abutting the project site. Therefore, this provision does not apply. H. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Additional Bicycle Parking. Additional bicycle parking beyond the minimum amount required in Table 4.6-3 that complies with the bike parking standards in Sections 4.6-145 and 4.6-150 may substitute up to 20% of off-street motor vehicle parking otherwise required in Table 4.6-2. For every 2 non -required bicycle parking spaces that meet the short -or long-term bicycle parking standards specified in Table 4.63, the motor vehicle parking requirement is reduced by 1 space. When existing parking converted to bicycle parking under this subsection results in surplus motor vehicle parking spaces, the surplus parking may be converted to another use in conformance withthe requirements of this Code. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors—Abutting Sites. Development sites abutting an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 15% from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. J. Motor Vehicle Parking Space Reduction Credit for Frequent Transit Corridors—Nearby Sites. Development sites not abutting but within 1/4 -mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may request a reduction of up to 10% from minimum off-street motor vehicle parking required in Table 4.6-2. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. K. Reduction Credit for ADA Improvements for Frequent Transit Corridors. Development sites abutting or within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed Frequent Transit Corridor may receive a reduction of up to 10% from the minimum off-street motorvehicle parking required in Table4.6-2 in exchange for contribution to the City forADA improvements in the public right-of-way. The required contribution will be equal to the Base Curb Ramp Fee multiplied by each set of 4 parking spaces to be reduced, rounded up to the next whole number (e.g. one Base Curb Ramp Fee for 1 to 4 parking spaces reduced, double the Base Curb Ramp Fee for 5 to 8 parking spaces reduced, etc.). The 400 0 W L Page 36 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Base Curb Ramp Fee must be set by Council resolution and must be approximately the cost of constructing one ADA -compliant curb ramp. Nothing in this subsection waives or alters any requirement for a developer to construct or provide on-site or off-site ADA improvements. Response: No reduction in parking totals is requested with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. N. Right Size Parking Alternative -Maximum. The Approval Authority may authorize an alternative parking standard that is more than 125% of the minimum off-street parking standard in Section 4.6-125. The alternative parking standard must be the peak parking demand identified by a parking generation study conducted according to the ITE Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies and prepared by a licensed engineer. (6412) Response: The project site is required to provide a minimum of 50 parking stalls and is limited to a maximum of 63 parking stalls. Atotal of 83 parking stalls is requested to serve the proposed restaurant, which exceeds the maximum allowed amount. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. 4.6-115 Motor Vehicle Parking - Parking Lot Design All off-street parking areas shall comply with the following dimensional standards: Table 4.6-1 Dimensional Feature (all dimensions in feet) Diagram Stall width, standard Parking Angle 0 45 J � 0 90 A I 9.0 9.0 I 9.0 I 9.01 Stallwidth, compact I A 1 30 801 801 8 0 Stall length. standard I1 24.0 18.0 18.0 18.0 Stall length. compact I1 22.0 16.0 16.0 16.0 Aisle width between stall Imes I 1 12.0 12.0 16.0 24.0 Bumper overhang(typicah IDI 0.0 1.5 1.6 2.0 Cross -aisle, I-way I1 16.0 16.0 16.0 1 16.0 Cross -aisle, 2 -way I1 24.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 Response: Parking stall locations and dimensions are shown on the site plan included with this application as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. 41to0 WL Page 37 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #84967 4.6-120 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Lot Improvements All parking areas shall conform to the setback, vision clearance, planting and screening provisions of this Code and shall be completed prior to occupancy. Required parking spaces shall be improved as follows: A. All parking lots, bays, and spaces must have a durable, dust -free surfacing of Asphaltic concrete, Portland cement concrete or other materials as approved by the City Engineer. Permeable pavement meeting standards in the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual may be allowed by the City Engineer for parking areas and driveways. Parking lot surfacing shall not encroach upon the public right-of-way. Response: The existing parking area will be resurfaced with new Asphalt concrete, as approved by the City Engineer. B. Adequate drainage improvements shall be provided to manage all onsite run-off. Provisions shall be madeforthe on-site collection of drainagewaters to eliminate sheet flow onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private property. All drainage systems shall be approved by the City Engineer. Response: Adequate drainage improvements are proposed to manage surface water run-off from the site, as shown on the storm plan included in Sheet C4.0 of Appendix 4. C. All parking spaces fronting a sidewalk, alley, street, landscaped area or structure shall be provided with a secured wheel bumper or linear curb not less than 6 inches in height to be set back from the front of the stall a minimum of 2 feet to allowfor vehicle encroachment. Wheel bumpers shall be a minimum of 6 feet in length. Curbs shall be constructed in conformance with the Standard Construction Specifications. EXCEPTION: As an option, the sidewalk or landscaped area may be widened 2 feet beyond the minimum dimension required to allow for vehicle encroachment. A curb not less than 6 inches in height shall protect the widened sidewalks and planter areas. Response: The site has been designed such that linear curb will be provided in front of parking spaces abutting the restaurant, drive-through lanes, and landscaped areas. D. Backing into the public right-of-way, other than alleys is prohibited. EXCEPTION: Parking areas of less than 4 spaces on a residentially zoned lotiparcel may back into the public right-of-way. Response: On-site traffic circulation allows for efficient navigation without backing into the public right-of-way. to 13WL. Page 38 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #94967 E. All spaces shall be permanently and clearly marked unless the Director determines that the spaces should not be marked for safety considerations. Old striping shall not be visible after being replaced by new striping. Response: All parking stalls with be permanently and clearly marked, consistent with this provision. No existing striping will be visible after being replaced by the new asphalt paving and new striping. F. Not more than 30% of the total parking spaces in a parking lot may be designated for compact cars, unless a greater percentage is authorized by the Director based on substantial evidence that greater than 30% of the total parking spaces is appropriate for the use. These spaces shall be signed andlor the space painted with the words "Compact Car Only." Response: No compact spaces are proposed with this application. Therefore, this provision does not apply. G. Parking Spaces for People with Disabilities. 1. Parking spaces for people with disabilities and accessible passenger loading zones that serve a particular building shall be located as close as possible to a building entrance. Response: The project site provides two accessible parking stalls with a shared passenger loading zone. Both spaces are located adjacent to the restaurant entrance. 2. The number and dimensions of parking spaces for people with disabilities shall be as specified in Section 1106 of the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. Response: The project site provides 83 parking stalls and therefore, is required to provide a minimum of two accessible parking stalls and one van accessible space according to Oregon Structural Specialty Code. The location of accessible parking stalls is shown on the site plan, included as Sheet C2.0 of Appendix 4. 4.6-125 Motor Vehicle Parking — Parking Space Requirements A. Table 4.6-2 establishes minimum off-street parking standards according to use, which apply to that use in any zoning district. B. The minimum parking standard for any use not specified in Table 4.6-2 is the average peak period parking demand identified for that use in the current version of the ITE Parking Manual, forthe day(s) of the weekwith the highest parking demand. C. The maximum off-street parking standard for any use that is not a residential use is 125% of the minimum off-street parking standard. There is no maximum off-street parking standard for residential uses. Ileo0 WL Page 39 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 D. Parking standards established in Table 4.6-2 may be modified as provided in Section 4.6-110. Table 4.6-2 Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie - 125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83 parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. Special Provisions. B. Commercial Districts. 1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed buildings. Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. too WL Page 40 Minimum Panama standard Zu Nssmmual uses Single mmily (attached and Oadoned) and auplev 1 space Wr each MVelnng when paved on street Poll Is available directly ab rt ng dwellings the proper and Mere are no adopted plans to remove the On street parking. 2 spau5 for each dwelMg when no paved on street parking Is available directly abuding the properly or when the Skbting on -street parking Is planned to be removed as pan UI an NoflW also Manuel dealings, l space ror each dwelling One GIWs out, Pus . 025 space for each bedroom orlove Hing unit plus l per bull hme employee W the busiest shin Sparking and morning houses (see SOC 67-215) 05 Man additional parking space for each boardlog mom In addition to any puling fora pnmary use. Commemialllndustdal uses CMld care center l space Snatch 35d square(eetofgrossarea, plus l dropoRspacs foretell 700 squarebeet,ff, sdoorarea. MMait.00 or bed and breakfast tadlNes l spas plus i space nor each guest mom. Eann and drintrat establishments is ace for each 1 Ws uam leet or aress Mor area. Retail trade and seMces(Induding shopping centers) l space for every 300 square feet or gross floor area. Manufacture and assembly. and other primary l space ror can l No square feet or gross floor area industrial uses. Includes warehousing, warehouse commereWl saks(IncludNg bulky l space has each 6N square fleet M gross Mor area. ...handle.) Pushed ark InsrXYtlonal was Educationist htllniss 2spaceloreableastimmin plus l Wasch 100squarebeet Urine largest Public assembly area. Public chatty holly None, unlessuunryvUltlxwill be parned ovemlght Recreational MdN s, and reYglous, social and public 1 spat or each IN square beet OF door area In Me prhnary aasembry area and 1 Instaboons for Sued 200 square feet Orgross Poor area for Me remainder of ale building. TMnspoftM facHPks tspace tor each 300 square feel M gross Mor area not Including vehicle storage aRu. Response: The proposed restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor area and requires a minimum of 50 parking stalls and not more than 63 parking stalls (ie - 125% of the minimum number of parking stalls). The project site includes 83 parking stalls and therefore exceeds the maximum parking requirements. In support of this request, a parking assessment memorandum from Kittleson and Associates is included with this application as Appendix 8. Special Provisions. B. Commercial Districts. 1. Parking lots in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District shall be designed so that every seventh space is developed as a landscaped separator between spaces. NC developments that require more than 25 parking spaces shall locate half of all the required spaces over 25 behind proposed buildings. Response: The project site is not located in the Neighborhood Commercial (NC) District. Therefore, this provision does not apply. too WL Page 40 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 2. Parking lots shall be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles. EXCEPTION: Parking spaces in excess of the number required by this Code may be used for temporary sales or display of merchandise where the activity does not create a hazard for automobile or pedestrian traffic orwhere otherwise allowed under this Code or the Springfield Municipal Code. Response: The project site's parking lot will be used exclusively for the parking of vehicles. 3. A minimum of 4 off-street parking spaces shall be required for all sites in commercial zoning districts that require parking, unless reduced under Section 4.6-110.M. Response: The parking totals provided for the proposed restaurant exceed the minimum off- street parking requirements established by this section. Adequate parking counts are provided, consistent with Table 4.6-2. 4.6-135 Loading Areas — Facility Design and Improvements A. All necessary loading areas for commercial and industrial development shall be located off-street and provided in addition to the required parking spaces. Response: As provided under Subsection C, no loading areas are provided based on the minimum size requirements for commercial loading areas. B. Vehicles in the loading area shall not protrude into a public right-of-way or sidewalk. EXCEPTION: When no other reasonable alternative exists, loading areas shall be located so that vehicles are not required to back or maneuver in the public right-of-way or internal travel aisles. Response: As provided below, no loading areas are provided based on the minimum size requirements for commercial loading areas. C. The minimum sizes required for commercial and industrial loading areas are as follows: 1. Two hundred fifty square feet for buildings of 5,000 to 20,000 square feet of gross floor area. Response: The restaurant building is 4,987 square feet of gross floor space and therefore, is below the 5,000 square foot threshold therefore the project is not required to provide a loading area. 41to0 WL Page 41 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 4.6-145 Bicycle Parking — Facility Design A. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be a powder coated staple or inverted -U rack as shown in Figure 4.6-B. Alternatively, the required bicycle parking spaces must fulfill the criteria for quality bicycle parking, which are as follows: 1. Supports the bicycle frame in a stable position without damage to wheels, frames, or components and provides two points of contact; 2. Allows locking of the frame and one or both wheels with a U -lock; 3. Is securely anchored to the ground or to a structure; 4. Resists cutting, rusting, bending, or deformation, both from natural causes and from human abuse; 5. Powder coated or durable, non -scratching surface; and 6. Works well for a variety of bicycle frame types (e.g., should work for step -through frame as well as diamond frame, children's bicycles as well as adult bicycles, recumbent as well as other styles of adaptive bicycles). Response: Bicycle parking spaces will consist of powder -coated staple style racks that are spaces to work with a variety of bicycle frame types. B. Required bicycle parking spaces and facilities must be constructed and installed in accordance with Section 4.6-150 and Figures 4.6-13 and 4.6-C. Bicycle parking must be provided at ground level unless an elevator with clear bicycle wayfinding signage is easily accessible and directs users to an approved bicycle storage area. Each required bicycle parking space must be accessible without removing another bicycle. Response: Bicycle parking will be provided adjacent to the restaurant building on the ground floor with adequate spacing between bicycles to provide convenient access. C. All required long-term bicycle parking spaces must be sheltered from precipitation and include lighting. Response: The proposed Chick -fl -A restaurantwill be 4,987 square feet. Per Table 4.6.3, the project restaurant is required to provide 1 bicycle parking space per 600 square feet of floor area, or nine bicycle parking spaces, with 25 percent of spaces designated as long-term parking and 75 percent designated as short-term parking. The applicant will provide ten bicycle parking spaces (four long-term, six short- term). Bicycle parking will be located under an awning and well -lit per this provision. 4013WL. Page 42 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 D. Short-term bicycle parking must be sheltered as follows: 1. If 10 or fewer short-term bicycle parking spaces are required, no shelter is required for short-term bicycle parking. Response: Six (or 75 percent) short-term bicycle spaces are provided. Therefore, the applicant does not exceed ten short-term bicycle spaces and is not required to shelter short-term bicycle parking. E. Bicycle parking that accommodates oversized bicycles and alternative bicycle types must be provided as follows: 1. Each oversized bicycle parking space must provide minimum clear area of 4 feet by 8 feet as shown in Figure 4.6-C. 2. At least 10% of the long-term bicycle parking spaces for commercial uses and residential uses must be oversized bicycle parking spaces. Response: One oversized bicycle parking space (10 percent ofthe required long-term parking) can be provided, as necessary, on the outside of the bicycle rack. 4.6-150 Bicycle Parking — Facility Improvements A. Bicycle Parking Location and Security. 1. Bicycle parking racks, shelters, or lockers must be securely anchored to the ground or to a structure. Response: Bicycle parking racks will be securely anchored to the ground, consistent with this provision. 2. Exterior long-term bicycle parking must be located within 200 feet from the main building entrance, primary point of entry to the use, or employee entrance. Response: Exterior long-term bicycle parking racks are located within 100 feet from the restaurant building entrance, consistent with this provision. 3. Exterior short-term bicycle parking must: a. Be located no further than 50 feet from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the use, as determined by the City, but not further away than the closest onsite automobile parking space excluding designated accessible parking spaces, whichever distance is less; and b. Be clearly visible from the main building entrance or primary point of entry to the use. too WL Page 43 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 Response: Exterior short-term bicycle parking racks are located 40 feet from the restaurant building entrance and are visible from the main building entrance, consistent with this provision. 4. Bicycle parking shall be separated from motor vehicle parking by a barrier, curb, or sufficient distance to prevent damage to parked bicycles. Response: Bicycle parking will be located immediately adjacent to the restaurant building, separated by curbing to prevent damage to parked bicycles. 5. Where bicycle parking facilities are not directly visible and obvious from the public right-of-way, signs shall be provided to direct bicyclists to the parking. Directions to sheltered facilities inside a structure may be signed or supplied by the employer, as appropriate. Short-term parking shall be made available to the general public. Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right- of-way, either from Gateway Street or the southern drive aisle. 6. Bicycle parking may be located inside a building on a floor, which has an outdoor entrance open for use, and which does not require stairs to access the space. EXCEPTION: The Director may allow bicycle parking on upper stories within multi -story residential buildings. Response: The applicant anticipates that bicycle parking will be visible from the public right- of-way, either from Gateway or the southern drive aisle. Bicycle parking and bicycle racks must be located to avoid conflict with pedestrian movement and access. Direct access from bicycle parking spaces to the public right-of-way must be provided by at - grade or ramp access. Pedestrian access must be provided from the bicycle parking area to the building entrance. Bicycle parking may be located in the public sidewalk or right-of-way where there is a minimum 5 feet between the parked bicycle and the storefront and does not conflict with pedestrian accessibility. Response: Bicycle parking will be located adjacent to the restaurant building, separated from pedestrian walkways. The applicant does not anticipate bicycle parking will conflict with pedestrian movement and access. B. Employers with changing rooms and shower facilities or other additional amenities may be eligible fora 10% reduction of Transportation System Development Charges if the Director determines that those facilities encourage bicycling or other active modes of transportation by employees or patrons. 4t7 0 W L Page 44 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick-fil-A #04967 Response: The applicant anticipates no changing rooms and shower facilities or other amenities will be provided with the development of the project site. 4.6-155 Bicycle Parking — Number of Spaces Required Table 4." Minimum Required Bicycle Parking Spaces Long and abort -Term Bicycle Use Catwory specific uses Number of Required Spaces Parkins Percentages Commends] General retail 1 per 3.000 square feet of floor area 25% long-term 75%short-term Eating and drinking 1 per 600 square feet of floor area 25% long -ten establishments 75% short-term Service establishments 1 per 2.000 square feet of floor area 25% long-term 75%short-term Art lnsthuflOngallery 1 per 1,500 square feet of floor area 25% long -tend 75%short-term DrIve-through only 2 for employee parking(minMum of 4 does not 100%tong-term establishments apply) Lodging 1 per 10 rentable rooms 75% long-term 25X short-term Omce, Including medical 0.75 per 5.000 square feet of floor area 7:% 'o offices and clln]¢ 25%short-term Industrial and wholesale 0,25 per employee OR 1 per 4.000 square feel of 75% long-term floor area, v.Tlchever a was 25%short-term Response: The proposed Chick-fil-A restaurant will be 4,987 square feet. Therefore, nine bike spaces are provided (four long-term, six short-term). 4.7-100 Specific Development Standards 4.7-145 Eating and Drinking Establishments The cumulative total area of sit-down restaurants and delicatessens, secondary retail uses and exercise studios in the GO District shall be limited to no more than 10 percent of the gross floor area of the office building in which they are sited. Response: The project site is not in the General Office (GO) zoning district. Therefore, this provision does not apply. IE30 WL Page 45 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 5.0 GATEWAY REFINEMENT PLAN Commercial Element Policies and Implementation Actions 2.0 Improve the appearance of the freeway commercial area around the intersection of Gateway Street and Belt Line Road. 2.1 As part of the site plan review process for development, require all landscaped areas to be at least 75 percent covered with living plant materials within 3 years of the date of installation. Response: The landscape plan includes a note that at least 75 percent of landscape areaswill be covered with living plant materials within three years of the date of installation. In support of this statement, the landscape architect has designed an automatic irrigation system and anticipates soil depth and organic composition is compatible with the plant species selected. The landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. 2.2 Through the site plan review process requires 7.5% of the interior of parking lots visible from arterials and collectors to be landscaped. Require vegetative screening of parking lots. Allow such vegetative screens to include shrubs to 3'/]' high, except in vision clearance areas. Response: The landscape plan indicates the majority of perimeter parking (17,372 square feet) will be screened by a three foot tall evergreen shrub hedge between the interior parking lot and Beltline and Gateway Street. The location of the parking lot is interior to the project site and as such, no conflict between vegetation height and vision clearance areas is anticipated. The landscape plan is included with this application as Sheet 11.0 of Appendix 4. 2.3 Require properties developing along the potential access routes to the McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site to provide planter strip and front yard landscaping designed to enhance the site's entryway. Examples could include additional street trees and landscaped areas. Response: No access to the McKenzie -Gateway Special Light Industrial site is proposed with this project. Therefore, the applicant anticipates that this policy does not apply. 2.4 The City shall explore siting and construction of a "Welcome to Springfield" sign in the vicinity of the Gateway/Beltline intersection. The sign shall be aesthetically designed and visible to travelers entering the Gateway area from Belt Line Road and 1-5. Surrounding park -like landscaping should be considered and encouraged as part of this entry design. Response: The applicant anticipates that a Welcome to Springfield sign would be placed at the Intersection of Gateway and Beltline on tax lot 1703222001201. The project site is located to the south of the speculative sign and therefore, the applicant 41ttJ 13 W L Page 46 Type II Site Plan Review (Pre -Submittal) I Chick -til -A #04967 anticipates no significant conflict with future siting considerations for the city welcome sign. 5.0 CONCLUSION As evidenced through this narrative and associated documents, the applicant's pre -development review application is consistent with the applicable local policies and regulations governing the allowance of these requests. Therefore, the applicant respectfully requests the City of Springfield's approval of this application. 4013WL Page 47 Appendix 1 Application Form City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD � Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal • ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: or Site Plan Modification Submittal: A licant Name: Steve Schwartz phone. 303.519.7206 Company: Chick-fil-A, Inc. Email: Steve. schwartz@ Address: 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92618 cfacorp.com Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.8362 Company: 4G Development & Consulting, Inc. Email: ahunt@4gdev.com Address: PO Box 2//70571, San Diego, CA 92198 Pro ert Owner: IVI1: /�,�. /,j;,,: ZS Phone: 511 1$` GElj Company: Glc - 1%) f .i .. o- (1 2L-_ r-.: Tree / 42� Email apo' i7s'"«er.c.0� Address: F -Y& 4M�i�r ASSESSOR'S MAP NO; TAX LOT NO S < /r Property Address: ] }�% r� � '��✓�.. �J r:z-i. _5 �; ',q � tG/, ��f� �f�`l7� Size of Property: , V ropuse No. of _ (�- Pro osed Name of Pr -A - Description of If you are filing in this form by hantl, please attach your proposal description to this applkation. Pro osal: Proposed Chick-fil-A fast food restaurant with dual drive-thru la Existin Use: Hotel/Motel and Elmer's Restaurant. New Im envious Surface Covera a Includin Bld . Gross Floor Area): sf Si natures: Please si nand riot our name and date in the apprc riate box on the next a e. Associated A lications: Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed b : Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 as. Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Owner: Date: I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: %11 rl-+ 1_+_s 114/'1111 Date: Signature/ Revised 1/7/14 KL 2 of 11 Appendix 2 Lot of Record Information RANDY PAPE BELTLINE 1%9 1700 r i 1400 1300 ZVt ~ BELT 00 1201 1100 1 00 1300 1400 1600 904 KRUSE 1900 w 901 i a` 905 0 Taxlot Lot of Record F —I PLSS Section 0 Deed 98-13132 I�n Chick-Fil-A Gateway & Beltline 0 Puerta Plat (Lot 2, Block 2) U rw Dale: Ju 28,2022 o s7. Ts Iso *DOW L Fgure 1 JM—Ing aPa JIW,= 1 18 PM Uw'ssoding Fmou of Land Monag—K,Shh ofQgon, Shh of Ogon WT, Shh of 0mgon GEO, rsn Canada, r ,HERE, Garan, ZMnolgm, M., LEGS, EPA USDA ®pALTA Commitment for Title Insurance )G— First Ame'ric'an ISSUED BY Commitment First American Title Insurance Company COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE Issued By FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY NOTICE IMPORTANT -READ CAREFULLY: THIS COMMITMENT IS AN OFFER TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE TITLE INSURANCE POLICIES. ALL CLAIMS OR REMEDIES SOUGHT AGAINST THE COMPANY INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT OR THE POLICY MUST BE BASED SOLELY IN CONTRACT. THIS COMMITMENT IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, REPORT OF THE CONDITION OF TITLE, LEGAL OPINION, OPINION OF TITLE, OR OTHER REPRESENTATION OF THE STATUS OF TITLE. THE PROCEDURES USED BY THE COMPANY TO DETERMINE INSURABILITY OF THE TITLE, INCLUDING ANY SEARCH AND EXAMINATION, ARE PROPRIETARY TO THE COMPANY, WERE PERFORMED SOLELY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMPANY, AND CREATE NO EXTRACONTRACTUAL LIABILITY TO ANY PERSON, INCLUDING A PROPOSED INSURED. THE COMPANY'S OBLIGATION UNDER THIS COMMITMENT IS TO ISSUE A POLICY TO A PROPOSED INSURED IDENTIFIED IN SCHEDULE A IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS OF THIS COMMITMENT. THE COMPANY HAS NO LIABILITY OR OBLIGATION INVOLVING THE CONTENT OF THIS COMMITMENT TO ANY OTHER PERSON. COMMITMENTTO ISSUE POLICY Subject to the Notice; Schedule B, Part I -Requirements; Schedule B, Part II -Exceptions; and the Commitment Conditions, FirstAmerican Title Insurance Company, a Nebraska Corporation (the "Company"), commits to issue the Policy according to the terms and provisions of this Commitment. This Commitment is effective as of the Commitment Date shown in Schedule A for each Policy described in Schedule A, only when the Company has entered in Schedule A both the specified dollar amount as the Proposed Policy Amount and the name of the Proposed Insured. If all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements have not been met within 90 days after the Commitment Date, this Commitment terminates and the Company's liability and obligation end. First American Title Insurance Company Kenneth 0. DeGiolgio, President Greg L Smit%, Secretary If this jacket was created electronically, it constitutes an original document This page & only a part ofa 2016 AL TAO Camoxb ant for Title Iruurenre &sued by Hat Am vimn Title Incur m Corpany. This Cbrrxrx ent is wt valid ewthout the Notion; the Cbrrmh nt m l sue iblicy; the Corrmb nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, Part I-Requlmn or; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Forth (or any derivative thereol) is restriclod to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Tide Association. 1. DEFINITIONS (a) "Knowledge" or" Known": Actual or imputed knowledge, but not constructive notice imparted by the Public Records. (b) "Land": The land described in Schedule A and affixed improvements that bylaw constitute real property. The term"Land" does not include any property beyond the lines of the area described in Schedule A, nor any right, title, interest, estate, or easement in abutting streets, roads, avenues, alleys, lanes, ways, or waterways, but this does not modify or limit the extant that a right of access wand from the Landis to be insured by the Policy. (c) "Mortgage": A mortgage, deed of trust, or other security instrument, including one evidenced by electronic means authorized by law. (d) "Policy": Each contract of title insurance, in a form adopted by the American Land Title Association, issued or to be issued by the Company pursuant to this Comrnbnent (e) "Proposed Insured": Each person identified in Schedule A as the Proposed Insured of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (f) "Proposed Policy Amount": Each dollar amount specified in Schedule A as the Proposed Policy Amount of each Policy to be issued pursuant to this Commitment. (g) "Public Records": Records established understate statutes at the Commitment Data for the purpose of imparting constructive notice of matters relating to real property to purchasers for value and without Knowledge. (h) "Titre": The estate or interest described in Schedule A. 2. If all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have not been met within the time period specified in the Commitment to Issue Policy, this Commitment terrnnates and the Company's liability and obligation end. 3. The Company's liability and obligation is limited by and this Commitment is not valid without: (a) the Notice; (b) the Commitment to Issue Policy; (c) the Commitment Conditions; (d) Schedule A; (e) Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; and (f) Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions. 4. COMPANY'S RIGHT TO AMEND The Company may amend this Comrnbnent at any time. If the Company amends this Commitment to add a defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other matter recorded in the Public Records prior to the Commitment Data, any liability of the Company is limited by Commitment Condition 5. The Company shall not be liable for any other amendment to this Commitment S. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY (a) The Company's liability under Commitment Condition 4 is limited to the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in the interval between the Company's delivery to the Proposed Insured of the Commitment and the delivery of the amended Commitment, resulting from the Proposed Insured's good faith reliance to: (i) comply with the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements; (ii) eliminate, with the Company's written consent, any Schedule B, Part II—Exceptions; or (iii) acquire the Title orcreate the Mortgage covered by this Commitment. (b) The Company shall not be liable under Comrntrrent Condition 5(a) if the Proposed Insured requested the amendment or had Knowledge of the rratterand did not notify the Company about it in writing. (c) The Company will only have liability under Commitment Condition 4 if the Proposed Insured would not have incurred the expense had the Commitment included the added matter when the Comrnbrent was first delivered to the Proposed Insured. (d) The Company's liability shall not exceed the lesser of the Proposed Insured's actual expense incurred in good faith and described in Commitment Conditions 5(axi) through 5(axiii) or the Proposed Policy Amount (e) The Company shall not be liable for the content of the Transaction Identification Data, if any. (f) In no event shall the Company be obligated to issue the Policy referred to in this Comrnbrent unless all of the Schedule B, Part I—Requirements have been met to the satisfaction of the Company. (g) In any event, the Company's liability is limited by the terms and provisions of the Policy. This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Comnxbrent for Title Iru ce &sued by HatAmerioon Title Incur m Company. This Comnxbrente; not valid ewthout the Notim; the Commtment m &sue Policy,' the Cbm xt ent Corditbre; Shcedule A� Schedule 3,, part I-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license tom the American Land Title Association. S. LIABILITY OF THE COMPANY MUST BE BASED ON THIS COMMITMENT (a) Only a Proposed Insured identified in Schedule A, and no other person, may make a claim under this Commi bent. (b) Any claim must be based in contract and must be restricted solely to the terns and provisions of this Commitment (c) Until the Policy is issued, this Commitment, as last revised, is the exclusive and entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Commitment and supersedes all prior commitment negotiations, representations, and proposals of any kind, whether written or oral, express or implied, relating to the subject matter of this Commi bent (d) The deletion or modification ofany Schedule B, Part II—Exception does not constitute an agreement or obligation to provide coverage beyond the terns and provisions of this Commitment or the Policy. (e) Any amendment or endorsement to this Commitment must be in writing and authenticated by a person authorized by the Company. (f) When the Policy is issued, all liability and obligation under this Commitment will end and the Company's only liability will be under the Policy. 7. IF THIS COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED BY AN ISSUING AGENT The issuing agent is the Company's agent only for the lirnted purpose of issuing title insurance comrntmenta and policies. The issuing agent is not the Company's agent for the purpose of providing closing or settlement services. S. PRO -FORMA POLICY The Company may provide, at the request of a Proposed Insured, a pro -forma policy illustrating the coverage that the Company may provide. A pro -forma policy neither reflects the status of Title at the fime that the pro -forma policy is delivered to a Proposed Insured, nor is it a commitment to insure. This page & only a partofs 2016 AL TAO Comnxbrent for Title Iruu ce &sued by HatAmerioon Title Insur m Conp any. This Comnxbrentis not valid ewthout the Notion; the Com tment m Issue Policy,' the Cbm xt ent Corditbre; Sb$edule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. .t ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance j •rstAmezi6w ISSUED BY Schedule A First American Title Insurance Company Transaction Identification Data for reference only., Issuing Agent: First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services Issuing Office's ALTA& Registry ID: Commitment No.: NCS-1090350-LA2 Property Address: Randy Pape Beltline and Gateway, Street, Springfield, OR Revision No.: Issuing Office: 4380 La Jolla Village Drive, Suite 110, San Diego, CA 92122 Loan ID No.: Issuing Office File No.: NCS-1090350-LA2 SCHEDULE A 1. Commitment Date: April 18, 2022 at 8:00 a.m. 2. Policy to be issued: (a) ® ALTA& 2006 Owners Standard Coverage Policy Proposed Insured: Chick-fil-A, Inc., a Georgia corporation Proposed Policy Amount: $8,000,000.00 $12,600.00 (b) ® ALTA& 2006 Loan Policy Proposed Insured:To Be Determined Proposed Policy Amount: $TBD $TBD (c) ❑ 2006 ALTA@ Policy Proposed Insured: Proposed Policy Amount: $ 3. The estate or interest in the Land described or referred to in this Commitment is Fee Simple 4. The Title is, at the Commitment Date, vested in: Sycan B Corp., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided 80.0% interest and Olympic Street, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, as to an undivided 20.0% interest, as undivided Tenants in Common, as to Parcel I and SYCAN B CORP., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided eighty percent (80%) interest, and OLYMPIC STREET, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided twenty percent (20%) interest, as Tenants in Common, as to Parcel II S. The Land is described as follows: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof This page & only a part ofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxbmnt for Title Iruurance &sued by Hat Amerimn Title Insurance Corryuny. This Commibrent is wt valid Wthout the Nonce; the Commihmnt m Issue iblicy; the Conmibrent Conditiom; Shcelule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All tights reserved. The use of this Forth (or any derivative Ihereol) is restricled to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reorinred under license from the American land Title Association. FIRST AMERICAN TITLEINSURANCE COMPANY By: Authorized Signatory If there are any questions concerning this Commitment, please contact: Jacqueline Erum at jerum@frstam.com First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services 777 South Figueroa Street, Suite 900 Los Angeles, CA 90017 (213)271-1700 phone This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Comnxb snt for Title Iru ce &sued by Hat Amsrimn Title Incur m Corryeny. This Conm entis not valid ewtbout the Notion; the Comm nt m /slue Policy; the Cbmm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part l-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance First American ISSUED BY Schedule BI & BI First American Title Insurance Company i ...errora�namw�feF.�uiia�Yf�nv� SCHEDULE B, PART Requirements Al of the following Requirements must be met: 1. The Proposed Insured must notify the Company in writing of the name of any party not referred to in this Commitment who will obtain an interest in the Land or who will make a loan on the Land. The Company may then make additional Requirements or Exceptions. 2. Pay the agreed amount for the estate or interest to be insured. 3. Pay the premiums, fees, and charges for the Policy to the Company. 4. Documents satisfactory to the Company that convey the Title or create the Mortgage to be insured, or both, must be properly authorized, executed, delivered, and recorded in the Public Records. This page & only a paRofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb ant for Title Insurance &sued by Hat Am vimn Title Insurance Corryeny. This Commibrent is wt valid Wthout the Nonce; the Commihmnt m lia; a iblicy; the Commibrent Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part l-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xcepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All tights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereol) is restricled to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are =hihited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Aaeodation. j f ALTA Commitment for Title Insurance FII SL{ ,4.wcrICtlw ISSUED BY Schedule BI & BII (Cont. First American Title Insurance Company ...�f-nlsmamw�[eF.�uiia�Yf��ev� SCHEDULE B, PARTII Exceptions THIS COMMITMENT DOES NOT REPUBLISH ANY COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION CONTAINED IN ANY DOCUMENT REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE SPECIFIC COVENANT, CONDITION, RESTRICTION, OR LIMITATION VIOLATES STATE OR FEDERAL LAW BASED ON RACE, COLOR, RELIGION, SEX, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, GENDER IDENTITY, HANDICAP, FAMILIAL STATUS, OR NATIONAL ORIGIN. The Policy will not insure against loss or damage resulting from the terms and provisions of any lease or easement identified in Schedule A, and will include the following Exceptions unless cleared to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property or by the Public Records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the Public Records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the Public Records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Any encroachment (of existing improvements located on the Land onto adjoining land or of existing improvements located on adjoining land onto the Land), encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate and complete land survey of the Land. 5. Any lien or right to a lien for services, labor, material or equipment, unless such lien is shown by the Public Records at Date of Policy and not otherwise excepted from coverage herein. The exceptions to coverage 1-5 inclusive as set forth above will remain on any subsequently issued Standard Coverage Title Insurance Policy. In order to remove these exceptions to coverage in the issuance of an Extended Coverage Policy the following items are required to be furnished to the Company; additional exceptions to coverage may be added upon review of such information: A. Survey or alternative acceptable to the Company B. Affidavit regarding possession C. Proof that there is no new construction or remodeling of any improvement located on the Land. In the event of new construction or remodeling the following is required: This page & only a paRofa 2016 ALTAO Cwmnxb ant for Title Insurance &sued by RmtAmemmn Title Insurance Corryeny. This Commibrentis wt valid ewthoutthe Nonce; the Cbnmi nt m lia; a iblicy; the Conmibrent Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, partl-Requimn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xcepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative Ihereol) is restricled to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are =hihited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Aaeodation. i. Satisfactory evidence that no construction liens will be fled; or ii. Adequate security to protect against actual or potential construction liens; iii. Payment of additional premiums as required by the Industry Rate Filing approved by the Insurance Division of the State of Oregon 6. Any defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim, or other wetter that appears for the first time in the Public Records or is created, attaches, or is disclosed between the Commitment Date and the date on which all of the Schedule B, Part I -Requirements are met. 7. Water rights, claims to water or title to water, whether or not such rights are a matter of public record. 8. Intentionally Deleted. 9. City liens, if any, of the City of Springfield. Note: A SEARCH WILL BE DONE UPON REQUEST 10. Unrecorded leases or periodic tenancies, if any. 11. Any conveyance or encumbrance by Sycan B Corp, should be executed pursuant to a proper resolution of the shareholders voted on at a duly called meeting of the shareholders in accordance with the By -Laws or other authority of the corporation. Certified copies of the resolution authorizing the conveyance and encumbrances and of the minutes of the meeting of the shareholders and copies of the By -Laws or other authority for such conveyance or encumbrance should be furnished for examination. The resolution should specify the officers authorized to sign on behalf of the corporation. 12. Any conveyance or encumbrance by Olympic Street LLC should be executed pursuant to their Operating Agreement, a copy of which should be submitted to this office for inspection. THE FOLLOWING EXCEPTIONS ARE AFFECTS PARCEL I: 13. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 14. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission recorded November 25, 1966, Reception No. 67649 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 15. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: July 21, 1972, Reception No. 9831 In Favor of: City of Springfield, a municipal corporation 16. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: November 06, 1972, Reception No. 27017 In Favor of: Pacific Power 8. Light Company, a corporation This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb snt for Title Iru ce &sued by Hat Amerimn Title Insur m Corryeny. This Comnxbrente; cwt valid ewthout the Notion; the Comm nt m Issue Policy; the Comm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbons Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. For: right of way 17. Easement, including terms and provisions contained therein: Recording Information: March 07, 1973, Reception No. 73-9791 In favor of: Pacific Power 8. Light Company, a corporation For: right of way 18. A lease, including the terms and provisions, dated December 11, 1971, executed by Charles F. Larson, Jr. as lessor and Jim E. Hemstreet as lessee, recorded April 02, 1976 as Reception No. 76- 15350 of Official Records. By mesne instruments of record, the Lessee's interest in said lease has been assigned and/or conveyed to Alis Hospitality, an Oregon limited liability Company by instrument recorded December 07, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-062954, and instrument recorded December 11, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012-063355. By mesne instruments of record, the Lessee's interest in said lease has been assigned and/or conveyed to BOEV, LLC, by instrument recorded October 22, 2014 as Instrument No. 2014-041794. Assignment of Lease by instrument: Recording Information: October 29, 2020 as Instrument No. 2 02 0-0626 10 19. Limited access provisions contained in Deed from Sunset Investment LLC, an Oregon limited liability company, successor in interest to Sunset Investments Limited Partnership, an Oregon limited partnership to the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation recorded October 06, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009-056577 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 20. Limited access provisions contained in Deed from Shilo Inn, Springfield, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company the State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation recorded October 06, 2009 as Instrument No. 2009-056578 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 21. Permanent easement for wall maintenance, including terms and provisions thereof. Recorded: October 06, 2009 as Instrument Nos. 2009-056577 and 2009- 22. Lease and the terns and conditions thereof Lessor: Shilo Management Corporation, dba Shilo Inn Lessee: Elmers Restaurants, Inc. As disclosed by: Warranty Deed Recorded: November 10, 2011 Recording No.: Instrument No. 2011-051261 Lessors interest is now held of record by Sterling Savings Bank, a Washington state chartered bank: By Instrument: Assignment of Lease Recorded: November 10, 2011 Recording No.: Instrument No. 2011-051263 This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb snt for Title Iru ce &sued by HatAmerimn Title Insur m Corryeny. This Comnxbrente; cwt valid ewthout the Notion; the Comm nt m Issue Policy,' the Comm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbons Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. 23. Deed of Trust and the terms and conditions thereof. Grantor/Trustor: Boev, L.L.C., an Oregon Limited Liability Company Grantee/Beneficiary: Summit Bank Trustee: Cascade Title Company Amount: $2,000,000.00 Recorded: October 22, 2014 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2014-041795 24. Assignment of leases and/or rents and the terns and conditions thereof: Assignor: Boev, L.L.C., an Oregon limited liability company Assignee: Summit Bank Recorded: October 22, 2014 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2014-041796 LI:IitHl[aNall� [Hi:(MgJINI� 6'fe1:1�e1tltltM67Ye1:iNti�IF 25. Subject property is under CITIES AND TOWNS EXEMPTION and is tax exempt. Any change in ownership before delivery of assessment roll may result in tax liability. Account No. 0188217. 26. The rights of the public in and to that portion of the premises herein described lying within the limits of streets, roads and highways. 27. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the State of Oregon, by and through its State Highway Commission recorded November 25, 1966, Reception No. 67649 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 28. Easement as shown on the recorded plat/partition For: Public utilities Affects: See plat for exact location 29. Relinquishment Deed, including terns and provisions thereof. Recorded: January 21, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020-003155 30. The forced removal or remediation of any existing structure, or any part of it, because any portion of it was built without obtaining a building permit from the proper government office or agency. 31. Limited access provisions contained in Deed to the City of Springfield, a municipal corporation of the State of Oregon, recorded January 20, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-004085 Deed of Records, which provides that no right of easement or right of access to, from or across the State Highway other than expressly therein provided for shall attach to the abutting property. 32. Covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in Deed. Executed by: The State of Oregon, by and through its Department of Transportation Recorded: January 20, 2021 Recording Information: Instrument No. 2021-004085 33. Property Line Adjustment Deed, including terns and provisions thereof. Recorded: September 24, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-061809 This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb snt for Title Iru ce &sued by HatAmerimn Title Insur m Corryeny. This Comnxbrente; wt valid ewthout the Notion; the Comm nt m Issue Policy; the Comm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbons Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivalive thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Asspd.fion. 34. Any facts, rights, interests or claims that may exist or arise by reason of the following matters disclosed by an ALTA/NSPS survey made by SB.F Land Services on November 12, 2021 last revised November 29, 2021, designated 2021-014-78: (A) Traffic signal junction box extends over the easterly boundary by an undisclosed distance onto the subject property; (B) Signs in the southeasterly corner extend over the easterly boundary by undisclosed distances, ownership unknown; (C) Signs extend over the southerly boundary by undisclosed distances, ownership unknown; (D) Concrete extends over the southerly boundary by an undisclosed distance, ownership unknown; (E) Power vault on the east side of the subject property does not fall within easement; (F) Electric transformers on the east and south portions of the subject property do not fall within an easement. -END OF EXCEPTIONS - This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb nt for Title Iru ce &sued by HatAmerimn Title Incur m Corryvny. This Conwxb ntis wt valid Wthout the Notion; the Comm nt m lssue Policy; the Comm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivalive thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Asspd.fion. INFORMATIONAL NOTES NOTE: We find no matters of public record against Chick -fl -A, Inc. that will take priority over any trust deed, mortgage or other security instrument given to purchase the subject real property as established by ORS 18.165. NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $23,166.33 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 1041506 Tax Code No.: 01900 NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $81,872.78 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 1104866 Tax Code No.: 01900 (Affects Improvement only for Parcel I) NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $2,271.24 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 5275159 Tax Code No.: 01900 (Affects Personal Property on Parcel I, assessed to Alis Hospitality) NOTE: Taxes for the year 2021-2022 PAID IN FULL Tax Amount: $1,709.28 Map No.: 17-03-22-20-01600 Property ID: 5329923 Tax Code No.: 01900 (Affects Personal Property on Parcel I, assessed to Southern Oregon Elmers LLC) NOTE: This Preliminary Title Report does not include a search for Financing Statements filed in the Office of the Secretary of State, or in a county other than the county wherein the premises are situated, and no liability is assumed if a Financing Statement is fled in the Office of the County Clerk covering Fixtures on the premises wherein the lands are described other than by metes and bounds or under the rectangular survey system or by recorded lot and block. NOTE: According to the public record, the following deed(s) affecting the property herein described have been recorded within 24 months of the effective date of this report: Statutory Warranty Deed recorded October 29, 2020 as Instrument No. 2020-062629, BOEV, LLC to Sycan B Corp and Olympic Street, LLC. Warranty Deed recorded September 30, 2021 as Instrument No. 2021-063161 to Sycan B Corp., an Oregon corporation, as to an undivided 80% interest, and Olympic Street, LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, as to an undivided 20% interest, as tenants in common This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb snt for Title Iru ce &sued by Hat Amsrimn Title Insur m Corryeny. This Comnxbrente; wt valid Wthout the Notion; the Comm nt m Issue Policy; the Comm nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbons Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivalive thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Asspd.fion. Situs Address as disclosed on Lane County Tax Roll: 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Conwm snt for Title Iru ce &sued by Hat Amsrimn Title Insur m Corryeny. This Conwm ente; riot valid mabout the Notion; the Comm nt m Issue Policy; the Comm nt Cond1bom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlra m&; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbons Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved The use of this Form (or any derivalive thereof) is restriced m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are mhihited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Assad.fion. ISSUED BY RnstAmmican First American Title Insurance Company Exhibit A File No: NCS-1090350-LA2 File No.: NCS-1090350-LA2 The Land referred to herein below is situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, and is described as follows PARCEL I: BEGINNING AT A2 INCH IRON PIPE FOUND MARKING THE INITIAL POINT OF PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN BOOK 53, PAGE 2, LANE COUNTY OREGON PLAT RECORDS, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON, SAID INITIAL POINT DESCRIBED AS BEING SOUTH 613.80 FEET AND EAST 646.49 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE WILLIAM STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1, IN SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION, 150.0 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 INCH IRON ROD MARKING THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LOT 1; THENCE SOUTH 00 04'25" EAST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 1 AND THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GATEWAY STREET 300.0 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION; THENCE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST ALONG THE MOST SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION 80.0 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AND THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 2, BLOCK 2, IN SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AND THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID MOST SOUTHERLY LINE SOUTH 890 55' 35" WEST 150.0 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD AND THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION; THENCE NORTH 00 04'25" WEST ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID PUERTA SUBDIVISION 277.15 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD SET ON THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF EAST BELT LINE ROAD AS SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE WAS FOUND TO HAVE BEEN MONUMENTED BY THE OREGON STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT; THENCE SOUTH 830 39' 16" WEST ALONG SAID MONUMENTED RIGHT OF WAY LINE 236.36 FEET TO A FOUND 5/8 INCH IRON ROD MARKED SHRW 358+00; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 890 57' 14" WEST 28.44 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE ARC OF A CERTAIN SPIRAL CURVE RIGHT (THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS SOUTH 370 30' 33" WEST 4.87 FEET) ON THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF HIGHWAY I-5 TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID WILLIAM STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46; THENCE SOUTH 00 05'49" EAST ALONG SAID LINE 498.31 FEET TO A 5/8 INCH IRON ROD BEARING SOUTH 00 04' 25" EAST 250.78 FEET AND SOUTH 890 55' 35" WEST 416.15 FEET FROM THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 890 55' 35" EAST 416.15 FEET TO A POINT ON SAID WESTERLY LINE OF GATEWAY STREET; THENCE NORTH 00 04'25" WEST 250.78 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING, ALL BEING IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST OF THE WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE FOLLOWING PARCEL OF LAND PREVIOUSLY TRANSFERRED TO THE OREGON DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE WILLIAM M. STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, LANE COUNTY, OREGON AND BEING A PORTION OF THAT PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THE QUITCLAIM DEED TO SUNSET INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RECORDED FEBRUARY 26, 1998, RECEPTION NO. 9813132, LANE COUNTY OFFICIAL RECORDS, THE SAID PARCEL BEING THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY INCLUDED IN A STRIP OF LAND 98.50 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE RELOCATED BELT LINE HIGHWAY, WHICH CENTER LINE IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT ENGINEER'S CENTER LINE STATION 'BL' 354+00.00, SAID STATION BEING 2,420.96 FEET SOUTH AND 1,275.21 FEET EAST OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ASHLEY C. STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 45, TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 2 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN; THENCE SOUTH 870 58,13" EAST 1,000.00 FEET TO ENGINEER'S CENTER LINE STATION 'BL' 364+00.00, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON. PARCEL II This page & only a paRofa 2016 AL TAO Cwmnxb ant for Title Iruurance &sued by Hat Amerimn Title Insurance Corryuny. This Commibrent is wt valid ewthout the Nonce; the Commih nt m /slue iblicy; the Conmi nt Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part l-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2066-2016 American Land Title Association. All tights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivative Ihereol) is restricled to ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American land Title Association. BEGINNING AT A POINT 415.70 FEET NORTH 890 55' 35" EAST OF A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE WILLIAM STEVENS DONATION LAND CLAIM NO. 46, IN TOWNSHIP 17 SOUTH, RANGE 3 WEST, WILLAMETTE MERIDIAN, 764.68 FEET SOUTH 00 04'25" EAST FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID CLAIM NO. 46; THENCE CONTINUING SOUTH 00 04'25" EAST 150.00 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF THAT ROAD DEEDED TO LANE COUNTY, OREGON, BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1967, CLERK'S FILE NO. 71908, LANE COUNTY OREGON RECORDS; THENCE SOUTH 890 55'35" WEST 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 04'25" WEST 150.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 55' 35" EAST 150.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, IN LANE COUNTY, OREGON, MORE RECENTLY DESCRIBED AS LOT 2, BLOCK 2, PUERTA SUBDIVISION, AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN VOLUME 53, PAGE 2, LANE COUNTY OREGON PLAT RECORDS, IN LANE COUNTY OREGON. LESS AND EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FOR ROADWAY RIGHT OF WAY PURPOSES. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF LAND DEDICATED TO THE PUBLIC AS DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 05, 2020 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2020-005894. This page & only a partofa 2016 AL TAO Comnibrent for Title Iru ce &sued by HatAmerimn Title Incur m Corryeny. This Comnibrentis not valid ewthout the Notim; the Comm nt m Issue Policy,' the Cbm agent Conditiom; Shcadule A� Schedule 8, part I-Requlmn &; Schedule 8, Pan II{xrepbom Copyright 2006-2016 American Land Title Association. All rights reserved. The use of this Form (or any derivalive thereof) is restricted m ALTA licensees and ALTA members in good standing as of the date of use. NI other uses are prohibited. Reprinted under license from the American Land Title Association. P U E R T A 5 U B D I V 15 1 ON SEC. 22 T17 R 3 W W.M. LANE COUNTY, OREGON DEDICATION SURVEYORS AFF/DAVIT H Y ,f,:-!/nP•••• M„lees ve11 �L.. �z. 081, w .(n. rN R�rvts - F� ACKNOWLEDGEMENT q osEcaN � ', k +rn rc ov s s w b0 Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. pv ig 0� •� a see y.es ,..�mo< a ;k d SURVEYORS AFF/DAVIT H Y ,f,:-!/nP•••• M„lees ve11 �L.. �z. APPRO(/AL5 .(n. rN R�rvts - r su w b0 Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. pv 0� •� a see y.es ,..�mo< a ;k d W DE5CR/P7/0N F� h n a-.rvr-cNeszrw�� V:..lf n. airs a<+n 0 C Ill19266 1 wH APPRO(/AL5 .(n. rN R�rvts - r su Lao C'✓e fY Perzny Ceenn: un �. d i � rrrq ^T tn. 1690 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: Richard L. Larson JOHNSON, CLIFTON, LARSON At CORSON, P.C. 975 Oak Street, Suite 1050 Eugene, Oregon 97401 9sr-oz-aysy UNTIL A CHANGE IS REQUESTED MAIL ALL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Sunset Investments Limited Partnership P 0 Box 10667 Eugene, Oregon 97440 "mat RECORDING RETURN TO: (�81'�1'�2 Faep E ft.m.iNNr or ou DmIsm Noe = 8.26'95g0PAEC 15.00 .0...oeeraaa 's0MR.26' 98Ap2PFON0 10.00 NC FEE.26'95g02AdT FOND 20.00 QUITCLAIM DEED KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, That SUNSET INVESTMENT CO., hereinafter "Grantor," for the consideration hereinafter stated, does hereby remise, release, and quitclaim unto SUNSET INVESTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, an Oregon limited partnership, hereinafter "Grantee", and unto Grantee's heirs, suc Lessors, and assigns all of Grantor's rights, title, and interest in that certain real property with the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, situated in the County of Lane, State of Oregon, described as follows: Legal description on attached Exhibit "A", consisting of 1 page. To have and to hold the same unto the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs, successors, and assigns forever. The true and actual consideration for conveyance is: contribution to limited partnership. THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND TO DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930, THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS INSTRUMENT MAY NOT BE WITHIN A FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT PROTECTING STRUCTURES. THE PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS, WHICH, IN FARM OR FOREST ZONES, MAY NOT AUTHORIZE CONSTRUCTION OR SITING OF A RESIDENCE AND WHICH LIMIT LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS 30.930 IN ALL ZONES. BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT, THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES AND EXISTENCE OF FIRE PROTECTION FOR STRUCTURES. QUITCLAIM DEED - Page 1 9tl1313G -In construing this deed„ where the context at requires, the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall be made 6o that this deed shall apply equally to corporations and to individuals. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has executed this instrument this 25th day of February, 1998. SUNSET INVVESTMENT CC, BY,. Charaoo P. Laraon, Managing Partner GRANTOR STATE OF OREGON ) 66 County of Lane ) y On this 25th day of February, 1998, before me, 466EIA LFtLF157wo the undersigned Notary Public, personally appeared Charles F. Largon, personally known to me / proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed to this instrument, and acknowledged that he executed it. WITNESS my hand and official seal. assau.sASAUCEPotary Publac for Ore on ., tlRll ]Ao M Commission Expires: ]a�✓/Id No]IA", 9mn, Y f4AW55gN,p 09BdR Rramwrnuw¢sa]..iex QUITCLAIM DEED - Page 2 I ' 9813132 EXHIBIT "A" The tadmfased To'bsdd,Polity is desebed as fenews: Beginning at a 2 inch Roo pipe found marking the hddal point of PUERTA SyrBDI VISION, as planed and recorded inBook 53, Page 2I.= County OregonPlat Record; in Laos County, Oregon, said iallial point described as being South 613.80 fat and But 646.49 her gem the Norihwastcoeaofthe Wiliiam Stevens Donation Land Calm No. 46, Towesbip 17Scutb, Range 3 Westafthe Wthmelm MosMie; theme -South 85°55'35"Wartaloogthe iorthadyline oflot 1,Black1, in said PUERTA SUBDIVISION, 150.0 feet to afoued5/8 inch rte rod mer)�zigthe Norlhww mmwoflaid Lot 1; thence South 0o 04' 25"East a[odg the Westerly line ofsaid Lot 1 od the Eestalyright ofway tine of Gateway Street 300.0 tet m the Semhaly Southeancamaafsafd PUERTA SUBDIVISION; thence South 89' 55'35" Wastud0ngt1temast Southerly I'me afsild PUERTA SUBDIVISION 80.0 fat we 5/8 inch von rad and the Southeast tamer ofLot 2, Black 2, in said PUERTASUBDIVISION, end the True point ofbeg®ng affix, tracthencin describ4- tuna eominuiog along said mon Southerly Has Smth890 55' 35" West 150.0 het m a5/8 Toch frmred aM the Scuthwbn emerafsaid PUERTA SUBDIVISION; them North 0.04' 25"Wen along the Westerly line ofed PUERTA SUBDIVISION 277.15 feet ao a 5/8 inch iron rod set an the Southerly right ofway Ona efEast Belt Lt.. Road as said right ofway line was food to have been contaminated by the Oregon State Siigieway Deparseent thence South 83° 39.16"Wese alms said emumeatedright ofway line 236.36 fee to a found 3/8 inch iron and marked SERW 358:01; thee- contlnuins along said right ofway line North 89" 57' 14" Wess 28.44 fat to a 5/8 inch Ron it; thee. Southerly along the ue of a certain spial curve right (the fang chard ofwhich beam South 37' 30' 33" Went 4.87 feet) on the Easterly right of way line ofPEghway I-5 to apdint m the Westerly line ofsaid Willies Stmmn Demotion Lend Claim No. 46; theme South 0° 05'49" East along said line 498.31 feet to a 5/x, inch iron and hearing SouthT 04' 25"East 250,78 feet ed South 89° 55' 35" West 416.15 fee from the true point ofbegimivg; thence North 89" 55'35" East 416.15 feet to a point m said Westerly tiro of Gateway Street; thence Nath P 04' 25"West 250.78 feetm the true pointofbighaft.11 being in the Northwest quarter of Seedan22, Township 17 South, Range 3 West ofthe Wih mmeMa die,, in Sane Comty, Oregon. Stare of Oregon County of Lane — ere, 'n tya'i. in and fw Na ,u hueby insw,nent waa,we I orr m at Fin p p'98FEE26ax 9:13 aaai 238.717 Exhibit A tape Conry...... aecoms Page 1 of 1 tare Cou/ty�cien �annaan --- 4 Appendix 3 Service Provider Comments (SUB) -- _ LEGEND GENNOTES GRACCEEGAL—B �..�p ERAL "RABUB'DOGNrvsxe r. rxo.�v�orvex Uux®sl uFAL_IAR,�Iva _ _ rr xxoror CAN.. �xFINE r Ns EIxERENTFOR ruECPOWER }[ Lr I �� .. NIFFIFIEDIORACCUTUROATERT e / I ,FSI 1� e N+ rNeros©eRE�"" ITNE ENE WATER CONSTRUCTION NOIES� E ;T ^J,i� r' 'I E rvcros®mwEalEWEOTRc)WxE I. rRorosmooxESTowe _ ORor—NEREDDITURECTNONNET„oN RVIA a. rNO OmESTOEtc cn Oxs ���NO DART rooms®aoxn-ox RYO..Bing.. INNI 4. rRCPo9FDSDC AII]Wa OGIB FUTURE -i PaaPos�9 �g.�E R PROPOSEWRO�TERLINEROET.P LEWxE ae-saws PAD �— III ®� � 1 w x CLEANOUT T w cELINE TA1— ExcmmNE i , PRP R R .>N r RIxD �- OWED REE WATER COUNBECTION I "'IN' �� O W L .. N N 1. sw AF.,,rl.B IBI rAso ,n�: rR nxereN GUI 1 FUTURE PHASE — ` 3xm U111 wms WORK �� F' I D NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN ' — PROPOSED s ` Wx o R++�w RESTAURANT 6r 4� �SANITARY SEWER CONSTRUCTION NOTES III CURRENT PERMIT "`,) _ I, nEmu EREEPTOR. II ✓ k 1� �I r�raN®ENENELINE YYY 3 FROM BUILLING l "��1� + �� �I N xN rRT PCFAw _ -R �r�m NT.R.EE _ — PROERsEENRENNO m FM- BE i „- DEADEm NTRR., �EORE W � � TPMENCE � I I FRANCHISE UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTE Tr — - ,III (I INDPONERPo,��sERVkETo ��New��. Q FERE109.R RREDoo I WGUED�.NUNENwONgR. IBOU sub 1� �� 0. - - INxr�r�I�ti�.A�,` xsENa1 z i mRrUTx�r��orN� T a needs-- _ _ rRaP�GANNER. ETOB WRNR --- -- J -- -� Loop our 5 l I EAC LL �� ae —.—. I l U� aloh k �'Q )-w jj 7 �- (l } 14 k-I_...Vl �, i s �I �,� Q Qo I�- E FUTURE PHASE WORK �� \./ Ww NOT TO BE INCLUDED IN 111. ,,,.( CURRENT PERMIT USe �'LJ 17b,. e a �p 4,o save none " T iFITN FUTURE ' — TF,L'T TL �h FSR# 04887 PADA T III IIIb„ T �- rN»rtr, .O, OREGON UTILITY A m '�-------._ NOTIFICATION CENTER A^^^^• i 1-300332-2344 9 BE%ORE �� 7 -.Fl PUN a 3 , AI IN FEET A, --."A. C5.0 Appendix 4 Plan Set C B 4 m VA CHICKiiiiiiiiiiiFlLiiiiiiiiiA GATEWAY &RANDY PAPE .4rmtag2 Pari PROJECT AREA v �N 1 -0 _cent Ave _ Q Stco Who I es ale'Q i PeaceIsacred Heart Medical 1 �j 1 �J Safi- eway q Rd � VICINITY MAP SCALE: NTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PHASE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE -STORY COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH FOOTPRINT OF 4,897 SF, A CONCRETE -PAVED DRIVE-THRU, AN ASPHALT -PAVED PARKING LOT, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND STORM WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSISTING OF WATER QUALITY LIDAS. THIS PHASE WILL ALSO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTING THREE ACCESS POINTS AND ASSOCIATED DRIVEWAYS LOCATED ON THE EAST (ALONG GATEWAY), SOUTH (ALONG THE FREIGHT ACCESS), AND WEST (ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY). FUTURE PHASES FOR THIS PROPERTY WILL INCLUDE TWO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS SHOWN IN THIS DOCUMENT AS PADS A AND B. SITE LOCATION THIS PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SE CORNER OF RANDY PAPE BELTLINE AND GATEWAY ST IN SPRINGFIELD OREGON. THE SITE HOLDS THE ADDRESS OF 3358 GATEWAY STREET N SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477.THE PROJECT SUE IS LOCATED ON TAX MAP 1703222 AND INCLUDES TAX LOT NUMBERS 001600 AND 001300 EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OREGON REVISED STATUTES 209.140-209.155 Al PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER N BASIS OF BEARING OREGON SOUTH STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83 (Ml 1) BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES, INTERNATIONAL FEET, SCALED ABOUT A CENTRAL CONTROL POINT DATUM NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVDW) BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE OPUS STATIC OBSERVATIONS. CHICK-FIL-A ATTN: STEVE SCHWARTZ 15635 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 350 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PHONE: (404) 305-4407 STEVE.SCHWARTZ@CFACORP.COM 4 ARCHITECT WARE MALCOMB ATTN: NONY RIVERA 3015 112TH AVE NE #205 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 PHONE: (425) 582-5517 NRI VERA@WAREMALCOMB.COM 3358 GATEWAY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 LAND USE DOCUMENTS CIVIL ENGINEER DOWL ATTN: MIKE TOWLE, PE 720 SW WASHINGTON AVE, SUITE 750 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PHONE: (971) 280-8645 MTOWLE@DOWL.COM 3 SITE MAP SCALE: NTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TERRACON CONSULTANTS ATTN: KRISTOPHERT. HAUCK, PE 700 NE 55TH AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 PHONE: (503) 742-7181 KRI STOPHER. HAUCK@TERRACON. COM E SURVEY 1 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CO.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 STORMWATER PLAN C5.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.1 FIRE SERVICE PLAN 11.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 'IINSA r_rIM1141 PRE -DEVELOPMENT: CIVIL'S PROJECT M SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.651 AC (81.62%) SITE PERVIOUS AREA: 0.822 AC (18.38%) POST -DEVELOPMENT: A12021 11/10 SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.648 AC (81.56%) SITE PERVIOUS AREA: 0.825 AC (18.44%) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 4,947 SF Z SITE PARKING: G exprcsz vnllenarveAalcrosenikm MAXIMUM PER CODE: 83 STALLS UJ ADA STALLS 2 COVER SHEET STANDARD STALLS PROVIDED 81 TOTAL PROVIDED 83 STALLS S&F LAND SERVICES ATTN: CHRIS SHERBY, PLS 4858 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD, STEW PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 PHONE: (503) 345-0328 JERED.MCGRATH@SFLANDS.COM OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 0 000 Doo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 R C B 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL'S PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG CO immimaia�cwairea aims araa�q ara i�ai � dal8 files praticei fm abwenmeaprgW Z m Y^y be rcPraWmainanY mvrrl rMMVY G exprcsz vnllenarveAalcrosenikm G auCnizea Praptl rcprcsaYa4ves. UJ SHEET U COVER SHEET O LU (n SHEET NUMBER C0.0 _a 4 ODOT HWY 69 - BELTLINE OS OS DS Os as as ACCESS RESTRICTION 14 as °S s - E OD IN FAVOR OF ODOT ® Ner53 46"W _104.56'- --- ---. --- -N IE 6" CPP 431.91' 41' •131.4' r `s. -t: -1-,- r_�5O �. ...,' ® IE 4" CMP=435.40' Y I� 1 EASEMENT TO ODOT 8 FOR WALL 19 `'�'1 `MAINTENANCE 22.90• ° \ „ / / / ` 20 YI 6 TVP IdI ® 1 0 8 Am s _ G I G IE 12" (E): G G G ° D IE \RCP=430.96' IE 18" (S): ELEC LINE F2 W -------- --- ABANDONED PE W K / 11 1987 SURVEY W WATER G PER 27852 FO Q IE 430\5 UYN I ELEC ONA TRANSFORMER W .6"/PVC � C=431.60' 11\ :43 .15' C dUK� O U-1 0 IDm m AT 0 3 P A e � TYP J6 1ST FLOOR FIFE : 438.25 G TYP G = KI PARCEL 1 DEED TO 19 20 21 ODOT, AND LIMITED ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 05 GS DS I -- b OS - cs O.D.O.T RW STA I "BL"361+20.00 -� 98.50IFT RIGHT \ o _ I I \ I I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD T \ 1 I Iron2021-004085 \ 31 I Ib d I o I= 1 s 32 I I 14' EASEMENT FOR 28 I o PUE PER PLAT OF *1 M4 SUBDIVISION _ 129.51_ I I+ - - W29'M'---------- POINT 0 BEGINNING - Me 4w PARCEL M ------- 4- -- e WESTE Y LINE OF ADJUSTED PROPERTYO I RELINQ ISHMENT 29 LINE PER EXCEPTION 33 w.a DEED P OPERTY 2021-061809 FROM OSOT TO CITY PER EX EPTION TAX LOT 1,300 SUBJECT TO I 2020-0 3155 DEC EASEMENT AND 30 I ,,; EQUITABLE SERVITUDES I .p s0 DOCUMENT FROM ODOT PER n' EXCEPTION 2020-065364 m I PARCEL II 3 � I 15�10' EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER TO CITY OF SPRINGFIED lJ BASEMENT FIFE: 426.99 Q 2 16 4'X15" EASEMENT FOR PACIFIC c� POWER G G c .10'X200' EASEMENT TO 17 PACIFIC POWER I I � I IEI -----------------�� 4 3 40' El G I G IE 12" (E): G G G ° I c IE 18" (S): G F2 W G TYP G = KI PARCEL 1 DEED TO 19 20 21 ODOT, AND LIMITED ACCESS TO HIGHWAY 05 GS DS I -- b OS - cs O.D.O.T RW STA I "BL"361+20.00 -� 98.50IFT RIGHT \ o _ I I \ I I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD T \ 1 I Iron2021-004085 \ 31 I Ib d I o I= 1 s 32 I I 14' EASEMENT FOR 28 I o PUE PER PLAT OF *1 M4 SUBDIVISION _ 129.51_ I I+ - - W29'M'---------- POINT 0 BEGINNING - Me 4w PARCEL M ------- 4- -- e WESTE Y LINE OF ADJUSTED PROPERTYO I RELINQ ISHMENT 29 LINE PER EXCEPTION 33 w.a DEED P OPERTY 2021-061809 FROM OSOT TO CITY PER EX EPTION TAX LOT 1,300 SUBJECT TO I 2020-0 3155 DEC EASEMENT AND 30 I ,,; EQUITABLE SERVITUDES I .p s0 DOCUMENT FROM ODOT PER n' EXCEPTION 2020-065364 m I PARCEL II 3 � I 15�10' EASEMENT FOR SANITARY SEWER TO CITY OF SPRINGFIED lJ BASEMENT FIFE: 426.99 Q 2 16 4'X15" EASEMENT FOR PACIFIC c� POWER G G c .10'X200' EASEMENT TO 17 PACIFIC POWER I I � I IEI -----------------�� 4 3 40' El PARKINGSTRIPES I FLOWLNECURB IE 12" (E): I I y� STANDARDCURB I 14 IE 18" (S): I F2 W -------- --- WALL -TOE W K ro SS SANITARY SEWER W WATER G GAS FO FIBER OPTIC UYN I FENCE-CHANLNK W BUILDING HATCH � ago I I 2 I LEGEND: BUILDING -------- BUILDING OVERHANG EL - SS \I N � - KRUSE WAY 1 I I 40' I I 1 QDEMOLITION NOTES 1. EXISTING POOL TO BE DEMOLISHED AND FILLED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION 2. EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BASEMENT TO BE DEMOLISHED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION, LIMITS OF BASEMENT NOT KNOW AT THIS TIME. 3. MOTEL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED ANY BASEMENT OR UNDERGROUND SPACES TO BE REMOVED/FILLED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE DEMOLITION NOTE 12 AND GENERAL NOTE. 4. EXISTING PAVING, CURBS, AND HARD SURFACES TO BE REMOVED 5. EXISTING UTILITIES, CURB,SIGNS AND SIDE WALKTO BE REMOVED FOR NEW DRIVE AISLE 6. EXISTING LIGHT POLES TO BE REMOVED 7. EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM TO BE ABANDON TO MAIN, PLUGGED AND GROUTED 8. EXISTING STORM WATER SYSTEMS TO BE REMOVED/ABANDONED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION 9. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 10. DEMO GAS UTILITIES AND EXISTING STRUCTURES 11. DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE DEMOLISHED AND MOVED TO THE NORTH 12. PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES OF LOT 1 PETRA NO DISTURBANCES WITHIN LOT 13. PROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 14. DEMOLISH SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER FOR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APRON. STORM STRUCTURE TABLE ❑1 PARKINGSTRIPES 436.15' FLOWLNECURB IE 12" (E): EXTRUDED CURB (N): STANDARDCURB - EDGE OF PAVEMENT IE 18" (S): EDGE OF CONCRETE F2 WALL TOP -------- --- WALL -TOE SD STORM SEWER SS SANITARY SEWER W WATER G GAS FO FIBER OPTIC D FENCE-CHANLNK 434.15' BUILDING HATCH & DEMO PLAN CO CONCRETEHATCH 433.51' CO MAJOR CONTOUR © MINOR CONTOUR 434.63' HANDICAP PARKING SIGN FLAG POLE 432.79' MONITORING WELL 08 BOLLARD TREE- DECIDUOUS 432.72' TREE -CONIFER ® POWER METER ❑A POWER TRANSFORMER © POWER VAULT LIGHT -LAMP POST D IE 4" PVC (SW): 432.84' SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT QS SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ® STORM AREA DRAIN O STORM MANHOLE O STORM CLEANOUT WATER SPIGOT - SHUTOFF 432.41' FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER WW®VV STM AD RIM: D4 WATER VALVE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL JUNCTION BOX 0T TELEPHONE RISER �JJ COMMUNICATION VAULT IRRIGATION CONTROL VALVE 01V CATV RISER MU UNKNOWN VAULT EL - SS \I N � - KRUSE WAY 1 I I 40' I I 1 QDEMOLITION NOTES 1. EXISTING POOL TO BE DEMOLISHED AND FILLED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION 2. EXISTING RESTAURANT AND BASEMENT TO BE DEMOLISHED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION, LIMITS OF BASEMENT NOT KNOW AT THIS TIME. 3. MOTEL STRUCTURE TO BE DEMOLISHED ANY BASEMENT OR UNDERGROUND SPACES TO BE REMOVED/FILLED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE DEMOLITION NOTE 12 AND GENERAL NOTE. 4. EXISTING PAVING, CURBS, AND HARD SURFACES TO BE REMOVED 5. EXISTING UTILITIES, CURB,SIGNS AND SIDE WALKTO BE REMOVED FOR NEW DRIVE AISLE 6. EXISTING LIGHT POLES TO BE REMOVED 7. EXISTING SANITARY SYSTEM TO BE ABANDON TO MAIN, PLUGGED AND GROUTED 8. EXISTING STORM WATER SYSTEMS TO BE REMOVED/ABANDONED PER GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERS RECOMMENDATION 9. EXISTING TREES TO BE REMOVED 10. DEMO GAS UTILITIES AND EXISTING STRUCTURES 11. DRIVEWAY APRON TO BE DEMOLISHED AND MOVED TO THE NORTH 12. PROTECT EXISTING STRUCTURES OF LOT 1 PETRA NO DISTURBANCES WITHIN LOT 13. PROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT 14. DEMOLISH SIDEWALK, CURB, GUTTER FOR PROPOSED DRIVEWAY APRON. STORM STRUCTURE TABLE ❑1 STM MH RIM: 436.15' IE 18" (S): IE 12" (E): 431.95' (N): IE 18" (N): 431.50' STM AD(HANDHOLE RIM: ) IE 18" (S): 431.74' F2 STM MH RIM: 435.60' AG IE 18" (S): 432.10' (S): IE 18" (N): 431.95' SEWER STRUCTURE TABLE ❑ sTM MH RIM: 435.69' (W): IE 18" (N): 43382' 1Q SAN MH RIM: 435.96' IE 18" (S): 433.67' IE (N): 426.76' 4 STM AD(HANDHOLE RIM: ) 434.07' IE (E): 426.61' AG CO IE (S): 426,77' Z IE 4" PVC (N): 433.27' IE (W): 426.61' J STM AD(HANDHOLE) RIM: 434.15' EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN CO IE 4" PVC (N): 433.51' CO SHEET NUMBER © STM AD RIM: 434.63' IE 6" RCP (SE): 432.79' IE 6" RCP (NW): 432.72' F7 STM AD RIM: 433.88' IE 4" PVC (SW): 432.84' IE 6" RCP (SE): 432.54' IE 6" RCP (NW): 432.41' ® STM AD RIM: 433.72' IE 2" PVC (NE): 432.53' IE 4" RCP (E): 432.65' IE 6" RCP (N): 432.52' �9 STM AD RIM: 435.38' IE 6" RCP (NW): 434.09' 10 STM CB RIM: 433.38' IE 6" CPP (W): 431.78' 11 STM CB RIM: 433.54' IE 6" CPP (W): 432.25' 12 STM CB RIM: 433.85' IE 6" CPP (W): 432.40' 13 STM CB RIM: 433.76' IE B" RCP (N): 432.41' 14 STM CB RIM: 433.71' IE 6" CPP (N): 432.41' 15 STM CB RIM: 434.12' IE 6" CPP (N): 432.87' i6 STM MH/CI RIM: 431.90' r� IE 12" RCP (N): 429.11' 17 STM MH/CI RIM: 434.66' U IE 12" PVC (S): 431.76' IE 12' PVC (E): 431.69' 18 STM MH/CI RIM: 436.04' IE 12" PVC (E): 431.21' 19 STM CB RIM: 433.16' 30 0 30 60 IE B" RCP (W): 432.00' IE 4" RCP (N): 431.51' SCALE IN FEET 2� STM CB RIM: 431.10' IE 6" RCP (W): 429.30' 2 1 1 ■ W® IE o00� 0 0 ° 000 Ooo Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 C *6' hDOWL 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 LU I.i Q C Q J � 9� 06z L o ' LU J Uj LU Z B ILN FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE N0. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL'S PROJECT p 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A11110021DRAWN BY AG CO Ima�aloa ewairea as ws dwdrq ani m al F-- dPrafiles Proiuxd la aLavenmed PrgW Z dv aar be wmacen In any manner amour G express vnrMna vaEal co n.-nrhom G au1Mx¢ed pygal rcpresenrn_ LU SHEET U EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN CO LU CO SHEET NUMBER C1.0 __ C N 2 i It UU M-1 In 4 4 3 I RANDY PAPE BELTINE 3 K QSITE PLAN NOTES 1. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2. PROPOSED CFA STANDARD CATCHING/SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 3. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PAINTED PARKING STRIPE 4. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE 5. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DETAILS 6. PROPOSED STANDARD A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 7. PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 8. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE 9. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE 10. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CANOPY 11. PROPOSED A.D.A. RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES 12. PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ELEVATION 13. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CONCRETE 14. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS 15. PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO W/ OUTDOOR TABLES & SEATING 16. PADS A AND B AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND DRIVING AREAS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED AT A LATER TIME. 17. PROPOSED BUILDING 18. PROPOSED 6"CURBAND GUTTER 19. PROPOSED LID STORMWATER FACILITY (RAIN GARDEN OR INFILTRATION PLANTER), SEE STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION 20. PROPOSED RETAINING WALL LEGEND I I OREGON UTILITY I NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 E ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 a W® oo�D aft" -PA Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 W Q Ce Q a J � 06z LL 0 0 ' LU Q d UJ J ILL0 B ♦♦Qnnw VN FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING --------- EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER ---------- SPILLING CURB & GUTTER a SIGN e SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT o STORM SEWER CLEANOUT ®❑ STORM CATCH BASIN PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT z PROPOSED CONCRETE G exPrczz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G PROPOSED LANDSCAPING W SHEET I I OREGON UTILITY I NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 E ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 0 a W® oo�D aft" -PA Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 W Q Ce Q a J � 06z LL 0 0 ' LU Q d UJ J ILL0 B ♦♦Qnnw VN FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG (n immi icacwaireacamse�iaai dPlB files praticcN fm abwenmeiprgW z maY ^y be rcproLxiinanY mvrrl WlFaY G exPrczz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G auMizel pmRtl rcprcsWa4ves. W SHEET U SITE PLAN O W CO SHEET NUMBER C2.0 _a ni 000 0 0 ° 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 Q J � Off z LL W Q'o LLJ LUJ LL F— 0 rQ a' V N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECTp 14801.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY AG CO lMa mncWarc m vs&wAq lnwi F-- dPlBfilesprWuxdlas—aniedprgW Z may rel be rcPr eci In am manner rMMd G express vnlMna vaGalwmerY bm G su1Mx¢ed pygal rcprcsaYaEws. LU SHEET U GRADING PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER Q C3.0 N 2 i It C 31 C ■-1 In 4 as I as a5 a5 as as u M RANDY PAPE BELTINE as — — as as as as 0 n K GENERAL NOTES: 1. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT A MAXIMUM OF 90 FEET 14841.01 ALONG A STORM LINE. Q STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. / PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION RAIN GARDEN DATE FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 2. PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION PLANTER DRAWN BY FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 3. PROPOSED 1.5' WIDE CURB CUT 4. PROPOSED 6" PVC D3034 STORM LINE FOR ROOF alglta floor produceal for above named probe t DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING OR DRIVE-THRU CANOPY. 5. PROPOSED 6" PERFORATED (AT TOP OF PIPE ONLY express wnttenor verb alconsenih om WITHIN STORMWATER FACILITY) PVC D3034 STORM autlwnretl proRtl representatives. UNDERDRAIN 6. PROPOSED 10" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 7. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 8. I PROPOSED 12" PERFORATED (AT TOP OF PIPE ONLY WITHIN STORMWATER FACILITY) PVC D3034 STORM UNDERDRAIN 9. PROPOSED 15" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 10. CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC MANHOLE 11. REPLACE EXISTING 12" PUBLIC DRAINAGE LINE WITH 15" I PVC D3034. LEGEND 4 1 3 7 N kRUSE WAY E BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER SPILLING CURB & GUTTER SIGN SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STORM SEWER CLEANOUT STORM CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITY 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 po� Qo0 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 W C. Q a J � 06 z LL W Q'o d Uj J LL0 B rQn2 IL V N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIVS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG CO Inform be on demand, on the d ravnng and In all alglta floor produceal for above named probe t Z may not be reproduced in any manner wfhout G express wnttenor verb alconsenih om G autlwnretl proRtl representatives. LU SHEET U STORMWATER PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER C4.0 _a oo�D 0 A 0 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 m wxm 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 Q J � Off z LL W Q'o q LLJ J LL F— 0 rQnIL 2 V N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY JLG rn Ind imcWarc mNind�inwl F-- dPlafilzzproticcNfmabw -n pmjW Z maY ny be rcProlxiin anY mvrrl rMMVY G express vnllm ar veAalcmttnikan G auMizel praptl rcprcsaYa4ves. LU SHEET U UTILITY PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER Q C5.0 oo�D 0 A 0 000 Ooo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 m wxm 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 Q a J � Off z LL W Q'o q LLJ J ILL F— 0 rQnIL 2 V N FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE 11/1012021 DRAWN BY JLG CO Inform be on eom mem on in. ar—ng and In all digital files proauoetl for above names project Z may not be reprMo M in any manner without G express wnttenor verb alconsenih om G autlwnreaproRtl represent atives. LU SHEET U FIRE SERVICE PLAN O LU CO SHEET NUMBER C5.1 Appendix 5 Architectural Plans PROJECT DATA: SITE AREA: GROSS: 1.64 AC 71/590 SF BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 4/987 SF COVERAGE: GROSS: 7% PARKING REQUIRED: RESTAU RANT 1/100 SF 50 STALLS PARKING PROVIDED: all, AUTO PARKING: 49 STALLS @9.83/1000 SF REQ. ACCESSIBLE 2 STALLS DT CAR STACK 44 CARS OP CANOPY 9TH CAR AT INNER LANE BIKE PARKING REQUIRED: SHORTTERM 6 BIKES LONG TERM 3 BIKES DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: ZONING: CC BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT: SIDE: REAR: LANDSCAPE SETBACKS: FRONT: SIDE: REAR: TI* 0 .� LANDSCAPE REQ.: KRUSE WAY BIKE PARKING FOOTPRINT ITYPy ' 7ol� S o'r1bam OFF-STREET PARKING: STANDARD: CO M PACT: DRIVE AISLE: OVERHANG: 10 FT 10 FT 10 FT 5 FT 5 FT 5 FT 5% 1 9X18 8X16 24 FT 2 FT REQ. PARKING RATIO BY USE: RESTAU RANT: 1/100 SF R ETAI L: 1/300 SF OFFICE: 1/300 SF This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Stormwater Management Design: AVERAGE REGIONAL REQUIRED PROVIDED Boundary Source: GIS MAP & AERIAL IMAGE NOTES: I 1 Interior parking lot area.l�— —' i PacificSourcc r Health Plans US Faatls CHEF'STORE v waytekQ � k4mefe" nU EGzmeFm PE Hiltonpartlenlnn Ch..Hank© Eugene/Spdngfield© e" _ �ark & Bartle Shoppe Lin t /. ARW Gateway-Btreet— &'Rady-PapeBeltlfim: --- - q�� --. Belnn=Fc FIII Outback Snaakhaua.9 BIKE PARKING SEATBACKS PSP24 Conceptual Site Plan 3350 Gateway St Springfield, OR 97477 1" —30' 1 MCDonald.9 II\1 MichaelsQ Q Duluth Trading Company f/est Buyq Panda E➢prasa� II Duah eros coffee I Taco Bell III I i iI I 0 15 30 60 Hop Valley Brewing Company 9 Teal. Supercharger vDenny's © x„^w,m Comfort Blntes Holiday Inn Express SpnngOeltl Riverhentl... Eugene -Springfield 150 ;11gill III I � 11 11 • Korean t an., f Presbyrennrl Qn.-Ngo aarJnalNay 9� Magnetic Pndel NORTH SHEET PSP25 walkway Clearance ITYPy ' 7ol� S o'r1bam OFF-STREET PARKING: STANDARD: CO M PACT: DRIVE AISLE: OVERHANG: 10 FT 10 FT 10 FT 5 FT 5 FT 5 FT 5% 1 9X18 8X16 24 FT 2 FT REQ. PARKING RATIO BY USE: RESTAU RANT: 1/100 SF R ETAI L: 1/300 SF OFFICE: 1/300 SF This conceptual design is based upon a preliminary review of entitlement requirements and on unverified and possibly incomplete site and/or building information, and is intended merely to assist in exploring how the project might be developed. Stormwater Management Design: AVERAGE REGIONAL REQUIRED PROVIDED Boundary Source: GIS MAP & AERIAL IMAGE NOTES: I 1 Interior parking lot area.l�— —' i PacificSourcc r Health Plans US Faatls CHEF'STORE v waytekQ � k4mefe" nU EGzmeFm PE Hiltonpartlenlnn Ch..Hank© Eugene/Spdngfield© e" _ �ark & Bartle Shoppe Lin t /. ARW Gateway-Btreet— &'Rady-PapeBeltlfim: --- - q�� --. Belnn=Fc FIII Outback Snaakhaua.9 BIKE PARKING SEATBACKS PSP24 Conceptual Site Plan 3350 Gateway St Springfield, OR 97477 1" —30' 1 MCDonald.9 II\1 MichaelsQ Q Duluth Trading Company f/est Buyq Panda E➢prasa� II Duah eros coffee I Taco Bell III I i iI I 0 15 30 60 Hop Valley Brewing Company 9 Teal. Supercharger vDenny's © x„^w,m Comfort Blntes Holiday Inn Express SpnngOeltl Riverhentl... Eugene -Springfield 150 ;11gill III I � 11 11 • Korean t an., f Presbyrennrl Qn.-Ngo aarJnalNay 9� Magnetic Pndel NORTH SHEET PSP25 E D C W_ 4 EXTERIOR FINISHES A17ACHED BR -A EC -1 BRICKVENEER PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: DARK BROWN COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE SIZE: MODULAR Integral Lighting BR -B -11 BRICKVENEER EXTERIOR PAINT - COLOR: LIGHT BROWN COLOR: DARK BRONZE SIZE: MODULAR FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS Bell 9 6'-4" 1'-0" 0" No STUCCO SYSTEM STOREFRONT COLOR: WRITE COLOR: DARK BRONZE FINISH: SAND MEDIUM 4'-0" 2'4" STUCCO SYSTEM COLOR: BROWN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM Gran° total 13 PERSPECTIVE VIEW B 0 W N[If -o W O O A Z U) LU g 0 0_ O M M � N W O) N V N C? O U) N J M x w iC 4 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW REF. ENCLOSURE FINISHES EC -1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE BR -A BRICKVENEER COLOR: DARK BROWN SIZE: MODULAR OP CANOPY FINISHES CP -1 PREFINISHED METAL COLOR: DARKBRONZE CP -2 METAL DECKING COLOR: WHITE PERSPECTIVE VIEW EXTERIOR ELEVATION T/ FRAMING 20'-412". EXTERIOR ELEVATION R, 2 1 1_ PROJECT DATA Prototype Edition: LS-_ _. Playground NO. PLAY Ls Exterior Finish Type: TOWER STUCCO Landscaping Type STANDARD CK, RD, LEED Rating NOT CERTIFIED 'Accept_ Wall FMETAL STUD NOT C-, - raminT Ing ype. GOLD, PLATINUM , � -- zl) STUD D-valuesPR: w000 METAL OOLD, PNriNUM ✓JO°O STUD- PREFAB, METAL RAM '_I I I - PREFAB, MODULAR FRAME, Drive TIIN Stack COs # • ,^-�•—..+'C MOWIAR ml tlic.dcr- iAiis� Kitchen Type: CENTERLINE Drive Thru Bypass Lane: YES E.. Water Filtration Type: TYPE A Drive Thru Number of Fulfillment Lanes:. # p D enc ETC Drive Thru Number of Pickup Lanes # OL Drive-Thru: YES 0 B O O 0 o p Drive Thru Number of Order Point Pylons: # O Industrialized Construction YES Drive Thru Number of Pickup Windows # Chick-til-A Number of Parking Spaces:# Drive Thru Door YES 5200 Buffington R o adp NumberAccessible Parking Spaces: Cross Parking: YES Square 4996 Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Seat Count - Interior: 84 Menu Board - Interior: YES Seat Count - Exterior: 16 Menu Board - Interior- Count: 5 ala _ Canopy Type - Order Point: DOUBLE Menu Board - Interior - Type DIGITAL °a' .HER Canopy Type - Meal Delivery: DOUBLE Menu Board - Walk-up: NO SITE 5 Menu Board -Walk-up -Count 0 Number of Registers: ADAPT Menu Board - Walk-up - Type N/A LOGO :HER AND Menu Board -Ober Point YES � � � �.. Mer Point - Count 4 __.SUP SO DO PD ADDRESS Menu Board - O e a NOT APPROVED- REVISE AND RESU&r9T... Menu Boats - Ober Point - Type: DIGITAL ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED - REJISE AND RESJBMR D FER ❑ APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT Planned Classification: BASE INITIAL DATE: raUED HIGH M STOM LOW :USTOM-LOW :USTOM-HIGH FRAMING 20'1 JOINT 13'-0" B/ CANOPY Y-8" WATER TABLE T-0" i T/ SLAB 0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION 'Recwa ar, I I I •l I .,... li 0 T/ FRAMING 20'-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Ilii Q Q� 1 a U 06 O Q LU LU rUL CD Lo V (� B a M in FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION A CONSULTANT PROJECT # DATE MWDDNY DRAWN BY Author Ftmdan on MZ J gats in LI all fllc paWce! for bae.I lej. lbay M be rmMu MIn arymaErq ulevPeawXNe�a�efblea�se'f han wlMlttc!tl Vde2 rprcnmvez SHEET DESIGN OVERVIEW SHEET NUMBER X-900 A17ACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Wdth Overall TleBack Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) Integral Lighting CI -A Exterior Canopy 1 V-812" 1'-0" 0" No CI -C Exterior Canopy 9 6'-4" 1'-0" 0" No C3 -B Exterior Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'-0" 2'4" No CSC Exterior Canopy 1 15'4" 4'-0" 2'4" Yes C4 -G Exterior Canopy 1 T-0" 4'-0" 2'4" Yes Gran° total 13 PERSPECTIVE VIEW B 0 W N[If -o W O O A Z U) LU g 0 0_ O M M � N W O) N V N C? O U) N J M x w iC 4 PERSPECTIVE VIEW 2 PERSPECTIVE VIEW PERSPECTIVE VIEW REF. ENCLOSURE FINISHES EC -1 PREFINISHED METAL COPING COLOR: MIDNIGHT BRONZE BR -A BRICKVENEER COLOR: DARK BROWN SIZE: MODULAR OP CANOPY FINISHES CP -1 PREFINISHED METAL COLOR: DARKBRONZE CP -2 METAL DECKING COLOR: WHITE PERSPECTIVE VIEW EXTERIOR ELEVATION T/ FRAMING 20'-412". EXTERIOR ELEVATION R, 2 1 1_ PROJECT DATA Prototype Edition: LS-_ _. Playground NO. PLAY Ls Exterior Finish Type: TOWER STUCCO Landscaping Type STANDARD CK, RD, LEED Rating NOT CERTIFIED 'Accept_ Wall FMETAL STUD NOT C-, - raminT Ing ype. GOLD, PLATINUM , � -- zl) STUD D-valuesPR: w000 METAL OOLD, PNriNUM ✓JO°O STUD- PREFAB, METAL RAM '_I I I - PREFAB, MODULAR FRAME, Drive TIIN Stack COs # • ,^-�•—..+'C MOWIAR ml tlic.dcr- iAiis� Kitchen Type: CENTERLINE Drive Thru Bypass Lane: YES E.. Water Filtration Type: TYPE A Drive Thru Number of Fulfillment Lanes:. # p D enc ETC Drive Thru Number of Pickup Lanes # OL Drive-Thru: YES 0 B O O 0 o p Drive Thru Number of Order Point Pylons: # O Industrialized Construction YES Drive Thru Number of Pickup Windows # Chick-til-A Number of Parking Spaces:# Drive Thru Door YES 5200 Buffington R o adp NumberAccessible Parking Spaces: Cross Parking: YES Square 4996 Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 Seat Count - Interior: 84 Menu Board - Interior: YES Seat Count - Exterior: 16 Menu Board - Interior- Count: 5 ala _ Canopy Type - Order Point: DOUBLE Menu Board - Interior - Type DIGITAL °a' .HER Canopy Type - Meal Delivery: DOUBLE Menu Board - Walk-up: NO SITE 5 Menu Board -Walk-up -Count 0 Number of Registers: ADAPT Menu Board - Walk-up - Type N/A LOGO :HER AND Menu Board -Ober Point YES � � � �.. Mer Point - Count 4 __.SUP SO DO PD ADDRESS Menu Board - O e a NOT APPROVED- REVISE AND RESU&r9T... Menu Boats - Ober Point - Type: DIGITAL ❑ APPROVED AS NOTED - REJISE AND RESJBMR D FER ❑ APPROVED FOR DESIGN INTENT Planned Classification: BASE INITIAL DATE: raUED HIGH M STOM LOW :USTOM-LOW :USTOM-HIGH FRAMING 20'1 JOINT 13'-0" B/ CANOPY Y-8" WATER TABLE T-0" i T/ SLAB 0" EXTERIOR ELEVATION 'Recwa ar, I I I •l I .,... li 0 T/ FRAMING 20'-4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1 PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION C Ilii Q Q� 1 a U 06 O Q LU LU rUL CD Lo V (� B a M in FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION A CONSULTANT PROJECT # DATE MWDDNY DRAWN BY Author Ftmdan on MZ J gats in LI all fllc paWce! for bae.I lej. lbay M be rmMu MIn arymaErq ulevPeawXNe�a�efblea�se'f han wlMlttc!tl Vde2 rprcnmvez SHEET DESIGN OVERVIEW SHEET NUMBER X-900 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author Fbmtw -bane on His G g and In Si a1gbil Mc ,oL Ic bee nanM pj. may. be mnA tlIn ary mane Wbwb mpress wnudn c baba mb tm amGlua aeax rm,esMr�'��es. SHEET FLOOR PLAN Fy:IMi�aWWIMM:+ A-201 4 3 2 1 REFER TO A-105 FOR OMD CANOPY INFO 35'-9' 19'-61/2' 64'-41/2" V - 81/2" 6' - 0" 4--8" 6' - 0" 4--8" 6' - 0" V - 75/8" 3'-41/2" V-8 3/ 10'-81/4" 7'-01/2' V-93/4 8'-2" 6'-0" 20-3" 6'-0" 23'-11 1/2" MB.B A2 D1 A-401 15 A-301 P P FIRE SPRINKLER RISER SHOWN M6.E FOR REFERENCE ONLY A A C m F v M6.J N m F 1 M6.B M C 1a DRIVE THRU � o ^ m I \`��.HOOD #1���/ I \\/� I w MB.B 00 WB.BD MB.B A2 MB.EJ LL. .�9 I -•-. q -I- e HOOD #21 I �� �i�\ I a STORAGE 11701 �G________ ____ y _ of WALLS AT 2 • 1T-3 • 1/4' a o m STORAGE TO HAVE 33 STUD FRAMING m 0 3 A-601 1 O A3 4'-41/2" • 38'-5" lY z y ¢ EXTEND TO DECK A 401 A-622 3 O A-701 I y y 0 z_ w c m A• 4 WB.BD WB.BE LL W _ z of u • , • 8 ¢ LL 2 O rc O p A-602 1 0 y W6.BB o , m u 0 • 7 A-601 9 Q = LL J �, 11o I ¢ U ----____CI _ U - • rc o of MAINTAIN Z'GAP 0 A4 o B1 i 0 I TYPICAL TRIM '-£I A-401 A-301 • m 27'-41/2" i 8'-51/2' I 41'-11" 5'-4" 8'-51/2" M 8'-6" m s' -z" ' IHOOD #3I I SERVICE m m M6.B m C9 ._ DINING 4 i _ 1 I PROVIDE FROM EDGE MINIMUM 9" CLEAR OF PANEL TO W6. BM rwBB N m O A-621 9 F • ADJACENT WA LL SU RFACE TO 7 D c a 4 A-622 2 _ - - - - - -_ - - _- - - -_ - - _ a MB.BF I • I AVOID CONFLICT WITH LADDER 3 1 W6.BB m - W04.BB WB.BM A-602 5 A-603 8 O a a^ ' D c m � p I 16 8 23 A-622 n'-2" 1'-7" < i SERVING 5'-6" 2'-5" 2 1T-2" I WB.AB WB.AK WB.AB WS. BB c 1 1U i •-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•-• - - _ - - - _ - - _ - - - - _ - - _ \ WB.BB ." ... WB.BO i i i 11'-T' 3'-4.. i Q MB I I m � - - - - - -•- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WB.BN 11 M6.B • O �� MB.D WO DD WB • 5 A-602 7 WB.BN • M6.0 E1 i N r 7'-31/2" 2'-B" 6'-41/2" 5" 23'-03/4" WB.AB WB.BE I 6 A-604 TECH CLOSET • WB.BH TEAM MEMBER I M6.0 i ROOM A-622 1I 21 1 M I • I • W4.AA ( R - -• mA 10 H-.-.-•-•-.-.-. • -.-. -.-•� WOMENS WB.AK • A-604 I • I • 12 12 B3 WB.DD WB.DL VESTIBULE 7 O4.AC A-622 5 WB.AD W4.AA I I J W6.HN •• 1 A-602 15 N I A-301 - a - MOD 6 A-621 m ^ 8 11 A-622 B2 A-623 y • I W4.AD � • WB.BH' • W6.BN I "T M6.B y r, °J WB.CD CLOSET W4.AC W4.AA WB.BN 14 0 5WB.LL ! - W4.AA WB.EK I I I OFFICE i 30 32 O 4"I W4.AD - - - - - AAAAAAA 20 of 1 A-621 1 c = RR VEST MENS .-.-. .-. .-. .-.-. MS.E .-.-. .-.-. N W4.CD e N U 31 MB.A A • 5 Al I 3 MOB(M6.N I M6.B E A-631 M MB.D MB MB.D MB.D L C 01 .- K -. .-.-.-.-.-.-. .-.-.-. .-. K .- .-.-. D3 C A-301 ----- ----- MB.D --- ----- A-611 *A1 9'-111/2" -41/2" 1'-103/4" 4'-93/4" 6'-0" 4'-8" 6'-0" 4'-73/4" 3'-41/2" 2'-81/2" 4'-63/4" 6'-0" 14'-5" 6'-0" 4'-63/4" 14'-41/4" S. 13'-4" &Y-51/4" 35'-6 1/2" 33'-8 1/4" 119'-8" FLOOR PLAN C4 1/4" = 1'-0" BRACE INTERIOR PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR COMPLIANCE WITH REFER TO LEGEND BELOW REFER TO WALLTYPES ON THE LOCAL BUILDING CODE. REFER TO REFLECTED CEILING PLAN FOR FOR WALL CAVITY FRAMING RIGHT FOR SHEATHING AND DRAFSTOPPING PARTITION LOCATIONS THAT EXTEND TO DECK. AND INSULATION MATERIALS ON EXPOSED SIDE(S) OF WALL (REFER TO ROOM WB ABS LABELS FOR ORIENTATION) \\ 14• • Al \\ I I A-611 I 1 A-623 I I I I PLUS SIGN INDICATES ADDITIONAL LAYER OF SHEATHING PAINTED FINISH I I - - ZI PAINTED FINISH w >O 0 > I m z GYPSUM BOARD SHEATHING w• 8o • I �• • ' i MENU BOARD BULKHEAD > Or w r N Z ¢ J p1 -A ¢ PAINTED FINISH O ¢ w > W m Z m W Z w GYPSUM BOARD z w z W Z ¢ z m z x¢ SHEATHING 0 �F mz W . A-624 U �F I ? U �F w ¢ z0 w Z0 ¢ J w3 w z0 FRP FINISH WOOD STUD WALL iOz m0 - z fOw T.O. FRP iOw . z >rc �� W4 2X4 WOOD STUDS GYPSUM BOARD TO xu o • GYPSUM BOARD TO m 4 m 0 = m w aOpO ¢ o m w EXTEND BELOW • z¢ 0 z w < EXTEND 1" BELOW TO. z • I TILE STOPS -- o ¢ x o z z x U W6 2X6 WOOD STUDS T.O. WALL TILE LL ¢ on WAINSCOT CAP o w ¢ AT BULKHEAD FRP WALL z m z a W8 2X8 WOOD STUDS W F 0 y W i FINISH LL ¢ W H z LLQ STAINLESS O 0 z 13 m 0 w W ? x WAINSCOT TOP CAP m 0 w z m 0 w F STEEL FINISH w ¢ onH m z LL¢ A-611 zx 20 • ?x _J 0 zx 0 CEMENT BOARD m x� onH m w m METAL STUD WALL = ¢ of x WAINSCOTING FINISH 2 0 • WALL TILE a �_ x SHEATHING z W Z 0 z w B M4 35/8"METAL STUDS WALL TILE U- LL PLYWOOD LL FINISH J U- LL ¢ x ¢ of STAINLESS STEEL W w ¢ o B M6 6" METAL STUDS FINISH z O FRP WALL FINISH z SHEATHING w CEMENT BOARD LL STOPS AT SINK of LL (70 wx LL M8 8" METAL STUDS ¢ PLYWOOD PAINTED O ¢> z p SHEATHING 1- STAINLESS STAINLESS WOOD BOARD z SHEATHING, TYP FINISH ID WALLTILE ¢ d STEEL FINISH STEEL FINISH D2 FINISH ¢ ¢ of BATT INSULATION wGYPSUM BOARD w WAINSCOTHEIGHT FINISH PLYWOOD z SHEATHING z VARIES BETWEEN D & N w of A 623 SHEATHING 3/4" PLYWOOD NOTE 1: WALL BLOCKING SHALL BE THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR'S a CEMENT BOARD FINISH TYPES d CEMENT BOARD I I CEMENT BOARD CEMENT BOARD I SHEATHING SHEATHING I - CEMENT BOARD CEMENTBOARD SHEATHING RESPONSIBILITY. BLOCKING SHALL INCLUDE, BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO: AREAS w CEMENT SHEATHING Lu WAINSCOT BOTTOM SHEATHING LL GYPSUM BOARD • • FRP WALL SHEATHING SHEATHING INDICATED ON INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR GRAB BARS, SHELVING BRACKETS, CEMENT BOARD BOARD TILE BASE Iii rc CAPANDTRIM SHEATHING z z FINISH TILE BASE WALK-IN MONITORS, FIXTURES, ETC, AS WELL AS BLOCKING FOR WINDOWS, CANOPIES SHEATHING SHEATHING FINISH TILE BASE W I I rc CARRY STAINLESS TILE BASE 0 FINISH d MIN. CLEARANCE, ROOF FRAMING, ROOF TOP UNITS, ETC. •17 • • TILE BASE -• • . CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING FINISH TILE BASE STEELALLTHE WAY FINISH ¢ RE: FLOOR PLAN NOTE 2: REFER TO STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS AND WALL SECTIONS FOR TILE BASE FINISH - I' ' - FINISH, TY ' '- ' < TILE BASE • ' Ca • - . • - • FINISH Qq VYNIL BASE FINISH - TO FLOOR TILE • I • • I • Ea w A3 w I • • • • - • - D3 3/4" CEMENT BOARD SHEATHING EXTERIOR WALL CONSTRUCTION. m C4 • A-604 _ m •-• _ m A3 C1 -• m FINISH C1 A -boa m m • A 604 m C2 A-604 TILE BASE - A-604 C1 m FINISH A-623 -. A3 • A- 04 O 0 -j TILE BASE FINISH io --4 C1 NOTE 3: REFER TO FINISH PLAN FOR WALL FINISH INFO AND SPECIFICATIONS RESTROOM ITYFI ❑A I ❑g EGOIEx A-604 A-623 CLOSET D1x1xG A-624 RESTROOMrvANIm SERMGIMMIURDARGRI X-641 PIAY EITCNEx IMOFIDxXI EITCNEx moon MMHM DHHGISRAADEMI A-604 WALWEI COOLER recx 0 aoSET A-623 FOR WALL SHEATHING INFO DRNE-ixRU VESTEIILE yESiIBULE DRNETIRIJ MARI..NI VES WLE18gx M WALWEI FREMER SERM5 OFFICE NOTE 4: GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AND/OR VERIFY FIRE BLOCKING SERVICE UTILITYIRISER ❑TEAM MEMBER ROOM N AT 10' MAX VERTICAL SPACING AND AT CEILING HEIGHT IN ALL COMBUSTIBLE STUD WALLS, ACCORDING TO LOCAL CODE REQUIREMENTS. FLOOR PLAN LEGEND: WALL TYPES LEGEND CT CABIN ET r ----- I RE: ELECTRICAL L N.T.S. -----� MDP RE: ELECTRICAL STEEL WALL BY INSULATION SCHEDULE FLOOR PLAN GENERAL NOTES OWNER RE: OWNER A.1 ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE FRAMING DIMENSIONS (FACE OF STUD/JAMB) EXACT LOCATIONS LOCATION R -VALUE THICKNESSFOR ROOF R-17.4 3" RIGID pUNLESS ISE NOTED. A.2 FASTENERS, ANCHORS, CLIPS, STRAPS, ETC WHICH ARE IN CONTACT WITH ITEM BY OWNER 0 A PRESERVATIVEATIVE RAND/OR FIRE TREATED WOOD SHALL BE OF G-185 HOT DIPPEDZINC- L WALLR-5 COATED GALVANIZED STEEL, STAINLESS STEEL, OR AN APPROVED EQUAL. -q-01 (CONTINUOUS) I" RIGID A.3 REFER TO CIVILAND LANDSCAPE FOR LOCATIONS OF WALKS, BOLLARDS, LANDSCAPING AREAS, FLAG POLE, AND OTHER SITE ITEMS. SOFFIT OR BULKHEAD WALL R 19 6" BATT A.4 REFER TO INTERIOR ELEVATIONS FOR LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF CORNER GUARDS. ABOVE RE: REFLECTED (CAVITY) A.5 CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE LOCATION OF POLE MOUNTED EXTERIOR CAMERA WITH CEILING PLAN STRONG SYSTEMS AND INSTALL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT AS REQUIRED. RE: SLAB R-10 2" RIGID ELECTRICAL. 2 -SIDED BRAND ICON AS REFER TO ACCESSIBILITY PLAN AND FURNITURE DRAWINGS FOR SEATING LAYOUT & RE: OWNER DRAWINGS SPECIFICATIONS. CONTACT: OWNER. NOTES: A.7 REFER TO ACCESSIBILITY PLAN AND OWNER DRAWINGS FOR CONDIMENT COUNTERS RECESSED PIN AND SLEEVE 1. REFER TO FLOOR PLAN AND WALL SECTION SHEETS AND TRASH RECEPTACLES. BOX. RE: A4/A620 & MEP FOR INSULATION EXTENTS AND LOCATIONS. A.B REFER TO IT WALLBOARD USER GUIDE FOR WALLBOARD INSTALLATION, IF APPLICABLE. DRAWINGS. 2. REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR INSULATION A.9 REFER TO MILLWORK PLAN FOR RAISED CONCRETE CURB LOCATIONS. ELECTRICAL PANEL RE: PRODUCT INFORMATION. A.10 FREEZER AND COOLER DOORS AND HARDWARE SUPPLIED BY FREEZER/COOLER ELECTRICAL D MANUFACTURER 4 3 2 1 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE/SIZE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author Fbmtw -bane on His G g and In Si a1gbil Mc ,oL Ic bee nanM pj. may. be mnA tlIn ary mane Wbwb mpress wnudn c baba mb tm amGlua aeax rm,esMr�'��es. SHEET FLOOR PLAN Fy:IMi�aWWIMM:+ A-201 E 4 K 2 1 a W- E oC� o � � o O O o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 D1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = V-0.1 D B4 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS A4 T/ FRAMING 20'-41/2" v PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR • REGULATORY T` CONTROL JOINT I3'-0"� APPROVAL, c3c B2 c1 -c c1 -c C1 -A c,_c BIDDING, OR vim A-504 CONSTRUCTION ■M i■ B/ CANOPY 9'-8" A-504 WATER TABLE 3'-0'h _... _... 11111 1 111110 C - A-504 A-501 `,........ T/ SLAB 0" A-501 Cl EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1 •-0" li 1 A-504 A-504 A-504 A-504 T/ FRAMING 20-41/2"h T/ FRAMING 20'-4 1/2' h a) •1 'cl) w 06 0 • -D; llw_ ' w CONTROL JOINT 13'-0' C4G CONTROL JOINT 13'-0" LL C1 -C - � Q 71� C3 -B AB04 T 0 Z B/ CANOPY 9'-8" B/ CANOPY 9'-8"h CDLin A/ LL *■ ■■ A, A-504 A-504 63 A-504 WATER TABLE 3'4"c4 WATER TABLE 3'-0h B3 A3 C CJ 0 w Q v FS !.r A-501 A-501 _ BUILDING TYPE/SEE: P13 LS LRG _ RELEASE: 22.05 T/ SLAB O" T/ SLAB O" PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS B3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION V 0) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION or BR-A(PRIMARY BRICK) W DESCRIPTION 0_ BR -02.... . 0 H ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX - SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 IMUTUAL MATERIALS LU JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA W BR -20....... N IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN 0 LU BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) o LU � J BR-03ACME D_ RUSTIC NMITE ARGOS, SAN TAN O A BR -19 D_ DESERTWHITE B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES (SEE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS LIST FOR CONTACT INFORMATION) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION PREFERRED REGION(S) BR-A(PRIMARY BRICK) W DESCRIPTION 0_ BR -02.... . ACME BRICK 1 PALOMA GRAY _. ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX - SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 IMUTUAL MATERIALS MIDNIGHTSKY JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -20....... GLEN-GERY IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK,PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) O N) 4-0' 24" � J BR-03ACME BRICK RUSTIC NMITE ARGOS, SAN TAN MALVERN, AR SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -19 MUTUALMATERIALS DESERTWHITE JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA WA IWEST BR -26 GLEN-GERY WHITEHALL JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA. ATLANTIC NORTHEAST MIDWEST B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN LU CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - ....MODEL.... X a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL W DESCRIPTION 0_ MODELNAME o COLOR NOTE BR -A v Q 9 MODULAR * No *SEE APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1_ CANOPY METAL FASCIA N V DURA COAT O DARK BRONZE N 1 O N) 4-0' 24" � J C4 -G M TEXTURE PVD O CANOPY METAL DECK Yes B1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION REVISION SCHEDULE 1/4" - J. -O., NO. DATE DESCRIPTION FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN CANOPY SCHEDULE CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - ....MODEL.... Overall Width... a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL MARK- DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODELNAME NUMBER COLOR NOTE BR -A BRICK VENEER (PRIMARY) 9 MODULAR * No *SEE APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1_ CANOPY METAL FASCIA .... DURA COAT DC19ST-2703 DARK BRONZE OIL RUBBED BRONZE METALLIC 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" YW C4 -G EMeHor Canopy TEXTURE PVD CP -2 CANOPY METAL DECK Yes WRITE SMOOTH V%HITE HIGH GLOSS EC -1 PARAPET WALL COPING DUROLAST/ MIDNIGHT EXCEPTIONAL METALS BRONZE PT -100 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE SW2807 ROCKWOOD REFUSE ENCLOSURE. FINISH: ACRYLIC #B66.350 SEMI -GLOSS ON DOOR FRAMES, SATIN ON WALLS PT -113 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE DARK BRONZE FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS - - ACRYLIC#B66-350 SC -1 -. STUCCO STO POWERWALL WESTHIGHLAN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM DWHITE- SC-2 STUCCO STO POWERWALL HARDWARE ST -1 STOREFRONT. YKK YES 45 DARK BRONZE (MATTE) GENERAL NOTES - LEGEND ❑ OIL EXTRACTION 1. ALL SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY OTHERS PORT ACCESS BOX 2. REF FLOOR PLAN AND WINDOW LEGEND FOR STOREFRONT INFORMATION - EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO. CO2 FILL BOX - r. DATE MM/DDNY FINISH SAND MEDIUM MATCH MORTAR COLOR RE: KITCHEN CANOPY SCHEDULE CARD READER BY LIGHT FIXTURE - Description Count Overall Width... a SECURITY RE: ELECTRICAL Integral Lighting CI -A 9R"A VENDOR -RE: ELEC 1 3'-81/2" r — � No C1 -C SCUPPER- T-11 CT CABINET- T-11 9 64" SEE A2/A-503 RE. ELECTRIC No C3 -B EMeHor Canopy A CONSULTANT PROJECT # iklfklf 15-0" 4-0' 24" No r. DATE MM/DDNY FINISH SAND MEDIUM an Siaigla ni DRAWN BY DOWNSPOUT- T-11. igW ffl or n SEE A3/A-503. u,mm'i«n zmlaream mz rtaip am zz SC -2 waaz=zar«mae na.za aq«cmm «c nermmauem in O ay ma""«znmwcapea waan Quwaeaizcc rvan azo -'am , zer eznmvc od ar SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EC -1 MDP - 9 RE ELECTRICAL SHEET NUMBER Grand total 13 A-301 0 0 4 1 3 1 2 1 ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Width... Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) - Integral Lighting CI -A EMeHor Canopy 1 3'-81/2" ,'-0" 0" No C1 -C EMeHor Canopy 9 64" ,'-0" 0" No C3 -B EMeHor Canopy 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" No C3 -C EMedor Canopy 1 15-0" 4-0' 24" YW C4 -G EMeHor Canopy 1 7-0" 4-0' 24" Yes an Siaigla ni DRAWN BY DOWNSPOUT- T-11. igW ffl or n SEE A3/A-503. u,mm'i«n zmlaream mz rtaip am zz SC -2 waaz=zar«mae na.za aq«cmm «c nermmauem in O ay ma""«znmwcapea waan Quwaeaizcc rvan azo -'am , zer eznmvc od ar SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS EC -1 MDP - 9 RE ELECTRICAL SHEET NUMBER Grand total 13 A-301 0 0 4 1 3 1 2 1 E 0 C B Q A, 5 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 rn4 EXTERIOR ELEVATION U 1 1/4" = V -a' Cl EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" B3 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = T-0" 4 B 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR APPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES (SEE NATIONAL ACCOUNTS LIST FOR CONTACT INFORMATION) FINISH I MANUFACTURER MODEL MORTAR PLANT LOCATION PREFERRED REGION(S) BR -A (PRIMARY BRICK) MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER BR-02ACME BRICK PALOMA GRAY ARGOS, SAN TAN ELGIN, TX SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -18 MUTUALMATERIALS MIDNIGHTSKY JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -20 GLEN-GERY IKHAKIMATT JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST BR -B (ACCENT BRICK) 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes BR -03 ACME BRICK RUSTIC V%H ITE ARGOS, SAN TAN MALVERN, AR SOUTHEAST, SOUTHWEST BR -19 IMUTUAL MATERIALS DESERTWHITE JARGOS, SAN TAN MICA,WA IWEST BR -26 GLEN-GERY WHITEHALL JARGOS, SAN TAN ICHESWCK, PA IATLANTIC, NORTHEAST, MIDWEST 4 B 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0" FINISH SCHEDULE - EXTERIOR ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark MODEL Overall Wdth Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) MARK DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER MODELNAME NUMBER COLOR NOTE BR -A BRICK VENEER (PRIMARY) 9 MODULAR 1'-0" 0" No *SEEAPPROVED BRICK ALTERNATES CP -1 CANOPY METAL FASCIA 15'-0" DURA COAT DC19ST-2703 DARK BRONZE OIL RUBBED BRONZE METALLIC 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes C4 -G Ededor Canopy TEXTURE PVD CP -2 CANOPY METAL DECK Yes V%HITE SMOOTH V%HITE, HIGH GLOSS EC -1 PARAPET WALL COPING DUROLAST/ MIDNIGHT EXCEPTIONAL METALS BRONZE PT -100 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE SW2807 ROCKWOOD REFUSE ENCLOSURE. FINISH: ACRYLIC #B66.350 SEMI -GLOSS ON DOOR FRAMES, SATIN ON WALLS PT -113 EXTERIOR PAINT SHERWIN WILLIAMS SHER-CRYL HIGH PERFORMANCE DARK BRONZE FINISH: SEMI -GLOSS ACRYLIC #B66-350 SC -1 STUCCO STO POWERWALL WESTHIGHLAN FINISH: SAND MEDIUM D NMITE SC -2 STUCCO STO POWERWALL HARDWARE FINISH: SAND MEDIUM ST -1 STOREFRONT YKK YES 45 DARK BRONZE MATTE) 41 GENERAL NOTES 1. ALL SIGNAGE PROVIDED BY OTHERS 2. REF FLOOR PLAN AND WINDOW LEGEND FOR STOREFRONT INFORMATION CANOPYNOTES: BUILDING MOUNTED CANOPIES - 8" THICK CANOPY - KYNAR FINISH OF STRUCTURE, FASCIA, & DECKING TO MATCH(T.1) COLUMN MOUNTED CANOPIES - 10" THICK CANOPY - FINISH OF STRUCTURE TO BEC R1 - FINISH OF DECKING TO BE CP -2 Grand total 2 13 LEGEND EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH MORTAR COLOR CARD READER BY ® SECURITY VENDOR -RE: ELEC SCUPPER- T-11 SEE A2/A-503 DOWNSPOUT- T-11 SEE A3/A-503 MDP_#D RE ELECTRICAL 0 0 1 ❑ OIL EXTRACTION PORT ACCESS BOX CO2 FILL BOX - RE: KITCHEN LIGHT FIXTURE - RE:ELECTRICAL r — � CT CABINET- T-11 RE: ELECTRICA L — J EC -1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION 1' FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE /SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author inmrmal'iDn nmrarea on wa d g am in Si digla mea produced fa lose naned pgct may na be maxi ead In any manna-�duwcayen v.drce� a rvba cmzcc rtan a hors:ed Drded rmreznmvaz. SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-301 ATTACHED CANOPY SCHEDULE Mark Description Count Overall Wdth Overall Tie Back Mounting Depth (Offset From Top) Integral Lighting CI -A Ededor Canopy 1 3'-81/2" 1'-0" 0" No CI -C Eodedor Canopy 9 64" 1'-0" 0" No C3 -B Ededor Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" No C3 -C Ededor Canopy 1 15'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes C4 -G Ededor Canopy 1 7'-0" 4'4" 24" Yes Grand total 2 13 LEGEND EXPANSION JOINT, SEALANT COLOR TO MATCH MORTAR COLOR CARD READER BY ® SECURITY VENDOR -RE: ELEC SCUPPER- T-11 SEE A2/A-503 DOWNSPOUT- T-11 SEE A3/A-503 MDP_#D RE ELECTRICAL 0 0 1 ❑ OIL EXTRACTION PORT ACCESS BOX CO2 FILL BOX - RE: KITCHEN LIGHT FIXTURE - RE:ELECTRICAL r — � CT CABINET- T-11 RE: ELECTRICA L — J EC -1 E 0 a Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 SITE ADAPT LOGO AND ADDRESS PROTOTYPICAL SET NOT FOR REGULATORY APPROVAL, BIDDING, OR CONSTRUCTION 1' FSR#04987 BUILDING TYPE /SEE: P13 LS LRG RELEASE: 22.05 PRINTED FOR PROJECT STATUS REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CONSULTANT PROJECT# DATE MM/DD/YY DRAWN BY Author inmrmal'iDn nmrarea on wa d g am in Si digla mea produced fa lose naned pgct may na be maxi ead In any manna-�duwcayen v.drce� a rvba cmzcc rtan a hors:ed Drded rmreznmvaz. SHEET EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER A-301 Appendix 6 Photometric Plan Plan View Scale - 1" = 25R + 'es 'ab +ab a.5 +p] 'a5 0.5 a.5 'a.5 *a.5 __ __ ___ _._ _. +05 'a.5 *08 'a.9 a.] '01 'a8 a8 'a8 'OA '0] 'O8 '8 'O8 +0A '3 +op +op +op +0a +a.a a.2 +a.a - _ _ I _ _ _ 'a5 'p8 'a. '09 '1A '1.1 '1.5 '18 13 '1A +02 'p8 'p8 'O8 '09 '1.1 ' 3 '1.2 'a.9 '0.5 j pAi I a1 'a.] '09 '1.1 '13 '1A '18 'l8 'l] '2p '1.5 '13 '13 ,-,+ '09 '1A '13 '18 '18 1A 'a.B 00 a.1 ap +al SA +u +1A +19 +2g +a2 +aa '2a 42a Sl SA +v +1. +u +1e +22 v +1.2 ae 'p8 '11 '18 'lp 'l8 '32 '5.5 '3< 'l] '21 '18 '13 '1. '11 '2.1 '29 32 '197 j a.1 *p9 *13 *19 *. A *31 8 *1 *1.5 *3p *37 *32 A< '2.1 00 a.2 *1A *13 *3p *38 *38 *38 *5 �ay,+88 '39 '38 *3A *23 18 *1.5 *1.7 *23 *32 *32 3.5 '22 W7,/5'9'J +02 'IA '11 '1A '2.1 '38 '37 'Ap '88 ']2 '43 '39 '3A '25 A '1.7 '18 '34 '33 #r '13 � I a°! 00 I I'12 15 + +� '43 '87 ']2 'Ag 1] + '27 ' 1 '19 '1 1 3 '33 3.6 +2.5 II 'a.3 II '13 +11 23 28 33 'A< '] 2 '] g 'A8 '3.5 (11 '29 < 1 '2 '2T '3 ' 'L.9 8 ± ___ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ --------- _ _ _ _ _ ________ --I I 0 'a.2 'a.2 *a.L *a.5 'a.] 'a.] 'a.] 1 'aA I 00 I I y '14 '18 +2d '28 '32 '<.5 ']p '73 '5.1 43<'3 A '2. +22 + + + + +1.2 '1.0 'a8+ + .Aus'13 '18 '22 '28 '3< 'A3 ']3 ']8 'A] '38 '35 '31 '27 '23 '2.1 +2'� *< M]3 *8.9 • 1 � 'a1 5�+*8A 'I 3e ® *p.] *fA ➢.] m *1A *15 *11 811 *a.] I '00 0] � 11 I '1A '15 5 '28 '3g 'A2 '6.5 +7.1 '<.5 39 35 '<A 38 '3p ' 3 '2.1 -SO 6 * 9 '40 ] ].5 0a *13 *18 *2A *"1. 'a. I 1 A +1A '22 +29 +38 +4A +89 +73 +A20 38 A] +43 + +2.5 +2.2 3 +'1.3 *2.p *3. +]5 +16 +0, <ai1 11 +02 +02 '03 403 +a8 +09 21 +2a +v +39 +eg +7.1 'a2 43a +38 +51 A 3. '3.a 'E. 8 \'31 '3.a `aa +20 +5 +.2 1 4- 0 ° oo0"O4 0 +0.2 +03 '03 40.5 +p8 +09 +13 +2p +2.5 +32 +37 +5.7 +6.2 +3.8 43.5 +32 +5A *m9 *A2 3.3 '12.8 ] +36 8 +2 T,i 'p5 +03 II I=13ILS ILIR� 11 ®S34S* 11 *.3 *03 *0.5 *OB *01 *09 *13 *1.B+22 *27 *33 *&0 *3.8 *2.B *28 *LB *l] *l< *2.7 * .5 8 J.8 K3.9 .� +p, 'a.3 87 SP 1 1 *aA +0a +0a +p.] *a8 *12 *15 181 *2p *22 '28 'Ap +<. +3.0 *2.2 *2 *LA'I NA 04A *3. '2A *L. _ _ _ _ _ _ b.] „�'�6 'd0 *A2 *3211 *p +a.3 - y +0.5 4.8 'aP 49 '12 '1B '18 '1P '1P '19 '22 '27 37 '19 '42 *sA *m2 *3A *2A ''33 3 319 2 a] 37 35 b_p. 3 'all + +a.ai --_- ______- _- - ____- _____ ---- 1 +01 '09 '1.1 '13 +18 +22 +2A +2.1 +19 +18 +18 +2p '19 '1. +1.1 +13 +38111 *<A i.8 *3. *2.81 *2 /2 118 '15 p*1.L 1"IA *1A *1A *1a *11 *18 18 'i *19 '2.5 ��.3 *41 Ns +35i +13 O8 %2 �4 t +23 +33 +35 +28 1 t9 +18 +11 '1.5 *12 � +� +2.7 * p .1 �0 '2 ��' '4Q 18 698 '18 '11 '11 A '2A '22 ' l �1l _ _'2.p 'I 23 *2g NA +511 '15 +0a 1!! +09 +1A +11 42.1 +29 +42 +53 +34 +2.5 +2.1 +18 +1A +1.1 +p. +0A a.] +18 '3A '3 '42 8 '2.5 '2.2 '2.3 '23,..:.1 '23 A '3A *3S 3 '2.1 / �1-a +19 +0a i1! +1A +18 +2p 427 +3A '55 +62 +38 +3p +23 +19 +13 +09 +p. 408 +8 +12 '31 '< B.2 '48 '3.1 '2.8 '2.8 '28 A '28 '3S i.8 '4g '2.9 8 '1458i 3 III +0a -I +1A +11 +23 432 +35 +g0 +65 +39 +3.5 +2g +2p +13 +09 +p. 408 +1.1 +2A '22 '2A i.2 NA 9 '5.'31 '3.2 '3.1 '32 '3.1 '35 '4.3 'g. '3 3 44 3 'g.8 -1 i+ r +0a i +1.1 +11 +2.5 433 +35 +53�+5] +3] +3g +27 +2p +13 +09 +p. 401 +11 +181 '22 72.8 '3.5 5.p %.2 '5. '3S '31 '3.5 '35 '35 '39 L.] '].a 5.6 '31 l Na 92 -'k 58' .2 *pg I a. a.b +1A +11 +22 '3.1 +3A '51 +63 +38 +34 +2.5 +19 +13 +09 +p. 401 +1A +1.]' '22 2.9 '3a '<.5 '<. '3S '3A '3A '38 '37 ND L.5 '49 '31 9 ' $ " 5 I +8 *pg I i 1 +03 +1A +18 +2p '2g +32 +55 +g.1 +3g +28 +22 +18 +1.2 +a.8 +a. '0] +1A +18 ''2.1 l 3< '48 %.p '5. 3.9 '"a.8 '3.5 3.5 i.5 '39 <a *].0 b.3 3.8 8 '4411 91 'ae 65 � +221i +p8 03 '1A +1A +11 +2.0 *2.] *L5 *L8 *3.1 +22 +18 +1.8 +1.2 *0.9 +a. +08 +1A 15 +2.1 +2i 30 04< B.9 b.2 3.8 3'3S 33 32 38 04S "T b.3 .5 .1 40 58 22111 +a.] 1 ,,.�+_ +p3 '09 +13 +1A +18 +21 +29 +31 +24 *A�-r.8 *1A *1.2 *1.a *a.B *a.8 *1.1 *1A i *1B *2.1 1X2.] 40 i 3+4. 3.1 3.9 '32 33 33 33 *4< S.8 *48 *2.8 *28 A *38 A *35 *1 ]I +al 0.8 +1A +13 +13 +15 +20 +20 +11 +1 +13 +1.1+ 9 +1A +1.1 +1A i *18 1X18 *2. � � +3 '2.9_ _ '2.8_ 03e_ _ 33 _ _ 3A 38 304S _____040 - 31 +2.5 '2. '1B 0 +1311 03 'al __ _ +a.8 '09 '1A '1.1 18 +15 +13 +13 +13 +A +1. '1.1 +12 18 �// '2.$ 'S.6 '2. + g '2A ' '3a 33 + '38 ND * A '44 ' '38 '2A ' '25 '2.2 '18 13 '2.2 1l +1Aii +03 'al \ +a8 '1A '1.1 '13 +15 8 +1A +13 +1.2 +1 +1.1 +1.1 1. +1.1 *1.2 +13 +18 f +11 +18 � ] '19 '2.1®�--''i -.a .8 '3.2 35 'aA '4.2 '43 *3.8 '3.2 ].]® *2.1 ®18 t2 'y� +1 +a.] +1.a 1. '13 418 +2A +18 +4 +1.4 +13 13 +13 +13 +1. +1.4 A +20 +22 +19 +11 '19 '19 '2.1 a i.2 *42 '41 '4p '4.1 3A *3A l '2.2 '18 +13 +09 +a.s j +1.2 +1A +18 422 +30 +30 +22 +11 +18 +1.5 +1.5 +1A +1. +18 411 +21 +29 .5 3 8 +1.3 +es +l +0511 +02 +10 11 +1.5 +11 +2.1 43p +41 +<A +28 +2.1 +19 '11 +1.5 +1.5 +1] +19 42.1 +27 +<A +48 +33 +23 +19 +11 +1A 1.1 + +p.5 p.5 +OB +0] +01 +pA +aAl *02 +1.1 +1.8+2e +27 43< +59 '51 +33 +27 +2A +1.8 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +2.1 42g +32 '55 +63 +37 +28 +2.1 +11 +13 +O8 +0A 40.5 0'' +pA +pA +O8 +01 +pA li '03 +1.1 +0 +32 43g +1 +59 +35 +3.2 +2A +2A +1.8 +1.8 +2. 43.1 +35 +A +gA +38 +34 +2A 1.9 1.4 0.8 a.8 i 12 1A 22 2.2 2.2 19 2.5 28 2. 1.8 1.8 1.3 1.1 lz0 +1.2 111 ♦�� yt' +18 +2.5 < )♦a +yma, 0 +3A +3< +2] +2A +1.g +1.g +2 +2.g ♦ * +51,a.ar 8. +38 +3g +28 +2.1 1.5 +1.1 +1.1 +1.3 +1.] 5 +3] +43 +3.5 +3< +3] +4< +3 +2A +2.1 +18 +1A +131 'O8 +13 T ! '18 +23 +33 +38 *83 1 *35 *33 *2< *2.a '18 '1.5 +2. *2 +32 *35 *59 *g. *4p *3.5 *28 '2. '1.5 +13 *1.2 +1A *18 A *29 +32 +3.1 *3.1 +32 +3p 28 +24 +23 *22 *2.1 *1811 1 +1 1 +1A +2p +27 +34 +58 +5A +3A +27 +2.1 +1.5 +1.5 +1 +22 +28 +33 +53 +62 +38 +3p +23 + 9 +1.5 +13 +1.1 '1A +1A +18 '21 +27 +3p '3.1 +28 +2.5 +2.1 +2p +22 '23 +25 +2A li +' l +1A +1A +1.7 +2.1 +29 +42 +48 +28 +2.1 +1. g +1A +1A +16 +19 +22 +28 +42 +5A +34 +24 +19 +1] +13 +1.1 +1.0 '1.1 '11 +12 '15 +18 +19 +19 +19 +11 +1.6 +1A +2p +23 +29 +3A1 A +02 +1.1 +1.3 *1A '2.2 3.1 +31 +22 +1A +1.5 +1A +13 +1A '1. 1. '11 +22 3. +35 +27 +1A +1.5 +13 +1.0 +0.9 408 +01 +p8 +02 +1A +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 +1.1 '13 '18 +2g +31 +45'i 3.1 +p8 i O8 1A %1 '1A +19 +19 +1A +13 +13 +1.1 +1.1 +13 '1. *1.3 +1A +1A +2.1 +22 +18 +A +13 +1.1 +1A a. +.g +a5 +a5 +aA +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.g +a.] +08 +1.1 18 +27 +33 +36I '3A +pA 11 +0A +01 +O8 40.9 +12 +12 +1A +1A +1A +1A 1.1 +1.2 +13 +13 +15 +1A +13 +A 1. +09 +8 I 1A +1.7 +27 +33 +3Ak *2.5 +aA 1. +e4 +0a +0A 40A +p8 +p8 +p8 + 8 +09 +09 9 1A +1.1 +1.2 413 +13 +1A +1A +13 +A +1A +09 + 8 1.0 +1.5 +2.5 +32 +3311 +2] 03 +3 +e4 40 +05 +05 +e6 +01 +O8 +1.1 1. +13 +1. 1.7 +18 +18 +1A +1A +13 +1A 9 I���yl /////���������� �� 09 +13 '22 +29 +38� +3A +03 II (� 11 -A +0.2 +0.3 '03 403 +03 +pA +p 5 +OB +O8 +1A +13 +1.5 +18 2. +2A +2. +2] +25 +22 +18 +1.5 +13 + .1 O8 +1.1 '11 +23 +33 A +29 li +02 +2p +0.2 402 03 +0 +0a +01 +1A +13 +18 +21 2 -3 +3A +32 +28 +23 +2p +1A +3 01 +0.9 +13 +19 +22 +a.1 11 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 +02 +02 +03 +Om +0A +p.8 +13 +11 +24 '3 +33 +3A +}.p +3.1 n +2.1 +1,$ +A Og +a.] +1.1 18 151 '13 +0.1 +a.1 +a.1 +0.1 +02 +a.3 *aA +a.g +09 +1A +2.0 +2.9 +3.6 +3A •+2A +32 +3.5 +2g +11 +13 +O8 *0< * 3 +02 +01 +01 +aO +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op +Op *p.3 *1.1 *1A f' p8 +a.1 ....... ..... ....... _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ *a.1.1 +a.a +aA +aA +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 a. + . + +aA +aA + * . a.3 'a.2 +a.1 +a.1 +a.1 *aA +a.0 OA +0A +a.a +0A +a.1 tel +a. +0.4+aA 'a.] +a.] 0A 5/ 3/16/2022 cele of to Scale rowing No. Appendix 7 Trip Generation Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson & Associates) I< KITTELSON 851 SW 6M AVENUE, SUITE 600 RTLAND, OR &ASSOCIATES P503228.52309T204 F 503.273.8169 u uS:eR,o u Date: August 5, 2022 To: Michael Liebler, PE City of Springfield Department of Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Cc : Steve Schwartz & Beth Witt, Chick-fil-A, Inc. Andrew Hunt & Sean 011et, PE, 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. From: Chris Brehmer, PE & Julia Kuhn, PE Project: Springfield Chick-fil-A#04987 Subject: Trip Generation Assessment Memo Project Ji: 28083 Chick-fil-A is proposing to redevelop the Guesthouse Inn & Suites site located in the southwest quadrant of the Gateway Street/Beltline Road intersection; the site address is 3358 Gateway Street. The existing buildings on-site will be removed and the site would be redeveloped to include a 4,987 square foot restaurant with a drive-through as well as two retail pad buildings. This memorandum provides a summary of the existing and proposed uses and the corresponding change in site trip generation. Based on the estimated change in trip generation, redevelopment of the site results in fewer than 1,000 new daily trips and fewer than 100 new peak hour trips compared to the former uses to be removed. We request your review and guidance related to site-specific traffic impact study scoping required to address Springfield Development Code Standards and the Department of Public Works Standard Operating Policies and Procedures. Existing and Proposed Site Uses Today, the site is occupied by occupied by a 143 -room Guesthouse Inn and Suites (previously the hotel was branded as a Shilo Inns Hotel and Suites) and includes a former attached restaurant and bar totaling 16,948 square feet (including a 6,048 square feet former Elmer's restaurant, a former 3,400 square feet Trackstirs Sports Bar and Grill, and a 7,500 square feet additional finished restaurant space). The site is bordered by Beltline Road to the north, Gateway Street and commercial developments to the east and Crossroads Center to the south. Today, access to the site is provided by a full movement driveway on Gateway Street located approximately 25 feet north of Kruse Way. HLENA ME. H. 128128083-SFRING17ELD CHICK -RL AI REPOR7jFINAL128C83 TRIGA£SESSMENTMEMO.00IX Sprmgfleld flick-fd-A Project#:28M3 A,mm2022 Pope As proposed, all existing site structures will be removed and the site will be redeveloped as a 4,987 square feet Chick-fil-A with a drive-through window on the north and east sides of the building. Two future general retail pad buildings are proposed including Pad A (approximately 7,000 square feet building) to the south and Pad B (approximately 6,250 square feet building) to the west. The tenants of these two retail buildings are not known at this time. The proposed site plan is attached to this letter as Appendix 1 for reference. The existing full movement driveway on Gateway Street is expected to be limited to left -in -right -in -right - out movements and new cross-over access will be provided connecting the site to commercial properties to the west and south'. The new connections will provide site -generated trips with the opportunity to enter and exit the site via the signalized access to Gateway Street via Crossroads Center. Existing Site Trip Generation Potential A trip generation estimate for the existing land use categories was estimated using trip rates and trip type date from the Trip Generation Manual, 11" Edition (published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, ITE in 2021) to provide a basis for comparison with the proposed redevelopment. For all uses, the peak hour of the generator is reported, rather than the peak hour of the adjacent street. Table 1. Trip Generation Potential — Existing Uses 'ITE published data only includes PM peak hour pass -by rate' this rate was applied to Daily and AM peak hour lacking other data. ' The left -turn movement restriction is planned in conjunction with other access changes along Gateway Street as part of the City of Springfield's Kruse Way caphal improvement project (P21165). This City project is funded by the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program, is intended to address safety issues associated with operations at the Gateway Street and Kruse Way intersection (ARTS Key # 20174), and is currently out for bidding for construction. Orals.& Associate, lot. POldmrd, Oregon Hotel 310 143 Rooms 1,143 76 40 36 86 SO 36 High Tumowr(SR-Down) Restaurant Less Pass -by Trps (43%p 932 16,9465F 1,811 -781 232 (100) 132 (57) 100 (Q3) 277 -119 141 -61 136 -S8 Net New Restaurant Trips 1,036 132 75 57 158 80 78 Total Drivtrway/External Trips TONT Pass -by Trips 2,960 (781) ME; (100) 172 (57) 136 (43) 363 (119) 191 (61) 172 (SB) Total Net Existing Trips 2,179 208 115 93 244 130 F 114 'ITE published data only includes PM peak hour pass -by rate' this rate was applied to Daily and AM peak hour lacking other data. ' The left -turn movement restriction is planned in conjunction with other access changes along Gateway Street as part of the City of Springfield's Kruse Way caphal improvement project (P21165). This City project is funded by the ODOT All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) program, is intended to address safety issues associated with operations at the Gateway Street and Kruse Way intersection (ARTS Key # 20174), and is currently out for bidding for construction. Orals.& Associate, lot. POldmrd, Oregon SWingfleld Ch ck-fd-A A,.t2022 Proposed Development Trip Generation Project #:28083 Pope 3 Table 2 presents vehicular trips associated with the proposed redevelopment per trip data in the Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition. Table 2. Proposed Development Trip Generation Estimate Weekday ��JWay PM Pro k He., ITE Daily 11111- 3,052 353 181 172 r Fart -food Restaurant with Drive- rive- Less Potential Trips far the Existing Ha[el andges[auran6 2,960 308 2,331 252 131 121 254 ]29 125 Th Through Window Resulting Difference in Driveway Trips q2 45 9 36 62 33 34 (Proposetl less Existing( Less Pau -by Trips DailyF,, 4,987 SF AM,SS%PM% (1,166) (]26) (66) (60) (]27) (65) (62/ Net New Restaurant Trips 1,165 126 65 61 127 64 63 Pad A—Strip Retail Plaza (fid 381 53 26 27 93 So 43 fin 7,000SF Less Poss-by Trips(W%)' (]30/ (]8/ (9) (9) (32) (I7) (]5) Net New Pad A Trips 251 35 17 18 61 33 28 Pad B— Strip Retail Plaza(<40k) 34048 24 24 83 45 38 tin 61250SF Less Pass -by Trips (34%l' (116) (16) (8) (8) (28) (15) (13) Net New Pad B Trips 224 32 16 16 55 30 25 Total Driveway/External Trips 3,052 353 181 172 430 224 206 Tata)Pass-by Tdps (1,412) (1 60) (83) (77) (187) (97) (90) Total Net Existing Trips 1,640 193 98 95 243 127 116 a No data provided for land Use Code 822 in Trp Generation Manoo),11"Edition. The average pass -by rate of 40% cited for ITE Land Use Code 821 seems high for site so a 34% pan -by rate from ITE Shopping Center in the hip Generation lbndbook, 3'a Edition was used as a proxy for AM, PM and daily rates. Estimated Change in Site Trip Generation Table 3 shows the anticipated change in trip generation associated with the redevelopment of the site. Table 3. Estimated Change in Trip Generation Kithelson 8 Associate; Inc. Portland, Oregon Proposed Site Redeezi proem (Table 2) 3,052 353 181 172 030 221 206 Less Potential Trips far the Existing Ha[el andges[auran6 2,960 308 172 136 363 191 172 (Toblel) Resulting Difference in Driveway Trips q2 45 9 36 62 33 34 (Proposetl less Existing( Kithelson 8 Associate; Inc. Portland, Oregon 5Poogfleld aiick-fd-A August= Project #:28093 Poge 0 Based on the 1,000 new daily trip and 100 new peak hour trip thresholds documented in Springfield Development Code Section 4.2-30S(B)2, it does not appear that a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is triggered by the proposed redevelopment. Should the future land use assumptions for Pad A or Pad B change, an additional trip comparison should be provided to assess whether an increase in site trip generation would trigger preparation of a TIS under the City's then -current traffic impact study thresholds. Traffic Management Plan Based on experiences at other Chick-fil-A restaurants, the grand opening period can experience higher trip generation rates than will occur under a "stabilized" condition. For this initial opening period, Chick- fil-A can prepare a Traffic Management Plan (TMP) that may incorporate support by local law enforcement and can include multiple levels of on-site management that can be activated or pared back as needed. Next steps Please review the trip information provided in this letter and let us know what additional traffic -related information may be required to support a land use application for site development. We appreciate your review and guidance and look forward to working with you on the Chick-fil-A land use application. PROFRs�/ 62R36PE l n OREGON P�SX, v<Y 11 1Z �BR LYNNE EXPIRES12131123 'Source: https://Iibra".gcode.us/Iib/sprimfield or/pub/development code/item/chapter 4 -section 4 2 100- 4 2105 Kittehon 8 Associate, Inc Pcm* d, Oregon Appendix 1 Proposed Site Plan C I I I I I Imm 4 m 20 4 3 I RANDY PAPE BELTINE 9 STALL: @9'X18' E4FEEE MPU PC. UP 17 P13 LS LRG 90 SEATS LOSS: 4,987 SF @9'X18' i I I "n"n" !Ni Y )STALLS @9'X18'1 'k 24.00' 16 2 1 1 7 STALLS 14 TYP 3200,. O v IN" nSITE PLAN NOTES 1. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK 2. PROPOSED CFA STANDARD CATCHING/SPILLING CURB AND GUTTER 3. PROPOSED 4" WHITE PAINTED PARKING STRIPE 4. PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT SURFACE 5. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU PAVEMENT MARKINGS REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR BUILDING DETAILS 6. PROPOSED STANDARD A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 7. PROPOSED VAN ACCESSIBLE A.D.A. STALL AND SIGNAGE 8. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED STOP BAR AND SIGNAGE 9. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU EQUIPMENT AND SIGNAGE 10. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CANOPY 11. PROPOSED A.D.A. RAMP WITH TRUNCATED DOMES 12, PROPOSED TRASH ENCLOSURE, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ELEVATION 13. PROPOSED DRIVE-THRU CONCRETE 14. PROPOSED WHITE PAINTED DIRECTIONAL ARROWS 15. PROPOSED CONCRETE PATIO W/ OUTDOOR TABLES & SEATING 16. PADS A AND B AND ASSOCIATED PARKING AND DRIVING AREAS TO BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED AT A LATER TIME. 17. PROPOSED BUILDING 18. PROPOSED 6"CURBAND GUTTER 19. PROPOSED LID STORMWATER FACILITY, SEE STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION 20. PROPOSED PHASE II LID STORMWATER FACILITY, SEE STORMWATER PLAN SHEET FOR MORE INFORMATION I ILEGEND CIVIUS PROJECT # BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER ------------ - SPILLING CURB &GUTTER a SIGN e SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT e STORM SEWER CLEANOUT ❑® STORM CATCH BASIN tli9ital files pmticcN fm abwenmeiprgW PROPOSED ASPHALT PAVEMENT '.°. PROPOSED CONCRETE I OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 3 1 2 1 1 N 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET ■ W® E o00� ma-ayo,) nq o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 RIIIIIIIIIIIIII LU I.i I.i C Q a J � _ 06z LL 0 / W Q UJ LUJ ILL 0 B �Q'^) z ILV FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIUS PROJECT # 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A1111012021 DMBy JLG ISO inmmnaicn cwaii,aa ca ms dnnw� am is aii � tli9ital files pmticcN fm abwenmeiprgW Z maY ^y bereproLxiin anY mvrrl WlFaY G exPrczz vnllenarvnbalcmvnlim G auYaizel pmRtl rcprcsWa4ves. LU SHEET U SITE PLAN O W CO SHEET NUMBER C2.0 _a Appendix 8 Parking Assessment Memorandum (Kittleson & Associates) I< KITTELSON 851 SW 6M AVENUE, SUITE 600 RTLAND, OR &ASSOCIATES P503228.52309T204 F 503.273.8169 MEMORANDUM Date: August 5, 2022 To: Andy Limbird & Andrew Larson City of Springfield Community Development Division 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Cc: Steve Schwartz & Beth Witt; Chick-fil-A, Inc. Andrew Hunt & Sean 011et, PE; 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. From: Chris Brehmer, PE & Julia Kuhn, PE Project: Springfield Chick-fil-A#04987 Subject: Parking Alternative Assessment Memo Project#; 28083 PROfFsf P �NGI NEFR /y �4 62636PE 9 OREGON 00 GL Y 11, 2, �Zv� "ER LYNN EXPIRES12131/23 Chick-fil-A is proposing to redevelop the Guesthouse Inn & Suites located at 3358 Gateway Street. The existing buildings on-site will be removed and replaced with a 4,987 square foot restaurant with a drive- through and two retail pad buildings. This memorandum provides a summary of parking demand anticipated with the proposed Chick-fil-A in support of a request for an alternative parking standard to exceed the off-street parking maximum standard in Springfield Development Code (SDC) Section 4.6.125. Based on Chick-fil-A's experiences, the proposed restaurant parking supply is needed to serve the parking demand on-site. As such, this memorandum provides technical documentation in support of the proposed alternative maximum for the Chick-fil-A only per the requirements in SDC Section 4.6.110. The retail tenants are not known at this time so the parking allowable by SDC 4.6.125 is being proposed for these pad buildings. CITY PARKING SUPPLY MAXIMUM SDC Table 4.6.2 establishes minimum off-street parking standards and SDC 4.6.125.0 states the maximum off-street parking standard for any use that is not a residential use is 125 percent of the minimum off- street parking standard. Per the table, the minimum parking requirement for eating and drinking establishments is 1 space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area. For the proposed Chick-fil-A, application of the 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking standard results in a maximum allowable 62 parking spaces (i.e., 1 space per 100 square feet x 1.25 x 4,987 square feet). HLENAME. H.' 128128083-SRRINGHELO CHICK -RL AI RARKINGI26083GARKINGASSESSMENTMEMO.00IX Sprlogfleld wick-fd-A Project#: 28M3 A,W 2022 Page t The Applicant seeks approval of additional parking for Chick-fil-A per SDC 4.6.130.N: Right Size Parking Alternative—Maximum that states: "The Approval Authority may authorize an alternative parking standard that is more than 125 percent of the minimum off-street parking standard in SDC 4.6.125. The alternative parking standard must be the peak parking demand identified by a parking generation study conducted according to the ITE Manual of Transportation Engineering Studies and prepared by a licensed engineer." ALTERNATIVE PARKING SUPPLY DETERMINATION In support of the proposed parking adjustment, we evaluated Information contained in the Parking Generation Manual, S1' Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). This reference document includes average and 8511 percentile parking rates based on the number of seats and the building size for Fast -Food Restaurantswith Drive -Through Windows (Land Use Code 934). These rates are provided for an average weekday, a Friday, and a Saturday. For both seats and building size, the Friday and Saturday time periods reflect higher demands than a Monday —Thursday. Table 1 provides the average and 85th percentile required parking calculations for the proposed Chick-fil-A based on information contained in the Parking Generation Manual for Friday and Saturday Table 1. Springfield Chick-fil-A Estimated Parking Demand per ITE Parking Generation Manual, St" Edition For retail uses, the effective capacity for parking is typically defined by the 85th percentile conditions. Based on the information shown in Table 1, the Parking Generation Manual, S`' Edition suggests that provision of 83 parking spaces could be considered appropriate (actual parking demand may be higher'). NEXT STEPS We trust this memorandum provides adequate documentation to support the proposed parking alternative maximum. Please let us know if you need any additional information as part of your review. ' Per Parking Generation Manual, 5" Edition, 85" percentile demand represents "the point at which 85 percent of the values fall at or below and 15 percent are above)" and "This number is not intended to recommend a policy about the level of parking that should be supplied. It is provided solely as qualitative reference for the analyst" Kittelson a Associate, Inc Pco* d, Oregon Appendix 9 Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Return to: Amy Chinitz, Drinking Water Protection Coordinator Springfield Utility Board 202 South 1St" Street Springfield, OR 97477 Phone: 541.744.3745 Email: AmyC@subutil.com I SPRINGFIELD 1k D Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Application Exemption Request Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Steve Schwartz Phone: 303.519.7206 Company: Chick-fl-A,Inc. Email: steve.schwartz@cfacorp.com Address: 15635 Alton Parkway, Suite 350, Irvine, CA 92618 Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Hunt Phone: 760.214.5362 Company: 4G Development and Consulting, Inc. Email: shunt@4gdev.com Address: PO Box 270571, San Diego, CA 92198 Property Owner: Attn: Richards Boyles !Phone: 5412840613 Company: Sycan B Corp+ Olypic Street, LLC Fax: Address: 840 Beltline Rd, Ste 202, Springfield, OR 97477 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17032220 TAX LOT NOS : 1300, 1600 Property Add reSS: 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield OR 97477 Associated Land Use or Building Permit Case No.: Planner: Andrew Limbird Existing Use: Motel and Restaurant Proposed Use: Restaurant Size of Proper : 4,49 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Property The undersigned acknowledges that the Information included with this application is correct and accurate. The undersigned also certifies that the total quantity of hazardous materials on the subject site will not exceed the Owned amount listed in this ap lication and will not contain Dense Non -Aqueous Phase Liquids (DNAPLs). s. 4'r ^1 'r g/JJnature �f y /(rLn�r le r L. Z Print Date: Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markarian 1 of 3 DWP Application Exemption Request Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: If you feel an item does not apply, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ DWP Application Exemption Request Form ❑ Proposal Description — provide a very brief description of the nature of the business or operation, as well as a description of how the business or operation will use, store, or produce hazardous materials Pleasesee attached project description and narrative responsewith findings for Spuny(ield Development Code (SDC) 3.3-200. ❑ List of All Hazardous Materials to be used, stored, or produced on the site (e.g., cleaning products, paints and paint products, pesticides, maintenance supplies, petroleum products, automotive supplies, etc.). Hazardous materials are defined as those chemicals or substances which are physical or health hazards as defined and classified in the most recently adopted or amended Fire Code by the City, whether the materials are in usable or waste condition. Commonly used office supplies do not need to be listed. The list should include the following for each hazardous material: ❑ Name of the product ❑ Manufacturer ❑ Total quantity of each product Response: Chick-fil-A uses cleaning, sanitizing, and disinfecting chemicals that are EPA registered products. Cleaning solvents, degreasers, and other cleaning chemicals are disposed in accordance with the manufacturer's label, Safety Data Sheets, and local, state, and federal regulations. Through daily use, cleaning chemicals are disposed into the sanitary sewer in diluted forms. Should bulk containers need to be disposed, the containers will be taken to a permitted local hazardous waste recycling facility. Revised 1/1/08 Molly Markanan 3 of 3 Appendix 10 Drainage Report DRAINAGE REPORT Chick-Fil-A - Gateway & Randy Pape 2322.14841.01 rfD PAF Q� p 1 NEF e 1M FE OIBiON 16 e D . FJOPBA= DiA7B 0k" Prepared for: ?repared by: Chick -fl -A 5200 Buffington Road AtIp O W L Atlanta, GA 30349 720 SW Washington St, Suite 750 Portland, OR 97205 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape development will construct a new fast food restaurant located southwest of the corner of Gateway Street& Randy Pape Beltline in Springfield, Oregon. The site will be developed with a drive through, parking areas, and landscaping. New sanitary, water and storm drain utilities will be constructed to service the development. The purpose of this report is to describe the stormwater management strategy being proposed for the CFA development. The design follows the standards and regulations developed by The City of Springfield as described in the Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). The City of Springfield defers to The City of Eugene's stormwater standards for the sizing of water quality facilities. The City of Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) describes that 1.4 inches of rainfall over 24 -hours must be mitigated by proposed stormwater facilities to meet pollution reduction requirements. Stormwater planters and raingardens have been proposed to mitigate runoff from the site for water quality. These have been sized following City of Eugene's approved methodology, referred to as 'The Presumptive Approach'. Proposed conveyance pipes have been sized for the 25 -year, 24-hour stormwater event. Runoff from the development has been designed to release into the public stormwater main in Gateway Street. DESIGNER CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this Stormwater Report for Chick-Fil-A— Gateway & Randy Pape has been prepared by me or under my supervision and meets minimum standards of City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012) and normal standards of engineering practice. I hereby acknowledge and agree that the jurisdiction does not and will not assume liability for the sufficiency, suitability, or performance of drainage facilities designed by me. AL pE3WL Pagel Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape I1F_3-l4:91l0111l�kI:Wks` 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW.....................................................................................1 Table 2: 1.1 Project Overview....................................................................................................1 Table 3: 1.2 Location.................................................................................................................1 Table 4: 1.3 Regulatory Requirements.......................................................................................1 Table 5: 1.4 Purpose..................................................................................................................2 2.0 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS ......................................... 2 Table 7: 2.1 Hydrologic Method.................................................................................................2 Table 8: 2.2 Design Storm.........................................................................................................2 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS.......................................................................3 3.1 Land Cover and Topography..................................................................................3 3.2 Climate...................................................................................................................3 3.3 Site Geology and Soil Characteristics....................................................................3 3.4 Hydrology...............................................................................................................4 4.0 POST -DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS...................................................4 4.1 Curve Number........................................................................................................4 4.2 Time of Concentration............................................................................................4 4.3 Hydrology...............................................................................................................5 5.0 WATER QUALITY..............................................................................................5 5.1 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................5 5.2 Stormwater Planters...............................................................................................5 5.3 Stormwater Rain Gardens......................................................................................6 6.0 WATER QUANTITY...........................................................................................6 6.1 Detention Requirement..........................................................................................6 6.2 Facility Design........................................................................................................7 7.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS.............................................................................7 7.1 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................7 7.2 System Capacity....................................................................................................7 7.3 Downstream Analysis.............................................................................................7 8.0 SUMMARY............................................................................................................7 FIGURES Figure1: Vicinity Map..................................................................................................................1 TABLES Table 1: Springfield Storm Data..................................................................................................2 Table 2: Eugene Storm Data.......................................................................................................3 Table 3: Soil Characteristics........................................................................................................3 Table 4: Existing Basin Areas.....................................................................................................4 Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas..........................................................................................4 Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas.........................................................................................5 Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary ............................................................................6 Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary ...................................................................6 AL pr3WL Page 11 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape APPENDICES Appendix A: Site Basin Maps Appendix B: Soil Report Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations Appendix D: Civil Stormwater Plans Appendix E: Conveyance Calculations Appendix F: Excerpts from Geotechnical Report Appendix G: Correspondence AL BOWL Page 111 Drainage Report I Chick-Fil-A — Gateway & Randy Pape 1.0 PROJECT OVERVIEW 1.1 Project Overview The proposed Chick-Fil-A (CFA) Gateway & Randy Pape project will construct a fast-food service restaurant with associated drive through, parking, landscaping, and utilities. The project will include additional tenant improvements on the western and southern portions of the site that will be developed in future phases, the stormwater system has been designed for the fully built condition. 1.2 Location The project site resides on one lot and is located at 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 97477 (See Figure 1: Vicinity Map). The lot to be used for this project is Taxlot No. 1703222001600. Figure 1: Vicinity Map peed i p _ 4 n Aee Project Location � AM1nEN wl 'K KMrM1Cn two 5 Y v S . Ke yuyaen Grupe way y L;L 2U51 EnEpp^"eis�� as 1.3 Regulatory Requirements The site is within the jurisdictional boundary of City of Springfield and must comply with the Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). The stormwater standards require water quality and quantity management for all re -developments. Additional details of the specific treatment, detention, and conveyance requirements are outlined in Section 5, 6, and 7. BOWL Pagel 1.4 Purpose The purpose of this report is to describe the water quality and quantity facilities being proposed as part of the project and to show that the design follows the standards and regulations developed by City of Springfield. 2.0 HYDRAULIC AND HYDROLOGIC ANALYSIS The hydrologic and hydraulic analysis for the project follows'The Presumptive Approach', as described by City of Eugene. The City of Springfield has chosen to utilize portions of Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) to address water quality and LIDA system sizing requirements. 2.1 Hydrologic Method The City of Eugene prescribes two methodologies for sizing stormwater planters and raingardens, the'Simplified Approach' and the'Presumptive Approach'. The Presumptive Approach has been selected for this project. The City publishes an Excel worksheet that conforms to The Presumptive Approach. The methodology used in the worksheet is based upon the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) and Technical Release No. 55 (TR -55) Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds. This worksheet was used to size the stormwater planters and raingardens proposed onsite. The SCS method is based on the curve number (CN) approach and uses the Natural Resources Conservation Service's (NRCS) equations for computing runoff losses and precipitation excess. The SCS method converts the incremental runoff depths into instantaneous hydrographs, which are then routed through an imaginary reservoir with a time delay equal to the basin time of concentration. Detailed descriptions of the site conditions and design assumptions used for the Pre -developed and Post -developed are outlined in Section 3 and 4. 2.2 Design Storm The design storm to be used within the City is a Type IA, 24-hour duration, based upon the rainfall depths reported on page 4-6 of the City of Springfield's Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012). These values will be used for the water quantity portion of the design. Table 1: Springfield Storm Data shows the total precipitation depths that were applied using the Type IA distribution to determine the runoff rates from the contributing drainage area. Table 1: Springfield Storm Data 2 -yr 3.30 Syr 3.80 10 -yr 4.30 25 -yr 4.80 100 -yr 5.20 Due to the City of Springfield adopting the City of Eugene's standard LIDA facilities, a'pollution reduction' or water quality storm event of period will be utilized for sizing the proposed rain gardens and planters. This value comes from Table C-1 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014). Recurrence Interval 24 -Hour Rainfall Depth (yrs) (in) 3.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Existing conditions are defined as the conditions that existed prior to the current development. The following sections outline the current topography, climate in the vicinity of the project site, site geology and soil characteristics, site hydrology, as well as assumptions related to the pre - development condition. 3.1 Land Cover and Topography The current site is developed and occupied by Guest House Inn, a motel with associated parking and landscaping. The existing onsite basin is 81.6% impervious. The existing site has slopes of approximately 1-5%, draining to catch basins throughout the site. A pre -developed curve number of 74 has been selected, assuming 'grassland' in good condition with a hydrologic soil group rating of'C', per Table 2-2a of the USDA Urban Hydrology forSmall Watesheds: TR -55 manual. 3.2 Climate The site is located in Lane County, Oregon. The area experiences distinct seasonal characteristics with gradual changes between seasons. Average daily temperatures range from 40"F to 68"F. Average annual rainfall recorded in this area is 46 inches. 3.3 Site Geology and Soil Characteristics The underlying soil types are classified by the United States Department of Agriculture Soil Survey of Lane County, Oregon and are identified in Table 2: Soil Characteristics. See Appendix B: Soil Report for additional information. Table 3: Soil Characteristics Coburg -Urban Land Complex C 26.3 Malabon-Urban Land Complex C 73.7 Group C soils have a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. There is a geotechnical report by Terracon dated January 7, 2022 with an Addendum dated August 5, 2022. An infiltration rate ranging from 0 to 2 inches per hour was found during investigations on the site. See Appendix F: Excerpts from Geotechnical Report. 3.4 Time of Concentration A time of concentration of 28.8 minutes has been calculated for the assumed pre -development condition. The pre -developed drainage path was taken to be 400 feet long, with an average slope of 0.50%. See Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations. 3.5 Hydrology The existing condition for the site appears to flow into catch basins throughout the site and release into an existing facility west of the site. It is undetermined whether this facility outlets into the public system in the public right of way to the north. The site is located in a greater drainage area that releases to Dodson Slough. Dodson Slough is listed as impaired for dissolved oxygen and Escherichia colitis (bacterium), but does not have any listed TMDL restrictions. Table 4: Existing Basin Areas lists the existing basin area, Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas lists the pre -developed basin areas. See Appendix A: Site Basin Maps for the location and extent of each basin. Table 4: Existing Basin Areas Site Condition At r a Area 1 Onsite Drainage Area' 3.651 0.822 4.473 1, 'Onsite Drainage Ama'consistsoa#amas Mat Maintoexistirgdt mwateriacitty. Table 5: Pre -Developed Basin Areas Impervious Pervious Total Site Condition Ar Area Area Onsite Drainage Area' 0.000 1 4.473 4.473 1, 'Omte Drainage Ama'consists ofall areas that drain to existing stormwater laciAty. 4.0 POST -DEVELOPED SITE CONDITIONS 4.1 Curve Number Runoff curve number calculations were completed using TR -55 methodology. The stormwater calculations have been completed with the assumption that all pervious areas have soils that are Hydrologic Soil Group 'C', see Appendix B: Soil Report for additional information. Table 2-2a of TR -55 provides an approximate curve number for commercial and business districts of 94. An overall composite curve number of 93.57 was calculated for the site, assuming 'open space' in good condition for all new pervious surfaces. 4.2 Time of Concentration A time of concentration of 5.0 minutes has been assumed for all basins under post-devel conditions. This has been used to calculate peak runoff rates for the proposed flow cc water quality methodologies. 4.3 Hydrology The proposed on-site development area is split into six sub -basins. All of the proposed basins are delineated by the drainage path they take from points across the site to their respective stormwater mitigation facilities. The proposed stormwater facilities include a combination of rain gardens and planters. Each facility has been designed with an underdrain and emergency overflow riser to ensure water quality and quantity performance standards can be met. The facilities have been designed to filter the water quality storm event through the growing media, while allowing excess flows to overflow into the emergency overflow riser. All flows leaving the facilities will exit the site via a connection into the public stormwater system in Gateway Street. Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas has been provided to summarize the proposed basin delineation and associated land use coverages. Table 6: Post -Developed Basin Areas Basin ID Area Basin 1 0.630 0.184 0.814 Basin 2 0.398 0.168 0.566 Basin 3 0.735 0.095 0.830 Basin 4 0.316 0.048 0.364 Basin 5 0.463 0.095 0.558 Basin 6 0.298 1.043 1.342 Total 3.585 0.888 4.473 5.0 WATER QUALITY 5.1 Design Guidelines The water quality facilities were designed per Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) to facilitate the treatment of all stormwater runoff from the proposed development. Per Section 1.7.2, stormwater facilities shall be designed to capture and treat runoff generated by 1.4 inches of rainfall over 24 hours for an NRCS Type 1A event. Because the facilities will route flows into the public system, they have additionally been sized to ensure that the 25 -year storm event, per Table 1: Springfield Storm Data, can pass through without causing indundation outside of each facility. 5.2 Stormwater Planters The site will utilize stormwater planters as a portion of the proposed water quality mitigation facilities. These have been designed per Section 2.3. 11 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014), utilizing The Presumptive Approach. The facilities will have 24 inches of growing medium and will not implement an underground injection control (UIC) component, per advisement by The City of Springfield during the pre -application conference dated June 9, 2022. The facilities will not have a subgrade infiltration rate of greater than 2 inches per hour and have therefore been sized as 'filtration' facilities, per Section 2.3.11., Each facility has been designed with an underdrain located below the growing medium, serving the purpose of routing treated runoff out and to the public connection. The facilities have been designed such that the rate at which flows filter through the growing medium and exit through the underdrain will not cause runoff to pass through the overflow during the water quality stormwater event. Additional flows will pass through the overflow riser to ensure that flooding outside of each facility does not occur. A summary of the stormwater planters is shown in Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary below. Table 7: Stormwater Planter Design Summary Planter 1 Basin 3 36,157 12 1,700 2.429 Planter 2 Basin 4 15,857 10 810 1,006 Planter 3 Basin 5 24,306 6 1,520 1,864 Planter Basin 58,441 12 2,410 2,580 1. Minimum rodpnnt represents r uimdsuri area d coverage to meet 'Pdbtion RetluG 'an Destration' dandartls 5.3 Stormwater Rain Gardens The site will additionally utilize stormwater rain gardens to achieve water quality mitigation for the site. These have been designed per Section 2.3.9 of the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (2014), utilizing The Presumptive Approach. The facilitieswill have 24 inches of growing medium, with an assumed drain down rate of 10 inches per hour, factored to 2.5 inches per hour. The facilities will not have a subgrade infiltration rate of greater than 2 inches per hour and have therefore been sized as 'filtration' facilities, per Section 2.3.9. A summary of the stormwater rain gardens is shown in Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary below. Table 8: Stormwater Rain Garden Design Summary Minimum rodpnnt represents r uimdsuri area &covema to Destination' dandartls 6.0 WATER QUANTITY 6.1 The project has been deemed as flow control exempt, per advisement by The City of during the pre -application conference dated June 9, 2022. The site has not been des any detention -specific facilities, and will not include restriction devices to provide flow 6.2 Facility Design In accordance with the conveyance design, each facility has been designed such that the 25 - year, 24-hour stormwater event can pass through without causing inundation outside of the facilities. This primarily will be achieved by providing emergency overflow structures in each planter and rain garden to ensure that larger stormwater events do not exceed the uptake rate of the growing media. 7.0 CONVEYANCE ANALYSIS 7.1 Design Guidelines Per section 4.03.5 of the City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012), proposed conveyance pipes must convey the 25 -year, 24-hour design storm event. A manning's n value of 0.013 will be used for all proposed pipe. 7.2 System Capacity A conveyance analysiswill be completed and stormwater pipes sized such that the proposed conveyance systems can adequately convey the 25 -year storm event without surcharging. Per section 4.03.5, surcharging will not be allowed if it will cause flooding in portions of a habitable structure. The conveyance pipes meet this requirement. The proposed conveyance pipes onsite have been modeled in Autodesk Storm and Sanitary Analysis (2022) to meet these requirements, see Technical Appendix C: Stormwater Input and Calculations. 7.3 Downstream Analysis Because this project will be redeveloping an existing site that has more impervious coverage than what is being proposed, the resultant peak flows entering the public system will be smaller than existing. Due to the decrease in flow, the project will not require a downstream analysis to prove capacity. 8.0 SUMMARY The proposed stormwater system design follows the standards and regulations developed by The City of Springfield. The site will provide water quality and quantity mitigation through proposed stormwater planters and rain gardens. These have been sized for a 1.4 inch over 24-hour stormwater event. The proposed conveyance pipes have been designed to convey the 25 -year, 24-hour stormwater event. A downstream analysis has been performed and found not to create capacity issues in the existing system. All facilities have been designed in accordance with the City of Springfield Engineering Design Standards & Procedures Manual (2012) and referenced Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual (2014) sections. APPENDIX A: SITE BASIN MAPS C 7 C ■-1 BASIN 5 24,306 SF (0.56 AC) PLANTER: 1,864 SF 4 0$ I OS 0$ OS OS OS OS 0$ KI 0$ OS OS OS 2 0 LL I OS 0$ O I o I I I 0 LL I I o I — I I o I �be I I I + I I T- RAINGARDEN 2 3 I 0 $D I I 4 1 3 1 2 ad Ve I I 1 ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL: 4.473 AC (194,844 SF) PROPOSED PERVIOUS: 0.888 AC (38,675 SF) 19.85% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS: 3.585 AC (156,169 SF) 80.15% BASIN 1: PERVIOUS=8,003 SF IMPERVIOUS=27,445 SF PAD B 6,250 SF CHICK-FIL-A 4,987 SF TOTAL=35,448 SF BASIN 2: PERVIOUS=7,304 SF I IMPERVIOUS=17,331 SF TOTAL=24,635 SF BASIN 3: PERVIOUS=4,138 SF IMPERVIOUS=32,019 SF TOTAL=36,157 SF I BASIN 4: PERVIOUS=2,075 SF IMPERVIOUS=13,782 SF TOTAL=15,857 SF I OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 BASIN 5: PERVIOUS=4,158 SF IMPERVIOUS=20,148 SF TOTAL=24,306 SF BASIN 6: PERVIOUS=12,999 SF IMPERVIOUS=45,442 SF PAD A 7,000 SF TOTAL=58,441 SF ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET E 0000 ° ° o 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 0 C B 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CO SHEET NUMBER EX -1 CIVIL'S PROJECT 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A11110/2021 DRAWN BY JLG (n Information cartel on this drat and In all digital elan produces for above named probe Z may not be reproduced in any manner wehow av Weal written or verbal consent from G authorized project repreaentaevea. SHEET U PROPOSED BASIN MAP 0 CO SHEET NUMBER EX -1 C 7 c 4 as y as as as as as O \ K3 as as as 4 434. _ `4 RD \ a\ y �y�y��, 0 N 3 .4 SO m I Imo O m �— O I I I \ O o � I OF Tc _28.8�mi:� — — — \� I / 7t I `"o I - 436' I l,l� - Y •ry , _ 436 - �f t g pA0 i .4'SS .436. - -0I° I \ _ I \\\ Ib �s\\ -437, l�----43\ -�-4-438 /;g G q36 - IP ----��pgpp--- ----— — — — — — — GG G G G \\ a -435— _ = �1 G n --- ----- - - - - -- -_436.- G G G - --C --- - - G - ' I \ I T — e / � c 43 J� G \ G G C/ oa/. ❑ _ --by" �I I I / \ I PRINTED FOR \\ I I ye A11110/2021 / DRAWN BY I (n Intormatloncontmne on0ktlra ngandinall \ I m, nre he reproduced in any manner Athow ¢z \ I II I v>Ira. preeepo I N, EXISTING BASIN MAP SS 11 I LU r I N I I I _ Q "r I EX -2 433. d Jill L I 11 _ 1,\\ 'A� K3 as as as 4 434. _ `4 RD \ a\ y �y�y��, 0 N 3 .4 SO m I Imo O m �— O I I I \ O o � I OF Tc _28.8�mi:� — — — \� I / 7t I `"o I - 436' I l,l� - Y •ry , _ 436 - �f t g pA0 i .4'SS .436. - -0I° I \ _ I \\\ Ib �s\\ -437, l�----43\ -�-4-438 /;g G q36 - IP ----��pgpp--- ----— — — — — — — GG G G G \\ a -435— _ = �1 G n --- ----- - - - - -- -_436.- G G G - --C --- - - G - ' I \ I T — e / � c 43 J� G \ G G C/ oa/. ❑ _ --by" �I I 1 ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL: 4.473 AC (194,844 SF) EXISTING PERVIOUS: 0.822 AC (35,806 SF) 18.38% EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 3.651 AC (159,038 SF) 81.38% PRE -DEVELOPED PERVIOUS: 4.473 AC (194,844 SF) 100.00% PRE -DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS: 0.000 AC (0 SF) 0.00% PRE -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PATH: 100 FT SHEET FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE 300 FT SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 �N V 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET ■ wiiill= E o00� ° 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 BOWL 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 FIIIIIIIIIIIIII LU c 0 Q z 1 J o� o LL / NW N Uj LU LL J T B Z i Q2 VI FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE N0. DATE DESCRIPTION D I PRINTED FOR \\ I I DATE A11110/2021 DRAWN BY JLG (n Intormatloncontmne on0ktlra ngandinall \ I m, nre he reproduced in any manner Athow ¢z \ I II I SS preeepo I I I EXISTING BASIN MAP SS 11 I LU I N I I I 1 ONSITE DRAINAGE AREA TOTAL: 4.473 AC (194,844 SF) EXISTING PERVIOUS: 0.822 AC (35,806 SF) 18.38% EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: 3.651 AC (159,038 SF) 81.38% PRE -DEVELOPED PERVIOUS: 4.473 AC (194,844 SF) 100.00% PRE -DEVELOPED IMPERVIOUS: 0.000 AC (0 SF) 0.00% PRE -DEVELOPED DRAINAGE PATH: 100 FT SHEET FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE 300 FT SHALLOW CONCENTRATED FLOW, 0.50% SLOPE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 �N V 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET ■ wiiill= E o00� ° 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 BOWL 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 FIIIIIIIIIIIIII LU c 0 Q z 1 J o� o LL / NW N Uj LU LL J T B Z i Q2 VI FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE N0. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVICS PROJECT4 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A11110/2021 DRAWN BY JLG (n Intormatloncontmne on0ktlra ngandinall I— dlgltal elea produced for ahoveramen probe m, nre he reproduced in any manner Athow ¢z auuof olotrhlcros from G preeepo SHEET EXISTING BASIN MAP O 0 LU DO SHEET NUMBER Q EX -2 APPENDIX B: SOIL REPORT Hydrologic Soil Group�ane County Area, Oregon a X £ x M 3 3 ApSale: 1:1,030RPnlealon A powb- t(&Sx IV)9rH. w a Nrva a ss 33 m m � ANw prnJ',rcn: wm hHUv Cxxnrrmo�tlrata: NG584 5kena:IIIM Zme1W YJG539 C51Jr1 Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 71MM22 3i Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 4 x N Hydrologic Sod Group—Lane County Area, Oregon LSDn Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 72N2D22 eal Conservation Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page 2 of 4 MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area at Were. (A09 ■ C The sal surveys that comprise your AOI ware mapped at Areaalntaest(AOII CID 1:20,090. ■ Soils ■ D blming: aSail Map may not be valid al Mile scale. Sail Rating Polygons O A G Not rated ornot available maps beyond the scale of mapping cause isunementof misunderstanding mie accuracy the detail of mapping and accuracyf soil 0 AID Water Feavtr placement,The lineplacem ent. The maps do not show the small areas Screams and Canals d contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed 0 B scale. Tmnspodaion 0 BIB .-.. Rails Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map 0 O N Interstate Highways measurements. 0 CID IIS Routes Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service 0 D Web Soil Surveil Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator(EPSG:9B5]) 0 Not rated ornot available Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Soil Raring Lines Background projection, which preserves direction and shape but distods A distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more +�+ AIB accurate calculations of distance dreams are required, B This product is generated from the USDA4gRCS carded data as �y BID of Ne version date(s) listed below. N C Sod Survey Area: Lane County Area, Oregon Survey Area Data: Version 19, Oct 27, 2021 y CID Sail map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales ,y D 1:5[),00D or larger. .. Not rated or not available Dates) genal images were photographed: Jun 12, 2019—tun Sal Rating Palms 19, 2019 ■ A The odhophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background ■ AID imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor ■ B shifting ofmap unit boundaries may be evident. BID LSDn Natural Resources Web Sod Survey 72N2D22 eal Conservation Service National Cooperative Sail Survey Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Sol Group—lane County Area, Oregon Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map lsul name Acres in A01 percent of AOI 32 Coburg-UNan land C 1.2 26.3% complex ]S Malabon-Urban land C 3.5 ]3.]% complex Totals for An. of Interest 4.7 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate ofwater infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained Orwell drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement Ofwater or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate Of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method. Dominant Condition LSM Natural Resources Web Sal Survey 7/20/2022 2allit Conservation SeMce Nalonal Cooperative Soil Survey page 3 of4 Hydrologic Sol Group—Lane County Area, Oregon Componert Percent Cuto//. None Specked Tie-break Rule: Higher LSM Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 7/20/2022 2� Conservation Serme National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of4 APPENDIX C: STORMWATER INPUT AND CALCULATIONS Chaptee4 Estimating Ruvof[ Technical Release 66 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2a Runoffcurve numbers for urban areas li Curve numbers for ---------Coverdescription--------- _--hydrologic soil group Average percent Cover type and hydrologic condition impervious areas A B C D Fully developed urban areas (vegetation established) Open space (lawns, Parks, golf courses, cemeteries, etc.) W: Poor condition (grass cover < 60%) 68 79 86 88 Fair condition (gross cover 60% to 7696) 48 68 78 84 Good condition (grass cover> 7696) ......................................... 38 61 74 80 Impervious areas: Paved parking lots, roofs, driveways, etc. (excluding right-of-way)............................................................. 88 98 ® 88 Streets and roads: Paved; curbs and storm sewers (excluding right -Of -way) . 88 98 98 88 Paved; open ditches (including right-of-way) 83 89 92 83 Gravel (including right-of-way) . 76 86 89 81 Dirt (including rigbtof--way). 72 82 87 88 Western desert urban areas: Natural desert landscaping (pervious areas only) -V ..................... 63 77 86 88 Artificial desert landscaping (impervious weed harrier, desert shrub with 1- W 2 -inch sand or gravel mulch and basin borders) 86 96 96 86 Urban districts: Commercial and business 86 88 92 94 86 Industrial 72 81 88 81 83 Residential districts by average lot size: 1/8 acre or less (town houses) 66 77 86 90 82 1/4 acre 38 61 76 83 87 1/3 acre 30 67 72 81 86 1/2 acre 26 64 70 80 86 1sure 20 61 68 79 84 2 acres 12 46 66 77 82 Developing urban areas Newly graded areas (pervious areas only, no vegetation) si 77 86 91 94 Idle lands (CN's are determined using cover types similar to those in table 2-2c). I Average mnoffcondition, and I,-0.28. a The average percent Impervious area shown was used to develop the composite CN's. Other assumptions areae follows: impervious meas me directly corrected to the drainage system, Impervious areas have aCN of 98, and pervious areas me considered equivalent W open store in good hydrologic condition. CN's for other combinations of conditions may be computed using figsae23 or 24. s CN's shown are equivalent to those of pasture Composite CN's may, be computed for other combinations of open space coverrype. Composite CN's for natwul desert landscaping should be computed using Rgues 23 or 2-4 based on the impervious area percentage (CN =98) and the pervious save CN. The pervious area CN's are assumed equivalent to desert elnub in poor hydrologic condition. Composite CN's to use for the design of temporary measures during grading and consomme should be computed using figure 28 or 2-0 based on the degree of development (impervious area percentage) and the CN's for the newly graded pervious aeae. (210 -VI -TR -M, Second Ed., Jrre 1986) 2-6 Chapters RethnaGng Ruvof[ Technical Release 55 Urban Hydrology for Small Watersheds Table 2-2c Runoffcurve numbers for other agricultural lands gazing and generally mowed for hay Brush—brush-weed-gates ndxWm with brush Poor 48 Curve numbers for 77 Cover description the major element. v Fair hydrologic soil group ---- 56 70 Hydrologic Good 30 a Cover type condition A B C D Pasture, grassland, or range—continuous Poor 68 79 86 89 Range for grazing. v Fair 49 69 84 Good 39 61 74 80 Meadow—continuous grass protected from — 30 58 71 78 gazing and generally mowed for hay Brush—brush-weed-gates ndxWm with brush Poor 48 67 77 83 the major element. v Fair 35 56 70 77 Good 30 a 48 65 73 Woods gores combination (orchard Poor 57 73 82 86 or tree farm). Y Fair 43 65 76 82 Good 32 58 72 79 Woods.& Poor 45 66 77 83 Fair 36 60 73 79 Good 30 v 55 70 77 Farmsteads—buddings, lanes, driveways, — 59 74 82 86 I Average mnolfcondltion, and 1.=024. 3 Poor: <5006)ground cover or heavily grazed with no match. Fair: 50 to 75%growd cover and not heavily grand. Good: >75% growl rover and tightly or only wessionally grazed. 3 Poor: <5006 growl rover. Fair: 50 to 75% ground cover. Good. >75% ground cover. 4 Actual curvenumber is less then 80; use CN= 80 for mnoff computations. e CN'sshownwere computed for areas with 50% woods and 50% goes (pastwe)cover. Other combinations of conditions may be computed from the CN's for woods and pasture. a Poor: FoastlitWe smWitn,wdbrusliuedeAmyedbyheavygrazingortegWarbu ng. Fair: Woods are grazed but notburned, andsomeforest tittercovetuthe soil. Good.. Woods se, protected from grazing, and litter and brash adequately cover the soil. (210 -VI -TR -M, Second M., Jwe 1986) Z-7 Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 Catchment ID: Basin :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate of 0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry mn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 2]444 sgfi Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 8003 sgft Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 35447 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 93 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design= N/Ain/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Type=l Filtration Rain Garden Facility Side Slopi Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility= Depth of Growing Medium (So @i Y�Y.'rYYSUArkE1T Facility Su Facility Surface Facility Bt Facility Bottom Ratio of FacilityArea to Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results cis Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility=q2.0 Peak Facility Overflow Rate= D.DDD cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry =of Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeet. Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility= 0.652 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= 0.143 cis Total Runoff Volume ro Stormwater Faci l try= 8220 cf Total Overflow Volume= 431 of Peak Off -Site Flow Rate Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Undercirairn 0.122 cis Drawdown Time= 1.Shours Pre-Development Runoff Data Peak Flow Rate e 0 145 cfs Total Runoff Volume =1 3868cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-0evelopment Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rate to Stormwater Facility= N/A cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= N/A cfs Total Runoff Volume OSis Facility a N/A cf Total Overflow Volume= N/A cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= N/A in Drawdown Time= N/A hours N/A Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? fMeetN/A s Requirement of No Facility Flooding? N/A Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11RIA-00S0ArkUM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 CatchmentlD: Basing :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry mn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 1]331 sgfi Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 7304 sgit Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 24635 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 91 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr at Design Soil Infiltration Re- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfatl Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood Control Facility Type=l Filtration Rain Garden Facility Side Slopi Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility= Depth of Growing Medium (So @i Y�Y.'rYYSUArkE1T Facility Su Facility Surface Facility Bt Facility Bottom Ratio of Facility Area to Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results ca Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=q12302326 Peak Facility Overflow Rate= D.DDD ca Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility=cf Total Overflow Volume= 0cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.423 ca Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 0.089 ca Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility= 5375 cf Total Overflow Volume= 16?cf Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 8.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairn D.D94 ca Drawdown Time= 02 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare- 0.101 ca Total Runoff Volume= 2688 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= ca Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11Y10-0YYSOW UM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SprinnFeld OR 97477 Catchmentl0: Basin3 :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry9prron,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 32019 sgfl Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 4138 sgfl Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 36157 sfi Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 95 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Rainfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Reduction 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Fbod Control Facility Type= Surface Length=ft Facility Side Slopes=to1 Surface Wchhs124 Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility -in Depth of Growing Medium(Soil)sin Filtration Stopnwater Planter Facility Surface Area= fi Facility Surface Perimeter-- Facility Bottom Are a= Facility Bo[ tom Perimeter- Basin Volume= Ratio of Facility Area to Impervious Area= 1700 sgfl sgfl of 36gfl 1700 360fl 1700.0 0.047 @i Y�Y.'rYYSiFYEtr Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.219 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate=0.000 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Faci Itry = 2825 cf Total Overflow Volume= 0of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 1.1 to Drawdown Time= 0.2 hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.]30 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare= 0.131 cis Total Runoff Volume ro Srorin as Faci l try= 9211 of Total Overflow Volume= 871 of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairn 0.098 cis Drawdown Time= 2.7 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare = 0.148 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 3945 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-0evelopment Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume OSis Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11Y10iIlikkAMM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 CatchmentlD: Basin4 :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry9prmn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 13]82 sgfl Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 2W5 sgfl Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 15857 sfl Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 95 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Fbod Control Facility Type= Surface Length=to Facility Side Slopes=to1 Surf ace Width=124 Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility- Depth of Growing Medium(Soil)sin Filtration Stopnwater Planter Facility Surface Area fi Facility Surface Perimeter- Facility Bottom Area= Facility Bo[ tom Perimeter- in Basin Volume= Ratio of Facility Area to Impervious Area= 810 sgfl sgfl of 182fl 810 182fl 675.0 0.051 @i Y�Y.'rYYSURUy1r Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.092 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rate= 0.000 cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry = 1199 cf Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 0.8 in Drawdown Time= 0.2 hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.316 cfs cis Peak Facility Overflow Rare=IN7 Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Facility a 3985 cf Total Overflow Volume=of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 10.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairncfs Drawdown Time= 1.2hours Pre-Development Runoff Dara Peak Flow Rare e 0.065 cfs Total Runoff Volume =1 1730 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11Y10iDRDUM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGateww-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SprinnFeld OR 97477 Catchmentl0: Basins :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry0prron,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 20148 sgfl Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 4158 sgfl Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 24306 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=l 94 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Ratnfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Reduction 1.4 inches Wato Ouali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Flood! Control Facility Type= Surface Length=fl Facility Side Slopes=lo1 Surface Wtl[hs124 Max. Ponding Depth in Stormwater Facility -in Depth of Growing Medium(Soil)sin lifltration Stormwater Planter Facility Surface Area- fl Facility Surface Perimeter-- Facility Bottom Are a= Facility Bo[ tom Perimeter- Basin Volume= Ratio of Facility Area to Impervious Area= 1520 sgfl sgfl of 324fl 1520 324fl 760.0 OD63 @i Y�Y.'rYYSiFYEtr Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.127 cis Peak Facility Overflow Rate= DDDR cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry= 1698 of Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 0.3 in Drawdown Time= 02 hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 0.469 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare=Icis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Faci Itry= 5905 cf Total Overflow Volume= of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 8.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairncis Drawdown Time= 02 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare = 0.100 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 2652 cf =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11Y10iIlikkAMM Stormwater Surface Filtration/Infiltration Facility Sizing Spreadsheet 24 Hour Storm, NRCS Type 1A Rainfall Distribution City of Eugene Name: CFAGate,sw-14841 Date: 7/26/2022 Address: 3350 Gateway St, Permit Number: #pii##pX I Flood Control SpdnnFeld OR 97477 CatchmentlD: Basins :r: ABP V. DOWL Complete this form for each drainage catchment in the project site that is to be sized per the Presumptive Approach. Provide a distinctive Catchment ID for each facility coordinated with the site basin map to correlate the appropriate calculations with the facility. The maximum drainage catchment to be modeled per the Presumptive Approach is 1 acre (43,560 SF) For infiltration facilities in Class A or B soils where no infiltration testing has been perfromed use an infiltration rate d0.5 in/hr. For all facilities use a maximum scil infiltration rate of 2.5 in/hr for topsoil/graving medium. loose' Yes" from the dropdoan boxes below next to the design standards requirements for Ihis facility. Pollution Reduction (PR)Yes Flow Control (FC)l Yes Destination(DT) No �AnIMllo-arlonnallymucxolxsmauwmmry mn,�easereemRaRm� Total Square Footage Impervious Area= 45442 sgfl Total Square Footage Pervious Area= 12999 sgfl Impervious Area CN= 98 Pervious Area CN= 74 Total Square Footage of Drainage Area= 58441 sit Time of Concentration Post Development: min Weighted Average CN=j 93 Site Data -Pre Development (Data in this section is only used if Flow Control is required) Pre -Development CN= T4 Time of Concentration Pre -Developments 28.8 min Data Tested Soil Infiltration Rate= 10 in/hr (S -None 4) Destination Design=-in/hr Design Soil Infiltration Rate- 2.5 in /hr Soil Infiltration Rate R iement Rainfall Depth Desi Stour Pdlulion Retluce. 1.4 inches WaterOuali Flan Control 3.6 inches I Flood Control Destination I 3.6 inches Fbod Control Facility Type= Surface Length=fl Facility Side Slopes=to1 Surf ace Width=124 Max. Ponding Depth in Stor.wer Facility -in Depth of Growing Medium(Soil)sin Infiltration Stormwater Planter Facility Surface Area It Facility Surface Perimeter- Faci lity Bottom Area= FacilityBottom Perimeter- Basin Volume= Ratio of Facility Area to Impervious Area= 2410 sgfl sgfl of 502fl 2410 502fl 2410.0 0.041 @iY�Y.'rYYSU1F5IdT Pollution Reduction-Calculation Results cis Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=qO.7 Peak Facility Overflow Rate= D.DDD cfs Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater "I Faci Itry = of Total Overflow Volume= of Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours Yes Facility Sizing Meets Pollution Reduction Standards? VES Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? VES JMeets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Flow Control-Calculation Results Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility= 1.019 cfs Peak Facility Overflow Rare=Icis Total Runoff Volume to Stormwater Faci Itry= 13592 cf Total Overflow Volume= of Peak Off -Site Flow Rare Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility= 12.0 in Filtration Facility Underdrairncis Drawdown Time= 3.3 hours Pre-Develo meM Runoff Date Peak Flow Rare = 0.240 cfs Total Runoff Volume= 6377c =Facility Sizing Meets Flow Control Standards? YES Meets Requirement for Post Development offsite flow lessor equal to Pre-Development Flow? El YES Meets Requirement for Maximum of 18 Hour Drawdown Time? Destination-Calculation Results cfs Peak Flow Rare to Stormwater Facility=7", Peak Facility Overflow Rare= cfs Total Runoff Volume to OS in Facility =cf Total Overflow Volume= cf Max. Depth of Stormwater in Facility=in Drawdown Time=hours _Facility Sizing Meets Destination Standards? .Meets Requirement of No Facility Flooding? Meets Requirement for Maximum of 30 hour Drawdown Time? 1.11Y10iI-A-SLIM APPENDIX D: CIVIL STORMWATER PLANS id C B 4 m VA CHICKiiiiiiiiiiiFlLiiiiiiiiiA GATEWAY &RANDY PAPE .4rmtag2 Pari PROJECT AREA v R �N _cent Ave osteo Wholesale Q PeaceHealth S_ crecl Heart Medical 9'� �7 f• VICINITY MAP SCALE: NTS PROJECT DESCRIPTION THIS PHASE OF THIS DEVELOPMENT WILL INCLUDE THE CONSTRUCTION OF A SINGLE -STORY COMMERCIAL RESTAURANT BUILDING WITH FOOTPRINT OF 4,897 SF, A CONCRETE -PAVED DRIVE-THRU, AN ASPHALT -PAVED PARKING LOT, UNDERGROUND UTILITIES INCLUDING WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, GAS AND COMMUNICATIONS, AND STORM WATER TREATMENT FACILITIES CONSISTING OF WATER QUALITY LIDAS. THIS PHASE WILL ALSO INCLUDE CONSTRUCTING THREE ACCESS POINTS AND ASSOCIATED DRIVEWAYS LOCATED ON THE EAST (ALONG GATEWAY), SOUTH (ALONG THE FREIGHT ACCESS), AND WEST (ADJACENT TO THE WESTERN PROPERTY). FUTURE PHASES FOR THIS PROPERTY WILL INCLUDE TWO COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS SHOWN IN THIS DOCUMENT AS PADS A AND B. SITE LOCATION THIS PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED ON THE SE CORNER OF RANDY PAPE BELTLINE AND GATEWAY ST IN SPRINGFIELD OREGON. THE SITE HOLDS THE ADDRESS OF 3358 GATEWAY STREET N SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477.THE PROJECT SUE IS LOCATED ON TAX MAP 1703222 AND INCLUDES TAX LOT NUMBERS 001600 AND 001300 EXISTING SURVEY MONUMENTS ARE TO BE PROTECTED DURING CONSTRUCTION OR REPLACED IN ACCORDANCE WITH OREGON REVISED STATUTES 209.140-209.155 Al PROJECT TEAM DEVELOPER N BASIS OF BEARING OREGON SOUTH STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM HAD 83 (Ml 1) BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS. DISTANCES SHOWN HEREON ARE GROUND DISTANCES, INTERNATIONAL FEET, SCALED ABOUT A CENTRAL CONTROL POINT DATUM NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL DATUM OF 1988 (NAVD88) BASED ON NATIONAL GEODETIC SURVEY ONLINE POSITIONING SERVICE OPUS STATIC OBSERVATIONS. CHICK-FIL-A ATTN: STEVE SCHWARTZ 15635 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 350 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92618 PHONE: (404) 305-4407 STEVE.SCHWARTZ@CFACORP.COM 4 ARCHITECT WARE MALCOMB ATTN: NONY RIVERA 3015 112TH AVE NE #205 BELLEVUE, WA 98004 PHONE: (425) 582-5517 NRI VERA@WAREMALCOMB.COM 3358 GATEWAY STREET, SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 LAND USE DOCUMENTS CIVIL ENGINEER DOWL ATTN: MIKE TOWLE, PE 720 SW WASHINGTON AVE, SUITE 750 PORTLAND, OREGON 97205 PHONE: (971) 280-8645 MTOWLE@DOWL.COM 3 SITE MAP SCALE: NTS 1; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TERRACON CONSULTANTS ATTN: KRISTOPHERT. HAUCK, PE 700 NE 55TH AVE PORTLAND, OREGON 97213 PHONE: (503) 742-7181 KRI STOPHER. HAUCK@TERRACON. COM E SURVEY 1 SHEETINDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE CO.0 COVER SHEET C1.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMO PLAN C2.0 SITE PLAN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 STORMWATER PLAN C5.0 UTILITY PLAN C5.1 FIRE SERVICE PLAN 11.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN 'IINSA r_rIM1141 PRE -DEVELOPMENT: CIVIL'S PROJECT M SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.651 AC (81.62%) SITE PERVIOUS AREA: 0.822 AC (18.38%) POST -DEVELOPMENT: A12021 11/10 SITE IMPERVIOUS AREA: 3.648 AC (81.56%) SITE PERVIOUS AREA: 0.825 AC (18.44%) PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 4,947 SF Z SITE PARKING: G exprcsz vnllenarveAalcrosenikm MAXIMUM PER CODE: 83 STALLS UJ ADA STALLS 2 COVER SHEET STANDARD STALLS PROVIDED 81 TOTAL PROVIDED 83 STALLS S&F LAND SERVICES ATTN: CHRIS SHERBY, PLS 4858 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD, STEW PORTLAND, OREGON 97225 PHONE: (503) 345-0328 JERED.MCGRATH@SFLANDS.COM OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 0 000 Doo 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 R C B 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL'S PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG CO immimaia�cwairea aims araa�q ara i�ai � dal8 files praticei fm abwenmeaprgW Z m Y^y be rcPraWmainanY mvrrl rMMVY G exprcsz vnllenarveAalcrosenikm G auCnizea Praptl rcprcsaYa4ves. UJ SHEET U COVER SHEET O LU (n SHEET NUMBER C0.0 _a C 31 C ■-1 In 4 as I as a5 as as as M RANDY PAPE BELTINE as — — as as as as 2 o n GENERAL NOTES: 1. CLEAN OUTS ARE REQUIRED AT A MAXIMUM OF 90 FEET ALONG A STORM LINE. Xi STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION NOTES 1. PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION RAIN GARDEN FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 2. PROPOSED STORMWATER INFILTRATION PLANTER FACILITY PER CITY OF SPRINGFIELD REQUIREMENTS 3. PROPOSED 1.5' WIDE CURB CUT 4. PROPOSED 6" PVC D3034 STORM LINE FOR ROOF DRAINAGE FROM BUILDING/DRIVE-THRU CANOPY. 5. PROPOSED 6" PERFORATED PVC D3034 STORM UNDERDRAIN 6. PROPOSED 10" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 7. PROPOSED 12" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 8. PROPOSED 12" PERFORATE PVC D3034 STORM UNDERDRAIN 9. PROPOSED 15" PVC D3034 STORM LINE 10. CONNECT TO EXISTING PUBLIC MANHOLE 11. REPLACE EXISTING 12" PUBLIC DRAINAGE LINE WITH 15" PVC D3034. LEGEND yo KRUSE WAY li 4 3 E Q �1 BOUNDARY LINE BUILDING EASEMENT CATCHING CURB & GUTTER SPILLING CURB & GUTTER LOW IMPACT DESIGN (LID) STORMWATER FACILITY SIGN SANITARY SEWER CLEANOUT STORM SEWER CLEANOUT STORM CATCH BASIN PROPOSED STORMWATER FACILITY 20 0 20 40 SCALE IN FEET 1 OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER 1-800-332-2344 ATTENTION: OREGON LAW REQUIRES YOU TO FOLLOW RULES ADOPTED BY THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER. THOSE RULES ARE SET FORTH IN OAR 952-001-0010 THROUGH OAR 952-001-0090. YOU MAY OBTAIN COPIES OF THE RULES BY CALLING THE CENTER. (NOTE THE TELEPHONE NUMBER FOR THE OREGON UTILITY NOTIFICATION CENTER IS (503) 232-1987.) 1 E o00� 0 po� Qo0 0 Chick-fil-A 5200 Buffington Road Atlanta, Georgia 30349-2998 720 SW Washington Street, #750 Portland, Oregon 97205 971-280-8641 0 W Q C Q a J � 06 z LL W Q'o Uj (LU LL `+ B \ 2 ILN FSR# 04987 REVISION SCHEDULE NO. DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIVS PROJECT M 14841.01 PRINTED FOR LAND USE DOCUMENTS DATE A12021 11/10 DRAWN BY JLG CO Inform atloncoeme, on thud vnng and In all algltal flea proaucel for above n am ei projet Z may not be reproduced in any manner wfhout G express wnttenor verb alconsenih om G autlwnretl proRtl representatives. LU SHEET U STORMWATER PLAN O LU (n SHEET NUMBER C4.0 _a APPENDIX E: CONVEYANCE CALCULATIONS Conveyance calculations will be included in future submission. APPENDIX F: EXCERPTS FROM GEOTECHNICAL REPORT August 5, 2022 Chick-fil-A, Inc. 3350 Gateway Street Atlanta, Georgia 30349 Attn: Ms. Beth 1Mtt P:(404)765-7822 E: beth.witt@cfacorp.com 1 rerracon Re: Infiltration Testing Results Report Chick at Restaurant #04987 G 3350 Gateway Street Springfield, Lane County, Oregon or Terracon Project No. 82225063 Dear Ms. 1Mtt:III/ This letter presents the results of our additional subsurface expIDPEl1En and infiltration testing for the proposed Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987 restaurant to be located at 3350 Gateway Street in Springfield, Lane County, Oregon. Our services were performed in accordance with Change Request #4 dated July 1, 2022, to our Master Services Agreement dated March 31, 2005. Terracon previously performed a geotechnical investigation at the siA, the results of which were presented in ourreport entitled "Geotechnical Engineering Report, Chick-fil-A Restaurant #04987, 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, Lane County, Oregon," Terracon Project No. 82225063, dated June 16, 2022. INTRODUCTION r The design team requested we performesting at four locations at the project site and provided a marked up Conceptual Site Plan, prepared by Ware Malcomb, dated June 16, 2022, showing the proposed locati ns. Email communications indicated that the tests should be performed at 5 feet below nd surface (bgs). This addendum describes the additional subsurface explorations and p IVs results of our infiltration testing. SITE CONDITIONS AND GEOTECHNICAL CHARACTERIZATION Site conditions at the time of our infiltration testing appeared unchanged from those described in the referenced Geotechnical Engineering Report. As part of our supplemental infiltration testing scope of services for the proposed development, we advanceerfve additional drilled borings (IT -1, IT -2, IT -3, IT -3a, and IT -4) to depths ranging from approximately 3.7 to 10 feet bgs. Soils encountered during the exploration generally Terracon Consultants, Inc. 766 NE 55TH Avenue Portland, Oregon 97213 P 156316593281 F [5031659 1287 terracmwnn Infiltration Testing Results 1 �err�con Chick -fl -A, Inc. a Springfield, Lane County, Oregon August 5, 2022 a Terracon Project No. 82225063 consisted of up to %-foot of asphalt over %-foot of base rock. The base rock was underlain by native lean clay with sand (CL). These materials are consistent with GeoModel Layers 1 and 2, respectively, as described in the Geotechnical Characterization section of t eferenced geotechnical report. Boring logs showing the soils encountered are presented in achments sh at the end of this report. A map showing the site and boring locations are the attached Exploration Plan. Groundwater Conditions We observed our explorations while drilling and after comple the presence I of groundwater during the current and previous site investigatio oundwater was encoun din B-1 during our previous 2022 investigation and in IT -3a during the infiltration testing, as shown on the boring logs at the end of this report. Groundwater levels previously observed in on-site explorations during our eadier investigation are provided on the boring logs in Exploration Results section of the referenced geotechnical report and are summarized in the following table: Approximate Depth to pproximate Depth to Groundwater while Drilling Groundwater after Drilling (feet) (feet) B-1 7 9 IT -3a 5% 5h 1. Below ground surface(bgs) 2. To prevent heating sands below the groundwater table, waterwas injected into the advancing augers within explorations B-3, 3-4, P-1 and P-2. Therefore, groundwater levelswere not recorded in these explorations. Groundwater Iuctuations occur due to seasonal variations in the amount of rainfall, runoff and other factors not evident at the time the borings were performed. Therefore, groundwater levels during construction or at other times in the life of the structure may be higher or lower than the levels indicated on lKoring logs. The possibility of groundwater level fluctuations should be considered when developing the design and construction plans for the project. STORMWATER INFILTRATION Infiltration tests were performed in general accordance with the Encased Falling Head Test method as described in Appendix G of the 2014 City of Eugene Stormwater Management Manual. The borings were advanced using a trailer -mounted solid -stem auger drill rig operated by our drilling subcontractor, Dan Fischer Excavating. Upon reaching the target infiltration depth, the auger was removed and a 6 -inch inner diameter PVC pipe was advanced approximately 2 to 3 inches into the soils at the infiltration test depth to create a seal with the surrounding soils. Then Responsive a Resourceful a Reliable Page 2 Infiltration Testing Results Chick -fl -A, Inc. a Springfield, Lane County, Oregon August 5, 2022 a Terracon Project No. 82225063 lrerracon a thin layer of open -graded gravel was placed in the bottom of the pipe to prevent scouring during placement of water for the testing. The test pipes were filled with 12 inches of water, and the soils were allowed to s r 2 hours. The water level was topped off as needed during the soaking period to maim water level. After the soaking period, we refilled the water level to 12 inches, and the drop in water level was recorded at 30 -minute intervals. Water levels were adjusted to provide a 12-incad following each reading. Measurements were taken with a tape measure and recorded to rest one- eighth of an inch for 90 minutes. Test results are presented at the end of this report, and are summarized in the following tW Infiltration Test Location Raw filtration Rate fo esign (does not inc ude safety or correction factors) 2 inches per hour IT -1 IT -2 2 inches per hour IT -3 0 inches paliakir IT -4 hes per GENERAL COMMENTS Our analysis and opinions are based upon our understanding of the project, the geotechnical conditions in the area, and the data obtained from our site exploration. Natural variationswill occur between exploration point locations or due to the modifying effects of construction or weather. The nature and extent of such variations may not become evident until during or after construction. Terracon should be retained as the Geotechnical Engineer, where noted in this letter, to provide observation and testing services during pertinent construction phases. If variations appear, we can provide further evaluation and supplemental recommendations. If variations are noted in the absence of our observation a d testing services on-site, we should be immediately notified so that we can provide evaluatioi pplemental recommendations. SI,ance upon the services and ny work product is limited to our client, and is not intended for partiesAnyuse orreliance of the provided information bythird partiesisdone solelyattheirrisk.No warrantieseither expressorimpliedare intended ormade. Site safetyand cost'ng includingexcavation supportand dewateringrequirements/design are the onsibility of others. If changes in the nature, design, or location of the project are planned, our conclusions and recommendations shall not be considered valid unless we review the changes and eitherverify or modify our conclusions in writing. Responsive a Resourceful a Reliable Page 3 EXPLORATION PLAN lrerracon Chick -fl -A #04987 • Springfield, OR GeoReport August 4, 2022 • Terracon Project No. 82225063 DIAGRAM IS FOR GENERAL LOCATION ONLY. AND IS AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY PROVIDED NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES BY MIC ROSOFT BING MAPS APPENDIX G: CORRESPONDENCE Arren Padaett From: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-ocgov> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 20224:05 PM To: Arlen Padgett Subject: [EXT] RE: Planter Sizing in City of Springfield SRemal Sender - use ca@ion when clicking links anrt opening attachments Yes that would be correct, as long as the project and area fall within the parameters of that design per the Eugene manual. Almost all projects in the city right now use wither the presumptive or simplified approach and we approve that regularly. From: Arren Padgett <apadgett@dowl.com> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2022 3:59 PM To: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-or.gov> Subject: Planter Sizing in City of Springfield Good afternoon Clayton, I am trying to get some questions clarified for a project I am working on in City of Springfield. We are planning to design stormwater planters to provide the runoff mitigation for the site, and I am trying to figure out what design methodology I need to follow. I see that in Chapter 3.0 'Stormwater Quality" of the Springfield SWMM it says that the jurisdiction uses portions of Eugene's SWMM for stormwater treatment facilities. I want to know if I need to be following Eugene's Section 2.3.11 to size the facilities, and whether I need to be using their "Presumptive Approach" that utilizes Eugene's design runoff events (see attached). Thank you, Arren Padgett Water Resources Designer DOWL (971)280-8641 1 office (971)280-8652 1 direct dowl.com Arren Padaett From: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-ocgov> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 10:52 AM To: Arlen Padgett Subject: [EXT] RE: Downstream Analysis Clarification SRemal Sender - use ca@ion when clicking links anrt opening attachments Is this for the proposed chick fit a at the corner of gateway and beltline? If so, no downstream analysis is required for that site as the site is already 100% impervious (or so close it doesn't matter) and as long as your impervious area doesn't exceed the existing impervious area there will be no increase in flow and with the requirement to meet current stormwater quality treatment requirements there will, in fact, be a decrease in peak flow due to the nature of how quality control works so those things let me find that no downstream analysis is required. From: Arren Padgett <apadgett@dowl.com> Sent: Friday, August 12, 2022 9:17 AM To: MCEACHERN Clayton <cmceachern@springfield-or.gov> Subject: Downstream Analysis Clarification Good morning Clayton, I first want to say I really appreciate how fast you were with the turn around on my last question, that helped considerably with pushing our design forward. I have another question I would like to get clarified if possible. I am now addressing the Downstream Analysis requirement for our project, and I would like to knowwhat type of delivery the city typically likes to see for this. Theway I sit right now, I have very limited information about the existing stormwater main in Gateway Street and the drainage basin or flow capacity it currently experiences. Does the City typically provide as-builts / drainage studies / etc. for developers? Project information: Chick-Fil-A Gateway 3350 Gateway Street, Springfield, OR 98477 Thank you, Arren Padgett Water Resources Designer Ill (971) 2868641 office (971) 2868652 direct dowl.cc,m