Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/15/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ Revised 1/7/14 IC 1 of 11 Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ I Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal, ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: Q Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant. complete this section) Applicant Name: Lucas and Carla McQuillan Phone: (541) 915-0896 Company: Children's Choice Montessori Email: caria0minstreAmn'esso".o'B Address: 1942 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Applicant's Rep.: Carl Sherwood, AIA and John Webster, AIA phone: (541) 342-8077 • Robertson Sherwood Architects c Company: P d@�e�hem�.com Email: i�c�a���nrnam�a.wm Address: 132 East Broadway, Suite 540 Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Lucas and Carla McQuillan Phone: (541) 915-0896 Company: Main Street Montessori Email: wriaOma'nst,eAmn'�rrore Address: 522 N 65th Street, Springfield, OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-26-24 TAX LOT NOS : 3000 Property Address: 1942 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Size of Property: 0.53 Acres ❑X Square Feet ❑Proposed of Unit; Proposed Name of Project: Children's Choice Montessori Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Adjustment of use to accommodate Standard Child Care Center (30 children) Existing Use: Home Day Care Center (16 children) New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): reduction of 240 sf Si natures: Please sign and Drint Mour name and date in the aDDrociriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 IC 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Signature I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information Identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the Imormabon will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the Information as sub d. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a ca l application. /') -- Revised 1/7/14 RL 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. Site Plan Review Application Form Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. Copy of the Deed Q Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the �/ required neighboring property notification packet. Ff State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. N/A❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre-Submitta/OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: VAII of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of /preparation. Q� All plan sets must be folded to BYE" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 Vite Assessment of Existing Conditions repared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or urveyor YThicinity Map e name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. N/A ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department N/A ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment 9r Letter of Map Revision J �/ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead WIrotection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b$ite Plan Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor N/A ❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon icensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, rash receptacles, and signs 21 Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces N/A VE] bservance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district Yn -site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ccess to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and imensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed ocation, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within '/1 mile) Revised 1/7/14 Ia 5 of 11 Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses N/A ❑ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. C. fisting Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or urveyor ocation and width of all existing easements ocation, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. N/A ❑ Location and type of existing street lighting N/A ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar ublic facilities ocation, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, idewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ocation and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate .o the complexity of the proposed project. Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. N/A d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below ❑ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development ❑ Location and width of all proposed easements ❑ Location and type of proposed street lighting ❑ Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 Ia 6 of 11 e. ndscape Plan Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director VQ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage N/A ❑1Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 S Location of existing and proposed street trees rchitectural Plans f. Existing here abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed Building structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown n -Site Lighting Plan g.Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing Z/nd attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: N/A ❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing N/A ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. N/A ❑ Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. N/A ❑ Photometric test report for each light source. N/A ❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. N/A ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11 N/A ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 N/A ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW N/A ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives N/A ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. N/A ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 N/A ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request N/A ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development N/A ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 N/A ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 Ia 8 of 11 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX. 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.spdrygfiald­or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Arenbelow this linefdled out by Applicant) __— (Please return to Clayton A&Eachern @ City ofSprb4gi2eld Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enmd: cnaealern@sprirtglleld-or. gm� Project Name: Children's Choice Montessori Applicant: Robertson Sherwood Architects pc Assessors Parcel #: 17-03-26-24 LOT 3000 Date: 6/10/22 Land Use(s): Child Care Center Phone #: (541) 342-8077 Project Size (Acres): 0.53 Fax #: (At a nunimmn5 all bases checked by the City on the front and backoftlds sheet shall be subnutted Approx. Impervious Area: 6,300 sf Email: }aetateK7mteasorane,wwa.wm Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Conversion from (existing 1,474 SF) Home Day Care Facility to Child Care Facility. 4,825 SF of driveway/sidewalks/patio cover to remain. 240 SF of driveway paving to be removed. Drainage Proposal (Public connedion(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Current rooftop gutter/downspouts run underground to gutter level at street curb. driveway surfaces drain to existing storm water area drain at East property line. Approx. 545 SF of existing driveway and parking is to be removed and converted to pervious surface landscaping, existing area drain will remain as overflow drain. Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: 545 SF of existing driveway and parking replaced with pervious landscaping. (Area below this line rdkd ord by the City andRehvned k the Aaabeand (At a nunimmn5 all bases checked by the City on the front and backoftlds sheet shall be subnutted or on application to be coaWletefor subauttal, although other requirements atay be necess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 Robertson I Sherwood I ArchlteCtS ac 132 East Broadway. Suite 540 p1541)342:8077 w a..r.bertaonaherw*u,.conn Eugene, Oregon 97401 r (540345-4302 Site Plan Review Narrative for: Children's Choice Montessori 1942 51" Street Springfield, Oregon July 14, 2022 Property Owner / Applicant Main Street Montessori 522 N 65g' Street Springfield Oregon 97478 Contact: Carla and Lucas McQuillan Phone: (541) 726-2654 Architect (Plan Preparation) Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc 132 E. Broadway, Suite 540 Eugene OR 97401 Attn: Carl Sherwood, AIA or John Webster, AIA Phone: (541) 342-8077 Project Location: Tax Map No. 17-03-26-24 Tax Lot 3000. Project address: 1942 51h Street, Springfield Oregon 97477. Project Description: The property at 1942 51n Street is currently licensed as an "In -Home Day Care Center' for up to 16 children (State provider HCF 501153). This application is for a Type II Site Plan Review approval to change the definition of the facility to a "Standard Child Care Center", allowing a maximum of 30 children, ages 2 to 6 years of age. Approvals Requested: Site Plan Review approval is requested: This application is a continuation ofthework performed under a previous Site Plan Review -Type II application (Case No. DRC2008-00070). That original reviewwas denied pending approved changes to Site access and Parking to meet Springfield Development Code standards. Attached Information: Site Plan Review Application Narrative (this document) 8 ^/a x 11 copy of Site Plan Tax Map of site Deed for the property (2008 and 2017) Title Report Recorded Shared Access Easement Agreement Site light data sheet Photos of existing ADA ramps and restroom. Full Size Plan Sets (4 copies) Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Approval Application Narrative Page 1 of 3 Site Ownership: The proposed work occurs on one tax lot: Lot 3000 The property is owned by: Main Street Montessori 522 N 65^ Street Springfield, Oregon 97478. Zoning: The site is within the City of Springfield's Urban Growth boundary in an R-3 District and per Metro Plan Designation, zoned as HDR (High Density Residential). Per SDC 4.7-125 Child Care Facilities: The proposed use (Child Care) is permitted for this zone and will meet the Children's Services Division (CDS) regulations. A 6 feet high sight -obscuring fence is surrounding all outdoor play areas. A 10 feet minimum landscape front yard setback is designated for the site. Site Access: An existing driveway from 5^ Street (East side of property) will be removed and replaced with sidewalk and curb/gutter per City of Springfield standards (Standard Drawing 3-7 and 3-12). Proposed 4 foot sidewalk connecting the street sidewalk to the existing accessible route to the building entrance. Vehicular access to the site is via an existing shared access easement (Lane County Records No. 2015- 037172). The access easement is an asphalt paved vehicular path running the length of the South property line. There are two driveways from this easement onto the site; one on the far East side (East driveway) and one midway through the site (West driveway). These two driveways will be used to access the newly designated off-street parking facilities (outlined below). Off -Street Parking Facilities: (Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-2) Parking Ratio for Employees: 1 parking space per 300 SF of gross area Parking Ratio for "Drop Off' parking: 1 parking space per 700 SF of gross area Parking Analysis Tax Lot 3000) Standard Parking: 1,474 SF 1350 = 5 spaces Drop Off Parkins: 1.474 SF 1700 = 3 spaces Total Required 8 spaces The existing parking surfaces will be restriped to indicate the new parking configuration: East driveway - Three (3) "Drop Off' parking stalls. This includes one van -accessible stall. West driveway - Six (6) standard size parking stalls (tandem stalls - two cars deep). Total provided parking = 9 spaces. See dimensioned Site Plan for sizes and configuration. Lot Bicycle Parking: (Based upon SDC, Table 4.6-155) Assisted Care and Day Cares (1 per 5 employees) 9 employees = 2 spaces required (75% long term / 25% short term) Bicycle parking provided = 1 long term / 3 short term Relocation of an existing floor -mounted triple loop bicycle rack will provide space for 3 short-term bicycle parking on the West parking area with walkways to building entrances. The bicycle rack is located directly adjacent to a gated entrance into the child play area. One wall -mounted bicycle rack will be located under the existing covered patio area to the South of the existing building. This covered patio area is located within the enclosed fence surrounding the child play area and served by an exterior wall -mounted light at the side door to the building. Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Approval Application Narrative Page 2 of 3 Site lighting: Existing wall -mounted lighting provides illumination for the immediate area around the building. Existing lighting on the front of the building serves the east parking area. A new pole -mounted (10' pole) back-to- back LED site light fixture will be installed to provide lighting for the west parking area. See attached lighting data sheet. Utility Infrastructure: The project site is served by adequate public utilities. No changes proposed. Stormwater Management: No Stonnwater management requirements per Clayton McEachern (Springfield Public Works). Changes to site include a REDUCTION of impervious paving. A 545 SF section of the existing driveway and existing gravel parking space will be removed as part of the site work, replaced with pervious landscaping (grass to match existing adjacent). The existing stormwater drain will remain and used as an overflow for water that does not sheet -infiltrate into the new pervious landscaping. Drain grille to be replaced with atrium grate. Floodplain: The property is not in a flood plain area. Wetlands: The property is not within identified areas of the Springfield Local and National Wetland Inventory Map. Drinking Water Protection (DWP): The property is located along the 1-5 year Time Of Travel Zone (TOTZ) according to the Springfield Wellhead Protection Area Map. No hazardous material storage is planned for the property beyond standard cleaning supplies. DWP exemption application has been filed with SUB. Irrigation: No irrigation system is present on the site. Existing landscaping (lawn and trees) is irrigated manually with hose bibb. Fire Protection: The existing building does not require automatic fire sprinkler systems per Code. Emergency vehicle access is available along the South property line, with access to all sides ofthe building within dimensional limits. The site is served by an existing fire hydrant, located 31'-6" north ofthe Northeast corner of the property. Building Height: The restriction on building height in the HDR zone is 35 feet. The existing height of the building is less than 20'-0". No changes proposed. END OF NARRATIVE Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Approval Application Narrative Page 3 of 3 Robertson I Sherwood I ArchlteCtS ac 132 East Broadway. suite 540 x1541)342:8077 www.robeasonsherw*W.com Eugene, Oregon 97401 r (540345-4302 Site Plan Review Photos for: Children's Choice Montessori 1942 5"' Street Springfield, Oregon Property Owner / Applicant Main Street Montessori 522 N 65g' Street Springfield Oregon 97478 Contact: Carla and Lucas McQuillan Phone: (541) 726-2654 Project Location: Tax Map No. 17-03-26-24 Tax Lot 3000. Project address: 1942 5th Street, Springfield Oregon 97477. Front porch: QI Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 1 of 5 ---CAW- Children's --C Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 2 of 5 Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 3 of 5 Bathroom: Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 4 of 5 END OF PHOTOS Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 5 of 5 Pre -Certification Consultation -Certified Center Page_ of Date of Visit 7/14/22 Facility Name Telephone Number Children's Choice 0010(12) Facility Address Facility Email Address 1942 5th St, Springfield OR caria@mainstreetmontessori.org Contact Name Telephone Number (if different from above) Carla McQuillan x Rules Discussed: x 0010(12) Building codes and zoning requirements x 0010(8) Floor plan submission x 0070(6) Enrollment in the central background registry x 0080 Director qualifications x 0090 Teacher qualifications x 0013 Inspections including fire and sanitation x 0205 Lead x 0190 Location and quantity of toilets and handwashing sinks x 0150 Space and equipment requirements for outdoor activity area x 0130 Caregiver -to -child ratios and group size x 0010 Application: required documents and fee Specific to Infant and Toddlers: x 0140 Determining capacity x 0190(5) Location of changing tables and handwashing sinks Capacity for center care is defined as: the total number of children allowed in the center at any one time, based on the available indoor and outdoor square footage, the number of toilets in the center and the number of qualified staff. Calculation of Activity Area and Capacity Sq. Ft. Planned Use Abe Range Available at All Times Potential Capacity yes No Room 173.97 infant/toddler area 4 Room 130 preschool area 1 Room 200.7 preschool area 2 Room 304.63 preschool area 3 Room 88 office area to be converted (preschool) Room 20 approx. area by bathroom (preschool) I ­- 1743sqIt I20 Numberof toilets (1:15 children 36 mo. or older): 3 Numberof hand washingsinks (1:2toilets): 2 Outdoor Activity Area (75 sq. ft per child): 1 Sq. ft. =4095 children Jill Bodner Signature: Licensing Specialist 07/14/2022 Date MAW a 5/22/19.v2 Pre -certification visit conducted by JB and CP with owner CM. We discussed plans to expand both bathrooms and to create a separate infant/toddler space. The remodeling of the infanthoddler bathroom should allow for supervision of changing area from main classroom space and easy access to the hand washing sink. In order to meet capacity goals, you may convert some current office space into usable preschool space. We also talked about the increased standard of supervision required for CC versus CF; taking down some walls and/or adding mirrors will help ensure full visibility and supervision of all spaces. We also discussed: -if you are going to have children under 1 year in with children over 24 months you will need to apply for an exception; must have designated space for non-mobile infants available -the infant/toddler window exit must be 5 square feet; current window opening is just under required size -if infanWtoddlers and preschool are together on the playground the entire group must follow the ratio for the youngest child; not necessary if age groups have separate spaces -staff who have worked as Assistant 2's for over one year can use that experience as teacher qualification -infant teacher must have qualifying experience with infanWyoung toddlers I left you with Packet One and a paper copy of the CC rule book. Based on our preliminary measurements, intended uses of existing space, and your stated plan for remodeling, we anticipate a capacity of 24 children in total. Following the remodeling we expect that the facility will be able to be approved as a Certified Center. CITTAW a 5M/N.•2 Robertson I Sherwood lArchitects ac 132 East Broadway. suite 540 x(541)342:8077 www.robeasonsherw*W.com Eugene, Oregon 97401 r (540345-4302 Product Information for: Children's Choice Montessori 1942 5"' Street Springfield, Oregon Property Owner / Applicant Main Street Montessori 522 N 65g' Street Springfield Oregon 97478 Contact: Carla and Lucas McQuillan Phone: (541) 726-2654 Project Location: Tax Map No. 17-03-26-24 Tax Lot 3000. Project address: 1942 5th Street, Springfield Oregon 97477. See the following documents for Specific Product information to be used on site. Children's Choice Montessori Robertson/Sherwood/Architects pc Type 11 Site Plan Review Photos Page 1 of 1 1000Bulbs- 2D2 age 101 Page 1/1 PLTS-11969 100W 5K T3 Luminaire Watts 100 W GL Ballast/Driver Factor 1.00 Back -to -Back Light Loss Factor 1.00 Total Proration Factor 1.00 Luminaire Lumens 14053 Ims m 27 Min: 0.50 fc X Max/Avg: 7.9 J I loft Avg: 6.5 fc Avg/Min: 13 Max: 51 fc + -Max/Min: 102 V don 190 09YN9Y UgM1 JAmly %1m. 0 Wash-Waree3423ADA Series Semi -Circular Models - 3 or 4 Stations - ADA Compliant 3424 -ES -ADA -1 -HI 3424 -ADA -2-H Fixture May Show Some Available Options Please visit www.dCorneng.com for most current specifications. Semi -Circular Models - 3 or 4 Stations - ADA Compliant Bowl and Sprayhead are type 304 stainless steel with satin finish. Bowl is 38" wide, and has an integral backsplash and spayhead. Heavy-duty S -clips securely anchor the backsplash to the wall. Spayhead is 15" diameter x 5-1/4" high. Standard Housing is black vinylclad, galvanized steel panels on both sides and a type 304 stainless steel panel with satin finish on the front side. Base is also stainless steel. ES Series feature a contoured 16 gage, type 304 stainless steel pedestal housing with satin finish. One piece housing and Flush mounted access cover allow for easier installation and servicing of unit. ADA Compliance. Units conform to ANSI, UFAS and ADA requirements for accessibility. Compliance is subject to the interpretation and requirements of the local code authority. Soap/Toiletry Tray on top of spayhead is standard. There are additional self -draining, air -circulating soap dishes on each side of the bowl. Sectional Control is standard. One pushbutton or sensor actuates one station. Hand Pushbuttons (suffix option -H) operate metering non -hold open Air -Control Valves and can be field set for Flow ranging from 5 to 60 seconds. Pushbutton requires less than 5 pounds of force to activate valve. Electronic Sensor Operation (suffix option -SO) includes individual solenoid valves activated by infrared sensors. A low voltage transformer is provided. Foot Pushbuttons are not available on these models. Spay Nozzles are vandal -resistant and provide a concentrated 0.5 GPM spay at each station. Hot & Cold Supplies are blended in an ASSE 1070 compliant temperature/pressure balancing mixing valve with integral checks and strainers. A minimum of 30 PSI supply pressure is required. Waste Connection is a 1-1/2" OD x 4" tailpiece. GUIDE SPECIFICATION Provide and install Acorn ADA Compliant Washfountain(specify model number and options) factory pre - assembled, with individual sectional control. Bowl shall a 14 gage stainless steel and shall have an integral backsplash. Spayhead shall be 18 gage stainless steel. Spay nozzles shall be vandal -resistant type with 0.5 GPM Flow controls. Provide self -draining, air -circulating type soap/toiletry tray on top of spayhead, and soap dish on each side of bowl. On -Floor and Off -Floor Models shall have backsplash and housing framework anchored to wall. The wall shall be structurally reinforced to support the fixture. Standard base On -Floor Models shall have additional Floor anchoring. Provide an ASSE 1070 compliant temperature/pressure balancing mixing valve with integral checks and strainers in H & C supply and field set water temperature at 105 degrees Fahrenheit. When hand operated non -hold open metering valves are specified, timing cycle shall be field set for approximately Page 1 W.3423ADA Revised: 01/03/22 Acorn Engineering Company • 15125 Proctor Avenue • P.O. Box 3527 • City Of 1rMustry, CA 91744-0527 U.S.A. Tel: (800) 488-8999 • (626) 336-4561 • Fax: (626) 961-2200 • www.acOrnerg.oem • E-mail: info@acorneng.com Wash -Ware®: 3423ADA Semi -Circular Models - 3 or 4 Stations - ADA Compliant 4' MODEL NUMBER AND OPTIONS SELECTION BASE MODEL NUMBERS (Must Specify) ❑ 3423 -ADA Semi -Circular, Three Station ❑ 3424 -ADA Semi -Circular, Four Station ❑ 3423 -ES -ADA Semi -Circular with Contoured ❑-PPZ Base, Three Station ❑ 3424 -ES -ADA Semi -Circular with Contoured ❑-SO Base, Four Station FIXTURE MOUNTING AND WASTE (Must Specify) (1-1/2" O.D. Tailpiece Provided Standard) LJ -1 Off -Floor, Wall Outlet LJ -2 On -Floor, Wall Outlet OPERATION (Must Specify) ❑-H Hand Operation ❑-PPZ Programmable Piezo Pushbutton (Not ADA Compliant On -2 On -Floor Units) Electronic Metering ❑-SO Sensor Operation ❑ -SO-BAT Sensor Operation, Battery Powered Metering Liquid Soap Dispenser (Batteriae Not included) Note: Fant operation is not available on these .*del$. Please visit WWW.acorcleddgxoro for most current specifications. RVl4 PRODUCT OPTIONS (Must Specify) ❑ -CB Column Braced to Backsplash ❑ -DV Liquid / Lotion Soap Dispenser ❑ -EG Enviro-Glaze Color, Bowl and Sprayhead NN Spedry: ❑ -HB Hose Bibb, Spedry: ❑ Left Side ❑ Right Side (Not ADA Compliant) ❑ -JH31 31" Junior Rim Height (Not ADA Compliant On -2 On -Floor Units) LJ -LES Less Backsplash ❑ -PCB Pipe Column Brace (Roe By Others) LJ -PDM Metering Liquid Soap Dispenser (Not Available with -PCB, -TM, or -TS) LJ -SPX 16 Gage Stainless Steel Housing (Standard on -ES Contoured Base Unite) LJ -ST Single Temperature Valve LJ -TM C or Multi -Fold Paper Towel Dispenser 3 (Not ADA Compliant) LJ -TS Single -Fold Paper Towel Dispenser (Not ADA Compliant) NN 2 1 1 2 44" 1118) 3 V. 282" 1�4) (40806 ) (724) NOTES: 1.-H Pushbutton. 3423/3424 -ADA -1-H 2. Spray Noale. 3423/3424 -ADA -2-H Page 2 W.3423ADA Revised: 01/03/22 Acorn Engineering Company • 15125 Proctor Avenue • P.O. Box 3527 • City of Industry, CA 91744-0527 U.S.A. Tel: (800) 488-8999 • (626) 336-4561 • Fax: (626) 961-2200 • www.acornerlg.com • E-mail: info@acorneng.com 5 4 n®vgas•W 3 2 1 3200 3300 1.04 AC SBr JE ai].W' 3201 e 0.5 AC rvW�syw ais W aor uao3sw iso 3101 = 3102 $ 1.29 AC a 0.15 AC � asssw sery,E zar 3100 0.53AC 0 3000 AC 0.53 AC ----—--------------------- 019-00 --`u019-00 91' A 2702 2709 2700 -------------- N iv F ParcelID: 0218956 Tax Account 7t: 1703262403000 1942 5th St, Springfield OR 97477 This map/plat is being furnished as an aid in locating the herein described land in relation to adjoining streets, natural boundaries and other land, and is not a survey of the land depicted. Except to the extent a policy of title insurance is expressly modified by endorsement, if any, the company does not insure dimensions, distances, location of easements, acreage or other matters shown thereon.