Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 7/20/2022Pre -Submittal Meeting Development and Public Works Department Reem 61 PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE: Friday, July 29, 2022 10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. DPW GenfelFence Room 616 Pre -submittal (Site Plan Review) #811 -22 -000174 -PRE 811-22-000178-PROJ Nation's Mini Mix Assessor's Map: 17-02-33-21 n: 800, 1203 & 1204 Address: 811 & 813 53r° Street Existing Use: LMI Applicant is submitting for Site Plan Review to come into conformance with City's development code. Planner: Drew Larson Meeting: Friday, July 29, 2022 10:00 — 11:00 via Zoom VICINITY MAP 811 -22 -000174 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-02-33-21 TL 800, 1203, 1204 811&81353'dSt. Nation's Mini Mix L VICINITY MAP 811 -22 -000174 -PRE Completeness Check Meeting 17-02-33-21 TL 800, 1203, 1204 811&81353'dSt. Nation's Mini Mix ',City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPNINOFIELIM Application Type (Applicant., check one) Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ® Major Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal! ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: LlMa'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this sectio Applicant Name: Robin R Nations, LLC Phone: 541-686-3031 Company: Nations Mini Mix N d Email:robin@V�n�,alt-ionnsscminimizcom Address: PO Box 394, Walterville, OR 97489 QFC MIA I j M'111 Applicant's Rep.: Ryley McDowell, Assistant Planner Phone. 541-302-9830 Company: Metro Planning, Inc. Email: ryley@metroplanning.com Address: 846 A St., Springfield, OR 97477 Property ert Owner: Same as Applicant Phone: Company: Email: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-21 TAX LOT NOS : 00800, 01203, 01204 Property Address: 811 53rd Street & 813 53rd Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 3.39 TOTAL Acres ® Square Feet LJP No. of rroposed : N/A Proposed Name of Project: Nations Mini Mix Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Site Review re Case No. 811 -21 -000291 -COD Existing Use: Light Medium Industrial (LMI) New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 25,703 sf Si natures: Please si n and rint our name and date in thea Associated Applications: propriate box on the next a e. Signs: y/ Pre -Sub Case No.: ~ -22411 -/� I r ate: I I N/ y Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: ff11 Application Fee: $ b Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ 1 0 PROJECT NUMBER: -D11� Rol Revise9 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 X.cof'h Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby ackno t I/ we are legally responsible for all statutory timelinK, I tformaKnAequests arldrequirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed an this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted, This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 222.118 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date: Signature Print Revised 1/1/14 KL 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. R,Ais d 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. © Site Plan Review Application Form Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. Copy of the Deed Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/z"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. R Completed Attached Scoping Sheet Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ® All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ® All plan sets must be folded to W/a" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ® Vicinity Map ® The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. ® The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department I /1aThe 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department �B Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ® Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. ® Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ® Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections ® Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces kRObservance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district ® On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation ® Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed ❑ Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces i /1U Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/z mile) Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11 f.. Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses 1`0 Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. C. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ❑ Location and width of all existing easements ® Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. ® Location and type of existing street lighting ® Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities ® Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ® Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. ❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below ® The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components ® Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development @Zll Location and width of all proposed easements ® Location and type of proposed street lighting ® Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan ❑ Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director ❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage ❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 ❑ Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans EE Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan ® Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: ® List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing fes, Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. ® Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. ❑ Photometric test report for each light source. ❑ An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 KL 7 of 11 ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 of 11 SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS �EGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-or. gov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet;' provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping street until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at httn://www.sprina ield- orgov/DPW/DPW/Eneineerin�dConstructionResowees ht nht n under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Farms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE. City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmceachern@springfield-or.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 SPRINGFIELD • - • • 6&� DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541 726.3753 FAX541.726 1021 www. springfieid-or go v STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ­ --------------------- (Area befow this line felled out by Applicant) -------- (Please return to Clayton McEachern ® City of Springfield Development and Public Works; Fax #736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), email, cmceachern au pringfield-or.gen Project Name: Nations Mini Mix Applicant: Robin R Nations LLC Assessors Parcel 4: 17-02-33-21-00800,01203, 01204 Date: 7/12/2022 Land Use(s): LMI Phone #: 541-302-9830 Project Size (Acres): 3.39 (total of all 3 tazlots) Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: 25,702 it Email: ryley@metroplanning.com Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): This application is in response to Code Compliance for Case#: 811 -21 -000291 -COD. ❑ Hillside Development: Drainage Proposal (Public com eetiorl discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheets) if necessary: Exisiting drainage system supports the subject propoerty already. Attatched site plan shows this system and how it sufficenity serves the property. ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: A stomneater line exists along the north side of G street. The side street drainage system support current stormrmwater patterns. ❑ Other Jurisdictions ------------ (Area below thisfin rdl d t by theCit, d Ret d to tiApplicant) ---------------- (At a minimum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back of this sheet strait be submitted or an a lication to be complete for submittal, although other requirements may be necessary,) Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note. UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email-. cmceachem@springfield-o,gov, FAX., (511) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS * Based upon the information provided on the front of this sheet, the following represents a minimum ofwhat is needed for an application to be complete jor submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu oflhe Springfield Development Cade (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval; Additional site speck information may he required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Design Staudards/Water Quality (EDSPM Cha ter3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All nOn-building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered eaiehbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 ofthe Eugene Stor ovater Management Manual. For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2.4.1). if a stormwater treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. ❑ ❑ All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building shall be orovided with secondary containment or weather resi dant enclo num U U Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the slate of Oregon. ❑ F-1 A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ❑ F7 Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. "This form shall he included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stermwarer study. "IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW dND SIGN! As the engineer of record, i hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted strop water study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ Elevations ofthe HOL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). n❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan act. Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load ❑ ❑ without failure ofthe pipe structure. ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-t ofthe EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity ofthree(3) feet oa, second at 0.5 nine fidI haled on Tahle 4-1 as well "This form shall he included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stermwarer study. "IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW dND SIGN! As the engineer of record, i hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted strop water study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stoonwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (F,DSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to the website: htio://www.deostate.or.us/wq/uic/uiahtm for more information. ❑ ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. "This form shall he included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stermwarer study. "IMPORTANT. ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOW dND SIGN! As the engineer of record, i hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted strop water study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 Written Narrative Nations Mini Mix Site Review Application Submittal 1 Da Document Date: 7/12/2022 i; Applicants Request: Site Review for Case#: 811 -21 -000291 -COD ASC awv5 Property Owner/ Applicant: Robin R Nations LLC IB=RRO &VtW0mK L 1W PO Box 394 Walterville, OR 97489 BAS A STREET SBR[KGnELO. OREGON 97477 1341)302-9830 w AEWP4 NINccoM Applicant Representative/ Ryley McDowell, Assistant Planner Project Coordinator: Metro Planning, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Subject Property: 17-02-33-21 tax lot: 00800, 01203, 01204 Property Size: 3.39 acres (total of all three Tax Lots) Zoning: Light -Medium Industrial (LMI) 1IPage Background: This application is for a site review of a property located at Map & Tax Lots 17-02-33-21-00800/01203/01204, The applicant is submitting this application to meet code compliance for Case#: 811 -21 -000291 -COD. The applicant is not requesting any further expansion; therefore, number of employees is set to stay the same. The subject site is 3.39 acres combined and is zoned LMI meaning it has a minimum FAR requirement of.25. This application does not include any proposed improvements therefore it will not exceed any impervious surface or FAR maximum allowances. The density proposed for this site will be at least .25 Far given all minor structures and three buildings that exist, and each do not exceed anywhere near 50Y. the total site. The result is a FAR above the minimum .25 in the base zone LMI but below any 50% total coverage thresholds. See A.3 below) 3.3-1010 Minimum Density and General Development Standards The General Development Standards for Mixed -Use described in Section 3.2-625 describe the pedestrian -friendly and transit oriented design standards that apply to mixed use and nodal development. These standards apply to development within the ND Overlay District. In addition to those standards found in Section 3.2-625, the following apply: A. Minimum Density and Floor Area Ratio (FAR). FAR means the amount of gross floor area of all buildings and structures on a building lot/parcel divided by the total lot/parcel area. A 2 story building that covers 50 percent of a lot/parcel would hove o FAR of 1.0. Typical suburban FARs range from 0.3 to 1.0 in mixed-use centers. 1. Where the base zone is LOR, new subdivisions shall achieve a minimum residential density of 6 units per net acre. Minimum residential density in MDR or MUR shall be 12 units per net acre, in HDR it shall be 25 units per net acre. The combined net residential density within a node or mixed-use center shall be 12 units per acre or more. Where the base zone is NC, CC, MRC, MUC or GO, the minimum floor area ratio (FAR) is.40. Where the base zone is LMI, Cl or MUE, the minimum FAR is 0.25. Response: Building 1 (Shop) is a two-story building and is 5,498 sq ft. Building 2 (Office) is a one-story building and is 3,673 sq ft. Building 3 which is connected to building 1 (Covered Area extension of shop) is also a 2 -story building and is 1,982 sq ft. In total, the structures cover about 11,153 sq ft out of 147,668 sq ft or 13%. Building 1 does not exceed 50% coverage nor does the other two structures and therefore the FAR for this site is less than 1.0 but higher than the minimum required of.25. This is including all other minor structures shown on the site plan (see attach site plan for dimensions of all structures) B. Building Setbacks. 1. Buildings occupied by commercial and industrial uses shall be set back a maximum of 20 feet from the street. There is no minimum setback from the street for commercial and industrial uses. 1. Residential uses shall be set back a maximum 25 feet from the street. 3. Where the site is adjacent to more than 1 street, a building is required to meet the above maximum setback standards on only 1 of the streets. 21 Pa ge Response: All buildings on this site which is zoned Light -medium -industrial have setbacks of a maximum 20 feet. C. Parking Between Buildings and the Street. 1. Automobile parking, driving, and maneuvering areas shall not be located between the main building and a street. 2. For sites that abut a street, parking shall be located at the rear of the building or on one or both sides of a building when at least 40 percent of the site frontage abutting the street (excluding required interior yards) is occupied by a building and/or on enhanced pedestrian space. Response: The site collectively does not have at least 40% site frontage. However, there is existing parking located at the rear of the building. The structures were built prior to this code amendment and the site was under different ownership. The client inherited these conditions therefore this section is not applicable. Parking is located in front of the office and within the fenced area to the west of the existing shop (See attached existing conditions site plan) 31 P a g a