HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/8/2022City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
Isrw�Ncrr�
:Application Type (Applicant., check one)
Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal:
Partition Tentative Submittal: x Subdivision Tentative Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Applicant Name: Rich Lorimor I Phone: 503-413-9815
Company: Bash Residential, LLC
Fax:
Address: 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223
Applicant's Rep.: Katie Keidel, Associate Planner i Je.1
Md
pp
Pho ie: 541-302-9830
Company: Metro Planning, Inc.
Fax:
Address: 846 A St., Spfld, OR 97477
Property Owner: Michael Covalt
Phone: 970-631-6800
Company: Bash Residential, LLC.
Fax:
Address: 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30-34
TAX LOT NO
5 :03501
Property Address: 1417 31 st St., Springfield, OR 97478
Size of Pro ert : .30
Acres 17t 5 uere Feet ❑
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your
Proposal: Not partition
proposal description to this application.
Existing Use: vacant
At of Lots/Parcels: 2
Total acreage of parcels/
allowableadg .30
Proposed #
Dwellunits 2
Si natures: Please sin and print vour name and date in thea ro riate box on the next aye.
Required Project information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications- Si ns:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Case No.: V
//��(�ryry (� I�
J —�� JWV �7-1! ✓ Y Z
Date:
Reviewed by:
A lication Fee:
• Ub
Technical Fee:
�A�
I, osta a Fee: -/
�l
TOTAL FEES: $ �� 1
5
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 kl i of 10
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
FPre-Submittalrsigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
e owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
ereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date:
Signature
Print
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a
complete application.
Date:
Signature � 1
6. V t -r
Print
Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10
City of Springfield
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Attn: Drew Larson
June 14, 2022
Re: Incomplete Items - Pre -Submittal Checklist
Case Number: 811 -22 -000065 -PRE
Project: 2 -Parcel Partition
Site Address: 1417 31" St., Spfld, OR 97478
Map & Tax Lot Number; 17-02-30-34-03501
Drew,
946 A STREET
S-CNG11;n, OREGON 97411
S4I}302-9931L
wN W ME-RCPaNN3NG.00M
The following addresses each of the City of Springfield Pre -Submittal Checklist Completeness Review Items for the
Lorimar— 2 -Parcel Partition. The Proposed Tentative Partition Plan written narrative and drawing set )attached) are
updated to meet all completeness requirements.
Springfield City Staff Completeness Items are indicated below by dark blue text, bold and/or italic typeface; Applicant's
responses are indicated by black text and plain typeface.
City Planning Completeness Item Notes
1. The Title Report must be Issues within 30 days of submittal, double check prior to submission.
Response: Arecent title report dated 03/31/22 is attached.
2. Minimum 7' Public Utility Easement along the entire frontage will be required. The shared stormwater facility
and lines will need their own easements and operations and maintenance agreement.
Response: Assuming the city is fine with the storm water facility location and size an easement will be created on the
final plat to cover it. This can be made a condition of approvalalong with the oand in agreement.
A 7' PUE along the entire frontage on 31" Street is indicated on the revised Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
3. Show the hydrant and power poles locations.
Response: These are indicated on the revised Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
4. Show existing street lighting including type and height.
Response: These are indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
S. Show the extent in which 31'T Street is paved and show driveway connection.
Response: This is now shown on the revised Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
6. Show required street frontage improvements and specific details; Public Works.
Response: This is now shown on the revisedTentativePartition Plan drawings.
2. Show Street trees and provide detail and size (1"caliper minimum) and type.
Response: This is now shown on the revised Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
8. Provide a utility plan showing size and location of all existing and proposed utilities. Ensure you work with
SUB water and electric prior to submittal to ensure capacity In the area can serve the 1 -parcel partition
including fire flows. This Information must be submitted with Tentative submittal for staff to find compliance
with SOC S.12 -125C; please note any upgrode/requirements in the narrative.
Response: Utilities are now indicated on the revised Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
Public Works Enaineerina Completeness Item Notes
1. Lot is In the 2 Year Time of Travel Zone.
Response: Narrative adjusted from 5 -Year ToTz to 2 -Year.
2. it Is listed in the narrative, but not shown on the existing conditions plan.
Response: Time of Travel Zone indicated in Notes section of Existing Conditions Plan drawing.
3. A 7' PUE is required to be dedicated along 31" Street AND with the shared stormwater facilitya drainage
easement and no build area will be required on parcel 1. A sewer easement for service to parcel will also
be needed.
Response: These items are completed and indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawing set,
4. No onsite service locations or routing is shown for utilities. All overhead utilities must be located
underground.
Response: All utilities will be located underground.
Onlysanitaryseweris shown for existing utilities, no power, telecom, water shown. Pavement limits of the
street on 31" not shown, the driveway is required to be paved from the existing edge of asphalt at least 18'
into parcel 2.
Response: All items are now indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
While referenced in the narrative, no stormwater Information presented. A report with the infiltration tests
and the calculations is required. An infiltration test of 10" is claimed but only be used if the planting
medium for the rain garden can be shown to infiltrate at that rate, typically this medium Is 2-3 inches an
hour. No grading or treatment calculations provided for the driveway. A detailed cross section and planting
plan Is required for the min garden, as is an O and M agreement. This agreement and maintenance will be
the sole responsibility of parcel l since it is entirely contained on parcel l and will require an easement.
Response: All of the stormwater information, including infiltration tests and calculations have since been submitted to
and acceptedas complete by Public Works.
If there are any questions or concerns regarding the above Memo Items, or regarding any parts of this Tentative
Subdivision application, please do not hesitate to contact me via email or by phone.
Sincerely,
Katie Keidel
Associate Planner
Metro Planning, Inc
kkei del Cd metroalan ni ne.co m
(541)302-9830
TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR
BASH RESIDENTIAL, LLC
■r� /
Submission No.
Document Date:
Applicant's Request:
IMBINNAWMANWR0.TRIrsRROI
Property Owner/ Applicant:
W A STREET
SPRINGHEtD. OREGON 97477
15411302-9830
WWW.METROPIANNINGCOM
Civil. Engineer:
Surveyor:
Project Planner:
Subject Property:
Location:
Property Size:
Zoning.,
Comprehensive Wan:
Number of Parcels Proposed:
Size Proposed Parcel 1:
Size Proposed Parcel 2:
2
06/16/2022
Approval of 2 -Lot Tentative Partition Plan
Michael Coval
Bash Residential, LLC
12600 SW 72nd Ave.
Tigard, OR 97223
.Eric Favreau, P.E.
Favreau Engineering
2206 Country Haven Dr
Eugene, OR 97408
(541)556-4425
Ryan Erickson, PLS
EGR & Associates, Inc.
25356 Prairie Road
Eugene, OR 97402
Katie Keidel, Associate Planner
Metro Planning, Inc.
846 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
(541)302-9830
Assessor's Map 17-02-30-34
Tax Lot 3501
1417 31" Street
Springfield, OR 97478
0.30 acres (13,068 sq. ft.)
LDR (Low Density Residential)
Low Density Residential (per Metro Plan)
2
5,670 sq ft
5,217 sq ft (excluding panhandle)
7,117 sq ft (including panhandle)
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 11
Background
The applicant is proposing to partition one (1) .3O acre parcel into two (2) parcels, Assessors Map & Tax Lot 17-02-30-
34-03501 (the "subject property"), is located on 31" Street near Olympic Street. The existing parcel is vacant; there are
nonexisting dwellings or structures. However, the City of Springfield Planning staff approved a plan allowing the property
owner to place a manufactured home on proposed parcel 1 concurrently with this Tentative Partition Application.
Ultimately, one manufactured home is proposed to be placed on each parcel.
The subject property is located in the Springfield Low Density Residential (LDR) zone which permits development of 6 to
14 dwellings per net acre. The proposed Tentative Partition Plan will develop 2 dwellings per.30 acres which meets the
density requirements (1.8 units minimum are required). All proposed development will meet the siting requirements
and criteria specified for LDR zoned single-family residences as specified in SDC Section 5.12-125.
This written statement intends to clearly demonstrate for City staff review how the proposed Tentative Partition Plan
will conform to all standards, regulations, and conditions of Land Divisions under SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan —General;
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Sprmgfield
Development Code (SDC) text sections are indicated by dark blue text, bold and/or italic typeface; Applicants responses
are indicated by black text and plain typeface.
SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General
Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards:
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this Code. When lots1parcels are more than
double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shall require that these lots/parcels be
arranged:
1. To allow re -division; and
2. To allow for the extension ofstreets to serve future lots/parcels.
3. Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a
determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lot/porcel is not impaired. In order to
make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section
5.12120E.
Response; Tax Lot 3501 is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and designated LD (Low Density Residential) on the
Metro Plan, and located on a North/South street. The proposed parcels will conform to the minimum standards as
specified for LDR (Low Density Residential) development. Neither proposed parcel will exceed the double minimum
required area for LDR single-family homes on North/South streets (5,000 sf), nor LDR single-family homes on Panhandle
Lots (4,500 sf).
Parcell is proposed at 5,670 sq ft.
Parcel 2 is proposed at 5,217 sq ft (excluding panhandle); 7,117 sq ft (including panhandle).
These criteria are met -
Metro Planning, Inc. lune 2022 12
B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from
collector and arterial sheets or to overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: The proposed parcels will conform to the minimum standards as specified for LDR (Low Density Residential)
development. Street frontage of the proposed parcels will not exceed double the minimum required for LDR single-
family homes on North/South streets (60 it) and for LDR single-family homes on a Panhandle Lot (20 ft).
Street frontage for Parcel 1 is proposed at 60 feet.
Street frontage for Parcel 2 is proposed at 20 feet.
These criteria are met.
C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections 3.2-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of
multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels
shall occur prior to recording the Plat.
Response: Complying with SDC 3.2-215 and SDC 4.2-120A, Parcels 1 and 2 will have driveway access via a shared 20'
wide easement, meeting panhandle frontage requirements as well as standard lot min/max driveway width
requirements. These criteria are met.
D. Block tength for focal streets is as specifnrd in Section 4.2-105DA
4. Black Length and Block Perimeter.
o. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following maximum,
except as provided or exempted elsewhere in this Code or in an applicable Refinement Plan
or Plan District:
i. 1,400 feet in Mixed -Use Districts consistent with standards In Sections
3.2-625E;
ii. 2,600 feet In industrial zoning districts;
iii. 2,400 feet for multi -unit development subject to Section 3.2-240A; and
iv. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts.
Response: The proposed Tentative Partition Plan utilizes an existing street network. This code section is not applicable
Land Divisions: Tentative Plan Submittal SOC 5.11-120
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are
being fulfilled.
EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director,
during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of o future
development application.
Metro Planning, Inc. lune 2022 13
A. General Requirements.
1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Professional Gond Surveyor on standard sheets of 38"x 24'. The services of an Oregon Licensed
Professional Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater
management street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues.
Response: The Tentative Subdivision Plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR & Associates, and Eric
Favreau, P. E. of Favreau Engineering, ensuring this plan has adequately and comprehensively address all standards and
requirements of this Code, including stormwater management, street design, and transportation issues, and site
constraint.
2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data,
normally 1"= 50;1"=100', or 1"= 200:
Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 20'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the
amount of data needing to be shown.
3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared.
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the plans that are included with this application.
4. The name and address of the owner, applicant if different and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who
prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response:
Property Owner: Michael Covalt, Bash Residential, LLC, 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223.
Applicant: Rich Lorimar, Bash Residential, LLC, 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223.
Land Surveyor. Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR & Associates.
Engineer: Eric Favreau, P.E. of Favreau Engineering.
Also see Tentative Partition Plan drawing set.
S. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner orsub-divider of which the
proposed land division Is a part.
Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the partitioner.
6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad
right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad rights-of-way are adjacent to the subject property.
7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties
within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
Response: The subject property is Springfield LDR (Low Density Residential) and designated L (Low Density Residential)
in the Metro Plan.
Metro Planning, Inc. lune 2022 14
H. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale.
Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions of each building site are clearly labeled on the Tentative Partition
Plan drawings.
9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after
platting and theirrequired setbacks fi un theproposed new property lines.
Response: There are no existing structures on the property.
10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and
adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems,
water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points.
Response: Water lines are existing and provided by Springfield Utility Board. Wastewater and Stormwater lines are
located in 31" Street and are public. All existing and proposed utilities and connection points, and necessary easements
are indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land
division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips.
Response: All public and private proposed easements are clearly indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose,condition or
limitations of the reservations dearly indicated.
Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use. This requirement is not applicable.
0. A Site Assessment of the Entire DevelopmentArea. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed
LandsmpeArchitect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at afoot intervals and percent of slope that
precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly
Indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will
not have an adverse Impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site.
information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site
Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response: The Site Assessment of the subject property was performed by Ryan Erickson, PLS, and Eric Favreau, P. E. of
Favreau Engineering, and includes all of the General Requirements, Site Assessment items, and Stormwater items. See
attached Tentative Subdivision Plan drawings.
1. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on
the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQW) Map on file in the Development Services Department;
Response: There -are no -watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property, thus this requirement is not applicable.
Metro Planning, Inc. lung 2022 P „ C e 15
1. The 100year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA
Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision;
Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated on
FIRM Map Number 41039C1161F dated June 2,1999; this requirement is not applicable.
3. The Time of Travel zones, as specified in section 3.3-2oo and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas
Map on file in the Development Service Department;
Response: The subject property falls within the 2 -year Time of Travel zone for Wellhead Protection.
4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant dusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown
on the (WLQW) Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings,
Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within
the boundaries of the subject property.
S. Sol] types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and
Response: The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the
subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Malabon-Urban land complex, with a depth to water table of
more than 80 inches. An infiltration test was performed by Eric Favreau, P -E. on 11/16/2021. The infiltration rate was
conservatively determined to be approximately 20"/hr. Therefore, for design purposes, it will be assumed that
infiltration rate will be 10"/hr.
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3.117.
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property.
C. A Stormwater Management Man drawn to scale with existing contours at afoot intervals and percent of slope that
precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent ofslope is 10 percent or
more, contours may be shown at 5foo£ intervals. This plan shall show the stormwatermanagement system for the
entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall requfre that an Oregon licensed
Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an
Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components:
I. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
2. Pervious and Impervious area drainage patterns;
3. The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain
lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwoter quality measures; and natural drainage -
ways to be retained;
4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours; and
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 16
S. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in
Section 4.3-110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and
documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to
allow staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes.
Response: Eric Favreau, P.E. concluded that the facility sizing of the rain garden was adequate per the rainfall
calculations.. No outfalt to the public stormwater system is proposed withthis partition. A 1,372 square foot house
previously existed on the site and this impervious area has been subtracted from the treatment square footage.
Therefore, the proposed facility has been sized for the net increase in runoff and includes treatment for two new single-
family dwellings and a common driveway. There currently is no formal drainage system along 31st Street, therefore the
proposed infiltration rain garden will be sized for the 25 -year event. The attached calculations demonstrate that this
facility has been sized to meet the design requirement for the 25 -year event.
See attached — Infiltration Rain Garden Detail Engineering plan.
D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code.
1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk AC mat, or gravel, widths and
names of all existing streets, alleys, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed land
divisfon;
Response: The subject property has frontage on 31" Street. There is an existing 60' right-of-way on 31" St, with 35' of
paved roadway. There is no existing curb, gutter or sidewalk.
2. The location; widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights -of --way to include the
approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets
as shown on the Metro Plan, including the TronsPlan, any approved Conceptual Development Plan and the
latest version of the Conceptual Local Street. Map,
Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject property.
3. The locations and widths of ail existing and proposed sidewalks pedestrian trails and accessways,
including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planterstrip;
Response: There are no existing or proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways.
4. The location of existing and proposed tmff C control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable;
Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is located approximately 242 feet north of
the Northwest comer of subject property. See attached Tentative Partition plans drawings for further details.
S. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable;
Response: The proposed driveway for both parcels is a 20' wide Shared Access and Utility Easement. Meeting
requirements for a 2 -lot partition with one panhandle lot, the shared driveway is 20' wide at street frontage and will
taper to the minimum required 12'.
Metro Planning, Inc. lune 2022 17
6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination;
Response All existing street lighting is indicated an the Tentative Partition plan drawing set. No additional streetlights
are proposed.
7. The location of existing and proposed transitfaU/itier
Response: The nearest transit facility is located on the South side of Olympic Street west of 28th Street and served by
Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 18.
8. Acopy of a Right-af--way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon
Department of Transportation /ODOTI facility; and
Response: 31st Street is a city street and does not have frontage on an ODOT facility.
9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in Section 4.2-105A.4.
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 11th Edition, single-family
detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.44 vehicles daily and .99 peak hour trips. A single-family
dwelling on each of the two parcels proposed generating 9.44 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or
average daily trips necessary for a Traffic Impact Analysis to be required.
E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel
size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Man that:
Response: No Future Development Plan is necessary as neither proposed parcel exceeds twice the minimum area
requirement.
F. Additional Information and/or applications required of the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall
include thefoflowfng Items, where applicable:
I. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property;
Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the existing
use of the subject property.
2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required;
Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner.
3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants
and other tmnsportation/frre access issues within 200feecof the proposed land division and all existing
Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division;
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Proposed Tentative Partition Plan drawing,
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 Is
4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district
Response: There are no overlay districts applicable to the subject. property.
5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable;
Response: Single-family residential is a permitted use in Springfield LDR (Low Density Residential). No Discretionary Use
Permit is required.
6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified In Section 5.19-100;
Response: No trees will be felled as a part of this application.
7. AGeotechnical Reportfor slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3500, and/or if the
required Site Assessment in Section 5.1-21208. Indicates the proposed development area has unstable
sails and/or high water table as specified in the Sails Survey of tone County;
Response: No Geotechnical Report is required as the subjectproperty consists of slopes less than 5%. NRCS Soil
Classification maps identify this site as having Class C Soils. Soil Type Malabon-Urban land complex #76. The soil is well -
draining soil ideal for urban development. The depth to water table is more than 80. inches.
See attached Infiltration Test performed by Eric Favreau, PE.
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a development is proposed outside of the
city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer;
Response: The subject property is located within the Springfield City limits.
A wetland delineation approved by the Department OfState Lands shall be submitted concurrently where
there is a wetland on the property;
Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject property.
10. Evidence that any required Federal or5tate permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted
concurrently;
Response: No Federal or State permits are required with this Tentative Partition application.
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and
method offfnancin g;
Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application.
I2. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowners Association Agreement where appropriate;
Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Associations are proposed.
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 19
13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2230,
Response: This application is for a Tentative Partition and not a Cluster Subdivision.
14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Directormay
waive certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall
address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteda specified in Section 5.12-
125.
Response: This application is for a Tentative Partition and not a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park
Subdivision.
Land Divisions SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable
criteria have been satisfied. if conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the
application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any
approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application
A. The requestconforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to fat/parrel size and dimensions.
Response The subject property is located on a North-South street. Proposed Parcel 1 falls under the criteria
requirements of a single-family dwelling in LDR zoning on a North/South street. Proposed Parcel 2 falls under the criteria
requirements of a single-family dwelling on a Panhandle lot. See below for specific details for each parcel.
Lat Size:
The minimum tot parcel size for a Standard lot on a North/South is 5,000 sq ft
The minimum lot/ parcel size fora Panhandle lot is 4,500 sq ft.
Proposed parcel 1 is a Standard North/South parcel and meets requirements at 5,670 sq ft.
Proposed parcel 2 is a Panhandle lot and meets requirements at 7,117 sq ft (including panhandle); 5,217 sq ft (excluding
panhandle).
LotFrontage:
The minimum street frontage for Lots/Porcels on a North/South street is 60 ft. The minimum street frontage required
fora panhandle parcel is 2D feet.
Proposed parcel 1 has 60 ft of street frontage.
Proposed parcel 2 has 20 ft of street frontage.
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 110
B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District
map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated as
Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed
development is 2 units per .30 acres, with the requirement being at least 1.8 units.
C. Capacity requirements of public and private focilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity;
sanitary sewer and stormwater monagement fadiities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be
exceeded, and the public Improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development unless
otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shall determine capacity issues.
Response: Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, street and traffic safety controls will not be exceeded. No
public improvements are proposed.
D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this Code and otherapplicable regulations.
Response: The proposed Tentative Partition Plan shall comply with all applicable public and private design and
construction standards contained in this SDC, and all applicable requirements and regulations.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas
with susceptibility offlooding; significant dusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map
and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock
outcroppings open spaces; and areas of historic andfor archaeological significance, as may be specified in
Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760,358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code
or in State or Federal law.
Response: There are no significant physical features on the subject property.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points havebeen designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and
pedestrian safety to avoid congestion, provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent
residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas,
minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified In this Code or other applicable regulations
and comply with the ODOT access management standards for Stare highways.
Response. The applicant is proposing. both lots have a shared driveway in order to mitigate the number of driveways.
Access and connectivity to nearby areas will be provided by 31" Street.
G. Development of any remainder of the property under the some ownership can be accomplished as specified in
this Code.
Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition.
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 11
H. Adjacent land can be developed or Is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code.
Response: All. adjacent land is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
1. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no
concurrent anne"don application Is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply.
Response: The proposed development is within the Springfield City limits.
J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following
approval criteria apply.,
Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
Metro Planning, Inc. June 2022 112