Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Application APPLICANT 6/22/2022
City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 6 Required Project Information (Applicant; complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name:Tim Edwards Phone:(530)624-8306 Company: Countryside Partners Springfield, LLC Fax: Address: 2571 California Park Dr Ste 130, Chico, CA 95928 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: John Anderson Phone: 541) 686-4540 Company: The Satre Group Fax: Address: 375 West 4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Tim Edwards Phone: 530 624-8306 Company: Countryside Partners Springfield, LLC Fax: Address: 2571 California Park Or Ste 130, Chico, CA 95928 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-00 TAX LOT NOS :04700 Property Address: 317 30th St, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 6.57 Acres V1 Square Feet Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description W this application. Proposal. Develop a vacant portion of the site fora parking lot, pavilion, and recreation field. Existing Use: Multi-famil housin # of Lots Parcels: t Av . Lot Parcel Size: sf Densi : du acre Prospective Applicant:�,{/�I/1 ` �� �" ,J Date: Signat e Print Required Intake Staff., complete his try��Project Information t / section)/ Case No.e v I ZZ S��/ Date: 2- Z Reviewedb :fi. 01/y App lication Fee: Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: O TOTAL FEES: PROTECT NUMBER: Revised 5121113 KL t of3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. . The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ❑✓ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development Services Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑✓ Development Issues Meeting Application Form © Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. © Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Q Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' Q North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Q Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area 2 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Q Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions N/A ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots N/A ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Q Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 June 21, 2022 Brentwood Estates Development Issues Meeting Map 17-02-31-00, Tax Lot 4700 I. THE PROJECT Countryside Partners Springfield, LLC is exploring the opportunity to provide 64 additional parking spaces, a pavilion, a walking path and a play field far the benefit of the residents of Brentwood Estates. While the Countryside Partners Springfield team has been investigating development feasibility, a number of questions have emerged, and it is time for this Development Issues Meeting. Outlined below is a brief description of the project and the property, followed by issues and questions. In advance, Countryside Partners Springfield, LLC and its development team thank staff for their assistance. IL THE PROPERTY The property is located in the Mid -Springfield Area and is approximately 6.57 acres. The lot contains the Brentwood Estates townhome community and a recently acquired vacant parcel toward the southeast portion of the property. This parcel was recently acquired from Eastern Lane Forest Protective Association through a property line adjustment. The Brentwood Estates property is zoned Medium Density Residential, and the acquired parcel is zoned Light -Medium Industrial. The proposed improvements will be concentrated on the acquired parcel, with vehicular and pedestrian connections to the adjoining townhome community. The property is located north of Main Street, which is classified as a minor arterial and east of 30� Street, a major collector. Surrounding Brentwood Estates to the east, are single-family residential homes. To the south is the adjoining Forest Service property, a Les Schwab Tire Center, and the Department of Human Services. To the west across 30'" Street is the Springfield Goodwill and Department of Motor Vehicles. III. QUESTIONS 1. Land Use. a. zoning. As noted above, the portion of the site that was acquired from the adjoining Forest Service property through a property line adjustment is zoned Light Medium Industrial (LMI). The LMI zone permits recreational facilities (SDC 3.2-410) that are listed for Commercial Zones in SDC 3.2-310 or public and private parks, playgrounds, and play/tot lot under the special standards in SDC 4.7-205. However, neither SDC 4.7- 205 (Recreation Facilities) nor SDC 4.7-200 (Public/Private Parks) place restrictions on private parks in the LMI zone or adjacent to residentially zoned property. (See enclosed letter from the Assistant City Attorney addressed to the Law Office of Mike Reeder, dated December 18, 2018.) PLANNERS LANDSCAPE ARCHRECfS + ENVIRONMENTALSPECIAL1ST3 375 West4th, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 Phone: 541.688.4540 www.satregroup.com 3mmv,00d Estates Page 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting - Questions Map 14-02-31-00, Tax Lots 4700 June 21 2022 Q: Does staff concur with this? b. Land Use Application(s). Based on communication between the Assistant City Attorney and the Law Office of Mike Reeder, staff recommended the client submit a Major Site Plan Review Modifcation. See Attached Letter to Reeder. The site is also within the Drinking Water Protection Overlay Zone (and in the 10- and 20 -year Time of Travel Zone Concentrations). Q: Does staff still concur that a Major Site Plan Review Modification is required? Will a Drinking Water Protection application be required, or can an exception be sought? 2. Utilities. a. Stormwater. The acquired parcel is extremely flat and lacks a clear sloped stormwater discharge point off property. There is an existing Swale running along the west edge, that with the property acquisition continues onto the adjoining Eastern Lane Forest Protective Association parcel. South of the project parcel, the Eastern Lane Forest Protective Association parcel drains back across Brentwood Estates property via a pipe within a 50' drainage easement to the Q Street Floodway. The applicant hopes to maintain the historic and existing stormwater destination by continuing the use of the stormwater swale off property. Q: Can the project's stormwater destination be a pipe overflow into the swale/channel offsite on the Forest Service Property or does overflow need to be via overland discharge (no pipe outfall)? Can staff comment on the proposed locations for on- site retention? b. Sanitary, Water, and Electric. No utilities other than electrical are needed for the parking lot or pavilion. No water or wastewater will be extended to the pavilion. Parking lot and site lighting would be powered from one of the apartment building panels. Q: Does staff concur or see any need for any utility extensions? 3. Access. a. Driveway and Parking. Access to the proposed site improvements will be via the existing internal driveway within the Brentwood Estates site. The proposed parking constitutes less than 50 percent of the development site. See Site Plan. Q: Does staff concur? Can staff provide information regarding access and parking requirements for the proposed use? Will there be a fire) emergency vehicle access requirement to the new improvements? As an addition to an existing facility and not tied to new dwelling units, what ADA parking will be required? 4. Other Information. Q. Is there anything else that staff would like to share with the applicant, or believes the applicant should be aware of, with respect to this project? 375 West 401 Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 656-0540 • www.satreamuo.c m Brentwootl Estates Development Issues Meeting — Questions Map 14-02-31-00, Tax Lots 4700 Page 3 of 3 This concludes the applicant's Project Consultation Meeting questions. In advance the applicant wishes to express their appreciation of staff time and effort in preparing responses to these questions. Sincerely, Jo In Avude vs&v John Anderson, ASLA Principal The Satre Group The Satre Gmup • 375 West 4'° Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, OR 97401 • (541) 686-4540 • wwwsatreerouncom R THE SATRE GROUP Land Use Planners, Landscape Architects, Environmental Specialists 375 West 41^ Avenue, Suite 201, Eugene, Oregon 97401 ,,. (541)686-4540 • www.satregroup.com TRANSMITTAL TO: City of Springfield DATE: June 21, 2022 225 5" Street PROJECT: Brentwood Estates Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting CLIENT PROJ #: ATTN: SG PROJ #: 2218 TRANSMITTED: Herewith X DISPOSITION: For Your Approval Separate Cover For Your Information/Use Other For Reply TRANSMITTED: # Copies Item Dated No. Pages (In addition to this cover paqO 4 paper copies of a: Development Issues Meetinq Application Packet Various Several REMARKS: This Development Issues Meeting application packet is hereby submitted for processing The submittal package includes: 1. This Transmittal. 2. Application Fee. 3. Application Form, 4. Written List of Questions. 5. Attachment A: Letter to Mike Reeder. 6. Site Plan. We look forward to your assistance with the project. Don't hesitate to contact us should you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you. COPIES TO: Agency BY: File X� Consultant Team X Owner u Other John Anderson. ASLA CITY ATTORNEY225FIFrHSTREET'S OFFICE SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 Ift_ _ _ _ _.541.744.4061 December 11, 2018 VIA EMAIL AND REGULAR MAIL wwvi.springfield-or.gov Mike Reeder Law Office of Mike Reeder 375 W. 4'- Avenue, Suite 205 Eugene, OR 97401 Re: Brentwood Estates Open Space and Parking Dear Mike: I am writing to follow up on our meeting with your client representative, Tim Edwards, on November 19, 2018. You have asked for City staffs position on your client acquiring and developing property adjacent to Brentwood Estates to be used by residents as a private park and parking. Specifically, you have asked whether that development could be approved under the existing Light -Medium Industrial (LMI) zoning. I have reviewed the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and discussed the matter with City staff, and we believe that the development you described may be permitted without need for a plan amendment and zone change. As we discussed in our meeting, your client is interested in acquiring property from the US Forest Service that is zoned UMI. The LMI zone permits "Recreational Facilities" that are listed for Commercial zones in SDC 3.2-310, which include "public and private parks," "playgrounds," and "park/tot lot" under the special standards in SDC 4.7-205. However, neither SDC 4.7-205 (Recreation Facilities) nor SDC 4.7-200 (Public Private Parks) place restrictions on private park facilities in the LMI zone or adjacent to residentially zoned property. Therefore, a private park or playground appears to be an allowed use of LMI zoned property. Furthermore, the fact that the resultant parcel would be split -zoned does not appear to prevent the use of a property line adjustment if your client acquires the US Forest Service property. We also discussed that there is no maximum parking restriction for a private park, playground, or park/tot lot in the LMI zone. However, motor vehicle parking cannot be a primary use of the area to be developed as a private park; any parking must be less than 50% of the development area. Staff recommends the best way forward for your client is to submit a Major Site Plan Modification application for the Brentwood Estates site plan. See SDC 5.17-145. The City would process that modification as a Type II decision, with notice to surrounding property owners but no public hearing unless specifically requested. No additional Development Issues Meeting is required, although your client may certainly request one if there are outstanding matters that your client wishes to discuss in advance of the Site Plan pre -application meeting. {000092033} Mike Reeder December 11, 2018 Page 2 Finally, please note that this letter only reflects City staff's opinion on the uses allowed within the LMI zone, based upon the facts shared by your client as we understand them. This letter does not guaranty that a Site Plan Modification would be granted or that the City would defend an application on appeal. If you have any questions or would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me. Sincerely, Krishun� aaZ Assistant City Attorney KSK:Ijc cc: Sandy Belson, Community Development Manager Jim Donovan, Planning Supervisor Andy Limbird, Senior Planner {00009203:3}