Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Item 01 Police Levy Discussion
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 5/23/2022 Results. Council may take this opportunity to provide feedback and ask questions. Meeting Type: Work Session STATEMENT: Staff Contact/Dept.: Sam Kelly- with DHM Research to poll the Springfield Community's support of maintaining Quattrocchi/CMO ATTACHMENTS: Staff Phone No: 541.726.3713 2: Questions and Results Estimated Time: 30 Minutes SPRINGFIELD Council Goals: Provide Financially CITY COUNCIL IMPACT: Responsible and research to poll the community to gauge support for the police levy renewal. Innovative Government Services ITEM TITLE: POLICE LEVY DISCUSSION ACTION At this meeting staff is giving the Council an update on the Police Levy Polling REQUESTED: Results. Council may take this opportunity to provide feedback and ask questions. ISSUE The current special operating levy for jail and police services expires as of June 30, STATEMENT: 2023. Before preparing the levy ballot title and description, City Staff partnered with DHM Research to poll the Springfield Community's support of maintaining the levy for 5 more years. ATTACHMENTS: 1: DHM PowerPoint Presentation 2: Questions and Results 3: CrossTab Analysis DISCUSSION/ The current special operating levy for jail and police services expires as of June 30, FINANCIAL 2023. The levy will be on the November, 2022 ballot for the Springfield IMPACT: Community to vote on. Before that ballot is created, staff partnered with DHM research to poll the community to gauge support for the police levy renewal. DHM is presenting tonight to go through their methodology and findings and answer any questions. One June 6, staff will return to discuss the ballot measure title and language, which will include the cost of the levy. City of Springfield Police Levy Renewal Survey April 2022 w a r m► ■ s� m� a � dhm RESEARCH Research purpose ■ Gauge support for police levy renewal ■ Measure satisfaction with public safety services ■ Identify strongest reasons to support and oppose the levy ■ Identify groups voters most trust when it comes to the levy DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Methodology ■ Hybrid (phone and text -to -online) survey of N=300 City of Springfield voters ■ Conducted April 15-21, 2022; 12 minutes to complete ■ Quotas set and data weighted by age, gender, race, educational attainment, party affiliation, and ward to ensure a representative sample of likely November 2022 voters ■ Margin of error ±5.7% ■ Due to rounding, some totals may differ by ±1 from the sum of separate responses. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 General mood and key issues About half of Springfield voters say the City is headed in the right direction. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 5 Voters most often say homelessness, public safety, and housing affordability are the biggest issues facing the area. 25% Homelessness 19% Public safety/crime/drugs 18% Housing affordability 6% Main Street project 6% Cost of living/inflation 6% Politicians/government 5% Jobs/economy DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 6 Satisfaction with services Seven in ten voters are satisfied with police, law enforcement, and uniformed patrol services. Fire and rescue services Police, law enforcement, and uniformed patrol services Springfield library services City street maintenance Springfield municipal jail services Very satisfied Very dissatisfied 'Not sure DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 8 Republicans and NAV/other voters, voters in Wards 5-6, voters without a four-year college degree, and White voters are more likely to be satisfied with police services. Republican Democrat NAV/Other Wards 1 & 2 Wards 5&6 77% High school or less 60% Some college W 76% College graduate 65% White 67% 78% POC 73% ■ 75% 60% 73% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 9 Levy test Provided with only a ballot title, a majority of voters say they would support the police levy renewal. Most supporters are certain of their support. Lean Certair 54% To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a re -year levy of $1.40 ?r $1,000 of assessed 'operty value, ?ginning 2023? Yes No Not sure DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Certainty of support for the levy is higher among Republicans and NAV/other voters, Ward 3-6 voters, older voters, and lower -education voters. Certain/ Lean Republican Democrat NAV/Other Wards 1 & 2 Wards 3 & 4 Wards 5 & 6 54% 18-29 _ 49% 30-44 59% 45-64 65+ ff 46% High school or less M 61% Some college 54% College graduate 48% 49% 52% 64% 60% 53% 50% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 12 Reminding voters that the levy is a renewal and providing voters with annual cost per typical household has little impact on support. Lean Certain 52% 54% First passed in 2002. Would renew the current levy at same rate as now. Would cost households assessed at $170,000 an average of $238 a year for five years '023-24. Test Pre-test Test Pre-test Test Pre-test DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Reasons to support and oppose levy Voters find all reasons to support the levy compelling. The strongest reason to support the levy is that it might help fund mental health services. , Very good / Good Could fund mental health services to address public safety more holistically, such as CAHOOTS and mental health services in jail. Ensures courts can continue to hear cases in timely manner and helps courts operate efficiently and effectively. Ensures adequate staffing so that police can investigate cases, solve crimes, and respond to calls quickly. Since jail opened in 2010, property crime has dropped about 50%; renewing levy ensures we keep our community safer. When crime rates increase, businesses leave, and property values drop; levy to help keep Springfield safe, ensure strong economy, and protect families' investments. Maintaining visible public safety presence is crucial to protecting safety of community. Now is not the time to cut funding. 178% 74% 74% 71% 69% 68% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 15 There is much overlap among key groups when it comes to top reasons to support the levy. Could fund mental health services Ensures courts can operate efficiently Ensures adequate staffing for police to do their jobs Jail helps lower crime and keep community safe Protects community, economy, families Now is not the time to cut funding X=top X=second X=third Some College 4MR611111111141 college grad x x x x x x x x x x Am= x x x x A�� DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 16 Reasons to support the levy outperform all reasons to oppose it. The strongest reason to oppose is that voters first want to see greater police accountability. Before approving continued investments, we first need to see reform and accountability in how department handles police misconduct. Property taxes already too high; It's time to start making cuts. This is an opportunity to rethink the City's budget; taxpayer funds should be used for other priorities. I don't trust the City of Springfield to spend funds wisely. There is abundant public safety presence now; Springfield doesn't need to maintain current service levels. Vnr.i ri^^04 / r -,^r% J 49% 45% 44% 60% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 17 The most compelling reason to oppose the levy—that voters first want greater police accountability—is held more strongly among Democrats and voters in Wards 1-2. Republican Democrat NAV/Other 44% a51% 79% Wards 1 & 2 Wards 3 & 4 1dF7'it:_� .Mo 71% Yo DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 18 Levy re-test After learning more, increases slightly. Lean Certain 58% CA 0/ support for the levy Test Pre-test Test Pre-test Test Pre-test DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 20 Messengers A majority of voters trust all tested messengers. As is true in many communities, non-elected/appointed leaders enjoy the most trust. A lot of trust > No trust at all Community Emergency Response Team members, who are volunteer residents trained to deal with emergencies Small business owners Leaders of local nonprofits Springfield Police Chief Springfield City Councilors Springfield Police Association, the union representing Springfield police DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 22 Key takeaways: general mood and public safety ■ Voter mood leans positive in the City of Springfield and positivity correlates with support for the proposed levy. ■ Voters consider public safety as one of the biggest issues facing the city, so voters will likely be receptive to the levy. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 23 Key takeaways: satisfaction with police services ■ Seven in ten voters are satisfied with police, law enforcement, and uniformed patrol services. Satisfaction with police also correlates with support for the levy. ■ A majority of Democrats, college graduates, and People of Color are satisfied with police services, but satisfaction is lower among these groups. They are more likely to want greater police accountability as a condition of their support. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 24 Key takeaways: support for the levy ■ Support increases to 58% after voters hear more about the levy. Among supporters, those who are certain of their support far exceed those who merely lean toward support. ■ The strongest supporters are seniors, non -college graduates, voters in Wards 3-6, Republicans, and NAV/Other voters. Softer supporters include non -seniors, college graduates, voters in Wards 1-2, and Democrats. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Key takeaways: reasons to support and oppose levy ■ Reasons to support the levy outperform reasons to oppose the levy. ■ The strongest reason to support the levy is that it might provide additional funds for mental health services. Voters want a levy that enhances both enforcement and treatment and that addresses two of their biggest concerns: public safety and homelessness. ■ The strongest reason to oppose, especially among Democrats and voters in Wards 1-2, is that voters first want to see greater police accountability. Connecting the levy to police accountability efforts will likely build additional support. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 26 Michelle Neiss mneiss@dhmresearch.com Tony laccarino tiaccarino@dhmresearch.com RESEARCH dhmresearch.com dhm RESEARCH April 26, 2022 To: Sam Kelly Quattrocchi, City of Springfield From: Michelle Neiss and Tony laccarino, DHM Research Re: City of Springfield Police Levy Renewal Survey, #01087 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY 555 SE MLK Jr. Blvd, Suite 105 Portland, OR 97214 503.220.0575 www.dhmresearch.com From April 15-21, 2022 DHM Research conducted a survey of Springfield registered voters. The purpose of the survey was to gauge support for renewal of a potential police levy; identify reasons why voters might support or oppose the levy; and identify the most trusted sources when it comes to opinions about the levy. Research Methodology: The hybrid survey consisted of 300 registered voters in Springfield and took approximately 12 minutes to complete. This is a sufficient sample size to assess voter opinions generally and to review findings by multiple subgroups, including by age, gender, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, party, and ward. Respondents were contacted from a list of registered voters. A hybrid approach was used, in which respondents had opportunities to complete the survey by phone and online. Telephone respondents were contacted by a live interviewer and text -to -online respondents received a text invitation directing them to an online survey. In gathering responses, a variety of quality control measures were employed, including questionnaire pre -testing and validation. Quotas were set and the date was weighted by age, gender, race and ethnicity, educational attainment, party, and ward to ensure a representative sample of likely November 2022 voters. Statement of Limitations: Any sampling of opinions or attitudes is subject to a margin of error. The margin of error is a standard statistical calculation that represents differences between the sample and total population at a confidence interval, or probability, calculated to be 95%. This means that there is a 95% probability that the sample taken for this study would fall within the stated margin of error if compared with the results achieved from surveying the entire population. The margin of error for this survey is +/- 5.7%. DHM Research Background: DHM Research has been providing opinion research and consultation throughout the Pacific Northwest and other regions of the United States for over 40 years. The firm is nonpartisan and independent and specializes in research projects to support public policy making. Attachment 2 Page 1 of 8 City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey April 15-21, 2022 Springfield Registered Voters N=300; ±5.7% margin of error 12 minutes DHM Research Project #01087 Hello, my name is from [name of fielding house]. I have some questions about your community (specify if possible). As needed: ■ We are not trying to sell you anything. ■ The survey should only take a few minutes and I think you will find the questions interesting. ■ Your answers are strictly confidential. [Telephone only] If at any time you are unsure of your answer, just let us know. VOTER MOOD 1. All things considered, would you say that the City of Springfield is headed in the right direction or are things off on the wrong track? .. o Right direction 48% Wrong track 23% I'm not sure 29% 2. What would you say is the biggest issue facing our area at this time? [Open] DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 8 Homelessness 25% Public safety/Crime/Drugs 19% Housing affordability 18% Main Street Project 6% Cost of living/Inflation 6% Politicians/Government 6% Jobs/Economy 5% Roads/Infrastructure 4% Education/Schools 4% Police accountability 2% Pandemic/COVID 2% Political division/Partisanship 2% Taxes 1% Graffiti/Trash 1% Other 5% None/Nothing 1% Don't know/Not sure 4% Refused/No opinion 1% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 2 of 8 The following are some services provided by the City of Springfield. For each, indicate if you are satisfied or dissatisfied with how the City is managing that service. [Wait and ask very/somewhat] [Don't read I'm not sure] [Randomize] INITIAL LEVY RENEWAL TEST The City of Springfield is considering putting on the ballot the following measure in November 2022. Please listen carefully. To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? 8. If the election was today, would you vote "yes" to support the measure, or "no" to oppose it? [Wait, ask if certain/lean] Response.. 00 Yes—certain 36% Somewhat Somewhat Very I'm not ResponseVery .. ii satisfied satisfied dissatisfied dissatisfied sure 3. Fire and rescue services 64% 22% 3% 1 % 10% 4. Police, law enforcement and 35% 35% 14%11 /° ° ° 5 /° uniformed patrol services 5. City street maintenance 14% 42% 22% 19% 3% 6. Springfield municipal jail 16% 28% 8% 9% 38% services 7. Springfield library services 36% 28% 5% 2% 29% INITIAL LEVY RENEWAL TEST The City of Springfield is considering putting on the ballot the following measure in November 2022. Please listen carefully. To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? 8. If the election was today, would you vote "yes" to support the measure, or "no" to oppose it? [Wait, ask if certain/lean] Response.. 00 Yes—certain 36% 54% Yes—lean 18% No—lean 13% 36% No—certain 23% I'm not sure 10% 10% 9. This property tax levy to fund police services and jail operations was first passed by Springfield voters in 2002. If passed, this measure would renew the current levy at the same rate as it is right now. This measure would cost households assessed at $170,000 an average of $238 a year for five years starting in 2023-24. Knowing this, would you vote "yes" to support the measure, or "no" to oppose it. [Wait, ask if certain/lean] DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 3 of 8 Rf-„—le! Tn Q1lm ,,,-,T [Rotate Support / Oppose Blocks] The following are reasons some people SUPPORT the Police Renewal Levy. For each, please tell me if you think it is a very good, good, poor, or very poor reason to SUPPORT the levy renewal. [Randomize] DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 4 of 8 Very Very I'm not Response category n=300 good Good Poor poor sure 10. When crime rates increase, businesses leave and property values drop. This levy will help keep Springfield safe, ensure a 42% 27% 11% 14% 6% strong local economy, and protect families' investments in their homes. 11. Maintaining a visible public safety presence is crucial to protecting the safety of our community. Now 40% 28% 14% 12% 6% is not the time to cut police budget or jail funding. 12. This levy could fund crucial mental health services to more holistically address public safety, 50% 28% 8% 9% 5% such as CAHOOTS mobile crisis intervention and mental health services in jail. 13. This levy ensures the courts can continue to hear cases in a timely 42% 32%12 8 /o 0 0 /o 6 0 /o manner and helps the courts operate efficiently and effectively. 14. This levy ensures adequate staffing so that police can 41% 33% 9% 11% 6% investigate cases, solve crimes, and respond to calls quickly. 15. Since the jail has opened in 2010, property crime has dropped about 39% 32% 12% 10% 7% 50%. Renewing this levy ensures we keep our community safer. DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 4 of 8 REASONS TO OPPOSE The following are reasons some people OPPOSE the Police Renewal Levy. For each, please tell me if you think it is a very good, good, poor, or very poor reason to OPPOSE the levy renewal. [Randomize] LEVY RETEST People sometimes change their minds when they learn more about an issue. I'd like to ask you about the levy measure again. To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? 21. If the election were today, would you vote "yes" to support the measure or "no" to oppose it? [Wait and ask certain or lean] DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 5 of 8 Very Very I'm not Response category n=300 good Good Poor poor sure 16. Our property taxes are already too high. It is time to start making 29% 19% 21% 21% 9% cuts. 17. There is an abundance of public safety presence now and 11% 17% 30% 34% 9% Springfield doesn't need to maintain current service levels. 18. 1 don't trust the City of Springfield 19% 25% 22% 22% 13% to spend funds wisely. 19. This is an opportunity to rethink the City's budget. I would prefer taxpayer funds be used for 25% 20% 16% 30% 9% priorities other than police services and jail operations. 20. Before approving continued investments in police services and jail operations, we first need 31% 29% 14% 20% 6% to see reform and accountability in how the department handles police misconduct. LEVY RETEST People sometimes change their minds when they learn more about an issue. I'd like to ask you about the levy measure again. To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? 21. If the election were today, would you vote "yes" to support the measure or "no" to oppose it? [Wait and ask certain or lean] DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 5 of 8 MESSENGERS For the following individuals or groups, who would you trust when it comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy? Please indicate if you would place a lot of trust, some trust, not much trust, or no trust at all in those individuals or groups. [Randomize] DEMOGRAPHICS These last few questions are for statistical purposes and to ensure we talk to a representative group of Springfield residents. 28. Do you describe your gender as: Male 49% Female 49% Non -binary or gender non -conforming n=1 [Don't read] I prefer not to say 2% 29. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? Select all that apply. [Allow for multiple responses] Response.. 00 Asian/Pacific Islander Not Black/African/African American 4% Response.., 0i . Trust Trust Trust At All . sure 22. Springfield Police Chief 21% 41% 18% 13% 7% 23. Springfield City Councilors 12% 41% 23% 15% 9% 24. Springfield Police Association, the union representing Springfield 16% 38% 17% 24% 5% police 25. Community Emergency Response Team members, who are 42% 42%/o 6 /o 0 5 0 /0 5 0 volunteer residents trained to deal with emergencies 26. Small business owners 32% 46% 13% 5% 4% 27. Leaders of local nonprofits 20% 46% 14% 12% 8% DEMOGRAPHICS These last few questions are for statistical purposes and to ensure we talk to a representative group of Springfield residents. 28. Do you describe your gender as: Male 49% Female 49% Non -binary or gender non -conforming n=1 [Don't read] I prefer not to say 2% 29. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? Select all that apply. [Allow for multiple responses] Response.. 00 Asian/Pacific Islander 1% Black/African/African American 4% Hispanic/Latino 4% Native American/American Indian 7% White/Caucasian 81% Other 4% I'm not sure [Exclusive] 2% I prefer not to say [Exclusive] 4% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 6 of 8 30. Which category best describes your 2021 gross household income before taxes? Remember to include everyone living in your household. Your best estimate will do. ResLjg=ategory 3% Less than $25,000 14% $25,000 to less than $50,000 17% $50,000 to less than $75,000 23% $75,000 to less than $100,000 21% $100,000 to less than $150,000 10% $150,000 or more 5% I prefer not to say 9% 31. What is the highest level of education that you have completed? .Response.. Less than high school 3% High school diploma / GED 31% Some college / 2 -year degree 41% College degree / 4 -year degree 14% Graduate / professional school 8% I prefer not to say 3% 32. Do you rent or own your home or do you have a different arrangement? 33. Age [Don't ask, record from sample] [Autofill age as:] Response.. 18-29 14% Rent 24% Own 64% 1 have a different arrangement 5% 1 prefer not to say 7% 33. Age [Don't ask, record from sample] [Autofill age as:] Response.. 18-29 14% 30-44 27% 45-64 32% 65+ 27% 34. Political party [Don't ask, record from sample] Response.. Democrat 38% Republican 26% Non-affiliated 30% Other 6% DHM RESEARCH I CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY I APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 7 of 8 35. Voting history [Don'- t ask, Record from sample] Response.. 0 of 4 ii 14% 1 of 4 12% 2of4 21% 3 of 4 22% 4 of 4 32% 36. Zip code [Don't ask, Record from sample] 37. Ward [Don't ask, Record from sample] DHM RESEARCH i CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY i APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 8 of 8 Ward 1 16% Ward 2 15% Ward 3 16% Ward 4 16% Ward 5 18% Ward 6 18% DHM RESEARCH i CITY OF SPRINGFIELD POLICE LEVY RENEWAL SURVEY i APRIL 2022 Attachment 2 Page 8 of 8 April 2022 City of Springfield Police Levy Renewal Survey Crosstabs Prepared by DHM Research 503.220.0575 dhm 555 SE MLK Jr. Blvd, Suite 105 RESEARCH Portland, OR 97214 www.dhmresearch.com Attachment 3 Page 1 of 74 City of Springfield Polive Levy Renewal Survey April 15-21, 2022; N=300 HOW TO READ CROSSTABLES Q1, All in all, do you think things are headed in the right direction or are things pretty much on the wrong track? Total Total 1371 599 100% Right direction 943 (B) 69% Wrong track 236 i 17% Don't know 192 - 14% Gender MaleFemale 599 772 100% 100% (B) (c) 394 5498 66% 71% ' 126C 100 21% I 14% 79 113 13% 15% How to Read Crosstables: In the example chart (left), rows represent the three possible response options to the question All in all, do you think things are headed in the right direction, or are things pretty much on the wrong track?" The three response options are: "right direction," "wrong track," and "don't know." The amounts in each response category sum to the amount in the "total" row at the top of the table. The first column, or banner, is the "Total" column. It reflects the overall results. The next two columns reflect the results of a subgroup, "Gender." The gender subgroup is composed of Males and Females, each with their own column. Both gender groups are assigned a letter (Male=B, Female=C). These two columns show how males' attitudes compare to females' attitudes. As shown in the chart, 69% of the full sample thinks things are headed in the right direction. Looking at the gender subgroup, 71 % of women think things are headed in the right direction, compared to 66% of men. -------------------------------------- (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BC Statistically Significant Differences: If a pair of cells has a difference which is statistically significant, the larger of the two cells is flagged with the letter of the opposite column. The test shows the difference in females' attitudes about things being headed in the right direction is statistically significantly different than those of males', which is signified by a "B" (the letter given to Males) next to females' results for "right direction." The footnote indicates the level of significance (sig=.05). This level of significance means that 5% of the time, the difference between how the two groups feel about the direction is due to random chance, while 95% of the time the difference is meaningful. Statement of Limitations: Any sampling of opinions or attitudes is subject to a margin of error, which represents the difference between a sample of a given population and the total population. The margin of error is a statistic expressing the amount of random sampling error in a survey's results and differs by sample size, as reflected in the table below. Margin of Error Based on Sample Size +/-2.8% +/-3.1% +/-3.5% +/-4.0% +/-4.4% +/-4.9% +/-5.7% +/-6.9% +/-8.0% +/-9.8% +/-13.8% Attachment 3 Page 2 of 74 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q1. All things considered, would you say that the City of Springfield is headed in the right direction or are things off on the wrong track? Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White POC ----- ----- Dem ----- Rep Other Rent ----- ----- ---- Own Or ---- ----- _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K Or ----- ----- > Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Right direction 145 28CD 33 41 43 71 72 114 21 59 31 55 34 95 55 56 32 43 55 27S 68 77 48% 66% 40% 43% 54% 48% 49% 50% 37% 51% 40% 51% 46% 50% 54% 46% 48% 46% 42% 59% 49% 48% Wrong track 68 6 23 23 15 39 27 52 14 21 26JL 21 19 35 23 29 13 28T 31 5 30 38 23% 14% 28% 25% 19% 27% 18% 23% 24% 18% 33% 20% 26% 18% 23% 24% 20% 29% 23% 10% 21% 23% I'm not sure 88 9 26 31 22 37 48 62 22 35 22 31 20 61 24 37 22 23 46 14 42 46 29% 20% 32% 32% 27% 25% 33% 27% 39% 31% 28% 29% 27% 32% 23% 30% 32% 25% 35% 31% 30% 29% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 3 of 74 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q1. All things considered, would you say that the City of Springfield is headed in the right direction or are things off on the wrong track? Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Right direction 145 21 25 23 21 24 30 46 44 54 145L - 116N 22 93P 39 12 95S 43 6 48% 44% 55% 47% 43% 45% 55% 49% 45% 50% 100% 55% 30% 57% 36% 42% 55% 38% 49% Wrong track 68 7 7 8 12 19BC 14 14 21 33H - 68K 42 25M 28 29 110 31 34R 2 23% 15% 15% 17% 26% 35% 25% 15% 21% 30% 100% 20% 34% 17% 26% 37% 18% 30% 16% I'm not sure 88 20FG 14 18 15 11 11 34J 331 22 - - 52 26 41 410 6 47 37 4 29% 41% 30% 36% 31% 20% 20% 36% 34% 20% 25% 36% 25% 38% 21% 27% 32% 35% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 4 of 74 4 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q2. What would you say is the biggest issue facing our area at this time? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 5 of 74 5 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll ----- ----- Grad+ ----- <$50K ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Homelessness 74 12 22 20 21 30 42 58 12 29 21 24 19 47 22 30 22 25 28 17S 30 44 25% 27% 27% 21% 26% 20% 29% 25% 22% 26% 27% 22% 26% 25% 21% 25% 32% 27% 21% 37% 22% 28% Public safety/Crime/ 56 7 17 17 15 27 28 43 9 16 14 271 11 34 27P 16 12 17 24 12 34V 22 Drugs 19% 17% 21% 18% 18% 19% 19% 19% 16% 14% 18% 25% 15% 18% 26% 13% 18% 18% 18% 27% 25% 14% Housing 53 5 15 15 18 32 20 47I 4 24 13 15 18N 27 12 27 12 15 25 5 26 27 affordability 180 120 180 16% 220 220 14% 21% 7% 21% 17% 140 250 140 120 220 170 160 19% 10% 18% 17% Main Street Project 18 1 6 8 4 8 10 16 2 6 7 5 1 17 8 8 3 9 7 1 7 11 6% 3% 7% 8% 5% 6% 7% 7% 4% 6% 9% 5% 2% 9% 8% 6% 4% 9% 5% 3% 5% 7% Cost of living/ 18 4E 6 7 1 9 10 14 4 5 4 8 6 12 5 9 2 3 10 3 11 8 Inflation 60 10% 7% 7% 1% 60 60 60 80 50 60 80 80 60 50 80 40 3% 8% 7% 8% 5% Politicians/ 18 1 9 6 3 14G 4 9 8H 8 5 5 4 9 5 11 2 4 8 3 5 13 Government 6% 2% 10% 6% 3% 10% 3% 4% 14% 7% 6% 5% 6% 5% 5% 9% 4% 5% 6% 7% 4% 8% Jobs/Economy 16 1 6 5 4 8 9 13 2 5 5 5 3 12 4 5 80 5 8 1 6 10 5% 3% 7% 6% 5% 5% 6% 6% 4% 5% 7% 5% 4% 6% 3% 4% 11% 5% 6% 3% 5% 6% Education/Schools 13 1 3 3 6 9 3 9 2 7L 5L 1 1 10 4 6 2 1 9 3 5 8 4% 2% 4% 3% 7% 6% 2% 4% 4% 6% 7% 1% 1% 5% 4% 5% 4% 1% 7% 6% 4% 5% Roads/Infrastructure 11 2C - 7C 2 3 7 10 1 3 3 5 1 9 1 6 2 1 8 1 5 6 4% 5% 7% 2% 2% 5% 5% 1% 3% 4% 4% 1% 5% 1% 5% 3% 1% 6% 3% 3% 4% Pandemic/COVID 7 1 - 1 5C 3 4 4 1 4 1 2 1 6 2 4 1 1 4 1 3 4 2% 3% 1% 6% 2% 3% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 2% 3% 2% 1% 3% 2% 2% 2% Police 7 1 3 1 2 2 5 1 6H 5 - 2 - 5 3 2 1 2 2 1 2 5 accountability 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 2% 3% * 11% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 3% Political division/ 5 - 1 2 2 2 3 4 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 2 2 3 - 1 4 Partisanship 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 4% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 3% Taxes 4 3C - 1 1 2 2 3 1 - 2 2 - 4 3 2 - 2 3 - 3 1 1% 6% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 3% 3% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% Graffiti/Trash 3 1 - 1 1 1 2 3 - - 2 1 - 3 1 2 - 2 1 - 1 2 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% Other 15 5 4 3 3 6 10 8 7H 8 3 4 6 7 9P 1 6P 5 5 3 7 8 5% 11% 5% 4% 4% 4% 7% 3% 13% 7% 4% 3% 9% 4% 8% 1% 8% 5% 4% 6% 5% 5% None/Nothing 2 - 1 1 - - 2 2 - - - 2 - 2 1 - 1 - 1 - 1 1 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% * 1% Don't know/Not sure 12 2 3 6 1 7 3 8 3 2 1 9JK 1 7 7 2 1 2 8 1 8 4 4% 4% 4% 7% 1% 5% 2% 3% 5% 2% 1% 8% 2% 3% 7% 2% 2% 2% 6% 1% 6% 3% Refused/No opinion 2 1 - 1 - 1 1 2 - - 1 1 2N - 1 1 - 2 - - 1 1 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 5 of 74 5 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q2. What would you say is the biggest issue facing our area at this time? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 6 of 74 6 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track Smwht Rest ----- ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- ----- Yes No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Homelessness 74 15 11 9 16 12 12 25 25 24 40 14 51 19 44 23 7 45 27 2 25% 30% 23% 19% 33% 21% 23% 27% 26% 22% 27% 20% 24% 26% 27% 22% 23% 26% 24% 17% Public safety/Crime/ 56 7 7 10 7 16 9 14 17 25 32 14 39 14 38P 14 4 35 18 4 Drugs 19% 15% 16% 20% 15% 29% 16% 15% 17% 23% 22% 21% 18% 19% 24% 13% 14% 20% 16% 29% Housing 53 16EF 8 11 4 4 10 24J 14 14 24 13 30 20M 26 23 3 29 24 - affordability 180 33% 170 220 80 8% 18% 250 15% 13% 17% 20% 14% 28% 16% 22% 10% 17% 21% Main Street Project 18 - 1 4 4 5B 5B 1 8H 10H 3 12K 16 1 10 4 4 12 5 1 6% 1% 8% 8% 10% 8% 1% 8% 9% 2% 18% 8% 2% 6% 4% 13% 7% 4% 11% Cost of living/ 18 1 6 3 1 5 2 7 4 7 6 2 17N - 12 4 2 13 5 - Inflation 6% 3% 13% 6% 2% 8% 4% 8% 4% 6% 4% 3% 8% 7% 4% 8% 7% 5% Politicians/ 18 1 3 1 4 5 4 5 4 9 4 10K 13 5 6 120 - 9 8 1 Government 6% 3% 7% 2% 7% 10% 7% 5% 5% 8% 3% 15% 6% 7% 3% 11% 5% 7% 7% Jobs/Economy 16 4F 2 3 1 - 6F 6 4 6 8 3 10 6 11 5 - 11 6 - 5% 9% 3% 6% 3% 12% 6% 4% 6% 6% 5% 5% 8% 7% 5% 6% 5% Education/Schools 13 5CD - - 3 3 2 5 3 5 8 1 10 2 7 5 1 10 3 - 4% 10% 6% 5% 4% 5% 3% 5% 6% 2% 5% 3% 4% 4% 3% 6% 2% Roads/Infrastructure 11 - 1 - 4 2 3 1 4 6 4 2 9 1 5 4 2 7 4 - 4% 3% 8% 4% 6% 1% 4% 5% 3% 3% 4% 1% 3% 4% 6% 4% 4% Pandemic/COVID 7 - - 2 1 3 2 - 3 4 5 2 5 1 1 3 30P 4 3 1 2% 4% 2% 5% 3% 3% 4% 4% 3% 3% 2% 1% 2% 11% 2% 2% 6% Police 7 1 3 1 1 0 1 4 2 1 1 4K 1 6M 1 60 - 1 6R - accountability 2% 1% 7% 1% 2% 1% 1% 4% 2% 1% * 6% * 8% * 6% * 5% Political division/ 5 - 2 1 - 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2 1 3 2 - Partisanship 2% 5% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 2% 1% 3% 1% 4% 1% 2% 4% 2% 2% Taxes 4 1 - - 1 - 2 1 1 2 3 - 4 - 3 1 1 3 - 1S 1% 2% 2% 4% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 2% 7% Graffiti/Trash 3 1 - 1 - - 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 - 2 1 - 2 1 - 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% Other 15 2 1 4 3 2 2 3 8 5 8 1 6 3 5 7 3 6 8 1 5% 4% 3% 9% 7% 4% 4% 3% 8% 4% 6% 1% 3% 5% 3% 7% 9% 4% 7% 10% None/Nothing 2 - 1 - 1 - - 1 1 - 2 - 2 - 2 - - 2 - - 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% Don't know/Not sure 12 1 3 3 3 1 1 4 6 2 8 1 12 1 6 5 1 3 8R 1 4% 2% 6% 6% 7% 2% 1% 4% 7% 2% 6% 1% 5% 1% 4% 4% 4% 2% 7% 9% Refused/No opinion 2 1 - 1 - - - 1 1 - 1 - 2 - 1 1 - 1 - 1RS 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 9% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 6 of 74 6 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q3. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Fire and rescue services Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ male White POC Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total satisfied 258 40 71 78 68 124 129 198 46 95 66 98 59 167 91 101 58 80 111 45R 121 138 86% 95% 87% 82% 85% 84% 88% 87% 82% 83% 84% 90% 81% 88% 89% 82% 87% 85% 84% 97%S 86% 86% Very satisfied 192 27 48 65 51 87 101 148 32 79K 41 71 45 125 73 71 43 67S 74 30 85 107 64% 64% 58% 68% 64% 59% 69% 65% 57% 69% 53% 66% 62% 65% 71% 58% 64% 71% 57% 64% 61% 67% Somewhat satisfied 67 13D 23D 13 17 37 29 51 14 16 24J 26 14 42 19 30 15 13 36R 15R 36 31 22% 31% 28% 14% 21% 25% 19% 22% 25% 14% 31% 24% 19% 22% 18% 24% 23% 13% 27% 33% 25% 19% Total dissatisfied 11 1 2 7 2 9 2 8 2 5 1 5 4 6 2 7 2 5 4 1 5 6 4% 1% 2% 7% 3% 6% 2% 4% 3% 4% 2% 5% 5% 3% 2% 6% 3% 5% 3% 1% 4% 4% Somewhat 8 - 1 5 2 5 2 6 - 4 1 3 3 4 1 5 2 3 3 1 4 4 dissatisfied 3% 1% 5% 3% 4% 2% 3% 3% 2% 3% 4% 2% 1% 4% 3% 4% 2% 1% 3% 2% Very dissatisfied 4 1 1 2 - 4 - 2 2 1 - 2 1 3 1 3 - 2 2 - 2 2 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% I'm not sure 30 2 9 10 10 14 15 21 9 14 11L 5 10 18 9 15 7 9 16T 1 14 16 10% 4% 11% 10% 12% 10% 10% 9% 15% 12% 14% 5% 14% 9% 9% 12% 10% 10% 13% 1% 10% 10% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 7 of 74 7 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q3. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Fire and rescue services (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 8 of 74 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- ----- DK Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total satisfied 258 43 37 40 43 49 46 80 83 95 132 56 195N 53 145 89 25 1555 90 12 86% 89% 82% 83% 88% 90% 85% 85% 85% 87% 91% 83% 93% 72% 90% 82% 83% 90% 79% 100% Very satisfied 192 29 29 30 31 37 36 57 61 73 98 44 153N 31 115P 54 23P 1235 59 10 64% 59% 63% 63% 64% 67% 66% 61% 63% 67% 68% 65% 73% 41% 71% 50% 77% 71% 52% 79% Somewhat satisfied 67 15 8 10 12 12 10 23 21 22 33 12 42 22 30 35OQ 2 32 32 3 22% 30% 18% 20% 24% 22% 18% 24% 22% 20% 23% 18% 20% 30% 19% 32% 6% 19% 28% 21% Total dissatisfied 11 1 3 1 1 2 3 4 2 5 6 4 2 9M 4 7 - 2 1OR - 4% 3% 7% 2% 2% 3% 6% 5% 2% 5% 4% 6% 1% 13% 2% 7% 1% 8% Somewhat 8 1 1 - 1 2 3 2 1 5 5 2 2 6M 4 4 - 2 6R - dissatisfied 3% 3% 2% 2% 3% 5% 3% 1% 4% 3% 3% 1% 8% 2% 4% 1% 5% Very dissatisfied 4 - 2 1 - - 1 2 1 1 2 2 - 4M - 40 - - 4R - 1% 4% 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1% 3% 5% 3% 3% I'm not sure 30 4 5 7 5 4 5 9 12 9 7 8 13 12M 13 12 5 16 14 - 10% 8% 12% 15% 10% 7% 9% 10% 13% 8% 5% 12% 6% 16% 8% 11% 17% 9% 12% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 8 of 74 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q4. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Police, law enforcement, and uniformed patrol services Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White POC ----- ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total satisfied 210 27 59 65 59 100 108 1661 31 68 60J 82J 45 143 74 92Q 40 63 91 36 96 114 70% 64% 72% 68% 74% 68% 73% 73% 55% 60% 77% 76% 62% 75% 73% 75% 60% 67% 69% 78% 69% 71% Very satisfied 105 15 23 31 35 56 48 85I 12 30 32 431 17 80M 45 39 19 29 49 12 52 53 35% 36% 28% 33% 44% 38% 33% 37% 22% 26% 41% 40% 24% 42% 44% 32% 28% 30% 37% 27% 37% 33% Somewhat satisfied 106 12 36 34 24 44 59 81 19 38 28 40 28 63 30 530 21 35 42 24S 44 61 35% 28% 44% 35% 30% 30% 40% 36% 34% 33% 36% 37% 38% 33% 29% 43% 31% 37% 32% 52% 32% 38% Total dissatisfied 74 12 21 24 17 43 28 52 19 36L 17 21 19 41 21 27 230 27 34 8 36 37 25% 29% 25% 25% 21% 29% 19% 23% 34% 32% 22% 19% 26% 22% 20% 22% 34% 28% 26% 17% 26% 23% Somewhat 41 6 9 15 11 26G 14 28 12 21 8 12 6 29 12 16 12 10 22 6 17 24 dissatisfied 14% 15% 10% 16% 14% 18% 9% 12% 22% 18% 10% 11% 8% 15% 12% 13% 18% 10% 17% 13% 12% 15% Very dissatisfied 33 6 12 9 6 17 15 25 7 15 9 9 13N 13 9 11 11 17T 12 2 20 13 11% 14% 15% 9% 8% 11% 10% 11% 12% 13% 12% 8% 18% 7% 8% 9% 17% 18% 9% 4% 14% 8% I'm not sure 16 3 2 6 4 4 11 8 6H 10K 1 5 8N 7 7 4 4 4 6 2 7 8 5% 8% 3% 7% 5% 3% 7% 4% 11% 9% 1% 5% 11% 4% 7% 3% 6% 5% 4% 4% 5% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 9 of 74 9 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q4. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Police, law enforcement, and uniformed patrol services (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 10 of 74 10 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK Yes ----- No DK ----- ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total satisfied 210 32 29 30 34 44 41 61 64 85H 116L 42 21ON - 142PQ 49 20P 149S 52 10S 70% 66% 63% 62% 71% 81% 75% 65% 67% 78% 81% 62% 100% 88% 45% 68% 86% 45% 77% Very satisfied 105 16 11 18 18 23 19 27 36 42 63 22 105N - 69P 24 11 76S 26 3 35% 33% 25% 36% 38% 42% 35% 29% 37% 38% 44% 32% 50% 43% 23% 37% 44% 22% 22% Somewhat satisfied 106 16 17 13 16 21 22 34 29 43 53 20 106N - 72P 24 9 73S 26 7S 35% 34% 38% 26% 33% 39% 40% 36% 30% 40% 37% 29% 50% 45% 22% 32% 42% 23% 55% Total dissatisfied 74 14 13 14 11 8 12 27 26 21 22 25K - 74M 14 540Q 5 18 55RT 1 25% 30% 28% 30% 24% 15% 23% 29% 27% 19% 15% 37% 100% 9% 50% 18% 10% 48% 7% Somewhat 41 8G 9G lOG 6 7G 1 17J 16 8 13 11 - 41M 12 260 3 13 27R 1 dissatisfied 14% 17% 19% 20% 12% 13% 2% 18% 16% 8% 9% 16% 55% 7% 24% 10% 7% 24% 7% Very dissatisfied 33 6 4 5 5 1 11F 10 10 12 9 14K - 33M 2 280Q 2 5 28RT - 11% 12% 10% 9% 11% 3% 20% 11% 10% 11% 7% 21% 45% 1% 26% 7% 3% 24% I'm not sure 16 2 4 4 3 2 1 6 7 3 6 1 - - 6 5 40 6 8 2R 5% 4% 8% 8% 6% 3% 3% 6% 7% 3% 4% 1% 4% 5% 14% 3% 7% 16% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 10 of 74 10 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q5. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: City street maintenance Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male White POC ---- ----- ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > Of 4 ----- ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total satisfied 169 33CD 42 44 50D 82 85 1341 24 55 38 76JK 40 109 69PQ 60 34 45 79 30 86 83 56% 77% 51% 46% 63% 55% 58% 59% 42% 48% 49% 70% 56% 57% 67% 49% 51% 48% 60% 65% 61% 52% Very satisfied 43 10 10 12 11 20 22 31 4 17 7 19 5 31 22 14 8 15T 20T 1 22 21 14% 24% 12% 12% 14% 14% 15% 14% 7% 15% 9% 18% 7% 16% 21% 11% 12% 16% 16% 3% 16% 13% Somewhat satisfied 126 22D 32 32 39D 61 62 103 20 38 31 561 35 78 47 47 26 30 58 29RS 64 62 42% 52% 39% 34% 49% 42% 43% 45% 35% 33% 40% 52% 49% 41% 46% 38% 39% 32% 44% 62% 46% 39% Total dissatisfied 124 10 36B 49BE 29 62 59 91 28 53L 40L 31 30 77 32 600 30 47 48 16 50 73 41% 23% 44% 51% 36% 42% 40% 40% 50% 47% 51% 28% 41% 40% 31% 49% 45% 50% 37% 34% 36% 46% Somewhat 66 5 20 27B 14 32 33 45 19H 29 18 19 19 41 14 30 210 21 27 11 26 40 dissatisfied 22% 12% 24% 28% 18% 22% 23% 20% 33% 25% 24% 18% 27% 21% 14% 24% 32% 22% 20% 23% 19% 25% Very dissatisfied 57 5 17 22 14 31 26 45 10 24L 21L 12 10 36 18 31 9 26T 22 5 24 33 19% 11% 20% 23% 18% 21% 18% 20% 17% 21% 27% 11% 15% 19% 18% 25% 13% 27% 17% 11% 17% 21% I'm not sure 8 - 4 3 1 3 4 3 4H 6 - 2 2 6 1 2 3 3 4 1 4 4 3% 5% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 8% 5% 2% 3% 3% 1% 2% 4% 3% 3% 1% 3% 2% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 11 of 74 11 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q5. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: City street maintenance (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 12 of 74 12 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total satisfied 169 31 21 31 26 26 33 52 57 59 100L 25 129N 32 102Q 55 12 101 59 8 56% 65% 46% 63% 55% 49% 60% 56% 59% 54% 69% 37% 61% 44% 63% 50% 40% 58% 52% 65% Very satisfied 43 11F 8 6 5 4 8 20 11 12 29L 6 37N 4 25 17 1 22 20 1 14% 23% 18% 13% 10% 7% 15% 21% 12% 11% 20% 8% 17% 6% 15% 16% 4% 13% 18% 9% Somewhat satisfied 126 20 13 24C 22 23 25 32 46 47 71L 19 93 28 77P 37 11 79 39 7 42% 41% 28% 50% 45% 41% 45% 35% 47% 43% 49% 28% 44% 38% 48% 34% 37% 46% 34% 55% Total dissatisfied 124 17 23 15 19 28 22 40 34 50 44 43K 81 38 58 49 16 70 49 4 41% 35% 50% 30% 40% 51% 40% 42% 35% 46% 30% 63% 39% 51% 36% 45% 55% 40% 43% 35% Somewhat 66 13 17EF 10 5 8 12 30IJ 16 21 31 16 49 16 33 23 10 39 24 3 dissatisfied 22% 26% 38% 21% 11% 15% 23% 32% 16% 19% 22% 23% 23% 21% 20% 21% 35% 23% 21% 24% Very dissatisfied 57 4 6 4 14BD 20BCDG 9 10 18 29H 13 27K 33 22M 26 26 6 31 25 1 19% 8% 13% 9% 29% 37% 17% 11% 19% 27% 9% 40% 15% 30% 16% 24% 20% 18% 22% 11% I'm not sure 8 0 2 3 3 - - 2 6J - 0 - - 3M 1 5 1 2 6 - 3% 1% 3% 6% 5% 2% 6% * 5% 1% 5% 5% 1% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 12 of 74 12 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q6. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Springfield municipal jail services Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White POC ----- ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > Of 4 Of 4 ----- ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total satisfied 134 23E 40 43 28 69 62 1131 13 47 29 58K 36 82 47 61 26 43 60 20 72V 62 45% 55% 48% 46% 35% 47% 42% 50% 23% 41% 37% 54% 50% 43% 46% 50% 39% 45% 46% 43% 51% 39% Very satisfied 49 11E 12 20E 7 26 22 39 5 14 12 23 10 32 23 15 12 12 25 8 25 24 16% 25% 14% 22% 8% 18% 15% 17% 9% 13% 16% 21% 14% 17% 22% 12% 17% 13% 19% 18% 18% 15% Somewhat satisfied 85 13 28 23 21 43 40 741 8 33 17 36 26 50 24 46OQ 14 30 35 12 47 39 28% 30% 34% 24% 27% 29% 27% 32% 14% 29% 22% 33% 36% 26% 23% 38% 21% 32% 27% 25% 33% 24% Total dissatisfied 50 10 12 19 10 30 20 39 9 17 19 14 14 29 16 18 15 12 24 10 25 26 17% 24% 14% 20% 12% 21% 14% 17% 17% 15% 24% 13% 19% 15% 16% 15% 23% 13% 18% 22% 18% 16% Somewhat 24 5 4 9 5 12 11 20 2 6 6 11 5 17 7 6 9P 3 11 9RS 10 14 dissatisfied 8% 11% 5% 10% 6% 8% 8% 9% 4% 6% 8% 10% 7% 9% 7% 5% 13% 3% 8% 19% 7% 9% Very dissatisfied 27 6 7 9 5 18 9 19 7 11 13L 3 8 12 9 12 6 10 13 1 15 12 9% 13% 9% 10% 6% 12% 6% 8% 12% 10% 16% 3% 12% 6% 9% 10% 9% 10% 10% 3% 11% 7% I'm not sure 115 9 31 33 42BD 47 65F 76 34H 50 30 35 23 80 39 44 26 40 48 16 43 72U 38% 21% 38% 35% 53% 32% 44% 33% 61% 44% 39% 33% 31% 42% 39% 36% 39% 42% 36% 35% 31% 45% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 13 of 74 13 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q6. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Springfield municipal jail services (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 14 of 74 14 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- ----- DK Yes ----- No ----- ----- DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total satisfied 134 20 13 23 21 29C 30C 32 44 59H 78L 26 116N 16 83P 37 15 89S 38 8 45% 40% 28% 47% 43% 53% 55% 34% 45% 54% 54% 38% 55% 22% 51% 34% 49% 51% 33% 60% Very satisfied 49 6 5 9 11 8 10 11 20 18 32 10 47N 1 32 12 5 35 14 - 16% 13% 10% 19% 22% 15% 18% 12% 21% 17% 22% 14% 22% 2% 20% 11% 18% 20% 13% Somewhat satisfied 85 13 8 13 10 21C 20C 21 23 41H 46 16 69 15 51 25 9 54 23 8RS 28% 27% 18% 28% 21% 38% 37% 22% 24% 37% 32% 24% 33% 21% 31% 23% 31% 31% 21% 60% Total dissatisfied 50 10 9 5 6 14 7 19 10 21 17 25K 21 27M 15 300 5 18 33RT - 17% 20% 20% 10% 12% 26% 14% 20% 11% 20% 11% 36% 10% 37% 9% 28% 17% 10% 29% Somewhat 24 6 2 3 3 9G 2 8 5 11 12 10 13 10 10 9 4 11 13 - dissatisfied 8% 12% 4% 6% 5% 16% 3% 8% 5% 10% 8% 14% 6% 13% 6% 8% 14% 6% 11% Very dissatisfied 27 4 7 2 3 5 6 11 5 11 5 15K 8 18M 5 210Q 1 7 20R - 9% 8% 16% 4% 7% 9% 10% 12% 5% 10% 3% 22% 4% 24% 3% 20% 3% 4% 18% I'm not sure 115 19F 24FG 21F 22F 12 17 431 431 29 50 17 74 30 64 41 10 67 44 5 38% 40% 52% 44% 45% 21% 32% 46% 44% 27% 35% 26% 35% 41% 40% 38% 34% 38% 38% 40% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 14 of 74 14 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q7. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Springfield library services Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ male White POC Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total satisfied 191 31 50 63 47 84 103F 146 35 74 45 72 50 117 61 78 47 59 83 38RS 87 105 64% 72% 60% 67% 59% 57% 70% 64% 61% 65% 58% 67% 70% 61% 59% 63% 70% 63% 63% 82% 62% 65% Very satisfied 109 16 27 33 33 48 59 81 20 45 26 38 26 67 28 540 24 34 45 20 46 62 36% 38% 33% 34% 41% 33% 40% 36% 36% 39% 33% 36% 36% 35% 28% 44% 35% 36% 35% 42% 33% 39% Somewhat satisfied 83 15E 23 31E 14 36 44 65 15 29 20 34 24 50 32P 24 23P 25 37 19 40 43 28% 35% 28% 32% 18% 25% 30% 29% 26% 25% 26% 31% 34% 26% 32% 19% 34% 27% 28% 40% 29% 27% Total dissatisfied 21 4E 8 8 1 12 9 17 2 6 7 8 4 15 4 10 7 6 10 2 13 8 7% 10% 9% 8% 2% 8% 6% 8% 3% 5% 9% 8% 5% 8% 4% 8% 10% 6% 7% 4% 10% 5% Somewhat 16 4 6 5 1 11 5 15 0 3 6 7 4 10 4 9 4 5 7 2 11 6 dissatisfied 5% 8% 8% 5% 2% 8% 4% 7% 1% 3% 8% 6% 5% 5% 4% 7% 5% 5% 5% 4% 8% 4% Very dissatisfied 5 1 1 3 - 1 3 2 1 2 1 1 - 5 - 1 3OP 1 3 - 3 2 2% 1% 2% 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% * 5% 1% 2% 2% 1% I'm not sure 88 8 25 24 31B 50 35 64 20 35 25 28 18 60 38Q 35 13 29T 39T 7 40 48 29% 18% 30% 25% 39% 34% 24% 28% 36% 31% 32% 26% 25% 31% 37% 29% 20% 31% 30% 14% 29% 30% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 15 of 74 15 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q7. Level of satisfaction with the following service provided by the City of Springfield: Springfield library services (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 16 of 74 16 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total satisfied 191 30 35F 35 30 29 32 65 65 61 97L 32 139 47 98 75 18 109 74 8 64% 61% 78% 72% 62% 54% 59% 69% 67% 56% 67% 48% 66% 64% 61% 69% 61% 63% 64% 67% Very satisfied 109 17 18 22 13 18 20 35 36 38 50 27 86 20 52 45 12 59 45 4 36% 35% 39% 46% 27% 33% 37% 37% 37% 35% 34% 40% 41% 27% 32% 41% 41% 34% 400 35% Somewhat satisfied 83 13 18 13 17 12 12 30 29 23 48L 5 53 27 46 30 6 50 28 4 28% 26% 39% 26% 34% 21% 22% 32% 30% 21% 33% 8% 25% 37% 29% 28% 20% 29% 25% 32% Total dissatisfied 21 2 1 3 2 4 1OBCE 3 5 14H 11 9 15 6 11 10 - 11 10 1 7% 4% 2% 5% 4% 7% 18% 3% 5% 13% 7% 13% 7% 8% 7% 9% 6% 8% 7% Somewhat 16 2 1 3 1 4 6 3 4 10 10 7 12 4 9 7 - 9 7 1 dissatisfied 5% 4% 2% 5% 3% 7% 11% 3% 4% 9% 7% 10% 6% 6% 6% 6% 5% 6% 7% Very dissatisfied 5 - - - 1 - 4F - 1 4 1 2 3 2 2 3 - 2 3 - 2% 1% 7% 1% 4% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 2% 1% 2% I'm not sure 88 17 9 11 17 21C 13 26 28 34 37 26 57 20 52 24 11 53 31 3 29% 35% 20% 23% 34% 39% 23% 28% 28% 31% 25% 39% 27% 27% 32% 22% 39% 31% 27% 26% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 16 of 74 16 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q8. Initial Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 17 of 74 17 shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 ----- ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- ---- male White ---- ----- ----- POC Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll Grad+ ----- ----- ----- <$50K ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total yes 162 20 41 50 51 77 83 128 29 56 42 63 37 108 61 66 33 55 67 26 69 93 54% 48% 49% 52% 64% 52% 56% 56% 50% 50% 54% 58% 51% 57% 60% 53% 50% 58% 51% 56% 49% 58% Yes - certain 108 14 17 38C 39C 53 54 87 17 34 34 39 28 71 45 42 21 38 39 21 45 62 36% 33% 20% 40% 49% 36% 37% 38% 31% 30% 43% 37% 39% 37% 44% 34% 31% 40% 30% 45% 32% 39% Yes - lean 54 6 24DE 12 12 24 29 41 11 22 8 24K 9 38 16 24 13 17 28 5 24 30 18% 15% 29% 12% 15% 16% 20% 18% 20% 19% 11% 22% 12% 20% 16% 20% 19% 18% 22% 11% 17% 19% Total no 109 18E 34E 38E 19 60 46 77 21 47 30 32 24 67 29 44 300 29 53 15 52 56 36% 42% 42% 40% 23% 41% 31% 34% 38% 41% 38% 29% 34% 35% 28% 36% 45% 30% 40% 33% 37% 35% No - lean 39 6 8 16 9 24 13 29 7 15 8 15 11 22 9 15 11 10 23 5 15 23 13% 15% 9% 17% 11% 16% 9% 13% 13% 13% 11% 14% 15% 12% 9% 12% 16% 11% 18% 11% 11% 14% No - certain 70 11 27E 22 10 36 33 48 14 31L 22L 17 14 45 19 29 19 18 30 10 37 33 23% 27% 33% 23% 13% 25% 22% 21% 25% 28% 28% 16% 19% 23% 19% 24% 29% 19% 23% 22% 26% 21% I'm not sure 30 4 7 8 10 10 19 22 7 11 6 13 11 16 13 13 4 11 11 5 19 11 10% 10% 9% 8% 13% 7% 13% 10% 12% 9% 8% 12% 15% 8% 12% 10% 5% 12% 9% 11% 13% 7% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 17 of 74 17 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q8. Initial Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 18 of 74 18 shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes No DK ----- ----- ----- ----- Yes ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total yes 162 22 22 31 28 33 26 44 59 59 93L 28 142N 14 162PQ - - 144ST 16 1 54% 45% 48% 64% 58% 60% 48% 47% 61% 54% 64% 42% 67% 19% 100% 83% 14% 12% Yes - certain 108 10 11 24BC 19 24BC 19 21 43H 44H 58 22 96N 7 108PQ - - 100ST 8 1 36% 21% 24% 50% 39% 45% 35% 22% 44% 40% 40% 32% 46% 9% 67% 57% 7% 5% Yes - lean 54 12 11 7 9 8 7 23 16 15 35L 7 45N 7 54PQ - - 45S 9 1 18% 24% 24% 14% 19% 15% 13% 24% 17% 14% 24% 10% 22% 10% 33% 26% 8% 7% Total no 109 22E 21E 12 11 16 25DE 43I 24 41 39 29K 49 54M - 1090Q - 16 91RT 2 36% 45% 47% 26% 24% 29% 47% 46% 25% 38% 27% 42% 23% 74% 100% 9% 79% 16% No - lean 39 10 8 3 5 7 6 18 8 13 15 9 19 19M - 390Q - 6 32R 1 13% 21% 17% 6% 11% 12% 11% 19% 9% 12% 10% 13% 9% 26% 36% 3% 28% 9% No - certain 70 12 14 9 6 9 20EF 26 16 29 24 19 30 35M - 700Q - 10 59RT 1 23% 24% 30% 19% 13% 17% 36% 27% 16% 26% 17% 29% 14% 48% 64% 6% 52% 7% I'm not sure 30 5 2 5 9G 6 3 7 14 9 12 11 20 5 - - 300P 13 7 9RS 10% 10% 4% 11% 18% 11% 5% 7% 15% 8% 9% 16% 10% 7% 100% 8% 6% 72% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 18 of 74 18 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q9. Informed Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 19 of 74 19 shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- ----- POC Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll ----- ----- Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- $100K Or ----- ----- > Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total yes 157 18 39 51 49 77 80 123 30 58 41 59 38 102 58 62 35 47 67 30 68 89 52% 43% 47% 53% 62% 52% 55% 54% 53% 51% 53% 54% 53% 53% 56% 51% 53% 50% 51% 65% 48% 56% Yes - certain 100 11 21 33 36BC 50 50 81 17 35 30 35 31 63 38 40 21 34 36 22S 42 58 33% 25% 25% 35% 44% 34% 34% 36% 30% 31% 39% 32% 42% 33% 37% 33% 32% 36% 27% 47% 30% 37% Yes - lean 57 8 18 18 14 27 30 43 13 23 11 24 8 39 20 22 14 12 32 8 26 31 19% 18% 22% 18% 17% 18% 21% 19% 23% 20% 14% 22% 11% 20% 19% 18% 21% 13% 24% 18% 19% 19% Total no 120 19 39 36 26 63 52 85 24 52 32 36 30 72 32 54 31 38 57 13 59 61 40% 45% 48% 37% 33% 43% 36% 37% 43% 46% 42% 33% 41% 38% 31% 44% 45% 41% 43% 27% 42% 38% No - lean 45 7 14 14 10 21 21 33 10 18 11 17 12 25 13 19 10 14 25 4 19 26 15% 17% 17% 15% 13% 14% 14% 14% 18% 16% 14% 16% 17% 13% 13% 16% 14% 15% 19% 8% 14% 16% No - certain 75 12 26 21 16 42 31 52 14 34L 22 19 18 47 19 34 21 24 32 9 40 35 25% 28% 31% 22% 20% 28% 21% 23% 25% 30% 28% 18% 24% 25% 19% 28% 31% 25% 24% 19% 28% 22% I'm not sure 22 5 4 9 4 7 14 19 3 4 5 131 4 18 13Q 7 1 9 7 4 13 9 7% 12% 5% 9% 5% 5% 10% 8% 4% 4% 6% 12% 6% 9% 12% 5% 2% 10% 5% 8% 9% 6% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 19 of 74 19 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q9. Informed Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 20 of 74 20 shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir Track ----- ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes No ----- ----- ----- DK ----- Yes No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total yes 157 26 22 29 26 29 25 48 55 54 87L 30 134N 17 139PQ 10 9P 141ST 15 1 52% 54% 48% 59% 54% 54% 45% 51% 57% 49% 61% 45% 64% 24% 86% 9% 29% 81% 13% 9% Yes - certain 100 15 12 20 17 21 15 27 37 36 55 19 87N 8 96PQ 3 1 94ST 5 1 33% 31% 26% 41% 35% 39% 27% 29% 38% 33% 38% 27% 41% 11% 59% 3% 4% 54% 4% 9% Yes - lean 57 11 10 9 9 8 10 22 18 18 33 12 47 9 43P 7 8P 46ST 11 - 19% 24% 22% 18% 19% 14% 18% 23% 18% 16% 23% 17% 22% 13% 27% 6% 26% 27% 9% Total no 120 21 21 15 19 20 24 42 34 44 46 33K 60 55M 16 94OQ 100 23 95RT 3 40% 44% 45% 30% 40% 37% 44% 45% 35% 41% 32% 49% 28% 74% 10% 87% 34% 13% 83% 23% No - lean 45 6 7 3 12D 10 7 13 16 17 21 9 26 17M 9 300 60 12 31R 2 15% 11% 15% 7% 25% 18% 13% 13% 16% 16% 14% 14% 12% 23% 6% 28% 19% 7% 27% 16% No - certain 75 16 14 11 7 10 17 29 18 27 26 24K 34 38M 7 64OQ 40 11 63RT 1 25% 33% 30% 23% 15% 19% 31% 31% 19% 25% 18% 35% 16% 51% 4% 59% 15% 6% 56% 7% I'm not sure 22 1 3 5 3 5 6 4 8 11 11 5 17 2 7 5 11OP 9 4 9RS 7% 2% 6% 11% 6% 9% 10% 4% 8% 10% 8% 7% 8% 2% 4% 4% 37% 5% 4% 69% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 20 of 74 20 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q10. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: When crime rates increase, businesses leave and property values drop. This levy will help keep Springfield safe, ensure a strong local economy, and protect families' investments in their homes. Age ----------------- Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 Total 300 43 82 95 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) Total good 207 28 51 66 69% 66% 62% 69% Very good 126 16 24 41 42% 39% 29% 43% Good 80 12 28 25 27% 28% 34% 26% Total poor 74 13 23 24 25% 31% 28% 25% Poor 34 7 8 13 11% 16% 10% 14% Very poor 41 6 15 11 14% 15% 19% 11% I'm not sure 19 1 8 5 6% 2% 9% 6% Gender --------- Ethnicity ---- Male Fe - ----------- 65+ male White POC ---- ---- ---- ----- ----- 80 147 147 227 57 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) 61 99 105 157 38 77% 67% 71% 69% 66% 45C 61 63 100 19 57% 42% 43% 44% 33% 16 38 42 57 19 20% 26% 28% 25% 34% 13 39 32 57 14 17% 26% 22% 25% 25% 5 17 15 26 5 7% 12% 10% 12% 9% 8 21 17 30 9 10% 14% 12% 13% 16% 5 9 10 13 5 6% 6% 7% 6% 9% Education Vote Party -----------------Income History ---------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 66 611 801 51 130 80Q 83 41 67 83 36 100 107 58% 78% 74% 71% 68% 78% 68% 61% 71% 63% 78% 71% 67% 45 40 41 25 82 53Q 50 22 45 52 18 58 68 40% 51% 38% 35% 43% 52% 41% 33% 48% 39% 38% 42% 43% 20 21 391 26 48 26 34 19 22 31 18S 41 39 18% 28% 36% 36% 25% 26% 27% 28% 23% 23% 39% 30% 24% 41KL 14 19 18 46 17 32 210 22 40 9 28 46 36% 18% 18% 25% 24% 16% 26% 32% 23% 30% 19% 20% 29% 18K 4 13 6 23 7 15 9 10 15 7 12 22 15% 5% 12% 9% 12% 7% 120 140 10% 11% 150 80 140 24L 10 7 12 23 9 17 12 12 25T 2 17 24 21% 13% 6% 16% 12% 9% 14% 18% 13% 19% 4% 12% 15% 7 3 9 3 15 6 8 5 5 9 2 12 7 6% 4% 8% 5% 8% 6% 6% 7% 6% 7% 4% 9% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 21 of 74 21 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q10. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: When crime rates increase, businesses leave and property values drop. This levy will help keep Springfield safe, ensure a strong local economy, and protect families' investments in their homes. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 155ST 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 100% 1000 1000 1000 101PQ 17 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 207 31 26 33 36 45BCG 36 57 69 81H 110L 42 520 69% 64% 57% 68% 74% 83% 66% 60% 71% 74% 76% 62% Very good 126 15 17 20 22 29B 24 32 41 53H 71 23 25R 42% 31% 38% 40% 45% 52% 44% 34% 43% 48% 49% 34% Good 80 16 9 13 14 17 12 25 27 28 39 19 11 27% 33% 19% 27% 29% 31% 22% 26% 28% 26% 270 270 Total poor 74 17EF 16EF 9 8 8 16 34IJ 17 23 32 21 25% 36% 36% 19% 16% 14% 29% 36% 18% 21% 22% 31% Poor 34 8D 7D 1 3 6 9D 15I 4 15I 15 10 11% 17% 15% 1% 6% 11% 16% 16% 4% 13% 11% 15% Very poor 41 9F 9F 9F 5 2 7 181 13 9 16 11 14% 19% 20% 18% 10% 3% 13% 20% 14% 8% 11% 16% I'm not sure 19 - 3 6B 5B 2 3 3 11 5 3 5 6% 8% 13% 10% 3% 5% 4% 11% 4% 2% 7% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 169N 27 148P 35 23P 155ST 43 8 80% 37% 91% 33% 79% 90% 38% 65% 106N 14 101PQ 17 8 102ST 23 1 50% 18% 62% 16% 27% 59% 20% 11% 63 13 47P 18 15OP 54S 20 7S 300 180 290 170 520 310 180 540 31 40M 11 60OQ 3 13 60RT 2 15% 54% 7% 56% 9% 7% 52% 14% 15 17M 4 29OQ 1 7 25R 2 7% 23% 2% 27% 3% 4% 22% 14% 15 23M 7 32OQ 2 6 34RT - 7% 31% 4% 29% 6% 4% 30% 11 7 3 130 30 5 11R 3R 5% 9% 2% 12% 12% 3% 10% 21% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 22 of 74 22 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Qll. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: Maintaining a visible public safety presence is crucial to protecting the safety of our community. Now is not the time to cut police budget or jail funding. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 23 of 74 23 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll ----- ----- Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 204 26 51 66 61 100 100 154 37 63 631 781 45 130 75Q 85 39 65 90 33 94 110 68% 62% 62% 69% 76% 68% 68% 68% 64% 56% 81% 72% 62% 68% 73% 69% 58% 69% 68% 70% 67% 69% Very good 120 16 20 43C 40C 57 61 94 19 36 40J 44 25 75 51Q 47 19 44 46 20 55 65 40% 38% 25% 46% 50% 39% 42% 42% 34% 32% 51% 41% 34% 39% 50% 38% 29% 47% 35% 43% 39% 41% Good 84 10 31 22 21 43 39 60 18 27 23 33 20 55 24 38 20 21 43 13 39 45 28% 23% 37% 23% 26% 29% 26% 26% 31% 24% 30% 31% 28% 29% 23% 31% 29% 23% 33% 27% 280 280 Total poor 77 15E 25 23 14 36 38 61 15 42KL 11 24 22 48 20 31 22 25 36 11 39 37 26% 35% 31% 24% 17% 25% 26% 27% 26% 37% 14% 22% 30% 25% 20% 25% 33% 26% 27% 24% 28% 23% Poor 41 8 14 10 8 17 22 33 6 23K 3 15K 12 27 11 16 12 16 14 9 20 21 14% 18% 17% 11% 11% 12% 150 150 11% 200 4% 140 160 140 11% 130 180 170 11% 190 140 13% Very poor 36 7 11 12 5 19 15 27 9 20L 8 8 10 21 9 15 10 9 21 2 19 17 12% 17% 14% 13% 6% 13% 10% 12% 15% 17% 10% 8% 14% 11% 9% 12% 15% 10% 16% 5% 14% 10% I'm not sure 19 1 6 7 5 10 9 12 5 9 4 7 5 13 7 6 6 4 6 3 7 12 6% 3% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 5% 9% 8% 5% 6% 8% 7% 7% 5% 9% 4% 5% 5% 5% 8% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 23 of 74 23 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Qll. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: Maintaining a visible public safety presence is crucial to protecting the safety of our community. Now is not the time to cut police budget or jail funding. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 152ST 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 94PQ 18 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 204 29 26 32 36 42C 39 55 68 81H 104 43 40% 68% 60% 57% 66% 73% 77% 72% 59% 70% 74% 72% 64% Very good 120 17 16 21 14 28E 26 33 35 53H 58 27 29R 40% 35% 35% 43% 29% 50% 47% 35% 36% 49% 40% 39% Good 84 12 10 11 22C 14 14 23 33 28 46 17 12 28% 25% 23% 24% 45% 26% 25% 24% 34% 26% 32% 25% Total poor 77 18EF 18EF 11 8 9 13 36IJ 19 22 32 22 26% 37% 39% 23% 16% 17% 23% 38% 20% 20% 22% 32% Poor 41 11D 6 3 5 7 9 17 8 17 18 11 14% 22% 13% 6% 10% 13% 17% 18% 8% 15% 12% 16% Very poor 36 7F 12EFG 8F 3 2 3 191 11 5 14 11 12% 15% 26% 17% 7% 4% 6% 20% 12% 5% 10% 16% I'm not sure 19 2 2 5 5 3 3 3 10 6 9 3 6% 3% 3% 11% 10% 6% 5% 3% 10% 6% 6% 4% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 168N 27 142PQ 42 20P 152ST 44 8 80% 37% 88% 39% 67% 88% 39% 63% 103N 12 94PQ 18 8 100ST 18 3 49% 17% 58% 17% 27% 58% 16% 20% 64 15 48 24 12 52 26 5 31% 20% 30% 22% 40% 30% 23% 43% 30 43M 14 580Q 4 14 62RT 1 14% 58% 9% 54% 14% 8% 55% 6% 19 19M 11 270 3 11 29R 1 9% 25% 7% 25% 11% 7% 25% 6% 11 24M 3 320Q 1 2 34RT - 5% 33% 2% 29% 4% 1% 29% 12 4 6 8 60 8 8 4RS 6% 5% 4% 7% 19% 4% 7% 31% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 24 of 74 24 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q12. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy could fund crucial mental health services to more holistically address public safety, such as CAHOOTS mobile crisis intervention and mental health services in jail. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 25 of 74 25 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 234 35 59 79 61 115 115 185 41 91 55 89 57 146 87 92 49 75 103 35 107 128 78% 83% 71% 83% 77% 78% 79% 81% 73% 80% 70% 82% 80% 76% 85% 75% 74% 80% 78% 74% 76% 80% Very good 150 22 36 49 43 65 82 1231 22 71KL 28 51 32 99 56 55 36 42 69 23 71 78 50% 52% 44% 51% 53% 44% 56% 54% 39% 62% 36% 47% 45% 52% 55% 45% 54% 44% 52% 50% 51% 49% Good 85 14 23 30 19 50G 33 62 19 20 261 381 25 47 31 37 13 34 34 11 35 50 28% 32% 27% 32% 23% 34% 23% 27% 33% 18% 34% 35% 35% 24% 30% 30% 19% 36% 26% 24% 25% 31% Total poor 50 6 16 13 14 27 21 30 14H 19 19L 12 12 32 12 24 13 16 21 8 25 25 17% 15% 20% 13% 18% 18% 14% 13% 25% 16% 24% 11% 16% 17% 12% 20% 19% 17% 16% 17% 18% 16% Poor 23 3 4 6 10 16G 6 13 6 10 6 7 4 18 5 14 3 9 10 3 12 11 8% 6% 5% 6% 13% 11% 4% 6% 11% 9% 80 60 50 9% 50 120 50 10% 70 60 80 7% Very poor 27 4 12 7 4 11 15 17 8 9 12L 5 8 14 7 10 10 7 11 5 13 14 9% 9% 15% 7% 5% 8% 10% 7% 14% 8% 16% 5% 11% 8% 7% 8% 14% 7% 9% 11% 9% 9% I'm not sure 16 1 8 4 4 5 11 13 1 4 5 7 3 13 3 7 5 3 7 4 9 7 5% 2% 9% 4% 5% 4% 7% 6% 20 40 60 70 40 70 3% 50 8% 3% 6% 80 6% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 25 of 74 25 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q12. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy could fund crucial mental health services to more holistically address public safety, such as CAHOOTS mobile crisis intervention and mental health services in jail. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 1495 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100P 35 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 234 34 35 38 42 47 39 69 79 86 123L 49 26% 78% 70% 76% 78% 86% 86% 72% 73% 82% 79% 85% 72% Very good 150 22 19 26 28G 35CG 19 41 55 54 82 30 13 50% 45% 42% 54% 59% 63% 35% 44% 56% 49% 57% 45% Good 85 12 16 11 13 12 20 28 25 32 41 18 12 28% 25% 34% 24% 28% 22% 37% 30% 26% 29% 28% 27% Total poor 50 12 8 6 6 7 11 20 12 18 20 15 17% 26% 17% 12% 12% 12% 20% 22% 12% 16% 14% 22% Poor 23 6D 7D - 2 3 5 13I 2 8 7 5 8% 13% 15% 3% 5% 9% 14% 2% 7% 5% 7% Very poor 27 6 1 6 4 4 6 7 10 10 13 10 9% 13% 3% 12% 9% 7% 11% 8% 10% 9% 9% 15% I'm not sure 16 2 3 5 1 1 4 5 6 5 2 4 5% 4% 6% 10% 2% 2% 8% 5% 6% 5% 1% 6% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 168 53 144PQ 69 22 1495 75 10 80% 71% 89% 63% 74% 86% 66% 78% 111 30 100P 35 14 1045 41 5 53% 40% 62% 33% 48% 60% 36% 36% 57 23 44 33 8 45 34 5 27% 31% 27% 31% 26% 26% 30% 42% 31 18 15 300 5 19 30R 1 15% 24% 9% 28% 17% 11% 26% 6% 16 6 8 140 2 9 13 1 7% 8% 5% 12% 6% 5% 11% 6% 15 12M 7 160 3 10 17R - 7% 16% 4% 15% 11% 6% 15% 12 3 3 100 30 5 9 2R 6% 4% 2% 9% 10% 3% 8% 16% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 26 of 74 26 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q13. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy ensures the courts can continue to hear cases in a timely manner and helps the courts operate efficiently and effectively. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 27 of 74 27 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 222 33 54 73 63 109 111 175 37 77 59 86 57 139 82 89 48 74 95 35 106 117 74% 78% 66% 76% 78% 74% 76% 77% 65% 68% 76% 80% 79% 73% 80% 73% 72% 78% 72% 76% 76% 73% Very good 127 18 27 41 40C 64 61 102 21 42 40 45 29 81 48 51 27 36 54 22 59 68 42% 42% 33% 44% 50% 43% 42% 45% 36% 37% 51% 42% 40% 42% 47% 41% 40% 38% 41% 48% 42% 43% Good 96 15 27 31 23 45 50 73 17 35 19 41 28 59 33 38 21 38 41 13 47 49 32% 35% 33% 33% 28% 31% 34% 32% 290 310 25% 380 39% 31% 32% 31% 310 400 310 280 340 30% Total poor 61 10 22E 19 9 31 26 41 15 29 16 16 13 37 17 26 16 15 31 9 29 32 20% 22% 27% 20% 12% 21% 18% 18% 26% 25% 20% 15% 19% 20% 16% 21% 24% 16% 24% 19% 21% 20% Poor 23 6E 6 8 3 13 9 15 6 8 6 10 5 14 6 8 8 5 12 5 12 11 8% 15% 7% 8% 4% 9% 6% 7% 10% 7% 7% 9% 7% 7% 6% 7% 12% 5% 9% 11% 9% 7% Very poor 37 3 16E 12 6 18 17 26 9 21L 10 6 8 23 10 18 8 11 20 3 16 21 12% 7% 20% 12% 8% 12% 12% 11% 16% 19% 13% 6% 12% 12% 10% 15% 12% 11% 15% 7% 12% 13% I'm not sure 17 - 6 3 8B 7 10 10 5 8 3 6 2 15 4 7 3 5 5 3 5 12 6% 7% 3% 10% 5% 7% 5% 8% 7% 4% 5% 3% 8% 4% 6% 5% 5% 4% 5% 4% 7% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 27 of 74 27 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q13. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy ensures the courts can continue to hear cases in a timely manner and helps the courts operate efficiently and effectively. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 222 38 28 36 34 47C 39 66 70 86 113 48 74% 78% 62% 74% 71% 86% 72% 70% 72% 79% 78% 71% Very good 127 21 18 23 20 24 21 40 43 44 73L 23 42% 44% 40% 47% 41% 44% 38% 42% 44% 41% 51% 34% Good 96 17 10 13 15 23C 19 26 27 42 40 25 32% 34% 21% 27% 30% 42% 34% 28% 28% 38% 28% 37% Total poor 61 9 15F 9 8 7 13 24 17 20 26 17 20% 18% 34% 19% 16% 12% 24% 25% 18% 18% 18% 26% Poor 23 3 4 2 4 4 5 7 7 10 10 7 8% 6% 9% 5% 9% 8% 10% 8% 7% 9% 7% 11% Very poor 37 6 11EF 7 4 2 8 17 11 10 16 10 12% 12% 24% 14% 8% 4% 14% 18% 11% 9% 11% 15% I'm not sure 17 2 2 3 6F 1 2 4 10 3 5 2 6% 4% 5% 7% 13% 2% 40 4% 10% 3% 4% 4% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 172N 36 150PQ 49 24P 161ST 52 9 82% 49% 93% 45% 80% 93% 46% 72% 101N 18 106PQ 12 9P 108ST 18 1 48% 24% 66% 11% 29% 62% 16% 10% 71 18 43 37 150 53 35 8RS 34% 25% 27% 34% 51% 31% 30% 62% 25 34M 8 500Q 2 8 51RT 1 12% 46% 5% 46% 8% 5% 45% 7% 9 14M 3 210Q - 5 18R 1 4% 19% 2% 190 30 160 70 16 20M 5 300Q 2 4 33RT - 8% 27% 3% 27% 8% 2% 29% 14 3 4 100 30 4 1OR 3R 6% 5% 2% 90 120 2% 90 210 (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 28 of 74 28 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q14. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy ensures adequate staffing so that police can investigate cases, solve crimes, and respond to calls quickly. Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ ----- ----- <$50K ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 223 30 57 71 65 106 113 173 37 78 61 83 54 140 84 87 48 73 93 38 100 123 74% 70% 69% 75% 81% 72% 77% 76% 66% 69% 79% 77% 74% 73% 82% 71% 72% 77% 71% 81% 72% 77% Very good 123 19 22 41C 40C 59 62 99 17 44 35 44 27 82 49 50 23 38 53 19 56 67 41% 45% 27% 43% 50% 40% 42% 44% 30% 39% 44% 41% 38% 43% 48% 41% 34% 41% 41% 41% 40% 42% Good 100 11 35 30 25 48 50 74 20 34 27 39 26 58 35 37 25 35 40 19 44 56 33% 25% 42% 31% 31% 33% 34% 33% 35% 30% 35% 36% 36% 31% 34% 30% 37% 37% 30% 40% 32% 35% Total poor 59 11E 18 23E 8 32 25 41 15 30 13 17 15 38 14 29 14 18 31 6 30 29 20% 25% 22% 24% 10% 22% 17% 18% 27% 26% 17% 15% 21% 20% 14% 24% 21% 19% 23% 13% 22% 18% Poor 28 5 7 11 3 17 11 21 6 11 3 13 8 16 6 15 7 9 12 4 14 13 9% 13% 9% 12% 4% 11% 7% 9% 10% 10% 4% 12% 11% 8% 6% 12% 10% 9% 9% 9% 10% 8% Very poor 32 5 10 11 5 15 14 20 10 18L 10L 3 7 22 9 15 7 9 19 2 16 16 11% 13% 13% 12% 6% 11% 10% 9% 17% 16% 13% 3% 10% 12% 8% 12% 11% 9% 14% 5% 11% 10% I'm not sure 18 2 7D 2 7 8 9 13 4 6 3 8 3 14 4 6 5 4 8 3 9 9 6% 5% 9% 2% 8% 6% 6% 6% 7% 5% 4% 8% 4% 7% 4% 5% 8% 4% 6% 5% 7% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, U`,% Attachment 3 Page 29 of 74 29 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q14. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: This levy ensures adequate staffing so that police can investigate cases, solve crimes, and respond to calls quickly. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- ----- Yes No ----- ----- DK Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total good 223 38 30 32 38 47CD 39 68 70 86 118L 42 178N 33 151PQ 51 21P 160ST 56 7 74% 77% 66% 65% 79% 86% 71% 72% 72% 78% 81% 62% 84% 45% 93% 47% 70% 92% 49% 56% Very good 123 18 18 19 20 26 22 35 39 48 67 24 105N 13 101PQ 14 8 107ST 15 1 41% 37% 39% 40% 41% 48% 41% 38% 40% 44% 47% 36% 50% 18% 63% 13% 26% 62% 13% 5% Good 100 20 13 12 18 21 16 32 31 37 50 17 73 20 50 38 13 53 41 6 33% 41% 28% 25% 38% 38% 30% 34% 32% 34% 35% 26% 35% 27% 31% 35% 44% 31% 36% 51% Total poor 59 9 15EF 11 3 6 15EF 24 14 22 21 23K 21 36M 6 500Q 40 7 50R 2R 20% 19% 32% 22% 7% 12% 28% 25% 15% 20% 15% 34% 10% 49% 4% 46% 14% 4% 44% 18% Poor 28 1 6B 4 2 5 9B 7 6 14 10 11K 14 13M 3 230 2 4 21R 2R 9% 2% 14% 8% 5% 10% 17% 8% 6% 13% 7% 17% 7% 17% 2% 21% 5% 3% 18% 18% Very poor 32 8EF 8EF 7F 1 1 6 161 8 7 11 12K 7 23M 2 270 20 3 29RT - 11% 17% 18% 14% 2% 2% 11% 17% 8% 7% 8% 17% 3% 32% 1% 25% 8% 2% 25% I'm not sure 18 2 1 6G 7CFG 1 1 3 13HJ 2 6 3 12 5 5 8 50 6 8 3RS 6% 4% 2% 13% 14% 2% 1% 3% 14% 2% 4% 4% 6% 6% 3% 7% 17% 4% 7% 26% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 30 of 74 ?0 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q15. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: Since the jail opened in 2010, property crime has dropped about 50%. Renewing this levy ensures we keep our community safer. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 31 of 74 31 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll ----- ----- Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 213 31 52 68 62 104 105 163 38 76 59 79 52 132 80Q 90Q 40 70 89 33 97 116 71% 74% 63% 71% 77% 71% 72% 72% 67% 67% 75% 73% 73% 69% 79% 73% 59% 74% 68% 70% 69% 73% Very good 118 16 24 36 43C 57 60 97I 16 45 37 37 25 73 50Q 47 21 37 52 17 54 64 39% 38% 29% 38% 53% 39% 41% 43% 28% 39% 47% 34% 35% 38% 48% 38% 31% 39% 39% 36% 38% 40% Good 95 15 28 32 20 47 45 66 22 31 22 42 27 58 31 43 18 33 37 16 43 52 32% 36% 34% 34% 24% 32% 31% 29% 38% 27% 29% 39% 38% 31% 30% 35% 27% 35% 28% 34% 31% 32% Total poor 65 10 20 24 11 32 32 48 14 29 15 21 17 42 17 24 220 20 31 10 34 31 22% 24% 24% 25% 14% 21% 22% 21% 25% 25% 19% 19% 23% 22% 16% 20% 32% 21% 24% 22% 24% 19% Poor 35 4 10 16 5 17 18 27 6 10 9 16 4 27 6 14 140 11 15 7 21 14 12% 10% 12% 16% 7% 12% 12% 12% 11% 9% 11% 15% 6% 14% 6% 11% 20% 12% 11% 15% 15% 9% Very poor 30 6 10 8 6 14 14 21 8 19L 6 5 13N 15 10 10 8 8 16 3 13 16 10% 13% 13% 8% 7% 10% 10% 9% 15% 16% 8% 4% 17% 8% 10% 8% 12% 9% 12% 7% 9% 10% I'm not sure 22 1 10D 4 7 12 9 16 4 9 4 9 3 18 5 8 6 5 12 4 9 13 7% 2% 12% 4% 9% 8% 6% 7% 8% 8% 5% 8% 4% 9% 5% 7% 9% 5% 9% 8% 7% 8% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 31 of 74 31 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q15. Opinion of the following as a reason to support the Police Renewal Levy: Since the jail opened in 2010, property crime has dropped about 50%. Renewing this levy ensures we keep our community safer. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 157ST 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 98PQ 13 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 213 34 25 29 41CD 45CD 38 60 70 83 113L 41 51% 71% 71% 56% 60% 85% 82% 70% 64% 73% 76% 78% 61% Very good 118 19 18 18 21 20 22 37 39 42 68L 20 26R 39% 39% 40% 37% 44% 36% 40% 40% 40% 38% 47% 30% Good 95 16 7 11 20C 25CD 16 23 31 41H 45 21 12 32% 32% 16% 23% 41% 46% 30% 24% 32% 38% 31% 31% Total poor 65 12E 15E 11 3 9 15E 27I 14 24 25 22K 22% 25% 33% 22% 7% 16% 28% 29% 14% 22% 17% 33% Poor 35 5 8E 5 1 7 9E 13 6 16 13 13K 12% 11% 17% 10% 3% 13% 17% 14% 6% 15% 9% 19% Very poor 30 7F 7F 6 2 2 6 14 8 8 12 9 10% 14% 15% 12% 4% 3% 11% 15% 8% 7% 8% 14% I'm not sure 22 2 5 9BFG 4 1 1 7 13J 2 6 4 7% 4% 11% 18% 8% 2% 2% 8% 13% 2% 4% 6% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 171N 30 145PQ 47 22P 157ST 48 8 81% 41% 90% 43% 73% 91% 42% 67% 99N 13 98PQ 13 7 98ST 18 1 47% 17% 61% 12% 22% 57% 16% 10% 72 18 47 33 15OP 59 29 7S 34% 24% 29% 31% 51% 34% 26% 57% 28 34M 12 490Q 4 12 52RT 1 13% 46% 7% 45% 12% 7% 46% 7% 19 14M 10 240Q 1 9 26R 1 9% 19% 6% 22% 5% 5% 23% 7% 9 20M 2 250 20 3 26R - 4% 27% 1% 23% 7% 2% 23% 12 9 5 130 40 4 14R 3R 6% 13% 3% 12% 14% 3% 13% 26% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 32 of 74 32 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q16. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: Our property taxes are already too high. It is time to start making cuts. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 33 of 74 33 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 147 24 42 48 33 75 69 110 27 46 42 591 35 94 49 58 37 41 65 27 75 72 49% 57% 51% 50% 41% 51% 47% 48% 47% 40% 54% 54% 49% 49% 48% 47% 55% 44% 50% 58% 53% 45% Very good 88 14 30E 27 17 48 39 62 19 32 29 27 22 54 27 38 21 24 42 13 41 48 29% 33% 37% 28% 21% 32% 26% 27% 34% 28% 37% 25% 30% 28% 27% 31% 31% 25% 32% 28% 29% 30% Good 58 10 11 21 16 27 30 48 8 13 13 321 13 40 22 20 16 17 24 14 34 24 19% 24% 14% 22% 20% 19% 20% 21% 13% 12% 17% 29% 19% 21% 21% 16% 24% 18% 18% 30% 24% 15% Total poor 126 16 29 42 39 58 66 99 22 60KL 28 38 33 81 43 53 27 39 60 16 48 78U 42% 38% 36% 44% 48% 40% 45% 44% 40% 53% 36% 35% 46% 42% 42% 43% 40% 41% 45% 35% 34% 49% Poor 62 7 13 21 21 25 36 48 12 26 15 21 16 39 19 28 11 19 28 5 19 43U 21% 17% 16% 22% 26% 17% 24% 21% 20% 23% 19% 19% 22% 20% 19% 23% 16% 21% 22% 11% 14% 27% Very poor 64 9 17 21 18 33 30 51 11 34L 13 17 17 42 24 25 16 19 31 11 28 36 21% 21% 20% 22% 22% 22% 21% 23% 19% 30% 17% 16% 23% 22% 23% 20% 23% 21% 24% 24% 20% 22% I'm not sure 27 2 11 5 8 14 12 18 7 8 8 11 4 16 11 12 4 14S 6 3 17 10 9% 5% 14% 6% 11% 9% 8% 8% 13% 7% 10% 10% 6% 8% 10% 10% 6% 15% 5% 7% 12% 6% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 33 of 74 33 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q16. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: Our property taxes are already too high. It is time to start making cuts. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 34 of 74 ?4 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes No ----- ----- ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total good 147 21 18 21 26 29 32 39 47 61H 68 44K 102 37 50 750 220 61 76R 1OR 49% 43% 39% 43% 53% 53% 59% 41% 48% 56% 47% 65% 49% 50% 31% 69% 73% 35% 66% 83% Very good 88 14 12 10 14 19 20 26 24 39 40 31K 60 26 23 58OQ 8 27 58R 3 29% 29% 26% 22% 28% 35% 36% 27% 25% 35% 27% 46% 28% 35% 14% 53% 26% 16% 51% 28% Good 58 7 6 11 12 10 13 13 23 22 29 13 43 11 27 17 14OP 34 18 7RS 19% 15% 13% 22% 25% 18% 23% 14% 23% 21% 20% 19% 20% 15% 17% 16% 48% 19% 16% 55% Total poor 126 23 23 21 18 21 20 46 39 41 66 22 90 29 97PQ 26 4 97ST 28 1 42% 47% 52% 43% 38% 38% 37% 49% 40% 38% 46% 33% 43% 39% 60% 24% 12% 56% 25% 5% Poor 62 11 12 11 10 10 8 24 20 18 34 8 46 13 53PQ 8 1 50S 11 1 21% 23% 27% 22% 20% 19% 14% 25% 21% 16% 24% 12% 22% 18% 33% 7% 3% 29% 10% 5% Very poor 64 11 11 10 8 11 13 22 18 23 32 14 44 16 43Q 18 3 47ST 17 - 21% 23% 24% 21% 17% 19% 23% 24% 19% 21% 22% 21% 21% 21% 27% 16% 9% 27% 15% I'm not sure 27 5 4 7 5 5 2 9 11 7 10 2 18 8 15 8 4 15 10 1 9% 10% 9% 14% 9% 9% 4% 10% 12% 6% 7% 2% 9% 11% 9% 7% 14% 9% 9% 12% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 34 of 74 ?4 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q17. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: There is an abundance of public safety presence now and Springfield doesn't need to maintain current service levels. Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 ----- ----- 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other Rent Own ----- ---- ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ ----- ----- <$50K ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 84 24CDE 18 32E 10 44 36 59 16 38K 13 33K 21 44 30 35 17 27 38 10 49V 35 28% 56% 22% 34% 12% 30% 25% 26% 28% 34% 16% 30% 29% 23% 29% 28% 25% 28% 29% 20% 35% 22% Very good 32 10E 9 10 3 19 12 20 7 14 4 15K 6 19 12 10 10 7 15 7 22V 10 11% 23% 11% 11% 4% 13% 8% 9% 12% 12% 5% 14% 8% 10% 11% 8% 16% 7% 12% 14% 16% 6% Good 52 14CE 9 22CE 6 25 25 39 9 25 9 18 15 26 18 25 6 20T 23 3 27 25 17% 33% 11% 23% 8% 17% 17% 17% 16% 22% 12% 16% 21% 14% 18% 20% 9% 21% 18% 6% 19% 15% Total poor 190 18 57B 53 63BD 92 97 148 36 68 58L 64 50 126 61 79 47 55 83 35R 78 112U 63% 42% 69% 56% 78% 63% 66% 65% 63% 59% 74% 60% 69% 66% 60% 64% 70% 58% 63% 76% 56% 70% Poor 89 11 32D 19 27 49 40 67 19 36 23 30 29 56 30 34 25 26 39 20 41 48 30% 26% 39% 20% 33% 34% 27% 30% 34% 32% 29% 27% 41% 29% 30% 27% 37% 28% 29% 44% 30% 30% Very poor 101 7 25 34B 36B 43 57 80 17 31 351 35 21 71 31 45 22 29 45 15 37 64U 34% 16% 30% 35% 45% 29% 39% 35% 29% 27% 45% 32% 28% 37% 30% 37% 32% 31% 34% 32% 26% 40% I'm not sure 26 1 8 10 8 11 14 20 5 8 8 11 2 21M 12 9 4 13 10 2 13 14 9% 2% 9% 10% 10% 7% 10% 9% 8% 7% 10% 10% 2% 11% 11% 7% 5% 13% 7% 4% 9% 9% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 35 of 74 35 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q17. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: There is an abundance of public safety presence now and Springfield doesn't need to maintain current service levels. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir Track ----- ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes No ----- ----- ----- DK Yes ----- ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total good 84 18E 18EG 13 8 17 10 361J 21 27 41 23 45 32M 21 550Q 7 23 56R 5R 28% 37% 40% 26% 16% 30% 19% 38% 21% 25% 28% 34% 21% 43% 13% 50% 25% 13% 49% 37% Very good 32 8 6 5 5 5 4 14 9 9 19 8 21 11 9 210 2 9 23R 1 11% 17% 12% 9% 10% 9% 7% 15% 10% 8% 13% 11% 10% 15% 5% 20% 7% 5% 20% 7% Good 52 10 13E 8 3 11 7 22I 11 18 22 15 24 21M 13 330 5 14 34R 4R 17% 20% 28% 17% 7% 21% 12% 24% 12% 17% 15% 23% 12% 29% 8% 31% 18% 8% 29% 30% Total poor 190 28 24 30 35 32 40C 52 65 73 93 40 146N 37 128PQ 45 18 140ST 45 5 63% 57% 53% 63% 72% 59% 74% 55% 68% 67% 64% 59% 69% 50% 79% 41% 59% 80% 40% 42% Poor 89 16 8 17 16 13 19 24 33 33 42 17 63 21 47 31 11 56 29 5 30% 33% 17% 36% 32% 25% 35% 25% 34% 30% 29% 25% 30% 29% 29% 28% 38% 32% 25% 37% Very poor 101 12 16 13 19 19 21 28 33 40 51 23 83N 16 81PQ 14 6 84ST 17 1 34% 25% 36% 27% 40% 35% 39% 30% 34% 37% 35% 34% 39% 21% 50% 13% 21% 48% 15% 5% I'm not sure 26 3 3 5 6 6 4 6 11 9 10 5 20 5 12 9 5 11 13 3R 9% 6% 7% 11% 11% 10% 7% 7% 11% 9% 7% 7% 9% 7% 8% 9% 16% 6% 11% 21% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 36 of 74 36 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q18. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: I don't trust the City of Springfield to spend funds wisely. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 37 of 74 37 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total good 131 27E 42E 42E 19 69 59 91 30 45 36 49 34 74 42 52 31 39 61 19 68 62 44% 63% 51% 45% 24% 47% 40% 40% 52% 40% 46% 45% 47% 39% 41% 42% 46% 42% 46% 40% 49% 39% Very good 56 10 22E 16 9 30 24 38 12 17 20 20 7 38 13 25 16 12 30 10 32 23 19% 23% 26% 17% 11% 20% 16% 17% 21% 15% 25% 18% 10% 20% 13% 21% 23% 13% 22% 22% 23% 15% Good 75 17E 21 27E 11 39 35 54 18 29 17 29 27N 37 29 27 15 27 31 9 36 39 25% 40% 25% 28% 13% 27% 24% 24% 32% 25% 21% 27% 37% 19% 28% 22% 23% 29% 24% 19% 26% 24% Total poor 129 12 26 42 49BC 62 64 105 22 54 33 43 29 90 43 55 30 44 50 24 51 78U 43% 29% 32% 44% 62%D 42% 44% 46% 38% 47% 42% 40% 40% 47% 42% 45% 44% 47% 38% 51% 37% 49% Poor 65 7 11 23 23C 29 34 50 12 29 15 21 11 46 19 29 16 21 28 11 27 38 22% 17% 13% 24% 29% 20% 23% 22% 21% 25% 19% 19% 16% 24% 19% 24% 24% 23% 21% 25% 19% 24% Very poor 65 5 15 19 26B 33 30 54 10 25 18 22 17 44 24 25 13 23 23 12 25 40 22% 12% 18% 20% 32% 23% 20% 24% 17% 22% 23% 21% 24% 23% 24% 21% 20% 24% 17% 26% 18% 25% I'm not sure 40 3 14 11 11 16 24 32 5 15 9 16 10 27 17 16 6 10 20 4 20 20 13% 8% 17% 12% 14% 11% 16% 14% 9% 13% 12% 15% 13% 14% 16% 13% 9% 11% 15% 9% 14% 12% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 37 of 74 37 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q18. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: I don't trust the City of Springfield to spend funds wisely. (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 38 of 74 38 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes No ----- ----- DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total good 131 17 19 20 28B 25 22 36 48 47 49 43K 82 42M 53 690Q 8 53 73R 5 44% 34% 42% 42% 57% 45% 40% 38% 50% 43% 34% 63% 39% 57% 33% 63% 28% 31% 64% 39% Very good 56 10 5 11 9 11 10 15 20 21 18 23K 26 29M 14 400Q 2 15 41RT - 19% 20% 11% 22% 19% 20% 19% 16% 20% 19% 13% 34% 12% 40% 9% 37% 5% 8% 36% Good 75 7 14 10 18B 14 12 21 28 25 31 20 56 13 39 29 7 38 31 5 25% 14% 31% 20% 38% 25% 21% 22% 29% 23% 21% 30% 27% 17% 24% 27% 23% 22% 28% 39% Total poor 129 24 19 18 17 23 28 44 35 51 79L 20 100 27 86P 29 15P 97S 28 5 43% 50% 43% 37% 34% 43% 51% 47% 36% 47% 55% 29% 48% 36% 53% 27% 49% 56% 24% 40% Poor 65 13 6 10 10 13 13 20 20 25 35 11 51 13 34 19 110P 44S 17 4 22% 27% 14% 21% 20% 23% 23% 21% 20% 23% 24% 16% 24% 18% 21% 18% 38% 25% 14% 35% Very poor 65 11 13 8 7 11 15 24 15 26 44L 9 49 14 52PQ 10 3 53S 11 1 22% 23% 29% 16% 14% 20% 28% 26% 15% 24% 30% 13% 24% 19% 32% 9% 11% 31% 10% 5% I'm not sure 40 7 7 10 4 6 5 14 14 11 17 5 29 5 23 10 7 23 14 3 13% 15% 15% 21% 9% 12% 9% 15% 15% 10% 11% 7% 14% 7% 14% 10% 22% 14% 12% 21% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 38 of 74 38 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q19. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: This is an opportunity to rethink the City's budget. I would prefer taxpayer funds be used for priorities other than police services and jail operations. Education Vote Party -----------------Income History ---------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 60K 24 52K 39 80 43 51 36 40 67 18 75V 62 53% 31% 48% 53% 42% 42% 42% 53% 42% 51% 38% 53% 38% 41KL 11 23 23 40 21 25 25OP 20 41 9 39 36 36% 15% 22% 32% 21% 21% 21% 37% 21% 31% 19% 28% 23% 19 13 28 15 39 21 26 11 20 26 9 35V 25 17% 17% 26% 21% 21% 21% 21% 17% 22% 19% 19% 25% 16% 42 49JL 46 28 93 48 57 29 42 54 26 51 86U 37% 62% 43% 39% 48% 47% 47% 43% 44% 41% 56% 36% 54% 21 11 15 9 34 15 20 12 13 18 11 19 28 18% 14% 14% 12% 18% 14% 16% 19% 14% 14% 25% 13% 18% 21 38JL 31 20 59 33 38 17 29 35 15 32 58U 19% 49% 28% 27% 31% 33% 31% 25% 31% 27% 32% 23% 36% 12 5 10 5 19 11 14 2 12 11 2 15 12 10% 60 10% 70 10% 110 11% 30 130 90 5% 10% 80 (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 39 of 74 39 Gender Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------------- Male Fe - ----------- Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Total good 136 30CDE 37 44 26 70 62 96 31 45% 71% 45% 46% 32% 48% 42% 42% 55% Very good 76 16E 25E 23 11 36 37 52 18 25% 38% 31% 24% 14% 25% 25% 23% 32% Good 61 14C 11 21 14 34 25 44 13 20% 33% 14% 22% 18% 23% 17% 19% 23% Total poor 137 11 35 43B 47BC 66 69 112I 19 46% 27% 42% 46% 59% 45% 47% 49% 33% Poor 47 4 16 12 15 20 27 39 5 16% 9% 19% 13% 19% 13% 19% 17% 9% Very poor 90 7 19 31 32BC 47 42 73 14 30% 17% 23% 33% 40% 32% 29% 32% 24% I'm not sure 27 1 11B 8 7 11 15 19 7 9% 2% 13% 9% 90 7% 10% 9% 120 Education Vote Party -----------------Income History ---------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 60K 24 52K 39 80 43 51 36 40 67 18 75V 62 53% 31% 48% 53% 42% 42% 42% 53% 42% 51% 38% 53% 38% 41KL 11 23 23 40 21 25 25OP 20 41 9 39 36 36% 15% 22% 32% 21% 21% 21% 37% 21% 31% 19% 28% 23% 19 13 28 15 39 21 26 11 20 26 9 35V 25 17% 17% 26% 21% 21% 21% 21% 17% 22% 19% 19% 25% 16% 42 49JL 46 28 93 48 57 29 42 54 26 51 86U 37% 62% 43% 39% 48% 47% 47% 43% 44% 41% 56% 36% 54% 21 11 15 9 34 15 20 12 13 18 11 19 28 18% 14% 14% 12% 18% 14% 16% 19% 14% 14% 25% 13% 18% 21 38JL 31 20 59 33 38 17 29 35 15 32 58U 19% 49% 28% 27% 31% 33% 31% 25% 31% 27% 32% 23% 36% 12 5 10 5 19 11 14 2 12 11 2 15 12 10% 60 10% 70 10% 110 11% 30 130 90 5% 10% 80 (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 39 of 74 39 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q19. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: This is an opportunity to rethink the City's budget. I would prefer taxpayer funds be used for priorities other than police services and jail operations. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 50 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 13 56OQ (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 136 24 28D 16 20 23 24 52I 36 48 67 27 21% 45% 50% 62% 33% 41% 43% 45% 56% 37% 44% 46% 40% Very good 76 9 21BDE 10 11 11 13 30 22 24 30 20 10 25% 19% 45%FG 21% 23% 20% 24% 32% 22% 22% 21% 29% Good 61 15D 7 6 9 13 11 22 15 24 37L 7 21 20% 31% 16% 12% 18% 23% 20% 24% 15% 22% 26% 11% Total poor 137 21C 10 26C 24C 25C 29C 32 50H 55H 68 34 46% 44% 23% 54% 49% 46% 54% 34% 52% 50% 47% 50% Poor 47 9CF 2 12CF 12CF 3 10CF 10 24HJ 13 27 7 16% 18% 3% 24% 25% 5% 18% 11% 25% 11% 19% 11% Very poor 90 13 9 14 11 22C 20 22 26 42H 42 27 30% 26% 20% 30% 24% 41% 36% 23% 27% 39% 29% 39% I'm not sure 27 3 7G 6G 5 6G 1 10 11 7 9 6 9% 6% 15% 13% 10% 11% 1% 10% 11% 6% 6% 9% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 77 51M 49 74OQ 13 50 80R 7R 36% 69% 30% 69% 43% 29% 70% 55% 36 36M 13 56OQ 70 17 58RT 1 17% 49% 8% 52% 22% 10% 50% 10% 41 15 36 18 6 33 22 6RS 19% 20% 22% 17% 21% 19% 19% 45% 113N 19 102PQ 30 5 110ST 26 1 54% 26% 63% 28% 17% 64% 22% 7% 42N 5 35PQ 10 2 36S 10 1 20% 6% 22% 9% 6% 21% 9% 7% 71N 15 66PQ 20 3 74ST 16 - 34% 20% 41% 19% 11% 43% 14% 21 3 11 4 12OP 13 9 5RS 10% 5% 7% 4% 40% 8% 8% 38% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 40 of 74 40 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q20. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: Before approving continued investments in police services and jail operations, we first need to see reform and accountability in how the department handles police misconduct. Education Vote Party -----------------Income History ---------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 90KL 35 55 48 103 62 73 39 59 84 24 86 94 79% 44% 51% 66% 54% 60% 60% 59% 62% 64% 51% 61% 58% 54KL 13 27 25 55 28 33 28 26 49 11 49 45 47% 16% 25% 35% 29% 27% 27% 41% 28% 37% 23% 35% 28% 37 22 28 22 48 34Q 40Q 12 32 35 13 37 49 32% 28% 26% 310 250 330 330 170 340 260 270 270 310 22 37J 441 23 75 31 44 25 29 44 20 44 58 19% 47% 41% 32% 39% 30% 36% 37% 31% 33% 44% 32% 36% 8 141 211 10 31 11 18 12 11 16 14RS 18 25 7% 18% 19% 14% 16% 10% 15% 18% 12% 12% 30% 13% 16% 13 231 24J 13 44 20 26 12 18 28 6 27 33 12% 29% 22% 18% 23% 20% 21% 18% 19% 21% 14% 19% 21% 2 71 91 1 13 10 5 3 7 4 3 10 8 2% 9% 8% 1% 7% 10% 4% 5% 7% 3% 5% 7% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 41 of 74 41 Gender Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------------- Male Fe - ----------- Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) Total good 179 31 48 55 44 88 87 137 34 60% 73% 59% 58% 55% 60% 59% 60% 59% Very good 93 17E 30E 31E 15 47 45 70 19 31% 41% 36% 33% 19% 32% 31% 31% 34% Good 86 14 19 24 30 41 42 67 14 29% 32% 23% 25% 37% 28% 29% 30% 250 Total poor 103 11 28 33 30 49 51 77 20 34% 27% 34% 35% 37% 34% 35% 34% 36% Poor 43 3 13 19B 8 23 19 32 11 14% 6% 16% 20% 10% 16% 13% 14% 19% Very poor 60 9 14 14 22 26 32 45 10 20% 21% 18% 15% 27% 18% 22% 20% 17% I'm not sure 18 - 6 6 6 10 8 13 3 6% 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 6% 5% Education Vote Party -----------------Income History ---------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ---- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 90KL 35 55 48 103 62 73 39 59 84 24 86 94 79% 44% 51% 66% 54% 60% 60% 59% 62% 64% 51% 61% 58% 54KL 13 27 25 55 28 33 28 26 49 11 49 45 47% 16% 25% 35% 29% 27% 27% 41% 28% 37% 23% 35% 28% 37 22 28 22 48 34Q 40Q 12 32 35 13 37 49 32% 28% 26% 310 250 330 330 170 340 260 270 270 310 22 37J 441 23 75 31 44 25 29 44 20 44 58 19% 47% 41% 32% 39% 30% 36% 37% 31% 33% 44% 32% 36% 8 141 211 10 31 11 18 12 11 16 14RS 18 25 7% 18% 19% 14% 16% 10% 15% 18% 12% 12% 30% 13% 16% 13 231 24J 13 44 20 26 12 18 28 6 27 33 12% 29% 22% 18% 23% 20% 21% 18% 19% 21% 14% 19% 21% 2 71 91 1 13 10 5 3 7 4 3 10 8 2% 9% 8% 1% 7% 10% 4% 5% 7% 3% 5% 7% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 41 of 74 41 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q20. Opinion of the following as a reason to oppose the Police Renewal Levy: Before approving continued investments in police services and jail operations, we first need to see reform and accountability in how the department handles police misconduct. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- Q Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) Total good 179 36F 31 27 29 28 30 661 55 58 91 41 60% 73% 68% 55% 59% 52% 54% 71% 57% 53% 63% 61% Very good 93 12 22BF 15 17 11 16 35 32 27 39 24 31% 26% 49% 30% 35% 19% 30% 37% 33% 25% 27% 35% Good 86 23CDEG 9 12 12 18 13 32 24 31 52 17 29% 48% 19% 25% 24% 33% 24% 34% 24% 28% 36% 25% Total poor 103 12 12 19 15 23 22 24 34 45H 45 24 34% 25% 25% 40% 31% 42% 41% 25% 35% 41% 31% 36% Poor 43 7 4 11 6 7 8 11 17 15 17 6 14% 14% 9% 23% 12% 13% 15% 12% 18% 14% 12% 8% Very poor 60 5 7 8 9 16B 14 13 17 30H 27 18 20% 11% 16% 17% 18% 29% 26% 14% 18% 27% 19% 27% I'm not sure 18 1 3 3 5 4 3 4 8 6 9 2 6% 2% 7% 5% 10% 7% 50 40 8% 6% 6% 4% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 108 58M 82 780 20 87 84R 8 51% 79% 51% 72% 67% 50% 74% 67% 47 42M 31 55OQ 7 34 57R 3 22% 56% 19% 50% 25% 19% 50% 22% 61 17 50 23 13P 53 28 6 29% 23% 31% 21% 42% 31% 24% 44% 85N 16 71PQ 26 6 78ST 23 2 40% 21% 44% 24% 19% 45% 21% 12% 34 7 31Q 12 - 32S 9 2 16% 10% 19% 11% 190 80 120 50N 8 40P 14 6 45ST 14 - 24% 12% 25% 12% 19% 26% 12% 18N - 9 5 4 9 6 3RS 9% 50 50 140 50 6% 210 (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 42 of 74 42 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q21. Re -Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- ----- POC Dem ----- ----- Rep Other Rent ----- ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Total yes 173 20 39 55 59BC 80 93 140 29 60 53J 61 38 122 62 72 37 55 74 32 71 102U 58% 47% 48% 58% 74%D 54% 63% 62% 51% 52% 68% 56% 52% 64% 60% 59% 55% 58% 56% 69% 51% 64% Yes - certain 111 13 21 38 39C 55 56 91 18 34 38J 38 30 75 43 45 21 35 44 24S 48 63 37% 31% 25% 40% 48% 37% 38% 40% 32% 30% 49% 35% 41% 39% 42% 37% 31% 37% 33% 51% 34% 39% Yes - lean 63 7 18 17 20 25 37 49 11 25 15 23 8 47M 19 27 16 19 30 8 23 40 21% 16% 22% 18% 26% 17% 25% 21% 19% 22% 19% 21% 11% 25% 19% 22% 23% 20% 23% 18% 16% 25% Total no 114 20E 39E 37E 19 63 47 77 25 53K 22 39 29 63 36 43 31 35 55T 12 58 56 38% 46% 47% 39% 23% 43% 32% 34% 45% 47% 29% 36% 41% 33% 35% 35% 45% 37% 42% 25% 42% 35% No - lean 45 10 11 16 9 30G 12 32 8 19 9 17 13 21 16 15 12 12 25 5 19 26 15% 22% 14% 16% 11% 21% 8% 14% 14% 17% 12% 16% 19% 11% 16% 12% 18% 13% 19% 11% 14% 16% No - certain 69 10 28E 22 10 32 35 45 18 34 13 21 16 42 20 28 19 23 30 7 39 30 23% 24% 33% 23% 12% 22% 23% 20% 31% 30% 17% 20% 22% 22% 19% 23% 28% 25% 23% 14% 28% 19% I'm not sure 12 3 4 3 2 5 8 10 3 1 2 91 5 6 4 7Q - 5 2 3 11V 2 4% 7% 5% 3% 3% 3% 5% 4% 4% 1% 3% 8% 7% 3% 4% 6% 5% 2% 6% 8% 1% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, U✓ Attachment 3 Page 43 of 74 43 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q21. Re -Test - To maintain current level of police services and jail operations, shall City of Springfield renew a five-year levy of $1.40 per $1,000 of assessed property value, beginning 2023? Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track Smwht Rest ----- ------ ----- Yes No ----- ----- ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Total yes 173 24 21 34C 28 34 32 45 62H 66 95L 31 149N 18 144PQ 16 13P 173ST - - 58% 50% 47% 70% 57% 63% 58% 48% 64% 61% 66% 46% 71% 25% 89% 15% 45% 100% Yes - certain 111 11 11 23BC 17 26BC 22 22 40H 48H 60 20 97N 9 10OPQ 9 2 111ST - - 37% 23% 25% 48% 35% 48% 41% 24% 42% 44% 41% 30% 46% 12% 62% 8% 7% 64% Yes - lean 63 13 10 11 11 8 10 23 21 18 35 11 52N 9 44P 7 11P 63ST - - 21% 27% 22% 22% 22% 16% 18% 25% 22% 17% 24% 17% 25% 12% 27% 7% 38% 36% Total no 114 23D 24DF 12 18 17 20 48IJ 30 37 43 34K 52 55M 16 910Q 70 - 114RT - 38% 48% 53% 25% 36% 30% 37% 51% 31% 34% 30% 51% 25% 74% 10% 84% 25% 100% No - lean 45 11D 8 3 7 10 6 20 10 15 16 14 21 21M 7 350Q 3 - 45RT - 15% 24% 18% 6% 14% 18% 11% 21% 10% 14% 11% 21% 10% 29% 4% 33% 11% 40% No - certain 69 12 16F 9 11 7 14 28 20 21 28 20 31 34M 9 550Q 4 - 69RT - 23% 24% 35% 19% 22% 13% 26% 30% 20% 20% 19% 30% 15% 45% 6% 51% 14% 60% I'm not sure 12 1 - 2 3 4 3 1 5 6 6 2 10 1 1 2 90P - - 12RS 4% 2% 5% 6% 6% 5% 1% 6% 6% 4% 3% 5% 1% 1% 2% 30% 100% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 44 of 74 44 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q22. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield Police Chief Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 ----- ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll ----- ----- Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 187 23 48 62 55 87 96 141 35 60 561 71 41 128 71Q 77 36 63 77 36S 82 105 62% 54% 58% 65% 68% 59% 65% 62% 62% 53% 71% 66% 57% 67% 70% 63% 54% 67% 58% 77% 58% 66% A lot of trust 64 8 10 20 25C 34 28 51 9 17 21 25 16 40 30Q 25 7 25 23 11 29 35 21% 18% 13% 21% 32% 23% 19% 22% 15% 15% 27% 23% 22% 21% 30% 21% 11% 26% 18% 24% 21% 22% Some Trust 123 15 38 41 29 54 68 90 27 43 34 46 26 88 41 52 29 38 53 25 53 71 41% 36% 46% 43% 36% 36% 46% 40% 47% 38% 44% 43% 35% 46% 40% 42% 43% 40% 41% 53% 38% 44% Not much/None 92 17 25 29 21 47 42 69 18 47KL 17 28 25 51 23 38 260 28 45T 9 46 46 31% 41% 31% 30% 26% 32% 29% 30% 32% 41% 22% 26% 35% 27% 23% 31% 39% 30% 34% 18% 33% 29% Not much trust 54 7 17 17 12 32 21 39 12 27 10 16 13 31 12 26 12 13 31 5 24 30 18% 17% 20% 18% 16% 22% 14% 17% 20% 24% 13% 15% 18% 16% 12% 21% 18% 14% 24% 11% 17% 19% No trust at all 38 10 8 11 8 15 21 30 6 19 7 12 12 19 11 12 14 14 14 4 22 16 13% 23% 10% 12% 11% 11% 15% 13% 11% 17% 9% 11% 16% 10% 11% 10% 20% 15% 11% 8% 16% 10% I'm not sure 21 2 9 5 5 13 9 17 4 7 5 9 6 13 8 7 5 4 10 2 12 9 7% 6% 11% 5% 6% 9% 6% 7% 6% 6% 7% 8% 8% 7% 7% 6% 8% 4% 7% 5% 9% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, U,% Attachment 3 Page 45 of 74 45 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q22. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield Police Chief (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 46 of 74 46 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK Yes ----- ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 187 27 23 32 25 37 42BCE 50 57 80HI 98 39 153N 23 129PQ 39 18P 144ST 36 7 62% 56% 50% 66% 52% 69% 78% 53% 59% 73% 68% 58% 73% 31% 80% 36% 61% 83% 32% 56% A lot of trust 64 9 8 14 6 16 12 17 20 27 35 16 53N 6 47P 10 6 51ST 12 - 21% 18% 18% 28% 12% 29% 21% 18% 20% 25% 24% 24% 25% 8% 29% 9% 21% 30% 11% Some Trust 123 18 15 18 19 22 31C 33 38 53 63 23 101N 17 82P 29 12 92S 24 7S 41% 38% 32% 38% 40% 40% 57% 35% 39% 48% 44% 34% 48% 23% 51% 27% 41% 53% 21% 56% Not much/None 92 19 17 14 18 13 12 361 32 24 37 23 42 46M 21 630Q 8 21 69RT 2 31% 39% 37% 28% 37% 24% 21% 38% 33% 22% 25% 33% 20% 63% 13% 58% 25% 12% 61% 13% Not much trust 54 14G 7 6 15G 8 4 211 21 12 21 13 30 23M 17 310 6 17 36R 2 18% 29% 15% 12% 31% 15% 7% 22% 21% 11% 14% 19% 14% 31% 11% 28% 19% 10% 31% 13% No trust at all 38 5 10 8 3 5 7 15 11 12 16 9 12 23M 4 320Q 2 4 34RT - 13% 10% 22% 16% 7% 8% 14% 16% 11% 11% 11% 14% 6% 32% 2% 30% 7% 3% 29% I'm not sure 21 3 6G 3 5 4 1 8 8 5 10 6 15 5 11 6 4 9 9 4RS 7% 6% 13% 6% 11% 8% 1% 9% 8% 4% 7% 9% 7% 6% 7% 6% 13% 5% 7% 31% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 46 of 74 46 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q23. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield City Councilors Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 159 23 36 50 49C 71 83 123 27 61 38 60 37 107 60 63 33 52 72 25 71 88 53% 55% 44% 53% 61% 49% 56% 54% 47% 53% 48% 56% 51% 56% 58% 51% 49% 55% 55% 53% 51% 55% A lot of trust 35 4 9 12 10 15 17 27 4 12 8 14 6 24 12 14 8 10 20 5 14 21 12% 10% 11% 13% 12% 10% 12% 12% 7% 11% 10% 13% 8% 13% 12% 12% 13% 10% 16% 10% 10% 13% Some Trust 124 19 27 38 40 57 66 96 23 48 30 46 31 82 48 48 24 42 52 20 57 68 41% 45% 33% 40% 49% 39% 45% 42% 40% 43% 38% 43% 43% 43% 47% 39% 36% 45% 39% 43% 40% 42% Not much/None 113 12 38 37 26 61 51 84 24 44 33 35 27 68 30 50 300 35 50 17 54 59 38% 29% 46% 38% 32% 42% 35% 37% 41% 39% 43% 33% 38% 35% 29% 41% 45% 37% 38% 36% 39% 37% Not much trust 68 8 21 19 19 36 32 54 12 23 20 25 15 42 18 33 14 20 28 13 32 36 23% 20% 26% 20% 24% 24% 22% 24% 22% 20% 25% 23% 20% 22% 18% 27% 21% 22% 21% 29% 23% 22% No trust at all 45 4 17E 18 7 25 19 30 11 21 14 10 12 26 12 16 160 15 22 4 22 23 15% 9% 21% 18% 8% 17% 13% 13% 20% 18% 18% 10% 17% 14% 12% 13% 24% 16% 17% 8% 16% 14% I'm not sure 28 7 8 8 5 15 13 21 6 9 7 12 8 17 12 10 4 7 10 5 15 13 9% 16% 9% 9% 6% 10% 9% 9% 11% 8% 9% 11% 11% 9% 12% 8% 6% 8% 7% 11% 11% 8% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, U,% Attachment 3 Page 47 of 74 47 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q23. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield City Councilors (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 48 of 74 48 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track Smwht Rest ----- ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- ----- DK Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 159 26 27 26 20 29 31 52 47 60 93L 23 120N 31 104P 38 17 119ST 36 4 53% 53% 59% 54% 42% 53% 57% 56% 48% 55% 64% 34% 57% 42% 64% 35% 56% 69% 31% 34% A lot of trust 35 1 7 10B 3 5 10B 8 12 14 21 7 29 5 24P 6 4 29S 5 1 12% 3% 15% 20% 5% 8% 18% 9% 13% 13% 15% 10% 14% 6% 15% 6% 14% 17% 5% 7% Some Trust 124 24 20 16 18 24 21 44 34 46 71L 17 91 26 80P 32 12 90S 30 3 41% 50% 44% 34% 37% 44% 39% 47% 35% 42% 49% 24% 43% 36% 49% 29% 42% 52% 27% 28% Not much/None 113 19 15 17 21 25 17 34 38 41 38 41K 71 38M 46 590Q 8 45 66RT 2 38% 39% 33% 34% 44% 45% 31% 36% 39% 38% 26% 61% 34% 52% 29% 54% 26% 26% 58% 14% Not much trust 68 11 8 9 16 15 8 19 25 23 27 22K 49 16 35 28 4 37 29 1 23% 23% 18% 19% 32% 28% 15% 20% 26% 21% 18% 32% 23% 22% 22% 26% 14% 22% 26% 7% No trust at all 45 8 7 7 5 9 8 15 13 18 11 20K 23 22M 11 310 3 8 37R 1 15% 17% 15% 15% 11% 17% 15% 16% 13% 16% 8% 29% 11% 30% 7% 28% 12% 4% 32% 7% I'm not sure 28 4 4 5 7F 1 7F 8 12 8 14 3 19 5 11 12 5 9 12 6RS 9% 7% 9% 11% 14% 2% 13% 8% 13% 7% 10% 5% 9% 7% 7% 11% 18% 5% 11% 52% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 48 of 74 48 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q24. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield Police Association, the union representing Springfield police Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 100% 1000 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 164 23 41 55 45 75 84 125 28 50 47 67J 41 102 57 73 33 53 68 31 73 91 55% 54% 49% 58% 56% 51% 57% 55% 50% 44% 60% 62% 57% 54% 56% 59% 49% 56% 52% 66% 52% 57% A lot of trust 49 7 9 18 16 22 25 39 7 13 15 21 12 32 22 19 8 20 19 9 23 26 16% 16% 11% 19% 20% 15% 17% 17% 12% 12% 19% 20% 16% 17% 22% 16% 12% 21% 14% 20% 17% 16% Some Trust 114 16 31 37 29 53 58 86 22 37 32 45 30 70 35 53 25 33 49 21 50 65 38% 38% 38% 39% 37% 36% 40% 38% 38% 33% 41% 42% 41% 37% 34% 43% 37% 35% 38% 46% 36% 40% Not much/None 121 20 37 36 28 65 55 90 26 61KL 28 32 27 78 37 46 32 38 58 13 57 64 40% 46% 45% 38% 35% 44% 38% 40% 46% 54% 36% 29% 38% 41% 36% 37% 47% 40% 44% 29% 41% 40% Not much trust 50 8 13 17 13 25 24 37 10 20 12 18 7 36 16 23 9 20 21 6 24 26 17% 18% 15% 17% 16% 17% 17% 16% 18% 17% 16% 16% 10% 19% 16% 19% 14% 21% 16% 13% 17% 16% No trust at all 71 12 24 20 15 39 31 53 16 41KL 16 14 20 42 21 22 22P 18 37 7 33 37 24% 28% 30% 21% 19% 27% 21% 23% 28% 36% 20% 13% 27% 22% 20% 18% 33% 19% 28% 15% 24% 23% I'm not sure 15 - 5 4 7 7 8 12 2 3 3 101 4 11 8 4 3 4 6 2 9 6 5% 6% 4% 9% 5% 6% 5% 4% 2% 4% 9% 5% 6% 8% 4% 4% 4% 4% 5% 7% 4% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 49 of 74 49 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q24. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Springfield Police Association, the union representing Springfield police (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 50 of 74 50 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 164 23 23 27 24 38B 31 45 50 68H 81 36 135N 20 115PQ 36 12 1235 35 6 55% 46% 50% 55% 49% 69% 57% 48% 52% 63% 56% 53% 64% 27% 71% 34% 40% 71% 31% 50% A lot of trust 49 3 9 10 8 11B 8 13 18 19 29 11 43N 5 41P 6 3 42ST 7 - 16% 6% 21% 21% 16% 20% 14% 13% 19% 17% 20% 16% 21% 7% 25% 5% 10% 24% 6% Some Trust 114 19 13 16 16 26 23 33 32 50 52 25 91N 15 75P 31 9 80S 28 6 38% 40% 29% 34% 33% 48% 42% 35% 33% 45% 36% 37% 43% 20% 46% 28% 30% 46% 24% 50% Not much/None 121 26F 21 18 22 15 20 471 39 35 56 28 64 51M 41 68OQ 12 42 75RT 4 40% 54% 45% 36% 44% 28% 36% 50% 40% 32% 39% 42% 31% 69% 26% 62% 40% 24% 65% 30% Not much trust 50 14FG 6 10 9 7 5 201 19 11 26 10 36 12 28 16 6 30 16 4 17% 29% 13% 20% 19% 12% 9% 21% 19% 10% 18% 14% 17% 17% 17% 15% 22% 17% 14% 30% No trust at all 71 12 15 8 13 9 15 27 21 24 30 18 28 38M 13 52OQ 5 13 58RT - 24% 25% 32% 17% 26% 16% 28% 28% 21% 22% 21% 27% 13% 52% 8% 48% 18% 7% 51% I'm not sure 15 - 2 4 3 2 4 2 8 6 7 4 12 3 5 4 6OP 8 4 3RS 5% 5% 9% 7% 3% 7% 2% 8% 5% 5% 6% 6% 4% 3% 4% 20% 5% 4% 21% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 50 of 74 50 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q25. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Community Emergency Response Team members, who are volunteer residents trained to deal with emergencies Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 65+ ----- ----- ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep Other Rent ----- ----- ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 250 38 62 82 68 118 128 196 43 96 62 92 60 162 88 102 55 81 109 41 110 140 83% 89% 76% 86% 86% 80% 87% 86% 76% 84% 80% 85% 83% 85% 86% 83% 82% 86% 83% 89% 79% 87% A lot of trust 125 17 37 38 34 58 65 99 22 53 31 41 31 79 44 57 22 41 54 21 55 70 42% 39% 45% 40% 42% 40% 44% 44% 38% 47% 40% 38% 43% 41% 43% 47% 33% 43% 41% 45% 39% 44% Some Trust 125 21C 25 44C 35 59 63 96 22 43 31 51 29 83 44 45 33 41 55 21 55 70 42% 50% 31% 46% 43% 40% 43% 42% 38% 37% 40% 48% 40% 43% 43% 37% 49% 43% 42% 45% 40% 44% Not much/None 35 3 14 9 9 21 13 24 8 12 10 13 9 20 7 15 10 11 16 4 21 15 12% 8% 17% 10% 11% 14% 9% 11% 14% 11% 13% 12% 13% 11% 7% 13% 15% 11% 12% 8% 15% 9% Not much trust 19 2 7 4 5 10 9 12 4 4 5 10 4 11 3 8 6 5 8 3 10 9 6% 5% 9% 5% 7% 7% 6% 5% 7% 4% 7% 9% 5% 6% 3% 6% 9% 5% 6% 6% 7% 6% No trust at all 16 1 7 5 3 11 4 12 4 8 5 4 5 9 4 8 4 6 7 1 11 5 5% 3% 8% 5% 4% 7% 3% 5% 7% 7% 6% 3% 7% 5% 4% 6% 6% 6% 5% 2% 8% 3% I'm not sure 14 1 6 4 3 9 6 8 6H 6 6 3 3 9 7 5 2 2 6 1 9 5 5% 3% 7% 4% 4% 6% 4% 3% 10% 5% 7% 2% 4% 5% 7% 4% 3% 2% 5% 3% 6% 3% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, U`,% Attachment 3 Page 51 of 74 51 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q25. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Community Emergency Response Team members, who are volunteer residents trained to deal with emergencies Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- ----- No DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 250 41 35 40 39 49 47 75 79 96 125 54 180 61 145PQ 84 21 155S 86 9 83% 84% 76% 83% 80% 90% 86% 80% 82% 88% 87% 81% 85% 83% 90% 78% 72% 89% 76% 74% A lot of trust 125 24 22 22 17 23 17 46 39 40 68 25 91 29 80P 36 10 80 41 4 42% 49% 49% 45% 35% 42% 32% 49% 40% 37% 47% 37% 43% 39% 49% 33% 33% 46% 36% 29% Some Trust 125 17 12 18 22 26C 29C 30 40 56H 57 29 89 33 65 48 12 75 45 6 42% 35% 27% 38% 45% 48% 54% 31% 41% 51% 39% 43% 42% 45% 40% 45% 39% 43% 40% 44% Not much/None 35 7 6 5 8 4 5 13 13 9 14 8 23 9 11 190 60 13 21R 1 12% 14% 13% 11% 17% 8% 9% 14% 14% 8% 10% 12% 11% 12% 7% 17% 20% 8% 19% 7% Not much trust 19 4 5 2 5 2 2 9 6 4 9 5 15 3 6 10 3 9 10 1 6% 9% 11% 4% 9% 3% 3% 10% 7% 3% 6% 7% 7% 4% 4% 9% 9% 5% 8% 7% No trust at all 16 3 1 4 4 2 3 3 7 6 5 4 9 5 4 8 30 4 12R - 5% 6% 1% 7% 7% 4% 6% 4% 7% 5% 4% 5% 4% 7% 3% 8% 11% 2% 10% I'm not sure 14 1 5 3 1 1 3 6 4 4 5 5 7 4 6 6 2 5 7 2R 5% 2% 11% 6% 3% 2% 6% 6% 4% 4% 4% 7% 3% 5% 4% 5% 8% 3% 6% 20% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 52 of 74 52 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q26. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Small business owners Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 233 35 65 72 61 112 117 179 42 81 64 87 55 151 81 101Q 46 71 103 40 111 122 78% 82% 78% 76% 76% 76% 79% 79% 74% 71% 82% 81% 76% 79% 79% 82% 69% 76% 79% 86% 79% 76% A lot of trust 95 16 22 26 30 49 44 72 16 26 341 36 22 62 30 45 18 32 42 13 44 52 32% 39% 27% 28% 38% 33% 30% 32% 28% 23% 43% 34% 30% 32% 29% 37% 27% 34% 32% 28% 31% 32% Some Trust 137 19 42 46 30 63 72 107 26 55 31 51 33 89 51 56 28 39 62 27 67 70 46% 44% 51% 48% 38% 43% 49% 47% 45% 49% 39% 47% 46% 47% 50% 46% 41% 42% 47% 58% 48% 44% Not much/None 54 8 14 21 12 29 22 36 14 31KL 8 15 15 30 16 17 19P 19 22 6 24 29 18% 18% 17% 22% 14% 20% 15% 16% 25% 27% 10% 14% 21% 15% 16% 14% 28% 20% 17% 13% 17% 18% Not much trust 40 7 11 12 10 20 19 27 9 24KL 6 10 13 21 10 16 13 15 15 6 19 21 13% 17% 13% 13% 12% 13% 13% 12% 16% 21% 8% 9% 18% 11% 10% 13% 20% 16% 12% 13% 14% 13% No trust at all 14 1 3 9 2 10 4 9 5 7 2 6 2 9 6P 1 6P 4 7 - 5 9 5% 1% 4% 9% 3% 7% 2% 4% 9% 6% 3% 5% 3% 5% 6% 1% 8% 4% 5% 4% 6% I'm not sure 13 - 4 2 8BD 5 8 12 1 2 6 6 2 11 5 5 2 4 6 1 5 8 4% 4% 2% 10% 4% 6% 5% 1% 2% 7% 5% 3% 6% 5% 4% 3% 4% 4% 1% 4% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 53 of 74 53 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q26. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Small business owners (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 54 of 74 54 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- ----- No DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 233 34 31 38 41 48BC 41 65 79 89H 117 53 174N 45 137P 75 21 149ST 76 8 78% 70% 69% 78% 84% 88% 75% 69% 81% 81% 81% 79% 83% 60% 85% 69% 71% 86% 66% 64% A lot of trust 95 13 9 13 17 22C 21C 22 30 43H 50 27 80N 14 65P 24 7 69ST 25 1 32% 27% 19% 26% 36% 41% 39% 23% 31% 40% 35% 41% 38% 19% 40% 22% 24% 40% 22% 12% Some Trust 137 21 22 25 23 26 20 43 49 45 67 26 94 31 72 51 14 80 51 7 46% 43% 49% 52% 48% 47% 36% 46% 50% 42% 47% 38% 45% 41% 45% 47% 47% 46% 45% 52% Not much/None 54 11F 12F 9 6 3 13F 24 14 16 23 12 25 28M 19 300 5 19 34R 1 18% 23% 27% 18% 11% 6% 23% 25% 15% 15% 16% 18% 12% 39% 12% 27% 18% 11% 30% 7% Not much trust 40 11EF 10EF 5 2 2 9F 22IJ 7 11 17 8 18 21M 15 200 4 16 22R 1 13% 23% 22% 11% 4% 4% 16% 23% 7% 10% 12% 12% 9% 28% 9% 18% 15% 9% 20% 7% No trust at all 14 - 2 4 4 1 4 2 7 5 6 4 7 8M 3 100 1 3 12R - 5% 5% 7% 8% 3% 7% 2% 7% 5% 4% 6% 3% 10% 2% 9% 4% 2% 10% I'm not sure 13 3 2 2 2 3 1 5 4 4 4 3 12 1 6 4 3 5 4 4RS 4% 7% 4% 4% 4% 6% 2% 6% 4% 4% 3% 4% 6% 1% 4% 4% 11% 3% 4% 29% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 54 of 74 54 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q27. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Leaders of local nonprofits Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- ----- Rep Other Rent ----- ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) A lot/Some 198 34D 50 59 55 89 105 150 39 92KL 37 69K 54N 115 66 84 45 64 94 30 91 107 66% 79% 61% 62% 69% 61% 71% 66% 69% 80% 48% 64% 75% 60% 64% 69% 67% 68% 71% 64% 65% 67% A lot of trust 61 17CDE 13 17 14 27 31 42 16 27K 8 26K 21N 32 23 26 12 19 27 12 33 28 20% 41% 15% 18% 18% 19% 21% 18% 28% 24% 11% 24% 29% 17% 22% 21% 18% 20% 20% 25% 24% 17% Some Trust 137 16 38 42 41 62 74 109 23 65KL 29 43 33 84 43 58 33 45 67 18 58 79 46% 38% 46% 44% 51% 42% 50% 48% 41% 57% 37% 40% 46% 44% 42% 47% 49% 48% 51% 39% 41% 49% Not much/None 78 8 24 26 20 45 31 61 11 15 34JL 291 15 58 27 31 17 20 34 14 39 40 26% 19% 29% 28% 24% 30% 21% 27% 19% 13% 44% 27% 20% 30% 26% 25% 25% 21% 26% 30% 28% 25% Not much trust 42 6 14 15 9 30G 11 33 5 8 15J 191 6 33 15 18 6 11 15 11 23 20 14% 13% 16% 15% 11% 21% 8% 15% 8% 7% 20% 17% 9% 17% 15% 15% 9% 12% 11% 23% 16% 12% No trust at all 36 3 10 12 11 14 20 27 6 7 19JL 10 8 25 11 13 11 9 19 3 16 20 12% 6% 13% 12% 14% 10% 14% 12% 11% 6% 24% 9% 11% 13% 11% 10% 16% 9% 15% 7% 11% 12% I'm not sure 24 1 8 10 5 13 11 16 7 7 7 10 4 18 10 7 5 10S 4 3 10 14 8% 2% 10% 11% 6% 9% 7% 7% 12% 6% 9% 9% 5% 10% 10% 6% 8% 11% 3% 6% 7% 8% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 55 of 74 55 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q27. Level of trust placed in the following when in comes to making a decision about how to vote for the levy: Leaders of local nonprofits (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 56 of 74 56 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) A lot/Some 198 34 29 28 36 39 32 63 64 71 102L 38 138 48 117P 62 19 120 70 8 66% 69% 64% 59% 73% 72% 59% 67% 66% 66% 71% 56% 65% 65% 73% 57% 63% 69% 61% 65% A lot of trust 61 6 9 11 10 15 11 16 20 25 41L 9 44 13 40 15 6 42 18 2 20% 13% 20% 22% 20% 27% 20% 17% 21% 23% 28% 14% 21% 18% 24% 14% 21% 24% 16% 16% Some Trust 137 27 20 18 26 25 21 47 44 46 61 28 93 34 78 46 13 79 52 6 46% 56% 44% 36% 53% 46% 39% 50% 45% 42% 42% 42% 44% 47% 48% 43% 43% 45% 46% 49% Not much/None 78 14 11 13 10 13 17 25 23 31 31 25K 57 19 34 370 7 42 35 2 26% 29% 24% 27% 20% 24% 32% 26% 23% 28% 21% 37% 27% 26% 21% 34% 25% 24% 31% 13% Not much trust 42 12F 8 7 5 5 7 191 12 11 16 13 30 12 22 17 3 24 17 2 14% 24% 17% 14% 11% 8% 12% 20% 13% 10% 11% 20% 14% 16% 14% 16% 10% 14% 15% 13% No trust at all 36 2 3 6 4 9 11B 6 10 19H 15 11 27 7 11 200 4 17 18 - 12% 5% 7% 13% 9% 16% 20% 6% 11% 18% 10% 17% 13% 10% 7% 18% 15% 10% 16% I'm not sure 24 1 6 7B 3 2 5 7 10 7 12 5 16 7 11 10 3 12 10 3R 8% 2% 12% 15% 7% 4% 9% 7% 11% 6% 8% 7% 8% 10% 7% 9% 12% 7% 8% 23% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 56 of 74 56 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q28. Do you describe your gender as: Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ male White POC Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 100% 1000 100% 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Male 147 22 45 43 37 147G - 110 29 52 40 55 40 89 52 64 26 43 68 19 76 71 49% 52% 55% 45% 46% 100% 48% 52% 46% 51% 51% 55% 47% 51% 52% 39% 46% 52% 41% 55% 44% Female 147 19 36 49 43 - 147F 116 25 60 38 49 32 101 49 55 40 51 57 27 60 87 49% 44% 44% 51% 54% 100% 51% 44% 53% 49% 45% 45% 53% 48% 45% 60% 54% 44% 59% 43% 54% Non -binary or gender 1 1 - - - - - - 1H 1 - - - - - 1 - - 1 - - 1 non -conforming * 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 1% I prefer not to say 5 - 1 4 - - - 1 1 - - 51 - 1 2 2 1 - 5 - 4 1 2% 1% 4% * 1% 4% * 2% 2% 1% 4% 3% 1% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 57 of 74 57 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q28. Do you describe your gender as: Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Male 147 28 21 20 24 28 26 49 44 54 71 39 100 43 77 60Q 10 80 63 5 49% 57% 47% 42% 49% 51% 47% 52% 46% 49% 49% 58% 48% 58% 48% 55% 34% 46% 55% 37% Female 147 19 23 28 22 26 29 42 50 55 72 27 108 28 83 46 19 93S 47 8 49% 40% 51% 58% 45% 47% 53% 45% 52% 50% 50% 39% 51% 38% 51% 42% 63% 53% 41% 63% Non -binary or gender 1 1 - - - - - 1 - - - - - 1 - 1 - - 1 - non -conforming * 30 1% 2% 1% 1% I prefer not to say 5 - 1 - 3 1 - 1 3 1 1 2 3 1 2 2 1 1 4 - 2% 2% 6% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 1% 2% 4% 1% 3% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 58 of 74 58 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q29. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 59 of 74 59 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Asian/ 4 1 3 - 1 2 2 - 4H 2 1 1 - 2 2 1 1 1 3 - 3 2 Pacific Islander 1% 1% 4% 1% 2% 1% 8% 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% * 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% Black/ 11 2 3 2 4 3 8 - 11H 9L 1 1 1 9 4 4 2 5 3 2 7 4 African American 4% 6% 4% 2% 5% 2% 6% 20% 8% 2% 1% 2% 5% 4% 3% 2% 5% 2% 3% 5% 3% Hispanic/Latino 13 2 3 5 3 6 8 - 13H 5 3 6 4 7 4 5 4 4 6 2 8 6 4% 6% 4% 5% 4% 4% 5% 24% 4% 4% 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 7% 4% 5% 5% 6% 4% Native American/ 20 3 6 7 5 11 8 - 20H 8 7 5 8N 7 8 10 3 7 8 2 5 15 American Indian 7% 7% 7% 7% 6% 7% 6% 36% 7% 9% 5% 12% 4% 7% 8% 5% 8% 6% 5% 4% 10% White/Caucasian 244 33 64 76 71 119 123 227I 17 92 65 88 61 159 78 104 56 79 108 40 113 132 81% 78% 78% 80% 89% 81% 84% 100% 30% 80% 83% 82% 85% 83% 76% 85% 83% 84% 82% 87% 80% 82% Other 11 1 4 3 3 10G 1 - 11H 6 2 3 3 6 4 4 2 2 5 2 4 7 4% 3% 5% 3% 4% 7% * 20% 5% 3% 3% 5% 3% 4% 3% 3% 2% 4% 3% 3% 4% I'm not sure 5 1 1 2 - 3 1 - - 1 1 2 2N - 1 1 2 - 2 1 5V - 2% 3% 1% 2% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 1% 1% 3% 2% 2% 3% I prefer not to say 11 1 4 4 2 5 4 - - 5 2 4 - 10 4 4 3 3 4 - 4 8 4% 2% 5% 4% 3% 3% 3% 4% 3% 4% 5% 4% 3% 5% 3% 3% 3% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Note: Percentage less than 0.5 printed as *. Attachment 3 Page 59 of 74 59 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q29. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 60 of 74 60 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Asian/ 4 - 3 - - 1 1 3 - 1 2 1 3 1 3 2 - 1 3 - Pacific Islander 1% 7% 1% 1% 3% 1% 1% 2% 2% 2% 2% 2% 1% 3% Black/ 11 2 - 2 5CG 1 - 2 81 1 4 1 4 4 6 3 2 7 3 1 African American 4% 5% 5% 11% 2% 3% 8% 1% 3% 1% 2% 6% 4% 3% 7% 4% 3% 10% Hispanic/Latino 13 3 1 3 4 1 1 4 7 2 4 4 7 6 8 5 1 9 4 1 4% 7% 1% 7% 8% 2% 2% 4% 8% 2% 3% 5% 3% 9% 5% 4% 3% 5% 3% 5% Native American/ 20 4 6 2 3 2 5 9 4 7 7 7 12 5 10 7 4 9 11 1 American Indian 7% 8% 12% 4% 5% 4% 9% 10% 5% 6% 5% 10% 6% 7% 6% 6% 13% 5% 9% 5% White/Caucasian 244 42C 31 42C 36 47C 46 73 79 93 118 56 176 60 134 86 25 148 86 10 81% 87% 68% 87% 75% 86% 84% 78% 81% 85% 82% 83% 84% 81% 83% 79% 85% 85% 76% 80% Other 11 1 4 - 4 1 1 4 4 3 5 1 7 4 6 5 - 6 5 - 4% 1% 9% 8% 3% 2% 5% 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 5% 4% 5% 3% 5% I'm not sure 5 2 1 - 1 1 - 3 1 1 4 1 5 - 1 3 1 1 4 - 2% 4% 2% 2% 1% 3% 1% 1% 3% 1% 2% 1% 3% 4% 1% 3% I prefer not to say 11 1 2 - 1 3 3 4 1 7 6 1 8 2 4 7 - 3 8R - 4% 2% 5% 2% 6% 6% 4% 1% 6% 4% 2% 4% 3% 2% 7% 2% 7% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 60 of 74 60 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q30. Which category best describes your 2021 gross household income, before taxes? Remember to include everyone living in your household. Your best estimate will do. Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ----- male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- > Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Less than $25,000 42 5 11 12 14 18 24 32 10 14 15 13 21N 15 21Q 14 6 42ST - - 17 25 14% 13% 13% 13% 17% 12% 16% 14% 17% 12% 20% 12% 28% 8% 21% 11% 9% 45% 12% 16% $25,000 to less 52 6 9 15 21C 25 27 40 9 24 13 14 12 35 21 23 8 52ST - - 22 31 than $50,000 17% 14% 12% 16% 27% 17% 18% 17% 17% 21% 17% 13% 16% 18% 21% 19% 11% 55% 15% 19% $50,000 to less 69 12 23 19 16 37 29 49 16 31 18 20 20 36 26 32 9 - 69RT - 29 40 than $75,000 23% 27% 28% 20% 20% 25% 20% 22% 29% 27% 23% 19% 28% 19% 25% 26% 14% 53% 21% 25% $75,000 to less 62 12 12 23 14 31 28 52 8 21 12 29 9 49M 14 29 16 - 62RT - 35 27 than $100,000 210 29% 150 240 180 210 19% 23% 130 18% 150 270 130 260 130 240 240 47% 25% 17% $100,000 to less 30 4 13E 11E 2 13 17 25 4 7 4 19JK 5 25 7 9 14OP - - 30RS 19 12 than $150,000 10% 9% 16% 12% 3% 9% 12% 11% 7% 6% 5% 18% 7% 13% 7% 7% 20% 65% 13% 7% $150,000 or more 16 2 9 4 2 6 10 14 2 5 4 7 2 14 3 4 9OP - - 16RS 9 7 5% 4% 11% 4% 3% 4% 7% 6% 4% 4% 5% 6% 3% 7% 3% 3% 13% 35% 6% 5% I prefer not to say 28 2 5 11 10 16 11 15 7 11 11L 5 3 17 10 12 6 - - - 9 18 9% 4% 6% 11% 13% 11% 8% 6% 13% 10% 14% 5% 4% 9% 10% 10% 8% 7% 11% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 61 of 74 61 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q30. Which category best describes your 2021 gross household income, before taxes? Remember to include everyone living in your household. Your best estimate will do. Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Less than $25,000 42 7 9 7 7 8 4 16 14 12 19 10 27 12 24 12 6 24 16 2 14% 15% 19% 15% 15% 15% 7% 17% 15% 11% 13% 15% 13% 16% 15% 11% 19% 14% 14% 16% $25,000 to less 52 7 9 8 9 9 10 16 17 19 24 17 37 15 30 16 5 31 19 3 than $50,000 17% 14% 19% 16% 19% 17% 19% 17% 18% 18% 17% 25% 17% 20% 19% 15% 18% 18% 16% 22% $50,000 to less 69 13 14 9 8 16 9 28 17 25 29 18 51 14 38 28 4 38 31T - than $75,000 23% 28% 32% 18% 17% 29% 16% 30% 17% 23% 20% 27% 24% 19% 23% 26% 13% 22% 27% $75,000 to less 62 11 6 9 15 10 11 17 24 20 26 12 41 20 30 25 7 36 24 2 than $100,000 210 22% 14% 19% 320 18% 20% 180 250 190 18% 18% 190 270 180 230 25% 21% 21% 19% $100,000 to less 30 4 1 10C 4 6 6 5 14 12 18 3 23 6 20 6 4 23S 6 1 than $150,000 10% 8% 2% 20% 9% 11% 11% 5% 14% 11% 12% 4% 11% 9% 12% 6% 15% 14% 5% 11% $150,000 or more 16 2 2 2 - 2 8E 4 2 10I 10 2 14 2 6 9 1 9 6 2 5% 5% 4% 4% 4% 14% 5% 2% 9% 7% 3% 7% 2% 4% 8% 2% 5% 5% 13% I prefer not to say 28 4 4 4 4 4 7 8 8 11 19 4 19 5 14 12 2 13 12 2 9% 8% 9% 8% 9% 7% 13% 9% 9% 10% 13% 6% 9% 7% 8% 11% 8% 7% 11% 20% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 62 of 74 62 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q31. What is the highest level of education that you have completed? Total Less than high school High school diploma/ GED Some college/ 2 -year degree College degree/ 4 -year degree Graduate/ professional school I prefer not to say Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S.-------------------------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total 18-29 30-44 45-64 65+ male White POC Dem Rep Other Rent Own Or < Coll Grad+ <$50K $100K Or > Of 4 Of 4 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 9 3C 1 4 1 7 2 5 3 2 5 2 1 7 9PQ - - 6 2 - 3 6 3% 8% 1% 4% 1% 5% 1% 2% 5% 2% 6% 2% 1% 4% 9% 6% 1% 2% 4% 93 19D 23 23 28 45 47 70 20 32 23 39 29N 48 93PQ - - 37T 37 10 46 48 31% 46% 27% 24% 36% 31% 32% 31% 35% 28% 29% 36% 40% 25% 91% 39% 28% 22% 33% 30% 123 14 33 38 38 64 55 98 19 48 32 43 26 81 - 123OQ - 37 61T 13 57 65 41% 320 400 400 470 440 380 43% 34% 42% 410 400 360 420 100% 39% 46% 29% 41% 41% 42 3 15 15 9 17 24 31 7 17 10 15 11 29 - - 42OP 8 13 16RS 22 20 14% 6% 19% 16% 11% 11% 16% 14% 11% 15% 12% 14% 15% 15% 62% 9% 10% 35% 16% 12% 25 3 11E 9 2 9 16 19 6 14 6 6 6 18 - - 25OP 6 12 6 10 15 80 80 13% 10% 2% 6% 11% 8% 10% 120 7% 6% 8% 10% 38% 6% 9% 12% 7% 10% 8 - - 6C 2 5 3 5 3 2 4 2 1 7 - - - 1 6 1 2 6 3% 6% 3% 3% 2% 2% 5% 2% 5% 2% 1% 4% 1% 5% 2% 2% 4% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 63 of 74 63 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q31. What is the highest level of education that you have completed? Total Less than high school High school diploma/ GED Some college/ 2 -year degree College degree/ 4 -year degree Graduate/ professional school I prefer not to say Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction --------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- --------------- Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 & 2 3 & 4 5 & 6 Dir Track Smwht Rest Yes No DK Yes No DK 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) 9 - 2 4 1 1 1 2 5 2 5 2 3% 4% 8% 2% 2% 1% 2% 5% 2% 3% 3% 93 15 12 14 21 18 14 27 35 32 51 21 31% 30% 27% 29% 43% 32% 25% 29% 36% 29% 35% 32% 123 25 19 18 18 20 23 44 36 43 56 29 41% 520 410 36% 38% 370 41% 470 37% 39% 390 430 42 4 6 8 3 9 12BE 10 11 21 21 9 14% 8% 14% 16% 6% 16% 23% 11% 11% 19% 14% 14% 25 4 4 5 4 5 3 7 9 9 12 4 80 80 8% 11% 80 10% 6% 8% 9% 8% 8% 6% 8 1 2 - 2 1 2 3 2 3 1 2 3% 2% 5% 4% 2% 3% 4% 2% 2% 1% 3% 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 8 1 7 2 - 5 4 - 4% 2% 4% 2% 3% 30 67 20 54 26 13 57 32 4 32% 26% 34% 24% 43% 33% 28% 35% 92 27 66 44 13 72 43 7 440 370 41% 41% 42% 42% 38% 59% 28 10 20 19 3 22 19 - 13% 14% 12% 18% 10% 13% 17% 12 13M 14 11 1 14 11 - 6% 18% 8% 10% 3% 8% 10% 4 3 2 5 1 3 4 1 2% 4% 1% 5% 3% 2% 4% 6% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 64 of 74 64 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q32. Do you rent or own your home? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 65 of 74 65 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep ----- Other Rent ----- ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll Grad+ ----- ----- ----- <$50K ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Rent 72 16DE 23 19 15 40 32 54 16 28 14 30 72N - 29 26 16 32T 29 7 38 34 24% 38% 28% 20% 19% 27% 22% 24% 29% 24% 18% 28% 100% 29% 21% 24% 34% 22% 16% 27% 21% Own 191 20 51 65B 55B 89 101 152I 30 76 50 66 - 191M 56 81 470 50 85 38RS 84 107 64% 46% 62% 69% 69% 61% 69% 67% 52% 66% 64% 61% 100% 54% 66% 70% 53% 65% 83% 60% 67% I have a different 15 3 3 5 4 10G 3 9 4 5 6 4 - - 3 10 3 6 3 - 7 8 arrangement 50 80 30 50 50 7% 2% 40 60 50 7% 40 2% 80 40 7% 3% 5% 5% I prefer not to say 21 4 6 6 6 8 11 12 7H 5 8 8 - - 15PQ 6 1 5 13 1 11 11 7% 8% 7% 6% 8% 5% 7% 5% 13% 5% 10% 8% 14% 5% 1% 6% 10% 1% 8% 7% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 65 of 74 65 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q32. Do you rent or own your home? (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 66 of 74 66 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Rent 72 17DG 13 6 11 15 9 31I 17 24 34 19 45 19 37 24 11 38 29 5 24% 36% 30% 13% 22% 28% 17% 33% 18% 22% 23% 28% 21% 26% 23% 22% 37% 22% 26% 41% Own 191 25 26 38BE 27 34 42BE 51 65 76H 95 35 143 41 108 67 16 122S 63 6 64% 51% 58% 78% 55% 62% 77% 54% 67% 69% 66% 52% 68% 56% 67% 62% 54% 70% 55% 49% I have a different 15 3 2 2 4 2 1 5 6 3 5 6 7 8M 4 110 - 4 10R 1 arrangement 50 7% 40 40 9% 40 2% 60 60 30 30 90 3% 11% 3% 10% 2% 9% 5% I prefer not to say 21 3 4 2 7 3 2 7 9 6 11 8 16 6 12 6 3 9 11 1 7% 7% 8% 4% 14% 6% 4% 8% 9% 5% 7% 12% 7% 8% 8% 6% 9% 5% 10% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 66 of 74 66 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q33. Age (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 67 of 74 67 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 ----- ----- 45-64 ----- 65+ male ----- ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 18 - 29 43 43CDE - - - 22 19 31 10 8 8 27JK 16N 20 23PQ 14 6 11 24 5 37V 6 14% 100% 15% 13% 14% 17% 7% 10% 25% 22% 10% 22% 11% 9% 12% 18% 12% 26% 4% 30 - 44 82 - 82BDE - - 45 36 61 16 31 18 33 23 51 23 33 260 20 35 22RS 54V 28 27% 100% 31% 25% 27% 29% 27% 23% 31% 31% 27% 23% 27% 39% 21% 27% 46% 39% 17% 45 - 64 95 - - 95BCE - 43 49 72 17 39 18 38 19 65 27 38 24 28 42 15 35 60U 32% 100% 29% 33% 32% 29% 34% 23% 35% 26% 34% 26% 31% 36% 29% 32% 32% 25% 37% 65+ 80 - - - 80BC 37 43 63 14 36L 34L 10 15 55 29 38Q 11 35ST 30 4 14 66U 27% 100%D 25% 29% 28% 25% 31% 44% 10% 21% 29% 29% 31% 16% 37% 23% 10% 10% 41% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 67 of 74 67 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q33. Age (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 68 of 74 68 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 18 - 29 43 8 4 7 6 7 11 11 14 18 28 6 27 12 20 18 4 20 20 3 14% 16% 8% 15% 13% 13% 19% 12% 14% 16% 19% 9% 13% 17% 13% 16% 15% 12% 17% 23% 30 - 44 82 14 16G 13 13 17 9 31 26 25 33 23 59 21 41 34 7 39 39R 4 27% 30% 36% 27% 27% 31% 16% 32% 27% 23% 23% 34% 28% 28% 25% 32% 24% 23% 34% 34% 45 - 64 95 11 17 13 14 17 23B 28 27 40 41 23 65 24 50 38 8 55 37 3 32% 22% 38% 27% 29% 30% 43% 30% 28% 37% 28% 35% 31% 32% 31% 35% 26% 32% 32% 25% 65+ 80 16 8 15 15 14 12 24 30 26 43 15 59 17 51P 19 10 59S 19 2 27% 32% 18% 30% 31% 26% 22% 26% 31% 24% 30% 22% 28% 23% 32% 17% 34% 34% 16% 18% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 68 of 74 68 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q34. Political party (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 69 of 74 69 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 ----- ----- 45-64 ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- Dem ----- Rep Other Rent ----- ----- ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Democrat 114 8 31 39B 36B 52 60 82 26 114KL - - 28 76 34 48 30 38 52 12 33 81U 38% 20% 37% 41% 45% 36% 41% 36% 46% 100% 39% 40% 33% 39% 45% 40% 40% 27% 24% 51% Republican 78 8 18 18 34BC 40 38 60 15 - 78JL - 14 50 27 32 15 29 30 8 23 55U 26% 18% 22% 19% 42%D 27% 26% 26% 27% 100% 20% 26% 27% 26% 23% 31% 23% 17% 17% 34% Not affiliated 89 24CDE 29E 32E 4 46 39 71 12 - - 89JK 26 54 36 35 16 21 41 23RS 72V 17 30% 57% 35% 33% 5% 31% 27% 31% 22% 83% 36% 28% 35% 28% 24% 22% 31% 50% 52% 11% Other 19 2 4 6 6 9 9 15 3 - - 19JK 4 12 5 8 5 6 9 3 11 8 6% 5% 5% 6% 8% 6% 6% 6% 5% 17% 6% 6% 5% 7% 8% 7% 6% 7% 8% 5% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 69 of 74 69 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q34. Political party (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 70 of 74 70 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Democrat 114 21 22G 18 19 18 15 431 38 33 59 21 68 36M 56 47 11 60 53T 1 38% 43% 49% 38% 40% 33% 27% 46% 39% 30% 41% 30% 32% 49% 35% 43% 36% 34% 47% 10% Republican 78 14 10 10 8 17 19E 24 17 37I 31 26K 60 17 42 30 6 53S 22 2 26% 29% 22% 20% 16% 32% 35% 26% 18% 34% 21% 38% 29% 23% 26% 28% 20% 31% 20% 19% Not affiliated 89 12 10 17 17 15 17 23 34 33 49 16 68 17 54 26 9 51 32 6 30% 26% 23% 35% 34% 28% 32% 24% 35% 30% 34% 24% 32% 24% 33% 24% 31% 29% 28% 52% Other 19 1 3 3 5 4 3 4 8 6 6 5 15 3 9 5 4 10 6 2 6% 3% 6% 7% 10% 6% 5% 4% 9% 6% 4% 7% 7% 4% 6% 5% 13% 6% 6% 19% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 70 of 74 70 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q35. Voting history (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 71 of 74 71 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- ----- 65+ ---- male ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > ----- Of 4 Of 4 ---- ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 1000 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) 0 of 4 41 15DE 16E 9E 1 21 18 31 9 3 6 33JK 12 25 16 16 8 12 17 11 41V - 14% 35% 19% 9% 2% 14% 12% 13% 15% 2% 7% 30% 17% 13% 16% 13% 12% 12% 13% 23% 29% 1 of 4 36 10E 12E 10 4 17 18 30 4 5 5 26JK 10 21 14 14 9 12 15 7 36V - 12% 23% 15% 11% 5% 11% 13% 13% 7% 5% 6% 24% 14% 11% 14% 11% 13% 13% 11% 14% 26% 2 of 4 63 12E 26DE 16 9 39G 23 47 11 25 13 25 16 37 18 28 15 14 33 10 63V - 21% 28% 32% 17% 11% 26% 16% 21% 20% 22% 16% 23% 22% 20% 18% 23% 23% 15% 25% 22% 45% 3 of 4 65 4 14 30BC 17 31 33 42 18H 28L 23L 13 15 41 24 29 12 24 24 8 - 65U 22% 9% 17% 32% 21% 21% 22% 19% 32% 25% 29% 12% 21% 22% 23% 24% 17% 26% 18% 16% 40% 4 of 4 95 2 14 30BC 50BC 40 54 77 15 53L 32L 11 19 66 30 36 24 32 43 12 - 95U 32% 5% 17% 31% 62%D 27% 37% 34% 26% 46% 40% 10% 26% 35% 30% 29% 35% 34% 33% 25% 60% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 71 of 74 71 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q35. Voting history (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 72 of 74 72 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong Very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 ----- 5 ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- ----- Yes No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) 0 of 4 41 7 5 10 6 5 9 11 16 14 18 11 29 8 23 14 4 20 18 3 14% 14% 10% 21% 12% 8% 17% 12% 16% 13% 13% 16% 14% 11% 14% 13% 14% 12% 16% 22% 1 of 4 36 3 2 1 12BCD 12BCD 6 5 13 18H 17 8 30 6 19 7 902 22 8 6RS 12% 6% 4% 3% 24% 22% 11% 5% 14% 16% 12% 12% 14% 9% 12% 7% 31% 13% 7% 48% 2 of 4 63 16 7 13 8 11 9 23 21 19 33 11 37 22M 27 310 5 29 32R 2 21% 32% 16% 26% 16% 20% 16% 24% 21% 18% 23% 16% 18% 30% 17% 28% 18% 17% 28% 16% 3 of 4 65 8 12 11 12 13 8 20 23 21 32 18 48 13 37 21 7 39 24 2 22% 17% 27% 23% 25% 24% 15% 22% 24% 19% 22% 27% 23% 17% 23% 19% 24% 22% 21% 13% 4 of 4 95 15 19 13 11 14 23 35 24 37 44 19 66 25 56Q 36Q 4 64T 32T - 32% 31% 43% 26% 23% 26% 42% 37% 25% 34% 31% 29% 31% 33% 34% 33% 13% 37% 28% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 72 of 74 72 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q37. Ward (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 73 of 74 73 Education Vote Gender Party -----------------Income History Age --------- Ethnicity ----------------- Rent/Own H.S. ----------------- --------- ----------------------- Male Fe- ----------- NAV/ --------- Grad Some Coll $50K- $100K 0-2 3-4 Total ----- 18-29 ----- 30-44 45-64 ----- ----- ----- 65+ male ---- ---- White ----- POC ----- ----- Dem Rep Other ----- ----- Rent ---- Own ---- Or _<_ ----- Coll Grad+ <$50K ----- ----- ----- $100K ----- Or > Of 4 ----- ---- Of 4 ---- Total 300 43 82 95 80 147 147 227 57 114 78 108 72 191 102 123 67 94 131 47 140 160 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) (U) (V) Ward 1 48 8 14 11 16 28 19 37 8 21 14 14 17N 25 15 25 8 14 24 6 25 23 16% 19% 17% 11% 20% 19% 13% 16% 15% 18% 18% 13% 24% 13% 14% 20% 11% 15% 18% 13% 18% 15% Ward 2 45 4 16 17 8 21 23 29 13 22 10 13 13 26 14 19 10 18 21 3 14 32U 15% 8% 20% 18% 10% 15% 16% 13% 22% 20% 13% 12% 19% 14% 14% 15% 15% 19% 16% 7% 10% 20% Ward 3 48 7 13 13 15 20 28 41 8 18 10 21 6 38M 18 18 13 15 18 11 24 24 16% 17% 16% 14% 18% 14% 19% 18% 14% 16% 12% 19% 9% 20% 18% 14% 19% 16% 14% 25% 17% 15% Ward 4 48 6 13 14 15 24 22 32 14H 19 8 21 11 27 22 18 7 16 23 4 25 23 16% 15% 16% 15% 19% 16% 15% 14% 25% 17% 10% 20% 15% 14% 21% 15% 10% 17% 18% 9% 18% 14% Ward 5 55 7 17 17 14 28 26 44 6 18 17 19 15 34 19 20 14 17 25 8 28 27 18% 16% 20% 17% 18% 19% 17% 20% 11% 16% 22% 18% 21% 18% 18% 17% 21% 18% 19% 17% 20% 17% Ward 6 55 11C 9 23C 12 26 29 43 8 15 19 20 9 42 15 23 16 14 20 14RS 24 31 18% 25% 10% 25% 15% 17% 20% 19% 14% 13% 25% 19% 13% 22% 14% 18% 24% 15% 15% 30% 17% 19% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDE, FG, HI, JKL, MN, OPQ, RST, UV Attachment 3 Page 73 of 74 73 DHM Research - City of Springfield Policy Levy Renewal Survey - April 15-21, 2022 Q37. Ward (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 74 of 74 74 Q1: Q4: Police Ward Ward Direction Satisfaction ----------------------------------- ----------------- ----------- ------------ Q8: Initial Test Q21: Re -Test Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Ward Wards Wards Wards Right Wrong very/ ----------------- ----------------- Total 1 ----- ----- 2 ----- 3 ----- 4 5 ----- ----- 6 ----- 1 ----- & 2 3 ----- & 4 5 ----- & 6 Dir ----- Track ----- Smwht Rest ------ ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Yes ----- No ----- DK ----- Total 300 48 45 48 48 55 55 94 97 109 145 68 210 74 162 109 30 173 114 12 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% (B) (C) (D) (E) (F) (G) (H) (I) (J) (K) (L) (M) (N) (0) (P) (Q) (R) (S) (T) Ward 1 48 48CDEF - - - - - 481J - - 21 7 32 14 22 22 5 24 23 1 16% 100%G 52% 15% 11% 15% 19% 13% 20% 16% 14% 20% 9% Ward 2 45 - 45BDEF - - - - 45IJ - - 25 7 29 13 22 21 2 21 24 - 15% 100%G 48% 17% 10% 14% 17% 14% 20% 7% 12% 21% Ward 3 48 - - 48BCEF - - - - 48HJ - 23 8 30 14 31 12 5 34 12 2 16% 100%G 50% 16% 12% 14% 20% 19% 11% 17% 20% 11% 19% Ward 4 48 - - - 48BCDF - - - 48HJ - 21 12 34 11 28 11 9P 28 18 3 16% 100%G 50% 15% 18% 16% 15% 17% 11% 30% 16% 15% 24% Ward 5 55 - - - - 55BCDE - - - 55HI 24 19 44 8 33 16 6 34 17 4 18% 100%G 50% 17% 28% 21% 11% 20% 15% 20% 20% 15% 28% Ward 6 55 - - - - - 55BCDE - - 55HI 30 14 41 12 26 25 3 32 20 3 18% 100%F 50% 21% 20% 19% 17% 16% 23% 9% 18% 18% 20% (sig=.05) (all pairs) columns tested BCDEFG, HIJ, KL, MN, OPQ, RST Attachment 3 Page 74 of 74 74