Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 5/11/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD w 0#/ Required Project Information Prospective Applicant Name: Kyle Bressler (Applicant: complete this section) Phone: 541 485-4050 ext 212 Company: Oxwood Properties A Street LLC Fax: Address: 88695 Gentry St. Eugene, OR 97402 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Katie Keidel Associate Planner Phone: 541 302-9830 Company: Metro Planning, Inc Fax: Address: 846A Street S fld OR 97477 Property Owner: Same as Prospective Alicant Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-35-42 TAX LOT NOS : 200 Property Address: 7388 Main St. S fid OR 97478 Size of Property: 1.19 Acres ® Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Proposed 9 -Lot Subdivision Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots Parcels: 9 Avg. Lot Parcel Size: approx.rr6o00sf Densit :approx.9.4 du/acre Prospective Applicant: Xa&lo X"114-11 Signature Katie Keidel, Associate Planner Print Case No.: Date: Date: 05/11/2022 Reviewed by: Application Fee: Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist X❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. X❑ Development Issues Meeting Application Form ® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. X❑ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" © Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' X1 North arrow ® Date of preparation ® Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ❑X Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained X❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions x] Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots X❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 DIM QUESTIONS FOR OXWOOD SUBDIVISION OAssessor's Map 8_ Tax Lot: 17-02-35-42-00200 May 11, 2022 Site Address: 7388 Main St., Spfid, OR 97478 1. We are hoping to have fire access on Main Street for the lots fronting Main Street as the area required for fire apparatus turnaround is limited within the proposed subdivision — as seen on the site plan. How does Fire feel about this concept? 2. With the new development code changes what critical requirements have changed for subdivisions? 3. If we don't have tentative approval by the time the new code comes into effect, can we withdraw the variance application for frontage requirement and invoke the new code for that component? 4. There are two different rights of way to match on 74th Street ... which one should we match? 5. Does the City have any other comments or thoughts on this proposal, or see any potential issues? Metro Planning, Inc Marrh 30, 2021 P a g e 11