Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/26/2022�ity of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) i GFIE ;lk 10 Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: Joe Sturtevant Phone: 360-713-7464 Company: Hayden Homes Fax: Address: 2464 SW Glacier PI, Ste 110, Redmond OR 97756 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Renee Clough, PLS, PE, AICP phone: 541-746-0637 Company: Branch Engineering, Inc Fax: Address: 310 5th St, Springfield OR 97477 Property Owner: Joe Sturtevant Phone: 360-713-7464 Company: Hayden Homes Fax: Address: 2464 SW Glacier PI, STE 110, Redmond OR 97756 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-32-00 TAX LOT NOS : 2202 Property Address: none Size of Property: 4.8 Acres X Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Subdivision Existing Use: Vacant # of Lots/Parcels: 36 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 2300 sf I Densit : 7.5 du/acre Prospective Applicant: ✓t.�� Date: 4-25-22 Signature Date Received Joe Sturtevant Print APR 2 0 2021 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section) �Orgi al Submittal No.: Z7'ro01p4-��-E Date: ZReviewedby: 1'�� Application Fee: uCi6.013 Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: b46 '90 PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist 91 Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑x Development Issues Meeting Application Form ® Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ® Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. x❑ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" ❑x Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ® North arrow x❑ Date of preparation ❑x Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number ❑x Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained ❑x Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions x❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots x❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 (Branch ENIGINEERIN& sine ,l April 19, 2022 DIM QUESTIONS WESTWIND ESTATES, 1'T ADDITION Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 22-198 The site lies at the northwest corner of the Daisy Street/Weyerhaeuser Haul Road intersection. It previously received tentative subdivision approval for a 24 lot subdivision in 2017 (Case Number TYP217-00012) and underwent a small lot concept DIM in May 2018. This DIM is requested to discuss a revised small lot concept. This concept has two main aims: increase affordable housing options in Springfield and minimize wetland impacts. To do this the concept utilizes small homes on small lots. 1. The city previously expressed interest in partnering with development on this site to construct S 481" St. a. Is the city still agreeable to transferring some property to private ownership? b. What amount of contribution will Hayden need to make towards the S 481" St improvements? c. Please confirm existing haul road pavement can be used for emergency vehicle egress if platted and built out before S 48th St is constructed. d. Is the city still considering a roundabout at S 48th and Daisy Streets? 2. A number of the lots are accessed by private accessways rather than a street. a. Can the accessways be privately owned by an HOA? b. Do they need designated pedestrian routes or can vehicles and pedestrians be mingled? c. Is 24' width of pavement acceptable for the accessways? 3. To maximize the number of lots possible (thereby increasing affordability by reducing the project's per lot cost), the public street has been minimized. a. Are curbside sidewalks acceptable for the public streets? b. Are the public street centerline radii acceptable? c. Considering the reduced lot dimensions and setbacks, along with curbside sidewalks, is the city willing to waive street tree requirements? d. Will PUEs be required along the public streets? 4. The number of lots is also maximized by reducing the lot sizes and setbacks. a. Are the reduced building setbacks (building to property line and building to building) acceptable? b. Can the two Acadia lots have only one off-street parking stall? EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD PHILOMATH 310 511, Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 P. 541.746.0637 1 a amv.brancheng inee ri ng.com Date Received APR 2 0 ZU[l Original Submittal (CV`s Westwind DIM Questions April 19, 2022 c. Lot dimensions and sizes are below current code minimum. Can this be addressed by a cluster subdivision and/or standards in the code to be adopted soon? S. Additional questions as time allows: a. Does staff see anything in new code standards which would be helpful to this project? b. At one time SUB Water was contemplating a new main in S 48- St. Is this still under consideration? c. Are any other utility upgrades under consideration? Branch Engineering, Inc. page 2 of 2 fn l �I CI 1 I I J smar rvow�LWls .HM smLA CYwNVEL F Sr atom �'. \� ... a./ewr:cw. cTrnrtom Pu �• MCL. sL�ratW IA� ,or R9•[T— W �I I R LOrN R I W �EK LOI JP n I .9 Lm J/ W)JO n .� a 61XIC �pr/YHC �, [�.I �{'smvuirn� A w zJ 9I q Lm z+ bru � I ;� Lar n Lora � W Lmv . fnl IIII �I of Lm z➢ 'q R brit I LOI ZI LmA '.i I R LOr 1D Lor 1e y I Lar n Lm re § S4TTH PL rew .o aD .o' w w w ao 0 '-^ Lml IMz ort Ipr. LOrS 10)e Ip!) Lpl9 ny Lm9 LO/10 bf 11 IOI )i LOI IJ Lm I. 1Or z'rlavWxArfx <M<M �Atitf MW N GTAYC +am STREU CMNNEL i8'-4pMu'rta'. APR19, 1111 Z EP O 0.0 bIA 33-198 . . m-xW sWxs � Mnuro wrmrron. C� Date Received APR 2 6 1022 Original SubMtlal�Nnj •�soevir�rvc "I APR19, 1111 Z EP O 0.0 L L r 33-198 0 LQ r N LLI 2 1^Q A yF• W N W Wz ® 4 O W Z d' > � J qYA F LL L V W vl ? 3 Qz o� "I APR19, 1111 e.awe. EP a oev 0.0 ren•••= 33-198 DIVISION CONCEPT ranch INEERING- �I o.e,ettl,l.. r I , -J — _roazarswxev um I sr � Q Fi i cm sir i I . W 1Iyy�LC<¢C`s`i]]l�'YR7 u]' �I 5. 10 I p W Q C) tn mx mxe i mww wrrnlwx q Z > � of J LL � E �� � E LA W o� a F APR 19, 2022 FR RIC 22-1988 ea^°BUILDOUT CONCEPT ��2 OF 2