The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 4/12/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Franklin Moles Medabalime Phone: 541-914-4334 Company: Fax: Address: 4145 Jasper Road, Springfield, OR 97478 Prospective Applicant's Rep.. Andrew Strout Phone: 541-746-0637 Company: Branch Engineering, Inc. Fax: 4A)Di�s SFAA �1— Address: 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Property Owner: Franklin Moles Medabalime Phone: 541-914-4334 Company: Fax: Address: 4145 Jasper Road, Springfield, OR 97478 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 18-02-05-23 TAX LOT NOS : 403 Property Address: 4145 Jasper Road, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 0.93 Acres iZ Square Feet Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal; Partition or Subdivision Existing Use: Single Family Residential # of Lots Parcels: 3-6 Av . Lot Parcel Size: 12,350-6,322 Sf Densi : 3-6 du/acre Prospective ��,, —� __ ��..A� Applicant: /7`Lc^""""•CIY��c,--r-''r-2 Date• ,3 oZL zSignat�ire F/1A kt,r,��R/3A�1 riot Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section) C Case No.•'bZ- N0D`1 -qV� Date• �� 2 7,O7r� Reviewed b 1 A lication Fee: 617 Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. Development Issues Meeting Application Form Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. 5( Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow .� Date of preparation .� street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points ❑ On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review ❑ Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height ❑ Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces ❑ Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 (0-11 rand:..,HGINEEUK- smreivn April 12, 2022 DIM QUESTIONS 4145 JASPER ROAD Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 22-148 The site is located at 4145 Jasper Road (TM 18-02-05-23, TL 403). The property is annexed into the City of Springfield and consists of approximately 0.93 acres. There is an existing home on the property with an access connection on Jasper Road. The property has approximately 83 -feet of frontage, and extends between 440- and 530 -feet south to the edge of the City of Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary. Jasper Road is fully developed along the site's frontage. It is the intent of the land owner to divide the property through either the partition or subdivision process. According to FEMA flood zone mapping system the entire property hes outside of any flood zone hazards, but is adjacent (to the south) to the 500- and 100yearflood zones. The adjacent properties to the east and west are not within city limits, and also do not meet current zoning density standards. The owner is balancing the pros and cons of a partition versus subdivision and single-family housing versus middle housing. The questions below are to help guide the project design. 1. If the land division does not meet density requirements based on placing a single- family home on each property, can it fulfill density requirements if it has the capacity to have multiplex style homes on each property 2. If the site has poor drainage and can't connect into the existing stormwater system on Jasper Road, due to pipe invert elevation, would it be permitted to send water to the 12" pipe or stream bed to the south (outside of the Urban Growth Boundary)? 3. The existing sanitary sewer connection for the home on site connects to a sewer lateral near the northeast property corner. The as builts for the lateral state it is a 6" line, however the GIS mapping tool says it is an 8" line. If it is a 6" line, would it be permitted to connect all the proposed properties to this line? If not, what would be the requirements for connecting into the 27" main within Jasper Road? 4. A recorded plat (Filbert Meadows First Addition) located to the west of the site, has a local road (Stellar Road) that ends at the easterly plat boundary. Is it EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD ALBANY 310 5'h Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p: 541.746.0637 1 Y✓ H" A'. branch eng i neering.com DIM Questions April 12, 2022 intended to extend this local road in the future? If so, would it impact the subject property, and what would its future alignment look like? S. Are there any red flags that the city sees with this plan that weren't addressed as part of the questions above? Any other information items that staff feel would be beneficial to the development would be greatly appreciated. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 2