The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 4/6/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPNINGFI� Application Type ,, _ Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Ma -or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Applicant Name: David Loveall Phone: 541 345.9900 Company: Masaka Properties Email: Address' 1657 Delrose Ave, Springfield, OR 97477 david@threesixteenministries.com Applicant's Rep.: Ryan Thomas Phone: 541.687.6918 Company: Ryan Thomas Construction LLC Email: Address: 91069 N. Willamette St., Coburg, OR 97408 ryan@rthomasconstmction.com Property Owner: David Loveall Phone: 541.345.9900 Company: Masaka Properties Email: Address: 1657 Delrose Ave, Springfield, OR 97477 david@thmesixteenministdes.com ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-35-31 TAX LOT NOS : 08000 PropertV Address: 448 Main St. (also 120 & 122 5th St.) Size of Property: 4800 AcresPraposetl ❑ Square Feet No. of Proposed Name of Project: Rivett Building @ 448 Main Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Remodel ground floor; construct 2 new stories (12 apartments) on top of existing building Existing Use: Commercial/mercantile/office - 3 ground Floor tenant spaces New Impervious Surface Coverage [Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): NONE / zero sf Si natures: Please sipL&al;Li2rint your name and date in thea Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: roriate box on the next a e. complete this section) Date Received Si ns: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date. APRip 6 011 RUeview�6e,,,, b . Case No.: II"c'01'D �� Date: (p ZZ Application Fee: echnical Fee: � ItevilevC ,L40 Postage Fee: il3 TOTAL FEES: (,off • 40 PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Signature I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete application. -e-4j '!i %�,�/ Date: ,st is-�02Z Signature ONY/17 6. 4 MALL Print Revised 1/7/14 KL 2 of 11 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Date: January 7, 2022 File Number: 21 -000324 -PRE Address: 448 Main St. Proposal: Remodel Ground Floor and Add 2 story Apartment Planner: Drew Larson Comments By: Eric Phillips -Meadow — 541-780-4048 FIRE COMMENTS o Site Plan Complete Incom p ple See Fire Note(s) ® ❑ On-site vehicular circulation o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Fire Note(s) ® ❑ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and similar public facilities LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Transportation Engineer/ Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#: 21-000324 Applicant: David Loveall TRANSPORTATION Right -of -Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ® ❑ Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ❑ ® (1) Traffic Impact Study o Land Division Tentative Plan Complete Incomplete See Transportation Note(s) ❑ ® (2) /4 ■ Location of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination Location of existing and proposed transit facilities ® ❑ Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways ® ❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and bike trails ® ❑ Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications, access easements or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any Revised 10/25/07 projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map 0 ® (3) Location of existing and required traffic _- control devices Transportation Notes: 1. The trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling units most likely will not generate enough traffic warranting traffic analysis according to SDC 4.2-105 thresholds. The applicant must include a trip generation estimate relating to the increase in trips documenting compliance with SDC 4.2-105. 2. Applicant must label the existing street lighting as current city standard decorative LED fixtures and label the existing streetlight associated with the signal pole. Lighting analysis was performed recently at the time of the decorative lighting project installation and not required as part of this application. 3. Applicant must show the correct location of the signal pole and mast arm for review. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: • Applicant must confirm with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) that the clearances diagram in relation to the proposed canopy overhang meets their signal design and clearances standards. Applicant must show the proposed canopy overhang on a plan sheet similar to how the proposed balconies are shown on sheet A0.02 for review. ReOsed 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 21 -324 -PRE PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ❑ 1 ® ❑ n/a ® ❑ n/a ® ❑ n/a ® ❑ 0/ ■ Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Vicinity Map The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services Department The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Services Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of SDC Sections 5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following information: Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) ❑ 1 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements ❑ ® 3 Location of existing and required power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities ® ❑ * Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points o Grading and Paving Plan Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) 4 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer 0 0 n/a Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system EJ 5 Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations M ❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns El 5 The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained n/a Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ❑ n/a Amount of proposed cut and fill o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. Complete Incomplete See PW Note(s) n/a Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management System Study Revised 10/25/07 PW Notes., 1. Site plan and utilities prepared by Architect, not licensed PE. 2. Soil information not provided and probably not needed, building foundation detail is provided that looks to be preapred by a qualified structural engineer. I assume the detailed calculations and drawings are included in builicing permit package, including soil bearing information. 3. Two different scenarios are included for possible power supply to building, both offsite. For either one to be approved full concurrence from the third party property owner and detailed plans for ALL work including new conduits needed and any road crossings will be required -and will also require an encroachment permit and detailed drawings for the demolition and restoration of all work in the ROW, including any ADA elements disturbed during the construction work. 4. No grading or paving plan is required, but ALL disturbed concrete requires full panel replacement, this includes the existing saw cuts already made in the alley to be restored. This means the WHOLE, ENTIRE cut up concrete panel requires replacement, not just the removed portion, to the existing joints. This also applies to all existing sidewalk panels on both sides and any distrubed pavement must be patched also. NOTE: If this work was done without any encroachment permit, one is required with detailed demolition and restoration shown and any needed traffic control to be done by a proffesional engineer. 5. Downspouts are shown on page al.05 but not how this water will be conveyed across the sidewalk? additioanl details required. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application: A TV report for the existing waste water lateral is required (this is standard for all intensification of connections downtown due to age of the infrastructure) to the sewer main connection. This is a 4" line and it should be confirmed via the architect and plubming code that this is sufficient for the number of units to be built on this site (personal expertise is this is not sufficient, and a new 6" line should be installed but only required if plumbing code or design professional requires it). Revised 10/25/07 City of Springfield Development Services Department 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST Project Name: Rivett Building @ 448 Main SPRINGFIELD wo Project Proposal: Two -Story addition and remodel to house commercial uses on the ground floor and 12 residential units above. Case Number: 811 -21 -000324 -PRE Project Address: 448 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-35-31; TLs 8000 Zoning: Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC) Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Nodal Development (/NDO) Applicable Refinement Plan: Downtown Refinement Plan Designation: Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC) Metro Plan Designation: Nodal Development Overlay Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: January 7, 2022 Application Submittal Deadline: July 6, 2022 Associated Applications: 811 -21 -000257 -PRE- DIM POSITION REVIEW OF NAME Project Planner Land Use Planning Drew Larson 736-1003 Transportation Planning Transportation Michael Liebler 736-1034 Public Works Utilities: Sanitary & Storm Sewer Clayton Mceachern 736-1036 Deputy Fire Marshal Fire and Life Safety Eric Phillips -Meadow 726-2293 Building Official Building Code Chris Carpenter 744-4153 APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM Applicant Applicant's Representative David Loveall Ryan Thomas Masaka Properties Ryan Thomas Construction LLC 1657 Delrose Ave. 91069 N. Willamette st. Springfield OR 97477 Coburg,OR 97408 Revised 10/25/07 TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST PLANNING o Application fee (confirm prior to submittal): Impervious Area: N/A Tentative Review Fee: $5,682.40 Final Site Plan Fee: $548.94 91FE PLAN flEV1EW:laoaa' 9Ua PmSUEmNInI MeeUnp CIV:UM 59L WA WA R glwlaphn N4lofSUU PIen UM: SG6M1 WA WA Rrvbw aM 3HUPIm NeWaw AavW uce: MotlMutim-LWwWWkNuro. SMe Mn NuvYw <. It fl. imam, a. ufn- $5 a i9j38 $361A0 Type 11 ar r . tO,OCU sq. It arpreaW lnlpervMua Wlfece SG3i8a$6Y1000 vp.M1 SX $193 3193 9He Plan Nariaw MotlAutinn-Major Ca :$5046 33.= $193 iypeN $M PNn RwIaw YOGflutlon-Mlntt CLLy: Mon Pull WA Type) UW:39A19 $'%as WA FIreISHa PYn EpunabR cs�,R 1/GS: Sa,69 $33].90 WA Typal FlreI SIb PW l3uvpwNuwlnmwnl See SpaUalim0u . a>a >a typal-Fhml ails pLn YMEaalloplren[ agn a aaadMfa 40% was wM ase plan (ae Iaxcaslw o3 pwdga) A 5% Tegnrolopy Pe. pgl.a wlwn In, >wnmaa. o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81/2"x 11" Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) [] 8 1/z" x 11" Copy of Site Plan o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) Q ® 2 Brief Narrative o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ►1 � Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor Vicinity Map ® ❑ The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings ❑ ❑ n/a The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ❑ 3 The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision [] 4 The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 lh feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings o Proposed Site Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) // Ps® Revised 10/25/07 Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)),setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown ❑ Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way shall be designated including at grade connections ® ❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as N/A area and percentage of the site proposed for Note(s) buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities Complete surfaces ❑ ❑ n/a Observance of solar access requirements as Note(s) specified in the applicable zoning district ® ❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, pedestrian circulation ® ❑ Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be ❑ n/a served, including the location and dimensions of ® ❑ existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and proposed to be closed [] Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces ® ❑ Note location of existing and planned Lane proposed development, including jurisdictional Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) ❑ ❑ n/a Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common ❑ open spaces, recreational areas, and other Location and type of existing street lighting ® similar public and semi-public uses Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. Complete Incomplete See Planning N/A Note(s) ❑ Phased Development Plan o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor ❑ ❑ n/a Location and width of all existing easements ® ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications, or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage ❑ Location and type of existing street lighting ® ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, Revised 10/25/07 neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities ® ❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ® 5 Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project ❑ n/a Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns o Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ® ❑ Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted 6 The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components [] n/a Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development n/a Location and width of all proposed easements [] Location and type of proposed street lighting Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities n/a Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines o Landscape Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) ❑ ❑ n/a Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director ❑ ❑ n/a Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage Revised 10/25/07 ❑ ❑ n/a Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 ❑ ❑ n/a Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system ❑ ❑ n/a Location and type of street trees ❑ ❑' n/a List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing and method of planting o Architectural Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 0 ❑ Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height ® Conceptual floor plans o On -Site Lighting Plan Complete Incomplete See Planning Note(s) 0 111 ■ Planning Notes: Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Photometric test report for each light source 1. Title report cannot be older than 30 days at the time of submittal, this may need to be updated prior to tentative submittal. 2. The narrative needs to address the Site Plan Criteria, SDC5.17-125; and the Nodal Development Overal District, SDC 3.3-1000. 3. Label floodzone and TOTZ on Site Assessment sheet. 4. Label H2O main size. 5. Two different scenarios for power supply; you will need property owner to sign the applicantion depending on which option you move forward with. 6. Stormwater desitination is not clear, please amend the plans to show final desitination. Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application, • For ease of review, please create each sheet in the checklist and show the required information within the checklist. There should be a Site Assessment; Proposed Site Plan; Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan; Proposed Utilities Plan; Architectural Plans; and an On-site Lighting Plan. Each should show the required information requested. All information should be presented as requested for ease of review. • Move the Mixed -Use Commercial standards to the Architectural Plans/Elevations. • There is a empty tree well on S1M1 Street that will require a new street tree. Revised 10/25/07 ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR PERMITS IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE - APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION: Applicable Not Applicable [] Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ ® A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district 0 If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ ® A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ ® Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer Revised 10/25/07 THIS APPLICATION IS: ❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ❑ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 - day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -day timeline. SAr'Owc zozz nt's Signature Date Revised 10/25/07 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN X www. cam pH rel an.c am 4campffrelab April 5, 2022 Andrew Larson City of Springfield Development & Public Works Springfield, OR 97477 Reference: Rivett Building Q 448 Main Street (MAP/TL #17-03-35-31-08000) Response to Site Plan Pre -Submittal Comments dated January 7, 2022: iL'7J�69Yilil_\Y[iLp T1 The trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling units most likely will not generate enough traffic warranting traffic analysis according to SDC 4.2-105 thresholds. The applicant must include a trip generation estimate relating to the increase in trips documenting compliance with SDC 4.2-105. b See calculation from Access Engineering, included as an attachment to the Narrative. T2 Applicant must label the existing street lighting as current city standard decorative LED fixtures and label the existing streetlight associated with the signal pole. Lighting analysis was performed recently at the time of the decorative lighting project installation and not required as part of this application. b Labels for street lighting updated on drawings. T3 Applicant must show the correct location of the signal pole and mast arm for review. b Location of traffic signal pole field verified and updated on drawings. PUBLIC WORKS: PW1 Site plan and utilities prepared by Architect, not licensed PE. b No action required. PW2 Information not provided and probably not needed, building foundation detail is provided that looks to be prepared by a qualified structural engineer. I assume the detailed calculations and drawings are included in building permit package, including soil bearing information. Date Received Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 AF41ORWI1$2 Original Submittal_ ^_ CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN X www.ca.'n. lvb. cam mcbmpllre I.b b No action required. Yes, detailed structural calculations and drawings will be included in the building permit package. PW3 Two different scenarios are included for possible power supply to building, both offsite. For either one to be approved full concurrence from the third party property owner and detailed plans for ALL work including new conduits needed and any road crossings will be required -and will also require an encroachment permit and detailed drawings for the demolition and restoration of all work in the ROW, including any ADA elements disturbed during the construction work. b See updated capacity letter, step plan, and aerial illustrations from SUB showing final solution for the power supply. All work is to be completed within existing utility easements and utilizing existing underground conduit runs, no demolition of road/sidewalk required. PW4 No grading or paving plan is required, but ALL disturbed concrete requires full panel replacement, this includes the existing saw cuts already made in the alley to be restored. This means the WHOLE, ENTIRE cut up concrete panel requires replacement, not just the removed portion, to the existing joints. This also applies to all existing sidewalk panels on both sides and any disturbed pavement must be patched also. NOTE: If this work was done without any encroachment permit, one is required with detailed demolition and restoration shown and any needed traffic control to be done by a professional engineer. b Any necessary removal/disturbance of concrete will be repaired by replacing full panels. This has been noted on the site plan sheet. PW5 Downspouts are shown on page a1.05 but not how this water will be conveyed across the sidewalk? additional details required. b Existing downspouts on Main St. and 5th St. are piped under the sidewalks to weep holes in the curb. Existing downspout at the NW comer is piped underground at alley. Existing downspouts will be replaced/extended, but no new downspout locations are proposed. Locations of existing downspouts and paths to weep holes are shown on the site plans. PW6 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. A N report for the existing waste water lateral is required (this is standard for all intensification of connections downtown due to age of the infrastructure) to the sewer main connection. This is a 4" line and it should be confirmed via the architect and plumbing code that this is sufficient for the number of units to be built on this site (personal expertise is this is not sufficient, and a new 6" line should be installed but only required if plumbing code or design professional requires it). b See letter (attached to Narrative) from Harvey & Price summarizing video review comments and recommendations for waste lines. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 7-d* www. complireloh.com Ncumpnreluh I1I&IIQIIIts 1[sllS.'F PL1 Title report cannot be older than 30 days at the time of submittal, this may need to be updated prior to tentative submittal. a New title report attached. PL2 The narrative needs to address the Site Plan Criteria, SDC5.17-125; and the Nodal Development Overal District, SDC 3.3-1000. b Narrative has been updated to address these sections. PL3 Label floodzone and TOTZ on Site Assessment sheet. b The site is not located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. b The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department b These notes have been added to the site plan sheets and the narrative. PL4 Label H2O main size. b Water main has been labeled on updated site plan sheet. PL5 Two different scenarios for power supply; you will need property owner to sign the application depending on which option you move forward with. b See attached construction agreement signed by the property owner and SUR. PLb Stormwater destination is not clear, please amend the plans to show final destination. b See response to item PW5 above. PL7 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. For ease of review, please create each sheet in the checklist and show the required information within the checklist. There should be a Site Assessment; Proposed Site Plan; Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan; Proposed Utilities Plan; Architectural Plans; and an On-site Lighting Plan. Each should show the required information requested. All information should be presented as requested for ease of review. b We formatted the narrative to address the checklist items one by one, with the drawings as support documentation. Due to the limited scope of this project it seemed redundant to make so many individual drawings/sheets. However, in the future we will format accordingly. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 -0— CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN N www.cp mpf trelo b.cpm #camp❑relpb PL8 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. Move the Mixed -Use Commercial standards to the Architectural Plans/Elevations. a These notes have been moved to sheet A2.01 PL9 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. There is an empty tree well on 5th Street that will require a new street tree. b There is not an empty street well along either street frontage. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE 1 ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN IV www.camptirelab.com #camplirela4 December 17, 2021 UPDATED APRIL 5, 2022 Andrew Larson City of Springfield Development & Public Works Springfield, OR 97477 SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION: Rivett Building Cr4448 Main St. (Map/TL: #17-03-35-31-08000) CONTENTS: A. NARRATIVE • Project summary • Plan set review items summary • Specific code section summaries B. ATTACHMENTS ATT -1: Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8.5" x 11" size, separate from large format drawing set ATT 2: Copy of Deed ATT -3: Preliminary Title Report ATT -4: Trip generation calculation from Access Engineering ATT -5: Excerpt from ODOT Signal Design manual, and correspondence with Kathy Tourtillott and Scott Cramer from ODOT clarifying clearance requirements for the traffic signal ATT -6: Letter from Springfield Utility Board stating that the site will be adequately served for electrical service, along with Tentative Step Plan and supporting illustrations ATT -7: Signed construction agreement between the property owner and Springfield Utility Board for installation of increased electrical service ATT -8: Letter from Springfield Utility Board stating that the site will be adequately served for water service, along with email and utilities plan showing water service available ATT -9: TV Report for Waste Water Lateral - letter from Harvey & Price summarizing video review comments and recommendations for waste lines ATT 10: Lighting Cut Sheets - See attached lighting cut -sheet for more information about type of illumination, wattage, shielding, etc. for the proposed gooseneck wall -mounted fixtures proposed for building exterior. ATT -11: Recorded utility easement documentation C. DRAWING SET (4) Copies of the drawing plan sets required, large format sheets; also see outline within narrative for specific review items and where they are addressed in the plan set Date Received Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 APR1616.g2 Original Submittal CAMPFIRE CU2 ARCHITECTURREE & & OESISIGNGN X www.co mpfirela G.cam Ycomp[be 0 Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 ACAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE -3- ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN ..0 www. comph re l a p.c om Mca morel as o Interior bearing walls -staggered steel stud bearing walls between apartment units; bearing shear walls at ground floor o Interior non-bearing walls- new interior walls throughout apartment units, enclosing stairs, W.C., utility room, storage closets, etc. o New beams/columns as indicated on structural drawings o New stair systems throughout, including (2) egress stairs, (12) typical apartment interior stairs, and (1) mezzanine stair for live/work unit • Fire/life safety: o Fire rated assemblies- 1 hour separation between ground floor and apartments on second floor; i hour between apartments; 1 hour stair enclosures o New NPFA-13 sprinkler system to be installed throughout building, in all enclosed spaces on all floors, and under stairwells • Exterior improvements: o New paint on exterior concrete facade; new upper level walls to be clad in brick - look fiber -cement panels o New awnings/canopies over entrances along Main Street and 5'h Street o New planter boxes and outdoor seating elements c New gooseneck wall -mounted light fixtures around building n New bike parking stalls • Proposed uses: o Ground floor residential- l accessible live/work unit at NE corner of building with independent entrance on 5t' St. o Ground floor commercial- 1 largetenant space along Main St„ 1 smallertenant space along 5th St.; to be built as shell spaces forthis permit; tenants notyet identified; future buildouts to be submitted as separate T.I. permits • Systems: o Electrical-serviceto be upgraded, including new meters and panels, per SUB and code requirements; new wiring, lighting, and receptacles throughout; coordination with other trades for power requirements for equipment o HVAC - new mini-splitsto independently serve each apartment and each commercial space; new exhaust ducting for residential kitchens and baths in (13) apartments as well as (2) public W.C. on ground floor; exhaust ducting for laundry in 2"a floor hallway and ground floor live/work unit; mechanical chase provided for potential future commercial kitchen in main commercial space, though equipment not part ofthis permit o Plumbing- new meter and upsized line from meter into building; tie into existing sanitary connection; new fixtures throughout and supply/waste piping; floor drains in ground floor W.C.'s, utility room, and trash alcove; new underfloor 75 - gallon grease trap in utility room; 2 new gas water heaters in utility room o Fire suppression- new sprinkler system throughout; hottap into main fire supply line along Main St., backflow, device in SW corner of building; standpipe and fire alarm panel to be in utility room; fire department connection to be at SE corner of building along Sth St. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 ARCHITECTURE C H CAMPFIRE C COLLABORATIVE 4' ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN X www.[ampfire la b.c pm R[pmpliuMb PLAN SET REVIEW ITEMS a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions -see Existing Site Plan on sheet A0.02 • Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect • Vicinity Map shown on sheet A0.01 • Refer to the existing site plan on sheet A0.02 for all relevant existing site features and their names, uses, locations and dimensions, as well as what is to be removed. Existing building perimeter is at extent of property lines. Building shares a party wall with one building on the south-west side. • The site is not located along a water course as indicated by the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works department. • The site is not located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. • The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department • For physical features such as tree diameters, refer to the existing site plan on sheet A0.02. There are no riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings on or adjacent to site. b. Site Plan - see Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02 • Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect • The location, dimensions, size, building adjacencies, and property lines are shown on the Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02. As this is an existing building with extents to the property line, there are no setbacks, so no surveyor was required. The Downtown Springfield parking exemption applies to this site. • For the locations and heights of walls,trash, and exterior features see sheet A2.01 No fences, or external site storage are proposed. New trash alcove shown the Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02, with more detail shown on the Level 1 - Dimensioned Plan on sheet A1.02. • Under the Downtown Springfield parking exemption no site-specific ADA parking spaces are proposed. The site is relatively flat for ADA use, and all entries are at grade. Please see plan 3/A0.02. • Dimensions of development are 40'x 120' as indicated on the Vicinity Plan on sheet A0.01. 100 percent ofthe property is building structure. There is no change in the footprint area of 4800 s.f., from existing to new proposal. All else is existing and is not proposed for change, such as sidewalks and other impervious surfaces. • As specified in 3.2-225 Base Solar Development Standards, the zoning of this site is MUC and does not need to observe solar access requirements. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN N www.campnralaEcom 4epm1Hrela6 5- • See site plans on sheet A0.02 for on-site loading areas, and vehicuIarand pedestrian circulation. • See site plans on sheet A0.02 for access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing curb cuts • Bicycle parking o See 2/A0.02 for proposed location of bicycle parking spaces o Short term stalls required: • Residential:1/unit, 75% long term, 25%shortterm • 13 units => 9.75 long term, 2.25 shortterm • Commercial/restaurant(TBD): 1/600 s.f., 25% long term, 75% short term • 2962 s.f. / 600 = 5 spaces; 1.25 long term, 3.75 shortterm o TOTAL REQUIRED: • 11 long term (9.75 + 1.25) • 6 short term (2.25 + 3.75) • t long term oversized o TOTAL PROVIDED/PROPOSED: • 11 long term vertical stalls+ 1 oversized stall, located in residential lobby through access -controlled exterior door 8 shortterm spaces provided by 4 new hoops; 2 hoops located near Main St. entrance, and 2 hoops located near lobby entry along 5'h St. Additional long-term storage if required for commercial tenant spaces to be provided within tenant spaces as part of future interior buildout (to be submitted in separate T.I. permit) • Lane Transit District Springfield Bus Station is located .1 miles south west of the site. • 100 percent of the property is building structure. No proposal to remove existing structure to dedicate or reserve for public and semi-public uses. • No proposed phasing development plan forthis project. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan- see Existing Site Plan on sheet A0.02 • Prepared by an Oregon licensed architect. • There are no applicable easements to the existing footprint. All overhangs over sidewalk are proposed at 5 ft depth, within the allowable half -depth of sidewalks (typical depth of east side walk is 10 ft; depth of south sidewalk is 16-8 ".) • See 3/A.01 and 1/A0.02 for location,widths, names of right-of-ways within or adjacent to the site and downspouts for roof drainage connections. The only other jurisdiction is ODOT located within the boundaries of Main Street. • See 1 /A0.02 for existing street lighting locations. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIREDRI ARCHITECTUURREE&8 DESIGN �J , www.compfirolub.com Mcampinelab WE • See 2/A0.02 for existing traffic control devices. See 2/A0.02 for proposed Fire department connection and backflow preventers. No existing power poles ortransformers. Closest public (neighborhood?) mailbox is 0.1 miles north-east from site under City Hall. • See 1/A0.02 for existing sidewalks. No new paths of any kind are proposed. • See 1/A0.02 and 2/A0.02 for location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to site, plus connection points. • See 1/A0.02 for existing spot elevation indicated by "+" symbol. North-east corner of site/building is at elevation of 459 ft above sea level. Site is relatively flat with gentle, declining slope from north to south, less than 5 percent slope. Adjacent existing paved surfaces are sloped towards storm drains. d. Proposed Grading, Paving and Utilities- see Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02 • Not proposing new onsite stormwater. Existing building covers entire property, no new impervious area proposed. Site has existing downspouts piped under sidewalk to weepholes at the curbs along Main St. and 5th St., and piped into storm sewer along alley. Drainage from new roof and canopies will tie into existing downspouts. • Not proposing new streets, alleys, or other rights -of -ways • There are no proposed easements. • Existing City -owned street light to remain. New wall -mounted gooseneck light fixtures proposed around building fa4ade, see Exterior Elevations on sheet A2.01 for locations. • Slopes are not greater than 5 percent. e. Landscape Plan- see Existing & Proposed Site Plans on sheet A0.02 • Landscape plan not required; site plan prepared by an Oregon licensed architect. • See 1/A0.02 for existing trees. No new proposed landscaping or street trees. f. Architectural Plans See attached drawing setfor architectural plans. The site does not abut residentially zoned properties, however exterior elevations are provided on sheet A2.01. g. On-site Lighting Plan • Existing City -owned standard decorative LED street lights to remain; see locations on 1 /A0.02. • New wall -mounted gooseneck down light fixtures proposed around building fa4ade, see Exterior Elevations on sheet A2.01 and plan 2/A0.02 for locations. • See attached lighting cut -sheets for more information about type of illumination, wattage, shielding, etc. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRECOLLABORATIVE -7- ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 74r waw. complirelobcom ifcompflrelob Additional Materials That May Be Deferred • New landscape materials are not proposed. • No new stormwater management system is proposed. • No irrigation plan is proposed. • Photometric test report for light source(s)to be provided as a deferred submittal if required. Additional Materials That May Be Required by the Director • A copy of a Preliminary Title Report -attached • No Traffic Impacf Study is required -the trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling units will be well below the thresholds outlined in SDC 4.2-105. Per staff request, we have included a memo from Access Engineering that provides a trip generation estimate. See attachment ATT -4 • Multi -family development- Per clarification with Planning staff, this section (SDC 3.2-240) does not apply to this project. The building is located in the Downtown Mixed Use area. The ground floor's greatest floor area is commercial; therefore, the commercial mixed use standards apply —not the multi -unit standards. • Site is not in riparian area/ or near a watercourse, so no Riparian Area Protection Report is required. • Site is not in an area of unstable soils or high water table, geotech report not required. • See below for code analysis pertaining to Mixed Use Overlay District (SDC 3.2-625) • No physical aspects of the proposed development include scale, odor noise, glare or vibrations that could impact the surrounding uses. • No trees are proposed to be removed, no tree felling permit necessary. • No wetlands are present on the property, to wetland delineation necessary. • No additional federal/state permits are required. • No grading, filling, or excavating is proposed that would affect drainage of site or surrounding area. • No Discretionary Uses or Variances are proposed. • No Annexation is proposed. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE $ ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN X www. camptirelo E. cam tcamphreloh 5.17.125 SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA A. No change in zoning is proposed; the existing zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram, and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. S. Capacity requirements for utilities will be met: • Electricity&water: see letters from SUB stating adequate capacity for utility serviceto the site • Sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities: see report from Harvey&Price • Streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded • Public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. See code analysis below for sections: • 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards—General • 3.2-630 Mixed -Use Development Standards- Specific 3.3-1000 Nodal Development Overlay District 3.2-240 Multi -unit Design Standards D. No new parking areas or ingress -egress points are proposed E. The site has no significant physical features requiring protection or special attention. There are no steep slopes, unstable soils, or considerable geologic conditions to address on site. The site is not located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The site is not located along a water course as indicated by the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works department. The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public Works Department. The site does not contain significant clusters of trees and shrubs, nor is it part of any riparian areas or wetlands. There are no rock outcroppings, natural open spaces, or areas of historic and or archeological significance on site. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE - 9-ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN zftC www.com Dtu.I. b.c om rcu.,H,e lvb 3.2-625 MIXED-USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS—GENERAL A. Building Design Standards 1. On corner lots/parcelsthis provision applies to both elevations requirement: 50 percent of length of elevation must linearly be window at ground floor East wall = 120 ft length East wall windows length = 62 ft 62/120®.52 Requirement met South wall = 40.42 ft length South wall window length = 34.75 ft 34.75/40.42 =.86 Requirement met Requirement: at least 25 percent of the ground floor wall area as windows and/or doors that allow views into lobbies, merchandise displays, or working areas. East wall = 120 ft length East wall views -in window length = 43.1 ft 43.1/120 =.36 Requirement met South wall = 40.42 ft length South wall views -in window length = 32.92 ft 32.92/40.42 =.81 Requirement met Exceptions: north wall adjacent to alley, east wall is party wall 2. N/A 3. Requirement met -along the vertical face of the building, offsets occur at a minimum of every 50 feet by providing: recessed balconies with a depth of 4' - 2" and balcony overhangs with a depth of no more than 5 ft 4. Requirement met- building design breaks up vast expanses by a combination of architectural elements and features, including, but not limited to: offsets, windows, entry treatments, balconies, overhangs and faux brick Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN K w ww.cpm pf irela a.c am 4ppmplhelal, S. Requirement met- design provides differentiation between the ground floor and upper stories, through balconies for upper levels, and awnings, canopies, or other similar treatments for lower levels. variation in building materials, paint, ornamentation, and windows. 6. N/A B. Building Orientation/Setbacks: N/A -existing building C. Weather Protection 1. Requirement met- proposed awnings and canopies are at least b feet wide (but not greater than 5' depth), and shall follow building offsets to eliminate long expanses of awnings. 2. Requirement met- awnings and canopies do not obscure architectural features (e.g., transom area) and do not extend into the second story of the building. 3. Requirement met- awnings and canopies are in proportion to the overall building and correspond to the width a nd locations of the storefront openings. 4. Requirement met- no backlit awnings or canopies are proposed. S. Requirement met- awnings and canopies are suspended from the building and not supported by posts. D. Landscaping & Screening 1. N/A- existing building/site 2. N/A -not adjacent to residential, no ground mounted equip., exist i ng street trees 3. Nil no new landscape areas 4. Requirement met - existing trash receptacles shared with neighbor and hosted on neighboring site behind buildings, does not abut residential districts; all utilities are wall - mounted on the rear/alley elevation facade; (e) street trees are fully grown E. Street Connectivity/Circulation: Nil existing site/development Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVEAN 11 - ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN www.camptirelob.com #campnrelab F. Neighborhood Compatibility: N/A- not adjacentto TDR zone G. Pedestrian Amenities 1. Approximately 13,470 S.F. requires 3 pedestrian amenities 2. Requirement met- proposal includes new outdoor seating, existing and new container planters, new canopies over sidewalk, existing street trees, existing sidewalk lights, and view of mural across street 3. Requirement met - a. Amenities are available along both 5th and main streets b. Amenities are sized appropriately for available space c. Amenities are consistent with those throughout downtown, and suitable for outdoor use d. N/A- no bus stops adjacent to site 3.2.630 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - SPECIFIC a. MUC development standard Requirement met - 86 percent of ground floor area within building is dedicated to commercial use; commercial use is proposed with residential uses concurrently 2. Requirement met- maximum square footage of a si ng Is tenant space is 2200 S.F.. 3. Requirement met- 100 percent of lot/parcel is building floor area Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE 12 - ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN Q www.comptlrelab.com Mcampurelab 3.3-1000 NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 3.3-1005 Purpose, Applicability and Review 1. Design standard met - See Project Scope Exterior Improvements above 2. Design standard met- Lane Transit District Springfield Station busses located -1 miles or 3 minute walk from site 3. Design standard met - Grocery, cafes, restaurants, banks, post office, art gallery, museum, and library located within walking distance of site. 4. Design standard met- Library plaza, Millrace park, Island park, Booth Kelley Path Trailhead withing walking distance of site. S. Design standard met - Site is near residential area. Site will add 13 new residential units on 4720 S.F. footprint. 3.3-1005 (13)(3) Applicability: An expansion of 50 percent or more of the total existing building square footage on the development site. Existing: LEVEL 1 - 4720 S.F Expansion: LEVEL 2-4362 S.F. LEVEL 3 - 4326 S.F. TOTAL: 3 STORIES - 13,408 ST Expansion is over 50 percent oftotal existing building square footage. 3.3-1010 (A): Mixed commercial and residential uses permitted within base Mixed -Use Commercial MUC District in Section 3.2-610; none ofthe prohibited uses listed in section 3.3-1010(8) are proposed 3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards Floor Area Ratio or FAR Gross floor area/ total lot parcel area. 13,408/4720= 2.8 A. Minimum Density and Floor Area Ratio 1. Requirement met - Site will add 13 new residential units in 4720 S.F. footprint 2. Requirement met- MUC minimum floor area is.4, actual is 2.8 3. N/A- Base zone is not LMI, CI, or MUE Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 0 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE -13- ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN 7� www. co mpl irela6.com xaamprirelah B. Building Setbacks 1. Requirement met- Commercial building is existing, with no setbacks from the street 2. Requirement met- Proposed residential uses will have zero setback from the street 3. Requirement met -Proposed building is existing and will have zero setback from the street C. Parking Between Building and the Street 1. NA- No new parking is proposed. Building is existing and falls under the Downtown Springfield parking exemption 2. NA- No new parking is proposed. Building is existing and falls under the Downtown Springfield parking exemption 3.3-1025 Specific Design Standards: Multi -unit residential dwellings shall comply with the design standards specified in Section 3.2-240 (see below) and Section 3.2-625C (see above). a 3.2-240 Multi -Unit Design Standards Per clarification with Planning staff, this section does not apply to this project. The building is located in the Downtown Mixed Use area. The ground floor's greatest floor area is commercial; therefore, the commercial mixed use standards apply — not the multi -unit standards. • Section 3.2-625C Weather Protection: Awnings and canopies are intended to protect pedestrians from the weather and add to the architectural interest of buildings. New commercial or mixed-use residential development shall provide a weather -protected area adjacent to sidewalks and plazas. The proposal achieves all requirements of this section; see details in code summary of section 3.2-625 above. Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334 A STREET AWACENT PROPERTY NOTINS NOT IN SCOPE WW1 K N INE AREA ERTYOF M) — F AREA OF WORK) y� ALLEY I MAIN STREET —7 I � III T1 448 MAIN STREET - RIVETT BUILDING SITE PLAN 1"=50" Projectnumber 21006 Date 2021.12.17 (E) FIRE HYDRANT U Date Receiv, J , vA�C9E COlLP00ap~\ APR 0 6 2011 Original Submittal ORAGEFEE: MASAKA PROPERTIES. LLC C47 Dir—. Ave. Smo,[,.M, OR 9]071 ORDER NO 2122079 TA%ACCOUNTNO. 03IM4I MAP NO 17030 -35 -31 -DO= Space Above Re9ervM ME Recorder a Use STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON. CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012. Gramm. conveys and warrants to NIAGARA PROPERTIES. LLC, an Oregon limited Liability Co.,,, Grantee. the forkuh, tlescnbed real OmCady free of yEUUmbranCN., except as spedOcally set ddh harem. Situated in Lane County. State of Oregon. to All See Legal Description attached Hared as Exhibit "A' Subject to and excepting, Covenants, Conditions. Restr ions and Easements of record BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS IMTRUMENT, ME PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS. V ANY, UNDER OR51961Oq 1. .1 AND 195.905 TO GENIIS AND SECTIONS 51011, CHAPTER M, OREGON WINS 9007, SECTIONS 2 TO9AND 17, CHAPTER 555, OREGON LANG Man. AND SECTIONS E TO 1. CHAPTER U OREGON LAWS MIO. THIS INSTRUMENT ODES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN TNS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND Me LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTdG THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACONRMG FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK METH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING 0 RTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING THENSFERREO R A LAVSULL ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, As DEFINED IN ORS TrED OR NS010. TO VERIFY THE APPRDVED USES OF THE LOT OR MARCEL, To DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON L UITS AGAINST Fp MMU GR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DIF NBC IN ORS 50.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT ME RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OHNE ES, IF ANY. UNDER ORS 19530, 195.M1 AND Mehill TO 196536 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 420, OREGON LAWS DWI. SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 9, CHAPTER SM. OREGON LAWS 209. AND SECTIONS 9 TO 7, CHAPTER I. OREGON LAWS the true and actual hichaderra[Ion he this Conveyance is $395,00000 (Here, comply with the @Dwremenl5 of ORS 93030.) Dated this March 18. 2021 THE DONALD F AND MARY JO LONDON EY TRUST DATED JULY 10. 2 12 DONALD F MOLONEY, CO TRUSTEE A AMY JO IjU H1 N. CO -TRUSTEE CJ State of ARIZONA County Of t'ru'e, The fore9Ding imenumenl was acknowledged before me Nis -IL do, of HOL ,:L'�J. by DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF TH_ECONALO F AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012uor. �M 'dd4'�;i00 F P blcn tll rine Sate of ARIZDNA �4r ". %r.Iv<a,�,,.enw.•. r�er1 ry Ill" MY wmmisslon e.nlres. i`Jc.nh�9 A:7 i Lane county clerk 12 2021-019176 Lane county De dd, B Records 03119!202101: 18:37 PM t1 Evergreen RPDOEEO--BTSGASMERW 2p0(le6 $92.00 SO ON TI I'M ou%I G0 �, �__s Land ilde (9m pa ny After recording return to: RATE, AJtlrex. Zip) Evergreen Land Tire Corp., MO Country ClUP Raeq pre120, Eugene, OR Slept Unfit repueMed oNemia , Send all Ma eM..HK to: SvneAaPYdW !a/nrF{tt GRANTOR'. DONALD F. MOLONEYAND AMY JO HUTCHISON, C0. TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. ANO MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012 Yea Earl Wla C MME. Nby. Core Creek. AZ 85331 ORAGEFEE: MASAKA PROPERTIES. LLC C47 Dir—. Ave. Smo,[,.M, OR 9]071 ORDER NO 2122079 TA%ACCOUNTNO. 03IM4I MAP NO 17030 -35 -31 -DO= Space Above Re9ervM ME Recorder a Use STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON. CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012. Gramm. conveys and warrants to NIAGARA PROPERTIES. LLC, an Oregon limited Liability Co.,,, Grantee. the forkuh, tlescnbed real OmCady free of yEUUmbranCN., except as spedOcally set ddh harem. Situated in Lane County. State of Oregon. to All See Legal Description attached Hared as Exhibit "A' Subject to and excepting, Covenants, Conditions. Restr ions and Easements of record BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS IMTRUMENT, ME PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS. V ANY, UNDER OR51961Oq 1. .1 AND 195.905 TO GENIIS AND SECTIONS 51011, CHAPTER M, OREGON WINS 9007, SECTIONS 2 TO9AND 17, CHAPTER 555, OREGON LANG Man. AND SECTIONS E TO 1. CHAPTER U OREGON LAWS MIO. THIS INSTRUMENT ODES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN TNS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND Me LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTdG THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACONRMG FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK METH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING 0 RTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING THENSFERREO R A LAVSULL ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, As DEFINED IN ORS TrED OR NS010. TO VERIFY THE APPRDVED USES OF THE LOT OR MARCEL, To DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON L UITS AGAINST Fp MMU GR FOREST PRACTICES, AS DIF NBC IN ORS 50.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT ME RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OHNE ES, IF ANY. UNDER ORS 19530, 195.M1 AND Mehill TO 196536 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 420, OREGON LAWS DWI. SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 9, CHAPTER SM. OREGON LAWS 209. AND SECTIONS 9 TO 7, CHAPTER I. OREGON LAWS the true and actual hichaderra[Ion he this Conveyance is $395,00000 (Here, comply with the @Dwremenl5 of ORS 93030.) Dated this March 18. 2021 THE DONALD F AND MARY JO LONDON EY TRUST DATED JULY 10. 2 12 DONALD F MOLONEY, CO TRUSTEE A AMY JO IjU H1 N. CO -TRUSTEE CJ State of ARIZONA County Of t'ru'e, The fore9Ding imenumenl was acknowledged before me Nis -IL do, of HOL ,:L'�J. by DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF TH_ECONALO F AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012uor. �M 'dd4'�;i00 F P blcn tll rine Sate of ARIZDNA �4r ". %r.Iv<a,�,,.enw.•. r�er1 ry Ill" MY wmmisslon e.nlres. i`Jc.nh�9 A:7 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 40.0 feet o1 Lot B. Block W. of 5pnngf elC, as gaffed and recon eal in Book I. Page 1, Lane County Oregon Oeetl Remrds. in Lane County, Oregon. evzi zmn aw.,aoao..e A 1570 Mohawk Boulevard • Springfield, OR 97477 P.O. Box 931 • Springfield, OR 9747) e. Phone: 541.741.1981 Fax 541]41.0619 Evergreen 14 In. C.m TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES • EE March 30, 2022 Order No. 21-22879 TITLE REPORT Masaki Properties LLC 1657 Derose Avenue Springfield, OR 97477 Attn: David Loveall e-mail: david@threesixteenministdes.com Dear David Loveall: ATT -3 260 Country Club Rd, Ste 120 - Eugene, OR 97401 P.O. Be. 10211 - Eugene, OR 97440 Pham. 541.687.9791 Fax: 541.987.0921 We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies as applied for, with coverage's as Indicated, based on this preliminary report. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO Showing fee simple title as of March 25, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., vested in: MASAKA PROPERTIES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid. Order No.: 21-22879 Page 1 of 4 ATT-3 SCHEDULE 6 GENERAL EXCEPTIONS 1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real property Or by the public records; proceedings by a public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records. 2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof. 3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water. 4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a correct survey would disclose. 5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. CURRENT EXCEPTIONS: 6. Urban Renewal Plan for Springfield, including the terms and provisions thereof, as set forth by instrument Recorded December 7, 2007, Reception No. 2007-081042, Lane County Oregon Records. NOTE: Taxes, Moo No. 17-038-35-31-08000, Code 19-99, Account No. 0313641, 2021-2022, $2,582.73, paid in full. NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 448 Main St., Springfield, OR 97477. INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows: WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MARCH 19, 2021, FROM DONALD F. MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST, DATED JULY 10, 2012, TO MASAKA PROPERTIES, LLC., AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED JULY 24, 2012, FROM DONALD F. MOLONEYAND MARY JO MOLONEY, TO DONALD F. MOLONEYAND MARYJO MOLONEY, TRUSTEES OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEYTRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012, RECEPTION NO. 2012-037091. OMer No.: 21-22679 Page 2 of 4 NOTE: Due to current conflicts or potential conflicts between state and federal law, which conflicts may extend to local law, regarding marijuana, if the transaction to be insured involves property which is currently used or is to be used in connection with a marijuana enterprise, including but not limited to the cultivation, storage, distribution, transport, manufacture, or sale of marijuana and/or products containing marijuana, the Company declines to dose or insure the transaction, and this Preliminary Title Report shall automatically be considered null and void and of no force and effect. Very truly yours, EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY HOME OFFICE By: Joseph M Silence Title Officer/ Title Manager NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF $200.00 WILL BE CHARGED. OAer No.: 21-22879 Page 3 of EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION The East 40.0 feet of Lot 8, Block 35, of Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book I, Page 1, Lane County Oregon Deed Records, in Lane County, Oregon. ONer No: 21-22878 Page 4 of 4 THIS MAP ISTD ASSIST LOCATING PROPERTY. MAP NO.: 17-03-35-31-08000 THE COMPANY ASSUMESNO LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES. N GnouayM 1 eve9reenu�ammec> 16.51 1 s 6,emee�raearreeem,� 13 v � 1 16 s' 7;400 7 0 $ _`�` 8100 h 8000 0.11 A ,'8300 co CID P_ 1` 1� 1 1N1, s 5 134' �s' 6 2az 32.a� r zs° 40' g �. � � 51 75007600 60, 0.04 Ac MAIN 41 404' 125;8`1 33' 127.5' 22' 1 44` M __....._.. "4L E.1]^ Pve. Suitt 2 ' `�genq.Oregon 9)001 'S6iv185.]H3 ?,nmas.a..aePn..e. Access Engineering LLC Td9%pert;tien En9ineertng - �' earns ossig.; Tap: aeMrauan "Ace nage...[ -tnwe mnaea -S1eeM L19atln9 OREGON--- ' '0 `kv ta. ygl:L WEBS RENEWS 6130122 Low -Rise Apartment Trip Generation Twelve low-rise apartment are planned for as an addition to a commercial building on Main Street in Springfield. Oregon. The City has asked the developer to include a trip generation estimate relating to the increase in trips documenting compliance with SDC 42-105.' The Springfield Development Code 42-105 states: A An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. A TIS is required if any of the following criteria are met, 1. Peak Hour Threshold If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS.shall be performed by a registered professional engineer. 2. Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of an existing use generates 1, 000 or more trips per day as determined by procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of - Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS shall be performed by a registered professional engineer. The trip generation for the 12 apartment addition on Main Street in downtown - Springfield, Oregmt is found using the I It Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual using the ITE Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) with the Dense Multi -Use Urban setting. The AM peak hour trips generated are 12 and the PM peak hour trips generated are 6. There is no daily trip data for the dense multi -use urban category. However, daily trips for the General Urban/Suburbam setting are 152 trips per day. As one can see, the 12 apartment unit addition will not generate enough_ daily or peak hour trips to warrant a Traffic Impact Analysis. ATf-4 ATT -5 From: TOURTLLOI-r Katherine Katherine.TOURTILLOTT®odotstate.or.us Subject: Fly: 448 Main Street, Springfield Date: November 2g, 2021 at 12:16 PM To: lenna@campfirelahown Ce: POWELL Wade Wade.POWELL0adots1e1e.or.uS, LIEBLER Michael mliebler@springfield-or.gm, PARKS Brian Brlan.N.PARKSgWatomgon.gw Hi Jenna, Had to get a few people involved but it looks like you need to leave 5' hemeen the awning and the signal pole. Please see email, below. Thank you. Kathy Tourtillott Area/District 5 Permits P: 541-735.4724 F: 541-7262509 2080 Laura Street Springfield OR 97477 Kathgdne.tourtillott@odot.state.or.us From: CRAMER Scott B<Scott.B.CRAMER@odot.state.or.us> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 11:47 AM To: LAFLEUR Christina L <Christina.L.LAFLEUR@odot.oregon.gov> Cc: PARKS Brian N <Bdan.N.PARKS@odot.oregon.gov>; TOURTILLOTT Katherine <Katherine.TOURTILLOTT@odot.state.ocus>; POWELL Wade <Wade.POWELL@odo1atate.Ocus>; SCHMIDT Jamie M<Jamie.M.SCHMIDT@odot.oregon.gov> Subject: RE: 448 Main Street, Springfield Good question! Section 5.5.4 of the Signal Design Manual should apply. While this isn't a law voltage utility conflict, working clearances still apply. So we are looking for 5'. Mps:l/wwworeg g / d t/E g' 'no/D is TrafticStandams/Signal-Design-2022-OS odl Scott B Cramer, P.E. State Traffic Signal Engineer I R 503/476-7849 Oregon Department of Transportation 1 4040 F2lrvlew IndusMal or SE seAt b vamernodot +rte or _ I Salem, Oregon 97302-1142 From: LAFLEUR Christina L<Christina.L.LAFLEUR@odm oregon g_ov> Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 11:30 AM To: CRAMER Scott B <Scott.B.CRAMER@Odot state or us> Cc: PARKS Brian N <Brlan.N.PARKS@odot.oreeen.Dov>; TOURTILLOTT Katherine ECathedne.TOURTILLOTT@odm.Wate or us>; POWELL Wade <Wade.POWELL@odat.state.or.us>; SCHMIDT Jamie M <jamte M SCHMIDT@odot ore c aov> Subject: RE: 448 Main Street, Springfield Hi Scott, Do we have a requirement for how much clearance we would want a building canopy to keep from a signal pole? The building at the address in the subject line is remodeling and wanted to take that in consideration. I am not aware of a standard for this, and would like your input. Thanks, Christy LaFleur, P.E. Region 2 Traffic Design Engineer Oregon Department of Transportation Region 2 Tech Center 455 Airport Rd SE, Bldg A Salem, OR 97301 Phone: 1-503986-2714 Traffic -Roadway Section Traffic Signal Design Manual - Signal Plan 5.5.4 Utility Conflicts Always check to see if there is the possibility of overhead and underground utility conflicts when locating poles. Conflicts with overhead and underground utilities will need to be addressed during the design of the signal. A minimum of 10 feet from overhead high voltage lines is required as per OAR 437-002-0047. For low voltage utilities (e.g. communication, fiber optic, cable, etc.), the following minimum clearances should be provided (See Figure 5-90): • A minimum of 5 feet from access points (e.g. removable pole caps, handholes, and terminal cabinets) and illumination fixtures • A minimum of 1 foot from above the mast amn and backplates if there are any known conflicts with utilities, contact the Region Utility Specialist for help. See chapter 8 for more detailed information about identifying conflicts and working with the Region Utility Specialist. There are three possible solutions depending on the situation; l.) the signal pole location may need to be adjusted (which may require other auxiliary signal equipment such as pedestrian pedestals), 2.) the utility may need to be relocated, or 3.) a combination of number one and two. Utility conflicts shall be addressed and resolved before the design is complete. January 2022 Page 5-99 ATT -5 Traffic -Roadway Section Traffic Signal Design Manual - Signal Plan Figure 5-90 1 Low Voltage Utility Clearances Gex.. �orar ✓[n ,.am reare pw�e[elN =.-ft-1-1�: aam,+➢�ape�a a.✓2.anw,ce.a anowro.' mature o[ z/bw ba✓eimfam,`p[tetl vkwo% /9�,alM1eatlinM[a,iont z aMmamrtrtance attivnes. ➢ tleae2n[esal a em,M1 Nn Nese. Use uil/ry pmvber 4. C/ea aano apo�lo ty o as Pul,�➢ unY�i,ie wlgge u,iline wNeann[ mrt nn ret lo9rtM1MWRI3]-CO2-➢M] January 2022 Page 5-100 no SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD ELECT R I C S[R"ICE CENTER 1001 MainStreet Springfield, OR 97477-4819 Tel 541.726.2395 Faa 5419262399 wwwsvbuti I—. March 25, 2022 Jenna Fribley Campfire Collaborative Architecture & Design 341 Main Street Springfield, OR 97477 RE: Capacity requirements to adequately serve the project at 448 Main Street Dear Jenna: The requested electrical service has the following characteristics: Panel Size: 1,000 Amp Voltage: 1201208 Volt, Three Phase Given these criteria, SUB has the following capacity requirements to serve the project for which the cost will be the responsibility of the developer: 1. Utility Transformer capacity. SUB will install an upgraded vault and transformer to provide sufficient capacity for the development. 2. Utility Secondary capacity. SUB will install additional conduit and conductor to connect the new/upgraded transformer to the existing secondary conduiticonductor system. 3. Utility Infrastructure design. Utility infrastructure design will be completed by SUB and the utility will coordinate the adjustment and/or installation of electric facilities with the developer. 4. Utility Infrastructure Installation. Infrastructure will be installed in accordance to the terms of a construction agreement between SUB and the developer. The electric distribution system shall be designed and installed to adequately serve the development in accordance with the Springfield Utility Board's Development and Redevelopment Policy. ncer Si�tX/%'L lye /p /V J" Dan Norland Electric Engineering Technician 541-744-3784 Enclosure: Electric Utility Work Temporary Pole Location ATT-0 TENTATIVE STEP PLAN FOR TEMP OVERHEAD POWER SOUR E WEDNESDAY INSTALL POLE AND CONDUIT TO VAULT 75GG09 THURSDAY INSTALL OVERHEAD TRANSFORMER BANK AND CONDUCTOR FRIDAY EARLYSTART SAM-9AM TRANSFER SERVICES TO OVERHEAD TRANSFORMER BANK REMOVE PADMOUNT TRANSFORMERS AND PRIMARY/SECONDARY IN VAULT 99AO17/99AO18 WEEKEND - MONDAY CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING VAULTS 99AO17/99AOIB TUESDAY CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH ALLEY AND INTERCEPT EXISTING 5" CONDUIT WEDNESDAY CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH ALLEY AND INTERCEPT EXISTING 5" CONDUIT THURSDAY CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW S'X 7' VAULT 22C005 FRIDAY CONTRACTOR CLEANUP AND TEMPORARY ALLEY RESTORATION - WEEKEND - MONDAY PULL PRIMARY BACK TO NEW VAULT 200005 TUESDAY SECONDARY TO 500 MAI N VAULT AND SET TRANSFORMER ON VAULT 200005 WEDNESDAY NIGHT WORK 7PM— 12AM CONVERT 500 MAIN STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE THURSDAY NO WORK. CREW ON REST. FRIDAY EARLYSTART 4AM —9AM CONVERT 141/149 STH STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE. CONVERT 538 MAIN STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE. SECONDARY TO VAULT 75GO09 - WEEKEND - MONDAY OVERTIME 7AM— 7PM SECONDARY FROM VAULT 75G009 TO 448 MAIN. CONVERT 440, 444, 448 MAIN STREET. TUESDAY REMOVE OVERHEADTEMP TRANSFORMER BANK AND CONDUCTOR WEDNESDAY REMOVE POLE AND CONDUIT. THURSDAY CONTRACTOR CONCRETE REPAIR FOR SIDEWALK AND 2 PANELS IN ALLEY. FRIDAY CLEANUP/FINISH Note: DatesMrnes are subject to change. Creative "' d dent t e t_ Our Sewing Room TB'np1fDf y C1O"'d merald Art Center M center ►r c�•r k The Simps> - � Z' +� Spnng(ield Mural +u Hearts For ospice fff- CONSTRUCTION ��AGREEMENT .paG�yR E EM EN T T MMREEMENImadeandaderedinmtksday iP�a M)'F 2G2z, by and between Me cm OF SPMNGEIEED, OREGON, a municipal mrmmtiorh zceng by and though the SPRINGFIELD UTUT, BOARD, hereinafter referred to as Me firs, party, ands Maab Pmp"m LLC, harebaRa mis ned m n Me second party. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Gnat parry owns and opera. munbipal assets, and water i share serving ends. and adjacent m Me corporation limits ofsald city, and WHEREAS. Me wound parry H planning Me deueloprnem and mnstruttbn of A Commerdal l ugdbq located at AIX Melts frreet In lane Coumy, Ctepn said devebped for COMMERCIAL purposes, described parficuhrhyasmicees, TA%MAP:17�3531, TAR EOE: M W 0 WHEREAS,tlmeaend party has applied tOthefira parrifor shaerlal seracesfm said devebpmes, mw, Maen, IT N AGREED by and between the For Party and Me seond patty and each M caolderaden m pmmlMs and agreemam ofMe others do hereby pmmbe ardagraeas "row : I. The Springfield MGM Board does hereby upon m fmMll an decade distribution syaem for Me service of A Commertal Bulling in acwdame adth plans nor ea emc devtlopmems shown on lob Number =W1 2. The second Party agree m pay Me first party Me wm of $4%899A payable before Me sten of wmerestion, in amordame will Me Springfield Wilily Boards Deeebpment and to deaslupm,Bt Charge Prlk, 3. TheMrt parWs pans,speciriaUoru and development charges are based on Me assumptions Mat themmplae dm tumnsysmm shall be lrestilel. BMettcmdPa h.l Mepbmandmntr Mederebpment othathon ArWg lV abtl.Mesaandparry Mat[myforamadditimalcotsfrmrredbytheAntparry. Said payment m be made prior m Me fi m party ennghing Me system alatr6al. 0. The second party ager to comply will all topes speeded in the mrent Elemdc 0eveloprsem and Redeveloper. Onew Policyin eRectatthe timethis agreemelrt Is entered into. S. The semnd any requests installation of distribution acilNes or commence whhin 30 days of Me nauseant data 6. The first parry agrees m make a conceited short m commence translation of distribution facilides within 30 this of Me second parrys requested installation; date provided Me seumd parry don rut ohMecl or dories Me Net partys auras. Within 180 days refthedateefthis agremem, lithe it party dons ml per( mics responsibilities underMe agreement, Me first parry has re, further obligation under this agreement 7. This agreement shall he binding upon bars, executars, admmistamre, su cexm¢ and assignee of the respecdy<wmn. 8. NolBingherein mmalnedenall bemnstrued as limbinUMefirat Wrtyorthesemnd party In anymanna ucept as herein sat fords impar re seMces, maers and Me reading therm(and Me billing for consumption, and asocamd serrAa clargex are toncaned. 9. "If sun or leplacfion hwlihrted by ekha party for Me purpose of<nforeing the tame of this ageemem, Me prevafling pads shall he entitled to judgnent spirit the oder party for Me preWiling parties reasonable aRwneyhn and court costsa �as ydaermine l bythe Court retrial or wry appealthere8wn. Rossinia3A� //re^4022 B, Z� B n�0ir- Wvftl R gnen CHoene Engineering &Gpermons PreP SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD WATER SERVICE CENTER 202 South 18th Street, Springfield, OR 97477-5240 Tel 541-72&2396 Fax 541-7477348 wwwsubutitmm TO: Drew Larson City of Springfield 225 N. 5th Street Springfield, OR 97477 DATE: October 11, 2021 SUBJECT: SUB Water comments for DIM 811 -21 -000257 -PRE, David Loveall Listed below are our comments for the above referenced development proposal: 1. The proposed development is within the Springfield city limits and currently receives water service from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB). 2. Please ask the developer to contact SUB Water Division for detailed information regarding any proposed modification of the existing water service(s) or any additional water services to the proposed development. 3. SUB and the City of Springfield are separate entities. Any water related items affecting your development will need to be coordinated through SUB Water Division independently from any items or submittals that maybe required by the City. please contact the SUB Water Division fordemged Information regarding any water service(s)W the proposed development. 4. Non-residential backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed downstream, aboveground and adjacent to the water/fire/irrigation service. New non-residential water services(domestic and irrigation) requ Ire the Installation of a Reduced Pressure Backfiox, Assembly (RPSA). S. New residential water services with lawn sprinkler systems or other cross -connection hazards will req ulma Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPRA) installed above ground and at a location between a tap on the domestic service line and the irrigation system. Residential fire systems Containing anti -freeze compounds or any other chemicals shall be Isolated using a RPBA. If no chemicals are used in the fire system, then a Double Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) is required. These assemblies are required to be installed above ground and at a location between a tap on the domestic service line and the fire system. 6. All non-residential domestic water, fire, and/or irrigation service(s) will require the installation ore backflow prevention assembly(ies). 7. All backflow prevention assembly design plans must be submitted W SUB Water Division for approval. For more detailed information about SU B's Cross Connection Control Program Standards contact the Water Division at 541-726-2396 or refer to SUB's website at: http://www.subutil.com/water/crosYconnecton- control-and-backflow-protection/. 8. Springfield has several wellhead protection areas. Ninety percent of Springfield's drinking water comes from wells. In every instance, care shall be taken to prevent groundwater contamination. Contractors/developers/mmers shall be responsible for the safe handling and storage of chemicals, petroleum products, fertilizers, and the prevention of groundwater and storm water runoff contamination. Special requirements maybe necessary for groundwater protection at this development. Formoredetailed information, contact the SUB Water Division Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator at 541-726-2396. PLEASE NOTE: SUB development charges are paid directly to SUB Water Division and SUB Electric Division. Sincerely, SpOtgfreld Udliry Board—Water Division Hi Andrew, Attached is what I have sent to the architect and the owner has filled out our meter sizing form. The owner is also working with our Water Quality manager on the placement of the backflow assemblies for the fire and domestic service. I am working with the owner on sizing the domestic water service. The 12" PVC water main that is under the sidewalk will supply any amount of water that this site will need. The static water pressure at the water main is 50 psi. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Scott Higley Engineering Technician Springfield Utility Board Water Service Center 202 South 18th Sheet Springfield, OR. 97477 e-mail scotth@subutil.cum www.subutil.com general (541)-726-2396 direct (541)-736-3295 cell (541)-501-1750 fax (541)-747-7348 From: HIGLEY Scott <scotth@subutil.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 2:47 PM To: 'Jenna Fribley' Senna@campfirelab.com> Cc: Water Engineering <Waterengineering@subutil.twm>; RebeccaW <RebeccaW @ subutil.com> Subject: RE: 448 MAIN ST Hi Jenna, Attached is a pdf of the water map and the letter that went to the city. Please let me know if you need anything else. I have sent the meter sizing for to Harvey and Price this morning and need to see any plans that you have for this development. Thanks, Scott Higley Engineering Technician Springfield Utility Board Water Service Center 202 South 18th Street ATT 8 From: NIGLEYScottsocbb@subull.mm d Subject: FW: 446 MAIN ST Dete: December 16, 2021 at 7:40 AM'' To: Drew Larson alarsonePspringfield-or.gov De: Water Englneenig Waterengineering@subulil.com, janna campfirelab.mm lenna4tcempfirelanoom Hi Andrew, Attached is what I have sent to the architect and the owner has filled out our meter sizing form. The owner is also working with our Water Quality manager on the placement of the backflow assemblies for the fire and domestic service. I am working with the owner on sizing the domestic water service. The 12" PVC water main that is under the sidewalk will supply any amount of water that this site will need. The static water pressure at the water main is 50 psi. Please let me know if you need anything else. Thanks, Scott Higley Engineering Technician Springfield Utility Board Water Service Center 202 South 18th Sheet Springfield, OR. 97477 e-mail scotth@subutil.cum www.subutil.com general (541)-726-2396 direct (541)-736-3295 cell (541)-501-1750 fax (541)-747-7348 From: HIGLEY Scott <scotth@subutil.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 2:47 PM To: 'Jenna Fribley' Senna@campfirelab.com> Cc: Water Engineering <Waterengineering@subutil.twm>; RebeccaW <RebeccaW @ subutil.com> Subject: RE: 448 MAIN ST Hi Jenna, Attached is a pdf of the water map and the letter that went to the city. Please let me know if you need anything else. I have sent the meter sizing for to Harvey and Price this morning and need to see any plans that you have for this development. Thanks, Scott Higley Engineering Technician Springfield Utility Board Water Service Center 202 South 18th Street I LO CD CD v io AST N r 8V-95 6V-161 H - s � AGF. GANG O k / IFN 138 75S r �N 134 151 N N d 140 130 -,\J .n _n .a Nv ti- 1II •4" PVC.'8691 rln 116" DI,'07957 4 1;; S T 6V -167 4V-148 =IRE SERVICE U) Lo\1 121 V-1 tV I N N N rIll1 AGF. GANG O F IFN pR� G d F- 1 22 ('4[D0�_ NI CO 44 dzt 9 M J ti- 1II •4" PVC.'8691 rln 116" DI,'07957 4 1;; S T 6V -167 4V-148 =IRE SERVICE U) Lo\1 121 V-1 tV I N N N rIll1 HARVEY$. PRfCE Project: 448 Main. Site Address 448 Main St. Springfield, Or. 97477 Regarding: Building Sewer Video. Author of document: gen Ellis, Harvey & Price. Date: 1/22/22 Upon reviewing the building drain videos offered on this project, here's our thoughts. The existing drain line makes multiple offsets that could and should be alleviated. The portion nearest the building has roots inside of the pipe. The roots appear to enter through inconsistent and poorly made pipe joints. The last few feet before the connection with the 10" sewer lateral appear to be sloped at roughly 45° upward off the 10". This same sloped run appears to be in good shape and is root free. Our recommendation is to replace the building sewerfrom the upstream end of the first piece off of the 10" main. This allows the existing 10" x 4" building sewer connection to remain in use while replacing the inferior section of existing 4" pipe. Regards, Ben Ellis. I/ILLIENNOWN LIGHTING Millennium Lighting w .millenniumlighting.com LEDRS10 -LED R SERIES OUTDOOR 10" ANGLE SHADE This item can be converted to a pendant or wall sconce with purchase of separate compatible downrod or goose neck Please see compatible downrods and arms below: Compatible downrods P5, R52, and R53 Compatible with arms: RGN10, RGN12, RGN13, RGN15, RGN22, RGNZ, RGN24, RGN30, and RCN41 Compatible with wire guard: RWG10 LEDRAS10-SB 12 SERIES Dimensions Width 10 - Height P - Wire Length 100" Weight 2.51 lbs. Finish 8 Material Finishes SB - Satin Black Material Metal LED Light Engine 11W LED 90 CRI 800 Lumens 3000k 50,000 Hour Lifespan Constructed in Aluminum S Year Warranty Replaceable LED Module Certification UL Listed Wet Location Item Number SKU'S LEDRASIO-SB xoh: al rhushes m o.J.r Iim fre must Is. properly ma Gln lautl 1—tru! T ererorg—suis. deaning rriod rs inch as reju lontNnlsM1 prearving8reneairng pmm,aearrn a:aan.4naG. `''M`^n`.(.e�g`^h`�n Vt10.1.Gn \IIIIVa Us NK VWn ��`�k UAA^AM1lil R SERIES ATT -10 R SERIES OPTIONS GOOSE NECKS - (WALL MOUNT) PGNIG PGNi2 RGNB 10, 314- RGN15 FINISHES ABR -Architectural Bronze P,l AL-Awminum ,o' W Aluminum Painted Satin Black y. E 14V CA G.I3, GA-Galvanizetl GV -Gray RGN22 RGN23 RGIIM NB- Navy Blue NC- Natural Copper '6a 'r T T SB -Satin Black 6y 1<-1'6 +I SG - Satin Green 11$ Jhi Red WH -W E I1x- ZI k IE SR Zr WH -White @ H 31 RGTN3G PGN41 13" B �' IE 3r �E 41 3 uavlP.m reNea STEMS AND CANOPY KITS -(CEILING MOUNT) RSCM WIRE GUARDS RSCKWmgle) O FINISHES w6 ABR - Architectural Bronze CPCopper ABR-Architectual Bronze e% CP - Copper RSI y --IF— 11- =� GA - Galvanized GV -Gray E SG - Satin Green _ NB - Navy Blue BR -hi Red RSCKSS(m°Aael•1 SB -Satin Black u SG - Satin Green O SA in Red R$2 RYI410 M WH - W WH White 4A Y� R53 WALL MOUNT SWIVELS WIRE GUARDS Mw FINISHES w6 ABR - Architectural Bronze CPCopper GA - Galva y --IF— 11- SB -Satin Black Black E SG - Satin Green flwR4 BR -hi Red E _" WH- - White >xJ, 14" PtlG¢ T,— 1=<3I RYI410 M R SERIES STEM CONNECTORS RC Accepts 3/4`stem FINISHES I`vJl ABR - ArchiteRural Bronze +x' AL -Aluminum CP - Copper GA - Galvanized GV - Gray NB - Navy Blue SB - Satin Black SG - Satin Green SR - Satin Red WH - White FINISHES ABR -Architectural Bronze CA - Cal,anized GY-Gray NB - Navy Blue SB - Satin Black SG - Satin Green SR - Satin Red WH - White sa3vls �� p �0L'61£ Mem ,91 a Qi N 3 lw — LLI � 0 r i d iTd'611 oQ Z , c4 m M1i 2 g w i�l „ o w r N d' F a u r 0 3 i �0L'01£ 3..oE ,Ce1 i d a p , Jd m M1i 2 g v3 i�l F a u 0 �0L'01£ 3..oE ,Ce1 Z O W � of W J 133L1S n15 i d m F m 2 g r s u Z Z O W � Ld W J a 0 � m 2Lr ,r.r - 39017503 - - TL 17-03.3531-04501 EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE MADE and entered Into this 19'A day of T'Eb -09 -V - ,1999, by and between CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, emunidpal corporation In Lane County, Oregon, heminafterrefened to satins Grantors, and The City of Springfieldacting byand throughIts SPRINGFIELD UTILITYBOARD, and unto imsucces acre; heminafterraferred to as the Grantee._ WITNESSETH: In consideration of the acceptance by Grantee and the use or holding of said easements for present or future. public use by Grantee. Grantors hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee, a perpetual easement as hereinafter described, together with the right to go upon saitl easement area for the purpose of constructing,.. reconstructing, maintaining, operating and using electrical transmission, distribution and telecommunications fmillim which Include butare not limited to bareformersand vaults, which mai hereafter be Installed on the following described property, towit Two easements located on that tract of land conveyed from Springfield Development Corporation to the City of Springfield, described by deed recorded February 14;1980, in Real 1057R, Reception No. 8008003, Dead Records of Lane County, Oregon, being more completely described as follows :- Easement A:(15Yt5').. to Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book -W on the Northerly margin ofen East- West alley; tm thence Eastady 15.00 teak thence Southerly 15.00 along Northerly margin of said alley, 15.00 feet to Easement B: (18N32-) Beginning atthe Northwest comer afBlook 88 o1 Mi and recorded In Book 25, Page 308, Dead Recon Northerly right of way of 'K Street; thence lasvir Northerly margin ofand East- West alley; thence% point of beginning; thence continuing along saitl Northerly margin of said alley. Northerly 32.00 feet point of beginning, In lane County, Oregon comerof Lotto, Black 9,01' Kelly's Addition d of Lane County, Oregon, said point being rargin ofalleyand run Northerly 15.00 feet; rtherly margin of said alley, thence Easterly in Lane County, Oregon. and Power Company's Addition, as flatted! on; run thence Easterly 145 fast along the f way Southerly 119 feet W a point an the any margin of the alley7.00 feet to the true tery 18.00 fact to a point thence leaving eat fiance Southerly 32.00 fest to the true 56aF®.25'9980M 2A29F®.25'9"02PFWO TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above easement to the said Grantee, fis heirs ant assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantorabove named have hereunto set Meir hand and seat this I�n1 day of to ,1999. 35 (SEAL) �'.y t Dan E. Brown a Public Works Director for the City of Springfield STATE OF OREGON)TY IA CIS I m � z a COUNOF NE) SS m aE N ot Onthlsl!i' dayof tefERJJOQ.y 1989, before me personallyappeared Dan E.Brown, whose Mentiyiswas proved to me an the basis Ofsatisfactoryevidence. and did say Mat he is Me Public Worcs Director of Me City of Springfield, and that said document was signed by him in behalf of said corporation by authority of its bylaws, and acknowledged to me that saidcorporation executed the same. n' Notary-Publia For Oregon OFRCIALBEAL r � , r. ?-CO?- Us p My Commission Expires on u BOrMYPOaUs NM4WNIkipF>PIRFBHaeda'aP BLILIMC 1901 WVNSP. "MMIH4Tf //9y' U 990 61 ai p ai I I a0� a: 1 SEE ZZSUPPLEMENi�L MAV WSao 4 Sow Za ae� w ae w I w 3000 f N 3300 3b a i 8c1 5 D0o � 3 1.4501 1 45f l4 M Yµ Y eioo B9o0 �Oo 9700 i -. Fe FOR m L No. I STREET I center F— N E) a SOO Map 17 03. 35 2 4 - ai p ai I I a0� a: 1 SEE ZZSUPPLEMENi�L MAV WSao 4 Sow Za ae� w ae w I w 3000 f N 3300 3b a i 8c1 5 D0o � 3 1.4501 1 45f l4 M Yµ Y eioo B9o0 �Oo 9700 i -. Fe FOR m L No. I STREET I center F— N E) a