HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 4/6/2022City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
SPNINGFI�
Application Type
,, _
Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ❑ Ma -or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑
Site Plan Review Submittal: Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal:
Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section)
Applicant Name: David Loveall Phone: 541 345.9900
Company: Masaka Properties
Email:
Address' 1657 Delrose Ave, Springfield, OR 97477
david@threesixteenministries.com
Applicant's Rep.: Ryan Thomas
Phone: 541.687.6918
Company: Ryan Thomas Construction LLC
Email:
Address: 91069 N. Willamette St., Coburg, OR 97408
ryan@rthomasconstmction.com
Property Owner: David Loveall
Phone: 541.345.9900
Company: Masaka Properties
Email:
Address: 1657 Delrose Ave, Springfield, OR 97477
david@thmesixteenministdes.com
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-35-31
TAX LOT NOS : 08000
PropertV Address: 448 Main St. (also 120 & 122 5th St.)
Size of Property: 4800 AcresPraposetl
❑ Square Feet
No. of
Proposed Name of Project: Rivett Building @ 448 Main
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Remodel ground floor; construct 2 new stories (12 apartments) on top of existing building
Existing Use: Commercial/mercantile/office - 3 ground Floor tenant
spaces
New Impervious Surface Coverage [Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): NONE / zero sf
Si natures: Please sipL&al;Li2rint your name and date in thea
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff.,
Associated Applications:
roriate box on the next a e.
complete this section)
Date Received
Si ns:
Pre -Sub Case No.:
Date.
APRip 6 011
RUeview�6e,,,, b .
Case No.: II"c'01'D �� Date: (p ZZ
Application Fee: echnical Fee: �
ItevilevC
,L40 Postage Fee: il3
TOTAL FEES: (,off • 40 PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
Owner:
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date:
Signature
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete application.
-e-4j '!i %�,�/ Date: ,st is-�02Z
Signature
ONY/17 6. 4 MALL
Print
Revised 1/7/14 KL 2 of 11
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Date: January 7, 2022
File Number: 21 -000324 -PRE
Address: 448 Main St.
Proposal: Remodel Ground Floor and Add 2 story Apartment
Planner: Drew Larson
Comments By: Eric Phillips -Meadow — 541-780-4048
FIRE COMMENTS
o Site Plan
Complete Incom p ple See Fire
Note(s)
® ❑ On-site vehicular circulation
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan
Complete Incomplete See Fire
Note(s)
® ❑ Location of existing and required fire hydrants and
similar public facilities
LAND DIVISION TENTATIVE PLAN APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Transportation Engineer/ Planner: Michael Liebler P.E. Case#: 21-000324
Applicant: David Loveall
TRANSPORTATION
Right -of -Way Approach Permit application must be provided where the property has
frontage on a Lane County or an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
® ❑ Copy of ROW Approach Permit Application
Traffic Impact Study - four (4) copies of a study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in
accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze
and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's
transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given
development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations,
access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also
address, if needed, City, Metro Plan and state land use and transportation policies and
objectives.
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
❑ ® (1) Traffic Impact Study
o Land Division Tentative Plan
Complete Incomplete See Transportation
Note(s)
❑ ® (2)
/4 ■
Location of existing and proposed street
lighting, including type, height, and area
of illumination
Location of existing and proposed transit
facilities
®
❑
Location and dimensions of existing and
proposed driveways
®
❑
Location and width of all existing and
proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and bike trails
®
❑
Location, widths, conditions, and names of
all existing and proposed streets, alleys,
dedications, access easements or other
right-of-ways within or adjacent to the
proposed land division. Proposed streets
should also include approximate radius of
curves and grades and relationship to any
Revised 10/25/07
projected streets as shown on the Metro
Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development
Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map
0 ® (3) Location of existing and required traffic
_- control devices
Transportation Notes:
1. The trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling units most likely will not
generate enough traffic warranting traffic analysis according to SDC 4.2-105
thresholds. The applicant must include a trip generation estimate relating to the
increase in trips documenting compliance with SDC 4.2-105.
2. Applicant must label the existing street lighting as current city standard
decorative LED fixtures and label the existing streetlight associated with the signal
pole. Lighting analysis was performed recently at the time of the decorative lighting
project installation and not required as part of this application.
3. Applicant must show the correct location of the signal pole and mast arm for
review.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
• Applicant must confirm with the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) that
the clearances diagram in relation to the proposed canopy overhang meets their
signal design and clearances standards. Applicant must show the proposed canopy
overhang on a plan sheet similar to how the proposed balconies are shown on sheet
A0.02 for review.
ReOsed 10/25/07
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Engineer: Clayton McEachern Case#: 21 -324 -PRE
PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
❑ 1
® ❑ n/a
® ❑ n/a
® ❑ n/a
® ❑
0/ ■
Revised 10/25/07
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect
or Engineer
Vicinity Map
The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site
features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and
impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is
remaining and what is being removed. For existing
structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between
buildings
The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and
top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian
setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development Services
Department
The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on
the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood
Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map
Amendment or Letter of Map Revision
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200
and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map
on file in the Development Services Department
Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5"
in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above
the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs,
riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings
Soil types and water table information as mapped and
specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A
Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be
submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates
the proposed development area has unstable soils
and/or a high water table
o Improvement and Public Utilities Plan must be in compliance with the regulations of
SDC Sections
5.17-100, 4.1-100, 4.2-100, and 4.3-100 and must include the following
information:
Complete
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
❑ 1
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
❑
Location and width of all existing and proposed
easements
❑
® 3
Location of existing and required power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar
public facilities
®
❑ *
Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on
and adjacent to the site, including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV.
Indicate the proposed connection points
o Grading and Paving Plan
Complete
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
4
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer
0
0 n/a
Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed
Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as
part of the stormwater management system
EJ
5
Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations
M
❑
Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns
El
5
The size and location of stormwater management
systems components, including but not limited to:
drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention
ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural
drainageways to be retained
n/a
Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours
lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope
over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot
intervals)
❑ n/a
Amount of proposed cut and fill
o Stormwater Management System Study - provide four (4) copies of the study with
the completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached. The plan, calculations, and
documentation must be consistent
with the Engineering Design Standards and
Procedures Manual.
Complete
Incomplete See PW
Note(s)
n/a
Scoping Sheet and attached Stormwater Management
System Study
Revised 10/25/07
PW Notes.,
1. Site plan and utilities prepared by Architect, not licensed PE.
2. Soil information not provided and probably not needed, building foundation detail is
provided that looks to be preapred by a qualified structural engineer. I assume
the detailed calculations and drawings are included in builicing permit package,
including soil bearing information.
3. Two different scenarios are included for possible power supply to building, both
offsite. For either one to be approved full concurrence from the third party
property owner and detailed plans for ALL work including new conduits needed
and any road crossings will be required -and will also require an encroachment
permit and detailed drawings for the demolition and restoration of all work in the
ROW, including any ADA elements disturbed during the construction work.
4. No grading or paving plan is required, but ALL disturbed concrete requires full panel
replacement, this includes the existing saw cuts already made in the alley to be
restored. This means the WHOLE, ENTIRE cut up concrete panel requires
replacement, not just the removed portion, to the existing joints. This also
applies to all existing sidewalk panels on both sides and any distrubed pavement
must be patched also. NOTE: If this work was done without any encroachment
permit, one is required with detailed demolition and restoration shown and any
needed traffic control to be done by a proffesional engineer.
5. Downspouts are shown on page al.05 but not how this water will be conveyed across
the sidewalk? additioanl details required.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application:
A TV report for the existing waste water lateral is required (this is standard for all
intensification of connections downtown due to age of the infrastructure) to the
sewer main connection. This is a 4" line and it should be confirmed via the
architect and plubming code that this is sufficient for the number of units to be
built on this site (personal expertise is this is not sufficient, and a new 6" line
should be installed but only required if plumbing code or design professional
requires it).
Revised 10/25/07
City of Springfield
Development Services Department
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
Project Name: Rivett Building @ 448 Main
SPRINGFIELD
wo
Project Proposal: Two -Story addition and remodel to house commercial uses on the ground
floor and 12 residential units above.
Case Number: 811 -21 -000324 -PRE
Project Address: 448 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Assessors Map and Tax Lot Number(s): 17-03-35-31; TLs 8000
Zoning: Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC)
Overlay District(s): Drinking Water Protection (DWP) Nodal Development (/NDO)
Applicable Refinement Plan: Downtown
Refinement Plan Designation: Mixed -Use Commercial (MUC)
Metro Plan Designation: Nodal Development Overlay
Pre -Submittal Meeting Date: January 7, 2022
Application Submittal Deadline: July 6, 2022
Associated Applications: 811 -21 -000257 -PRE- DIM
POSITION
REVIEW OF
NAME
Project Planner
Land Use Planning
Drew Larson 736-1003
Transportation Planning
Transportation
Michael Liebler 736-1034
Public Works
Utilities: Sanitary & Storm Sewer
Clayton Mceachern 736-1036
Deputy Fire Marshal
Fire and Life Safety
Eric Phillips -Meadow 726-2293
Building Official
Building Code
Chris Carpenter 744-4153
APPLICANT'S DEVELOPMENT REVIEW TEAM
Applicant Applicant's Representative
David Loveall Ryan Thomas
Masaka Properties Ryan Thomas Construction LLC
1657 Delrose Ave. 91069 N. Willamette st.
Springfield OR 97477 Coburg,OR 97408
Revised 10/25/07
TENTATIVE SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
PRE -SUBMITTAL CHECKLIST
PLANNING
o Application fee (confirm prior to submittal):
Impervious Area: N/A
Tentative Review Fee: $5,682.40
Final Site Plan Fee: $548.94
91FE PLAN flEV1EW:laoaa'
9Ua
PmSUEmNInI MeeUnp
CIV:UM 59L
WA
WA
R glwlaphn N4lofSUU PIen
UM: SG6M1
WA
WA
Rrvbw aM 3HUPIm NeWaw
AavW
uce:
MotlMutim-LWwWWkNuro.
SMe Mn NuvYw
<. It fl. imam, a. ufn-
$5 a
i9j38
$361A0
Type 11
ar r .
tO,OCU sq. It arpreaW lnlpervMua Wlfece
SG3i8a$6Y1000 vp.M1
SX
$193
3193
9He Plan Nariaw MotlAutinn-Major
Ca :$5046
33.=
$193
iypeN
$M PNn RwIaw YOGflutlon-Mlntt
CLLy: Mon
Pull
WA
Type)
UW:39A19
$'%as
WA
FIreISHa PYn EpunabR
cs�,R 1/GS: Sa,69
$33].90
WA
Typal
FlreI SIb PW l3uvpwNuwlnmwnl
See SpaUalim0u .
a>a
>a
typal-Fhml ails pLn YMEaalloplren[
agn a aaadMfa 40% was wM ase
plan (ae Iaxcaslw o3 pwdga) A 5%
Tegnrolopy Pe. pgl.a wlwn
In, >wnmaa.
o Copy of the Site Plan reduced to 81/2"x 11"
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
[] 8 1/z" x 11" Copy of Site Plan
o Copy of the deed and a preliminary title report issued within the past 30 days
documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. If the applicant is not the property
owner, written permission from the property owner is required.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
® 1 Deed and Preliminary Title Report
o Brief narrative explaining the purpose of the development, the existing use of the property,
and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be
taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future
expansion plans, if known.
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
Q ® 2 Brief Narrative
o Site Assessment of Existing Conditions
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
►1 �
Revised 10/25/07
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
Vicinity Map
® ❑
The name, location and dimensions of all
existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly
indicating what is remaining and what is being
removed. For existing structures to remain, also
indicate present use, size, setbacks from
property lines, and distance between buildings
❑ ❑ n/a
The name, location, dimensions, direction of
flow and top of bank of all watercourses and
required riparian setback that are shown on the
Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file
in the Development & Public Works Department
❑ 3
The 100 -year floodplain and floodway
boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or
FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or
Letter of Map Revision
[] 4
The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC
3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development
& Public Works Department
Physical features including, but not limited to
trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured
4 lh feet above the ground (stands of more than
five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with
mix of trees species noted), riparian areas,
wetlands and rock outcroppings
o Proposed Site Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
//
Ps®
Revised 10/25/07
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size
(gross floor area applicable to the parking
requirement for the proposed use(s)),setbacks
from property lines, and distance between
buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared
by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum
setbacks are shown
❑ Location and height of existing or proposed
fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash
receptacles, and signs
❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical,
compact and ADA parking spaces; including
aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and
striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way
shall be designated including at grade
connections
®
❑
Dimensions of the development area, as well as
N/A
area and percentage of the site proposed for
Note(s)
buildings, structures, parking and vehicular
areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious
o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities
Complete
surfaces
❑
❑ n/a
Observance of solar access requirements as
Note(s)
specified in the applicable zoning district
®
❑
On-site loading areas and vehicular and
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
pedestrian circulation
®
❑
Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be
❑
n/a
served, including the location and dimensions of
®
❑
existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and
proposed to be closed
[]
Location, type, and number of bicycle parking
spaces
®
❑
Note location of existing and planned Lane
proposed development, including jurisdictional
Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile)
❑
❑ n/a
Area and dimensions of all property to be
conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common
❑
open spaces, recreational areas, and other
Location and type of existing street lighting
®
similar public and semi-public uses
Phased Development Plan Where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and
sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street
connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other
required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater
management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the
Site Plan application being submitted.
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
N/A
Note(s)
❑
Phased Development Plan
o Existing Improvements and Public Utilities
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
®
❑
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Architect,
Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer, or Surveyor
❑
❑
n/a
Location and width of all existing easements
®
❑
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and
names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications,
or other rights-of-way within or adjacent to the
proposed development, including jurisdictional
status other than City. Indicate connection points
for roof drainage
❑
Location and type of existing street lighting
®
❑
Location of existing and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
Revised 10/25/07
neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow
preventers and similar public facilities
®
❑
Location, width, and construction material of all
existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps,
pedestrian access ways, and trails
®
5
Location and size of existing utilities on and
adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer
mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N.
Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail
must be proportionate to the complexity of the
proposed project
❑
n/a
Show existing and proposed spot elevations or
contours, and direction of drainage patterns
o Proposed Grading,
Paving, & Utilities Plan
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
®
❑
Prepared by an Oregon Licensed Civil Engineer,
except where noted
6
The approximate size and location of storm water
management systems components
[]
n/a
Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and
names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or
other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the
proposed development
n/a
Location and width of all proposed easements
[]
Location and type of proposed street lighting
Location of existing and required traffic control
devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow
preventers and similar public facilities
n/a
Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be
prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be
drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land
with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with
5 foot contour interval lines
o Landscape Plan
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
❑
❑
n/a
Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or
other Landscape Professional approved by the
Director
❑
❑
n/a
Location and dimensions of landscaping and open
space areas to include calculation of landscape
coverage
Revised 10/25/07
❑
❑
n/a
Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110
❑
❑
n/a
Written description, including specifications, of the
permanent irrigation system
❑
❑
n/a
Location and type of street trees
❑
❑'
n/a
List in chart form the proposed types of landscape
materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include
in the chart genus, species, common name,
quantity, size, spacing and method of planting
o Architectural Plan
Complete
Incomplete
See Planning
Note(s)
0
❑
Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures
proposed for the development site, including
height
®
Conceptual floor plans
o On -Site Lighting Plan
Complete Incomplete See Planning
Note(s)
0
111 ■
Planning Notes:
Location, orientation, and maximum height of
exterior light fixtures, both free standing and
attached
Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off
angles and type of illumination, wattage, and
luminous area
Photometric test report for each light source
1. Title report cannot be older than 30 days at the time of submittal, this may need to be
updated prior to tentative submittal.
2. The narrative needs to address the Site Plan Criteria, SDC5.17-125; and the Nodal
Development Overal District, SDC 3.3-1000.
3. Label floodzone and TOTZ on Site Assessment sheet.
4. Label H2O main size.
5. Two different scenarios for power supply; you will need property owner to sign the
applicantion depending on which option you move forward with.
6. Stormwater desitination is not clear, please amend the plans to show final desitination.
Additional comments not related to the completeness of the application,
• For ease of review, please create each sheet in the checklist and show the required
information within the checklist. There should be a Site Assessment; Proposed Site Plan;
Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan; Proposed Utilities Plan; Architectural Plans;
and an On-site Lighting Plan. Each should show the required information requested. All
information should be presented as requested for ease of review.
• Move the Mixed -Use Commercial standards to the Architectural Plans/Elevations.
• There is a empty tree well on S1M1 Street that will require a new street tree.
Revised 10/25/07
ANY REQUIRED ADDITIONAL MATERIALS, APPLICATIONS OR
PERMITS
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS OR
APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD
CONSIDER UTILIZING EITHER THE DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING OR THE PRE -
APPLICATION REPORT FOR MORE DETAILED INFORMATION:
Applicable Not
Applicable
[]
Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional
materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
❑
Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150
feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses
(WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct
tributaries of WQLW
❑ ®
A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted
concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table
present
❑
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address
the additional standards of the overlay district
0
If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling
Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100
❑ ®
A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State
Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland
on the property
❑ ®
Any required federal or state permit must be submitted
concurrently or evidence the permit application has been
submitted for review
Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the
development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be
submitted prior to development
Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified
in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100
❑
An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the
City's urban service area and can be serviced by sanitary sewer
Revised 10/25/07
THIS APPLICATION IS:
❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING
❑ INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE
City Planner Date
This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4-
105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land
use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day
processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or
when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either
signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the
date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing
information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information
will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for
Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to
submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and
processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 -
day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after
the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the
120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the
120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if
the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is
sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects
the application proposal and additional review is required.
I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the
City within the 180 -day timeline.
SAr'Owc zozz
nt's Signature Date
Revised 10/25/07
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN
X www. cam pH rel an.c am 4campffrelab
April 5, 2022
Andrew Larson
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
Springfield, OR 97477
Reference: Rivett Building Q 448 Main Street
(MAP/TL #17-03-35-31-08000)
Response to Site Plan Pre -Submittal Comments dated January 7, 2022:
iL'7J�69Yilil_\Y[iLp
T1 The trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling units most likely will not generate enough
traffic warranting traffic analysis according to SDC 4.2-105 thresholds. The applicant must
include a trip generation estimate relating to the increase in trips documenting compliance with
SDC 4.2-105.
b See calculation from Access Engineering, included as an attachment to the Narrative.
T2 Applicant must label the existing street lighting as current city standard decorative LED fixtures
and label the existing streetlight associated with the signal pole. Lighting analysis was
performed recently at the time of the decorative lighting project installation and not required as
part of this application.
b Labels for street lighting updated on drawings.
T3 Applicant must show the correct location of the signal pole and mast arm for review.
b Location of traffic signal pole field verified and updated on drawings.
PUBLIC WORKS:
PW1 Site plan and utilities prepared by Architect, not licensed PE.
b No action required.
PW2 Information not provided and probably not needed, building foundation detail is provided that
looks to be prepared by a qualified structural engineer. I assume the detailed calculations and
drawings are included in building permit package, including soil bearing information.
Date Received
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 AF41ORWI1$2
Original Submittal_ ^_
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN
X www.ca.'n. lvb. cam mcbmpllre I.b
b No action required. Yes, detailed structural calculations and drawings will be included in the
building permit package.
PW3 Two different scenarios are included for possible power supply to building, both offsite. For
either one to be approved full concurrence from the third party property owner and detailed
plans for ALL work including new conduits needed and any road crossings will be required -and
will also require an encroachment permit and detailed drawings for the demolition and
restoration of all work in the ROW, including any ADA elements disturbed during the
construction work.
b See updated capacity letter, step plan, and aerial illustrations from SUB showing final
solution for the power supply. All work is to be completed within existing utility easements
and utilizing existing underground conduit runs, no demolition of road/sidewalk required.
PW4 No grading or paving plan is required, but ALL disturbed concrete requires full panel
replacement, this includes the existing saw cuts already made in the alley to be restored. This
means the WHOLE, ENTIRE cut up concrete panel requires replacement, not just the removed
portion, to the existing joints. This also applies to all existing sidewalk panels on both sides and
any disturbed pavement must be patched also. NOTE: If this work was done without any
encroachment permit, one is required with detailed demolition and restoration shown and any
needed traffic control to be done by a professional engineer.
b Any necessary removal/disturbance of concrete will be repaired by replacing full panels.
This has been noted on the site plan sheet.
PW5 Downspouts are shown on page a1.05 but not how this water will be conveyed across the
sidewalk? additional details required.
b Existing downspouts on Main St. and 5th St. are piped under the sidewalks to weep holes in
the curb. Existing downspout at the NW comer is piped underground at alley. Existing
downspouts will be replaced/extended, but no new downspout locations are proposed.
Locations of existing downspouts and paths to weep holes are shown on the site plans.
PW6 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. A N report for the existing
waste water lateral is required (this is standard for all intensification of connections downtown
due to age of the infrastructure) to the sewer main connection. This is a 4" line and it should be
confirmed via the architect and plumbing code that this is sufficient for the number of units to be
built on this site (personal expertise is this is not sufficient, and a new 6" line should be installed
but only required if plumbing code or design professional requires it).
b See letter (attached to Narrative) from Harvey & Price summarizing video review comments
and recommendations for waste lines.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
7-d* www. complireloh.com Ncumpnreluh
I1I&IIQIIIts 1[sllS.'F
PL1 Title report cannot be older than 30 days at the time of submittal, this may need to be updated
prior to tentative submittal.
a New title report attached.
PL2 The narrative needs to address the Site Plan Criteria, SDC5.17-125; and the Nodal Development
Overal District, SDC 3.3-1000.
b Narrative has been updated to address these sections.
PL3 Label floodzone and TOTZ on Site Assessment sheet.
b The site is not located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as
specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
b The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and
delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public
Works Department
b These notes have been added to the site plan sheets and the narrative.
PL4 Label H2O main size.
b Water main has been labeled on updated site plan sheet.
PL5 Two different scenarios for power supply; you will need property owner to sign the application
depending on which option you move forward with.
b See attached construction agreement signed by the property owner and SUR.
PLb Stormwater destination is not clear, please amend the plans to show final destination.
b See response to item PW5 above.
PL7 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. For ease of review, please
create each sheet in the checklist and show the required information within the checklist. There
should be a Site Assessment; Proposed Site Plan; Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan;
Proposed Utilities Plan; Architectural Plans; and an On-site Lighting Plan. Each should show the
required information requested. All information should be presented as requested for ease of
review.
b We formatted the narrative to address the checklist items one by one, with the drawings as
support documentation. Due to the limited scope of this project it seemed redundant to
make so many individual drawings/sheets. However, in the future we will format
accordingly.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
-0—
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
N www.cp mpf trelo b.cpm #camp❑relpb
PL8 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. Move the Mixed -Use
Commercial standards to the Architectural Plans/Elevations.
a These notes have been moved to sheet A2.01
PL9 Additional item not related to the completeness of this application. There is an empty tree well
on 5th Street that will require a new street tree.
b There is not an empty street well along either street frontage.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE 1
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
IV www.camptirelab.com #camplirela4
December 17, 2021 UPDATED APRIL 5, 2022
Andrew Larson
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
Springfield, OR 97477
SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION: Rivett Building Cr4448 Main St. (Map/TL: #17-03-35-31-08000)
CONTENTS:
A. NARRATIVE
• Project summary
• Plan set review items summary
• Specific code section summaries
B. ATTACHMENTS
ATT -1: Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 8.5" x 11" size, separate from large format drawing set
ATT 2: Copy of Deed
ATT -3: Preliminary Title Report
ATT -4: Trip generation calculation from Access Engineering
ATT -5: Excerpt from ODOT Signal Design manual, and correspondence with Kathy Tourtillott
and Scott Cramer from ODOT clarifying clearance requirements for the traffic signal
ATT -6: Letter from Springfield Utility Board stating that the site will be adequately served for
electrical service, along with Tentative Step Plan and supporting illustrations
ATT -7: Signed construction agreement between the property owner and Springfield Utility
Board for installation of increased electrical service
ATT -8: Letter from Springfield Utility Board stating that the site will be adequately served for
water service, along with email and utilities plan showing water service available
ATT -9: TV Report for Waste Water Lateral - letter from Harvey & Price summarizing video
review comments and recommendations for waste lines
ATT 10: Lighting Cut Sheets - See attached lighting cut -sheet for more information about type of
illumination, wattage, shielding, etc. for the proposed gooseneck wall -mounted fixtures
proposed for building exterior.
ATT -11: Recorded utility easement documentation
C. DRAWING SET (4) Copies of the drawing plan sets required, large format sheets; also see outline
within narrative for specific review items and where they are addressed in the plan set
Date Received
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 APR1616.g2
Original Submittal
CAMPFIRE CU2
ARCHITECTURREE & & OESISIGNGN
X www.co mpfirela G.cam Ycomp[be 0
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
ACAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE -3-
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
..0 www. comph re l a p.c om Mca morel as
o Interior bearing walls -staggered steel stud bearing walls between apartment
units; bearing shear walls at ground floor
o Interior non-bearing walls- new interior walls throughout apartment units,
enclosing stairs, W.C., utility room, storage closets, etc.
o New beams/columns as indicated on structural drawings
o New stair systems throughout, including (2) egress stairs, (12) typical apartment
interior stairs, and (1) mezzanine stair for live/work unit
• Fire/life safety:
o Fire rated assemblies- 1 hour separation between ground floor and apartments
on second floor; i hour between apartments; 1 hour stair enclosures
o New NPFA-13 sprinkler system to be installed throughout building, in all enclosed
spaces on all floors, and under stairwells
• Exterior improvements:
o New paint on exterior concrete facade; new upper level walls to be clad in brick -
look fiber -cement panels
o New awnings/canopies over entrances along Main Street and 5'h Street
o New planter boxes and outdoor seating elements
c New gooseneck wall -mounted light fixtures around building
n New bike parking stalls
• Proposed uses:
o Ground floor residential- l accessible live/work unit at NE corner of building with
independent entrance on 5t' St.
o Ground floor commercial- 1 largetenant space along Main St„ 1 smallertenant
space along 5th St.; to be built as shell spaces forthis permit; tenants notyet
identified; future buildouts to be submitted as separate T.I. permits
• Systems:
o Electrical-serviceto be upgraded, including new meters and panels, per SUB
and code requirements; new wiring, lighting, and receptacles throughout;
coordination with other trades for power requirements for equipment
o HVAC - new mini-splitsto independently serve each apartment and each
commercial space; new exhaust ducting for residential kitchens and baths in (13)
apartments as well as (2) public W.C. on ground floor; exhaust ducting for laundry
in 2"a floor hallway and ground floor live/work unit; mechanical chase provided
for potential future commercial kitchen in main commercial space, though
equipment not part ofthis permit
o Plumbing- new meter and upsized line from meter into building; tie into existing
sanitary connection; new fixtures throughout and supply/waste piping; floor
drains in ground floor W.C.'s, utility room, and trash alcove; new underfloor 75 -
gallon grease trap in utility room; 2 new gas water heaters in utility room
o Fire suppression- new sprinkler system throughout; hottap into main fire supply
line along Main St., backflow, device in SW corner of building; standpipe and fire
alarm panel to be in utility room; fire department connection to be at SE corner of
building along Sth St.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
ARCHITECTURE
C H CAMPFIRE C COLLABORATIVE 4'
ARCHITECTURE &DESIGN
X www.[ampfire la b.c pm R[pmpliuMb
PLAN SET REVIEW ITEMS
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions -see Existing Site Plan on sheet A0.02
• Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect
• Vicinity Map shown on sheet A0.01
• Refer to the existing site plan on sheet A0.02 for all relevant existing site features and their
names, uses, locations and dimensions, as well as what is to be removed. Existing building
perimeter is at extent of property lines. Building shares a party wall with one building on
the south-west side.
• The site is not located along a water course as indicated by the Water Quality Limited
Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works department.
• The site is not located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as
specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
• The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and
delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and Public
Works Department
• For physical features such as tree diameters, refer to the existing site plan on sheet A0.02.
There are no riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings on or adjacent to site.
b. Site Plan - see Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02
• Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect
• The location, dimensions, size, building adjacencies, and property lines are shown on the
Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02. As this is an existing building with extents to the
property line, there are no setbacks, so no surveyor was required. The Downtown
Springfield parking exemption applies to this site.
• For the locations and heights of walls,trash, and exterior features see sheet A2.01 No
fences, or external site storage are proposed. New trash alcove shown the Proposed Site
Plan on sheet A0.02, with more detail shown on the Level 1 - Dimensioned Plan on sheet
A1.02.
• Under the Downtown Springfield parking exemption no site-specific ADA parking spaces
are proposed. The site is relatively flat for ADA use, and all entries are at grade. Please
see plan 3/A0.02.
• Dimensions of development are 40'x 120' as indicated on the Vicinity Plan on sheet
A0.01. 100 percent ofthe property is building structure. There is no change in the
footprint area of 4800 s.f., from existing to new proposal. All else is existing and is not
proposed for change, such as sidewalks and other impervious surfaces.
• As specified in 3.2-225 Base Solar Development Standards, the zoning of this site is MUC
and does not need to observe solar access requirements.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
N www.campnralaEcom 4epm1Hrela6
5-
• See site plans on sheet A0.02 for on-site loading areas, and vehicuIarand pedestrian
circulation.
• See site plans on sheet A0.02 for access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served,
including the location and dimensions of existing curb cuts
• Bicycle parking
o See 2/A0.02 for proposed location of bicycle parking spaces
o Short term stalls required:
• Residential:1/unit, 75% long term, 25%shortterm
• 13 units => 9.75 long term, 2.25 shortterm
• Commercial/restaurant(TBD): 1/600 s.f., 25% long term, 75% short
term
• 2962 s.f. / 600 = 5 spaces; 1.25 long term, 3.75 shortterm
o TOTAL REQUIRED:
• 11 long term (9.75 + 1.25)
• 6 short term (2.25 + 3.75)
• t long term oversized
o TOTAL PROVIDED/PROPOSED:
• 11 long term vertical stalls+ 1 oversized stall, located in residential
lobby through access -controlled exterior door
8 shortterm spaces provided by 4 new hoops; 2 hoops located near
Main St. entrance, and 2 hoops located near lobby entry along 5'h St.
Additional long-term storage if required for commercial tenant spaces
to be provided within tenant spaces as part of future interior buildout
(to be submitted in separate T.I. permit)
• Lane Transit District Springfield Bus Station is located .1 miles south west of the site.
• 100 percent of the property is building structure. No proposal to remove existing
structure to dedicate or reserve for public and semi-public uses.
• No proposed phasing development plan forthis project.
c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan- see Existing Site Plan on sheet A0.02
• Prepared by an Oregon licensed architect.
• There are no applicable easements to the existing footprint. All overhangs over sidewalk
are proposed at 5 ft depth, within the allowable half -depth of sidewalks (typical depth of
east side walk is 10 ft; depth of south sidewalk is 16-8 ".)
• See 3/A.01 and 1/A0.02 for location,widths, names of right-of-ways within or adjacent to
the site and downspouts for roof drainage connections. The only other jurisdiction is
ODOT located within the boundaries of Main Street.
• See 1 /A0.02 for existing street lighting locations.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIREDRI
ARCHITECTUURREE&8 DESIGN
�J , www.compfirolub.com Mcampinelab
WE
• See 2/A0.02 for existing traffic control devices. See 2/A0.02 for proposed Fire department
connection and backflow preventers. No existing power poles ortransformers. Closest
public (neighborhood?) mailbox is 0.1 miles north-east from site under City Hall.
• See 1/A0.02 for existing sidewalks. No new paths of any kind are proposed.
• See 1/A0.02 and 2/A0.02 for location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to site,
plus connection points.
• See 1/A0.02 for existing spot elevation indicated by "+" symbol. North-east corner of
site/building is at elevation of 459 ft above sea level. Site is relatively flat with gentle,
declining slope from north to south, less than 5 percent slope. Adjacent existing paved
surfaces are sloped towards storm drains.
d. Proposed Grading, Paving and Utilities- see Proposed Site Plan on sheet A0.02
• Not proposing new onsite stormwater. Existing building covers entire property, no new
impervious area proposed. Site has existing downspouts piped under sidewalk to
weepholes at the curbs along Main St. and 5th St., and piped into storm sewer along alley.
Drainage from new roof and canopies will tie into existing downspouts.
• Not proposing new streets, alleys, or other rights -of -ways
• There are no proposed easements.
• Existing City -owned street light to remain. New wall -mounted gooseneck light fixtures
proposed around building fa4ade, see Exterior Elevations on sheet A2.01 for locations.
• Slopes are not greater than 5 percent.
e. Landscape Plan- see Existing & Proposed Site Plans on sheet A0.02
• Landscape plan not required; site plan prepared by an Oregon licensed architect.
• See 1/A0.02 for existing trees. No new proposed landscaping or street trees.
f. Architectural Plans
See attached drawing setfor architectural plans.
The site does not abut residentially zoned properties, however exterior elevations are
provided on sheet A2.01.
g. On-site Lighting Plan
• Existing City -owned standard decorative LED street lights to remain; see locations on
1 /A0.02.
• New wall -mounted gooseneck down light fixtures proposed around building fa4ade, see
Exterior Elevations on sheet A2.01 and plan 2/A0.02 for locations.
• See attached lighting cut -sheets for more information about type of illumination, wattage,
shielding, etc.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRECOLLABORATIVE -7-
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
74r waw. complirelobcom ifcompflrelob
Additional Materials That May Be Deferred
• New landscape materials are not proposed.
• No new stormwater management system is proposed.
• No irrigation plan is proposed.
• Photometric test report for light source(s)to be provided as a deferred submittal if
required.
Additional Materials That May Be Required by the Director
• A copy of a Preliminary Title Report -attached
• No Traffic Impacf Study is required -the trip generation from the 12 additional dwelling
units will be well below the thresholds outlined in SDC 4.2-105. Per staff request, we have
included a memo from Access Engineering that provides a trip generation estimate. See
attachment ATT -4
• Multi -family development- Per clarification with Planning staff, this section (SDC 3.2-240)
does not apply to this project. The building is located in the Downtown Mixed Use area.
The ground floor's greatest floor area is commercial; therefore, the commercial mixed use
standards apply —not the multi -unit standards.
• Site is not in riparian area/ or near a watercourse, so no Riparian Area Protection Report is
required.
• Site is not in an area of unstable soils or high water table, geotech report not required.
• See below for code analysis pertaining to Mixed Use Overlay District (SDC 3.2-625)
• No physical aspects of the proposed development include scale, odor noise, glare or
vibrations that could impact the surrounding uses.
• No trees are proposed to be removed, no tree felling permit necessary.
• No wetlands are present on the property, to wetland delineation necessary.
• No additional federal/state permits are required.
• No grading, filling, or excavating is proposed that would affect drainage of site or
surrounding area.
• No Discretionary Uses or Variances are proposed.
• No Annexation is proposed.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE $
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
X www. camptirelo E. cam tcamphreloh
5.17.125 SITE PLAN REVIEW CRITERIA
A. No change in zoning is proposed; the existing zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram,
and/or the applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development
Plan.
S. Capacity requirements for utilities will be met:
• Electricity&water: see letters from SUB stating adequate capacity for utility serviceto the
site
• Sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities: see report from Harvey&Price
• Streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded
• Public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development
C. The proposed development shall comply with all applicable public and private design and
construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. See code analysis
below for sections:
• 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards—General
• 3.2-630 Mixed -Use Development Standards- Specific
3.3-1000 Nodal Development Overlay District
3.2-240 Multi -unit Design Standards
D. No new parking areas or ingress -egress points are proposed
E. The site has no significant physical features requiring protection or special attention. There are no
steep slopes, unstable soils, or considerable geologic conditions to address on site. The site is not
located in the 100 -year flood plain or have flood boundaries on the site as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps. The site is not located along a water course as
indicated by the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public
Works department. The site is not located in any of the Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC
3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development and
Public Works Department. The site does not contain significant clusters of trees and shrubs, nor is
it part of any riparian areas or wetlands. There are no rock outcroppings, natural open spaces, or
areas of historic and or archeological significance on site.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE -
9-ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
zftC www.com Dtu.I. b.c om rcu.,H,e lvb
3.2-625 MIXED-USE DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS—GENERAL
A. Building Design Standards
1. On corner lots/parcelsthis provision applies to both elevations requirement: 50 percent of
length of elevation must linearly be window at ground floor
East wall = 120 ft length
East wall windows length = 62 ft
62/120®.52 Requirement met
South wall = 40.42 ft length
South wall window length = 34.75 ft
34.75/40.42 =.86 Requirement met
Requirement: at least 25 percent of the ground floor wall area as windows and/or doors that
allow views into lobbies, merchandise displays, or working areas.
East wall = 120 ft length
East wall views -in window length = 43.1 ft
43.1/120 =.36 Requirement met
South wall = 40.42 ft length
South wall views -in window length = 32.92 ft
32.92/40.42 =.81 Requirement met
Exceptions: north wall adjacent to alley, east wall is party wall
2. N/A
3. Requirement met -along the vertical face of the building, offsets occur at a minimum of
every 50 feet by providing: recessed balconies with a depth of 4' - 2" and balcony overhangs
with a depth of no more than 5 ft
4. Requirement met- building design breaks up vast expanses by a combination of
architectural elements and features, including, but not limited to: offsets, windows, entry
treatments, balconies, overhangs and faux brick
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
K w ww.cpm pf irela a.c am 4ppmplhelal,
S. Requirement met- design provides differentiation between the ground floor and upper
stories, through balconies for upper levels, and awnings, canopies, or other similar
treatments for lower levels. variation in building materials, paint, ornamentation, and
windows.
6. N/A
B. Building Orientation/Setbacks: N/A -existing building
C. Weather Protection
1. Requirement met- proposed awnings and canopies are at least b feet wide (but not greater
than 5' depth), and shall follow building offsets to eliminate long expanses of awnings.
2. Requirement met- awnings and canopies do not obscure architectural features (e.g.,
transom area) and do not extend into the second story of the building.
3. Requirement met- awnings and canopies are in proportion to the overall building and
correspond to the width a nd locations of the storefront openings.
4. Requirement met- no backlit awnings or canopies are proposed.
S. Requirement met- awnings and canopies are suspended from the building and not
supported by posts.
D. Landscaping & Screening
1. N/A- existing building/site
2. N/A -not adjacent to residential, no ground mounted equip., exist i ng street trees
3. Nil no new landscape areas
4. Requirement met - existing trash receptacles shared with neighbor and hosted on
neighboring site behind buildings, does not abut residential districts; all utilities are wall -
mounted on the rear/alley elevation facade; (e) street trees are fully grown
E. Street Connectivity/Circulation: Nil existing site/development
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVEAN 11 -
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
www.camptirelob.com #campnrelab
F. Neighborhood Compatibility: N/A- not adjacentto TDR zone
G. Pedestrian Amenities
1. Approximately 13,470 S.F. requires 3 pedestrian amenities
2. Requirement met- proposal includes new outdoor seating, existing and new
container planters, new canopies over sidewalk, existing street trees, existing sidewalk
lights, and view of mural across street
3. Requirement met -
a. Amenities are available along both 5th and main streets
b. Amenities are sized appropriately for available space
c. Amenities are consistent with those throughout downtown, and suitable for
outdoor use
d. N/A- no bus stops adjacent to site
3.2.630 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - SPECIFIC
a. MUC development standard
Requirement met - 86 percent of ground floor area within building is dedicated to
commercial use; commercial use is proposed with residential uses concurrently
2. Requirement met- maximum square footage of a si ng Is tenant space is 2200 S.F..
3. Requirement met- 100 percent of lot/parcel is building floor area
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE 12 -
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
Q www.comptlrelab.com Mcampurelab
3.3-1000 NODAL DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
3.3-1005 Purpose, Applicability and Review
1. Design standard met - See Project Scope Exterior Improvements above
2. Design standard met- Lane Transit District Springfield Station busses located -1 miles
or 3 minute walk from site
3. Design standard met - Grocery, cafes, restaurants, banks, post office, art gallery,
museum, and library located within walking distance of site.
4. Design standard met- Library plaza, Millrace park, Island park, Booth Kelley Path
Trailhead withing walking distance of site.
S. Design standard met - Site is near residential area. Site will add 13 new residential
units on 4720 S.F. footprint.
3.3-1005 (13)(3) Applicability: An expansion of 50 percent or more of the total existing building
square footage on the development site.
Existing:
LEVEL 1 - 4720 S.F
Expansion:
LEVEL 2-4362 S.F.
LEVEL 3 - 4326 S.F.
TOTAL:
3 STORIES - 13,408 ST
Expansion is
over 50 percent oftotal existing building square footage.
3.3-1010 (A): Mixed commercial and residential uses permitted within base Mixed -Use Commercial
MUC District in Section 3.2-610; none ofthe prohibited uses listed in section 3.3-1010(8) are proposed
3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards
Floor Area Ratio or FAR
Gross floor area/ total lot parcel area.
13,408/4720= 2.8
A. Minimum Density and Floor Area Ratio
1. Requirement met - Site will add 13 new residential units in 4720 S.F. footprint
2. Requirement met- MUC minimum floor area is.4, actual is 2.8
3. N/A- Base zone is not LMI, CI, or MUE
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
0 CAMPFIRE COLLABORATIVE -13-
ARCHITECTURE & DESIGN
7� www. co mpl irela6.com xaamprirelah
B. Building Setbacks
1. Requirement met- Commercial building is existing, with no setbacks from the street
2. Requirement met- Proposed residential uses will have zero setback from the street
3. Requirement met -Proposed building is existing and will have zero setback from the
street
C. Parking Between Building and the Street
1. NA- No new parking is proposed. Building is existing and falls under the Downtown
Springfield parking exemption
2. NA- No new parking is proposed. Building is existing and falls under the Downtown
Springfield parking exemption
3.3-1025 Specific Design Standards: Multi -unit residential dwellings shall comply with the design
standards specified in Section 3.2-240 (see below) and Section 3.2-625C (see above).
a 3.2-240 Multi -Unit Design Standards Per clarification with Planning staff, this section does
not apply to this project. The building is located in the Downtown Mixed Use area. The
ground floor's greatest floor area is commercial; therefore, the commercial mixed use
standards apply — not the multi -unit standards.
• Section 3.2-625C Weather Protection: Awnings and canopies are intended to protect
pedestrians from the weather and add to the architectural interest of buildings. New
commercial or mixed-use residential development shall provide a weather -protected area
adjacent to sidewalks and plazas. The proposal achieves all requirements of this section; see
details in code summary of section 3.2-625 above.
Campfire Collaborative: Architecture & Design, PC 341 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97477 541.914.0334
A STREET
AWACENT PROPERTY
NOTINS
NOT IN SCOPE
WW1
K
N
INE
AREA ERTYOF
M) — F
AREA OF WORK) y�
ALLEY
I
MAIN STREET
—7
I � III T1
448 MAIN STREET - RIVETT BUILDING
SITE PLAN 1"=50"
Projectnumber 21006
Date 2021.12.17
(E) FIRE HYDRANT
U
Date Receiv, J ,
vA�C9E COlLP00ap~\
APR 0 6 2011
Original Submittal
ORAGEFEE:
MASAKA PROPERTIES. LLC
C47 Dir—. Ave. Smo,[,.M, OR 9]071
ORDER NO 2122079
TA%ACCOUNTNO. 03IM4I
MAP NO 17030 -35 -31 -DO=
Space Above Re9ervM ME Recorder a Use
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON. CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO
MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012. Gramm. conveys and warrants to NIAGARA PROPERTIES.
LLC, an Oregon limited Liability Co.,,, Grantee. the forkuh, tlescnbed real OmCady free of
yEUUmbranCN., except as spedOcally set ddh harem. Situated in Lane County. State of Oregon. to All
See Legal Description attached Hared as Exhibit "A'
Subject to and excepting, Covenants, Conditions. Restr ions and Easements of record
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS IMTRUMENT, ME PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE
ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS. V ANY, UNDER OR51961Oq 1. .1 AND 195.905 TO GENIIS AND SECTIONS 51011,
CHAPTER M, OREGON WINS 9007, SECTIONS 2 TO9AND 17, CHAPTER 555, OREGON LANG Man. AND SECTIONS E
TO 1. CHAPTER U OREGON LAWS MIO. THIS INSTRUMENT ODES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
TNS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND Me LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR
ACCEPTdG THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACONRMG FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK METH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING 0 RTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING THENSFERREO
R A LAVSULL ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, As DEFINED IN ORS TrED OR NS010. TO VERIFY THE APPRDVED
USES OF THE LOT OR MARCEL, To DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON L UITS AGAINST Fp MMU GR FOREST PRACTICES,
AS DIF NBC IN ORS 50.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT ME RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OHNE ES, IF ANY.
UNDER ORS 19530, 195.M1 AND Mehill TO 196536 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 420, OREGON LAWS DWI.
SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 9, CHAPTER SM. OREGON LAWS 209. AND SECTIONS 9 TO 7, CHAPTER I. OREGON LAWS
the true and actual hichaderra[Ion he this Conveyance is $395,00000 (Here, comply with the
@Dwremenl5 of ORS 93030.)
Dated this March 18. 2021
THE DONALD F AND MARY JO LONDON EY TRUST
DATED JULY 10. 2 12
DONALD F MOLONEY, CO TRUSTEE A
AMY JO IjU H1 N. CO -TRUSTEE CJ
State of ARIZONA
County Of t'ru'e,
The fore9Ding imenumenl was acknowledged before me Nis -IL do, of HOL ,:L'�J. by
DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF TH_ECONALO F AND MARY JO
MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012uor.
�M
'dd4'�;i00
F P blcn tll rine Sate of ARIZDNA
�4r ". %r.Iv<a,�,,.enw.•. r�er1 ry
Ill" MY wmmisslon e.nlres. i`Jc.nh�9 A:7
i
Lane county clerk 12
2021-019176
Lane county De dd, B Records
03119!202101: 18:37 PM
t1
Evergreen
RPDOEEO--BTSGASMERW 2p0(le6
$92.00
SO ON TI I'M ou%I G0
�,
�__s Land ilde
(9m pa ny
After recording return to: RATE, AJtlrex. Zip)
Evergreen Land Tire Corp.,
MO Country ClUP Raeq pre120, Eugene, OR Slept
Unfit repueMed oNemia , Send all Ma eM..HK to:
SvneAaPYdW !a/nrF{tt
GRANTOR'.
DONALD F. MOLONEYAND AMY JO HUTCHISON, C0.
TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. ANO MARY JO
MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012
Yea Earl Wla C MME. Nby. Core Creek. AZ 85331
ORAGEFEE:
MASAKA PROPERTIES. LLC
C47 Dir—. Ave. Smo,[,.M, OR 9]071
ORDER NO 2122079
TA%ACCOUNTNO. 03IM4I
MAP NO 17030 -35 -31 -DO=
Space Above Re9ervM ME Recorder a Use
STATUTORY WARRANTY DEED
DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON. CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO
MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012. Gramm. conveys and warrants to NIAGARA PROPERTIES.
LLC, an Oregon limited Liability Co.,,, Grantee. the forkuh, tlescnbed real OmCady free of
yEUUmbranCN., except as spedOcally set ddh harem. Situated in Lane County. State of Oregon. to All
See Legal Description attached Hared as Exhibit "A'
Subject to and excepting, Covenants, Conditions. Restr ions and Easements of record
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS IMTRUMENT, ME PERSON TRANSFERRING FEE TITLE SHOULD INQUIRE
ABOUT THE PERSON'S RIGHTS. V ANY, UNDER OR51961Oq 1. .1 AND 195.905 TO GENIIS AND SECTIONS 51011,
CHAPTER M, OREGON WINS 9007, SECTIONS 2 TO9AND 17, CHAPTER 555, OREGON LANG Man. AND SECTIONS E
TO 1. CHAPTER U OREGON LAWS MIO. THIS INSTRUMENT ODES NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN
TNS INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND Me LAWS AND REGULATIONS BEFORE SIGNING OR
ACCEPTdG THIS INSTRUMENT THE PERSON ACONRMG FEE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK METH THE
APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY PLANNING 0 RTMENT TO VERIFY THAT THE UNIT OF LAND BEING THENSFERREO
R A LAVSULL ESTABLISHED LOT OR PARCEL, As DEFINED IN ORS TrED OR NS010. TO VERIFY THE APPRDVED
USES OF THE LOT OR MARCEL, To DETERMINE ANY LIMITS ON L UITS AGAINST Fp MMU GR FOREST PRACTICES,
AS DIF NBC IN ORS 50.930 AND TO INQUIRE ABOUT ME RIGHTS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTY OHNE ES, IF ANY.
UNDER ORS 19530, 195.M1 AND Mehill TO 196536 AND SECTIONS 5 TO 11, CHAPTER 420, OREGON LAWS DWI.
SECTIONS 2 TO 9 AND 9, CHAPTER SM. OREGON LAWS 209. AND SECTIONS 9 TO 7, CHAPTER I. OREGON LAWS
the true and actual hichaderra[Ion he this Conveyance is $395,00000 (Here, comply with the
@Dwremenl5 of ORS 93030.)
Dated this March 18. 2021
THE DONALD F AND MARY JO LONDON EY TRUST
DATED JULY 10. 2 12
DONALD F MOLONEY, CO TRUSTEE A
AMY JO IjU H1 N. CO -TRUSTEE CJ
State of ARIZONA
County Of t'ru'e,
The fore9Ding imenumenl was acknowledged before me Nis -IL do, of HOL ,:L'�J. by
DONALD F MOLONEY AND AMY JO HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF TH_ECONALO F AND MARY JO
MOLONEY TRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012uor.
�M
'dd4'�;i00
F P blcn tll rine Sate of ARIZDNA
�4r ". %r.Iv<a,�,,.enw.•. r�er1 ry
Ill" MY wmmisslon e.nlres. i`Jc.nh�9 A:7
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East 40.0 feet o1 Lot B. Block W. of 5pnngf elC, as gaffed and recon eal in Book I. Page 1, Lane
County Oregon Oeetl Remrds. in Lane County, Oregon.
evzi zmn
aw.,aoao..e
A
1570 Mohawk Boulevard • Springfield, OR 97477
P.O. Box 931 • Springfield, OR 9747) e.
Phone: 541.741.1981
Fax 541]41.0619
Evergreen
14 In. C.m
TITLE INSURANCE SERVICES • EE
March 30, 2022
Order No. 21-22879
TITLE REPORT
Masaki Properties LLC
1657 Derose Avenue
Springfield, OR 97477
Attn: David Loveall
e-mail:
david@threesixteenministdes.com
Dear David Loveall:
ATT -3
260 Country Club Rd, Ste 120 - Eugene, OR 97401
P.O. Be. 10211 - Eugene, OR 97440
Pham. 541.687.9791
Fax: 541.987.0921
We are prepared to issue on request and on recording of the appropriate documents, a policy or policies
as applied for, with coverage's as Indicated, based on this preliminary report.
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO
Showing fee simple title as of March 25, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., vested in:
MASAKA PROPERTIES LLC, an Oregon Limited Liability Company
Subject only to the exceptions shown herein and to the terms, conditions and exceptions contained in the
policy form. No liability is assumed until a full premium has been paid.
Order No.: 21-22879
Page 1 of 4
ATT-3
SCHEDULE 6
GENERAL EXCEPTIONS
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the records of any taxing authority
that levies taxes or assessments on real property Or by the public records; proceedings by a
public agency which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether
or not shown by the records of such agency or by the public records.
2. Facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public records but which could be
ascertained by an inspection of the land or by making inquiry of persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, or claims of easement, not shown by the public records; reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; water rights, claims or title to water.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments or other facts which a
correct survey would disclose.
5. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, material, equipment rental or workers compensation
heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records.
CURRENT EXCEPTIONS:
6. Urban Renewal Plan for Springfield, including the terms and provisions thereof, as set forth by
instrument Recorded December 7, 2007, Reception No. 2007-081042, Lane County Oregon
Records.
NOTE: Taxes, Moo No. 17-038-35-31-08000, Code 19-99, Account No. 0313641, 2021-2022,
$2,582.73, paid in full.
NOTE: The address of the property to be insured herein is: 448 Main St., Springfield, OR 97477.
INFORMATIONAL NOTE: The current vesting deed and all changes back to the deed which
vests ownership 24 months ago are as follows:
WARRANTY DEED RECORDED MARCH 19, 2021, FROM DONALD F. MOLONEY AND AMY JO
HUTCHISON, CO -TRUSTEE OF THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEY TRUST, DATED
JULY 10, 2012, TO MASAKA PROPERTIES, LLC., AN OREGON LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
BARGAIN AND SALE DEED RECORDED JULY 24, 2012, FROM DONALD F. MOLONEYAND
MARY JO MOLONEY, TO DONALD F. MOLONEYAND MARYJO MOLONEY, TRUSTEES OF
THE DONALD F. AND MARY JO MOLONEYTRUST DATED JULY 10, 2012, RECEPTION NO.
2012-037091.
OMer No.: 21-22679
Page 2 of 4
NOTE: Due to current conflicts or potential conflicts between state and federal law, which conflicts may
extend to local law, regarding marijuana, if the transaction to be insured involves property which
is currently used or is to be used in connection with a marijuana enterprise, including but not
limited to the cultivation, storage, distribution, transport, manufacture, or sale of marijuana and/or
products containing marijuana, the Company declines to dose or insure the transaction, and this
Preliminary Title Report shall automatically be considered null and void and of no force and effect.
Very truly yours,
EVERGREEN LAND TITLE COMPANY
HOME OFFICE
By:
Joseph M Silence
Title Officer/ Title Manager
NO LIABILITY IS ASSUMED HEREUNDER UNTIL POLICY IS ISSUED AND PREMIUM PAID. IF FOR
ANY REASON THE REPORT IS CANCELLED, A MINIMUM CANCELLATION FEE OF $200.00 WILL BE
CHARGED.
OAer No.: 21-22879
Page 3 of
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
The East 40.0 feet of Lot 8, Block 35, of Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book I, Page 1, Lane
County Oregon Deed Records, in Lane County, Oregon.
ONer No: 21-22878
Page 4 of 4
THIS MAP ISTD ASSIST
LOCATING PROPERTY. MAP NO.: 17-03-35-31-08000
THE COMPANY ASSUMESNO
LIABILITY FOR INACCURACIES.
N GnouayM 1
eve9reenu�ammec>
16.51 1
s 6,emee�raearreeem,� 13
v � 1
16 s'
7;400 7 0 $ _`�` 8100
h 8000 0.11 A ,'8300
co CID
P_
1` 1�
1 1N1,
s
5 134' �s' 6 2az 32.a� r zs° 40' g �. � � 51
75007600 60,
0.04 Ac MAIN
41 404' 125;8`1 33' 127.5' 22' 1 44` M __....._..
"4L E.1]^ Pve. Suitt 2
' `�genq.Oregon 9)001
'S6iv185.]H3
?,nmas.a..aePn..e.
Access Engineering LLC
Td9%pert;tien En9ineertng
- �' earns ossig.;
Tap: aeMrauan
"Ace nage...[
-tnwe mnaea
-S1eeM L19atln9
OREGON---
' '0 `kv ta.
ygl:L WEBS
RENEWS
6130122
Low -Rise Apartment Trip Generation
Twelve low-rise apartment are planned for as an addition to a commercial building on
Main Street in Springfield. Oregon. The City has asked the developer to include a trip
generation estimate relating to the increase in trips documenting compliance with SDC
42-105.'
The Springfield Development Code 42-105 states:
A An applicant may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify
potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation
measures. A TIS is required if any of the following criteria are met,
1. Peak Hour Threshold If a change in land use or intensification of an existing
use generates 100 or more trips during any peak hour as determined by
procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS.shall be performed
by a registered professional engineer.
2. Average Daily Traffic Threshold. If a change in land use or intensification of
an existing use generates 1, 000 or more trips per day as determined by
procedures contained in the most recent edition of the Institute of -
Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, a TIS shall be performed
by a registered professional engineer.
The trip generation for the 12 apartment addition on Main Street in downtown -
Springfield, Oregmt is found using the I It Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual
using the ITE Code 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low Rise) with the Dense Multi -Use
Urban setting. The AM peak hour trips generated are 12 and the PM peak hour trips
generated are 6. There is no daily trip data for the dense multi -use urban category.
However, daily trips for the General Urban/Suburbam setting are 152 trips per day. As
one can see, the 12 apartment unit addition will not generate enough_ daily or peak hour
trips to warrant a Traffic Impact Analysis.
ATf-4
ATT -5
From: TOURTLLOI-r Katherine Katherine.TOURTILLOTT®odotstate.or.us
Subject: Fly: 448 Main Street, Springfield
Date: November 2g, 2021 at 12:16 PM
To: lenna@campfirelahown
Ce: POWELL Wade Wade.POWELL0adots1e1e.or.uS, LIEBLER Michael mliebler@springfield-or.gm, PARKS Brian
Brlan.N.PARKSgWatomgon.gw
Hi Jenna,
Had to get a few people involved but it looks like you need to leave 5' hemeen the awning and the signal pole.
Please see email, below.
Thank you.
Kathy Tourtillott
Area/District 5 Permits
P: 541-735.4724 F: 541-7262509
2080 Laura Street Springfield OR 97477
Kathgdne.tourtillott@odot.state.or.us
From: CRAMER Scott B<Scott.B.CRAMER@odot.state.or.us>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 11:47 AM
To: LAFLEUR Christina L <Christina.L.LAFLEUR@odot.oregon.gov>
Cc: PARKS Brian N <Bdan.N.PARKS@odot.oregon.gov>; TOURTILLOTT Katherine
<Katherine.TOURTILLOTT@odot.state.ocus>; POWELL Wade <Wade.POWELL@odo1atate.Ocus>; SCHMIDT
Jamie M<Jamie.M.SCHMIDT@odot.oregon.gov>
Subject: RE: 448 Main Street, Springfield
Good question! Section 5.5.4 of the Signal Design Manual should apply. While this isn't a law voltage utility
conflict, working clearances still apply. So we are looking for 5'.
Mps:l/wwworeg g / d t/E g' 'no/D is TrafticStandams/Signal-Design-2022-OS odl
Scott B Cramer, P.E.
State Traffic Signal Engineer I R 503/476-7849
Oregon Department of Transportation 1 4040 F2lrvlew IndusMal or SE
seAt b vamernodot +rte or _ I Salem, Oregon 97302-1142
From: LAFLEUR Christina L<Christina.L.LAFLEUR@odm oregon g_ov>
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2021 11:30 AM
To: CRAMER Scott B <Scott.B.CRAMER@Odot state or us>
Cc: PARKS Brian N <Brlan.N.PARKS@odot.oreeen.Dov>; TOURTILLOTT Katherine
ECathedne.TOURTILLOTT@odm.Wate or us>; POWELL Wade <Wade.POWELL@odat.state.or.us>; SCHMIDT
Jamie M <jamte M SCHMIDT@odot ore c aov>
Subject: RE: 448 Main Street, Springfield
Hi Scott,
Do we have a requirement for how much clearance we would want a building canopy to keep from a signal
pole? The building at the address in the subject line is remodeling and wanted to take that in consideration. I
am not aware of a standard for this, and would like your input.
Thanks,
Christy LaFleur, P.E.
Region 2 Traffic Design Engineer
Oregon Department of Transportation
Region 2 Tech Center
455 Airport Rd SE, Bldg A
Salem, OR 97301
Phone: 1-503986-2714
Traffic -Roadway Section
Traffic Signal Design Manual - Signal Plan
5.5.4 Utility Conflicts
Always check to see if there is the possibility of overhead and underground utility conflicts
when locating poles. Conflicts with overhead and underground utilities will need to be
addressed during the design of the signal. A minimum of 10 feet from overhead high voltage
lines is required as per OAR 437-002-0047. For low voltage utilities (e.g. communication, fiber
optic, cable, etc.), the following minimum clearances should be provided (See Figure 5-90):
• A minimum of 5 feet from access points (e.g. removable pole caps, handholes, and
terminal cabinets) and illumination fixtures
• A minimum of 1 foot from above the mast amn and backplates
if there are any known conflicts with utilities, contact the Region Utility Specialist for help. See
chapter 8 for more detailed information about identifying conflicts and working with the
Region Utility Specialist. There are three possible solutions depending on the situation; l.) the
signal pole location may need to be adjusted (which may require other auxiliary signal
equipment such as pedestrian pedestals), 2.) the utility may need to be relocated, or 3.) a
combination of number one and two. Utility conflicts shall be addressed and resolved before the
design is complete.
January 2022 Page 5-99
ATT -5
Traffic -Roadway Section
Traffic Signal Design Manual - Signal Plan
Figure 5-90 1 Low Voltage Utility Clearances
Gex.. �orar ✓[n ,.am reare pw�e[elN
=.-ft-1-1�: aam,+➢�ape�a
a.✓2.anw,ce.a anowro.'
mature o[
z/bw ba✓eimfam,`p[tetl vkwo% /9�,alM1eatlinM[a,iont
z aMmamrtrtance attivnes.
➢ tleae2n[esal a em,M1 Nn Nese. Use uil/ry pmvber
4. C/ea aano apo�lo ty o as Pul,�➢ unY�i,ie
wlgge u,iline wNeann[ mrt nn ret
lo9rtM1MWRI3]-CO2-➢M]
January 2022 Page 5-100
no
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
ELECT R I C S[R"ICE CENTER 1001 MainStreet Springfield, OR 97477-4819 Tel 541.726.2395 Faa 5419262399 wwwsvbuti I—.
March 25, 2022
Jenna Fribley
Campfire Collaborative Architecture & Design
341 Main Street
Springfield, OR 97477
RE: Capacity requirements to adequately serve the project at 448 Main Street
Dear Jenna:
The requested electrical service has the following characteristics:
Panel Size: 1,000 Amp
Voltage: 1201208 Volt, Three Phase
Given these criteria, SUB has the following capacity requirements to serve the project
for which the cost will be the responsibility of the developer:
1. Utility Transformer capacity. SUB will install an upgraded vault and transformer
to provide sufficient capacity for the development.
2. Utility Secondary capacity. SUB will install additional conduit and conductor to
connect the new/upgraded transformer to the existing secondary
conduiticonductor system.
3. Utility Infrastructure design. Utility infrastructure design will be completed by
SUB and the utility will coordinate the adjustment and/or installation of electric
facilities with the developer.
4. Utility Infrastructure Installation. Infrastructure will be installed in accordance
to the terms of a construction agreement between SUB and the developer.
The electric distribution system shall be designed and installed to adequately serve the
development in accordance with the Springfield Utility Board's Development and
Redevelopment Policy.
ncer
Si�tX/%'L lye /p
/V
J"
Dan Norland
Electric Engineering Technician
541-744-3784
Enclosure:
Electric Utility Work
Temporary Pole Location
ATT-0
TENTATIVE STEP PLAN FOR TEMP OVERHEAD POWER SOUR E
WEDNESDAY INSTALL POLE AND CONDUIT TO VAULT 75GG09
THURSDAY INSTALL OVERHEAD TRANSFORMER BANK AND CONDUCTOR
FRIDAY EARLYSTART SAM-9AM TRANSFER SERVICES TO OVERHEAD TRANSFORMER BANK
REMOVE PADMOUNT TRANSFORMERS AND PRIMARY/SECONDARY IN VAULT 99AO17/99AO18
WEEKEND -
MONDAY
CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING VAULTS 99AO17/99AOIB
TUESDAY
CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH ALLEY AND INTERCEPT EXISTING 5" CONDUIT
WEDNESDAY
CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH ALLEY AND INTERCEPT EXISTING 5" CONDUIT
THURSDAY
CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL NEW S'X 7' VAULT 22C005
FRIDAY
CONTRACTOR CLEANUP AND TEMPORARY ALLEY RESTORATION
- WEEKEND -
MONDAY PULL PRIMARY BACK TO NEW VAULT 200005
TUESDAY SECONDARY TO 500 MAI N VAULT AND SET TRANSFORMER ON VAULT 200005
WEDNESDAY NIGHT WORK 7PM— 12AM CONVERT 500 MAIN STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE
THURSDAY NO WORK. CREW ON REST.
FRIDAY EARLYSTART 4AM —9AM CONVERT 141/149 STH STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE.
CONVERT 538 MAIN STREET TO 120/208V, 3 PHASE. SECONDARY TO VAULT 75GO09
- WEEKEND -
MONDAY OVERTIME 7AM— 7PM SECONDARY FROM VAULT 75G009 TO 448 MAIN. CONVERT 440,
444, 448 MAIN STREET.
TUESDAY REMOVE OVERHEADTEMP TRANSFORMER BANK AND CONDUCTOR
WEDNESDAY REMOVE POLE AND CONDUIT.
THURSDAY CONTRACTOR CONCRETE REPAIR FOR SIDEWALK AND 2 PANELS IN ALLEY.
FRIDAY CLEANUP/FINISH
Note: DatesMrnes are subject to change.
Creative "'
d dent t
e
t_
Our Sewing Room
TB'np1fDf y C1O"'d merald Art Center
M
center ►r
c�•r
k
The Simps> - � Z'
+� Spnng(ield Mural
+u
Hearts For ospice
fff-
CONSTRUCTION ��AGREEMENT
.paG�yR E EM EN T
T MMREEMENImadeandaderedinmtksday iP�a M)'F 2G2z, by and between Me cm
OF SPMNGEIEED, OREGON, a municipal mrmmtiorh zceng by and though the SPRINGFIELD UTUT, BOARD,
hereinafter referred to as Me firs, party, ands Maab Pmp"m LLC, harebaRa mis ned m n Me second party.
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Gnat parry owns and opera. munbipal assets, and water i share serving ends. and
adjacent m Me corporation limits ofsald city, and
WHEREAS. Me wound parry H planning Me deueloprnem and mnstruttbn of A Commerdal l ugdbq
located at AIX Melts frreet In lane Coumy, Ctepn said devebped for COMMERCIAL purposes, described
parficuhrhyasmicees,
TA%MAP:17�3531, TAR EOE: M W 0
WHEREAS,tlmeaend party has applied tOthefira parrifor shaerlal seracesfm said devebpmes, mw,
Maen,
IT N AGREED by and between the For Party and Me seond patty and each M caolderaden m pmmlMs and
agreemam ofMe others do hereby pmmbe ardagraeas "row :
I. The Springfield MGM Board does hereby upon m fmMll an decade distribution syaem for Me service of A
Commertal Bulling in acwdame adth plans nor ea emc devtlopmems shown on lob Number =W1
2. The second Party agree m pay Me first party Me wm of $4%899A payable before Me sten of wmerestion,
in amordame will Me Springfield Wilily Boards Deeebpment and to deaslupm,Bt Charge Prlk,
3. TheMrt parWs pans,speciriaUoru and development charges are based on Me assumptions Mat themmplae
dm tumnsysmm shall be lrestilel. BMettcmdPa h.l Mepbmandmntr Mederebpment
othathon ArWg lV abtl.Mesaandparry Mat[myforamadditimalcotsfrmrredbytheAntparry. Said
payment m be made prior m Me fi m party ennghing Me system alatr6al.
0. The second party ager to comply will all topes speeded in the mrent Elemdc 0eveloprsem and
Redeveloper. Onew Policyin eRectatthe timethis agreemelrt Is entered into.
S. The semnd any requests installation of distribution acilNes or commence whhin 30 days of Me nauseant
data
6. The first parry agrees m make a conceited short m commence translation of distribution facilides within 30
this of Me second parrys requested installation; date provided Me seumd parry don rut ohMecl or dories
Me Net partys auras. Within 180 days refthedateefthis agremem, lithe it party dons ml per( mics
responsibilities underMe agreement, Me first parry has re, further obligation under this agreement
7. This agreement shall he binding upon bars, executars, admmistamre, su cexm¢ and assignee of the
respecdy<wmn.
8. NolBingherein mmalnedenall bemnstrued as limbinUMefirat Wrtyorthesemnd party In anymanna ucept
as herein sat fords impar re seMces, maers and Me reading therm(and Me billing for consumption, and
asocamd serrAa clargex are toncaned.
9. "If sun or leplacfion hwlihrted by ekha party for Me purpose of<nforeing the tame of this ageemem, Me
prevafling pads shall he entitled to judgnent spirit the oder party for Me preWiling parties reasonable
aRwneyhn and court costsa �as ydaermine l bythe Court retrial or wry appealthere8wn.
Rossinia3A� //re^4022
B, Z� B
n�0ir- Wvftl R gnen
CHoene Engineering
&Gpermons PreP
SPRINGFIELD UTILITY BOARD
WATER SERVICE CENTER 202 South 18th Street, Springfield, OR 97477-5240 Tel 541-72&2396 Fax 541-7477348 wwwsubutitmm
TO: Drew Larson
City of Springfield
225 N. 5th Street
Springfield, OR 97477
DATE: October 11, 2021
SUBJECT: SUB Water comments for DIM 811 -21 -000257 -PRE, David Loveall
Listed below are our comments for the above referenced development proposal:
1. The proposed development is within the Springfield city limits and currently receives water service
from the Springfield Utility Board (SUB).
2. Please ask the developer to contact SUB Water Division for detailed information regarding any
proposed modification of the existing water service(s) or any additional water services to the
proposed development.
3. SUB and the City of Springfield are separate entities. Any water related items affecting your
development will need to be coordinated through SUB Water Division independently from any items
or submittals that maybe required by the City. please contact the SUB Water Division fordemged
Information regarding any water service(s)W the proposed development.
4. Non-residential backflow prevention assemblies are required to be installed downstream, aboveground and
adjacent to the water/fire/irrigation service. New non-residential water services(domestic and irrigation)
requ Ire the Installation of a Reduced Pressure Backfiox, Assembly (RPSA).
S. New residential water services with lawn sprinkler systems or other cross -connection hazards will req ulma
Reduced Pressure Backflow Assembly (RPRA) installed above ground and at a location between a tap on the
domestic service line and the irrigation system. Residential fire systems Containing anti -freeze compounds or
any other chemicals shall be Isolated using a RPBA. If no chemicals are used in the fire system, then a Double
Check Valve Assembly (DCVA) is required. These assemblies are required to be installed above ground and at
a location between a tap on the domestic service line and the fire system.
6. All non-residential domestic water, fire, and/or irrigation service(s) will require the installation ore backflow
prevention assembly(ies).
7. All backflow prevention assembly design plans must be submitted W SUB Water Division for approval. For
more detailed information about SU B's Cross Connection Control Program Standards contact the Water
Division at 541-726-2396 or refer to SUB's website at: http://www.subutil.com/water/crosYconnecton-
control-and-backflow-protection/.
8. Springfield has several wellhead protection areas. Ninety percent of Springfield's drinking water comes from
wells. In every instance, care shall be taken to prevent groundwater contamination.
Contractors/developers/mmers shall be responsible for the safe handling and storage of chemicals,
petroleum products, fertilizers, and the prevention of groundwater and storm water runoff contamination.
Special requirements maybe necessary for groundwater protection at this development. Formoredetailed
information, contact the SUB Water Division Drinking Water Source Protection Coordinator at 541-726-2396.
PLEASE NOTE: SUB development charges are paid directly to SUB Water Division and SUB Electric Division.
Sincerely,
SpOtgfreld Udliry Board—Water Division
Hi Andrew,
Attached is what I have sent to the architect and the owner has filled out our meter sizing
form. The owner is also working with our Water Quality manager on the placement of the
backflow assemblies for the fire and domestic service. I am working with the owner on
sizing the domestic water service. The 12" PVC water main that is under the sidewalk will
supply any amount of water that this site will need. The static water pressure at the water
main is 50 psi. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Scott Higley
Engineering Technician
Springfield Utility Board
Water Service Center
202 South 18th Sheet
Springfield, OR. 97477
e-mail scotth@subutil.cum
www.subutil.com
general (541)-726-2396
direct (541)-736-3295
cell (541)-501-1750
fax (541)-747-7348
From: HIGLEY Scott <scotth@subutil.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 2:47 PM
To: 'Jenna Fribley' Senna@campfirelab.com>
Cc: Water Engineering <Waterengineering@subutil.twm>; RebeccaW
<RebeccaW @ subutil.com>
Subject: RE: 448 MAIN ST
Hi Jenna,
Attached is a pdf of the water map and the letter that went to the city. Please let me know
if you need anything else. I have sent the meter sizing for to Harvey and Price this
morning and need to see any plans that you have for this development.
Thanks,
Scott Higley
Engineering Technician
Springfield Utility Board
Water Service Center
202 South 18th Street
ATT 8
From:
NIGLEYScottsocbb@subull.mm d
Subject:
FW: 446 MAIN ST
Dete:
December 16, 2021 at 7:40 AM''
To:
Drew Larson alarsonePspringfield-or.gov
De:
Water Englneenig Waterengineering@subulil.com, janna campfirelab.mm lenna4tcempfirelanoom
Hi Andrew,
Attached is what I have sent to the architect and the owner has filled out our meter sizing
form. The owner is also working with our Water Quality manager on the placement of the
backflow assemblies for the fire and domestic service. I am working with the owner on
sizing the domestic water service. The 12" PVC water main that is under the sidewalk will
supply any amount of water that this site will need. The static water pressure at the water
main is 50 psi. Please let me know if you need anything else.
Thanks,
Scott Higley
Engineering Technician
Springfield Utility Board
Water Service Center
202 South 18th Sheet
Springfield, OR. 97477
e-mail scotth@subutil.cum
www.subutil.com
general (541)-726-2396
direct (541)-736-3295
cell (541)-501-1750
fax (541)-747-7348
From: HIGLEY Scott <scotth@subutil.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2021 2:47 PM
To: 'Jenna Fribley' Senna@campfirelab.com>
Cc: Water Engineering <Waterengineering@subutil.twm>; RebeccaW
<RebeccaW @ subutil.com>
Subject: RE: 448 MAIN ST
Hi Jenna,
Attached is a pdf of the water map and the letter that went to the city. Please let me know
if you need anything else. I have sent the meter sizing for to Harvey and Price this
morning and need to see any plans that you have for this development.
Thanks,
Scott Higley
Engineering Technician
Springfield Utility Board
Water Service Center
202 South 18th Street
I
LO
CD
CD
v io AST
N
r 8V-95
6V-161
H -
s
�
AGF.
GANG
O
k /
IFN
138
75S
r
�N 134
151
N
N
d
140 130
-,\J .n _n .a Nv
ti-
1II •4" PVC.'8691
rln
116" DI,'07957
4 1;; S T
6V -167
4V-148
=IRE SERVICE
U)
Lo\1
121
V-1
tV I N
N
N rIll1
AGF.
GANG
O
F
IFN
pR�
G d
F-
1 22
('4[D0�_
NI
CO
44
dzt
9
M J
ti-
1II •4" PVC.'8691
rln
116" DI,'07957
4 1;; S T
6V -167
4V-148
=IRE SERVICE
U)
Lo\1
121
V-1
tV I N
N
N rIll1
HARVEY$. PRfCE
Project: 448 Main.
Site Address 448 Main St. Springfield, Or. 97477
Regarding: Building Sewer Video.
Author of document: gen Ellis, Harvey & Price.
Date: 1/22/22
Upon reviewing the building drain videos offered on this project, here's our thoughts.
The existing drain line makes multiple offsets that could and should be alleviated. The portion nearest
the building has roots inside of the pipe. The roots appear to enter through inconsistent and poorly
made pipe joints.
The last few feet before the connection with the 10" sewer lateral appear to be sloped at roughly 45°
upward off the 10". This same sloped run appears to be in good shape and is root free.
Our recommendation is to replace the building sewerfrom the upstream end of the first piece off of the
10" main. This allows the existing 10" x 4" building sewer connection to remain in use while replacing
the inferior section of existing 4" pipe.
Regards,
Ben Ellis.
I/ILLIENNOWN
LIGHTING
Millennium Lighting
w .millenniumlighting.com
LEDRS10 -LED R SERIES OUTDOOR 10" ANGLE SHADE
This item can be converted to a pendant or wall sconce with
purchase of separate compatible downrod or goose neck
Please see compatible downrods and arms below:
Compatible downrods P5, R52, and R53
Compatible with arms: RGN10, RGN12, RGN13, RGN15, RGN22, RGNZ,
RGN24, RGN30, and RCN41
Compatible with wire guard: RWG10
LEDRAS10-SB
12 SERIES
Dimensions
Width
10 -
Height
P -
Wire Length
100"
Weight
2.51 lbs.
Finish 8 Material
Finishes SB - Satin Black
Material Metal
LED Light Engine
11W LED
90 CRI
800 Lumens
3000k
50,000 Hour Lifespan
Constructed in Aluminum
S Year Warranty
Replaceable LED Module
Certification
UL Listed Wet Location
Item Number
SKU'S LEDRASIO-SB
xoh: al rhushes m o.J.r Iim fre must Is. properly
ma Gln lautl 1—tru! T ererorg—suis. deaning
rriod rs inch as reju lontNnlsM1 prearving8reneairng
pmm,aearrn a:aan.4naG. `''M`^n`.(.e�g`^h`�n Vt10.1.Gn \IIIIVa Us NK VWn ��`�k UAA^AM1lil
R SERIES
ATT -10
R SERIES OPTIONS
GOOSE NECKS - (WALL MOUNT)
PGNIG PGNi2 RGNB 10, 314-
RGN15
FINISHES
ABR -Architectural Bronze
P,l AL-Awminum
,o' W Aluminum Painted Satin Black
y. E
14V CA
G.I3, GA-Galvanizetl
GV -Gray
RGN22 RGN23 RGIIM NB- Navy Blue
NC- Natural Copper
'6a 'r T T SB -Satin Black
6y 1<-1'6 +I SG - Satin Green
11$ Jhi Red
WH -W
E I1x- ZI k IE SR Zr WH -White
@ H 31
RGTN3G PGN41
13" B
�' IE 3r
�E 41 3 uavlP.m
reNea
STEMS AND CANOPY KITS -(CEILING MOUNT)
RSCM
WIRE GUARDS
RSCKWmgle)
O FINISHES
w6
ABR - Architectural Bronze
CPCopper
ABR-Architectual Bronze
e% CP - Copper
RSI
y --IF— 11-
=� GA - Galvanized
GV -Gray
E
SG - Satin Green
_
NB - Navy Blue
BR -hi Red
RSCKSS(m°Aael•1 SB -Satin Black
u
SG - Satin Green
O SA in Red
R$2
RYI410
M
WH - W
WH White
4A
Y�
R53
WALL MOUNT SWIVELS
WIRE GUARDS
Mw FINISHES
w6
ABR - Architectural Bronze
CPCopper
GA - Galva
y --IF— 11-
SB -Satin Black Black
E
SG - Satin Green
flwR4
BR -hi Red
E _" WH- - White
>xJ,
14"
PtlG¢
T,— 1=<3I
RYI410
M
R SERIES
STEM CONNECTORS
RC Accepts 3/4`stem
FINISHES
I`vJl ABR - ArchiteRural Bronze
+x' AL -Aluminum
CP - Copper
GA - Galvanized
GV - Gray
NB - Navy Blue
SB - Satin Black
SG - Satin Green
SR - Satin Red
WH - White
FINISHES
ABR -Architectural Bronze
CA - Cal,anized
GY-Gray
NB - Navy Blue
SB - Satin Black
SG - Satin Green
SR - Satin Red
WH - White
sa3vls ���
p �0L'61£ Mem ,91 a
Qi N
3
lw —
LLI
� 0
r
i
d
iTd'611
oQ
Z
,
c4
m
M1i
2
g
w
i�l
„
o
w
r
N
d'
F
a
u
r
0
3
i
�0L'01£
3..oE
,Ce1
i
d
a
p
,
Jd
m
M1i
2
g
v3
i�l
F
a
u
0
�0L'01£
3..oE
,Ce1
Z
O
W
�
of
W
J
133L1S
n15
i
d
m
F
m
2
g
r
s
u
Z
Z
O
W
�
Ld
W
J
a
0
�
m
2Lr ,r.r -
39017503 -
- TL 17-03.3531-04501
EASEMENT
THIS INDENTURE MADE and entered Into this 19'A day of T'Eb -09 -V - ,1999, by and between CITY OF
SPRINGFIELD, emunidpal corporation In Lane County, Oregon, heminafterrefened to satins Grantors, and The City
of Springfieldacting byand throughIts SPRINGFIELD UTILITYBOARD, and unto imsucces acre; heminafterraferred
to as the Grantee._
WITNESSETH: In consideration of the acceptance by Grantee and the use or holding of said easements for present
or future. public use by Grantee. Grantors hereby grant, bargain, sell and convey unto the Grantee, a perpetual
easement as hereinafter described, together with the right to go upon saitl easement area for the purpose of
constructing,.. reconstructing, maintaining, operating and using electrical transmission, distribution and
telecommunications fmillim which Include butare not limited to bareformersand vaults, which mai hereafter
be Installed on the following described property, towit
Two easements located on that tract of land conveyed from Springfield Development Corporation to the City of
Springfield, described by deed recorded February 14;1980, in Real 1057R, Reception No. 8008003, Dead Records
of Lane County, Oregon, being more completely described as follows
:-
Easement A:(15Yt5')..
to Springfield, as platted and recorded in Book -W
on the Northerly margin ofen East- West alley; tm
thence Eastady 15.00 teak thence Southerly 15.00
along Northerly margin of said alley, 15.00 feet to
Easement B: (18N32-)
Beginning atthe Northwest comer afBlook 88 o1 Mi
and recorded In Book 25, Page 308, Dead Recon
Northerly right of way of 'K Street; thence lasvir
Northerly margin ofand East- West alley; thence%
point of beginning; thence continuing along saitl
Northerly margin of said alley. Northerly 32.00 feet
point of beginning, In lane County, Oregon
comerof Lotto, Black 9,01' Kelly's Addition
d of Lane County, Oregon, said point being
rargin ofalleyand run Northerly 15.00 feet;
rtherly margin of said alley, thence Easterly
in Lane County, Oregon.
and Power Company's Addition, as flatted!
on; run thence Easterly 145 fast along the
f way Southerly 119 feet W a point an the
any margin of the alley7.00 feet to the true
tery 18.00 fact to a point thence leaving
eat fiance Southerly 32.00 fest to the true
56aF®.25'9980M
2A29F®.25'9"02PFWO
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the above easement to the said Grantee, fis heirs ant assigns forever.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantorabove named have hereunto set Meir hand and seat this I�n1 day of
to
,1999.
35
(SEAL) �'.y
t Dan E. Brown a
Public Works Director for the City of Springfield
STATE OF OREGON)TY IA
CIS I m � z a
COUNOF NE) SS m aE N
ot
Onthlsl!i' dayof tefERJJOQ.y 1989, before me personallyappeared Dan E.Brown, whose Mentiyiswas
proved to me an the basis Ofsatisfactoryevidence. and did say Mat he is Me Public Worcs Director of Me City of
Springfield, and that said document was signed by him in behalf of said corporation by authority of its bylaws, and
acknowledged to me that saidcorporation executed the same. n'
Notary-Publia For Oregon
OFRCIALBEAL r � , r. ?-CO?-
Us
p My Commission Expires on u
BOrMYPOaUs
NM4WNIkipF>PIRFBHaeda'aP
BLILIMC
1901 WVNSP.
"MMIH4Tf
//9y' U 990 61
ai p ai I I a0� a:
1
SEE
ZZSUPPLEMENi�L MAV
WSao 4 Sow Za ae� w ae
w I w
3000 f N 3300 3b
a i
8c1
5
D0o � 3 1.4501 1 45f
l4 M Yµ Y
eioo B9o0 �Oo 9700
i
-. Fe FOR
m
L
No. I STREET I center
F—
N
E)
a
SOO
Map 17 03.
35 2
4 -
ai p ai I I a0� a:
1
SEE
ZZSUPPLEMENi�L MAV
WSao 4 Sow Za ae� w ae
w I w
3000 f N 3300 3b
a i
8c1
5
D0o � 3 1.4501 1 45f
l4 M Yµ Y
eioo B9o0 �Oo 9700
i
-. Fe FOR
m
L
No. I STREET I center
F—
N
E)
a