Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 3/9/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ 111- Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: ElMa'or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal, ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: ❑ Ma'or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant. complete this section) Applicant Name: Adam Man rich Phone: 541 342-7210 Company: Systems West Engineers Email: amanrich@s stemsw Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 tengineers.com Applicant's Rep.: Peter Kin Phone:541-650-0529 Company: Rowell Brokaw Email: eter@rowellbrokaw.c Address: 1203 Willamette St, Eugene OR Property Owner: 725 A Street LLC Phone: 541 342-7210 Company: C/O Adam Mangrich Email: amanrich@s stemsw Address: 1250 E 29th PL, Eugene OR, 97402 tengineers.com ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033542 TAX LOT NOS : 04900 Property Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 ❑PropSize of Property: 21,300 Acres ❑ S uare Feet x Droa No. ps NA Proposed Name of Project: Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Demolition of existing drive through, buildincl envelope repair and partial remcladdincl Existing Use: Office New Impervious Surface Coverage (Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 0 sf Si natures: Please sign and Drint Mour name and date in the aDDroDriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., Associated Applications: box on the next.a e complete this section) Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 Id 1 of 11 IM Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. Pre -Submittal Owner: The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby ackn I ge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, informatj�i, ecuests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Feb. 11, 2022 Signature Adam Mangrich Submittal I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This s m serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.176 pertaining to a complete applica Owner: Feb. 11, 2022 Date: Signature Adam Mangrich Print Revised 1/7/14 Ia 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 160 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ❑ Copy of the Deed ❑ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑ All plan sets must be folded to 61/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 1/7/14 KL 4 of 11 SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO ,a.t Site Assessment of Existing Conditions AND A-111 SITE PLAN LvJ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor Vicinity Map ® The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. NA ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department NA ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision NA ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department El Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 '/3 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO AND A-111 SITE PLAN Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor ® Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. NON—BUIWINc Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs [� Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections ® Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces oveaAu.1.eNSiONSOPrxe IOr Ane PnOvmeo NA ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district NA ❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation NO NEW PFoPoss. ® Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces ® Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within '/3 mile) VAO Nm PIAN Revised 1/7/14 Ia 5 of 11 NA ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses NA ❑ Phased Development Plan - where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO ANDA -111 SITE PLAN Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor NA ❑ Location and width of all existing easements NOEASMENTS VJ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof drainage. SIP EFTS AND ALLEYS NOTED. NOT CHANGE TO ROUE RUNOFF PROPOSED. Location and type of existing street lighting EXISTING LIGHT ROLES NOTED [� Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities dLocation, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails NA ❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate �{ to the complexity of the proposed project. NONEWSERVICEOROONNECTIONS R1 Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. DRAINAGE AND EXISTING GRADING DIAGRAM INCLUDED d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan NON.GRADINGORUTLRYCoNNECToL$ ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below EZ The approximate size and location of storm water management systems components 66 Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -of -ways within or adjacent to the proposed development Location and width of all proposed easements NONE Location and type of proposed street lighting NONEWSTREETLIGHTS.EXISTINGNOIED [Information on existing slopes over 5% shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed surveyor and be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land with a slope over 10 percent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines NONE>uGRADING.ALLEXISTINGLOWSLOPE& Revised 1/7/14 Ia 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan SEE A-111 SITE PLAN Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage NO NEW SCREENING PUNTING. PUNTING FENS LOCATED WITH AREAS ® Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 NONEWSCREENING PUNTING LA Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans SEE A-111 SITE PLAN ® Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan SEE LIGHTING PLANS AND RENDERINGS ® Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: DEFERR FINAL PUNTING List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing NA ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. NOSTORMWATESCOPEINPRWECT ® Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. Photometric test report for each light source. [� An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: NA ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. NA ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1/7/14 Ia 7 of 11 NA ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 NA ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW NA ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives SEE NARMVE NA ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. NA ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 NA ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property NA ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request NA ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development NA ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 NA ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 Ia 8 of 11 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX. 541.736.1021 www.spnngfield-orgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stonnwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS U 17 rrrrr 31b4LCeI91 ri7 V,P"IN N:1 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attu: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: httv://www.springfield- or.gov/DPW/EnginmringmdConstructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachern, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachem@springfieldor.gov Phone: (541) 736 —1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD 225 FIFTH STREET OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX: 541.726.1021 www.spdrygfiald­or.gov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK ----------- — (Area below this b'sefdled out by Applicant) __— (Please return to Clayton MEachern @ City ofSprtngiiield Development and Public Works, Fan # 736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), enwd:cnae�lern@sprirtglleldor.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: (Area below this line /'died outby the City andReturned m the Aaabeand (At a nurumuan, all boxes checked by the City on the front and backoftlus sheet shall be subnutted or on application to be coaWletefor subnuttal, afthough other requirements n be recess Drainage Study Type (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study—(use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study— (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wedand/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachem @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfeAd-or,gov, FAX., (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS r Baredupon the tnfor nation provided on tie front ofdds sheet, the follou>ing represents a ndndnnou of uvh w it merkdfor on application to be complete for subnddal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu ofde Sprirgtield Development Cork (SDC) or the City's Engineering Design A3mma1. Connpltance with these requirements does not constitute site appromol, Adebooml site specific information nary be required Note: Upon scoping sheet subndttal, ensure completedfornu has been signed in the spare provickel below: Interim Design Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e. g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stonmvater quality. Additionally, aminimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ ❑ Where required, vegetative stommwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Stormrmer Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stomrmvater Management Manual (Sec2A.1). ❑ ❑ If a stormrmer treatment Swale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stomrmvater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. drains. ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year stoma event and overflow effects of a 25 -year stoma event Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. Review ofDownstream System EDSPM Section 4.03A.0 ❑ A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ n Design of Stoma Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ ❑ Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set ❑ ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 15 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 50,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All stoma pipes shall be designed to Other/Miscethmeous ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ Private stommwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stommater flows from one property to another. ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03A A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEQ. Refer to thewebsite: him/Avww.deo.state.or.ushvo/uic/uic.htm for more infomuation. ❑ Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *Thisform simU be inchukd m nn Nhuhmen5 inside the frontcover, ofthe stormnsder shady. * IAWORTANT..- ENGINEER PLEASE READ BEEOWAND SIGN' As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stommater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 ROWELL BROKAW Site Plan Review Application Narrative Note: Revisions are shown in BLUE. Issued by: Serena Lim, Project Manager Peter King, Project Architect Project Site Subject site: Lane County Map No. 17033542, Tax Lot 04900 Size (gross): 0.49 acres / 21,301 square feet FAR: 0.34 (existing) of 0.40 (minimum), no change proposed Zoning: Mixed -Use Commercial Zoning overlays: Nodal Development Overlay Applicable Code Sections: 1. 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards 2. 3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards (Nodal Development Overlay District) 3. 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District 4. 5.17-125 Site Plan Review Criteria Project Description: The subject property is a former bank with an adjacent drive-through and parking lot, now used as commercial office space by Systems West Engineers (SWE). SWE has no use for the drive-through and would like to repair the building's exterior in concert with rebranding efforts and a grand opening in spring of 2022. The proposed project includes removal of the existing drive-through canopy and associated drive aisles, removal of the single -lane driveway on A Street and repair of the curb and sidewalk in its place, revised parking stripes, expansion of existing planters along the building's north and west elevations, and replacement of some existing cladding with new cladding materials. No other changes or alterations are proposed to the existing building, structure, or window and door openings. There will be no change to the building area. Page l of 1203 Willamette suite 210 8 March 2022 Eugene, Oregon 87401 541 4851003 mwellbmkaw. conn Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding Systems West Engineers a,.1hi . Design. strategy 725 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review Application Narrative Note: Revisions are shown in BLUE. Issued by: Serena Lim, Project Manager Peter King, Project Architect Project Site Subject site: Lane County Map No. 17033542, Tax Lot 04900 Size (gross): 0.49 acres / 21,301 square feet FAR: 0.34 (existing) of 0.40 (minimum), no change proposed Zoning: Mixed -Use Commercial Zoning overlays: Nodal Development Overlay Applicable Code Sections: 1. 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards 2. 3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards (Nodal Development Overlay District) 3. 3.3-200 Drinking Water Protection Overlay District 4. 5.17-125 Site Plan Review Criteria Project Description: The subject property is a former bank with an adjacent drive-through and parking lot, now used as commercial office space by Systems West Engineers (SWE). SWE has no use for the drive-through and would like to repair the building's exterior in concert with rebranding efforts and a grand opening in spring of 2022. The proposed project includes removal of the existing drive-through canopy and associated drive aisles, removal of the single -lane driveway on A Street and repair of the curb and sidewalk in its place, revised parking stripes, expansion of existing planters along the building's north and west elevations, and replacement of some existing cladding with new cladding materials. No other changes or alterations are proposed to the existing building, structure, or window and door openings. There will be no change to the building area. Page l of Design Team Owner 725 A Street LLC c/o Adam Mangrich 1250 E 291M1 PI Eugene OR 97403 Architect Rowell Brokaw Architects John Rowell, Principal in Charge Peter King, Project Architect Serena Lim, Designer/Project Manager Lorri Nelson, Landscape Architect Structural Engineer Branch Engineering, Inc. Rick Hernandez, P.E., S.E., Project Manager CM/GC McKenzie Commercial Jim Mender, Project Manager & Cost Estimator Documents Attached to this Application 1. Sheet G -001 -Cover 2. Sheet A-005 - Perspective Renderings 3. Sheet A-010 - Site Plan - Existing and Demolition 4. Sheet A-111 - Site Plan 5. Sheet A-112 - Planting Plan 6. Sheet A-113 - Roof Plan and I" Floor RCP 7. Sheet A-201 - Elevations - Demo 8. Sheet A-202 - Elevations 9. Sheet A-301 - Wall Sections 10. Sheet A-311 - Exterior Details 11. Sheet A-313 - Exterior / Site Details 12. Underground Sprinkler Specification 13. Parklex Product Guide ROW ELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 2 of 7 III ! I f!1I G1 J 9_1 11110 6111 17-11119 q 1. Mixed -Use Development Standards, Section 3.2-625 A. Section 3.2-625.A.1 requires all elevations of buildings abutting any street to provide at least 50% of their length and at least 25% of the ground floor area as windows and/or doors allowing views in... On corner lots/parcels this provision applies to both elevations. 4 The subject parcel is a corner lot and the existing building's north and west facades face the public right-of-way. The impact of the west facade on pedestrians is limited because it is set back approximately 100 feet from 7°h Street, and separated from the sidewalk by the existing parking lot. The existing north elevation along A Street is 55% glazed (by length and ground - level wall area) and complies with this requirement. The existing west elevation along 7th Street is glazed on 32% of the length and 22% of the ground -level wall area, so this facade is an existing nonconforming condition. One reason for the solidity of the west wall is that the bank vault is located in the south west corner of the building. While no changes are proposed to the existing wall openings, new bold -colored sunshades at each of the existing punched openings and new landscaping along the west wall of the building will provide pedestrian -scale interest on the west elevation. B. Section 3.2-625.A.2 requires at least 30% (linear) of the primary entrance elevation to be windows with views into lobbies, displays, or working areas for all industrial uses. 4 The existing north elevation includes the primary entrance and is 55% glazed. The existing elevation complies with this standard. (OR the standard only applies to industrial uses and is not applicable). C. Section 3.2-625.A.3.a-c requires wall offsets in the form of 4 -foot recesses, or 4 - foot extensions, or 3 -foot roof elevation changes at least every 50 feet. 4 The primary building facade along A street meets this standard. The existing west face of the building abutting the existing parking lot is mostly straight and is an existing non -conforming condition. Because the scope of this project is limited to exterior repairs and cosmetic improvements, changing the existing structure to meet this standard would pose an unreasonable burden on the Owner and such changes are not proposed. D. Section 3.2-625.A.4 requires the inclusion of architectural features (e.g. offsets, windows, wood siding, brick, stucco, textured materials) to break up expanses of single -element building elevations. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 3 of 7 4 The existing north and south elevations comply with this standard; stone cladding and floor -to -ceiling windows alternate with stucco exterior walls. A combination of new phenolic (wood) rainscreen cladding, new metal cladding, and freshly painted existing stucco are proposed to improve the appearance of the north and south facades; the existing stone cladding is to remain. The existing west facade is rundown, lacks composition, and is visually busy; the proposed metal cladding will simplify the overall material palette and unify the building's features. Three new sunshades will protrude appx. 2 feet from the wall and will be painted a bold color to punctuate the west elevation. The expansion of an existing planter will accommodate new landscaping that will provide natural colors and textures along the entire west elevation. E. Section 3.2-625.A.5 requires differentiation between the ground level and upper stores through the use of bays, balconies, awnings, canopies, variation in materials, etc. 4 This standard is not applicable because the 2 n floor of the building is primarily attic and storage space. (See I.D. response for a description of the building's exterior features.) F. Section 3.2-625.A.6 pertains to structures listed on the Springfield Historic Landmark Inventory and does not apply. G. The requirements of Section 3.2-625.8 pertain to new buildings and do not apply. H. Section 3.2-625.0 requires the provision of weather -protected areas (awnings, canopies) adjacent to sidewalks and plazas for new developments. 4 The existing building features a prominent overhang that provides ample protection from weather at the primary entrance along A street. The overhang wraps from the northeast corner to the northwest corner of the building and is echoed by a change in materials at the southwest corner that continues above the recessed (covered) south/rear entrance along the public alley. I. Section 3.2-625.D.1.a requires mixed-use developments to provide landscaping and screening in accordance with Sections 4.4-105 and 4.4-110. 4 Standard 4.4-105 pertains to new developments and is not applicable. However, expanded landscaped areas are proposed adjacent to the existing main entrance and along the west elevation of the existing building. Per Standard 4.4-105.6, the existing irrigation system will be extended to support new landscaping. Per Standard 4.4-105.1, existing plants and trees to remain will be protected or not impacted by the proposed project. Standards 4.4-110.A.1-3 and 5-6 are not applicable to the subject property. Standard 4.4-110.A.4 requires screening for trash receptacles. Office trash and recycling is located in the covered area (south/rear entrance) along the public alley. The alley meets this requirement, per 02/17/2022 Pre -Submittal meeting discussion. ROW ELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 4 of 7 I Section 3.2-625.D.1.b requires street trees in accordance with Section 4.2-140. 4 The requirements of this section are not applicable because the scope of site improvements is limited to the demolition area and planters immediately adjacent to the exterior walls of the existing building. No improvements to the parking lot or surrounding sidewalks are proposed; existing trees are to remain. K. Section 3.2-625.D.2 requires screening in accordance with Section 4.4-110 and subsections a -c. 4 Standard 3.2-625.D.2.a pertains to areas abutting residential districts and does not apply. Standard 3.2-625.D.2.b requires ground -mounted utility equipment to be located to minimize visual impact or screened. No new above-ground/ground-mounted utility equipment is proposed, and all existing above-ground/ground-mounted utility equipment to remain is either placed in a discrete location or screened by equipment covers or landscaping. Standard 3.2-625.D.2.c requires landscaping to attain 50% coverage within 2 years and 100% coverage within 4 years. The proposed new landscaping is designed and species selected to meet this requirement. L. Section 3.2-625.D.3 requires irrigation systems to support landscaping and encourages drought -resistant plants. 4 Existing irrigation systems will be extended to support new landscaping in the proposed expanded planter beds, and plant species have been selected with consideration for the conditions of their proposed location. M. Section 3.2-625.D.4 is redundant to Section 3.2-625.D.2.a-c. See above. N. Section 3.2-625.E.1-4 pertain to street networks and do not apply to the proposed project's limited scope of work. O. Standard 3.2-625.E.5 requires pedestrian paths and sidewalks to conveniently connect all building entrances with each other and to public rights-of-way. 4 Existing building entrances are directly accessible from the public right-of-way; the north entrance abuts the sidewalk to the north, and the south entrance abuts the public alley to the south. P. Section 3.2-625.F.1-5 pertains to a development's compatibility with surrounding parcels in other zones and does not apply to the subject property or the proposed scope of work. ROW ELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 5 of 7 O. Section 3.2-625.6 requires new structures and substantial improvements to existing buildings to provide pedestrian amenities. 4 These standards do not apply to the proposed project because the scope of work is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. However, the proposed landscaping and exterior lighting will improve the overall appearance and pedestrian experience of the site. 2. Nodal Development Overlay District - Minimum Density and General Development Standards, Section 3.3-1020 A. Section 3.3-1020.A requires a minimum FAR of 0.40 for parcels in a MUC zone. 4 The existing building and site have a FAR of 0.34 and are nonconforming, however this standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope of work is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. B. Section 3.3-1020.13 requires a maximum setback of 20 feet for commercial uses and no minimum setback. 4 The existing building complies with this standard on its north elevation and is nonconforming on its west elevation where an existing parking lot separates the building from the right-of-way. This standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. C. Section 3.3-1020.0 prohibits the location of parking areas between main buildings and the street. 4 The north (A street) side of the property complies with this standard (existing building and planters occupy 46% of site frontage). The west side is nonconforming where the existing parking lot separates the building from the right-of-way for the entire length of the property. This standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. 3. Drinking Water Protection Overlay District - Review, Section 3.3-225 A. Section 3.3-225 requires a DWP Overlay District Development Application when the criteria of both Subsections A.1 and A.2 are met. 4 The eastern portion of the subject property is within the 99 -year TOTZ. The proposed project will include a Building Permit (3.3-225.A.i.a) and Site Plan Review process (3.3-225.A.Lc). The proposed project will not change or affect the storage, use, and/or production of hazardous or other materials that propose a risk to groundwater (3.3-225.A.2.a) or increase the quantity of hazardous or other materials that pose a risk to groundwater that are stored, used, and/or produced on site (3.3-225.A.2.b). The applicant seeks exemption from this requirement. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 6 of 7 4. Site Plan Review Criteria - Section 5.17-125 A. Section 5.17-125.A requires the zoning to be consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and applicable maps. 4 There are no proposed changes to the existing zoning of the site. B. Section 5.17-125.6 requires the facility to meet capacity requirements for water, electricity, sanitary sewer, stormwater, and street and traffic safety. 4 None of the proposed improvements are expected to increase loads on the existing water, electricity, sanitary sewer, stormwater, street or traffic safety systems. C. Section 5.17-125.0 requires developments to comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. 4 The proposed project will comply with all applicable standards and regulations as addressed in this narrative and as shown in the attached documents. D. Section 5.17-125.D requires parking and ingress -egress points to facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety, avoid congestion, and provide connectivity with adjacent residential areas, transit stops, activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas, and minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets. 4 The proposed changes to the existing driveways and parking configuration reflect the removal of the existing drive-through facility and will improve the vehicular circulation and overall safety of the site. E. Section 5.17-125.E requires the protection of features such as steep slopes with unstable soil, areas susceptible to flooding, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, waterways, riparian areas, and wetlands. 4 There are no such areas present on the subject property; existing mature trees and landscaping to remain will be protected. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 7 of 7 LL LE , -"., - ,I - .... - I OEM ©. ROWELL BROKAW ...... --------- X, 61 LL LE , -"., - ,I - .... - I OEM ©. F21' IttM9P w- NOT TO SCALE ROWELL BROKAW ...... --------- X, F21' IttM9P w- NOT TO SCALE SWE Envelope SECTION 32 8423 UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS PART1 GENERAL 1.01 SECTION INCLUDES A. Pipe and fittings, valves, sprinkler heads, and accessories. B. Control system. 1.02 RELATED REQUIREMENTS A. Division 26- Electrical. B. Division 31 - Earthwork C. Section 329300 -Planting 1.03 REFERENCE STANDARDS A. ASTM D2241 - Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Pressure -Rated Pipe (SDR Series); 2015. B. ASTM D2564- Standard Specification for Solvent Cements for Poly(Vinyl Chloride) (PVC) Plastic Piping Systems; 2012 (Reapproved 2018). C. NEMA 250- Enclosures for Electrical Equipment (1000 Volts Maximum); 2018. 1.04 ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS A. Coordination: Coordinate the work with site backfilling, landscape grading and delivery of plant life. B. Preinstallation Meeting: Convene one week prior to commencing work of this Section. 1.05 SUBMITTALS A. See Section 01 3000 -Administrative Requirements, for submittal procedures. B. Product Data: Provide component and control system and wiring diagrams. C. Record Documents: Indicate piping layout to water source, location of sleeves under pavement, location and coverage of sprinkler heads, components, plant and landscaping features, site structures, schedule of fittings to be used. Record actual locations of all concealed components. 1. Produce and keep current throughout the project. 2. Indicate two dimensions for valves, stub outs, and main line T's, L's, ends, elbows and change in direction. 3. Submit to Owner's Representative for approval. D. Quality Assurance Data: Submit license information and project references including name and location of previous projects, date of installation, square footage of areas with irrigation work, description of irrigation system and owner's Contact information. E. Operation and Maintenance Data: 1. Provide instructions for operation and maintenance of system and controls, seasonal activation and shutdown, and manufacturer's parts catalog. 2. Provide schedule indicating length of time each valve is required to be open to provide a determined amount ofwater. F. Maintenance Materials: Provide the following for Owner's use in maintenance of project. 1. See Section 01 6000- Product Requirements, for additional provisions. 2. Extra Sprinkler Heads: One of each type and size. 3. Extra Valve Keys for Manual Valves: One. 4. Extra Valve Box Keys: One. 5. Extra Valve Marker Keys: One. 6. Wrenches: One for each type head core and for removing and installing each type head. 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-1 SWE Envelope 1.06 QUALITY ASSURANCE A. Installer Qualifications: Company specializing in performing the work of this section with minimum 5 years of experience. 1. Successfully completed at least 5 comparable scale projects. 2. Submit names, addresses, dates, owners and locations of previous projects if requested by Owner's Representative. 3. Submit valid Oregon Landscape Contractors license and Landscape Business license (Plumbing license if plumbing is required). PART2 PRODUCTS 2.01 REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS A. Comply with applicable code for piping and component requirements. 2.02 IRRIGATION SYSTEM A. Use only new materials of brands and types specified herein. B. Substitutions: See Section 01 6000- Product Requirements. C. Irrigation design velocities shall not exceed five (5) feet per second. 2.03 PIPE MATERIALS A. PVC Pipe: ASTM D2241; 200 psi (1.38 MPa) pressure rated upstream from controls, 160 psi (1.10 MPa) downstream; solventwelded sockets. B. Pipe: PVC 1120, Schedule 40, Type 1, normal impact: IPS, NSF approved; conform to ASTM D1784,02241. C. Fittings: PVC Type 1, white schedule 40 and gray schedule 80; ASTM D1784, ASTM D2466 or ASTM D2464, as applicable. D. Risers: PVC Type 1, one piece schedule 80 gray PVC nipple, threaded both ends. ASTM D1784, ASTM D2464. No snap -risers. E. Swing Joint and Fittings: Install double swing joint risers at all rotors as detailed. Suring -Pipe, snap and "Funnypipe" risers not acceptable. F. Flex Riser- Assembly (spray heads only): 18"minimum, 3' maximum Swing Pipe with transfer barb 90 degree ells at both ends, and a marlex ell below the irrigation head. G. Electrical Conduit and Fittings: All fittings and pipe shall be installed per all applicable electrical codes and per Electrical Division 26 0000. All electrical conduit needs to be hard pipe, no flex pipe. H. Solvent Cement: ASTM D2564 for PVC pipe and fittings. 1. NSF approved solvent for Class 1245-6&C PVC, through 4:. R.G.Sloan Weld -On, Christy's pre -approved. Ensure that manufacturer's expiration date is not exceeded. I. Cleaner and Primer: Industrial Polychemical Service Co., Inc., No. P-70, or type as recommended by PVC Pipe Manufacturer. J. Sleeve Material: PVC Type 1, ASTM D1784, ASTM D2241. Any other pipe unacceptable. 1. Sleeves are required where irrigation pipe and/or wires cross under all hardscape surfaces. Sleeves shall extend one foot beyond edge of hardscape surfaces and set at depth in accordance with typical irrigation mainline depths. 2. 4" or 6" (4" minimum). 2.04 IRRIGATION HEADS A. Spray heads shall be professional/commercial grade. 1. Rainbird, 1800 PRS series, Hunter PRS 40 MP Rotator. 2. Mid-size, gear drive, Hunter 1-20 low angle and short radius, Rainbird 5000. 3. Large turf areas, Hunter 1-20 SS or 1-25 SS Series stainless steel. a. All spray heads installed with flex pipe, rotors installed with PVC swing joint assemblies. 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-2 SWE Envelope 4. Drip systems shall be installed only where conventional spray head systems are impractical, due to design constraints or other factors a. When used, they must be Rain bird brand drip line with automated stainless steel filtration system. 2.05 VALVES A. Isolation valves: Nibco T-113 gate valve with bronze handle or approved. B. Automatic Control Valves: Globe type, 200 psi rated, threaded connections, with cross type operating handle designed to receive operating key: Rainbird PEB-PRS-D Series, or pre -approved equal. C. Shut -Off Valves at Control Valves: USA manufacture, gate valves. 120 PSI cold water rated, construction to be brass or bronze on 2" and under valves. All gate valves to have bronze handle. Unionized angle -globe type sized to match mainline; Nibco, Champion or pre -approved equal. D. Quick Coupling Valves: New quick coupler valves are not allowed. See hose bib valve. E. Hose Bib Valve: 3/4" inverted garden valve, heavy duty with floating seat, loose key. Nibco or pre -approved equal. F. Manual Drain Valves: Globe or angle brass manual valves by Nibco, Champion or pre -approved equal. All valves to have non -floating seat disk that allows positive drainage. G. Master Valve: Normally open and flanged at both ends. Bermad 710 series or pre -approved equal. 2.06 VALVE BOXES A. Planting Areas: Size box to encompass all valves and/or fittings. Each with corresponding lid bolted closed. Black boxes and Green T -Top lids in lawns, Black boxes and Brown Mulch T -Top lids in plant beds. Boxes shall be set to finish grade and slope of lawn/planter bed. Box assembly shall be deep enough to fully house valve assembly without components being buried. B. Pavement Areas: Traffic rated, mark all lids with permanent "Irrigation" label. Brook's, Christy's, Oldcastle Precast or pre-aproved equal. C. Automatic control valve assembly: Standard/Jumbo (12" high minimum); Hose bibb: 10" round; manual drain valve: 10" round; Manual drain valve: 10" round. Ametek/Armor/Pentek or pre -approved manufacturer. 2.07 ZONE CONTROL WIRE A. Provide according to manufacturer's wire schedule for valve specifications. 14 gauge minimum. Type AWG -UF, bearing US approval. Spare set of control wires to be run to each valve. Colors: Red (control valve), white (common), yellow(spare common), black (spare control) and blue (tracer). 2.08 COMMUNICATION WIRE A. Maxicom Communication Wire: 19 AWG CATS min., PE 89 cable, 6 pair, or approved equal. 2.09 WIRECONNECTIONS A. Zone Control Wires: 3M Brand, DBY, Direct Bury Splice Kit or approved equal. B. Communication Wires: UR -2 butt splice kit 034005 or pre -approved equal. C. Splice is only allowed at the termination to connect to the flow sensor. 2.10 UTILITY LOCATOR WIRE A. 14 gauge minimum.Type AWG -UF, bearing US approval. Blue in color. 2.11 FLOW SENSOR A. Rainbird Flow sensor, 4" tee type sensor (FS300P), model M80104 or pre -approved equal. 2.12 BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICE A. Refer to plumbing fixtures Section 22 4000. 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-3 SWE Envelope 2.13 CONTROL SYSTEM A. Automated irrigation from a Maxicom Multi -Site Irrigation Central Control System. B. Irrigation controllers shall not be on a shared circuit. PART 3 EXECUTION 3.01 EXAMINATION A. Verify location of existing utilities and irrigation system. B. Verify that required utilities are available, in proper location, and ready for use. 3.02 PREPARATION A. Piping layout indicated is diagrammatic only. Route piping to avoid plants, ground cover, and structures. B. Layout and stake locations of system components. C. Review layout requirements with other affected work. Coordinate locations of sleeves under paving to accommodate system. 3.03 TRENCHING A. Trench and backfill in accordance with Section 31 2316 and Section 31 2323. B. Trench Size: 1. Minimumwidth: 1.5 times the outside diameter of the pipe. 2. Minimum Cover Over Installed Supply Piping: 24 inches (_ mm). 3. Minimum Cover Over Installed Branch Piping: 18 inches (_ mm). C. Trench to accommodate grade changes and slope to drains. D. Maintain trenches free of debris, material, or obstructions that may damage pipe. 3.04 INSTALLATION A. Install pipe, valves, controls, and outlets in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Connect to utilities. C. Set outlets and box covers at finish grade elevations. D. Provide for thermal movement of components in system. E. Slope piping for self drainage to gravel filled well point. F. Use threaded nipples for risers to each outlet. G. Install control wiring in accordance with Section 26 0519. Provide 10 inch (250 mm) expansion coil at each valve to which controls are connected, and at 100 ft (30 m) intervals. Bury conduit beside pipe. H. Install control tubing in accordance with Section 26 0533.13. Provide 10 inch (250 mm) expansion coil in irrigation piping at each valve to which controls are connected, and at 100 ft (30 m) intervals. Bury control tubing beside pipe. I. Mark valves with neoprene valve markers containing locking device. Set valve markers in pipe risers extending from top of valve to finish grade. J. After piping is installed, but before outlets are installed and backfilling commences, open valves and flush system with full head of water. K. Existing landscape must remain irrigated throughout the duration of the project. L. Verify that existing system has a designated meter service and backflow.. Deduction meters off domestic service for irrigation will not be acceptable. 3.05 FIELD QUALITY CONTROL A. Field inspection and testing will be performed under provisions of Section 01 4000- Quality Requirements. 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-4 SWE Envelope 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-5 B. Prior to backfilling, test system for leakage at main piping to maintain 100 psi (690 kPa) pressure for one hour. C. System is acceptable if no leakage or loss of pressure occurs and system self drains during test period. D. Awater audit performed by an Irrigation Association (IS) Certified Landscape Irrigation Auditor, conducted in accordance with the current IS audit standards for all new, as well as existing, irrigated zones shall be completed. An audit report shall be approved by the Owner's Representative. 3.06 BACKFILLING A. Provide 3 inch (75 mm) sand cover over piping. B. Backfill trench and compact to specified subgrade elevation. Protect piping from displacement. 3.07 SYSTEM STARTUP A. Prepare and start system in accordance with manufacturer's instructions. B. Adjust control system to achieve time cycles required. C. Adjust head types for full water coverage as directed. 3.08 CLOSEOUT ACTIVITIES A. Instruct Owner's personnel in operation and maintenance of system, including adjusting of sprinkler heads. Use operation and maintenance data as basis for demonstration. 3.09 MAINTENANCE A. See Section 01 7000 - Execution and Closeout Requirements, for additional requirements relating to maintenance service. END OF SECTION 100% CDs UNDERGROUND SPRINKLERS 2072-0308 328423-5 Natural wood cladding for architectural applications Parklex The surface characteristics of Parklex provides outstanding protection against adverse weather. QatµW%x Prayx,c� O 01 ctc e a V %urthet tt` Facade is a high-density stratified wood panel for external facade cladding. It is installed as a ventilated facade, as louvres or overlapping slats and on soffits and curved walls. Facade achieves the best possible fire test results for organic materials, in accordance with European and US regulations ENI 3.501 and US ASTM/NFPA. Block Tek is a high-density composite decking for external environments, extremely resistant to atmospheric degradation. 4 vear Ideal for patios, walkways and outer perimeters of buildings. Block Tek is a strong, weather resistant, hard-wearing floor with no requirement for subsequent maintenance or treatment. e We emphasize and expand the living beauty found in real wood; its feel, character and natural warmth. Combining organic raw materials and modern technology to make the perfect product for high -traffic areas. L'4�IiRlw IJ, � I 1 ILL. 0 0 (D f5 a 0 0 d Walls and Ceilings solutions cover internal high -transit areas in dry environments (Dry Inlernal) and in areas where high humidity levels persist (Wel Inlernal). Parklex Aconslic is the solution for projects requiring specific sound attenuation. Hy Tek is a high-density natural wood floor for interior use, ideal for high traffic areas such as conference rooms, museums, offices and hotels. 32 ZClass• pC6 Gratlea CLASS Wet Internal Wood. Copper Le Monaatere des Augwtines Quebec, Canada ABCP Architecture 1 I Poligono Alkaiaga, c/ Baldrun 31780 Bera - Navarra - Spain Tel. +34 948 625 045 parklex@parklex.com www.parklex.com THIS APPLICATION IS: ❑ COMPLETE FOR PROCESSING ® INCOMPLETE AND NEEDS MISSING INFORMATION NOTED ABOVE This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 - day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -day timeline. Revised 10/25/07 2/18/2022 City Planner Date This is not a decision on your application. Springfield Development Code Section 5.4- 105 and Oregon Revised Statutes 227.178 require the City take final action on a limited land use decision within 120 days after the application is deemed complete. The 120 -day processing period for this application begins when all the missing information is submitted or when you request that the City proceed without the information. You must indicate by either signing this form or by submitting a written response to the City within seven days of the date of this form asserting your intentions regarding the provision of the missing information. If you indicate herein or in your written response that the missing information will be submitted, then you have 180 days from the date the application was submitted for Pre -Submittal Review to provide the City with the missing information. If you refuse to submit the missing information, then upon receipt of the full application packet and processing fee, the City will deem the application complete for purposes of starting the 120 - day clock and begin processing the application. No new information may be submitted after the start of the 120 -day period unless accompanied by a request for an extension of the 120 -day processing time. Upon receipt of a request for extension, the City may extend the 120 -day period for a reasonable period of time. The City may also require additional fees if the new information is submitted after the Notification to Surrounding Property Owners is sent out and a second notification is required or if the new information substantially affects the application proposal and additional review is required. I, the owner/applicant, intend to submit all missing items indicated herein to the City within the 180 -day timeline. Revised 10/25/07