HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, Pre PLANNER 3/11/2022Pre -Submittal Meeting
Development and Public Works Department
Reem 61
PRE -SUBMITTAL MEETING DATE:
Tuesday, March 22, 2022
11:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m.
DPW Conferenee Room 616
Pre -submittal (Partition Tentative) #811 -22 -000065 -PRE 811-22-000070-PROJ Rich Lorimor
Assessor's Map: 17-02-30-34 TL: 3501
Address: 141731" Street
Existing Use: vacant
Applicant has submitted plans for a 2 -lot residential partition
Planner: Drew Larson
Meeting: Tuesday, March 22, 202211:00 — 12:00 via Zoom
VICINITY MAP
811 -22 -000065 -PRE Pre -submittal meeting
17-02-30-34 TL 3501
1417 31n Street
Rich Lorimor
!City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
SPNINGFI�
A!/
Application Type (Applicant; check one)
Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑
Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative
Required Project Information (Applicant.,
Applicant Name: Rich Lodmor
Submittal:
complete this section)
Phone: 503-413-9815
Company. Bash Residential, LLC lFax.
Address: 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223
Applicant's Rep.: Katie Keidel, Associate Planner
Phone- 541-302-9830
Com an :Metro Planning, Inc.
Address: 846 A St., Spfld, OR 97477
Property Owner: Michael Covalt
Phone: 970-631-6800
Company: Bash Residential, LLC. IFew.
Address: 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223
ASSESSOR'S MAP No, 17-02-30-34
TAX LOT NOS :03501
Property Address: 1417 31st St., Springfield, OR 97478
Size Of Property: .30 Acres ® Square Feet ❑
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description Of if you are filling in this form by hantl, please attach your proposal tlescdption to this application.
Proposal: 2 -lot partition
Existing Use: vacant
# of Lots Parcels: 2
Total acreage Of parcels/
allowable dens! .30
Proposed #
Dwell units 2
Signatures: Please si n and rint our name and date in thea ro riate box on the next a e.
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.: �� �'Z S
0
Z Reviewed by:
Case No.:
I Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee:
Posta a Fee:
YY
TooOTAL FEES: $ a
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
�5. so m
cummPl n mRt9Im9Pmmmn
645 A FIER
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
15411302-9930
w MVROPDWNING.00M
Metro Planning, Inc.
TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR
BASH RESIDENTIAL, LLC
Submission No.
Document Date:
Applicant's Request:
Property Owner/ Applicant:
Civil Engineer:
Surveyor:
Project Planner:
Subject Property:
Location:
Property Size:
Zoning:
Comprehensive Pian:
Number of Parcels Proposed:
Size Proposed Parcell:
Size Proposed Parcel 2:
FEB 2022
1
02/24/22
Approval of 2 -Lot Tentative Partition Plan
Michael Coval
Bash Residential, LLC
12600 SW 72"d Ave.
Tigard, OR 97223
Enc Fawcau, P.E.
Favreau Engineering
541-5561425
EGR & Associates, Inc.
c/o Ryan Erickson, PLS
25358 Prairie Road
Eugene, OR 97402
Metro Planning, Inc.
c/o Jed Truett, AICP
846 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Tel(541)302-9830
Assessors Map 17-02-30-34
Tax Lot 3501
1417 31i° St
Springfield, OR 97478
0.30 acres (13,068 sq. ft.)
R-1 (Low Density Residential)
Low Density Residential (per Metra Plan)
2
5,462 sf
7,502 sf (including pole)
Background
The applicant is proposing to partition one .30 acre parcel into two parcels, Assessor's Map & Tax Lot 17-02-30-34-03501
(the "subject property"), is located on 31'r Street near Olympic Street. The existing parcel is vacant; there are no existing
dwellings or structures. However, the City of Springfield Planning staff approved a plan allowing the property owner to
place a manufactured home on proposed parcel 1 concurrently with this Tentative Partition Application. Ultimately, one
manufactured home is proposed to be placed on each parcel.
The subject property is located in Springfield and zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) which permits development of 6
to 14 dwellings per net acre. The proposed Tentative Partition Plan will develop approximately 2 dwellings per.30 acres
which meets the density requirements (1.8 units minimum are required). All proposed development will meet the siting
requirements and criteria specified for LDR zoned single-family residences as specified in SDC Section 5.12-125.
This written statement intends to clearly demonstrate for City staff review how the proposed Tentative Partition Plan
will conform to all standards, regulations, and conditions of Land Divisions under SOC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan —General;
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements; and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. The Springfield
Development Code (SDC) text sections are indicated by dark blue text, bold and/or italic typeface; Applicant's responses
are indicated by black text and plain typeface.
SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General
Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards:
A. The lot/porcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this Code. When lots/parcels are more than
double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shalt require that these lots/parcels be
arranged:
1. To allow re -division; and
2. To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels.
3. Placement of structures an the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a
determination that the potential maximum density of the larger IaVparcel is not impaired. In order to
make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section
5.I2120E.
Response: Tax Lot 35D1 is zoned LDR (Low Density Residential) and designated LD (Low Density Residential) on the
Metro Plan, and located on a North/South street. The proposed parcels will conform to the minimum standards as
specified for LDR (Low Density Residential) development. Neither proposed parcel will exceed the double minimum
required area for LDR single-family homes on North/South street (5,000sf), nor LDR single-family homes on Panhandle
Lots (4,500 sf).
Parcel 1 is proposed at 5,462 St. Parcel 2 is proposed at 7,502 sf. These criteria are met.
Metro Planing, Inc. FEB 2022 P a g e 12
B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from
collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: The proposed parcels will conform to the minimum standards as specified for LDR (Low Density Residential)
development. Street frontage of the proposed parcels will not exceed double the minimum required for LDR single-
family homes on North/South streets (60 ft) and for LDR single-family homes on a Panhandle Lot (20 ft).
Street frontage for Parcel 1 is proposed at 60 feet. Street frontage for Parcel 2 is proposed at 20 feet. These criteria are
met.
C. Panhandle lou/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections 3.2-215 and 4.2-110A. In the case of
multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels
shall occur prior to recording the Plot.
Response: Proposed Parcels 1 and 2 will have a driveway access via a shared 20' easement.
D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-105D.4.
4. Block Length and Block Perimeter.
a. Block perimeter for all street classifications must not exceed the following maximums,
except as provided or exempted elsewhere in this Code or in an applicable Refinement Plan
or Plan District:
f. 1,400 feet in Mixed -Use Districts consistent with standards in Sections
3.2-625E;
H. 2,600 feet in industrial zoning districts;
iii. 2,400 feet for multi -unit development subject to Section 3.2-140A; and
iv. 1,600 feet in other zoning districts.
Response: The proposed Tentative Partition Plan utilizes an existing street network. This code section is not applicable
Land Divisions: Tentative Plan Submittal SDC 5.12-120
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are
being fulfilled.
EXCEPTION; In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director,
during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of o future
development application.
A. General Requirements.
I. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon
Licensed Professional Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18"x 24". The services of an Oregon Licensed
Professional Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater
management street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 13
Response: The Tentative Subdivision Plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, PIS of EGR & Associates, and Eric
Favreau, P.E. of Favreau Engineering, in order to adequately and comprehensively address all standards and
requirements of this Code, including stormwater management, street design, and transportation issues, and site
constraint.
2. The scale of the Tentative plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data,
normally 1"= 50;1" =100, or I"=100'.
Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 20'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the
amount of data needing to be shown.
3. A north arrow and the dote the Tentative Plan was prepared.
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the plans that are included with this application.
4. The name and address of the owner, applicant if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who
prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response:
Property Owner: Michael Covalt, Bash Residential, LLC, 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223.
Applicant: Rich Lorimar, Bash Residential, LLC, 12600 SW 72nd Ave. #140, Tigard, OR 97223.
Land Surveyor: Ryan Erickson, PLS of EGR & Associates.
Engineer: Eric Favreau, P.E. of Favreau Engineering.
All of these details are indicated on the Tentative Partition Plans.
5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitionerorsub-divider of which the
proposed land division is a part.
Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the partitioner.
6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad
right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division.
Response: No city limit, OGB, or railroad rights-of-way are adjacent to the subject property.
7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties
within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property.
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LOR (Low Density Residential), designated L (low density residential) in
the Metro Plan.
S. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres/ of each tot/parcel and the approximate
dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes roseate.
Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions of each building site are clearly labeled on the Tentative Partition
Plan drawings.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 14
9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after
platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines.
Response: There are no existing structures on the property.
10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and
adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwoter management systems,
water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points.
Response: Water lines are existing and provided by Springfield Utility Board. Wastewater and Stormwater lines are
located in 31" Street and are public. All existing and proposed utilities and connection points, and necessary easements
are indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land
division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips.
Response: All public and private proposed easements are clearly indicated on the Tentative Partition Plan drawings.
12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reservedfor public use, with the purpose, condition or
limitations of the reservations clearly indicated.
Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use. This requirement is not applicable.
B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed
Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at Ifoot intervals and percent of slope that
precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly
Indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will
not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site.
Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site
Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response The Site Assessment of the subject property was performed by Ryan Erickson, PLS, and Eric Favreau, P.E. of
Favreau Engineering, and includes all of the General Requirements, Site Assessment items, and Stormwater Items. See
attached Tentative Subdivision Plan drawings.
1. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on
the water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQW) Map on file in the Development Services Department;
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the
subject property; thus this requirement is not applicable.
2. The 100year floodplain an ifloodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA
Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision;
Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated on
FI RM Map Number 41039C1161F dated June 2, 1999; thus this requirement is not applicable.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 P a g e 15
3. The Time of Travel zones as specified in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas
Map on file in the Development Service Department;
Response: The subject property falls within the 5 -year Time of Travel zone for Wellhead Protection.
4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown
on the (WLQW) Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings;
Response: There are no dusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within
the boundaries of the subject property.
5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and
Response: The Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRC5) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the
subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Malabon-Urban land complex, with a depth to water table of
more than 80 inches. An infiltration test was performed by Eric Favreau, P.E. on 11/16/2021. The infiltration rate was
conservatively determined to be approximately 20"/hr. Therefore, for design purposes, it will be assumed that
infiltration rate will be 10"/hr.
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117.
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property.
C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that
precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or
more, contours may be shown at 5 foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwoter management system for the
entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed
Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an
Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components:
1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations;
2. Pervious and Impervious area drainage patterns,
3. The size and location of starmwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain
lines, catch basins, dry wells and/ar detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainage -
ways to be retained,
4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours; and
S. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in
Section 4.3-110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and
documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to
allow staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes.
Metra Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 16
Response: Eric Favreau, P.E. concluded that the facility sizing of the rain garden was adequate per the rainfall
calculations. No outfall to the public stormwater system is proposed with this partition. A 1,372 square foot house
previously existed on the site and this impervious area has been subtracted from the treatment square footage.
Therefore, the proposed facility has been sized the net increase in runoff and includes treatment for two new single
family dwellings and a common driveway. There currently is no formal drainage system along 31st St. Therefore, the
proposed infiltration rain garden will be sized for the 25 -year event. The attached calculations demonstrate that this
facility has been sized to meet the design requirementfor the 25 -year event. See attached Infiltration Rain Garden
Detail Engineering plan.
D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code.
1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and
names of all existing streets, alleys, or other fights -of -way within or adjacent to the proposed land
division;
Response: The subject property has frontage on 31" Street. There is an existing 60' right-of-way in 31" St, with 35 feet of
paved roadway. It does not have a curb, gutter or sidewalk.
2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights -of --way to include the
approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposedstreets to any projected streets
as shown on the Metro Plan, including the TmnsPlan, any approved Conceptual Development Plan and the
latest version of the Conceptual Local Street Map;
Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject property.
3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways,
including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required plonterstrip,
Response: There are no existing or proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways.
4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers,
neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable;
Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is located approximately 242 feet north of
the Northwest comer of subject property. See attached Tentative Partition plans drawings for further details.
S. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable;
Response: The proposed driveway Is a 20 ft wide Shared Access and Utility Easement. Parcel 1 has 60 feet of street
frontage and the access driveway is 20 it wide. A panhandle driveway is proposed for Parcel 2 and is 20 feet wide at
street frontage as required, and will taper to the minimum required 12 feet as the driveway meets parcel 2.
6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination;
Response: Existing street lighting is indicated on the Tentative Partition plan drawing set. No additional streetlights are
proposed.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 17
Z The location of existing and proposed transit facilities,
Response: The nearest transit facility is located on the South side of Olympic Street West of 28th Street and served by
Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 18.
8. A copy of a Right -of --way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon
Department of Transportation (ODOTI facility; and
Response: 31st Street is a city street and does not have frontage on an ODOT facility.
9. ATraffic Impact Study preparedby a Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in Section 4.1-105A.4.
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-family
detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each of the two
parcels proposed generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips necessary for
a traffic impact study to be required.
E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel
size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that.
Response: No Future Development Plan is necessary as neither proposed parcel exceeds twice the minimum area
requirement.
F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall
include the following items, where applicable:
1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property;
Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the existing
use of the subject property.
2. if the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required,
Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner.
3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants
and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing
Partitions or Subdivisions Immediately adfacent to the proposed land division;
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Proposed Tentative Partition Plan drawing.
4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district;
Response: There are no overlay districts applicable to the subject property.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 18
S. Now the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable;
Response: Single-family residential is a permitted use in the UDR (Low Density Residential) zone; thus no Discretionary
Use Permit is required.
6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100,
Response: No trees will be felled as a part of this application.
7. A Geotechnical Reportfor slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the
required Site Assessment in Section 5.1-21208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable
solls and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County;
Response: No Geotechnical Report is required as the subject property consists of slopes less than 5%. NRCS Soil
Classification maps identify this site as having Class C Soils. Soil Type Malabon-Urban land complex a76. The soil is well -
draining soil ideal for urban development. The depth to water table is more than 80 inches. See attached Infiltration Test
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a development Is proposed outside of the
city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced bysonitary sewer,•
Response: The subject property is located within the city limits.
A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where
there is a wetland on the property;
Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject property.
10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted
concurrently;
Response: No federal or state permits are required with this Tentative Partition application.
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to Include the approximate time of installation and
method of financing;
Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application.
12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate;
Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowners Associations are proposed.
13. Cluster5ubdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2230;
Response: This application is for a Tentative Partition and not a Cluster Subdivision.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 19
14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling pork or mobile home pork is proposed, the Director may
waive certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall
address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-
125.
Response: This application is for a Tentative Partition and not a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park
Subdivision.
Land Divisions SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable
criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the
application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any
approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions.
Response: The subject property is located on a North-South street. Proposed Parcel 1 falls under the criteria
requirements of a single-family dwelling in LDR zoning on a North/South street. Proposed Parcel 2 falls under the criteria
requirements of a single-family dwelling on a Panhandle lot. See below for specific details for each parcel.
Lot Size:
The minimum lot/porcel size for a standard lot on a North/South is 5,000 sq. ft.
The minimum lot/parcel size for a Panhandle lot Is 4,500 sq ft.
Proposed parcel 1 is a standard North/South parcel and meets requirements at 5,462 sf sq ft.
Proposed parcel 2 is a standard panhandle lot and meets requirements at 7,502 sq ft, including the pole.
Lot Frontage:
The minimum street frontage for Lots/Parcels on a North/South street is 60 ft. The minimum street frontage required
for a panhandle parcel is 20 feet
Proposed parcel 1 has 60 ft of street frontage.
Proposed parcel 2 is designed to have 20 ft of street frontage.
0. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Pion District
map, and Conceptual Development Plan.
Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. in the Metro Plan, this area is designated as
Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed
development is 2 units per.30 acres, with the requirement being at least 1.8 units.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 110
C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity,
sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities, and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be
exceeded, and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development unless
otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility
provider shot] determine capacity issues.
Response: Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, street and traffic safety controls will not be exceeded. No
public improvements are proposed.
D. The proposed land division shall comply withal/ applicable public and private design and construction
standards contained in this Code and otherapplicabie regulations.
Response: The proposed Tentative Partition Plan shall comply with all applicable public and private design and
construction standards contained in this SDC, and all applicable requirements and regulations.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to; steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas
with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map
and their associated riparian areas; other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117; rock
outcroppings; open spaces; and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in
Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code
or in State or Federal low.
Response: There are no significant physical features on the subject property.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to. facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and
pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent
residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas,
minimize driveways an arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations
and comply with the ODOT access management standards farstate highways.
Response: The applicant is proposing both lots have a shared driveway in order to mitigate the number of driveways.
Access and connectivity to nearby areas will be provided by 31" Street.
G. Development of any remainder of the property under the some ownership can be accomplished as specified in
this Code.
Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition.
H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code.
Response: All adjacent land is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
I. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no
concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply.
Response: The proposed development is within the Springfield City limits.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 r a.,, e Ill
Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following
approval criteria apply:
Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this
criterion does not apply.
Metro Planning, Inc. FEB 2022 112