The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 3/9/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) 6 ILo IL Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) At Carver 1Phone: 503-545-4121 Com an : Carver Family,LLC iFax• Address: 112 Timson Drive, Folsom, CA 95630 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Andrew Strout Phone: $41-746-0637 Com n : Branch Engineering, Inc. Fax, Address: 310 5th Street, Springfield, OR 97477 AoolzEw S P 9RAk)C9£AAmr,t)£E tt ING. LO PropertV Owner: Scott Carver Phone: 503-5454121 Com an : Carver Family, LLC Fax' Address: 112 Timson Drive. Folsom, CA 95630 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-30-43 ITAX LOT NOS : 6401 Property Address: 3654 Kathryn Avenue. Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 3.13 Acres JZ Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: expansion of existing industrial development Existing Use: Industrial * of Lots/Parcels: 1 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 3.13 acres Density: WA du/acre Prospective Applicant:A,10 Date: 1 ature - lN�'7� Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section) Case No.: 7-Z--O00063-PRE Date: 19C&L q ZdZZ Reviewed by: uJ Application Fee: 6 { �,_\O() Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: 64L, R) I PR03ECT NUMBER - - U Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the. City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist II Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. V1 Development Issues Meeting Application Form 'V Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. yJ Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' Irl North arrow - 'Z Date of preparation {V Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained N/A ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMS Related to Land Divisions N/A ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots N/A ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review 'V Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces '1 Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 (Branch ElIG I N E E R IN G_ sraewn March 8, 2022 DIM QUESTIONS 3645 KATHRYN AVENUE Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 21-749 The site is located at 3654 Kathryn Avenue (TM 17-02-30-43, TI. 6401). The property configuration in this application reflects a Property Line Adjustment that has yet to be submitted. The site lies within the Heavy Industrial zone. The existing improvements were part of a Site Plan Review in 2008. The applicant is proposing to expand the improvements westward to include a new 100' x 270' building and approximately 28,000 square feet of additional impervious area for parking and circulation. The building will be divided into up to five tenant spaces. The intention is to market the spaces to tenants in the warehouse, wholesale and/or distribution markets. Each tenant will have space for two loading docks capable of accommodating 53 -foot trailers (72 -foot trucks). Each tenant will also have 650 square feet of office space and be configured to allow 24 -foot delivery trucks to pull through the building and exit on the opposite side. Included with this application is a proposed development plan. The questions below are to help guide the project design. 1. Regarding public infrastructure: a. As part of this application, will any public improvements be required along Kathryn Avenue? b. According to the Stormwater Basin Master Plan, the basin the site is located in (9_265) has no capacity issues. Besides treatment of non -roof impervious area, are there any stormwater requirements that we should be aware or 2. Regarding the impervious areas: a. Since the new impervious area totals 63,000 square feet (27,000 square foot building plus 36,000 square feet of paving), please confirm this project will require a Site Plan Review application rather than an MDS. b. The existing impervious area does not appear to be receiving treatment and it appears difficult to convey the runoff through the new construction without it entering a new treatment system. Please confirm that it is acceptable to not treat portions of the water from the new impervious area provided that an equal or greater area of existing impervious area gains treatment. EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD ALBANY 310 5'h Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p: 541.746.0637 1 �.branchengineering.cam DIM Questions March 8, 2022 3. Vehicular circulation: a. Does the city have any design concerns regarding the pull through aspect of the building design? b. Does the city have any design concerns regarding the number of access driveways? 4. Fire Service: a. It is our understanding that a turnaround will not be necessary since one full side of the new structure can be serviced by pulling in the middle driveway and looping through to exit by the eastern driveway. Does the fire department agree that a turnaround is not necessary? b. Two hydrants are currently available to the site. Is this sufficient for fire standards? 5. Are there any red flags that the city sees with this plan that weren't addressed as part of the questions above? Any other information items that staff feel would be beneficial to the development would be greatly appreciated. Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 2 of 2