Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 2/11/2022City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review I3PNINOFI� on Type (Applicant., check one) Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑ Site Plan Review Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑ Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Adam Man rich I Phone: 541 342-7210 Company; Systems West Engineers Email:aman rich@s stemsw Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 tengineers.com Applicant's Rep.: Peter Kin Phone:541-650-0529 Company: Rowell Brokaw Email: eter@rowellbrokaw.c Address: 1203 Willamette St, Eugene OR Property Owner: Adam Mancl rich Phone: 541 342-7210 Company: Systems West Engineers Email: amangrich@s stemsw Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 tengineers.com ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033542 TAX LOT NOS : 04900 PropertV Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 Size of Property: 21,300 Acres Elsquare Feet El Proposed No. of • NA I Proposed Name of Project: Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding Description of tf you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Demolition of existing drive throuclh, buildina envelope repair and partial re-claddin Existing Use: Office New Impervious Surface Coverage.(Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 0 sf Signatures: Please sin and print your name and date in the aoDrooriate Required Project Information (City Zntake Staff., n Associated Applications: I/A box on the next a e. complete this section) Signs: 'A Pre -Sub Case No.: ZL- 000OW&-r06 Date: tf I7.di =- Reviewed b n.J Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: $ Technical Fee: $ Posta a Fee: $ TOTAL FEES: $ 1 PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby ackn I ge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, informat' equests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Feb. 11, 2022 Signature Adam Mangrich I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This rs m§rrt serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a complete applica n. Adam Mangrich Feb. 11, 2022 Date: ,,i.f, .... Revised Ip/14 KL 2 of 11 Site Plan Review Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. . Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11 Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ❑ Site Plan Review Application Form ❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ❑ Copy of the Deed ❑ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. ❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request. ❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal: ❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑ All plan sets must be folded to 8'/2' by 11" and bound by rubber bands. Please Note: • These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents. • The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine the feasibility of a proposed plan. • Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation. Revised 117114 KL 4 of 11 a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO ,tet AND A-111 SITE PLAN vL� Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor [� Vicinity Map ® The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. NA ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department NA ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision NA ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department S6 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/1 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings b. Site Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO AND A-111 SITE PLAN Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor NA ❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. NONEWEUILDINO Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs NA ❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections No CHANOES TO THE PARKING LOT. NO ADA SPACES CURRENTLY IN THIS LOT ® Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces OVERALL DIMENSIONS OF THE Lar AGE WO IOEo NA ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district NA ❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation NONEW PROPOSED ® Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces [� Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile) VICINITY PIAN Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11 NA ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses NA ❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan application and which are deferred to future review procedures. c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO �t AND A-111 SITE PLAN W1 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or Surveyor NA ❑ Location and width of all existing easements NOEASMENTS m Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof �f drainage. STREETS AND ALLEYS NOTED. NOT CHANGE TO HOOF RUNOFF PROPOSED, u Location and type of existing street lighting EXISTING_GfET POLES NOTED [� Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar public facilities dLocation, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails NA ❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate to the complexity of the proposed project. NO NEW SERVICE OR CONNECTIONS NA ❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage patterns. NONEWGRADING NA d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan NO NEW GRADING OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS ❑ P ed by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below ❑ The approxi size and location of storm water management ems components ❑ Location, widths (of pa and right-of-way), and n of proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other rights -o - s within or ent to the proposed development ❑ Location and width of all ❑ Location and type of pr d street lighting ❑ Information fisting slopes over 5% shall be prepared b Oregon licensed surve nd be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land wi slope over 10 rcent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11 e. Landscape Plan SEE A-111 SITE PLAN [� Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional approved by the Director .� Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage NO NEW SCREENING PLANTING. PLANTING BEDS LOCATED WITH AREAS NA ❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 NONEWSCREENINGPLANTwG V Location of existing and proposed street trees f. Architectural Plans SEE A-111 SITE PLAN Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be shown g. On -Site Lighting Plan SEE LIGHTING PLANS AND RENDERINGS Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal: OEFEflfl FINRL PLANTING List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing NA ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting plan shall be provided. Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above ground utilities. Photometric test report for each light source. [� An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director: IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: NA ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. NA ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation measures. Revised 1p/14 KL 7 of 11 NA ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 NA ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW NA ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives SEE NFFPIiNE NA ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses, the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards. NA ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 NA ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property NA ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request NA ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development NA ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 NA ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 of 11 SPRINGFIELD REET DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OR 225 FIFTH ST OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.375353 PAX: 541.736.1021 w .springgeldocgov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.springfield_ or.gov/DPW/EnginceringandConstructionResowr s.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Farms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachem, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmceacherrrCspringfield-or.gov Phone: (541) 736-1036 Fax: (541) 736-1021 DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX 541.726.1021 wtnv.springlield-orgov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK (Area below this line filled out by Applicant) ------------------------------ (Please rearm to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Develop+nenl and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phane # 736-1036), email'cmceachervr(a2vpringfield-or.go v Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Pracflces: ------------- (Area below this line Ned put br the City and Returned to the Applicant) (Ara minimum, all bases checked kv the City on al efiont and back of this sheet shall be submitted a'm+a licalimt to he mm tete orsubmittal, ulthou hoHrerr uirements ma be a,y.) Drainage Study Tyne (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): Mote UH may be substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development: ❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS PorO clot IIx Only: * Based upon the information provided an thefront of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is neededfor an application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage, however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) or the City s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site approval, Additional site Spee fic information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has been signed in the space provided below: Interim Desig. Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3 Req'd N/A ❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multichambered catchbasin w/oil filtration media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by vegetated methods. ❑ Where required, vegetative stormwam, design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Smnnwater Management Manual. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2A 1). If stonnwater treatment swalc is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, bottom slope, and seed unix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual, Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. U U Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. [_1 F-] A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ❑ R Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and over effects of a 25 -year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contents, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ ❑ Private Stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more RMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03AA). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DRQ. Refer to the website: http://www.deu.state.or.us/wa/uic/uie.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stormwater study. ' 1MPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAh'D SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted Stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0 On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). ❑ Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. ❑ F-] Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04). ❑ F-1 Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set. ❑ F� Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 vice full based on Table 4-1 as well. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contents, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site drains. ❑ ❑ Private Stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more RMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03AA). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DRQ. Refer to the website: http://www.deu.state.or.us/wa/uic/uie.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stormwater study. ' 1MPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAh'D SIGN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted Stormwater study and plan set. Signature Date Form Version 5: June 2015 Project Site Subject site: 1203 W.11amette 11 February 2022 Sone 210 Eugene, Oregon 97401 FAR: 541 4851003 Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding rov211broka�:•.com Systems West Engineers ArMt.,W.. O,Mgn. Strategy 725 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review Application Narrative Issued by: Serena Lim, Project Manager Peter King, Project Architect Project Site Subject site: Lane County Map No. 17033542, Tax Lot 04900 Size (gross): 0.49 acres / 21,301 square feet FAR: 0.34 (existing) of 0.40 (minimum), no change proposed Zoning: Mixed -Use Commercial Zoning overlays: Nodal Development Overlay Applicable Code Sections: 1. 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards 2. 3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards (Nodal Development Overlay District) Project Description: The subject property is a former bank with an adjacent drive-through and parking lot, now used as commercial office space by Systems West Engineers (SWE). SWE has no use for the drive- through and would like to repair the building's exterior in concert with rebranding efforts and a grand opening in spring of 2022. The project includes the removal of the existing drive-through canopy and drive aisles, the expansion of an existing planter, and replacement of some existing cladding with new cladding materials. No other changes or alterations are proposed to the existing building, structure, or window and door openings. There will be no change to the building area. Page 1 of 6 Design Team Owner 725 A Street LLC c/o Adam Mangrich 1250 E 29'^ PI Eugene OR 97403 Architect Rowell Brokaw Architects John Rowell, Principal in Charge Peter King, Project Architect Serena Lim, Designer/Project Manager Lorn Nelson, Landscape Architect Structural Engineer Branch Engineering, Inc. Rick Hernandez, P.E., S.E., Project Manager CM/GC McKenzie Commercial Jim Mender, Project Manager & Cost Estimator Drawings Attached to this Application Included Documents: 1. Sheet G-001 - Cover 2. Sheet A-005 — Perspective Renderings 3. Sheet A-010 — Site Plan — Existing and Demolition 4. Sheet A-111 — Site Plan 5. Sheet A-113 — Roof Plan and 11t Floor RCP 6. Sheet A-201 — Elevations — Demo 7. Sheet A-202 — Elevations 8. Sheet A-301 — Wall Sections 9. Sheet A-311 — Exterior Details 10. Sheet A-312 — Exterior / Site Details 11. Sheet LT -01 — Lighting Plan 12. Sheet LT -02 — Lighting Diagrams ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 2 of 6 ZONING STANDARDS NARRATIVE 1. Mixed -Use Development Standards, Section 3.2-625 A. Section 3.2-625.A.1 requires all elevations of buildings abutting any street to provide at least 500/c of their length and at least 25% of the ground floor area as windows and/or doors allowing views in... On corner lots/parcels this provision applies to both elevations. 4 The subject parcel is a corner lot and the existing building's north and west facades face the public right-of-way. The impact of the west facade on pedestrians is limited because it is set back approximately 100 feet from 7" Street, and separated from the sidewalk by the existing parking lot. The existing north elevation along A Street is 55% glazed (by length and ground - level wall area) and complies with this requirement. The existing west elevation along 7' Street is glazed on 32% of the length and 22% of the ground -level wall area, so this fagade is an existing nonconforming condition. One reason for the solidity of the west wall is that the bank vault is located in the south west corner of the building. While no changes are proposed to the existing wall openings, new bold -colored sunshades at each of the existing punched openings and new landscaping along the west wall of the building will provide pedestrian -scale interest on the west elevation. B. Section 3.2-625.A.2 requires at least 30% (linear) of the primary entrance elevation to be windows with views into lobbies, displays, or working areas for all industrial uses. 4 The existing north elevation includes the primary entrance and is 55% glazed. The existing elevation complies with this standard. (OR the standard only applies to industrial uses and is not applicable). C. Section 3.2-625.A.3.a-c requires wall offsets in the form of 4 -foot recesses, or 4 -foot extensions, or 3 -foot roof elevation changes at least every 50 feet. 4 The primary building facade along A street meets this standard. The existing west face of the building abutting the existing parking lot is mostly straight and is an existing non -conforming condition. Because the scope of this project is limited to exterior repairs and cosmetic improvements, changing the existing structure to meet this standard would pose an unreasonable burden on the Owner and such changes are not proposed. D. Section 3.2-625.A.4 requires the inclusion of architectural features (e.g. offsets, windows, wood siding, brick, stucco, textured materials) to break up expanses of single -element building elevations. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 3 of 6 4 The existing north and south elevations comply with this standard; stone cladding and floor -to -ceiling windows alternate with stucco exterior walls. A combination of new phenolic (wood) rainscreen cladding, new metal cladding, and freshly painted existing stucco are proposed to improve the appearance of the north and south facades; the existing stone cladding is to remain. The existing west facade is rundown, lacks composition, and is visually busy; the proposed metal cladding will simplify the overall material palette and unify the building's features. Three new sunshades will protrude appx. 2 feet from the wall and will be painted a bold color to punctuate the west elevation. The expansion of an existing planter will accommodate new landscaping that will provide natural colors and textures along the entire west elevation. E. Section 3.2-625.A.5 requires differentiation between the ground level and upper stores through the use of bays, balconies, awnings, canopies, variation in materials, etc. 4 This standard is not applicable because the 2nd floor of the building is primarily attic and storage space. (See 1.D. response for a description of the building's exterior features.) F. Section 3.2-625.A.6 pertains to structures listed on the Springfield Historic Landmark Inventory and does not apply. G. The requirements of Section 3.2-625.6 pertain to new buildings and do not apply. H. Section 3.2-625.0 requires the provision of weather -protected areas (awnings, canopies) adjacent to sidewalks and plazas for new developments. 4 The existing building features a prominent overhang that provides ample protection from weather at the primary entrance along A street. The overhang wraps from the northeast corner to the northwest corner of the building and is echoed by a change in materials at the southwest corner that continues above the recessed (covered) south/rear entrance along the public alley. I. Section 3.2-625.D.i.a requires mixed-use developments to provide landscaping and screening in accordance with Sections 4.4-105 and 4.4- 110. 4 Standard 4.4-105 pertains to new developments and is not applicable. However, expanded landscaped areas are proposed adjacent to the existing main entrance and along the west elevation of the existing building. Per Standard 4.4-105.G, the existing irrigation system will be extended to support new landscaping. Per Standard 4.4-105.I, existing plants and trees to remain will be protected or not impacted by the proposed project. Standards 4.4-110.A.1-3 and 5-6 are not applicable to the subject property. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 4 of 6 Standard 4.4-110.A.4 requires screening for trash receptacles. Office trash and recycling is located in the covered area (south/rear entrance) along the public alley. This area is not screened. The building is built to the property line in this location and there is not sufficient room for vegetative screening. A fence in this location would obstruct existing floor -to -ceiling windows on the south facade and create a dark and cagey environment at the rear entrance and could obstruct emergency egress from the building. The applicant is not proposing changes to this existing non -conforming condition. J. Section 3.2-625.D.1.b requires street trees in accordance with Section 4.2- 140. 4 The requirements of this section are not applicable because the scope of site improvements is limited to the demolition area and planters immediately adjacent to the exterior walls of the existing building. No improvements to the parking lot or surrounding sidewalks are proposed; existing trees are to remain. K. Section 3.2-625.13.2 requires screening in accordance with Section 4.4-110 and subsections a -c. Standard 3.2-625.D.2.a pertains to areas abutting residential districts and does not apply. Standard 3.2-625.D.2.b requires ground -mounted utility equipment to be located to minimize visual impact or screened. No new above-ground/ground-mounted utility equipment is proposed, and all existing above-ground/ground-mounted utility equipment to remain is either placed in a discrete location or screened by equipment covers or landscaping. Standard 3.2-625.D.2.c requires landscaping to attain 50% coverage within 2 years and 100% coverage within 4 years. The proposed new landscaping is designed and species selected to meet this requirement. L. Section 3.2-625.D.3 requires irrigation systems to support landscaping and encourages drought -resistant plants. 4 Existing irrigation systems will be extended to support new landscaping in the proposed expanded planter beds, and plant species have been selected with consideration for the conditions of their proposed location. M. Section 3.2-625.D.4 is redundant to Section 3.2-625.D.2.a-c. See above. N. Section 3.2-625.E.1-4 pertain to street networks and do not apply to the proposed project's limited scope of work. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHIIECTS Page 5 of 6 O. Standard 3.2-625.E.5 requires pedestrian paths and sidewalks to conveniently connect all building entrances with each other and to public rights-of-way. 4 Existing building entrances are directly accessible from the public right-of-way; the north entrance abuts the sidewalk to the north, and the south entrance abuts the public alley to the south. P. Section 3.2-625.F.1-5 pertains to a development's compatibility with surrounding parcels in other zones and does not apply to the subject property or the proposed scope of work. Q. Section 3.2-625.G requires new structures and substantial improvements to existing buildings to provide pedestrian amenities. + These standards do not apply to the proposed project because the scope of work is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. However, the proposed landscaping and exterior lighting will improve the overall appearance and pedestrian experience of the site. 2. Nodal Development Overlay District - Minimum Density and General Development Standards, Section 3.3-1020 R. Section 3.3-1020.A requires a minimum FAR of 0.40 for parcels in a MUC zone. 4 The existing building and site have a FAR of 0.34 and are nonconforming, however this standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope of work is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. S. Section 3.3-1020.13 requires a maximum setback of 20 feet for commercial uses and no minimum setback. 4 The existing building complies with this standard on its north elevation and is nonconforming on its west elevation where an existing parking lot separates the building from the right-of-way. This standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. T. Section 3.3-1020.0 prohibits the location of parking areas between main buildings and the street. U. The north (A street) side of the property complies with this standard (existing building and planters occupy 46% of site frontage). The west side is nonconforming where the existing parking lot separates the building from the right-of-way for the entire length of the property. This standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing building. ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 6 of 6 LL D € y�{S �P gra 3E x Skies A et O