HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 2/11/2022City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review
I3PNINOFI�
on Type (Applicant., check one)
Site Plan Review Pre -Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Pre -Submittal: ❑
Site Plan Review Submittal: Ma"or Site Plan Modification Submittal: ❑
Required Project Information (Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Adam Man rich I Phone: 541 342-7210
Company; Systems West Engineers
Email:aman rich@s stemsw
Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 tengineers.com
Applicant's Rep.: Peter Kin
Phone:541-650-0529
Company: Rowell Brokaw
Email: eter@rowellbrokaw.c
Address: 1203 Willamette St, Eugene OR
Property Owner: Adam Mancl rich
Phone: 541 342-7210
Company: Systems West Engineers
Email: amangrich@s stemsw
Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477 tengineers.com
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17033542
TAX LOT NOS : 04900
PropertV Address: 725 A Street, Springfield, OR 97477
Size of Property: 21,300 Acres Elsquare Feet El
Proposed No. of • NA
I
Proposed Name of Project: Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding
Description of tf you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Demolition of existing drive throuclh, buildina envelope repair and partial re-claddin
Existing Use: Office
New Impervious Surface Coverage.(Including Bldg. Gross Floor Area): 0 sf
Signatures: Please sin and print your name and date in the aoDrooriate
Required Project Information (City Zntake Staff.,
n
Associated Applications: I/A
box on the next a e.
complete this section)
Signs: 'A
Pre -Sub Case No.: ZL- 000OW&-r06
Date: tf I7.di =-
Reviewed b n.J
Case No.:
Date:
Reviewed by:
Application Fee: $
Technical Fee: $
Posta a Fee: $
TOTAL FEES: $
1 PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 1/7/14 KL 1 of 11
Owner Signatures
This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent
complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application
process.
An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted.
The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and
accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the
owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf.
I/we do hereby ackn I ge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory
timelines, informat' equests and requirements conveyed to my representative.
Date: Feb. 11, 2022
Signature
Adam Mangrich
I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check
performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as
necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise
contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as
submitted. This rs m§rrt serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining to a
complete applica n.
Adam Mangrich
Feb. 11, 2022
Date:
,,i.f, ....
Revised Ip/14 KL 2 of 11
Site Plan Review Application Process
1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Application for Pre -Submittal
• The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal
meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon.
• Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven
working days of receiving an application.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting
• The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre -
submittal meeting.
• The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and
Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning
Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes.
The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items
required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the
applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City.
3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and
Issue a Decision
• A complete application must conform to the Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements
Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet.
• A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless
appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application.
• Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the
property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition,
the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property.
• There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed.
• Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their
comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval
criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those
given notice.
. Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied.
• At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision
prior to issuing the final land use decision.
• The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is
effective on the day it is mailed.
• The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15
calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official.
Revised 1/7/14 KL 3 of 11
Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements Checklist
NOTE:
• ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal.
• If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please
state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form.
❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the pre -submittal and submittal stages.
❑ Site Plan Review Application Form
❑ Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the
property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the
action to be taken. The narrative should also include the proposed number of employees
and future expansion plans, if known. Density - if applicable, list the size of property
(acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed.
❑ Copy of the Deed
❑ Copy of the Site Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the
required neighboring property notification packet.
❑ State or Federal Permits Required - The applicant must demonstrate that an
application has been submitted for any required federal or state permit and provide a copy
of the application upon request.
❑ Completed Attached Scoping Sheet
❑ Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR
Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Submittal:
❑ All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and
sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of
preparation.
❑ All plan sets must be folded to 8'/2' by 11" and bound by rubber bands.
Please Note:
• These plans must provide enough information to enable the City to
determine that the proposed development is feasible, but are not
necessarily required to be detailed construction level documents.
• The City's Engineering Design Standards Manual, while not land use
criteria, may be used in whole or n part, by the City Engineer to determine
the feasibility of a proposed plan.
• Nothing herein should be interpreted as implying any requirement in
contradiction of Oregon Statute or Oregon Administrative Regulation.
Revised 117114 KL 4 of 11
a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO
,tet AND A-111 SITE PLAN
vL� Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
[� Vicinity Map
® The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb
cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what
is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size,
setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings.
NA ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses
and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse
Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
NA ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest
adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment
or Letter of Map Revision
NA ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead
Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department
S6 Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when
measured 4 1/1 feet above the ground (stands of more than five (5) trees may be
shown as a cluster with mix of trees species noted), riparian areas, wetlands and rock
outcroppings
b. Site Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO
AND A-111 SITE PLAN
Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
NA ❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the
parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and
distance between buildings; measured setbacks shall be prepared by an Oregon
licensed Surveyor when minimum setbacks are shown. NONEWEUILDINO
Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage,
trash receptacles, and signs
NA ❑ Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and ADA parking spaces;
including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping. ADA routes from public
rights-of-way whall be designated including at grade connections No CHANOES TO THE PARKING LOT. NO
ADA SPACES CURRENTLY IN THIS LOT
® Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site
proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and
other impervious surfaces OVERALL DIMENSIONS OF THE Lar AGE WO IOEo
NA ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district
NA ❑ On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation NONEW PROPOSED
® Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and
dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed
Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces
[� Note location of existing and planned Lane Transit District facilities (within 1/2 mile)
VICINITY PIAN
Revised 1/7/14 KL 5 of 11
NA ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses
NA ❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a
phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries
and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a defined sequence
addressing street connectivity between the various phases and accommodating the
logical extension of other required public improvements, including but to limited to,
sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity. The applicant must
clearly indicate which phases are proposed for approval under the current Site Plan
application and which are deferred to future review procedures.
c. Existing Improvement and Public Utilities Plan SEE A-010 EXISTING/DEMO
�t AND A-111 SITE PLAN
W1 Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, Civil Engineer or
Surveyor
NA ❑ Location and width of all existing easements NOEASMENTS
m Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing streets, alleys,
dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development,
including jurisdictional status other than City. Indicate connection points for roof
�f drainage. STREETS AND ALLEYS NOTED. NOT CHANGE TO HOOF RUNOFF PROPOSED,
u Location and type of existing street lighting EXISTING_GfET POLES NOTED
[� Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles,
transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, waterline backflow preventers and similar
public facilities
dLocation, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails
NA ❑ Location and size of existing utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary
sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone,
and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Detail must be proportionate
to the complexity of the proposed project. NO NEW SERVICE OR CONNECTIONS
NA ❑ Show existing and proposed spot elevations or contours, and direction of drainage
patterns. NONEWGRADING
NA d. Proposed Grading, Paving, & Utilities Plan NO NEW GRADING OR UTILITY CONNECTIONS
❑ P ed by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer, except where noted below
❑ The approxi size and location of storm water management ems components
❑ Location, widths (of pa and right-of-way), and n of proposed streets, alleys,
dedications or other rights -o - s within or ent to the proposed development
❑ Location and width of all
❑ Location and type of pr d street lighting
❑ Information fisting slopes over 5% shall be prepared b Oregon licensed
surve nd be drawn with one foot contour interval lines; land wi slope over 10
rcent shall be shown with 5 foot contour interval lines
Revised 1/7/14 KL 6 of 11
e. Landscape Plan SEE A-111 SITE PLAN
[� Prepared by an Architect, Landscape Architect, or other Landscape Professional
approved by the Director
.� Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of
landscape coverage NO NEW SCREENING PLANTING. PLANTING BEDS LOCATED WITH AREAS
NA ❑ Where applicable, screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 NONEWSCREENINGPLANTwG
V Location of existing and proposed street trees
f. Architectural Plans SEE A-111 SITE PLAN
Where abutting residentially zoned properties, exterior elevations of all proposed
structures over 140 square feet for the development site, including height, shall be
shown
g. On -Site Lighting Plan SEE LIGHTING PLANS AND RENDERINGS
Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing
and attached
Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination,
wattage, and luminous area
Additional Materials That May be Deferred at the discretion of the applicant until
Final Site Plan or Building Permit Submittal:
OEFEflfl FINRL PLANTING
List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground
cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size and spacing
NA ❑ Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, a planting
plan shall be provided.
Irrigation Plan showing of irrigation lines, required backflow preventers and above
ground utilities.
Photometric test report for each light source.
[� An applicant may submit conceptual floor plans in order to have staff address
Resolution of potential nuisance conflicts
Additional Materials That May be Required by the Director:
IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL
STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE
APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS
DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120:
NA ❑ Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting
ownership and listing all encumbrances.
NA ❑ A developer may be required to prepare a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) to identify
potential traffic impacts from proposed development and needed mitigation
measures.
Revised 1p/14 KL 7 of 11
NA ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to
demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240
NA ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of
bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the
top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW
NA ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if
the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or
a high water table, or if required by the City Engineer
Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional
standards of the overlay district on plans and narratives SEE NFFPIiNE
NA ❑ Where physical aspects of a proposed development, including but not limited to
scale, odor noise, glare or vibration, will impact less intensive surrounding uses,
the Director may request submittal of conceptual floor plans or other information
necessary to determine compliance with applicable standards.
NA ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified
in SDC 5.19-100
NA ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be
submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property
NA ❑ The applicant must demonstrate that an application has been submitted for any
required federal or state permit and provide a copy of the application upon request
NA ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land
and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development
NA ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100
and 5.21-100
NA ❑ An Annexation shall be submitted prior to submission of application, as specified
In SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but
within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer
Revised 1/7/14 KL 8 of 11
SPRINGFIELD
REET
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS OR 225 FIFTH ST
OREGON SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.375353
PAX: 541.736.1021
w .springgeldocgov
December 6, 2013
REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY:
In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help
engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and
Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became
apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added
bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of
decisions.
As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process.
Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require
development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater
scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet,
which reflects changes requested by the development community.
PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A
COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN
CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS
DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS:
1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location.
2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study.
(Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.)
3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept., Attn: Clayton
McEachem.
4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimum requirements for a complete
stormwater study.
5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stormwater
study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The
scoping sheet shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study.
Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter)
as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: http://www.springfield_
or.gov/DPW/EnginceringandConstructionResowr s.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Farms
section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process.
Sincerely,
Clayton McEachem, PE
City of Springfield, Development and Public Works
Email: cmceacherrrCspringfield-or.gov
Phone: (541) 736-1036
Fax: (541) 736-1021
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS
SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477
PHONE: 541.726.3753
FAX 541.726.1021
wtnv.springlield-orgov
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK
(Area below this line filled out by Applicant) ------------------------------
(Please rearm to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield Develop+nenl and Public Works; Fax # 736-1021, Phane # 736-1036),
email'cmceachervr(a2vpringfield-or.go v
Project Name:
Applicant:
Assessors Parcel #:
Date:
Land Use(s):
Phone #:
Project Size (Acres):
Fax #:
Approx. Impervious Area:
Email:
Project Description (include a copy of Assessor's map):
Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary:
Proposed Stormwater Best Management Pracflces:
------------- (Area below this line Ned put br the City and Returned to the Applicant)
(Ara minimum, all bases checked kv the City on al efiont and back of this sheet shall be submitted
a'm+a licalimt to he mm tete orsubmittal, ulthou hoHrerr uirements ma be a,y.)
Drainage Study Tyne (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): Mote UH may be substituted for Rational Method)
❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations)
❑ Mid -Level Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations)
Environmental Considerations:
❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Hillside Development:
❑ Wetland/Riparian: ❑ Floodway/Floodplain:
❑ Soil Type: ❑ Other Jurisdictions
Downstream Analysis:
❑ N/A
❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Design HGL to use for starting water surface elevation:
❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to:
Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachem@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021
COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS PorO clot IIx Only:
* Based upon the information provided an thefront of this sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is neededfor an
application to be complete for submittal with respect to drainage, however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC) or the City s Engineering Design Manual. Compliance with these requirements does not constitute site
approval, Additional site Spee fic information may be required. Note: Upon scoping sheet submittal, ensure completedform has been
signed in the space provided below:
Interim Desig. Standards/Water Quality (EDSPM Chapter 3
Req'd N/A
❑ All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multichambered catchbasin w/oil filtration
media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by
vegetated methods.
❑ Where required, vegetative stormwam, design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth
in Chapter 2 of the Eugene Smnnwater Management Manual.
❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified
by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Sec2A 1).
If stonnwater treatment swalc is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes,
bottom slope, and seed unix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual,
Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM.
All building rooftop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall
be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure.
U U Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon.
[_1 F-] A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map.
❑ R Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and over effects of a 25 -year storm event.
The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins.
❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contents, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑ ❑ Private Stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more RMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03AA). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DRQ. Refer to
the website: http://www.deu.state.or.us/wa/uic/uie.htm for more information.
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stormwater study.
' 1MPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAh'D SIGN!
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted Stormwater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03.4.0 On-site drainage shall be governed by the
Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC).
❑
Elevations of the HGL and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable.
❑
F-]
Design of Storm Systems (EDSPM Section 4.04).
❑
F-1
Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type and sizes clearly indicated on the plan set.
❑
F�
Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe and 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or
proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 lb load
without failure of the pipe structure.
❑
❑
Manning's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table 4-1 of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to
achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet per second at 0.5 vice full based on Table 4-1 as well.
❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contents, located at one foot interval. Include spot elevations and site grades showing how site
drains.
❑ ❑ Private Stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to
another.
❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more RMPs, with the exception of
residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03AA). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DRQ. Refer to
the website: http://www.deu.state.or.us/wa/uic/uie.htm for more information.
Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates for the 2 through 25 -year storm events.
*This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, ofthe stormwater study.
' 1MPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ BELOWAh'D SIGN!
As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted Stormwater study
and plan set. Signature Date
Form Version 5: June 2015
Project Site
Subject site:
1203 W.11amette
11 February 2022
Sone 210
Eugene, Oregon 97401
FAR:
541 4851003
Systems West Exterior Repairs and Recladding
rov211broka�:•.com
Systems West Engineers
ArMt.,W.. O,Mgn. Strategy
725 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Site Plan Review Application Narrative
Issued by: Serena Lim, Project Manager
Peter King, Project Architect
Project Site
Subject site:
Lane County Map No. 17033542, Tax Lot 04900
Size (gross):
0.49 acres / 21,301 square feet
FAR:
0.34 (existing) of 0.40 (minimum), no change proposed
Zoning:
Mixed -Use Commercial
Zoning overlays:
Nodal Development Overlay
Applicable Code Sections:
1. 3.2-625 Mixed -Use District Development Standards
2. 3.3-1020 Minimum Density and General Development Standards (Nodal Development
Overlay District)
Project Description:
The subject property is a former bank with an adjacent drive-through and parking lot, now used
as commercial office space by Systems West Engineers (SWE). SWE has no use for the drive-
through and would like to repair the building's exterior in concert with rebranding efforts and a
grand opening in spring of 2022.
The project includes the removal of the existing drive-through canopy and drive aisles, the
expansion of an existing planter, and replacement of some existing cladding with new cladding
materials. No other changes or alterations are proposed to the existing building, structure, or
window and door openings. There will be no change to the building area.
Page 1 of 6
Design Team
Owner 725 A Street LLC
c/o Adam Mangrich
1250 E 29'^ PI
Eugene OR 97403
Architect Rowell Brokaw Architects
John Rowell, Principal in Charge
Peter King, Project Architect
Serena Lim, Designer/Project Manager
Lorn Nelson, Landscape Architect
Structural Engineer Branch Engineering, Inc.
Rick Hernandez, P.E., S.E., Project Manager
CM/GC McKenzie Commercial
Jim Mender, Project Manager & Cost Estimator
Drawings Attached to this Application
Included Documents:
1. Sheet G-001 - Cover
2. Sheet A-005 — Perspective Renderings
3. Sheet A-010 — Site Plan — Existing and Demolition
4. Sheet A-111 — Site Plan
5. Sheet A-113 — Roof Plan and 11t Floor RCP
6. Sheet A-201 — Elevations — Demo
7. Sheet A-202 — Elevations
8. Sheet A-301 — Wall Sections
9. Sheet A-311 — Exterior Details
10. Sheet A-312 — Exterior / Site Details
11. Sheet LT -01 — Lighting Plan
12. Sheet LT -02 — Lighting Diagrams
ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 2 of 6
ZONING STANDARDS NARRATIVE
1. Mixed -Use Development Standards, Section 3.2-625
A. Section 3.2-625.A.1 requires all elevations of buildings abutting any street
to provide at least 500/c of their length and at least 25% of the ground
floor area as windows and/or doors allowing views in... On corner
lots/parcels this provision applies to both elevations.
4 The subject parcel is a corner lot and the existing building's north and west
facades face the public right-of-way. The impact of the west facade on
pedestrians is limited because it is set back approximately 100 feet from 7"
Street, and separated from the sidewalk by the existing parking lot.
The existing north elevation along A Street is 55% glazed (by length and ground -
level wall area) and complies with this requirement. The existing west elevation
along 7' Street is glazed on 32% of the length and 22% of the ground -level wall
area, so this fagade is an existing nonconforming condition. One reason for the
solidity of the west wall is that the bank vault is located in the south west corner
of the building.
While no changes are proposed to the existing wall openings, new bold -colored
sunshades at each of the existing punched openings and new landscaping along
the west wall of the building will provide pedestrian -scale interest on the west
elevation.
B. Section 3.2-625.A.2 requires at least 30% (linear) of the primary entrance
elevation to be windows with views into lobbies, displays, or working
areas for all industrial uses.
4 The existing north elevation includes the primary entrance and is 55% glazed.
The existing elevation complies with this standard. (OR the standard only applies
to industrial uses and is not applicable).
C. Section 3.2-625.A.3.a-c requires wall offsets in the form of 4 -foot
recesses, or 4 -foot extensions, or 3 -foot roof elevation changes at least
every 50 feet.
4 The primary building facade along A street meets this standard. The existing
west face of the building abutting the existing parking lot is mostly straight and
is an existing non -conforming condition. Because the scope of this project is
limited to exterior repairs and cosmetic improvements, changing the existing
structure to meet this standard would pose an unreasonable burden on the
Owner and such changes are not proposed.
D. Section 3.2-625.A.4 requires the inclusion of architectural features (e.g.
offsets, windows, wood siding, brick, stucco, textured materials) to break
up expanses of single -element building elevations.
ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 3 of 6
4 The existing north and south elevations comply with this standard; stone
cladding and floor -to -ceiling windows alternate with stucco exterior walls. A
combination of new phenolic (wood) rainscreen cladding, new metal cladding,
and freshly painted existing stucco are proposed to improve the appearance of
the north and south facades; the existing stone cladding is to remain.
The existing west facade is rundown, lacks composition, and is visually busy; the
proposed metal cladding will simplify the overall material palette and unify the
building's features. Three new sunshades will protrude appx. 2 feet from the wall
and will be painted a bold color to punctuate the west elevation. The expansion
of an existing planter will accommodate new landscaping that will provide natural
colors and textures along the entire west elevation.
E. Section 3.2-625.A.5 requires differentiation between the ground level and
upper stores through the use of bays, balconies, awnings, canopies,
variation in materials, etc.
4 This standard is not applicable because the 2nd floor of the building is primarily
attic and storage space. (See 1.D. response for a description of the building's
exterior features.)
F. Section 3.2-625.A.6 pertains to structures listed on the Springfield Historic
Landmark Inventory and does not apply.
G. The requirements of Section 3.2-625.6 pertain to new buildings and do not
apply.
H. Section 3.2-625.0 requires the provision of weather -protected areas
(awnings, canopies) adjacent to sidewalks and plazas for new
developments.
4 The existing building features a prominent overhang that provides ample
protection from weather at the primary entrance along A street. The overhang
wraps from the northeast corner to the northwest corner of the building and is
echoed by a change in materials at the southwest corner that continues above
the recessed (covered) south/rear entrance along the public alley.
I. Section 3.2-625.D.i.a requires mixed-use developments to provide
landscaping and screening in accordance with Sections 4.4-105 and 4.4-
110.
4 Standard 4.4-105 pertains to new developments and is not applicable. However,
expanded landscaped areas are proposed adjacent to the existing main entrance
and along the west elevation of the existing building. Per Standard 4.4-105.G,
the existing irrigation system will be extended to support new landscaping. Per
Standard 4.4-105.I, existing plants and trees to remain will be protected or not
impacted by the proposed project.
Standards 4.4-110.A.1-3 and 5-6 are not applicable to the subject property.
ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 4 of 6
Standard 4.4-110.A.4 requires screening for trash receptacles. Office trash and
recycling is located in the covered area (south/rear entrance) along the public
alley. This area is not screened. The building is built to the property line in this
location and there is not sufficient room for vegetative screening. A fence in this
location would obstruct existing floor -to -ceiling windows on the south facade and
create a dark and cagey environment at the rear entrance and could obstruct
emergency egress from the building. The applicant is not proposing changes to
this existing non -conforming condition.
J. Section 3.2-625.D.1.b requires street trees in accordance with Section 4.2-
140.
4 The requirements of this section are not applicable because the scope of site
improvements is limited to the demolition area and planters immediately
adjacent to the exterior walls of the existing building. No improvements to the
parking lot or surrounding sidewalks are proposed; existing trees are to remain.
K. Section 3.2-625.13.2 requires screening in accordance with Section 4.4-110
and subsections a -c.
Standard 3.2-625.D.2.a pertains to areas abutting residential districts and does
not apply.
Standard 3.2-625.D.2.b requires ground -mounted utility equipment to be located
to minimize visual impact or screened. No new above-ground/ground-mounted
utility equipment is proposed, and all existing above-ground/ground-mounted
utility equipment to remain is either placed in a discrete location or screened by
equipment covers or landscaping.
Standard 3.2-625.D.2.c requires landscaping to attain 50% coverage within 2
years and 100% coverage within 4 years. The proposed new landscaping is
designed and species selected to meet this requirement.
L. Section 3.2-625.D.3 requires irrigation systems to support landscaping
and encourages drought -resistant plants.
4 Existing irrigation systems will be extended to support new landscaping in the
proposed expanded planter beds, and plant species have been selected with
consideration for the conditions of their proposed location.
M. Section 3.2-625.D.4 is redundant to Section 3.2-625.D.2.a-c. See above.
N. Section 3.2-625.E.1-4 pertain to street networks and do not apply to the
proposed project's limited scope of work.
ROWELL BROKAW ARCHIIECTS Page 5 of 6
O. Standard 3.2-625.E.5 requires pedestrian paths and sidewalks to
conveniently connect all building entrances with each other and to public
rights-of-way.
4 Existing building entrances are directly accessible from the public right-of-way;
the north entrance abuts the sidewalk to the north, and the south entrance abuts
the public alley to the south.
P. Section 3.2-625.F.1-5 pertains to a development's compatibility with
surrounding parcels in other zones and does not apply to the subject
property or the proposed scope of work.
Q. Section 3.2-625.G requires new structures and substantial improvements
to existing buildings to provide pedestrian amenities.
+ These standards do not apply to the proposed project because the scope of work
is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to the existing
building. However, the proposed landscaping and exterior lighting will improve
the overall appearance and pedestrian experience of the site.
2. Nodal Development Overlay District - Minimum Density and General Development
Standards, Section 3.3-1020
R. Section 3.3-1020.A requires a minimum FAR of 0.40 for parcels in a MUC
zone.
4 The existing building and site have a FAR of 0.34 and are nonconforming,
however this standard is not applicable to the proposed project because the
scope of work is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to
the existing building.
S. Section 3.3-1020.13 requires a maximum setback of 20 feet for commercial
uses and no minimum setback.
4 The existing building complies with this standard on its north elevation and is
nonconforming on its west elevation where an existing parking lot separates the
building from the right-of-way. This standard is not applicable to the proposed
project because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic
improvements to the existing building.
T. Section 3.3-1020.0 prohibits the location of parking areas between main
buildings and the street.
U. The north (A street) side of the property complies with this standard (existing
building and planters occupy 46% of site frontage). The west side is nonconforming
where the existing parking lot separates the building from the right-of-way for the
entire length of the property. This standard is not applicable to the proposed project
because the scope is limited to exterior/site repairs and cosmetic improvements to
the existing building.
ROWELL BROKAW ARCHITECTS Page 6 of 6
LL
D € y�{S �P gra
3E
x Skies A
et
O