HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 11 Capital Improvement ProgramAGENDA ITEM
SUMMARY Meeting Date: 1/18/2022
Meeting Type: Regular Meeting
Staff Contact/Dept.: Jeff Paschall, DPW -CMD
Staff Phone No: 541-726-1674
Estimated Time: 10 Minutes
SPRINGFIELD Council Goals: Maintain and Improve
CITY COUNCIL Infrastructure and Facilities
ITEM TITLE:
2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT PLAN
ACTION
Conduct a Public Hearing on the Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
REQUESTED:
After Public Input, by Motion Adopt or Reject the 2023-2027 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY REINVESTMENT PLAN.
ISSUE
The City of Springfield's 2023-2027 CIP — A Community Reinvestment Plan has
STATEMENT:
been drafted by staff, reviewed by the Planning Commission (September 21, 2021
and October 5, 2021), and reviewed by the City Council in work session (January 3,
2022). It is now ready for public hearing and adoption.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Communication Memorandum from 1/3/2022 work session
2. 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program— A Community Reinvestment
DISCUSSION/
The City of Springfield's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year
FINANCIAL
Community Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding,
IMPACT:
evaluation, and construction of City owned and operated public facilities. A
fundamental purpose of the CIP is to facilitate the efficient use of capital resources
to maintain, improve, and expand City assets. The underlying concept is to
strategically prioritize and program these resources to extend the useful life of
existing assets, replace assets before failure, and to support growth with timely
expansion of key infrastructure. The first year of the adopted CIP will be used to
program new projects in the FY23 Capital Budget.
As a reference, the Council Briefing Memorandum from the January 3, 2022 work
session is included as Attachment 1.
After hearing public comments, Council is requested to adopt the 2023 — 2027
Capital Improvement Program by motion.
MEMORANDUM City of Springfield
Date: 1/3/2022
To: Nancy Newton COUNCIL
From: Jeff Paschall, City Engineer BRIEFING
Tom Boyatt, Community Development Director
Subject: 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT MEMORANDUM
PROGRAM, A COMMUNITY
REINVESTMENT PLAN
ISSUE: Draft project lists have been prepared for the City of Springfield's 2023-2027 CIP — A
Community Reinvestment Plan. The lists have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and
are now being brought to the City Council for review and comment prior to a Public Hearing
scheduled for January 18, 2022
COUNCIL GOALS/
MANDATE:
Maintain and Improve Infrastructure and Facilities
Maintaining and adopting an annual CIP is integral to implementing several Council Goals, but
it is critical to maintaining and improving City owned infrastructure and facilities, or identifying
new infrastructure needs as the City grows.
DISCUSSION:
The City of Springfield's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community
Reinvestment Plan that describes the near-term program for funding, evaluation, and
construction of City owned and operated public facilities. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is
to facilitate the efficient use of capital resources to maintain, improve, and expand City assets.
The underlying concept is to strategically prioritize and program these resources to extend the
useful life of existing assets, replace assets before failure, and to support growth with timely
expansion of key infrastructure.
The CIP is typically updated on a biennial schedule, however due to the many unforeseen events
over the last year, the update did not follow the traditional schedule and process. In addition, the
traditional CIP update schedule was not well aligned with the City's budget calendar, with the
draft Capital Budget completed before adoption of the CIP. Council agreed to update the
schedule so that the CIP can be adopted in the fall/winter prior to preparation of the draft Capital
Budget during the winter/spring.
The CIP is an intermediate step in a process that originates with long term planning activities
that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future and concludes with
the adoption of the annual Capital Budget to appropriate funds to construction projects.
Operation and maintenance cost is separately included in the City's budget.
As an interim step in the process, the CIP identifies the facilities concepts that may reasonably
be expected to be required in the next five years, refines those concepts, and provides a priority
list of projects. Priority projects are selected from the long list of needed capital improvements
identified in the various master plans, refinement plans, or other asset management reports and
tools. The draft project lists are then presented to both the Planning Commission and the City
Council for public review and comment prior to adoption by the City Council.
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 3
MEMORANDUM
Page 2
Over the last decade, the City has seen the wastewater and stormwater funds stabilize. This
supported completion of nearly all the rehabilitation and upgrade work identified in the 2008
Wastewater Master Plan. In addition, some large stormwater projects such as the Mill Race
restoration and Mill Race Stormwater Treatment Facility were completed. Street and
Transportation funds have not seen growth to keep pace with operating costs and do not provide
for robust capital spending on those systems. Voters approved a general obligation bond in 2018
dedicated to preservation of several collector and arterial street segments, otherwise the City
relies on federal and state funding sources to support a majority of street and transportation
projects with a majority share of street capital transfers and systems development charges
dedicated to providing required local match to those outside funding sources.
The project section of the 2023-2027 CIP is organized by asset system with three sections for
each system. The first section is a table that has details for the projects that are either in the
current capital budget or have been completed since the last CIP update. The next section is the
project detail sheets for those projects proposed to be programmed over the next five-year cycle.
The last section is another table detailing the list of currently unfunded or partially funded
projects. As appropriate resources become available or potential grant opportunities are
identified these lists will be used to match projects with those opportunities.
Stormwater — In review of the current capital budget and the previous CIP, a majority of the
projects have been placed into a hold status. This is due to focusing limited capital delivery
staffing resources to delivery of the 2018 GO Bond street preservation projects, as well as
federal aid funded projects such as Mill Street Reconstruction. However, water quality
initiatives are being advanced as many of the street projects incorporate improvements to treat
runoff from street surfaces.
Street and Transportation — Currently all but one of the street segments scheduled for
preservation through the voter approved five-year general obligation bond are either completed
or in active construction. The final segment (Centennial Boulevard from Aspen St. to Prescott
St.) is anticipated to be under construction in the spring of 2022. Several safety and pedestrian
projects were also completed over the past three years, and many others are in the design phase
with construction anticipated in 2022 or 2023.
Wastewater — Several unplanned sewer projects have been completed over the last couple of
years as issues have been identified through routine inspection by operations staff, or through
other project work. The most recent example is the repair of a broken pipe as part of the
Mohawk Boulevard preservation project. Several other projects are currently in the design
phase with anticipated construction in either 2022 or 2023. There are two pipeline rehabilitation
projects proposed in the 2023-2027 CIP, that have been identified through the Flow Monitoring
Analysis project. Additionally, with the completion of the hydraulic model update, staff is
planning to have a consultant under contract in early 2022 to complete an update of the
Wastewater Master Plan.
Buildings and Facilities — Available funding for building and facilities projects is very limited so
there is a long list of identified unfunded projects or programs. However, upgrades to the fuel
facility storm system and a building assessment at the Booth Kelly site were completed in 2021.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The CIP does not carry budget authority. It is, however, a valuable planning tool used to guide
staff, the Budget Committee, and the City Council in creating the annual budget to fund priority
projects.
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 3
MEMORANDUM
Page 3
RECOMMENDED ACTION: The Council is requested to review and provide consensus for
the recommended five-year CIP. The CIP, as modified by any Council input, will be brought
back to the Council for public comment and adoption at their January 18, 2022, regular meeting.
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 3
SPRINGFIELD
ii970!
EGON
1 � ;
- 4
Ilk
A.
A Community Reinvestment Plan
2023-2027
N eei.. n
l7
Nar oW
Rd
v = M -1a Rd
H+Y taA u,
m OlymPicgr ¢'�a
V � nyyV Blvd Centennial Blvd S�
Pioneer Parkway West
y N
kgSpringfield 5'a�gye
Main St
m
S n n
ragye•w
Attachment 2, Page 1 of 67
58th St Thurston Re
Main St
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
FY 2023-2026
Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
A Community Reinvestment Plan
Sean VanGordon, Mayor
City Council
Damien Pitts
Ward 1
Steve Moe
Ward 2
Kori Rodley
Ward 3
Leonard Stoehr
Ward4
Marilee Woodrow
Ward 5
Joe Pishioneri
Ward 6
Nancy Newton, City Manager
Niel Laudati, Assistant City Manager
Attachment 2, Page 2 of 67
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVESUMMARY................................................................................................................... 1
SECTION I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIPGoals........................................................................................................................... 5
CIP Project Development and Review Process................................................................. 5
Typesof Capital Needs...................................................................................................... 6
Project Selection Resources.............................................................................................. 6
Facilities Plans
Wastewater Master Plan..................................................................................... 6
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan....................................................................... 7
Building and Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work .............................. 8
UrbanRenewal Plans........................................................................................................ 9
Land Use Plans
Public Facilities and Services Plan........................................................................ 9
Springfield Transportation System Plan............................................................ 10
RefinementPlans............................................................................................... 10
SECTION II FUNDING
Capital Project Funding..............................................................................
Systems Development Charges.................................................................
External Revenue Sources..........................................................................
OtherRevenues.........................................................................................
City Accounting Funds Used for Capital Resources ...................................
SECTION III FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
Financial Summaries—All Programs
SECTION IV PROJECTS
Projects Table of Contents
12
12
13
13
.. 14
.......................................................................... 18
................................................. 19
Attachment 2, Page 3 of 67
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
INTRODUCTION
The City of Springfield's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is a five-year Community Reinvestment Plan
that identifies capital investments necessary in the next five-year horizon to sustain, improve, and grow
City assets and infrastructure systems. A fundamental purpose of the CIP is to prioritize and balance
capital needs with capital funding resources. The underlying concept is to program all reasonably
available sources of revenue for future expenditures. Since projected revenue sources may produce
significantly less than the needs identified in the City's infrastructure facilities plans and asset
management system, the CIP is used as the vehicle to balance priorities and funding while maintaining
good stewardship over City assets.
The CIP is updated on a biennial schedule and is an intermediate step in a process that originates with
long term planning activities that anticipate the need for public facilities at least 20 years into the future
and concludes with the adoption of the annual Capital Budget. Based on available information during
each update cycle, projects are selected and prioritized from the long list of needed capital
improvements identified through the City's asset management program and from the various master
plans and refinement plans adopted by the City Council. Traditionally, the principal constraints in
developing the CIP are the realistic availability of staff and financial resources to support the timely
completion of each cycle's project portfolio.
The first two years of the CIP will be the basis for developing the City's Capital Budget for FY23 and FY24
with such modifications as are necessary or prudent to respond to immediate concerns and the often -
fluid nature of funding opportunities. In preparation of the capital budget, it is important to consider not
only the immediate availability of financial resources, but also the availability of resources to manage
design and construction. This may mean staff resources to conduct those activities in house, or to
manage consultants who take on responsibility for design and construction management. A successful
capital budget must be mindful of budgeting only those projects or project phases that the City has the
capacity to deliver. The Development and Public Works Department maintains two capital project
delivery groups, one for the delivery of local projects presented in this document, and the second for
delivery of regional projects for the Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission capital
improvement program.
Projects that are currently in Capital Budget and in various stages of planning, design, and construction
are shown in a table at the beginning of each specific infrastructure program section. At the end of each
program section the CIP includes a list of projects that have been identified through various facilities
planning efforts but are currently unfunded or not programmed due to staff resource limitations. These
projects are aimed at improving neighborhoods, providing for economic growth, improving traffic
safety, mobility, and access, complying with environmental standards, and maintaining the existing city
infrastructure.
FY At1%tM6f0t2 Ir 6r*r6f®'Oram Page 1
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW
The public input process for the CIP typically begins every other year in August when citizens,
organizations, and City staff are asked to suggest projects for consideration in the CIP. The Planning
Commission and the City Council then review the draft CIP and a public hearing is held prior to Council
adoption.
o August: CIP project review process starts
o September: Capital project requests go to Public and City Departments
o September: publish Internal draft CIP
o September/October: Planning Commission reviews Draft CIP
o November/December: City Council work session review and Public Hearing on Draft CIP
o January/February: Draft Capital Budget Prepared
o April/May: Capital Budget presented to Budget Committee
The City's final commitment to spend public funds occurs through the annual City budget process.
Although the CIP is the starting point for the annual Capital Budget, the projects budgeted each year can
vary somewhat from those proposed in the CIP.
PROJECT CATEGORIZATION
Projects in the CIP are grouped by relevant infrastructure program areas (stormwater, streets and
transportation, wastewater, and buildings and facilities). The first list of projects in each program area
are those that have been funded in previous CIPS and are in the current capital budget. The next set of
projects are those that are proposed for programming over the next five-year period and are described
in detailed projects sheets. The final list of projects in each program area are high priority needs that are
not scheduled to be programmed over the next five-year period due to lack of funding or staffing
resources. Should available resources be identified, these projects may be budgeted before the next CIP
update.
The following are descriptions of the City's most significant projects in the CIP:
Franklin Boulevard Phase 2 —The Franklin Boulevard Reconstruction Project will construct modern urban
standards improvements on the old Hwy 99 alignment in Glenwood called Franklin Boulevard between
the Franklin/Glenwood intersection and the Franklin/McVay intersection to support Glenwood
redevelopment and regional safety and mobility for transit, bicycles/pedestrians, and autos. Phase 1
has been completed with the construction of the roundabouts at the Franklin/McVay intersection and
improvements extending just west of Concord Street. Design of improvements from Mississippi Avenue
to Henderson Avenue is currently underway with funds received in 2020. In November 2021 that City
learned that a U.S. Department of Transportation Rebuilding America, Infrastructure with Sustainability
and Equity (RAISE) Grant was awarded to the project in a joint application with Eugene. This grant
award will fund the construction of the roundabout at Mississippi Avenue. The City continues to seek
funding opportunities to continue advancing the future vision and improvements for Franklin Boulevard.
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Projects — One of the key goals of the Capacity, Management, Operations,
and Maintenance Program is to eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1) of groundwater into the sanitary
FY At1%tM6f0t2 Ir 6r>ar6 f®'Oram Page 2
sewer system. Utilizing the recently updated and calibrated hydraulic model, sanitary sewer basins with
potential high levels of 1/1 were identified. Two micro -basins (70th Street and 72nd Street) have been
programmed for rehabilitation in the CIP.
42nd Street Operational, Safety, and Mobility Improvements — Upgrade to address safety and operations,
in particular for freight accessing the OR 126 Expressway -Freight Route and OR 12613 -Main St. Upgrade
the UP rail crossing serving the International Paper industrial center, upgrade intersection control at the
westbound OR 126 ramp terminal, add urban level lighting, add ADA -accessible connections from
Olympic St. and Industrial Ave. to the McKenzie Levee Path, add left turn bay on 42nd St. at Industrial
Ave and improve traffic signals at the eastbound OR 126 ramp terminal, Olympic Street and the
International Paper driveways
Irving Slough Improvements —The project begins near 42nd Street and OR 126 and runs north to the
Urban Growth Boundary. The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for
flood control and the construction of a stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements and
upgrades will be incorporated into the project where applicable to meet regulatory requirements. This
project is identified as a priority in the adopted Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.
FINANCING
There are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include revenues derived
from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes) which function like user fees. By Council direction,
these are preferentially devoted to preservation of existing infrastructure. The second major source is
Systems Development Charges (SDC), which are designed to recover, from development, the cost
impact that development has on infrastructure, both existing and needed to meet the future demands
of development. A large portion of these revenues must, by law, be devoted to capacity increasing
capital activity. Only that portion of SDC revenue which is derived from a reimbursement fee may be
spent on preservation or rehabilitation of existing infrastructure. A third major source of capital funding
is external contributions, in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans, payments by developers for
specific improvements, and assessments of benefitted property owners, also for specific improvements.
Other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City's two urban renewal
districts (Glenwood and Downtown), and revenue from internally generated charges also play a role.
In addition to funding direct project construction, Local Wastewater and Drainage SDC revenues fund
debt service payments for bonds sold to fund prior projects. These projects include both those that
increased capacity and wastewater rehabilitation projects as part of program to reduce inflow and
infiltration and meet permit requirements. The City sold local wastewater revenue bonds in 2009 and
storm drainage revenue bonds in 2010. Wastewater Bond proceeds were dedicated to completing
required rehabilitation projects as well as expanding sanitary sewer service into unserved areas within
the Urban Growth Boundary to promote future growth. Stormwater revenue bonds have been used to
complete several major stormwater initiatives, and several capital projects related to the City's
obligation to address stormwater quality, permitting and threatened fish impacts.'
' For bonding purposes, the local wastewater and stormwater utilities are combined into a single sewer utility.
FY At1%tM6f0t2 Ir 6r&r6f®'Oram Page 3
In 2018 voters passed a 5 -year general obligation bond dedicated to street preservation of several
arterial and collector streets across the City. The last of these projects is scheduled for completion
during the 2022 construction season. In addition, a portion of increased revenue to the street fund from
the 2017 State Transportation Bill (HB 2017) was directed to the slurry seal program allowing for several
local residential streets to be crack sealed and an asphalt slurry to be applied to reseal and preserve the
existing surface. Current revenue projections will allow for small annual program to preserve and
maintain local and residential streets to be funded in the CIP for the next 5 -year cycle. Additionally, the
ADA transition program will see a small increase in funding as well as an annual allocation to continue to
advance upgrades to bring City facilities into compliance with current standards improving access to all
users. However, it must be noted that current revenue projections do not support an effective street
preservation program.
System Development Charge (SDC) revenue has remained stable with improvement SDCs the majority
of funds received. Improvement SDC revenue may only be programmed in support of projects that
expand capacity and are on the adopted SDC projects lists. SDC reserves are not sufficient to support all
projects on the list and are typically utilized to leverage external funding sources such as federal and
state grants.
External sources, such as intergovernmental grants, or developer or benefitted property owner
contributions, are an important, but highly volatile funding source. Generally, they do not form the basis
for concluding a project can be funded, but rather when such funding sources develop, can be a trigger
to increase the priority of a project. Recently, the City has had some success in developing external
funding for isolated projects, such as the Mill Street Reconstruction, Franklin Boulevard, and the South
28th Street paving project. Future success is highly dependent upon the fiscal and monetary policies of
other levels of government.
CONCLUSION
The Capital Improvement Program serves as a guide for the City's needed infrastructure improvements.
It is shaped by citizen input, the best professional judgment of staff and outside experts, and estimates
of the City's projected financial resources. The CIP is subject to biennial review and revision. The
direction provided by this document helps the City of Springfield target its resources to capital
improvements which best serve the needs of the citizens of Springfield.
FY At1MtM6f0t2 Ir erfpr6f®dram Page 4
SECTION I CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
CIP GOALS
The goals of the CIP include:
1) Providing a balanced program for capital improvements given reasonably anticipated funding
and staff resources over a five-year or greater planning period and identifying the extent to
which resources can meet capital needs;
2) Improving neighborhoods;
3) Providing for economic and community growth;
4) Improving safety, access, and mobility across all transportation modes;
5) Complying with environmental standards and improving environmental quality;
6) Maintaining the existing City infrastructure; and
7) Protecting public health and safety.
CIP PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND REVIEW PROCESS
Capital improvements must be consistent with the Metropolitan Area General Comprehensive Plan, the
Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP), the Springfield 2030 Comprehensive Plan, The Springfield
Transportation System Plan, and all other Council adopted plans and policies. The relevant plans are
listed in a subsequent section of this report.
In general, all Capital Projects included in the CIP meet one or more of the following criteria:
1) Project addresses State or Federal laws or regulations to eliminate or reduce the potential for
environmental degradation or health hazards or to address issues that affect the safety and
general welfare of the community.
2) Project maintains existing assets, extends the useful life of assets, or improves or expands
infrastructure to facilitate community development and/or improve operations.
3) Project responds to requests from citizens, neighborhood groups, advisory committees, or
government bodies, and provides a public benefit.
4) Project is included in local and/or regional infrastructure plans.
In the adopted CIP only those capital improvements which are funded within the current projections for
the appropriate revenue streams are considered. Projects for which the funding is not identified or
programmed are shown in the unfunded priority project list strictly for informational purposes.
Historically, the CIP has not attempted to consider whether or not the City has the operating resources
(either staff or funding for consultants to manage projects), necessary to advance a particular project.
FY At1%tM6f0t2 Ir 6r&r6f®'Oram Page 5
TYPES OF CAPITAL NEED
Rehabilitation & Preservation of Existing Capital Assets
The CIP reflects the broad direction of the City Council to preserve existing capital assets before they fall
into disrepair and require expensive rehabilitation or replacement. Preservation is an important tool
used to protect or extend the asset's useful life. If preservation is not completed on a regular and timely
basis, the asset will deteriorate prematurely and its benefit to the community will be lost. In that event
reconstruction may be required. Reconstruction costs are frequently multiple times the cost of
preservation and maintenance, particularly for street surfaces.
All capital assets require preservation or rehabilitation activities during their useful life and the City must
demonstrate fiscal responsibility by planning for this need. Inclusion of these projects in the CIP is a
necessary step to plan for that preservation and rehabilitation.
New Capital Facilities and Capacity Enhancements
As the City reaches outward into the Urban Growth Boundary or anticipates infill or increased density of
development in the city limits, the need to plan for expansion of capital assets and provide safe and
efficient capital facilities increases. New streets are necessary to provide for the movement of goods
and people and access to property in developing areas. In addition, wastewater and stormwater systems
are necessary to protect water quality, people and the environment in order to preserve the health,
welfare, and safety of the community.
PROJECT SELECTION RESOURCES
The following is a list of various plans with descriptive summaries that guide the decisions made about
CIP project choice. The City draws a distinction between facilities plans, which focus on facility needs
and how systems function, and land use plans, which provide more general guidance. General guidance
can inform the development of facilities plans and can constrain facility development to conform to the
policy set of the land use planning document. (The Springfield Transportation System Plan is somewhat
of an exception to these distinctions, since it is a land use plan that also serves as a facilities plan and
does contain specific project guidance.)
FACILITIES PLANS
Wastewater Master Plan (2008)
The City of Springfield provides wastewater collection and conveyance services by way of a system of
pipelines and pump stations that it owns and operates. Along with the City of Eugene, Springfield
discharges to a regional collection and treatment system owned by the Metropolitan Wastewater
Management Commission (MWMC). Springfield's Wastewater Master Plan provides an assessment of
existing and future needs for the City's collection system. Because the City's system connects to the
regional system, the Master Plan must consider and reflect results of the MWMC's Since completion of
the Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) in 2010, The City along with its regional partners
(Eugene and MWMC) have written and implemented a Capacity, Management, Operations and
FY At1%tM6f0t2 Ir 6r9ar6 f®'Oram Page 6
Maintenance program. One of the key elements was to conduct a gap analysis across all aspects of the
operation and management of the City's wastewater collection system. For the CIP, a key gap, was a
developing and implementing a comprehensive flow monitoring plan that included data collection and
analysis of data to identify necessary projects. The initial phases of this work have completed and will
now inform an update to the Wastewater Master Plan which currently underway.
The Current Master Plan is intended to identify existing and future capacity constraints, determine
capacity requirements and identify system improvements necessary to meet the City's projected
population and employment growth through the 2025 planning year. The Department of Environmental
Quality has issued a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (#102486) for
Springfield, Eugene and MWMC, which includes conditions under which treated wastewater can be
discharged to the Willamette River. Included in those conditions is a requirement that Springfield,
Eugene and MWMC fully implement a wet weather flow management strategy to comply with the
State's Bacteria Standard, which prohibits storm related overflows. The standard states that no
untreated wastewater can be discharged to the waters of the State or US, except under the following
conditions: for flows greater than those occurring for the 24-hour duration, 1 in 5 -year winter and 1 in
10 -year summer storms.
Subsequent to the development and completion of the WWFMP, the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality, in response to an objection from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), is
no longer permitted to include the exceptions for untreated wastewater discharges as provided by the
State's Bacteria Standard. DEQ is currently placing a prohibition on all overflows from wastewater
conveyance systems and associated pump stations. This regulatory change places additional burden on
the conveyance system operation and maintenance to eliminate all wet weather-related overflows. The
NPDES permit for the regional wastewater treatment plant is scheduled for renewal in the first quarter
of 2022 and will contain the prohibition of all overflows absent a change of policy from EPA.
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (2008)
In 2008, the City Council adopted a comprehensive Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP). The
purpose of this document is to provide a guide to plan for more comprehensive, efficient, and multi -
objective management of the City's stormwater system. The majority of the City's stormwater runoff
drains through an integrated network of pipes and open channels, discharging either directly to the
main stem Willamette or McKenzie Rivers or through outfalls to a tributary of either of those rivers.
Prior to the SWFMP, the City typically designed and constructed facilities for treating and conveying
stormwater runoff on an individual development or site -by -site basis. In addition, as is typical for nearly
all cities, most of the City's stormwater collection and conveyance system was historically designed and
built with the sole objective of addressing flooding issues.
Most of the major portions of the City's stormwater drainage system infrastructure were built during
the 1960s and as development increased, the system was retrofitted with extensions and additions.
Most of the main conveyance system was not upsized to facilitate the increased flows associated with
full City build out.
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWrP@itRrEWam Page 7
The City also has a Council -adopted Stormwater Management Plan which establishes goals, policies and
implementation actions to address water quality and management of the stormwater system, including
open waterways within the City's jurisdiction. This plan is required and approved by the Department of
Environmental Quality (DEQ) as part of its issuance and management of the City's stormwater discharge
permit. In June of 2021, after a several year process, DEQ issued the City an updated Phase II National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Stormwater Permit. This revised permit
contains more stringent regulatory requirements and standards that the City will be expected to meet
by the end of 2024. Additionally, the Willamette River and McKenzie River (a tributary to the Willamette
River) are listed on the State's 303(d) list indicating that water quality standards for specific pollutants in
these streams are currently not being met. The City must address Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL)
limitations on the level of certain pollutants (temperature, bacteria, and mercury) through
implementation of the Stormwater Management Plan and the TMDL Implementation Plan. These plans
and requirements impact the nature and design of capital projects that are constructed to manage
stormwater.
Building & Facilities Preservation and Maintenance Work Plan
This plan identifies and addresses capital improvement needs at City owned buildings, including: City
Hall, Springfield Justice Center, Springfield Museum, Booth Kelly Center, fire stations, Development and
Public Works operations buildings, and the Depot. The plan tracks and provides a snapshot of repairs
and asset preservation improvements that are immediately evident, and which have been deferred for
various reasons, together with ongoing maintenance needs and necessary replacement of building
systems expected to reach the end of their useful life.
The City continues to face several critical building/facilities operations, maintenance, and preservation
issues. In preparation of the FY21 Capital budget, a $59 million list of deferred/backlog facilities repairs
were identified, along with a $300k annual need for routine maintenance. needs as well as ongoing
annual maintenance/preservation needs. In FY09, the City implemented an Internal Building
Preservation Charge with intent to program $300k annually for ongoing preservation. Since inception,
the Internal Building Preservation Charge on average has generated just over $260k per year dedicated
to projects, through FY19. Staff has developed the City Buildings/Facilities Work Plan inclusive of all City
Fire Stations, City Hall, Springfield Justice Center, Development and Public Works operations facilities,
Springfield Depot, and the Carter Building. For example, the Buildings and Facilities unfunded project list
included in this CIP an unfunded project to replace the City Hall HVAC System at an estimated cost of
$1.8 million. The last major update or replacement to the system was nearly 20 years ago and the
current units are nearing the end of the serviceable life.
Additionally, there are other project management responsibilities related to public buildings and
facilities maintenance and preservations that have been identified through previously adopted CIP
documents, such as preservation projects at the Depot and Booth Kelly and demolition of the Carpenter
shed and gun range at Booth Kelly. Any future building needs such as new fire station construction or
potential demolition of the Carter Building will be addressed through the CIP process.
FYAR1ed W i_%1 PSgWrP JntRrO7am Page 8
URBAN RENEWAL PLANS
Downtown Urban Renewal Plan (2007)
The primary goal of the Downtown Urban Renewal Plan is to assist in the revitalization of business and
elimination of blight in the downtown area. The Downtown Urban Renewal Plan has projects listed to
obtain these goals.
Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan (1999, updated 2004)
The primary goal of the Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan is to eliminate blighting influences found in the
Renewal Area. The Glenwood Urban Renewal Plan project list includes:
o Promote private development and redevelopment;
o Rehabilitate building stock;
C) Improvements to streets, sidewalks, bikeways, pathways, streetscapes, parks, and open spaces;
o Utility improvements;
o Parking;
o Public facilities;
C) Housing;
o Public signage and community gateway entrance improvements.
LAND USE PLANS
Metro Plan
The Metro Plan serves as the sole official long-range comprehensive plan (public policy document) of
metropolitan Lane County and the cities of Eugene and Springfield. As Springfield and Eugene carry out
their obligations under ORS 197.304 which required establishing separate urban growth boundaries,
more comprehensive planning is taking place on a city -specific basis, through city -specific plans adopted
by each jurisdiction. The Metro Plan continues to include some of the regional land use planning that is
collaboratively addressed by Lane County, Eugene and Springfield. The Metro Plan provides the overall
framework for planning functions, including establishing the policy basis for a general, coordinated,
long-range approach among affected agencies for the provision of the facilities and services needed in
the metropolitan area.
Springfield Comprehensive Plan
The Springfield Comprehensive Plan establishes the Springfield urban growth boundary and sets policy
direction in Springfield -specific elements, including Economic Development, Residential Land Use &
Housing, and Urbanization. The Recreation Element is the Willamalane Park and Recreation
Comprehensive Plan, and the Transportation Element is the Springfield Transportation System Plan.
Springfield will continue to further add to and revise the Springfield Comprehensive Plan and come to
rely less on the Metro Plan for city -specific policy.
Public Facilities and Services Plan
FYA4t1ed(W i_%1 PSgWrP9ntRrO7am Page 9
The Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP) is an element of the Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area
General Plan (Metro Plan). It is the Metro Plan Element which identifies significant facilities in general
terms and confirms that those facilities are consistent with the planning policies set out in the Metro
Plan. The projects identified in the PFSP are generally a subset of the projects contained in the various
facilities plans. The PFSP does not identify transportation projects, which are covered in the Springfield
Transportation System Plan, but does identify wastewater and stormwater projects, among others. The
PFSP does not, nor should it, identify every project; it includes only those projects identified as
significant on the basis of definitions set forth in the PFSP.
Springfield Transportation System Plan (2014)
The Springfield 2035 Transportation System Plan (TSP) provides a 20 -year blueprint for how the City
should maintain and improve the transportation network to meet growth demands within Springfield's
Urban Growth Boundary (UGB). The 2035 TSP ensures the City's vision for the transportation system
meets community needs, communicates the City's aspirations, and conforms to state and regional
policies.
Refinement Plans
Downtown Refinement Plan (1986, updated 2005)
The primary goal of the Springfield Downtown Refinement Plan is to provide goals and policies through
which downtown Springfield may become a more vital and attractive place to shop, conduct business,
and recreate. Goals include creating a pedestrian friendly downtown, new opportunities for a variety of
land uses, adequate parking, and a positive identity for Downtown. See *link
East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan (1992)
o The primary goal of the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood Plan is to address the concerns of the
citizens living within the East Kelly Butte Neighborhood such as land use, housing,
transportation, public facilities and neighborhood character.
East Main Refinement Plan (1988)
The primary goal of the East Main Refinement Plan is to address the concerns of the citizens living within
the East Main Refinement Plan Neighborhood such as providing housing options, a mix of land uses,
commercial centers, compatible industrial development, a safe and efficient street system including
bicycle facilities. See *link
Gateway Refinement Plan (1992)
The primary goal of the Gateway Refinement Plan is to refine and augment the Eugene -Springfield
Metropolitan Area General Plan to provide specificity for site-specific land use decisions, and to identify
the near and long-term public facilities needs to support development and livability of the area. This
plan incorporates goals and policies, controls, and design standards for elements such as land
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWrP9itRrO7am Page 10
development, economic development, natural assets and open space, transportation systems, and
public facilities. See *link.
Glenwood Refinement Plan (1999, updated 2012)
The primary goal of the Phase I Glenwood Refinement Plan Update was to facilitate redevelopment in
the Glenwood Riverfront District based on the successful implementation of the Plan's vision, policies,
and standards. The plan identifies the density, mix, type, and location of housing, employment land,
and public open space and the required level of public facilities to support projected demand. See *link
Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan (1986)
The primary goal of the Mid -Springfield Refinement Plan is to assign site-specific plan designations in
areas designated "Mixed -Use" on the Metro Plan Diagram and to recognize the needs of industrial and
commercial land uses and to resolve conflicts with residential neighbors. Goals were set to address
these concerns. See *link
Q Street Refinement Plan (1987)
The primary goal of the Q Street Refinement Plan is to guide land use decisions in the Q Street area.
Land use decisions will be made to, among other things, provide for commercial development, enhance
existing neighborhoods, attract medium and high-density residential development, discourage through
truck traffic. See *link
FYARIedYFWi_%1 PagwrWtRro7am Page 11
SECTION II FUNDING
CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING
There are limited sources of funding for capital activity. The principal sources include 1) revenues
derived from user fees or those taxes (such as fuel taxes or voter approved general obligation bonds)
which function like user fees; 2) Systems Development Charges (SDCs), which are designed to recover
from development the cost impact that development has on public infrastructure; 3) external
contributions, in the form of intergovernmental grants or loans, payments by developers for specific
improvements, and assessments of benefitted property owners, also for specific improvements; and 4)
other sources such as revenue leveraged by tax increment financing in the City's two urban renewal
districts, and revenue from internally generated charges, which at present play a minor role in capital
project funding.
USER FEES
Each of the three public infrastructure systems (streets, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage) is funded
by fees paid by those who use the system. In the case of the local wastewater and storm drainage
systems those fees are directly billed to users. In the case of the transportation system those fees are
collected in the form of taxes on motor fuel at both the state and local level, by state fees for licensing
and registration of drivers and vehicles, as well as weight mile taxes imposed on the trucking industry,
and via temporary property tax increases that result from approved general obligation bonds.
The City issued revenue bonds in 2009 and 2010 to fund local wastewater and storm drainage capital
projects. Revenue bonds are typically paid for with fees collected. In 2018 the voters approved a 5 -year
general obligation bond to repair specific arterial and collector streets to avoid more costly and
disruptive future roadway reconstruction.
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGES
The second major source of capital funding is Systems Development Charges (SDCs). These are charges
imposed on development to provide funding to assure that the City can fund the cost of the
infrastructure needed to serve that level of development. The City currently has SDCs for transportation,
wastewater, and stormwater.
SDCs are calculated based on a methodology which must be adopted by the Council and which must
conform to State law. The process involves two separate components. The first is an improvement fee
which is based on a determination of which capital projects are needed to accommodate growth and
the amount of additional capacity that is created by those projects to meet growth demands. The
second component is a reimbursement fee, which is based on new development's use of the existing
system and the amount of capacity available in that system. If the system has existing capacity, then
development can be charged a fee based upon the units of existing capacity development will require.
These charges are increased annually based on documented increase in the Cost of Construction Index.
FYAR1edYW i—%1 PSg erpfftRro7am Page 12
EXTERNAL REVENUE SOURCES
These sources include both intergovernmental grants and loans as well as contributions by private
individuals to the cost of infrastructure either through assessments imposed by the City or voluntarily as
part of a proposal to develop property in the City. In many cases these sources of revenue, however
derived, are accompanied by restrictions on their use.
The City regularly receives allocations of transportation funding from Federal programs. The Central
Lane Metropolitan Planning Organization (CLMPO) acting through its Metropolitan Policy Committee
(MPC) allocates Federal formula funds to its member jurisdictions for planning, preservation and
construction projects on portions of the transportation system that are regionally significant. In
addition, the City regularly seeks Federal funding directly through efforts focused on the Oregon
congressional delegation.
In the past, the local wastewater system has benefitted from a variety of Federal programs, most
notably the Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF), a program funded by Federal dollars. In recent
years, however, little to no Federal aid has been available for local wastewater activity. This may change
in the future with the recent passage of the Federal infrastructure bill, but the extent to which
additional federal dollars will be available remains to be seen.
Private contributions toward capital funding also are available, but generally in restricted circumstances.
In order to facilitate provision of services to a new development, a developer can make a significant
contribution to a particular project when it is needed for the development in question when the City
does not have the financial resources to construct the project in circumstances which fit with the
developer's timetable. Lastly, individual citizens sometimes contribute in the form of assessments for
specific projects which benefit their properties. This is done through the creation of a local improvement
district (LID), including all of the benefitted properties. The cost of the project is then assessed against
those properties on a proportionate basis.
OTHER REVENUES
There are two other alternative revenue sources available for capital project funding. The first is tax
increment financing through the two urban renewal districts created by the City — one in Glenwood and
one in Downtown. In an urban renewal district additional taxes resulting from increases in assessed
value are sequestered and made available to the district, which then uses those revenues to support
debt service on urban renewal bonds used to finance projects within the district.
The second alternative revenue source is an internal charge which is assessed against City departments'
operating Budgets to provide funding for preservation and rehabilitation of City buildings and structures.
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgWrP@itRr07am Page 13
CITY ACCOUNTING FUNDS USED FOR CAPITAL RESOURCES
USER FEE/TAX FUNDS
Street Capital Fund
Purpose: To account for operation, maintenance, and construction of the City's streets and
transportation system. This includes the City's pavement preservation program, signal operations,
bicycle and pedestrian facilities, and street light replacement and maintenance. Revenues are
generated from a three -cent local motor vehicle fuel tax and a State fuel tax.
Restrictions: Use of these funds is restricted to activities within public rights of way by the Oregon
Constitution.
Wastewater Capital Bond
Purpose: To account for the construction of capital facilities which are identified in the Wastewater
Master Plan as requiring rehabilitation of the existing system or expansion to support growth and
development. Revenue bond proceeds provide the financing for the expenditures of this fund.
Restrictions: Funding provided by bond proceeds, including interest earnings, are restricted by the
terms of the bond contract developed at the time of the bond sale.
Wastewater Capital Fund
Purpose: To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City's wastewater
collection system. Wastewater user fee collections provide the financing for the expenditures of this
fund.
Restrictions: As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for
planning, constructing, maintaining and operating the wastewater collection system.
Stormwater Capital Fund
Purpose: To account for the operation, construction, and maintenance of the City's stormwater
collection and treatment system. Stormwater user fee collections provide the financing for the
expenditures of this fund.
Restrictions: As allowed under state statute, the proceeds of the user fees are retained in the fund for
planning, constructing, maintaining, and operating the stormwater collection and treatment system.
SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE (SDCs) FUNDS
ORS 223.297-223.314 provides the statewide framework guiding systems development charges.
Expenditures of improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity -enhancing projects for the
system for which the fee is imposed. The reimbursement portion of SDCs may be used for capital
projects related to the system for which the fee was collected, including rehabilitation of existing
systems.
FyAR1ed (W i_%1 PSg erp7htRro7am Page 14
Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for available capacity within the existing wastewater collection system that is
attributable to growth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Wastewater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use capital maintenance or
construction on the wastewater collection system.
Local Wastewater Systems Development Charge Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for construction of the growth -related portion of capacity -enhancing capital
projects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Expenditures of Wastewater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity -
enhancing projects for the wastewater system.
Stormwater Systems Development Reimbursement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for available capacity within the existing stormwater system that is attributable to
growth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Stormwater Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or
construction on the stormwater collection system.
Stormwater Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for construction of the growth -related portion of capacity -enhancing capital
projects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Expenditures of Stormwater Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity -
enhancing projects for the stormwater system. Transportation Systems Development Reimbursement
Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for available capacity within the existing transportation system that is attributable
to growth. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Transportation Reimbursement SDCs are restricted for use on capital maintenance or
construction on the transportation system.
Transportation Systems Development Improvement Capital Projects Fund
Purpose: To account for construction of the growth -related portion of capacity -enhancing capital
projects. Financing is provided by a SDC levied against developing properties.
Restrictions: Expenditures of Transportation Improvement SDCs are restricted by state law to capacity -
enhancing projects for the transportation systems.
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWrP@itRrO7am Page 15
EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTION FUNDS
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Fund
Purpose: To account for Federal grant revenues received for the primary purpose of advancing capital
projects that primarily benefit low-income persons.
Restrictions: CDBG funds, including interest earnings, must meet the Federal government criteria of
benefiting low to moderate income individual's needs, eliminating slums and blight, and addressing
urgent needs.
Development Projects Fund
Purpose: This fund accounts for funds donated by developers toward the construction of capital
projects directly affected by the particular development.
Restrictions: Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projects
for which they were collected.
Special Assessments Capital Project Fund
Purpose: To account for the interim financing and related costs of construction for public improvements
which primarily benefit adjacent property owners of the subject capital project. Revenues are
generated through special assessments being levied against the benefiting properties.
Restrictions: State law restricts assessments to the specific improvement constructed.
Federal and State Aid Project Funds
Purpose: To account for State and Federal grants awarded to the City for the purpose of preserving or
enhancing City facilities. These funds are typically directed towards projects that preserve or enhance
the City's transportation infrastructure. Following is a list of the typical sources:
• STBG Funds — Surface Transportation Block Grant Funds
• TA Funds—Transportation Alternatives Funds
• CMAQ Funds — Congestion Mitigation Air Quality Funds
• SRTS Funds — Safe Routes To Schools Funds
• ARTS Funds — All Roads Transportation Safety Funds
Restrictions: Funding is usually project specific and must only be spent towards those capital projects
that meet the requirements of the specific grant.
OTHER FUNDS
Springfield Economic Development Agency (SEDA) Funds
Purpose: To account for funds collected and set aside within Urban Renewal Districts as defined and
adopted by the City Council.
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWrP9itRr07am Page 16
Restrictions: Funds collected within the specified Urban Renewal District and set aside for capital
projects are restricted for use on capital projects benefiting the Urban Renewal District.
Booth Kelly Fund
Purpose: To account for revenues received from rents and leases at the Booth Kelly Center. These
funds are set aside for Capital Improvement projects that improve the Booth Kelly Center.
Building Preservation Fund
Purpose: To account for funds collected and set aside for maintenance and improvements to City
owned buildings and facilities.
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW2qitRrEWam Page 17
SECTION III FINANCIAL SUMMARIES
2023 TO 2027
SUMMARY OF PROPOSED REVENUES AND EXPENDITURES ($000s)
REVENUE
SOURCE
FUND
#
BEGINNING
BALANCE
20232024
REVENUE
EXPEND
REVENUE
EXPEND
2025
REVENUE
EXPEND
2026
REVENUE EXPEND
2027
REVENUE
EXPEND
TOTAL
REVENUE EXPEND
BALANCE
CURRENT REVENUES
BUILDING PRES. RESERVE
420
0
300
270
300
270
300
270
300
270
300
270
1,500
1,350
150
SDC (TRANS IMPROV)
434
2,303
600
295
600
295
600
295
600
295
600
295
5,303
1,475
3,828
SDC (TRANS REIMBUR)
434
144
30
150
30
50
30
110
30
50
30
50
294
410
-116
SDC (WASTEWATER IMPROV)
611
2,076
250
0
250
0
250
1,000
250
0
250
0
3,326
1,000
2,326
SDC (WASTEWATER REIMBUR)
611
4,609
600
250
600
250
600
250
600
500
600
0
7,609
1,250
6,359
SDC (STORM IMPROVEMENT)
617
1,533
200
30
200
0
200
0
200
42
200
433
2,533
505
2,028
SDC (STORM REIMBURSEMENT)6434
1,533
125
103
125
103
125
103
125
103
125
103
2,158
515
1,643
STORM CAPITAL
9,687
1,200
570
1,250
790
1,350
1,100
1,400
758
1,450
1,900
16,337
5,118
11,219
WASTEWATER CAPITAL
9,741
2,200
3,000
2,300
2,000
2,450
1,750
2,600
1,750
2,750
1,750
22,041
10,250
11,791
STREET CAPITAL
Sub -totals:
1,447
33,073
150
5,6551
615
5,283
150
5,8051
200
3,958
150
6,055
551
5,429
150
6,255
200
3,968
150
6,455
200
5,001
2,197
63,298
1,766
23,639
431
39,659
GRANTS & DONATIONS
ODOT*
420
0
12,000
12,000
0
0
0
0
12,000
12,000
0
FEDERAL GRANT*
Sub -totals:
420
0
0
877
8771
3,589
3,589
0
0
0
or
4,466
4,466
0
12,877 12,877 0 0 3,589 3,589 0 0 0 0 16,466 16,466
0
Grand Totals
33,073
18,532
18,160
5,805
3,958
9,644
9,018
6,255
3,968
6,455
5,001
79,764
40,105
39,659
*These funds may not pass through the City's budget.
**Proposed CDBG Capital Projects are identified in March. Therefore, Community Development Block Grant projects are not included.
FYAR1ed FW i_%1 PSg e2gnbTro7am Page 18
SECTION IV PROJECTS
SYSTEM
PAGE
UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT PAGES.................................................................................. 20
STORMWATER
Overview..................................................................................................................................... 21
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Update..............................................................................................22
FY23-FY27 Ongoing Programs.....................................................................................................24
FY23-FY27 Capital Projects..........................................................................................................28
Unfunded Priority Project List.....................................................................................................36
TRANSPORTATION
Overview.........................................................................
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Update ..................................
FY23-FY27 Ongoing Programs .........................................
FY23-FY27 Capital Projects ..............................................
Unfunded Priority Project List .........................................
WASTEWATER
Overview......................................
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Update
FY23-FY27 Ongoing Programs......
FY23-FY27 Capital Projects...........
Unfunded Priority Project List......
BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY
................................................. 37
................................................. 38
................................................. 40
................................................. 45
................................................. 50
.........................................................................................52
.........................................................................................53
......................................................................................... 54
......................................................................................... 57
......................................................................................... 60
Overview.....................................................................................................................................61
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Update..............................................................................................62
FY23-FY27 Ongoing Programs.....................................................................................................63
Unfunded Priority Project List.....................................................................................................64
FyAR1ed (W i—%1 PSgW2gntRr07am Page 19
UNDERSTANDING THE PROJECT PAGES
Once projects are identified and selected for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program, a project
page is created for the project. The project page includes important information about a project such
as: project description, relation to plans and policies, and status. This information is important for
conveying and tracking details as each project moves from concept to construction. The following is a
list and description of these elements:
Prosect Description — This is a description or early scope for a project. Many times this description will
be very broad as it may be taken from a master plan or refinement plan and most likely in conceptual
form. The actual scope of a project is generally refined through the various phases of project planning,
design and delivery.
Project Status — Status describes the current stage of the Project, e.g. Planning, design, or construction.
Specific Plans/Policies related to this Prosect — This is a list of the various Council Goals, master plans,
refinement plans, adopted policies, and/or reports that relate to a project.
Expenditure Schedule — Lists various project activities and estimates the timing and cost to accomplish
the project activity.
Funding Source — Describes how and when a project will/needs to be funded and the source of that
funding (e.g., bonds, capital funds, SDCs, grants).
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW2qitRr07am Page 20
STORMWATER
Overview
Stormwater projects fall into several categories:
Stormwater Studies — These projects typically fund the study of an area or basin to review current
conditions and model future conditions to determine capital investment needs such as water quality
facilities, repairs and upgrades, or system expansion.
Stormwater Rehab/Improvements — These projects typically provide upgrades to the City's existing
stormwater system or the removal of inactive or potentially unsafe storm lines. Projects may include the
repair and upsizing of storm lines, or the addition of storm lines to reduce localized flooding and
enhance system performance.
Capacity Enhancement — These projects typically provide additional capacity to an existing stormwater
system that is currently undersized or address capacity needs that have been identified to support
future growth. These types of improvements may include an additional detention pond, detention
facilities, offline water quality treatment facilities, or increased pipe capacity.
Restoration and enhancement — These projects typically involve restoring or enhancing streams and
waterways. Projects may include repairing channel deterioration, providing access for fish passage,
removal of invasive plant species and enhancing native species, or improving flow capacity.
New Facilities - These projects typically add new capacity to the system by constructing new stormwater
facilities because of or in anticipation of new development, or permit requirements to expand treatment
capacity. Projects may include storm lines or water quality facilities built as part of a new subdivision or
identified in the Stormwater Master Plan. Projects may also include the extension of stormwater
pipelines to support growth.
FYAR1edYW i—%1 PagwNntRro7am Page 21
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Status Update - Stormwater
FYAR1.qd(W i_%1 Pag e2iolblfro7am Page 22
In
Project
Previous
Project
FY22 Budget
Total Cost to
Project Title
Number
CIP
Project Category
Status
($ in Thousands)
Complete
Notes
5th St./EWEB Path Pipe Upgrade
P21124
X
Upgrades
On -Hold
$112
Booth Kelly Stormwater Drainage
P50234
X
Upgrades
Not Started
$150
Plan Implementation
Irving Slough Improvements
P21138
X
Water Quality
Not Started
$785
2021 Maintenance Hole Rehab
P21168
Repair and
Design
$75
Preservation
Construction planned for FY22
Channel 6 Master Plan
P41020
X
Upgrades
On -Hold
$799
Implementation
Stormwater Master Plan Update
P41021
X
Studies
Not Started
$0
Glenwood Stormwater Master Plan
P41042
X
Studies
Planning
$100
42nd Street Levee Study
P41044
X
Flood Control
Planning
$534
Receiving a State grant ($40,000) in FY22
Glenwood Park Blocks
P41045
X
Studies
Not Started
$50
Stormwater Repair
P61002
X
Repair and
Ongoing
$500
Preservation
Program
Channel Improvement
P61004
X
Water Quality
Ongoing
$1,092
Program
MS4 Permit Implementation
P61005
X
Water Quality
Ongoing
$40
Program
Riparian Land Management
P61006
X
Water Quality
Ongoing
$500
Program
HOA Water Quality Facilities
P61013
X
Water Quality
Ongoing
$85
Program
2016 Manhole Surface Repair
P21131
Repair and
Completed
$38,824
Preservation
Constructed in FY20
Over -Under Emergency Repair
P21163
Repair and
Completed
$121,243
Preservation
Constructed in FY20
FYAR1.qd(W i_%1 Pag e2iolblfro7am Page 22
Stormwater Repair and Preservation
Drainage Repair
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
This program involves the rehabilitation of Springfield drainage systems; to repair or replace older pipe in the system
and solve flooding problems and reduce street surface failures due to poor drainage. This program also includes
rehabilitation of catch basins and culverts to prevent flooding, and the contractual cleaning of large storm sewer pipe.
Potential projects include:
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Asset Management Program
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Stormwater Capital
$150
$150
$150
$150
$150
$750
Stormwater Reimbursement SDC
$50
$50
$50
$50
$50
$250
Total
$200
$200
$200
$200
$200
$1,000
FYARIedYW i-%1 PSgW2@itRr07am Page 23
Stormwater Water Quality
Channel Improvement
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
This project is intended to provide improvements to key drainage ways to address barriers to fish passage, and to
correct previous channel modifications that have caused deterioration of flow capacity, water quality, and fish habitat
functions. These improvements include culvert replacements or retrofits, road crossing and outfall modifications, and
channel restoration. The adoption of the Springfield Total Maximum Daily Load Implementation Plan identifies an
additional temperature benefit from channel restoration and shading.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Asset Management Program
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Stormwater Capital
$80
$80
$80
$80
$80
$400
Stormwater Reimbursement SDC
$20
$20
$20
$20
$20
$100
Total
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$500
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW27htRr07am Page 24
Stormwater Water Quality
MS4 Permit Requirements
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Develop and implement programs and projects to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharge requirements. In 2003, the City applied for an
MS4 permit from the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), which authorizes the City to lawfully
discharge stormwater to the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers and their tributaries. The Permit was renewed in 2021
and requires the City to implement programs and capital projects that improve stormwater quality. Data show that
stormwater in Springfield waterways routinely violates water quality standards established to protect human health anc
aquatic life. This project provides for minor capital improvements and/or capital equipment purchases necessary and
appropriate to address high priority water quality problem areas.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Stormwater Capital
$20
$20
$20
$20
$20
$100
Stormwater Reimbursement SDC
$20
$20
$20
$20
$20
$100
Total
$40
$40
$40
$40
$40
$200
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW2@itRr07am Page 25
Stormwater Water Quality
Riparian Land Management
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
This project provides funding to purchase riparian area lands from private property owners where needed to meet City
and regulatory objectives for water quality, stormwater management, flood control and habitat protection. It also
provides funding for consultant services to evaluate riparian buffer areas, City and other activities affecting them.
Property acquisitions will typically result in increased operational spending to maintain city owned property. Projects
developed on property acquired may, however, produce savings through reduced spending for flood control, water
quality improvement, and wetland mitigation activities. Project funding levels have been reduced to conform to
eligibility levels for improvement SDCs. Council adoption and implementation of a reimbursement SDC may permit
restoration of prior funding levels.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Stormwater Capital
$15
$15
$15
$15
$15
$75
Stormwater Reimbursement SDC
$13
$13
$13
$13
$13
$65
Total
$28
$28
$28
$28
$28
$140
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW29itRr07am Page 26
Stormwater Water Quality
HOA Water Quality Facilities (WQF)
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
There are approximately 40 WQFs in subdivisions that were built between 1993 and 2010 that are privately owned by
HOAs or another private entity (individual residents, the original developer, etc.). The City has taken a progressively
more active role in maintaining these facilities over the past five years. With the approval of Council in 2013, the City's
Operations Division hires a temporary work crew each summer to manage vegetation in the facilities and ensure they
are functioning properly. This capital program will begin setting aside funds to take over and bring into compliance
selected privately owned water quality facilities.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $85 $85 $85 $85 $85 $425
Stormwater Reimbursement SDC
Total $85 $85 $85 $85 $85 $425
FYAR1edYW i -%I PSgWf3@itRrEWam Page 27
Stormwater Expansion
Glenwood Stormwater Planning/Implementation
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
To improve the stormwater system including pipe and open channel improvements, for flood control and water quality
improvements at various locations within Glenwood as identified in the Stormwater Facilities Master Plan (SWFMP),
and to support implementation of the existing refinement plan for Glenwood. This project has involved evaluation of
the Glenwood area and identification of new stormwater outfall locations and construction/enhancement of existing
outfall structures to the Willamette River. Specific projects will be implemented as development occurs, consistent
with the Public Facilities and Services Plan (PFSP). This project is moving into the next phase which involves
preliminary design and initiating permitting activities to advance development.
Project Status:
Planning
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Glenwood Refinement Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $220 $220
Sormwater Improvement SDC $30 $30
Total $250 $0 $0 $0 $0 $250
FYAR1ed W i—%1 PSgWf3 JntRrO7am Page 28
Stormwater Repair and Preservation
High Banks Road (42nd Street) Levee
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Conduct a study of the condition of the High Banks Road (42nd Street) Dike to identify any structural or non-structural
deficiencies and to evaluate the potential for obtaining federal accreditation of this Dike as a flood control facility under
the National Flood Insurance Program and for compliance with the National Levee Safety Program. FEMA conducted
an initial study in 2018, and the City now needs to begin implementing the recommended upgrades and repairs, as
well as conduct further investigation. The City will receive one State grant in FY22 to managed through Lane County
for further study, and a second grant through the State in FY23. The second grant will be through American Recovery
Plan Act (ARPA) funds.
Project Status:
Planning
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
National Levee Safety Program
National Flood Insurance Program
High Bank Road Dike Operation and Maintenance Agreement
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
State Grant $100 $100
Total $100 $0 $0 $0 $0 $100
FYAR1edYW i_%I PSgWr3gntRr07am Page 29
Stormwater Repair and Preservation
Irving Slough Headgate to Outfalls
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The project consists of open channel improvements in multiple locations for flood control and the construction of a
stormwater storage facility. Water quality improvements will be incorporated into the project where applicable to meet
regulatory requirements. The Stormceptor at Olympic Street will also be replaced. This project will be constructed as
part of the N. 42nd Street Improvements Project
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield Stormwater Management Plan
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $440 $750 $1,190
Sormwater Improvement SDC $0
Total $0 $440 $750 $0 $0 $1,190
FYAR1edYW i—%1 PSg ef39itRro7am Page 30
Stormwater Flood Control
S. 67th Street Stormwater Improvements
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Pipe improvements for flood control. Currently, during heavy rainfall the storm system surcharges at 67th and Main
Street flooding private property.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $408 $408
Sormwater Improvement SDC $42 $42
Total $0 $0 $0 $450 $0 $450
FYAR1edYW i-%1 Pagwf34tRrO7am Page 31
Stormwater Expansion
Jasper-Natron
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The Jasper-Natron area requires comprehensive evaluation for future stormwater infrastructure needs to support
future growth and meet the City's DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit requirements. The first phase of the project will
completing the analysis to develop a master plan for the basin, followed by implementation either by private
developments, or City sponsored initiatives. The funding identified is for study and plan development.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $350 $350
Sormwater Improvement SDC $350 $350
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $700 $700
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgWf3fftRrO7am Page 32
Stormwater
Lower Mill Race
Department Development and Public Works
Water Quality
Project Description:
Design and construct a daylight or diversion pretreatment structure, an offline water quality treatment facility, and a
green pipe open channel improvement. Additional detail for this multi -faceted project are in WQ-12 project of the
Stormwater Facilities Master Plan.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Master Plan
DEQ Stormwater Discharge Permit
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) Implementation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Booth Kelly Stormwater Plan
Stormwater Management Plan
Mill Race Ecosystem Plan
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $500 $500
Sormwater Improvement SDC $73 $73
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $573 $573
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWf3@itRrO7am Page 33
Stormwater Studies
Mill Race Firm Update
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Using consulting services, prepare a scope document for a new flood plain study to update the Flood Insurance Rate
Map (FIRM) for the Springfield Mill Race from the inlet at Clearwater Park to the outlet at Island Park to incorporate
construction changes.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan
Continued Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $200 $200
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $200 $200
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW!37htRrO7am Page 34
Stormwater Studies
Over -Under Channel Phase 2
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The Over -Under Channel system has approximately 2,200 linear feet of woodstave pipe, and 1,000 linear feet of
corrugated metal pipe (CMP) remaining under the existing channel. Phase 2 is intended to replace the existing
woodstave and remaining CMP with a new pipe, as well as provide a parallel pipe for additional capacity as
recommended in the 2008 Stormwater Facility Master Plan and the Over -Under Channel investigative report. The
remaining pipe to be replaced runs from 10th Street east to 14th Street across Springfield School District property and
Willamalane Park property.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Stormwater Master Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Stormwater Capital $500 $500
Sormwater Improvement SDC $10 $10
Total $0 $0 $0 $0 $510 $510
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSgWf3@itRr07am Page 35
Unfunded Projects List - Stormwater
FYAR1ed (W i_%1 Pag e!391blfro7am Page 36
Project
Estimated Funding
Project Title
Project Category
Status
Need
Notes
Gray Creek/72nd Street
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$6,000,000
Construction of new channels and other improvements to accommodate
runoff from future development
Corporate Way Pond
Studies
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$250,000
Develop a vegatation management plan SWMP Project 43-WQ
Cedar Creek Intake Reconstruction
Water Quality
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,000,000
Restoration work to improve and manage year round flow volumes
North Willamette Heights
Studies
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$100,000
Develop a basin specific master plan to guied development and
redevelopment
Jasper Slough
Restoration
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$100,000
Culvert and open channel improvements along with riparian vegetation
restoration
This pipeline is located south of S. A Street and is complicated by the fact
Woodstave Removal
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$750,000
portions of the line are under existing buildings and lack public access
easements
S and T Streets Drainage
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$750,000
Upgrade project to improve inadequate storm system and alleviate
localized flooding. Reference Channel 6 Study and Master Plan
-5 N. Gateway/Sports Way Channel
Water Quality
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$750,000
Construct a combination flood control/water quality facility adjacent to
the Gateway Natural Resource area.
Q Street Channel
Water Quality
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$750,000
Channel Repair, riparian enhancement and shading to address
temperature issues in the TMDL.
Maple Island Slough
Studies
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$650,000
Evaluate capacity needs to support developments and develop a
vegetation management plan.
FYAR1ed (W i_%1 Pag e!391blfro7am Page 36
TRANSPORTATION
Overview
Transportation projects fall into the categories noted below:
Planning and Project Development — These projects range from larger facility planning, to concept
project planning, to specific project development. Funding for these projects relies heavily on Federal
and State funds, with City funds used to supplement project budgets and, in some cases, provide
required match funding to external resources. Current examples of this in the CIP are Mill Street
Reconstruction and Franklin Boulevard Phase 2 Improvements.
Maintenance and Operations — These projects are typically programmatic and can provide funding for a
range of activities within each project. Street Light Infill and Pole Replacement, Traffic Control Projects,
and Intelligent Transportation System investments fall in to this category.
Pavement Preservation — These projects are identified by the Operations Division through the
Infrastructure Management System. Funding for these projects relies heavily on local and State fuel tax
revenues and are supplemented with Transportation Reimbursements SDCs, and federal dollars
programmed at the discretion of the Central Lane Metropolitan Planning organization (MPO). Examples
of pavement preservation projects is the Street Seal and Overlay program identified in this CIP and the
Street Bond preservation projects identified in the previous CIP and current Capital Budget.
System Improvement, Existing — These projects typically either bring existing infrastructure up to the
adopted urban standards, or make capacity and safety improvements to existing facilities. Funding for
these projects rely on all available resources. A current example of these types of projects in the CIP is
the Filling the Gaps — Safe Routes to Schools project.
System Improvement, New Facilities — These projects typically add new infrastructure to the City's
transportation system and are identified within the various planning documents. The trigger for these
projects is driven mostly by growth and an identified future need to relieve stress on the system. Project
funding relies on all available sources.
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW14@itRrEWam Page 37
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Status Update - Streets and Transportation
FYAR1.gd W i_%1 PSgW144nbTro7am Page 38
In
Total Cost to
Project
Previous
Project
FY22 Budget
Complete
Project Title
Number
CIP
Project Category
Status
($ in Thousands)
($ in Thousands)
Notes
Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Blvd.
Construction of Phase 1 (42nd PI. to 51st PI.)
P21114
X
Safety
Completed
$1,406
Phase 1
improvements completed in FY21
Main St. Pedestrian Crossings Phase
P21142
X
Safety
Completed
$316
Final crossing location constructed in FY20
3
Filling the Gaps - Sidewalk Infill
P21147
X
Safety
Design
$225
Majority of funding received through State
Project
gants
14th St. and Commercial St. Overlays
P21150
X
Repair and
Completed
$335
Constructed in FY20
Preservation
Centennial Blvd Overlay
P21151
X
Repair and
Design
$719
Construction planned for FY22
Preservation
High Banks Rd./58th St./
Repair and
P21152
X
Construction
$999
Active Construction with completion in FY22
Thurston Rd. Overlay
Preservation
S. 28th Street Paving
P21155
X
Upgrades
Design
$1,272
30% design review complete
Mill Street Reconstruction
P21156
x
Repair and
Planning
$40
Consultant contract executed in FY22
Preservation
Mohawk blvd./Olympic St. Overlay
P21157
x
Repair and
Construction
$0
Active Construction with completion in FY22
Preservation
Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Blvd.
P21159
X
Safety
On -Hold
$604
Design is scheduled to begin in late FY22
Phase 2 - S. 42nd St. Roundabout
G Street, 21st St., and 5th & M St.
School crossing and ADA
P21161
Safety
Completed
$335
Project was funded with federal CDBG funds
and completed in FY21
Improvements
42nd St. Overlay
P21162
X
Repair and
Completed
$400
Constructed in FY22
Preservation
Gateway/Kruse Improvements
P21165
x
Safety
Design
$0
Jasper Rd./Dondea RRFB
P21167
Safety
Design
$0
Funded with Safe Routes To Schools (SRTS)
and MPO grant funds
City of Springfield Signal
Funded with State All Roads Transportation
P21173
Upgrades
Design
Enhancements
Safety (ARTS) grant funds
Jasper/Filbert RRFB Crossing
P21174
Safety
Design
$0
Funded with Safe Routes To Schools (SRTS)grant
funds
Slurry Seal 2021
P21175
X
Repair and
Completed
$350
Completed in FY22 in through and IGA with
Preservation
Lane County
FYAR1.gd W i_%1 PSgW144nbTro7am Page 38
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Status Update - Streets and Transportation
FYAR1.qd(W i_%1 Pagw149_nbTr07am Page 39
In
Total Cost to
Project
Previous
Project
FY22 Budget
Complete
Project Title
Number
CIP
Project Category
Status
($ in Thousands)
($ in Thousands)
Notes
Virginia/Daisy Bicycle Blvd.
P21114
X
Safety
Completed
$1,406
Construction of Phase 1 (42nd PI. to 51st PI.)
Phase 1
improvements completed in FY21
Franklin OR 225
P21176
Upgrades
Planning
$60
Recently funded through reallocation of
MPO funds
West D Street Improvements
P41049
x
Safety
Design
$39
Project identified and funded though the
Walking -Biking Safety grant application
Franklin Phase 2 Design
P41058
x
Upgrades
Design
$0
ADA Transition Projects
P61003
X
Upgrades
Ongoing
$50
Program
Funds set aside to advance projects to
Transportation Demand
Ongoing
P61007
X
enhance non -auto travel links thoughout the
Management
Program
City.
Funds set aside to advance intersection
Traffic Control Projects
P61008
X
Ongoing
improvement projects. Example: S. 42nd
Program
St.\Daisy Intersection.
Ongoing
Funds set aside to advance project in the
Gateway Area Traffic Improvements
P61009
X
Program
Gateway area to increase capacity.
FYAR1.qd(W i_%1 Pagw149_nbTr07am Page 39
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
ADA Transition Projects
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 requires the City to maintain a "Transition Plan" that details how it will
bring facilities that were not in compliance at the adoption of the act, up to the newly adopted standards. Currently, the
City policy is to correct defects as projects occur and to make improvements as requests are received from citizens
who make their need known. This project will set aside funds to be used for high priority locations that are identified,
and will allow the City to respond in a timely manner to those requests.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield TSP
Regulatory Requirements
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Street Capital
$50
$50
$50
$50
$50
$250
Transportation Reimbursement SDC
$50
$50
$50
$50
$50
$250
Total
$100
$100
$100
$100
$100
$500
FYARIedYW i-%1 PSgWI49itRr07am Page 40
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
Transportation Demand Management
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The project includes match funding for other transportation options projects to enhance non -auto travel links in the
community such as Street multi -use paths, bike lane striping, enhancements to pedestrian facilities, and other
activities that promote non -single auto travel choices.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield TSP TDM Goals
State Legislation Regional Transportation Plan
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Transportation Improvement SDC
$10
$10
$10
$10
$10
$50
Total
$10
$10
$10
$10
$10
$50
FYAR1edYW i_%1 Pag a,44tRro7am Page 41
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
Traffic Control Projects
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
This project is for installation of new traffic signals and modification of existing signals or installation of roundabouts at
various City intersections. Example intersections include: Thurston Rd. & 66th St., 42nd St. & Marcola Road, South
42nd & Daisy St., South 40th & Daisy St., 19th St. and Marcola Rd., and 28th St. & Centennial Blvd. Signal
modifications may include changing phase order, adding overlaps, and other enhancements to safety or efficiency like
improved pedestrian crossings. Various striping and signing improvements may also be implemented under the
Traffic Control Projects. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category
they are given an individual account and at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable
SDC funds.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield TSP Regional Transportation Plan
Council Policy
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Transportation Improvement SDC
$35
$35
$35
$35
$35
$175
Total
$35
$35
$35
$35
$35
$175
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSrgel4fftRro7am Page 42
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
Gateway Area Traffic Improvements
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Transportation improvements at various locations in the Gateway area to increase capacity, relieve congestion, and
improve safety. Funding is set aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are
given an individual account and at that time another source of funding is identified to match the allowable SDC funds.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield TSP Gateway Traffic Capacity Analysis
Council Goals 1-5/Beltline Environmental Assessment
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Transportation Improvement SDC
$225
$225
$225
$225
$225
$1,125
Total
$225
$225
$225
$225
$225
$1,125
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSrgW14@itRr07am Page 43
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS)
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
ITS projects in various locations to increase communications, capacity, safety and traveler information. Funding is set
aside in this program and as projects are identified that fit into this category they are given an individual account and
at that time another source of funding will be identified to match the allowable SDC funds.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Regional ITS Operations & Implementation Plan for Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area
Springfield TSP
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Transportation Improvement SDC
$25
$25
$25
$25
$25
$125
Total
$25
$25
$25
$25
$25
$125
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSrgW147htRr07am Page 44
Streets and Transportation Repair and Preservation
Local/Residential Street Preservation and Maintenenace
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
A continuing street maintenance preservation effort by slurry and crack sealing of Local/Residential Street System
performed by contract. In order to maintain the City's local street system approximately 5 to 8 miles should be crack
sealed and slurry sealed annually. Funds prgrammed fund an annual slurry seal project.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Infrastructure Management System
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Street Capital
$150
$150
$150
$150
$150
$750
Total
$150
$150
$150
$150
$150
$750
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW14@itRr07am Page 45
Streets and Transportation Upgrades
42nd Street Operational, Safety, and Mobility Improvements
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Upgrade to address safety and operations, in particular for freight accessing the OR 126 Expressway -Freight Route
and OR 1266 -Main St. Upgrade the UP rail crossing serving the International Paper, Sierra Pine, and Weyerhaeuser
industrial center, upgrade intersection control at the westbound OR 126 ramp terminal, add urban level lighting, add
ADA -accessible connections from Olympic St. and Industrial Ave. to the McKenzie Levee Path, add left turn bay on
42nd St. at Industrial Ave and improve traffic signals at the eastbound OR 126 ramp terminal, Olympic Street and the
International Paper driveways.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield 2030 Infrastructure Management System
Springfield TSP
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
State Funds Transfer $12,000 $12,000
Total $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000
FYAR1edYW i_%1 PSrgW14qitRr07am Page 46
Streets and Transportation Repair and Preservation
Q Street Reconstruct - 5th to Pioneer Parkway East
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
According to the most recent City of Springfield pavement condition index data, o Street between 5th and Pioneer
Parkway East is in poor condition and requires reconstruction curb to curb. As part of the project all facilities such as
ADA feature will be brought into compliance.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Infrastructure Management System
Springfield TSP
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024 2025 2026
2027 Total
Federal Aid Grant
$637
$3,589
$4,226
Transportation Reimbursement SDC
$73
$60
$133
Street Capital
$351
$351
Total
$710
$0 $4,000 $0
$0 $4,710
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW!9@itRrEWam Page 47
Streets and Transportation Safety
Virginia- Daisy Bikeway -- 32nd Street RRFB
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Design and construct a rapid rectangular flashing beacon (RRFB) crossing at the intersection of 32nd St and Virginia.
This was a key safety element identified in the Virginia -Daisy Bikeway plan. Funding for this element was recently
secured through reallocation of federal funds from another Springfield project.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Springfield TSP
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Federal Aid Grant $240 $240
Transportation Reimbursement SDC $27 $27
Total $267 $0 $0 $0 $0 $267
FYARIed W i_%1 PSgW!q JntRrO7am Page 48
Streets and Transportation Repair and Preservation
Aspen Street Improvements
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The City has negotiated jurisdictional os Aspen St. and Menlo Lp. Between Centennial Blvd. and Tamarack St. As
part of the transfer agreement, the County is giving the City $415,000 to facilitate pavement improvments as well as
facilities upgrades (e.g., sidewalks).
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Infrastructure Management System
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Street Capital $415 $415
$0
Total $415 $0 $0 $0 $0 $415
FYAR1edYW i—%1 PSgW!qgntRrO7am Page 49
Unfunded/Partial Funded Projects List - Streets and Transportation
FYAR1.qd(FWi_%1 Pagw!9@1bTrO7am Page 50
Project
Estimated Funding
Project Title
Project Category
Status
Need
Notes
Construction of Bicycle, pedestrian, and ADA improvements between S.
Virginia -Daisy Bikeway Phase 3
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,400,000
32nd Street and S. 42nd Street. Currently scoping for potential ARTS
grant funding.
Gateway-Beltline Intersection
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$20,000,000
Phase 2 improvements currently outlined in the Revised Environmental
Improvements
Assessment (REA) include construction of a couplet.
$55,000 on an
Signal System Mondernization
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
annual basis
Upgrade program to keep City traffic signals up to date on technology
S. 48th Street connection - Main to
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$927,000
Construction of this new road segment is delopment driven.
Daisy
Repair and
$50,000 on an annual
This City owns 14 bridges that are inspected on a biennial schedule by
Bridge Preservation
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
ODOT. This program would facilitate completion of identified repair
Preservation
basis
needs
Downtown District Pedestrian Scale
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$7,600,000
Complete all downtown lighting upgrade phases.
Lighting
Arterial/Collector Street Preservation
Repair and
$1,000,000 on an
A continuing street maintenance effort of pavement sealing and/or
Program
Preservation
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
annual Basis
overlay of the Arterial/Collector Street System
Street Light Infill & LPS Light
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$2,000,000
Replace 2,720 existing low pressure sodium (LPS) lights with LED
Replacement/Upgrades
technology and reduce energy costs.
Arterial/Collector Street
$1,000,000 on an
Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 24
Reconstruction Program
Restoration
Not Programmed Pending Funding
annual Basis
miles of streets classified as a collector or arterial have deteriorated to
the point that reconstruction of the structure is the only option
Local/Residential Street
$300,000 on an
Within the City's Street inventory, the condition of approximately 68
Restoration
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
miles of local/residential streets has deteriorated to the point that
Reconstruction
annual basis
reconstruction of the structure is the only option
This project will upgrade the roundabout at Maple Island Road and
Maple Island Improvements
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$2,000,000
International Way. It will also extend the Maple Island Loop Road to the
north along the Maple Island Slough.
Intelligent Lighting Controls
Upgrades
Not Programmed Pending Funding
$700,000
An Intelligent lighting system will monitor street light performance,
enhancing operations and maintenance
The project will add lighting to Main Street from 20th to 72nd by placing
Main Street Lighting
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,000,000
lights on existing poles where available and installing new poles where
necessary
Several crossings have been identified that would receive a safety benefit
Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements
Safety
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$750,000
from the installation of a RRFB (Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon) or a
PHB (Pedestrian Hybrid Beacon).
Signal Communications
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$500,000
The project will evaluate central system software, fiber optic lines,
wireless radio communication, and existing copper connections
FYAR1.qd(FWi_%1 Pagw!9@1bTrO7am Page 50
Unfunded/Partial Funded Projects List - Streets and Transportation
FYARIedYW i_%1 Pagw!94nbTrO7am Page 51
Project
Estimated Funding
Project Title
Project Category
Status
Need
Notes
The project will complete required Federal National Environmental Policy
Glenwood Riverfront Path
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,000,000
Act (NEPA) documentation and approval for the new Glenwood Multi -
Use Riverfront Path, including locating the path alignment along the
Willamette River and completing pathway design
Laura Street
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
TBD
Urban standards project in partnership with Lane Co.
Construct Mississippi Ave roundabout and segment to just east of
Franklin Blvd Phase 2
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
Henderson Ave.
Main Street Safety Project Phase 1
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$17,600,000
28th St Bike Lanes
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
TBD
Currently scoping for potential ARTS grant funding
14th St Bikeway
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
TBD
Currently scoping for potential ARTS grant funding
E St Bikeway
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
TBD
48th Street / G Street / 52nd Street
Path
Not Programmed Pending Funding
TBD
McKenzie River Path
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
TBD
FYARIedYW i_%1 Pagw!94nbTrO7am Page 51
WASTEWATER
Overview
Wastewater projects included in this CIP fall into two categories:
Preservation and Rehabilitation —These projects typically involve upgrading the current wastewater
system. Projects may include the rehabilitation of existing sanitary sewer lines, laterals and connections
to reduce infiltration and inflow of groundwater into the system.
New Facilities — These projects typically involve the construction of new wastewater facilities as a result,
or in anticipation of new development. Projects may include sanitary sewer lines built as part of a new
subdivision and extension of sanitary sewer trunk lines.
FYARIedYW i_%1 Pggg eiSqiUfro7am Page 52
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Status Update - Wastewater
FYAR1.9d(W i_%1 Pages%lblfro7am Page 53
In
Total Cost to
Project
Previous
Project
FY22 Budget
Complete
Project Title
Number
CIP
Project Category
Status
($ in Thousands)
($ in Thousands)
Notes
Design is currently at 60%, Actively working
Jasper Trunk -Phase 3
P21065
X
Expansion
Design
$2,344
on wetlands mitigation plan
2016 Manhole Surface Repair
P21131
Repair and
Completed
$39
Preservation
Constructed in FY21
Project has been initiated to correspond
S. 28th Sewer Extension
P21166
X
Expansion
Design
$1,200
with 28th Street CMAQ Paving.
Construction planned for FY23
42nd 48th Sewer Rehabilitation
P21170
x
Repair and
Design
$1,500
Preservation
Construction planned for FY23
Crest Lane Sewer Ext.
P21171
Expansion
Completed
$44
Constructed in FY21. Example of
Watewater Repair funds (P61001) utilized.
Work on Phase 3 microbasin modeling
Flow Monitoring Analysis &Plan
P41041
X
Studies
Design
$200
continues. Rehab projects have been
identinfied and will be programmed in the
CIP
Request for proposals to be advertised in2nd
Wastwater Master Plan
P41062
X
Studies
Planning
$500
qtr of FY22
Funds to be programmed to repair and
CMOM Planning & Implementation
P61000
X
Repair and
Ongoing
$3,200
preservation projects identified through
Preservation
Program
modeling
Repair and
Ongoing
Funds programmed each year for
Wastewater Repair
P61001
X
$500
Preservation
Program
unforeseen emergency repair work.
Funds set aside to extend wastewater
Local Sewer Extension
P61013
X
Expansion
On -Hold
$1,500
service to annexed area within the City that
Pre not currently served.
FYAR1.9d(W i_%1 Pages%lblfro7am Page 53
Wastewater Repair and Preservation
Wastewater Repair
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
This project involves the contracted repair or replacement of sanitary sewers that require either emergency
rehabilitation as a result of Sanitary Sewer Overflows or the prospect of impending system failures. The DPW
Operations Division addresses an average of four (4) emergency repairs of this nature annually.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
CMOM Program
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Wastewater Capital
$250
$250
$250
$250
$250
$1,250
Wastewater Reimbursement SDC
$250
$250
$250
$250
$250
$1,250
Total
$500
$500
$500
$500
$500
$2,500
FYARIedYW i-%1 PSgW!97htRr07am Page 54
Wastewater Repair and Preservation
CMOM Planning & Implementation
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The City of Springfield's obligations in the 2001 Wet Weather Flow Management Plan (WWFMP) were completed by
January 2010; however it is necessary for the City to continue to fund wastewater system rehabilitation and Inflow and
Infiltration (1/1) reduction projects. These additional projects will be identified through the Wastewater Master Plan
Update project and the Capacity, Management, Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) program that will likely be
included in the next NPDES permit for the wastewater system.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
Regulatory Requirements
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Wastewater Capital
$250
$250
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$3,500
Total
$250
$250
$1,000
$1,000
$1,000
$3,500
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW!9@itRr07am Page 55
Wastewater Expansion
Local Sewer Extensions
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Within the City of Springfield's city limits and Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) are several areas that are fully
developed, but lack wastewater service. The project would fund extending wastewater pipes to these areas upon
request of affected property owners or annexation, with some or all of the cost possibly reimbursable through
assessments. Increased infrastructure will increase the need for more maintenance personnel which impacts the
wastewater operations budget. The estimated increase in the wastewater operations cost is $1,600 per 1,000 feet of
new pipe.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
Council Goal to provide for development
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Wastewater Capital
$500
$500
$500
$500
$500
$2,50C
Total
$500
$500
$500
$500
$500
$2,50C
FYAR1edYW i-%1 PSgW!99itRr07am Page 56
Wastewater Repair and Preservation
70th St Basin Rehab
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
One of the key goals of the CMOM Program is to eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1). Utilizing output from the flow
monitoring and analysis work, it has been determined that wastewater pipelines serving the 70th Street Basin exhibit a
high rate of 1/I, and thus is prioritized for a rehabilitation project.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
Council Goal to provide for development
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Wastewater Capital $2,000 $2,000
Total $2,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,000
FYARIedYW i-%1 PSgW@qitRrEWam Page 57
Wastewater Repair and Preservation
72nd St Basin Rehab
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
One of the key goals of the CMOM Program is to eliminate inflow and infiltration (1/1). Utilizing output from the flow
monitoring and analysis work, it has been determined that wastewater pipelines serving the 72nd Street Basin exhibit
a high rate of 1/I, and thus is prioritized for a rehabilitation project.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
Council Goal to provide for development
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Wastewater Capital $1,500 $1,500
Total $0 $1,500 $0 $0 $0 $1,500
FYARIed W i—%1 PSgW@ JntRr07am Page 58
Wastewater Expansion
Harbor Drive Pump Station
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
The S. 2nd St./Harbor Drive area is currently not have sanitary sewer service. The Council has directed staff to
analyze areas within the UGB where investment in infrastructure may spur residential development, and investment in
the Harbor Drive Pump Station provides a key service to 58 buildable acres. This project will construct a sanitary
pump station and associated pipline to connect to the dry lines previously constructed.
Project Status:
Not Started
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Wastwater Master Plan
Council Goal to provide for development
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Total
Wastewater Capital
Wastewater Improvement SDC $1,000 $1,000
Total $0 $0 $1,000 $0 $0 $1,000
FYAR1edYW i—%1 PSgW@gntRrO7am Page 59
Unfunded Projects List - Watewater
FYAR1.gd (W i_%1 PagwoolbTro7am Page 60
Estimated Funding
Project
Need
Project Title
Project Category
Status
($ in thousands)
Notes
Replace a 12" pipe with a new 18" pipe. With model analysis this
19th Street Sewer Upgrade
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,500
upgrade may not be necessary. Will be evaluated with Master Plan
Update
Marcola Rd Sewer
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$500
Provide sewer service to area within the UGB currently not annexed.
Main Street Improvements - Unit 1
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$2,100
Upgrade pipeline capacity to support future growth in East Springfield
Peacehealth-Riverbend PS
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$3,189
New pump station to support development within the Riverbend
campus.
Main Street Improvements - Unit 2
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,145
Upgrade pipeline capacity to support future growth in East Springfield
Upgrade existing pumps to maintain capacity and avoid potential SSOs.
Hayden Lo PS
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,050
Project will be reevaluated as some work has been completed through
routine maintenance.
Upgrade existing pumps to maintain capacity and avoid potential SSOs.
River Glen PS
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$950
Project will be reevaluated as some work has been completed through
routine maintenance.
FYAR1.gd (W i_%1 PagwoolbTro7am Page 60
BUILDINGS AND PROPERTY
Overview
The Buildings and Property section identifies and programs available funds for a variety of projects that
may include construction of new facilities; maintenance, repair or renovation of existing facilities; and
the demolition of unnecessary or un -maintainable facilities. As the City of Springfield grows, so does the
need for municipal public services. These services come with an associated infrastructure that requires
continual monitoring, maintenance, replacement and/or additions.
Currently funding is only identified for one ongoing program which is the general ongoing Building
Preservation program. Several other projects are identified in the Unfunded Priority Project List. On the
overall buildings and Facilities needs list, there are projects at all City -owned buildings, including City
Hall, Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Depot, and Development and Public Works Operations
Division Facilities.
FyAR1ed (W i_%1 PagweAntRro7am Page 61
FY20-FY22 Capital Project Status Update - Building and Facilities
FYAJtt&~fP,I "fir@7am Page 62
In
Total Cost to
Project
Previous
Project
FY22 Budget
Complete
Project Title
Number
CIP
Project Category
Status
($ in Thousands)
($ in Thousands)
Notes
Program funds preservation and repairs of
Building Preservation
P61011
X
Repair and
Ongoing
$306
City owned buildings. (e.g., City Hall Seismic
Preservation
Program
upgrades)
Booth Kelly Building Assessment
P41029
X
Studies
Completed
$39
Assessment is complete. City Staff will be
reviewing and evaluating next steps.
Booth Kelly Roof Replacement
P21084
X
Repair and
Not Started
$100
Preservation
Booth Kelly Building Repair
P21170
x
Repair and
Not Started
$40
Preservation
Existing oil/water separator replumbed to
Fuel Facility Stormwater Upgrade
P21121
x
Upgrades
Completed
$37
connect to sanitary.
Initial study has been completed in
Firing Range Decommissioning
P21075
X
Water Quality
On -Hold
$25
coordination with DEQ
FYAJtt&~fP,I "fir@7am Page 62
Buildings and Facilities Repair and Preservation
Building Preservation
Department Development and Public Works
Project Description:
Perform preservation, capital maintenance and repair projects on City -owned buildings, including but not limited to
City Hall, 5 Fire Stations, Museum, Justice Center, Jail, Depot, Carter Building and Maintenance Facilities. Projects
can include the repair, renovation or replacement of structural, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems. Other
projects can include systems preservation such as, painting, roofing, lighting, alarm and elevator projects as well as
repair and/or upgrades to aesthetic and architectural elements.
Project Status:
Ongoing Program
Specific Plans/Policies Related to this Project:
Council Goals
Capital Costs ($ in thousands)
Fund
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
Total
Building Preservation Fund
$270
$270
$270
$270
$270
$1,350
Total
$270
$270
$270
$270
$270
$1,350
FYARIedYW i_%1 PSgW@@itRr07am Page 63
Unfunded Projects List - Buildings and Facilities
Project Title
Project Category
Project
Status
Estimated Funding
Need
Notes
Municipal Parking Garage
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$2,500,000
Initial design phase completed. Project on hold pending future Glenwood
developments.
City Storage Facility
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$300,000
Library
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$28,000,000
City Hall Renovation
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$4,000,000
Fire Station 4
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$6,100,000
City Hall HVAC
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$1,800,000
Energy Efficiency Projects
Upgrades
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$200,000
Downtown Mill Plaza Design &
Construction
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$3,700,000
City Hall Storage
Expansion
Not Programmed -Pending Funding
$100,000
Council Chambers Upgrades
Upgrades
Not Programmed Pending Funding
$175,000
ARPA (American Recovery Plan Act) funds are a proposed source for
moving this project forward.
FYAR1ed (W i_%1 Pagwo7hbTro7am Page 64