HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 09 Floodplain AmendmentsAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
Meeting Date:
Meeting Type:
Staff Contact/Dept.:
Staff Phone No:
1/3/2022
Regular Meeting
Sandy Belson/DPW
Kristian Kraaz/CAO
541-736-7135
541-744-4062
Estimated Time: Consent Calendar
SPRINGFIELD Council Goals: Mandate
CITY COUNCIL
ITEM TITLE: FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT CODE AMENDMENTS
ACTION
Conduct a second reading and adopt AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
REQUESTED:
SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC) SECTION 3.3-400 —
FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT REGARDING REGULATION OF
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN; AMENDING SDC
SECTION 6.1-100 — DEFINITIONS; ADOPTING SEVERABILITY AND
ABROGATION CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
ISSUE
The City of Springfield participates in the National Flood Insurance Program
STATEMENT:
(NFIP) and must adopt and enforce a floodplain management ordinance regulating
development in the community's floodplain. The City must adopt an updated
floodplain development ordinance to ensure ongoing compliance with current NFIP
minimum standards. The amendments to SDC Sections 3.3-400 and 6.1-100
incorporate federal requirements as shown in the State of Oregon Model Flood
Hazard Management Ordinance (effective October 2020). Updating Springfield's
Development Code to align with current federal requirements will allow the City to
continue to participate in the NFIP.
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: City Council Ordinance
Exhibit A: Staff Report and Findings of Fact
Exhibit B: Legislative Amendments to the Development Code
DISCUSSION/
The City Council and Board of County Commissioners held a joint public hearing
FINANCIAL
on Dec. 13, 2021 and closed the hearing and written record. Once the Council
IMPACT:
adopts the ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners would hold its third
reading of Ordinance 21-08, currently scheduled for February 8, 2022.
Continued participation in the NFIP enables the residents and property owners in
Springfield access to federally -backed flood insurance. It also ensures Springfield's
ongoing eligibility for federal disaster relief.
CITY OF SPRINGFIELD, OREGON
ORDINANCE NO.
(GENERAL)
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE (SDC) SECTION 3.3-
400 — FLOODPLAIN OVERLAY DISTRICT REGARDING REGULATION OF DEVELOPMENT
WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN; AMENDING SDC SECTION 6.1-100 — DEFINITIONS; ADOPTING
SEVERABILITY AND ABROGATION CLAUSES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the State of Oregon has in ORS 197.175 delegated responsibility to local governmental
units to adopt floodplain management regulations designed to promote the public health, safety, and
general welfare of its citizenry;
WHEREAS, the flood hazard areas of the City of Springfield are subject to periodic inundation which
may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, disruption of commerce and
governmental services, extraordinary public expenditures for flood protection and relief, and
impairment of the tax base, all of which adversely affect the public health, safety, and general welfare;
WHEREAS, these flood losses may be caused by the cumulative effect of obstructions in special flood
hazard areas which increase flood heights and velocities, and when inadequately anchored, cause
damage in other areas; uses that are inadequately floodproofed, elevated, or otherwise protected from
flood damage also contribute to flood loss;
WHEREAS, the City of Springfield participates in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)
administered by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and is thus required to adopt and
enforce a floodplain management ordinance regulating development in the community's floodplain;
WHEREAS, the Springfield City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5366 on March 16, 1987 which
repealed and replaced the adopted floodplain management regulations in Article 27 of the Springfield
Development Code (SDC);
WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently amended the floodplain regulations seven times;
WHEREAS, the Springfield Development Code was reformatted through Ordinance 6206 adopted on
September 17, 2007 which resulted in the Floodplain Overlay District being codified as Section 3.3-400
which contains the standards and regulations to be applied to development within the Floodplain
Overlay District;
WHEREAS, the Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD), which is the
designated NFIP coordinating agency for the state, completed an audit of Springfield's floodplain
regulations which resulted in recommendations to update the City's floodplain management program to
comply with FEMA's current minimum floodplain development standards contained in the Code of
Federal Regulations Title 44, a requirement for participation in the NFIP;
WHEREAS, to bring the City into compliance with minimum requirements, it is necessary to amend
SDC 3.3-400 regulating development in the Floodplain Overlay District so that it aligns with the State of
Oregon Model Flood Hazard Management ordinance produced by DLCD and approved by FEMA Region
X. effective October 23, 2020;
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 51
WHEREAS, notice was sent to the Department of Land Conservation and Development on August 4,
2021, 35 days prior to the first evidentiary hearing as required under OAR 660-018-0040(8);
WHEREAS, on September 8, 2021 the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing
regarding this proposal, Planning File #811-21-000210-TYP4, and kept the written record open through
October 15, 2021, for submission of additional information to consider in its recommendation; and
WHEREAS, after review of the staff report, evidence in the record, and testimony of those who spoke
at the public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the changes to the
Springfield Development Code on October 19, 2021;
WHEREAS, on December 13, 2021 the Springfield City Council and Lane County Board of
Commissioners held a duly noticed joint public hearing regarding this proposal, Planning File #811-21-
000210-TYP4, and after review of the Planning Commission recommendation, staff report, evidence in
the record, and testimony of those who spoke at the public hearing, the Springfield City Council and
Lane County Board of Commissioners;
WHEREAS, these regulations are adopted through the City of Springfield's broad home rule authority
under the Chapter II of Springfield City Charter, which provides the following:
Section 4. Powers of the City. The City has all powers that the constitutions, statutes and
common law of the United States and of the State of Oregon now or hereafter expressly or
impliedly granted or allowed the City, as fully as though this Charter specifically enumerated
each of those powers.
Section 5. Construction of Powers. In this Charter no specification of power is exclusive or
restricts authority that the City would have if the power were not specified. The Charter shall be
liberally construed, so that the City may exercise as fully as possible all powers possible for it
under this Charter and under United States and Oregon law. A power of the City continues
unless the grant of the power clearly indicates the contrary.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The findings of fact set forth in Exhibit A are adopted.
Section 2. Sections 3.3-400 and 6.1-100 of the Springfield Development Code are amended
as provided in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference.
Section 3. Savings Clause. Except as specifically amended herein, the Springfield
Development Code shall continue in full force and effect.
Section 4. Severability Clause. This ordinance and the various parts thereof are hereby
declared to be severable. If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this
Ordinance is, for any reason, held invalid or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such
portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and said holding shall not affect
the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance.
Section 5. Abrogation Clause. This ordinance is not intended to repeal, abrogate, or impair
any existing easements, covenants, or deed restrictions. However, where this ordinance and another
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 51
ordinance, easement, covenant, or deed restriction conflict or overlap, whichever imposes the more
stringent restrictions shall prevail.
Section 6. Effective date of Ordinance. This Ordinance will take effect as provided in
Section 2.110 of the Springfield Municipal Code, or upon the date that an ordinance is enacted by the
Lane County Board of Commissioners adopting the same amendments as described in Section 2 of this
Ordinance, or upon acknowledgement of this Ordinance under ORS 197.625, whichever occurs last.
ADOPTED by the Common Council of the City of Springfield this day of , 2022,
by a vote of for and against.
APPROVED by the Mayor of the City of Springfield this day of , 2022.
ATTEST:
City Recorder
Mayor
Attachment 1, Page 3 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 1 of 11
STAFF REPORT and FINDINGS OF FACT
TYPE IV —LEGISLATIVE AMENDMENT TO THE SPRINGFIELD DEVELOPMENT CODE
CASE NUMBER:
Springfield 811-21-000210-TYP4; Lane County File NO. 509-PA21-05870
HEARING DATE:
December 13, 2021
REPORT DATE:
December 20, 2021
PROJECT NAME: Floodplain Overlay District Code Amendments
AFFECTED AREA: Properties within the Floodplain Overlay Zone
NATURE OF THE REQUEST
The City of Springfield seeks approval of amendments to the Springfield Development Code
(SDC) Sections 3.3-400 Floodplain Overlay District and 6.1-100 Definitions to incorporate federal
requirements as shown in the State of Oregon Model Flood Hazard Management Ordinance
(effective October 2020). Updating Springfield's Development Code to align with current federal
requirements will allow the City to continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP).
II. BACKGROUND
The City of Springfield participates in the NFIP which is run by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). The objectives of the NFIP are to: (1) ensure that new buildings
will be free from flood damage; (2) prevent new development from increasing flood damages on
existing properties; and (3) ensure the natural and beneficial functions of the floodplain are
maintained. NFIP was created by the U.S. Congress in 1968 to help minimize the costs of disaster
relief and reduce the loss of life and property caused by flooding. Participation in the NFIP
allows members of the Springfield community to access federally backed flood insurance. Flood
insurance is required for federally backed loans to purchase or build structures located within
the floodplain. Participation also ensures the City remains eligible for Federal disaster assistance
in identified floodplain areas.
Participation in the NFIP requires communities to adopt and enforce a floodplain management
ordinance that regulates development within their floodplain. SDC 3.3-400 includes the City of
Springfield's regulating language. To ensure that a community is in compliance with FEMA
requirements, a flood insurance coordinator periodically makes Community Assistance Visits
(CAVs) to participating communities to evaluate their local floodplain management program in
relation to the regulations that govern the NFIP. In Oregon, the Department of Land
Conservation and Development (DLCD) conducts these visits on behalf of FEMA. The City of
Springfield's most recent CAV visit resulted in the City being required to update its floodplain
code provisions to meet current minimum standards for continued participation in the NFIP.
The City of Springfield entered into the NFIP in 1985. Floodplain regulations were adopted as
Article 27 (Floodplain Special Purpose District) of the Comprehensive Zoning Code through
Ordinance 5304 on September 3, 1985. The Springfield Development Code (SDC) was adopted
by Ordinance 5326 on May 5, 1986, and the floodplain management regulations were included
as Article 27. FEMA revised its floodplain management regulations after the SDC was adopted,
which necessitated that the City adopt revised regulations consistent with FEMA provisions by
Attachment 1, Page 4 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 2 of 11
April 1, 1987 in order remain eligible for continued participation in the NFIP. These updated
regulations were adopted by Ordinance 5366 on March 16, 1987, which repealed Article 27 and
replaced it with a revised Article 27. Ordinance 5366 also amended Article 2 (Definitions) to
comply with required Federal definitions for the NFIP.
The floodplain management regulations of Article 27 were revised seven more times up through
1999; most amendments were very minor, such as changes to the dates of the regulating
floodplain maps or cross-referencing other code sections. Ordinance 5858, adopted June 5,
1997, made specific amendments to the floodplain regulations to again bring the City into
compliance with current NFIP requirements by adopting several additional provisions including
permitting procedures, substantial damage inspections, and enforcement language. SDC was
reformatted through Ordinance 6206, adopted September 17, 2007; this resulted in the
Floodplain Overlay District being codified as Section 3.3-400 of the SDC. Staff is unaware of any
amendments to Section 3.3-400 Floodplain Overlay District that have occurred since that time.
III. SITE INFORMATION
Affected properties are those which are located within the City of Springfield's Floodplain
Overlay District. This includes 938 tax lots. The Floodplain Overlay District encompasses areas
within Springfield's Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) along the McKenzie and Willamette Rivers,
as well as around other streams and channels within the City.
IV. PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS AND CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
Under SDC 5.6-110, amendments of the Development Code text are reviewed under a Type IV
procedure as a legislative action. Type IV procedures, as defined in SDC 5.1-140, require a
review and recommendation by the Planning Commission and adoption of ordinance by City
Council. As the floodplain regulations apply outside the city limits, per the Urban Transition
Agreement with Lane County, the Lane County Board must co -adopt the code amendments for
them to apply outside the city limits. The Planning Director for the City of Springfield initiated
the development code amendments on August 4, 2021 on behalf of the City of Springfield as is
allowed under SDC 5.6-105 B.
In accordance with the City of Springfield Citizen Involvement Program, the Committee for
Citizen Involvement (CCI) reviewed and approved a Citizen Engagement Strategy for this
proposal on August 3, 2021. Per this strategy and other requirements (as noted) the City has
completed the following:
• Submitted notice of the proposed amendments to the Department of Land
Conservation and Development (DLCD) on August 4, 2021, 35 days in advance of the
first evidentiary hearing as required by ORS 197.610(1) and OAR 660-018-0020.
• Mailed notice of the September 8, 2021 Planning Commission Hearing and December
13, 2021 City Council Joint Hearing with the Lane County Board of Commissioners to
property owners who own property within the Floodplain Overlay District on August 18,
2021.
• Emailed notice of the proposed amendments to stakeholder groups per the Citizen
Engagement Strategy on August 23, 2021.
Attachment 1, Page 5 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 3 of 11
• As required by SDC 5.1-140 C, provided agency referrals to the Development Review
Committee regarding the proposed amendments via email on August 23, 2021
(Springfield Utility Board Water and Electric Division Directors, Northwest Natural,
CenturyLink, Comcast, Rainbow Water and Fire District, Emerald People's Utility District,
and Willamalane Park and Recreation).
• Published notice of the proposed amendments in the Register Guard on August 25, 2021
as required by SDC 5.1-140.
• Posted notice of the proposed amendments and the dates of the public hearings on the
City of Springfield website which routinely posts public hearing notices.
• Social media post about the floodplain development code updates as part of the
National Preparedness Month outreach campaign. Post published Sunday, September
26, 2021
• Creation of a floodplain webpage that includes project information. https://springfield-
or.gov/city/development-public-works/floodplain-management/. Webpage was first
available October 5, 2021 and is updated periodically.
Planning Commission public hearing
The Planning Commission held a public hearing on September 8, 2021 and left the record open
through October 15, 2021 for additional comment to be included in their consideration.
(Comments received after October 15, 2021 will be provided to the City Council and Board of
County Commissioners for their public hearing).
There were multiple inquiries about the proposed code language and the location of the
floodplain. Two people submitted written testimony prior to the public hearing. Mr. Finley
expressed concerns with 1) the requirements for structures partially located in the floodplain
must meet the floodplain development standards and 2) requirements pertaining to the
installation of new electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and other equipment. He stated that the
requirements were too much for someone who was 88 and on a fixed income.
Mr. Carpenter requests that an applicant be able to obtain a variance when the Floodplain
Overlay Zone is based on an out-of-date map when conditions on the ground have changed to
the extent that the floodplain map is no longer accurate. He also requests that instead of having
to show an "exception hardship" that the applicant only be required to show a "hardship".
The code provisions cited by these two people are required as put forth by the state's model
code in order to maintain compliance with federal requirements for NFIP participation. Findings
have been added to address these comments under Statewide Planning Goal 10.
For this request, the Planning Commission made a recommendation to the Springfield City
Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners which are the Approval Authorities for the
final local decision (SDC 5.1-140 F.). Per the Urban Transition Intergovernmental Agreement and
SDC 5.6-115 B., development code amendments which impact areas outside the City limits must
be co -adopted by the Lane County Board of Commissioners in order to apply to urbanizable
areas within the Springfield UGB. Decisions of the Springfield City Council and Lane County
Board of Commissioners may be appealed to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals within 21
Attachment 1, Page 6 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 4 of 11
calendar days of the date the decision becomes final as specified in ORS 197.830 (SDC 5.1-140
G.).
City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners
The Lane County Board of Commissioners conducted a first reading of Ordinance 21-08 on
November 30, 2021. The Springfield City Council and Lane County Board of Commissioners held
a joint public hearing on the amendments to Springfield's floodplain regulations on December
13, 2021. Notice of the public hearing was published in the Register -Guard on November 23 and
mailed to the parties of record and those who had requested notice. The City sent out a media
release that resulted in articles in the Springfield Chamber of Commerce newsletter and the
Chronicle and was posted on front page of city's website. The Springfield Board of Realtors
submitted written comment the afternoon of the public hearing. The Realtors expressed
concern that the City is requiring more free board clearance than required for participation in
the NFIP. They are also concerned that the elevation increase for replacements in mobile home
parks and subdivisions would split neighborhood fabric and drive up costs. The City is not
adopting standards more than the minimum required by the NFIP in either of these areas.
V. APPROVAL CRITERIA & FINDINGS
The request is subject to approval criteria in SDC 5.6-115, which covers adoption or amendment
of refinement plans, plan districts and the development code. The following approval criteria
are listed under SDC 5.6-115:
A. In reaching a decision on the adoption or amendment of refinement plans and this
Code's text, the City Council shall adopt findings that demonstrate conformance to the following:
1. The Metro Plan;
2. Applicable State statutes; and
3. Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules.
Findings showing that the proposed amendments to the development code meet the applicable
criteria of approval appear in regular text below. Direct citations or summaries of criteria appear
in italics and precede or are contained within the relevant findings.
Conformance with the Metro Plan
The Eugene -Springfield Metropolitan Area General Plan (Metro Plan) includes policy direction
relevant to floodplain regulations. Per SDC 3.3-100, references for the Floodplain Overlay
District are contained in the Environmental Resources Element of the Metro Plan. The following
policies from the Natural Hazards subsection apply to this request:
"C.30 Except as otherwise allowed according to Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
regulations, development shall be prohibited in floodways if it could result in an increased flood
level. The floodway is the channel of a river or other water course and the adjacent land area
that must be reserved to discharge a one -percent -chance flood in any given year."
Finding 1: The amendments bring the City of Springfield's floodplain regulations into
compliance with current FEMA requirements for circumstances under which development is
Attachment 1, Page 7 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 5 of 11
allowed in the floodway. This includes requirements applicable to garages and appurtenant
(accessory) structures when proposed to be located within the floodway (SDC 3.3.430(13)(2)(a)(i)
and 3.3.430(13)(3)(f)(i)).
Finding 2: The amended standards specifically require the City of Springfield to review all
development permit applications to determine if development is proposed to be located in the
floodway (SDC 3.3.425(C)(1)(c)). If so, the amended standards require the City to assure certain
provisions are met as described in Findings 4-6.
Finding 3: Under the amendments, the City requires applicants to obtain a Conditional Letter
of Map Revisions (CLOMR) from FEMA prior to issuing a floodplain development permit for
development that proposes encroachment in the floodway which would increase the base flood
elevation (the flood level) per SDC3.3.425(C)(3)(c)(i)(aa). A CLOMR is FEMA's comment on a
proposed project that would affect hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source
and thus result in the modification of an existing floodway.
Finding 4: The standards prohibit fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other
development within the floodway unless an applicant obtains certification from a registered civil
engineer demonstrating through specified studies that the proposed encroachment will not
increase flood levels during a base flood, or the applicant has applied for and been approved for
a CLOMR (SDC 3.3.430(13)(4)(a)(i)-(ii)).
Finding 5: The amendments remove an exception from the currently adopted standards
which allows existing manufactured homes and other structures already in the floodway to be
replaced if located in the same site and of the same size without certification. This exception is
not compliant with current FEMA requirements.
Finding 6: The amendments maintain a higher standard that prohibits subdivision and
partitioning of land for residential purposes if land is located entirely in the floodway (SDC
3.3.430(13)(4)(c)).
Finding 7: The standards maintain approval criteria prohibiting the City from issuing a
variance within the floodway if any increase in flood levels during base flood discharge would
result (SDC 3.3.440(C)(3)).
"C.31 When development is allowed to occur in the floodway or floodway fringe, local
regulations shall control such development in order to minimize the potential danger to life and
property. Within the UGB, development should result in in filling of partially developed land...
Finding 8: In this case "floodway fringe" is interpreted by the City to mean the floodplain.
The Metro Plan defines floodplain as, "The area adjoining a river, stream, or watercourse that is
subject to 100 -year flooding. A 100 -year flood has a one -percent chance of occurring in any one
year as a result of periods of higher -than -normal rainfall or stream flows, high winds, rapid
snowmelt, natural stream blockages, tsunamis, or combination thereof."
Finding 9: The purpose of the Floodplain Overlay District is to control development in the
floodplain, including the floodway, in such a way as to minimize potential danger to life and
Attachment 1, Page 8 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 6 of 11
property. Bringing SDC 3.3-400's provisions into compliance with current NFIP minimum
requirements will allow the City to better protect areas within the floodplain from flood hazard.
The amendments add or update standards which specify how development within the
floodplain must be built. These standards, such as anchoring, elevation, floodproofing, and flood
opening requirements, are intended to ensure development in the floodplain is better able to
withstand the impacts of flooding to minimize the potential danger during a flood event.
Finding 10: The amendments do not prevent in -filling of partially developed land within the
UGB, rather, they require that development be done in a specified manner and meet certain
standards when done in the Floodplain Overlay District.
Conformance with Applicable State Statutes
ORS 227.186 requires local governments to mail individual notice ('Ballot Measure 56 Notice') to
real property owners of pending land use changes that could limit or prohibit previously allowed
uses. This notice must be mailed at least 20 days but not more than 40 days before the first
evidentiary hearing on the proposed ordinance changes.
Finding 11: On August 18. 2021, the City mailed Ballot Measure 56 notice for the first hearing
on September 8, 2021 to all owners of property within the Floodplain Overlay District, in
compliance with ORS 227.186. This notice also included the date and time of the public hearing
before the City Council and Board of County Commissioners.
ORS 197.610 and OAR 660-018-0020 require local jurisdictions to submit proposed land use
regulation changes to the Department of Land Conservation and Development.
Finding 12: As noted in Section IV, the City provided notice of the proposed amendments to
DLCD on August 4, 2021, 35 days in advance of the first evidentiary hearing in conformance with
ORS 197.610(1) and OAR 660-018-0020.
ORS 195.305 requires public entities to provide just compensation to property owners when
enacting land use regulations that restrict the residential use of private real property or a
farming or forest practice and that reduce the fair market value of the property.
Finding 13: The amendments do restrict development under certain circumstances in the
Floodplain Overlay District, but do not require compensation due to the restriction of real
property because they satisfy two exceptions noted in that statute. First, the amendments
satisfy the exception under ORS 197.305(3)(c), which provides that the requirement does not
apply to land use regulations that "are required to comply with federal law." The amendments
are required by federal law to comply with the FEMA NFIP minimum standards for participation.
Second, the amendments satisfy the exception under ORS 195.305(3)(b), which exempts
payment of just compensation when the regulations "restrict or prohibit activities for the
protection of public health and safety." Flood hazard areas are subject to periodic inundation
which may result in loss of life and property, health and safety hazards, and other adverse
effects on the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed amendments mitigate
these adverse effects and therefore are necessary to protect public health and safety.
Conformance with Applicable State-wide Planning Goals and Administrative Rules
Attachment 1, Page 9 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 7 of 11
Statewide Planning Goal 7- Areas Subject to Natural Disasters and Hazards: Requires local
governments to protect people and property from natural hazards, including flooding. In part, it
requires local governments to adopt comprehensive plans that reduce risk from natural hazards.
Finding 14: The Metro Plan contains a section entitled Natural Hazards which covers
protection of life and property from natural hazards and disasters. Findings 1-10 detail how the
amendments comply with the Metro Plan's policies for reducing risk from flood hazard.
Finding 15: Goal 7 includes a "safe harbor" provision based on the implementation of the
minimum requirements of the National Flood Insurance Program: "Local governments will be
deemed to comply with Goal 7 for coastal and riverine flood hazards by adopting and
implementing local floodplain regulations that meet the minimum National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) requirements." The amendments make changes to the SDC that are required to
bring the City's regulations into compliance with current minimum requirements for
participation in the NFIP. The amendments are intended to align SDC 3.3-400 more closely with
the state's model floodplain ordinance, which has been approved by FEMA.
Finding 16: The Goal 7 Guidelines encourage local governments to consider additional
provisions that go beyond the safe harbor approach: "Local governments should consider
measures that exceed the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP)". The amendments retain all
currently adopted higher standards. They also include new provisions that go beyond the
minimum requirements of the model floodplain ordinance. These amendments regulate the
storage of environmentally hazardous materials in crawl spaces and garages. They require an
agreement between the City and owners of recreational vehicle parks or recreational vehicle
storage to ensure compliance with the City's floodplain regulations and to create an emergency
plan specifying how flood warnings will be received and how vehicles, trailers and occupants will
be safely evacuated in the event of a flood.
Finding 17: The Goal 7 Guidelines also state, "Local governments should give special
attention to emergency access when considering development in identified hazard areas." The
amendments retain adopted standards which require ingress and egress on streets for
emergency vehicles and services during flood events, and also retain adopted standards which
prohibit any new street from being at an elevation of less than one foot below the base flood
height to ensure streets are drivable during a base flood event (SDC 3.3.430(A)(6)).
Finding 18: The Goal 7 Guidelines also state, "When reviewing development requests in high
hazard areas, local governments should require site-specific reports, appropriate for the level
and type of hazard (e.g., hydrologic reports, geotechnical reports or other scientific or
engineering reports) prepared by a licensed professional. Such reports should evaluate the risk
to the site as well as the risk the proposed development may pose to other properties." The
amendments remove an exception that allowed structures located within the floodplain to be
replaced without a study if on the same site and of the same size. Removal of this exception
now requires a site-specific report be generated for all development proposed in the floodway,
which is a high hazard area. The amendments add a requirement to the Floodways section that
requires hydrologic and hydraulic analyses be performed to ensure proposed encroachments in
the floodway would not result in an increase in flood levels (SDC 3.3.430 (13)(4)(a)(i)). The
amendments also add language to multiple sections specifying that information and certification
Attachment 1, Page 10 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 8 of 11
must be provided by licensed professionals, such as in the provisions for Non-residential
Construction where the language of "registered professional" is added (SDC 3.3.430
(B)(3)(c)(i)(ca)).
Statewide Planning Goal 9- Economic Development: Requires local governments to maintain a
working inventory of buildable lands suitable for economic growth and opportunity. In part, the
comprehensive plan must, "Provide for at least an adequate supply of sites of suitable sizes,
types, locations, and service levels for a variety of industrial and commercial uses consistent with
plan policies."
Finding 19: The amendments are more restrictive in terms of what development is allowed
within the floodway; however, the City does not count areas within the floodway in its industrial
or commercial lands inventory. Outside of the floodway within other areas of the Floodplain
Overlay District, the amendments do not regulate if development can occur, but rather how
development is done. These new regulations add specific standards for tanks (SDC 3.3.430
(A)(5); for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and other equipment (SDC 3.3.430 (A)(4)(a)); and
require conformance with floodplain regulations when converting a building to a commercial or
industrial use. These design requirements do not have a material effect on the size or type of
development allowed. Thus, the amendments do not reduce the development potential of
Springfield's industrial or commercial land inventories in a manner inconsistent with Goal 9.
Statewide Planning Goal 10- Housing: Requires local governments to inventory buildable lands
that are suitable and available for residential use. Cities must develop plans "in a manner that
insures the provision of appropriate types and amounts of land within urban growth
boundaries." The amount of land planned for residential development should be adequate for a
20 -year supply.
Finding 20: The amendments are more restrictive in terms of what development is allowed
within the floodway; however, the City does not count areas within the floodway in its housing
lands inventory. Outside of the floodway within other areas of the Floodplain Overlay District,
the amendments do not regulate if development can occur, but rather how development is
done. The new regulations add specific standards for electrical, mechanical, plumbing and other
equipment (SDC 3.3.430 (A)(4)(a)); specifically require that a manufactured dwelling park
greater than 5 acres in size establish a base flood elevation if it is not already known; affects the
height at which a manufactured dwelling must be elevated (SDC 3.3.430 (A)(8)(b) and SDC
3.3.430 (b)(3)(d)); changes anchoring standards for manufactured dwellings (SDC 3.3.430 (A)(2)
and 3.3.430 (B)(3)(d)); creates design requirements specific to garages and appurtenant
structures (SDC 3.3.430 (13)(2) and SDC 3.3.430 (13)(3)(f); and require conformance with
floodplain regulations when converting a building to a residential use. These design
requirements do not have a material effect on the density of residential development. Thus, the
amendments do not reduce the development potential of Springfield's housing land inventories
in a manner inconsistent with Goal 10.
Finding 21: In his written testimony, William Carpenter identifies a Statewide Planning Goal to
encourage Affordable Housing as the criterion he addresses in support of revisions to the
variance language. He notes two problems with the variance section. One is that an out-of-date
FIRM shows an "Impossible Floodway" exists where the past open drainage channels have been
filled in and their flows directed into underground piping systems that no longer present a
Attachment 1, Page 11 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 9 of 11
channeled pathway for floodwaters to reach the property. The example he provides is actually
an area of special flood hazard, Zone A, rather than a floodway. The process that FEMA has set
up to address this situation which is referenced in the code language is the Letter of Map
Revision. As stated in the definition, LOMRs are "based on the implementation of physical
measures that affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus
result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodway..." The LOMR process
appropriately addresses the situation described and therefore no changes are needed to the
Variance Section.
Finding 22: The second problem Mr. Carpenter identified in the Variance section is the
"exceptional hardship" language, asserting that it should be amended to just "hardship". While
the City is in need of affordable housing and supports the implementation of Goal 10, it seeks to
do so while maintaining compliance with federal requirements. The "exceptional hardship"
language is from the model code. Not including that language could result non-compliance with
the National Flood Insurance Program requirements which could eventually lead to the loss of
ability to access the flood insurance necessary to obtain a federally backed mortgage when
purchasing a house in the regulatory floodplain. That outcome would have a much broader and
long-lasting negative impact on the ability of households to purchase homes in all areas of the
community planned for residential development.
Finding 23: Joseph Finley submitted written testimony. Although he didn't cite an approval
criterion, he cited that certain requirements are too much for an 80 -year-old on fixed income.
The most relevant criterion is the Statewide Planning Goal for Housing. The two requirements
Mr. Finely identifies (1— require that new electrical, mechanical, plumbing, and other
equipment be installed to resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and stresses, including the
effects of buoyancy, and 2 — specify that structures partially located in the floodplain comply
with the Development Standards) are minimum requirements of the model code. As with the
Finding above, compliance with the National Flood Insurance Program requirements enables
community members to access the flood insurance required to obtain a federally backed
mortgage when purchasing a house in the regulatory floodplain, thus allowing homeowners to
purchase homes in areas of the community planned for residential development.
Finding 24: The Springfield Board of Realtors submitted testimony that two provisions would
increase housing costs. The Realtors stated that the City is requiring two feet of free board
clearance which is more than required by the NFIP. For residential construction, the code
amendments do not change the existing requirement to elevate the lowest floor to one foot
above the Base Flood Elevation (one foot of free board). In these situations, the City is not
requiring two feet of free board, nor is it requiring a height beyond what is required by the
model code. In areas where the Base Flood Elevation is unknown (unnumbered A zones), the
model code does require that the development proposal be a minimum of two feet above the
highest adjacent grade to be reasonably safe from flooding. This safety measure may increase
development costs, but is necessary for the City to conform with the requirements of the NFIP.
Finding 25: The Realtors' second issue involves the new requirement that replacement
manufactured dwellings in existing Mobile Home Parks and Subdivisions be elevated in
conformance with the requirements for new manufactured dwellings. The City agrees that this
requirement may increase costs and result in the replacement dwellings being elevated higher
Attachment 1, Page 12 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 10 of 11
than their neighbors, but it is a requirement of the model code and therefore will ensure
Springfield's continued participation in the NFIP. It will also enable the purchasers of these new
homes access to federally backed mortgages should the owners need to finance the purchase of
replacement dwellings.
Statewide Planning Goal 12- Transportation: Requires jurisdictions to create a transportation
system that supports a variety of transportation modes so as not to limit residents in the way
they can access various aspects of their community. The Transportation Planning Rule (OAR 660-
012-0060) implements Goal 12.
Finding 26: OAR 660-012-0060 requires a local government to establish mitigation
measures if an amendment to a land use regulation would "significantly affect an existing or
planned transportation facility." Subsections (1)(a) -(c) determine whether the requested land
use regulations amendments significantly affect a transportation facility.
Finding 27: A land use regulation amendment "significantly affects" transportation under
Subsection 1(a) if it "Change[s] the functional classification of an existing or planned
transportation facility (exclusive of correction of map errors in an adopted plan)."The
amendments do not change any functional classification under OAR 66-012-0060(1)(a).
Finding 28: A land use regulation amendment "significantly affects" transportation under
Subsection 1(b) if it "Change[s] standards implementing a functional classification system." The
amendments do not change the City's standards for implementing its functional classification
system under OAR 66-012-0060(1)(b).
Finding 29: Under Subsection (1)(c), a land use regulation amendment "significantly affects"
transportation if it results in (A) types or levels of travel or access inconsistent with the functional
classification of a transportation facility; (B) degrades the performance of a transportation
facility such that it would not meet performance standards identified in the TSP or
comprehensive plan; or (C) degrades the performance of a transportation facility that is
otherwise projected to not meet the performance standards in the TSP or comprehensive plan.
To determine whether the amendments "significantly affect" a transportation facility within the
meaning of (1)(c) a local government should compare the most traffic -generative use reasonably
allowed in the current zone with the most traffic -generative use reasonably allowed in the new
zone. The amendments to the Floodplain Overlay District do not change the underlying zoning
districts or materially change the uses that are allowed outright, conditionally allowed, or
prohibited. Accordingly, the amendments do not change the most traffic -generative uses
reasonably allowed on impacted properties and therefore do not result in any of the effects
described under (A) -(C).
Finding 30: The amendments to the code will not "significantly affect" an existing or
planned transportation facility under OAR 660-012-0060(1)(a), (b), or (c) and thus complies with
OAR 660-012-0060 and Goal 12 requirements.
VI. CONCLUSION
Based upon the evidence above and the criteria of SDC 5.6-115 for approving amendments to
the Springfield Development Code, the text amendments to SDC 3.3-400 and SDC 6.1-100 are
consistent with these criteria.
Attachment 1, Page 13 of 51
Exhibit A, Page 11 of 11
Attachment 1, Page 14 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 1 of 37
Legislative Version of
Amendments to the Springfield Development Code
Section 3.3-400 Floodplain Overlay District to Incorporate Federal
Requirements
AMENDMENTS
Section 3.3-400 of the Springfield Development Code (SDC) has been re -organized to more
closely match the structure of the Oregon Model Hazard Ordinance (version October 2020) that
was developed to incorporate requirements of the Federal Emergency Management Agency.
The recommended amendments are shown in legislative format (deleted text with strike-thru red
font and new text with double underline red font). For ease of review, this legislative format
does not show where code language was moved from one place to another. Commentary is
shown in purple italics font, preceding the text to which it is referring; commentary is provided
for explanatory purposes and is not adopted as code.
Commentary: The existing structure of Section 3.3-400 is shown in purple. A table of contents
outlining the new structure of the Floodplain Overlay District section will be added (shown in
red) to match the layout used in the upcoming Development Code updates. Throughout,
numbering has also been formatted to match the upcoming Development Code updates.
Section 3.3-400 Floodplain Overlay District
3.3-405 Purpose
3.3-410 Applicability
3.3-415 Review
3.3-420 Development Standards
3.3-425 Emergency Approval
3.3-430 Variance Procedures
3.3-435 Post -Flood Substantial Damage Procedures
3.3-440 Periodic Floodplain Inspections and Enforcement Actions
3.3-445 Land and Drainage Alteration Permits—Enforcement of Requirements and
Penalties
.3.400 Floodplain Overlay District
.3.405 Statutory Authority and Interpretation
3.3.410 Purpose
3.3.415 Definitions
3.3.420 Applicability
3.3.425 Administration
3.3.430 Development Standards
3.3.435 Floodplain Development Permits
3.3.440 Variances
.3.445 Periodic Floodplain Inspection. Enforcement of Requirements and
Penalties
Commentary: Creates new section on Statutory Authority and Interpretation that adds required
language from model code.
.3.405 Statutory Authority and Interpretation
Attachment 1, Page 15 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 2 of 37
A) Statutory Authorization.
The State of Oregon has in ORS 197.175 delegated the responsibility to local governmental
units to adopt floodplain management regulations designed to promote the public health,
safety, and general welfare of its citizenry.
B) Interpretation. In the interpretation and application of this Section, all provisions shall be:
1) Considered as minimum requirements;
2) Liberally construed in favor of the governing body: and
3) Deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers granted under state statutes.
Commentary. Matches language from model code by making minor changes to wording and
adds (9) and (10). Adds language to (7) stating a purpose is also to inform potential buyers of
approved variances in the floodplain.
3.3.410 Purpose
3.3-405 Purpose
JAI: The Floodplain (FP) Overlay District is established to promote the public health, safety
and general welfare, and to minimize public and private losses due to flood conditions in
specific areas. The provisions of this Section are designed to:
(1:) Protect human life and health.
(2): Minimize expenditure of public money on costly flood control projects.
(31: Minimize the need for rescue and relief efforts associated with flooding, and
generally undertaken at the expense of the general public.
(41: Minimize prolonged business interruptions.
J51: Minimize damage to public facilities and utilities, including, but not limited to: water
and gas mains, electric, telephone and sewer lines, streets and bridges located in areas
of special flood hazards.
(61: Help maintain a stable tax base by providing for the sound use and development of
flood hazard areas so as to minimize future flood blight areas caused by
floes.
J71: Provide iRfGrrRatiGR toNotify potential buyers of -that the property is in a special flood
hazard areaiR areas Of GpeGial flood hazarJ, and as applicable, notify potential buyers
when development has been approved under a variance to the Floodplain Overlay
District standards.
J81: Minimize the threat to persons, property, and urban water quality from flooding, and
inadequate or improper drainage resulting from uncontrolled development or
redevelopment of land to include filling, grading, excavation, removal; earthwork
Attachment 1, Page 16 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 3 of 37
construction including berms and dikes; stockpiling of materials; or otherLand and
Drainage Alteratiensland and drainage alterations.
9M Notify those who occupy special flood hazard areas that they assume responsibility
for their actions.
1"0 Participate in and maintain eligibility for flood insurance and disaster relief.
Commentary. Matches language from model code by making minor changes to wording.
Updates title of permit issued in floodplain to Floodplain Development Permit to clarify that it is a
separate permit from the Land and Drainage Alteration Permit (LDAP).
JBJ: In order to accomplish the purpose, this Section includes methods and provisions for:
i1l: Restricting or prohibiting uses and development which are dangerous to health,
safety, and property due to water or erosion hazards, or which result in damaging
increases in erosion or in flood heights or velocities.
(21. Requiring that uses and development vulnerable to floods, including facilities which
serve such these uses, be protected against flood damage at the time of initial
construction.
(31. Controlling the alteration of natural floodplains, stream channels, and protective
barriers, which help accommodate or channel flood waters.
(41. Controlling filling, grading, dredging, and other development, which may increase
flood damage.
(51. Preventing or regulating the construction of flood barriers which will unnaturally
divert flood waters, or which may increase special flood hazards in other areas.
(61: Issuing a' and and Drainage Alteration Floodplain Development Permit.
Commentary. Adds a definitions section. Defines terms as required or recommended by model
code. Clarifies definitions in this Section apply to the Floodplain Overlay District. Definitions
specific to the management of floodplains removed from SDC 6.1-110, as described below.
3.3.415 Definitions
For the purposes of the Floodplain Overlay District only, the following definitions apply. Where
the definitions in this Section conflict with a definition provided in SDC 6.1-105 or SDC 6.1-110,
the definition in this Section will prevail. Unless specifically defined below or in SDC 6.1-110.
words or phrases used in this Floodplain Overlay District shall be interpreted so as to give them
the meaning they have in common usage.
A
Appeal. A request for a review of the interpretation of any provision of this Section or a
request for a variance.
Area of shallow flooding. A designated Zone AO, AH. AR/AO or AR/AH on a
community's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) with a one percent or greater annual
Attachment 1, Page 17 of 51
B
C
Iq
F
Exhibit B, Page 4 of 37
chance of flooding to an average death of one to three feet where a clearly defined
channel does not exist, where the path of flooding is unpredictable. and where velocity
flow may be evident. Such flooding is characterized by ponding or sheet flow.
Area of special flood hazard. The land in the floodplain within a community subject to a
one percent or greater chance of flooding in any given year. It is shown on the Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) as Zone A. AO, AH, Al -30, AE, A99. AR. "Special flood
hazard area" is synonymous mous in meaning__ and definition with the phrase "area of special
flood hazard".
Base flood. The flood having a one percent chance of being equaled or exceeded in
any given year.
Base flood elevation (BFE). The elevation to which floodwater is anticipated to rise
during the base flood.
Basement. Any area of the building having its floor subarade (below around level) on M11
sides.
Building. See "Structure."
Community. The City of Springfield and the area within Springfield's planning and
building safety jurisdiction which extends out to Springfield's urban growth boundary.
Development. Any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including
but not limited to buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filling, grading, paving,
excavation or drilling operations or storage of equipment or materials.
Flood or Flooding.
(1) A general and temporary condition of partial or complete inundation of normally dry
land areas from:
W The overflow of inland or tidal waters.
Lb The unusual and rapid accumulation or runoff of surface waters from any source.
Mudslides(i.e.. mudflows) which are proximately caused by flooding as defined in
paragraph (a)(2) of this definition and are akin to a river of liquid and flowing mud on
the surfaces of normally dry land areas, as when earth is carried by a current of
water and deposited along the path of the current.
2) The collapse or subsidence of land along the shore of a lake or other body of water
as a result of erosion or undermining caused by waves or currents of water exceeding
anticipated cyclical levels or suddenly caused by an unusually high water level in a
Attachment 1, Page 18 of 51
91
Exhibit B, Page 5 of 37
natural body of water, accompanied by a severe storm, or by an unanticipated force of
nature, such as flash flood or an abnormal tidal surae, or by some similarly unusual and
unforeseeable event which results in flooding as defined in paragraph (a)(1) of this
definition.
Flood elevation study. See "Flood Insurance Study".
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). The official map of a community, on which the
Federal Insurance Administrator has delineated both the special hazard areas and the
risk premium zones applicable to the community. A FIRM that has been made available
digitally is called a Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRMI.
Flood Insurance Study (FIS). An examination, evaluation and determination of flood
hazards and, if appropriate, corresponding water surface elevations, or an examination.
evaluation and determination of mudslide (i.e., mudflow) and/or flood -related erosion
hazards.
Flood proofing. Any combination of structural and nonstructural additions, changes, or
adjustments to structures which reduce or eliminate risk of flood damage to real estate
or improved real property. water. and sanitary facilities, structures, and their contents.
Floodplain or flood prone area. Any land area susceptible to being inundated by
water from any source. See "Flood or flooding."
Floodplain administrator. The community official designated by title to administer and
enforce the floodplain management regulations.
Floodplain management. The operation of an overall program of corrective and
preventive measures for reducing flood damage, including but not limited to emergency
preparedness plans, flood control works, and floodplain management regulations.
Floodplain management regulations. Zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations,
building codes, health regulations, special purpose ordinances (such as floodplain
ordinance, grading ordinance and erosion control ordinance), and other application of
police power. The term describes such state or local regulations, in any combination
thereof, which provide standards for the purpose of flood damage prevention and
reduction.
Floodway. The channel of a river or other watercourse and the adjacent land areas that
must be reserved in order to discharge the base flood without cumulatively increasing
the water surface elevation more than a designated height. Also referred to as
"Regulatory Floodway."
Functionally dependent use. A use which cannot perform its intended purpose unless
it is located or carried out in close proximity to water. The term includes only docking
facilities, port facilities that are necessary for the loading and unloading of cargo or
passengers, and ship building and ship repair facilities, and does not include long-term
storage or related manufacturing facilities.
Attachment 1, Page 19 of 51
L
Exhibit B, Page 6 of 37
Highest adjacent grade. The highest natural elevation of the around surface prior to
construction next to the proposed walls of a structure.
Historic structure. Any structure that is:
1M Listed individually in the National Register of Historic Places (a listing maintained by
the Department of Interior) or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as
meeting the requirements for individual listing on the National Register:
tZ Certified or preliminarily determined by the Secretary of the Interior as contributing to
the historical significance of a registered historic district or a district preliminarily
determined by the Secretary to qualify as a registered historic district:
3) Individually listed on a state inventory of historic places in states with historic
preservation programs which have been approved by the Secretary of Interior: or
U4 Individually listed on a local inventory of historic places in communities with historic
preservation programs that have been certified either:
a) By an approved state program as determined by the Secretary of the Interior or
b) Directly by the Secretary of the Interior in states without approved programs.
Letter of Map Change (LOMC). Means an official FEMA determination, by letter, to
amend or revise effective Flood Insurance Rate Maps and Flood Insurance Studies. The
following are categories of LOMCs:
1) Conditional Letter of Map Amendment (CLOMA). A CLOMA is FEMA's comment
on a proposed structure or group of structures that would, upon construction, be located
on existing natural ground above the base (1 -percent -annual -chance) flood elevation on
a portion of a legally defined parcel of land that is partially inundated by the base flood.
2) Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR). A CLOMR is FEMA's comment on a
proposed project that would, upon construction, affect the hydrologic or hydraulic
characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing
regulatory floodwav, the effective base flood elevations, or the special flood hazard area.
3) Conditional Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (CLOMR-F). A CLOMR-F is
FEMA's comment on a proposed project that would, upon construction, result in a
modification of the special flood hazard area through the placement of fill outside the
existing regulatory floodway.
4) Letter of Map Amendment (LOMA). An official amendment, by letter. to the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) based on technical data showing that an existing
structure, parcel of land or portion of a parcel of land that is naturally high ground. "
has not been elevated by fill) above the base flood, that was inadvertently_ included in the
special flood hazard area.
Attachment 1, Page 20 of 51
M
N
R
Exhibit B, Page 7 of 37
5) Letter of Map Revision (LOMR). A LOMR is FEMA's modification to an effective
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), or Flood Boundary and Floodwav Map (FBFM). or
both. LOMRs are generally based on the implementation of physical measures that
affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a flooding source and thus result in
the modification of the existing regulatory floodwav, the effective base flood elevations_
or the SFHA. The LMOR officially revises the FIRM or FBFM, and sometimes the Flood
Insurance Study (FIS) report, and, when appropriate, includes a description of the
modifications. The LOMR is generally accompanied by an annotated copy of the
affected portions of the FIRM. FBFM. or FIS report.
6) Letter of Map Revision based on Fill (LOMR-F). A LOMR-F is FEMA's modification
of the special flood hazard area shown on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) based
on the placement of fill outside the existing regulatory floodway.
7) PMR. A PMR is FEMA's physical revision and republication of an effective Flood
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) or Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report. PMRs are generally
based on physical measures that affect the hydrologic or hydraulic characteristics of a
flooding source and thus result in the modification of the existing regulatory floodway.
the effective baes flood elevations, or the special flood hazard area.
Lowest floor. The lowest floor of the lowest enclosed area (including basement). An
unfinished or flood resistant enclosure, usable solely for parking of vehicles, building
access or storage in an area other than a basement area is not considered a building's
lowest floor provided that such enclosure is not built so as to render the structure in
violation of the applicable non -elevation design requirements of this Section.
Manufactured dwelling. A structure, transportable in one or more sections, which is
built on a permanent chassis and is designed for use with or without a permanent
foundation when attached to the required utilities. The term "manufactured dwelling"
does not include a "recreational vehicle" and is synonymous with "manufactured home".
Manufactured dwellingpark or subdivision. A parcel (or contiguous parcels) of land
divided into two or more manufactured dwelling lots for rent or sale.
Mean sea level. For purposes of the National Flood Insurance Program. the National
Geodetic Vertical Datum (NGVD) of 1929 or other datum, to which Base Flood
Elevations shown on a community's Flood Insurance Rate Map are referenced.
New construction. For floodplain management purposes. "new construction" means
structures for which the "start of construction" commenced on or after the effective date
of a floodplain management regulation adopted by the City of Springfield and includes
any subsequent improvements to such structures.
Recreational vehicle. A vehicle whichis:
Attachment 1, Page 21 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 8 of 37
1W Built on a single chassis:
tZ 400 square feet or less when measured at the largest horizontal prosection:
L3 Designed to be self-propelled or permanently towable by a light duty truck: and
U4 Designed primarily not for use as a permanent dwelling but as temporary living
quarters for recreational, camping, travel, or seasonal use.
Regulatory floodway. See "Floodwav".
Special flood hazard area. See "Area of special flood hazard" for this definition.
Start of construction. Includes substantial improvement and means the date the
building permit was issued, provided the actual start of construction. repair.
reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, placement, or other improvement was within 180
days from the date of the permit. The actual start means either the first placement of
permanent construction of a structure on a site, such as the pouring of slab or footings,
the installation of piles, the construction of columns, or any work beyond the stage of
excavation: or the placement of a manufactured dwelling on a foundation. Permanent
construction does not include land preparation, such as clearing, grading, and filling: nor
does it include the installation of streets and/or walkways: nor does it include excavation
for a basement, footings, piers, or foundations or the erection of temporary forms: nor
does it include the installation on the property of accessory buildings, such as garages or
sheds not occupied as dwelling units or not part of the main structure. For a substantial
improvement, the actual start of construction means the first alteration of any wall_
ceiling, floor, or other structural part of a building, whether or not that alteration affects
the external dimensions of the building.
Structure. For floodplain management purposes, a walled and roofed building_, including
a gas or liquid storage tank, that is principally above ground, as well as a manufactured
dwelling.
Substantial damage. Damage of any origin sustained by a structure whereby the cost
of restoring the structure to its before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50
percent of the market value of the structure before the damage occurred.
Substantial improvement. Any reconstruction, rehabilitation, addition, or other
improvement of a structure, the cost of which equals or exceeds 50 percent of the
market value of the structure before the "start of construction" of the improvement. This
term includes structures which have incurred "substantial damage." regardless of the
actual repair work performed. The term does not, however, include either:
1M Any project for improvement of a structure to correct existing violations of state or
local health, sanitary, or safety code specifications which have been identified by the
local code enforcement official and which are the minimum necessary to assure safe
living conditions: or
Attachment 1, Page 22 of 51
V
W
Exhibit B, Page 9 of 37
JZ Any alteration of a "historic structure." provided that the alteration will not preclude
the structure's continued designation as a "historic structure."
Variance. A grant of relief by the City of Springfield from the terms of a flood plain
management regulation.
Violation. The failure of a structure or other development to be fully compliant with the
community's floodplain management regulations. A structure or other development
without the elevation certificate, other certifications, or other evidence of compliance
required in this Section is presumed to be in violation until such time as that
documentation is provided.
Water surface elevation. The height. in relation to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum
NGVD) of 1929, or other datum, of floods of various magnitudes and frequencies in the
floodplains of coastal or riverine areas.
3.3.420 Applicability
3.3-410 AppliGability
Commentary: Adds clarifying language.
JA -)The FP Overlay District applies to all areas of special flood hazard within the Springfield
urban growth boundary.
Commentary. Adds required language from model code identifying FIRM panel numbers
applicable to Springfield and physical location of flood maps.
jB-jThe areas of special flood hazard are identified as follows:
J1:) Those areas identified by the Federal Insurance Administration in scientific and
engineering reports entitled "THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FIS FOR THE CITY
OF SPRINGFIELD, LANE COUNTY, OREGON", dated June 2, 1999 and any revision
thereto, and "THE FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY FOR LANE COUNTY, OREGON,
UNINCORPORATED AREAS," dated June 2, 1999 and any revisions thereto, with
accompanying Fleed InsuraRGe Maps; Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) panels 1133.
1134, 1135, 1141, 1142, 1144, 1153, 1154, 1158, 1161, 1162, 1165, 1166, 1167, and
1170 are hereby adopted by reference and declared to be a part of this Section. The FIS
and FIRM panels are on file at the Development Center located in Springfield City Hall;
Commentary. Makes wording changes to accurately reflect process for designation of additional
flood hazard areas. These areas would be designated through a zoning process rather than by
the City Engineer.
J21: Areas of special flood hazard designated as within the FP Overlay district because
they are 1,ny +ho r! +„ En g4 neer as susceptible to inundation of water from any source
where the above -referenced maps have not identified any special flood areas.
Attachment 1, Page 23 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 10 of 37
Commentary: Makes minor wording additions as required to comply with model code.
JC—j The flood insurance studies and accompanyingFlood Insurance Rate Maps specified
above are hereby adopted by City Ordinance and filed with the City Engineer. These studies
and their accompanying maps shall form the basis for the administration and implementation
of this Section.
JD—j Warning and Disclaimer of Liability. The degree of flood protection required by this
Section in the areas designated in Subsection kB)., above is based on scientific and
engineering considerations. Larger floods can and will occur on rare occasions. Flood
heights may be increased by human -made or natural causes. This Section does not imply
that land outside the areas of special flood hazards or uses permitted within these areas will
be free from flooding or flood damages. This Section shall not create liability on the part of
the City of Sprinafield, eany officer or employee of the City, or the Federal Insurance
Administrator, for any flood damages that e4ay-result from reliance on this Section or any
administrative decision lawfully made under this Section.
Commentary: Adds required language from model code.
E) Coordination with State of Oregon Specialty Codes. Pursuant to the requirement
established in ORS 455 that the City of Springfield administers and enforces the State of
Oregon Specialty Codes. the City of Springfield does hereby acknowledge that the Oregon
Specialty Codes contain certain provisions that apply to the design and construction of
buildings and structures located in special flood hazard areas. Therefore. this Section is
intended to be administered and enforced in conjunction with the Oregon Specialty Codes,
Commentary., Renames Section to better match model code layout and intent of language
added to the Section.
3.3.425 Administration
3.3-415 Revueui
Commentary: Makes minor wording changes to clarify review process.
JA -j Floodplain Ddevelopment proposals within the FP Overlay District shall beare reviewed
under Type �-1 procedure found in SDC 5.1-125. (Ssee SeGtiGR SDC 4.3-145 for siting
standards and review process for certain wireless telecommunications systems facilities).
Floodplain Ddevelopment approval within the FP Overlay District, and'nGPad;;g a Land and
Drainage Alteration Permit, shall must be obtained before construction or development
begins within any area of special flood hazard established in SeGtien SDC 3.14240k[31.
Approval is required for all structures, manufactured homes and development as defined in
this Code.
Commentary: Adds language required by model code and identifies the job title within the City
responsible for administering the floodplain management program.
B) Designation of the Floodplain Administrator. The Development and Public Works
Director is hereby appointed to administer, implement. and enforce this Section by a__ranting_
or denying development permits in accordance with its provisions. The Floodplain
Administrator may delegate authority to implement these provisions.
Attachment 1, Page 24 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 11 of 37
Commentary: Adds Subsection (C) which is required language from model code and explains
the City's duties in administering the floodplain management program. Deletes Subsection B,
and moves bullets 1-10 under Subsection (1) Permit Review and rewords or deletes as
described below to match required language from model code.
C) Duties and Responsibilities of the Floodplain Administrator. Duties of the floodplain
administrator, or their designee, shall include, but not be limited to:
1) Permit Review. Review all development permit applications to determine that:
Commentary. Subsections 1.4. are reworded to match required model code language and
renumbered to (a) -(c) and (e). Subsection (d) is required language from model code that is
added and requires the City to determine if proposed development is located with an area of the
floodplain where Base Flood Elevation (BFE) has been determined.
011 Review a'I deyelnnmeRt applinotinnc to deteFmino that +The +;_R_ e
requirements of this Section have been satisfied;
(h& 2i Reyinw all deyelnmment annlinatinns to determine that A 1 other required local
state, and federal permits have been obtained. nenessar„ permits have hoop
ebt'airRed frem these Cederal�t a er IeEalr-gvPerp .entacal aged iess feF whrtnh�G
approval is req sired;
e
cc3 Review all developmente� applications to determine if the prepesal
proposed development is located in the floodway. If the prepesal s located in the
floodway, assure that the floodway provisions in SDC 3.3.430(81(4) ennreanhrn
o e 's+ensref Sec#+en 3.3 420C. are met: and -
d) Review all development permit aDDlications to determine if the proposed
development is located in an area where Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data is
available either through the Flood Insurance Study (FIS) or from another
authoritative source. If BFE data is not available. then ensure compliance with the
rovisions of SDC 3.3.430(A)(8): and
(e) Provide to the bBuildina eOfficials the Base Flood Elevation (BFE) applicable to
any building requiring a development permit. 4—.When base flood elevation data has
not been provided as specified in Ses#1eRSDC 3.3. -4240(B) -k1)-, the Floodplain
Administrator Git„ Eneipeer wiek►all obtain, review and utilize any base flood
elevation data and floodway data available from a Federal, State or other source in
order to administer this Section.
Commentary. Adds required language from model code which outlines responsibilities of the
City in administering the floodplain regulations.
fl Review all development permit applications to determine if the proposed
development qualifies as a substantial improvement as defined in SDC3.3.415.
Attachment 1, Page 25 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 12 of 37
a) Review all development permit applications to determine if the proposed
development activity is a watercourse alteration. If a watercourse alteration is
proposed, ensure compliance with theprovisions in SDC 3.3.430(A)(11
h) Review all development permit applications to determine if the proposed
development activity includes the placement of fill or excavation.
Commentary: Language deleted from this Subsection to match model code layout. Covered by
Subsection (2)(a) of this Section 3.3.425(C).
Commentary: Language deleted from this Subsection to match model code layout. Substantial
Improvement requirements are covered by Section 3.3.425 (D).
r:� Asn ■:r�r.�ranrs�ss� i �r.:r.�at�r_�: �a r:*:♦: �er_r. rsr�+s�rsts
Commentary: Language deleted from this Subsection to match model code layout. Covered by
Subsection (2)(k) of this Section 3.3.425(C).
Maintain fer ni ihlin inspeGtien all re GOrdS nortainiRg to the nreyisiens of this
SeGtien;
Commentary: Language deleted from this Subsection to match model code layout.
Requirements covered by Subsection (3)(b) Watercourse Alterations of this Section 3.3.425(C).
and Subsection (A)(1) of Section 3.3.430.
Commentary: Language deleted from this Subsection as this is now done through a FEMA
process (LOMA, LOMR).
Attachment 1, Page 26 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 13 of 37
Commentary: Adds required language from model code. Subsection (2) clarifies the information
related to floodplain management that the City must keep and make available for the public.
Subsection (3) describes circumstances under which the City must provide information to other
entities. This includes: requiring the City to notify the Federal Insurance Administrator of
annexations to the City and urban growth boundary expansions), notify DLCD and relevant
agencies and adjacent communities prior to altering a watercourse, providing information to the
Federal Insurance Administrator when the base flood elevation changes.
2) Information to be Obtained and Maintained. The following information shall be
obtained and maintained, and shall be made available for public inspection as needed:
a) Obtain, record, and maintain the actual elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of
the lowest floor (including basements) and all attendant utilities of all new or
substantially improved structures where Base Flood Elevation (BFE) data is provided
through the Flood Insurance Study (FIST. Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), or
obtained in accordance with SDC 3.3.430(A)(8).
b) Obtain and record the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the natural
rade of the building site for a structure prior to the start of construction and the
placement of any fill and ensure that the requirements of SDC 3.3.430(B)(4) and
SDC 3.3.425(C)(1)(b) are adhered to.
c) Upon placement of the lowest floor of a structure (including basement) but prior to
further vertical construction, obtain documentation, prepared and sealed by a
professional licensed surveyor or engineer, certifying the elevation (in relation to
mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement).
d) Where base flood elevation data are utilized. obtain As -built certification of the
elevation (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor (including basement)
prepared and sealed by a professional licensed surveyor or engineer, prior to the
final inspection.
(e) Maintain all Elevation Certificates (ECL submitted to the city:
f) Obtain, record, and maintain the elevation (in relation to mean sea level) to which
the structure and all attendant utilities were floodproofed for all new or substantially
improved floodproofed structures where allowed under this Section and where Base
Flood Elevation (BFE) data is provided through the FIS. FIRM, or obtained in
accordance with SDC 3.3.430(A)(8).
a) Maintain all floodproofing certificates required under this Section
h) Record and maintain all variance actions, including justification for their issuance:
i) Obtain and maintain all hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed as required
under SDC 3.3.430(B)(4).
i) Record and maintain all Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage
calculations and determinations as required under SDC 3.3.425(DLI,
Attachment 1, Page 27 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 14 of 37
k) Maintain for public inspection all records pertaining to the provisions of this
Section.
3) Requirement to Notify Other Entities and Submit New Technical Data.
al Community Boundary Alterations. The Floodplain Administrator shall notify the
Federal Insurance Administrator in writing whenever there is an annexation to the
City of Springfield, when the boundary of the community has been modified by an
expansion of the urban growth boundary, or the city has otherwise assumed
authority or no longer has authority to adopt and enforce floodplain management
regulations for a particular area, to ensure that all Flood Hazard Boundary Maps
FHBMI and Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) accurately represent the
community's boundaries. Include within such notification a copy of a map of the
community suitable for reproduction, clearly delineating annexed area or the new
urban growth boundary or new area for which the community has assumed or
relinquished floodplain management regulatory authority.
b) Watercourse Alterations. Notify adjacent communities. the Department of Land
Conservation and Development, and other appropriate state and federal agencies.
prior to any alteration or relocation of a watercourse, and submit evidence of such
notification to the Federal Insurance Administration. This notification shall be
provided by the applicant to the Federal Insurance Administration as a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) along with either:
i) A proposed maintenance plan to assure the flood carrying capacity within the
altered or relocated portion of the watercourse is maintained; or
ii) Certification by a registered professional engineer that the project has been
designed to retain its flood carrying capacity without periodic maintenance.
The applicant shall be required to submit a Conditional Letter of Map Revision
CLOMR) when required under SDC3.3.425(C)(3)(c). Ensure compliance with all
applicable requirements in SDC 3.3.425(Cl(3)(cl and SDC 3.3,430(Al(11.
c) Requirement to Submit New Technical Data. A community's base flood
elevations may increase or decrease resulting from physical changes affecting
flooding conditions. As soon as practicable, but not later than six months after the
date such information becomes available. the City shall notify the Federal Insurance
Administrator of the changes by submitting technical or scientific data in accordance
with Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). Section 65.3. The Citv may
require the applicant to submit such data and review fees required for compliance
with this Section through the applicable FEMA Letter of Map Change (LOMCI
process.
(i) The Floodplain Administrator shall require a Conditional Letter of Map
Revision prior to the issuance of a floodplain development permit for:
(aa) Proposed floodwav encroachments that increase the base flood
elevation; and
Attachment 1, Page 28 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 15 of 37
(ba) Proposed development which increases the base flood elevation by
more than one foot in areas where FEMA has provided base flood elevations
but no floodway.
iii) An applicant shall notify FEMA within six (6) months of project completion
when an applicant has obtained a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
from FEMA. This notification to FEMA shall be provided as a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR).
iii) The applicant shall be responsible for preparing all technical data to support
CLOMR/LOMR applications and paving any processing or application fees
associated with the CLOMR/LOMR.
(iv) The Floodplain Administrator shall be under no obligation to sign the
Community Acknowledgement Form, which is part of the CLOMR/LOMR
application, until the applicant demonstrates that the project will or has met the
requirements of this Section and all applicable state and federal permits.
Commentary: Moves Section 3.3-435 to Subsection (D) of this Section 3.3.425 and renames to
better align with layout of model code. Subsection A. is reworded to match required language
from model code. Changes require City to now make damage inspections for any event, natural
or other causes, not just post -flood. Wording in Subsection C. is updated to accurately reflect
timing of reporting damage. A determination of Substantial Improvement (which includes a
determination of Substantial Damage) triggers requirements for the structure to be brought into
compliance with current code requirements, including the development standards of Section
3.3.430. This means a property owner wishing to substantially improve a structure within the
Floodplain Overlay District will need to comply with the floodplain development standards.
D) Substantial Improvement and Substantial Damage Assessments and Determinations.
3.3-435 Post -Flood Substantial Darnage Procedures
A-. Building inspectors from the Development Sep.19 le -s -and Public Works Department
shall conduct Substantial Improvement (SI) (as defined in SDC 3.3.415) reviews for all
structural development proposal applications and maintain a record of SI calculations
within permit files in accordance with SDC 3.3.425(C)(2): and shall conduct Substantial
Damage (SD) (as defined in SDC 3.3.415) assessments when structures are damaged
due to a natural hazard event or other causes; and shall make SD determinations
whenever structures within the special flood hazard area as established in SDC
3.3.420(8)) are damaged to the extent that the cost of restoring the structure to its
before damaged condition would equal or exceed 50 percent of the market value of the
structure before the damage occurred.
rnal% pest fleed after a fleed event te deteFMiRe damage te
GtFYGtYFes by the f'99diRg-.
2M& A list of damaged structures, which are not in compliance with the provisions of this
Section, shall will be reported to FEMA.
C-. The City shafLwill notify affected property owners prier tewhen submitting the
damage report to FEMA.
3.3.430 Development Standards
Attachment 1, Page 29 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 16 of 37
Commentary: Minor wording changes to match model code language and to use UGB rather
than "city and its urbanizable area."
JA j General Standards. In all areas of special flood hazard areas within the Gi+vry aR 'rcu
urhanizahle area UGB, the following standards app! be adhered to:
Commentary: Adds required model code language. Some of this language was contained in
3.3-415 B. 9.. If development alters or relocates a watercourse, requires that the flood carrying
capacity not be diminished and requires that maintenance be provided to ensure this.
1) Alteration of Watercourse. Require that the flood carrying capacity within the altered
or relocated portion of said watercourse is maintained. Require that maintenance is
provided within the altered or relocated portion of said watercourse to ensure that the
flood carrying capacity is not diminished. Require compliance with SDC 3.3.425(C)(3)(bl
and SDC 3.3.425(C)(3)(c).
Commentary: Updates to comply with required model code language. These changes remove
the use of two anchoring standards and removes anchoring requirements for manufactured
homes from this Subsection. Anchoring requirements for manufactured homes are contained in
3.3.430(B)(3)(d) Manufactured Dwellings and have been updated to match required model code
language and comply with current requirements.
MI—Anchoring. All new construction, manufaGt Ured homes and substantial
improvements subjen+ +e loos than 18 innheo of flood water .during a 100 year fleeld shall
be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse or lateral movement of the structure resultina
from hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads, including the effects of buoyancy. All
manufactured dwellinas shall be anchored per SDC 3.3.430(B)(3)(d).;and shall be
Commentary: Minor revisions for consistency with model code language.
U3 2-;_ Construction Materials and Methods.
ja—)=All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed with
approved materials and utility equipment resistant to flood damage.
jb:j All new construction and substantial improvements shall be constructed using
aeved methods and practices that minimize flood damage.
Commentary: Moves Subsection 2. c. to this Subsection. Renames 3. Utilities to (b) Water
Supply, Sanitary Sewer, and On -Site Waste Disposal Systems and makes it a subsection of (4)
Attachment 1, Page 30 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 17 of 37
Utilities to match model code layout. Under (a): adds duct systems, provides more specific
requirements for how equipment must be designed and installed to resist flooding and more
explicit requirements for where equipment must be elevated to. Requires equipment to meet
these standards if replaced as part of a substantial improvement. Minor changes to wording in
(b) to comply with required model code language.
U4 Utilities and Equipment.
a) Electrical. Mechanical. Plumbing, and Other Equipment. Electrical, heating,
ventilation, air-conditioning, plumbing, duct systems, and n;r-nondi+iening on, ,pmen+
and other equipment and service facilities shall be designed ands ethe ° O
elevated at or above the base flood elevation or shall be designed and installed
lesated-to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the components and to
resist hydrostatic and hydrodynamic loads and stresses, including the effects of
buoyancy. during conditions of flooding. In addition, electrical, heating, ventilating.
air-conditioning, plumbing, duct systems, and other equipment and service facilities
shall meet all the requirements of this Section if replaced as part of a substantial
improvement.
�."+� Water Supply. Sanitary Sewer. and On -Site Waste Disposal Systems.
aa -.All new and replacement water supply systems shall be designed to
minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the system;_
ii New and replacement sanitary sewage systems shall be designed to
minimize or eliminate infiltration of flood waters into the systems and discharge
from the systems into flood waters�d.
iii EOn-site waste disposal systems shall be located to avoid impairment to
them or contamination from them during flooding consistent with the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality.
Commentary: Adds Subsection with required language from model code. Subsection covers
specific development standards for tanks including anchoring requirements. Adds a reference
to the Springfield's locally adopted fire code.
5 Tanks.
W Underground tanks shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral
movement under conditions of the base flood.
b) Above -ground tanks shall be installed at or above the base flood elevation or
shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and lateral movement under
conditions of the base flood.
c) Above -ground and underground storage tanks, piping, pumps, and related
equipment shall meet the requirements of the City of Springfield's locally adopted fire
code.
Commentary: Moves Subsection 3.3-420 B. 5. to this subsection to better align with new layout
of Section 3.3.430 and makes minor updates to wording.
Attachment 1, Page 31 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 18 of 37
M-5-. Streets.
fal: Adequate provisions shall must be made for accessibility during a base flood to
ensure ingress and egress for ordinary and emergency vehicles and services during
potential future flooding.
fb): No street or surface of any new street shall may be at an elevation of less than 4
one foot below the base flood height.
U7 4. -Subdivision Proposals.
Commentary: Adds language to comply with model code layout and required language. This
language is similar to the standard contained in 3.3-420 A. 4. f.
(a) All new subdivision proposals and other proposed new developments fincluding
proposals for manufactured dwelling parks and subdivisions) greater than 50 lots or
five acres, whichever is the lesser, shall include within such proposals. Base Flood
Elevation data:
Commentary: Changes formatting of a. and b. to match model code layout and wording of a. -c. to
align with required model code language. Expands requirements to include other large
developments, including manufactured dwelling parks.
b�b-.All new subdivision proposals and other proposed new developments (including
proposals for manufactured dwelling parks and subdivisions) shall:
Q Be consistent with the need to minimize
flood damage;
ii hHave public utilities and facilities such as, inGludin^ but not limited to:
sewer, gas, electrical and water systems located, constructed, and maintained to
minimize or eliminate flood damage;
Mc. All cubdiyicinn nrnnnc ils shall h Have adequate drainage provided to
reduce exposure to flood hazards. darnage; and
Commentary: Minor wording changes to make terminology consistent with other Sections.
Up d -.-One hURdred yeaFBase flood elevation data shall must be provided and shown
on final and subdivision plats. The boundaries of the 100 y base flood and
floodway shall must be shown on the final subdivision plat;
(Me -.-A permanent monument shall must be established and maintained on land
subdivided, showing the elevation in feet above mean sea level. The location of the
monument shall must be shown on the final partition map or subdivision plat;
Commentary: Deleted to match model code. Language contained in Subsection (a) above.
Attachment 1, Page 32 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 19 of 37
Commentary: Subsection renamed to align with model code layout. Language added and
deleted to comply with required model code language. Requires Base Flood Elevation to be
determined for large-scale development in any A zone if there is not an established base flood
elevation. Now requires development proposals within unnumbered A zones to be elevated a
minimum of two feet if no base flood elevation data is available. Removes the exemption for
manufactured homes in existing mobile home parks and subdivisions.
/ )5.Reyiow of Building PerUse of Other Base Flood Data.
a When Where base flood elevation data has not been provided in accordance with
SDC 3.3.420(B) the local floodplain administrator shall obtain, review, and
reasonably utilize any Base Flood Elevation data available from a federal, state, or
other source, in order to administer SDC 3.3.430. All new subdivision proposals and
other proposed new developments (including proposals for manufactured dwelling
parks and subdivisions) must meet the requirements of SDC 3.3.430(Al(7).
b) Base Flood Elevations shall be determined for development proposals that are
five acres or more in size or are 50 lots or more, whichever is lesser in any A zone
that does not have an established base flood elevation. Development proposals
located within an unnumbered A zone shall be reasonably safe from flooding. +s-4et
available either three gh the Fleed Ins uranne Study er frem anether autheritatiye
plaGement shall be reviewed te assure that proposed GenstrijGt'E)R wall be FeaSoRably
safe from fleo ding. The test of reasonableness shall includes without limitation the
but net he limited to the use of historical data, high water marks, FEMA provided
Base Level Engineering data, or photographs of past flooding, where available.
When no base flood elevation data is available, the elevation requirement for
development proposals within an unnumbered A zone is a minimum of two (2) feet
above the highest adjacent grade to be reasonably safe from flooding. Failure to
elevate at least 2 -two feet above (the exterier` grade in these zones may result in
higher insurance rates.. This requirement does not apply to mane ifaGt fired homes in
existing Mehile Heme Parks and S b diVisinns
Commentary: Adds language required by model code. Requires structures that are partially
located in the floodplain to comply with the Floodplain Overlay District standards, and requires
structures located in multiple flood zones to comply with the more restrictive requirements.
9) Structures Located in Multiple or Partial Flood Zones. In coordination with the State
of Oregon Specialty Codes:
a) When a structure is located in multiple flood zones on the community's Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) the provisions for the more restrictive flood zone shall
apply.
b) When a structure is partially located in a special flood hazard area, the entire
structure shall meet the requirements for new construction and substantial
improvements.
Attachment 1, Page 33 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 20 of 37
Commentary. Makes changes to wording to comply with required model code language.
JB- Specific Standards. In all areas of special floe d haz- r4flood zones within the City and its
urbanizable area where base fl^^'d elevation data has been pFevi ded as speGifi^rl in
SeGti^nc. 3 4 10and Q ^r 3.3 41513A., the following nr^„ic+i^nc+ ^r^ r^^„ired:s ecific
standards shall apply to all new construction and substantial improvements in addition to the
General Standards contained in SDC 3.3.430(A).
Commentary. Adds required model code language. Some of these standards for flood openings
were applied to residential construction in 3.3-420 B. 1. B. i. -iv.. The new required language
applies flood opening standards more broadly to all development with fully enclosed areas
below the lowest floor. Adds a higher standard that limits the storage of toxic materials in crawl
space areas.
(1) Flood Openings. All new construction and substantial improvements with fully
enclosed areas below the lowest floor (excluding basements) are subject to the following
requirements. Enclosed areas below the Base Flood Elevation, including crawl spaces
shall:
(a) Be designed to automatically equalize hydrostatic flood forces on walls by
allowing for the entry and exit of floodwaters.
b) Be used solelv for parkina. storaae. or buildina access: however. storaae of toxic
material, oil, gasoline, or any priority persistent pollutant identified by the Oregon
Department of Environmental Quality is not allowed unless confined to a tank
installed in comDliance with SDC 3.3.430(A)(5) and the City of SDrinafield's locallv
adopted fire code.
c) Be certified by a registered professional engineer or architect or meet or exceed
all of the following minimum criteria:
i) A minimum of two openings.
(iii) The total net area of non -engineered openings shall not be less than one
square inch for each square foot of enclosed area, where the enclosed area is
measured on the exterior of the enclosure walls.
iii) The bottom of all openings shall be no higher than one foot above grade.
(iv) Openings may be equipped with screens, louvers, valves, or other coverings
or devices provided that they shall allow the automatic flow of floodwater into and
out of the enclosed areas and shall be accounted for in the determination of the
net open area.
v) All additional higher standards for flood openings in the State of Oregon
Residential Specialty Codes Section R322.2.2 shall be complied with when
applicable.
Commentary. Adds required language from model code. Subsection covers specific
development standards for garages. Allows attached garages to be constructed below base
flood elevation as long as certain standards are met including that the garage is only used for
Attachment 1, Page 34 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 21 of 37
parking, building access, or storage. Clarifies that detached garages must follow standards for
appurtenant structures as described in Section 3.3.430(B)(3)(0. Adds a higher standard that
limits the storage of toxic materials in garages.
2) Garages.
a) Attached garages may be constructed with the garage floor slab below the Base
Flood Elevation (BFE) in flood zones, if the following requirements are met:
i) If located within a floodway the proposed garage must comply with the
requirements of SDC 3.3.430(B)(4).
ii) The floors are at or above grade on not less than one side:
iii) The garage is used solely for parking, building access_ and/or storage:
however, storage of toxic material, oil, gasoline, or any priority persistent
pollutant identified by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality is not
allowed unless elevated one foot above base flood elevation or confined to a
tank installed in compliance with SDC 3.3.430(A)(5) and the City of Springfield's
locally adopted fire code.
iv) The garage is constructed with flood openings in compliance with SDC
3.3.430(B)(1) to equalize hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls by allowing for
the automatic entry and exit of floodwater.
v) The portions of the garage constructed below the BFE are constructed with
materials resistant to flood damage:
(vi) The garage is constructed in compliance with the standards in SDC
3.3.430(ft and
(vii) The garage is constructed with electrical, and other service facilities located
and installed so as to prevent water from entering or accumulating within the
components during conditions of the base flood.
b) Detached garages must be constructed in compliance with the standards for
appurtenant structures in SDC 3.3.430(B)(31(f) or non-residential structures in SDC
3.3.430(B)(3)(c) depending on the square footage of the garage.
Commentary: Adds required model code language and language recommended by DLCD.
3) For Special Flood Hazard Areas with Base Flood Elevations. In addition to the
general standards listed in SDC 3.3.430(A) the following specific standards shall apply in
special flood hazard areas with Base Flood Elevations (BFEI: Zones Al -A30. AH. and
AE, and in other flood zones where Base Flood Elevations are available or required to
be determined under Sections 3.3.430(71 and (8).
Commentary. Moves Section 3.3-420 D. to align with model code layout, renamed and
language revised to comply with required model code language. Language now specifies zones
in which the requirement applies and affirmatively prevents development in the floodplain unless
the stated standard is met.
Attachment 1, Page 35 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 22 of 37
Mn. EP,G ,,, h,,,on+ Before Regulatory Floodway. In areas where a regulatory
floodway has not been designated, no new construction, substantial improvement. or
other development (including fill) shall be permitted within Zones Al -30 and AE on
the community's Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM). unless it is demonstrated that
Tthe cumulative effect of thea-ny proposed development, when combined with all
other existing and anticipated development, shawill not increase the water surface
elevation of the base flood more than 4 -one foot at any point within the community.
Commentary: Subsection moved from 3.3-420 B. 1. to align with the model code layout.
Wording changes made to align with required model code language and to delete flood opening
requirements which are now contained in 3.3.430(8)(1). Adds that conversion of a building to
residential use must elevation requirements.
4-.Ub Residential Construction. a. -New construction, conversion to, and substantial
improvement of any residential structure shall have the lowest floor, including
basement, elevated to hone foot above the Bbase Hood Eelevation
Enclosed areas below the lowest floor shall comply with the flood opening
requirements in SDC 3.3.430(Bl(11.
Commentary: Subsection moved from 3.3-420 B. 2. and language revised to comply with model
code layout and required language. Adds conversions nonresidential uses must comply with
these standards. Adds requirement than certification be done by a registered professional.
W2L. Non-residential Construction.
0a: New construction, conversion to, and substantial improvement of any
commercial, industrial or other nonresidential structure shall have either the
lowest floor, including basement, elevated to a level at least hone foot above the
Attachment 1, Page 36 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 23 of 37
base flood elevation (BFE),: or --Or together with attendant utility and sanitary
facilities shall:
as i. Be flood -proofed to 4 -one foot above the base flood elevation level, so
that the structure is watertight with walls substantially impermeable to the
passage of water;
ba 4. Have structural components capable of resisting hydrostatic and
hydrodynamic loads and effects of buoyancy;
ca ++i-. Be certified by a registered professionals engineer or architect that the
design and methods of construction are in accordance with accepted
standards of practice for meeting provisions of this Subsection based on their
development and/or review of the structural design, specifications, and plans.
Tlhe Such certifications shall be provided to the Floodplain Administrator as
set forth in SDC 3.3.425(C)(2)Builyding Official as specified in Sentien 3
41 b.
ii b, Nonresidential structures that are elevated, not flood -proofed, shall meet
comply with the same standards for enclosed areas below the lowest floor in
SDC 3.3.430(B)(1). space below the lowest floor as sperifierd in Subseetiop
,above:
Mc_ Applicants flood -proofing non-residential buildings shall be notified that
flood insurance premiums will be based on rates that are 4 -one foot below the
flood -proofed level (e.g., a building GenStrUGted floodproofed to the base flood
elevationlevel will be rated as 4 -one foot below tba�r level).
Commentary. Subsection moved from 3.3-420 B. 3., renamed, and language revised to
comply with model code layout and required language. Requirements remove the two
different standards that were in place for elevation and replace with one standard for all
manufactured dwellings regardless of location. Requirements change how elevation from
base flood elevation is measured for manufactured dwellings from lowest floor to bottom of
longitudinal chassis frame and electrical crossover. Adds anchoring requirements specific to
manufactured dwellings to this Subsection. Some of this language was previously contained
in 3.3-420 A. 1. Removes c. regarding Recreational Vehicles to its own subsection to match
model code layout.
dM& Manufactured HemesDwellinas.
01 a Manufactured dwellings to be placed (new or replacement) or substantially
improved that are supported on solid foundation walls shall be constructed with flood
openings that comply with SDC 3.3.420(B)(1): ll man, fa„t, herd homes that are
plaGed or substantially improved WithiR ZORes A! ,
AH and AE shall be elevated
GR a permanent fon`dation where the lowest floor of
, ithe man„fant„re.d home is
elevated to a height of 1 feet abode the base floor) elevation:
f, On sites in a new man„faot„rerd home park er sub division;
Attachment 1, Page 37 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 24 of 37
ii The bottom of the longitudinal chassis frame beam shall be at or above Base
Flood Elevation:
iii b-. All rnManufactured homes dwellings to be placed (new or replacement) or
substantially improved shall be anchored to prevent flotation, collapse, and
lateral movement during the base flood. Anchoring methods may include but are
not limited to, use of over -the -top or frame ties to ground anchors (Reference
FEMA's "Manufactured Home Installation in Flood Hazard Areas" guidebook for
additional technique,, ). andon s tes in ap existing mane ifanti herd heme pork or
subdovosmen within Zenes A! 30, AH or AE that are ROt SUbjeGt te the previsions ef
Subseetfen a.,above shall be elevated sothat--.
r�rerrr_tssa�s=rr_�ss�:tre�s�rr_r.�.. :*:rr_��:r_�:Lrr_�arrr.
4. The mons ifagti hold home chassis is supperteld by reipforoeld piers or other
fog R dation elements of at least equivalent strength that are Re less than 2C.
innhes in height aheye grade
(iv) Electrical crossover connections shall be a minimum of twelve (121 inches
above Base Flood Elevation (BFE).
Commentary: Creates new Subsection specific to recreational vehicles (RVs) to match model
code layout. Language from 3.3-420 B. 3. c. moved and revised to comply with required
language from model code. Changes further clarify what is considered temporary siting of an
RV and requires that if an RV does not meet temporary siting requirements it must comply with
the development standards for manufactured dwellings. Clarifies that RV's get a Floodplain
Development Permit if not temporarily sited. Adds a higher standard for recreational vehicles in
Recreational Vehicle Parks or Vehicle Storage.
(ME Recreational Vehicles. Recreational vehicles placed on sites are required to:
w'th'n Zones A!_` 0 AH er AE shall:
jib: Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days, and
On Bade fully licensed and ready for highway use on its wheels or iackina
system. is attached to the site only by auick disconnect tvpe utilities and securit
devices, and has no permanently attached additions; or
(iii: Satin y -Meet the reVieW proned6 irerequirements of SeEtien SDC
3.3.430(B)(3)(d)-445, including the anchoring and elevation requirements for
manufactured dwellings: and
(iv) Obtain a Floodplain Development Permit per SDC 3.3.425.
Attachment 1, Page 38 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 25 of 37
v) Recreational Vehicle Parks and Recreational Vehicle Storage. Owners of a
Recreational Vehicle Park and/or Recreational Vehicle Storage must enter into
an agreement with the City stating that the Recreational Vehicle Park/Storage will
be operated in compliance with the City's floodplain regulations: stipulate that
prior to flood season the manager check to ensure that the recreational vehicles
comply with the requirements above: and create an emergency plan that
specifies how flood warnings will be received and how vehicles, trailers. and
occupants will be safely evacuated in the event of a flood.
Commentary: Adds Subsection with required language from model code. Subsection covers
specific development standards for appurtenant structures. Requires certain development
standards be met including limiting uses and size, requiring flood -resistant materials and design.
(f) Appurtenant (Accessory) Structures. Relief from elevation or floodproofina
requirements for residential and non-residential structures in flood zones may be
ranted for appurtenant structures that meet the following requirements:
i) Appurtenant structures located partially or entirely within the floodwav must
comply with requirements for development within a floodwav found in SDC
3.3.430(6)(41.
(ii) Appurtenant structures must only be used for parking. access, and storage
and shall not be used for human habitation:
(iii) In compliance with FEMA's policy issued in 2021 for appurtenant (accessory)
structures within special flood hazard areas, appurtenant structures are limited to
one-story structures less than 600 square feet.
(iv) The portions of the appurtenant structure located below the Base Flood
Elevation must be built using flood resistant materials:
v) The appurtenant structure must be adequately anchored to prevent flotation,
collapse, and lateral movement of the structure resulting from hydrodynamic and
hydrostatic loads, including__ the effects of buoyancy, . during__ conditions of the base
flood.
vi) The appurtenant structure must be designed and constructed to equalize
hydrostatic flood forces on exterior walls and comply_ with the requirements for
flood openings in SDC 3.3.430(Bl(11:
vii) Appurtenant structures shall be located and constructed to have low
damage potential:
(viii) Appurtenant structures shall not be used to store toxic material, oil. or
gasoline, or any priority persistent pollutant identified by the Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality unless confined in a tank installed incompliance with
DC 3.3.430(A)(5).
Attachment 1, Page 39 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 26 of 37
(ix) Appurtenant structures shall be constructed with electrical, mechanical, and
other service facilities located and installed so asto prevent water from entering
or accumulating within the components during conditions of the base flood.
Commentary. Makes changes to comply with required model code language. Adds
Subsection clarifying conditions under which the City may permit encroachment in the
floodway resulting in an increase in base flood elevation. Removes an existing exception
which is not compliant with current requirements.
4QG Floodways. Located within the areas ef special flood hazard area established in
SeEtien SDC 3.3.420 B ^ 1 OA. and Q. are areas designated as floodways. Since the
floodway is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity of flood -waters which carry
debris, potential projectiles, and erosion potential, the following provisions apply:
(W4-. Encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and
other development is prohibited within the adopted regulatory floodway unless_
Qi -G Certification by an registered professional civil engineer or Gis
provided demonstrating through hydrologic and hydraulic analyses performed in
accordance with standard engineering practice that the proposed encroachments
shall not result in any increase in flood levels within the community during the
occurrence of the base flood discharge...
(ii) The City may permit encroachments within the adopted regulatory floodwav
that would result in an increase in base flood elevations, provided that a
Conditional Letter of Map Revisions (CLOMR) is applied for and approved by the
Federal Insurance Administrator, and the requirements for such revision as
established under Volume 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations Section 65.12
are fulfilled.
JW2-. If the requirements of Sebsect+eeSDC 3.3.4 )S. I., abeve are satisfied,
all new construction, -substantial improvements, and other development shall
comply with all other applicable specialflood hazard reduction provisions of
SDCS1 ih��t eR3.3.430 B., abs.
Uc -3-. Subdivision and partitioning of land for residential purposes is prohibited if land
is located entirely within the floodway.
Commentary. Adds Subsection with language from model code that is required if a
community has any shallow flooding areas -(-designated as AH or AO) on their FEMA flood
maps. Although Springfield does not currently have any areas designated as such, FEMA is
updating the maps covering Springfield and may add AO or AH zones. Inclusion of this
language allows the City to have provisions in place should FEMA designate areas of
shallow flooding or should the City designate areas as such. Subsection covers specific
development standards in areas of shallow flooding for development, including new
construction, conversions, substantial improvements and RVs.
Attachment 1, Page 40 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 27 of 37
5) Standards for Shallow Flooding Areas. Shallow flooding areas appear on FIRMs as
AO zones with depth designations or as AH zones with Base Flood Elevations. For AO
zones the base flood depths range from one (1) to three (3) feet above ground where a
clearly defined channel does not exist, or where the path of flooding is unpredictable and
where velocity flow may be evident. Such flooding is usually characterized as sheet flow.
For both AO and AH zones, adequate drainage paths are required around structures on
slopes to guide floodwaters around and away from proposed structures.
a) Standards for AH Zones. Development within AH Zones must comply with the
standards in SDC 3.3.430(A). SDC 3.3.430(B). and SDC 3.3.430(6)(5).
b) Standards for AO Zones. In AO zones, the following provisions apply in addition
to the requirements in SDC 3.3.430(A) and SDC 3.3.430(B)(5):
i) New construction, conversion to, and substantial improvement of residential
structures and manufactured dwellings within AO zones shall have the lowest
floor, including basement, elevated above the highest grade adjacent to the
building. at minimum to or above the depth number specified on the Flood
Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) (at least two (2) feet if no depth number is
specified). For manufactured dwellings the lowest floor is considered to be the
bottom of the longitudinal chassis frame beam.
ii) New construction, conversion to, and substantial improvements of non-
residential structures within AO zones shall either:
(aa) Have the lowest floor (including basement) elevated above the highest
adjacent grade of the building site, at minimum to or above the depth number
specified on the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) (at least two (2) feet if
no depth number is specified): or
(ba) Together with attendant utility and sanitary facilities, be completely
floodproofed to or above the depth number specified on the FIRM or a
minimum of two (2) feet above the highest adjacent grade if no depth number
is specified, so that any space below that level is watertight with walls
substantially impermeable to the passage of water and with structural
components having the capability of resisting hydrostatic and hvdrodvnamic
loads and the effects of buoyancy. If this method is used, compliance shall be
certified bya registered professional engineer or architect as stated in SDC
3.3.430(B)(3)(c)(il(cal.
(iii) Recreational vehicles placed on sites within AO Zones on the community's
Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) shall either:
(aa) Be on the site for fewer than 180 consecutive days. and
(ba) Be fully licensed and ready for highway use. on its wheels or jacking
system, is attached to the site only by quick disconnect type utilities and
security devices, and has no permanently attached additions: or
Attachment 1, Page 41 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 28 of 37
ca Meet the elevation requirements of SDC 3.3.430(B)(5)(b)(i)-and the
anchoring and other requirements for manufactured dwellings of SDC
3.3.430(B)(3)(dl.
(iv) In AO zones, new and substantially improved appurtenant structures must
comply with the standards in SDC 3.3.430(B)(3)(fl.
v) In AO zones, enclosed areas beneath elevated structures shall comply with
the requirements in SDC 3.3.430(B)(11.
Commentary: Adds section with required model code language. Makes clear that a Floodplain
Development Permit must be obtained before any development -related activity begins and
describes the required elements of a permit application.
3.3.435 Floodplain Development Permits
A) Floodplain Development Permit Required. A Floodplain Development Permit shall be
obtained before construction or development begins within any area horizontallv within the
special flood hazard area established in SDC 3.3.420(8). The permit shall be required for all
structures, including manufactured dwellings, and for all other development, as defined in
SDC 3.3.415, including fill and other development activities.
B) Application for Floodplain Development Permit. Application for a permit may be made on
forms furnished by the Floodplain Administrator and includes plans drawn to scale showing_
the nature, location, dimensions, and elevations of the development area: existing or
proposed structures: fill: storage of materials: drainage facilities: and the location of the
foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required:
1) In flood zones, the proposed elevation (in relation to mean sea level), of the lowest
floor (including basement) and all attendant utilities of all new and substantially improved
structures: in accordance with the requirements of SDC 3.3.425(C)(2).
2) Proposed elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any non-residential
structure will be floodproofed.
3) Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect licensed in the State of
Oregon that the floodproofing methods proposed for any -non-residential structure meet
the floodproofing criteria for non-residential structures in SDC 3.3.430(B)(3)(c).
4) Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated.
5) Base Flood Elevation data for subdivision proposals or other development when
required per SDC 3.3.425(C)(1) and SDC 3.3.430(A)(7).
6) Substantial improvement calculation for any improvement. addition. reconstruction
renovation, or rehabilitation of an existing structure.
7) The amount and location of any fill or excavation activities proposed.
Commentary: Updates Section title to reflect model code layout and adds required model code
language.
Attachment 1, Page 42 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 29 of 37
3.3.440 Variances
A) The issuance of a variance is for floodplain management purposes only. Flood
insurance premium rates are determined by federal statute according to actuarial risk and
will not be modified by the granting of a variance.
Commentary. Makes minor wording changes to align with terminology to be used in the
development code updates.
UB A-. A Variance from the provisions of this Section, with respect to the provisions for
special flood hazard reduction, shall will be reviewed as a Type "' pFeGe'urO decision as
specified in SDC 5.1-135.
Commentary. Adds required model code language covering the conditions under which the City
may grant a variance. (2) and (3) were covered by 3.3-430 E. and F. and were moved here and
reworded to match model code.
C) Conditions for Variance
1) Generally, variances may be issued for new construction and substantial
improvements to be erected on a lot of one-half acre or less in size contiguous to and
surrounded by lots with existing structures constructed below the base flood elevation, in
conformance with the provisions of SDC 3.3.440(C)(3) and SDC 3.3.440(C)(5). and SDC
3.3.440(D). As the lot size increases beyond one-half acre, the technical justification
required for issuing a variance increases.
2) Variances shall only be issued upon a determination that the variance is the
minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief.
3) Variances shall not be issued within any floodway if any increase in flood levels
during the base flood discharge would result.
Commentary: Adds required model code language. 3.3-430 B. 1.-3. and 9.40. are covered by
required model code language (c), 4.-5. are added to (a) as examples of good and sufficient
cause.
4) Variances shall only be issued upon:
a) A showing of good and sufficient cause
b) A determination that failure to grant the variance would result in exceptional
hardship to the applicant: and
c) A determination that the granting of a variance will not result in:
i) Increased flood heights
(ii) Additional threats to public safety (such as potential danger that materials
may be swept onto other lands to the injury of others: potential danger to life and
Attachment 1, Page 43 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 30 of 37
property due to flooding, debris, or erosion damage: inability for emergency
vehicles to safely access the property in times of flood).
(iii) Extraordinary public expense (such as the costs of providing government
services during flood conditions including the maintenance and repair of public
utilities and facilities including but not limited to sewer, gas, electrical, and water
systems, and streets and bridges).
(iv) Create nuisances (based on expected heights, velocity, rate of rise,
sediment, debris transported by the floodwaters and the effects of hydrodynamic
forces, if applicable, expected at the site).
v) Cause fraud on or victimization of the public, or
(vi) Conflict with existing laws or ordinances.
Commentary: Adds required model code language. Allows the City to grant variances for new
construction and substantial improvements if certain requirements are met.
5) Variances may be issued by the City for new construction and substantial
improvements, and for other development necessary for the conduct of a functionally
dependent use provided that the criteria of SDC 3.3.440(C)(2) — (4)are met, and the
structure or other development is protected by methods that minimize flood damages
during the base flood and create no additional threats to public safety.
Commentary: Adds required model code language. Requires the City to provide certain
disclaimers when a variance is granted and keep records of variances granted.
D) Variance Notification. Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given written
notice that the issuance of a variance to construct a structure below the Base Flood
Elevation will result in increased premium rates for flood insurance and that such
construction below the base flood elevation increases risks to life and property. Such
notification and a record of all variance actions, including justification for their issuance shall
be maintained in accordance with SDC 3.3.425(C1(21.
Commentary: Deletes approval criteria. The criteria below are either removed or covered by
(4)(a) -(c) of the above subsection as noted.
Attachment 1, Page 44 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 31 of 37
Commentary: Makes language changes to update the process to be used for recording a
variance to ensure it aligns with Lane County practice and expands requirement for this to be
done to include a variance of any kind.
JC-. Reasonable conditions may be established in connection with a Variance if necessary
to comply with the purpose and req uiromontc standards of this Section. If approved. T, Gases
where a VaFiaRGe is gFanted to allew residential GenStF61GtiE)R with a lewest fleer elevation
below the required minimum elevatien, er nenresidential fleed preefing belew the required
minimum elevati„n, the applicant shall must record a deed Gevenant that notice of variance
with Lane County Deeds and Records.the G St Of flni,rd inoi iraRce will be nr�mmeR arable
with the innreased ricL resulting from the roma mord fleer elevation flood preefin`r
Commentary. Deletes language which is covered by the required definition for Substantial
Improvement in Section 3.3.415(34)(b).
Commentary: Deletes language which is covered by required model code language in Section
3.3.440 (C)(2)-(3).
Attachment 1, Page 45 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 32 of 37
Commentary. Creates new Section combining 3.3-440 and 3.3-445 and making language edits
to comply with required model code language.
3.3.445 -440 ---Periodic Floodplain Inspections, and -Enforcement of Requirements and
Pena—It iesA iG_ -
Commentary. Updates to clarify departments and roles responsible for floodplain inspection,
updates name of required permit, removes language that does not align with City practice.
WField staff fr"m +The Development con,,, es Department andlsr the Public Works
Department shal -will make periodic inspections of floodplain areas both -within the city limits
and +ho —ty Simits but ,eri+hiri the City's urban serviGes areaUGB to establish that any
activity involving the fill and/or removal of materials within the floodplain is being performed
in compliance with an approved Floodplain Development PermitLand and Di^ono
AlteratiOR Permit. The staff shall prepare a field MpOrt IiStiRg ROR complying Gonrfl�ons to he
delivered to the- Direc4o Upon receipt of th-k--a report -listing non -complying conditions-, the
Floodplain Ad min istratorD+reEtor shat will proceed with enforcement actions including, but
not limited to: the issuance of a Stop Work Order; the issuance of a citation; and the
commencement of civil legal proceedings.
Commentary. Adds required model code language stating requirement to comply with the
requirements of the Floodplain Overlay District and clearly stating the consequences of a
violation.
B) All development within special flood hazard areas is subject to the terms of this Section
and required to comply with its provisions and all other applicable regulations.
C) No structure or land shall hereafter be constructed, located, extended, converted. or
altered without full compliance with the terms of this Section and other applicable
regulations. Violations of the provisions of this Section by failure to comply with any of its
requirements (including violations of conditions and safeguards established in connection
with conditions) shall constitute a civil infraction subject to the applicable procedures and
penalties for abatement and civil infractions in the Springfield Municipal Code (SMC).
Nothing contained herein shall prevent the City of Springfield from taking such other lawful
action as is necessary to prevent or remedy any violation, nor preclude the City from using
any other remedies available by law.
Commentary. Updates language to comply with required model code language and relevant
enforcement procedures within the City. Updates name of permit required to reflect that the
Floodplain Development Permit is the permit required in the floodplain.
1) Within City limits. a-.Eenforcement of the provisions of this Section is through
/+rlmmonnomoH+ r.f ,.,.,,l regal pFeGood,,,nsthe applicable procedures for abatement and
civil infractions as provided in the Springfield Municipal GeertCode. ` ielati^n „f +ho
Attachment 1, Page 46 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 33 of 37
J21: Within the UGB (including within Citylimits --enforcement of the provisions of this
Section may also be through commencement of legal proceedings in Lane County
Circuit Court. Upon determination that a violation has occurred, the court may:
Jaj: Require the person responsible and/or the property owner to cease the violation
of the provisions of this Section and bring the property into conformance with this
Section;
(b): Require the person responsible and/or the property owner to take action to
return the property to its original condition action before any work initiated without a
Floodplain Development' and and Drainage Alteration Permit;
Jct. If the person responsible and/or the property owner does not return the property
to its original condition within the prescribed time period, authorize the City to take
whatever action is necessary to return the property to its original condition prior to
the initiation of any work without a' and and Drainage lterat'OR Perms Floodplain
Development Permit, or otherwise bring the property into conformance with the
provisions of this Section;
id): Authorize the City to charge the costs for restoring the property to its original
condition or for bringing the property into conformance with the provisions of this
Section either against the property itself, the person responsible, or the property
owner; and/or
Jej: Order the person responsible and/or the property owner to pay to the City its
attorney fees and costs incurred in pursuing its civil legal remedies.
Commentary. Delete language that is not applicable to enforcement of a Floodplain
Development Permit. Existing code does not clearly explain the difference between a Floodplain
Development Permit (which is required by the Development Code) and Land Drainage and
Alteration Permit (which is required by the Municipal Code). Updated language in this Section
3.3.445 focuses on enforcement provisions for the Floodplain Development Permit which is
within the City's jurisdiction to enforce, even outside of city limits.
...
Attachment 1, Page 47 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 34 of 37
Commentary: This Subsection was deleted from 3.3-420 Development Standards B. 4.. The
model code does not have any requirements specific to foundations as that is covered by
Section 3.3.430 (B)(3)(d) and the Building Code.
EMMMATAN".
s„:rrsa s�irtsr_�:r.■:TMaMMY-MI sT:is_ar.�:�:r :r_�n r.�rsr�Tr.■:Lsms�
MIN
e M10 M! W., � --n nen ru 1. M, r W W - T "n my -� I
Commentary: This section was removed from the Floodplain Overlay District Section. SDC 5.1-
110 B. covers emergency situations within the City.
Attachment 1, Page 48 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 35 of 37
Attachment 1, Page 49 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 36 of 37
Legislative Version of
Amendments to the Springfield Development Code
Section 6.1-110 Meaning of Specific Words and Terms to Remove
Language Specific to Section 3.3.400 Floodplain Overlay District
AMENDMENTS
The amendments to the section are shown in legislative format (deleted text with strike-thru red
font). Only definitions that are changed or deleted are shown below. Commentary is show in
purple italics font. Commentary is provided for explanatory purposes and is not adopted as
code.
Commentary: The changes to the definitions in this chapter remove any of the specific language
related to the floodplain. They also remove words that are only used in the Floodplain Overlay
District Section. The required definitions for the Floodplain Overlay District are contained in the
proposed amendments to Section 3.3-415 as shown above.
Building. Any structure used or intended for sheltering any use or occupancy.°coirSeGtien 3.3 400 Fleedplain Overlay DistriGt, the terms "building" and "struGture" arepermanently on a tFaGt of land. This definition spedfiGally indudes a Mobile herne, rnanufaGturedherne and any aGGesseries, and gas or liquid storage tanks prindpally above ground.
Building Official. The person responsible for the administration and enforcement of the
Building Safety Codes; the ,July authorized Tppyecen�i„�� Te Gter respencihle in
nom.
NN
Development. Any human -made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including, but
not limited to, a change in use; construction, installation or change of a structure; subdivision
and partition; establishment or termination of a right of access; storage of materials, equipment
or vehicles on the land; drilling and site alteration due to land surface mining, filling, grading,
dredging, paving, excavation or clearing of trees and vegetation. Agricultural uses (including
agricultural structures), when otherwise permitted by the base zoning district, are exempt from
this definition. -
o..Gayatien or drilling operations. As used in Section 3.4-280C., any activity within the
Glenwood Riverfront portion of the Willamette Greenway Overlay District that would alter the
elevation of the land; remove or destroy plant life; cause structures of any kind to be installed,
erected, or removed; or result in a measurable change of any kind.
Attachment 1, Page 50 of 51
Exhibit B, Page 37 of 37
WIN 0_11 "Il MINMII "11 1
.. . _ -I
IMM ITIMUR
Structure. Anything constructed or built, any edifice or building or any kind or any piece of work
artificially built up or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner. As used in
SeGtien 3.3 400, Fleedplain Overlay DiStFiGt, a walled or reefed building inGluding a gas or liquid
sterage tank that is ririRGipalIy abeye greunrl
Attachment 1, Page 51 of 51