Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 12/3/2021City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Site Plan Review Minor Modification SPRINGFIELD W & Applicant Name: Glen A. Miller Phone: 503.636.7979 Company: GA Miller Architecture PC Fax: 503.636.9898 Address: 141 Del Prado St., Lake Oswego, OR 97035 Applicant's Rep.: Joe Karcher Phone: 541.342.6557 Ex. 1200 Company: JCK Subs, LLC dba Jersey Mike's Subs Fax: Address: 875 Country Club Road, Eugene, OR 97401 Property Owner: Attn: Mark Schick Phone: 503.433.8606 Company: Alprop LLC Fax: Address: 4905 SW Griffith Drive, Suite 205, Beaverton, OR 97005 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17 03 25 3316900 TAX LOT NO(S): Lot 3 Block 5 Mohawks Add. Lane C Property Address: 1131 Mohawk Blvd., Springfield, OR Size of Property: 0.24 Acres 0 Square Feet ❑ Proposed Name of Project: Jersey Mike's Subs Description of if you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Remodel of interior vacant space for new fast- casual restaurant. Work includes new grille, type &type II hoods,elec Proposal: tonal, plumbing, millwork, and new finishes throughout Site work includes maintenance such as new parking lot sur- ace,new s np r , up ra es an access o e s e, a Iona -1 ig mg, painting e ending exterior. Existing Use: Vacant, previously two restaurants Signatures: Please and print your name and date in the appropriate box on the next page. gin Associated Applications: Case No. 611-21-000311-TYP1 Date: 12/03/2021 Reviewed by: LM Application Fee: $ 1536 Technical Fee: $ 76'60 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ 1612'60 PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 10 Signatures The undersigned acknowledges that the Information In this application Is correct and accurate. Applicant: 640, Date: October 19,2021 Signature Glen A. Miller Print If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. Owner: t e2 Date: % 0 - Signature Print �'� ,I Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 10 Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application to the Development & Public Works Department The application must conform to the Site Plan Review Minor Modification Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-7 of this application packet. Planning Division staff screen the submittal at the front counter to determine whether all required items listed in the Site Plan Review Minor Modification Submittal Requirements Checklist have been submitted. Applications missing required items will not be accepted for submittal 2. City Staff Conduct Detailed Completeness Check • Planning Division staff conducts a detailed completeness check within 30 days of submittal. • The assigned Planner notifies the applicant in writing regarding the completeness of the application. • An application is not be deemed technically complete until all information necessary to evaluate the proposed development, its impacts, and its compliance with the provisions of the Springfield Development Code and other applicable codes and statutes have been provided. Incomplete applications, as well as insufficient or unclear data, will delay the application review process and may result in denial. 3. City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • This is a Type I decision and thus is made without public notice and without a public hearing since there are clear and objective approval criteria and/or development standards that do not require the use of discretion. • Decisions address all the applicable approval criteria and/or development standards. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City and may not be appealed. Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 10 Site Plan Review Minor Modification Submittal Requirements Checklist ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ® Site Plan Review Minor Modification Application Form © Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken, including findings demonstrating compliance with SDC 5.17-125, Site Plan Review Criteria. ❑X Copy of the Deed ® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ❑ Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. Ivo new approaches are proposed. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY CITY STAFF. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLANNER ASSIGNED TO YOUR APPLICATION MAY REQUEST ANY INFORMATION ON THIS LIST DURING COMPLETENESS REVIEW IF IT IS NOT SUBMITTED WITH THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL AND IS NECESSARY FOR REVIEWING THE APPLICATION. ❑ Two (2) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet attached - the plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the City's Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. No changes are proposed to the existing sm-faces. ❑X Four (4) Copies of the Modified Plan Sets Including the Following: © All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ❑ All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. N/A a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ❑x Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer ® Vicinity Map Shown on the Cover Sheet ® The name, location and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use, size, setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings. Revised 5/21/13 KL 4 of 10 N/!t ❑ The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department NIA ❑ The 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision Iti/A ❑ The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department Nose ❑ Physical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4'/z feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings NLA ❑ Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Site Plan ® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Architect, Landscape Architect, or Engineer X❑ Proposed buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area applicable to the parking requirement for the proposed use(s)), setbacks from property lines, and distance between buildings ® Location and height of existing or proposed fences, walls, outdoor equipment, storage, trash receptacles, and signs ❑X Location, dimensions, and number of typical, compact and disabled parking spaces; including aisles, wheel bumpers, directional signs, and striping x❑ Dimensions of the development area, as well as area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, parking and vehicular areas, sidewalks, patios, and other impervious surfaces no change ❑ Observance of solar access requirements as specified in the applicable zoning district ® On-site loading areas and vehicular and pedestrian circulation no change. ❑X Access to streets, alleys, and properties to be served, including the location and dimensions of existing and proposed curb cuts and curb cuts proposed to be closed ® Location, type, and number of bicycle parking spaces ® Location of existing and proposed transit facilities Mohawk Blvd. is a transit route N• A ❑ Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces, recreational areas, and other similar public and semi-public uses fid/A ❑ Phased Development Plan — where applicable, the Site Plan application must include a phasing plan indicating any proposed phases for development, including the boundaries and sequencing of each phase. Phasing must progress in a sequence promoting street connectivity between the various phases of the development and accommodating other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water, and electricity. The applicant must indicate which phases apply to the Site Plan application being submitted. c. Improvement and Public Utilities Plan N/A Revised 5/21/13 KL 5 of 10 ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Location and width of all existing and proposed easements ❑ Location, widths (of paving and right-of-way), and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed development, including ownership and maintenance status, if applicable. ❑ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting ❑ Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units, and similar public facilities ❑ Location, width, and construction material of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways, and trails ❑ Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points d. Grading, Paving, & Stormwater Management Plan Existing to remain, no change. ❑ Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns ❑ The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at S foot intervals) ❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill e. Landscape Plan existing to remain, no changes. ❑ Drawn by a Landscape Architect ❑ Location and dimensions of landscaping and open space areas to include calculation of landscape coverage ❑ Screening in accordance with SDC 4.4-110 ❑ Written description, including specifications, of the permanent irrigation system ❑ Location and type of street trees ❑ List in chart form the proposed types of landscape materials (trees, shrubs, ground cover). Include in the chart genus, species, common name, quantity, size, spacing, and method of planting f. Architectural Plans ® Exterior elevations of all buildings and structures proposed for the development site, including height ❑x Conceptual floor plans Revised 5/21/13 KL 6 of 10 g. On -Site Lighting Plan ❑ Location, orientation, and maximum height of exterior light fixtures, both free standing and attached ❑ Type and extent of shielding, including cut-off angles, and type of illumination, wattage, and luminous area ❑ Photometric test report for each light source ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required ❑ Where a multi -family development is proposed, any additional materials to demonstrate compliance with SDC 3.2-240 ❑ Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW ❑ A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present ❑ Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ❑ If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 ❑ A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ❑ Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ❑ Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development ❑ Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ❑ An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer Revised 5/21/13 KL 7 of 10 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 57477 PHONE 541.726.3753 FAX 541,736 1021 tvcm✓.spongtield-or:gov December 6, 2013 REQUIRED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET USE POLICY: In October 2003, Springfield Public Works released a trial "stormwater scoping sheet," provided to help engineers and developers meet stormwater requirements in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) and Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual (EDSPM). After a five month trial period, it became apparent that users of the scoping sheet submitted much more complete applications than non-users. An added bonus was a decrease in the overall review time spent on the applications, resulting in quicker notice of decisions. As a result of the benefits of the scoping sheets, the City has decided to make their use a mandatory process. Current city policy is that the use of stormwater scoping sheets is required for all applications which require development review. All applications submitted to the City shall provide a copy of a completed stormwater scoping sheet with the application packet. Attached with this letter is the latest version of the scoping sheet, which reflects changes requested by the development community. PLEASE NOTE: SUBMITTED APPLICATIONS WILL NOW BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A COMPLETED STORMWATER SCOPING SHEET, STORMWATER STUDY AND PLANS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE SCOPE REQUIREMENTS DIRECTIONS FOR USING STORMWATER SCOPING SHEETS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.) Obtain scoping sheet from application packet, city website, or other location. 2.) Fill out project information (top half of front sheet) prior to commencement of work on stormwater study. (Note: Do not sign scoping sheet until it is received from the City with requirements checked.) 3.) Mail, fax, or email all pages to: City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Dept, Attn: Clayton McEachem. 4.) Receive completed scoping sheet (filled out by the City) indicating minimums requirements for a complete stormwater study. 5.) Include four (4) copies of complete scoping sheet (signed by engineer at the bottom of page 2), stonuwater study and plans that comply with the minimum required scope with submittal of application packet. The scoping street shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover of the stormwater study. Stormwater scoping sheets can be found with all application packets (City website and the DPW front counter) as well as on the Engineering and Construction Resources webpage located at: or.goN,/DPW/Engineerin2widCojistructionResources.htm under the Public Improvement Permit Projects Forms section. Thank you in advance for working with the City of Springfield with this new process. Sincerely, Clayton McEachem, PE City of Springfield, Development and Public Works Email: cmeeachern@springfield-or.gov Phone: (541) 736-1036 Fax: (541) 736 —1021 SPR 3P GF�bU1'` DEVE.OPMEMT AND PUBLIC WORKS 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 PHONE: 541.726.3753 FAX 541.726.1021 www_cpringfoad-ocgov STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM SCOPE OF WORK (Area belmv this linefi//ed out 6y Apylrcanq - _— .._ _. _________ (Please r ,turn to Clayton MCEach,, a @ City of Sprin,feld Development and P,,bhe H orks, Fax #736-1021, Phone # 736-1036), eased: cmceachern@sl)riiigfi'eld-o,-.gov Project Name: Applicant: Assessors Parcel #: Date: Land Use(s): Phone #: Project Size (Acres): Fax #: Approx. Impervious Area: Email: Project Description (Include a copy of Assessor's map): Drainage Proposal (Public connection(s), discharge location(s), etc. Attach additional sheet(s) if necessary: Proposed Stormwater Best Management Practices: ------------------------------ Out,belaw this line fd@d nut by the QIE and R,to,aed an file AonAaaNl ----------------------- (At a mtidmum, all boxes checked by the City on the front and back ofthe, sheetshall be submitted for an a lication to be cam Tete for submittal, although other requirements may be )7ecessary.) Drainaee Study Tyne (EDSPM Section 4.03.2): (Note, UH maybe substituted for Rational Method) ❑ Small Site Study — (use Rational Method for calculations) ❑ Mid -Level Development Study—(use Unit Idydrograph Method for calculations) ❑ Full Drainage Development Study — (use Unit Hydrograph Method for calculations) Environmental Considerations: ❑ Wellhead Zone: ❑ Wetlmrd/Riparian: ❑ Soil Type: Downstream Analysis: ❑ N/A ❑ Flow line for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Design HGL to rise for starting water surface elevation: ❑ Manhole/Junction to take analysis to: ❑ Hillside Development ❑ Floodway/Floodplain: ❑ Other Jurisdictions Return to Clayton McEachern @ City of Springfield, email: cmceachern@springfield-or,gov, FAX: (541) 736-1021 COMPLETE STUDY ITEMS For 0(ficiaLUse ONy. * Based upon the information provided on the front ofthfs sheet, the following represents a minimum of what is needed far an application to be completefor submittal with respect to drainage; however, this list should not be used in lieu of the Spring6eld Develayrrrervt Code (SDC) ar de City's Engineering Design Mmrual. Compliance uvi0v these iequiiemenLs does tmt consthuie site approval, Additional site specific information mny be regab ed Nod. Upon soaping sheet submittal, ensure completed form hos been signed to the space provided belmn: Interim Design Standa rds/Water Quality (EDS FM- Chapter 3) Req'd N/A Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). All non -building rooftop (NBR) impervious surfaces shall be pre-treated (e.g. multi-chambered catchbasin w/oil filtration Elevations of the HOE and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. media) for stormwater quality. Additionally, a minimum of 50% of the NBR impervious surface shall be treated by Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04). vegetated methods. Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type mid sizes clearly indicated en the plan set. Where required, vegetative stormwater design shall be consistent with design standards (EDSPM Section 3.02), set forth Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe mid 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or in Chapter 2 ofthe Eugene Stormwater Management Mamtal. ❑ ❑ For new NBR impervious area less than 15,000 square feet, a simplified design approach may be followed as specified without failure of the pipe structure. by the Eugene Stormwater Management Manual (Seo2.4.1). ❑ Mmming's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table4-1of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to If a stormwater treatment scale is proposed, submit calculations/specifications for sizing, velocity, flow, side slopes, achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet her second at 0.5 nine full based on Table 4-1 as well. bottom slope, and seed mix consistent with City of Springfield or Eugene's Stormwater Management Manual. ❑ Water Quality calculations as required in Section 3.03.1 of the EDSPM. All buildingroollop mounted equipment, or other fluid containing equipment located outside of the building, shall be provided with secondary containment or weather resistant enclosure. General Study Requirements (EDSPM Section 4.03) ❑ ❑ Drainage study prepared by a Professional Civil Engineer licensed in the state of Oregon. El ❑ A complete drainage study, as required in EDSPM Section 4.03.1, including a hydrological study map. ❑ ❑ Calculations showing system capacity for a 2 -year storm event and overflow effects of a 25 -year storm event. The time of concentration (Tc) shall be determined using a 10 minute start time for developed basins. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located atone foot interval. Include spot elevations mid site grades sl o ving how site drains. Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEC. Reform the website: http://tvtvw.dee.state.or.us/coo/uiduie.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates forthe 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. "IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ REhOWAND SYCiN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Si^_nahae Date Form Version 5: June 2015 A downstream drainage analysis as described in EDSPM Section 4.03A.C. On-site drainage shall be governed by the Oregon Plumbing Specialty Code (OPSC). Elevations of the HOE and flow lines for both city and private systems where applicable. Design of Storm Systems(EDSPM Section 4.04). Flow lines, slopes, rim elevations, pipe type mid sizes clearly indicated en the plan set. ❑ Minimum pipe cover shall be 18 inches for reinforced pipe mid 36 inches for plain concrete and plastic pipe materials, or proper engineering calculations shall be provided when less. The cover shall be sufficient to support an 80,000 Ib load without failure of the pipe structure. ❑ ❑ Mmming's "n" values for pipes shall be consistent with Table4-1of the EDSP. All storm pipes shall be designed to achieve a minimum velocity of three (3) feet her second at 0.5 nine full based on Table 4-1 as well. ❑ ❑ Existing and proposed contours, located atone foot interval. Include spot elevations mid site grades sl o ving how site drains. Private stormwater easements shall be clearly depicted on plans when private stormwater flows from one property to another. ❑ ❑ Drywells shall not receive runoff from any surface w/o being treated by one or more BMPs, with the exception of residential building roofs (EDSP Section 3.03.4.A). Additional provisions apply to this as required by the DEC. Reform the website: http://tvtvw.dee.state.or.us/coo/uiduie.htm for more information. Detention ponds shall be designed to limit runoff to pre -development rates forthe 2 through 25 -year storm events. *This form shall be included as an attachment, inside the front cover, of the stormwater study. "IMPORTANT: ENGINEER PLEASE READ REhOWAND SYCiN! As the engineer of record, I hereby certify the above required items are complete and included with the submitted stormwater study and plan set. Si^_nahae Date Form Version 5: June 2015 STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS FOR JERSEY MIKE'S SUBS 1131 MOHAWK BLVD SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 -- TRASH ENCLOSURE -- EXPIRES: 12/31122 Contact Person: John E Nordling, PD NORDLING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, LLC 677 sw 11un, sine 200 oaavanon OR woca Contents Calculation' Cl -C4 Proj. No.' 21-115 JERSEY MIKES SPRINGFIELD G A MILLER ARCHITECT Dxte: SEP 2021 By: JEN Sheet No.: COVE ILL J ILL J J NORDLING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, LLC 6777 SLP I I I Ih, 9 t, 2 )0 B—Irmo OR, !19008 Proj. N..: 21-115 JERSEY MIKES SPRINGFIELD G A -MILLER ARCIIITECT Dato: SEP 2021 By: JEN Sheet No. CI A ROOF DECK O ROOF 6E4M O P057 Pee PSP DL LL 5 25 WW 8 -0 VERCO TYPE N-24 22 GAGE S'-m' SPAN CAP 106 peFKoi. L1360 63 par -014 Per Per DL LL To 5 25 4'-0' 14'-0' INS 5 x 4 x 0.1875 RI R2 P 8 DL 215 Ibe LL '100 Iba 0 HSS 6 x 6 x0.1895 R1 R2 Rm. 0 0 62 O n 462 0 A500 (ride B t X16 V MAX 462 Ibs M MAX 1,386 ff-Ibs fir 0.2 Ib 2.2 < 18.4 Ii 29.6 k. i s1 A., 0.00 Air -0.05 L/+999 ok A 11 -0.05 215 215 L/ .999 L 700 700 ".II.ond n 915 915 A500 Qmde BC—�6 V MAX 915 "1y1, W, M MAX 3,202 ft-lb e 1070plf DL 422 Il 0,70 tripe i K b d R 'm 8.0 8.01 F OS < 18,4 WK ib 9.1 30.4 ksi 2.0 2.0 Z371 sl 81 1 Fe 22.8.8 ksl 22,8 A,, -009 f» 023 HI-1 0.083 IB-2 0.090 91-3 0.094 17.9 km < 1.0 _ 1,0 10 0 w -0.28 L/ 597 ok A',L -0.37 L/457 ufQ2'a00z 10 orf 9BP 291 1,500 NORDLING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, LLC 077o5Wn1m.sulI,aDll ll,—,.OR,DT00e Dot,: SFP 2021 Proi N,.: 21-115 JLRNHKES SPRINGPIELU SPRINGFIELD FIELD c A MH 1 ER ARCHITICT By:7FN Sheet No,:C2 Wind Speed: 98 mph Lbposure: B W all Height (h) : 6-0" Damping : 5 Wall Length (b) : 14'-0" b/s : 2.33 Wall Depth (1): 4" Me: 0.70 qc: 14,64 psf Catst : 0.887 Cf: 1.39 WP: 10.8 P.,f-A9u V 462 Ibe M I9ab ft -lbs H = 1,386 ft-Ibe / 462 Ilbs = 3.0 ft Topographic Feature: Homogeneous HeightofH'dl(h) 0 it Crest Length(Lh) 0 R Crest to Stmcture Dist (x) 0 ft Kn: 0.85 K:: 0.00 Kx: 1.00 K7: 0.00 Loed-4261is FaoLing: 2'-0"0x3'-2" Height=3'-0" Lateral Soil Bearing Pressure 150 pef 1/2" Motion at Surface 1.0 pcf Unrestrained Footine Depth Analysis Depth Requricd 3.11 It NORDLING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS, LLC 6775 SW 1111, Slice 200 n,1111-oo On 97008 PrDi. No.: 21-115 TFRSEY MIKES SPRTKCTFTELD C A MILLER ARCHITECT Date: SEP 2021 By: JEN Sheer No.: C3