HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.11.15 GT PacketAGENDA ITEM SUMMARY Meeting Date: 11/15/2021
Meeting Type: Work Session
Staff Contact/Dept.: Molly Markarian/DPW Staff Phone No: 541.726.4611 MAIN STREET GOVERNANCE TEAM (GT) Estimated Time: 90 Minutes
ITEM TITLE: MAIN STREET SAFETY PROJECT – DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
ACTION REQUESTED:
Review draft Facility Plan, community feedback and recommended Springfield policy and code amendments and respond to discussion questions to inform finalizing the Main Street Facility Plan for public hearings starting in early 2022.
ISSUE STATEMENT:
Since the April 2021 Governance Team meeting, the project team developed and sought
feedback from advisory bodies and the broader community on the draft Main Street Facility Plan. The purpose of this Work Session is to: discuss the draft Facility Plan and recommended Springfield policy and code amendments; and seek Governance Team
feedback to inform finalizing the Main Street Facility Plan for public hearings starting in early 2022.
ATTACHMENTS: Attachment 1: Fact Sheet #6 – Draft Facility Plan Attachment 2: Draft Meeting Slideshow
Attachment 3: Discussion Questions
DISCUSSION: At their April 20, 2021 meeting, the Governance Team provided feedback on an
infrastructure solution ‘toolbox’ and recommendations to improve safety for Main Street. At their May 10, 2021 Work Session, the City Council confirmed that the toolbox recommendations met their expectations and direction to date and directed the project team
to proceed with drafting the Main Street Facility Plan. This summer, the project team drafted the plan in coordination with the project’s Technical
Advisory Committee. Attachment 1 highlights the main points and overall recommendations and links to the draft Facility Plan. Attachment 2 provides an overview of the Draft Facility Plan and key steps needed to implement the Facility Plan, including proposed amendments to the Development Code.
This fall, the project team sought feedback on the draft Facility Plan from the project’s Strategic Advisory Committee and the broader community. Attachment 2 also summarizes community outreach efforts, including a Spent the Rent podcast episode, and feedback
themes on the draft Facility Plan. During the meeting, staff will review the draft Facility Plan and recommended policy and
ordinance amendments. Staff will also review community feedback in more detail and seek Governance Team responses to the discussion questions outlined in Attachment 3 to inform finalizing the draft Facility Plan for public hearings starting in early 2022.
MAIN STREET SAFETY PROJECT |20th Street to 72nd Street
open
What is the Main Street
Safety Project?
Springfield’s Main Street is consistently ranked
as one of the most unsafe city streets in
Oregon based on the severity and frequency
of traffic crashes. The Oregon Department
of Transportation (ODOT) and the City of
Springfield must address this problem to save
lives, reduce injuries, and lessen property
damage due to crashes.
The purpose of the Main Street Safety Project
Planning Phase is to select infrastructure
solutions that will make Main Street safer
for people walking, biking, driving, and
taking transit.
The selected safety improvements will provide
for the movement of goods and people,
support the economic viability of the corridor,
accommodate current bus service and future
transit solutions, and complement traffic safety
education and enforcement.
Timeline
• Fall 2021: Draft Facility Plan will be shared
with the Technical Advisory Committee and
Strategic Advisory Committee, adjacent
business and property owners, and the
community at-large to give feedback.
• Fall 2021/Winter 2022: The Planning
Commission, Main Street Governance Team
and City Council will review the Draft Facility
Plan and community feedback.
• 2022: Adoption hearings.
Project Area
Project contact: Molly Markarian City of Springfield
541-726-4611 | info@ourmainstreetspringfield.org
https://mainstreetsafety.org
Main Street Main Street
28th Street58th Street69th StreetVirginia Avenue Daisy Street Hwy 126DMV
Bob Keefer Center Fire Station
Riverbend Elementary
Thurston High
School 72nd Street20th StreetN 42nd StreetFire Station
Ridgeview Elementary
How to Give Feedback
• Email: info@ourmainstreetspringfield.org
• Website Comment Form:
mainstreetsafety.org then select “Contact Us”
• Public Meetings: times and dates to be
posted on mainstreetsafety.org
• Mail: City of Springfield, Attn. Main Street
Safety Project, 225 Fifth Street, Springfield, OR
Draft Facility Plan
The main points and overall recommendation of the Draft Facility Plan are on the back of this fact sheet.
You can also review the Draft Facility Plan and give feedback at mainstreetsafety.org.
Attachment 1, Page 1 of 2
Fact Sheet #6 Draft Facility Plan
Draft Facility Plan
The community has reiterated that there
really is a serious safety problem on Main
Street. Community input and values shaped
the goals, objectives, analysis of potential
solutions, and final recommendations that
address the specific type of crashes that occur
on Main Street. The recommended safety
solution toolbox approach responds to
community desire for simplicity, flexibility,
and phase ability, as outlined below.
Additional recommended upgrades include low-cost systemic safety upgrades, such as better street
lighting and fewer driveways, and accommodating Enhanced Corridor transit.
Tools include:
Raised medians can do the most to reduce conflicts
and move turns to safer locations. They can also make
pedestrian crossings safer.
The recommended use of raised medians would:
• Reduce crashes by nearly half, and limit out-of-direction
travel for business access to about 30 seconds, on
average (when combined with roundabouts).
• Reduce turning conflicts by moving turns to safer
locations and create more opportunities for safer
pedestrian crossings.
Roundabouts instead of intersection signals would:
• Improve safety at major intersections.
• Reduce congestion.
• Make U-turns easier when raised medians are present.
• Enable freight trucks to make U-turns.
Street cross-section upgrades would balance
improvements for walking and biking with property
impacts. For most of Main Street, the long-term cross-
section would be four feet wider on each side.
In Summary, the community has reiterated that:
There really is a serious safety problem on corridor. It’s ODOT’s and the City’s duty to tackle the problem.
Our approach is sensible and responsible. We do listen and we do care. ODOT and the City will continue
to listen to stakeholders and make adjustments in future design phases to ensure the safety, business
community, mobility, transportation choices, vital community, and feasibility goals and objectives are met.
Plan is Ready for Your Review
Visit mainstreetsafety.org to review the
entire plan and then provide your feedback.
How to Give Feedback
• Email: info@ourmainstreetspringfield.org
• Website Comment Form: mainstreetsafety.org
then select “Contact Us”
More options listed on front page.
Approach includes:
Adjustability: Most of Main Street would get raised
medians, but we will adjust their locations to meet the
needs of all users. Some of the Guiding Principles we’ll
use include:
• Keep openings at major intersections.
• Allow left turns and U-turns at minor streets where
possible.
• Keep left-turn access to major traffic generators.
• Allow for emergency vehicle access.
Gradual change: As we secure funding, solutions
such as roundabouts, raised medians, and street cross
section upgrades will be added in phases. Chapter 5 of
the Draft Facility Plan provides an implementation plan
with guidance for which intersections and segments of
Main Street to prioritize for safety upgrades based on the
project goals and objectives.
Location: The plan includes cross-section variations for
location-specific constraints and property impacts—
not “one size fits all.” Also, the plan recommends
constrained cross-section upgrades at first, with
minimal widening.
Attachment 1, Page 2 of 2
MAIN STREET GOVERNANCE TEAM
November 15, 2021
AGENDA Project Context
•Purpose, timeline and milestones
Draft Facility Plan
•Overview with focus on chapters 4 & 5
•Overview of proposed Development Code changes
•What we heard
Discussion
Next Steps
PURPOSE STATEMENT
PROJECT CONTEXT
Safety
Increase the safety of Main Street for all users
Business Community
Support the viability of existing and future businesses
Mobility
Ensure people and goods travel efficiently and reliably through the corridor
Transportation Choices
Create a multimodal environment that connects people and destinations
Vital Community
Support the vitality of the community and its vision for Main Street
Feasibility
Develop a plan with a clear and achievable approach to implementation
Community Priorities
Goals & Objectives Evaluation Criteria Recommendations Draft Facility Plan
PROJECT CONTEXT:
Why are we doing this?
PROJECT CONTEXT:
Why are we doing this?
PROJECT CONTEXT
Winter/Spring
2021 We’reHere
PROJECT CONTEXT
Project has evolved. Here is what the project is NOT:
• It's not a Lane Transit District project
• It's not EmX
•It would not prevent all left turns
•It would not need extensive new right-of-way
• It's not one size fits all
•It would not be built all at once
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
The Facility Plan:
•Pulls together analysis, outreach and design concepts
•Expresses community values
•Designs a framework for the project.
•Signals agencies to begin detailed design and construction.
•Refines the Springfield Transportation System Plan.
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Divided into 5 chapters, with roadmap to guide readers
at beginning
•Chapter 1 – Introduction
•Chapter 2 –Main Street Needs
•Chapter 3 –Solutions Development & Evaluation Process
•Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
•Chapter 5 –Implementing the Toolbox of Solutions
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
•Adjustability –does not
promote a “one size fits all”
approach but allows for
accommodation of site-specific
constraints during design.
•Gradual Change –solutions
must allow for a phased
approach for implementation
(see Ch. 5).
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
•Roundabouts align with project
goals better than traffic signals
o Better at relieving congestion
o Better for improving safety
o Complement raised medians by
facilitating U-turns
o Opportunity for landscaping to
enhance corridor appearance
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
•Raised medians will be greatest
contributor to improved safety on
Main Street –expected to reduce
crashes by 35%
•The recommended approach
balances safety with accessibility,
limiting out-of-direction travel to 30-
60 seconds, on average
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
•Guiding principles included to guide future implementation
o Keep full access to arterials and collectors at intersections
o Limit out-of-direction travel time
o Pair raised medians with roundabouts
o U-turns at major intersections and unsignalized intersections
o Avoid overlapping turn lanes
o Consider left-in access to large traffic generators
o Emergency vehicle access
o Access to streets with no outlets
o Crossing for people walking and biking
o Provide two-stage lefts where feasible
o Avoid freight routing through neighborhoods
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
Three base cross section designs:
•Constrained Width
•Balanced Street Width
•Active Transportation
Enhanced
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 4 –Recommended Toolbox of Solutions
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
Chapter 5 –Implementing the Toolbox of Solutions
•Funding Strategy
•Project Development
•Policy and Plan Coordination
•Adoption Process
•Phasing
•Future Steps (Funding, Design, Construction)
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
DRAFT FACILITY PLAN
LOCAL POLICY AND ORDINANCE
AMENDMENTS
Tech Memo #19 (Local Policy & Ordinance Amendments)
builds upon Tech Memo #18 (Implementation Overview)
•Recommends specific City policy and ordinance
amendments to implement Main Street Facility Plan
Springfield Comprehensive Plan/Springfield 2035
Transportation System Plan (TSP)
Springfield Development Code
LOCAL POLICY AND ORDINANCE
AMENDMENTS
Transportation System Plan, Chapter 5
•Add section describing role of refinement plans
•Include reference to Main Street Facility Plan as a
relevant refinement plan
•Modify intersection performance standards for Main
Street to reference Facility Plan
•Add reference to Facility Plan in the Safety discussion
LOCAL POLICY AND ORDINANCE
AMENDMENTS
Springfield Development Code
Section Summary
4.2-105C Minimum street curb-to-curb
widths and minimum street right-of-way
widths
Amend Section 4.2-105C and footnote 5 to
Table 4.2-1 to expand applicability
provisions and include standards in
“Facility Plans.”
4.2-105M Special Setback Streets
Amend subsection 1.b. (Special Street
Setbacks) to include specified special
setback distances for the Main Street
Corridor. The special setback distances
correspond to individual segments.
COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Strategic Advisory Committee
Web Updates
Fact Sheet
Postcard
E-Update
Spent the Rent Podcast
Chamber of Commerce:
Government Issues Committee
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK:
Common Themes –Project & Process
Largely heard -
•Positive reception for project, enthusiasm for community benefit
•Appreciation for project engagement, information, responsiveness
•Questions regarding deliverables, stages, outcomes
Some shared -
•Skepticism that effort and potential corridor impacts worth community
benefits
•Lower confidence in corridor awareness of project, feedback not
addressed as desired
•Last minute circumstances, lack of interest, other priorities, online
format, general agency distrust influenced decision to not engage
COMMUNITY FEEDBACK:
Common Themes –Draft Facility Plan
Largely heard –
•Positive feedback overall, support for specific tools
•Toolbox good, allows for a flexible approach to implementation
•Concerns for implementation impacts to site access/usage and
out of direction travel for residents, customers, freight
Some shared –
•Doubt that tools address project goals as presented
•Suggestions for alternative solution approaches
•Reflections on existing out of direction travel for bicyclists and
pedestrians, economic impact of bicycle and pedestrian trips
PLANNING COMMISSION
DISCUSSION
We heard agreement:
•Overall support for approach and toolbox
•Applaud community engagement, with desire to replicate
•Plan demonstrates that responded to community
•Code update will demonstrate commitment
Some shared:
•Desire for more enhanced pedestrian crossings, lighting,
landscaping, and traffic enforcement
DISCUSSION
Does the draft Facility Plan:
•address Governance Team questions and concerns?
•incorporate community feedback as envisioned?
•meet your expectations?
Questions or concerns regarding local policy amendments?
Any additional reflections as we prepare the draft Plan for
public hearings?
Nov/ODOT Mobility Advisory Dec Committee
Springfield City Council
Dec Adoption Draft Facility Plan and Policy/Code recommendations
Early Public Hearings2022
NEXT STEPS
THANK
YOU!
Contact
Molly Markarian
Project Manager
info@ourmainstreetspringfield.org
Comments
Project Website
www.mainstreetsafety.org
Governance Team Main Street Safety Project November 15, 2021
Discussion Questions
Does the draft Facility Plan:
• address Governance Team questions and concerns?
• incorporate community feedback as envisioned?
• meet your expectations?
Do you have any questions or concerns regarding the recommended local policy amendments?
Do you have any additional reflections as we prepare the draft Plan for public hearings?