HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 11/5/2021City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPRINGFIELD
w 07
-
Required Project Information .. - this section)
Prospective
Applicant Name: Dustin McCluskey Phone- 541.968.6990
Company:
Address: 1413 Kellogg Road, Springfield, OR 97477 _
S•
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: Carol Schirmer
Phone: 541.234.5108
Company: Schirmer Consulting, LLC lf:fm:
Address: PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 I (itmll— f M erco
L
Property Owner: Same as applicant
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17 02 34 31
TAX LOT NO S ): 3600
Property Address: 6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478
Size of Property: 2 acres or 87,107 sf Acres ❑ Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Development of property with multi -family housing
Existing Use: Single family house
# of Lots/Parcels: 1
Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 87,107 sf
Densi : 14-28 du/acre
Prospective
Applicant:
Date:
Signature
Dustin McCluskey
Print
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Case No.: h-II-ngo -OLC-- I Date: I I 6 a Reviewed b ,-M(I
Application Fee:
Technical Fee: $0
Postage Fee: $O
TOTAL FEES: $ -O PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3
0h
/h
JCity of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPNINOPIE�
Required Project
Prospective
Applicant Name: Dustin McCluskey
Phone:
541.868.6990
Company:
Fax•
Address: 1413 Kellogg Road, Springfield, OR 97477
Prospective
Applicant's Re .: Carol Schirmer
Phone:
541.234.5109
Company: Schirmer Consulting, LLC
Fax:
Address: PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440
Property Owner: Same as applicant
Phone:
Company: -
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17 02 34 31
TAX LOT NO S):
3600
-
Property Address: 6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478
Size of Pro e 2 acres or 87,107 sf Acres ❑ Square
Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to
Proposal: Development of property with mufti -family housing
this application.
Existing Use: Single family house
# of Lots/Parcels: 1
Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 87,107
sf
Density:
14-28 du/acre
Prospective
Applicant:
�/—
Si nature '
Dustin McCluskey
Print
Case No.: Date:
Date: O
Reviewed by:
A plication -Fee: $
Technical Fee: $0
Posta
a Fee: 0
TOTAL FEES: PRO]ECT,NUMBER:
YW�.-:i{{f".. ,Y['dia' .. .h. v„�,'T •. � vna ..YiaF.9 .P - ...r._
_
i e 6lXa
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 cf3
Development Issues Meeting Process
The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss
his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can
be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development
Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development
conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision
and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or
the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development
opportunities and constraints. The status may change overtime as development conditions or
standards change.
1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application
• The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal
Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet.
• Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday.
• We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of
receiving the application.
• The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the
meeting.
2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting
• The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting.
• The meeting is scheduled for one hour.
• Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the
submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be
discussed.
• The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report.
Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3
Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist
❑x Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee
calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public
Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected
at the time of complete application submittal.
❑x Development Issues Meeting Application Form
x❑ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer
during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five
questions.
❑x Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to
review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on
the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible
given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate
with the level of detail provided in the application.
Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in
the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions &
Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review
Submittal Requirements.
❑x Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17"
Q Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and
related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100'
ER North arrow
Q Date of preparation
Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number
0 Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area
F Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points
Q On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain
lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained
fX1 Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for
common open spaces
DIMs Related to Land Divisions
0 Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots
® How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets
DIMS Related to Site Plan Review
0 Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area),
setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height
Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways,
sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces
R Parking and circulation plan
Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3
November 3, 2021
MCCLUSKEY MULTI -FAMILY
6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478
Map: 17 02 34 31
Tax Lot: 3600
Zoning: LDR
Plan: MDR
Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - Written List of Questions
Property Description.
The subject property is approximately 2 acres in size and contains a single-family home and associated
accessory buildings. The subject property is zoned LD and planned MDR. The client plans on the
developing the property as follows:
• Rezone the property from LD to MDR to match the Metro Plan designation.
• Partition the property so the single-family home remains on one lot.
• Develop the remaining property with multi -family housing.
1. Partitioning and Density
The intention is to partition the property in such a way that the single-family home resides on one
parcel (Parcel 1) and the multi -family on the other parcel (Parcel 2). As shown on the Site Plan the
approximate size of the single-family lot will be 6,160 sf. The zoning will be MDR for the entire
property.
Density minimum for MDR is 14 units per acre.
Density maximum for MDR is 28 units per acre.
A lot that is 6,160 sf (.1414 acres) has a required minimum density of 1.97 units or 2 units for that lot.
The client would prefer to rezone the entire property and leave the single-family house on that lot.
The remaining property is 80,860 sf (minus dedicated right of way of 5,651 sf and minus existing PUE
of 4,125 so = 71,784 sf or 1.6342 acres.
Density for Parcel 2 would be 23 units minimum and 45.75 or 46 units maximum.
Q: Is the density calculation correct for each parcel and will the client be able to retain the single-
family home on Parcel 1 as a single family home even though it doesn't meet minimum density?
Q: Has the density for Parcel 2 been calculated correctly?
2. Multi -Unit Design Standards
The property to the east is zoned LDR. SDC 3.2-240 contains the majority of the criteria for designing
this site.
SDC 3.2-240 3. in particular raises questions with respect to how this design meets the intent.
Q: The existing single-family home is within 75' of the development site. Is there any flexibility in the
required setback. With additional flexibility the open space could be designed more to the interior
of the site which would be more desirable than having the open space closer to Main Street.
Q: Transition and Compatibility between LDR and MDR: Can a second story deck encroach into the
setback no more than 10 feet? Can first floor patios encroach on the setback?
Q: Transition and Compatibility between MDR and MDR: Can a second story deck encroach into the
setback no more than 2 feet? Can first floor patios encroach on the setback?
Schirmer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108
Landscape Architecture + Land Use Planning
McCluskey Multi -Family 2
Dim Meeting Questions
November 2021
Q: Can Open Space include the required setback when it is not behind a building?
Q: Is there a minimum requirement for common open space vs. private open space of the total open
space requirement?
3. Right of Way Dedication and Access
The subject property is within the vicinity of a future street extension. 60th Place is already partially
dedicated at both the northeast and northwest corners of the property as shown on the Site Plan. The
client is proposing to dedicate the north 30 feet of the property to right of way and take access to the
multi -family project from there.
Q: What will the street section look like? (i.e., sidewalk width, setback sidewalk, paving width, etc.)
Q: Can secondary emergency vehicle access be provided from Main Street?
Q: Can the existing curb cut in the southeast corner on Main Street be retained for maintenance
vehicle access and potentially a maintenance building in that area?
4. Utilities
Q: Can SUB staff confirm that there is sufficient electric and water system availability and capacity
for development of the subject property?
Q: Can staff see any issues with stormwater control and/or flooding in this area?
S. Is there anything in the material submitted with this Development Issues Meeting application that staff
finds incomplete or incorrect? If so, what would that be? What are all the required applications for
this project?
Thank you in advance for your assistance with this project.
Sincerely,
Schirmer Consulting, LLC
Carol Schirmer
Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440
Landscape Architecture+ Land Use Planning