Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 11/5/2021City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD w 07 - Required Project Information .. - this section) Prospective Applicant Name: Dustin McCluskey Phone- 541.968.6990 Company: Address: 1413 Kellogg Road, Springfield, OR 97477 _ S• Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Carol Schirmer Phone: 541.234.5108 Company: Schirmer Consulting, LLC lf:fm: Address: PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 I (itmll— f M erco L Property Owner: Same as applicant Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17 02 34 31 TAX LOT NO S ): 3600 Property Address: 6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Property: 2 acres or 87,107 sf Acres ❑ Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Development of property with multi -family housing Existing Use: Single family house # of Lots/Parcels: 1 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 87,107 sf Densi : 14-28 du/acre Prospective Applicant: Date: Signature Dustin McCluskey Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section) Case No.: h-II-ngo -OLC-- I Date: I I 6 a Reviewed b ,-M(I Application Fee: Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $O TOTAL FEES: $ -O PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 0h /h JCity of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPNINOPIE� Required Project Prospective Applicant Name: Dustin McCluskey Phone: 541.868.6990 Company: Fax• Address: 1413 Kellogg Road, Springfield, OR 97477 Prospective Applicant's Re .: Carol Schirmer Phone: 541.234.5109 Company: Schirmer Consulting, LLC Fax: Address: PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 Property Owner: Same as applicant Phone: Company: - Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17 02 34 31 TAX LOT NO S): 3600 - Property Address: 6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Pro e 2 acres or 87,107 sf Acres ❑ Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling In this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to Proposal: Development of property with mufti -family housing this application. Existing Use: Single family house # of Lots/Parcels: 1 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 87,107 sf Density: 14-28 du/acre Prospective Applicant: �/— Si nature ' Dustin McCluskey Print Case No.: Date: Date: O Reviewed by: A plication -Fee: $ Technical Fee: $0 Posta a Fee: 0 TOTAL FEES: PRO]ECT,NUMBER: YW�.-:i{{f".. ,Y['dia' .. .h. v„�,'T •. � vna ..YiaF.9 .P - ...r._ _ i e 6lXa Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 cf3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change overtime as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ❑x Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. ❑x Development Issues Meeting Application Form x❑ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ❑x Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. ❑x Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Q Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' ER North arrow Q Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number 0 Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area F Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points Q On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained fX1 Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions 0 Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ® How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMS Related to Site Plan Review 0 Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces R Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 November 3, 2021 MCCLUSKEY MULTI -FAMILY 6082 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Map: 17 02 34 31 Tax Lot: 3600 Zoning: LDR Plan: MDR Development Issues Meeting (DIM) - Written List of Questions Property Description. The subject property is approximately 2 acres in size and contains a single-family home and associated accessory buildings. The subject property is zoned LD and planned MDR. The client plans on the developing the property as follows: • Rezone the property from LD to MDR to match the Metro Plan designation. • Partition the property so the single-family home remains on one lot. • Develop the remaining property with multi -family housing. 1. Partitioning and Density The intention is to partition the property in such a way that the single-family home resides on one parcel (Parcel 1) and the multi -family on the other parcel (Parcel 2). As shown on the Site Plan the approximate size of the single-family lot will be 6,160 sf. The zoning will be MDR for the entire property. Density minimum for MDR is 14 units per acre. Density maximum for MDR is 28 units per acre. A lot that is 6,160 sf (.1414 acres) has a required minimum density of 1.97 units or 2 units for that lot. The client would prefer to rezone the entire property and leave the single-family house on that lot. The remaining property is 80,860 sf (minus dedicated right of way of 5,651 sf and minus existing PUE of 4,125 so = 71,784 sf or 1.6342 acres. Density for Parcel 2 would be 23 units minimum and 45.75 or 46 units maximum. Q: Is the density calculation correct for each parcel and will the client be able to retain the single- family home on Parcel 1 as a single family home even though it doesn't meet minimum density? Q: Has the density for Parcel 2 been calculated correctly? 2. Multi -Unit Design Standards The property to the east is zoned LDR. SDC 3.2-240 contains the majority of the criteria for designing this site. SDC 3.2-240 3. in particular raises questions with respect to how this design meets the intent. Q: The existing single-family home is within 75' of the development site. Is there any flexibility in the required setback. With additional flexibility the open space could be designed more to the interior of the site which would be more desirable than having the open space closer to Main Street. Q: Transition and Compatibility between LDR and MDR: Can a second story deck encroach into the setback no more than 10 feet? Can first floor patios encroach on the setback? Q: Transition and Compatibility between MDR and MDR: Can a second story deck encroach into the setback no more than 2 feet? Can first floor patios encroach on the setback? Schirmer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 • (541) 234-5108 Landscape Architecture + Land Use Planning McCluskey Multi -Family 2 Dim Meeting Questions November 2021 Q: Can Open Space include the required setback when it is not behind a building? Q: Is there a minimum requirement for common open space vs. private open space of the total open space requirement? 3. Right of Way Dedication and Access The subject property is within the vicinity of a future street extension. 60th Place is already partially dedicated at both the northeast and northwest corners of the property as shown on the Site Plan. The client is proposing to dedicate the north 30 feet of the property to right of way and take access to the multi -family project from there. Q: What will the street section look like? (i.e., sidewalk width, setback sidewalk, paving width, etc.) Q: Can secondary emergency vehicle access be provided from Main Street? Q: Can the existing curb cut in the southeast corner on Main Street be retained for maintenance vehicle access and potentially a maintenance building in that area? 4. Utilities Q: Can SUB staff confirm that there is sufficient electric and water system availability and capacity for development of the subject property? Q: Can staff see any issues with stormwater control and/or flooding in this area? S. Is there anything in the material submitted with this Development Issues Meeting application that staff finds incomplete or incorrect? If so, what would that be? What are all the required applications for this project? Thank you in advance for your assistance with this project. Sincerely, Schirmer Consulting, LLC Carol Schirmer Consulting, LLC • PO Box 10424, Eugene, OR 97440 Landscape Architecture+ Land Use Planning