The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPermit Building 1998-09-25SPFTNGFIELD 225 North Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 tocaEion of Proposed Work: 1550 28TH ST Assessors ttap #: 17032541- o COMMERCIAI,/INDUSTRIAL PERMIT APPLICATION CITY OF SPRINGFIEI,D I COMMUNITY SERVICES DIVISION BUILDING SAFETY Page 1 ilob Number: 981025 Office: Inspection Line: 725 -37 59 726 -37 69 Tax Lot #: 00100 Owner: BARRY KASORIS Address: 1650 28TH STREET DescrJ-ption Of Work: ADDIT TO METAL BUILDING phone #: ciry/stare/zip: SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 ADDITION Va].ue:0.00 General-: Plumbing: Electrical: ConEractor ESSEX GENERAL 0054531 3754 W 11TH EUGENE OR 974020000 SCI PLTMBTNG OOBB449 REYNOLDS ELECTR 001.7252 2T75 W 2ND AVE EUGENE OR 974O2OOOO Const. Contractor #Expires tL/ 1-o / e8 03/oe/e4 02/08/ee Phone 342 - 4509 935-2t56 343 -7297 No Single Fixture Storm Sewer --- PLIIMBING --- 540 tt Fee Q4t ate: o8/17 /98 Rec By /g Nor Charge 20.00 175.00 195.00 Value 250, 000 . 00 250, 000 . 00 2 TOTAT PERMIT QUAD AREA: 2CNW Item ADDITION TOTAL VALUE OF PROJECT LAND USE t9 etSquare Feet r$,s Plan Check Fee t80 oq /F BUILDING Surcharge/admin MECHANICAL surcharge/admin PLUMBING Surcharge/admin SDC SUBTOTAL PERMITS ,O0 770.50 51.55 0.00 0.00 195.00 r-5.50 L5 ,355 .20 L6 ,407 .95 TOTAL PERMIT FEES EXCLUDING ELECTRICAL L6,407 .95 SPFINGFIELE' Job Number: 981-025 qTT OF o Page 2 REQUTRED TNSPECTTONS It is the responsibility of the permit. holder to see that all inspections are made at the proper time. To request an inspection, call 725-3769 (recorder), state your City designated job number, job address, type of inspectj-on requested and when you will- be ready for inspection. Requests received before 7:00 a.m. will be made t.he same working day, requests made after 7:00 a.m will- be made the following work day. Special Inspections: In accordance with Section 306 of the StaLe Specialty Code a special i-nspector sha11 be employed by the Owner/Contractor during construction of any following "*t'work. A copy of the special testing reporLs shafl be furnished to Building Safety. In addition to the inspections specified, the Building Official may make or require other inspections of any construction work to ensure compliance with the Building, City or Development Code. FOOTING - After trenches are excavated. FOITNDATION - After forms are erected but prior to concrete placement. ITNDERGROITND PLIIMBING - Prior t.o filling trench. STORM SEWER LINE - Prior to filling trench. ROUGH PLIn4BING - Prior to cover. ROUGH ELECTRICAL - Pri-or To Cover. DRYWELL - Engineered Drywell Required FRAMING - Prior to cover. INSUL-V.B./SUB: TO BE CALLED FOR AT SAME TIME AS SUB FRAMING INSPECT MECH/SUB: FOI,LOWING ROUGH MECHAI{ICAL APPROVAL, PRIOR TO COVER FRAMING - Prior to cover. DRYWALL - Prior to taping. FINAL PLIIMBING - When all plumbing work is complete. FINAL ELECTRICAL - When all electrical work is complete. FINAL FIRE - When all- Fire DepartmenL requirements have been met. been met. FINAL SITE PI,AN - After all requirements have been met for Minimum Development Standards or from the Development Agreement. FINAL BUILDING - When all required inspections have been approved and the building is complet.e. --- ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DRC 98-02-046, PLANNER ]S LAUREN LEZELL ELECTRICAL PERMTT REQUIRED Plans Revi-ewed By: TOM MARX Building Site Reviewed By: LISA HOPPER Date: 09/24/98 By signature, f state and agree, that T have carefully examined the completed appllcation and do hereby cerLify that all information hereon is true and correct, and I further certify that any and all work performed sha11 be done in accordance with the Ordinances of the City of Springfield, and the Laws of the State of Oregon pertaining to the work described herein, and that NO OCCUPANCY wil-l be made of any structure without permission of the Community Services Division, Bullding Safety. I further certify that only conLractors and employees who are in compliance with ORS 701.055 will- be used on this project. I further agree to ensure that all- required inspections are requested at the proper t permit c of plans ime, that proje ard is I ct address is readable from the street, that the at the {ont of the property, and the approved set the slte at a1l- times during construction. ture rema 1n Date ?- zs -9t SPRINGFIELO rTob Number: 981,025 CITY OF SPruNGFIEIT', Page 3 --- VAIJIDATION --- Receipt Number: Date Paid: Amount Recei-ved: Received By 1.,rDl t9 CITY OF OREGON --/._\02/Ll/98 LOi22 OF 226 3689 2E FTYTE S1nEgr SP&INCEIEUT, oREGoH INSPBCITON REQIIEST: OPEICE: 726-3759 1 Pernits areif eork is n of'lssuance 180 days. ferableot started sithin or l'f vork is 2. COTTTRACTOR IIISf,ALIArION Electrical Contractor Address . 4. Neu Residenrial-Single orllulti-Family per dvilling unit.Service Inciuied:. Items Cost 1000 sq.ft. or less Each additional 500sq. ft or Dortion thereof SPFD DEY. SER. 401 anps t 601.aEPs t 10000ver Reconnect 200 anps' aDps 401 l{ev, SPrtt}fGFtELO 'd Eore. or - $ 8s.00 $ 1s.00 $ 40.00 see s 3s.00 s z.ao @ oor Sum ons cicv Ezf +. 2aa-< Expiration Da-[e Supervisor License Nunrber ihe :' Phone 3t/3-- -t ? 7 201 Pump or lrrlgation Sign/outline LiShting-Linited Energy/ResLinited Energy/Coorm s 50.00 s 60.00 s100.00 s130.00 s300.00s 40.00 Constr Contr. Nuaber Expiration Date Tenporary Servlces or Feedersfnstallation, Alteration or Relocation lJ, t' .;/"L.+l 'or lessto 400 anps -to 60O aops -amps or 1000T5TEs r.00 .00 .00,B'affi $40sss $eoSignature of Supervi Electrician Address ci Phone ! ! I nade ont intended DATE: ,,1 ,Q, A 'rytr D. E ts or Extension Per Panel OSNER TNSIATIATION The installation is beingproperty f ovn vhich is nofor sale, lease or rent. Ovners Signature: One Circuir IEach Addi tionalCircuit or rrith Servicezror Feeder Perni t q g J_X- Hiscellaneous (Service/feeder not included) -Each installation $ 40.00 $ 40.00 $ 20.00 s 36.00 5. SUBTOTAL OF AEOVE 5Z State Surcharge 3Z Adninistrariva Fee TCItALRP,CEII/ED cf) I ! I i : ( lr;-' "oi- ' t(. 97477 "-.1o -' 726-3769 - dJ- '$ . cor{PLETE EEE SCEmUIA pBIOY 4c Q,v rer-) 0 3 iU!6tc t ! JOURNAL OR JOB NO.Q2/_af ATTACHMENT A CITY OF SPRINGFIELD SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CHARGE WORKSHEET LOCATION //,,2 ;84 ,1- DEVELOPMENT TYPE A..l J,'-l,i', + -T^-L,',,, €ru,ce,.-A ',, +/J"fi!.1 TZE:BUiLDING S LOT SiZ Ft 1. STORM DRAINAGE t /u*t,l"i ,?"/-? = .ia;a ;(d*xtz.r) = ,/t\ n eo 1 4 IMPERVIOUS SQ. FT 2. SANITARY SEI^/ER-CITY NO. OF PFU'S I X $47.14 PER PFU (See Reverse Side) 3 . TRANSP0RTATION .Z;S) /L.r 2a fi =vt At.-' NO OF UNITS X TRIP RATE X COST PER TRIP 9. 6 ,:z x /. 75 x $475.3? x $475.32 X $0.227 PER SQ FT $?7<; .t2A-5 9v- o/$5 Cr'r,J--T $X 4. SANITARY SEI^IER-Ml^ll'4c A. REIMBURSEMENT COST: ,9 N0. 0F FEU ',S ? .0 / X ,!t y- PER FEU B. IMPROVEMENT COST: f;c NO. OF FEU'S 16} X /O,-- PER FEU 7)4 $ /t1 .9- . s 38i9MhJMC CREDIT IF APPLiCABLE (SEE REVERSE) MWMC ADl',lINISTRATIVE FEE SUBTOTAL (ADD ITEMS 1,2,3 & 4) TOTAL-MhJMC SDC $ 10.00 ,-rQt/ $ /.9//- 5. ADMINISTRATIVE FEES: BASE CHARGE (SUBTOTAL ABOVE) X .05 $ ii e-7r * 9,C-- Date 7' TOTAL SDC $ )qcf na t-K*- 1/*,t-,-'/ t sbd-lcqdr:ai nator ATTACH'A.I^IPD FIX IUHE UNIT CALCULA IION IABLE: Nurrrber of New Fixtures X Unit Equivalent = Fixture Urits(NOTE: Fcr remodels, calculatc c FIXTURE 'I-'/PE Bathtub. Drinking Fountain.. Floor Drain. lnterceptors For Grease/OiliSolids/E1c................ lnterceptors For Sand/Auto Wash/Etc................ Laundry Tub/Clotheswasher.... Clothesurasher - 3 Or More... Mobile Home Park Trap (1 Per Trailer)...... Receptor For Refrigerator/Water Station/Etc....... Receptor [:or Commercial Sink/Dishwasher/Etc.. Shower, Single Sta11.......... Shower, C ang... Sink: Bar, Commercial, Residential Kitchen.......... Urinal, Stall/Wall... Wash Basin/Lavatory, Single....... Toilet, Public lnstallation. Toilet , Pri.rate.... Miscellanecrus: the NET additional fixtures) NUMBER OF NEW FIXTURES -_lz_- TOTAL FIXTURE UNITS UNIT EOUIVALENT FIXTURE UNITS 2 1 2 3 6 2 6 b 1 3 2 1/Head Z 2 1 6 4 CREDIT CI\LCULATION TABLE: Based on assessed value. calculate : redits separates. lf improvements occurred after annexation date in table, Credit for Parcel or Land Only lf Applicable Iri-provemerrt (if after annexation date) !/ ,2- (Rate X Assessed Value) X$ x$E.i 57 '7C )-) LL- (Rate X Assessed Value) CREDIT TOTAL $ia:.7 e'.- Year Annexed Rateper$1,O00 Assessed Value Year Annexed Rate per $1,OOO Assessed Value 1 980 1 981 1 982 1 983 1 984 1 985 1 986 1 987 1 988 ,,---^----\i4.zz r 4.18 4.12 3.99 3.83 3.68 3.48 3.1 B 2.82 2.42 before F*---..w9_er 1 989 '1990 1 991 1 992 1 993 1 994 1 995 1 996 1 997 $1.98 1.55 1.15 0.96 0.83 0.67 o.52 0.38 o.21 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS FOR STORM DRAINAGE (For Estimating purposes Onlyl Residential. Commerical lndustrial.... Governmental......... o.4 0.9 05 0.5 FIXUNIT.Wf 'D lMPERVlous AREA = TorAL Lor srzE x RUNOFF coEFFlcrENT aqr C'TY OF OFEGO'U SPFl.----.iFIELD D EVE LOP M E NT S E RW C ES DE PA RTM E NT Date of Letter June 29, 1998 Applicant Barry Kosoris 1650 28th Street Springfield, OR. 97477 Prooerty Owner Same as above 225 FIFTH STBEET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (541 ) 726-s753 FAX(s41) 726-3689 NOTICE OF DECISION . LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Journal Number 98-04-87 Surveyor Roberts Surveying lnc. P.O. Box 7155 Eugene, OR. 97401 Property Owner BMI Contractors lnc. 1600 N. 28th Street Springfield, OR. 97477 Description of Proposal The Lot Line Adjustment Application proposes to adjust the interior side property line common to a portion of Lots 3 and 4 of Southern Pacific lndustrial Park (tax lot 100) and tax lot 400 on assessot's map 17-03- 2541. The property line adjustment is requested in order to increase the vehicle parking area on tax lot 1 00. Backo round/Site Information The properties involved are located on the west side of 28th Street, north of Olympic Street within the city limits. The lots are zoned Light Medium lndustrial (LMl) on the City of Springfield Zoning Map and designated LMI on the Metropolitan Plan. Decision Preliminary Plan Approval, with conditions, as of the date of this letter. \Mren the conditions attached to this request have been met, Final Map Approvalwill be granted. Preliminary Plan Approval expires 90 days from this letter. Other Uses Authorized by the Decision None. Criteria of Approval (Ref. Section 33.030 of the Sprinqfield Development Code) The application shall be approved, approved with conditions, or denied based on compliance with the criteria of Section 33.030 of the Springfield Development Code. Staff shall develop Findings of Fact demonstrating that the lot line adjustment does not. (1) CREATE A NEW LOT OR LAND-LOCKED pARCEL; The proposal is to adjust the interior side property line common to tax lot 100 and 400. Both lots abut and have access to 28th Street. This lot line adjustment will not affect access to public rights of way or create a new lot. FINDING: This proposal does not create any additionat tots or tand-tocked parcets because the lots are pre-existing and maintain frontage on public sfreefs, therefore this criterion has been met. (2) REDUCE AN EXISTING LOT BELOW THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS ESTABLISHED BY THE APPLICABLE ZONING DISTRICT OR OTHERWISE VIOLATE STANDARDS OF THIS CODE, OR STRUCTURAL SPECIALTY AND LIFE SAFETY CODE STANDARDS; All property involved is zoned Light Medium lndustrial and is subject to frontage and lot size standards of Article 20 of the SDC. SDC 20.0 30, Lot Size Standards. (1) ln all industrial districts, the minimum lot size shall be {O,OOO square feet with a minimum of 75 feet of frontage. TAX LOT 100: The area will be increased to 96,925 square feet after adjustment. This lot has approximately 181 feet of frontage on 28th Street. LOT 400: The area will be decreased to 89,360 square feet. This lot has approximately 265 feet of frontage on 28th Street. FINDING: Both the proposed tax lots 100 and 400 exceed the minimum dimensional and frontage standards of SDC 20.030. Therefore, this criterion has been met. (3) IMPEDE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ADOPTED TRANSPORTATION OR PUBLIC FACILITIES PLANS OR APPROVED CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS; The two properties seeking Development Approval are inside City limits. The properties have not been identified on adopted transportation plans. FINDING: Staff finds that this citeion has been met because granting development approvat to these properties will not impede implementation of City transportation and public facilities ptans. (4) VIOLATE ANY PREVIOUS REQUIREMENTS OR CONDITIONS THE APPROVAL AUTHORIW MAY HAVE lMPosED ATA PRIOR PUBLtc HEARTNG oR MEETTNG; AND The proposed adjustment of tax lots 100 and 400, assessor's map 17-03-2541 does not violate any requirements or conditions imposed at the time of prior public hearing or meeting. Finding: This citeion has been met because there are no known previous agtreements or conditions of approval affected by this application. (5) REDESIGN OR RECONFIGURE LOTS WITHIN A SUBDIVISION BY A SERIES OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENTS WHICH CREATE TWO LOTS FROM 2 THREE LOTS SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED A REDESIGN OR RECONFIGURATION OF r-oTS. One of the lots involved is within a platted subdivision; however, this proposed adjustment will not redesign the lot configurations. FINDING: The Lot Line Adjustment does not redesign or reconfigure lots within a subdivision because lot lines are being moved to redistribufe srde yard areas of existing lots and no other changes are proposed. Conclusion: Considering these findings of fact, staff finds the Lot Line Adjustment complies with the criteria of Article 33, Section 33.030 of the Springfield Development Code and approves the application with the conditions specified below: What needs to be done by the applicant to obtain final approval? The Springfield Development Code requires that a surveyor set new propefi pins and create new legal descriptions. These conditions are required to be completed within 90 days of the date of this letter. Condition 1) The applicant must provide new legal descriptions of each tax lot. The Springfield Development Code requires that a surveyor set new property pins and create new legaldescriptions. Condition 2) A Final Map must be prepared by an Oregon Registered Surveyor or Engineer which meets the Lane County Surveyor's standards for a land survey. This map shall include the revised lot dimensions and the following language: .FINAL MAP- THIS LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT MODIFIES TAX LOT 4OO, LANE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAP # 17-03-2541AND LOTS 3 AND 4 OF SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL PARK SUBDIVISION AS PLATTED AND RECORDED IN FILE -, SLIDE-, LANE COUNTY PLAT RECORDS, LANE COUNTY, OREGON'. The applicant has 90 days to file a revised Final Map with the Lane County Surveyor's Office and return a filed copy to the City of Springfield Planning Division with any documents required as a condition of approval. A Final Approval Notice will be issued within 5 days of required final submittal to complete the process. No other Development Approval, including Building Permits, will be issued until the Final Approval Notice has been issued. Appeals: This Lot Line Adjustment request is considered a decision of the Director and as such can be appealed to the Planning Commission. An appeal may be filed by an affected party with the Development Services Department within 10 calendar days of the date of that decision. The appeal must be submitted on forms supplied by the Ci$ in accordance with SDC Article 15 - Appeals, and be accompanied by a $250.00 fee, refundable if the appeal is upheld. Questions: Please call Lauren Lezell in the Development Services Department at 503/726-2301 if you have questions regarding this process. 3 C'TY OF SPR OREGON 4*\'SPRr :IELO D EV E LOP M ENT S ERW C E S DE PA RTM E NT DATE OF NOTICE: JOURNAL NUMBER: APPLICANT/ PROPERW OWNER: 225 FIFTH STREET SPRINGFIELD, OR 97477 (s41) 726-37s3 FAX(s41) 726-368e NOTICE OF LIMITED LAND USE DECISION. SITE PLAN REVIEW May 7, 1998 98-0246 Springfield lndoor Soccer, lnc. 2210 Sandy Drive Eugene, Or. 97401 Attn: Barry Kosaris ARCHITECT:Galen B. OhmartAlA 474 \Mllamette Street Eugene, Or. 97401 REQUEST Type ll Site Plan Modification for "Kick City lndoor SocceC'. Phase l, (Jo.No. 95-08-158), was approved for a 19,200 square foot soccer facility and27 parking spaces. Phase 2 planned for an additional 69 parking spaces. This Site Plan Modification revises Phase 2 to include a 9,620 square foot soccer field and less parking spaces (35). Recreational facilities such as athletic field/stadiums are permitted uses in the LMI District per SDC 20.020(7) (a) with reference to Section 18.020 (6). DECISION Preliminary Site Plan approvalwith conditions as of the date of this notice. OTHER USES THAT MAY BE AUTHORIZED BYTHE DECISION None SITE INFORMATION The subject property is located at 1650 28th Street, also described as Tax Lots 100 and 104 on Assessor's Map 17{3-25.41. The properly is located on the west side of 28th Street, north of Olympic Boulevard. Abutting the site to the north, south and west are industrialand warehouse uses. The Southem Pacific lndustrial Park is located on the east side of N. 28th Street. The applicant has also submifted a Lot Line Adjustment (Jo. No. 98-M47) for the south (side) property line in order to conespond properg lines to the configuration shown on the tentative site plan. ZONING AND METRO PLAN DESIGNATION The zoning and the Metro Plan designation (Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan) of the property is Light Medium lndustrial(LMl). 1 WRITTEN GOMMENTS Limited land use decisions require the notification of property owners/occupants within 100 feet of the proposed development, allowing for a 144ay comment period prior to the staff decision. No wriften comments were submifted. CRITERIA FOR APPROVAL (Ref. Section 31.060 of the SDC) COMPLIANCE wlTH THE SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTIONS 3.050 AND 3I.O5O OF THIS CODE. The site plan application was submitted on February 20, 1998 and contained all information required to initiate Type ll Site Plan Review procedures in accordance with SDC Articles 3 and 31. This decision is issued within the required 120 day review period. 2.PROPOSED ON€ITE AND OFF SITE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS ARE SUFFICIENT TO ACCOMITIIODATE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AS SPEGIFIED IN ARTICLES 31,32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND/OR ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Conformance with Article 32 (Public and Private lmprovementsl Water and Electric Service. SDC Section32.120 states: "Each development area shall be provided with a water system having.sufficiently sized mains and lesser Iines to furnish adequate supply to the development. A 12'water line in 28th Street currently serves this development. Electricitv. SDC 32.120(21states, "Whenever possible, utility lines shall be placed underground." Underground electrical service is available from the transformer located along the north property line approximately 200' west of 28th Street. Finding: The prcposed plans for water and electicalserurbe comply with the standards fhe SDC for the provision of water and electicalservrbes. Sanitary Sewer. SDC 32.100(1) states: "...sanltary sewerr shall be lnstalled to serue each new development and to connect developments to new mains. lnstallation of sanitary sewerc shall comply with the provlsions of thls code, the Standard Gonstruction Specifications, Chapter 2 of the GIty Gode, and Department of Envlronmental Quality (DEA) regulations..." The site is cunently served by the public sanitary sewer system. The City Engineer has determined that the existing public systems have capacity to accept the increased sanitary flow generated by this proposal. Finding: The sanitary sewers cunently seruing this development arc sufticient to handle the incrcased sewer demand frcm the proposed addition. Storm Sewer. SDC 32.100 (1) states: "The Approval Authority shall grant development approval only where adequate provisions for storm and flood water run-off to the City's storm water dralnage system have been made as determined by the City Englneer." SDC 32.110(4) states, "A development shall be required to employ dralnage management practices approved by the City Engineer and conslstent with Metro Plan pollcles which mlnlmlze the amount and rate of surface run-off into recelving streams." Developments with parking areas over 5,000 square feet in area must employ drainage management practices approved by the City Engineer. Because the new impervious paving area exceeds 5,000 square feet, Drainage Best Management Practices (BMP) must be used. The applicant proposes using multi+hamber catchbasins in the parking lot to satisff water quality BMP's. These units are acceptable, provided they are modified to include an oil-filtering medium within the inlet chamber. Run-off from new roof areas should be directed into one or more dry wells, with an overflow connection into the site storm drain system, in compliance with the storm water reduction methods in SDC 32.110(4), Finding: Adequate provisions have not been made for addressing dninage flow, reduction and prc-trcatment of storm water runoff to the CiU storm dninage sysfems as shown on the tentative site plan. The CiU Engineer has determined that plans must be submitted for paffing area sysfems thaf address methods of rcduct)an pior to discharying to City storm water drainage facilities. Condition t) Submit a revised storm drainage plan detailing pre-treatment and reduction of storm water runoff, for review and approval by the Ci$ Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Public lmorovements SDC 32.020 2(b) states, "All lots and development shall have approved access to a public street...All streets and alleys shall be dedicated and improved ln accordance with this article." SDC 32.020(10xb)4a, Exceptions, states, "ln all other cases of unimproved streets, an lmprovement Agrcement shall be required as a condition of Development Approval, postponlng lmprovements until such tlme that a Gity strcet improvement prolect ls initiated." This development has access to 28th Street. 28th is classified as a minor arterial on the Conceptual Local Street Map. Per SDC 32.020, the specification for minimum curb to curb width is 48'. The existing curb to curb width on 28th along the frontage of this site is 44'. Finding: The 28th Sfreef fiontage does not meetthe standadsfor a fully improved street. SDC 32.020 rcquircs that an lmprovement Agreement, which posfpones imprcvements until such time that a CW sfieef imprcvement prciect is initiated, is signed priorto devetopment approval. This criteia can be met if an lmprovement Agreement is recorded priorto Final Site Plan approval. Condition 2) Provide a signed and recorded lmprovement Agreement for the 28th Street frontage prior to Final Site Plan Approval. $ystem Development Charoes The following estimates are not part of a land use application but are given in order to help the applicant with cost estimates. Public Works has estimated SDC charges at approximately $15,000. A precise fee will be determined when the plans for the facility are submitted for building permit review. 3 Conformance with standards of SDG Article 31 - Site Ptan Review and Article 20 - lndustrial Zoning Districts. Landscaping. sDc 31.110(21Planting standards, states: ,,...the minimum planting acceptable per 1000 square feet of required planting area shalt be as fotlows...(a) at least two trees not less than 6 feet in height and not tess than 2 lnches in caliper...(b) ten shrubs, five gallons or larger...(c) tawn and/or ground cover may be substituted for trees or shrubbery, except where required for screening, when there are adequate provisions for ongoing maintenance.', Setback Standards. SDC 20.050, states: "ln the LMI District, each lot shall have planted setbacks of not less than the following sizes: (i)(b) parking setback - S feet. The site plan shows a 5'planted setback (approximately 1250 square feet) abutting the parking area at the south (side) property line. The planted area consists of (11) 2-inch caliper trees and 30 shrubs, five gallons in size. The 5' planted setback is located on tax lot 400 (immediately south of the subject site). The applicant has submitted a Lot Line Adjustment application (Jo. No. 9g-04-97), concurrent with this Site Plan Review application, in order to incorporate the area into tax lot 100. Finding: The submifted plan contains the sufficient number and sized ptantings required by sDC 31.140(2) and 20.050(1)(b), however the propefi tine must be relocated to include the 5' planted setback area as paft of the subject property. Condition 3) Relocate the recorded south lot line to include the all property affected by this site plan prior to Final Site Plan approval. screening and Lighting. sDc 31.160(1)" ...screening shall be required for trash receptacles." The site plan does not show screening for the trash enclosure. Finding: rhe sife plan does not comply with sDC 31.160 g1) because screening is not indicated for the trash receptacle. condition 4) Provide screening for the trash receptacle on the Final site plan. ProDosed oneite and off-eite oublic and private improvements are sufficient to accommodate the proposed development as specified in any applicable refinement olan. Conformance with the applicable Mid€prlngfield Refinement Ptan tndustriat Development Policles: (Ordinance No. 5341, as adopted July 1986 and amended March 19g7) 2. Ensure that the minlmum levet of urban sewlces are provlded to lndustrial land development through the slte plan revlew process (Article s{, sprlngfield Development Code) and through capital lmprovements programmlng. All key urban services are available to this development, including sanitary sewer, solid waste management, water and electric service, lire and emergency medical services and police protection. 4 4 4. Requlre participation in improvement districts as a condition of development approvalwhere necessary to ensure the timely provision of public facilities and streets. As a condition of development approval, the applicant must sign an lmprovement Agreement for the future full improvement of 28th Street. Finding: This citeion is met because the proposal is in accordance with SDC Articles 20, 31, and 32 and the Mid-Spingfield Refinement Plan. 3.TNVENTOR|ED NATURAL (INCLUDING REGULATED WETLA-NDS) AND HISTORIC FEATURES OF THE SITE HAVE BEEN ADEQUATELY GONSIDERED tN THE PROJECT DESIGN, CONSISTENTWTH THE METRO PLAN POLIGIES. The Metro Plan, the Mid-Springfield Refinement Plan, the Draft Natural Resource SpecialStudy, the NationalWetlands lnventory Map, the Draft Springfield Wetland lnventory Map, the Hydric Soils Map, and the list of Historic Landmark Sites have been consulted. There are no inventoried natural or historic features on the development site. PARKING AREAS AND INGRESS.EGRESS POINTS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED SO AS TO FACILITATE TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY, TO AVOID CONGESTION AND TO MINIMIZE CURB CUTS ON ARTERIAL AND GoLLECTOR STREETS AS SPECIFIED lN ARTICLES 3{, 32, THE APPROPRIATE ZONING AND/OR ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICT ARTICLE AND ANY APPLICABLE REFINEMENT PLAN. Parkino. SDC Section 20.070 - Off-Street Parking Standards 1. The Springfield Development Code does not contain specific parking standards for "soccer facilities". However, Section 18.070 (7) lists the off-street parking standards for "recreational facilities" - a comparable use . The standards state that 1 parking space for each 100 square feet of ffoor area in the primary assembly area and 1 for each 200 square feet of gross floor area for the remainder of the building are required. Based on these standards, Phase I required 103 parking spaces. The parking provided for Phase I (27 spaces with additional paving area available for Phase ll) did not meet code requirements. The applicant provided a parking study per SDG Section 31.170 (1) (d), which allows a reduction in the number of required parking spaces without a variance based on an approved Trafftc Study. The applicants engineer prepared a parking study on December 20, 1995. The study was reviewed by the City's Transportation Division. The City Traffic Engineer concuned with the study findings and concluded that 35 parking spaces were sufficient to serve the development based on parking and trip generation for similar facilities and an evaluation of the transportation needs of the expected users. This Site Plan Modiftcation proposes less parking than originally shown for Phase ll (35 versus 69). The City of Springfield Transportation Engineer reviewed the cunent parking proposal and found that 35 additional parking spaces were sufficient to serve this development. 5 SDC Section 31.190 (1), requires parking areas to be paved. The applicant is advised that overflow parking on unpaved areas of the oroperty is a violation of the Sprinofield Development Code. , 2. Parking Area lmprovement Standards, SDC 31.190(8)(a) states, ,,Parking spaces for disabled people and accessible passenger loading zones that serve a particular building shal! be located on the shortest possible accessible circulation route to an accessible entrance of the building." The plan shows two handicapped parking spaces (#41 and #42) located opposite the building entrance near the south property line. Parking spaces located closer to the building are available for handicapped parking. Finding: The location of handicapped pafting spaces does not amply with SDC 31.190 (8). lf the paNng spaces for disabled people and accessib/e passenge r loading zones are rclocated to the shorfesf posslD/e accessible route to the building or a stiped crosswalk to the entrance is provided, this citerion will be met. Condition 5) Relocate handicapped parking spaces to the shortest possible accessible circulation route to an accessible entrance of the building. What Needs to Be Done By The Applicant To Obtain Fina! Site Plan Aoproval? Three copies of a Final Site Plan and any additional required plans, documents or information are required to be submitted to the Planning Division within g0 days of the date of this letter showing compliance with SDC Article 31 Criteria of Approval 1-4, as conditioned: Condition l) Submit a revised storm drainage plan detailing pre-treatment and reduction of storm water run-off, for review and approval by the City Engineer prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Condition 2) Provide a signed and recorded lmprovement Agreement for the 28th Street frontage prior to Final Site Plan Approval. Condition 3) Relocate the recorded south lot line to include the all property affected by this site plan prior to Final Site Plan approval. condition 4) Provide screening for the trash receptacle on the Final site plan. Gondition 5) Relocate handicapped parking spaces to the shortest possible accessible circulation route to an accessible entrance of the building. DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: ln order to complete the site plan review process, a Development Agreement is required to ensure that the terms and conditions of site plan review are binding upon both the applicant the City. Staff will prepare this document (Ref. sDc 31.090). sIGNS: signs are regulated by the springfield city code Article g, chapter 7. The number and placement of signs must be coordinated with the Community Services Division. The locations of signs on a site plan do not constitute approval ftom the community services Division. A separate sign permit is required. Lisa Hopper (726- 3790) is the contact person. 6 Additional lnformation: The application, alldocuments, and evidence relied upon by the applicant, and the applicable criteria of approval are available for ftee inspection and copies are available at a cost of $0.75 for the first page and $0.25 for each additional page at the Development Services Departmenl,22S Fifth Street, Springfield, Oregon. Appeal: lf you wish to appeal this Type Il Limited Land Use Site Plan Review Approval decision, you must do so within 10 days of the date of this letter. Your appeal must be in accordance with SDC, Article 15, Appeals. Appeals must be submitted on a City form with a fee of $250.00. The fee will be returned to the applicant if the Planning Commission approves the appeal application. Questions: Please call Lauren Lezell in the Planning Division of the Development Services Department at (541) 726-3759 if you have any questions regarding this process 7