HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 10/13/2021DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM
APPLICANT: Brad Rogers
MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, November 4, 2021, 1:30— 2:30
PLACE: Virtual via Microsoft Teams
CONTACT PERSON: Brad Rogers
x Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Umbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Carino
_ Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW
AL Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW
_ Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW)
Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works
Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager
_ Kristi Krueger, Principal Engineer, Development & Public Works
�f Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works
Eric Phillips -Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department
�. Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works
_ Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
]� Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water)
_ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric)
�c Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP)
Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District
Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District
Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division
(odotr2planmg r@odot.state.or. us)
Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board
Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board
Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools
Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools
_ Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools
Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official
Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department
Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director
Luke Pilon, CenturyUnk
Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW
_ Jeff Paschall, AIC DPW City Surveyor
Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services
Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation (Steve Gallup, cc only)
Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director
Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911
Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas
Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable
Water Resource Coordinator, ESD
Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District
Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request)
Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM)
Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations)
Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and
file to Shannon. Thanks!
Revised: 06/08/2020
DEVELOPMENT ISSUES
MEETING
DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL
225 FIFTH STREET
DPI117C,onfffenee Room 615,41
Meeting Date; Thursday, November 412021 1:30-2:30
1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -21 -000266 -PRE Brad Rogers
Assessors Map: 17-032541 TL 400
Address: 160028' Street
Existing Use: LMI
Applicant has submitted proposal for partition and site plan to relocate Trak Power Sports from
its Glenwood location
Planner: Drew Larson
The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for
you to review or print out @ Laserriche website: www.soringfeld-or.Dovtweblink8tbrowse.asox
VICINITY MAP
811 -21 -000266 -PRE Development Issues Meeting
17-03-25-41 TL400
1600 28`h Street
Brad Rogers
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Development Issues Meeting (DIM)
SPRINGFIELD
rw1 i
Required Project Information (Applicant:
Prospective Brad Rogers
Applicant Name:
complete this section)
Phone: 541-915-4883
Company: Rogers Holdings LLC
Fax:
Address: PO Box 70448, Springfield OR 97475
Prospective
Applicant's Rep.: Rodd Hansen, AIA
phone: 541-687-7800
Company: Rodd Hansen Architect, LLC
Fax:
Address: 1551 Oak St, Ste A, Eugene OR 97401
Property Owner: Brad Rogers
Phone: 541-915-4883
Company: Rogers Holdings LLC Fax:
Address: PO Box 70448, Springfield OR 97475
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-25-41
TAX LOT NOS : 400
Property Address: 1600 28th St
Size of Property: 2.05 Acres ❑x Square Feet ❑
Description of If you are filling. this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Proposal: Partition and Si Plan Review
Existing Use: light indu ial
# of Lots/Parcels: 2
Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 1 acre sf
Densit : N/A du/acre
Prospective
Applicant: A
Date: v
Sig I
• l�dl oG2(�
Print
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. complete this section)
Case No.: 911 WV2W - kti Date: I Reviewed by: 1"M1 !�
Application Fee: $ I N / •00
Technical Fee: $0
Postage Fee: $0
TOTAL FEES: $ II i -0
PROJECT NUMBER:
Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3
Canch
rNGINEE RING -
5 -1997
October 7, 2021
RE: DIM QUESTIONS
1600 28- ST (TM 17-03-25-41, TL 400)
Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 21-602
The subject site is underdeveloped with a large gravel/grass area in the western
half. The property owner is considering construction of a new structure and parking
area for relocation of Trak Powersports (formerly Ramsey -Waite) from their Glenwood
site. The project will consist of a new building (approx. 15,000 sf) and associated
parking; sketches of two layout concepts are included in this application.
It is the property owner's desire to have the new development be an entirely
independent entity from the existing development on the site. To facilitate this a
partition to separate the two areas is desired.
The property and the lands to the north and west is zoned Light -Medium
Industrial (LMI); the lands to the south are zoned Major Retail Commercial (MRC); and
the lands to the east are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI).
The property owner wants to understand the amount of time from project
commencement to occupancy. The questions below will help the design team
understand the necessary scope which can then be developed into a timeline.
1. Land use process
a. What Use Category from Table 3.2-410 is applicable to this project?
b. Will an MDS Major application be acceptable?
c. Does staff have recommendations on the timing of the partition and MDS
applications? Will the MDS need to encompass the entire site if the
partition plat is not recorded or can it be limited to the area of new
development if a tentative partition is submitted concurrently?
d. If it needs to encompass the entire site, will the currently developed
portion need to be updated to reflect all current code criteria?
e. What is the current average timeline for review and approval of an 1bIDS
Major (or whatever other application type is stated as required in b above)?
f. Please review the order of applications between: Tentative Partition, Final
Partition, Tentative MDS, Final MDS and building permits. In particular,
may the Final MDS and building permits be submitted concurrently?
EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD PHILOMATH
310 Sn, Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p: 541.746.0637 1 �.branchengineenng.conn
DIM Questions
1600 28e St
io/7/2021
g. The area of proposed development appears to be within the 2- and 5 -year
Time of Travel Zones for the Maia and SP wells. Please confirm if this
triggers the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District (DWP).
It. If the DWP is triggered, please review the limitations it places on materials
Bud storage.
i. For calculation of bicycle parking, will "General retail" or "Industrial and
wholesale" be more applicable from Table 4.6-3?
j. For calculation of vehicular parking, will 'Retail trade and services" or
"...other primary industrial uses" be more applicable from Table 4.6-2?
k. Considering the primary stock for the business is vehicular in nature, will
it be permissible to have a stock display area between the building and the
street? The stock will be brought inside each night. Would the stock
display area need to meet parking standards or are other standards more
applicable?
2. Public Services
a. Will the curves in Olympic Street limit the access point for the new
development?
b. Will street lights be required for Olympic Street?
c. Will flow control requirements apply to the site, or will the development
just need to meet water quality before connecting with public stormwater?
d. Can the site connect with what appears to be a public wastewater
manhole/lateral at the SW corner of the site? Are as-builts available?
3. Fire
a. Will an access route need to fully surround the building?
b. If an access route does not need to fully surround the building, will a
turnaround be needed?
c. What is the required distance to a hydrant? Does it appear that a new
hydrant will be needed?
4. Miscellaneous
a. Will street trees be required along Olympic Street?
b. Please confirm Olympic Street is a Minor Arterial and 281" Street is a Major
Collector.
S. Has staff observed any red flags? Does staff have any input regarding
comparative approvability between the two layout concepts?
Branch Engineering, Inc.
Page 2 oft
ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN
1
1
I
I
1
11
\ 1
(YLLI
LL1
Q
O Z
PR.'WIELNR/rL
TiLE�&lE P.a.l
�I
® aRG",Z—Zk m4L6 " AN
7
1
I
I
I
\ - I
\ - 1
\ I
1
- 1
\ \ 1
nne.
W W
LLl
a
Q Z
I
ARCHITECTURAL 51TE PLAN
ia'x�c�uwi
TIRE:SItE fiAN
7
®ARCLITECTUR L SITE PL51TE PLAN
frre r. N`
VW
W
z
oZ
C