Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DIM PLANNER 10/13/2021DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING FORM APPLICANT: Brad Rogers MEETING DATE/TIME: Thursday, November 4, 2021, 1:30— 2:30 PLACE: Virtual via Microsoft Teams CONTACT PERSON: Brad Rogers x Current Planning Staff: L Miller, A Umbird, M Rust, D Larson, M Carino _ Jeff Paschall, City Engineer, DPW AL Kyle Greene, Managing Civil Engineer—DPW _ Ken Vogeney, Emergency Manager (DPW) Clayton McEachern, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Matt Stouder, Environmental Services Div. Manager/MWMC General Manager _ Kristi Krueger, Principal Engineer, Development & Public Works �f Michael Liebler, Transportation Planning, Civil Engineer, Development & Public Works Eric Phillips -Meadow, Deputy Fire Marshall 2, Fire & Life Safety Department �. Ben Gibson, Maintenance Supervisor, Development & Public Works _ Eric Adams, Planning, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Ladd Boyce, Keoki Lapina, Springfield Utility Board (Water) ]� Greg Miller, Springfield Utility Board (Water) _ Sanjeev King, Nick Amann, Springfield Utility Board (Electric) �c Amy Chinitz, Springfield Utility Board (DWP) Thomas Jeffreys, (EPUD) Emerald Peoples Utility District Michael Wargo, Willamalane Park and Recreation District Matt Caswell, Planning & Development Manager, ODOT, State Highway Division (odotr2planmg r@odot.state.or. us) Brad Rudler, (Electric) Eugene Water and Electric Board Wallace McCullough, (Water), Eugene Water and Electric Board Brett Yancey, Chief Operations Officer; Springfield Public Schools Chris Reiersgaard, Asst. Director of Facilities & Operations; Springfield Public Schools _ Safe Routes to School, Springfield Public Schools Chris Carpenter, DPW Building Official Rick Lewis, Police Chief, Police Department Tom Schwetz, LTD, Planning and Development Director Luke Pilon, CenturyUnk Tom Boyatt, Community Development Manager, DPW _ Jeff Paschall, AIC DPW City Surveyor Sunny Washburn, Program Coordinator, Environmental Services Sasha Vartanian, Lane County Transportation (Steve Gallup, cc only) Tom Boyatt, Interim Development and Public Works Director Marie Longworth, Central Lane Communications 911 Monte Brown, Northwest Natural Gas Jason McDonald, Comcast Cable Water Resource Coordinator, ESD Jamie Porter, Rainbow Water District Kristina Kraaz, City Attorney (Mary Bridget Smith upon specific request) Courtney Griesel, Senior Management Analyst (EDM) Brenda Jones, Administrative Specialist (DIM Annexations) Please mark who you would like to attend this meeting and return form and file to Shannon. Thanks! Revised: 06/08/2020 DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MEETING DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SPRINGFIELD CITYHALL 225 FIFTH STREET DPI117C,onfffenee Room 615,41 Meeting Date; Thursday, November 412021 1:30-2:30 1. DEVELOPMENT ISSUES MTG #811 -21 -000266 -PRE Brad Rogers Assessors Map: 17-032541 TL 400 Address: 160028' Street Existing Use: LMI Applicant has submitted proposal for partition and site plan to relocate Trak Power Sports from its Glenwood location Planner: Drew Larson The Development Issues Meeting informational packet for this meeting is available on-line for you to review or print out @ Laserriche website: www.soringfeld-or.Dovtweblink8tbrowse.asox VICINITY MAP 811 -21 -000266 -PRE Development Issues Meeting 17-03-25-41 TL400 1600 28`h Street Brad Rogers City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD rw1 i Required Project Information (Applicant: Prospective Brad Rogers Applicant Name: complete this section) Phone: 541-915-4883 Company: Rogers Holdings LLC Fax: Address: PO Box 70448, Springfield OR 97475 Prospective Applicant's Rep.: Rodd Hansen, AIA phone: 541-687-7800 Company: Rodd Hansen Architect, LLC Fax: Address: 1551 Oak St, Ste A, Eugene OR 97401 Property Owner: Brad Rogers Phone: 541-915-4883 Company: Rogers Holdings LLC Fax: Address: PO Box 70448, Springfield OR 97475 ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-03-25-41 TAX LOT NOS : 400 Property Address: 1600 28th St Size of Property: 2.05 Acres ❑x Square Feet ❑ Description of If you are filling. this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: Partition and Si Plan Review Existing Use: light indu ial # of Lots/Parcels: 2 Av . Lot/Parcel Size: 1 acre sf Densit : N/A du/acre Prospective Applicant: A Date: v Sig I • l�dl oG2(� Print Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. complete this section) Case No.: 911 WV2W - kti Date: I Reviewed by: 1"M1 !� Application Fee: $ I N / •00 Technical Fee: $0 Postage Fee: $0 TOTAL FEES: $ II i -0 PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Canch rNGINEE RING - 5 -1997 October 7, 2021 RE: DIM QUESTIONS 1600 28- ST (TM 17-03-25-41, TL 400) Branch Engineering Inc. Project No. 21-602 The subject site is underdeveloped with a large gravel/grass area in the western half. The property owner is considering construction of a new structure and parking area for relocation of Trak Powersports (formerly Ramsey -Waite) from their Glenwood site. The project will consist of a new building (approx. 15,000 sf) and associated parking; sketches of two layout concepts are included in this application. It is the property owner's desire to have the new development be an entirely independent entity from the existing development on the site. To facilitate this a partition to separate the two areas is desired. The property and the lands to the north and west is zoned Light -Medium Industrial (LMI); the lands to the south are zoned Major Retail Commercial (MRC); and the lands to the east are zoned Heavy Industrial (HI). The property owner wants to understand the amount of time from project commencement to occupancy. The questions below will help the design team understand the necessary scope which can then be developed into a timeline. 1. Land use process a. What Use Category from Table 3.2-410 is applicable to this project? b. Will an MDS Major application be acceptable? c. Does staff have recommendations on the timing of the partition and MDS applications? Will the MDS need to encompass the entire site if the partition plat is not recorded or can it be limited to the area of new development if a tentative partition is submitted concurrently? d. If it needs to encompass the entire site, will the currently developed portion need to be updated to reflect all current code criteria? e. What is the current average timeline for review and approval of an 1bIDS Major (or whatever other application type is stated as required in b above)? f. Please review the order of applications between: Tentative Partition, Final Partition, Tentative MDS, Final MDS and building permits. In particular, may the Final MDS and building permits be submitted concurrently? EUGENE -SPRINGFIELD PHILOMATH 310 Sn, Street, Springfield, OR 97477 1 p: 541.746.0637 1 �.branchengineenng.conn DIM Questions 1600 28e St io/7/2021 g. The area of proposed development appears to be within the 2- and 5 -year Time of Travel Zones for the Maia and SP wells. Please confirm if this triggers the Drinking Water Protection Overlay District (DWP). It. If the DWP is triggered, please review the limitations it places on materials Bud storage. i. For calculation of bicycle parking, will "General retail" or "Industrial and wholesale" be more applicable from Table 4.6-3? j. For calculation of vehicular parking, will 'Retail trade and services" or "...other primary industrial uses" be more applicable from Table 4.6-2? k. Considering the primary stock for the business is vehicular in nature, will it be permissible to have a stock display area between the building and the street? The stock will be brought inside each night. Would the stock display area need to meet parking standards or are other standards more applicable? 2. Public Services a. Will the curves in Olympic Street limit the access point for the new development? b. Will street lights be required for Olympic Street? c. Will flow control requirements apply to the site, or will the development just need to meet water quality before connecting with public stormwater? d. Can the site connect with what appears to be a public wastewater manhole/lateral at the SW corner of the site? Are as-builts available? 3. Fire a. Will an access route need to fully surround the building? b. If an access route does not need to fully surround the building, will a turnaround be needed? c. What is the required distance to a hydrant? Does it appear that a new hydrant will be needed? 4. Miscellaneous a. Will street trees be required along Olympic Street? b. Please confirm Olympic Street is a Minor Arterial and 281" Street is a Major Collector. S. Has staff observed any red flags? Does staff have any input regarding comparative approvability between the two layout concepts? Branch Engineering, Inc. Page 2 oft ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN 1 1 I I 1 11 \ 1 (YLLI LL1 Q O Z PR.'WIELNR/rL TiLE�&lE P.a.l �I ® aRG",Z—Zk m4L6 " AN 7 1 I I I \ - I \ - 1 \ I 1 - 1 \ \ 1 nne. W W LLl a Q Z I ARCHITECTURAL 51TE PLAN ia'x�c�uwi TIRE:SItE fiAN 7 ®ARCLITECTUR L SITE PL51TE PLAN frre r. N` VW W z oZ C