Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout01-08-21 Agenda Packet THE FULL PACKET IS POSTED ON THE WEBSITE www.mwmcpartners.org MWMC MEETING AGENDA Friday, January 8th, 2021 7:30 AM – 9:30 AM (PDT) Due to the Coronavirus Pandemic and Oregon Executive Order 20-16, the MWMC Meeting will be held remotely via computer or phone. To join the meeting by phone dial: 1-786-535-3211; Access Code: 956-276-197 7:30 – 7:35 I. ROLL CALL 7:35 – 7:40 II. CONSENT CALENDAR a. MWMC 12/11/20 Minutes Action Requested: By motion, approve the Consent Calendar 7:40 – 7:45 III. PUBLIC COMMENT: Public comment can be submitted by email to jbrennan@springfield-or.gov or by phone 541-726-3694 by 5 PM January 7th, 2021 or made at the meeting. All public comments need to include your full name, address, if you are representing yourself or an organization (name of organization), and topic. 7:45 – 8:05 IV. ON-CALL ENGINEERING SERVICES & DISASTER MITIGATION CONSULTANT AWARD ………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...……Troy McAllister Action Requested: Approve, by motion, Resolution 21-01 8:05 – 8:30 V. FY 2021-22 BUDGET KICKOFF……………………………………………………………………………...Matt Stouder ……………………………..………….…………………………………………………..Katherine Bishop, David Breitenstein Action Requested: Informational and Discussion 8:30 – 8:40 VI. BUSINESS FROM COMMISSION, GENERAL MANAGER, & WASTEWATER DIRECTOR 8:40 VII. ADJOURNMENT , Agenda Item ll • • • • • • • • MWMC Meeting Minutes 12/11/2020 Page 6 of 6   12th, 2021 MWMC meeting. Mr. Stouder expressed appreciation to the commissioners and staff for their attention and participation this year, and wished everybody a Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. Wastewater Director: Mr. Breitenstein announced they continue to collect samples weekly to test for COVID. His team met with OSU researchers last week to review results of the community trace project sampling. OSU was pleased with the results and thought the research from Eugene and Springfield was beneficial to the work they are doing. Graphs were shown to the commission of the correlations between viral loads and COVID cases, and also correlations between viral loads and median income of residents. Mr. Stouder stated there are 9 sites in Eugene and 8 sites in Springfield that were tested. Mr. Breitenstein said West Eugene and the Thurston area showed higher counts. OSU indicated they would be interested in coming back for more research, but need to be invited back by the local Health Authority and also receive funding. The previous project was funded by Peace Corps. Mr. Breitenstein said he would keep the commission updated on any future developments of COVID sampling. Greg Watkins was appointed as the maintenance manager in Eugene and will provide oversight on all mechanical and electrical maintenance. Mr. Watkins has a background in mechanical engineering, and has been involved in many complex projects. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Farr said he recognized Mr. Watkins capabilities when he was hired on, more than 25 years ago. Commissioner Farr said Lane County health is moving forward with the vaccination very quickly, and hopefully that will have an impact on whether or not the MWMC meetings are virtual. Mr. Stouder suspected the meetings at that time will be a hybrid, and will include attendees on both the Zoom platform and in person. Pat Farr adjourned the meeting at 8:20am ______________________________________________________________________________ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 31, 2020 TO: Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) FROM: Troy McAllister, Managing Civil Engineer SUBJECT: On-Call Engineering Services & Disaster Mitigation Consultant Contract Award ACTION REQUESTED: Approve Resolution 21-01 ISSUE Staff requests Commission approval of Attachment #1 regarding Resolution 21-01, which authorizes staff to negotiate and execute contracts with four businesses to provide on-call professional engineering/technical services to support the MWMC Capital Improvement Program (CIP). BACKGROUND During the annual budget process, the Commission and Governing bodies review and approve the Regional Wastewater Program CIP, which includes a five-year project plan. Staff expects to present the FY 2021/2022 draft CIP to the Commission at the February 12, 2021 MWMC meeting. To support the CIP budgeted projects, the need exists for consultant professional services. Example projects needing consultant services include: P80109 Resiliency Follow-up work, P80064 Glenwood Pump Station Upgrades, P80101 Comprehensive Facility Plan Update, P80102 Filtration, P80078 Waste Activated Sludge Thickening, and improvements/solutions related to the MWMC upcoming permit renewal. The P80109 Resiliency Follow-up mitigation work is the next step to help with addressing “level of service” goals before a natural disaster such as 9.0 magnitude earthquake or major flooding. Attachment #2 shows the 2019 recommendations from the P80096 Disaster Mitigation & Recovery Plan. Agenda Item lV Memo: On-Call Engineering Services & Disaster Mitigation Consultant Contract Award December 31, 2020 Page 2 of 3 DISCUSSION As stated in Resolution 21-01, the MWMC issued a request for proposals (RFP) on September 1, 2020 for On-Call Engineering Services & Disaster Mitigation work per the MWMC procurement rule 137-048-0220. The RFP package was emailed to the Commission on September 1, 2020. The RFP included the following information: The MWMC intends to select and award up to four firms for five-year contract durations with the option of contract renewals in year 2026 and 2031 based on the MWMC needs for engineering services and disaster mitigation/recovery topics (page 3 of RFP). Proposal Evaluation Criteria (on page 8 of RFP): 1) Business/Proposer’s capabilities, experience, & resource management (40 points) 2) Staff qualifications/expertise & management (25 points) 3) Reference checking (35 points) The MWMC award will be to the highest scoring proposers up to four firms for “on-call” professional services agreements. The MWMC controls its options of how the “on-call” work will be distributed moving forward based on consultant’s performance, expertise, availability, and cost impacts/control. Certain “on-call” work will require MWMC updates and/or approvals (page 9 of RFP) Scope of Services & Objectives (pages 10-12 of RFP) At least nine or more consulting firms looked at the RFP. On October 13, 2020 the MWMC received six proposals. The proposals were evaluated and scored via the RFP qualification-based selection process completed by a Proposal Review Committee. On December 1, 2020 staff issued Attachment #3 regarding “Notice of Intent to Select Consultant” that included a summary of scores. No protests were received related to MWMC procurement rule 137-48-0240 (Protest Procedures). Staff recommends establishing four on-call consultant agreements with the following firms: ➢ Carollo Engineers, Inc. (Portland, Oregon) ➢ Jacobs Engineering Group, Inc. (Corvallis, Oregon) ➢ Brown and Caldwell, Inc. (Portland, Oregon) ➢ West Yost Associates, Inc. (Lake Oswego, Oregon) As stated in Resolution 21-01, the initial individual contract value is not to exceed $150,000. Each medium/large task order work will be pre-negotiated to define the scope of consultant work/deliverables, insurance changes and pricing before staff seeks the MWMC final approval to Memo: On-Call Engineering Services & Disaster Mitigation Consultant Contract Award December 31, 2020 Page 3 of 3 proceed via future Resolution(s) to amend the related consultant contract. Potential 2021 consultant work includes: P80064 Glenwood Pump Station Upgrades and P80109 Resiliency Follow-up work (Disaster Mitigation topics). ACTION REQUESTED Staff requests approval of Resolution 21-01 authorizing the MWMC Executive Officer or designee to execute four consultant agreements with the professional engineering firms listed above. ATTACHMENTS 1. Resolution 21-01 2. 2019 Recommendations from the P80096 Disaster Mitigation & Recovery Plan 3. Notice of Intent to Select Consultant (dated December 1, 2020) Attachment 2 Attachment 3 Attachment 3 ______________________________________________________________________________ M E M O R A N D U M DATE: December 31, 2020 TO: Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) FROM: Matt Stouder, Executive Officer Dave Breitenstein, Wastewater Division Director Katherine Bishop, Environmental Services Program Manager SUBJECT: FY 2021-22 Budget Kick Off: Key Outcomes and Performance Indicators ACTION REQUESTED: Provide comments and input to staff regarding the purpose statement, key outcomes and performance indicators ISSUE At the meeting on January 8, 2021 staff will provide a presentation to include key dates for the FY 2021- 22 budget development and adoption process, and an overview of the key outcomes and performance indicators. The Commission will be requested to confirm or modify the purpose statement, key outcomes and performance indicators, and provide staff with input on the indicators and measures that should be reported in the FY 2021-22 Budget. DISCUSSION Each year, Regional Wastewater Program (RWP) staff begins the annual budget process for the RWP by reviewing the work plan performance and projections. Staff also reports performance relative to the Commission’s key outcomes and performance indicators that are included in the current MWMC FY 2020-21 Budget. The January 8 meeting provides an opportunity for an annual review of the MWMC purpose statement. The proposed FY 2021-22 key outcomes and indicators include carrying forward several indicators that are incorporated in the adopted FY 2020-21 Budget, with minor revisions and adjusted performance indicators to be discussed at the meeting. Additionally, components of the MWMC Strategic Plan will be incorporated into the FY 2021-22 Budget. ACTION REQUESTED Provide input to staff regarding the purpose statement, key outcomes and performance indicators. ATTACHMENT: 1. Draft RWP Overview, Key Outcomes and Performance Indicators Agenda Item V Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission Overview ATTACHMENT 1 Page 1 of 4 REGIONAL WASTEWATER PROGRAM OVERVIEW The Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission The Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission (MWMC) was formed by Eugene, Springfield, and Lane County through an intergovernmental agreement (IGA) in 1977 to provide wastewater collection and treatment services for the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. The seven-member Commission is composed of members appointed by the City Councils of Eugene (3 representatives), Springfield (2 representatives) and the Lane County Board of Commissioners (2 representatives). Since its inception, the Commission, in accordance with the IGA, has been responsible for oversight of the Regional Wastewater Program (RWP) including: construction, maintenance, and operation of the regional sewerage facilities; adoption of financing plans; adoption of budgets, user fees and connection fees; adoption of minimum standards for industrial pretreatment and local sewage collection systems; and recommendations for the expansion of regional facilities to meet future community growth. Staffing and services have been provided in various ways over the 44 years of MWMC’s existence. Since 1983, the Commission has contracted with the Cities of Springfield and Eugene for all staffing and services necessary to maintain and support the RWP. Lane County’s partnership has involved participation on the Commission and support for customers that are served by the MWMC in the Santa Clara unincorporated area. Regional Wastewater Program Purpose and Key Outcomes The purpose of the RWP is to protect public health and safety and the environment by providing high quality wastewater management services to the Eugene-Springfield metropolitan area. The MWMC and the regional partners are committed to providing these services in a manner that will achieve, sustain, and promote balance between community, environmental, and economic needs while meeting customer service expectations. Since the mid-1990s, the Commission and RWP staff have worked together to identify key outcome areas within which to focus annual work plan and budget priorities. The FY 20-21 RWP work plans and budget reflect a focus on the following key outcomes or goals. In carrying out the daily activities of managing the regional wastewater system, we will strive to achieve and maintain: 1. High environmental standards; 2. Fiscal management that is effective and efficient; 3. A successful intergovernmental partnership; 4. Maximum reliability and useful life of regional assets and infrastructure; 5. Public awareness and understanding of MWMC, the regional wastewater system, and MWMC’s objectives of maintaining water quality and a sustainable environment. The Commission believes that these outcomes, if achieved in the long term, will demonstrate success of the RWP in carrying out its purpose. In order to help determine whether we are successful, indicators of performance and targets have been identified for each key outcome. Tracking performance relative to identified targets over time assists in managing the RWP to achieve desired results. The following indicators and performance targets provide an important framework for the development of the FY 21-22 RWP Operating Budget, Capital Improvements Program and associated work plans. Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission Overview ATTACHMENT 1 Page 2 of 4 Outcome 1: Achieve and maintain high environmental standards. Indicators: Performance: FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Estimated Actual FY 21-22 Target  Volume of wastewater treated to water quality standards 100%; 10.9 billion gallons 100%; 11 billion gallons 100%; 11 billion gallons  Average removal efficiency of carbonaceous biochemical oxygen demand (CBOD) and total suspended solids (TSS) (permit limit 85%) 97% 97% 95%  High quality biosolids (pollutant concentrations less than 50% of EPA exceptional quality criteria) Arsenic 21% Cadmium 12% Copper 29% Lead 8% Mercury 5% Nickel 5% Selenium 12% Zinc 29% Arsenic 25% Cadmium 15% Copper 30% Lead 10% Mercury 10% Nickel 10% Selenium 15% Zinc 30% Arsenic <50% Cadmium <50% Copper <50% Lead <50% Mercury <50% Nickel <50% Selenium <50% Zinc <50%  ISO14001 Environmental Management System Certification (no major nonconformance) All objectives met All objectives met All objectives met Outcome 2: Achieve and maintain fiscal management that is effective and efficient. Indicators: Performance: FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Estimated Actual FY 21-22 Target  Annual budget and rates align with the MWMC Financial Plan Policies met Policies met Policies met  Annual audited financial statements Clean audit Clean audit Clean audit  Uninsured bond rating AA AA AA  Reserves funded at target levels Yes Yes Yes Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission Overview ATTACHMENT 1 Page 3 of 4 Outcome 3: Achieve and maintain a successful intergovernmental partnership. Indicators: Performance: FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Estimated Actual FY 21-22 Target  Industrial Pretreatment Programs are consistent with the MWMC pretreatment model ordinance Consistent across service area Consistent across service area Consistent across service area  MWMC capital projects consistent with CIP budget and schedule 90% of initiated projects within budget and 100% (11 of 11 projects) on schedule 100% of initiated projects within budget and 100% (9 of 9 projects) on schedule 100% of initiated projects within budget and 75% on schedule  Interagency coordination regarding Capacity Management Operations and Maintenance (CMOM) Program CMOM Program update presented to the Commission Quarterly meetings between Eugene and Springfield; Annual update to the Commission Quarterly meetings between Eugene and Springfield; Annual update to the Commission  Community presentations regarding MWMC partnership, services and outcomes delivered jointly 2 community presentations delivered by staff to groups in the service area 4 community presentations delivered by staff to groups in the service area 4 community presentations delivered by staff to groups in the service area Outcome 4: Maximize reliability and useful life of regional assets and infrastructure. Indicators: Performance: FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Estimated Actual FY 21-22 Target  Preventive maintenance completed on time (best practices benchmark is 90%) 92% 94% 90%  Preventive maintenance to corrective maintenance ratio (benchmark 4:1-6:1) 6:1 5:1 5:1  Emergency maintenance required (best practices benchmark is less than 2% of labor hours) 1% 1% <2%  Asset management (AM) processes and practices review and development Asset management plan implementing Moving to a biannual update to AM plan Continue biannual update to AM plan  MWMC Resiliency Plan Presented final plan to the Commission Plan implementation Continue plan implementation Metropolitan Wastewater Management Commission Overview ATTACHMENT 1 Page 4 of 4 Outcome 5: Achieve and maintain public awareness and understanding of MWMC, the regional wastewater system, and MWMC’s objectives of maintaining water quality and a sustainable environment. Indicators: Performance: FY 19-20 Actual FY 20-21 Estimated Actual FY 21-22 Target  Communications Plan Update of plan completed with survey results Update approved and implement 2021 Communications Plan Continue 2021 Implementation of the 2021 Plan  Promote MWMC social media channels Grew Facebook followers to 375 – Did not meet goal to grow Twitter or Instagram Growth of Facebook and Instagram followers are on track while Twitter continues to struggle Implement strategies to grow Facebook followers to 700, Instagram to 275 and Twitter to 250  Create and distribute MWMC e-newsletters Distributed monthly and increased distribution to 222 subscribers Distribute monthly and increase distribution to 300 subscribers Distribute monthly and increase distribution to 375 subscribers  Pollution prevention campaigns 2 campaigns, 3 sponsorships; reaching 40% of residents in the service area 2 campaigns, 4 sponsorships; reaching 25% of residents in the service area 2 campaigns, 4 sponsorships; reaching 25% of residents in the service area  Provide tours of the MWMC Facilities Provided tours for 840 people. Tours canceled as of March due to social distancing requirements No tours provided, due to social distancing requirements Provide tours for greater than 1,150 people  Clean Water University Reached 25% of 5th Graders in the service area Reach 25% of 5th Graders in the service area if online enrollment holds Reach 25% of 5th Graders in the service area  Community survey (approx. every 4 years) Survey completed in Fall 2019 --- ---