The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMiscellaneous Correspondence 1987-03-02SPRINGFIELD CMY OF SPRINGFIELD Planning Department I'larch 2, 1987 Ned Nebeta l.lil I amal ane Park & Recreati on Di stri ct 151 North 4th Street Springfield, Oregon 97477 SUBJECT: Review Schedule for Lively Pool Site Dear Ned: I have prepared two separate scenarios for the various reviews that are requiredfor the development of the proposed Live'ly Pool site. Please be aware that all deadlines and hearing dates are based on acceptance of complete applications. SCHEDULE #1 Metro P'lan Amendment No Fee Charged Spri ngfiel d Planning Conmission Springfield City Council Eugene City Counci'l Lane County Corrnissioners l,lil I amal ane Comp P'lan Amendment* Sp riri lanning Commission i ty Counci'l Annexati on /lone Change Spri ngf i el d Pl anni ng Cormi ssi on Springfiel d City Council Boundary Corrnission* 2/4/87 3/t6/87 Early ApriI 1987 Mid-April 1987 Fee $400.00 4/8/87 (deadl ine 3/9/87 \ 4/20/87 Fee $640.00 qiafti (deadl ine 3/9/87 )5/6/87 (deadl ine 4/10/87 ) 4/20/87 5/18/87 ngfiel d P ngfiel d Cps *Note: Community/Regional ?arks require Discretionary Use approval unless theyappear on an adopted Park or Public Facilities Plan. The City Council must adopt the amended Comp Plan to eliminate the requirement of Discretionary Use Approva'|. 4/3/87 6/5/87 ( deadl ine 3/3/87) Fee $200.00 (dead'l ine 5/6/87) 225 North 5th Street . Springfield, Oregon 97477 . 503/726-3759 aw6j>\ *Note: Annexation is not necessary to rezone or develop, however, if annexationis postponed, rezoning, Discretionary Use and site plan wou'ld be reviewed by the Hearings 0fficial. The Hearings 0fficial schedules public hearings the 3rd Hednesday of each month. App'lication must precede these hearings by one month. Expedited Review (Boundary Conmission) Fee $200.00 The Boundary Commission can process an expedited annexation request 25 daysafter any date the application is submitted. An expedited review by-passesthe City's Type IY annexation review process. However, an expedited review can become a normal Boundary Commission public hearing by anyone requesting such a hearing. A1so, because the Planning Conmission and City Council do not participate in an expedited review, there is no change in zone other than removal of the UFl10 overlay. In order to develop this site for park use a zone change from LDR to PLO wou'ld be required sometime after annexation.This zone change could not occur until the Plan amendment is final (See Eugene/Lane County action on Metro Plan Amendment). Site Plan Review $160.ffi * $8.00 per acre Deadlines every Friday; review occurs 12 days 'later. SCHEDULE #2 (This alternative involves deve'lopment approval prior to annexation.) Metro Plan Amendment o fee charged See this section of SCHEDULE #1 l{i'l l amal ane Comp Pl an Amendment Fee $400.00 See this section of SCHEDULE #1 Zone Change Fee $400.00 Assuming final action on the Metro Plan Amendment occurs by the first of May, a rezoning before the Hearings 0fficial could be held on the 3rd l,lednesday of May, L987. Hearings 0fffcial 5/20/87 (deadline 4/?0/871 Discretionary Use Approval Fee $200.00 + 5169.00 + $8.00 per acre. 0n'ly necessaly if l.lillamalane Comp Plan Amendment has not been adopted by theCity Council. Discretionary Use also requires a site plan (included in the fee). Hearings 0fficial 5/20/87 (deadline 4/?0/871 Schedule #1 could complete all necessary review procedures (except bui'ldingpermits) by early May, 1987, if no appeals are 'filed along the way and iFexpedited review is unchal'lenged (Estimating an appeals factor is an exercise in geometric progression). Schedule #1 would cost 91,200-$1,500.00 in fees. Schedule #? could complete all necessary review procedures (except buildingpermits and annexation) by the end of April if no appeals are filed. Schedule #2(excluding future annexation) would cost $1,000-$1,200.00 in fees. Note: The schedules I have developed here are not oniy "best case" but also assume that any development issues which may affect this site have been resolved.By this I mean key urban services and compliance with our Development Code. Fromour previous discussions I'm sure you are aware that the proposed primary accessto a conrnunity or regional park must come from an arterial or collector street.Until access to this site can be resolved, the land use reviews identified in Schedules 1 and 2 should not be regarded as a comnitment from the City that development of this site as a cor,munity or regional park can occur as current'ly proposed. If you have any your convenience. questions concerning the outlined schedules, please call me at Cordi al 1 y, Gregory S. Mott Development Code Administrator cc:Greg l.Iinterowd, P'lanning & Development Directr Dave Brown, Traffic Technician Cindie Harmon, Development Permit Coordinator Lorne Pleger, Plans Examiner Dennis Shew, Deputy Fire Marshal