The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutApplication APPLICANT 8/31/2021 (3)City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Development Issues Meeting (DIM) SPRINGFIELD W 0#/ Required Project Information (Applicant: complete this section) Prospective Matt Hannigan an Applicant Name: 9 Phone: 541-416-5238 Company: Les Schwab Fax: Address: 20900 Cooley Road Bend, OR 97701 Prospective Suzannah Stanley 971-346-3808 Applicant's Rep.: Phone: Company: Mackenzie I Fax: Address: 1515 SE Water Ave Ste 100 Portland, OR 97214 Property Owner: Same as applicant Phone: Company: Fax: Address: 1702313104200, 1702313104201,1702313104500, 1702313104600, ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 1702313104700,1702313104701,1702313104800,1702313104900 Property Address: 3294 Main Street Size of Property: 157,742 SF 3.62 AC Acres Square Feet Description of If you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Proposal: see attached letter Existing Use: Tire store # of Lots Parcels: 8 Avg. Lot Parcel Size: N/A sf Densit : N/A du/acre Prospective �^ August 26, 2021 Applicant: / V � �� Date: Signature Matt Hannigan Print 811 -21 -000232 -PRE 08/31/2021 Case No.: Date: Reviewed b 646 Application Fee: Technical Fee: 0 Posta a Fee: 0 646 811-21-000235-PROJ TOTAL FEES: $ PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 5/21/13 KL 1 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Process The purpose of a Development Issues Meeting is to give an applicant the opportunity to discuss his/her development proposal with the development review staff of the City. The discussion can be general or specific, depending on the details provided with the application. A Development Issues Meeting provides information to an applicant related to the current development conditions and standards of the City. The Development Issues Meeting is not a land use decision and does not confer any development rights, establish any conditions, or bind the applicant or the City to any course of action. The meeting conveys the status of known development opportunities and constraints. The status may change over time as development conditions or standards change. 1. Applicant Submits a Development Issues Meeting Application • The application must conform to the Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist on page 3 of this application packet. • Development issues meetings are conducted every Thursday. • We strive to conduct the development issues meetings within three to four weeks of receiving the application. • The applicant's proposal is circulated to the relevant staff in preparation for the meeting. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Development Issues Meeting • The applicant and any design team should attend the development issues meeting. • The meeting is scheduled for one hour. • Staff attending the meeting will be prepared to discuss the issues raised in the submittal by the applicant. Other issues raised during the meeting may also be discussed. • The meeting is informal and the City will issue no staff report. Revised 5/21/13 KL 2 of 3 Development Issues Meeting Submittal Requirements Checklist ❑ Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee will pay calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public online Works Department. The applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the time of complete application submittal. x❑ Development Issues Meeting Application Form x❑ Five (5) Questions - list specific questions the applicant would like staff to answer during the meeting. So that each question may be fully evaluated, the list is limited to five questions. ❑ Four (4) Copies of the Proposed Plan - suggested information valuable for staff to b review the proposal is listed below. It is not necessary to include all of these items on y the site or plot plan. However, applicants are encouraged to address as many as possible email given that the level of information that will be derived from the meeting is commensurate with the level of detail provided in the application. Applicants are also encouraged to include additional information on the plan as listed in the Springfield Development Code (SDC) 5.12-120, Land Divisions - Partitions & Subdivisions - Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements or 5.17-120, Site Plan Review Submittal Requirements. Drawn in ink on quality paper no smaller than 11" x 17" Scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, such as 1" = 30', 1" = 50' or 1" = 100' North arrow Date of preparation Street address and assessor's map and tax lot number Dimensions (in feet) and size (either square feet or acres) of the development area Location and size of existing and proposed utilities, including connection points On-site drainage collection system and flow patterns, the size and location of drain lines and catch basins, dry wells, and natural drainageways to be retained Area and dimensions of all property to be conveyed, dedicated, or reserved for common open spaces DIMs Related to Land Divisions N/A ❑ Approximate location, number and dimensions of proposed lots ❑ How streets in the proposal area connect with existing streets DIMs Related to Site Plan Review Proposed and existing buildings: location, dimensions, size (gross floor area), setbacks from property lines, distance between buildings, and height Area and percentage of the site proposed for buildings, structures, driveways, sidewalks, patios and other impervious surfaces Parking and circulation plan Revised 5/21/13 KL 3 of 3 MACKENZIE. August 27, 2021 City of Springfield Attention: Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Re: L5027 Springfield OR Due Diligence - SD Development Issues Meeting Request Project Number 2210232.00 Dear Development & Public Works Les Schwab Tire Center is planning a remodel of their existing store at 3294 Main Street. A Development Issues Meeting for a project at this site was held in 2017 (notes enclosed), though the scope has since been reduced. This letter describes the project and questions from the applicant team. Site Information The site area is approximately 157,742 SF (3.62 AC). The total existing parking and vehicular area is approximately 59,991 SF. The total landscaping and open space area is 46,937 SF. There are currently 77 parking spaces including 3 accessible spaces. The subject site currently contains three buildings totaling approximately 18,740 SF and three canopies totaling approximately 6,060 SF (24,800 SF total). Per the City's definition of "building," the canopy area is already considered building area.' Proposed Alterations The proposed project is a within -the -walls remodel, also infilling most of the existing canopy area. Exterior work will likely be limited to refresh of materials and a potential entry enhancement. The tire wash station will be moved from outside the building to inside. Accessible parking spaces may be moved around near the new entry as required by the building code. No changes are proposed to other parking or paved areas, access points, trash areas, signs, utility connections, or stormwater. We understand improvements will be required to 33rd Street but no right-of-way dedication will be needed. In the 2017 DIM, staff stated that there is a 2004 improvement agreement on the Les Schwab lots which could be modified to limit the scope of the frontage improvements to stop at the northern edge of the building (limits of the work) and no longer cover the full lot frontage. As no building area will be added with the remodel, it is expected that fire sprinklers will not need to be added. A fire alarm is in place and will be updated as required. During construction, Les Schwab will likely use temporary tents and/or trailers for customers and employees to use ' Building. Any structure used or intended for sheltering any use or occupancy. 03.224.9560 • F503.228.1285 • W MCx NZE.COM • RiverEast Center, 1515 SE Water Avenue,#100, Portland, OR 97214 oo.tar-a�o�e.shtetENGINEERING. a o.E Pa nw...auo..uuu ...uM.oEARCHITECTURE M. G5ndOegonV�wangon-Satle w City of Springfield LS 015 Hood River Due Diligence - SO Project Number 2210233.00 August 27, 2021 Page 2 PROCESS We understand if only interior alterations are proposed, no Site Plan Review will be required and zoning compliance review will be completed under the building permit. If the proposal includes an increase in building area with minor parking and site improvements, the review would be completed through a Type II Site Plan Review (SPR) Modification since the site has previously undergone an initial Site Plan Review in 20D4. However, enclosing the canopy should not be considered adding building area. QUESTIONS 1. The site abuts low-density residential zoning to the north. However, the project will be concentrated inside and on the south side of the southernmost building, and will not impact the residential zone. If SPR Modification is required, please confirm this project can be reviewed through a Minor SPR Modification. 2. Will a Drinking Water Protection review be required for this project, with its scope limited to enclosing building area, changing an entry, and remodeling the interior? 3. Will the proposed scope of work require an oil water separator? 4. Wall/building signage is planned to be replaced on at least the main building and alignment building. The mansard portion of the roof is anticipated to be removed on all portions of the building. Prominent locations will have a vertical fascia at a similar proportion to the existing mansard. Will the vertical fascia be considered "wall" for the purposes of sign mounting? Are the signage requirements calculated per building? 5. Please describe any landscape upgrades that may be required as well as the triggers. Will these be required for this limited scope remodel project? Will the 10' landscaped setback be required between the building and 33rd Street even if the remodel does not affect this area? Will maintenance of the existing stormwater facilities on lot 4200 be required even if no increase in impervious area is proposed? Will maintenance of any other previously installed landscaping be required? If so, what is involved? Please contact me at sstanlev(amkcnze.com if you have any questions. Si c rely, Inil/�Suzanny I�`--- Land Use Planner Enclosure(s): Aerial Map Block Plans Alta Survey 2017 DIM Notes c: Matt Hannigan— Les Schwab Tire Centers Julie Bradshaw — Mackenzie M. LES SCHWAB #027 3294 Main Street Springfield, Oregon Legend Subject Site Parcels cu roust �� Nr, nfi Eugene (Springfield AND 0 2010mi.oft OOOrpo t o MACKENZIE. P 306.790.9995 • F 306.709.5565 • W MCKNZE.COM Logen Builtlin9.500 Vnion SL L,9565, 5eeL11e, W 98101 O pu MACKENZIE ALL R10—R-WEo e« o w 6o zzo linch=60 feet N wxhdmnioxn cu roust �� Nr, nfi Eugene (Springfield AND 0 2010mi.oft OOOrpo t o MACKENZIE. P 306.790.9995 • F 306.709.5565 • W MCKNZE.COM Logen Builtlin9.500 Vnion SL L,9565, 5eeL11e, W 98101 O pu MACKENZIE ALL R10—R-WEo i ----- -moi I � . EXISTING DETENTION FACILITY I I, IIt I U Z O I � m JI ,liI I I I BUILDINGS, MACKitiWIi., I C , Les Schwab #027 - Springfield Les Schwab Tires 03/20/21 F �L Parlun Existing: 77 Spaces Proposed: 77 Spaces Existing: 3,583 SF Proposed: 1,925 SF Option A Proposed: 1,905 SF Option B service BaVs: Existing: 5Interior (Building B) 4 E derior (Building A) Proposed: 9Interior (4 Interior at Building A, 5Interior at Building B) LEGEND SHOWROOM ■ BACK OF HOUSE SERVICE BAYS WAREHOUSE ------- PROPERTY LINE - -- OVERHEAD 11 LIFT NOTE: All structural elements in RED' 'Disclaimer: Identified structural elements are based on existing facilities information provided by Owner and non-destructive observations only. Actual structural elements may differ from those depicted. EXISTING SITE PLAN AWO ® L1 EQUIPNENT II 645 SF ❑ - WAREHOUSE V 1389 SF E _J Gr7 EQUIPNENT 485 SF TRAINING 109 SF CUSTOMER_ _J LOUNGE SERVICE 764 SF 11 BAYS 1700 SFL ACCESSIBLE UNISEX WAREHOUSE D 895 SF __U V5W 6 SF SES 1161 SF (/\\\ ch 182 SF BLOCK PLAN - OPTION A 1" - 1fylY' OBJECTIVES MET NOT MET COMPROMISED* Enclose Service Bays X �� SERVICE BAYS Move Entry from Service Bays X Upgrade Exterior Brand X Increase Operational Efficiency Upgrade Showroom / Lounge X Add Service Bay Count X Improve Parking and Site Circulation Address Deferred Maintenance Eliminate Ofr-Site Storage 'IF COMPROMISED, SEE NOTES ON PLAN PROS: • Optimum bay depth, increased baywAdth • Utilizes existing restroom plumbing with revision of door placement and wall location • Replacement of canopy structure allows far optimum doorwidths • Entrance remains in existing location • Largest dedication space to sales and customer lounge • Manager and Trenng receive eDdenor windows CONS: • Not a prototypical layout • Display walls furthest from sales and minimal site lines to the back wall • New bays require relocation of structure and removal of extenor wa l pa,".typical intemet bar .and shape Existing: 77 Spaces Existing: 5 Interior (Building B) Proposed: 77 Spaces 4 Exterior (Building A) Proposed: 9Interior Shoxrcarrr (4 Interior at Building A-Nev, Exalting: 3,583 SF 5 Interim at Building B - ExaEng Proposed: 1,925 SF Condition) LEGEND SHOWROOM ------- PROPERTYLINE ■ BACK OF HOUSE OVERHEAD �� SERVICE BAYS II 1�1 LIFT ■ WAREHOUSE NOTE: All structural elements in RED* *Disclaimer: Identified structural elements are based on existing facilities information provided by Owner and non-destructive observations only. Actual structural elements may differ from those depicted. M AC I< E N Z I E , Les Schwab #027 - Springfield BLOCK PLAN - OPTION A A001Les Schwab Tires 062021 W OBJECTIVES MET NOT MET COMPROMISED* Enclose Service Bays X SERVICE BAYS Move Entry from Service Bays X ■ WAREHOUSE Upgrade Exterior Brand X Increase Operational Efficiency Upgrade Showroom / Lounge X Add Service Bay Count X Improve Parking and Site Circulation Address Deferred Maintenance Eliminate Ofr-Site Storage 'IF COMPROMISED, SEE NOTES ON PLAN PROS: • Optimum bay depth, increased bayvddth • Utilizes existing restroom plumbing with revision of door placement and wall location • Replacement of canopy structure allows far optimum door widths • Entrance remains in existing location • Mlanagerreceivesmdenorvdndows • Allows better space in Warehouse #2 • Display walls in front of Sal es area CONS: • Not a prototypical layout • New bays require relocation of structure and removal of extenorwal • Customer lounge is compact • Reduces floor area for equipment adjacent to service lifts P�arldm: Service Bays: Existing: 77 Spaces Existing: 5 Interior (Building B) Proposed: 77 Spaces 4 Exterior (Building A) Proposed: 9lntenor Shoxroa (4 Interior at Building A-Nev, Existing: 3,583 SF 5 lntenor at Building B - Existing Proposed: 1,905 SF Condition) LEGEND SHOWROOM ------- PROPERTYLINE ■ BACK OF HOUSE OVERHEAD SERVICE BAYS Imo' LIFT ■ WAREHOUSE NOTE: All structural elements in RED* *Disclaimer: Identified structural elements are based on existing facilities information provided by Owner and non-destructive observations only. Actual structural elements may differ from those depicted. M AC I< E N Z I E , Les Schwab #027 - Springfield BLOCK PLAN - OPTION B JI"�VVL Les Schwab Tires OarM21 MACKENZIE. P503.224.9560 • F503.228.1285 • W MCKNZE.COM MEETING NOTES RiverEaat Center, 15155E Water Avenue, #100, Portland, OR 97214 Portland. Oregon • Vancouver. Washington • Seattle, Washington PROJECT NUMBER: 2170218.00 ISSUE DATE: July 19,2017 PROJECT NAME: Les Schwab #027 Springfield RECORDED BY: Suzannah Stanley, Land Use Planner TO: FILE PRESENT: Kyle Greene, Michael Liebler, Liz Miller—City of Springfield Gilbert Gordon — Eugene Springfield Fire Allie Camp — Lane Transit District Cody Smith, Bart McKee, Amy Chinitz — Springfield Utility Board Terry Krause, Greg Mine, Suzannah Stanley — Mackenzie SUBJECT: Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) INFORMATION ITEMS 1. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated the meeting is #17 -00078 -PRE. 2. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) began discussion of the applicants five questions. 3. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated ODOT was invited to the meeting but did not attend and sent a memorandum stating they had no comments. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) is not sure if ODOT understood improvements would be required to 33r° Street. Public Works Public Improvements 4. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated because Main Street is generally fully improved, only improvements on 33rd Street will be required (along Les Schwab's frontage). This will include curb, gutter, sidewalk, and street trees (every 30'). The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) stated if there is a light at the intersection (i.e., if existing street lights meet the spacing standards), no new street lights will be required (updated LED fixtures on the 33rd Street frontage may be required and would cost $250 each). No right-of-way dedication should be required. S. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated review times should be approximately three months and two to three reviews for a project of this size and for an applicant who is not familiar with City of Springfield's process. Each review should be completed in approximately three weeks. The typical public improvement permit process is three to six months, but this project is relatively small and straightforward. 6. Mackenzie (Greg Mine) asked to look at Street View on the computer and how the new sidewalk should be extended from the existing ramp. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene/Michael Liebler) stated ODOT will likely require the ramp to be updated. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) will ask ODOT and the applicant can contact Jeff Prociw, the local office contact, who will issue the miscellaneous permit that will be required. Doug Baumgartner and April Jones provided the 11:\Projects\217021800\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfi id -De lopmenti sues-1707M.doa Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) Les Schwab #027 Springfield Project Number 2170218.00 Page 2 notes, but they are in the Salem office. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) recommended contacting both of them as well as Jeff. 7. Mackenzie (Greg Mino) asked the City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) if frontage improvements would be limited to the northern edge of the buildings (the affected portion of the site) since the changes to the site are concentrated on the south end of the site and are not significant (i.e., a new building or full redevelopment). The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated this was likely the case; however, there is a 2004 Improvement Agreement on the Les Schwab lots for improvements along the entire frontage of 33rd Street. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) stated the 2004 Improvement Agreement for the Les Schwab site will have to be modified to limit the scope of the frontage improvements to the northern edge of the building rather than the full lot frontage. Alternatively, constructing the improvements now would release the property from the improvement agreement. B. Mackenzie (Greg Mino) asked if any improvements past the new gutter line (such as resurfacing) would be required. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated there is always a potential depending on conditions. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) stated two-thirds improvements would not be required, just improvements to the centerline or slightly beyond if required for grading. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated since there are potholes and other issues, improvements may have to be extended farther into the street (though this will likely not be determined until plan review). 9. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) showed "improvement agreements' on any surrounding properties. There are no improvement agreements for any of the lots across 33rd Street. Stormwater 10. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated lot 4200 is a detention facility forthe entire site. Since no increase in impervious area is proposed, no further detention will be required. Maintenance of the facility (and an operations and maintenance plan) will be required. 11. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) presented comments from City of Springfield Environmental Services (Megan Murphy) regarding the health of the plants in the detention facility. 12. All existing or new catch basins tributary to the redevelopment will need to be double chamber catch basins, with filter inserts. No additional stormwater treatment is required. Existing catch basins will also be maintained according to the inspection report received at the meeting. Note: any full pavement replacement that is not tributary to the pond facility may require additional stormwater treatment measures. Lane Transit District 13. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) stated the Main -McVey Transit Study is currently underway, studying locally preferred options for bus, transit, etc. The existing street cross-section has 8d of right-of-way, the maximum required following the study could be up to 96' (8' extra on each side). Since the right-of-way line is currently at the back of the sidewalk and the building is further set back, this likely would not affect the proposal. The maximum dedication would be 8. 14. If Les Schwab would like to provide comments and follow along on progress, they can sign up for email updates on the "Our Main Street" website. As the process moves forward (beyond the locally preferred options phase), specific transit locations will be identified. Mackenzie (Terry H:\Projects\317021800\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfeld-De lopmenti sues-170706.doa Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) Les Schwab 11027 Springfield Project Number 2170218.00 Page 3 Krause) indicated that Les Schwab branding is critical to them and their iconic sign is an important aspect of their brand. If the Main Street project includes dedication of property that causes conflict with existing sign, it needs to be determined if Les Schwab will be allowed to keep the existing sign and only relocate it. The best way to track this is to sign up on the website and stay involved. The Main Street project is a few years out and will not affect this project, but Les Schwab should get involved and voice their concerns early and stay informed. 15. Lane Transit District (Alfie Camp) stated there are no plans to change stations until the plan moves forward. No dedications or changes will be required with this application; however, the City of Springfield (Michael Uebler) recommends showing the potential 8' dedication on the plans. The City has not determined any code changes that may follow the Lane Transit District process (such as minimum setbacks or landscape requirements). Planning Approval Process 16. The City of Springfield Planning Supervisor (Jim Donovan, contact by Liz Miller), who completed the last site plan review application, indicated in that application there were many public comments from neighbors (regarding the Swale, noise, screening, landscaping, and driveways), and it is located near residentially zoned properties. Since this application involves an expansion, the City of Springfield (Jim Donovan) determined it would be beneficial to notify the neighbors (through a Type II) about the application, which will be a major site plan modification. 17. A drinking water protection application may also be required if the action will affect the storage, use, or production of groundwater. For example, if only the seating area was affected, the review type would not be triggered, but if containers of spray or lubricants are moved, it would be triggered. If not required, the applicant must request a drinking water protection exemption. The drinking water protection application process is relatively straightforward in this area. The application must certify fire code requirements are met. If protections are needed, they may be required as conditions. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) Indicated the project will affect the entire operation (other than storage) such as service bays with fluid, batteries, etc. so it appears a drinking water protection application will be required. A. The Springfield Utility Board (Amy Chinitz) stated the key is submitting the application in time before the building permit is needed. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated the application is submitted through planning, generally concurrent with the site plan review application. B. The Springfield Utility Board (Amy Chinitz) stated if hazardous materials will be moved outside, they will need to review this as well as part of the drinking water protection. The Springfield Utility Board (Amy Chinitz) stated they will perform a site visit and observe how the site is used to make recommendations on drinking water protection measures. 18. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated once the pre -submittal meeting application is submitted, the meeting will be scheduled in five to seven days. Once the major site plan modification application is submitted, it is generally reviewed in 35 to 60 days (including a 14 -day comment period once the application is complete), not including a 15 -day appeal period following the decision. The drinking water protection application is generally reviewed in 30 days (concurrent with the major site plan modification application). H:\Projects\21M21 00\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfi id -De lopmenti sues-170706.doa Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) Les Schwab #027 Springfield Project Number 2170218.00 Page 4 19. Following the initial land use application, a final site plan application is required, demonstrating the conditions of approval are met (generally taking approximately one to two weeks). Then the applicant completes a development agreement. Planning can sign off on building permits once the development agreement is submitted. 20. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated there is a strong possibility a land drainage alteration permit (LDAP) will be required. The applicant team should confer with the LDAP reviewers around the time of permit submittal. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated that unlike building permits, the LDAP can be issued prior to close of the land use appeal period. 21. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated the building permit cannot be issued until the public improvement permit (PIP) work is bonded, so the PIP should be submitted first. The public improvements must be complete before the building certificate of occupancy is issued. Additional Requirements —On -Site and in Right -of --Way 22. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated the following upgrades will be required to existing site elements: A. "Maintaining the use' (per 5.17-155 Swale and Catch Basin Maintenance) as explained in City of Springfield Environmental Services' (Megan Murphy) information on the Swale, attached. B. Maintaining previously installed landscaping. C. Potential additional bike parking, if more spaces are needed for the new floor area D. A 10' landscaped setback will be required along 33rd Street. (4.4-105 states setbacks must be planted.) Mackenzie (Greg Mino) asked if a walkway could be added in addition to the landscaping, within the ld setback; the City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated this was acceptable. The City of Springfield (Kyle Greene) stated they were not sure if street trees will be required in the right-of-way through the PIP process. The City of Springfield (Michael Liebler) stated the first street tree would be required at the end of the 25' clear vision triangle, and every 30' (but not within 20' of street lights). Chapter 12 of the EDSPM describes city requirements for frontage improvements. 23. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated it appears some street trees on the west side of Main Street were removed. Those will be required to be replanted and must meet the standards for trees under power lines (appendices of Chapter 6 of engineering code). 24. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) asked if there will be any changes to exterior lighting. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) indicated some may be proposed in the southern parking area and on the new building. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated poles can be no more than 25'(12' if within 50' of a residential zone) and must be shielded down. Signage 25. David Bowlsby, the City of Springfield Building Official, is the sign reviewer and he is on vacation until July 10, 2017 (Liz suggested contacting David directly). 26. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) asked the Springfield Utility Board (Cody Smith) what their setback requirement is for signs from the street. The Springfield Utility Board (Cody Smith) stated OSHA requires ld which is what they enforce. H:\Projects\21M21 00\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfi id -De lopmenti sues-170706.do Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) Les Schwab #027 Springfield Project Number 2170218.00 Page 5 27. The City of Springfield (Michael Uebler) stated, from the Transportation Department's perspective, as long as the pole is not in a hazardous area (such as walkway or lane), the sign could remain. This may not be the case if the bus lane is extended following the transit study. One of City Council's directives on the transit study was to minimize impacts on businesses. Allie said LTD doesn't prefer bus pull-outs because they slow the busses' reentry into traffic. Lane Transit District (Alfie Camp) stated a queue jump may be requested in the future; this gives a bus the right-of- way to enter an intersection before the rest of traffic has the green light to cross through an intersection (e.g., Walnut Street). OTHER Fire 28. Eugene Springfield Fire (Gilbert Gordon) asked if the intent is to add fire sprinklers to Building 1. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) indicated the intent is to build a new separate building adjacent to the existing and to have all functions in the new building except for tire storage. They would be separate buildings with 6" seismic joint with fire rated separation with access (fire rated doors) at the separation. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) indicated the new building would be "M" occupancy and the existing would be S-1. Neither requires fire sprinkler based type VB construction due to their small size (+/- 5,000 SF each). Mackenzie (Terry Krause) indicated the intent is to only sprinkle the existing building if required for tire storage. 29. Eugene Springfield Fire (Gilbert Gordon) confirmed tire storage over 6' high is high -hazard commodities and would be considered high piled combustible storage (per NFPA 13), but the S-1 Occupancy classification under building code is correct (it is an S-1 Occupancy with H5 classification of commodity). Eugene Springfield Fire (Gilbert Gordon) confirmed this space is required to be spdnklered. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) stated the roof of the existing structure cannot support the weight of a wet sprinkler system and asked if it would be acceptable if the racks supporting the tires could be utilized to support the fire sprinklers if engineered to do so with calculations. Eugene Springfield Fire (Gilbert Gordon) stated that was acceptable. 30. Eugene Springfield Fire (Gilbert Gordon) indicated there is an 8" sprinkler line to Building 3 and it could 'T" off of that line to Building 1 since it is unlikely both would be involved in fire at same time, o there is a water service in 33rd Street that could be used if that costs less to tap. Utilities 31. Springfield Utility Board (Bart McKee) indicated there is enough water capacity on the east side. If additional water service is required, it could be provided from 32nd Street. 32. Springfield Utility Board (Bart McKee/Gilbert Gordon) indicated their acceptance of the option to provide fire sprinkler service for the storage portion of the building off of the existing sprinkler service off of Main Street that serves Building 3. Control valve would be required to isolate the services from each other (potentially at -grade valve, as opposed to PIV). 33. Springfield Utility Board (Cody Smith) stated if electrical service will be upgraded, a commercial service request form will be required to start the process. H:\Projects\21M21 00\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfeld-De lopmenti sues-1707M.do Development Issues Meeting Notes (July 6, 2017) Les Schwab 11027 Springfield Project Number 2170218.00 Page 6 Temporary Uses 34. Mackenzie (Terry Krause) asked about temporary equipment, such as tents, which may be needed to continue operation during the remodel (20 weeks). Springfield Utility Board (Gilbert Gordon) stated a tent permit is required for tents over 400 SF (an application is available on the City's website). The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) stated these should be noted in the site plan review application as an initial phase for approval, but the code might consider the tents or trailers a change to the use. The City of Springfield (Liz Miller) will research land use requirements for temporary facilities. Planning will need to know timelines, areas, service locations, etc. Every effort has been made to accurately record this meeting. If any errors or omissions are noted, please provide written response within five days of receipt. Enclosures: ODOT Response IAO943 2004 Improvement Agreement Environmental Services Condition Report -Inspection Results c: Present Matt Hannigan, Rory O'Brien — Les Schwab Mark O'Leary, Jim McClelland — Interface Engineering, Inc. Alison Hoagland, Marty Gleeson — Mackenzie H:\Projects\317021800\6 Final\MM-Les Schwab -0 75pringfeld-De lopmenti sues-170706.do June 23, 2017 ODOT Response Department of Transportation Region 1 Headquarters 123 NW Flanders Street Portland, Oregon 97209 (503) 731.8200 FAX (503) 73 1,8259 ODOT #7804 Project Name: Les Schwab Tires _ Applicant: Man Hannigan Jurisdiction: City of Springfield Jurisdiction Case #: 811 -17 -000048 -PRE Site Address: 3294 Main Street, Springfield, OR 97478 Legal Description: 17S 02W 3131 Tax Lot(s): 04600 State Highway: OR 126B Mileposts: 3.73 The site of this proposed land use action is adjacent to OR126B, McKenzie Highway (Main Street). ODOT has permitting authority for this facility and an interest in ensuring that this proposed land use is compatible with its safe and efficient operation. Please direct the applicant to the District Contact indicated below to determine permit requirements and obtain application information. CO'_ EVICNTS/FINDINGS Tax lot 4600 is currently served by a single access to Main Street which also serves as the northern leg of the signalized intersection at 32"d Street. Based on the reviewed land use notice material, the proposed addition to the existing buildings will not trigger the need for a new ODOT access permit if the existing access to Main Street is to be used solely without any reconstruction. An ODOT Miscellaneous Permit most be obtained for any work that is to be performed in the highway right of way. Please send a copy of the Notice of Decision including conditions of approval to: ODOT Region 2 Planning Development Review 455 Airport Road SE, Bldg. B Salem, Oregon 97301 ODOTR2PI,ANMC,Rla odotstate.or.us Development Review Coordinamr. Douglas Douglas.G.BaumgarmcrLodofstate.or.us Baum¢arnrer.. P.E., P.E. G.rW SaI- IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT INCLUDING NOTICE OF POTENTIAL ASSESSMENT LIEN (In Lieu of Immediate Construction of Public Improvement; Includes Waiver of Right to Remonstrate) IN CONSIDERATION of the covenants herein recited, the City of Springfield, hereinafter referred to as City, and Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc. hereinafter referred to as Applicant(s), do covenant and agree with respect to the real property described below as follows: 1. Applicant(s) warrants and represents to the City of Springfield that it is the owner of the property more particularly described and set forth in Paragraph 7 below and, as owner, has the authority to enter into this Improvement Agreement with the City of Springfield. 2. Applicant(s) desires Development Approval from the City with respect to the following Development Application DRC 2004-00033 3. The development will cause both an immediate and long-term demand on the various public facilities of City and Lane County including the specific public improvements necessitated by the development as set forth in paragraph 6. 4. This Improvement Agreement is an alternative to imposing a condition on Applicant's development approval that the Applicant make immediate construction of any public improvement that the development necessitates. The objective is to promote efficiency, coordination, and spread costs by providing an opportunity for a district wide improvement mechanism where construction occurs in a coordinated project with the participation of adjacent and other properties in the area, instead of requiring immediate improvement in conjunction with each development application. There is no guarantee, however, that such a coordinated project will be possible and the City reserves the right to require construction of the improvements in the future at City discretion. 5. (a) Applicant and City agree that Applicant will pay the cost of the following public facility improvements described in Paragraph 6 in accordance with respective cost assumption policy established by City at the time the City determines to undertake and complete such public improvements. (b) Applicant and City acknowledge and agree that the cost of such improvements and the portion thereof to be paid by Applicant are presently unknown and may be greater than the costs that would be apportioned if the improvements were constructed immediately or by Applicant now or later. (c) Applicant acknowledges that the timing of the construction of such improvements is within the sole and exclusive direction of the City. 6. (a) STREET IMPROVEMENTS along the frontage of 33rd Street to include: ® surface paving; ® storm sewers, ® sanitary sewers; curbs, ® gutters; ® planter strips; ® street trees; ® street lights; ® sidewalks. (b) TRAFFIC SIGNALS at the intersection of N.A. (G) OT^:ER 11,1PPOVE' iE:" S N.A. Division of Chief Deputy Clerk P005-050644 Lane County Deeds and Records $66.00 00711915200500506440080083 07/08/2005 01;51:30 PM RPR-AGRE Cnt-2 Stn -15 CASHIER 06 $5.00 $40.00 $10.00 $11.00 AFTER RECORDING RETURN TO: CITY OF SPRINGFIELD- PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT -225 FIFTH STREET -SPRINGFIELD OR 97477 U]DATA%RzoI E,11t1 ErGON\GpMpOeld Mem Stm rImovv ,,t A6roemenL d- REVISED January r0U5 Applicant acknowledges that the list of marked improvements reflect those that would currently be required under the appropriate City codes and ordinances. Applicant acknowledges that it understands that the improvements made will be those required to bring the street to full urban standards for the then current functional classification of the street as those standards exist at the time the improvements are made and may, therefore, differ from the list of improvements checked herein. 7. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE EXHIBIT "A" ATTACHED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AKA: Les Schwab Tire Center Tax Map & Lot No.: 17023131 04200, 04201, 04500, 04600, 04701, 04800, and 04900 Property Address: 3294 Main Street 8. City agrees that Applicant's execution and performance of the terms of the Agreement will be deemed to be in compliance with City's policy pertaining to improvement requirements, and if Applicant complies in every respect with all other applicable laws of the State of Oregon, Lane County, and City, Applicant shall be entitled to Development Approval, subject to the terms and conditions of approval set forth therein. 9. This agreement is enforceable by the State of Oregon, Lane County or City. 10. APPLICANT AGREES TO SIGN ANY AND ALL WAIVERS, PETITIONS, CONSENTS AND ALL OTHER DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO OBTAIN THE ABOVE LISTED IMPROVEMENTS UNDER ANY IMPROVEMENT ACT OR PROCEEDING OF THE STATE OF OREGON, LANE COUNTY, OR CITY AND TO WAIVE ALL RIGHT TO REMONSTRATE AGAINST SUCH IMPROVEMENTS. Applicant does not waive any right to protest the amount or manner of spreading the assessment thereof, if the same shall appear to the Applicant to bear inequitably or unfair upon said property of Applicant. Applicant's acceptance of the non -remonstrance condition is in consideration for the City's waiver of the requirement for the immediate construction of the public improvements that the development necessitates. This improvement agreement waives the property owner's right to file a written remonstration. It does not waive a property owner's right to comment on the proposed district or any related matters orally or in writing. 11. It is the intention of the parties hereto that the covenants herein contained shall run with the land herein described, and shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, assigns, administrators, and successors of the parties hereto, and shall be construed to be a benefit and a burden upon the property herein described. This Agreement shall be recorded in the Lane County Deed Records. NOTICE TO APPLICANT/PROSPECTIVE PURCHASER If you are the applicant or a prospective purchaser of this property, you are advised to discuss this Agreement with an Attorney of your choice. Execution and recordation of this Agreement will place requirements on the Owner and any subsequent purchaser of the Real Property described in Section 7 and their heirs, successors and assigns. These requirements include but are not limited to the payment for the public improvements described in Section 6. This may result in an assessment lien on the Real Property described in Section 7 and significant costs to the Owner and Purchasers, and their heirs, successors and assigns. An Applicant's signature on this Agreement indicates that the Applicant has thoroughly read this Agreement, understands it, has had the opportunity to consult legal counsel prior to its execution, and understands that execution of the Agreement may result in significant financial obligations imposed upon the Owner of the Real Property. Any prospective Purchaser of the property burdened by this Improvement Agreement should also thoroughly review this Agreement, consult with legal counsel prior to purchasing the property, and understand that this Agreement may result in a significant financial obligation imposed upon any Owner of the Real Property described in Section 7. UIDAT Rea I_Ei,m%0ReGON'smrarem- M,, s,,mmororemem Ag,em-t1,o �ulseo D„a,y zoos P.3ge 20(3 WHEREFORE, the parties have hereunto set their hand this day of March , 2005 _(SEAL cr. executive Vice President (TITLE) (SEAL) (TITLE) STATE OF OREGON l COUNTY OF CROOK f 5S BE IT REMEMBERED that on thisA-/gh day of March ,2005 before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Richard B. Borgman _ whose identity was proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence and who by me duly sworn, did say that he is/are the Sr. Executive Vice President of the within named Corporation and does acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said Corporation, and that the seal affixed to said instrument is the Corporate seal of said Corporation, and that said instrument was signed and sealed in behalf of said Corporation by authority of its Board of Directors IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. oFFICIPL SEfLL Notary Public fo regokr BONNIE M. MCCOV - No PUOUC-0REOON mwnax9.m NO. JULYM ,"l f� MY WMNOS:.!C`N EL�I!iES JULY 10, 2001 �[ li �C C/ My Commiss on Expires CITY OF}/SPRINGFIELD By Dennis P. Ernst -City Surveyor STATE OF OREGON l COUNTY 01`14NE J SS BE IT REMEMBERED that on this. day of IVAeQL— , 200�before me, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County and State, personally appeared the within named Dennis P. Ernst whose identity was proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same freely and voluntarily IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written. OFFN.YALSEAL TURF McTAGGAIR ROTARY PUBIIC•OREGM COMMNiSIGN NO. $76M MY MISSION EXPIRES DECOM481C7 u9DATAReal ES61m,31EG.a,311 oq' g" D,,slmnmmp—mem Aareunenl do Page 1, f 3 a Notary blit for r n My Commission Ex Ires FENSEOTan—, 11119 May 12, 2005 Branch No. 02-035 Exhibit xhi i A LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC (Tax Map 17-02-31-31, Tax Lots 4200, 4201, 4500, 4600, 4701, 4800, 4900 and pin of 4700) SITUATED in the City of Springfield, Lane County, State of Oregon in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 31 in Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian and described as follows: Commencing at the Southwest corner of the Lucinda Comegys Donation Land Claim No. 81, Township 17 South, Range 2 West of the Willamette Meridian, thence South 00' 30' 30" West 1667.7 feet to an. iron pipe on the north margin of the McKenzie Highway (an 80.00 -foot wide right- of-way) ; thence North 89' 44' West 248.7 feet along said margin to an iron pin that marks the southeast comer of the lands that were conveyed to Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc_ in that certain Bargain and Sale Deed that was recorded December 7, 1972 in Reel 615R at Reception No. 31607 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon (aka Tax Lot 4600) as said comer lies at the intersection of the north margin of the McKenzie Highway with the west margin of 33' Street (a 60.00- foot wide right-of-way), which comer is the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING of the lands described herein; THENCE, leaving said TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and along the south line of said lands that were conveyed by Reception No. 31607 and the south line of the lands that were conveyed to Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc. by that certain Warranty Deed that was recorded January 16, 1996 in Reel 2131R at Reception No. 9602742 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon. (aka Tax Lot 4700) as said lines are common with said north margin of the McKenzie Highway the following one numbered course: (1) NORTH 89" 44'00" WEST 243.65 FEET to the southeast corner of the lands that are proposed for conveyance to, or have been conveyed to, the State of Oregon, which lands are described in EXHIBIT "A-1" and graphically shown on EXHIBIT "B" as said exhibits are attached hereto and made a part hereof; which southeast comer hes at the beginning of a tangent curve to the right; THENCE, along the east line of last said lands the following three numbered courses: (2) along said tangent curve to the right having a radius center that bears NORTH 00° 16' 00" E 40.00 FEET, a central angle of 23' 13' 57", a long chord of NORTH 78' 07' 02" WEST 16.11 FEET, an are length of 16.22 FEET to point of compound curvature to the right and (3) along said compound curvature to the right having a radius center that bears NORTH 23'29'57" E 17.00 FEET, a central angle of 32'49'36", a long chord of NORTH 50° 05'15" WEST 9 61 FEET, an arc length of 9.74 FEET to a second point of compound curvature to the right and (4) along said compound curvature to the right having a radius center that bears NORTH 56° 19'33" E 95.00 FEET, a central angle of 12" 03'10", a long chord of NORTH 27' 38' 52" WEST 19.95 FEET, an are length of 19.99 FEET to the southeast comer of the lands that were conveyed to the City of Springfield for road purposes by that certain Bargain and Sale Deed that was recorded February 22, 2005 as Recorder's Number 2005-012390 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon, which lands me described in EXHIBIT "A-2" and graphically shown on LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT `B" as said exhibits are attached hereto and made apart hereof THENCE, along the east, north and west lines of last said lands the following four numbered courses: (5) continuing along the are of last said curvature to the right having a radius center that bears NORTH 68° 22'43" E 95.00 FEET, a central angle of 21'47'01", a long chord of NORTH 10'43'46" WEST 35.90 FEET, an are length of 36.12 FEET to a point of tangent line; (6) along said tangent line, NORTH 00° 09' 44" EAST 37.76 FEET; (7) NORTH 89° 44'00" WEST 60.00 FEET; and (8) SOUTH 00° 09'44" WEST 73.00 FEET to the northwest corner of said lands that are proposed for conveyance, or have been conveyed to, the State of Oregon; THENCE, along the west line of last said lands the following one numbered course: (9) SOUTH 45' 12'52" WEST 38.15 FEET to a point on the line that is common with the south line of said lands that were conveyed by Reception No. 9602742 (aka Tax Lot 4700) and said north margin of the McKenzie Highway; THENCE, along last said south line and margin the following one numbered course: (10) NORTH 89° 44'00" WEST 3.30 FEET to the southwest comer of last said lands; THENCE, along the west line of said lands and the west lines of the lands that were conveyed to Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc. in that certain Warranty Deed that was recorded July 10, 1995 in Reel 2077R at Reception No. 9537504 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon (aka Tax Lots 4800, 4701, 4900, 4200 and 4201) the following one numbered course: (11) NORTH 00° 32'30" EAST 463.90 FEET to the northwest corner of said lands; THENCE, along the northerly lines of last said lands the following three numbered courses: (12) SOUTH 89° 39'01 " EAST 296.23 FEET, (13) SOUTH 00' 31,18" WEST 11200 FEET and (14) SOUTH 89° 34' 17" EAST 76.71 FEET to the east-northeast corner of said lands as said comer lies on the aforesaid west margin of 33" Street; and THENCE, along last said margin and the east lines of said lands that were conveyed by Reception No. 9537504 (aka Tax Lots 4800, 4701, 4900, 4200 and 4201), the east line of the lands that were conveyed to Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc. in that certain Warranty Deed that was recorded February 14, 1973 in Reel 625R at Reception No. 736653 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon (aka Tax Lot 4500) and the east line of said lands that were conveyed by Reception No. 31607 in the Official Records of Lane County, State of Oregon (aka Tax Lot 4500) the following one numbered course: (15) SOUTH 00° 30' 30" WEST 351.23 FEET RETURNING to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 157,519 Square Feet (3.62 Acres) more or less. Bearings and distances shown hereon were taken from record data and dat shown on the Survey Map by Daniel W. Baker that was filed August 26, 1996 as County Survey File No. 33732 in the Office of the County Survey of Lane County, State of Oregon. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC Page 2 of 5 EXHIBIT "A -111 Tax Map & Lot number 17-02-31-31-04700 (on the date of execution) REAL PROPERTY DONATION IN FEE TO THE STATE OF OREGON BEING a portion of that land described in that certain Statutory Warranty Deed to Les Schwab Tire Centers sof Oregon, Inc. recorded January 16, 1996 at Reception No. 9602742, Reel 2131 R in Lane County Oregon Official Records, located in Section 31, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian, City of.Springfield, County of Lane, State of Oregon more particularly described as follows. BEGINNING at the Southeast comer of said land which is also a point on the North Right of Way line of McKenzie Highway (also known as Main Street), said point also being 40.00 feet Northerly of the centerline thereof measured at right angles thereto; thence along the South -line of said land and the North Right of Way line of said McKenzie Highway North 89"44'00" West, 126.25 feet; thence leaving said line North 45°1252" East, 38.15 feet to a point of intersection with a linethat is 27.00 feet North of, when measured at right. angles to, and parallel with the aforementioned South line of said land, said line is also the South line of the Right of Way dedication the City of Springfield being recorded simultaneously by separate document; thence along said line South 89°44'00" East, 66.78 feet to the a point of intersection with a non -tangent curve to the left having a radius of 95.00 feet; thence leaving said line Southeasterly along the am of said curve 19.98 feet through a central angle of 12°03'10", (chord bears South 27'38'52" East, 19.95 feet), to a point of tangent compound curvature to the left having a radius of 17.00 feet, thence along the arc of said curve 9.74 feet, through a central angle of 32"49'36", (chord bears South 50°05'15" East, 9.61 feet), to a point of tangent compound curvature to the left having a radius of 40.00 feet; thence along the arc of said curve 16.22 feet, through a central angle of 23°13'57", (chord bears South 78°07'02" East, 16.11 feet), to the point of beginning. CONTAINING an area of 2389 square feet more or less. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description is the South line of said land as described in said deed, Le. North 89"44'00" West. LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC Page 3 of 5 EXHIBIT "A -2" Tax Map & Lot number 17-02-31-31-04700 (on the date of execution) RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION TO THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES BEING a portion of that land described in that certain Statutory Warranty Deed to Les Schwab Tire Centers of Oregon, Inc. recorded January 16, 1996 at Reception No. 9602742, Reel 2131 R in Lane County Oregon Official Records, located in Section 31, Township 17 South, Range 2 West, Willamette Meridian,�City of Springfield, County of Lane, State of Oregon more particularly described as follows. COMMENCING at the Southeast comer of said land which is a point on the North Right of Way line of McKenzie Highway (also known as Main Street), said point also being 40.00 feet Northerly of the centerline thereof measured at right angles thereto and also being the beginning of a tangent curve to the right having a radius of 40.00 feet; thence, from a tangent bearing of North 89'44'00" West, Northwesterly along the arc of said curve, which is also the Easterly line of the proposed Right of Way dedication to the State of Oregon being recorded simultaneously by separate document, 16.22 feet, through a central angle of 23°13'57" (chord bears North 78"OT02" West, 16.11 feet) to a point of tangent compound curvature to the right having a radius of 17.00 feet; thence - Northwestedy along the arc of said curve 9.74 feet, through a central angle of 32°49'36" (chord bears North 50°05'15" West, 9.61 feet) to a point of tangent compound curvature to the right having a radius of 95.00 feet; thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve 19.98 feet, through a central angle of 12°03'10" (chord bears North 27"38'52" West, 19.95 feet) to a point of intersection with a line that is 27.00 feet North of, when measured at right angles to, and parallel with -the South line of said land, said line also being the North line of the proposed Right of Way dedication to the State of Oregon :being recorded simultaneously by separate document, said point also being the POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said line North 89"44'00" West, 66.78 feet;. thence leaving"said line North 00°09'44" East, 73.00 feet; thence South 89"44'00" East, 60.00 feet; thence South 00°0944" West, 37.76 feet; to the beginning of a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 95.00 feet; thence Southeasterly along the arc of said curve 36.12 feet, through a central angle of 21°47'01" (chord bears South 10°4346" East, 35.90 feet) to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING an area of 4459 square feet more or less. THE BASIS OF BEARINGS for this legal description is the South line of said land as described in said deed, I.e. North 89'44'00" West. _ LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAS TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC Page 4 of 5 EXHIBIT "B" Z y} 'W F+ NF K 3iJ$ INi ~� bwo (1)z h .n O 1�0 - LJ n LLI o U) d-iw Elf obi Zi W W n~ [] z Yr2N K W F-- c m p� M F z� -07a--}I-1-� .. Zvi lsz Q W <. �W1/ ^ N W W z Z F V, U O N O(� J �-+ O SO'9fZ 3,Of,Zf.Oar Ld �z Sox Q Ld W mW O Icif L mi ¢� _ m11N F czZ2 mo F t; i � . �/ 1�� IilNW¢J SCD Of LL. LL J1� O ; y ti W W F JF� J QQ 1 S j -. ma n o rc am}mz '¢IZZi Vo V~I3�yaRF (�vW OZ mN WZWZ6U ¢6 1-�m RJ NNNNNN og000 x win i�5 yNjV ww� 0000�o zn ZzQV Q OQN N pW� N L'j RHOz 11 w \ dz sz 'viaom - LEGAL DESCRIPTION LANDS OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF OREGON, INC Page 5 of 5 Condition Report/Inspection Results Name: Les Schwab Inspected: 8/13/2015 Address: 3294 Main Street Tax Lots: 17-02-31-31-04200,-04500,-04600, 04700,-04701,_0480_0 Condition: Overall the pond is in fair condition. There is quite a bit of sediment that has accumulated around the 12" inlet, about a 10 square -foot area. Sediment is also in the outlet basin, about 7" in the lower basin and about 1" in the upper basin. Invasive blackberry, bird's foot trefoil, and tansy ragwort are in the facility. Recommended Maintenance • Hand -remove sediment from around the 12" inlet with minimum damage to vegetation using proper erosion control measures. It is easier to remove small amounts of sediment. • Remove blackberry, tansy ragwort, and bird's toot trefoil using manual methods (do not use herbicides). • Remove sediment from the lower catch basin outlet and dispose of properly. Outlet I Blackberry Condition Report/Inspection Results Catch Basins Rating: Poorto Gooci Condition: Catch Basin 1: no sediment (Good) Catch Basin 2: 9" sediment in first chamber of basin, sediment around basin, rusty water (Poor) Catch Basin 3: 9-10" of sediment in first chamber, sediment around basin, rusty water (Poor) Catch Basin 4: 2" sediment, some garbage (Fair) Required Maintenance: • Remove sediment from the chambers of basins 2 and 3 and dispose of properly. • Remove sediment from around these basins. Recommended Maintenance: • Continue routine maintenance for basins 1 and