Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/28/2021a4A A STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97V7 15411302-9830 W W WAFROPLANNING.COM MEMORANDUM Date: 07/28/2021 To: City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 From: Jed Tmett, AICP, Principal Metro Planting, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel 541-302-9830 e-mail: icd@metmnlarmine.com RE: Chad Wilson Tentative Plan Partition This memo accompanies the Tentative Partition Plat Application for Grand. The following attachments arc included with dais memo: • Application Fee • Land Division Tentative Application Form • Written Statement • Current Deed • Preliminary Title Report • Land Division Plan, reduced to 8-1/2x11 • Stormwater Report from Eric Favreau o Infiltration Test o Infiltration Rain Garden Detail Driveway o Soakage Trench Detail o Soakage Tmnch Sizing o SIM FORM Driveway WQ • Three (3) Existing Plan • Three (3) Proposed Plan Please do not hesitate in contact me in am office at 541-302-9830 or by email at iednmetooplanningeom with any funder questions or concerns. Rgds. Jed Tmett, AICP Principal City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision 9PnINGF1� Application Type (Applicant., check one) Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ® Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: LJPartition Tentative Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal: ❑ Required(Applicant., complete this section) Applicant Name: Chad Wilson Phone: Company: an Fax: Address: PO Box 5143. Eugene, OR 97405 Applicant's Rep.: Curtis Thomas Phone:541-302-9930 Company: Metro Planning, Inc. Fax: Address: 946 A St. Springfield, OR. 97477 Property Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-42 TAX LOT NOS : 00300 & 00700 Property Address: 5524 B Street. Springfield, OR. 97479 Size of Property: 17,943 Acres Square Feet Proposed Name of Subdivision: Description of If you are filing in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application. Pro oral• A three lot partition. Existin Use: Single-family home. # Of Lots/Parcels: 3 Total acreage of parcels/ 3 allowable density: proposed n N/A Dwell units Signatures: Please si n and orint your name and date in the goorooriate box on the next 120C.Q.1 Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section) Associated Applications: Signs: Pre -Sub Case No.: l -at _00DIoZ" Date: Reviewed by: c Case No.: b 11 - D -l- Di qq I Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: 6033 Technical Fee: s.301. 6 Posta a Fee: S TOTAL FEES:$ �SZ�• PROJECT NUMBER: SI12(-1 -pMS Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, requests and requirements conveyed to my representative. Date: Signature C'ra I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed an this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting. I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted, This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 227.178 pertaining W a complete application. 6_tAe,. i2 - tj t Date: L k_ Signature i Chad Wilson Print Revised 1/7/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. • The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. • If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. �] Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ❑X Land Division Tentative Application Form ® Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ® Copy of the Deed ® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ® Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 8'/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. QA Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. ®A Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed StormwaterScoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. TA Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ® All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions ® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer Revised 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 KI Vicinity Map ® The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. ®,rhe name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ®,fhe 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision N,Vhe Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department YPhysical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings UJ,toil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan ® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor EXity boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division ® Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division ® Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale ❑X Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination ® Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. ® Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities ® Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways [TAocation of existing and proposed transit facilities NRocation and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails Location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1p/14 kl 5 of 10 N1 Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points E(fFhe locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated Q'Future Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan ® Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: [NSA Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement QA Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 EVA Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW NA A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present [TA Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district MA If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 SIA A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property 9A Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ®A Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 ®A Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ®A An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer NO'A All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 Lnxr nr PIdARIw aRr cmw¢mm srnvlcu 846 A STREET SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477 (5411302-9830 TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR CHAD WILSON Submittal No. Document Date: Applicant's Request: Property Owner/ Applicant: Surveyor: Project Planner: Location: Subject Property: Property Size: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: Number of Parcels Proposed: Size Proposed Parcel 1: Size Proposed Parcel 2: Size Proposed Parcel 3: 1 07/28/2021 Request forapproval for Tentative Partition Application to create a 3 Lot Partition Chad Wilson and Katie Lewis PO Box 5143 Eugene, OR 97405 Ryan Erickson EGR & Associates 2535 B Prairie Rd. Eugene, OR 97402 Metro Planning, Inc. c/o led Truett, AICP 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 5524 B St. Springfield, OR 97478 Assessor's Map 17-02-33-42 Tax Lot 00300 & 00700 .41 acres (17,952 sq ft) R-1 (Low Density Residential) Low Density Residential (per Metro Plan) 3 4501 Sq Ft 5814 Sq Ft (including pole) 7637 Sq Ft (including pole) Written Statement—Tentative Partition Background The applicant owns two adjacent parcels: Tax Lot 17-02-33-42-00700 and Tax Lot 17-02-33-42-00300. The applicant is proposing to partition these two parcels into three lots. Currently, there is a single-family home on the property. No development is proposed with this application except for the platting of two lots into three. Density: The partition as proposed will have a density of 7.3 dwelling units per acre. This written statement addresses SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan – General, SDC 5.12- 120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria, and demonstrates how this Tentative Partition Plan application meets all of the SDC requirements and criteria. SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards: A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this Code. When lots/parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district the Director shall require that these lotsrparcels be arranged. 1. To allow re -division; and 2. To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels. 3. Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lot/parcel is not impaired. In order to make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 5.12-120E. Response: The subject property is in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), on an East- West street. Parcel 1 conforms to the Minimum Area and Minimum Street Frontage requirements for a Standard Lot/Parcel in a Spfld LDR zone on an East-West street, which requires (at minimum) 45 ft of street frontage and 4,500 sq ft of area. As proposed, Parcel 1 has 59 ft of street frontage, and 4,501 sq ft in area, so meeting the above stated requirements. Parcels 2 & 3 conform to the Minimum Area and Minimum Street Frontage requirements for Multiple Panhandle Lots/Parcels in a Spfld LDR zone, which require (at minimum) 26 ft street frontage (or an equivalent easement) and 4,500 sq ft of area. As proposed, Parcels 2 & 3 share 26 ft panhandle of street frontage, as required. Parcel 2 has an area of 5,814 sq ft and Parcel 3 has an area of 7,637 sq ft, and so meet the minimum area requirements. All three proposed parcels meet the standards as specified in SDC 3.2-215 and are detailed in this Written Statement in Section 5.13-130. No Lots/Parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted. This standard has been met. B. Double frontage lotsrparcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations. Response: The proposed tentative partition will not result in the creation of double frontage parcels. this standard does not apply. C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections 3.2-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lotsrparceis shall occur prior to recording the Plat. Response: All three lots will have a driveway access via a shared driveway, although Parcel 1 may opt for a separate drive directly off B St. Parcels 2 & 3 are panhandle lots and will have a shared access easement of 26' wide, or 13' each. As a condition of approval for this Tentative Partition, construction of necessary utilities will occur prior to recording the Plat. D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-115. Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The proposed tentative partition utilizes an existing street network. SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are being fulfilled. D(CEPTION. In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. General Requirements. 1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 16" x 24". The services of and Oregon registered Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, a licensed Oregon Land Surveyor as required. 2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally I" = 50; 1" = 100; or I" _ 200'. Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 20', which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the amount of data needing to be shown. 3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. Response: A north arrow and date are included on the Tentative Partition Plan drawing that is included with this application. 4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan. Response: This information is shown on the face of the Tentative Partition Plat. 5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or sub -divider of which the proposed land division is a part. Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the partitioner. See attached Partition Plat Drawing. 6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad right-of-way are adjacent to the subject property. 7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), and designated L (low density residential) in the Metro Plan. 8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are clearly labeled on the attached Tentative Partition Plan drawing. 9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. Response: There are no existing structures on the site. 10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points. Response: The existing sanitary sewer line, stormwater facilities, and water mains are all shown and labeled on the attached plan. The public sanitary and storm sewer systems as well as water and electricity are located within the B Street right-of-way. Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell located on each parcel (as required by the City of Springfield Stormwater Scoping Sheet). A treatment swale is provided to pre -treat the runoff from the shared driveway prior to exiting the site. See all stormwater details on the attached Tentative Partition Plan Drawing. 11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing or proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division, the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. Response: All existing and proposed easements are shown on the attached Tentative Partition Plan. 12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated. Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use; thus this requirement is not applicable. B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. Response: The enclosed Tentative Partition Plan prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor identifies all physical features of the subject property as required. 1. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQW) Map on file in the Development Services Department; Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property; thus this requirement is not applicable. 2. The 100year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated on FIRM Map Number 41039C1 166F dated 09/27/1985, thus this requirement is not applicable. 3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Service Department; Response: The subject property falls within the 20 -year time of travel zone for wellhead protection. 4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the (WLQW) Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within the boundaries of the subject property. 5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County,- and The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Coburg - Urban land complex (32), with a depth to water table of about 18-30 inches. 6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117. Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property, thus this requirement is not applicable. C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at 1 foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or more, contours may be shown at 5 foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: 1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations,- 2. ocations;2. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns; 3. The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures, and natural drainage -ways to be retained, 4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours, and 5. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations and documentation as required in Section 4.3-110 shall be submitted supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs Standards and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes. Response: Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell located underneath the proposed shared driveway. Runoff from the driveway will be pre-treated in a swale and all runoff will drain to the roadside ditch at pre -development rates. There will be three private soakage trenches sized to accommodate runoff from each home plus 1/3 of the driveway surface. D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this Code. 1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and names of all existing streets, alleys, or other fights -of -way within or adjacent to the proposed land division, Response: The subject site has 85 ft of frontage on B Street. B Street does not have a curb, gutter or sidewalk and is made of gravel. There is a ditch adjacent to the property in the B Street right-of-way that will serve as the destination for stormwater exiting the site. An irrevocable petition for future improvements can be signed by the applicant. 2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of curves and grades. The relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, including the TransPlan, any approved Conceptual Development Plan and the latest version of the Conceptual Local Street Map, Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject site; thus this requirement is not applicable. 3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip; Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways. The applicant can sign an irrevocable petition to improve the sidewalk, curb, gutter, street trees, paving, etc. 4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable; Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is approximately 90 feet West of the Southwest corner of the subject property on the North right of way of B Street. There are power poles on the North side of B street. There are no other public facilities such as traffic control devices, transformers, or neighborhood mailbox units located adjacent or within the development site. 5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable, Response: The driveway to serve future development will take place in the panhandles of the property. The panhandle driveway will be shared and will be installed at the time of site development. All panhandle driveway standards will be met per SDC 3.2-220. 6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination, Response: As illustrated on the Tentative Partition Plan, there is an existing streetlight on the SW corner of B and 55th Street. No additional streetlights are proposed. 7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities, Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest transit facility is located near the intersection of Main Street and 54th Street and served by Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 11. 8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOTJ facifity, and Response: B Street is a city street and not ODOT facility, thus, this requirement is not applicable. 9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specified in Section 4.2-105A.4. Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each of the three parcels proposed generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips necessary for a traffic impact study to be required. E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that 1. Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot parcel dimensions and sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential district, and shall include a plot plan showing building footprints for compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in Section 3.2-205, 2. Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the proposed development based upon compliance with the Springfield Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans. Plan Distncts, Master Plans, or the Code; 3. Accommodates other required public improvements, including but not limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity; 4. Addresses physical features, including but not limited to, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands, rock outcroppings and historic features, and 5. Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing. Response: No phasing plan is being proposed. F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: 1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property,- Response: roperty; Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the existing use of the subject property. 2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner. 3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, dnveways, pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division, Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet. 4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district; Response: Not applicable. 5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable; Response: The proposed parcels are for low density residential use, and so no Discretionary Use is requested. 6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100; Response: There are no trees on the property. 7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in Section 5.1-21208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County, Response: The site is flat and there are not high water tables. 8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer, Response: The subject property is located within the city limits, thus no annexation application is necessary. 9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property; Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject site, thus this requirement is not applicable. 10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently, Response: No federal or state permits are required with this partition application, thus this requirement is not applicable. 11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing; Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application. 12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate, Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed, thus this requirement is not applicable. 13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2230, Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision. 14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-125. Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park. 5.13-130 The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response Parcel 1 is on an East-West street in a LDR zone and meets the requirements of a minimum of 4,500 ft of area and 45 ft of street frontage. Parcels 2 and 3 both meet the minimum area of 4,500 sq ft each, and street frontage of 26 ft total (13' each), for development requirements for Multiple Panhandle lots in a Low -Density Residential zone. Below are specific details of each lot, demonstrating that each conforms to the respective required sizes and dimensions, and are included on the Tentative Partition Plan. Lot Area: The proposed Parcel 1 is 4,501 sq. ft. and so meets the standard. The proposed Parcel 2 is 5,814 sq ft, and proposed Parcel 3 (LDR Panhandle Lot) minimum is 4,500 sq ft is 7,637 sq ft. and so meet this standard. Lot Frontage: Proposed Parcel 1 has 59 ft of street frontage, and so meets this requirement. Proposed Parcels 2 & 3 have 13 ft each of street frontage, for a total of 26 ft of street frontage, so this requirement is met. B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated as Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed development is approximately 7 units per acre. C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity, sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: A public sanitary mainline and water mainline are located within the B Street rights-of-way. Dwellings on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 will be served by a future line/lateral that will connect to the existing line. Stormwater drainage will be managed by three private soakage trenches sized to accommodate runoff from each home plus 1/3 of the driveway surface. D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable regulations. Response: All the existing public and private facilities meet the design and construction standards of the SDC. There are no public improvements proposed with this partition application. In addition, the future private utilities will be constructed according to all applicable SDC and other regulations. This approval criterion will be satisfied. E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated riparian areas, other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117,' rock outcroppings; open spaces, and areas of historic and/or archaeological significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760, 358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in State or Federal law. Response: The subject property does not have steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding, clusters of trees, watercourses and riparian areas, open spaces, historical significance, etc. This criterion is not applicable. F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas, transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access management standards for State highways. Response: The proposal is for single family dwellings. Parking will be provided on each lot. G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can be accomplished as specified in this Code. Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition. H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its development as specified in this Code. Response: All adjacent land is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable. 1. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted, the standards specified below shall also apply. Response: Not applicable. The proposed development is within the city limits; therefore, this criterion does not apply. J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply: Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this criterion does not apply. ----5 / Ty--- ;-. \\;\ 2 f i 2{} /®a - .��,�� §\ t 2