HomeMy WebLinkAboutPacket, DRC PLANNER 7/28/2021AGENDA
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
COMMITTEE
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
225 FIFTH STREET
Conference Room 616/ MS Teams
StaffReview.' Tuesday, August24,2021 9;00-10;00a,m,
1. Partition Tentative 811-21-000199-TYP2 811-21-000104-PROJ Chad Wilson
Assessors Map: 17-02-33-42 TL: 300 & 700
Address: 5524 B Street
Existing Use: residential
Applicant submitted plans for a 3 -lot partition
Planner: Drew Larson
Meeting: Tuesday, August 24, 2021 9:00 — 10:00 virtual meeting via Microsoft Teams
The Complete DRC Packet for this meeting is available online for you to review or print out
from the laserfiche website: httD://www.sorinafield-or.00v/weblinkB/browse.asox
VICINITY MAP
811-21-000199-TYP2 Partition Tentative
17-02-33-42 TL 300 & 700
5524 B Street
Chad Wilson
City of Springfield
Development & Public Works
225 Fifth Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Land Division Tentative Plan
Partition, Subdivision
9PnINGF1�
Application Type (Applicant., check one)
Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ® Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: LJPartition
Tentative Submittal: ❑ Subdivision Tentative Submittal: ❑
Required(Applicant., complete this section)
Applicant Name: Chad Wilson Phone:
Company: an Fax:
Address: PO Box 5143. Eugene, OR 97405
Applicant's Rep.: Curtis Thomas
Phone:541-302-9930
Company: Metro Planning, Inc.
Fax:
Address: 946 A St. Springfield, OR. 97477
Property Owner:
Phone:
Company:
Fax:
Address:
ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-33-42
TAX LOT NOS : 00300 & 00700
Property Address: 5524 B Street. Springfield, OR. 97479
Size of Property: 17,943 Acres Square Feet
Proposed Name of Subdivision:
Description of If you are filing in this form by hand, please attach your proposal description to this application.
Pro oral• A three lot partition.
Existin Use: Single-family home.
# Of Lots/Parcels: 3
Total acreage of parcels/ 3
allowable density:
proposed n N/A
Dwell units
Signatures: Please si n and orint your name and date in the goorooriate box on the next 120C.Q.1
Required Project Information (City Intake Staff., complete this section)
Associated Applications: Signs:
Pre -Sub Case No.: l -at _00DIoZ"
Date: Reviewed by:
c
Case No.: b 11 - D -l- Di qq
I Date: Reviewed by:
Application Fee: 6033
Technical Fee: s.301. 6 Posta a Fee: S
TOTAL FEES:$ �SZ�•
PROJECT NUMBER: SI12(-1 -pMS
Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10
Lnxr nr PIdARIw aRr cmw¢mm srnvlcu
846 A STREET
SPRINGFIELD, OREGON 97477
(5411302-9830
TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR
CHAD WILSON
Submittal No.
Document Date:
Applicant's Request:
Property Owner/ Applicant:
Surveyor:
Project Planner:
Location:
Subject Property:
Property Size:
Zoning:
Comprehensive Plan:
Number of Parcels Proposed:
Size Proposed Parcel 1:
Size Proposed Parcel 2:
Size Proposed Parcel 3:
1
07/28/2021
Request forapproval for Tentative Partition
Application to create a 3 Lot Partition
Chad Wilson and Katie Lewis
PO Box 5143
Eugene, OR 97405
Ryan Erickson
EGR & Associates
2535 B Prairie Rd.
Eugene, OR 97402
Metro Planning, Inc.
c/o led Truett, AICP
846 A Street
Springfield, OR 97477
Tel (541) 302-9830
5524 B St.
Springfield, OR 97478
Assessor's Map 17-02-33-42
Tax Lot 00300 & 00700
.41 acres (17,952 sq ft)
R-1 (Low Density Residential)
Low Density Residential (per Metro Plan)
3
4501 Sq Ft
5814 Sq Ft (including pole)
7637 Sq Ft (including pole)
Written Statement—Tentative Partition
Background
The applicant owns two adjacent parcels: Tax Lot 17-02-33-42-00700 and Tax Lot
17-02-33-42-00300. The applicant is proposing to partition these two parcels into three
lots. Currently, there is a single-family home on the property. No development is
proposed with this application except for the platting of two lots into three.
Density:
The partition as proposed will have a density of 7.3 dwelling units per acre.
This written statement addresses SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan – General, SDC 5.12-
120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria,
and demonstrates how this Tentative Partition Plan application meets all of the SDC
requirements and criteria.
SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General
Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards:
A. The lot/parcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this
Code. When lots/parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted by
the zoning district the Director shall require that these lotsrparcels be arranged.
1. To allow re -division; and
2. To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels.
3. Placement of structures on the larger lots/parcels shall be subject to
approval by the Director upon a determination that the potential maximum
density of the larger lot/parcel is not impaired. In order to make this
determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as
specified in Section 5.12-120E.
Response:
The subject property is in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), on an East-
West street.
Parcel 1 conforms to the Minimum Area and Minimum Street Frontage requirements for
a Standard Lot/Parcel in a Spfld LDR zone on an East-West street, which requires (at
minimum) 45 ft of street frontage and 4,500 sq ft of area.
As proposed, Parcel 1 has 59 ft of street frontage, and 4,501 sq ft in area, so meeting
the above stated requirements.
Parcels 2 & 3 conform to the Minimum Area and Minimum Street Frontage requirements
for Multiple Panhandle Lots/Parcels in a Spfld LDR zone, which require (at minimum) 26
ft street frontage (or an equivalent easement) and 4,500 sq ft of area.
As proposed, Parcels 2 & 3 share 26 ft panhandle of street frontage, as required. Parcel
2 has an area of 5,814 sq ft and Parcel 3 has an area of 7,637 sq ft, and so meet the
minimum area requirements.
All three proposed parcels meet the standards as specified in SDC 3.2-215 and are
detailed in this Written Statement in Section 5.13-130.
No Lots/Parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted.
This standard has been met.
B. Double frontage lotsrparcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent
access to residential development from collector and arterial streets or to
overcome specific topographic situations.
Response: The proposed tentative partition will not result in the creation of double
frontage parcels. this standard does not apply.
C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections
3.2-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of multiple panhandles in Subdivisions,
construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lotsrparceis
shall occur prior to recording the Plat.
Response: All three lots will have a driveway access via a shared driveway, although
Parcel 1 may opt for a separate drive directly off B St. Parcels 2 & 3 are panhandle lots
and will have a shared access easement of 26' wide, or 13' each. As a condition of
approval for this Tentative Partition, construction of necessary utilities will occur prior to
recording the Plat.
D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-115.
Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply.
The proposed tentative partition utilizes an existing street network.
SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements
A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that
the provisions of this Code are being fulfilled. D(CEPTION. In the case of Partition
applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during
the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be
addressed as part of a future development application.
A. General Requirements.
1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan,
shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor on standard
sheets of 16" x 24". The services of and Oregon registered Engineer may
also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially
stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and
site constraint and/or water quality issues.
Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson, a licensed
Oregon Land Surveyor as required.
2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved
and the amount of detail and data, normally I" = 50; 1" = 100; or I" _
200'.
Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 20', which is appropriate to the size of
the development site and the amount of data needing to be shown.
3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared.
Response: A north arrow and date are included on the Tentative Partition Plan drawing
that is included with this application.
4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the
Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan.
Response: This information is shown on the face of the Tentative Partition Plat.
5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner
or sub -divider of which the proposed land division is a part.
Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the
area owned by the partitioner. See attached Partition Plat Drawing.
6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special
service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way, which cross or abut the
proposed land division.
Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad right-of-way are adjacent to the subject
property.
7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the
proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of
the subject property.
Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), and
designated L (low density residential) in the Metro Plan.
8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of
each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site,
where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale.
Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are clearly labeled on the
attached Tentative Partition Plan drawing.
9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures
to remain on the property after platting and their required setbacks from
the proposed new property lines.
Response: There are no existing structures on the site.
10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary
easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including but not
limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water
mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed
connection points.
Response: The existing sanitary sewer line, stormwater facilities, and water mains are
all shown and labeled on the attached plan. The public sanitary and storm sewer
systems as well as water and electricity are located within the B Street right-of-way.
Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an individual drywell
located on each parcel (as required by the City of Springfield Stormwater Scoping
Sheet). A treatment swale is provided to pre -treat the runoff from the shared driveway
prior to exiting the site. See all stormwater details on the attached Tentative Partition
Plan Drawing.
11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing or proposed
easements on and abutting the proposed land division, the location of any
existing or proposed reserve strips.
Response: All existing and proposed easements are shown on the attached Tentative
Partition Plan.
12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use,
with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly
indicated.
Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use; thus this
requirement is not applicable.
B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment
shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and
drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that
precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed
modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may
waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed
development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water
quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent
properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A
Site Assessment shall contain the following information.
Response: The enclosed Tentative Partition Plan prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS, an
Oregon licensed land surveyor identifies all physical features of the subject property as
required.
1. The name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all
watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses
(WLQW) Map on file in the Development Services Department;
Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited
Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property; thus this requirement is not
applicable.
2. The 100year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as
specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA
approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision;
Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and
floodway boundaries as indicated on FIRM Map Number 41039C1 166F dated
09/27/1985, thus this requirement is not applicable.
3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specified in Section 3.3-200 and
delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the
Development Service Department;
Response: The subject property falls within the 20 -year time of travel zone for wellhead
protection.
4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees
and shrubs, watercourses shown on the (WLQW) Map and their riparian
areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings;
Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas,
wetlands, or rock outcroppings within the boundaries of the subject property.
5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the
Soils Survey of Lane County,- and
The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil
type covering the subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Coburg -
Urban land complex (32), with a depth to water table of about 18-30 inches.
6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117.
Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject
property, thus this requirement is not applicable.
C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at
1 foot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the
information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or
more, contours may be shown at 5 foot intervals. This plan shall show the
stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt
by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed Civil
Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater
management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be
required. The plan shall include the following components:
1. Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations,-
2.
ocations;2. Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns;
3. The size and location of stormwater management systems components,
including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or
detention ponds; stormwater quality measures, and natural drainage -ways
to be retained,
4. Existing and proposed site elevations, grades and contours, and
5. A stormwater management system plan with supporting calculations
and documentation as required in Section 4.3-110 shall be submitted
supporting the proposed system. The plan, calculations and
documentation shall be consistent with the Engineering Designs
Standards and Procedures Manual to allow staff to determine if the
proposed stormwater management system will accomplish its purposes.
Response: Stormwater drainage from each proposed parcel will be piped to an
individual drywell located underneath the proposed shared driveway. Runoff from the
driveway will be pre-treated in a swale and all runoff will drain to the roadside ditch at
pre -development rates. There will be three private soakage trenches sized to
accommodate runoff from each home plus 1/3 of the driveway surface.
D. A Response to Transportation issues complying with the provisions of this
Code.
1. The locations, condition, e.g., fully improved with curb, gutter and
sidewalk, AC mat, or gravel, widths and names of all existing streets,
alleys, or other fights -of -way within or adjacent to the proposed land
division,
Response: The subject site has 85 ft of frontage on B Street. B Street does not have a
curb, gutter or sidewalk and is made of gravel. There is a ditch adjacent to the property
in the B Street right-of-way that will serve as the destination for stormwater exiting the
site. An irrevocable petition for future improvements can be signed by the applicant.
2. The locations, widths and names of all proposed streets and other
rights-of-way to include the approximate radius of curves and grades. The
relationship of all proposed streets to any projected streets as shown on
the Metro Plan, including the TransPlan, any approved Conceptual
Development Plan and the latest version of the Conceptual Local Street
Map,
Response: There are no proposed streets or other rights-of-way adjacent to the subject
site; thus this requirement is not applicable.
3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks,
pedestrian trails and accessways, including the location, size and type of
plantings and street trees in any required planter strip;
Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and
accessways. The applicant can sign an irrevocable petition to improve the sidewalk,
curb, gutter, street trees, paving, etc.
4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire
hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and
similar public facilities, where applicable;
Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is
approximately 90 feet West of the Southwest corner of the subject property on the North
right of way of B Street. There are power poles on the North side of B street. There are
no other public facilities such as traffic control devices, transformers, or neighborhood
mailbox units located adjacent or within the development site.
5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways,
where applicable,
Response: The driveway to serve future development will take place in the panhandles
of the property. The panhandle driveway will be shared and will be installed at the time
of site development. All panhandle driveway standards will be met per SDC 3.2-220.
6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type,
height and area of illumination,
Response: As illustrated on the Tentative Partition Plan, there is an existing streetlight
on the SW corner of B and 55th Street. No additional streetlights are proposed.
7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities,
Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the
subject property. The nearest transit facility is located near the intersection of Main
Street and 54th Street and served by Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 11.
8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the
property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation
(ODOTJ facifity, and
Response: B Street is a city street and not ODOT facility, thus, this requirement is not
applicable.
9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer, where
necessary, as specified in Section 4.2-105A.4.
Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation
Manual, 7th Edition, single-family detached houses have an average trip generation rate
of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each of the three parcels proposed
generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips
necessary for a traffic impact study to be required.
E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/parcels that are more
than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall
include a Future Development Plan that
1. Indicates the proposed redivision, including the boundaries, lot parcel
dimensions and sequencing of each proposed redivision in any residential
district, and shall include a plot plan showing building footprints for
compliance with the minimum residential densities specified in Section
3.2-205,
2. Addresses street connectivity between the various phases of the
proposed development based upon compliance with the Springfield
Transportation System Plan (including the Conceptual Street Map), the
Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), applicable Refinement Plans. Plan
Distncts, Master Plans, or the Code;
3. Accommodates other required public improvements, including but not
limited to, sanitary sewer, stormwater management, water and electricity;
4. Addresses physical features, including but not limited to, significant
clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the Water Quality
Limited Watercourse Map and their associated riparian areas, wetlands,
rock outcroppings and historic features, and
5. Discusses the timing and financial provisions relating to phasing.
Response: No phasing plan is being proposed.
F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative
Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable:
1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division
and the existing use of the property,-
Response:
roperty;
Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the
proposed partition and the existing use of the subject property.
2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the
property owner is required;
Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner.
3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, dnveways,
pedestrian connections, fire hydrants and other transportation/fire access
issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing
Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land
division,
Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet.
4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable
overlay district;
Response: Not applicable.
5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where
applicable;
Response: The proposed parcels are for low density residential use, and so no
Discretionary Use is requested.
6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100;
Response: There are no trees on the property.
7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as
specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in
Section 5.1-21208. indicates the proposed development area has
unstable soils and/or high water table as specified in the Soils Survey of
Lane County,
Response: The site is flat and there are not high water tables.
8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a
development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City's urban
growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer,
Response: The subject property is located within the city limits, thus no annexation
application is necessary.
9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall
be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property;
Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject site, thus this requirement is
not applicable.
10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied
for or approved shall be submitted concurrently,
Response: No federal or state permits are required with this partition application, thus
this requirement is not applicable.
11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the
approximate time of installation and method of financing;
Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition
application.
12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association
Agreement, where appropriate,
Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed, thus this
requirement is not applicable.
13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified
in Section 3.2230,
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision.
14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile
home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal
requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the
Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the
park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-125.
Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a
manufactured dwelling park.
5.13-130
The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon
determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be
attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the
case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to a public agency, the Director may
waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed
as part of a future development application.
A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel
size and dimensions.
Response
Parcel 1 is on an East-West street in a LDR zone and meets the requirements of a
minimum of 4,500 ft of area and 45 ft of street frontage.
Parcels 2 and 3 both meet the minimum area of 4,500 sq ft each, and street frontage of
26 ft total (13' each), for development requirements for Multiple Panhandle lots in a
Low -Density Residential zone.
Below are specific details of each lot, demonstrating that each conforms to the
respective required sizes and dimensions, and are included on the Tentative Partition
Plan.
Lot Area:
The proposed Parcel 1 is 4,501 sq. ft. and so meets the standard.
The proposed Parcel 2 is 5,814 sq ft, and proposed Parcel 3 (LDR Panhandle Lot)
minimum is 4,500 sq ft is 7,637 sq ft. and so meet this standard.
Lot Frontage:
Proposed Parcel 1 has 59 ft of street frontage, and so meets this requirement.
Proposed Parcels 2 & 3 have 13 ft each of street frontage, for a total of 26 ft of street
frontage, so this requirement is met.
B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or
applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual
Development Plan.
Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro
Plan, this area is designated as Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the
LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed development is
approximately 7 units per acre.
C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited
to, water and electricity, sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities;
and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the public
improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development,
unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The
Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues.
Response: A public sanitary mainline and water mainline are located within the B Street
rights-of-way. Dwellings on Parcel 2 and Parcel 3 will be served by a future line/lateral
that will connect to the existing line. Stormwater drainage will be managed by three
private soakage trenches sized to accommodate runoff from each home plus 1/3 of the
driveway surface.
D. The proposed land division shall comply with all applicable public and private
design and construction standards contained in this Code and other applicable
regulations.
Response: All the existing public and private facilities meet the design and construction
standards of the SDC. There are no public improvements proposed with this partition
application. In addition, the future private utilities will be constructed according to all
applicable SDC and other regulations. This approval criterion will be satisfied.
E. Physical features, including, but not limited to: steep slopes with unstable soil
or geologic conditions; areas with susceptibility of flooding; significant clusters of
trees and shrubs; watercourses shown on the WQLW Map and their associated
riparian areas, other riparian areas and wetlands specified in Section 4.3-117,'
rock outcroppings; open spaces, and areas of historic and/or archaeological
significance, as may be specified in Section 3.3-900 or ORS 97.740-760,
358.905-955 and 390.235-240, shall be protected as specified in this Code or in
State or Federal law.
Response: The subject property does not have steep slopes, susceptibility to flooding,
clusters of trees, watercourses and riparian areas, open spaces, historical significance,
etc. This criterion is not applicable.
F. Parking areas and ingress -egress points have been designed to: facilitate
vehicular traffic, bicycle and pedestrian safety to avoid congestion; provide
connectivity within the development area and to adjacent residential areas,
transit stops, neighborhood activity centers, and commercial, industrial and public
areas; minimize driveways on arterial and collector streets as specified in this
Code or other applicable regulations and comply with the ODOT access
management standards for State highways.
Response: The proposal is for single family dwellings. Parking will be provided on each
lot.
G. Development of any remainder of the property under the same ownership can
be accomplished as specified in this Code.
Response: The applicant acknowledges and accepts the terms under this condition.
H. Adjacent land can be developed or is provided access that will allow its
development as specified in this Code.
Response: All adjacent land is developed; therefore, this criterion is not applicable.
1. Where the Partition of property that is outside of the city limits but within the
City's urbanizable area and no concurrent annexation application is submitted,
the standards specified below shall also apply.
Response: Not applicable. The proposed development is within the city limits; therefore,
this criterion does not apply.
J. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is
proposed, the following approval criteria apply:
Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile
home park; therefore, this criterion does not apply.
----5
/
Ty--- ;-.
\\;\
2 f
i
2{}
/®a
-
.��,��
§\
t
2