Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutApplication APPLICANT 7/23/2021846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Ph: (541)302-9830 metroplanning.com MEMORANDUM Date: 07/23/2021 To: City of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 From: Jed Truett, AICP, Principal Metro Planning, Inc. 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel 541-302-9830 e-mail: ied(almetroolannine com RE: Grand Real Estate Investments, Inc. Tentative Plan Partition This memo accompanies the Tentative Partition Plat Application for Grand. The following attachments are included with this memo: • Application Fee • Land Division Tentative Application Form • Written Statement • Current Deed • Preliminary' Title Report • land Division Plan, reduced to 8-1/2x11 • Stormwater Details from Eric Favreau • Three (3) Existing Plan • Three (3) Proposed Plan Please do not hesitate to contact me in our office at 541-302-9830 or by email at ed@metroplanning.com with any further questions or concerns. Rgds. Jed Tmen, AICP Principal 10ty of Springfield Development & Public Works 225 Fifth Street Springfield, OR 97477 Land Division Tentative Plan Partition, Subdivision SPRINGFIELD w */ Application Type (Applicant. check one) Partition Tentative Pre -Submittal: ® Subdivision Tentative Pre -Submittal: ❑ Partition Tentative Submittal: Subdivision Tentative Submittal: completeRequired Project Information (Applicant: Applicant Name: Robert and Ricky Grand Phone: ❑ Company: Grand Real Estate Investments Inc. Fax: Address: 1675 Willamette St. Eugene, OR 97401 Applicant's RC .: Phone: 541-302-9830 Company: Metro Planning, Inc. Fax: Address: 846 A St. Springfield, OR. 97477 PropertV Owner: Phone: Company: Fax: Address: ASSESSOR'S MAP NO: 17-02-31-24 TAX LOT NOS : 03000 ProperPropertv Address: 479 33rd St. Springfield, OR 97478 Size of Pro ert : 0.30 Acres ® Square Feet Proposed Name of Subdivision: N/A Description of Ir you are filling in this form by hand, please attach your Proposal; A two -lot partition. proposal description to this application. Existing Use: Single-family home. # Of Lots/Parcels: 1 Total acreage of parcels/ 4 allowable densit Proposal *N/A (2 SF Dwell Unita lots` Signatures: Please sin and grint your name and date in t e anomoriate Required Project Information (City Intake Staff. Associated Applications: box on the next complete this section) Si ns: a e. Pre -Sub Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Case No.: Date: Reviewed by: Application Fee: Technical Fee: Posta a Fee: TOTAL FEES: PROJECT NUMBER: Revised 1/7/14 kl 1 of 10 Owner Signatures This application form is used for both the required pre -submittal meeting and subsequent complete application submittal. Owner signatures are required at both stages in the application process. An application without the Owner's original signature will not be accepted. The undersigned acknowledges that the information in this application is correct and accurate for scheduling of the Pre- Submittal Meeting. If the applicant is not the owner, the owner hereby grants permission for the applicant to act in his/her behalf. I/we do hereby acknowledge that I/we are legally responsible for all statutory timelines, information, reques s an eq ments conveyed to my �.�wesetative. Date: rg un I represent this application to be complete for submittal to the City. Consistent with the completeness check performed on this application at the Pre -Submittal Meeting, I affirm the information identified by the City as necessary for processing the application is provided herein or the information will not be provided if not otherwise contained within the submittal, and the City may begin processing the application with the information as submitted. This statement serves as written notice pursuant to the requirements of ORS 22].1]8 pertaining to a complete application. Owner: Date Signature Revised 1p/14 kl 2 of 10 Land Division Tentative Application Process 1. Applicant Submits a Land Division Tentative Application for Pre -Submittal • The application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A pre -submittal meeting to discuss completeness is mandatory, and pre -submittal meetings are conducted every Tuesday and Friday, from 10:00 am - noon. • Planning Division staff strives to conduct pre -submittal meetings within five to seven working days of receiving an application. 2. Applicant and the City Conduct the Pre -Submittal Meeting • The applicant, owner, and design team are strongly encouraged to attend the pre - submittal meeting. • The meeting is held with representatives from Public Works Engineering and Transportation, Community Services (Building), Fire Marshall's office, and the Planning Division and is scheduled for 30 to 60 minutes. The Planner provides the applicant with a Pre -Submittal Checklist specifying the items required to make the application complete if it is not already complete, and the applicant has 180 days submit a complete application to the City. 3. Applicant Submits a Complete Application, City Staff Review the Application and Issue a Decision • A complete application must conform to the Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist on pages 4-6 of this application packet. • A Type II decision, made after public notice, but without a public hearing, unless appealed, is issued within 120 days of submittal of a complete application. • Mailed notice is provided to property owners and occupants within 300 feet of the property being reviewed and to any applicable neighborhood association. In addition, the applicant must post one sign, provided by the City, on the subject property. • There is a 14 -day public comment period, starting on the date notice is mailed. • Applications are distributed to the Development Review Committee, and their comments are incorporated into a decision that addresses all applicable approval criteria and/or development standards, as well as any written comments from those given notice. • Applications may be approved, approved with conditions, or denied. • At the applicant's request, the Planner can provide a copy of the draft land use decision prior to issuing the final land use decision. • The City mails the applicant and any party of standing a copy of the decision, which is effective on the day it is mailed. • The decision issued is the final decision of the City but may be appealed within 15 calendar days to the Planning Commission or Hearings Official. Revised 1/7/14 kl 3 of 10 Land Division Tentative Submittal Requirements Checklist NOTE: • ALL of the following items MUST be submitted for BOTH Pre -Submittal and Submittal. If you feel an item on the list below does not apply to your specific application, please state the reason why and attach the explanation to this form. ® Application Fee - refer to the Development Code Fee Schedule for the appropriate fee calculation formula. A copy of the fee schedule is available at the Development & Public Works Department. Any applicable application, technology, and postage fees are collected at the pre -submittal and submittal stages. ® Land Division Tentative Application Form ® Narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed development, the existing use of the property, and any additional information that may have a bearing in determining the action to be taken. Density - list the size of property (acres), maximum allowable density and the density proposed. ® Copy of the Deed ® Copy of a Preliminary Title Report issued within the past 30 days documenting ownership and listing all encumbrances. ® Copy of the Land Division Plan Reduced to 81/2"x 11", which will be mailed as part of the required neighboring property notification packet. NQA Right -of -Way Approach Permit Application provided where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility. �3A Three (3) Copies of the Stormwater Management System Study with Completed Stormwater Scoping Sheet Attached - The plan, supporting calculations, and documentation must be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards and Procedures Manual. NA Three (3) Copies of the Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer in accordance with SDC 4.2-105 A.4. Traffic Impact Studies (TIS) allow the City to analyze and evaluate the traffic impacts and mitigation of a development on the City's transportation system. In general, a TIS must explain how the traffic from a given development affects the transportation system in terms of safety, traffic operations, access and mobility, and immediate and adjoining street systems. A TIS must also address, if needed, City, metro plan and state land use and transportation policies and objectives. KI Four (4) Copies of the Following Plan Sets for Pre -Submittal OR Three (3) Copies of the Following Plan Sets: 0 All of the following plans must include the scale appropriate to the area involved and sufficient to show detail of the plan and related data, north arrow, and date of preparation. ® All plan sets must be folded to 81/2" by 11" and bound by rubber bands. a. Site Assessment of Existing Conditions LN Prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer R.v sed 1/7/14 kl 4 of 10 ® Vicinity Map ® The name, location, and dimensions of all existing site features including buildings, curb cuts, trees, and impervious surface areas, clearly indicating what is remaining and what is being removed. For existing structures to remain, also indicate present use and required setbacks from proposed property lines. NXhe name, location, dimensions, direction of flow and top of bank of all watercourses and required riparian setback that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourse Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department ®.Vhe 100 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision MA -he Time of Travel Zones, as specified in SDC 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development & Public Works Department NVhysical features including, but not limited to trees 5" in diameter or greater when measured 4 1/2 feet above the ground, significant clusters of trees and shrubs, riparian areas, wetlands and rock outcroppings ®foil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County. A Geotechnical Report prepared by an Engineer must be submitted concurrently if the Soils Survey indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or a high water table b. Land Division Tentative Plan M Prepared by an Oregon licensed Land Surveyor MPCity boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary, and any special service district boundaries or railroad right-of-way which cross or abut the proposed land division Location and width of all existing and proposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division ® Boundaries of entire area owned by the property owner, of which the proposed land division is a part, as well as dimensions and size of each parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site indicating the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale X❑ Location and type of existing and proposed street lighting, including type, height, and area of illumination ® Location, widths, conditions, and names of all existing and proposed streets, alleys, dedications or other right-of-ways within or adjacent to the proposed land division. Proposed streets should also include approximate radius of curves and grades and relationship to any projected streets as shown on the Metro Plan, TransPlan, Conceptual Development Plan, or Conceptual Local Street Map. ® Location of existing and required traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities X1 Location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways N&Aocation of existing and proposed transit facilities MAocation and width of all existing and proposed sidewalks, sidewalk ramps, pedestrian access ways and bike trails MA-ocation, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip Revised 1/7/14 W 5 of 10 ❑X Location and size of existing and proposed utilities on and adjacent to the site including sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable TV. Indicate the proposed connection points N❑Ahe locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated ®AFuture Development Plan where phasing or large lots/parcels are proposed as specified in SDC 5.12-120 E. c. Stormwater Management Plan FX] Prepared by an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer ❑ Planting plan prepared by an Oregon licensed Landscape Architect where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system ❑ Roof drainage patterns and discharge locations ❑ Pervious and impervious area drainage patterns © The size and location of stormwater management systems components, including but not limited to: drain lines, catch basins, dry wells and/or detention ponds; stormwater quality measures; and natural drainageways to be retained ❑ Existing and proposed spot elevations and contours lines drawn at 1 foot intervals (for land with a slope over 10 percent, the contour lines may be at 5 foot intervals) ❑ Amount of proposed cut and fill ❑ Additional Materials That May be Required IT IS THE APPLICANT'S RESPONSIBILITY TO DETERMINE IF ADDITIONAL STANDARDS/APPLICATIONS APPLY TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER UTILIZING PRE -DEVELOPMENT MEETINGS AS DISCUSSED IN SDC 5.1-120: NA Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of any Homeowner's Association Agreement QA Additional plans and documentation for submittal of a Cluster Subdivision proposal as specified in SDC 3.2-230 9A Riparian Area Protection Report for properties located within 150 feet of the top of bank of any Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WQLW) or within 100 feet of the top of bank of any direct tributaries of WQLW INA A Geotechnical Report prepared by an engineer must be submitted concurrently if there are unstable soils and/or a high water table present NA Where the development area is within an overlay district, address the additional standards of the overlay district ®A If five or more trees are proposed to be removed, a Tree Felling Permit as specified in SDC 5.19-100 QA A wetland delineation approved by the Oregon Division of State Lands must be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property ©A Any required federal or state permit must be submitted concurrently or evidence the permit application has been submitted for review ®A Where any grading, filling or excavating is proposed with the development, a Land and Drainage Alteration permit must be submitted prior to development Revised 1/7/14 kl 6 of 10 MA Where applicable, any Discretionary Use or Variance as specified in SDC 5.9-100 and 5.21-100 ®A An Annexation application, as specified in SDC 5.7-100, where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within the City's urban service area and can be served by sanitary sewer NIA All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing Revised 1/7/14 kl 7 of 10 vaR RSE nanxRR nn coxsunRs samco 846 A STREET SPRINGEIEM, OREGON 97477 1541)302-9830 wNW.MEcRO"NNING.COM Metro Planning, Inc. TENTATIVE PARTITION FOR GRAND REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC. Written Statement Submission No. Document Date: Applicants Request: Property Owner/ Applicant: Civil Engineer: Surveyor: Project Planner. Subject Property. Location: Property Size: Zoning: Comprehensive Plan: Number of Parcels Proposed: Size Proposed Parcel 1: Size Proposed Parcel 2: July 2021 1 07/21/2021 Request for approval of Tentative Two Lot Partition Grand Real Estate Investments, Inc. 1675 Willamette Sr. Eugene, OR 97401 Eric Favreau Favreau Engineering, Inc (541)556-4425 EGR & Associates, Inc. c/o Ryan Erickson, PIS 25356 Prairie Road Eugene, OR 97402 Metro Planning, Inc. c/o led Truett, AICP 846 A Street Springfield, OR 97477 Tel (541) 302-9830 Assessor's Map 17-02-31-34 Tax Lot 03000 479 33`d St. Springfield, OR 97478 0.30 acres (13,150 sq. ft.) R-1 (Low Density Residential) Low Density Residential (per Metro Plan) 04 5,916 sf 7,234 sf (including pole) cage 11 Written Statement- Tentative Partition Background The applicant is proposing a Tentative Partition of Tax Lot 17-02-31-24-03000 into two parcels. Currently, there is a single-family home on Proposed Parcel 1; no additional development is proposed for Parcel 1. Proposed Parcel 2 will be partitioned as a panhandle lot. No development is proposed for Parcel 2. Density: Tax Lot 03000 is 0.30 acres and zoned Low Density Residential (LDR) which allows for 6 to 14 dwellings per acre. The current density is 3.3 dwelling units per acre and the tentative partition proposes 6.6 dwelling units per acre. This Written Statement demonstrates that this application for a two -lot Tentative Partition addresses, and definitively meets, all of the requirements and criteria mandatory as specified by SDC 5.12.115 Tentative Plan - General, SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements, and SDC 5.12-125 Tentative Plan Criteria. SDC 5.12-115 Tentative Plan—General Any residential land division shall conform to the following standards: A. The lotlparcel dimensions shall conform to the minimum standards of this Code. When lots/parcels are more than double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, the Director shall require that these lots/parcels be arranged. 1. To allow re -division; and 2. To allow for the extension of streets to serve future lots/parcels. 3. Placement ofstructures on the largerlots/parcels shall be subject to approval by the Director upon a determination that the potential maximum density of the larger lotlparcel is not impaired. In order to make this determination, the Director may require a Future Development Plan as specified in Section 5.12-120E. Response: The subject property is in an area zoned Low Density Residential (LDR). Proposed Parcel 1 is a standard lot on a North-South street, and conforms to the minimum area requirements as specified in SDC 3.2-215. Proposed Parcel 2 is a Panhandle lot and conforms to the minimum area requirements as specified in SDC 3.2- 215. These requirements are addressed in detail later in this statement. Neither of these parcels are double the minimum area permitted by the zoning district, so the remainder of this subsection does not apply. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e l 2 B. Double frontage lots/parcels shall be avoided, unless necessary to prevent access to residential development from collector and arterial streets or to overcome specific topographic situations. Response: The proposed Tentative Partition will not result in the creation of double frontage parcels; this standard does not apply. One will be a standard lot and one is a panhandle lot. C. Panhandle lots/parcels shall comply with the standards specified in Sections 3.2-215 and 4.2-120A. In the case of multiple panhandles in Subdivisions, construction of necessary utilities to serve all approved panhandle lots/parcels shall occur prior to recording the Plat. Response. Parcel 2 is a panhandle lot and will be served by a 20' handle or access easement. It is 7,234 square feet and so exceeds the minimum area required of 4,500 sq ft. Since this is a single panhandle the improvements will be constructed after the plat is recorded. D. Block length for local streets is as specified in Section 4.2-115. Response: 4.2-115 is no longer a code section. Therefore, this criterion does not apply. The proposed tentative partition utilizes an existing street network. SDC 5.12-120 Tentative Plan Submittal Requirements A Tentative Plan application shall contain the elements necessary to demonstrate that the provisions of this Code are being fulfilled. EXCEPTION: In the case of Partition applications with the sole intent to donate land to a public agency, the Director, during the Pre -Submittal Meeting, may waive any submittal requirements that can be addressed as part of future development application. A. General Requirements. 1. The Tentative Plan, including any required Future Development Plan, shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Land Surveyor on standard sheets of 18"x 24". The services of and Oregon registered Engineer may also be required by the City in order to resolve utility issues (especially stormwater management, street design and transportation issues), and site constraint and/or water quality issues. Response: The tentative partition plan has been prepared by Ryan Erickson (EGR & Associates) a licensed Oregon Land Surveyor as required. 2. The scale of the Tentative Plan shall be appropriate to the area involved and the amount of detail and data, normally 1" = 50', 1" _ 100', or 1 " = 200'. Response: The scale of the Tentative Plan is 1" = 10'; which is appropriate to the size of the development site and the amount of data needing to be shown. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 13 3. A north arrow and the date the Tentative Plan was prepared. Response: A north arrow and Tentative Plan preparation date are included on the Tentative Plan drawing included with this application. 4. The name and address of the owner, applicant, if different, and the Land Surveyor and/or Engineer who prepared the Partition Tentative Plan. Response: The surveyor and engineer who prepared the Tentative Partition Plan are, respsectively, Ryan Erickson, from EGR and Associates, LLC, and Eric Favreau, from Favreau Engineering. 5. A drawing of the boundaries of the entire area owned by the partitioner or sub -divider of which the proposed land division is a part. Response: A thicker, black line is drawn around the subject property to easily show the area owned by the partitioner. 6. City boundaries, the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB) and any special service district boundaries or railroad right -of --way, which cross or abut the proposed land division. Response: No city limit, UGB, or railroad right-of-way is adjacent to the subject property. 7. Applicable zoning districts and the Metro Plan designation of the proposed land division and of properties within 100 feet of the boundary of the subject property. Response: The subject property in an area zoned LDR (Low Density Residential), designated L (low density residential) in the Metro Plan. 8. The dimensions (in feet) and size (either in square feet or acres) of each lot/parcel and the approximate dimensions of each building site, where applicable, and the top and toe of cut and fill slopes to scale. Response: The proposed parcel sizes and dimensions are dearly labeled on the tentative partition plan drawing. 9. The location, outline to scale and present use of all existing structures to remain on the property after platting and their required setbacks from the proposed new property lines. Response: The existing structures to remain are on the property, including their setbacks, are shown on the Tentative Partition Plan drawing. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 14 10. The location and size of existing and proposed utilities and necessary easements and dedications on and adjacent to the site, including but not limited to sanitary sewer mains, stormwater management systems, water mains, power, gas, telephone, and cable N. Indicate the proposed connection points. Response: The location and size of existing utilities are noted on the tentative plan, including water, wastewater, stormwater and underground utilities. 11. The locations widths and purpose of all existing orproposed easements on and abutting the proposed land division; the location of any existing or proposed reserve strips. Response: The existing 10' PUE is shown on the proposed land division. The 60.00' Ash Street vacation is also shown on the site plan. 12. The locations of all areas to be dedicated or reserved for public use, with the purpose, condition or limitations of the reservations clearly indicated. Response: There are no areas being dedicated or reserved for public use. This requirement is not applicable. B. A Site Assessment of the Entire Development Area. The Site Assessment shall be prepared by an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect or Engineer and drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and delineates the areas described below. Proposed modifications to physical features shall be clearly indicated. The Director may waive portions of this requirement if there is a finding that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on physical features or water quality, either on the site or adjacent to the site. Information required for adjacent properties may be generalized to show the connections to physical features. A Site Assessment shall contain the following information. Response: The enclosed Tentative Partition Plan prepared by Ryan Erickson, PLS, an Oregon licensed land surveyor identifies all physical features of the subject property as required. 1. The name, location, dimensions, direction offiowand top of bank of all watercourses that are shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses (WLQIM Map on file in the Development Services Department; Response: There are no watercourses shown on the Water Quality Limited Watercourses Map that encumber the subject property. thus this requirement is not applicable. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 F a g e S 2. The 100year ffoodplain and floodway boundaries on the site, as specified in the latest adopted FEMA Flood Insurance Maps or FEMA approved Letter of Map Amendment or Letter of Map Revision; Response: The subject property is located outside of the 500 -year floodplain and floodway boundaries as indicated on FIRM Map Number 41039C1 161F dated June 2, 1999, thus this requirement is not applicable. 3. The Time of Travel Zones, as specked in Section 3.3-200 and delineated on the Wellhead Protection Areas Map on file in the Development Service Department; Response: The subject property falls within the 10 year time of travel zone for wellhead protection. 4. Physical features including, but not limited to significant clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses shown on the (WLQM Map and their riparian areas, wetlands, and rock outcroppings; Response: There are no clusters of trees and shrubs, watercourses, riparian areas, wetlands, or rock outcroppings within the boundaries of the subject property. 5. Soil types and water table information as mapped and specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; and Response: The Natural Resource conservation Service (NRCS) Web Soil Survey indicates the soil type covering the subject property consists of one -hundred percent (100%) Awbrig-Urban Land Complex, with a depth to water table of 0 to 2 inches. 6. Natural resource protection areas as specified in Section 4.3-117. Response: There are no natural resource protection areas present on the subject property, thus this requirement is not applicable. C. A Stormwater Management Plan drawn to scale with existing contours at lfoot intervals and percent of slope that precisely maps and addresses the information described below. In areas where the percent of slope is 10 percent or more, contours may be shown at 5 foot intervals. This plan shall show the stormwater management system for the entire development area. Unless exempt by the Public Works Director, the City shall require that an Oregon licensed Civil Engineer prepare the plan. Where plants are proposed as part of the stormwater management system, an Oregon Licensed Landscape Architect may also be required. The plan shall include the following components: Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 r - 6 3. The locations and widths of all existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways, including the location, size and type of plantings and street trees in any required planter strip; Response: There are not any existing and proposed sidewalks, pedestrian trails and accessways. The applicant can sign an irrevocable petition to improve the sidewalk. 4. The location of existing and proposed traffic control devices, fire hydrants, power poles, transformers, neighborhood mailbox units and similar public facilities, where applicable; Response: As noted on the Tentative Partition Plan, the nearest fire hydrant is approximately seven (7) feet West of the Northwest corner of the subject property. There are power poles on the NE and NW comer of the property that have a power line between them. There is a water meter directly to the West of the existing home and a mailbox near the SW corner of the property. Additionally, there is a waste water manhole on the NE corner of the site. There are no other public facilities such as traffic control devices, or transformers located adjacent or within the development site. 5. The location and dimensions of existing and proposed driveways, where applicable; Response: The driveway to serve future development will take place in the panhandle of the property. The panhandle driveway will be installed at the time of site development. 6. The location of existing and proposed street lighting: including the type, height and area of illumination; Response: As illustrated on the Tentative Partition Plan, there is an existing street light on the on the NW corner of the property about 20' south of the northern property line. No additional streetlights are proposed. 7. The location of existing and proposed transit facilities; Response: There are no existing or proposed transit facilities adjacent, or within, the subject property. The nearest transit facility is located near the intersection of Main Street and 33rd and served by Lane Transit District (LTD) Route 11. 8. A copy of a Right-of-way Approach Permit application where the property has frontage on an Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) facility, and Response: 33rd Street is a city street and does not have frontage on an ODOT facility. This requirement is not applicable. 9. A Traffic Impact Study prepared by a Traffic Engineer, where necessary, as specked in Section 4.2-105A.4. Response: Based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition, single-family detached houses have an average trip generation rate of 9.57 vehicles daily. A single-family dwelling on each of the two parcels proposed Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 a E' 18 generating 9.57 trips per parcel per day results in fewer peak hour or average daily trips necessary for a traffic impact study to be required. E. A Future Development Plan. Where phasing and/or lots/paroels that are more than twice the minimum lot/parcel size are proposed, the Tentative Plan shall include a Future Development Plan that: Response: No phasing plan is being proposed. F. Additional information and/or applications required at the time of Tentative Plan application submittal shall include the following items, where applicable: 1. A brief narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed land division and the existing use of the property; Response: This written statement serves as a narrative explaining the purpose of the proposed partition and the existing use of the subject property. 2. If the applicant is not the property owner, written permission from the property owner is required; Response: The attached application form has been signed by the property owner. 3. A Vicinity Map drawn to scale showing bus stops, streets, driveways, pedestrian connections, Fire hydrants and other transportation/fire access issues within 200 feet of the proposed land division and all existing Partitions or Subdivisions immediately adjacent to the proposed land division; Response: A vicinity map is shown on the Tentative Partition Plan sheet. 4. How the Tentative Plan addresses the standards of any applicable overlay district; Response: Not applicable. 5. How the Tentative Plan addresses Discretionary Use criteria, where applicable; Response: Single-family residential is a permitted use in the LDR (Low Density Residential) zone; thus no Discretionary Use Permit is required. 6. A Tree Felling Permit as specified in Section 5.19-100; Response: No trees will be felled as a part of this application. Not applicable. 7. A Geotechnical Report for slopes of 15 percent or greater and as specified in Section 3.3-500, and/or if the required Site Assessment in Section 5.1-21208. indicates the proposed development area has unstable soils and/or high water tab le as specified in the Soils Survey of Lane County; Response: The site is of slopes less than 5% and composed of Awbrig-Urban land complex. The soil is mainly used for urban and homesite development, yards, and open Metra Planning, Inc. July 2021 19 areas between buildings. However, no development is proposed at this time. The water table is below 80 inches (see infiltration report by Enc Favreau, a licensed engineer). This criterion is met. 8. An Annexation application as specified in Section 5.7100 where a development is proposed outside of the city limits but within City's urban growth boundary and can be serviced by sanitary sewer; Response: The subject property is located within the city limits, thus no annexation application is necessary. 9. A wetland delineation approved by the Department of State Lands shall be submitted concurrently where there is a wetland on the property; Response: There are no existing wetlands on the subject site. This requirement is not applicable. 10. Evidence that any required Federal or State permit has been applied for or approved shall be submitted concurrently; Response: No federal or state permits are required with this partition application. This requirement is not applicable. 11. All public improvements proposed to be installed and to include the approximate time of installation and method of financing; Response: There are no proposed public improvements with this proposed partition application. 12. Proposed deed restrictions and a draft of a Homeowner's Association Agreement, where appropriate; Response: No deed restrictions or Homeowner's Association are proposed. This requirement is not applicable. 13. Cluster Subdivisions shall also address the design standards specified in Section 3.2230; Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a cluster subdivision. 14. Where the Subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the Director may waive certain submittal requirements specified in Subsections A. through M. However, the Tentative Plan shall address the applicable standards listed under the park Subdivision approval criteria specified in Section 5.12-125. Response: This application is for a tentative partition and not a subdivision of a manufactured dwelling park. 5.13-130 The Director shall approve or approve with conditions a Tentative Plan application upon determining that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. If conditions cannot be attached to satisfy the approval criteria, the Director shall deny the application. In the case of Partitions that involve the donation of land to Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e 110 a public agency, the Director may waive any approval criteria upon determining the particular criterion can be addressed as part of a future development application. A. The request conforms to the provisions of this Code pertaining to lot/parcel size and dimensions. Response: The proposed Parcel 1 meets minimum area (5,000 sq ft) and street frontage (60 ft) development requirements in a Low -Density Residential zone, on a North-South Street. The proposed Parcel 2 meets the minimum area (4,500 sq ft) and frontage (20 ft) development requirements for a panhandle lot. Below describes specifics of each lot. Lot Size: Parcel 1 is 5,916 sf. Parcel 2 is 7,234 sf. These both, respectively, meet the minimum lot/parcel minimum area requirements. Lot Frontage: Parcel 1 has 85 ft of street frontage. Parcel 2 lot has 20 ft of street frontage. These both, respectively, meet the minimum street frontage requirements . B. The zoning is consistent with the Metro Plan diagram and/or applicable Refinement Plan diagram, Plan District map, and Conceptual Development Plan. Response: The zoning of the subject property is Low -Density Residential. In the Metro Plan, this area is designated as Low -Density Residential. The minimum density in the LDR zone is 6 units per acre and the maximum is 14. The proposed development is about 7 units per acre (current is 3.3 units/acre). C. Capacity requirements of public and private facilities, including but not limited to, water and electricity; sanitary sewer and stormwater management facilities; and streets and traffic safety controls shall not be exceeded, and the public improvements shall be available to serve the site at the time of development, unless otherwise provided for by this Code and other applicable regulations. The Public Works Director or a utility provider shall determine capacity issues. Response: A public sanitary mainline and water mainline are located within the 33rd Street rights-of-way. The dwelling on Parcel 2 will be served by a future line/lateral that will connect to the existing line. Stormwater drainage for Parcel 2 will be managed by the proposed infiltration rain garden, sized for the 25 -year event, with an overflow to the existing roadside ditch. Streets and traffic safety controls will not be exceeded. All improvements will be done at the time of site development. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 111 J. Where the Subdivision of manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park is proposed, the following approval criteria apply. Response: This tentative partition is not part of a manufactured dwelling park or mobile home park; therefore, this criterion does not apply. Metro Planning, Inc. July 2021 P a g e 113 a2! vlaz$p«!.§ Ra 2; \} \ ® m,a :tQ Q -UH R + � ----j � _- ' _ � - P4 :..>:r/, \ � , � 2! z*` , ! _._ml._ } DRAINAGE AREA = AVERAGE RUNOFF COEFFICIENT (C) _ MAXIMUM DEPTH BOTTOM LENGTH OF FACILITY= BOTTOM WIDTH OF FACILITY- SIDE SLOPES = VOID RATIO = AVERAGE PERMEABILITY OF SOIL = SURFACE AREA OF BOTTOM - SURFACE AREA OF ZONE A = RAIN GARDEN CALCULATIONS FOR TL 17-02-31-24-03000 2,034 SO. FT. = 0.047 ACRES 1.00 1 FEET 61 FEET 2 FEET 3 FEET HORIZONTAL TO 1 FOOT VERTICAL 100% 0.50 INCHES/HR 122 SO. FT, 536 SO, FT, OUTFLOW CA RACILY OF FACILITY- 5.1 CU. FT./HR= 0.63 GALLONS PER MINUTE MAXIMUM STORAGE AT OVERFLOW- 329 CLL FT, OF WATER FACILITY VOLUME= 12.2 CUBIC YARDS 25YEAR TOTAL RECURRENCE RAINFALL TOTAL OUTFLOW DURATION DURATION RAINFALL DURING STORM EVENT FROM STORAGE OF STORM OF STORM INTENSITY STORM RUNOFF FACILITY REQUIRED FACILITY IN MINUTES IN HOURS IN/HR INCHES CU. FT. CU. FT. CU. FT. SIZING 5 0.08 3.45 0.29 49 1 48 OK 10 017 2.37 0.40 67 2 65 OK 15 0.25 1.90 048 81 3 78 OK 20 0.33 1.56 0.52 88 4 84 OK 30 0.50 1.36 0.68 115 7 109 OK 60 1.00 0.81 0.81 137 13 124 OK 120 2.00 0.56 1.12 190 27 163 OK 180 3.00 049 1.47 249 53 196 OK 240 4.00 044 1.76 298 71 227 OK 360 6.00 0.37 222 376 134 242 OK 400 800 0.34 2.72 461 179 282 OK 600 1000 0.31 3.10 525 223 302 OK 720 12.00 0.28 3,36 570 268 302 OK 900 1500 0.25 3.75 636 335 301 OK 1080 18.00 0.23 414 702 402 300 OK 1260 21.00 0.22 4.62 783 469 314 OK 1440 24.00 0.21 504 854 536 316 OK 5'����o NIP c3 87 OREGON �,}t{/✓/ .,v1 -ea._ e* 12,y0,^Q - 9+c J. F A 4 EXH�3 VJi1/9 47933rd St, SPRINGFIELD INFILTRATION RATE June 15, 2021 The site is a vacant lot with mowed grass. NRCS soil classification maps identify this site as having Class D soils. DETERMINATION OF INFILTRATION RATE One test hole was dug onsite in the approximate location of the proposed stormwater facility. The test hole was dug approximately 7 feet deep. Ground water was not encountered. The infiltration rate was conservatively determined to be about 1" per hour. For purposes of determining the facility size, an infiltration rate of 0.5' per hour was used. FACILITY SIZING An open drainage channel exists on the east side of 33rd Street, but it has not been sized to accommodate private runoff- Therefore, the proposed infiltration rain garden will be sized for the 25 -year event, with an overflow to the existing roadside ditch. The attached calculations demonstrate that this facility has been sized to meet the design requirement for the 25 -year event. NZ, of OREGON 91C J.fAVP�4 EXPIICs i$/3V2I PR PLAN ZONES - ZONE PER RAN ZONES TOP OF 3'13LOPE 2R -OVERFLOW LFAWDTP DWY DETAILS TAr FREEBO ELEVATION \\L PER PLAN 12" MIN 1 ?I Il I i' 171 lurilll�l,. II Im II ILII m17 TOPGOIL III -IL NI3OIL �¶IEIIII __ VIII THIONE 1 WASTED OPEN ROCK ' R ti- I �F�6 ,�- w. 1=1i-ZI-O- QI li�l-L�I�'I_II¶I 4 PIPE TO EXISTING NATIVESbILL�I III CH ANNEL ON 33RD - _ I PER PLAN - FILTER FABRIC SURROUNDING ROCK LATER 538 SQUARE FEE( IN ZONE A THE RAIN GARDENS WILL SE FILLED WITH E2' OF TOPSOIL (SWAY MIXT. VEGETATION IN THE RAIN GARDENS SHALL BE PLANTED PER SCHEME I OF THE CITY OF 9 -GENE STORMWATER MANUAL SECTION 238. PLANTSTO BE T ON CENTER. ESTIMATED PLANT COUNT: ZONEA ZONEB CAREXOSNUPTA 2SR- PGTB CAMASSIAOUAMASH 75. PPOTS JUNCUSPATENS 258 -4 -POTS DESCHAMPSIACAE3PITOSA 75-XPCTS TL 17-02-31-24-03000 PARTITION INFILTRATION RAIN GARDEN DETAIL NO SCALE 6J9TA£ t� INVESTMENTS PARTITION TL: 17-02-31-24-03000 _` �' Al INFILTRATION RAIN GARDEN FAVREAU ENGINEERING E�